Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02382289 2007-03-23
30629-7
FLOATING PHAKIC REFRACTIVE LENS DESTGN
FoR PRLSERVING Cy1~ llYNAMICS
1. PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED
A posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL) is surgically implanted
behind the iris and in front of the human natural ciystalline Icns for
correcting myopia
or hyperopia. The PRL is the only reversible procedure for correcting severe
refractive errors in both myopic and hyperopic patients. However, there are
three
major complications associated with thc PRL implantation. They are: (I)
intraocular
pressure (IOP) elevation; (2) cataract induction; and (3) iris pic-ment
dispersion. Only
when all of these three complicatior-s are successfully resolved will PRL
technology
become acceptable to surgeons and patients. Currently, IOP elevation has been
successfully controlled by surgical iridotomy (i.e., two holes made in the
iris either by
laser or knife). Cataract induction and iris pigment dispersion remain as the
majoJ-
complications for PRL implantation.
The-present invention aims to define a number of requirements, including PRL
material characteristics, for a floating PRL desif-n which preserves eyc
dynanlics.
Such a floating PRL design solves the problems of cataract induction and iris
pigment
dispersion caused by the implantation of a PRL.
1
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCTIUSOO/40768
II. PRIOR ART
There are a number of patents describing the posterior chamber PRL concept
and specific lens designs. US Patent 4,585,456, Blackmore, issued April 29,
1986,
discloses a phakic intraocular lens (IOL) composed of flexible materials which
is
positioned against the natural lens of the eye and is held in place
immediately adjacent
to the natural lens and the ciliary sulcus. Tilere are no specific disclosures
of the PRL
material properties, such as softness. The lens does not float in the eye but,
rather, is
fastened in place.
Other patents describe different ways of reducing IOP elevation and avoiding
cataract formation by PRL designs and their f xation mechanisms. For example,
Fedorov, in US Patent 5,480,428, issued Januai-y 2, 1996, discloses a novel
phakic
lens design which has an opening tlirough the center of the optic body. This
open
hole allows aqueous humor to flow througli the lens body, thereby prcvcnting
lOP
elevation, but it reduces the optical performance of the phakic lens. This
patent also
does not disclose the lens material properties or lens surface properties for
such lens
designs. Fedorov, in U.S. Patent 5,258,025, issucd Novenlber 2, 1993,
discloses that
post-operative inflammation, caused by the contacting of the supporting
elements
with the ocular tissue, is prevented by moving supporting elements to the
periphery of
the phakic lens. The Zinn's zonules are strong enougli to hold the supporting
elements in place without causing inflammation. Again, Fedorov failed to
specify the
lens material properties and lens surface properties. Furtlier, this is not a
floating lens
design.
Finally, PCT Published Application WO 98/17205, Valunin et al., published
April 30, 1998, describes the structure of a phakic IOL, wllich floats in the
eye.
Valunin taught that the phakic IOL can be made from, for example, silicone,
silicone-
methacrylate copolymers, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl
methacrylate) and collagen/acrylate blends. However, no specific properties of
a
suitable material, such as mass per unit area or specific gravity, are
defined.
2
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
Accordingly, there is a great need to identify desirable lens materials with
required properties which, in combination with proper lens specifications, can
preserve the eye dynainics after PRL implantation. The combination of lens
dcsign
and the lens material properties makes it possible to avoid cataract induction
and iris
pigment dispersion. Neither the lens design alone nor the lens material
properties
alone can achieve the desirable floating features.
III. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of the cutTent lnventlon is to providc a PRL, with a propcr Iens
design and material properties, that may be placed in the posterior chamber of
the
human eye for correction of refractive errors. It is also the object of this
invention to
provide a PRL that can float in aqueous humor and that is very flexible and
soft. The
floating action and soft nature of the PRL will preserve the eye dynamics so
that
cataract induction of the human crystalline lens will be avoided and iris
pignient
dispersion eliminated. It is further an object of the present invention that
this floating
design and these benefits be achieved by selecting biocompatible materials
having
defined properties and by selecting other parameters, such as low mass per
unit
surface area (grams/mm2), of the PRL. It is a still further object of this
invention that,
due to the softness of the PRL niaterial and the floating nature of thc PRL
design,
when the iris contracts, it can niove freely and constantly ovcr the anterior
surface of
the PRL without causing iris pigment dispersion.
