Language selection

Search

Patent 2387173 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2387173
(54) English Title: HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION AND ADJUVANT
(54) French Title: COMPOSITION HERBICIDE ET ADJUVANT
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01N 57/20 (2006.01)
  • A01N 25/30 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • KOENIG, SHANE JOHN (Australia)
  • MUIR, CLIFFORD NEALE (Australia)
(73) Owners :
  • NUFARM LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • NUFARM LIMITED (Australia)
(74) Agent: BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-04-04
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-04-19
Examination requested: 2005-03-31
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AU2000/000283
(87) International Publication Number: AU2000000283
(85) National Entry: 2002-04-11

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
PQ3393 (Australia) 1999-10-13
PQ4059 (Australia) 1999-11-15

Abstracts

English Abstract


A herbicidal glyphosate composition including the monoisopropylamine salt of
glyphosate and the ammonium salt of glyphosate.


French Abstract

Cette invention se rapporte à une composition herbicide à base de glyphosate, contenant le sel mono-isopropylamine du glyphosate et le sel ammonium du glyphosate.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


12
Claims:
1. A herbicidal glyphosate composition including the monoisopropylamine salt
of glyphosate and the ammonium salt of glyphosate.
2. A herbicidal composition according to claim 1 in the form of an aqueous
solution.
3. A herbicidal composition according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of said
monoisopropylamine salt to said ammonium salt is in the range of from 80:20 to
97:3 based on the weight of glyphosate acid in each form.
4. A herbicidal composition according to claim 2 wherein the weight ratio is
in
the range of from 85:15 to 95:5 based on glyphosate acid.
5. A herbicidal composition according to claim 3 wherein the concentration of
glyphosate in the isopropylamine and ammonium salt form is at least 360 g/L
based on glyphosate acid.
6. A herbicidal composition according to claim 5 wherein the concentration is
at least 450 g/L glyphosate.
7. A herbicidal composition according to claim 5 wherein the concentration is
at least 490 g/L.
8. A herbicidal composition according to claim 5 wherein the concentration is
at least 500 g/L.
9. A herbicidal composition according to claim 5 wherein the concentration is
no more than 620 g/L glyphosate.
10. A herbicidal composition according to claim 1 further including a
surfactant
in an amount of up to 20% by weight of the total composition.

13
11. A herbicidal composition according to claim 10 wherein the surfactant
includes a phosphate ester.
12. A herbicidal composition according to claim 10 wherein the surfactant
includes an ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester.
13. A herbicidal composition according to claim 12 wherein the surfactant
includes an ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester in the form of a salt selected
from the ammonium and alkylamine salt in an amount of from 0.5 to 5% by weight
of the total composition.
14. A herbicidal composition according to claim 2 wherein the composition
further includes a herbicide selected from triazines and dinitroanilines.
15. A herbicidal composition according to claim 1 in the form of a dilute
composition for application to crops, the composition including an aqueous
solution of at least 3.6 g/L of glyphosate in the form of said
monoisopropylamine
salt and said ammonium salt; ammonium sulphate selected from ammonium
sulphate alkylammonium sulphate and mixtures thereof; a surfactant component
including an ammonium salt of an ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester; and an
amphoteric surfactant.
16. A herbicidal composition according to claim 15 wherein the amphoteric
surfactant is a phospholipid with an acidic buffer.
17. A method of forming a glyphosate composition for application to weeds
including applying to the herbicidal composition of claim 5 with water to
provide a
solution containing at least 3.5 g/L of glyphosate based on the glyphosate
acid
and mixing the composition with an adjuvant including
from 5 to 30% by weight of a sulphate selected from ammonium sulphate,
alkylammonium sulphate and mixtures thereof;

14
from 0 to 25% by weight of ammonium salt of an ethoxylated alcohol
phosphate ester and;
from 0.5 to 10% by weight of amphoteric surfactant.
18. A method according to claim 17 wherein the amphoteric surfactant is a
phospholipid and the ammonium salt of an ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester
is
present in an amount of from 0.5 to 25% by weight of the adjuvant composition.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
1
Herbicidal Composition and Adjuvant
The present invention relates to a herbicidal composition and in particular a
composition containing the herbicide glyphosate.
N-phosphonomethylglycine, known by its common name glyphosate, is a well
known broad spectrum herbicide which is widely used in domestic and broadacre
weed control. Glyphosate is a water insoluble acid and is therefore formulated
as
a water soluble salt, generally the isopropylamine salt.
Glyphosate is sold and used in a range of formulation types. The manufacturers
of glyphosate generally prepare it for transport and shipping as an aqueous
concentrate from which commercial products can readily be prepared by dilution
and in some cases the addition of additives.
Glyphosate may be formulated for sale as an aqueous concentrate which is
diluted by the end user prior to application. Concentrates may be packaged
with
surfactants and may be used with adjuvants which are mixed with the herbicide
in
a spray tank before use. Glyphosate is also sold to domestic markets as a
dilute
solution packaged with a spray applicator ready for direct application to
weeds.
Water soluble granules or powders are also available which contain a
glyphosate
salt and generally also a surfactant. These dry formulations are dissolved in
water by the end user before application.
Despite the versatility of glyphosate it tends to be less stable in solution
particularly concentrated solutions at low temperature and the high viscosity
of
concentrated solutions makes them difficult to pump and handle. There is a
need
for a glyphosate composition which is stable and easy to handle in a wide
range
of formulations.
Glyphosate products are frequently sprayed in conjunction with other
pesticides.
Although this can greatly reduce the cost of application incompatibility
between
glyphosate and the second pesticide can be an issue.

