Language selection

Search

Patent 2316876 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2316876
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR MAKING A DISPOSABLE ABSORBENT WEB WITH IMPROVED WET-TENSILE STRENGTH
(54) French Title: PROCEDE DE FABRICATION D'UNE BANDE CONTINUE CELLULOSIQUE A RESISTANCE A LA TRACTION A L'ETAT HUMIDE AMELIOREE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21H 21/20 (2006.01)
  • D21H 21/24 (2006.01)
  • D21H 23/76 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ANDERSON, RALPH L. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1998-12-08
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 1999-07-08
Examination requested: 2003-09-12
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US1998/026045
(87) International Publication Number: WO 1999034059
(85) National Entry: 2000-06-29

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/001,276 (United States of America) 1997-12-31

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method of improving the wet-tensile strength of a cellulosic web including
providing a papermaking furnish containing a cellulosic material and water;
adding a surfactant to the papermaking furnish; and adding a wet strength
resin to the papermaking furnish after addition of the surfactant. In certain
implementations, the surfactant includes an alkyl sulfate or an alkyl
sulfonate. The method provides an improved cellulosic web haing improved
wet/dry tensile ratio.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé permettant d'améliorer la résistance à la traction à l'état humide d'une bande continue cellulosique, consistant à préparer une composition de fabrication renfermant un matériau cellulosique et de l'eau, à ajouter un agent tensio-actif à ladite composition et à ajouter, à cette composition, après addition de l'agent tensio-actif, une résine conférant une résistance à l'état humide. Dans certains modes de mise en oeuvre, l'agent tensio-actif comprend un alkyl sulfate ou un alkyl sulfonate. Le procédé permet d'obtenir une bande continue cellulosique améliorée présentant un rapport résistance état humide/état sec amélioré.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


14
I CLAIM:
1. A method of improving the wet-tensile strength of a cellulosic web, the
method comprising:
providing a papermaking furnish containing a cellulosic material and water;
adding a surfactant to the papermaking furnish; and
adding a wet strength resin to the papermaking furnish after addition of the
surfactant.
2. The method of improving the wet-tensile strength of a cellulosic web
according to claim 1, wherein the surfactant includes an alkyl sulfonate or an
alkyl
sulfate.
3. The method of improving the wet-tensile strength of a cellulosic web
according to claim 1, wherein the surfactant is selected from the group
consisting of
Witco 5175-26A, Witco EP-5327-97; Witco EP-5293-150, and combinations
thereof.
4. The method of improving the wet-tensile strength of a cellulosic web
according to claim 1, wherein the wet-strength resin is added at a rate of
between 5.0
and 25.0 pounds per ton of cellulosic material.

15
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the surfactant is added at a rate
of
less than about 10 pounds per ton of cellulosic material.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the surfactant is added at a rate
of
less than about 5 pounds per ton of cellulosic material.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein:
the surfactant is added to the papermaking furnish at a rate of between 0.5
and 5 pounds per ton of cellulosic material; and
the wet strength resin is added at a rate of 0.5 to 15 pounds per ton of
cellulosic material.
8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
formation of a cellulosic web by removal of a significant majority of the
cellulosic material from the papermaking finish;
wherein at least 80 percent of the wet strength resin is secured to the
cellulosic web.
9. A method of improving the wet-tensile strength of a cellulosic web, the
method comprising:
providing a papermaking furnish containing a cellulosic material and water;

16
adding between 0.5 and 5.0 pounds of a surfactant to the papermaking
furnish per ton of cellulosic material; and
adding between 5.0 and 25.0 pounds of a wet strength resin to the
papermaking furnish per ton of cellulosic material after adding the
surfactant.
10. The method according to claim 9, further comprising:
formation of a cellulosic web by removal of a significant majority of the
cellulosic material from the papermaking finish;
wherein at least 80 percent of the wet strength resin is secured to the
cellulosic web.
11. The method according to claim 9, wherein the surfactant includes a
sulfonate.
12. The method according to claim 9, wherein the papermaking furnish
comprises fibers selected from the group consisting of northern softwood
kraft,
bleached recycled fiber, unbleached recycled fiber, chemical-thermo-mechanical
pulp, and southern softwood kraft.
13. A method of improving the ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile
strength of a cellulosic web, the method comprising:
providing a papermaking furnish of cellulosic material and water;
adding a surfactant to the papermaking furnish; and

