Language selection

Search

Patent 2340438 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2340438
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PRETREATING PAPER PULP
(54) French Title: PROCEDE ET APPAREIL POUR LE PRETRAITEMENT DE LA PATE A PAPIER
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21D 05/26 (2006.01)
  • D21D 05/00 (2006.01)
  • D21F 01/66 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MATULA, JOUNI (Finland)
(73) Owners :
  • ANDRITZ OY
(71) Applicants :
  • ANDRITZ OY (Finland)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2008-01-15
(86) PCT Filing Date: 1999-08-18
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-03-02
Examination requested: 2003-09-10
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/FI1999/000684
(87) International Publication Number: FI1999000684
(85) National Entry: 2001-02-13

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
981798 (Finland) 1998-08-21

Abstracts

English Abstract


The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for pretreating paper
pulp. The method and apparatus according to the invention
are especially preferably applicable to be used in the paper machine approach
system of paper machines producing filler-containing grades.
A characterizing feature of the method and apparatus according to the
invention is that a propeller pump is used as the gas separation tank
(16) feed pump (120).


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé et un appareil pour le prétraitement de la pâte à papier. Le procédé et l'appareil selon l'invention sont destinés à être utilisés de préférence dans un système d'approche d'une machine à papier produisant des qualités de papier contenant des charges. Une caractéristique du procédé et de l'appareil réside dans le fait qu'il est prévu une pompe à vis utilisée comme pompe d'alimentation (120) d'un réservoir de séparation des gaz (16).

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


12
CLAIMS
1. A method of pretreating paper pulp, in which method at least the greater
part
of the paper pulp, is fed by means of a gas separation tank feed pump (12,
120) into
a gas separation tank (16) and from there by means of a fan pump (18) further
to a
head box (22) of the paper machine (24), characterized in that the paper pulp
is fed
into the gas separation tank (16) from a white water tank (100) located at the
paper
machine level (K); and
the paper pulp is fed into the gas separation tank (16) by means of a
propeller pump
(12) located at the paper machine level (K).
2. A paper pulp pretreatment method according to claim 1, characterized in
that
prior to being transferred into the gas separation tank (16), of the fractions
forming
the paper pulp at least a filler fraction and a fiber fraction are treated
separately in
their own screening stages in order to remove impurities from said fractions,
after
which said fractions are combined to form paper pulp.
3. A paper pulp pretreatment method according to claim 1, characterized in
that
fractions of the fiber pulp contained in the paper pulp are treated separately
each in
its own screening stage.
4. A paper pulp pretreatment method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized
in that centrifugal clearing is used in said screening stages.
5. A paper pulp pretreatment method according to claim 2 or 3, characterized
in that a pressure screen is used in said screening stages.
6. A paper pulp pretreatment method according to claim 1, characterized in
that
the paper pulp is fed by means of the propeller pump (12) into the gas
separation
tank (16) directly from the white water tank (10) without employing special
cleaning.
7. An apparatus for pretreating paper pulp, which apparatus comprises at least
a
gas separation tank feed pump (12), a gas separation tank (16), a fan pump
(18) and

13
a head box (22) of a paper machine (24), characterized in that the white water
tank
(100) and the feed pump (120) are located at the machine level (K); and
said gas separation tank (16) feed pump is a propeller pump (120), by means of
which the paper pulp is fed from the white water tank (10) into the gas
separation
tank (16).
8. An apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that it comprises in
the
process order prior to the gas separation tank feed pump (120) both means (54)
for
screening a filler slurry and means (46, 48, 50) for screening the fiber pulp.
9. An apparatus according to claim 8, characterized in that said filler slurry
screening means comprise a centrifugal cleaning arrangement (54).
10. An apparatus according to claim 8, characterized in that said fiber pulp
screening means comprise a centrifugal arrangement (46, 48, 50).
11. An apparatus according to claim 8, characterized in that said fiber pulp
screening means comprise a pressure screen.
12. An apparatus according to claim 8, 10 or 11, characterized in that said
fiber
pulp screening means comprise a special individual screening device (46, 48,
50) for
each sort of fiber pulp.
13. An apparatus according to claim 10, 11 or 12, characterized in that said
fiber
pulp screening means (46, 48, 50) are located in the process order prior to
the white
water tank (10), which, in turn, is located prior to the gas separation tank
feed pump.
14. An apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that said gas
separation
tank (16) is provided with means for regulating the inlet pressure of the fan
pump (18)
without overflow.
15. An apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that a surface level
height difference between the white water tank (100) and the gas separation
tank
(16) is not more than 9 meters.

