Language selection

Search

Patent 2268794 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2268794
(54) English Title: SYSTEM, DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR SCHEDULING VARIABLE BIT RATE TRAFFIC IN A COMMUNICATION NETWORK
(54) French Title: SYSTEME, DISPOSITIF ET PROCEDE D'ORDONNANCEMENT D'UN TRAFIC A DEBIT BINAIRE VARIABLE, DANS UN RESEAU DE COMMUNICATION
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H04J 3/16 (2006.01)
  • H04J 3/17 (2006.01)
  • H04Q 11/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • RUSZCZYK, CHESTER A. (United States of America)
  • LEE, WHAY CHIOU (United States of America)
  • CHLAMTAC, IMRICH (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MOTOROLA, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • MOTOROLA, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1998-07-17
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-02-25
Examination requested: 1999-04-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1998/014894
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1999009690
(85) National Entry: 1999-04-14

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/086,636 (United States of America) 1998-05-29
60/055,658 (United States of America) 1997-08-14

Abstracts

English Abstract


A system, device, and method for scheduling data transmission opportunities
for variable bit rate traffic provide data transmission opportunities at a
peak cell rate when the end user is actively transmitting data, and provide
data transmission opportunities at a lower rate when the end user has no data
to transmit. When the end user has no data to transmit, any excess data
transmission opportunities (i.e., data transmission opportunities from the
lower rate up to the peak cell rate) are available for statistically
multiplexing traffic from other end users. Various embodiments utilize a lower
rate anywhere between a zero rate and a sustainable cell rate, inclusive.
Alternative embodiments allocate a burst of data transmission opportunities
equivalent to a maximum burst size at the peak cell rate when the end user has
data to transmit, after which the end user is once again provided data
transmission opportunities at the lower rate.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un système, un dispositif et un procédé d'ordonnancement des possibilités d'émission de données, lesquels sont destinés à un trafic à débit binaire variable et offrent des possibilités d'émission de données à un débit cellulaire de pointe, lorsqu'un utilisateur terminal émet des données, ainsi que des possibilités de transmission à un débit inférieur lorsque l'utilisateur n'a pas de données à émettre. Dans ce dernier cas, toutes les disponibilités d'émission de données en excès (à savoir des possibilités d'émission de données se situant entre un débit inférieur et un débit cellulaire de pointe) sont disponibles pour multiplexer de manière statistique le trafic à partir d'autre utilisateurs terminaux. Divers modes de réalisation mettent en oeuvre un débit inférieur, se situant n'importe où entre un débit zéro et un débit cellulaire admissible, inclus. D'autres modes de réalisation attribuent une salve de possibilités d'émission de données à une dimension maximale de salve, à un débit cellulaire de pointe, lorsque l'utilisateur terminal a des données à émettre, après quoi cet utilisateur terminal se voit offrir une fois encore des possibilités d'émission de données à un débit inférieur.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


22
We claim:
1. A method for scheduling data transmission opportunities for an
end user generating variable bit rate data, the method comprising the
steps of:
determining that the end user has data to transmit;
allocating data transmission opportunities at a peak cell rate upon
determining that the end user has data to transmit; and
allocating data transmission opportunities at a lower rate when the
end user has no data to transmit, wherein the lower rate is equal to one
of:
a zero rate, such that the end user is required to contend for data
transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities are
allocated at the lower rate; and
a non-zero rate, such that the end user is not required to contend
for data transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities
are allocated at the lower rate.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of allocating data
transmission opportunities at the peak cell rate upon determining that the
end user has data to transmit comprises allocating a burst of data
transmission opportunities equivalent to a predetermined maximum burst
size at the peak cell rate upon determining that the end user has data to
transmit, and wherein the step of allocating data transmission
opportunities at the lower rate when the end user has no data to transmit
comprises allocating data transmission opportunities at the lower rate
upon completion of the burst of data transmission opportunities.
3. A device for scheduling data transmission opportunities for an end
user generating variable bit rate data, the device comprising:
determining logic operably coupled to determine that the end user
has data to transmit;

23
first allocating logic responsive to the determining logic to allocate
data transmission opportunities at a peak cell rate upon determining that
the end user has data to transmit; and
second allocating logic responsive to the first allocating logic to
allocate data transmission opportunities at a lower rate when the end
user has no data to transmit, wherein the lower rate is equal to one of:
a zero rate, such that the end user is required to contend for data
transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities are
allocated at the lower rate; and
a non-zero rate, such that the end user is not required to contend
for data transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities
are allocated at the lower rate.
4. An apparatus comprising a computer usable medium having
embodied therein a computer readable program for scheduling data
transmission opportunities for an end user generating variable bit rate
data, the computer readable program comprising computer readable
program instructions enabling a computer to perform the steps of:
determining that the end user has data to transmit;
allocating data transmission opportunities at a peak cell rate upon
determining that the end user has data to transmit; and
allocating data transmission opportunities at a lower rate when the
end user has no data to transmit, wherein the lower rate is equal to one
of:
a zero rate, such that the end user is required to contend for data
transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities are
allocated at the lower rate; and
a non-zero rate, such that the end user is not required to contend
for data transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities
are allocated at the lower rate.

