Language selection

Search

Patent 2360802 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2360802
(54) English Title: INTENSITY-BASED OPTICAL WAVE GUIDE SENSOR
(54) French Title: CAPTEUR A GUIDE D'ONDES OPTIQUES BASE SUR L'INTENSITE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01B 11/16 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • GREGORY, OTTO J. (United States of America)
  • EULER, WILLIAM B. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
(71) Applicants :
  • THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-01-25
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-07-27
Examination requested: 2001-07-26
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2000/001613
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2000043729
(85) National Entry: 2001-07-26

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/117,301 (United States of America) 1999-01-26

Abstracts

English Abstract


The optical waveguide sensor (10) is comprised of a housing (12) having an
exterior (16) and an interior surface (14). The exterior surface (16) is
coated with at least two layers, the first layer comprised of a low index of
refraction material (24) and the second layer comprised of a highly reflective
material (26). The housing is in communication with first (28) and second (30)
optical fibers.


French Abstract

Cette invention concerne un capteur à guide d'onde optique (10) comprenant un boîtier (12) qui présente une surface extérieure (16) et une surface intérieure (14). La surface extérieure (16) est recouverte d'au moins deux couches, la première renfermant un matériau à faible indice de réfraction (24), la seconde un matériau fortement réfléchissant (26). Le boîtier est en communication avec la première (28) et la seconde (30) fibre optique.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


10
1. An optical waveguide sensor comprising:
a housing, the housing having an interior and exterior surface, the exterior
surface having at least two layers, the first layer comprised of a low index
of refraction
material and the second layer comprised of a highly reflective material;
a first optical fiber in communication with the housing;
a second optical fiber in communication with the housing; and
means for detecting the change in the intensity of light when light is
passed through the housing, reflected and refracted within the housing and
received by
the second optical fiber, the optical wave guide sensor being capable of
measuring up to
at least 2000 µ.epsilon. when the housing is stressed.
2. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 wherein the housing
has first and second opposed ends, the first optical fiber in communication
with the first
end and the second optical fiber in communication with the second end.
3. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 wherein the first layer
is comprised of polyimide.
4. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 or 3 wherein the
second layer is comprised of aluminum.
5. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 wherein the first layer
is selected from the group consisting of polyimide, silicon and germanium.
6. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 or 5 wherein the
second layer is selected from the group consisting of aluminum, silver,
platinum and
palladium.
7. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 wherein the sensor is
insensitive to temperatures in the range of about -20 to 50° C.
8. The otpical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 wherein the optical
fibers are multimode.
9. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 1 wherein the housing is
comprised of glass.
10. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 9 wherein the housing is

11
cylindrical.
11. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 10 wherein the housing
has dimensions of 0.5mm inside diameter x 1mm outside diameter x 100mm long.
12. The optical waveguide sensor according to claim 11 wherein the optical
waveguide sensor has a gage factor of 490.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
1
Title of the Invention
Active Strain Gages for Earthquake Damage Assessment
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to optical waveguide sensors and more
specifically to temperature insensitive optical waveguide sensors which can
monitor
strain in excess of 2000 ~,s.
2. Description of the Related Art
In some regions of countries, it is necessary to assess the condition of vital
infrastructure elements (viz. roads, bridges and buildings under normal
loading
1 o conditions and after catastrophic events such as earthquakes and floods.
For example,
state highway departments and construction companies could use such
information to
minimize repair cost, reduce service disruptions and avoid or detect
catastrophic failures.
Such data could also be used to alert emergency response teams to dangerous
conditions
within structures, provide warning of imminent structural failure and/or give
detailed
damage information for use in structural repair. Automated diagnostic
monitoring
systems could monitor the integrity of a structure and assess the damage with
little
human intervention through real time processing of the information.
Electrical strain gages, including resistive type strain gages and their
equivalents
such as piezoelectric, semiconductor, and capacitance gages, are fairly
compact and
2o highly accurate strain measuring devices. However, they have the
disadvantage of
rather small dynamic range and some hysteresis. Traditional electric
resistance strain
sensors have gage factors less than four. Environmental conditions such as
moisture and
temperature markedly affect the performance of resistance strain gages and
thus, those
gages need frequent calibration. If the baseline electrical resistance changes
sufficiently
due to environm.,ntal effects, the gage will not develop its stated
calibration factor and
measuring errors will be introduced. For traditional strain measurement
methods, the
problem of gage stability due to temperature changes can be reduced if the
period of
observation is kept short, otherwise the response must be considered to be a
function of
temperature (hence time) in addition to strain. Comparisons with traditional
electrical
3o resistance strain gages show that the optical methods are cost effective
because of their
high gage factors. There are also compatible with fiber optic communication
systems
and can be accessed from remote locations in a reliable manner.
Optical fiber based sensors have been applied to many of applications
including

