Language selection

Search

Patent 2327438 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2327438
(54) English Title: ROOFTOP OR SLANTED SURFACE SNOW REMOVAL DEVICE
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF DE DENEIGEMENT DE TOITURE OU DE SURFACE EN PENTE
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract

A snow removal apparatus that can be used to remove snow from a pitched roof while the operator is on the roof. There can also be a helper on the ground. The apparatus includes two vertical snow--cutting cords, a horizontal cutting blade, and a sheet of plastic attached to the trailing edge of the cutting board. When in use, the operator pulls the horizontal cutting blade through the snow cutting loose a square section which then slides down the plastic to the ground as the apparatus moves up the roof line. When there is insufficient slope to the roof, the helper on the ground will pull on the downslope cords, causing the horizontal cutting blade to turn up to a vertical position, and pull the snow over the edge of the roof.


French Abstract

Dispositif de déneigement de toiture en pente avec une personne sur la toiture qui le manipule. Une autre personne peut également se trouver au sol. Le dispositif comprend deux câbles qui fendent la neige, une lame de coupe horizontale et une feuille de plastique fixée à la bordure arrière de la plaque. Pour l'utiliser, l'opérateur tire la lame de coupe qui découpe une section carrée de neige. Il laisse glisser la feuille de plastique au sol à mesure que le dispositif remonte la pente de la toiture. Si la pente de la toiture est insuffisante, l'assistant qui se trouve au sol tire sur les câbles ascendants pour faire lever la lame de coupe horizontale et pousser la neige par-dessus la bordure de la toiture.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


8
Claims
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege
is claimed
are defined as follows:
1 A manually operable tool for removing snow from roofs or slanted surfaces
comprising:
i) a thin board type mainframe having two ends, a leading edge, a trailing
edge a
top and a bottom.
ii) a length of plastic sheeting fastened to said trailing edge of said
mainframe by
a snap-together section.
iii) two lengths of a cord attached to said mainframe by inserting cords
through
holes drilled near each said end of said mainframe.
iv)one wheel or one skid, on one end of one axle, is attached to each said end
of
said mainframe.
2 The tool as defined in claim 1, in which said mainframe is a board-shaped
cutting
blade.
3 The tool as defined in claim 1 or 2, in which both said ends are cut square,
and
perpendicular to said leading edge.
4 The tool as defined in claim 1, in which the top and bottom of said leading
and trailing
edges are chamfered.
The tool as defined in claim 1 or 3, in which holes have been drilled at the
two ends to
allow the attachment of the two axles for said wheels or said skids.
6 The tool as defined in claims 1 or 2, in which said top of said mainframe at
said trailing
edge of said mainframe has a notched area running the full length of said
mainframe.
7 The tool as defined in claim 6, in which said notched area creates a ledge
that has
pegs that project above the ledge.
8 The tool as defined in claims 1, 6 or 7, in which a perforated strip is a
strip the same
size and shape as the notched area, and drilled to the same size and pattern
as the
pegs on the ledge, and completely fills the notched area when pressed in
place.
9 The tool as defined in claim 8, in which said perforated strip is removable
and
reusable.
The tool as defined in claims 8, or 9, in which said snap-together section
consists of
said notched area, the said perforated strip, the ledge and the pegs.
11 The tool as defined in claims 1 or 2, in which the top and the leading edge
of said
mainframe has a beveled area to generate a downward force while being pulled
forward.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02327438 2004-10-06
Description
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
Technical field
This invention relates to a manually operable tool for removing snow from a
roof
or sloped surface.
Background
I have found these patents have some similarities.
Canadian patent number 1042257
Issued 781114
Snow remover
Mittelstadt, Robert A. U.S.A.
Application number 268,109
Filed 761217
Application for Canadian Patent
2038348
John Cooley, U.S.A.
Canadian Patent Number 5083388
John Cooley, U.S.A.
Jan 28,1992
These two patents have long unwieldy handles attached for pushing the device
up the
roof. To operate them from the ground, you would have to have a very long
handle to
reach the roof of an average building. Standing on ladders is unsafe, as snow
coming
off the roof can knock you off the ladder.
If you were on the roof, the end of the handle would be hard to control when
the cutting
device was close to you.
The second device seems to require pushing or pulling a roller for plastic
through the
snow, at the end of a long pole.