24
5. A data signal embodied in a carrier wave, wherein embodied in
the data signal is a computer readable program for scheduling data
transmission opportunities for an end user generating variable bit rate
data, the computer readable program comprising computer readable
program instructions enabling a computer to perform the steps of:
determining that the end user has data to transmit;
allocating data transmission opportunities at a peak cell rate upon
determining that the end user has data to transmit; and
allocating data transmission opportunities at a lower rate when the
end user has no data to transmit, wherein the lower rate is equal to one
of:
a zero rate, such that the end user is required to contend for data
transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities are
allocated at the lower rate; and
a non-zero rate, such that the end user is not required to contend
for data transmission opportunities when data transmission opportunities
are allocated at the lower rate.
6. A method for transmitting end user data by an access interface unit
in a shared medium communication network, the end user data having
associated quality of service constraints, the method comprising the steps
of:
receiving end user data to be transmitted;
determining an amount of time before a next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
determining whether the quality of service constraints will be
violated by waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity
based on the determined amount of time before the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
buffering the data until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity, if the quality of service constraints will not be violated by
waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity; and

25
contending for a data transmission opportunity, if the quality of
service constraints will be violated by waiting until the next scheduled
data transmission opportunity.
7. A device for transmitting end user data in a shared medium
communication network, the end user data having associated quality of
service constraints, the device comprising:
receiving logic operably coupled to receive end user data;
determining logic responsive to the receiving logic to determine an
amount of time before a next scheduled data transmission opportunity
and to determine whether the quality of service constraints will be
violated by waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity
based on the determined amount of time before the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
buffering logic responsive to the determining logic, the buffering
logic buffering the data until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity, if the quality of service constraints will not be violated by
waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity; and
contending logic responsive to the determining logic, the
contending logic contending for a data transmission opportunity, if the
quality of service constraints will be violated by waiting until the next
scheduled data transmission opportunity.
8. An apparatus comprising a computer usable medium having
embodied therein a computer readable program for transmitting end user
data by an access interface unit in a shared medium communication
network, the end user data having associated quality of service
constraints, the computer readable program comprising computer
readable program instructions enabling a computer to perform the steps
of:
receiving end user data to be transmitted;

26
determining an amount of time before a next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
determining whether the quality of service constraints will be
violated by waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity
based on the determined amount of time before the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
buffering the data until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity, if the quality of service constraints will not be violated by
waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity; and
contending for a data transmission opportunity, if the quality of
service constraints will be violated by waiting until the next scheduled
data transmission opportunity.
9. A data signal embodied in a carrier wave, wherein embodied in
the data signal is a computer readable program for transmitting end user
data by an access interface unit in a shared medium communication
network, the end user data having associated quality of service
constraints, the computer readable program comprising computer
readable program instructions enabling a computer to perform the steps
of:
receiving end user data to be transmitted;
determining an amount of time before a next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
determining whether the quality of service constraints will be
violated by waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity
based on the determined amount of time before the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity;
buffering the data until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity, if the quality of service constraints will not be violated by
waiting until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity; and

27
contending for a data transmission opportunity, if the quality of
service constraints will be violated by waiting until the next scheduled
data transmission opportunity.
10. A system comprising a headend unit in communication with an
access intertace unit over a shared medium communication network,
wherein the headend unit includes:
a headend scheduler operably coupled to schedule data
transmission opportunities for an end user generating variable bit rate
data, the headend scheduler determining that the end user has data to
transmit, allocating data transmission opportunities at a peak cell rate
upon determining that the end user has data to transmit, and allocating
data transmission opportunities at a lower rate when the end user has no
data to transmit.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
1
SYSTEM, DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR SCHEDULING
VARIABLE BIT RATE TRAF=FIC IN A COMMUNICATION
NETWORK
Related Applications
This application claims priority from United States provisional
patent application number 60/055,658 entitled System, Device, And
Method For Scheduling In A Communication Network filed on August 14,
1997, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Background
1. Field of the Invention
- The invention relates generally to communication systems, and
more particularly to scheduling transmission opportunities in a
communication network.
2. Discussion of Related Art
In today's information age) there is an increasing need for high-
speed communications that provide guaranteed quality of service (QoS)
for an ever-increasing number of communications consumers. To that
end, communications networks and technologies are evolving to meet
current and future demands. Specifically, new networks are being
deployed which reach a larger number of end users, and protocols are
being developed to utilize the added bandwidth of these networks
efficiently.
One technology that has been widely employed and will remain
important in the foreseeable future is the shared-medium network. A
shared medium network is one in which a single communications
channel (the shared channel) is shared by a number of end users such
that uncoordinated transmissions from different end users may intertere
with one another: Since communications networks typically have a
limited number of communications channels) the shared medium network

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTNS98/14894
2
allows many end users to gain access to the network over a single
communications channel, thereby allowing the remaining
communications channels to be used for other purposes. However, the
shared medium network is only feasible when each end user only
transmits data intermittently) allowing other end users to transmit during
periods of silence.
One problem in a shared medium network involves scheduling
end user transmissions to provide each end user with guaranteed
bandwidth and QoS. In a cell-based network such as an Asynchronous
Transfer Mode (ATM) network, one technique for scheduling end user
transmissions is to provide each end user with data transmission
opportunities at its peak cell rate) which is the maximum rate at which the
end user can generate cells. Such a scheduling technique works well for
continuous bit rate traffic which always generates cells at the peak cell
rate. However, such a scheduling technique may be inefficient for
variable bit rate traffic, which does not always generate cells at the peak
cell rate. Furthermore, such a scheduling technique does not allow for
statistical multiplexing (i.e.) bandwidth sharing) of end user traffic.
Therefore, an efficient technique for scheduling variable bit rate traffic
that
allows for statistical multiplexing is needed.
Brief Description of the Drawing
In the Drawing,
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an exemplary shared medium
network in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present
invention;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a headend unit and an access
intertace unit in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present
invention;
FIG. 3 is a state diagram showing three possible states of a MAC
User and the transitions among them in accordance with various

