Language selection

Search

Patent 2311782 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2311782
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR EXTRACTING ORGANIC MOLECULE(S) USING A SOLVENT MEDIUM CONTAINING A HYDROFLUOROETHER
(54) French Title: PROCEDE D'EXTRACTION DE MOLECULE(S) ORGANIQUE(S) METTANT EN OEUVRE UN MILIEU SOLVANT CONTENANT UN HYDROFLUOROETHER
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C07B 63/00 (2006.01)
  • B01D 11/02 (2006.01)
  • B01D 11/04 (2006.01)
  • C11B 3/00 (2006.01)
  • C11B 9/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SURBLED, MICHEL (France)
  • LEMAIRE, BENOIT (France)
  • MENGAL, PHILIPPE (France)
  • MOMPON, BERNARD (France)
(73) Owners :
  • EXTRACTIVE
(71) Applicants :
  • EXTRACTIVE (France)
(74) Agent: OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1998-11-26
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-06-03
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/FR1998/002546
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1999026903
(85) National Entry: 2000-05-26

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
97/15114 (France) 1997-11-26

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention concerns a method for extracting an organic molecule or a group
of organic molecules from a raw material or for purifying an extract obtained
by a conventional extraction method characterised in that it consists in using
a solvent medium comprising at least a hydrofluoroether selected among the
group consisting of methoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OCH3) and its isomer
((CF3)2CFCF2OCH3), ethoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OC2H5) and its isomer
((CF3)2CFCF2OC2H5) and propoxy-undecafluoropentane (C5F11OC3H7), said
hydrofluoroether having a boiling point in atmospheric pressure ranging
between +15 ~C and +100 ~C.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour extraire une molécule organique ou un groupe de molécules organiques à partir d'une matière première ou pour purifier un extrait obtenu par une méthode traditionnelle d'extraction caractérisé en ce qu'il met en oeuvre un milieu solvant comprenant au moins un hydrofluoroéther choisi dans le groupe constitué par le méthoxy-nonafluorobutane (C¿4?F¿9?OCH¿3?) et son isomère ((CF¿3?)¿2?CFCF¿2?OCH¿3?), l'éthoxy-nonafluorobutane (C¿4?F¿9?OC¿2?H¿5?) et son isomère ((CF¿3?)¿2?CFCF¿2?OC¿2?H¿5?), et le propoxy-undécafluoropentane (C¿5?F¿11?OC¿3?H¿7?), ledit hydrofluoroéther présentant une température d'ébullition à la pression atmosphérique comprise entre +15 ·C et +100 ·C.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


11
CLAIMS
1. Method for extracting an organic molecule or a
group of organic molecules from a raw material, or for
purifying an extract obtained by a conventional
extraction method, characterised in that it uses a
solvent medium containing at least one hydrofluoroether
chosen from the group made up of
methoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OCH3) and its isomer
((CF3)2CFCF2OCH3), ethoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F9OC2H5) and
its isomer ((CF3)2CFCF2OC2H5) and
propoxy-undecafluoropentane (C5F11OC3H7), said hydrofluoroether
having a boiling point in atmospheric pressure ranging
between +15°C and +100°C.
2. Method according to claim 1, characterised in
that said hydrofluoroether has a boiling point at
atmospheric pressure in the range of +30°C to +80°C.
3. Method according to either of claims 1 or 2,
characterised in that said solvent medium includes at
least one co-solvent.
4. Method according to claim 3, characterised in
that said co-solvent is chosen from the group made up of
ethanol and water.
5. Method according to any of claims 1 to 4,
characterised in that it is implemented at room
temperature.

12
6. Method according to any of claims 1 to 5,
characterised in that it is implemented at atmospheric
pressure.
7. Extract obtained with the method according to
any of claims 1 to 6.
8. Purified extract obtained with the method
according to any of claims 1 to 6.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
1
METHOD FOR EXTRACTING ORGANIC MOLECULES) USING A
SOLVENT MEDIUM CONTAINING A HYDROE'LUOROETHER
The invention relates to the field of organic
chemistry.
More precisely, the invention relates to a new
method for solubilizing one or more organic molecules
using a solvent medium containing a hydrofluoroether.
The invention finds application in particular in
extraction, purifying, fractionating, separating,
refining, depolluting, analysis operations, etc... These
operations concern chiefly, but not exclusively, the
aromatic, cosmetic, pharmaceutical, agribusiness, fine
chemistry or environment-related industries.
The use of the solubilizing properties of some
molecules is a well-known operation, in particular for
the purpose of obtaining concentrated extracts. In this
precise example, the extracts are conventionally
obtained by contacting a given raw material with an
extraction solvent such as hexane, acetone, ethanol.
This contacting may be conducted by hot or cold
maceration, with or without shaking, by single or
multiple extraction, for time intervals of varying
lengths, etc... according to a unit protocol in separate
batches or a continuous process. Other physical means
may also be applied such as ultrasound or microwaves in

