Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SCALEABLE NEAR-END SPEECH
CANCELLATION FOR TIP AND RING TONE SIGNAL
DETECTORS
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to methods and systems that provide
suppression of near-end speech energy for applications including, but not
limited to, improving the talkoff and talkdown performance of inband signal
tone detection systems. In particular, the present invention describes a
method and system providing interconnection between the tip and ring
to telephone line interface and subsequent communications equipment for the
purposes of calibrating a selectable line bridging circuit and extracting a
single, unidirectional path containing predominantly far end energy, wherein,
near-end speech signals have been canceled. The method and system
inherently provide access to on-hook service signals, such as calling party
identification data transmissions.
Back4round of the Invention
Echo cancellation systems are widely used in the telephone network
and in station set equipment. The traditional role of echo cancellation
systems in the telephone network has been to improve the quality of a
2o transmission channel by removing unwanted signal reflections that occur at
points of impedance mismatch in the communication circuit. Echo cancellers
have also been employed in station set equipment, for the most part, to
enable high speed, full duplex data transmission. With the introduction of
new telephone services aimed at the analog residential subscriber, echo
cancellers or near-end speech cancellation systems have recently become of
significant importance in subscriber station sets to improve the performance
of inband tone signal detectors.
Inband tone signaling schemes using combinations of discrete
frequencies have long been used in the telephone system. The primary
advantage of inband tone signaling is that the same spectrum that normally
carries customer speech can be used to alternately transmit signal and
control information. Sharing the voiceband is essential in situations where
bandwidth is limited and dedicated control channels are either too costly or
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCTNS99/10023
pose a degradation to service. Some of the most common examples of
inband tone signaling used in the telephone network today include call
progress signals, such as dial tone, stutter dial tone, audible ringing, busy,
reorder, call waiting, etc., and Dual Tone Multi-Frequency (DTMF) signals
used predominantly for dialing.
In recent years, new telephone services, such as Calling Identity
Delivery on Call Waiting (CIDCW), Call Waiting Deluxe (CWD) and advanced
screen telephony platforms, such as the Analog Display Services Interface
(ADSI) and the Internet or Web Phone, have been deployed and require
reliable Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) tone signal detection for
signals sent by a Stored Program Control Switching System (SPCSS) or a
far-end server. These services and platforms, encouraged by many
technological advances in semiconductors, are transforming the conventional
telephone set into a sophisticated, integrated communications terminal
bearing a liquid crystal display and keyboard that under microprocessor, if
not
digital signal processor, control can track the state of a call and react to
network and far-end tone signals.
All inband tone signaling systems are premised on the belief that a
tone signal can be reliably detected. For Analog Display Services Interface
(ADSI} Customer Premises Equipment (CPE), reliable detection of network
call progress signals is necessary for the CPE to properly track the state of
the call and generate internal events that are to be processed by a
downloadable service script resident in the CPE. For CIDCW and CWD
CPEs, reliable detection of the CPE Alerting Signal (CAS) is necessary to
engage the CPE's off-hook data transmission mode for the reception of a
data burst containing the calling party's number, name, location or personal
identification number. For telephone answering machines and voicemail
systems, reliable detection of DTMF signals is necessary to allow the
subscriber to specify editing and control actions, even during playback of
3o voice messages.
While reuse of an inband channel provides an efficient means for
network-to-station set or server-to-station set signaling, significant
problems
2
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
related to signal recognition may be encountered by station sets attempting to
detect tone signals.
Two traditional problems with inband tone signal detection are detector
talkoff and talkdown.
Talkoff occurs whenever a tone signal detector erroneously accepts
signal imitations produced by speech, music or noise as valid tone signals.
Studies, experimentation, and field experience have all decisively confirmed
that human speech can imitate some of the spectral and temporal properties
of tone signals. The combination of consonants, vowels, syllables, and
l0 accent that frequently occur in an ordinary telephone conversation can
cause
a tone signal detector to talkoff. Ever since the first use of inband tone
signaling in the telephone network, it has been a challenge designing reliable
tone signal detection systems that are non-responsive to signal imitations.
Talkdown is another significant performance characteristic of tone
signal detectors. Talkdown occurs whenever a tone signal detector fails to
recognize a valid tone signal because it was masked or denied validation as a
tone signal because of extraneous energy present on the line. In some
instances, tone signals may compete with speech, music and other
background noise. The presence of these complex signals distorts valid tone
signals and can impair their detection.
Talkoff and talkdown are two critical performance measures for a tone
signal detector. They respectively describe the detector's ability to resist
signal imitations and to recognize valid tone signals obscured by speech,
music or noise. Although tone signal detection has been a prevalent art in the
telephone network for decades, only recently has the need for robust talkoff
and talkdown performance been simultaneously required in an application.
For the most part, prior art tone signaling applications, such as DTMF
dialing,
have benefited from environments where detector talkdown performance
could be sacrificed in favor of improving talkoff performance. With the advent
of CIDCW, CWD and ADSI, simultaneous robust talkoff and talkdown
performance became a necessity.
Bellcore has specified CPE or station set criteria in Bellcore documents
SR-TSV-002476, entitled "Customer Premises Equipment Compatibility
3
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
Considerations for the Voiceband Data Transmission Interface", Issue 1,
December 1992, and SR-3004, entitled "Testing Guidelines for Analog Type
1, 2, and 3 CPE Described in SR-INS-002726", January 1995, that address
the talkoff and talkdown performance of tone signal detectors for the CAS and
call progress signals. The recommendations contained in these documents
call for highly reliable tone signal detection. For example, SR-TSV-002476
recommends that a CAS detector respond to no more than 1 signal imitation
in 45 hours of exposure to equal amounts of average level near-end and far-
end telephone speech. The talkdown criteria that must be simultaneously
l0 achieved by this CAS tone signal detector for the average near-end talker
on
an average loop are the recognition of 99% of all valid CAS. The combination
of these performance criteria makes CAS tone signal detectors that are
compliant with SR-TSV-002476 arguably the most robust inband tone signal
detectors ever deployed in the telephone network.
For tone signal detection systems used at a subscriber's location,
signal imitations can come from both the near-end subscriber's voice as well
as the voice of a far-end party. The near-end subscriber's voice is usually
the
dominant source of talkoff because the electrical speech level of the near-end
subscriber is significantly stronger than that of the far-end. The speech
signal
of the far-end party is reduced by the loss on two loops, i.e., the far-end
party's loop and the near-end subscriber's loop, and any intervening network
loss before it appears at the near-end subscriber's station set. The near-end
subscriber is also the dominant cause of talkdown since signals like the CAS
and call progress signals are typically transmitted from the central office
SPCSS while the far-end party is either muted or not yet connected.
It is characteristic of tone signal detectors to employ the concept of
guard action to resist tone signal imitations and gain a degree of immunity to
talkoff. Such detectors validate a tone signal only if a certain signal-to-
guard
ratio is satisfied for each tone signal frequency component. The signal-to-
guard ratio is the ratio of the power present within a tone signal frequency
band to the power present in one or several designated guard bands. The
guard band is a portion of the voiceband that the tone signal detector uses to
extract information about the purity of the tone signal. A single guard band
4
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
can be seiected for all the tone signal frequency components or a
combination of several guard bands may be used.
Detectors using the guard principle usually require a large positive
signal-to-guard ratio to validate incoming tone signals to minimize talkoff. A
large signal-to-guard ratio demands that the energy within the signaling
frequency band be relatively pure with respect to the energy in the guard
band(s). Since speech is likely to produce significant energy at frequencies
outside the signaling bands, this condition rejects many potential energy
patterns that might talkoff a detector and, hence, improves tone signal
detector talkoff performance.
