Language selection

Search

Patent 2377347 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2377347
(54) English Title: CEMENTING SPACERS FOR IMPROVED WELL CEMENTATION
(54) French Title: ENTRETOISES DE CIMENTATION AMELIOREE DE PUITS
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E21B 33/13 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HABERMAN, JOHN P. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • JOHN P. HABERMAN
(71) Applicants :
  • JOHN P. HABERMAN (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MBM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGENCY
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2013-03-19
(22) Filed Date: 2002-03-22
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-09-27
Examination requested: 2008-03-20
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/818,109 (United States of America) 2001-03-27

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method of cementing a well using a cementing spacer. The method includes
pumping a drilling fluid into a well. A cementing spacer is then pumped into
the well to
serve as a buffer between the drilling fluid and a cement. The cementing
spacer includes
substantially unviscosified water and a weighting agent. Cement is then pumped
into the
well to displace the cementing spacer and the drilling fluid to complete the
cementing of
the well.


French Abstract

Une méthode de cimentation d'un puits au moyen d'une entretoise de cimentation. La méthode consiste à pomper un liquide de forage dans un puits. Une entretoise de cimentation est alors pompée dans le puits pour servir de tampon entre le fluide de forage et le ciment. L'entretoise de cimentation comprend de l'eau essentiellement non visqueuse et un alourdissant. Le ciment est alors pompé dans le puits pour déplacer l'entretoise de cimentation et le fluide de forage pour procéder à la cimentation du puits.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION FOR WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method of cementing a well using a cementing spacer, the method
comprising:
pumping a drilling fluid into a well;
pumping a cementing spacer into the well to displace the drilling fluid, the
cementing
spacer comprising substantially unviscosified water, a weighting agent and a
low
density weighting agent; and
pumping cement into the well to displace the cementing spacer and the drilling
fluid and
to thereby complete the cementing of the well.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighting agent comprises barite.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the weighting agent comprises calcium
carbonate.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the cementing spacer further comprises a
friction
reducing additive.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the low density weighting agent comprises a
selected
volume of hollow glass spheres.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the low density weighting agent comprises a
selected
volume of ceramic spheres.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the low density weighting agent comprises a
selected
volume of foamed nitrogen.
9

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02377347 2011-05-17
CEMENTING SPACERS FOR IMPROVED WELL
CEMENTATION
Background of Invention
Field of the Invention
[0001) The invention relates generally to cementing spacers for use in
cementing
wellbores. More specifically, the invention relates to the use of Stokes Law
cementing spacers when cementing wells.
Background Art
[0002] When drilling an oil or gas well, drilling fluid having a prescribed
density is
used during the drilling operation for several purposes including, for
example,
balancing a formation fluid pressure (which generally increases as the depth
of a
well increases) present in geologic formations that are penetrated by the
wellbore.
The drilling fluid, or "drilling mud," is typically pumped down a drillstring,
through a drill bit, and is returned to the surface though an annulus formed
between the drillstring and a wall of the wellbore. This process is known as
"circulation" of the drilling fluid.
[0003] If the density of the drilling fluid is excessive, the hydrostatic
pressure
exerted by the drilling fluid on the formations can result in fractured
formations
and a resultant loss of drilling fluid into the "broken down" formations. Loss
of
drilling fluid into the formation typically results in "lost circulation"
(e.g., the loss
of a return fluid communication path to the surface through, for example, the
I

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
.wellbore annulus) and eventually a pressure underbalance with -respect to
formation fluid pressure. Lost circulation can result in uncontrolled
discharge or
"blowouts" of pressurized formation fluids to the surface because pressure
control
of the well has been lost. For example, when drilling fluid is lost into the
formation, the wellbore pressure drops and permits higher pressure formation
fluids to flow into the wellbore in the form of a "kick." The kick may
propagate to
the surface and result in a blowout that can damage rig equipment and injure
or
kill rig personnel.
[0004] These conditions may generally be avoided by appropriate selection of
the
density of the drilling fluid used to drill the well. The density of the
drilling fluid
is usually controlled by the addition of "weighting agents" in the form of,
for
example, particulate solids of heavy earth materials, such as barite. The
weighting
agents are added to the drilling fluid in a known ratio with respect to the
fluid
volume in the wellbore to produce a carefully regulated drilling fluid with a
known density.
[0005] During the drilling process, it is often necessary to periodically
lower steel
casing or well liners into the wellbore to line the walls thereof in order to
maintain
stability of the wellbore. Moreover, the casing may be required to protect
shallower formations from the high wellbore pressures required to maintain
fluid
pressure balance or overbalance with respect to formations near the bottom of
the
wellbore. The casing, which is typically steel, must fit inside the wellbore
diameter.
[00061 After the casing is placed in the wellbore, an external casing annulus
is
formed between an outer surface of the casing and the wall of the wellbore. In
order to prevent fluid communication along the external casing annulus, oil
well
cement is typically pumped into the external casing annulus. Cementation of
the
casing in the wellbore is important because undesirable fluid communication
2

