Language selection

Search

Patent 2361433 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2361433
(54) English Title: INTERNET OVER SATELLITE
(54) French Title: INTERNET PAR SATELLITE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06F 15/00 (2006.01)
  • G06F 13/14 (2006.01)
  • H04B 7/185 (2006.01)
  • H04L 12/46 (2006.01)
  • H04L 12/66 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TOPOREK, JEROME D. (United States of America)
  • PALTER, DAVID C. (United States of America)
  • MCCOOEY, JEREMY A. (United States of America)
  • HASSON, MARC B. (United States of America)
  • HARTRICK, TIMOTHY W. (United States of America)
  • GUYER, KAY A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • MENTAT INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • MENTAT INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-02-02
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2000-08-10
Examination requested: 2003-04-01
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2000/002891
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2000046669
(85) National Entry: 2001-08-01

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/243,185 (United States of America) 1999-02-02
09/243,554 (United States of America) 1999-02-02
09/306,236 (United States of America) 1999-05-06
09/306,678 (United States of America) 1999-05-06
09/493,338 (United States of America) 2000-01-28
60/118,227 (United States of America) 1999-02-02

Abstracts

English Abstract


A telecommunications apparatus, system and method for providing transport of
packetized information over a satellite network, providing a bi-directional
flow of information between a client (380) and a server (388) from a first
satellite gateway (384) over a connection (386) to a second satellite gateway
(386), utilizing protocol translation between TCP protocol and satellite
protocol. A telecommunication apparatus, system and method for managing memory
for storing information communicated over TCP connections and for controlling
information flow in TCP connections are also provided.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un appareil de télécommunications, un système et un procédé destinés à permettre le transport d'informations par paquets sur un réseau de satellites, en faisant passer un flux bidirectionnel d'informations, entre un client (380) et un serveur (388), d'une première passerelle satellite (384) à une seconde passerelle satellite (386) au moyen d'une liaison (385), à l'aide d'une traduction de protocole entre le protocole TCP et le protocole de satellite. La présente invention concerne aussi un appareil, un procédé et un procédé de gestion de mémoire destinés à stocker une information transmise sur des liaisons TCP et à réguler le débit d'informations sur des liaisons TCP.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


36
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A communication apparatus for transmitting packetized
information, said information comprising a plurality of packets, each of said
packets
comprising data and a header, over a satellite link in a telecommunications
system, said
system comprising a client, selected from a plurality of potential clients, a
server, selected
from a plurality of potential servers, a first gateway, connected to said
client by a first
telecommunications link, a second gateway, connected to said server by a
second
telecommunications link, a third telecommunications link connecting said first
gateway to
said second gateway, said apparatus comprising:
a network interface for linking said first gateway with said client;
a satellite gateway interface;
a system memory; and
a bus interconnecting said network interface, said satellite gateway
interface, and said system memory with a processor, said processor operatively
disposed
to:
intercept a connection with said server, said communication initiated by
said client;
establish a connection between said first gateway and said second gateway
over said telecommunications link;
provide a bi-directional flow of information from said client to said server
and from said server to said client using said connection between said first
gateway and
said second gateway, wherein said providing a bi-directional flow occurs
transparently to
said client and said server.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said processor is further
operatively disposed to convert said information at said first gateway from a
first protocol
into a second protocol for transmission over said telecommunications link; and
convert said second protocol into said first protocol at said second
gateway.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the first protocol comprises TCP
and said second protocol comprises XTP.

37
4. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said second protocol is more
suitable for transmission over a satellite link than using a TCP protocol.
5. A communication apparatus comprising:
a TCP interface;
a satellite gateway interface;
a system memory;
a bus interconnecting said TCP interface, said satellite gateway interface
and said system memory with a processor, said processor operatively disposed
to:
intercept a first communication connection between a client and a server;
form a second communication connection between a first satellite gateway
and a second satellite gateway that is over a satellite link;
transmit information describing said first connection to said second
satellite gateway; and
form a third communication connection between said second satellite
gateway and a destination server using said information describing said first
connection
wherein said forming said second connection and forming said third connection
occur
transparently to said client and said server.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said information comprises a
client address and a destination server address.
7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said processor is further
operatively disposed to transmit a response from said second satellite gateway
to said first
satellite gateway when said third communication connection with said
destination server
occurs.
8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said processor is further
operatively disposed to transmit a response from said first satellite gateway
to said client
when said third communication connection with said destination server occurs.
9. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein said processor is further
operatively disposed to transmit a failure response from said first satellite
gateway to said
client when said third communication connection is lost.

38
10. A apparatus for establishing a communication between a first
computer and one of a plurality of second computers, said apparatus
comprising:
a network interface;
a satellite gateway interface;
a system memory;
a bus interconnecting said network interface, said satellite gateway
interface and said system memory with a processor, said processor operatively
disposed
to:
provide a first protocol and a second protocol, wherein at least one of said
plurality of second computers is able to communicate with said first computer
using said
first protocol and at least one of said plurality of second computers is able
to
communicate with said first computer using said second protocol;
determine whether a connection can be established between said first
computer and at least one of said plurality of second computers using said
first protocol;
if said connection cannot be established, then establish a connection
between said first computer and said at least one of said plurality of second
computers
using said second protocol.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein each of said plurality of second
computers is able to communicate with said first computer using said second
protocol.
12. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein said first protocol is XTP.
13. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein said second protocol is TCP/IP.
14. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein said first protocol has a first
throughput and said second protocol has a second throughput, said first
throughput being
at least 7.5 times greater than said second throughput at a bit error rate of
1 x 10-7
15. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein said first protocol has a first
throughput and said second protocol has a second throughput, said first
throughput being
at least 10 times greater than said second throughput at a bit error rate of 1
x 10-6
16. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein said first protocol has a
throughput of at least 95% of an available bandwidth at a bit error rate of 1
x 10-8.

39
17. In a communications system for providing transport of packetized
information in a TCP protocol between a client and a server, a method of
converting said
system to a system for providing transport of packetized information in a
satellite
protocol, said method comprising:
installing a first gateway, said first gateway operatively disposed to
intercept connections from said client to said server; said first gateway
further operatively
disposed to convert said packetized information from TCP protocol to satellite
protocol;
installing a second gateway, said second gateway disposed to establish a
connection with said server, said second gateway further operatively disposed
to convert
said packetized information from satellite protocol to TCP protocol, said
first gateway
and said second gateway operatively disposed to establish a connection over a
common
telecommunications link.
18. A communication system for transmitting packetized information,
said information comprising a plurality of packets, each of said packets
comprising data
and a header, over a satellite link, said system comprising:
a client, selected from a plurality of potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link;
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway;
code for intercepting a connection attempt with said server, said
connection attempt initiated by said client;
code for establishing a connection between said first gateway and said
second gateway over said third telecommunications link;
code for providing a bi-directional flow of information from said client to
said server and from said server to said client using said connection between
said first
gateway and said second gateway, wherein said providing a bi-directional flow
occurs
transparently to said client and said server; and
a computer readable storage medium for storing said codes.
19. The system of claim 18 further comprising:

40
code for converting said information at said first gateway from a first
protocol into a second protocol for transmission over said telecommunications
link; and
code for converting said second protocol into said first protocol at said
second gateway.
20. The system of claim 19 wherein said code for converting comprises
removing said header to leave said data substantially intact.
21. The system of claim 19 wherein said code for converting comprises
code for removing said header to leave said data substantially intact and code
for
encapsulating said data using a satellite protocol header.
22. The system of claim 21 wherein said data is a portion of said flow
of information.
23. The system of claim 18 further comprising code for receiving said
flow of information by said second gateway over said telecommunications link.
24. A communication system comprising:
code for intercepting a first communication connection between a client
and a server;
code for forming a second communication connection between a first
satellite gateway and a second satellite gateway that is over a satellite
link;
code for transmitting information describing said first connection to said
second satellite gateway;
code for forming a third communication connection between said second
satellite gateway and a destination server using said information describing
said first
connection wherein said code for forming said second connection and code for
forming
said third connection execute transparently to said client and said server;
and
a computer readable storage medium for holding said codes.
25. The system of claim 24 wherein said information comprises a
client address and a destination server address.
26. A system for establishing a communication between a first
computer and one of a plurality of second computers, said system comprising:

41
code for providing a first protocol and a second protocol, wherein at least
one of said plurality of second computers is able to communicate with said
first computer
using said first protocol and at least one of said plurality of second
computers is able to
communicate with said first computer using said second protocol;
code for determining whether a connection can be established between
said first computer and at least one of said plurality of second computers
using said first
protocol;
code for establishing a connection between said first host computer and
said at least one of said plurality of second host computers using said second
protocol, if
said code for determining determines that a connection cannot be established
between
said first computer and said second computer using said first protocol; and
a computer readable storage medium for holding said codes.
27. The system of claim 26 wherein each of said plurality of second
computers is able to communicate with said first computer using said second
protocol.
28. The system of claim 26 wherein said first protocol is XTP.
29. The system of claim 26 wherein said second protocol is TCP/IP.
30. A communication method for transmitting information, said
information comprising a plurality of packets, each of said packets comprising
data and a
header, in a system comprising a client, selected from a plurality of
potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link;
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway, said method comprising:
intercepting a connection attempt with said server, said connection attempt
initiated by said client;
establishing a connection between said first gateway and said second
gateway over said third telecommunications link;
providing a bi-directional flow of information from said client to said
server and from said server to said client using said connection between said
first gateway

42
and said second gateway, wherein said providing a bi-directional flow occurs
transparently to said client and said server.
31. The method of claim 30 further comprising:
converting said information at said first gateway from a first protocol into
a second protocol for transmission over said third telecommunications link;
and
converting said second protocol into said first protocol at said second
gateway.
32. The method of claim 31 wherein the first protocol comprises TCP
and the second protocol comprises XTP.
33. The method of claim 31 wherein said second protocol is more
suitable for transmission over a satellite link than using a TCP protocol.
34. The method of claim 31 wherein said converting comprises
removing said header to leave said data substantially intact.
35. The method of claim 31 wherein said converting comprises
removing said header to leave said data substantially intact and encapsulating
said data
using a satellite protocol header.
36. The method of claim 35 wherein said data is a portion of said flow
of information.
37. The method of claim 30 further comprising receiving said flow of
information by a gateway over said third telecommunications link.
38. A communication method comprising:
intercepting a first communication connection between a client and a
server;
forming a second communication connection between a first satellite
gateway and a second satellite gateway that is over a satellite link;
transmitting information describing said first connection to said second
satellite gateway; and
forming a third communication connection between said second satellite
gateway and a destination server using said information describing said first
connection

43
wherein said forming said second connection and forming said third connection
occurs
transparently to said client and said server.
39. The method of claim 38 wherein said information comprises a
client address and a destination server address.
40. The method of claim 38 further comprising transmitting a response
from said second satellite gateway to said first satellite gateway when said
third
communication connection with said destination server occurs.
41. The method of claim 38 further comprising transmitting a response
from said first satellite gateway to said client when said third communication
connection
with said destination server occurs.
42. The method of claim 38 further comprising transmitting a failure
response from said first satellite gateway to said client when said third
communication
connection is lost.
43. A method for establishing a communication between a first
computer and one of a plurality of second computers, said method comprising:
providing a first protocol and a second protocol, wherein at least one of
said plurality of second computers is able to communicate with said first
computer using
said first protocol and at least one of said plurality of second computers is
able to
communicate with said first computer using said second protocol;
determining whether a connection can be established between said first
computer and at least one of said plurality of second computers using said
first protocol;
establishing a connection between said first computer and said at least one
of said plurality of second computers using said second protocol if said
determining step
determines that a connection cannot be established between said first computer
and said
second computer using said first protocol.
44. The method of claim 43 wherein each of said plurality of second
computers is able to communicate with said first computer using said second
protocol.

