Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.
Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:
(12) Patent Application: | (11) CA 2339911 |
---|---|
(54) English Title: | ACCURATE AGILE WAVELENGTH OPTICAL SOURCE AND USE THEREOF |
(54) French Title: | SOURCE OPTIQUE DE LONGUEUR D'ONDE PRECISE ET AGILE, ET UTILISATION CONNEXE |
Status: | Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication |
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC): |
|
---|---|
(72) Inventors : |
|
(73) Owners : |
|
(71) Applicants : |
|
(74) Agent: | |
(74) Associate agent: | |
(45) Issued: | |
(22) Filed Date: | 2001-03-07 |
(41) Open to Public Inspection: | 2002-09-07 |
Availability of licence: | N/A |
Dedicated to the Public: | N/A |
(25) Language of filing: | English |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): | No |
---|
(30) Application Priority Data: | None |
---|
This disclosure applies to an improvement on conventional optical transmitter
architecture which allows the
production of bursts of data signals with accurate selectable optical
frequency within the target optical band.
The invention overcomes the limitation caused when the monitor and feedback
circuits do not provide sufficient
control within the required time. A key aspect of this invention is the
ability to ensure the output frequency is
well controlled, even for rapid changes in output frequency, as in packet on
wavelength systems. Two
approaches are discussed: one for cases when the laser cannot be tuned within
an allowed switching time, and
one which applies when the laser can be tuned sufficiently quickly but
requires on-going stabilization. The
second approach may be used to improve the performance of the first approach.
The first approach, in which a
single laser cannot tune accurately within the required time, makes use of
multiple lasers implemented with an
appropriately fast optical switch to select the desired laser, each laser
being tuned and locked on the frequency
required for the packet it will address while an other is (or others are)
transmitting. In the second approach, in
which a single laser can be tuned to the nominal frequency during the
transition time, the implementation
improves the initial spectral quality and frequency accuracy on switching to a
new frequency through: -setting
the initial frequency as determined by a set of parameters in a table, -
improving the output quality during the
data transmission, -updating the table parameters based on the changes
necessary to improve the signal. The
second approach is particularly appropriate for rapid cyclical requirements
for a particular wavelength, as the
conditions for any wavelength may be nominally unchanged from cycle to cycle.
If the tunable lasers cover only
a fraction of the desired optical band, multiple lasers may be operated in
paralleled to provide full coverage of
the wavelength band, and combined with a fast optical switch, while being
controlled with either of the two
control approaches. This disclosure also applies to the use of such rapidly
tuned optical sources to provide data
units, frames or packets where each data unit can be of arbitrary frequency
within a set of operational
frequencies.
Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2339911 was not found.
2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.
Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.
For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee and Payment History should be consulted.
Description | Date |
---|---|
Inactive: IPC deactivated | 2013-11-12 |
Inactive: IPC deactivated | 2013-11-12 |
Inactive: IPC deactivated | 2013-11-12 |
Inactive: IPC assigned | 2013-01-23 |
Inactive: First IPC assigned | 2013-01-23 |
Inactive: IPC assigned | 2013-01-23 |
Inactive: IPC expired | 2013-01-01 |
Inactive: IPC expired | 2013-01-01 |
Inactive: IPC expired | 2013-01-01 |
Inactive: IPC from MCD | 2006-03-12 |
Inactive: IPC from MCD | 2006-03-12 |
Inactive: IPC from MCD | 2006-03-12 |
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline | 2004-03-08 |
Time Limit for Reversal Expired | 2004-03-08 |
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented | 2003-12-15 |
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice | 2003-03-07 |
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) | 2002-09-07 |
Inactive: Cover page published | 2002-09-06 |
Inactive: First IPC assigned | 2001-05-03 |
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) | 2001-04-10 |
Inactive: Office letter | 2001-04-10 |
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant | 2001-04-10 |
Application Received - Regular National | 2001-04-06 |
Abandonment Date | Reason | Reinstatement Date |
---|---|---|
2003-03-07 |
Fee Type | Anniversary Year | Due Date | Paid Date |
---|---|---|---|
Application fee - small | 2001-03-07 |
Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.
Current Owners on Record |
---|
CEDRIC DON-CAROLIS |
PETER MCILROY |
Past Owners on Record |
---|
None |