Language selection

Search

Patent 2338367 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2338367
(54) English Title: JOINT
(54) French Title: JOINT
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E04F 15/16 (2006.01)
  • E04F 15/04 (2006.01)
  • E04F 21/22 (2006.01)
  • F16B 5/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HAMBERGER, PETER (Germany)
  • HIPPER, AUGUST (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • HAMBERGER INDUSTRIEWERKE GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • HAMBERGER INDUSTRIEWERKE GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: OYEN WIGGS GREEN & MUTALA LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2005-07-05
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-04-25
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-06-23
Examination requested: 2001-01-22
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/DE2000/001277
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2001048331
(85) National Entry: 2001-01-22

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
19962830.0 (Germany) 1999-12-23
20002413.2 (Germany) 2000-02-10

Abstracts

English Abstract


What is disclosed is a joint for two flat structural members, in particular
floor panels.
wherein a groove and tongue joint is provided functionally separate from
locking.
This locking is effected by a twistlock of a structural member, said twistlock
being
spaced apart from the groove and tongue joint and engaging with a
correspondingly
formed engaging element of the other structural member. The locking is
preferably
formed both at the longitudinal edges and at the front edges of a rectangular
structural member, for instance of a floor panel. The locking allows for a
joint of the
floor panels in flat position, i.e. without twisting.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un assemblage de deux composants plats, notamment de panneaux de revêtements de sols, selon lequel une liaison rainure/languette (16, 28) est réalisée de façon fonctionnellement séparée d'un verrouillage. le verrouillage est assuré par une mortaise (30) d'un composant, cette mortaise étant distante de la liaison rainure/languette (16, 28) et s'engageant dans l'élément tenon (24) correspondant de l'autre composant. La liaison est, de préférence, réalisée sur les bords longitudinaux comme sur les bords frontaux d'un composant rectangulaire, par exemple, d'un panneau de revêtement de sol. Grâce au verrouillage, les panneaux de sol sont assemblés en position plane et évitent ainsi de virer.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


9
What is claimed is:
1. A joint for plate-shaped structural members, for instance floor panels,
comprising
a groove and tongue joint passing a parting plane between two adjacent
structural
members, and a locking for fixing the relative position determined by said
groove
and tongue joint, the locking comprising a twistlock formed on one of the
structural members and separated from said groove and tongue joint, said
twistlock being positively or non-positively engageable with an engaging
element
on the other structural member, said tongue and said twistlock being provided
on
the same structural member and a front recess being formed between said tongue
and said twistlock, the front recess extending inwardly into said same
structural
member relative to said parting plane.
2. The joint according to claim 1, wherein said twistlock is provided at a
distance
to the tongue on one structural member and wherein the engaging element is
provided at a distance to the groove on the other structural member.
3. The joint according to claim 2, wherein said twistlock is provided at a
floor side.
4. The joint according to claim 1, wherein said twistlock is provided at a
floor side.
5. The joint according to claim 1, wherein a notch is formed at a face of said
twistlock
facing said tongue, said notch having a correspondingly formed projection of
the
engaging element as a counterpart.
6. The joint according to claim 5, wherein said notch and said projection both
are delimited
by inclined faces.
7. The joint according to claim 6, wherein the depth of said front recess is
chosen as a
function of a desired extraction force for separating the structural members.