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
3
embodiments including prior art embodiments and a preferred
embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a logic diagram showing exemplary head end scheduler
logic in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a logic diagram showing exemplary head end scheduler
logic in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a logic diagram showing exemplary MAC User logic in
accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a logic diagram showing exemplary head end scheduler
logic in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a logic diagram showing exemplary head end scheduler
logic in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention;
F1G. 9 is a logic diagram showing exemplary head end scheduler
logic in accordance with a fifth embodiment of the present invention;
Detailed Description
An efficient technique for scheduling variable bit rate traffic that
allows for statistical multiplexing is needed. The present invention
provides such an efficient technique for scheduling variable bit rate traffic
by providing data transmission opportunities at the peak cell rate when
the end user is actively transmitting data, and providing data transmission
opportunities at a lower rate when the end user has no data to transmit.
When the end user has no data to transmit, any excess data transmission
opportunities (i.e., data transmission opportunities from the lower rate up
to the peak cell rate) are available for statistically multiplexing traffic
from
other end users. Various embodiments of the present invention utilize a
lower rate anywhere between a zero rate and a sustainable cell rate,
inclusive. Alternative embodiments of the present invention allocate a
burst of data transmission opportunities equivalent to a maximum burst
3 0 size at the peak cell rate when the end user has data to transmit) after
which the end user is once again provided data transmission
opportunities at the lower rate.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTNS98/14894
4
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing an exemplary shared medium
network 100 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present
invention. The shared medium network 100 allows a number of end
users 110, through 110N to access a remote external network 108 such
S as the Internet. The shared medium network 100 acts as a conduit for
transporting information between the end users 110 and the external
network 108.
The shared medium network 100 includes a Headend Unit (HU)
102 that is coupled to the external network 108. The HU 102 is in
communication with a plurality of Access Intertace Units 104, through
104N (collectively referred to as "AIUs 104" and individually as an "AIU
104") by means of a shared physical medium 106. Each end user 110
intertaces to the shared medium network 100 by means of an AIU 104. A
single AIU 104 may support one or a number of the end users 110.
The shared physical medium 106 includes a pluraVity of channels
over which information can be transferred between the HU 102 and the
AIUs 104. In the preferred embodiment, each channel is unidirectional;
that is, a particular channel either carries information from the HU i 02 to
the AIUs 104 or from the AIUs 104 to the HU 102. Those channels that
carry information from the HU 102 to the AIUs 104 are typically referred to
as "downstream channels." Those channels that carry information from
the AIUs 104 to the HU 102 are typically referred to as "upstream
channels." In alternative embodiments, these various upstream and
downstream channels may, of course, be the same physical channel, for
example) through time-division multiplexing/duplexing) or separate
physical channels, for example, through frequency-division
multiplexing/duplexing.
In the preferred embodiment) the shared medium network 100 is a
data-over-cable (DOC) communication system wherein the shared
3 0 physical medium 106 is a two-way hybrid fiber-optic and coaxial cable
(HFC) network. The HU 102 is a headend device typically referred to as
a "cable router." The AIUs 104 are cable modems. In other

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99I09690 PCT/US98/14894
embodiments, the shared physical medium 106 may be coaxial cable,
fiber-optic cable, twisted pair wires, and so on, and may also include air,
atmosphere, or space for wireless and satellite communication.
In the shared medium network 100 of the preferred embodiment,
5 the downstream channels are typically situated in a frequency band
above approximately 50 MHz, although the particular frequency band
may vary from system to system, and is often country-dependent. The
downstream channels are classified as broadcast channels, since any
information transmitted by the HU 102 over a particular downstream
channel reaches all of the AIUs 104. Any of the AIUs 104 that are tuned
to receive on the particular downstream channel can receive the
information.
_ In the shared medium network 100 of the preferred embodiment,
the upstream channels are typically situated in a frequency band
1 S between approximately 5 through 42 MHz, although the particular
frequency band may vary from system to system, and is often country-
dependent. Each upstream channel is divided into successive time slots,
and is therefore often referred to as a "slotted channel." A slot may be
used to carry a protocol data unit including user or control information) or
may be further divided into mini-slots used to carry smaller units of
information. The upstream channels are classified as shared channels,
since only one A1U 104 can successfully transmit in a slot or mini-slot at
any given time) and therefore the upstream channels must be shared
among the plurality of AIUs 104. If more than one of the AIUs 104
simultaneously transmit in a slot or mini-slot) there is a collision that
corrupts the information from all of the simultaneously transmitting AIUs
104.
In order to allow multiple AIUs 104 to share a single upstream
channel, the HU 102 and the AIUs 104 participate in a medium access
control (MAC) protocol. The MAC protocol provides a set of rules and
procedures for coordinating access by the AIUs 104 to the shared
channel. Each AIU 104 participates in the MAC protocol on behalf of its