Although this strategy may provide good talkoff performance, talkdown
performance is likely to suffer unless speech, music or noise that can mix
with
a tone signal is successfully attenuated or canceled. Two basic approaches
have been employed by the majority of new CIDCW, CWD, and ADS/ CPE to
provide satisfactory tone signal detector performance. The simplest approach
has been the direct, parallel connection of the tone signal detector to tip
and
ring interface. Better arrangements have placed the tone signal detector
behind a speech path separation device that inherently attenuates the level of
near-end speech. More complex arrangements have utilized analog and
2o digital cancellation techniques. A closer examination of several existing
prior
art implementations that fall within these two categories reveals their
advantages, disadvantages, and the benefits of the present invention.
Method 1
In the simplest approach, the tone signal detector is bridged directly
across the tip and ring interface of the station set as illustrated in FIG. 1.
This
arrangement is advantageous primarily because of its minimal fine
interconnection complexity. The tone signal detector passively listens across
the line. Its high impedance and parallel line connection mean that it does
not interfere with other station sets on the same line or communication
equipment beyond its point of presence. It further provides access to on-
hook-service signals, such as Calling Identity Delivery (CID). Its
interconnection method is also very amenable to adjunct communication
5
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
devices that do not incorporate any type of line termination circuit that may
normally be used in an integrated telephone.
The primary disadvantage of the bridged tip and ring arrangement is
that it presents the worst case tone signal detection environment. The tone
signal detector in this arrangement is exposed to the full power of near-end
speech. This creates significant difficulties for achieving robust talkoff and
talkdown performance. A survey of speech levels, adjusted and converted to
obtain levels at the station set, indicates that near-end telephone speech has
a mean Active Speech Level (ASL) of -19 dBm with a Gaussian distribution
and standard deviation of approximately 4 dB. Using the three sigma case as
the upper limit, near-end speech levels at the subscriber's tip and ring
interface can reach levels as high as -7 dBm ASL. Experimentation and
experience have decisively shown that the talkoff and talkdown performance
of a tone signal detector rapidly degrades as the level of speech increases.
The rate of talkoff, or number of talkoffs per hour, tends to rise
exponentially
with increasing speech level. Speech levels at -7 dBm ASL are extremely
loud and usually pose a substantial threat for talkoff and talkdown. Although
possessing low interconnection complexity, the bridged tip and ring
arrangement offers no benefit in reducing the level of near-end speech.
Near-end speech poses a even greater threat for CAS tone signal
detectors. Not only are near-end speech levels loud, but the threat of talkoff
is further enhanced because near-end speech is likely to be pre-emphasized
by the subscriber's telephone handset. Historically, the transmitter response
of the handset provides gain in the upper voiceband to counteract the effect
of loop loss. Although most of the speech energy is in the lower part of the
voiceband (< 1000 Hz), psychological studies have determined that energy in
the upper voiceband is necessary and critical to maintain the intelligibility
of
speech. As a result, telephone transmitters have been historically designed
to supply an energy boost in the upper voiceband. A survey of commercially
3o available telephone equipment indicates that an average transmitter
characteristic can be approximated by a straight line with positive slope from
300 Hz to 3000 Hz over a log-frequency scale, with a response at 300 Hz
down 5 dB relative to 1000 Hz and a response at 3000 Hz 5 dB higher relative
6
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCTlUS99/10023
to 1000 Hz. Since CAS frequencies, 2130 and 2750 Hz, are in the upper
voiceband, transmitter pre-emphasis will place more speech energy in the
signaling bands and create even more potential for talkoff that is not
mitigated
by the bridged tip and ring arrangement.
Tone signal detector talkdown is also a problem for the bridged tip and
ring arrangement because near-end speech energy will often overwhelm the
tone signal energy. In the case of CIDCW, for instance, the CAS is typically
sent from the SPCSS at -15 dBm per tone. Attenuation due to the loop
response can introduce up to 15 dB of loss in the 99 percentile case. Since
near-end speech can combine with CAS, tip and ring CAS tone signal
detectors will be exposed to a worst-case signal-to-speech ratio of -23 dB (-
15
-15 - (-7} dB). Reliable detection of tone signals with such a poor signal-to-
noise ratio is difficult, even for liberal detectors that make little attempt
to
reject signal imitations. With a tone signal detector employing the
aforementioned guard principle, the signal-to-guard ratio qualification
criteria
would not be met in many instances of legitimate tone signals because near-
end speech energy would significantly corrupt the signal.
As taught in Battista, et. al., Patent No. 5,519,774 entitled, "Method
and System for Detecting at a Selected Station an Alerting Signal in the
Presence of Speech", tone signal detectors can be designed to provide good
talkoff and talkdown performance for bridged tip and ring applications.
However, the meticulous adjustment of detection parameters that is
necessary to achieve the proper balance of talkoff and talkdown performance
in these designs is a difficult and time consuming process. Furthermore,
there is no guarantee that the final detector design will be conducive to a
specific manufacturing process.
fn summary, the bridged tip and ring tone signal detector arrangement
is a simple, non-intrusive method to access service signals, such as inband
tone signals and on-hook CID data transmission signals. However, from the
standpoint of tone signal detection, it is the most difficult arrangement to
achieve good talkoff and talkdown performance because it does nothing to
reduce the level of near-end speech incident upon a tone signal detector.
The prior art has already established that tip and ring tone signal detectors
7
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
with good talkoff and talkdown performance, while achievable, are extremely
difficult to design and build.
Method 2
A second common arrangement employed in conjunction with tone
signal detectors that provides improved talkoff and talkdown performance
without modifications to a tone signal detector's algorithm is illustrated in
FIG.
2. In this system, the tone signal detector is located behind a device
typically
referred to as a hybrid.
The hybrid is a device that converts the bi-directional path on the tip
l0 and ring interface into two separate unidirectional paths for transmit and
receive. Far-end and network signals on the tip and ring interface appear on
the receive path where the tone signal detector is connected. Near-end
signals are ideally transferred from the transmit path behind the hybrid to
the
tip and ring interface.
In practice, some leakage of near-end speech energy will occur across
the hybrid and appear at the input to the tone signal detector. The amount by
which the near-end energy at a given frequency is attenuated by the hybrid is
known as the transhybrid loss. The transhybrid loss is a function of how well
the impedance of the balance network matches the impedance presented by
the tip and ring interface.
The amount of transhybrid loss is critical to the performance of the
tone signal detector in this arrangement because the transhybrid loss effects
a reduction in the level of near-end speech incident upon the tone signal
detector. Attenuation of the near-end speech level is useful because it dually
reduces the probability of a talkoff occurrence and the probability that near-
end speech will corrupt an incoming CAS. With a 6 dB transhybrid loss, for
example, the level of near-end speech appearing at the tone signal detector
input will be reduced from -7 to -13 dBm ASL and the signal-to-speech ratio
will improve from -23 to -17 dB over the bridged tip and ring arrangement.
Experimentation and experience have demonstrated that a reduction of 3 dB
in near-end speech level or a similar improvement in signal-to-speech ratio
dramatically improves the talkoff and talkdown performance of a tone signal
detector similar to that described in Battista, et. al. Furthermore, a key
design
8
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
benefit of the hybrid arrangement is that it makes balancing the tradeoff
between taikoff and talkdown performance less difficult because the dynamic
swing of the tone signal detector, which is defined as the difference in dB
between the worst case speech level and the worst case tone level, has been
reduced.
Because transhybrid loss rapidly decreases as the match between the
line impedance and the balance network diverges, a single network may not
provide a suitable degree of transhybrid loss across the large majority of
loop
conditions. With a single balance network, for instance, the worst case
transhybrid loss can range from 2 to 6 dB over the domain of all loop
impedances in the U.S. network. To obtain further reduction in near-end
speech level and improve the signal-to-speech ratio, the single balance
network may be replaced by multiple, fixed networks or an adjustable network
as illustrated in FIG. 3. This arrangement is sometimes referred to as an
analog echo canceller.