17
adding a wet strength resin to the papermaking furnish after addition of the
surfactant;
wherein the ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile strength is greater
than
0.20.
14. The method of improving the ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile
strength of a cellulosic web according to claim 13, wherein the ratio of wet-
tensile
strength to dry-tensile strength is greater than 0.50.
15. The method of improving the ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile
strength of a cellulosic web according to claim 13, wherein the surfactant
contains a
sulfonate.
16. The method of improving the ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile
strength of a cellulosic web according to claim 13, wherein the surfactant is
Witco
5175-26A.
17. A method of improving the ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile
strength of a cellulosic web, the method comprising:
providing cellulosic material;
combining the cellulosic material with water to form a papermaking furnish;

18
adding between 0.5 and 5.0 pounds of a sulfonate-containing surfactant per
ton of cellulosic material to the papermaking furnish; and
after adding the surfactant, adding between 5.0 and 25 pounds of wet
strength resin per ton of cellulosic material to the papermaking furnish.
18. The method according to claim 17, further comprising:
formation of a cellulosic web by removal of at least 90 percent of the
cellulosic material from the papermaking finish;
wherein at least 80 percent of the wet strength resin added to the
papermaking finish is secured to the cellulosic web.
19. The method according to claim 17, wherein the web is formed by a through
dried process without creping.
20. The method according to claim 17, wherein the web is formed by wet press
and crepe transfer technique.
21. A cellulosic web having improved wet-tensile strength formed by the method
of claim 1.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
1
METHOD FOR MAKING A CELLULOSIC WEB WITH IMPROVED WET-TENSILE STRENGTH
Technical Field
This invention relates generally to an absorbent web and a method for
preparing the absorbent web. More particularly, the invention relates to a
cellulosic
web having improved wet-tensile characteristics and methods for making the
same.
Background
Cellulosic web-based products, such as hand towels, wipers, and the like, are
widely manufactured in the paper making industry. Each product has unique
characteristics requiring appropriate attributes. The proper attributes ensure
that the
product is suitable for its intended purpose. For many products, these
attributes
include high tensile strength and high water absorbency.
Tensile strength of cellulosic webs is often measured under dry conditions to
determine "dry-tensile strength", and under wet conditions to determine "wet-
tensile
strength". Wet-tensile strength and dry-tensile strength are often closely
related.
Products having high dry-tensile strength frequently have high wet-tensile
strength.
The relationship between dry-tensile strength and wet-tensile strength occurs,
in
part, because certain manufacturing processes enhance both properties. For
example, pressing a cellulosic web under high pressure often imparts increased
dry-
tensile and wet-tensile strengths.
A cellulosic web must have adequate dry-tensile strength and adequate wet-
tensile strength. However, since cellulosic webs often deteriorate and lose
strength