44
45. The method of claim 43 wherein said first protocol has a first
throughput and said second protocol has a second throughput, said first
throughput being
at least 7.5 times greater than said second throughput at a bit error rate of
1 x 10 -7
46. The method of claim 43 wherein said first protocol has a first
throughput and said second protocol has a second throughput, said first
throughput being
at least 10 times greater than said second throughput at a bit error rate of 1
x 10 -6.
47. The method of claim 43 wherein said first protocol has a
throughput of at least 95% of an available bandwidth at a bit error rate of 1
x 10 -8.
48. A method for managing memory for buffering information, said
information comprising a plurality of packets, each of said packets comprising
data and a
header, in a system comprising a client, selected from a plurality of
potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link,
said first gateway comprising a first buffer and a second buffer;
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway, said method comprising:
intercepting a connection attempt with said server, said connection attempt
initiated by said client, said client capable of establishing connections at a
first
characteristic data rate;
establishing a connection between said first gateway and said second
gateway over said third telecommunications link, said connection having a
second
characteristic data rate; wherein said first buffer stores information
received over said
third telecommunications link and said second buffer stores information for
said client;
determining a state in said first buffer, said state indicating that said
second characteristic data rate in said third telecommunications link is
greater than said
first characteristic data rate for said client; and
setting a receive window size for said client at said first gateway to reduce
an amount of data received over said third telecommunications link for said
client.

45
49. The method of claim 48 wherein said state comprises a buffer full
condition.
50. The method of claim 48 wherein said state comprises a threshold
value for buffer contents has been reached.
51. The method of claim 48 wherein said setting said receive window
size comprises reducing a receive window size by about 50%.
52. The method of claim 48 wherein said connection attempt by said
client with said server comprises a TCP protocol.
53. The method of claim 48, wherein said connection between said
first gateway and said second gateway comprises a satellite protocol.
54. The method of claim 53 wherein said satellite protocol further
comprises an XTP protocol.
55. A computer program product for managing memory for buffering
information, said information comprising a plurality of packets, each of said
packets
comprising data and a header, in a system comprising a client, selected from a
plurality of
potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link,
said first gateway comprising a first buffer and a second buffer;
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway, said computer program product comprising:
code for intercepting a connection attempt with said server, said
connection attempt initiated by said client, said client capable of
establishing connections
at a first characteristic data rate;
code for establishing a connection between said first gateway and said
second gateway over said third telecommunications link, said connection having
a second

46
characteristic data rate; wherein said first buffer stores information
received over said
third telecommunications link and said second buffer stores information for
said client;
code for determining a state in said first buffer, said state indicating that
said second characteristic data rate in said third telecommunications link is
greater than
said first characteristic data rate for said client;
code for setting a receive window size for said client at said first gateway
to reduce an amount of data received over said third telecommunications link
for said
client; and
a computer readable storage medium for holding the codes.
56. The computer program product of claim 55 wherein said state
comprises a buffer full condition.
57. The computer program product of claim 55 wherein said state
comprises a threshold value for buffer contents has been reached.
58. The computer program product of claim 55 wherein said code for
setting said receive window size comprises code for reducing a receive window
size by
about 50%.
59. The computer program product of claim 55 wherein said
connection attempt by said client with said server comprises a TCP protocol.
60. The computer program product of claim 55, wherein said
connection between said first gateway and said second gateway comprises a
satellite
protocol.
61. The computer program product of claim 60 wherein said satellite
protocol further comprises an XTP protocol.
62. A system for managing memory for buffering a flow of
information over a satellite, said system comprising:
a client, selected from a plurality of potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link,
said first gateway comprising a first buffer and a second buffer;

47
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway; wherein said first gateway is operatively disposed to:
intercept a connection attempt with said server, said connection attempt
initiated by said client, said client capable of establishing connections at a
first
characteristic data rate;
establish a connection between said first gateway and said second gateway
over said third telecommunications link, said connection having a second
characteristic
data rate; wherein said first buffer stores information received over said
third
telecommunications link and said second buffer stores information for said
client;
determine a state in said first buffer, said state indicating that said second
characteristic data rate in said third telecommunications link is greater than
said first
characteristic data rate for said client; and
set a receive window size for said client at said first gateway to reduce an
amount of data received over said third telecommunications link for said
client.
63. The system of claim 62 wherein said state comprises a buffer full
condition.
64. The system of claim 62 wherein said state comprises a threshold
value for buffer contents has been reached.
65. The system of claim 62 wherein said setting said receive window
size comprises reducing a receive window size by about 50%.
66. The system of claim 62 wherein said connection attempt by said
client with said server comprises a TCP protocol.
67. The system of claim 62 wherein said connection between said first
gateway and said second gateway comprises a satellite protocol.
68. The system of claim 67 wherein said satellite protocol further
comprises an XTP protocol.

48
69. A method for controlling the flow of information, said information
comprising a plurality of packets, each of said packets comprising data and a
header, in a
system comprising a client, selected from a plurality of potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link;
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway, said method comprising:
intercepting a connection attempt with said server, said connection attempt
initiated by said client;
establishing a connection between said first gateway and said second
gateway over said third telecommunications link;
determining a round trip time for data to travel from said first gateway to
said second gateway over said connection;
determining a data rate for said connection;
determining a bandwidth delay product from said round trip time and said
data rate;
determining a flow control limit for said connection from said bandwidth
delay product; and
limiting data transfer over said connection based upon said flow control
limit.
70. The method of claim 69 wherein said connection uses a satellite
protocol.
71. The method of claim 69 wherein said determining a round trip time
for said connection further comprises obtaining said round trip time from a
user.
72. The method of claim 69 wherein said determining a data rate for
said connection further comprises obtaining said round trip time from a user.
73. The method of claim 69 wherein said determining a bandwidth
delay product for said connection further comprises multiplying said round
trip time and
said data rate.

49
74. The method of claim 69 wherein said determining a flow control
limit for said connection further comprises multiplying said bandwidth delay
product by a
scaling factor and dividing by a number of connections for said link.
75. The method of claim 74 wherein said scaling factor is eight.
76. The method of claim 69 further comprising:
determining from at least one of a plurality of connections at said first
gateway ones that can benefit from flow control.
77. The method of claim 76 wherein said determining comprises
selecting from said plurality of connections ones that are not initializing.
78. The method of claim 76 wherein said determining comprises
selecting from said plurality of connections ones that are buffering data
above a threshold.
79. A system for controlling the flow of information over a satellite,
said system comprising:
a client, selected from a plurality of potential clients;
a server, selected from a plurality of potential servers;
a first gateway, connected to said client by a first telecommunications link;
a second gateway, connected to said server by a second
telecommunications link;
a third telecommunications link connecting said first gateway to said
second gateway; wherein said client is operatively disposed to
determine a round trip time for data to traverse from said first gateway
over said third telecommunications link to said second gateway over a
connection;
determine a data rate for said connection;
determine a bandwidth delay product from said round trip time and said
data rate;
determine a flow control limit for said connection from said bandwidth
delay product; and
limit data transfer over said connection based upon said flow control limit.

50
80. The system of claim 79 wherein said connection uses a satellite
protocol.
81. The system of claim 79 wherein said determine a round trip time
for said connection further comprises obtaining said round trip time from a
user.
82. The system of claim 79 wherein said determine a data rate for said
connection further comprises obtaining said round trip time from a user.
83. The system of claim 79 wherein said determine a bandwidth delay
product for said connection further comprises multiplying said round trip time
and said
data rate.
84. The system of claim 79 wherein said determine a flow control limit
for said connection further comprises multiplying said bandwidth delay product
by a
scaling factor and dividing by a number of connections for said link.
85. The system of claim 84 wherein said scaling factor is eight.
86. The system of claim 84 wherein said client is further operatively
disposed to:
determine from at least one of a plurality of connections ones that can
benefit from flow control.
87. The system of claim 86 wherein said determine comprises selecting
from said plurality of connections ones that are not initializing.
88. The system of claim 86 wherein said determine comprises selecting
from said plurality of connections ones that are buffering data above a
threshold.
89. A computer program product for controlling the flow of
information over a data link, said data link having at least one of a
plurality of
connections, said computer program product comprising:
code for determining a round trip time for data to traverse said data link on
said connection;
code for determining a data rate for said connection;

51
code for determining a bandwidth delay product from said round trip time
and said data rate;
code for determining a flow control limit for said connection from said
bandwidth delay product;
code for limiting data transfer over said connection based upon said flow
control limit; and
a computer readable storage medium for containing the codes.
90. The computer program product of claim 89 wherein said
connection comprises a TCP connection.
91. The computer program product of claim 89 wherein said code for
determining a round trip time for said connection further comprises code for
obtaining
said round trip time from a user.
92. The computer program product of claim 89 wherein said code for
determining a data rate for said connection further comprises code for
obtaining said
round trip time from a user.
93. The computer program product of claim 89 wherein said code for
determining a bandwidth delay product for said connection further comprises
code for
multiplying said round trip time and said data rate.
94. The computer program product of claim 89 wherein said code for
determining a flow control limit for said connection further comprises code
for
multiplying said bandwidth delay product by a scaling factor and dividing by a
number of
connections for said link.
95. The computer program product of claim 94 wherein said scaling
factor is eight.
96. The computer program product of claim 89 further comprising:
code for determining from at least one of a plurality of connections ones
that can benefit from flow control.