14
16. An apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that a surface level
height difference between the white water tank (100) and the gas separation
tank
(16) is less than 6 meters.
17. An apparatus according to claim 7, characterized in that a surface level
height difference between the white water tank (100) and the gas separation
tank
(16) is 2 to 4 meters.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
Method and apparatus for pretreating paper pulp
The present invention relates to a method of and apparatus for pretreating
paper pulp. The method and apparatus according to the invention are
especially preferably applicable to be used in paper machine approach
systems in order to optimize the operation of the so-called short circulation.
Almost all prior art paper machine approach systems feeding paper pulp to
the paper machine, which are well described in, e.g., US patent publication
jo 4,219,340, comprise the following components: a white water tank, a
centrifugal cleaning plant with feed pumps and pumps between various
stages, a gas separation tank with vacuum providing means, a fan pump, a
head box screen, a paper machine head box, and white water trays. Said
components are placed in connection with the paper machine and
arranged to operate as follows: The fiber material used for paper making
and the fillers which are diluted with the so-called white water obtained
from the wire section of the paper machine, are dosed from the machine
chest into the white water tank usually located at the bottom level of the
mill. By means of a feed pump also located at the bottom level of the mill,
the fiber suspension is pumped from the white water tank usually at the
machine level of the mill, i.e. the location level of the paper machine, or,
as
in said patent, to a first cleaning stage of a centrifugal cleaning plant
located above it. The centrifugal cleaning plant usually comprises several
(most commonly 4 - 6) stages, each typically having a feed pump of its
own. By means of pressure created by said feed pump, the fiber
suspension accepted in the first cleaning stage of the centrifugal cleaning
plant is further conveyed to a gas-separation tank typically located at a
level above the machine level. In practice that means about 10 - 12
meters above the surface of the white water tank. In the gas-separation
tank the fiber suspension is subjected to the effect of vacuum created by
vacuum apparatus, which most commonly are liquid ring pumps, whereby
both part of the gas dissolved in the suspension and the gas in the form of

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
2
small bubbles in the suspension rises above the surface of the liquid in the
tank and is discharged from the tank through the vacuum apparatus. From
the gas-separation tank the fiber suspension, wherefrom gas has been
removed as thoroughly as possible, flows to a fan pump located at the
bottom level of the mill, which feed pump further pumps the fiber
suspension to a head box screen (not shown in said US-patent) also
located at the bottom level of the mill, whereafter the fiber suspension
flows to the machine level into the head box of the paper machine.
io One problem in the paper machine approach system of prior art is its huge
volume mostly due to the volume of the gas separation tank and the
centrifugal cleaning plant as well as the long and large-sized piping.
Volume in itself is not a major problem, except for space utilization and the
point that it involves relatively big investments, but long delays due to
great
volumes essentially restrain the grade change and lead to great amounts
of broke in connection with the grade change. In connection with the grade
change, broke is formed of all the pulp being used to produce the final
product before the relative amount of all components of the fiber
suspension have been equalized throughout the approach system to
correspond to the content of the desired final product.
Said problem has already been dealt with in Fl patent 89728, according to
which different types of white waters are collected from the wire section of
the paper machine and guided directly to the short circulation of the paper
machine without employing any actual white water tank. In said
publication, under each white water tray there is a pump for delivering the
white water to a suitable location. The publication describes the white
water channels to be very flat, i.e. of small volume, so that the delays
remain as short as possible. In the solution according to said publication,
3o arranged at the side of the wire section there is a small pumping container
and means providing pumping operation, from which the white water is
further delivered to the process. The deaeration reached by means of this

