Language selection

Search

Patent 2379228 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2379228
(54) English Title: METHOD OF ESTIMATING UNKNOWN OR IMPRECISELY KNOWN VARIABLES IN A PAPER MAKING PROCESS
(54) French Title: PROCEDE POUR FAIRE UNE ESTIMATION DE VARIABLES INCONNUES OU CONNUES DE FACON IMPRECISE DANS UN PROCESSUS DE FABRICATION DE PAPIER
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21F 11/00 (2006.01)
  • D21G 9/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SHAKESPEARE, JOHN (Finland)
  • HAMALAINEN, JARI (Finland)
  • NYBERG, PETRI (Finland)
(73) Owners :
  • METSO PAPER AUTOMATION OY
(71) Applicants :
  • METSO PAPER AUTOMATION OY (Finland)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-07-14
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-01-25
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/FI2000/000648
(87) International Publication Number: FI2000000648
(85) National Entry: 2002-01-14

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/353,884 (United States of America) 1999-07-15

Abstracts

English Abstract


Method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables in a paper making
process wherein a mathematical model of a process is formed, the model
including at least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known.
A plurality of process variables and at least one property of a manufactured
paper are measured. At least one of said measured variables or properties is
chosen as a reference variable. An initial value is chosen for the target
variable for solving the mathematical model and a difference between the
simulated reference variable and the measured reference variable is
determined. The difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized to
estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the target variable.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour faire une estimation de variables inconnues ou connues de façon imprécise dans un processus de fabrication de papier, selon lequel on établit un modèle mathématique du processus, le modèle comprenant au moins une variable cible inconnue ou connue de façon imprécise. On mesure plusieurs variables du processus et au moins une des propriétés du papier manufacturé. Au moins une de ces variables mesurées est choisie comme variable de référence. Une valeur initiale est choisie pour la variable cible afin de solutionner le modèle mathématique, et l'on détermine une différence entre la variable de référence simulée et la variable mesurée. La différence constitue une fonction de coût qui est optimisée pour estimer la valeur inconnue ou connue de façon imprécise de la variable cible.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


6
CLAIMS
1. A method of estimating unknown or imprecisely known variables
in a paper making process, the method comprising the steps of
forming a mathematical model of a process, the model including at
least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known,
measuring a plurality of process variables and at least one property
of a manufactured paper web,
utilizing the measurements as initial and boundary values of the
model,
choosing at least one of said measured process variables or
measured web properties as a reference variable,
choosing an initial value for the target variable,
solving the mathematical model,
simulating a value of the reference variable utilizing the model,
determining a difference between the simulated reference variable
and the measured reference variable, the difference constituting a cost
function,
and optimizing the cost function to estimate the unknown or
imprecisely known value of the target variable.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the process is a flow
process in a headbox and the target variable is a variable of the headbox.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the target variable is a
slice opening profile of the headbox.
4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the reference variable is
a fiber orientation angle profile.
5. A method according to claim 3, wherein the reference variable is
a basis weight profile.
6. A method according to claim 3, wherein the reference variable is
a dry weight profile.
7. A method according to claim 2, wherein the measured process
variables comprise headbox pressure and headbox consistency.
8. A method according to claim 2, wherein the measured process
variables comprise a profile of dilution valve positions.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02379228 2002-O1-14
WO 01/06056 PCT/FI00/00648
1
METHOD OF ESTIMATING UNKNOWN OR IMPRECISELY KNOWN
VARIABLES IN A PAPER MAKING PROCESS
The invention relates to a method of estimating unknown or
imprecisely known variables in a paper making process.
US patent 5 812 404 discloses a method for the continuous overall
regulation of a headbox of a paper machine. A physical fluid flow model of a
pulp suspension flow discharged from the headbox to be regulated is formed
and solved to obtain a simulated flow state based, e.g., on data on the
geometry of the headbox and initial and boundary conditions related to the
headbox. A target flow state based on the quality requirements of the paper
produced from the pulp suspension flow, the costs of operation and runnability
of the machine is obtained and a difference between the simulated flow state
obtained as the solution of the flow model and the target flow state is
~5 determined. This difference constitutes a cost function which is optimized
to
determine optimal regulation values and set values for instrumentation devices
and actuators of the headbox which affect the pulp suspension flow.
Provision of accurate initial and boundary conditions is
advantageous in a method disclosed in US 5812404 but the solution of US
20 5 821 404 relies on measurements alone to provide said conditions.
Measurements alone cannot provide all required initial values with adequate
accuracy. The values of variables are also too imprecise or unknown at
several other points of the paper making process, and thus it would be
necessary to obtain a more accurate estimate of the variable values.
25 An object of the present invention is to provide a method for
obtaining a more accurate estimate of unknown or imprecisely known
variables of a .paper making process.
The method of the invention is characterized by comprising the
steps of
3o forming a mathematical model of a process, the model including at
least one target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known,
measuring a plurality of process variables and at least one property
of a manufactured paper web,
utilizing the measurements as initial and boundary values of the
35 model,