52
97. The computer program product of claim 96 wherein said code for
determining comprises code for selecting from said plurality of connections
ones that are
not initializing.
98. The computer program product of claim 96 wherein said code for
determining comprises code for selecting from said plurality of connections
ones that are
buffering data above a threshold.
99. A method for controlling the flow of information over a satellite
data link, said satellite data link having at least one of a plurality of
connections, said
method comprising:
determining a round trip time for data to travel from a first node on said
satellite data link to a second node on said satellite data link over said
connection;
determining a data rate for said connection;
determining a bandwidth delay product from said round trip time and said
data rate;
determining a flow control limit for said connection from said bandwidth
delay product; and
limiting data transfer over said connection based upon said flow control
limit.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
1
INTERNET OVER SATELLITE
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
The subject application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 60/118,227, filed February 2, 1999, in the name of Jerome D.
Toporek
et. al, titled, "Internet Over Satellite Apparatus," (Attorney Docket Number
16625-
001100), the complete disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The subject application also claims priority from the following five
commonly-owned co-pending applications, which are hereby incorporated by
reference in
their entirety for all purposes:
1. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/243,185, filed February 2,
1999, in the name of Jerome D. Toporek et. al, titled, " Internet Over
Satellite System,"
(Attorney Docket Number 16625-001200);
2. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/243,554, filed February 2,
1999, in the name of Jerome D. Toporek et. al, titled, "Internet Over
Satellite Method,"
(Attorney Docket Number 16625-001300);
3. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/306,678, filed May 6, 1999,
in the name of Jerome D. Toporek et. al, titled, "Method and System for
Managing
Memory in an Internet Over Satellite Connection," (Attorney Docket Number
16625-
001210);
4. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/306,236, filed May 6, 1999,
in the name of Jerome D. Toporek et. al, titled, "Method and System for
Controlling Data
Flow in an Internet Over Satellite Connection," (Attorney Docket Number 16625-
001220); and
5. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. (Attorney
Docket Number 16625-001110), filed January 28, 2000, in the name of Jerome D.
Toporek et. al, titled "Internet Over Satellite Apparatus," and which also
claims priority
from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/118,227.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
2
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to telecommunications devices, systems and
techniques. More particularly, the present invention provides devices, systems
and
methods for managing memory and/or transmitting information using a TCP
connection
over a satellite system for use in a wide area network of computers such as
the Internet.
The present invention provides a high speed and quality transmission of
signals to a
distant location over a satellite system using an Xpress Transport Protocol
(herein "XTP")
protocol, for example. The present invention also provides a controlled memory
management in equipment for high speed and quality transmission of signals to
a distant
location over a satellite system using an XTP protocol, for example. But it
will be
recognized that the invention has a much wider range of applicability; it can
also be
applied to a private bridged network, terrestrial wireless network links, and
the like.
The Internet is an international "super-network" connecting together
millions of individual computer networks and computers. The Internet is
generally not a
single entity. It is an extremely diffuse and complex system over which no
single entity
has complete authority or control. Although the Internet is widely known for
one of its
ways of presenting information through the World Wide Web (herein "Web"),
there are
many other services currently available based upon the general Internet
protocols and
infrastructure.
The Web is generally easy to use for people inexperienced with computers.
Information on the Web can be presented on "pages" of graphics and text that
contain
"links" to other pages either within the same set of data files (i.e., Web
site) or within data
files located on other computer networks. Users often access information on
the Web
using a "browser" program such as one made by Netscape Communications
Corporation
of Mountain View, California or Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington.
Browser programs process information from Web sites and display the
information using
graphics, text, sound, and animation. Accordingly, the Web has become a
popular
medium for advertising goods and services directly to consumers.
The Internet supports many other forms of communication. For example,
the Internet allows one-to-one communication via electronic mail, which is
commonly
known as "e-mail." The Internet also has "bulletin boards" which are used by
users to
post colorful text and graphics for others to read and respond to. For real
time
communication, the Internet has "chat rooms" and the like, which allow users
to

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
3
communicate to each other by way of typed messages. In some cases, the
Internet can
also be used for voice communication between users. All of these forms of
communication are possible, at least in part, by way of an important
connection, which
allows information to be transmitted from many different servers on the
Internet.
The Internet is based on the TCP/IP protocol suite. At the network layer,
and Internet Protocol, which is known as IP, provides a mechanism to deliver
packets
addressed to individual computers. The Internet has a plurality of computer
systems
implementing IP, which are generally interconnected to each other using local
area
networks and dedicated transmission lines to form a wide area network of
computers. IP
packets are delivered on a best effort basis and are not guaranteed to arrive
at their
intended destination, which is known as "unreliable" service.
For many applications that require reliable data delivery service, the
Internet uses a connection mechanism called Transmission Control Protocol,
which is
known as TCP. TCP has a variety of desirable characteristics that allows it to
be suitable
for communication over the Internet. For example, TCP considers the data size
or best
sized segment of data to send from a transmitting server over the
communication medium
to a receiving server. Additionally, TCP maintains a timer, which waits for
the receiving
server to send an acknowledgement of the reception of the data segment from
the
transmitting server. If the timer times out before the acknowledgement is
received, TCP
resends the data segment, which provides reliability in the communication. TCP
also
maintains a checksum on its header and data, which monitors any modification
in the data
in transit. If the data arrives with an invalid checksum, TCP discards the
data and does
not acknowledge receiving the data. If data segments arrive out of order, TCP
can also
recombine the segments in order at the receiving server. Furthermore, TCP
provides flow
control, which only allows a finite amount of data to be sent to a buffer on
the receiving
server. This prevents a fast server computer from overflowing all the buffers
on a slower
server computer.
Although TCP has been well suited for transmitting Internet data between
a plurality of servers, which are coupled to each other by way of conventional
telephone
systems and lines with similar characteristics, TCP has many limitations. For
example,
TCP is suitable for "short hops" but often slows down communication over
extremely
long distances which can have significant latency (e.g., transcontinental hops
via
satellite). Here, the flow control and acknowledgment features take too long
to send and

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
4
receive, which make communication slow. Additionally, opportunities for gains
in
efficiency still exist. In particular, TCP has been found to be slow and
cumbersome for
transmission of Internet data over a satellite network, for example. Further,
high speed
transmission of Internet data over a satellite network, for example, to a
relatively slower
recipient, such as modem, and the like, can cause congestion. Additionally,
pathological
conditions can arise in networking using satellites, that can cause resource
exhaustion in
systems, which leads to further slowing of TCP connections. Additionally,
networking
using satellites often encounters significant bit error rates, which leads to
further slowing
of TCP connections. These and other limitations will be more fully described
according
to the Figs. below.
From the above, it is seen that a more efficient way of transporting Internet
services, and a more efficient way of managing memory in the transmission
thereof, over
large geographical regions using wireless communication media is highly
desirable.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention, a technique for improving TCP
performance over a wireless wide area network is provided. In an exemplary
embodiment, the present invention provides apparatus, systems and methods for
converting information using a TCP connection to an Xpress Transport Protocol
(herein
"XTP") connection, for example, which is more suitable for transmission over a
wireless
network system such as a satellite system.
According to the present invention, techniques for controlling information
flow in TCP connections, and for managing memory for storing information
communicated over one or more TCP connections over a wireless wide area
network are
provided. In an exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides methods
and
systems for controlling the buffering of information and/or the rate that
information flows
over a TCP connection to an Xpress Transport Protocol (herein "XTP")
connection, for
example.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a communication
apparatus for transmitting information over a satellite link. The apparatus
includes a TCP
interface coupled to a satellite gateway interface for providing a bi-
directional flow of
information, which has data and a header, using a TCP connection. As merely an
example, the bi-directional flow of information can be from the Internet or
Internet-like

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
network of computers or any network using TCP/IP protocols. The apparatus also
includes a processor for converting the information, using the TCP connection,
into a
satellite protocol for transmission over a satellite link. The satellite
protocol has suitable
characteristics for transmission of such information over a satellite link.
The protocol can
5 include, among others, XTP, XTP-like protocols, and the like.
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a
communication apparatus for establishing a plurality of connections for
transmission of
information using a TCP connection over a satellite link. The apparatus
includes a TCP
interface for forming a first communication connection between a first client
(e.g., user
computer) to a first satellite gateway. The apparatus also includes a
satellite gateway
interface for forming a second communication connection between the first
satellite
gateway to a second satellite gateway that is over a satellite link.
Information describing
characteristics (e.g., source and destination IP addresses and port numbers)
of the first
connection is transmitted to the second satellite gateway. A third
communication
connection is formed between the second satellite gateway and the destination
server. A
combination of these connections forms a transparent connection from the
original first
client to the destination server.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a communication
system for transmitting information over a satellite link. The system includes
a first
gateway having code for providing a bi-directional flow of information, which
has data
and a header, the first gateway being coupled to a TCP connection. As merely
an
example, the bi-directional flow of information can be from the Internet or
Internet-like
network of computers or any network using TCP/IP protocols. The system also
includes
code for converting the information from the TCP protocol into a satellite
protocol for
transmission over a satellite link The system also includes a second gateway
for
receiving the information from the first gateway over a satellite link. The
second gateway
can include code for converting the information from a satellite protocol,
that has suitable
characteristics for transmission over a satellite link, to a TCP protocol. The
satellite
protocol can include, among others, XTP, XTP-like protocols, and the like.
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a
communication system capable of establishing a plurality of connections for
transmission
of information using a TCP connection over a satellite link. The system
includes code for
intercepting a first communication connection between a first client (e.g.,
user computer)

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
6
to a first satellite gateway. The system also includes code for forming a
second
communication connection between the first satellite gateway to a second
satellite
gateway that is over a satellite link. Information describing characteristics
(e.g., source
and destination IP addresses and port numbers) of the first connection is
transmitted to the
second satellite gateway. A third communication connection is formed between
the
second satellite gateway and the destination server. A combination of these
connections
forms a transparent connection from the original first client to the
destination server.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a communication
method for transmitting information over a satellite link. The method includes
providing
a bi-directional flow of information, which has data and a header, using a TCP
connection. As merely an example, the bi-directional flow of information can
be from the
Internet or Internet-like network of computers or any network using TCP/IP
protocols.
The method also includes converting the information, using the TCP connection,
into a
satellite protocol for transmission over a satellite link The satellite
protocol has suitable
characteristics for transmission of such information over a satellite link.
The protocol can
include, among others, XTP, XTP-like protocols, and the like.
In an alternative embodiment, the present invention provides a
communication method for establishing a plurality of connections for
transmission of
information using a TCP connection over a satellite link. The method includes
intercepting a first communication connection between a first client (e.g.,
user computer)
to a first satellite gateway. The method also includes forming a second
communication
connection between the first satellite gateway to a second satellite gateway
that is over a
satellite link. Information describing characteristics (e.g., source and
destination IP
addresses and port numbers) of the first connection is transmitted to the
second satellite
gateway. A third communication connection is formed between the second
satellite
gateway and the destination server. A combination of these connections forms a
transparent connection from the original first client to the destination
server.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a method for
managing memory for buffering information communicated over an Internet
connection
established across a satellite link. The method can be operable on a large
variety of
systems, such as a system comprising one or more clients, one or more servers,
a first
gateway connected to at least one client, a second gateway connected to at
least one
server, and a wireless telecommunications link between these gateways. The
method

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
7
includes intercepting a connection attempt with a server initiated by a
client. The client
will attempt a connection that will have a first characteristic data rate. A
connection can
be established between a first gateway and a second gateway over the
telecommunications link, that can be a satellite link or the like. This
connection will have
a second characteristic data rate. The first gateway can include a buffer for
storing
information received over the telecommunications link from the second gateway
and a
buffer for storing information to be sent to the client. The method can
perform a step of
determining a state in the receive buffer. The state can indicate whether the
characteristic
data rate in the telecommunications link is substantially greater than the
characteristic
data rate for the client. A step of setting a receive window size for the
client at the first
gateway to reduce an amount of data received over the telecommunications link
for the
client can also be part of the method. The combination of these steps can
provide a
method for managing memory for buffering information coming from the
telecommunications link in the first gateway.
In another aspect of the present invention, a system for controlling the
flow of information over a satellite is provided. The system can include at
least one
client, selected from a plurality of potential clients and at least one
server, selected from a
plurality of potential servers. 'The system can also include a first gateway,
connected to
the client by a first telecommunications link, and a second gateway, connected
to the
server by a second telecommunications link. A third telecommunications link
connecting
the first gateway to the second gateway can also be part of the system. The
system is
operative to intercept a connection attempt with the server initiated by the
client at a first
characteristic data rate. The system can then establish a connection between
the first
gateway and the second gateway over the third telecommunications link. This
connection
will have a second characteristic data rate. The first buffer stores
information received
over the third telecommunications link and the second buffer stores
information to be sent
to the client. The system can determine a state in the first buffer. The state
indicates that
the second characteristic data rate in the third telecommunications link is
greater than the
first characteristic data rate for the client. The system can also set a
receive window size
for the client at the first gateway to reduce an amount of data received over
the third
telecommunications link for the client.
In a yet further aspect according to the present invention, a computer
program product for controlling the flow of information over a wireless data
link is