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/2b045
2
when wet, wet-tensile strength is normally significantly lower than dry-
tensile
strength. Thus, many cellulosic webs have inadequate wet-tensile strength,
even
though they have adequate dry-tensile strength.
While a hand towel must have some dry-tensile strength, high dry-tensile
strength can be disadvantageous because it correlates closely with stiffness
and stiff
webs. Hand towels manufactured from stiff webs are received with disfavor by
consumers, since the towels do not have the soft feel of traditional cotton
hand
towels. In contrast, consumers desire high wet-tensile strength, because it
allows
more vigorous use of the hand towel to pick up spills and scrub wet soiled
surfaces.
Traditionally, the wet-tensile strength of hand towels is improved by using
increased
pressure or a wet strength resin. While these methods increase the wet
strength of
the hand towels, they usually also increase the dry strength. For example, the
addition of CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose) causes significant increases in both
wet
tensile and dry tensile strengths.
The relationship between wet-tensile and dry-tensile is often expressed as a
tensile strength ratio in which wet-tensile strength is divided by dry-tensile
strength
to get the wet/dry tensile ratio (wet-tensile value in numerator, dry-tensile
value in
denominator). The wet/dry tensile ratio is normally less than 0.3, since the
wet-
tensile strength is usually significantly less than the dry-tensile strength.
The ratio is
preferably as close to 1 as possible, since this indicates a high wet-tensile
strength
relative to dry-tensile strength. Cellulosic webs with high wet/dry tensile
ratios are
soft, yet strong.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/Z6045
Therefore, a need exists for an improved cellulosic web that has high wet-
tensile strength and a high wetldry tensile ratio.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides an improved method for making a cellulosic
web, as well as a web made using the improved method. The method includes
addition of surfactant and wet strength resin to a paperrnaking furnish. The
resulting
papermaking furnish is formed into a cellulosic web that is dried in
accordance with
conventional paper making methods. The finished web has improved strength
properties. In a certain implementation, the finished web has improved wet-
tensile
strength and an improved wet/dry tensile ratio.
A specific implementation of the method of the invention includes providing
a papermaking furnish containing a cellulosic material and water. Surfactant
is
added to the papermaking furnish. A wet strength resin is added to the
papermaking
furnish after addition of the surfactant. In a specific implementation, the
surfactant
includes a sulfonate, such as the surfactant Witco 5175-26A, sold by the Witco
Chemical Co. Following addition of the surfactant, the cellulosic material is
removed from the papermaking furnish to form a cellulosic web. A high
percentage
of the wet strength resin that was added to the papermaking furnish is
retained by the
cellulosic web. Finally, the cellulosic web is dried and formed into finished
products, such as hand towels. The resulting web has improved wet-tensile
strength
as well as an improved the wet/dry tensile ratio.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
4
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each
discussed embodiment of the present invention. While the invention is
susceptible
to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof will be
described in
detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit
the
invention to particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention
is to
cover modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit
and scope
of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Detailed Description
The present invention is directed to an improved method for making a
cellulosic web, as well as a web made using the improved method. The method
includes addition of surfactant and wet strength resin to a papermaking
furnish. The
resulting papermaking furnish is formed into a cellulosic web. This web is
subsequently dried in accordance with conventional paper making methods. The
finished web has improved strength properties, for example, improved wet-
tensile
strength and an improved wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile strength ratio
(wet/dry
tensile ratio).
The method includes providing a papermaking furnish containing a cellulosic
material and water. The cellulosic material is, for example, Northern Soft
Wood
Kraft (NSWK), chemi-thermo-mechanical pulp (CTMP), natural redwood (RW),
Mobile Pine (MP), or a recycled wood fiber, such as bleached recycled office
waste
fiber.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
Surfactant is added to the papermaking furnish and a wet strength resin is
added after the addition of the surfactant. When an appropriate surfactant is
added
to the papermaking furnish, the quantity of wet-strength resin added to the
furnish
may be greatly reduced without sacrificing wet-tensile strength. When even
very
low levels of surfactant are added, marked enhancements to the wet-tensile
strength
of the resulting web are observed. In some such implementations, the wet-
tensile
strength increases significantly while the dry-tensile strength decreases.
This
resulting cellulosic web shows improved softness and wet-strength properties.
While the present invention is not limited to a specific surfactant, one
appropriate surfactant is Witco 5175-26A, manufactured by the Witco Chemical
Co.
Witco 5175-26A includes a significant sulfonate component. Preferred
surfactants
include an anionic alkyl sulfate or anionic alkyl sulfonate component.
Acceptable
surfactants include Witco EP-5327-97 and EP-5293-150, also manufactured by the
Witco Chemical Co. In addition to the anionic alkyl sulfate or anionic alkyl
sulfonate component, the surfactant may include other wetting agents to
improve
water compatibility and absorbency on the fiber.
The quantity of surfactant added to the papermaking furnish is between 0.1
and 10.0 pounds per ton of cellulosic material. In specific implementations,
the
quantity is from 0.5 to 5.0 pounds per ton. In yet another implementation, the
quantity is between 0.5 and 2.5 pounds per ton of cellulosic material. The
quantity
is approximately 1.0 pounds per ton in specific implementations in which the
cellulosic material is primarily NSWK fibers.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCTNS98/26045
6
Following addition of the surfactant, a wet strength resin is added to the
papermaking furnish. The wet-strength resin provides a binding force securing
the
cellulosic web when wet. The wet-strength resin is preferably water soluble.
Suitable resins include polyamide-epichlorohydrin resins such as those sold by
Hercules Incorporated of Wilmington, Delaware, under the brand name Kymene
557H and Kymene 2064. These resins include low molecular weight polymers
having reactive functional groups, including epoxy and amino groups.
The wet-strength resin is added at a rate of between 5.0 and 30.0 pounds per
ton of cellulosic material. While the complete mechanism of the present
invention is
not fully understood, without limiting the invention, it is believed that the
addition
of the surfactant to the papermaking formulation provides greater absorbency
or
functionality of the wet-strength resin. The improved absorbency or
functionality of
the wet-strength resin allows for use of reduced wet-strength resin.
After addition of the surfactant and wet-strength resin, the cellulosic
material
is removed from the papermaking filrnish to form a cellulosic web. A high
percentage of the wet strength resin added to the papermaking fiunish is
retained by
the cellulosic material as the cellulosic web is formed. In specific
implementations,
at least 80 percent of the wet strength resin is secured to the cellulosic
web. The
cellulosic web is then dried and formed into finished products, such as hand
towels.
The resulting cellulosic web has improved wet-tensile strength as well as an
improved ratio of wet-tensile strength to dry-tensile strength . Referring now
to the