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTNS98/14894
6
end users. For convenience) each participant in the MAC protocol is
referred to as a "MAC User."
A MAC User typically represents a connection supporting a
particular end user application. Although it is not elaborated upon, a
MAC User could also represent an aggregate of connections that share
similar traffic characteristics. In many modern communication networks,
each MAC User has specific traffic parameters and QoS requirements,
which are agreed upon when the MAC User establishes a connection in
the network and which are guaranteed by the network. For example) a
MAC User may require a guaranteed minimum amount of bandwidth, a
guaranteed maximum transfer delay for the data it transmits, or a
minimum time variation between transmission opportunities provided by
the HU 102. In a cell-based network such as an Asynchronous Transfer
Mode (ATM) network) a number of parameters are used to characterize
the bandwidth requirements of each MAC User. Specifically, a set of
ATM Traffic Descriptors is used for characterizing the type of traffic
generated by the MAC User) and a set of QoS Parameters is used for
specifying the network services required by the MAC User.
The ATM Traffic Descriptors include Peak Cell Rate (PCR))
Sustainable Cell Rate (SCR), Minimum Cell Rate (MCR), and Maximum
Burst Size (MBS). The PCR is an indication of the maximum data rate
(cells per second) that will be generated by the MAC User. The SCR
represents the long-term average data rate generated by the MAC User.
The MCR is the minimum data rate (cells per second) required by the
MAC User. The MBS is the maximum size (number of cells) of any burst
generated by the MAC User.
The ~oS parameters include Maximum Cell Transfer Delay
(MaxCTD)) Cell Delay Variation (CDV), and Cell Loss Ratio (CLR). The
MaxCTD specifies the maximum delay (including the access delay and
propagation delay of the underlying communications network) that will be
tolerated by the MAC User. The CDV specifies the maximum time
variation between data transmission opportunities that will be tolerated

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99l09690 PCTJUS98/14894
7
by the MAC User. The CLR specifies the MAC User's allowance of cells
that may be dropped by the network, in terms of a ratio of lost cells to all
the cells transmitted by the MAG User.
MAC Users having similar traffic characteristics are categorized
into service categories. ATM defines five service categories, namely
continuous bit rate (CBR), real-time variable bit rate (RT-VBR), non-real-
time variable bit rate (NRT-VBR), available bit rate (ABR)) and-unspecified
bit rate (UBR). Each MAC User is categorized into one of the service
categories.
CBR connections are characterized by traffic having a fixed bit rate
and requiring real-time delivery of cells. The ATM Traffic Descriptor for
the CBR service category is PCR. The QoS Parameters far the CBR
service category are MaxCTD, CDV, and CLR.
RT-VBR connections are characterized by traffic having a variable
bit rate and requiring real-time delivery of cells. In a typical RT-VBR
connection, the traffic over the connection will have periods where cells
are generated in bursts at the PCR and periods of silence where no cells
are generated (voice and real-time video are good examples of RT-VBR
traffic). The ATM Traffic Descriptors for the RT-VBR service category are
PCR, SCR) and MBS. The G~oS Parameters for the RT-VBR service
category are MaxCTD, CDV, and CLR.
NRT-VBR connections are characterized by traffic having a
variable bit rate (similar to RT-VBR connections), but not requiring real
time delivery of cells. NRT-VBR connections typically require a low CLR.
ABR connections are characterized by traffic requiring a minimum
cell rate, but willing to accept additional bandwidth if and when such
additional bandwidth becomes available. The ATM Traffic Descriptors for
the ABR service category are the MCR and PCR. The MCR is the
minimum guaranteed cell rate required by the connection. The PCR is
the maximum cell rate at which the connection can transmit if allowed by
the network. Consequently, the transmission rate of the ABR connection
lies somewhere between the MCR and the PCR. No QoS Parameters

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTNS98/14894
g
are defined for the ABR service category. ABR connections are typically
subject to a flow control mechanism with feedback that requires the
source of the connection to adapt its rate in response to changing ATM
layer transfer characteristics.
UBR connections are not guaranteed any bandwidth and have no
QoS requirements. The ATM Traffic Descriptor for the UBR service
category is the PCR. The PCR is the maximum cell rate at which the
connection can transmit if allowed by the network.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram 200 showing the HU 102 and the AIU
104 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The block diagram 200 shows the HU 102 in communication with one of
the AIUs 104 by means of a downstream channel 230 and an upstream
channel 240. In the preferred embodiment, the downstream channel 230
and the upstream channel 240 are separate channels carried over the
shared physical medium 106. The AIU 104 supports at least one End
User 110. The HU 102 transmits data and control messages to the AIU
104 by means of downstream channel 230, and receives reservation
requests and data from the AIU 104 by means of upstream channel 240.
The HU 102 includes a Connection Manager (CM) 215. The CM
215 is responsible for connection admission control for the network.
More specifically, the CM 215 is responsible for establishing and
terminating connections in the network.
Before an End User such as the End User 1 i 0 can communicate
over the network, a connection must be established. Therefore, when the
End User 110 requests admission to the network, a connection request
message is forwarded to the CM 215. The connection request message
specifies the bandwidth and QoS requirements for the connection in the
form of an ATM Service Category and associated ATM Traffic Descriptors
and QoS Parameters. The CM 215 decides whether or not to establish
the connection, and thereby admit the End User 110 to the network)
based on the ability (or inability) of the network to meet the bandwidth
and QoS requirements of the End User 110.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTNS98/14894
9
The HU 102 also includes a Headend Scheduler (HES) 214 that is
coupled to the CM 215 and to an Adaptive Reservation Manager (ARM)
211. The HES 214 is responsible for scheduling data transmission
opportunities for those End Users that have been admitted to the network
by the CM 215. When the CM 215 establishes a connection, the CM 215
sends a connection setup message to the HES 214 including a
connection identifier and the ATM Service Category and associated ATM
Traffic Descriptors and QoS Parameters for the established connection.
Similarly, when the CM 215 terminates a connection, the CM 215 sends
a connection release message to the HES 214 including a connection
identifier for the terminated connection. The HES 214 uses the
connection information received from the CM 215 together with feedback
information received from the ARM 211 to control the timing of control
messages transmitted by the ARM 211.
The ARM 211 is responsible for implementing the MAC protocol in
the HU 102. The ARM 211 includes a Reservation Manager (RM) 212
and a Feedback Controller (FC) 213. The RM 212 monitors the
contention mini-slots on the upstream channel 240 to determine the
result of contention for each contention mini-slot. The RM 212 sends the
contention results to the FC 213 and to the HES 214. The FC 213
maintains the state information for each priority class (if multiple priority
classes are implemented to support differentiated quality of service),
determines the assignment of contention mini-slots for each contention
cycle, and formats the control messages to be transmitted on the
downstream channel 230. The FC 213 bases the timing of control
message transmissions on, among other things, timing information
received from the HES 214.
The AIU 104 includes a User Intertace (UI) 225 for interfacing with
the End User 110. Data transmitted by the End User 110 is received by
the UI 225 and stored in a Memory 224. The UI 225 also stares in the
Memory 224 a time stamp indicating the arrival time of the data.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
The AIU 104 also includes a Control Message Processor (CMP)
222 that is coupled to the Memory 224. The CMP 222 is responsible for
processing data and control messages received from the HU 102 by
means of Receiver 221. The CMP 222 participates as a MAC User in the
5 MAC protocol on behalf of the End User 110.
A number of different MAC protocols have been developed for use
in the shared medium network 100. These protocols can generally be
categorized as contention-free protocols and contention-based protocols.
Contention-free protocols, such as time-division multiple-access (TDMA)
10 and round-robin polling, avoid collisions on the shared channel by
authorizing only one MAC User to transmit at a time. Contention-based
protocols, such as certain reservation-based protocols, do not avoid
collisions but instead resolve any collisions that do occur on the shared
channel.
In a preferred embodiment, the MAC protocol uses a combination
of polling and contention-based reservation for scheduling upstream
transmissions. Contention-based reservation requires a MAC User to
make a reservation before the HU 102 will allocate bandwidth to the MAG
User. The HU 102 provides reservation opportunities to the MAC Users
by transmitting special control messages (described in detail below) to
the MAC Users by means of the downstream channel 230. A MAC User
makes a reservation by transmitting a reservation request message in
response to a reservation opportunity provided by the HU 102. Each
reservation opportunity typically authorizes multiple MAC Users to
respond, and therefore the MAC Users must contend for a reservation.
Not all MAC Users are required to make a reservation. Certain MAC
Users are allocated bandwidth regularly without having to make
reservations.
Each MAC User that is required to make a reservation maintains a
MAC User state machine as known in the prior art and described with
reference to FIG. 3. The MAC User starts in the INACTIVE state 302) and
remains there so long as it has no data to transmit. When the MAC User