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
between the bottom of the wellbore and the surface through the external casing
annulus can result in formation fluid leakage to the surface or to other
subsurface
formations, and can result in other types of well damage resulting in a loss
of
production potential. The oil well cement is placed in the external casing
annulus
by pumping a substantially fluid cement slurry down the casing, out of the
bottom
of the casing, and up into the external casing annulus.
[00071 During the cementing process, the cement slurry must completely
displace
the drilling fluid from the external casing annulus because drilling fluid
that is not
displaced may provide a path for the flow of formation fluids up the external
casing annulus after the cement has set. Moreover, slurries of oil well cement
are
often not chemically compatible with common drilling fluids. For example, if
the
cement slurry comes into direct contact with the drilling fluid during the
displacement process, the cement slurry and the drilling fluid may mix
together
and form a viscous material. When the cement slurry is pumped into the
external
casing annulus, the cement slurry may bypass the viscous material, thereby
leaving channels of viscous material that do not set up to form a solid,
impermeable cement barrier to formation fluids. Accordingly, a cement "spacer"
fluid is often pumped into the wellbore between the drilling fluid and the
cement
slurry to improve the displacement of the drilling fluid and to prevent direct
contact and mixing of the drilling fluid and the cement slurry.
[0008) Again, however, the density of such a cement spacer cannot exceed
certain
limits or the lost circulation condition will be encountered, and it cannot
fall below
other certain limits or an underbalanced condition will occur. Thus it is
necessary
to be able to control the density of the spacer fluid used in cementing
operations in
a manner similar to that used to control the density of drilling fluid during
drilling
operations.
3

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
[0009] Prior art spacers are generally made by mixing a suitable liquid base
fluid
with a viscosifier which may be, for example, a soluble polymer or bentonite
clay
and a weighting agent including, for example, solid particles of barite or
calcium
carbonate. The weighting agent may also include low-density particles such as
hollow glass or ceramic spheres or foamed nitrogen. The most common spacer
base fluid is plain water. "Plain water" includes, for example, any source of
chemically suitable water that is readily available for such applications,
including
fresh water, seawater, saltwater, and brine. Alternatively, a suitable organic
solvent may be used as the spacer base fluid. Organic solvents are often
advantageous for use in displacing oil based drilling fluids. When used in
this
manner, organic solvents may also include viscosifiers and weighting agents.
[0010] In prior art cement spacer fluids, the viscosifier is used to support
the
particles of weighting agent so as to prevent settling of the weighting agent
during
the pumping operation. A performance objective of the viscosifier is often to
develop "gel strength" under static conditions to aid in the support of the
weighting agent particles. Particle settling in cement spacer fluids, is
usually
evaluated in laboratories with settling tests, similar to the API free water
test used
for cement slurries. In the test, the volume of free water, which accumulates
on
the top of the spacer under specified conditions, is determined. A common
practice is to require that the free water be below some maximum volume.
[0011] Therefore, it is desirable to have a cementing spacer that is designed
to
displace drilling fluid in a wellbore and serve as a buffer between the
drilling fluid
and a cement slurry used to cement, for example, casing in a wellbore.
Moreover,
it is desirable to have a cementing spacer that can be readily formed at a
well site.
4

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
Summary of Invention
[00121 A method of cementing a well using a cementing spacer. The method
comprises pumping a drilling fluid into a well and pumping a cementing spacer
into the well to displace the drilling fluid, wherein the cementing spacer
comprises
substantially unviscosified water and a weighting agent. Cement is then pumped
into the well to displace the cementing spacer and the drilling fluid to
complete the
cementing of the well.
[00131 Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the
following description and the appended claims.
Detailed Description
[0014] Embodiments of the invention have been developed from a study of
particle
settling calculations based on the Stokes-Einstein equation. The particle
settling
calculations show that the sedimentation rate, or particle settling velocity,
of
particles of a weighting agent in a base fluid is relatively slow when
compared to
the depth of a typical well. For example, a total sedimentation distance of
about
40 feet in a 4 hour period was calculated for particles of a calcium carbonate
weighting agent in a water base fluid.
[00151 Accordingly, if a controlled density cementing spacer comprising
calcium
carbonate and water (and substantially no viscosifier) is pumped into an
external
casing annulus in a substantially vertical wellbore, particles of calcium
carbonate
in the cementing spacer typically will settle no more than about 40 feet by
the time
the cement has set. This degree of settling will not cause any operational
problems with respect to cementing the well.
[0016] In an embodiment of the invention, the cementing spacer comprises a
weighting agent (such as, for example, calcium carbonate, barite, ferrite,
hematite,
etc.) and water. Note that as previously disclosed, "water" may include fresh