10
8. The joint according to claim 5, wherein the depth of said front recess is
chosen as a
function of a desired extraction force for separating the structural members.
9. The joint according to claim 1, wherein the engagement between said
twistlock and said
engaging element is chosen such that a tension force is acting, pressing said
floor
members together.
10. The joint according to claim 9, wherein the depth of said front recess is
chosen as a
function of a desired extraction force for separating the structural members.
11. The joint according to claim 1, wherein the joint is provided at long and
narrow sides of
a floor panel.
12. The joint according to claim 11, wherein the depth of said front recess is
chosen as a
function of a desired extraction force for separating the structural members.
13. The joint according to claim 1, wherein the depth of said front recess is
chosen as a
function of a desired extraction force for separating the structural members.
14. The joint according to claim 1, wherein glue joining of the structual
members is
performed in addition to the positive or non-positive engagement.
15. The joint according to claim 1, wherein a dead-sounding layer is provided
at a floor face.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02338367 2004-04-07
Description
Joint
The invention relates to a joint for structural members, in particular for
floor
panels .
Such a joint for floor panels is for instance disclosed in EP 0 098 162 B1. In
the case of this known, so-called "glue-free" joint, the adjacent
circumferential edges
of the panels are joined by a groove and tongue joint. There, the lower groove
cheek
of the one panel facing the contact face is extended beyond the vertical
parting
plane and comprises a locking projection at its end portion, said locking
projection
immersing in a corresponding recess of the tongue of the other floor panel. In
order
to facilitate the laying of the panels, the joint in the engaging portion of
the extended
groove cheek with the tongue is performed with play so that displacing of the
panel
along the longitudinal edges is rendered possible.
W097147834 A'I shows a generic joint in which, similar to the solution
described above, the lower groove cheek of a floor panel is extended beyond
the
vertical parting plane and is provided with a projection which engages with a
corresponding clamping recess of the tongue. Contrary to the solution
initially
described, the engagement between the extended groove cheek and the
corresponding recess of the tongue is performed such that a force is exerted
by this
locking which presses the two floor panels towards each other perpendicular to
the
vertical plane.
In both solutions described above, the groove and tongue joint has a double
function. The groove and tongue joint on the one hand ensures the accurately
fitting
positioning of the two floor panels relative to each other so that no gaps and
projections occur and the required laying quality is guaranteed. The second
function
consists in ensuring this predetermined relative position by the non-positive
or
positive locking between the extended groove cheek and the tongue even in the
case of strain on the floor or of temperature and moisture fluctuations.
It is a problem With the known solutions that the extended groove cheek has
to be resiliently deformed to perform the engagement between the locking
elements.
In the case of unfavourable conditions, for instance with excessive strain of
the
resilient lower groove cheek or in the case of swelling due to moisture and
the

CA 02338367 2004-04-07
2
influence of temperature, cracks may occur in the contact area of the lower
groove
cheek with the pertinent floor panel so that the groove cheek can no longer
fulfil the
locking function described before. In addition, the quality of the fitting of
the groove
and tongue joint is aggravated in the case of such cracks occurring in the
contact
area, so that the accuracy required for correct floor laying is no longer
guaranteed.
As compared to this, it is an object of the present invention to provide a
joint
for structural members, in particular floor panels, in which an accurately
fitting
relative position is ensured with a minimum of equipment required.
Pursuant to the invention, fitting and locking are assumed by two separate
structural members. Fitting is performed conventionally via a groove and
tongue joint
while locking is performed via a twistlock formed at a distance to the groove
and
tongue joint and thus being functionally independent thereof. The twistlock
may be
formed at the tongue-side front face or at the groove-side front face of a
floor panel.
In a preferred embodiment, the twistlock is formed at a distance to the tongue
and immerses in a recess at the lower, floor-side groove cheek which, contrary
to the
prior art, is not resilient. This means that in a preferred variant both the
tongue and
the twistlock ace passing ttie vertical parting plane between the structural
members
in horizontal direction and are each immersing in corresponding recesses of
the
opposite structural member. With this variant, it is of particular advantage
that
substantially less material has to be removed relative to the solutions
initially
described, so that the shaping process for processing the front faces is
facilitated.
A particularly reliable locking which is easy to be manufactured is obtained
when the twistlock is provided with a recess with which a projection at the
bottom of
the lower groove cheek engages. The contact area between groove cheek and
twistlock is preferably designed as inclined face, so that, even with
relatively great
tolerances, the applying of a predetermined prestress force admitting the two
structural members to move towards each other is ensured.
The twistlock advantageously extends along the lower side of the structural
member, so that a high-quality visible and stepping surface can be produced.
It is of very particular advantage if a groove is formed between the twistlock
and the tongue, the depth of which determines the resilience of the twistlock
relative