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99109690 PCTNS98/14894
11
receives data to be transmitted) the MAC User transitions into the
CONTENTION state 304. In the CONTENTION state 304, the MAC User
contends for access to the shared channel until it is able to make a
successful reservation for itself. Upon making a successful reservation in
state 304, the MAC User transitions into the ACTIVE state 306. Here) the
MAC User receives opportunities from the HU 102 to transmit data, and
remains in the ACTIVE state 306 so long as it has data to transmit. Upon
transmitting all of its data) the MAC User is considered to be "fulfilled,"
and the MAC User transitions back into the INACTIVE state 302. Each
MAC User that is not required to make a reservation remains in the
ACTIVE state 306 so long as its connection is active.
In a preferred embodiment, the MAC protocol divides each
upstream channel into discrete time slots. A MAC User transmits
reservation request messages and data in slots designated by the HU
102. In the preferred embodiment) the upstream channel supports two
types of slots, namely contention slots and data slots. Contention slots
are typicaNy of shorter duration than data slots, and are therefore often
referred to as "mini-slots" or "contention mini-slots." Contention mini-slots
are used for transmitting reservation request messages, white data slots
are used for transmitting data messages. Each data slot is typically
capable of carrying the equivalent of a single protocol data unit, which, in
a cell-based network such as Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM)) is a
cell.
Although not required, a typical embodiment divides the upstream
channel 240 into consecutive contention cycles) where each contention
cycle is typically composed of a predetermined number of contention
mini-slots and a predetermined number of data slots set at fixed locations
within the contention cycle. It is typical for the contention mini-slots (and
therefore the data slots also) to be contiguous within the contention cycle.
For the sake of simplicity, the contention mini-slots are typically
scheduled in clusters, each of which consists of the maximum number of
contention mini-slots that can fit within a data slot.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
12
For each contention cycle, the HU 102 transmits an entry poll
message to the MAC Users by means of the downstream channel 230.
The entry poll message includes an assignment of contention mini-slots
for the contention cycle, indicating which MAC Users) are permitted to
contend in each contention mini-slot, and an assignment of data slots for
the contention cycle, indicating which MAC User is permitted to transmit
data in each data slot. Each entry poll message also includes feedback
information (described in detail below) for each contention mini-slot in the
preceding contention cycle. The feedback information allows each MAC
User that contended in the preceding contention cycle to determine the
outcome of its contention (i.e., success or failure).
Typically, only MAC Users that are in the CONTENTION state 304
that have data to transmit may contend for a reservation by transmitting a
reservation request message in a designated contention mini-slot. The
HU 102 monitors each contention mini-slot to determine the result of
contention for each contention mini-slot. Specifically) the HU 102
receives either (1 ) no transmission, indicating that no MAC User
transmitted in the contention mini-slot; (2) a reservation request message,
indicating that a single MAC User transmitted in the contention mini-slot
and identifying that MAC User; or (3) a collision) indicating that more than
one MAC User transmitted in the contention mini-slot. For convenience,
the three states are referred to as IDLE, SUCCESS, and COLLISION,
respectively.
As discussed above, the HU 102 includes feedback information in
each entry poll message. Specifically, in each entry poll message, the
HU 102 indicates a feedback state (i.e.) IDLE) SUCCESS, or
COLLISION) for each contention mini-slot in the preceding contention
cycle. The feedback information allows each MAC User that transmitted
a reservation request message in the preceding contention cycle to
determine the result of its contention attempt. Specifically, each MAC
User examines the feedback state corresponding to the contention mini-
slot in which the MAC User transmitted its reservation request message

