Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 FIELD OF THE INVENTION
2 The present invention relates to a choke valve for controlling fluid flow
3 in a line.
4
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
6 A choke valve is a throttling device used to reduce the fluid pressure or
7 flow rate in a flow line. (Hereinafter the device is referred to as a
"choke".)
8 Chokes are commonly used in connection with well drilling and production
9 operations for producing oil or gas, although they have other applications
as
well.
11 In many cases, the stream passing through the choke is very erosive.
12 For example, a choke used in a drilling or production operation may be
13 exposed to a high pressure gas stream moving at high velocity and carrying
14 sand particles. In the course of undergoing pressure reduction in passing
through the choke, the velocity of the flow stream is increased. This
16 exacerbates the erosional effect of the flow stream. Choke failure due to
17 erosion can lead to very serious problems in controlling well flow or, as a
18 minimum, leads to costly repairs.
19 As a result of these factors, designers of chokes go to great lengths in
trying to improve the durability of their products. The present invention is
21 concerned with a combination of design features which, when implemented,
22 yielded surprisingly beneficial durability improvements in a type of known
23 choke commonly referred to as having a "cage with external sleeve flow
trim".
24 In general, such a choke comprises:
~ a valve body and a flow trim;
2
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 ~ the valve body having an axial main bore or cavity extending part
2 way through the body, an inlet bore connecting with the inner end of
3 the main bore from the side, and an outlet bore extending to one
4 end of the body from the main bore. The three bores form a
generally T-shaped bore network wherein the main bore contains
6 the valve components;
7 ~ the inlet and outlet passages into the main bore may take various
8 configurations to provide appropriate flow line interface; and
9 ~ the flow trim, comprising a cage and external throttling sleeve,
being positioned in the main bore at the junction of the bores. The
11 cage is a stationary tubular member which extends transversely
12 over the inner end of the inlet bore. The cage typically has two
13 pairs of ports, arranged in opposed relationship, extending through
14 its side wall. The ports of one pair are larger than those of the other
pair. The flow stream may move through the inlet bore, enter the
16 cage through the ports and leave through the outlet bore. An
17 annular passageway is formed between the body and the cage so
18 that fluid entering from the inlet bore may circulate through the
19 passageway to reach the various ports. The tubular throttling
sleeve is configured to closely fit over the cage and it can be
21 advanced axially to slide across the ports and throttle or close them
22 as required.
3
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 There are, of course, additional necessary components, such as
2 means for advancing or withdrawing the throttling sleeve and means for
3 closing and sealing the main bore, but they are not involved in the present
4 invention and will not be described in detail herein.
In summary therefore, the choke design of interest utilizes a stationary
6 cage coupled with a sliding external sleeve to control the flow area (the
ports).
7 The choke is designed so that the stream entering through the inlet bore
8 travels into the cage through the annular passageway and the throttled
ports;
9 it then leaves through the outlet bore.
There are a number of chokes available commercially which utilize the
11 aforementioned flow trim design. United States Patent No. 4,540,022
("'022")
12 discloses one such choke having a flow trim comprising a cage and external
13 sleeve. This patent is assigned to the assignee of the present application.
14 The present invention was developed in the course of a research effort to
extend or improve the durability of this choke.
16 It needs to be noted that the '022 choke, in its commercially offered
17 form, has always had the ports offset 45° from the axis of the inlet
bore.
18 It further needs to be understood that, in some models of the choke of
19 interest, an internal sleeve {referred to as a retainer) is provided,
contiguous
to the main bore surface. This retainer acts to lock the cage in place. For
21 purposes of the claims of this application, the retainer is to be
considered to
22 be simply an extension of the body. So when the term "body" is used in the
23 claims, it is intended to describe both a body without an internal retainer
or
24 one equipped with a retainer.