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
2
order to optimise extraction kinetics, yields or the
quality of the extracts. On completion of the
extraction, the exhausted raw material is separated from
the solvent containing the solutes. The latter are
concentrated by evaporation of the extraction solvent
until a crude extract is obtained. The crude extract may
undergo subsequent purification treatments such as, for
example, desolvation. During the evaporation stage, the
solutes undergo thermal stress which may lead to the
denaturing of some of its constituents (onset of
"roasted" notes, change in colour, loss of activity,...).
This degradation may be particularly extensive during
the final desolvation of the extract, since industrial
regulations lay down increasingly severe standards for
residual solvent(s).
To these technical and regulatory restrictions must
be added those imposed by consumers who demand products
of increasingly higher purity, devoid of any toxicity
yet having faultless organoleptic qualities.
New technologies have therefore been developed in
order to substitute in full or in part those solvents
having a certain extent of toxicity such as benzene,
hexane or chlorinated products. Among these
technologies, extraction using a gas in supercritical
state has been the subject of numerous patent
applications. By gas in the supercritical state is meant
a gas which, when placed under special conditions of
temperature and pressure, enters into an intermediate
state between a liquid and a gas. On a phase diagram,
this state is located beyond the critical point.
In known methods concerning this technique, the
solvent gas may be carbon dioxide, alkanes or alkenes
(butane, butene, propane, propene,...), chlorinated
molecules such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), etc...
either separately or in a mixture. For reasons of
toxicity and safety, the solvent gas is most often

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
3
carbon dioxide, whose critical point co-ordinates are 73
bars and 31.3°C. However, in most of the described
methods, carbon dioxide is preferably subjected to a
pressure of between 100 and 300 bars. The cost of the
installations using supercritical methods is
proportional to pressure constraints. These
installations are therefore, by definition, extremely
costly and rather more reserved up until now for
products with high added value.
To reduce installation costs, . several patent
applications describe methods based on the principle of
the refrigerating cycle in which the solvent gas of
varying chemical nature is not in the supercritical
state but simply liquefied under the action of pressure
in the range of 2 to 25 bars.
Patent application EP 0 616 821 (on behalf of Wilde
P.) describes just such a method which generally uses
non-chlorinated hydrofluoroalkanes as solvent gas and in
particular 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane. In this method,
1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane is liquefied under the action
of a pressure of 6 bars and placed in contact with the
raw material to be extracted. However, since 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane has limited solvent power, exhaustion
of the raw material is conducted using multiple-
percolation according to the well-known Soxhlet
technique.
In order to remedy this constraint, patent GB 2 288
552 (Powell R.) describes a method based on the same
principle but which uses a hydrofluoroether as solvent
gas instead of 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane.
Hydrofluoroethers combine the qualities of 1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane (safety, non-flammability, chemical
inertia) with distinctly greater solvent power. However,
in the described method, the hydrofluoroethers used are
characterised by a number of carbon atoms lying between

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
4
2 and 4 and a boiling point generally in the range of
-85°C and 15°C, preferably between -70°C and -
10°C.
These characteristics require the use of specific
equipment with which the solvent gas can be liquefied
under pressure before and during extraction. For
industrial application, this obligation becomes a non-
negligible financial restriction since the industrialist
must replace or considerably modify production tooling.
The purpose of the present invention is to put
forward a new method for solubilizing or insolubilizing
an organic molecule or a group of organic molecules in a
solvent or a mixture of solvents, which does not involve
the above-cited disadvantages of the prior art.
In particular, one objective of the present
invention is to describe said method which may be
implemented using atmospheric pressure at room
temperature.
A further objective of the present invention is to
disclose such a method which uses an atoxic solvent or
mixture of solvents.
These different objectives are reached through the
invention which concerns a method using at least one
solubilization step of an organic molecule or group of
organic molecules in a solvent medium, characterised in
that said solvent medium contains at least one
hydrofluoroether chosen from the group made up of
methoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F90CH3) and its isomer
( ( CF3 ) 2CFCF20CH3 ) , ethoxy-nonafluorobutane ( C4FgOC2H5 ) and
its isomer ( (CF3) zCFCF20C2H5) and propoxy-
undecafluoropentane (CSF110C3H~), said hydrofluoroether
having a boiling point in atmospheric pressure ranging
between +15°C and +100°C.
The method of the invention has the major advantage
of being able to be implemented under normal conditions
of pressure and temperature, that is to say at
atmospheric or near atmospheric pressure and at room or