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
13
to determine if the result is SUCCESS or COLLISION. If the feedback
state indicates SUCCESS, then the MAC User transitions from the
CONTENTION state 304 to the ACTIVE state 306 and awaits data
transmission opportunities from the HU 102; otherwise) the MAC User
remains in the CONTENTION state 304 and awaits further contention
opportunities from the HU 102.
The HU 102 provides data transmission opportunities to the active
MAC Users (i.e., those MAC Users that have made a successful
reservation or require no reservation). Specifically, the HES 214
schedules data transmission opportunities to the active MAC Users by
allocating data slots on the upstream channel 240 such that each MAC
User receives a sufficient amount of bandwidth within its QoS constraints.
CBR connections require bandwidth at a constant rate within
specified delay and fitter constraints. Therefore, CBR MAC Users are
allocated data transmission opportunities at regular intervals at the PCR.
CBR MAC Users are not required to make reservations, and therefore
remain in the ACTIVE state 306 as long as the CBR connection is active.
RT-VBR connections are allocated a sufficient amount of
bandwidth to meet the bandwidth and real-time delivery requirements of
the connection. One approach is to treat the RT-VBR connection like a
CBR connection by allocating bandwidth at regular intervals at the PCR.
This guarantees that the bandwidth and real-time delivery requirements
of the connection will be met. However, it may also be an inefficient use
of bandwidth, since the RT-VBR connection does not generate data
constantly at the PCR.
Treating a RT-VBR connection like a CBR connection may be
acceptable for certain RT-VBR connections, specifically those having an
SCR close to the PCR, but is less desirable if there is a significant
difference between the SCR and the PCR. Therefore) it is convenient to
categorize each RT-VBR connection according to the ratio of SCR to
PCR. If the ratio of SCR to PCR exceeds a predetermined value, for
example 0.5, then the connection is considered to be a CBR-like

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
14
connection that can be treated like a CBR connection with little loss of
bandwidth efficiency. However, if the ratio of SCR to PCR is less than or
equal to the predetermined value, then the connection is considered to
be a "bursty" connection, and is preferably not treated like a CBR
S connection.
For a "bursty" RT-VBR connection, bandwidth allocation at the PCR
is excessive and is therefore inefficient and undesirable. Likewise, it is
also undesirable to allocate bandwidth at the SCR, since the network
would then be unable to guarantee real-time delivery of cells for the
connection. Therefore) various embodiments of the present invention
allocate data transmission opportunities for "bursty" RT-VBR traffic at the
PCR when the MAC User has data to transmit and at a lower rate when
the MAC User has no data to transmit. For convenience) the MAC User is
said to be "active" when it is determined that the MAC User requires data
transmission opportunities at the PCR and "inactive" when it is
determined that the MAC User does not require data transmission
opportunities at the PCR.
In a first embodiment, the HES 214 allocates data transmission
opportunities at the PCR while the MAC User is "active" and at a zero rate
while the MAC User is "inactive". In this first embodiment) the MAC User
begins in the INACTIVE state 302, and transitions into the CONTENTION
state 304 when the MAC User receives data to be transmitted. In the
CONTENTION state 304, the MAC User contends as described above.
Once a successful reservation is made, the MAC User transitions into the
ACTIVE state 306, and the HES 214 allocates data slots to the MAC User
at the PCR. The HES 214 monitors the data slots allocated to the MAC
User to determine whether the MAC User continues to transmit data, in
which case the MAC User is active, or the MAC User is no longer
transmitting data, in which case the MAC User is inactive. After a
3 0 predetermined number of data slots in which no data is transmitted by the
MAC User, the MAC User transitions back to the INACTIVE state 302) and
the HES 214 stops allocating data slots to the MAC User.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTlUS98l14894
Exemplary HES 214 logic for scheduling data transmission
opportunities in accordance with the first embodiment of the present
invention is shown in FIG. 4. The HES 214 allocates data transmission
opportunities for the MAC User at the zero rate when the MAC User is
5 "inactive" (402). When the MAC User makes a reservation (404), the
HES 214 allocates data transmission opportunities for the MAC User at
the PCR (406). The HES 214 continues allocating data transmission
opportunities at the PCR as long as the MAC User continues transmitting
data. When the MAC User has not transmitted data for a predetermined
10 number of consecutive data transmission opportunities (408)) the HES
214 returns to allocating data transmission opportunities for the MAC
User at the zero rate (402).
-This first embodiment for handling "bursty" RT-VBR traffic is
bandwidth efficient) at least to the degree that the MAC User is not
15 allocated bandwidth in excess of its required bandwidth (other than the
overhead of waiting until the MAC User has not transmitted data for a
predetermined number of consecutive data transmission opportunities
before the MAC User is considered to be "inactive"). However, because
the MAC User is required to contend for access following a period of
inactivity) the MAC User is required to buffer data during the period of
contention and therefore is delayed in transmitting the data. The
contention access delay may vary each time the MAC User contends,
since there is no a priori knowledge as to how many contention cycles it
will take before a successful reservation is made. Therefore, the
contention access delay and its variability makes it difficult for the HES
214 to meet the guaranteed CDV for the MAC User.
The contention access delay also affects the CLR. If the contention
access delay is too large, some cells become "obsolete" and are
consequently dropped by the MAC User. Although typical RT-VBR
connections can tolerate a certain amount of cell loss, it is desirable to
minimize such degradation if possible. Moreover, the smaller the CLR)
the more closely the SCR requirement is matched. Thus, it is preferable