These and other objects are accomplislied by a phakic refractive lens for
implantation in the posterior chamber of the eye, said lens having no
permanent
fixation in the posterior chamber other than simple floating in the aqueous
humor
when positioned between the iris and the natural crystalline lens, said lens
having the
following properties:
(a) mass per unit surface area of from about 0.03 to about 0.30 mg/hnm2,
preferably from about 0.05 to about 0.13 mg/mm2;
(b) specific gravity of the materials used for said lens of from about 0.9 to
about 1.2 grams/cm3; and
3
CA 02382289 2007-03-23
30629-7
(c) the lens must be flexible, preferably the
hardness of the material used for said lens being from about
20 to about 50 Shore A.
According to one aspect of the present invention,
there is provided a phakic refractive lens, said lens
structurally adapted for implantation in the posterior
chamber of the eye so as to float in the aqueous humor
between the iris and the natural lens, said lens having met
the following properties: a) the mass per unit area of the
lens is from about 0.03 to about 0.30 mg/mm2; b) the lens is
flexible; and c) the specific gravity of the materials
comprising the lens is from about 0.9 to about 1.2 g/cm3.
According to another aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a use of a phakic refractive
lens as described herein for correcting vision of a myopic
or a hyperopic patient.
According to still another aspect of the present
invention, there is provided a kit comprising: (1) a phakic
refractive lens as described herein; and (2) means for
implanting said phakic refractive lens in the eye of a
patient such that the lens is floating in the aqueous humor
of the eye between the patient's iris and natural lens with
no permanent point of fixation.
4
CA 02382289 2007-03-23
30629-7
IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig: 1 is a cut-away view of the eye showing tiic positioning of the Icns of
the
present invention.
Fig. 2 is a top view and a sidc vicw of a lcns of thc prescnt invcntion (scc
Example 2).
Fig. 3 is a top view and a side view of a prior art fixed position intt-
aocular lens
(see Example 3).
Fig. 4 is a top view and side view of a lens of the present invention (see
Example 4).
V. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF TIIE INVENTION
There are many factors affeeting the forrnation of cataracts after
implantation
of a PRL. First, if a PRL directly contacts the natural crystalline lens, it
causes stress
on that lens. As a result, a subcapsular cataract may develop. Second,
disturbance of
eye dynamics can also induce cataract formation. Sincc the PRL is positioned
between the iris and the human natural crystalline lens, it nearly blocks the
whole
pupil. Although an iridotomy is typically performed to successfully prevent
IOP
elevation, the blockage of thc pupil by the PRL still inhibits the
frec'cxchange of
aqueous humor between the anterior chamber and posterior chamber of the eyc,
thereby disturbing the eye dynamics. This may result in accelerated formation
of
cataracts. A floating PRL design will maximize the exchange of aqueous humor
between the posterior chanlber and anterior chamber, preserving the eye
dynamics.
As a result, it avoids cataract induction. Finally, the PRL of the present
invention is
so flexible and soft that it yields to the iris when a contact occurs. The
iris feels the
PRL as if it were part of the aqueous humor, avoiding iris pigmeiit
dispersion.
The primary feature of the floating PRL design of the present invention is
that
it does not have any permanent fixation mechanism. The PRL (1) simply floats
in the
aqueous humor (2) as shown in Figl. In that figure, the PRL is positioned
between
4a
CA 02382289 2007-03-23
30629-7
the iris (3) and the natural lens (4) in the eyc. The lens has a structure of
the type
shown in PCT Published Application 98/17205, Valunin, et al., published April
30,
1998, and U.S. Patent 6,015,435, Valunin, et al., issued January 18 2000.
Therefore, it does not cause any permanent stress
against the human crystalline lens. Due to its floating nature, the PRL is
constantly
clianging its location within the boundary detennined by thc haptics. When the
iris
(3) contracts and moves toward the ccn1.er of the anterior surfacc of tiic
PRL, lhc iris
may exert some prcssurc via the PRL to the natural crystalline Icns (4).
Bccause of
its floating nature, the PRL does not have any localized pressure points
against the
lo human crystallinc lens. This floating PRL simply transmlts the pressure in
any
direction as if it were part of the aqueous niediuni. This way, thc stress on
thc natural
crystalline lens caused by iris movement is dissipated by the floating PRL
much the
same way as by the aqueous humor. As a result, cataract induction by the PRL
implantation is minimized.
The second feature of the floating PRL design is that it allows the iris to
move
freely and constantly on its anterior surface without causing iris pigment
dispersion.