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
2
We have now found that by mixing the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate with
the
ammonium salt of glyphosate, particularly in certain ratios, compositions are
stable at a wide range of concentrations. For example, the viscosity of
aqueous
solutions is reduced allowing the composition to be more easily dispensed or
allowing the concentration to be significantly increased while remaining
stable.
This finding was surprising as the ammonium salt of glyphosate is much less
soluble than the isopropylamine salt. The compositions of the invention also
generally exhibit good compatibility with other pesticides.
In accordance with the invention we provide a glyphosate composition including
the monoisopropylamine salt of glyphosate and the ammonium salt of glyphosate.
The ratio of said monoisopropylamine salt to said ammonium salt is typically
in
the range of from 80:20 to 97:3 based on the weight of glyphosate in the acid
form. In this ratio of salt the composition is surprisingly versatile allowing
extremely high concentrations to be handled more easily and with enhanced
stability.
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention the weight ratio of
said
monoisopropylamine salt to said ammonium salt is in the range of 85:15 to 95:5
based on the weight of glyphosate in the acid form.
The glyphosate composition of the invention may use glyphosate at a wide range
of concentrations. For example the composition may have a high concentration
of 600g/L, based on the weight of glyphosate in the acid form, or more such as
may be used for transport and shipping, it may be a concentrate of the type to
be
diluted prior to use or it may be a dilute composition prepared from the
concentrate or of the type sold in spray packs for domestic use.
It is desirable to sell and transport glyphosate as a high concentration
aqueous
solution however the useful concentration of conventional compositions is
limited
by viscosity of the formulation and its solution stability. Conventional
glyphosate
compositions become increasingly viscous in aqueous solution at concentrations

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
3
above 300g/L (based on the acid form) and particularly from about 360g/L with
the result that at high concentrations they cannot as readily be dispensed by
the
end user. The pumps used by farmers to dispense herbicides do not readily
allow
delivery of compositions containing over 490g/L glyphosate. At high
concentrations glyphosate is also less stable in solution, particularly at low
temperatures.
The glyphosate concentrate compositions of the invention will typically
include at
least 300g/L of glyphosate. The compositions of the invention are particularly
advantageous when they include at least 360g/L glyphosate based on acid form
and preferably they include at least 450g/L. Even more preferably the
concentration is at least 490g/L and most preferably the glyphosate
concentration
is at least 500g/L. We have found that concentration of up to 540g/L or more
may
be formed with a viscosity allowing easy dispensing by the container pump
systems used by farmers. Further the composition is generally stable even at
low
temperatures for example at 5°C.
Manufacturing concentrates may be prepared with concentrations of as high as
620g/L or more. Although concentrated compositions of at least 360g/L
glyphosate are preferred the composition of the invention may be in the form
of a
diluted composition if desired. The concentration will preferably be at least
3.6g/L
For example it may be in the form of a dilute formulation prepared from a
concentrate before application or it may be a dilute solution of the type
packaged
for the domestic market.
The composition of the invention may and typically will contain other
additives.
For example the composition may include a surfactant component. The surfactant
component may include one or more surfactants and is preferably present in an
amount of up to 20% by weight of the total composition. In cases where the
surfactant is present at the upper end of this range the glyphosate
concentration
will be relatively low. More preferably the surfactant is present in an amount
of up
to 5% by weight of the total composition. At such surfactant concentrations
higher amounts of glyphosate may be used to provide at least 500g/L
glyphosate.

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
4
Examples of surfactants which may be useful include alkanolamides, betaine
derivatives, ethoxylated propoxylated block copolymers, glycerol esters,
glycol
esters, imidazolines and imidazoline derivatives, lanolin derivatives,
lecithin
derivatives, tertiary or quaternary polyoxyalkylene alkylamines,
polyoxyalkylene
and non-polyoxyalkylene alkylamine oxides, polyoxyalkylene alkylethers,
polyoxyalkylene alkylarylethers, polyoxyalkylene alkylesters, alkoxylated and
non-
alkoxylated sorbitan esters, alkyl glycosides, alkyl polyglycosides, sucrose
esters,
sucrose glycerides, alkyl sulphates or phosphates, olefin sulfonates,
alkylaryl
sulfonates, polyoxyalkylene alkylether sulphates or phosphates, sulfosuccinate
derivatives, sulfosuccinamates, taurates, sulphates and sulfonates of oils,
fatty
acids, alcohols, alkoxylated alcohols, fatty esters and aromatic derivatives
and
mixtures thereof.
We have found the properties of the composition are particularly useful when
the
surfactant includes a phosphate ester, particularly an ethoxylated alcohol
phosphate ester which may be in the form of a salt such as the ammonium or
alkylamine salt such as the monoisopropylamine salt. It is particularly
preferred
that the surfactant includes the ammonium salt of the ethoxylated alcohol
phosphate ester.
It is often desirable to use other herbicides in combination with glyphosate.
In
some cases these other herbicides can be mixed with the glyphosate composition
and additives shortly before application. Dinitroanilines are one of the most
commercially successful classes of herbicides. In particular, trifluralin is
widely
used in pre-sowing application to soil in many important crops. It is
effective
against both grassy weeds and broad-leave weeds. Herbicides of the triazine
family, particularly atrazine, are also used at the time of sowing crops,
particularly
canola.
In order to kill the maximum number of weeds the timing for application of
glyphosate needs to be left until shortly before sowing. This also coincides
with
the optimal timing for dinitroanilines and triazines. If glyphosate and