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
8
provided. The data link can comprise one or more connections. The computer
program
product comprises a computer readable storage medium for holding a plurality
of code.
Code for intercepting a connection attempt with a server initiated by a client
at a first
characteristic data rate is included in the program product. Further, code for
establishing
a connection between a first gateway and a second gateway over a
telecommunications
link at a second characteristic data rate is also included. A first buffer in
the first gateway
stores information received over the telecommunications link and a second
buffer stores
information to be sent to the client. The product can also include code for
determining a
state in the first buffer. The state indicates a condition where the
characteristic data rate
of the telecommunications link is substantially greater than that of the
client. If this
condition is detected, then the product invokes code for setting a receive
window size for
the client at the first gateway to reduce an amount of data received over the
telecommunications link for the client.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a method for
controlling the flow of information over an Internet connection established
across a
satellite link. The method can be operable on a large variety of systems, such
as a system
comprising one or more clients, one or more servers, a first gateway connected
to at least
one client, a second gateway connected to at least one server, and a wireless
telecommunications link between these gateways. The method includes
intercepting a
connection attempt with a server initiated by a client. A connection can be
established
between a first gateway and a second gateway over the telecommunications link,
that can
be a satellite link or the like. The method can include a step of determining
a round trip
time for data to travel from the client to the server over the connection. A
data rate for
the connection can also be determined. From the round trip time and the data
rate, a
bandwidth delay product can be determined by the method. The method can also
determine a flow control limit for the connection from the bandwidth delay
product. A
step of limiting data transfer over the connection based upon the flow control
limit can be
part of the method. The combination of such steps as these can provide a
method for
controlling the flow of TCP data over networks spanning large geographical
regions using
a wireless communication media, and the like.
In another embodiment, the present invention can select from among
connections, ones that can benefit available system resources by being flow
controlled.
Some embodiments can screen for flow control those connections that are not
initializing,

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
9
or are transferring data in blocks below a threshold value, or above a
threshold value and
the like. In many embodiments, a bandwidth delay product for the connection
can be
determined by multiplying round trip time and data rate. In some embodiments,
a flow
control limit for a connection can be determined by multiplying bandwidth
delay product
by a scaling factor and dividing by a number of connections for the link.
In another aspect of the present invention, a system for controlling the
flow of information over a satellite is provided. The system can include at
least one
client, selected from a plurality of potential clients and at least one
server, selected from a
plurality of potential servers. The system can also include a first gateway,
connected to
the client by a first telecommunications link, and a second gateway, connected
to the
server by a second telecommunications link. A third telecommunications link
connecting
the first gateway to the second gateway can also be part of the system. The
system is
operative to determine a round trip time for data to traverse from the client
over the first
telecommunications link, the second telecommunications link and the third
telecommunications link to the server over a connection. The system can
determine a
data rate for the connection. Further, the system can determine a bandwidth
delay
product from the round trip time and the data rate. The system can determine a
flow
control limit for the connection from the bandwidth delay product and limit
data transfer
over the connection based upon the flow control limit. Limiting data transfer
in such a
manner can interface relatively fast data transfer on the telecommunications
links to a
relatively slower data transfer rate in the client, for example.
In a yet further aspect according to the present invention, a computer
program product for controlling the flow of information over a wireless data
link is
provided. The data link can comprise one or more connections. The computer
program
product comprises a computer readable storage medium for holding a plurality
of code.
Code for determining a round trip time for data to traverse the wireless data
link over a
connection can be part of the product. Further, the computer program product
can include
code for determining a data rate for the connection. Code for determining a
bandwidth
delay product from the round trip time and the data rate can also be included.
Code for
determining a flow control limit for the connection from the bandwidth delay
product and
code for limiting data transfer over the connection based upon the flow
control limit can
also be part of the computer program product.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
In another aspect of the present invention, techniques for matching a data
rate for information flowing through a predetermined point in a network, such
as a
satellite, to the data rate capabilities of a remote point on the network are
provided. In
one embodiment, the present invention provides rate control to maintain a
suitable or
5 predetermined data rate over the satellite device. The rate control provides
a plurality of
queues for buffering incoming data. Incoming data are checked against a
predetermined
length. Data in excess of the predetermined length are stored in the queues.
At
predetermined intervals, information is taken from one or more queues and
transmitted
along the outgoing data path. This processing can enable systems according to
the
10 present invention to provide for data rate control across a particular
point of interest along
the network, such as a satellite link.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method of converting a
communications system for providing transport of packetized information in a
TCP
protocol between a client and a server to a system for providing transport of
packetized
information in a satellite protocol between the client and the server includes
a step of
installing a first gateway operatively disposed to intercept connections from
the client to
the server. The first gateway is further able to convert the packetized
information from
TCP protocol to satellite protocol. A step of installing a second gateway
capable of
establishing a connection with the server and further operatively disposed to
convert
packetized information from satellite protocol to TCP protocol is also
included in the
method. The first gateway and the second gateway are able to establish a
connection over
a common telecommunications link. The combination of these elements can
provide a
method for converting a system for TCP telecommunications to satellite
protocol
communications.
Numerous benefits are achieved by way of the present invention over
conventional techniques. In a specific embodiment, the present invention
provides a
higher throughput than conventional systems. Additionally, the present
invention
provides for a way to transparently improve TCP performance over a satellite
network.
In other embodiments, the present invention provides for a novel protocol
which is
suitable for long latency, high loss, asymmetric bandwidth conditions, which
are typical
of satellite communications.
In a specific embodiment, the techniques according to the present
invention can quickly resize the receive window to achieve a match between the
data rate

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
11
of a sender and the data rate of a receiver of a TCP connection over a
satellite link. In
some embodiments, the techniques of the present invention can be applied to
each
satellite connection separately, so that one slow receiver will not degrade
performance of
other connections over the same link. In some embodiments, the present
invention
provides for a management of buffer memory in a novel protocol which is
suitable for
long latency, high loss, asymmetric bandwidth conditions, which are typical of
satellite
communications. In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides a
more even
distribution of network resources than conventional systems. Many embodiments
according to the present invention provide for sharing a network/satellite
link between
connections. In many embodiments, it is less likely that a burst of data from
one
particular connection will be queued for transmission over the link in front
of data for
other connections. In other embodiments, the present invention provides for
data flow
control in a long latency, high loss, asymmetric bandwidth communications
medium,
which is typical of satellite communications.
The present invention also provides for relatively easy implementation
into, or interface with, a conventional satellite system. Depending upon the
embodiment,
one or more of these benefits can be present. These and other advantages or
benefits are
described throughout the present specification and are described more
particularly below.
These and other embodiments of the present invention are described in
more detail in conjunction with the text below and attached Figs.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a simplified diagram of a satellite system according to an
embodiment of the present invention;
Figs. 2 and 2A are simplified diagrams of system architectures according
to embodiments of the present invention;
Figs. 3A-3J are simplified diagrams of process diagrams according to
embodiments of the present invention;
Figs. 4-6 are simplified diagrams of experimental data according to
embodiments of the present invention; and
Fig. 7 is a simplified diagram of a gateway interface according to an
embodiment of the present invention.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
12
DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
Before discussing the various embodiments, it may assist the reader to
more fully understand the limitations of using TCP over a satellite network.
Some of
these limitations are described more fully below.
Congestion Avoidance: In order to avoid the possibility of congestive
network meltdown, TCP generally assumes that all data loss is caused by
congestion and responds by reducing the transmission rate. Over satellite
links, however, TCP often misinterprets the long round trip time and bit
errors as congestion and responds inappropriately. Similarly, the TCP
"Slow Start" algorithm, which over the terrestrial infrastructure prevents
new connections from flooding an already congested network, over
satellites forces an excessively long ramp-up for each new connection.
While these congestion avoidance mechanisms are important in routed
environments, they are often ill-suited to satellite links.
Data Acknowledgments: The simple, heuristic data acknowledgment
scheme used by TCP generally does not adapt well to long latency or
highly asymmetric bandwidth conditions. To provide reliable data
transmission, the TCP receiver often constantly sends acknowledgments
for the data received back the sender. The sender generally does not
assume any data is lost or corrupted until a multiple of the round trip time
has passed without receiving an acknowledgment. If a packet is lost or
corrupted, TCP can retransmit all of the data starting from the first missing
packet. The algorithm may not respond well over satellite networks where
the round trip time is long and error rates are high. Further, the constant
stream of acknowledgments frequently wastes precious back channel
bandwidth. If the back channel bandwidth is small, the return of the
acknowledgments to the sender can become the system bottleneck in some
cases.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
13
Window Size: TCP utilizes a sliding window mechanism to limit the
amount of data in flight. When the window becomes substantially full, the
sender stops transmitting data until it receives new acknowledgments from
the destination server. Over satellite networks, where acknowledgments
are slow to return, the TCP window size generally sets a hard limit on the
maximum data throughput rate. The minimum window size often needed
to fully utilize an error-free link, known as the "bandwidth-delay product,"
is 100 Kbytes for a T 1 satellite link and 675 Kbytes for a 10 MBps link,
for example. Bit errors can increase the required window size further.
However, most implementations of TCP/1P are often limited to a
maximum window size of 64 KB and many common operating systems
use a default window size of only 8 KB, imposing a maximum throughput
rate over a satellite link of only 128 Kbps per connection, regardless of the
bandwidth of the data pipe.
According to the present invention, a technique for providing a TCP
connection over a wide area wireless network is provided. In an exemplary
embodiment,
the present invention provides apparatus, systems and methods for converting
information
using a TCP connection to an XTP connection, which is more suitable for
transmission
over a wireless network system such as a satellite system.
Further, according to the present invention, techniques for controlling
information flow in TCP connections, and for managing memory for one or more
TCP
connections over a wireless wide area network are provided. In an exemplary
embodiment, the present invention provides methods and systems for controlling
the flow
of information and/or memory management for buffering information transmitted
over a
TCP connection to an XTP connection, which is more suitable for transmission
over a
wireless network system such as a satellite system. Details of the present
invention are
described throughout the present specification and more particularly below.
Fig. 1 is a simplified diagram of a satellite system 100 according to an
embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an illustration
and should
not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art
would recognize
other variations, modifications, and alternatives. Among other features, the
system 100
includes a satellite network system, which has satellites) 101. The satellite
101 receives