When the iris contracts or dilates, the PRL yields to the iris movement
bccause of the
floating feature and the softness of the PRL material. The iris "feels" the
PRL as if
the PRL were part of the aqueous humor so that iris pigment dispersion is
avoided.
The third feature of the floating PRL design is that it allows the aqueous
humor to flow from posterior chamber to anterior chambcr. In hcalthy eyes,
this
outflow occurs constantly. An ideal PRL should have a large surface area and a
small
mass. The materials used for making PRLs should be very sofl and flexible. All
of
these prope'rties are critical factors for the fomlulation of a floating PRL
to allow the
maximum outflow of the aqueous humor.
Those who are skilled in the art understand that the specific gravity of the
aqueous humor of the human eye is approximately equal to that of water (1
gram/cm3)
and that any article which can float in water lias to liave a weight equal to
or slightlv
lighter than 1 gram/cm3. However, some materials with a much larger specific
5
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
gravity (such as 1.2g/cm3, as shown in Example 5) than that of the aqueous
humor can
still be used to achieve a floating design. The following example clearly
illustrates
how a material wliicli is heavier than water can be uscd to makc a PRI, that
floats in
water. It was surprisingly found that PRLs made from a medical grade silicone
with a
specific gravity of 1.05 float on the water surface while a cataract
intraocular lens
(IOL) made from the sanic medical gi-ade siliconc does not float on thc watcr
surfacc
(see Examples 2 and 3). The silicone PRL can be forced into water. However, as
soon as the force is released, the silicone PRL floats back to the water
surface. On the
other hand, the prior art cataract IOL madc from thc same siliconc matcrial
can only
float on the water surface when it is very cautiously placed on that water
surface.
When the water is slightly disturbed or the cataract IOL is forced into the
water, it
does not float back on the water surface again. The only difference in this
set of
experiments is the shape of the PRL (Fig 2) and the cataract IOL (Fig 3).
As shown in Fig 2, the PRL has a relatively large surface area. The linear
dimensions are approximately 6 x 11 mm. This is equivalent to a surface area
of
about 132 mmZ. Typically, PRLs with configurations as sliown in Fig 2 weigh
about
15 mg or less. Therefore, the mass per unit surface area for the PRL is
approximately
0.11 mg/mm2. On the other hand, a cataract IOL (see Fig 3) typically has an
optical
diameter of 6 mm and weighs about 20 mg. Therefore, the mass per unit surface
area
for the cataract IOL is approximately 0.31 mg/mn12. The silicone used in this
case is a
typical hydrophobic material with a contact angle of 95 . The hydrophobicity
of the
PRL creates a considerable surface tension between the PRL and water. This
surface
tension is the driving force for keeping the PRL floating. There exists a
balance
between the two opposite forces: gravity and surface tension. Prefeired
hydrophobic
materials for use in the present invention have a contact angle of about 80
or higher,
most preferably about 90 or higher. PRLs made from materials with a specific
gravity greater than about 1.0 have a tendency to not float on water. However,
the
surface tension between a hydrophobic PRL and water keeps the PRL floating on
water surface even if its specific gravity is greater than about 1Ø
Increasing the
specific gravity will decrease the floatability while increasing the surface
area or
reducing the mass of the PRL or both will increase the floatability. Given a
material,
6
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCTIUSOO/40768
the determining factor for a floating PRL is the ratio of nlass pcr unit
surface area. As
shown in above example, the mass per unit surface area for the PRL of the
present
invention is approxinlately 0.11 nlg/mn12 and for the prior art cataract IOL
is
approximately 0.31 mg/mm2. It is therefore concluded that if a PRL's mass per
unit
surface area is equal to or grcatcr than about 0.31 nlg/n1n12, it may not bc
used
effectively for a floating lens design. Thus, the mass per unit surface area
of the lens
of the present invention should bc from about 0.03 to about 0.30, pi-cferably
from
about 0.05 to about 0.30, most preferably from about 0.05 to about 0.13
mg/mm2.
The comparison of the silicone PRL and the siliconc cataract IOL given in
above discussion (i.e., Examples 2 and 3), is only for the purpose of
illustration. It
clearly demonstrates that the mass per unit surface area, not the specific
gravity, is the
determining factor for a floating PRL design. This principle applies to PRLs
made
from hydrophilic material as well. It is important to mention that it is not
necessary
for a PRL to float on the water surface to obtain the bcnefits of the present
invention.