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
7
tables produced below, example formulations of cellulosic webs constructed in
accordance with the present invention are shown.
Each table shows five different formulations of cellulosic webs. The
summary data shown reflects the averaged values for eight different samples of
each
formulation. In producing each formulation, a cellulosic fiber feed stock was
added
and mixed with water to form a papermaking formulation. A surfactant and wet
strength resin were sequentially added (in the orders, as indicated). A
cellulosic web
formed from the papermaking formulation was dried, and the resulting dried web
was tested for wet-tensile strength and dry-tensile strength according to
paper testing
methods on Instron and Twing-Albert tensile testing instruments.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98126045
8
Table lA: Addition of Surfactant followed by Wet Strength
Resin to NSWK feed stock.
Formulation 1 2 3 4 5
Feed Stock NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK
First Additive WSR Witco Witco Witco Witco
First Additive 10 1 3 5 IO
Dose (lbJton)
Second Additive --- WSR WSR WSR WSR
Second Additive ---- 10 10 10 10
Dose (Ib./ton)
Dry-tensile 18.65 17.67 17.42 18.69 14.74
Change Dry-tensile---- - 5.3 - 6.6 + 0.2 - 2l
.0
Wet-tensile 1.85 3.29 3.05 2.86 1.52
Change Wet-tensile-- + 77.8 + 64.9+ 54.6 - 17.8
Wet-tensile / 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.10
Dry-tensile
Ratio
Improvement in - 90 90 50 0
Wet-tensile
/
Dry-tensile Ratio
(percent)
NSWK = Northern Softwood Kraft
WSR = Wet strength resin
Witco = Surfactant containing sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Co.,
sold
under the name Witco 5175-26A
First Additive Dose and Second Additive Dose are measured in pounds of
additive
to pound of feed stock.
Table 1 A shows that addition of a surfactant prior to addition of the wet-
strength resin results in an increase in wet-tensile strength and an increase
in the
wet/dry tensile ratio when applied to NSWK feed stock. Formulation 1, which is
the
control in which no surfactant was added, has a significantly lower wet/dry
tensile
ratio and lower wet-tensile strength than formulations 2, 3, 4, and 5, in
which the
surfactant Witco 5175-26A was added first.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
9
Table 1B: Addition of Wet Strength Resin followed
by Surfactant to NSWK Feedstock
Formulation 1 2 3 4 ~~S
Feed Stock NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWIC
First Additive WSR WSR WSR WSR WSR
First Additive IU - 10 10 !0 10
Dose (lb./ton)
Second Additive----- Witco Witco Witco Witco
Second Additive--- 1 3 5 10
Dosee (Ib./ton)
Dry-tensile 18.65 16.4 15.20 14.72 13.45
Change Dry-tensile---- - 12.1 - 18.5 - 21.1 - 27.9
Wet-tensile 1.85 1.52 1.32 1.27 1.24
Change Wet-tensile---- - 17.8 - 28.6 - 3l - 33.0
.4
Wet-tensile 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09
/ Dry-tensile
Ratio
Improvement ---- -l0 -20 - 10 - 10
in Wet-tensile
/
Dry-tensile
Ratio (percent)
NSWK = Northern Softwood Kraft
WSR = Wet strength resin
Witco = Surfactant containing sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Co.,
sold
under the name Witco 5175-26A
First Additive Dose and Second Additive Dose are measured in pounds of
additive
to pound of feed stock.
Table 1 B, when compared with Table 1 A, demonstrates the importance of
adding surfactant prior to adding the wet strength resin to NSWK feed stock.
In
Table 1B, the formulations have a first additive of the wet strength resin and
a
second additive of the Witco 5175-26A surfactant. Compared to formulations
from