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
14
and transmits information between a plurality of ground stations 107, 108 or
satellite
dishes. Each satellite ground station includes a satellite dish, and a
satellite modem
109A, 109B or other form of receiver such as a VSAT indoor unit, which is
coupled,
directly or indirectly to a satellite gateway 111 A, 111 B.
Satellite antenna 108 receives and transmits signals 103 through satellite
101. Satellite antenna 108 connects to satellite gateway 111B that couples to
a wide area
network such as the Internet 129 or an Internet, which is coupled to a server
131. The
gateway 111B also couples through satellite modem 109B. The server and the
Internet
communication occur in a common protocol such as TCP/IP, UDP/IP or the like.
The
satellite gateway will be described in more detail below.
Satellite antenna 107 receives and transmits signals 105 through satellite
101. Satellite antenna 107 connects to satellite gateway 11 lA that couples to
a local area
network such as Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI, or others 121, which is coupled to
computer terminals 123 or clients. Here, satellite gateway couples to laptop
117, which is
coupled through modem 119. The client, the laptop, and the local area network
use a
common connection format such as TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, or the like. The satellite
gateway
will be described in more detail below.
In a specific embodiment, satellite gateway 11 lA intercepts a TCP
connection from a client and converts data 105 to a satellite protocol for
transmission
over satellite 101. The gateway 111A also couples through satellite modem
109A, which
transmits data to satellite 101. The satellite gateway 111B on the opposite
side of the
satellite link translates the data in the satellite protocol back to TCP for
communications
with the server 131. In a specific embodiment, the present invention provides
improved
performance over conventional techniques. Additionally, techniques of the
present
invention remain substantially transparent to an end user and is fully
compatible with the
Internet or an Internet infrastructure. In many, if not all aspects, no
substantial changes
are required to the client or server. In preferred embodiments, applications
continue to
function without substantial hardware and/or software modifications.
Although the above has been described in terms of a specific networking
diagram, it is possible to implement the present satellite gateway in other
configurations.
For example, the present satellite gateway can be one "hub" or central gateway
that
serves a plurality of remote gateways. Each of the remote gateways is
connected to the
central gateway to create an individual satellite link.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
Other common network topologies can also be used. Further, in some
embodiments, different telecommunications links can be used to carry forward
and
backward paths of a connection. For example, a satellite link can be used to
carry data on
the forward path, while telephone line can be used for the backward path.
Other types of
5 telecommunications hardware may be substituted for the example hardware
described
here without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Additionally, the present satellite gateway is generally described as a stand
alone unit. It will be recognized, however, that the present gateway can be
implemented
or integrated into a client machine. For example, the present gateway can be
10 implemented on a personal computer using a satellite card, which can be
inserted into a
WindowsTM 98 machine. The present gateway can also be implemented on other
operating systems such as Windows NT, MacOS, and Linux. Of course, the exact
manner of implementation will depend upon the application. Additionally, the
present
satellite gateway may be integrated into a standalone satellite modem, VSAT
hardware,
15 router or other network devices.
I. PROTOCOL DESIGN
In a specific embodiment, the present invention includes a novel satellite
protocol, which provides improved throughput for satellite networks. The
present
protocol can be designed to respond efficiently to typical satellite latency,
bit errors, and
asymmetric bandwidth conditions. The present protocol also can take advantage
of
optimizations possible on a point-to-point link with fixed bandwidth. For
further
information regarding satellite protocols, such as XTP, reference may be had
to Tim
Strayer, "A Brief Introduction to the Xpress Transport Protocol," which is
incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes. These and other features
of the
present satellite protocol are described in more detail below.
The present protocol utilizes an efficient selective retransmission
algorithm for the acknowledgment of data. Because the hop over the satellite
is a point-
to-point link with no intermediate routing, any gaps in the packet sequence
can be
assumed to be data loss due to corruption. The receiving satellite gateway
requests
retransmission immediately upon detection of the missing data from the
transmitting
satellite gateway.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
16
The present protocol is substantially free from the frequent
acknowledgment features of conventional TCP. In some embodiments, the present
protocol does not use acknowledgments as the primary means of identifying lost
data. In
these embodiments, the present protocol needs only infrequent acknowledgments
to
confirm data arrival and clear buffers. (Conventional TCP sends a constant
stream of
acknowledgments over the reverse channel.) The present protocol reduces back
channel
usage by 70% or more, thereby increasing the performance of networks where
limited
back channel bandwidth is the system bottleneck.
The present protocol offers adequately large window sizes for transmission
of data between the satellite gateways. Because the bandwidth-delay product
over the
satellite between the satellite gateways is much larger than that from the
satellite gateway
to the end node, the large present protocol window enables the bandwidth-delay
product
to window size ratio to remain relatively constant. The present gateway
becomes a buffer
for the network, allowing high throughput independent of the window size of
the clients
and servers.
The present protocol generally does not use unnecessary congestion
avoidance mechanisms for the hop over the satellite between the satellite
gateways. The
present system, however, continues to use "Slow Start" and all other standard
TCP
congestion avoidance algorithms for the terrestrial connections between the
present
gateways and the end nodes. The present protocol also uses a streamlined
handshake
mechanism to reduce the number of round-trip times required for connection set-
up.
The present apparatus, systems and methods can run over IP for
compatibility with routed networks. Alternatively, it can run directly over
the link layer
for substantially improved performance in most instances. Depending upon the
embodiment one or more of these features can be available.
The above has generally been described in terms of desirable features of
the present satellite protocol. It would be recognized that many other types
of features
can be available. Additionally, the present invention does not necessarily
require each of
the above features. Any combination can be used depending upon the
application. One
of ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications,
and
alternatives.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
17
II. XPRESS TRANSPORT PROTOCOL
In a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides an "Xpress
Transport Protocol," which is commonly known as XTP. XTP provides orthogonal
protocol functions for separation of implementation from policy, separation of
rate and
flow control, explicit first-class support for multicast, and data delivery
service
independence. XTP has a variety of suitable characteristics for transmission
of data over
a satellite link, which are described more fully below.
In a specific embodiment, the present protocol includes a set of
mechanisms whose functionality is orthogonal. The most notable effect of this
is that
XTP separates communication mechanism (e.g., data-gram, virtual circuit,
transaction,
etc) from an error control policy employed (fully reliable through
uncorrected). Further,
flow and rate control as well as error control can be tailored to the
communication at
hand. If desired, any set of these control procedures can be turned off.
The present protocol also provides for separation of rate and flow control.
1 S In general, flow control operates on end-to-end buffer space. Rate control
is a
producer/consumer concept that considers processor speed and congestion. TCP
does not
provide rate control, and combats congestion with slow-start and other
heuristics. XTP
provides mechanisms for shaping rate control and flow control independently.
In a specific embodiment, the present protocol provides explicit multicast
support. Here, multicast is not an afterthought in XTP. Each mechanism used
for uni-cast
communications is available for multicast use as well.
The present protocol also has data delivery service independence. In
particular, XTP is a transport protocol, yet with the advent of switched
networks rather
than routed networks, a traditional network layer service may not be
appropriate in every
instance. XTP generally requires that the underlying data delivery service
provides
framing and delivery of packets from one XTP-equipped host to another. This
could be
raw MAC or IP or AALS. XTP also employs parametric addressing, allowing
packets to
be addressed with any one of several standard addressing formats. Other
features of XTP
include, among others, implicit fast connection setup for virtual circuit
paradigm; key-
based addressing lookups; message priority and scheduling; support for
encapsulated and
convergence protocols; selective retransmission and acknowledgment; and fixed-
size 64-
bit aligned frame design.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
18
XTP defines the mechanisms necessary for delivering user data from one
end system to one or more other end systems. Each XTP implementation maintains
the
state of each of its communications. Well-defined packet structures,
containing user data
or control information, are exchanged in order to effect the user data
transfer. The control
information is used to provide the requested layer of correctness and to
assist in making
the transfer efficient. Assurance of correctness is done via error control
algorithms and
maintenance of a connection state machine. Flow and rate control algorithms,
certain
protocol modes, and traffic shaping information are used to provide the
requested quality
of service as efficiently as possible.
The collection of information comprising the XTP state at an end system is
called a context. This information represents one instance of an active
communication
between two (or more) XTP endpoints. A context should be created, or
instantiated,
before sending or receiving XTP packets. There may be many active contexts at
an end
system, one for each active conversation or message.
Each context manages both an outgoing data stream and an incoming data
stream. A data stream is an arbitrary length string of sequenced bytes, where
each byte is
represented by a sequence number. The aggregate of a pair of active contexts
and the
data streams between them is called an association.
A context at an end system is initially in a quiescent state. A user in need
of communication services requests that the context be placed into the
listening state.
The context now listens for an appropriate FIRST packet. The FIRST packet is
the initial
packet of an association. It contains explicit addressing information. The
user should
provide all of the necessary information for XTP to match an incoming FIRST
packet
with the listening context.
At another end system a user requests communication service from XTP.
Since this user will initiate the association, the context moves from a
quiescent state to an
active state directly. The active context constructs a FIRST packet, complete
with explicit
addressing information from the user. The FIRST packet is sent via the
underlying data
delivery service.
When the FIRST packet is received at the first host's XTP implementation,
the address is compared against all listening contexts. If a match is found,
the listening
context moves to the active state. From this point forward an association is
established,
and communication can be completely symmetric since there are two data
streams, one in

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
19
each direction, in an association. Also, no other packet during the lifetime
of the
association will carry explicit addressing information. Rather, a unique "key"
is carried in
each packet that maps the packet to the appropriate context.
Once all data from one user has been sent, that data stream from that user's
context can be closed. Sentinels in the form of options bits in a packet are
exchanged to
gracefully close the connection. Other forms of less graceful closings are
possible by
abbreviating this exchange. When both users are done, and both data streams
closed, the
contexts move into the inactive state. One of the contexts will send a
sentinel that causes
the association to dissolve. At this point, both contexts return to the
quiescent state.
Generally all of XTP's packet types use a common header structure. All of
the information necessary to steer the packet's payload to the proper point of
processing is
carried in the header. Much of how an XTP context operates is controlled by a
set of bit
flags that are concentrated in one field in the packet header. Fifteen flags
are defined,
including bit flags to control connection shutdown, bit flags to control the
acknowledgment policy, and bit flags that are markers in the data stream. The
remaining
bit flags control the end-to-end operating modes. Examples include enabling or
disabling
error control or flow control, or enabling multicast mode.
XTP flow control is based on 64-bit sequence numbers and a 64-bit sliding
window. XTP also provides rate control whereby an end system or intermediate
system
can specify the maximum bandwidth and burst size it will accept on a
connection. A
Traffic Segment provides a means for specifying the shape of the traffic so
that both end
systems and intermediate systems can manage their resources and facilitate
service
quality guarantees.
Error control in XTP incorporates positive and, when appropriate, negative
acknowledgment to effect retransmission of missing or damaged data packets.
Retransmission may be either go-back-N or selective. The retransmission
algorithms are
conservative: only data that is shown to be missing via control messages may
be
transmitted. This avoids spurious and possible congestion-causing
retransmissions. The
error control algorithm, while basically conservative, can also be aggressive:
systems,
techniques and methods for a quick-acting error notification are provided.
XTP also specifies techniques for extending error control to a multicast
environment. The error control algorithm in multicast is identical to the uni-
cast
algorithm, although additional sophistication is required to manage state
variables and