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
16
that a contention-based reservation access scheme that supports
multiple priority classes be used so that the RT-VBR users can be given
high priority for reservation access. One contention-based reservation
access scheme that supports multiple priority classes is described in U.S.
S Patent Application No. 08/865,924 entitled System, Device) and Method
for Sharing Contention Mini-Slots Among Multiple Priority Classes, filed
on May 30) 1997 in the name of Chester A. Ruszczyk, Whay Chiou Lee,
and Imrich Chlamtac (Attorney Docket No. CX097020) with a preferred
collision resolution technique described in U.S. Patent Application No.
08l866,865 entitled System, Device, and Method for Contention-Based
Reservation in a Shared Medium Network, filed on May 30, 1997 in the
name of Chester A. Ruszczyk, Whay Chiou Lee) and Imrich Chlamtac
(Attorney Docket Na. CX096053). Even with the use of an efficient
contention-based reservation access scheme that supports multiple
priority classes, it is important that the CM 215 only admit an additional
RT-VBR user if the system can support the user without excessive
contention access decay.
In a second embodiment) the HES 214 allocates data transmission
opportunities at the PCR rate white the MAC User is "active" and at a
lower non-zero rate, preferably at the SCR, while the MAC User is
"inactive". In this second embodiment, HES 214 allocates data
transmission opportunities for the MAC User regularly (although the
allocation rate varies)) so the MAC User remains permanently in the
ACTIVE state 306 and is not required to make a reservation. The HES
214 typically begins by allocating bandwidth at the lower non-zero rate
and monitoring for data transmissions by the MAC User. As soon as the
MAC User begins transmitting data in the designated data slots) the HES
214 increases the bandwidth allocation to the PCR and monitors for the
MAC User to stop transmitting data. The HES 214 continues allocating
bandwidth at the PCR so long as the MAC User is actively transmitting
data. When the MAC User stops transmitting data) the HES 214 throttles
the bandwidth allocation back to the lower non-zero rate. This throttling
*rB

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99l09690 PCT/US98/14894
1~
can occur immediately upon a determination that the MAC User is
"inactive" (e.g., following a predetermined number of data transmission
opportunities in which no data was transmitted) or gradually by
decreasing the bandwidth allocation in steps. By providing a minimum
bandwidth equal to the tower non-zero rate and providing PCR on
demand, the HES 214 is more easily able to meet the delay and fitter
requirements of the MAC User because the slots allocated at the lower
non-zero rate are sent at known intervals) and the HES 214 is able to
react quickly when the MAC User requires bandwidth at the PCR._
Exemplary HES 214 logic for scheduling data transmission
opportunities in accordance with the second embodiment of the present
invention is shown in FIG. 5. The HES 214 allocates data transmission
opportunities for the MAC User at the lower non-zero rate when the MAC
User is "inactive" (502). When the MAC User transmits data in response
to an allocated data transmission opportunity (504), the HES 214
allocates data transmission opportunities for the MAC User at the PCR
(506). The HES 214 continues allocating data transmission opportunities
at the PCR as long as the MAC User continues transmitting data. When
the MAC User has not transmitted data for a predetermined number of
consecutive data transmission opportunities (508), the HES 214 returns
to allocating data transmission opportunities for the MAC User at the
lower non-zero rate (502).
One advantage of this second embodiment is that the MAC User
"knows" that it is being provided regular data transmission opportunities.
Therefore, any data received between scheduled data transmission
opportunities can be buffered until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity, and the MAC User is not required to contend in order to get
transmission opportunities. However, if the MAC User is frequently
"inactive" for a comparatively long time with respect to the time it is
"active," much bandwidth is wasted. Moreover, the ability for the system
to statistically multiplex RT-VBR connections is diminished. In this
second embodiment, it is also possible that under certain circumstances,

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTNS98/14894
18
the reduced allocation rate will be insufficient to guarantee that data
received by the MAC User between polls can be transmitted within the
QoS constraints simply by waiting for the next data transmission
opportunity. fn this situation, it is preferable for the MAC User to contend
for a reservation) prompting the HES 214 to provide a data transmission
opportunity to the MAG User sooner than the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity.
In a third embodiment, the MAC User decides whether or not to
contend when it receives data between scheduled data transmission
opportunities. When the MAC User receives data to be transmitted, the
MAC User first determines the amount of time before the next scheduled
data transmission opportunity) and then determines whether the QoS
constraints will be violated if the MAC User waits until the next scheduled
data transmission opportunity. If waiting until the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity will violate the QoS constraints, then the MAC
User contends for a reservation; otherwise, the MAC User waits for the
next scheduled data transmission opportunity.
Exemplary MAC User logic in accordance with the third
embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 6. The logic begins
in step 602) and upon receiving data to be transmitted in step 604)
proceeds to determine the amount of time before the next scheduled data
transmission opportunity, in step 606. The logic then determines whether
the GloS constraints for the MAC User will be violated if the MAC User
waits until the next scheduled data transmission opportunity) in step 608.
If the QoS constraints will not be violated if the MAC User waits until the
next scheduled data transmission opportunity (NO in step 610), then the
logic buffers the data until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity, in step 612. However) if the QoS constraints will be violated
if the MAC User waits until the next scheduled data transmission
opportunity (YES in step 610)) then the logic contends for a reservation,
in step 614. The logic terminates in step 699.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
19
Exemplary HES 214 Logic for scheduling data transmission
opportunities in accordance with the third embodiment of the present
invention is shown in FIG. 7. The HES 214 allocates data transmission
opportunities for the MAC User at the lower non-zero rate when the MAC
User is "inactive" (702). When the MAC User either transmits data in
response to a data transmission opportunity or makes a reservation
(704), the HES 214 allocates data transmission opportunities for the MAC
User at the PCR (706). The HES 214 continues allocating data
transmission opportunities at the PCR as long as the MAC User
continues transmitting data. When the MAC User has not transmitted
data for a predetermined number of consecutive data transmission
opportunities (708), the HES 214 returns to allocating data transmission
opportunities for the MAC User at the lower non-zero rate (702).
In the embodiments described above, the HES 214 utilizes only
1 S the PCR and SCR traffic descriptors for scheduling data transmission
opportunities. However, RT-VBR traffic is also characterized by the MBS,
which specifies the maximum amount of data that the MAC User can
transmit at the PCR during any one burst. Alternative embodiments
utilize the MBS to simplify scheduling by automatically allocating a burst
of data transmission opportunities (referred to as a "burst allocation")
equivalent to the MBS at the PCR when the MAC User becomes "active."
During the burst allocation, the HES 214 does not have to monitor and
react to the status of the MAC User (i.e., "active" or "inactive"), and
therefore the HES 214 logic is simplified. Upon completion of the burst
allocation, the HES 214 automatically treats the MAC User as being
"inactive" and allocates data transmission opportunities at the lower rate.
By automatically providing a burst allocation when the MAC User
becomes "active," the HES 214 provides for efficient bandwidth utilization
if the MAC User transmits a maximum size burst each time it becomes
"active." However, utilizing the burst allocation is inefficient if the actual
burst size is variable or is consistently less than the MBS. When the MBS

