Language selection

Search

Patent 2328823 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2328823
(54) English Title: TRACTION DEVICE (THE ARTIC CLAW)
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF DE TRACTION " ARTIC CLAW "
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract

A traction device for placement beneath the driving wheel of a vehicle disabled on a slippery road surface. The traction device is comprised of a rectangular metal frame that consists of a rectangular double sided wire mesh grid that is affixed to it along its inner periphery, and the outer portion of the rectangular metal frame provided with a grated rubber edge. The double sided wire mesh grid of the rectangular metal frame is exposed to grip the vehicle's tire and subsequently the slippery driving surface. The grated rubber edge covers the outer edge of the metal rectangular metal frame to prevent injury from exposed metal edges, and aids in holding the traction device in place as the vehicle passes over the rectangular metal frame during vehicle extraction.


French Abstract

Un dispositif de traction à placer sous la roue d'entraînement d'un véhicule immobilisé sur une chaussée glissante. Le dispositif de traction comprend un châssis métallique rectangulaire composé d'un grillage métallique rectangulaire agrippant sur deux faces et fixé au châssis métallique le long de sa périphérie interne, et la portion externe du châssis métallique rectangulaire comprend un rebord en caoutchouc râpé. Ce rebord en caoutchouc recouvre le rebord extérieur du châssis métallique rectangulaire pour éviter les blessures causées par les arêtes métalliques à nu, et pour aider à maintenir en place le dispositif de traction lorsque le véhicule roule par-dessus le châssis métallique rectangulaire durant l'extraction du véhicule.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


7
THE EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION IS WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVELGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A traction device for improving vehicle tire traction on slippery road
conditions, the
traction device comprising a double sided rectangular metal mesh grid, a
rectangular
metal frame and a grated rubber edge, the inner portion of the rectangular
metal frame
being affixed to said mesh grid along its periphery; and the outer portion of
the metal
frame is provided with said grated rubber edge.
(a) a traction device comprised of a unitary, one piece, double sided
rectangular metal
mesh grid, the one side being adapted for engagement with a slippery road
surface
and the other side being adapted for engagement with the driving wheel of the
vehicle, said metal mesh grid being affixed to the inner portion of the said
rectangular
metal frame, and
(b) said rectangular metal frame having a pair of opposite longitudinal
elements and a
pair of opposite latitudinal elements, the outer portion of said elements
provided with
said grated rubber edge, and
(c) said grated rubber edge being adapted for a protective layer for the outer
portion of
said rectangular metal frame and the said grated rubber edge further
comprising
additional adhesiveness of said rectangular metal frame to the slippery road
surface.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02328823 2004-03-12
1
The title of this invention is Traction Device. This invention is a Traction
Device for
vehicles which have become disabled on ice or snow covered roadways. This
invention is
a traction device consisting of a wire mesh grid doubled in thickness encased
in a
rectangular metal frame and its outer portion of the metal frame is provided
with a grated
rubber edge along its periphery.
The frame is intended to be used to improve wheel traction in a situation
whereby a
vehicle's wheels lack the ability to effectively grip a slippery driving
surface when a
vehicle is in a stationary position. Spinning wheels due to the lack of
traction grip onto
the frame and allow the vehicle to proceed. The combination of the double
sided mesh
grid and the grated rubber edging holds the traction device in place as the
vehicle is
extricated as a result of improved traction between the tires and the slippery
driving
surface.

CA 02328823 2004-03-12
2
This invention relates to a portable, easily managed way that a person may
improve
vehicle tire traction a snow or ice covered driving surface. Maximum traction
is
achieved as the drive tires) pass over the rectangular mesh grid frame which
is placed
over the ice or snow covered surface. Motor vehicles often have difficulty
gaining
sufficient traction from a stationary position on a slippery driving surface
such as
snow or ice.
In the past a number of traction devices have been proposed and constructed to
improve the traction of the driving wheels of an automobile on icy or snow
covered
pavements. One such example in the United States proposed by Covington in U.
S.
Patent 4,265,399 suggests a foldable anti-skid device consisting of a
plurality of
framed sections each framed section comprising a sheet of wire mesh framed
within
angle irons. This example is also quite similar to the art exemplified by
inventor
Caragata in Canada Patent CA02247881 and in Canada Patent CA1297768 by
inventors Bratic and Lewin.
Some anti skid mats have been constructed from chain mesh of varying sizes and
configurations. Metal reinforced sheeting has frequently been employed often
including on the sheeting an abrasive or a grit -like coating to provide
traction
between the mat and pavement on the one hand, and the driving wheel and the
mat on the other hand.