Multiple balance networks or an adjustable balance network provide
significant improvement in transhybrid loss over a signal network system.
Transhybrid losses of greater than 15 dB could usually be achieved using at
least three fixed networks. Because more than one balance network is
available, the architecture must also include a mechanism (not shown) to
select the optimal network for the loop condition encountered.
Although favorable from the standpoint of tone signal detector
performance, arrangements like those illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3 have
certain disadvantages. First, traditional hybrid architectures are well suited
for
integrated telephone applications where separation of the speech path is
inherently needed to provide the handset receiver and transmitter functions.
For devices like telephone adjuncts, these systems are less practical.
Adjunct devices are usually electrically connected in series with a station
set
and must therefore be capable of passing basic telephone line attributes such
as DC voltage, line current, AC signals, and power ringing. To that extent, it
is common practice to employ the bridged tip and ring solution previously
described because the tip and ring interface physically passes through the
adjunct unimpeded. To adapt a hybrid arrangement like those in FIGS. 2 and
9
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
3 for an adjunct, two hybrids must be placed back-to-back so that the two wire
interface is regenerated for connection to a subscriber's telephone set.
Additional circuitry is needed to either regenerate DC line voltage and power
ringing or provide a means to route such signals around the back-to-back
hybrids arrangement. This arrangement then becomes similar to a network
repeater circuit where transmission characteristics of the repeater that
affect
the quality of the voice channel and factors like closed loop gain must be
carefully engineered to avoid unstable device operation and provide a
transparent line interface. For these reasons, the traditional hybrid solution
useful in integrated telephone sets is not very practical for low cost
adjuncts.
Another important consideration for the hybrid systems in FIGS. 2 and
3 is the provisioning of sidetone in integrated station sets. Traditionally, a
certain amount of transhybrid leakage was intentionally designed into
telephone sets to allow users to hear an attenuated version of their own
speech. Psychologically, this provides the subscriber with the impression that
the station set is operational. As a result, transhybrid losses were adjusted
to
provide no more than 6 dB of loss to satisfy the human factors requirements
for sidetone. For tone signal detector performance and system design, this
presents a disadvantage. In order to increase the transhybrid loss of the
arrangements in FIGS. 2 and 3, a secondary circuit is needed to provide an
alternate path for sidetone.
There is a third disadvantage to the arrangements in FIGS. 2 and 3,
especially for integrated station set applications. There are instances when
the functional elements of the station set may need access to the AC signals
on the tip and ring interface even though the station set is in the on-hook
condition. Two such identifiable instances include support for Multiple
Extension Interworking (MEI) and on-hook services such as CID.
MEI is a signaling method and protocol for communication among
CPEs on a subscriber's line that enables three functions: 1 ) the reception of
CIDCW by all compatible CPE, regardless of their individual hook state; 2)
the generation of customer line signals, such as Flash, to indicate selection
of
a call control action; and 3) the management of CAS acknowledgment
signaling interactions among multiple C1DCW, CWD, and ADSI CPE. In
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
order to perform the MEI protocol, a CPE must be able to detect a CAS while
it is on-hook. With the hybrid systems depicted in FIGS. 2 and 3, the hybrid
function is generally disconnected from the line interface by the hook switch
function when the subscriber's set is in the on-hook condition. Consequently,
the tone signal detector, being on the receive side of the hybrid, will lose
access to the tone signals on the tip and ring interface. To overcome this
limitation, even further additional circuitry is required to provide an
alternate
signal path to the tip and ring interface while the CPE is on-hook.
Another similar disadvantage that is readily identifiable in the
l0 arrangements depicted in FIG. 2 and 3 is the difficulty of supporting on-
hook
services such as CID. On-hook CID services, like Calling Number Delivery
(CND), Calling Name Delivery (CNAM) and Visual Message Waiting indicator
(VMWI), deliver data using the same Frequency Shift Keying (FSK)
modulation technique as off-hook CIDCW and CWD services. The desire for
modular CID functional elements that perform all the necessary procedures of
both the on-hook and off-hook data transmission protocols in Bellcore's
document GR-30-CORE, "Voiceband Data Transmission Interface", Issue 1,
December 1994, has led to the fabrication of Application Specific Integrated
Circuits (ASICs), herein referred to as CID ASICs. These devices combine
the FSK demodulation and CAS tone signal detection functions onto a single
device. For reasons that include providing universal applicability to adjuncts
and integrated sets alike, minimizing complexity and device pin count
reduction, a single device input on CID ASICs must be shared for both on-
hook and off-hook CID services. With the hybrid arrangements illustrated in
FIGS. 2 and 3, the reduction in circuit complexity offered by CID ASICs is
partially offset by the need for external circuitry and control that provides
multiple signal paths to access to the tip and ring interface depending upon
the hook condition of the CPE. It is a highly desired feature for a CID ASIC
to
allow the device to be inserted into any design without impacting or requiring
specific circuitry, or imposing performance criteria on other aspects of the
system architecture.
11
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
Method 3
A third arrangement that also builds upon the systems depicted in
FIGS. 2 and 3, yet provides significant improvements in the cancellation of
near-end speech is shown in FIG. 4. In combination with a hybrid, a digital
echo canceller can be employed to increase the transhybrid loss to 25 dB or
more. The primary benefit of a digital echo canceller is that it practically
eliminates any chance of near-end talkoff and talkdown because it highly
attenuates the near-end speech echo.
In addition to those cited for the hybrid systems in FIGS. 2 and 3, the
prime disadvantage of this speech cancellation system is the significant
resources and interface circuitry required. Typical implementations of digital
echo cancellers require an optimized microprocessor to perform the
mathematical operations that remove the near-end echo, interface circuitry to
digitize analog signals and memory code storage support. If the tone signal
detector is implemented external to the echo canceller as illustrated in FIG.
4,
an additional digital-to-analog converter is necessary. For these reasons,
digital echo canceller implementations have not yet become practical for low
cost adjunct and integrated telephones.
Method 4
A fourth arrangement that has been attempted to cancel near-end
speech using a scaled Wheatstone bridge circuit is illustrated in FIG. 5. In
US
patent application No. 08/540,532, filed October 10, 1995, and entitled
"Apparatus For Dialing Of Called lD Block Code and Receiving Call Waiting
Caller-ID-Signal', Lim, et. al., disclose a Wheatstone bridge circuit as
illustrated in FIG. 5. This arrangement employs the Wheatstone bridge
principle where if the balance network identically matches the impedance of
the loop and fixed resistors Ra and Rb are identical, the near-end speech
signals arriving at the input to the differential amplifier G from the two
circuit
legs will be identical in magnitude and phase. The differential amplifier will
subtract these signals from each other and produce a resultant signal that is
input to the tone signal detector containing the residual energy of the near-
end speech cancellation process. In practice, resistance Rb is scaled to a
factor C greater than resistance Re to reduce loading effects on the tip and
12
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
ring interface. Likewise, the single balance network impedance is scaled by
the same factor.
Although this arrangement cancels near-end speech and provides
access to the tip and ring interface regardless of station set hook state, it
performs poorly in practice over the domain of loop impedances. The reason
for its poor performance is two-fold. First, the fixed impedances Ra and Rb
are subject to component tolerances and consequently are never identically
matched. This results in an imbalance in the bridge that is amplified by the
differential amplifier. Second, the single, fixed balance network employed in
the circuit provides a poor match over the domain of possible loop
impedances. Experimentation has demonstrated that the worst case near-
end speech cancellation performance of the Wheatstone bridge arrangement
in FIG. 5 is about 1 to 2 dB. Because of its inadequate performance, the
Wheatstone bridge arrangement has often been ignored.