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
3
apparatus is not efficient enough to provide undisturbed operation of the
paper machine, though.
In addition to problems related to space utilization and great liquid volume,
it may be noticed that the centrifugal cleaning plant creates other
problems, too. The traditional location of the centrifugal cleaning plant in
the paper machine approach system has been explained on the grounds
that the location is chosen to ensure that the fiber suspension just prior to
the head box of the paper machine is free of particles unsuitable for paper
io making, such as sand, bark specks, slivers and even over-sized filler
pieces, which may all be called as, e.g., impurities or impurity particles.
During the tests we have made we have noticed, however, that especially
in the case of paper machines producing filler-containing grades, a major
part of the fraction rejected by said centrifugal cleaning plant, that is
fraction removed from the flow going to the paper machine head box, is as
such suitable for papermaking. One reason for this is that the cyclones of
the centrifugal cleaning plant are dimensioned to prevent any unsuitable
material from passing into the head box, and, on the other hand, the
centrifugal cleaners may be planned to operate in an optimal way with one
material only or a few very similar materials. Taking into account e.g. the
very different densities of various components, such as e.g. fibers and
mineral-based fillers, it is easy to believe that in that kind of application
the
centrifugal cleaning plant can not perform optimal function with regard to
any component, but the basic goal of the centrifugal cleaning plant has to
be to keep the ratios of the components in the fiber suspension essentially
unchanged during the cleaning and to prevent any particle unsuitable for
papermaking from entering the head box of the paper machine. In fact, the
same problem is dealt with in Fl patents 93753 and 97736, although
accepting the presence of reject from the centrifugal cleaning plant.
One preferable solution to the problem mentioned above is said to be
separate treatment of every component of paper pulp: fresh fiber

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
4
suspension, pulp broke, recycled fibers, fillers, etc in their own sections
prior to mixing the components together. In that case, in each application it
is possible to choose the most suitable cleaning method and apparatus for
each component. The result is that only clean fractions are introduced to
the short circulation of the paper machine and the centrifugal cleaning
plant is not needed at all. In addition to that, cleaning every component
with an apparatus dimensioned and adapted for that special purpose is
essentially more efficient and economical in view of energy consumption
and the selection of appropriate devices for performing the cleaning
io compared with the centrifugal cleaning plant of prior art.
There are still some additional problems caused by the centrifugal cleaning
plant. Due to great liquid volume and complex flow piping, the centrifugal
cleaning plant tends to, if not directly create fluctuation in paper pulp flow
and pulp pressure, at least maintain and possibly strengthen these
fluctuations. Further, a complex centrifugal cleaning plant comprising
several (most commonly 4 - 6) stages and a large amount of relatively
small-sized flow units creates a major flow resistance, the compensation of
which using several large-sized centrifugal pumps is very power-
consuming. Usually there is a separate feed pump for each cleaning stage
of the centrifugal cleaning plant, in which case the total power requirement
of all the pumps of the short circulation of the paper machine in an
average-sized mill is in the order of 2 MW.
Another factor having an effect on the power consumption of especially
pumping is the location of the short circulation components of the mill in
relation to each other. The first disadvantage is noticed to be the location
of the gas separation tank usually being placed at a level above the
machine level. If it would be possible to bring the gas separation tank to
the machine level, it would eliminate the need to pump the fiber
suspension with the feed pump higher than the machine level. A
precondition for this is, though, that the gas separation tank has to be