In fact, it is more desirable to have a PRL which can float in water instead
of on the
water surface. This is because the inside of the eye is filled with aqueous
humor and
the PRL is suspended in the aqueous llumor. To simulate the PRL implanted in
the
eye, a PRL which can float in water tenlporarily when watcr is disturbed
sliglltly, will
have met the design feature. This is because, in healtlly eyes, aqueous humor
always
flows from posterior chamber to anterior chamber. When such an outflow occurs,
it is
very important that the PRL floats to allow the aqueous humor to pass by,
therefore
preserving the eye dynamics. Furthermore, the outflow of the aqueous hunlor
avoids
direct contact of the PRL with the natural crystalline lens and thereby avoids
cataract
induction by the implantation of a PRL.
It was found that PRLs made from hydrophilic materials, such as
poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (polyHEMA), the classic example of a hydrogel
material, can temporarily float in water when the mass per surface area
criteria are
met. When fully hydrated in water, polyHEMA llydrogel has a contact angle of
34 .
Preferred hydrophilic materials have a contact angle of about 40 or less.
7
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
This unexpected discovery is very important for a number of reasons. First,
most polymeric materials have a specific gravity greater than about 1. This
invcntion
allows the use of sucli matcrials for a floating PIZL design. Sccond, the
current
invention will lead enginccrs to dcsign a PRL witll a niaximum surface area
and a
minimum weight in order to maximize the floating design features. Finally, the
relationship of various factors needs to be considered in order to maximize
the
floating feature. For cxample, wlien a material witli liigh specific gravity
is used for
the floating PRL design, its surface area can be increased or its total weight
can be
decreased or both in order to compensate the negative cffcct by the increase
in the
specific gravity.
In summary, the most critical factor for a floating PRL design is not the
specific gravity but the mass per unit surface area (milligram/mmz).
Experiments
indicate materials with specific gravity greater than about 1.0 g/cm3 can be
used for
the floating design if its mass/area is minimized. For example, an acrylic
material
with a specific gravity of 1.2 gram/cm3 can be used to acliieve the floating
features
(Example 5). In general, the materials useful in the prescnt invention will
have a
specific gravity of from about 0.9 to about 1.2, preferably froin about 1.0 to
about 1.2
g/cm3, and most preferably from greater than about 1.0 to about 1.2 g/cm3.
Finally,
the materials used for making the lenses of the present invention should be
flexible,
preferably having a hardness of from about 20 to about 50 Shore A. This will
allow
the lens to maintain its shape for proper functioning, but will also give it
sufficient
flexibility for insertion into the eye and for non-damaging interactions with
the iris
and the natural lens in the eye. In some instances it may be possible to use
materials
having a hardness greater than 50 Shore A, if that material (for example,
poly(methyl
methaerylate)) can be made flexible by using it at very small thicknesses (sec
Examples 7 and 8), or (for example, poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate)) by
hydrating it
(see Example 6).
A logical extension of the present invention is that if the surface area of
the
PRL is increased, such as by roughening the surface of the non-optical portion
of the
8
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCTIUSOO/40768
lens, the value of the mass per unit surface area of the lens is decreased,
thereby
forming a more effective floating PRL, even for lenses with soniewhat higher
masses.
Preferred materials for use in fonnulating the lenses of the present invention
include silicones, poly(acrylates), poly(methacrylates), hydrogels, collagen-
containing
polymers, and mixtures of those materials.
The present invention also encompasses a kit which coniprises the phakic
refractive lens described above togethcr with a mcans (oi- insei-ting the Icns
into the
posterior chamber of the eye such that it floats in the aqueous humor of the
eye
between the patient's iris and natural lens, without any point of pennanent
fixation.
Such means may include one or more of the following: an instrument for making
the
required incision in the cornea, an instrument for inserting the phakic lens
into the
eye, an instrument for correctly placing the phakic lens in the eye, means for
closing
the corneal incision, and instructions for the implanting of the lens in the
eye.
VI. EXAMPLES
The following examples are given for the purpose of illustrating the present
invention and are not intended to be limiting thereof.
Contact angle is a measurement of surfacc hydrophobicity (or hydrophilicity).
In the present invention, Sessile Drop method and a Rame-Hai-t Goniometer are
used
for the measurement. In a typical test, the average of 12 readings is used for
reporting
purposes. A typical hydrophobic material, such as silicone, usually has a
contact
angle in the range of about 800 or higher, while a typical hydrophilic
material, such as
poly-HEMA, has a contact angle in the range of about 40 or lower.