The review of the prior art has established that talkoff and talkdown
performance of a tone signal detector can be significantly improved by
attenuating the level of incident near-end speech. It has further established
that most prior art near-end speech cancellation techniques require system
architectures that remove the tone signal detector from the tip and ring
interface and place it at a location that does not generally have access to
line
signals when the station set is on-hook without additional signal paths. One
prior art cancellation method does provide access to tip and ring regardless
of
hook-state; however, its cancellation performance is poor.
Summary of the invention
In view of the foregoing, it is an object of the present invention to
provide a method and system to cancel near-end speech energy for tone
signal detectors that connect to the tip and ring interface using an improved
Wheatstone bridge technique that also provides access to on-hook service
signals regardless of the hook state of subsequent communications
equipment. The method and system operate independently of other
telephony functions and can be applied in standalone adjunct devices as well
as integrated into a telephone set. The degree of near-end speech
13
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCTNS99/10023
cancellation is controllable by scaling the system implementation to achieve
the desired amount of near-end speech attenuation.
Specifically, the system uses a voltage or current sensing element
placed in series with either the tip or ring interface lead. A scaled mirror
impedance of both the sensing element and impedance presented by the tip
and ring interface is the placed across the tip and ring interface to form a
Wheatstone bridge. Rather than create two bi-directional paths, only a single
receive path is differentially extracted from center of the bridge for input
to a
tone signal detector. Attenuation of near-end speech energy is controlled by
the calibration and selection of the scaled mirror impedance values which are
available from either a fixed set of R, L and C networks or an adjustable
network. A controlling function uses one of several methods described to
select the best network either at the time that the device is connected to the
line, at the start of every telephone call or continuously adapting throughout
the duration of a call.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a prior art tip and ring tone signal detector
connection method;
F1G. 2 is a block diagram of a traditional prior art telephone hybrid
2o used to attenuate near-end speech for the benefit of tone signal detection;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a traditional prior art telephone hybrid
employing multiple balance networks and/or an adjustable network to
attenuate near-end speech for the benefit of tone signal detection;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a traditional prior art telephone hybrid
used in conjunction with a digital echo cancellation device to attenuate near-
end speech for the benefit of tone signal detection;
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a prior art fixed Wheatstone bridge
arrangement that attenuates near-end speech for the benefit of tone signal
detection;
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an illustrative embodiment of the near-end
speech cancellation system of the present invention using a voltage sense
implementation;
14
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of another illustrative embodiment of the
near-end speech cancellation system of the present invention using a current
sense implementation;
FIG. 8 illustratively depicts a digitally enhanced near end speech
cancellation system;
FIG. 9 depicts exemplary plots of time shifting and windowing in
accordance with an aspect of my invention;
FIG. 10 depicts exemplary plots of time shifting and amplitude
adjusting in accordance with an aspect of my invention;
FIG. 11 depicts the method of obtaining a cancelled signal in
accordance with the embodiment depicted in FIG. 11;
FIG. 12 depicts an exemplary time shift and amplitude grid in
accordance with an aspect of my invention; and
FIG. 13 depicts an exemplary time shift and amplitude grid in
accordance with an aspect of my invention.
Detailed Description
Analo4 Svsfem
A generalized block diagram of an analog near-end speech
cancellation system 10 for a tip and ring tone signal detector using a voltage
sense implementation in accordance with an aspect of my invention is shown
in FIG. 6. A similar block diagram of the near-end speech cancellation
system 110 using a current sense implementation in accordance with another
aspect of my invention is shown is FIG. 7. Differences in the operation of
these implementations will be noted as necessary below.
Turning now to FIG. 6, there is shown the system 10 with three points
of interconnection: a primary tip and ring interface 29, a secondary tip and
ring interface 30, and a receive interface 31. Through the primary tip and
ring
interface 29, the system 10 connects to a telephone loop i2, which, in turn,
interconnects the system 10 to a central office or remote terminal
communications equipment 11. The secondary tip and ring interface 30 is
shown connecting to either a subscriber station set 13 or subsequent
communication circuits 14 depending upon the application. For an adjunct
device, the system 10 would be incorporated into the adjunct and the
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
secondary tip and ring interface 30 would interconnect an external subscriber
station 14 set as shown. For an integrated telephone set, the system 10
would become a front end circuit that interconnects the primary tip and ring
interface 29 to subsequent communications circuits 14 within the telephone
set. The receive interface 31 provides a signal path to a tone signal detector
27 or FSK demodulator 28 as shown. This path predominantly contains only
the signal energy transmitted by the office equipment 11 to the system
through the primary tip and ring interface 29. A small residual cancellation
energy of the near-end speech signal transmitted by the subscriber station set
13 or communications circuit 14 may appear on the receive interface 31.
The object of the near-end speech cancellation system 10 for tip and
ring tone signal detectors is to highly attenuate near-end speech signals to
reduce the probability of talkoff and improve the signal-to-speech ratio,
thereby improving the tone signal detector's signal recognition performance.
In accordance with this aspect of my invention near-end speech cancellation
is achieved in this system by forming a Wheatstone bridge using the
combined impedance of the loop 12 and office equipment 11 as the
impedance that is to be matched by a network from the set M1, M2 through
Mn 22. The Wheatstone bridge uses a parallel circuit with common end
nodes containing two known resistances of equal value that are singularly
connected to the unknown impedance and the matched impedance,
respectively. Voltage division will occur across each circuit. The center taps
will contain the same voltage and signal phase when the unknown impedance
is perfectly matched by the matching impedance.
In the voltage sense implementation in FIG. 6, a known resistance R1
17 is placed in series with either lead of the primary tip and ring interface
29.
The value of R1 17 is chosen to be small (1 to 15 ohms) to avoid an
excessive DC voltage drop resulting from the draw of telephone line current.
Line currents typically range from 18 to 120 mA. Instead of using an
impedance identical to R1 17 in the mirror circuit of the bridge, an impedance
significantly larger by a factor of K is chosen. The larger impedance is
necessary to prevent excessive loading of the telephone line by the mirror
circuit of the bridge. Generally, values of K in the range of 50 to 1000 are
16
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/100Z3
practical. In FIG. 6, the mirror image of impedance R1 17 is shown as the
parallel-series combination of impedances R2 23, R3 24 and R4 32. The
combined impedance of these elements is set to match impedance R1 17
multiplied by a factor of K.
The matching of impedance R1 17 and its scaled mirror image is
critical to the circuit's cancellation performance. Although it is possible to
simply use fixed resistances for both R1 17 and its image that differ by a
factor of K, parts tolerances may lead to unacceptable impedance
mismatches depending upon the desired degree of cancellation performance
sought. Rather than require the need for expensive, small tolerance
components, the preferred implementation in FIG. 6 uses a fixed impedance
slightly greater than sensing impedance R1 17 in parallel with an adjustable
impedance consisting of fixed impedance R2 23 and a switchable impedance
ladder R3 24. The purpose of the parallel combination of impedances is to
permit the mirror image of R1 17 to be adjustable in fine steps. Since the
effective resistance of resistances in parallel is smaller than that of the
smallest parallel resistance, impedance R4 32 is set to R1 *(K + Y), where
factor Y is in the range from 1 to 10. Fine tuning of the mirror image
impedance is achieved by closing and opening switches in the resistance
ladder R3 24. A fixed impedance R2 23 has been placed in series with the
resistance ladder to permit smaller, more practical resistance elements to be
used in the resistor ladder. Fixed impedance R2 23 simply offsets the
combined parallel resistance offered by itself and the resistance ladder. The
combined impedance of fixed impedance R2 23 and the resistance ladder R3
24 should equal R1 *K*(K+Y)/Y at a maximum. Although the resistance
ladder can be implemented in various ways, a digitally controllable resistance
where the resistance value is controlled by a binary data word is preferred as
shown in FIG. 6. The value of the binary data word is determined by a
system controller 19 according to a method later described.