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
constructed either to function without overflow, because the functioning of
overflow requires a relatively high free fall, in practice from above the
machine level to the level under the machine level, or to comprise a pump
arranged in connection with the overflow to create the pressure difference
s ensuring the functioning of the overflow. In other words, the surface level
of the gas separation tank (to be more exact, the inlet pressure of the fan
pump) could not be determined by means of overflow, when applying the
first alternative, but some substitutive method should be found. Because
the basic goal of the regulation of the surface level of the gas separation
io tank is, as already mentioned before, to maintain the inlet pressure of the
fan pump constant, it is in fact more economical to use a regulation system
taking into account, in addition to the changes in the surface level, also the
fluctuations in paper pulp density, which may sometimes be remarkable.
As a result, this kind of change will be accompanied by improvement in
is paper quality and stabilization of the manufacturing process. Thus, the
result is a solution that is more economical in view of energy consumption
in pumping and, at the same time, has a distinctly positive effect on paper
quality and process runnability.
2o A further factor having an effect on the energy consumption of pumping in
the paper machine approach system is the height of the white water tank.
The white water tanks, i.e. tanks wherein the so-called white waters from
the paper machine are collected, have traditionally been almost ten meters
high, relatively large containers located at the bottom level of the paper
25 mill, and the surface level of these tanks has fluctuated a lot. One reason
for the differences in the surface level is e.g. the location of the white
water
tank in connection with the machine. In the case of a so-called fourdrinier
machine, the white water tank, in that case also referred to as the wire pit,
has been located under the wire section, whereby even constructional
3o reasons have caused the surface level of the white water tank to be
relatively low. The surface level of a white water tank arranged at the side
of the wire section or the like (a so-called off-machine silo), in turn, is
not

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
6
always as high as it might in practice be. The big size of the white water
tank has been justified on the basis that the presence of a big buffer tank
has been regarded as a positive factor stabilizing the process. This has
also caused some increase in energy consumption, because at first the
feed pump has had to compensate the sometimes low surface level of the
white water tank, and extra delays in the process due to the big volume of
the white water tank.
Said location of the white water tank at the bottom level of the mill, that
is,
io under the machine level, may be avoided in the approach system
according to the invention. The solutions according to the invention make it
possible to arrange the white water tank at the machine level, whereby
also the gas separation tank feed pump located at the side of the white
water tank is placed at the machine level.
When solving said problems e.g. in the way described before, it is possible
to develop the paper machine approach system further by employing as
gas separation tank feed pump a propeller pump with a substantially
smaller power requirement and with a capacity to head ratio essentially
2o better compared to a centrifugal pump. In this case, the stock, either all
or
at least the main part of it, is fed into the gas separation tank by means of
said propeller pump. As to practical characteristics, the propeller pump is
better suited for the purpose than the centrifugal pump, but earlier it has
not been possible to use it in said application, because the propeller pump
has not met the head requirements of prior art processes. Compared to
the power requirement of about 2 MW of said prior art apparatus, the
employment of one propeller pump results in a power consumption of
about 200 kW, i.e. it is possible to save about 90 % of the power needed.
It is possible to develop the paper machine approach system still further
according to a preferred embodiment of the invention by totally
abandoning said gas separation tank feed pump from the approach

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
7
system. In some suitable conditions this may be done simply by bringing
the gas separation tank down to the machine level, whereby the pressure
difference needed to transfer the fiber suspension, totally or at least the
main part of it, from the white water tank to the gas separation tank is so
small that it may be created by means of the vacuum apparatus i.e.
vacuum pump/s of the gas separation tank. The arrangement according to
this embodiment may, if necessary, be provided with a valve for controlling
the flow from the white water tank to the gas separation tank.
io Some of the advantages of utilizing the method according to the invention
are, e.g.:
- overall decrease of reject in papermaking due to more accurate
screening,
- more stable operation of the paper machine short circulation,
- smaller flow resistances in the paper machine short circulation,
- space saving in the paper machine short circulation,
- saving of energy needed for pumping,
- shorter delays,
- quick grade change,
- a cleaner process, no microbe growth,
- simple construction - economical investment.
The characteristic features of the method and apparatus according to the
invention are described in the appended patent claims.
In the following, the method and apparatus according to the invention are
described in more detail with reference to the appended figures, of which
Fig. 1 illustrates mainly a prior art solution according to US-patent
4,219,340,
3o Fig. 2 illustrates a solution according to a preferred embodiment of the
invention, and