CA 02328823 2004-03-12
3
Another anti-skid device disclosed by Haynes in U.S. Patent 3,786,989 refers
to a
rectangular traction mat comprised of a plurality of sharp transverse metal
slits coated
with beads or globules of plastic.
In addition to the above prior devices, typical prior patented approaches have
included
chain link systems that are installed directly around the drive tires) of the
vehicle
to prevent the tires from spinning such as in Canada Patent CA1122108 by
inventor
Martinelli.
The above prior devices have been met with varying degrees of success in use.
Covington's U. S. Patent 4,265,399 is similar to the other track-like devices
which are
very bulky, heavy, and cumbersome to utilize. As in the case of Covington's
patent
herein above mentioned, these devices are also inconvenient to store in the
trunk of
an automobile. Devices constituted to chain link systems such as in Canada
Patent
CA1122108 by Martinelli were very flexible and difficult to place on the
desired
location of the tire. These types of traction devices are inconvenient to use
and
expensive to the consumer to replace when such articles when due to
deterioration or
damage from normal wear, they become ineffective or unusable. In addition, as
in the
device disclosed by Haynes in U.S. Patent 3,786,989 a material such as plastic
does
not seem to provide sufficient traction results between the wheel and the
slippery road
surface, and would seem to "spin" the mat out from beneath it, requiring a re-
placement of the mat.

CA 02328823 2004-03-12
4
The above drawbacks and disadvantages of prior traction devices are overcome
by
the present invention which for one object the unique and improved traction
device for
vehicles, which is especially basic in construction and economical to build,
while at
the same time providing an effective means for enabling a vehicle which has
become
disabled on a slippery road surface to pull out under its own power.
The above object is accomplished by a traction device consisting essentially
of a
wire mesh grid doubled in thickness and encased in a substantially rectangular
metal
frame, presenting a multiplicity of edges at both faces, one side being
adapted for the
engagement with the slippery road surface, and the other side being adapted
for the
engagement with the drive wheel of the vehicle. Due to the nature of the metal
frame
there are sharp edges of the rectangular frame following its construction. A
grated
rubber edge is fitted on the outer two opposite longitudinal elements as well
as on the
two opposite lateral elements of the metal rectangular frame to lesson the
likelihood
of injury, as well as aid in holding the traction device in place as the
vehicle passes
over the traction device during vehicle extraction.

CA 02328823 2004-03-12
5
In the drawings which illustrate the embodiments of the invention, Figure 1
is a key identifying the different components of a traction device according
to
the invention. Figure 2 is a top view of a traction device according to the
invention. Figures 3-5 show a side view of the traction device of Figure 2 in
use.
Figure 6 shows a cross section of the inside of the rubber edging of the
traction
device according to the invention . Figure 7 shows the grated design of the
rubber
edging of the traction device according to the invention.
The traction device Figure 2 is comprised of a rectangular double sided metal
mesh grid (2) along the inner periphery of the rectangular metal frame (3) and
the
outer portion of the rectangular metal frame (3) is provided with said rubber
edge ( 1 ).
The traction device illustrated comprises a guide 1 which is placed
longitudinally at the edge of the vehicle's drive tire(2) and the driving
surface (A),
in Figure 3. The grated rubber lateral edge of the traction device is firmly
placed
against the vehicle's drive tire (2) in Figure 3, thereby one side of the
double sided
metal mesh grid is placed onto the slippery driving surface (A). The vehicle's
drive tire (2) travels onto the other side of the double sided metal mesh
grid, Figure
4. The vehicle proceeds over the traction device, as the tire (2) travels onto
a more
stable driving surface Figure 5. Figure 6 provides a cross section of the
grated
rubber edge which is provided on the outer portion of the rectangular metal
frame.
The grated rubber edge in Figure 6 encompasses a sleeve like design (B) in
which