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
near room temperature. Preferably, the method of the
invention is implemented at room temperature and at
atmospheric pressure.
Within the scope of the present invention, said
5 hydrofluoroethers may be used pure or in a mixture. In
addition to their high solvent power, they have the
advantage of being non-toxic, chemically inert, non
flammable, colourless, odourless, tasteless. They also
have low calorific capacity and low latent heat of
to vaporization. Finally, they also have the advantage of
having zero Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) and a low
Global Warming Potential (GWP).
Also, preferably, said hydrofluoroether has a
boiling point at atmospheric pressure in the range of
+30°C to +80°C.
According to one variant of the invention, said
solvent medium may, in addition to at least one
hydrofluoroether, also contain at least one co-solvent.
By co-solvent is meant any molecule of any chemical
nature whatsoever added in varying quantities to the
hydrofluoroethers for the purpose of altering the
properties of the mixture obtained (solvent power,...).
According to the present invention, the preferred co
solvents have the lowest toxicity possible. By way of
example, that is in no way restrictive, ethanol and
water are considered to be co-solvents within the scope
of the present invention.
The present invention may be implemented in
particular to obtain extracts of superior quality from a
raw material, and/or to purify and/or fractionate such
extracts under normal conditions of pressure and
temperature.
When the method of the invention is used to obtain
extracts of superior quality from a raw material, the
method of obtaining these new extracts conforms to the
prior art: placing the hydrofluoroether(s), whether or

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
6
not containing one or more co-solvents, in contact with
a determined raw material by hot or cold maceration,
with or without shaking, by single or multiple
extraction, for time intervals of varying lengths, etc...
Other physical means may also be used such as ultrasound
or microwaves in order to optimise the extraction
kinetics, yields or the quality of the extracts.
The exhausted raw material after extraction is
separated from the solvent containing the solutes. The
latter are concentrated by evaporation of the
hydrofluoroether(s) until the extract is obtained. Given
the physico-chemical characteristics of
hydrofluoroethers, it is not necessary to apply any
special pressure before or during extraction. Extraction
is therefore conducted under atmospheric pressure. This
characteristic of the invention is of importance since
it allows substitution of conventionally used extraction
solvents by hydrofluoroethers without requiring any
change to existing industrial tooling.
The extracts obtained are characterised by: no
toxicity caused by extraction solvents, low residual
solvent content, high purity and low production costs
while complying with the most restrictive environmental
standards. This last characteristic of the extracts
obtained can be accounted for by the absence of any need
for changes to production tooling and easy
hydrofluoroether regeneration.
The method of the invention may also be used to
purify and/or fractionate extracts obtained with a
conventional extraction method in order to remove, or at
least substantially reduce, the concentration of one or
more undesired molecules in the extract. By way of
example of such molecules, that is in no way
restrictive, mention may be made of the extraction
solvents used in conventional methods and pesticides.

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
7
The hydrofluoroether(s) containing one or more
undesired molecules are separated from the extract by
simple sedimentation, filtration or azeotropic
separation.
Given the physico-chemical characteristics of the
hydrofluoroethers of the present invention, it is not
necessary to apply any special pressure either before or
during purifying and/or fractionating. It is therefore
conducted at atmospheric pressure. In addition, all the
purification and/or fractionating steps are conducted at
a temperature of below 80°C, preferably at room
temperature.
The refined extracts obtained show no or a greatly
reduced number of undesired molecules, low residual
solvent content, high purity, intactness of the "noble"
constituents of the extract (no thermal degradation),
low production costs while conforming to the most
restrictive environmental standards.
The invention also covers any extract or any
purified extract which may be obtained by using the
method of the invention. Such extracts may in particular
be aromatic extracts, active ingredients, colouring
extracts, etc...
The invention and the various advantages it offers
will be more easily understood on reading the following
description of four non-restrictive examples of
embodiment.
Example 1:
100 g of lavendula hybrida flowers crushed and
dried (dry matter - 85 %) are placed in contact with 2
litres of methoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F90CH3). The
mixture is brought to 45°C and shaken for 5 hours. After
solid/liquid separation, the filtrate is evaporated in a
vacuum (250 mbar, 48°C). An extract weighing 13.16 grams