Assuming that the ratio of impedance R1 17 to its mirror impedance is
equal to 1/K, completion of the bridge requires that a scaled impedance on
the mirror circuit be selected to match the combined impedance of loop 12
and the office equipment 11. The scaling factor for the matching mirror
17
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
impedance is also required to be factor K. The set of balance networks
shown as M1, and M2 through Mn 22 represent fixed or variable impedances
consisting of one or more circuit configurations, such as series, parallel,
series-parallel, etc, containing resistive, capacitive and inductive elements.
Values for these elements and the number of networks in the set ace chosen
to obtain a scaled mirror impedance that can best match the domain of
impedances that can be encountered on the primary tip and ring interface 29
and that can meet a worst case near-end cancellation objective. Depending
upon the balance network configuration, resistive and inductive elements are
1o generally K times as large as the impedance presented by the primary tip
and
ring interface 29. Capacitive elements are K times smaller. Experimentation
and experience have demonstrated that a single network may provide only 6
dB of cancellation under some loop conditions, while two judiciously chosen
networks could provide up to 12 dB. Additional networks would likewise
improve the worst case degree of cancellation across the domain of loop and
office equipment impedances.
Although in FIG. 6 I illustratively depict switches S2 through Sn 30 as
connecting the balance networks to the secondary tip and ring interface,
alternate implementations exist that position switches S2 through Sn 30 at
locations where they could be better protected from metallic line surges.
Metallic line surges are high voltage spikes generated by events such as
lightning. Customer Premises Equipment designed for the telephone network
must be able to survive the metallic line surges described by FCC Part 68.
For example, switches S2 through Sn 30 could be moved to a location at
either the input or output of the differential amplifier 25. In both cases,
the
balance networks M1 through Mn would remain permanently connected to the
Tip and Ring interface. Each balance network would require its own matching
mirror sense impedance 23, 24 and 32 and independent calibration as
discussed later. If positioned at the input to the differential amplifier 25,
switches S2 through Sn 30 would be used to select a signal derived from one
of the mirror circuits formed by a balance network and its mirror sense
impedance 23, 24 and 32. Alternatively, each mirror circuit could be provided
its own differential amplifier and switches S2 through Sn could be used to
18
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
select the appropriate amplifier output to create the receive signal 31. These
methods are practical when the number of balances networks, M1 through
Mn, remains small, i.e., three or less, to prevent excessive loading of the
tip
and ring Interface.
The receive signal path 31 is obtained by differentially amplifying the
signals at the center taps of the bridge. One input to differential amplifier
25
is connected through DC blocking capacitor C2 20 to the lead on the primary
tip and ring interface 29 that contains the sensing element R1 17. Its other
input is capacitively coupled through capacitor C1 21 to a common node
between the balance networks M1 through Mn 22 and the mirror impedance
of sense impedance R1 17. If the match between the combined impedance
of the loop 12 and office equipment 11 and the selected balance network is
sufficiently close, the voltage signals appearing at the input to the
differential
amplifier 25 will be almost identical in magnitude and phase. With a common
mode rejection ratio of 60 dB or better, the differential amplifier will
subtract
the signals from each other and create a receive signal 31 where the near-
end speech energy has been canceled.
At least one switch point in the set S2 through Sn 30 will remain closed
while the subscriber station 13 or communications circuit 14 is on-hook to
provide access to the tip and ring interface. This balance network may be
chosen specifically for use in the on-hook condition to satisfy impedance and
regulatory requirements. Switches S1 through Sn can be implemented using
technology such as, but not limited to, transistors, electromechanical, solid
state or photomos relays, field effect transistors or optocoupler devices.
Because the differential amplifier 25 remains connected to the primary
tip and ring interface while on-hook, signals such as CID and VMWI FSK can
be received. The gain of the differential amplifier 25 is set by the system
controller 19 based upon its selection of the balance network. The gain is
determined by the equation:
Gain = [R1 (K+1 )+Zb]/R1 (K+1 ) (1 )
where Zb = 1/jwC1 + Mn and Mn is the impedance of the selected balance
network. The gain values for each network and each combination of
19
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
networks that are to be used as a balance network are pre-computed and
stored in the system controller memory. A network identifier Nn, where n is a
whole number, is assigned to each gain value to indicate the network for
which it applies. Each single network M1 through Mn and combination of
networks shall possess a unique identifier.
The central procedural execution element of the system is the system
controller 19. The system controller performs the functions of 1 ) monitoring
the line voltage sense function 34; 2) applying the calibration source 15 and
DC termination 16; 3) tuning the resistor ladder to best match the combined
mirror impedance, consisting of R2 23, R3 24 and R4 32, to the sensing
impedance R1 17; 4) monitoring the energy estimator 26; 5) selectively
closing one or more switches in the set S2 through Sn 34 to attach one or
more balance networks to the secondary tip and ring interface 30; 6) setting
the gain of the differential amplifier 25 based on the selection of balance
network; and 7) using feedback from the energy estimator 26 to decide which
balance network results in the best cancellation of a calibration signal.
The method for selecting the best available balance network begins
when the device containing the speech cancellation system is first connected
to the telephone loop 12. In its simplest form, the line sense function 34
outputs a binary signal to the system controller indicating whether the line
is
idle or in-use based upon the line voltage at the primary tip and ring
interface
29. Generally, the line can be considered idle if the voltage is above 23
volts
and power ringing is not present. On the initial application of line voltage
to
the system during installation, following the restoration of line voltage
after a
service discontinuity or after some predetermined interval, the system
controller 19, if the line is idle, proceeds to terminate the line using its
DC line
termination 16 through switch S1 18 to create an off-hook line condition. The
system controller will then either 1 ) transmit a signal for calibration, 2)
dial at
least one DTMF digit using the complex signal source 15 to remove dial tone
prior to transmission of the calibration signal, or 3) dial a maintenance
number
that will create a stable call state after which transmission of the
calibration
signal can begin. In all cases, the system controller should first sense the
presence of dial tone on the primary tip and ring interface 29 or wait a
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
predetermined period of time t1 until the application of dial tone can be
assumed before dialing any digits or calibrating the cancellation circuit.
Detection of dial tone energy can be performed using the energy estimator
function 26 or an optional dial tone detector 27.
In the first instance, the calibration signal can begin after termination of
the line; however, subsequent calibration procedures should be delayed until
the application of dial tone or expiration of the predetermined interval t1.
Typically, a dial tone delay time t1 of three seconds should cover the 99%
percentile case in the U.S. network. The purpose of waiting for the
to application of dial tone is to assure that the office equipment 11 has
properly
terminated the loop 12. Because this option creates a stable call state for
calibration, the performance of the cancellation system may perform better
using this option since office equipment 11 used in the call initiation state
may
differ from the stable call state.
The complex signal source 15 can consist of a single or multiple tone
generator, a flat or spectrally shaped noise generator or a DTMF generator.
For use in an application involving the detection of call progress signals, a
single calibration tone in the frequency range of 300 to 700 Hz is
appropriate.
For use in an application involving the detection of the CAS, single or dual
tones at frequencies between 2100 and 2900 are suitable. DTMF signals,
such as DTMF D or DTMF A in the preferred embodiment, are also suitable
and practical since these signals are already available to complete the GR
30-CORE off-hook data transmission handshake in CIDCW/CWD and ADSI
CPE. A complex noise signal is also sufficient for these applications and
others.
Depending upon the method of application of the calibration signal as
described above, the energy estimator 26 can either be responsive to dial
tone or not. Generally, the energy estimator 26 should not be responsive to
dial tone when the calibration signal is present to minimize error in the
energy
readings. If one or more digits are dialed prior to the calibration signal or
the
calibration causes the removal of dial tone, an energy estimator 26 that is
responsive to dial tone can also serve to detect the presence of dial tone.
21
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/100Z3
The energy estimator 26 provides the system controller with an analog or
digital output that is proportional to the energy level on the receive path
31.