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
8
Fig. 3 illustrates a solution according to a second preferred embodiment of
the invention.
The prior art approach system illustrated in Fig. 1 comprises a white water
s tank 10, a feed pump 12, a centrifugal cleaning plant 14 (with several
stages not shown), a gas separation tank 16 with its vacuum apparatus 17,
a fan pump 18, a head box screen 20, a head box 22 of the paper
machine and white water collection channels (not shown). Said
components are placed in connection with the paper machine 24 and
io arranged to operate as follows. Fiber material used in paper making, which
may comprise fresh pulp, secondary pulp and/or broke, and fillers which
are diluted with the so-called white water obtained from the paper
machine, primarily from its wire section, are introduced into the white water
tank 10 into which the white waters are collected and which is usually
15 located at the bottom level of the mill in prior art arrangements, to
produce
paper pulp. By means of a feed pump 12, also located at the bottom level
of the mill, said paper pulp is pumped from the white water tank 10 to the
centrifugal cleaning plant 14 usually located at the machine level K of the
mill (the location level of the paper machine 24), which cleaning plant most
20 usually comprises 4 - 6 stages. Stock accepted by the first stage of the
centrifugal cleaning plant 14 proceeds further under pressure created by
the feed pump 12 (and with the contributory effect of the vacuum of the
gas separation tank) into the gas separation tank 16 located at a level T
above the machine level. The gas separation tank 16 typically comprises
25 an overflow to keep the surface level of stock in the tank constant. At the
overflow the stock discharged from the tank flows down under the machine
level into the white water tank 10 located at the bottom level of the mill.
From the gas separation tank 16 the essentially gas-free paper pulp, i.e.
pulp from which gas has been removed as thoroughly as possible by
30 means of the vacuum apparatus 17, flows into the fan pump 18 located at
the bottom level of the mill, which fan pump pumps the paper pulp further
to the head box screen 20 also located at the bottom level of the mill,

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
9
wherefrom the accepted paper pulp flows to the machine level K into the
head box 22 of the paper machine 24.
Figure 2 illustrates a solution according to a preferred embodiment of the
invention in connection with a conventional white water tank 10 of prior art.
In the solution according to the figure, three pipelines 40, 42 and 44 are
connected with the white water tank 10, each pipeline bringing different
fiber pulp into the white water tank. Each pipeline 40 - 44 is connected to
its own centrifugal cleaning arrangement 46, 48 and 50 respectively.
io However, it has to be stated that centrifugal cleaning is by no means the
only screening possibility, as pressure screens of new type, preferably
provided with slot drums, are very well suitable for the final screening of
various pulp fractions. Further, one has to notice that it is also possible to
connect all said pipelines together, whereby various sorts of pulp are
is mixed together prior to the white water tank e.g. in a special mixing tank,
wherefrom the stock is taken into a so-called machine chest utilized as a
buffer tank. Naturally, this kind of mixing needs appropriate dosing which is
not described in this text more precisely as it is considered to be known to
any person normally skilled in the art. In this embodiment of the invention,
2o each centrifugal cleaning arrangement 46 - 50 is considered to treat its
own sort of pulp e.g. so that arrangement 46 treats the pulp broke from the
broke pulper of the paper machine, arrangement 48 recycled fiber pulp
and arrangement 50 fresh fiber pulp. The figure further illustrates a pump
in connection with each centrifugal cleaning arrangement, with which
25 pumps the different pulps are introduced through the cleaner/s into the
white water tank 10. Said pumps may, though, be located in the process
remarkably further from the cleaner/s. It is even possible to place various
treatment apparatus between the pump and the cleaner/s. With this
arrangement, each sort of pulp may be treated as optimally as possible, in
30 other words so that each cleaner may be chosen and run according to
optimal screening of the sort of pulp in question. After the cleaners
illustrated in the figure, the process may comprise various intermediate