4
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
2 In accordance with the invention, a choke valve having a cage with
3 external sleeve flow trim is provided with the following combination of
4 features:
(1 ) One pair of ports is aligned with the axis of the inlet bore; and
6 (2) A protuberance, referred to as a deflection bar, extends
7 downwardly and inwardly from the body into the main bore in
8 alignment with its axis and located about 180° from the axis of
9 the inlet bore. Otherwise stated, the bar is located at the top of
the main bore, in line with the axis of the inlet bore. The
11 deflection bar preferably having angled side surfaces for
12 deflecting the circularly flowing streams moving through the
13 semi-circular branches of the annular passageway, whereby
14 they converge together angularly instead of head on.
By modifying the choke in this way, localized erosion, arising at several
16 areas of the steel surfaces containing the flow, has been significantly
reduced.
17 Broadly stated, the invention is an improvement in a choke valve
18 comprising a body having first and second ends, the body having an internal
19 surface forming a main bore extending axially part of the way therethrough
from its first end, an inlet bore connecting with the main bore and an outlet
21 bore connecting axially with the main bore, the main bore containing a flow
22 trim comprising a tubular stationary cage extending transversely of the
inlet
23 bore and forming opposed ports in its side wall, the surtace of the main
bore
24 combining with the cage to form an annular passageway having semi-circular
sections so that fluid may flow from the inlet bore, through the passageway
5
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 sections and ports and out the outlet bore, the flow trim further comprising
a
2 tubular sleeve operative to slide over the cage from its first end to
throttle the
3 ports and means for actuating the sleeve and sealing the first end of the
main
4 bore. The improvement comprises: one pair of ports being aligned with the
inlet bore; and a protrusion extending inwardly into the main bore from the
6 main bore surface and being located in opposed relationship to the inlet
bore,
7 so that fluid streams moving through the sections of the annular passageway
8 is deflected inwardly by the protrusion.
9
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
11 Figure 1 is a simplified, cross-sectional end view of a choke body,
12 retainer and cage showing the ports offset angularly relative to the axis
of the
13 inlet bore, in accordance with the commercial version of the '022 prior art
14 choke, which was the embodiment used in the initial tests described;
Figure 2 is a view similar to Figure 1, with arrows fancifully indicating
16 the main flow moving through the annular passage to the ports;
17 Figure 3 is a view similar to Figure 1 with arrows fancifully indicating
18 the main flow pattern and bold arrows indicating deflected fluid which
19 impinges against the retainer to cause localized erosion in areas
identified by
x's;
21 Figure 4 is a view similar to Figure 1 with arrows fancifully indicating
22 the circular flows of fluid moving through the semi-circular sections of
the
23 annular passageway. The head-on collision of these flows causes localized
24 erosion in the area identified by a 0;
6
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 Figure 5 is a view similar to Figure 1 with arrows fancifully indicating
2 the circular flows moving both through the sections of the annular
3 passageway and internally of the cage. These flows cause localized erosion
4 in areas identified by O's;
Figure 6 is a cross-sectional side view of a complete choke having its
6 ports offset as in the preceding Figures, showing areas identified where
7 localized erosion arises due to the swirling and collision of flow of the
fluid;
8 Figure 7 is a simplified, cross-sectional end view of a choke body,
9 retainer and cage with one pair of ports (normally the larger pair) aligned
with
the inlet bore axis and a deflection bar in position opposite to the inlet
bore.
11 Arrows fancifully indicate the nature of the flow streams;
12 Figure 8 is a cross-sectional side view of a complete choke in
13 accordance with the invention, having its major ports aligned with the axis
of
14 the inlet bore and a deflection bar in place; and
Figure 9 is a cross-sectional side view of a complete choke having an
16 alternative bore arrangement, incorporating the invention.
17
18 DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
19 A series of bench tests were carried out to study the erosional effects
of pumping a pressurized stream of water, carrying entrained sand, through a
21 choke 1, shown in Figures 1 - 6.