CA 02327438 2004-10-06
2
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
Patent CA1042257 fig 4 shows a device being pulled over the roof from one side
to the
other.
The use of the ropes or cords in this fashion will result in the roof at the
peak
being cut by the downward force of the ropes. The ropes must be thrown over
the roof,
making control and placement difficult.
It is common in devices for removing snow from roofs that shovels are the
preferred mediums. There are normally at least two persons on the roof at the
same
time. On larger roofs, there could be upwards of ten or more. Each shovel full
of snow
must be picked up and carried to the edge of the roof and thrown over,
increasing the
risk of slipping off the roof and seriously hurting the person. This damages
the roof by
walking on it, and by cutting, scraping, and gouging, with the shovels. There
is also the
possibility of a heart attack in older persons. It takes about two hours to
clear an
average size roof.
Summarv
I have found that these disadvantages may be overcome or diminished by:
Limiting the number of persons on the roof to one.
Limiting the walking distance on the roof.
Putting wheels or skids on the mainframe, preventing it from digging in,
gouging, or
scraping the roofs' surface.
Attaching a plastic sheet to the mainframe with the snap-together section to
protect the
roof and gutters from the sliding snow and to facilitate the removal of snow
without
lifting, or going near the edge, thereby greatly reducing the risk of a heart
attack or
slipping off the roof.Reducing the time to approximately fifteen minutes, for
an average
size roof.
The length of cords from mainframe to the ground to retain control, is the
limiting

CA 02327438 2004-10-06
3
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
factor for two person operations. Usually three stories high are no problem.
There is no limit to the height of the building for one-person operation.
The Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device is operated from the top of
the
roof where it can be controlled and maneuvered around obstacles on the roof by
the
cords, without dragging the cords against the roofing material.
On the Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device, there is an area'/z' x
36" to
pull through the snow. There are no long handles to work around, and no
special
cutters attached to the head of the device. It is simple to use, light in
weight,
inexpensive to produce, and compact for shipping and storing.
Brief description of drawings
In drawings which illustrate embodiments of the invention:
Figure 1 is a top view of the embodiment. Scale 1" = 4.5"
Figure 2 is left elevation of the embodiment. Full Scale
Figure 3 is left elevation x-ray view of the embodiment. Full Scale
Figure 4 is SW isometric view of another embodiment. Scale 1" = 4.5"
Figure 5 is SW isometric view of the axle. Full Scale
Figure 6 is left elevation of the wheel. Full Scale
Figure 7 is front elevation of the wheel with the axle installed. Full Scale
Figure 8 is the layout of the sash type control cord. Not to scale
Figure 9 is SW isometric view of the assembled unit. Scale 1" = 4.5"
Figure 10 is elevation showing placement of cords when pulling the unit up a
roof.
Figure 11 is isometric view showing how cords are held to slice a section of
snow.

CA 02327438 2004-10-06
4
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
Detailed description
The tool illustrated comprises a'N" x 6" x 36" board type mainframe Fig 1.
Starting 3" in from each end Fig 1(10), there is a 3/8" in 1 sloped center
section
Figs 1&3(5), from 3/8 " down on leading edge (4), to 1" behind leading edge at
top of
the mainframe. The purpose of this sloped center section (5), is to generate a
downward force on the mainframe as it is pulled under the snow.
The top leading edge has a 1/8 " chamfer Figs 1,2&3(12a) for 3" at each end of
the mainframe. The bottom leading edge has a 1/8 " chamfer Figs 2&3(12b) for
the full
length of the mainframe. The bottom trailing edge has a 1/8 " chamfer Figs
2&3(12c) for
the full length of the mainframe.
The left and right ends are cut square and perpendicular to the leading edge.
The 1/4 " diameter holes Figs 1,2&3(3), to hold the axles for the wheels, are
drilled one in each end of the mainframe, vertically centered, 1" behind the
leading
edge and parallel to the top, and perpendicular to the end, to a depth of 1-
'/2 ".
The 1/4 " diameter by 2" long axle Fig 5(15) is inserted through the 1/4 " hub
Fig
6(14) of the'/2 " wide by 3" diameter wheel (13), as in Fig 7, then inserted
and glued in
the hole Figs 1,2&3 (3), leaving sufficient clearance to allow the wheel to
tum freely.
One wheel on one axle is installed on each end of the mainframe Fig 9.
The 3/16 " diameter holes Figs 1(1)(1 a) for the 1/8 " diameter control cords
Fig
8, are drilled horizontally 3'/ " deep, vertically centered on the leading
edge Figs
1&3(4), 2" in from each end, and perpendicular to the leading edge.
The 1" diameter holes Figs 1 &3(2) for the control cord exit, are drilled
vertically
through the mainframe, centered 4" behind the leading edge and 2" in from each
end,
intersecting holes Figs 1&3(1)(1a).
The two 50 foot control cords are tied together at one end Fig 8(27). Measure
from eave to peak, then add 5 feet. Tie a knot in each cord at this distance
from the end