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
achieve continuous streaming. Accordingly, XTP is a preferred satellite
protocol
according to the present invention.
Although the above has generally been described in using an XTP
protocol, it will be understood that other types of protocols can be used. For
example, the
5 protocol can be a modified TCP, a modified XTP, and others. Additionally,
the protocol
can be any that is suitable for transmission over a satellite link.
Additionally, one of
ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications, and
alternatives.
Fig. 2 is a simplified diagram of system architecture 200 according to an
embodiment of the present invention. This diagram is merely an illustration
and should
10 not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art
would recognize
other variations, modifications, and alternatives. The system architecture 200
includes at
least a client 201, which is coupled to a satellite gateway 203, which
transmits and
receives information via satellite link 209 from a satellite gateway 205.
Satellite gateway
205 couples to server 207. Satellite gateway and server couple to each other
through the
15 Internet or an Internet-like network of computers.
Client 201 can be represented in multiple layers, including application and
physical layers. The layers may include a browser 211. The browser 211 allows
a user to
communicate information from an application layer to a physical layer for
transmission to
a gateway. The browser 211 is generally in the application layer, which
provides the
20 information. For example, the browser can be one of suitable design made by
a company
called Netscape Communications Corporation of Mountain View, California or
Microsoft
Corporation of Redmond, Washington or others. In addition to browsers, other
TCP
applications, including FTP file transfers, may also be used to communicate
between
clients and servers.
The information goes through the transport layer (e.g., TCP) 213 and then
through the IP layer 215, which is the networking layer. The transport layer
provides a
flow of data between the client and the gateway. The IP layer handles movement
of data
comprising packets between the client and the gateway, or other network. The
information is sent through the physical layer, which includes a driver 217.
The driver
217 transmits the information to the gateway 203 through hardware 219
connected to
gateway 203 via a telecommunications link 221, which can be a wire, cable,
fiber optic,
or other physical communication medium. Alternatively, the driver 217 receives
information from the gateway 203 via link 221 and hardware2l 9. The driver can
be a

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
21
network operating system with a network interface card in the client computer,
for
example.
From the physical connection 221, the information traverses to the
gateway 203. The gateway has a physical layer 223, which interacts with driver
225.
The gateway also includes a networking layer 227 and a transport layer 229,
which is
coupled to a translation module 231. The networking layer 227 determines
whether the
information can be routed over the satellite protocol. If so, the data is
passed up to the
transport layer 229. If not, the data is immediately forwarded out to the rate
control
module 234 for delivery to the satellite link 239 in non-translated form. The
translation
module 231 converts the information into a satellite protocol 233, which is
suitable for
use over a satellite link. A rate control module 234 determines whether the
information
can be passed immediately to the satellite connection or be queued for later
delivery. The
satellite connection is coupled to a physical layer 237 by a driver 235, which
transmits
information to and from satellite 209. The information traverses to and from
the satellite
in a wireless medium, 239, 241.
Information is received by the satellite gateway 205, which includes
multiple layers, physical and others. The physical layer 243 couples to driver
245. The
networking and transport layer include a satellite protocol 247 and a rate
control 244.
The network and transport layers connect to a session layer which comprises
translation
module 249. The translation module converts the information using the
satellite protocol
back to TCP/IP. The information traverses through the transport layer (i.e.,
TCP) 251 and
the networking layer (i.e., IP) 253. Information from the satellite gateway
205 enters a
physical layer 257 through driver 255. The driver transmits the information to
a server
207 over telecommunications link 259. Driver 255 can also receive information
from
server 207 in the backward path.
From the telecommunications link 259, the information is sent to driver
263 in the server 207 via physical layer 261. The information traverses from
the driver to
a networking layer, which includes IP 265. The information also traverses from
the
networking layer to a transport layer, which includes TCP 267. The information
is
delivered to a Web server application 269, for example. Between the server 207
and the
satellite gateway 205 is the Internet or another IP network, depending upon
the
application.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
22
In a specific embodiment, information can flow through a gateway, such
as gateway 203, 205 at the network layer, bypassing the transport and
application layers
altogether. For example, in gateway 203, information can enter from client 201
via
telecommunications link 221. Physical layer 223 passes the information to
driver 225. In
turn, driver 225 passes the information to network layer 227. Network layer
227 can
route the information to its destination using IP. The information then flows
from
network layer 227 to driver 235. Driver 235 interacts with physical layer 237
to pass the
information along to satellite 209 via telecommunications link 239.
In a specific embodiment, the translation module converts information
using a TCP connection to a suitable connection for transmission over a
satellite system.
The suitable connection for the satellite is generally resilient to
transmission over a
wireless network such as a satellite network, e.g., Orion WorldcastTM or
PanAmSatT""
SpotBytesT"" services, and the like. The connection should also be suitable
for long
latency, high loss, and asymmetric bandwidth conditions. The connection should
also be
transparent to the end user at the client or server location. The long latency
is typically
about 200 milliseconds to about 700 milliseconds, per satellite hop but is not
limited to
such values.
In a specific embodiment, the present translation module converts
information using a TCP connection into an XTP, modified TCP or XTP-like
protocol for
transmission over a satellite link, which is illustrated by Fig. 2A, for
example. Here, the
TCP module receives information 350 including the TCP connection. The
information
includes data 333, a TCP header 335, and an IP header 337. The TCP module
removes
the TCP header from the information such that the information 351 includes
substantially
all data 333 and passes the data, along with certain TCP header information,
to the
translation module. The translation module passes the data or portions of data
to the
satellite protocol module where a satellite protocol header 339 is prepended
onto the data.
The header is an XTP header or like. The information 352 now includes the XTP
header,
which is suitable for transmission over the satellite link. Depending on the
specific
implementation, the XTP header and data may also be prepended with an IP
header for
transmission over the satellite link. In particular, the information is
transferred to the
physical layer and the driver. The driver and physical layer send the
information to a
receiving satellite gateway, which may prepend additional headers.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
23
From the satellite link, the information including the XTP header enters a
receiving XTP module. The receiving XTP or satellite protocol module removes
the XTP
header from the information, leaving data 353. The receiving satellite
protocol module
passes the data to the translation module, which can be a routing module used
to route
data to the proper protocol. The translation module then passes the data to
the TCP
module. The receiving TCP module attaches a TCP header 343 and IP header 341
onto
the data to form information that is now ready for transmission over a network
to a
receiving server destination. The information using the TCP connection
traverses through
a network to the destination server.
In other embodiments, the translation module can also convert a portion of
the information including the data and TCP/IP headers to information using the
XTP
protocol. Alternatively, the translation module can convert more than one
segment of
information including multiple TCP/IP headers into a single piece of
information
including the XTP header for transmission over a satellite link. Depending
upon the
application, the translation module can convert the information including the
TCP
connection into any one or any combination of the above. Further details of
these
techniques, and others, are described in more detail below.
Figs. 3A and 3B are simplified diagrams of process diagrams according to
embodiments of the present invention. These diagrams are merely illustrations
and should
not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art
would recognize
other variations, modifications, and alternatives. In a specific embodiment,
the present
invention uses a connection process 300, which is illustrated by Fig. 3A. The
connection
process uses a plurality of separate connections using a "handshaking routine"
in the
satellite system to provide a transparent TCP connection to an end user. The
satellite
system can be similar to the one described herein, but is not limited. The
present process
begins at start, step 301. In a specific embodiment, a plurality of
connections are
provided. In particular, the present process provides a first connection, step
303. The
first connection is a TCP connection between a client and a client side
gateway, which
interfaces to a satellite link. The present process provides a second
connection, step 305,
which provides a connection between the client side gateway and a destination
gateway
over a wireless (e.g., satellite) link. The connection between the wireless
link can be any
suitable connection such as XTP or XTP-like connection. The present process
provides a
third connection, step 307, which forms a TCP connection between the
destination

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
24
gateway to the destination server, which can traverse through the Internet or
an Internet.
Once these connections have been made they are maintained, step 309. The
present
process ends at stop 311, which terminates all three connections.
In a specific embodiment, the present process occurs by way of a selected
sequence of steps. Here, TCP SYN packets are intercepted transparently by a
satellite
gateway. The satellite gateway establishes a new XTP connection across the
satellite link
to the other satellite gateway. Information, including IP addresses and port
numbers,
about the requesting client and the destination server is transferred across
the satellite link
to the other satellite gateway. The destination gateway then sets up a TCP
connection
with the destination server, using the client's addressing information so that
the server
sees the TCP connection as being the same as if the client itself had
established the
connection. The satellite gateway makes routing decisions based upon source
and
destination addresses in the IP header of packets entering the gateway in
order to
determine whether the packets should be routed over the satellite
telecommunications
link. Once the TCP connection to the server is established, the destination
gateway
communicates back to the sending gateway, which then acknowledges the
connection
with the client.
In one or more embodiments, this sequence of steps has advantages. In
particular, the client does not believe the connection is established until
the server has
accepted this connection, which tends to reduce or even eliminate false
indications of
successful connection establishment. Additionally, both the client and server
see the
connection as happening immediately between the two of them, without detecting
that the
satellite connection is happening in between the client and the server . That
is, the present
invention substantially preserves "end-to-end semantics" of the connection. In
other
embodiments, the connectivity is symmetric. Here, "clients" may exist on
either side of
the satellite link, and "servers" may exist on either side. Systems on either
side may
request connections to systems on the other side, and the satellite gateways
will intercept
the connections.
Fig. 3B illustrates a simplified flowchart of a novel routing process 320 in
a specific embodiment according to the present invention that begins with a
starting step
321. This diagram is merely an example which should not limit the scope of the
claims
herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations,
modifications,
and alternatives. In a step 323, a client host sends a TCP packet destined for
a particular

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
IP address to a satellite gateway. In an example, the satellite gateway can be
similar to
the one 111A described above, but can also be others. In a decisional step
325, the
satellite gateway receives the packet and determines whether the packet is to
be carried
over an XTP connection prior to transmission. An example of an XTP protocol
has been
5 described herein, but should not limit the scope of the claims. Any suitable
satellite
protocol can be used according to certain embodiments of the present
invention. If the
destination address of the TCP packet is configured to be converted to the XTP
protocol
format, then the packet is converted into the XTP protocol in a step 331.
Otherwise, the
packet is transmitted in its TCP format via an alternative branch to step 327.
By way of
10 the present decisional process, the present invention is useful for sites
where a single
satellite gateway communicates with multiple remote sites, some of which have
gateways
that are compatible with XTP protocol while other sites do not contain
corresponding
gateways. Additionally, the present invention allows specific addresses to be
configured
for protocol translation and other addresses to be configured for no
translation, based on
1 S policy decisions of the network administrator.
In a specific embodiment, the present invention also provides a rate control
step (step 327). In a step 327, processing is performed to maintain a suitable
or
predetermined data rate over the satellite device. The processing of step 327
may require
buffering of packets in order to avoid overloading the satellite link, such as
105 and 103
20 in Fig. 1. This can be accomplished using the process depicted by Figs. 3C-
3D, but is not
limited to this process. Then, in a step 329, the packet is transmitted along
a connection
transmitted from the sending satellite gateway across the satellite link.
Then, in a step
333, the packet is converted back to TCP, if it was converted to XTP protocol
in step 331.
Then, in a step 335, the packet is routed to its remote destination. The
present invention
25 is especially useful for sites where a single satellite gateway
communicates with multiple
remote gateways, some of which are compatible with XTP protocol while others
of the
remote gateways are not. Some configurations may have multiple remote sites
per
satellite gateway. Some of these remote sites may have a satellite gateway
installed,
while others do not. Thus, there may be no satellite gateway on the remote
side, just a IP
routing configuration. The process completes routing (step 335) when the
information
enters a destination server 131, which transfers the information to a
destination client.
The process stops (step 337) when the connection is terminated.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
26
In a particular embodiment according to the present invention, TCP
connections at times pass a piece of information in the protocol header which
must be
delivered as soon as possible to the destination side of the connection. This
piece of
information is known as the "urgent pointer". In select embodiments, the TCP
implementation that is part of the client-side satellite gateway, such as for
example
satellite gateway 203 of Fig. 2, can extract this urgent pointer from the TCP
header.
However, this operation is not required by the system of Fig. 2 and is not
intended to limit
the scope of the claims. A TCP module, such as TCP module 229 of Fig. 2, for
example,
can extract the urgent pointer and pass it to a satellite gateway translation
module, which
can be satellite gateway translation module 231 of Fig. 2, or an equivalent.
The urgent
pointer is passed down to a satellite protocol module, such as satellite
protocol module
233 of Fig. 2, or an equivalent. The urgent pointer can then be carried in the
satellite
protocol header to a satellite gateway, such as satellite gateway 205 of Fig.
2, or any other
receiving satellite gateway. At the receiving satellite gateway, the urgent
pointer can be
extracted by a satellite protocol module, such as satellite protocol module
247 of Fig. 2,
and passed up to a translation module, such as translation module 249, or
another satellite
translation module, which can deliver it to a TCP module, such as TCP module
251. The
TCP module then incorporates the urgent pointer in its target field in the TCP
header for
immediate delivery to an end server, such as end server 207. This header for
delivery to
the server refers to the point in the data stream that has not yet arrived at
the second
satellite gateway machine. In some embodiments, appropriate urgent pointer
processing
can alleviate malfunctions.
Fig. 3C illustrates a simplified flowchart of a data rate control process such
as data rate control step 327 in Fig. 3B in a specific embodiment according to
the present
invention. This diagram is merely an example which should not limit the scope
of the
claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize other
variations,
modifications, and alternatives. Fig. 3C shows a first decisional step 341 of
determining
whether queues are empty when an incoming packet arrives. In a presently
preferable
embodiment, there are two queues, one for queuing high priority (HIPRI)
traffic and one
for queuing "normal" traffic. A person of ordinary skill in the art can
appreciate that the
number of queues can be extended or reduced by straightforward extensions of
the
embodiments according to the present invention. If the queues are empty, then