CA 02338367 2004-04-07
3
to the vertical parting plane. This means that the tension forces applied by
the
twistlock and the extraction forces for taking apart the structural members
can easily
be adapted to varying ambience conditions or materials by changing the depth
of
this groove.
The invention may for instance be used with laminate floors having a carrier
plate of high-pressure or medium-pressure wood fibers. On principle, the glue-
free
joint pursuant to the invention may also be used with other floors, for
instance
parquet floors.
Another advantage of the joint pursuant to the invention consists in that the
structural members can be joined and locked with each other by sliding along
the
floor face. In the case of the prior art initially mentioned it is, however,
necessary to
first of all incline one structural member relative to the other structural
member so as
to insert the tongue in the groove, and to subsequently cause locking by
twisting to
the plane position. This means that by providing floor panels with the locking
pursuant to the invention the laying of the floor can be performed in a
substantially
easier and quicker Way.
The sliding faces along which the structural members are sliding during the
locking process are preferably designed as inclined faces.
When the structural members are laid flatly side by side, preferably both the
longitudinal edges and the side edges of the structural members are joined
pursuant
to the invention.
In addition to the locking described before, the structural members may also
be glued.
In the following, a preferred embodiment of the invention is explained in
detail
by rneans of schematic drawings.
Fig. 1 illustrates the joint area of two floor panels;
Fig. 2 illustrates the flUOf panels of Fig. 1 in the joined state and
Fig. 3 illustrates a representation to explain the laying process.

CA 02338367 2001-O1-22
The invention will be explained in the following by means of a laminate floor.
Such a laminate floor consists of a plurality of floor members of which merely
the joint area of two adjacent floor panels 2, 4 is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Each floor panel
2, 4 of a laminate floor has a carrier plate 6 - also referred to as core -
consisting of
high-pressure wood fibers. Such a carrier plate 6 ensures good dimensional
stability
and high resistance to pressure.
The floor face of each floor panel 2, 4 is formed by a countermove laminate 8
applied to the lower overall surface of each floor panel. In the case of
particular
applications, a moisture insulating sheet (not illustrated) rnay be
incorporated. This
countermove laminate 8 further increases the dimensional stability of the
flooring
material. As is illustrated in dot and dash in Figure 1, a dead-sounding layer
11 for
insulating structure-borne noise may be applied at the bottom of each floor
panel 2,
4. The dead-sounding layer may be formed of conventional insulating materials,
such as for instance polyurethane foam etc.
Ttie visible surface of the floor panels 2, 4 is formed by a decorating
laminate
and a cover layer 12 applied thereupon. The decorating laminate 10 is
manufactured by printing and gives the floor an appearance that comes
extremely
close to the structure of natural wood floors. The cover layer 12 provides for
the
necessary robustness and wear resistance of the flooring material.
In the front face 14 of the floor panel 4 illustrated in Fig. 1, a rectangular
groove 16 is formed which is limited by a higher groove cheek 18 and a lower
groove
cheek 20.
The lower portion of tf~e groove cheek 20 which is spaced apart from the
groove 16 is provided with a recess 22, the depth T of which his greater than
the
depth t of the groove 16. The remaining wall thickness of the groove cheek 20
is so
great that its resilient deformation during the joint of the panel is
practically
negligible. At the lower side of the groove cheek 20 a projection 24 is
provided which
extends in the direction of the floor face of the floor panel 4. The side
faces
(perpendicular to the drawing plane) of the projection 24 are fon~ed by
inclined
faces.
The front face 26 of the adjacent floor panel 2 is of corresponding
construction. Accordingly, a tongue 28 corresponding to the groove 16 projects
from
the front face 26. The groove and tongue joint formed by the groove 16 and the