CA 02327438 2004-10-06
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
knot Fig 8(23&25). These become the top knots. Thread the loose ends of the
left and
right cords through the 3/16 " holes Fig 1(1 &1 a) entering at the leading
edge, Fig
1(16&18) and exiting from the 1" hole on the upper side of the mainframe Fig
1(17&19).
Pull the cords through until the top
knots touch the leading edge at (16&18), then tie another knot Fig 8(24&26) in
each
cord at Fig 1(17&19). These become the bottom knots. This fixes the placement
of the
mainframe on the control cords, and can be adjusted by moving the knots. The
bottom
lengths of the cords are for use by the ground person.
The trailing edge Figs 1,2&3(7), has a notched area Figs 1&3(11), creating
a ledge Fig 1&3(22) 1" wide by 1/4 " thick by 36 " long. This ledge (22) has
12 each 1/4"
diameter holes, drilled vertically through the ledge, centered on the ledge,
starting 1
in from each end and spaced 3" apart.
The 1" flat surface of the ledge Figs 1&3(22), has 12 each 1/4 " round by'/ "
long wood or composite pegs or dowels Figs 1,2&3(8) permanently fixed in the
12
equally spaced 114 " diameter holes. This creates 12 pegs, 1/4 " in diameter
by 1/4 "
high, rising above the horizontal surface of the ledge Fig 2(8).
The 1" wide by 1/4 " thick by 36 " long strip Fig 1,2&3(6), that has 12 each
1/4 "
diameter holes Figs 1&3(9), drilled to mate with the pegs Figs 1&3(8), when
pressed
down firmly, will fill the void of the notch Fig 3(11). This strip Fig 3(6)
has a 1/8 "
chamfer Figs 1,2&3(12d) on the top extreme trailing edge for the full 36 "
length. This
becomes the perforated strip Fig 4.
Place the 36 " end of the plastic sheet over the pegs on the ledge. Then
position
the perforated strip over the plastic sheeting, aligning the holes in the
strip with the pegs
on the ledge. Press down, snapping the perforated strip into the notched area.
This
pushes the pegs through the plastic sheeting into the holes in the perforated
strip,