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
2
displacement (position), temperature, pressure, sound, and strain. In
application,
optical sensor data collection can generally be divided into two basic
categories: phase-
modulated and intensity-modulated. Intensity modulated sensors are usually
associated
with displacement or some other physical perturbation that interacts with the
sensor. The
perturbation causes a change in received light intensity and the intensity is
related to the
monitored parameter. Phase-modulated sensors compare the phase of light in a
sensing
path to the phase in a reference. Phase difference can be measured with
extreme
sensitivity, but frequently requires sophisticated electronics for signal
processing. Also,
phase modulated sensors have been used to measure temperature, thus they need
to be
to calibrated for temperature when used in a strain application. Application
of this type of
optical sensor includes in situ monitoring of thin film deposition thickness.
Phase-
modulated sensors are generally more accurate than intensity-modulated
sensors.
However, they are usually more expensive and extremely sensitive to
environmental
effects, such as temperature.
The optical waveguide sensor of the invention overcomes the drawbacks of the
aforementioned prior art strain gages
Brief Summary of the Invention
Broadly, the invention comprises an optical waveguide sensor, which comprises
a
housing having an interior and exterior surface. At least two layers are
applied to the
2o exterior surface of the housing. The first layer comprises a low refractive
index material
and the second layer comprises a highly reflective material. First and second
optical
fibers are in communication with the housing. A beam of light of known
intensity is
passed through the first optical fiber through the housing and received by the
second
optical fiber. The beam is attenuated according to how many 'bounces' or
reflections it
experiences as it passes through the housing which is determined by the
conformation of
the housing. The conformation of the housing is directly related to the
bending strain
that the housing experiences. Means for detecting the change in the intensity
of the
beam of light is in communication with the second optical fiber which allows
for the
monitoring of up to at least 2000 ps.
3o In a preferred embodiment of the invention the optical waveguide sensor
comprises a flexible, hollow, glass tube with an absorptive layer of polyimide
deposited
on the outsid., followed by the deposition of a layer of high optical
reflection, such as
aluminum. The parameter that is monitored is the intensity of the exiting
light after the

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
3
beam has passed through the sensor tube. The beam is attenuated according to
how
many 'bounces' or reflections it experiences which in turn is a function of
the radius of
curvature of the hollow tube sensor. The radius of the curvature of the tube
is directly
related to the bending strain that the tube experiences and so applied strain
can be
inferred by monitoring the exit light beam intensity. The stability,
ruggedness and
simplicity of the present invention facilitate its use for remote sensing
applications.
Since optical fiber technology can be used to both send and receive the light
signals,
instantaneous strain can be monitored and relayed immediately or stored for
later
retrieval via a transmission link.
1o In another preferred embodiment of the invention the optical waveguide of
the
invention has a gage factor of about 500 for strains in excess of 2000 ~s. The
housing is
comprised of a hollow, glass wave-guide of dimensions of about 0.5 mm ID X 0.8
mm
OD X 100 mm long.
The geometry of the housing of the optical waveguide sensor is compatible with
standard telecommunications thereby facilitating the incorporation of the
housing into
smart system arrays for damage assessment in structures such as buildings,
roads, and
bridges. Optical fibers bring the excitation light signal to and the response
signal from
the housing. In a preferred embodiment, the housing is a glass tube having a
small
diameter. The small diameter glass tubes act as the substrate for multiple
thin film layers
2o that can be optimized to provide the maximum dynamic range for a
predetermined strain
excursion. The optical wave guide sensor of the invention which comprises a
glass tube
coated with the thin film layers responds to bending strain by attenuating the
optical
intensity of the excitation signal and exhibits little or no hysteresis.
The optical waveguide sensors of the invention have a large gage factor of
about
500, and are temperature insensitive, i.e. the sensors do not respond to
temperature
changes over the normal range of outdoor temperatures (-20 to 50 °C),
inexpensive to
manufacture, not affected by electromagnetic fields, chemically inert to
environmental
conditions such as moisture and acid rain thereby making it possible to embed
the
sensors in a concrete structure with no fear of chemical reaction with the
concrete and
3o are readily interfaced with fiber optics communications equipment, i.e. the
connection
between the optical fibers and the sensing area can be hermetically sealed
between the
fiber and the capillary tube.
Brief Description of the Drawings