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
8
is collected which has the aromatic notes characteristic
of hybrid lavender.
Example 2:
30 grams of whole dried flowers of lavendula
hybrida and 250 g of methoxy-nonafluorobutane
(C4F90CH3)are added to a mixing grinder of Warring
Blender type in order to crush the flowers directly in
contact with the solvent. After grinding for 30 seconds
at 22°C the flowers are separated from the solvent by
filtration and rinsed twice in l5 ml of fresh solvent.
The lavender residue is replaced in contact with the
same quantity of fresh solvent and re-extracted under
the same conditions. Overall, 5 successive extractions
are made. Each filtrate is evaporated separately. The
extracts obtained are weighed and the results given in
the table below.
Grinding/extractio 1 2 3 4 5
n
Mass of extract 1.72 0.67 0.58 0.58 0.13
(g)
The global yield of the 5 extraction tests is 12.27
o. The total mass of extract obtained is 3.68 g. The
first extract obtained is in the form of a limpid
slightly yellow-coloured oil. It has a strong smell and
has the aromatic notes that are characteristic of hybrid
lavender flowers.
Example 3:
An emulsion water model is reconstituted by
emulsifying 1 o by mass of essential oil of lavender
(obtained by conventional hydrodistillation) in
demineralised water. The emulsion obtained has a milky

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
9
appearance characteristic of emulsion waters. 170 grams
of this solution are placed in contact with quantities
of methoxy-nonafluorobutane (C4F90CH3) in accordance with
a methoxy-nonafluorobutane/emulsion ratio (m/m) of 0.01,
0.02, 0.1 and 0.2 relative to the emulsion. After
homogenisation and sedimentation, the methoxy-
nonafluorobutane containing the essential oil is drawn
off and evaporated in a vacuum (250 mbars, 48°C). An
additional test is made conducting 3 successive washings
of the model in accordance with a global ratio of 0.3.
The table below gives the percentages of essential oil
extracted from the model in relation to the ratio and
expressed relative to the initial quantity of essential
oil in the model.
Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.1 0.2 0.3*
essential oil 3g 44 67 72 1 0
5 0 4 % 5 0 7 0 83
extracted , . . . .
* result obtained for 3 washings
The best result is obtained with a ratio (methoxy-
nonafluorobutane/model) of 0.3 with 3 successive
washings. In this case, 83 % of the emulsified essential
oil is extracted with methoxy-nonafluorobutane.
Example 4:
A model of food oil to undergo de-solvation is
reconstituted by incorporating 150 ppm of hexane in
commercial soybean oil. The exact content of hexane in
the oil is determined using the IUPAC 2 607 method by
head space in gaseous phase chromatography.
It is desired to solubilize the residual hexane in
the methoxy-nonafluorobutane and to collect the solution
obtained by simple sedimentation. The methoxy
nonafluorobutane is incorporated into the model
according to a (methoxy-nonafluorobutane/residual

CA 02311782 2000-OS-26
l~
hexane) ratio of 5. After homogenisation and
sedimentation for one hour at room temperature (25°C),
oil samples are taken to analyse the hexane content. The
results obtained show that 23.5 % of the hexane
initially present is extracted from the oil by methoxy-
nonafluorobutane in a single extraction.
The above-described examples of the invention are
not intended to limit the scope of the invention. In
this respect, it will be noted that the invention may be
implemented under any method requiring the
solubilization of a molecule or a group of molecules in
a solvent.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2311782 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2003-11-26
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2003-11-26
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2002-11-26
Letter Sent 2002-04-26
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2002-04-17
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2001-12-27
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2001-12-27
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2001-12-27
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-11-26
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2001-11-26
Letter Sent 2000-11-06
Inactive: Single transfer 2000-09-27
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-08-10
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2000-08-01
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2000-08-01
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2000-07-27
Application Received - PCT 2000-07-25
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1999-06-03

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2002-11-26
2001-11-26
2001-11-26

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2001-11-28

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - small 2000-05-26
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2000-11-27 2000-05-26
Registration of a document 2000-09-27
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2001-11-26 2001-11-28
Reinstatement 2002-04-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
EXTRACTIVE
Past Owners on Record
BENOIT LEMAIRE
BERNARD MOMPON
MICHEL SURBLED
PHILIPPE MENGAL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2000-08-10 1 44
Abstract 2000-05-26 1 71
Description 2000-05-26 10 406
Claims 2000-05-26 2 38
Notice of National Entry 2000-07-27 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2000-11-06 1 114
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2001-12-27 1 182
Notice of Reinstatement 2002-04-26 1 172
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2002-12-24 1 176
Reminder - Request for Examination 2003-07-29 1 112
Correspondence 2000-07-27 1 15
PCT 2000-05-26 13 455
Correspondence 2002-03-11 8 331
Fees 2002-04-17 1 45