After the calibration source 15 is applied or interval t1 expires, the
system controller begins calibrating the combined impedance of R2 23, R3 24
and R4 32. Proceeding in a methodical fashion, the system controller 19
alters the impedance of R3 24 by opening and closing taps on the resistor
ladder in an attempt to make the combined impedance R2 23, R3 24 and R4
32 closely match, if not exactly equal, a value of K times that of sense
impedance R1 17.
to In the preferred implementation, the system controller 19 starts the
search by programming a digitally controllable resistance to either its
lowest,
highest or mid-range resistance value. It then proceeds to sequentially step
up or down the ladder to search for the resistance value of R3 24 that
provides the minimum receive 31 level. At each step, the controller reads the
output of the energy estimator 26 and determines whether the new energy
estimate is greater or less than the previous step.
If the new energy estimate is less, the system controller 19 updates its
record of the previous resistance value and energy level held in buffer
locations L1 and E1, respectively, with the new resistance value and energy
2o level. In the preferred implementation, both the resistance value and
energy
estimate are binary words. The system controller 19 then continues changing
the resistance value in the same direction of its previous path.
If the new energy estimate was greater than the previous level, the
system controller 19 should not update buffer locations L1 and E1.
Anticipating that noise may result in a spurious peaks in the energy
estimates,
the system controller 19 should continue to change the resistance value in the
same direction. If, after several steps, the energy estimates are still
greater
than E1 and appear to be increasing, the resistance value should be reset to
L1 to complete the calibration of R3 24. Otherwise, if the energy estimates
are lower, the system controller 19 should continue searching for the minima
by changing the resistance value in the same direction.
The one exception to this rule applies when the system controller 19
starts the initial resistance of the ladder 24 at a point other than its
minimum
22
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
or maximum, such as its mid-point value. In this case, upon obtaining several
energy estimates that are greater than the value stored in buffer E1
immediately after the first step, the system controller 19 should reverse the
direction of its path and begin again from its initial starting point. By
starting
at a mid-point value, convergence of the search may proceed quicker.
In any case where the energy estimate is indeterminately different from
the previous reading E1, the system controller 19 should not update buffer
locations L1 and E1 and should continue to step the resistance in the same
direction until a determination can be made.
Once the calibration of resistance ladder R3 24 is complete, the
selection process to choose the best balance network from the set M 1
through Mn 22 to match the loop 12 and office equipment 11 impedance
begins. In the case of a few fixed networks, the system controller 19
methodically proceeds to close the remaining switches in singular fashion
from the set S2 through Sn 34. The closure of each switch attaches a
balance network to the secondary tip and ring interface 30.
Prior to changing the switch settings, the system controller 19 selects
and sets the differential amplifier gain to a predetermined value, e.g., the
lowest, highest or mid-range gain value of the set of networks. Upon closure
of a switch from the set S2 through Sn 34, the system controller reads the
output of the energy estimator 26. If the energy estimate is less than the
value stored in buffer E1, the system controller 19 updates a best network
buffer, BN, with the identity, Nn, of the current network attached to the
line.
Likewise, the system controller 19 updates buffer E1 with the new energy
estimate. The system controller 19 then proceeds to remove the current
network and attach another from the remaining subset of networks. The
system controller 19 proceeds in this fashion until all networks have been
tested. Upon testing the last network Mn, the BN buffer contains the identity
of the individual network that minimizes the receive 31 level over the set M1
through Mn. Optionally, the system controller 19 can now attempt
combinations of networks M1 through Mn to determine if a combination of
networks produces a lower receive 31 level. All combinations of networks M1
through Mn 22 can be tested.
23
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCTNS99/100Z3
After determining the best single or combination of networks from the
set M1 through Mn 22, the system controller 19 then opens all switches from
S2 through Sn 34 and closes only those switches needed to produce the
network identified by the contents of buffer BN. The complex signal source
15 and the DC termination 16 are removed by opening switch S1 18. The
system controller 19 next retrieves a pre-computed gain value stored in its
memory that is associated with the identifier of the selected balance network.
The gain of the differential amplifier 25 is then set to this value, thereby
completing the calibration procedure.
1o If at any time during the network selection process, an energy estimate
either exceeds or underruns the scale of the energy estimator 26, the system
controller 19 may elect to adjust the gain of the differential amplifier 25 by
a
discrete step, such as 6 dB, and repeat the selection procedure for all or
part
of the networks. The system controller 19 may also elect to increase the gain
of the differential amplifier 25 to resolve which is the better network if two
or
more networks produce nearly the same energy estimate.
If the set of balance networks M7 through Mn 22, are implemented in
whole or part by adjustable resistive, capacitive or inductive elements, the
selection process can use a calibration procedure for each programmable
element similar to that described for resistor ladder R3 24.
Upon the subscriber station 13 or communication circuit 14 going on-
hook and entering the idle condition, the system controller can either leave
the existing balance network connected to the secondary tip and ring
interface 30 or it could resort back to a special network designed to satisfy
on-
hook impedance regulations. A change in balance network selection due to
the idle CPE condition would also cause the gain of the differential amplifier
25 to be adjusted accordingly. The system controller 19 will sense an on-
hook condition using the line sense function 34. A continuous on-hook
duration of at least 1.55 seconds would need to be timed by the system
controller 19 before actually considering the subscriber station set 13 or
communications circuit 14 idle to prevent falsely interpreting DC signals such
as Flash. When the subscriber station set 13 or communications circuit 14
subsequently proceeds to the off-hook condition, the system controller would
24
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
change the balance network selection to that identified in the buffer BN and
adjust the differential amplifier gain 25 accordingly.
Because the tip and ring near-end speech cancellation system allows
multiple balance networks or an adjustable network to be used, the system's
cancellation performance can be improved or scaled as necessary.
Additional balance networks provide better coverage in terms of impedance
match over the domain of the loop 12 and office equipment 11 impedances.
A block diagram of the near-end speech cancellation system 110 using
a current sense implementation in accordance with another aspect of my
invention is shown in FIG. 7. The operation of this system is similar to the
voltage sense implementation in FIG. 6. The object remains to form a
Wheatstone bridge with a mirror circuit possessing a scaled image of the loop
and office equipment impedance. Rather than attempting to sense the line
impedance using a passive element such as R1 17, the implementation in
FIG. 7 uses an active component. Specifically, impedance R1 i7 and the
combination of impedances R2 23, R3 24 and R4 32 are replaced by a
transistor pair configured as a mirrored current sources 117 and 124. In
particular, transistor Q1 replaces impedance R1 17 and transistor Q2 and
resistor Rw replace impedances R2 23, R3 24 and R4 32.
The current sense implementation of the near-end speech cancellation
system 110 employs the characteristic of a transistor current source
configuration whereby, due to the common voltage between the base and a
common ground of each transistor in an identical pair, the reference current
flowing through one transistor configured as a diode with its base connected
to its collector will be mirrored by its counterpart in both magnitude and
phase. A current , i.e., a reference current, passing through the subscriber
station set on the secondary tip and ring interface would be mirrored by
transistor Q2, thus creating a mirrored current through the balance network.
In a basic current source, the reference current would equal the mirrored
current if the emitter areas of the transistors were identical.
To prevent excessive loading on the primary tip and ring interface by
the mirror circuit of the bridge, the balance network impedance value should
be appropriately scaled up by a factor of K. Instead of scaling an impedance
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
as per the voltage sense implementation, the current sense implementation
scales the mirror current Im down by a factor of K. When a match between
the combined impedance of the loop and office equipment and a balance
network from the set M1 through Mn is achieved using the network selection
procedure previously described, such that the impedance of the balance
network is a factor of K greater, the transistor current source will create
identical voltages at the center tap of the bridge.