22 The choke 1 comprised a body 2 forming a main bore 3, inlet bore 4
23 and outlet bore 5. A flow trim 6, comprising a stationary cage 7 and
throttling
24 sleeve 8, was positioned in the main bore 3. The cage 7 had a pair of
opposed large ports 9 and a pair of opposed small ports 10. The two pairs of
7
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 ports were offset at 90° from each other. A retainer 11 locked the
cage 7 in
2 position. A stem assembly 12 was provided in the main bore 3 for advancing
3 and retracting the sleeve 8 as required to throttle the ports 9, 10. A
suitable
4 seal assembly 13 completed the componentry of the known choke 1. The
choke 1 had its ports 9, 10 offset at 45° relative to the axis 14 of
the inlet bore
6 4, in accordance with the commercially offered design.
7 Water was pumped through the choke 1 at 123 gpm with a pressure
8 drop of 850 psi. The water contained 1 % sand by mass.
9 The mixture was pumped through the choke to assess wear rate,
material loss and performance. Inspections were carried out after each 4
11 hour interval of pumping.
12 It was deduced, mainly as a result of examining wear patterns and
13 weight loss, that the bulk of the water/sand mixture passed through the
choke
14 1 was substantially in accordance with the arrows shown in Figures 3, 4 and
5. As shown in Figure 2, the stream would enter through the inlet bore 4,
16 divide and move circularly around the cage 7 through the annular
17 passageway 15, enter the cage bore 16 through the bores 9, 10 and swirl and
18 advance out through the cage bore and outlet bore 5.
19 It was determined that localized wear occur-ed at the far corners 30
(see Figure 5) of the cage port 9 and at an impingement area 31 (see Figure
21 3), on the inner surface of the retainer 11. It was assumed from this wear
that
22 fluid was striking the corners 30 and being deflected at the area 31 to
cause
23 erosion. This flow pattern is indicated by the bold arrows on Figure 3.
8
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 It was further determined that localized wear of the main bore surface
2 32 occurred in the area 33, identified by 0's. It was conjectured that the
3 circular fluid flows moving through the two sections of the annular
4 passageway 15 would collide head on at the far side of the cage 7, thereby
generating eddy currents which caused localized erosion at area 33 (see
6 Figure 4).
7 It was further determined that erosional wear occurred along the
8 surface 50 of the cage bore 16, the exposed surface 51 of the sleeve 8 and
9 the surface 52 of the outlet bore 5. It was conjectured that, when flow
entered
the cage bore 16 through the offset ports 9, 10, it was caused to swirl, as
11 indicated by the bolded arrows in Figure 5. It was assumed that the wear of
12 the aforementioned surtaces 50, 51 and 52 was caused by the swirling flow
13 pattern arising from the offset positioning of the ports 9, 10.
14 Several tests were then conducted with the large ports 9 aligned with
the axis 14 of the inlet bore 4. It was found that, with this change, the wear
at
16 the impingement area 31, outer port corners 30, and along surfaces 50, 51
17 and 52, was greatly reduced.
18 However the eddy current erosion at area 33 persisted.
19 A second change was then initiated. A deflection bar 40, having
inwardly slanted side surfaces 41 was attached to the body 2 at the top of the
21 main bore surface 32, in alignment with the axis 14 of the inlet bore (see
22 Figure 7).
9
CA 02274345 1999-06-11
1 Further tests were then carried out using the two modifications in
2 combination. The choke 1 was configured as shown in Figures 7 and 8. It
3 was found that the choke functioned with minimal erosional wear at the areas
4 and port corners where wear had previously occurred.
It is believed that the deflection bar 40 deflects the semi-circular flows
6 in the annular passageway 15 and minimizes the production of destructive
7 eddy currents.
8 The combination of providing the deflection bar 40 at the position
9 stated and aligning the large ports 9 with the axis 14 of the inlet bore 4
greatly
reduced localized impingement and eddy current erosion as well as the more
11 spread out swirl erosion. Choke life has been at least doubled by making
12 these modifications.