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
water, salt water, seawater, brine, or any other chemically suitable source of
water
that will not adversely react with drilling mud or the cement in the wellbore.
The
cementing spacers described above are typically referred to as "Stokes Law"
mixtures. The resulting cementing spacers have numerous advantages discussed
below when compared to prior art spacers that use viscosifiers to support the
weighting agent.
[00171 One form of the Stokes-Einstein equation is shown below as Equation 1:
V2gr2(d,-df) (1)
9v
wherein V is a particle settling velocity (cm/sec), g is gravitational
acceleration
(980 cm/sec 2), r is a particle radius (cm), dp is a particle density (g/cm3),
df is a
fluid density (g/cm3), and v is a fluid viscosity (poise).
[0018] Numerical solutions of Equation 1 have been determined for different
types
of particulate weighting agents (such as; for example, calcium carbonate,
barite,
ferrite, hematite, etc.) and different particle diameters. Moreover, the
solutions
have been determined using water or organic solvents. The results show that,
compared to a depth of a well (e.g., the overall height of a cement annulus
from a
casing bottom to a well head) and to a length of a typical casing string, the
sedimentation velocity (or sedimentation rate) of particles of the weighting
agent
is substantially slow.
[0019] Therefore, based on calculations performed using Equation 1, it has
been
determined that cementing spacers comprising water and a weighting agent have
a
substantially slow particle settling velocity so that they may be pumped into
a well
using typical rig operating techniques and do not require the addition of a
viscosifier (such as bentonite or viscosifying polymers) to impede particle
settlement or otherwise affect the rheology of the cementing spacer. A small
amount of viscosifier may be present in the cementing spacer as long as the
6

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
amount does not substantially affect the rheology of the cementing spacer
(e.g., as
long as the amount of viscosifier does not substantially affect the settling
properties of the weighting agent). These cementing spacers do not adversely
affect cement slurries used to cement wells, and avoidance of the use of
viscosifiers may have several advantages, including:
^ Cementing spacers are less expensive because they comprise fewer
components.
^ Cementing spacers have predictable properties resulting in less pilot
testing
and quality control requirements.
= The reduction or absence of gel strength development, combined with the
settling motion of the cementing spacer particles, maintains hydrostatic
pressure on the cement slurry as it sets and thereby provides a better seal
through producing zones.
= Cement bond well logs are improved.
= Cementing spacers have a substantially Newtonian rheology and experience
turbulent flow at lower pumping rates and thereby improve the
displacement of drilling fluid (in the external casing annulus) by the cement
slurry.
^ Less mixing occurs at the interface between the turbulent flow cementing
spacer and the drilling fluid, which also improves the displacement of the
drilling fluid.
[0020] While the cementing spacers comprise substantially unviscosified water
and a weighting agent, other non-viscosifying additives may be used as well.
For
example, friction reducing additives may be used with the invention. Friction
reducing additives may also serve to either minimize or enhance solid packing
of
particles of the weighting agent.
7

CA 02377347 2011-05-17
[00211 Moreover, during extended settling conditions (e.g., settling
conditions that
continue for some time after the cement has set), particles of the weighting
agent
(which may comprise, for example, barite) in the cementing spacer settle and
may
form a "plug" (e.g., a "barite plug") proximate the top of a cement column.
The
plug forms an additional seal and further prevents fluid transmission from the
bottom of the wellbore to the surface. The additional sealing properties of
the
plug may be useful, for example, in meeting regulatory requirements associated
with, for example, external casing pressure and/or microannular gas leakage (a
condition that results from the formation of a small microannulus or gap
between
the set cement and the casing and/or the formation which may allow slow
leakage
of gas to the surface).
[00221 Stokes Law calculations also apply to the "particle rise" of particles
of low
density weighting agents that may be added to the cementing spacer. For
eieample, the use of hollow glass or ceramic spheres, foamed nitrogen, etc.,
to
lower or reduce the density of the cementing spacer may also be used in
embodiments of the invention. Further, the cementing spacers may be used to
recover expensive oil based drilling fluids from wells for future reuse.
[00231 While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number
of
embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will
appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the
scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the
invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
8