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
27
processing continues with a decisional step 343. Otherwise, processing
continues with a
decisional step 345.
Decisional step 343 determines whether the current system clock tick
count is the same as a stored clock tick count. If the system clock tick and
the stored
clock tick are the same, then processing continues with decisional step 349,
which
determines whether a byte counter and a length of an incoming packet are
greater than a
predetermined maximum, based on the desired transmission rate, denoted here as
"MAX". If the maximum would not be exceeded, then processing continues with
step
355, in which the packet is sent and the byte counter is incremented by the
packet length.
Otherwise, if the maximum would be exceeded in step 349, then processing
continues
with a step 357, in which the difference between MAX and the current value of
the byte
counter is stored as "EXTRA", and a timer can be started. Processing then
continues at
step 345. Otherwise, if step 343 determines that the clock tick and stored
clock tick are
different, processing continues with a step 347 in which a byte counter is
cleared and the
stored clock tick is updated. Processing then continues with a step 355, as
described
above.
If decisional step 341 determines that at least one of the queues is not
empty, or if the packet length would have increased the byte counter beyond
MAX in step
349, then in a decisional step 345, a determination is made whether the
incoming packet
is a retransmission. If the packet is a retransmission, then in a step 351,
the packet is
added to the high priority (HIPRI) queue. Otherwise, in a step 353, the packet
is added to
the normal queue.
Fig. 3D illustrates a simplified flowchart of a timer service process useful
in conjunction with data rate control process illustrated by Fig. 3C in a
specific
embodiment according to the present invention. This diagram is merely an
example
which should not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill
in the art
would recognize other variations, modifications, and alternatives. Fig. 3D
shows a step
361 invoked whenever a timer set in step 357 expires. In step 341, the byte
counter is
cleared and the local maximum is set to the maximum MAX added toEXTRA. Then,
in a
decisional step 363, the high priority (HII'RI) queue is checked to determine
whether
packets are on the queue. If there are packets on the HII'RI queue, then
processing
continues with a decisional step 365. Otherwise, processing continues with a
decisional
step 367.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
28
If there are packets on the HIPRI queue, then in a decisional step 365, a
determination is made whether the byte counter and the packet length are less
than a local
maximum. If this is indeed the case, then processing continues with a step 369
in which
the packet is dequeued from the HIPRI queue and sent. Also, the byte counter
is
incremented to reflect the length of the data in the packet. Otherwise, if
decisional step
365 determines that the byte counter and the packet length exceed the local
maximum,
then in a step 371 the timer is restarted and processing returns to the
invoking process.
Processing can continue when the timer expires.
If decisional step 363 determines that there are no packets on the HII'RI
queue, then processing continues with a decisional step 367. Decisional step
367
determines whether there are packets on the normal queue. If there are no
packets on the
normal queue, then processing continues with a step 375, in which the current
clock tick
is stored in a global cell. Otherwise, if decisional step 367 determines that
packets are on
the normal queue, then processing continues with a decisional step 373, in
which a
determination is made whether the byte counter and the packet length are less
than the
local maximum. If this is indeed the case, then processing continues with a
step 377, in
which the packet is dequeued from the normal queue and sent. Also, the byte
counter is
incremented to reflect the length of the data in the packet. Otherwise, if
decisional step
373 determines that if the byte counter and the packet length exceed the local
maximum,
then in a step 379 the timer is restarted and processing returns to the
invoking process.
Processing can continue when the timer expires.
Fig. 3E illustrates a representative system overview in a particular
embodiment according to the present invention. This diagram is merely an
example
which should not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill
in the art
would recognize other variations, modifications, and alternatives. A client
380 initiates a
connection request to a TCP server 388. Satellite gateway 384 intercepts the
connection
request and establishes a second connection 385 with a second Satellite
gateway 386.
The second satellite gateway 386 then initiates a third connection 387 with
the server 388.
Once connection 387 is established and that information has been communicated
back to
the satellite gateway 384, the first TCP connection 383 can be confirmed
between the
client 380 and satellite gateway 384.
In some embodiments, a data flow control process 382 useful for limiting
an aggregate amount of data buffered by satellite gateway 384 and/or satellite
gateway

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
29
386 for TCP connections sending data to client 380 is provided. Select
embodiments can
control data flow on a TCP connection when data has been buffered for a client
on that
connection, for example. As seen in Fig. 3F, the first TCP connection 383 can
be
confirmed between the client 380 and satellite gateway 384 via data flow
control process
382. In select embodiments, data flow control process 382 can limit the amount
of
memory that a client TCP connection, such as client TCP connection 383, can
send to a
satellite gateway, such as satellite gateway 384, in order to control the
amount of data
stored on the satellite gateways 384 and satellite gateway 386 on either side
of connection
385. Although depicted in terms of a separate control process 382 interposed
within
connection 383 between client 380 and satellite gateway 384, the present
invention can
also be embodied in other forms. For example, control process 382 can be co-
located
with first satellite gateway within client 380's machine, or can reside with
first satellite
gateway 384 in a separate machine, and the like.
Although depicted in terms of satellite and satellite gateways, the present
invention can also be embodied in other forms of network hardware. For
example, first
gateway 384 and second gateway 386 can be connected by a wireless network and
the
like.
Fig. 3G illustrates a simplified flowchart of a connection flow control
selection process in a particular embodiment according to the present
invention. This
diagram is merely an example which should not limit the scope of the claims
herein. One
of ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications,
and
alternatives. Fig. 3G illustrates an input data flow 390. A decisional step
391 determines
whether the connection on which input data flow 390 is received is a new
connection. If
this is so, the new connection is not marked for flow control. Otherwise, in a
decisional
step 392, a size of the contents of a buffer associated with the connection is
checked
against a threshold. If the contents of the buffer exceeds the threshold, then
in a step 393,
the connection is selected for the flow control limit calculation. Otherwise,
the
connection is not selected for flow control. The steps illustrated in Fig. 3G
can provide
embodiments with the capability to screen out connections that are
initializing or which
are transferring data intermittently. Such connections need not be selected
for the flow
control limit calculation because they do not consume sufficiently large
system resources.
New connections need not be selected for the flow control limit calculation
until a
threshold amount of data has been buffered for the new connection. In a
presently

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
preferable embodiment, the threshold is reached if the connection buffers the
threshold
amount of data in memory. In this particular embodiment, a connection that
sends less
than the threshold amount, waits, and then sends more data, need not be
selected for the
flow control limit calculation because not all of the threshold amount of data
resided in
memory at one time. However, in other embodiments, an average of data in the
buffer, or
a buffered amount of data over a particular time period could also be used as
a basis for
controlling flow on the connection without departing from the scope of the
present
invention. In a presently preferable embodiment, the threshold limit can be 50
Kbytes.
However, those of ordinary skill in the art can readily apply the methods and
systems of
10 the present invention to other threshold values.
Fig. 3H illustrates a simplified flowchart of a data flow control process
useful in conjunction with the satellite gateway system illustrated by Fig. 3F
in a specific
embodiment according to the present invention. This diagram is merely an
example
which should not limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill
in the art
15 would recognize other variations, modifications, and alternatives. Fig. 3H
illustrates an
input data flow 394 for a particular connection. A decisional step 395
determines
whether the connection corresponding to input data 394 is being flow
controlled. If this is
so, then in a step 396, a round trip time (RTT) to send a byte of data across
the link and
back for the connection can be determined. Round trip time can be determined
by input
20 from a user, or automatically determining the time for a sample piece of
data to traverse
the link, and the like. Then in a step 397, a data rate, or bandwidth, for the
connection is
determined. Data rate can be determined by input from a user, or automatically
with a
sample piece of data, and the like. In a present embodiment, the user enters
the rate and
round-trip time as separate inputs. However, other embodiments can allow the
user to
25 enter a pre-computed bandwidth-delay product or can determine the round-
trip time by
probing the link. Then, in a step 398, a bandwidth delay product can be
determined by
multiplying the bandwidth of the link, in bytes, by the round-trip time.
In a step 399, a flow control limit can be determined for the connection. A
flow control limit can be an amount of data to buffer for the connection, or
the like. In a
30 presently preferable embodiment, the flow control limit can be an amount of
memory
allocated to each active data connection selected during the processing
detailed in Fig.
3G. The flow control limit can be computed by multiplying the bandwidth-delay
product
by a scaling factor and then dividing that total by the number of active data
connections.