Table 1 A using the same dosage and different order of addition, the
formulations in
Table 1 B have significantly lower wet-tensile strength and wet/dry tensile
ratios.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
Table 2A
Formula8on 1 2 3 4 5
Feed Stock NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK
First Additive WSR Witco Witco Witco Witco
First Additive 20 I 3 5 10
Dose (IbJton)
Second Additive -- WSR WSR WSR WSR
Second Additive - 20 20 20 20
Dose (Ib./ton)
Dry-tensile 13.13 13.08 12.80 12.97 12.87
Change Dry-tensile---- - 0.4 - 2.5 - I - 2.0
.2
Wet-tensile 2.65 3.22 2.79 3.63 3.01
Change Wet-tensile--- 21.5 5.3 37.0 13.6
Wet-tensile / .20 .25 .28 .28 .23
Dry-tensile
Ratio
Improvement in ---- 25 40 40 I S
Wet-tensile
/
Dry-tensile Ratio
(percent)
NSWK =Northern Softwood Kraft
WSR = Wet strength resin
Witco = Surfactant containing sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Co.,
sold
under the name Witco 5175-26A
First Additive Dose and Second Additive Dose are measured in pounds of
additive
to pound of feed stock.
5
Table 2A shows significant increase in the wet/dry tensile ratios in
formulations 2, 3, 4, and 5 compared to formulation 1. The difference in the
formulations is that a surfactant was not used in formulation 1, but was used
in
formulations 2, 3, 4, and S.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/26045
11
Table 2B
Formulation 1 2 3 4 5
Feed Stock NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK NSWK
First Additive WSR WSR WSR WSR WSR
First Additive 20 20 20 20 20
Dose (lb./ton)
Second Additive ---- Witco Witco Witco Witco
Second Additive -- 1 3 5 10
Dose (lb.lton)
Dry-tensile 13.13 13.67 12.71 13.13 11.42
Change Dry-tensile---- 4.1 - 3.2 0 - 13.0
Wet-tensile 2.65 3.02 2.84 3.33 2.40
Change Wet-tensile---- 44.2 7.2 25.7 - 9.4
Wet-tensile / .20 .22 .22 .25 .21
Dry-tensile Ratio
Improvement in --- 10 10 25 5
Wet-tensile /
Dry-tensile Ratio
(percent)
NSWK = Northern Softwood Kraft
WSR = Wet strength resin
Witco = Surfactant containing sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Co.,
sold
under the name Witco 5175-26A
First Additive Dose and Second Additive Dose are measured in pounds of
additive
to pound of feed stock.
The formulations of Table 2B, compared to the formulations of Table 2A,
show that order of addition of the surfactant containing a sulfonate
influences the
wet/dry tensile ratios, and that the ratio is improved by adding the wet-
strength resin
after addition of the surfactant.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCTNS98/26045
12
Table 3A: Addition of Surfactant followed by Wet Strength
Resin to Bleached Recycled Office Waste Fiber Feed stock
Formulation I 2 3 4 5
Feed Stock RO RO RO RO RO
First Additive WSR Witco - WitccoWitco Witco
First Additive 20 1 3 5 10
Dose (Ib.hon)
Second Additive --- WSR WSR WSR WSR
Second Additive ---- 20 20 20 20
Dose (Ib./ton)
Dry-tensile 11.04 11.2 11.21 12.50 1 I
.49
Change Dry-tensile---- + 1.4 + 1.5 + ( + 4.1
3.2
Wet-tensile 1.20 1.74 1.15 1.39 I .40
Change Wet-tensile---- + 45 - 4.2 + ( + 16.7
5.8
Wet-tensile / 0.11 0.16 0.10 0.1 0.12
Dry-tensile I
Ratio
Improvement in -- 45 - 9 0 9
Wet-tensile
/
Dry-tensile Ratio
(Percent)
RO = Bleached recycled office waste fiber
WSR = Wet strength resin
Witco = Surfactant containing sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Co.,
sold
under the name Witco 5175-26A
First Additive Dose and Second Additive Dose are measured in pounds of
additive
to pound of feed stock.
Tables 3A and 3B show that even very low levels of surfactant can
dramatically increase the wet-tensile strength of recycled office waste fiber
feed
stock.