To illustrate how this configuration cancels near-end speech from the
secondary tip and ring interface on the receive path, yet while providing
l0 access to signals from the primary tip and ring interface, assume that the
combined impedance of the loop and office equipment is Rs and that the
balance network has a matching impedance of K*Rs. Place a DC voltage
source of Vdc and an AC voltage source of Vx*sin(wt) in series with the loop
and office equipment resistance Rs. Further assume that the secondary tip
and ring interface has an impedance of Rx.
Neglecting the diode drop of current source transistor Q1, the
reference current Iref is equal to (Vdc+Vx*sin(wt))/(Rs+Rx). The mirror
current is then (Vdc+Vx*sin(wt})/(K*(Rs+Rx)). The voltage across the
balance network is therefore (Vdc+Vx*sin(wt))*Rs/(Rs+Rx). The voltage
across the loop and office equipment is (Vdc+Vx*sin(wt))*Rx/(Rs+Rx).
Summing these voltage using the differential amplifier provides a receive path
voltage of Vx*sin(wt)*(Rx-Rs)/(Rs+Rx). Thus signals on the primary tip and
ring interface appear on the receive path.
Now assume that the secondary tip and ring interface has an AC
voltage source of Vx*sin(wt) in series with its impedance Rx and that the AC
source from the office equipment if off, i.e., Vs = 0. The reference current
would be equal to (Vdc-Vx*sin(wt))/(Rs+Rx}. The mirror current Im would be
equal to (Vdc-Vx*sin(wt})/(K*(Rs+Rx)). The voltage across the balance
network would be equal to (Vdc-Vx*sin(wt)}*Rs/(Rs+Rx). The voltage across
the loop and office equipment is (Vdc-Vx*sin(wt))*Rs/(Rs+Rx). Summing
these voltage using the differential amplifier provides a receive path voltage
of
26
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
zero. AC signals from the secondary tip and ring interface have effectively
been canceled on the receive path.
There are at least three benefits of the current sense implementation
over the voltage sense implementation. First, the voltage drop across the
transistor current source is approximately fixed at 0.5 to 0.7 volts and it
does
not linearly increase as subscriber station set current draw increases. This
reduces the increase in line voltage produced by the sense impedance and
makes the system more transparent to the office equipment. Second, the
current sense implementation is more conducive to an integrated circuit
manufacturing process since high wattage resistances needed for impedance
R1 17 are eliminated. Third, the current source implementation eliminates
the need for an adjustable resistor ladder R3 24 by using transistors with
similar characteristics. Although a resistor ladder can be used to fine tune
the
mirror current Im using a procedure similar to that previously described, it
is
probably not necessary because the voltages presented to the differential
amplifier are less sensitive to the value of resistance Rw.
Those skilled in the art will note that FIG. land the accompanying
description are simply means for implementing my invention on an integrated
circuit. Accordingly, there may be other arrangements of integrated circuit
components capable of accomplishing the functions described by FIG. 6 and
FIG. 7. Specifically, in the transistors of FIG. 7 may be replaced by other
combinations of transistors that provide, for example, a bipolar current
source.
Digital Enhancement System
In the near-end speech cancellation system depicted in FIG. 6,
cancellation of near-end speech is achieved by matching a scaled impedance
to the impedance of the telephone line. Two signals are tapped from the
center of the Wheatstone bridge and presented to the input of the differential
amplifier 25. When the impedances are properly matched, each tapped
signal contains near-end speech signals of equivalent amplitude and
synchronous phase. The differential amplifier 25 subtracts the two tapped
signals, thereby canceling the near-end speech components and producing a
resultant receive signal 31 that contains only those signals incident upon the
27
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
system 10 from the office equipment 11 and loop 12. This technique is
analog in nature and is beneficial for inexpensive adjunct devices that need
to
connect to the telephone line with minimal interfacing circuitry.
The cancellation system presented in FIG. 6 teaches the use of a set
of switching elements 22 that connect the mirror networks to complete the
Wheatstone bridge. In some cases, it is desirable to eliminate the need for
these switching elements or further improve the cancellation performance
without adding additional networks. One alternative previously disclosed in
this application is to permanently connect each network to the mirror sensing
impedance 23, 24, and 32 and the primary tip and ring interface 29. In this
configuration, the use of multiple balance networks creates multiple
permanently connected mirror legs of the Wheatstone bridge where each
balance network has it own mirror-sensing impedance 23, 14, and 32.
However, the practical use of this configuration is limited to a small number
of
networks. The reason is that the presence of multiple permanently connected
mirror networks lowers the on-hook impedance of the device. If too many
networks are used, the on-hook impedance of the system 10 creates a
condition that is undesirable for reliable dialing and reception of on-hook
data,
such as Caller ID.
To make the switching element 22 optional or further improve the near-
end speech cancellation performance, a mathematical method can be
implemented by a central processing unit using the configuration depicted in
FIG. 8. FIG. 8 shows the switching element 22 present, but they can be
replaced with a single or multiple permanent networks. The system 100, of
FIG. 10, incorporates a central processing unit 190 capable of adding and
multiplying digital words and including a phase shifter 101 and gain control
103. Unlike most echo cancellation systems, the unique attribute of this
system 100 is that it requires only low processing capabilities. This allows
simple microcontrollers, instead of digital signal processors, to perform. the
near-end speech cancellation. A further unique attribute of this system 100 is
that it provides a digital cancellation capability that is convenient for
devices,
such as adjuncts, that need to connect to the telephone line with minimal
interface circuitry. All of the previous benefits described for the near-end
28
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
speech cancellation system 10 apply to the digital system 100 illustrated in
FIG. 8. Furthermore, the digital cancellation system 100 is ideally suited for
applications where the CAS detector 27 or FSK demodulator 28 will be
simulated (i.e., performed mathematically) by the central processing unit 190.
At a high level, the mathematical cancellation method consists of: 1 )
applying the complex signal source 15 as a calibration signal; 2) sampling
both tapped signals 104 and 105 from the center of the Wheatstone bridge;
3) utilizing phase shifter 101 and gain control i 03 determining the best
phase
shift and gain factors that match the mirror signal 105 to the reference
signal
l0 104; 4) removing the complex signal source and applying the best phase
shift
and gain factors to the sampled mirror signal 105; and 5) beginning steady-
state operation where the reference signal 104 and the manipulated mirror
signal are subtracted from each other to produce a resultant signal in digital
representation that can be either passed to mathematical algorithms that
perform tone signal detection and FSK demodulation, or to a digital-to-analog
converter 102 that creates an analog resultant signal.
Similar to the analog system 10, the mathematical cancellation method
requires a period of calibration to adapt the system 100. The calibration
method begins by applying the complex signal source 15 to the line. The
complex signal source 15 can be a simple signal source, such as a sine
wave, where the central processing unit 190 can only turn the source on or
off. However, the complex signal source 15 can also be a signal that is
controlled both in amplitude and phase by the central processing unit 190.
Such a signal can be a pseudo-noise sequence mathematically generated by
a series of shift registers. In this case, the complex signal source 15 is
likely
to be a digital-to-analog converter that is fed digital words by the central
processing unit 190 for signal generation by direct digital synthesis. This
method allows more accurate calibration of the cancellation system 100.
The mathematical cancellation system 100 incorporates an analog to
digital (A/D) converter 102 to sample both signals 104 and 105 tapped from
the center of the Wheatstone bridge. The sampled versions of these tapped
signals will be manipulated by the central processing unit 190 to produce a
resultant signal where the near-end speech signal is cancelled. At the start
of
29
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
the calibration process, it is unlikely that the phase and amplitude of the
complex signal present on each of the tapped signals will be identical. During
the calibration period, the central processing unit 190 attempts to determine
the optimal phase shift and amplitude factors. It manipulates of one these
signals and takes feedback measurements of a resultant signal with the goal
of minimizing the resultant signal. The signal that is manipulated is a
sampled version of the mirror signal 105 tapped from the Wheatstone bridge.