CA 02379228 2002-O1-14
WO 01/06056 PCT/FI00/00648
2
choosing at least one of said measured process variables or
measured web properties as a reference variable,
choosing an initial value for the target variable,
solving the mathematical model,
simulating a value of the reference variable utilizing the model,
determining a difference between the simulated reference variable
and the measured reference variable, the difference constituting a cost
function,
and optimizing the cost function to estimate the unknown or
~o imprecisely known value of the target variable.
The essential idea of the invention is that a mathematical model of
a process is formed, the model including at least one target variable which is
unknown or imprecisely known. Plural process variables are measured and at
least one property of the manufactured paper web is measured. At least one of
~5 said measured process variables or measured web properties is chosen as a
reference variable. Boundary conditions for the mathematical model are
obtained from the remaining measured process variables and measured web
properties. An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the
mathematical model, the reference variable is thereby simulated, and a
2o difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured
reference variable is determined. This difFerence constitutes a cost function
which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the
target variable. The idea of a preferred embodiment is that the process is a
flow process in a headbox and the target variable is a variable of the
headbox.
25 An advantage of the invention is that variables of the paper making
process can be estimated in a more accurate and diverse manner than earlier,
which allows ~to improve control of the paper making process. The method
applies particularly to estimation of unknown or imprecisely known variables
which are multivariate or vector quantities, such as the cross machine profile
3o of a process variable or web property, or the statistical distribution of a
variable
whose value changes with position or time.
In this disclosure the term "paper" also refers to paper board and
tissue.
The invention will be described in greater detail in the
3s accompanying drawings, in which
Figure 1 is a schematic side view of a paper making process,

CA 02379228 2002-O1-14
WO 01/06056 PCT/FI00/00648
3
Figure 2 is a simplified block diagram of a method of the invention,
and
Figure 3 is a simplified flowchart for an optimizing controller in which
the method of the invention can be utilized.
Figure 1 schematically shows a paper machine. The paper machine
comprises a headbox 1, from which pulp is fed into a former 2, where a fiber
web 3 is formed of the pulp. The web 3 is conveyed to a press 4 and further to
a dryer unit 5. From the dryer unit 5 the web 3 is conveyed to a reel 6. A
paper
machine may also comprise, for example, a size press, coaters or a calender,
1o which are not illustrated in the Figure 1 for the sake of clarity.
Furthermore, the
function of the paper machine is known per se for those skilled in the art,
and
will therefore not be further explained in this context.
The paper machine also comprises at least one measuring device 7
for measuring properties of the paper web 3. The measuring device 7 is used
~5 for measuring e.g. the basis weight BW, dry weight profile DWP and the
fiber
orientation angle profile FO of the paper web 3. The paper machine also
comprises other measuring devices for measuring values and properties at
different parts of the paper machine. Headbox pressure P, headbox
consistency Cs, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP and headbox upper
lip
2o profile ULP are given as examples of such measurements in Figure 1.
Additional properties of the paper web or of process streams can be measured
from samples taken from the manufactured paper or process streams using
instruments located elsewhere.
The invention relates to a method for estimating unobserved
25 variables or imprecisely measured process variables in a paper machine
during operation, and especially for estimating an unknown or imprecisely
measured process variable in the headbox 1 of a paper machine or in the
sheet formed of the headbox discharge. A mathematical model of the process
is formed based for example on the geometry of the headbox 1 and physical
3o models of the flow phenomena occurring therein, and including at least one
target variable which is unknown or imprecisely known. Plural process
variables are measured, for example using instruments in or around the
headbox 1 and the various process streams leading to or from the headbox,
and ~at least one property of the manufactured paper web 3 is measured using
35 instruments elsewhere on the machine or in a laboratory. At least one of
said
measured process variables or measured web properties is chosen as a