Example 1 - Floating Silicone PRL
SIEL 1.46 is a silicone material witll a refractive index of 1.46 and specific
gravity of 1(commercially available from SIEL, Ltd. a specialty silicone
supplier in
Russia). A small amount of the material (Part A: Part B = 10 : 1 by weight)
(about
9
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
30 mg or less) is placcd onto a PRL metal mold. The mold is clamped and placed
in a
pre-heated oven at 120 C for 70 minutes. The mold is then cooled down to about
room temperature. The mold is opcned and the PRL carefully rcmoved fi-om the
mold.
The PRL has a configuration and dimensions as shown in Figure 2.
The PRL is placed in deionized water and obscrved to float on the water
surface. A spatula or forceps can be used to gently push the PRL into the
water.
However, as soon as the pushing force is released, the PRL will float back
onto the
water surface. Even when the whole PRL is pullcd into the water, it comes back
on
the water surface as soon as the pulling force is released. The contact angle
of the
PRL is 80 . The Shore A hardness of the PRL matcrial is in the range of 20 to
25.
The PRLs with configurations shown in Fig 2 typically weigh 15 milligrams
or less. The surface area of the PRL is approximately 132 mm2. Thcrcfore, the
inass
per unit surface area is approximately 0.11 milligrams/mm2 or less.
Example 2 - Floating Silicone PRL
A silicone material Med 6820, manufactured by NuSil Silicone Technology, is
used to prepare PRLs under the following conditions. Equal amounts of Part A
and
Part B are mixed for 10 minutes. The mixture is transferred to a syringe and
degassed
under vacuum until all the visible air bubbles disappear. A very small amount
of the
mixture is poured into a metal alloy mold and cured at 120 C for 70 minutes.
The
PRL is removed from the mold and placed in DI water with its posterior side
facing
down. The PRL is observed to float on the water surface. When a spatula or
forceps
is used to gently push the PRL into the water, the PRL floats back onto the
water
surface as soon as the spatula is removed from the PRL.
Other physical and mechanical properties of the Med 6820 silicone material
are as follows: tensile strength = 750 psi; elongation = 125%; refractive
index = 1.43;
specific gravity = 1.05 g/cm3 at room temperature. The specific gravity
measurement
is based on ASTM D792 Specific Gravity and Density of Plastics by
Displacement,
using a Cahn DCA312 Dynamic Contact Angle Analyzer. The contact angle, as
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCTIUSOO/40768
measured by Sessile Drop Method, using a Rame-Hart Goniometer is 95 . The
hardness is in the range of 40 to 50 Shore A.
The shape and dimensions of the PRL are the same as that in Example 1. The
mass per unit surface area in this case is approximately 0.12 milligrams/mm2.
Example 3 (Comparative) - Non-iloating, Silicone Cataract Intraocular Lens
(IOL)
By way of comparison, a non-floating lens is made as follows. Using the
identical silicone material as in Example 2, i.e., Mcd 6820 by NuSil Silicone
Technology, a regular intraocular lens (IOL) for cataract surgery is molded,
instead of
a PRL. This cataract IOL has a shape and dimensions illustrated in Figure 3.
The cataract IOL is placed in DI water and it is observed that the cataract
IOL
does not float on the water surface or in the water, and it sinks to the
bottom of the
container. It requires a much larger force to disturb water in order to let
the IOL
temporarily float in water. This is because the mass of this cataract lens is
much
larger than that of the floating force. In this case, the surfacc area of the
cataract IOL
is approximately 64 mm2. The cataract IOL weighs 20 mg. Thcrefore, the mass
per
unit surface area for this cataract IOL is approximately 0.31 mg/mmz, more
than twice
as large as that of the lenses of the present invention illustrated in
Examples 1 and 2.
Example 4 - Floatin Acrylic PRL
A mixture of 15.2 grams of hexylmethacrylate, 4.8 grams of
methylmethacrylate, 0.07 grain of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, and 0.02
gram of
benzoyl peroxide is purged with argon and then lleated at 100 C to prepare a
viscous
syrup. The syrup is still flowable when it is swirled. The syrup is then
transferred to
a glass lens mold and placed in an oven at 100 C overnight (approximately 16
hours).
The mold is cooled down to room temperature and opened to obtain a positive
powered lens.
I1
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
The configuration of the lcns is illustratcd in Figurc 4. Its ovcrall diamctcr
is
about 10.5 mm and optical diameter is about 5 mm. When the lens is placed in
deionized water witli the posterior side facing down, it floats on the water
surface.