A sampled version of the tapped signal 104 from the other leg of the
Wheatstone bridge will act as the reference signal.
After the central processing unit 190 connects and activates the
complex signal source 15, the system adaptation process begins with the
sampling of both tapped signals 104 and 105 using the analog to digital
converter 102. The signals are sampled at a rate preferably 20 times or more
than the highest frequency in the complex signal. The mirror signal 105 is
likely to be out of phase, time shifted and at a different amplitude than the
reference signal 104. The first step in calibrating the mathematical canceller
is to determine the difference in phase and time shift between the tapped
signals 104 and 105. This is achieved by first collecting and storing three or
more periods [3/(1000T) ms] worth of the tapped signals. Preferably, the
samples of each signal are collected simultaneously. The total amount of
signal that needs to sampled and stored is about twice the expected time shift
between tapped signals.
Once collected in memory or storage 106, the central processing unit
190 then follows a systematic algorithm to determine the optimal time shift
needed in the sampled mirror signal 105. Several search algorithms can be
applied. The simplest approach uses a time shift range with a fixed,
incremental step. The central processing unit 190 makes a copy of the
sampled mirror signal 105 and, starting at the lower end of the time shift
range, applies the time shift to the mirror signal 105. The time shift can be
both positive and negative to account for signal delay, capacitive phase delay
and inductive phase advance. Time shifting can be implemented in several
ways, but the simplest method is to shift all points by the fixed increment of
one sample.
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
After the time shift has been applied as illustrated in FIG. 9, the
modified mirror signal 105 is subtracted from the sampled reference signal
104. The subtraction process occurs over a window that falls within the
duration of the sampled, tapped signals. A smaller window is used so that as
the shifting occurs in the mirror signal 105, sufficient sample points exist
to
perform the subtraction calculation. Preferably, the window is established at
the center portion of the sampled reference signal 104. The window size is
preferably one-fourth of the sampled, reference signal length to permit
calculation for both signal delay and signal advance situations.
The resultant digital signal after the subtraction process is then
processed by a signal level estimation algorithm 107, such as one that
produces a mean square estimate of the signal power. The signal level
estimator produces a single power estimate that is used as a figure of merit
to
rate the time shift factor. The signal power estimate is compared to a stored
value, called the Lowest_power estimate. Initially, the
Lowest_power estimate variable is set to its highest digital value. If the
measured signal power estimate is lower than the Lowest_power estimate
value, the Lowest_power estimate value is updated to the new measured
signal power estimate and the time shift factor that was applied to the mirror
signal is stored in the variable called Best time shift estimate. The
algorithm
now loops and proceeds to the next step in the time shift range. ft repeats
the application of time shifting to a copy of the sampled mirror signal 105,
the
subtraction and signal power estimation processes and as wells as the
comparison to the stored signal power estimate. This process is repeated
until the entire time shift range is covered.
More advanced algorithms can be used that track the gradient change
in the signal power estimates. If the gradient is getting larger, divergence
is
occurring and there may be no need to continue further with the process. In
these cases, such an algorithm may help the process converge in less time.
Once the best time shift has been determined, the stored copy of the
sampled mirror signal is manipulated to exhibit the Best time shift estimate.
The Lowest_power_estimate is again set to its highest digital value. The next
31
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
step in the calibration process is to find the gain or attenuation factor that
results in the lowest complex signal return.
Once again, several search algorithms can be applied. The simplest
approach uses an amplitude range with a fixed, incremental step preferably
equal to a one step of the analog-to-digital converter. In this approach, the
time shifted mirror signal is multiplied by the amplitude factor and the
central
processing unit 19 proceeds similarly as previously described to subtract the
shifted, amplitude-adjusted mirror signal from the sampled reference signal
104. The procedure is illustrated in FIG. 10. Signal power estimation is
l0 performed and the search for the lowest power estimate proceeds. However,
instead of updating the variable Best time shift estimate when the measured
signal power estimate is lower than the Lowest_power estimate, the variable
Best amplitude estimate stores the factor used to multiply the shifted, mirror
signal. The algorithm then loops and proceeds to the next step in the
amplitude range. This process is repeated until the entire amplitude range is
covered. Similarly, more advanced algorithms can be used to track gradient
changes in the signal power estimates for faster convergence of the best
amplitude factor.
The amplitude range can be determined by comparing the peak levels
of the sampled reference signal and the mirror or shifted mirror signals. The
amplitude factor can be estimated by taking the ratio of the reference signal
peak amplitude to the shifted mirror signal peak amplitude (RSP/SMSP). If
the reference signal peak amplitude is higher than the shifted mirror signal
peak amplitude, additional signal gain is needed for good cancellation.
However, for added reliability, the amplitude range should be set at
2*RSP/SMSP at the upper end and SMSP/{RSP) at the Power end. If the
shifted mirror signal peak amplitude is greater than the reference signal peak
amplitude, the opposite condition exists and attenuation is desired for good
cancellation. In this case, the amplitude range should be set at
RSP/(2*SMSP) at the lower end and SMSP/RSP at the upper end.
Alternatively, the amplitude range can be a fixed range, such as 1/128 to 128.
Once the time shift and amplitude factors are known, the central
processing unit 190 exits the calibration routine by turning off the complex
32
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCTNS99/10023
signal source 15 and disconnecting it from the telephone line. The central
processing unit 190 then establishes the amplitude factor as the
Best amplitude estimate and the time shift factor as the
Best time_shift estimate. It then starts continuously sampling the tapped
signals 104 and 105 and applies the time shift and amplitude factors to the
sampled version of the mirror signal in real time. Also in real time, the
central
processing unit 190 subtracts the shifted, amplitude adjusted mirror signal
from the reference signal to produce the resultant signal. The resultant
signal
is the sampled equivalent of the Receive Signal 31 in FIG. 6. The procedure
is illustrated in FIG. 11. Near-end speech is cancelled on this signal. It can
than be passed to a digital implementation of a tone signal detector 27 or
FSK demodulator 28 or passed to a digital-to-analog converter for analog
reconstruction as previously described.
The above algorithm attempts to find the time shift and amplitude
factors that produce a resultant signal with the lowest signal power estimate.
In most cases, this algorithm should suffice. However, depending upon the
complex signal used, it is possible for the above algorithm to find the best
time shift and the best amplitude factor that when combined only result in a
local minima power estimate condition for the resultant signal. In such cases,
a brute force method of systematically processing a two dimensional grid
(consisting of amplitude factors versus time shift factors) is recommended.
Instead of attempting to identify these factors independently of one another,
a
trial and error effort is made by trying each point in the grid as illustrated
in
FIG. 12. The combination that produces the lowest signal power estimate is
the pair of factors to be used during steady-state operation.
To make this algorithm converge faster, every second or third point in
the grid can be initially evaluated instead of evaluating every point as
illustrated in FIG. 13. However, the signal power estimate for each point must
be stored. After the initial round is complete, the central processing unit 19
searches the grid for a rectangle whose corner points have the lowest
resultant signal power estimates. The signal power estimates of the 4 corner
points are averaged and stored in a local variable. The central processing
unit
19 then uses the coordinates of those four points to determine the new
33
CA 02331892 2000-11-09
WO 99/59320 PCT/US99/10023
amplitude and time shift ranges. It then focuses in on that space and
iteratively repeats the process as many times as desired. At the point where
the difference between the new, average 4 point power estimate is less than
2% different from the previous average 4 point power estimate, the process is
terminated and the switch to steady-state operation can begin.
The above description has been presented only to illustrate and
describe the invention. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the
invention to any precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations
are possible in light of the above teaching. The embodiments were chosen
to and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and
its
practical application to enable others skilled in the art to best utilize the
invention on various embodiments and with various modifications as are
suited to the particular use contemplated.
34