CA 02338367 2001-O1-22
tongue 28 corresponds to the joint of conventional laminate floors which are,
for
instance, joined by gluing only. In the area of the floor face of the floor
panel 2, a
twistlock 30 is formed which is separated from the tongue 28 via a front
recess 32.
This means that the side walls of the front recess 32 are on the one hand
limited by
the twistlock 30 and on the other hand by the tongue 28. The depth S of the
front
recess 32 is greater than the length s of the twistlock - i.e. the groove
bottom is
displaced inwardly relative to the front face 26. By varying the depth S, the
resilience
of the twistlock 30 can be adjusted so that the extraction forces for
dismounting the
floor can be adapted.
The major area of the twistlock 30 which is spaced apart from the front recess
32 extends in prolongation of the floor face of the floor panel 2. In the face
of the
twistlock 30 facing the front recess 32, a notch 34 is provided which - as
will be
described in detail in the following - is engageable with the projection 24 of
the
recess 22 and is formed approximately below the front face of the tongue 28.
The front face of the twistlock 30 is provided with an inclined sliding face
36
which facilitates the joint of the floor panels 2, 4 in interaction with the
adjacent
inclined face of the projection 24.
For joint the floor panels 2, 4, the projection 24 slides on the sliding face
36
and the tongue 28 immerses in the groove 16. In this relative position, the
lower
groove cheek 20 in turn immerses in the front recess 32.
On further shifting of the floor panel 4 relative to the floor panel 2, the
twistlock 30 is resiliently deflected downwards due to the transversal force
introduced via the inclined sliding face 36 (cf. Fig. 2, illustration in dot
and dash).
The sliding face 36 slides along the projection 24 until the latter catches
with the
notch 34. In this state, the twistlock 30 engages the projection 24, the
contact
between these two structural members merely being performed along the inclined
faces formed at the right side in Fig. 2 while the inclined faces positioned
at the left
side are spaced apart from each other.
The position of the projection 24 and of the notch 32 is chosen such that the
two front faces 14, 26 are flatly pressed against each other in the locked
state, so
that the gap in the front face area between the two floor panels 2, 4 is
minimal. The
front face of the twistlock 30 is spaced apart from the adjacent front face of
the
recess 22. Since the depth S of the front recess 32 is greater than the length
s of the
tongue 28, the bottom of the front recess 32 is also spaced apart from the
front face

CA 02338367 2001-O1-22
~i
14 of the floor panel 4 alleging the parting plane 38 (Fig. 2, illustration in
dot and
dash).
The orientation of the floor panels 2, 4 in vertical direction is performed
alone
by the groove and tongue joint 28, 16, while the locking and pressing of the
floor
panels 2, 4 is performed alone by the twistlock 30 interacting with the
projection 24.
and thus depends on the resilience of the twistlock 30. This can be changed by
varying the depth S of the front recess 32 (indicated by broken lines in Fig.
1 ), so
that the resilient deflection of the twistlock 30 and the locking force can
easily be
adapted as a function of the choice of material and of the conditions of use
of the
floor.
Even if, in the case of unfavourable conditions, for instance with an
overstraining of the twistlock 30, a crack occurs in the area indicated with
reference
numeral 40, no offset in height has to be feared since the fisting between the
groove
16 and the tongue 28 remains unimpaired while at most the locking forces are
reduced.
With the conventional solutions, due to the double function of the groove and
tongue joint, both the locking and the fitting between the floor panels are
neutralized
when the lower groove cheek breaks. The invention thus constitutes a
substantial
improvement of conventional glue-free joints, so that an accurately fitting
laying of
the floor is guaranteed even with highest strains and even in the case of
mistakes in
laying.
The method of laying the floor panels 2, 4 as constructed pursuant to the
invention is explained in the following by means of Figure 3. It is assumed
that one
or several floor panels 2 (4) have already been laid on a floor 42 indicated
with in
dot and dash, wish merely the longitudinal side of the panel incorporating the
tongue
28 and the twistlock 30 being illustrated in Fig. 3. The floor panel 4 to be
added also
is placed flatly on the floor 42 and is then shifted in X-direction (arrow in
Figure 3)
until the inclined face 36 gets into contact with the projection 24.
Subsequently, a
striking block 44 is applied which has a more or less L-shaped cross-section
and
which rests with its longer leg on the upper side of the floor panel 4 while
the shorter
leg at least partially encompasses the right front face of tt~e floor panel in
Figure 3,
so that this short leg is in contact with the tongue 28.