CA 02379228 2002-O1-14
WO 01/06056 PCT/FI00/00648
4
reference variable. Boundary conditions for the mathematical model are
obtained from the remaining measured process variables and measured web
properties. An initial value is chosen for the target variable for solving the
mathematical model, the reference variable is thereby simulated, and a
difference between the simulated reference variable and the measured
reference variable is determined. This difference constitutes a cost function
which is optimized to estimate the unknown or imprecisely known value of the
target variable. The initial value chosen can be, for example, an imprecise
measurement of the target variable, so that the optimization produces an
~o estimate which is of superior accuracy to the measurement.
A simplified flow chart for the estimation process is depicted in
Figure 2. The physical and geometric parameters are known a priori. The
measurements of known states are provided by measuring instruments or
operator input. The initial estimate of the unknown variable or state may be
~5 supplied from an approximate measurement, or may be provided by other
means of estimation, or by an operator.
For example, in the headbox 1 the slice opening profile is
approximately known. The profile of the upper lip ULP is measured at a
number of locations across the slice, but the shape of the lower lip is
generally
2o unknown. However, various profiles which depend on the slice opening
profile
are measured, such as the basis weight profile BW or dry weight profile DWP
and the fiber orientation angle profile FO.
The optimization uses the measured slice lip shape as an initial
estimate of the slice opening profile. One or more suitable measurements,
25 such as the fiber orientation angle profile FO or dry weight profile DWP or
basis weight profile BW are used as reference variables. Other
measurements, such as headbox pressure P, consistency Cs, temperatures,
flows, a profile of dilution valve positions DVP etc. are used as inputs to a
mathematical model of the flow process in the headbox 1 and jet. By solving
3o the mathematical model of the headbox 1, a simulation of the fiber
orientation
angle profile is obtained. A penalty to be optimized is calculated from the
difference between the measured fiber orientation angle profile and simulated
fiber orientation angle profile. This penalty is optimized by adjusting the
estimate of the slice opening profile, the optimum being reached when the
35 simulated fiber orientation angle profile most closely matches the measured
fiber orientation angle profile.

CA 02379228 2002-O1-14
WO 01/06056 PCT/FI00/00648
This invention solves a mathematical model of the headbox to
estimate unknown or imprecisely known current operating parameters
consistent with measured properties of the current product.
The present invention is particularly well suited for estimation of the
5 initial conditions for a method of optimizing control such as that disclosed
in
US 5 812 404 which is incorporated herein by reference. The present invention
uses inverse modeling to provide such a controller with improved estimates of
its initial and boundary conditions. The present invention can utilize similar
mathematical and physical models to those used by such a controller, or can
use different ones.
A simplified flow chart for an optimizing controller is depicted in
Figure 3. One or more of the "measurements of known variables/states" in that
figure can be supplied by the estimation process of this invention.
The drawings and the description thereof are merely intended to
~5 illustrate the inventive idea. The details of the invention may vary within
the
scope of the claims. Thus the method of the invention can in principle be
applied at any point of the paper making process.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPRP received 2005-06-16
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2004-07-14
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2004-07-14
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2003-07-14
Letter Sent 2002-09-24
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-07-25
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-07-10
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2002-07-09
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2002-07-05
Application Received - PCT 2002-05-03
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-01-14
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2001-01-25

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2003-07-14

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2002-01-14

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2002-07-15 2002-01-14
Basic national fee - standard 2002-01-14
Registration of a document 2002-01-14
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
METSO PAPER AUTOMATION OY
Past Owners on Record
JARI HAMALAINEN
JOHN SHAKESPEARE
PETRI NYBERG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-07-08 1 10
Description 2002-01-13 5 261
Claims 2002-01-13 1 43
Abstract 2002-01-13 1 69
Drawings 2002-01-13 2 33
Cover Page 2002-07-09 1 46
Notice of National Entry 2002-07-04 1 208
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2002-09-23 1 112
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2003-08-10 1 176
PCT 2002-01-13 7 273
Correspondence 2002-07-04 1 25
PCT 2002-01-14 3 166