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
4
Fig. 1 is a schematic of an embodiment of the optical waveguide
sensor of the invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic of the layout used for testing an embodiment of the
optical
waveguide sensor.
Fig. 3 is a graph illustrating the strain response of optical waveguide
sensors
comprised of uncoated, aluminum coated, polyimide coated, and polyimide plus
aluminum coated capillaries.
Fig. 4 is a graph illustrating the strain response of an optical waveguide
sensor
comprised of an ITO and aluminum coated capillary.
Fig. 5 is a table of gage factors for the various types of sensors shown in
Figs. 3
and 4.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments)
Referring to Fig. 1, the optical waveguide sensor 10 of the invention is
generally
shown. A housing 12 has an interior surface 14 and an exterior surface 16. The
exterior
surface 16 is comprised of at least one layer of low index of refraction
material 24 and at
least one layer of highly reflective material 26. The housing 12 , and layers
28 and30
have very small coefficients of expansion, e.g. 9X106 in/in °C. The
basic dimensions of
the sensor 10 in the direction of strain do not change over the temperature
ranges
typically encountered environmentally. The housing 12 is in communication with
a first
optical fiber 28 and a second optical fiber 30. Means for detecting (not
shown) the
change in the intensity of light when light is passed through the housing 12,
reflected and
refracted within the housing 12 and received by the second optical fiber 30,
is in
communication with the second optical fiber 30.
In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the low index of refraction
material
of the first layer 24 is polyimide and the highly reflective material of the
second layer 26
is aluminum.
EXPERIMENTAL
The invention comprises a robust waveguide strain sensor capable of monitoring
strain of up to about at least 2000~s. The active strain elements for the
sensors comprise
3o hollow glass tubes onto which thin film, optically active materials are
deposited.
lOcm long, hollow glass wave guides were obtained from commercial suppliers.
The tube type sizes evaluated were; plain glass tubes, 5mm ID with 0.20mm wall
thickness (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh PA) and ~16 - 35 ~,m polyimide coated
glass

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
tubes with wall thickness, 0.09mm, 0.175mm, 0.1075mm and tube inside
diameters of 0.32mm, 0.45mm, and 0.53mm respectively (Alltech Company,
Deerfield,
NY). The tubes were cleaned with a commercial ammonia based glass cleaner and
then
with acetone, methanol and deionized water rinses followed by blow drying in
filtered
5 nitrogen gas. Subsequent to cleaning they were placed in an ozone plasma
chamber for
two hours to remove any residual organic surface contaminants. Three different
thin
film coatings were evaluated for the optically sensitive layer; polyimide,
indium tin
oxide and zinc oxide in thicknesses of 0.1 to 40 Vim. Other coatings believed
suitable for
purposes of the ir_vention include silicon and germanium.
1 o Polyimide coatings were 'standard' films provided by gas chromatography
supply
houses for column capillaries. The latter two materials were deposited by RF
reactive
sputtering. After applying the active coating, a reflective outer layer of
aluminum
(~O.S~,m) was deposited, also by reactive sputtering. Other reflective layers
believed to
be suitable include silver, platinum, and palladium. The source and detector
optical
fibers were then epoxy bonded into either end of the tubes. The ends of the
source and
detector fibers 28 and 30 respectively were prepared, using standard industry
techniques,
to produce a flat surface normal to the fiber and sensor axis.
Referring to Fig. 2., the main components of the experimental apparatus were 1
)
a HeNe laser light source 40 emitting light energy in a range of 632 to 633
nm, 2) a
2o microscope objective lens in a micro manipulator mount 42 to focus the
laser light onto
the source optical fiber 28, 3) a reference photodiode beam detector 44, 4)a
sensing beam
photodiode detectors 46, 5) a four point bending apparatus 48 with built in
position
sensing 50 and a comparator 52. Beam chopping and frequency sensitive
amplification
was used to stabilize the system against line power and laser fluctuations.
About 4% of
the laser light was directed to the reference diode detector 44 via a beam
splitter 52 in the
optical path. The reference signal was electronically divided into the sensor
output
signal to further reduce random noise. Commercial multimode optical fibers
were used
to bring the light source to the sensor input and carry the light exiting the
sensor to the
output detector. Strain was induced using the four point bending apparatus
ASTM C-
1341-97 with a programmable stepper motor. Typical step size was 0.25mm.
The relationship between strain and deflection for a rod or tube in four point
bending is:
__ s
s 8a +az d (1)