CA 02338367 2001-O1-22
7
By slight strokes with a hammer 46 on the striking block 44 in the direction
of
the floor panel 2 already laid, the engagement of the locking elements is
performed
as illustrated in Figure 2.
The orientation in longitudinal direction of the panels subsequently is
performed by applying the striking block 44 to the narrow side. By applying
strokes,
the floor member 4 can be shifted along the longitudinal side of the panels
that have
already been laid, until the narrow sides are locked with each other.
It is essential that the concept pursuant to the invention allows for the
floor
panels 2, 4 to be joined in flat position, i.e. without twisting. Such
twisting was
necessary with the prior art as initially described. The measures pursuant to
the
invention thus substantially facilitate laying, so that laying work may also
be
performed by a non-professional person.
In order to enable a particularly reliable joint of the floor panels 2. 4,
joint by
gluing may be performed in addition to the locking as explained. This gluing
is
preferably effected in the groove and tongue area.
Another particular advantage of ttie construction pursuant to the invention is
that the twistlock 30 is forrned flush at the lower side of the floor panels
2, 4, so that
a flat contact is guaranteed. Since the groove and tongue joint and the
locking are
provided independently of each other, the two floor panels 2, 4 are guided
exactly by
the groove and tongue joint during the locking process already. With the prior
art
initially mentioned, the lower groove cheek which simultaneously forms the
locking
member is resiliently deflected during the locking process, so that the
precise
guiding of the locking process pursuant to the invention is not possible.
Since no twisting is required with the locking pursuant to the invention, it
remains left to the person laying the panels whether he will first join the
long sides or
the narrow sides of the floor panels. In the case of locking which requires
twisting,
the adjacent floor panels first had to be joined along the narrow sides, and
subsequently this long board consisting of a plurality of individual floor
panels had to
be twisted to engage with the floor panel already laid. This is substantially
more
awkward since the aligning of such long boards is much more difficult than the
successive laying of short floor panels.
With the embodiment described before, the twistlock 30 is formed at the same
floor panel 2 as the tongue 28. In kinernatic reversal, the twistlock 30 could
also be

CA 02338367 2001-O1-22
formed at ttie floor panel 4 provided with the groove 16, this, however,
necessitating
the removal of some more material in order to cut the front face free.
Instead of locking via inclined faces, other geometries, for instance rounded
faces, vertical faces, etc. could also be used. It may on principle also be
imagined to
manufacture the twistlock 30 from some other material and to fix it to the
panel.
What is disclosed is a joint for two flat structural members, in particular
floor
panels, wherein a groove and tongue joint is provided functionally separate
from
locking. This locking is effected by a twistlock of a structural member', said
twistlock
being spaced apart from the groove and tongue joint and engaging with a
correspondingly formed engaging element of the other structural member. The
locking is preferably formed both at the longitudinal edges and at the front
edges of
a rectangular structural member, for instance of a floor panel. The locking
allows for
a joint of the floor panels in flat position, i.e. without twisting.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2008-04-25
Letter Sent 2007-04-25
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Grant by Issuance 2005-07-05
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-07-04
Pre-grant 2005-03-11
Inactive: Final fee received 2005-03-11
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-10-06
Letter Sent 2004-10-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2004-10-06
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2004-09-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-04-07
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-10-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2002-10-23
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2001-06-23
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-06-22
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-04-11
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-04-11
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2001-03-29
Letter Sent 2001-03-29
Application Received - PCT 2001-03-27
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-01-22
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-01-22

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-04-15

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2001-01-22
Request for examination - standard 2001-01-22
Registration of a document 2001-01-22
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2002-04-25 2002-04-24
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2003-04-25 2003-04-25
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2004-04-26 2004-04-21
Final fee - standard 2005-03-11
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2005-04-25 2005-04-15
MF (patent, 6th anniv.) - standard 2006-04-25 2006-04-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HAMBERGER INDUSTRIEWERKE GMBH
Past Owners on Record
AUGUST HIPPER
PETER HAMBERGER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2001-01-22 1 18
Description 2001-01-22 8 425
Claims 2001-01-22 3 85
Drawings 2001-01-22 3 39
Cover Page 2001-06-22 1 25
Description 2004-04-07 8 417
Claims 2004-04-07 2 68
Representative drawing 2004-10-28 1 10
Cover Page 2005-06-14 1 41
Notice of National Entry 2001-03-29 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2001-03-29 1 113
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2001-12-31 1 111
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2004-10-06 1 160
Maintenance Fee Notice 2007-06-06 1 173
PCT 2001-01-22 2 43
PCT 2003-01-23 7 285
Correspondence 2005-03-11 1 30