The PRL can be forced into the water. Howevcr, the PRL can float in water
wllen it is
slightly disturbed. The specific gravity of lens material is measured to be 1
.09 g/cm3.
The contact angle of this copolynler of hexylmethacrylate and methacrylate is
measured to be 76 . The lens weiglls 21 nig and its surface area is
approximately
174mm2. Therefore, the mass per unit surface arca in this casc is about 0.12
mg/mniz.
Other properties of this acrylic material are as follows: refractive index:
1.482;
glass transition temperature = 23 C; hardness = 47 Shore A.
Example 5 - Floatint! Acrvlic PRL
A mixture of 48 grams of ethylene glycol phenyl ether acrylate, 2 grams of
bisphenol A propoxylate diacrylate, 0.65 grams of 2-(4-benzoyl-3-
hydroxyphenoxy)
ethyl acrylate, and 50 milligrams of azobisisobutyronitrile is de-aired with
ultra-pure
nitrogen gas for about 15 minutes. This mixture can be used for making the PRL
directly or can be pre-gelled. In either case, the mixture is transferred into
a mold.
Curing conditions are: temperature 90 - 110 C; time = 11 - 16 hours. Other
properties of this acrylic material are: refractive index = 1.558; glass
transition
temperature = 7 C; Shore A hardness 36; tensile strength % 280; elongation % =
160%. The specific gravity of this material is 1.2 grams/cm3. The contact
angle of
this polymer is 81 . The PRL weighs 23.2 milligrams. The PRL shape and
dimensions are same as that in Example 4 (Fig 4). The surface area is
approximately
173 mm2. Therefore, the mass per unit surface area foi- this PRL is
approximately
0.13 mg/mm2.
When this PRL is placed in deionized water wit11 the posterior side facing
down, it floats on the water surface. The PRL can be forced into the water.
However,
the PRL can float in water when it is slightly disturbed.
12
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
Example 6- Floatiniz Hydrophilic Lens
A proccdure similar to that of Example 4 is 1'6llowcd cxccl)t a diflci-cnt
composition is used. The new composition comprises a mixture of 5 grams of 2-
hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 0.25 grani of ethylene glycol
dimethacrylate,
and 5 mg of benzoyl peroxidc. The lens made fi-om this composition docs not
float on
the water surface. However, it can float for a few seconds in water when the
water
solution is slightly stirred. Sucli a temporary lloating can also meet the
requirement
of a floating PRL design. Inside the eye the aqueous humor flows from
posterior
chamber to anterior chamber. When such an aqucous humor flow occurs, a
floating
PRL will yield to the aqueous outflow, tliercby prescrving cyc dynamics.
The non-hydrated poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) lias a specific gravity of
1.15 g/em3. It is a solid, hard material and its hardness exceeds the Shore A
scale.
The mass per unit surface area for the dry poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)
lens is
about 0.12 mg/mmz, However, when it is hydrated, poly(hydi-oxyethyl
methacrylate)
absorbs about 40% water and becomes soft. The contact angle of the ftilly
hydrated
lens is 34 .
Example 7
A very thin disc is cut by lathe out of poly(methyl metliacrylate) (PMMA)
material. PMMA has specific gravity of 1.19 g/crn3 and is a hard solid polymer
witll a
Rockwell hardness of M-93. Its hardness exceeds the Sliore A hardness scale
and,
therefore, it cannot be measured by Shore A method. The disc llas a radius of
6 mm
and a thickness of about 0.07 mm. It weighs about 9 mg. Tllerefore, the mass
per
surface area is about 0.04 mg/mm2. The disc was found to be able to float on a
water
surface. Without external force applied to the disc, it always floats on the
water
surface. However, it can be forced into water. When water is slightly
disturbed, the
disc can float in water. Furthermore, althougll PMMA material is a hard solid,
when
it is machined into a disc with a thickness of about 0.07 mm, it becomes much
morc
flexible, For example, it can be rolled up without breaking the disc.
13
CA 02382289 2002-02-20
WO 01/15636 PCT/US00/40768
Example 8
A similar disc was also cut out of PMMA material with a radius of about 5mm
and thickness of 0.28 mni. The disc weiglis about 26 mg. Therefore, the mass
pcr
surface area is 0.17 mg/mm2. The disc is found to be able to float on a water
surface.
Without external force applied to the disc, it always floats on the water
surface.
However, the disc can be forced into water. When water is slightly disturbed
the disc
can also float in water.
14