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
6
Where 8 is deflection from equilibrium of the center of the tube, d is the
outside
diameter of the tube, and a is half the distance between the two movable
(inner) pins of
the four point bending rig (2a=2.92cm in this case).
Equation ( 1 ) gives a measurement of strain based on the geometry of the four-
point bending device. The quantity 8 can be measured directly or can be
determined
accurately by constructing a calibration curve of 8 versus inner pin
displacement. Over
the range of bending necessary to attain 2000~s, 8 is linear with displacement
and so can
be directly inferred from the linear displacement of the inner pins.
RESULTS
1o The smart optical strain sensor employs a hollow glass waveguide support
with
the active sensing material located between the glass outer wall and the
reflective
(aluminum) over coating. The gage factor or response to strain was calculated
as
follows:
G_ DID 1
I° DE
(2)
where DI is the change in intensity as measured by the light detector diode at
two strain
levels, Os is the change in strain, and I° is the intensity in the
unstrained condition. Since
the intensity versus strain response was found to be essentially linear over
the strain
ranges tested, the gage factor was calculated by dividing the slope of the I
versus E curve
2o by the I-axis intercept of the straight line that best fit the data. In
practice the parameter
measured is the output voltage of the amplifier used to measure the response,
to intensity
changes, of the sensor output detector diodes. That voltage was divided by the
output of
the reference diode amplifier and the ratio of the two voltages plotted as a
function of
strain.
When an ITO layer is added to the sensor construction, the gage factor is
reduced
but the range increases significantly. The particular structure, used for the
response
curve in Figure 4, was formed by sputtering 0.9~.m of ITO followed by O.S~,m
of
aluminum onto the polyimide coated 0.53mmm ID tubes. The gage factor for that
sensor
configuration was 410. The change in signal when going from unstrained to
2000~E was
3o extrapolated to 'ue 90% (reduction). This is in contrast to the typical 50%
signal
reduction observed over the same strain range for the various specimens
without ITO

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
7
active layer (Figure 3). The associated gage factors for the configurations
presented in
Figures 3 and 4 are summarized in the table of Figure 5.
Cyclic straining of the sensor was done to test the reproducibility of the
optical
sensors. In four cycles from zero to maximum strain, for identical thin film
structures
fabricated on tubes of the same ID, the strain gages had reproducibility
better than 1 %.
DISCUSSION
The optical strain waveguide sensors are based on the loss of light that
occurs
when the laser beam hits the inner wall of the waveguide, traverses the wall
(and any
coatings thereon), reflects from the mirrored outer layer (aluminum) and
traverses the
1 o coatings and wall of the waveguide once more. When light impinges upon the
inner
surface of the capillary, some is reflected, some is scattered (non-specular
reflection) and
some is transmitted (refracted) into the tube wall. These processes occur at
each
subsequent interface as well with an reflection/transmission ratio that
depends, according
to Fresnel and Snell Laws, upon indices of refraction of each material in the
stack. In
addition, each material absorbs some of the light in accordance with its
individual
absorptivity. So after one interaction event, the initial intensity, Io, is
reduced to I1 = (1-
f)Io. Where 'f is the fractional loss for one interaction. If there are 'N'
interactions,
then the final intensity is IN = (1-f)NIo. With the highly reflective coating
in place on the
outside, only absorption and scattering actually reduce the intensity of the
light beam
2o since reflection and refraction only affect the phase of the light waves as
they arrive at
some point in space.
As bending stresses are applied to the sensor, the curvature increases thereby
increasing the number of 'bounces' or interactions between the light beam and
the
waveguide with associated losses for each bounce. The equation for the number
of
bounces, N, as function of radius of curvature, R, is given by (11):
N - 1 + sL,
2dcos-' '
(3)
And d is the outer diameter of the tube, s is the strain and L is the gage
length.
When an aluminum reflective layer is used as the outer coating little light
can
3o escape, thus the gage factor is reduced for that configuration. This is
supported by the
fact that the smallest gage factor occurred for the plain glass capillaries
coated with an
aluminum reflector. Almost all the light that is launched into the tube
reaches the

