Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.
Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:
(12) Patent Application: | (11) CA 2307504 |
---|---|
(54) English Title: | ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR LOCATING DATA CARRIERS |
(54) French Title: | DISPOSITIF ET PROCEDE POUR LOCALISER DES SUPPORTS DE DONNEES |
Status: | Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication |
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC): |
|
---|---|
(72) Inventors : |
|
(73) Owners : |
|
(71) Applicants : |
|
(74) Agent: | SMART & BIGGAR LP |
(74) Associate agent: | |
(45) Issued: | |
(86) PCT Filing Date: | 1999-08-19 |
(87) Open to Public Inspection: | 2000-03-09 |
Examination requested: | 2004-08-16 |
Availability of licence: | N/A |
Dedicated to the Public: | N/A |
(25) Language of filing: | English |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): | Yes |
---|---|
(86) PCT Filing Number: | PCT/EP1999/006107 |
(87) International Publication Number: | WO 2000013035 |
(85) National Entry: | 2000-04-26 |
(30) Application Priority Data: | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The invention comprises an arrangement with which mobile objects can be
located in particular areas. The mobile objects for locating, e.g., persons or
inanimate objects, are provided with a data carrier which determines the
absolute position using a position-determining system such as e.g., GPS. For
many applications, it is not always necessary to know the absolute position of
the object. Information about the area in which the object is located is
usually sufficient. In order to optimise the exchanging of data between the
application that requires the location of the data carrier and the object
itself, the absolute position of the objects is transmitted to an information
unit when the data carrier is initialised. Said information unit translates
the co-ordinates using a digitised map or a plan divided into areas so that
the object can be allocated to a corresponding area. This data is stored in
the information unit. The boundaries of the area in which the object is
located are transmitted to the data carrier and if the object changes its
position, the data carrier itself can determine whether the object has left an
area. If the current position of the data carrier no longer matches the area
information, the data carrier reports its position to the information unit
again. If an application requests the position of a data carrier, the
information unit transmits the data carrier area information that has been
stored to the application. This results in optimal communications between the
applications and the data carriers. The position of the data carrier can be
established even when the data carrier cannot be reached momentarily.
L'invention concerne un dispositif permettant de localiser des objets mobiles dans des zones déterminées. Les objets mobiles à localiser, par exemple des personnes ou des objets, sont pourvus d'un support de données qui détecte leur position absolue au moyen d'un système de détermination de position, par ex. GPS. Pour de nombreuses applications, il n'est pas toujours nécessaire de connaître la position absolue d'objets. Une information sur la zone, dans laquelle se trouvent les objets, est suffisante dans la plupart des cas. Afin d'optimiser l'échange de données entre l'application, pour laquelle le lieu de situation de l'objet présente un intérêt, et l'objet lui-même, la position absolue de l'objet est transmise à une unité d'information lors de l'initialisation du support de données. Cette unité d'information traduit les coordonnées au moyen d'une carte numérisée ou d'une division en zones, de sorte que l'objet peut être affecté à une zone correspondante. Ces données sont mémorisées dans l'unité d'information. Les limites de la zone dans laquelle se trouve l'objet sont transmises au support de données. Ce dernier peut déterminer lui-même en cas de changement de position si l'objet quitte ou non une zone. Si la position, à un moment donné, du support de données ne coïncide plus avec les informations de zone, le support de données signale de nouveau sa position à l'unité d'information. Si une application demande la position d'un support de données, l'unité d'information transmet à l'application les informations de zone mémorisées du support de données. La communication entre les applications et le support de données est ainsi optimisée. La position du support de données peut être déterminée même si l'on ne peut pas avoir accès momentanément au support de données.
Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.
Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.
For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee and Payment History should be consulted.
Description | Date |
---|---|
Inactive: IPC assigned | 2015-01-29 |
Inactive: IPC removed | 2015-01-19 |
Inactive: IPC removed | 2015-01-19 |
Inactive: First IPC assigned | 2015-01-19 |
Inactive: IPC assigned | 2015-01-19 |
Inactive: IPC expired | 2010-01-01 |
Inactive: IPC removed | 2009-12-31 |
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline | 2006-05-16 |
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition | 2006-05-16 |
Inactive: IPC from MCD | 2006-03-12 |
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice | 2005-08-19 |
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition | 2005-05-16 |
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition | 2004-11-16 |
Letter Sent | 2004-09-01 |
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant | 2004-08-16 |
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant | 2004-08-16 |
Request for Examination Received | 2004-08-16 |
Inactive: Cover page published | 2000-07-12 |
Inactive: Cover page published | 2000-06-23 |
Inactive: First IPC assigned | 2000-06-20 |
Letter Sent | 2000-06-14 |
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE | 2000-06-14 |
Application Received - PCT | 2000-06-09 |
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) | 2000-03-09 |
Abandonment Date | Reason | Reinstatement Date |
---|---|---|
2005-08-19 |
The last payment was received on 2004-07-13
Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.
Fee Type | Anniversary Year | Due Date | Paid Date |
---|---|---|---|
Registration of a document | 2000-04-26 | ||
Basic national fee - standard | 2000-04-26 | ||
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard | 02 | 2001-08-20 | 2001-06-11 |
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard | 03 | 2002-08-19 | 2002-06-25 |
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard | 04 | 2003-08-19 | 2003-07-23 |
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard | 05 | 2004-08-19 | 2004-07-13 |
Request for examination - standard | 2004-08-16 |
Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.
Current Owners on Record |
---|
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V. |
Past Owners on Record |
---|
HENNING MAASS |
THOMAS FALCK |