CA 02316876 2000-06-29
WO 99/34059 PCT/US98/Z6045
13
Table 3B: Addition of Wet Strength Resin followed by
Surfactant to Bleached Recycled Office Waste Fiber Feed Stock
Formulation 1 2 3 4 5
Feed Stock RO RO RO RO RO
First Additive WSR WSR WSR WSR WSR
First Additive 20 20 20 20 20
Dose {Ib./ton)
Second Additive ---- Witco Witco Witco Witco
Sccond Additive -- 1 3 5 10
Dose (Ib./ton)
Dry-tensile 11.04 11.75 11.55 11.95 11.28
Change Dry-tensile---- + 6.4 + 4.6 + 8.2 + 2.2
W et-tensile 1.20 1.78 1.16 1.35 1.14
Change Wet-tensile--- 48.8 - 3.3 12.5 - 5.0
Wet-tensile / 0.11 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.10
Dry-tensile
Ratio
Improvement in ---- 36 - 9 1 - 9
Wet-tensile
/
Dry-tensile Ratio
(Percent)
RO = bleached recycled office waste fiber
WSR = Wet strength resin
Witco = Surfactant containing sulfonate manufactured by Witco Chemical Co.,
sold
under the name Witco 5175-26A
First Additive Dose and Second Additive Dose are measured in pounds of
additive
to pound of feed stock.
While the present invention has been described with reference to several
particular implementations, those skilled in the art will recognize that many
changes
may be made hereto without departing form the spirit and scope of the present
invention.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2316876 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2006-12-08
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2006-12-08
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-12-08
Letter Sent 2003-10-15
Request for Examination Received 2003-09-12
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-09-12
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2003-09-12
Letter Sent 2001-05-01
Letter Sent 2001-05-01
Inactive: Single transfer 2001-04-02
Inactive: Cover page published 2000-10-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2000-10-01
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2000-09-19
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2000-09-18
Application Received - PCT 2000-09-15
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 1999-07-08

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-12-08

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-11-09

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2000-06-29
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2000-12-08 2000-09-22
Registration of a document 2001-04-02
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2001-12-10 2001-09-28
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2002-12-09 2002-10-23
Request for examination - standard 2003-09-12
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2003-12-08 2003-10-30
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2004-12-08 2004-11-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC.
Past Owners on Record
RALPH L. ANDERSON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2000-06-29 13 453
Abstract 2000-06-29 1 45
Claims 2000-06-29 5 130
Cover Page 2000-10-03 1 38
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2000-09-18 1 110
Notice of National Entry 2000-09-18 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-05-01 1 113
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-05-01 1 113
Reminder - Request for Examination 2003-08-11 1 112
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-10-15 1 173
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2006-02-02 1 174
Correspondence 2000-09-18 1 15
PCT 2000-06-29 11 389