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2377347 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2022-03-22
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2020-05-08
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2013-03-19
Inactive: Cover page published 2013-03-18
Inactive: Office letter 2013-01-11
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-01-11
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2013-01-07
Letter Sent 2012-12-31
Reinstatement Request Received 2012-12-17
Pre-grant 2012-12-17
Withdraw from Allowance 2012-12-17
Final Fee Paid and Application Reinstated 2012-12-17
Inactive: Final fee received 2012-12-17
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2012-12-17
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2012-03-22
Deemed Abandoned - Conditions for Grant Determined Not Compliant 2011-12-16
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2011-06-16
Letter Sent 2011-06-16
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2011-06-16
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2011-06-07
Letter Sent 2011-06-02
Reinstatement Request Received 2011-05-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2011-05-17
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2011-05-17
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2011-05-17
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2010-05-17
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.29 Rules requisition 2010-05-17
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-11-17
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-11-17
Letter Sent 2008-04-10
Letter Sent 2008-04-10
Small Entity Declaration Request Received 2008-03-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-03-20
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2008-03-20
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2008-03-20
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2008-03-20
Reinstatement Request Received 2008-03-20
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2007-03-22
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-03-08
Inactive: Office letter 2007-03-08
Inactive: Office letter 2007-03-08
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-03-08
Appointment of Agent Request 2007-01-29
Revocation of Agent Request 2007-01-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-09-27
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-09-26
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2002-06-18
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2002-06-05
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2002-06-05
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2002-04-22
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-04-22
Application Received - Regular National 2002-04-22

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2012-12-17
2012-03-22
2011-12-16
2011-05-17
2008-03-20

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2013-03-18

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2002-03-22
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2004-03-22 2004-02-13
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2005-03-22 2005-02-02
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2006-03-22 2006-01-27
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2007-03-22 2007-01-19
Request for examination - small 2008-03-20
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2008-03-25 2008-03-20
2008-03-20
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - small 07 2009-03-23 2009-03-09
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - small 08 2010-03-22 2010-03-08
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - small 09 2011-03-22 2011-03-22
Reinstatement 2011-05-17
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - small 10 2012-03-22 2012-12-17
Reinstatement 2012-12-17
Final fee - small 2012-12-17
MF (application, 11th anniv.) - small 11 2013-03-22 2013-03-18
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - small 2014-03-24 2014-03-18
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - small 2015-03-23 2015-03-19
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - small 2016-03-22 2016-03-15
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - small 2017-03-22 2017-03-15
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - small 2018-03-22 2018-03-19
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - small 2019-03-22 2019-03-21
MF (patent, 18th anniv.) - small 2020-03-23 2020-03-16
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - small 2021-03-22 2021-03-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
JOHN P. HABERMAN
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2002-03-22 1 17
Description 2002-03-22 8 391
Claims 2002-03-22 1 35
Description 2002-06-05 8 375
Abstract 2002-06-05 1 16
Claims 2002-06-05 1 33
Cover Page 2002-09-06 1 24
Abstract 2011-05-17 1 12
Description 2011-05-17 8 332
Claims 2011-05-17 1 30
Cover Page 2013-02-18 1 26
Filing Certificate (English) 2002-04-22 1 165
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2003-12-23 1 125
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2004-12-23 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2005-12-28 1 118
Reminder - Request for Examination 2006-11-23 1 118
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2006-12-27 1 120
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2007-05-31 1 167
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2008-04-10 1 177
Notice of Reinstatement 2008-04-10 1 171
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2010-08-09 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R29) 2010-08-09 1 164
Notice of Reinstatement 2011-06-02 1 172
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2011-06-16 1 165
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (NOA) 2012-03-12 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2012-05-17 1 173
Notice of Reinstatement 2012-12-31 1 171
Fees 2012-12-17 1 157
Correspondence 2002-04-22 1 17
Correspondence 2002-06-05 16 562
Fees 2004-02-13 1 64
Correspondence 2007-01-29 3 87
Fees 2007-01-19 1 99
Correspondence 2007-03-08 1 14
Correspondence 2007-03-08 1 15
Correspondence 2008-03-20 3 106
Fees 2008-03-20 1 42
Fees 2009-03-09 1 45
Correspondence 2012-12-17 2 75
Correspondence 2013-01-11 1 13
Fees 2014-03-18 1 24
Fees 2015-03-19 1 25
Fees 2016-03-15 1 25
Maintenance fee payment 2017-03-15 1 25
Maintenance fee payment 2018-03-19 1 25
Maintenance fee payment 2019-03-21 1 25
Maintenance fee payment 2020-03-16 1 26
Maintenance fee payment 2021-03-18 1 26