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
8
detector fiber at the exit end. On the other hand plain glass, without any
coatings at
all, loses the most intensity on each bounce since light can escape the tube
completely.
So the totally uncoated configuration has the largest gage factor of all. A
similar
scenario applies to the polyimide coated capillaries with and without the
reflecting outer
coatings. One might conclude, therefore, that the 'best' sensor is the plain
uncoated
glass and this might be so for applications where the maximum strain is less
than
1000~s. (For instance, counting the traffic passage on a highway with optical
sensors
imbedded in the roadway would require sensors with responses optimized for
something
like 400ps.) However, there are other considerations. First of all the plain
glass tubes
are not robust enough to reliably record 2000~,E without failure. If the walls
were thinner
they could withstand more bending but then they become too fragile to handle.
The
addition of the polyimide layer was an enhancement developed for the gas
chromatography industry. The polyimide layer increased the flexibility of the
capillaries
permitting wall thickness reductions and much smaller bend radii without
failure. As
part of the evaluation, three sizes of polyimide coated tubes were tested.
It is believed a sensor which has an ID of 0.53~0.012 mm a wall thickness of
0.085~0.012mm and a polyimide layer 24~4~.m thick. is a convenient match for
the
mufti-mode fibers that are currently used. With this particular capillary,
strain in excess
of SOOO~,s can easily be attained. Smaller, thinner walled polyimide coated
capillary
2o tubes are available should measurements at even higher strains be required.
The addition of absorptive layers and the tailoring of their thickness can be
used
to expand the dynamic range of the optical sensors design and end use,
tailored for a
specific dynamic range. Ideally the maximum strain should result in a
reduction of
intensity to a few percent of the initial value.
The waveguide sensor of the invention is a robust, chemically and thermally
stable waveguide. The sensor can survive strain in excess of 2000~,s and is
readily
incorporated into optical fiber data collection systems. The optical
properties of the
active coatings on the sensor can be optimized to give the maximum dynamic
range for a
specific maximum strain criterion. Polyimide-coated capillaries can be
strained at least
3o to SOOO~s and are supplied with better tolerance control.
The foregoing description has been limited to a specific embodiment of the
invention. It will be apparent, however, that variations and modifications can
be made to
the invention, with the attainment of some or all of the advantages of the
invention.

CA 02360802 2001-07-26
WO 00/43729 PCT/US00/01613
9
Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims to cover all such
variations and
modifications as come within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Having described my invention, what I now claim is:

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2006-01-25
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2006-01-25
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2005-01-28
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-01-25
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2004-07-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-06-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2004-05-17
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2003-11-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-03-13
Inactive: Office letter 2002-06-18
Letter Sent 2002-06-14
Letter Sent 2002-06-14
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2002-04-17
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-04-17
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-12-13
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2001-12-04
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-11-26
Letter Sent 2001-11-26
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2001-11-26
Application Received - PCT 2001-11-15
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2001-07-26
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2001-07-26
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-07-27

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-01-25

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-01-26

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2001-07-26
Request for examination - standard 2001-07-26
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2002-01-25 2001-10-16
Registration of a document 2002-04-17
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2003-01-27 2003-01-23
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2004-01-26 2004-01-26
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS
Past Owners on Record
OTTO J. GREGORY
WILLIAM B. EULER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2001-11-29 1 6
Description 2003-03-13 9 478
Abstract 2001-07-26 1 41
Claims 2001-07-26 2 54
Description 2001-07-26 9 479
Drawings 2001-07-26 3 45
Cover Page 2001-12-13 1 35
Abstract 2004-05-17 1 19
Claims 2004-05-17 3 103
Description 2004-05-17 9 479
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2001-11-26 1 179
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2001-11-26 1 112
Notice of National Entry 2001-11-26 1 204
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2002-06-14 1 114
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2002-06-14 1 114
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2005-03-22 1 174
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2005-04-11 1 166
PCT 2001-07-26 6 255
Correspondence 2001-11-26 1 26
Correspondence 2002-04-17 3 88
Correspondence 2002-06-12 1 14
Fees 2001-10-16 1 24