CA 02327438 2004-10-06
6
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device
sandwiching the plastic sheeting between the strip and the ledge, affixing the
plastic
sheeting to the mainframe. This removable and reusable perforated strip allows
exchanging different lengths of plastic sheets for different sizes of roofs,
or to replace
worn or damaged plastic sheets
The sheeting Fig 9(21) is made of 6 mil plastic, clear or colored. Its
dimensions are the
width of the mainframe by approximately 5 feet longer than the eave to peak
distance. It is towed up the slanted roof surface by the peg and strip system
on the
trailing edge of the mainframe, and its' purpose is to provide a low
coefficient of friction
surface for the snow to slide down hill and off the roof. It also protects the
roof and
gutters and lets the snow go over the eave without catching the trough.
The purpose of the control cords from the leading edge of the mainframe Fig
1(16&18) and Fig 9, is for cutting the vertical sides of the slice of snow,
and for pulling
the mainframe with attached plastic sheeting up the slope. The Knot that
connects the
two cords together is used as an indicator to keep the mainframe parallel to
the eave.
The purpose of the bottom control cords exiting from the upper side of the
mainframe Fig 1(17&19) and Fig 9, is for use when the slope is insufficient to
allow the
snow to slide freely on its own. When the person on the ground pulls the
mainframe
backwards, the mainframe will stand on the trailing edge Fig 2(7). This
produces a wall
which catches the snow on the plastic sheet Fig 9(21) and pulls it downslope
and over
the edge. These bottom cords are also used for returning the mainframe to the
eave
and setting up for the next slice after each slice of snow has been removed.
These embodiments can be made from wood, aluminum, plastic, fiberglass, iron,
steel, and can be made by shaping, planing, carving, machining, pouring,
injection,
forming, molding, casting, extruding, and must be strong enough to hold their
form
under heavy snow load conditions.

CA 02327438 2004-10-06
7
Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removaf Device
These embodiments are not limited to the stated measurements. They can be
adjusted
to fit almost any project. I have found that a 36 " mainframe works best on
houses and a
48 " mainframe is better for expansive areas.
The Rooftop or Slanted Surface Snow Removal Device is simple to use,
inexpensive to
produce, light in weight and compact, allowing for minimal shipping costs and
storage
space.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2020-12-14
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2007-10-09
Inactive: Cover page published 2007-10-08
Inactive: Final fee received 2007-07-30
Pre-grant 2007-07-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-07-23
Letter Sent 2007-07-23
4 2007-07-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-07-23
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2007-05-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-10-03
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-05-03
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-11-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-07-05
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2005-02-11
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to Office letter 2004-12-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-10-06
Inactive: Office letter 2004-09-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-08-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-03-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-08-12
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-02-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-01-15
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-07-22
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-06-12
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-06-11
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-01-31
Inactive: Office letter 2001-01-23
Inactive: Filing certificate - RFE (English) 2001-01-15
Application Received - Regular National 2001-01-15
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2000-12-12
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2000-12-12
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2000-12-12

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2006-12-05

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2000-12-12
Request for examination - small 2000-12-12
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2002-12-12 2002-11-27
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2003-12-12 2003-12-03
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2004-12-13 2004-12-06
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2005-12-12 2005-11-25
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2006-12-12 2006-12-05
Final fee - small 2007-07-30
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - small 2010-12-13 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - small 2011-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - small 2012-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - small 2013-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - small 2014-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - small 2008-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - small 2016-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - small 2017-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 18th anniv.) - small 2018-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - small 2019-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - small 2007-12-12 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - small 2015-12-14 2007-11-19
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - small 2009-12-14 2007-11-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ROBERT LAWRENCE MCNEILLY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-05-15 1 26
Description 2003-01-14 7 320
Abstract 2003-01-14 1 24
Claims 2003-01-14 2 116
Drawings 2003-01-14 10 132
Description 2003-08-11 7 309
Claims 2003-08-11 2 95
Abstract 2003-08-11 1 21
Description 2000-12-11 7 251
Abstract 2000-12-11 1 20
Claims 2000-12-11 2 87
Drawings 2000-12-11 10 134
Cover Page 2002-06-06 1 54
Description 2004-10-05 7 268
Claims 2004-08-22 2 58
Claims 2005-11-29 1 53
Claims 2006-10-02 1 63
Representative drawing 2007-09-13 1 22
Cover Page 2007-09-13 1 51
Filing Certificate (English) 2001-01-14 1 164
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2002-09-15 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2003-09-14 1 115
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2004-09-13 1 123
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2005-09-12 1 119
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2006-09-12 1 118
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2007-07-22 1 164
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2007-09-12 1 130
Correspondence 2001-01-14 1 9
Fees 2002-11-26 1 122
Fees 2003-12-02 1 22
Correspondence 2004-09-26 1 19
Fees 2004-12-05 1 24
Fees 2005-11-24 1 22
Fees 2006-12-04 1 22
Correspondence 2007-07-29 1 23
Fees 2007-11-18 1 28