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCTJUS98114894
is considerably larger than a typical burst size, the system's ability to
statistically multiplex RT-VBR connections is diminished.
Exemplary HES 214 logic for scheduling data transmission
opportunities in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present
5 invention is shown in FIG. 8. The HES 214 allocates data transmission
opportunities for the MAC User at the zero rate when the MAC User is
"inactive" (802). When the MAC User makes a reservation (804), the
HES 214 makes a burst allocation for the MAC User at the PGR (806).
When the burst allocation is complete (808), the HES 214 returns to
10 allocating data transmission opportunities for the MAC User at the zero
rate (802).
Exemplary HES 214 logic for scheduling data transmission
opportunities in accordance with a fifth embodiment of the present
invention is shown in FIG. 9. The HES 214 allocates data transmission
15 opportunities for the MAC User at the lower non-zero rate when the MAC
User is "inactive" (902). When the MAC User either transmits data in
response to a data transmission opportunity or makes a reservation
(904), the HES 214 makes a burst allocation for the MAC User at the PCR
(906). When the burst allocation is complete (908), the HES 214 returns
20 to allocating data transmission opportunities for the MAC User at the
lower non-zero rate (902).
Although the above embodiments are described with reference to
a particular reservation-based MAC protocol that utilizes a slotted
upstream channel, the present invention is not limited to either the
reservation-based MAC protocol or the slotted upstream channel. The
described scheduling techniques are applicable to other MAC protocols
and other upstream channel configurations. In particular, the described
scheduling techniques are applicable to a MAC protocol commonly
referred to as Multimedia Cable Network System (MCNS). It will be
apparent to a skilled artisan how the described scheduling techniques
can be applied to the MCNS protocol and to other MAC protocols and
upstream channel configurations.

CA 02268794 1999-04-14
WO 99/09690 PCT/US98/14894
21
All logic described herein can be embodied using discrete
components, integrated circuitry, programmable logic used in conjunction
with a programmable logic device such as a Field Programmable Gate
Array (FPGA) or microprocessor, or any other means including any
S combination thereof) Programmable logic can be fixed temporarily or
permanently in a tangible medium such as a read-only memory chip, a
computer memory, a disk, or other storage medium. Programmable logic
can also be fixed in a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave,
allowing the programmable logic to be transmitted over an intertace such
as a computer bus or communication network. All such embodiments are
intended to fall within the scope of the present invention.
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms
without departing from the essence or essential characteristics. The
described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as
illustrative and not restrictive.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2013-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2002-07-17
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2002-07-17
Inactive: Status info is complete as of Log entry date 2001-08-28
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to Office letter 2001-07-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-07-17
Extension of Time for Taking Action Requirements Determined Compliant 2000-08-03
Letter Sent 2000-08-03
Inactive: Extension of time for transfer 2000-07-17
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2000-02-15
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 1999-06-23
Inactive: Cover page published 1999-06-17
Inactive: IPC assigned 1999-05-17
Inactive: First IPC assigned 1999-05-17
Application Received - PCT 1999-05-14
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 1999-04-14
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 1999-04-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1999-02-25

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2001-07-17

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2000-06-23

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 1999-04-14
Request for examination - standard 1999-04-14
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2000-07-17 2000-06-23
Extension of time 2000-07-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MOTOROLA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
CHESTER A. RUSZCZYK
IMRICH CHLAMTAC
WHAY CHIOU LEE
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 1999-04-14 21 1,067
Abstract 1999-04-14 1 63
Claims 1999-04-14 6 241
Drawings 1999-04-14 5 106
Cover Page 1999-06-16 2 74
Representative drawing 1999-06-16 1 9
Notice of National Entry 1999-06-23 1 203
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2000-03-20 1 111
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2000-04-17 1 109
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-08-14 1 185
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Office letter) 2001-08-21 1 172
Correspondence 2000-07-17 1 44
Correspondence 2000-08-03 1 9
PCT 1999-04-14 2 96
Correspondence 2000-02-15 1 15