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
31
The scaling factor is chosen to permit sufficient data to be buffered in order
to keep the
network link fully utilized. In a presently preferable embodiment, a scaling
factor of
eight is chosen. However, embodiments can use other scaling factors, or
scaling
functions, or the combination of multiple scaling factors without departing
from the scope
of the present invention. Then, in a step 401, data on the connection can be
limited by
buffering incoming data on the connection up to the limit determined in step
399. The
system can refrain from buffering more data than there is allocated space
available in
physical system memory.
It is noteworthy that many embodiments according to the present invention
can adapt to change in the number of active connections. If one connection is
active, that
connection will be permitted to use the entire bandwidth. When a second
connection
becomes active, flow control limits can be adjusted for both the first and
second
connections by calculating a flow control limit whenever new data arrives. In
this
manner, bandwidth can be allocated among connections irrespective of the order
that
connections are established. Additionally, embodiments according to the
present
invention permit sharing of a satellite link between connections by reducing
the
likelihood that a burst of data from one particular connection will be queued
for
transmission over the link in front of data for other connections. This makes
network
throughput more consistent across multiple connections.
Fig. 3I illustrates a simplified structure component diagram of a
representative buffer architecture of a particular embodiment according to the
present
invention. This diagram is merely an example which should not limit the scope
of the
claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would recognize other
variations,
modifications, and alternatives. Fig. 3I illustrates a satellite gateway 384.
Satellite
gateway 384 comprises a TCP buffer 405, that interfaces with a client, such as
client 380
of Fig. 3E via connection 383. Further, satellite gateway 384 comprises a
satellite
protocol buffer 406, that interfaces with a satellite, such as satellite 101
of Fig. 3E via
connection 385. TCP over satellite systems can temporarily store data in one
or more
buffers controlled by the TCP protocol layer and the satellite protocol layer
in satellite
gateway 384. Data to an endpoint, such as client 380 of Fig. 3E, for example,
can be
delivered from one or more TCP buffers, such as TCP buffer 405. As space
becomes
available in TCP buffer 405, data can be transferred from satellite protocol
buffer 406 to
TCP buffer 405. As space becomes available in satellite protocol buffer 406,
the satellite

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCTNS00/02891
32
protocol can permit more data to be sent across the satellite link, such as
satellite link 385
in Fig. 3E, for example. In a representative example of an application of an
embodiment
according to the present invention, a satellite gateway, such as satellite
gateway 384 can
feed data to a plurality of modems. The modem links cannot accept data at the
same rate
as the satellite link. In such a situation, techniques according to the
present invention can
circumvent expending relatively large amounts of buffer space for holding data
for the
modems.
Fig. 3J illustrates a simplified flowchart of a connection memory
management process in a particular embodiment according to the present
invention. This
diagram is merely an example which should not limit the scope of the claims
herein. One
of ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications,
and
alternatives. Fig. 3J illustrates output data 402, that can reside in
satellite protocol buffer
406 of Fig. 3I, for example. When data is not being delivered from the TCP
layer to the
end client at an acceptable rate, congestion in the satellite link can occur.
This congestion
can be detected by the satellite protocol in a decisional step 403, wherein
the satellite
protocol determines whether a state of the satellite protocol buffer 406 has
become
saturated. In some embodiments, a threshold can be established for the buffer.
Exceeding this threshold can indicate a saturation condition is present. If
the protocol
buffer has become saturated, then in a step 404, the satellite protocol
reduces a maximum
receive window for data that will be accepted across the satellite link 385 by
a reduction
factor. In a presently preferable embodiment, a reduction factor of 50% can be
used. In a
particular embodiment, an minimum value for the receive window can be
configured to
assure that the window is not reduced to zero. Otherwise, if a client is
receiving at a data
rate comparable to the data rate of the system, then the saturation condition
will not be
reached.
In a particular embodiment according to the present invention, a
connection to a receiver, such as client 384, for example, that has a
relatively slow data
rate, can start with a full-sized receive window. Using the techniques
according to the
present invention, the receive window can be resized to achieve a match
between the data
rate of the sender and the data rate of the receiver. Thus, in some
embodiments, new
connections can have the capability of consuming a full window of memory
before the
system detects the lower data rate condition and restricts how much additional
new data
will be buffered for the connection. In a presently preferable embodiment, the
techniques

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
w0 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
33
of the present invention can be applied to each satellite connection
separately, so that one
slow receiver will not degrade performance of other connections over the same
link.
Fig. 7 illustrates a representative apparatus in a particular embodiment
according to the present invention. This diagram is merely an example which
should not
limit the scope of the claims herein. One of ordinary skill in the art would
recognize
other variations, modifications, and alternatives. Fig. 7 depicts a block
diagram of a
protocol gateway in a particular embodiment according to the present
invention, such as
protocol gateway 11 lA, or the like. Protocol gateway 111A includes a bus 112
which
interconnects major subsystems such as a central processor 114, a system
memory 116
(typically RAM), and a number of optional external devices such as a display
screen 124
via a display adapter 126, a keyboard 132 and a mouse 146 via an I/O
controller 118, a
floppy disk drive 136 operative to receive a floppy disk 138. Storage
Interface 134 may
act as a storage interface to a fixed disk drive 144. An optional CD-ROM
player 140
operative to receive a CD-ROM 142 can also be included. Other forms of
storage, such
as a flash memory 147 can also be included. A network interface 148A can
provide a
direct connection to a remote server via a telephone link or to the Internet
using a
common protocol such as TCP/IP or the like. Network interface 148A can
interface to
one or more outside networks, which can employ any network format known in the
art,
such as Ethernet, Token Ring, ATM, IEEE 802.3, X.25, Serial Link Internet
Protocol
(SLIP), FDDI and the like. Network interface 148B may also connect to a
satellite
gateway, such as satellite gateway 109A, or other network interconnecting
devices or
computer systems. Network interface 148A can interface to one or more outside
networks, which can employ any network format known in the art, such as
Ethernet,
Token Ring, ATM, IEEE 802.3, X.25, Serial Link Internet Protocol (SLIP), FDDI
and the
like. Many other devices or subsystems (not shown) may be connected in a
similar
manner. Also, it is not necessary for all of the devices shown in Fig. 7 to be
present to
practice the present invention, as discussed below. The devices and subsystems
may be
interconnected in different ways from that shown in Fig. 7 in various
embodiments. Code
to implement the present invention, may be operably disposed or stored in
computer-
readable storage media such as system memory 116, fixed disk 144, CD-ROM 140,
or
floppy disk 138.
System 111A is merely one example of a configuration that embodies the
present invention. It will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the
art that many

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
34
system types, configurations, and combinations of the above devices are
suitable for use
in light of the present disclosure.
Although the above has generally described the present invention
according to specific systems, methods and embodiments, the present invention
has a
much broader range of applicability. In particular, the present invention is
not limited to
satellite telecommunications, but can be applied to any networking situation
where an
improved or optimized protocol is desired for use over a specific portion of
the network,
and the end systems cannot be updated to use the improved protocol. Thus, in
some
embodiments, satellite gateways could provide access to wireless or cabled
networks and
internetworks of all kinds. Of course, one of ordinary skill in the art would
recognize
other variations, modifications, and alternatives.
Experiment:
To prove the principles and operation of the present system, experiments
have been performed. In the present experiments, we ran a series of single-
client FTP file
transfer throughput tests to compare performance of conventional TCP and the
present
invention over a wide variety of different TCP windows sizes, link bandwidths,
round trip
delay times, and bit error rates. In one experiment, "Window Size" was
compared against
"Throughput," as shown by the simplified diagram 400 of Fig. 4, for example.
This
diagram is merely an example and should not limit the scope of the claims
herein. One of
ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications, and
alternatives.
Without perforniance enhancements or TCP window size tuning, most clients were
limited to a throughput rate of less than 100 Kbps when the round trip time
was 540 ms.
As the test data in Fig. 4 show, even clients with a 32 KB window were able to
reach a
throughput of a mere 400 Kbps. The present system allowed the client to take
advantage
of the available bandwidth regardless of the window size of the client or
server.
In an alternative experiment, a "Round Trip Delay" was analyzed against
"Throughput," as shown in a simplified diagram 500 of Fig. 5, for example.
This
diagram is merely an example and should not limit the scope of the claims
herein. One of
ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications, and
alternatives.
Here, the present invention removed the dependency of TCP on the round trip
time of the
network. Performance was measured over symmetric 2 Mbps and 10 Mbps links with
no
errors. These results illustrated that TCP is able to fully saturate
terrestrial low-delay

CA 02361433 2001-08-O1
WO 00/46669 PCT/US00/02891
networks, but as the delay increases, TCP performance dropped rapidly. In
contrast, a
network which used the present system was able to maintain near complete usage
of the
link regardless of the round trip time of the network.
In an alternative experiment, a "Bit Error Rate" was monitored against
5 "Throughput," which is shown by the simplified diagram 600 of Fig. 6, for
example. This
diagram is merely an example and should not limit the scope of the claims
herein. One of
ordinary skill in the art would recognize other variations, modifications, and
alternatives.
Networks which incorporated the present invention were also sensitive to the
bit error rate
of the link. The diagram shows throughput as a function of the bit error rate
for a
10 symmetric 10 Mbps satellite network with a 540 ms round trip time and a TCP
window
size of 1 MB. Even at low error rates, TCP was able to deliver a mere 1.2
Mbps. At an
error rate of 1.0 x 10-S, TCP's throughput dropped to 0.05 Mbps. A network
which used
the present system was able to fully saturate the link at low error rates and
delivered 2.7
Mbps even at an error rate of 1.0 x 10-S.
15 While the above is a full description of the specific embodiments, various
modifications, alternative constructions and equivalents may be used. For
example, the
above has generally been described in terms of using XTP as a satellite
protocol. Other
types of protocols may be available. For example, the protocol can include a
modified
TCP or the like. Therefore, the above description and illustrations should not
be taken
20 as limiting the scope of the present invention which is defined by the
appended claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from PCS 2022-09-10
Inactive: First IPC from PCS 2022-09-10
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2018-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2009-01-01
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2008-12-08
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2008-12-08
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.29 Rules requisition 2007-12-06
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2007-12-06
Inactive: IPRP received 2007-10-29
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-06-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-06-06
Letter Sent 2006-05-17
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2006-05-08
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2006-02-02
Letter Sent 2003-05-02
Request for Examination Received 2003-04-01
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-04-01
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2003-04-01
Letter Sent 2002-02-12
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-01-07
Inactive: Cover page published 2001-12-13
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2001-12-11
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2001-11-30
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2001-11-28
Application Received - PCT 2001-11-22
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2000-08-10

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2006-02-02

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2008-01-29

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2001-08-01
Registration of a document 2002-01-07
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2002-02-04 2002-01-17
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2003-02-03 2003-01-17
Request for examination - standard 2003-04-01
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2004-02-02 2004-01-20
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2005-02-02 2005-01-19
Reinstatement 2006-05-08
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2006-02-02 2006-05-08
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2007-02-02 2006-11-20
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2008-02-04 2008-01-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
MENTAT INC.
Past Owners on Record
DAVID C. PALTER
JEREMY A. MCCOOEY
JEROME D. TOPOREK
KAY A. GUYER
MARC B. HASSON
TIMOTHY W. HARTRICK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2001-11-30 1 5
Description 2001-08-01 35 2,092
Drawings 2001-08-01 16 201
Claims 2001-08-01 17 740
Abstract 2001-08-01 1 62
Cover Page 2001-12-13 1 40
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2001-11-28 1 112
Notice of National Entry 2001-11-30 1 195
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2002-02-12 1 113
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-05-02 1 174
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2006-03-30 1 177
Notice of Reinstatement 2006-05-17 1 165
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2008-02-28 1 168
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R29) 2008-02-28 1 168
PCT 2001-08-01 10 412
Correspondence 2001-12-03 1 31
PCT 2001-08-01 1 34
PCT 2001-08-01 1 33
PCT 2001-08-01 1 32
Fees 2003-01-17 1 31
Fees 2002-01-17 1 32
Fees 2004-01-20 1 31
Fees 2005-01-19 1 25
Fees 2006-05-08 1 27
Fees 2006-11-20 1 28
PCT 2001-08-02 5 207
Fees 2008-01-29 1 34