CA 02328823 2004-03-12
6
the outer portion of the rectangular metal frame is affixed. A thin metal
lining (C)
inside the sleeve of the grated rubber edge in Figure 6 ensures that the
grated
rubber edge is permanently affixed to the outer edge of the rectangular metal
frame. Figure 7 illustrates the outer grated design of the grated rubber edge.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2013-12-19
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2013-09-23
Letter Sent 2012-12-19
Inactive: Office letter 2010-02-03
Inactive: Reversal of will be deemed expired status 2010-02-03
Letter Sent 2009-12-21
Change of Address Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-09-17
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2009-07-10
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2009-03-17
Inactive: Office letter 2007-12-05
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Grant by Issuance 2004-12-07
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-12-06
Pre-grant 2004-09-28
Inactive: Final fee received 2004-09-28
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-04-26
Letter Sent 2004-04-26
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-04-26
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2004-04-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-03-12
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-02-06
Change of Address Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-06-10
Inactive: Office letter 2003-06-10
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2003-04-22
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2002-10-08
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2002-07-26
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-06-19
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-06-18
Change of Address Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-05-31
Inactive: Office letter 2001-05-31
Letter Sent 2001-04-27
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2001-04-03
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-04-03
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-04-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2001-04-03
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2001-04-03
Request for Examination Received 2001-04-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-02-09
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2001-01-26
Application Received - Regular National 2001-01-25
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2000-12-19

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2003-10-14

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2000-12-19
Request for examination - small 2001-04-03
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2002-12-19 2002-10-07
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2003-12-19 2003-10-14
Final fee - small 2004-09-28
MF (patent, 4th anniv.) - small 2004-12-20 2004-11-29
MF (patent, 5th anniv.) - small 2005-12-19 2005-12-17
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - small 2006-12-19 2006-12-04
MF (patent, 7th anniv.) - small 2007-12-19 2007-11-26
MF (patent, 8th anniv.) - small 2008-12-19 2008-12-12
MF (patent, 9th anniv.) - small 2009-12-21 2009-12-21
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - small 2010-12-20 2010-11-29
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - small 2011-12-19 2011-12-05
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
FARLEY STEPHEN DONSKY
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-05-22 1 17
Abstract 2000-12-18 1 35
Description 2000-12-18 3 101
Drawings 2000-12-18 3 75
Drawings 2001-04-02 1 26
Claims 2001-04-02 2 115
Description 2002-10-07 4 139
Abstract 2002-10-07 1 23
Drawings 2002-10-07 4 97
Claims 2002-10-07 2 81
Claims 2004-03-11 1 32
Description 2004-03-11 6 163
Representative drawing 2004-04-18 1 29
Filing Certificate (English) 2001-01-25 1 161
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2001-04-26 1 178
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2002-09-22 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2003-09-21 1 114
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2004-04-25 1 161
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2004-09-20 1 123
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2005-09-19 1 119
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2006-09-19 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2007-09-19 1 130
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2008-09-21 1 121
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2009-09-21 1 120
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2010-09-20 1 121
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2011-09-19 1 120
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2012-09-19 1 121
Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-01-29 1 170
Second Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2013-06-19 1 120
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2013-09-22 1 120
Correspondence 2001-01-25 1 21
Correspondence 2001-04-02 2 98
Correspondence 2003-04-21 1 42
Correspondence 2003-06-09 1 13
Fees 2003-10-13 3 91
Fees 2001-05-30 1 16
Fees 2002-10-06 1 58
Correspondence 2004-09-27 1 76
Fees 2004-11-28 2 191
Fees 2005-12-18 2 138
Fees 2006-12-03 1 62
Correspondence 2007-12-04 2 63
Fees 2007-11-25 2 93
Fees 2008-12-11 1 72
Correspondence 2009-03-16 2 47
Correspondence 2009-07-09 2 44
Correspondence 2010-02-02 1 18
Fees 2009-12-20 1 129
Correspondence 2010-02-01 1 22
Fees 2010-11-28 1 241
Fees 2011-12-04 1 73