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
tanks, pumpings or other apparatus needed for treatment of each pulp
fraction. Further, the embodiment of the figure illustrates a filler treatment
arrangement comprising a mixing/dispersing tank 56, a filler slurry feed
pump 58 and a centrifugal cleaning arrangement 54 performing the
5 screening of the filler and a pipeline 52 feeding the screened filler
material
to between the white water tank 10 and the feed pump 120. This
arrangement ensures that only really too big-sized filler particles are
removed from the filler material flow and either totally removed from the
system or e.g. returned back to the dispersing stage. Thus, this solution
lo prevents the rejecting of fairly big filler particles which are still
clearly
thinner than the paper, which rejecting would be normal in case of a
conventional prior art centrifugal cleaning plant. As feed pump 120, a
propeller pump is employed which creates a head that is sufficient at least
when e.g. there is no centrifugal cleaning plant creating flow resistance
between the pump 120 and the gas separation tank 16. And, as already
stated, in some cases the feed pump may be replaced with the vacuum
apparatus of the gas separation tank, which vacuum apparatus creates the
pressure difference needed for transferring the paper pulp.
2o Figure 3 illustrates a solution according to a second preferred embodiment
of the invention. It relates to a new kind of white water tank 100 located
essentially (the main part of the white water tank is above the surface of
the machine level and the water level is clearly above the surface of the
machine level) at the machine level of the paper mill, into which tank the
fiber fractions are brought via pipelines 40 - 44 and which has a surface
level at the level Sloo. The figure illustrates in broken lines a prior art
white
water tank 10 located at the bottom level of the mill and having a surface
level at level Slo, and a feed pump 12. In some cases, the height
difference between the surface levels of Sloo and Sio is several meters,
3o especially in cases where the wire pit is located under the wire section of
the paper machine, whereby the difference in height may be calculated
directly in extra consumption of pumping energy in an arrangement

CA 02340438 2001-02-13
WO 00/11265 PCT/F199/00684
11
according to prior art. In addition to that, a large-sized white water tank
creates in the operation of the process a delay of its own. In the solution
according to the figure, the height difference dh between the surface levels
of the white water tank 100 and the gas separation tank 16 is less than 9
meters, preferably less than 6 meters, suitably 2 - 4 meters, whereby the
head requirement of the pump 120 is low enough to fully enable the use of
a propeller pump.
It has to be noticed from the above, that although the invention has been
io described in connection with the paper machine short circulation without a
centrifugal cleaning plant, this is only one special embodiment of the
method according to the invention. In other words, the method and
apparatus according to the invention are applicable also in a short
circulation where the centrifugal cleaning plant is located in the traditional
position. In that kind of embodiment only some advantages are lost, which
would be achievable when applying an embodiment fully in accordance
with the invention. Nevertheless, the employment of a propeller pump
according to the invention brings such remarkable advantages in all
applications that its utilization is always justified.
As noticed from the above, a new method of pretreating paper pulp fed to
the paper machine has been developed, which method eliminates many
drawbacks and disadvantages of prior art and solves problems that have
been disturbing the use of prior art approach systems. From the above it
has to be noticed, though, that the individual novel features described in
different embodiments are applicable independently and by no means
inevitably in the connection where they have been presented in the above.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2018-08-20
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-06-11
Letter Sent 2017-08-18
Grant by Issuance 2008-01-15
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-01-14
Inactive: Final fee received 2007-10-17
Pre-grant 2007-10-17
Letter Sent 2007-07-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-07-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-07-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-07-10
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2007-05-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2007-02-01
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-08-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-12-19
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-06-27
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-06-27
Letter Sent 2003-09-30
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-09-10
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2003-09-10
Request for Examination Received 2003-09-10
Letter Sent 2002-05-06
Letter Sent 2002-02-14
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-01-10
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-05-17
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2001-04-24
Inactive: IPC assigned 2001-04-18
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2001-04-18
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-04-18
Application Received - PCT 2001-04-10
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-03-02

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-07-18

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ANDRITZ OY
Past Owners on Record
JOUNI MATULA
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2001-05-14 1 6
Description 2001-02-12 11 591
Abstract 2001-02-12 1 48
Claims 2001-02-12 3 110
Drawings 2001-02-12 3 66
Claims 2002-01-13 3 110
Abstract 2002-01-13 1 48
Drawings 2002-01-13 3 66
Claims 2005-12-18 3 96
Claims 2007-01-31 3 88
Representative drawing 2007-06-13 1 6
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2001-04-18 1 111
Notice of National Entry 2001-04-17 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2002-02-13 1 113
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-09-29 1 173
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2007-07-22 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2017-09-28 1 178
Correspondence 2001-04-18 1 25
PCT 2001-02-12 12 473
Fees 2001-08-02 1 24
Correspondence 2007-10-16 1 43