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
dinitroanilines or triazines could be effectively applied together this has
the
potential to allow better knockdown. It would also allow farmers to sow a crop
at
the optimal time to maximise yield and reduce competition from weeds. Tank
mixing of the herbicides would reduce the labour and cost associated with
5 separate applications which are currently required.
Existing formulations of glyphosate are generally incompatible with
dinitroanilines
and triazines. For example mixture with trifluralin or atrazine can result in
phase
separation when the herbicides are combined. Also their combined use has been
found to seriously reduce the efficacy of the compositions.
We have found that the compositions of the invention exhibit improved
compatibility. In particular when the ammonium salt of an ethoxylated alcohol
phosphate ester is used as the surfactant in the compositions of the invention
the
formulation is compatible with dinitroanilines or triazines and mixtures of
these
herbicides with glyphosate do not generally suffer loss of efficacy to the
same
extent as conventional formulations. Indeed there is a significant improvement
in
efficacy when compared with combinations of the presently available herbicide
compositions at corresponding concentrations.
Accordingly in a preferred embodiment of the invention we provide a glyphosate
formulation including the monoisopropylamine salt of glyphosate and the
ammonium salt of glyphosate wherein the ratio of said monoisopropylamine salt
and ammonium salt is in the range from 80:20 to 97:3 (preferably 85:15 to
95:5)
and therein the formulation includes a surfactant including the ammonium salt
of
an ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester. The ethoxylated alcohol phosphate
ester is preferably present in an amount of up to 5% by weight of the
composition
and most preferably from 0.5 to 5% by weight of the total composition.
The composition of the invention may be used as a stand alone product by
diluting it with water to the required glyphosate concentration. It is
desirable in
many circumstances to use the herbicide composition in combination with an
adjuvant. When the herbicide composition is to be used with other herbicides
or

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
6
with hard diluting water (over 1000 ppm) then use of an adjuvant is
particularly
preferred. Suitable adjuvants for use with glyphosate are known in the
industry
and they may be used if desired.
Suitable adjuvants include equivalently acceptable inorganic salts,
dispersants,
wetters and antifoam agents. Examples of acceptable inorganic salts include
ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, potassium phosphate, tetrapotassium
pyrophosphate, sodium bisulphate, sodium sulphate, ammonium bicarbonate.
Ammonium sulphate is particularly preferred.
Examples of dispersants and wetters include the surfactants referred to above,
however preferred dispersants include long aliphatic quaternary ammonium
compounds, aliphatic amines, alkylpolysaccharides and ethoxylated phosphates.
Ethoxylated fatty amine surfactants such as soya amine ethoxylate and tallow
amine ethoxylate, alkylpolysaccharides and ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester
or mixtures, of two or more thereof, or with the above examples of surfactants
are
particularly useful.
The adjuvant may if desired contain crop oils such as paraffinic oils,
vegetable
oils or vegetable oil derivatives.
We have found that certain types of adjuvant components in combination provide
compatibility with other herbicides such as triazine and dinitroanilines and a
level
of activity which is not readily obtained with existing adjuvants.
Accordingly in a further aspect the invention provides an adjuvant composition
for
use with glyphosate herbicide compositions the adjuvant including:
ammonium sulphate, an alkylammonium sulphate or mixture thereof;
a surfactant component including an ammonium salt of an ethoxylated
alcohol phosphate ester and
an amphoteric surfactant.

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
7
The alkylammonium sulphate when present may be a mono-, di- or trialkyl-
ammonium sulphate. The alkyl group or groups preferably contain up to six
carbon atoms, more preferably up to 4 carbon atoms and most preferably are
isopropyl. Ammonium sulphate is preferably present.
The amphoteric surfactant is preferably a phospholipid with an acidic buffer,
particularly propionic acid .
The preferred concentration of components in the adjuvant are as follows:
from 5 to 30% w/w of ammonium sulphate alkylammonium sulphate or
mixture thereof;
from 0 to 25% w/w, preferably from 0.5 to 25% w/w of ammonium salt of an
ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester and;
from 0.5 to 10% w/w of amphoteric surfactant which is preferably a
phospholipid.
The adjuvant of the invention may be used with the glyphosate composition of
the
invention or it may be used with other glyphosate compositions such as those
which are commercially available from numerous sources. The adjuvant
composition of the invention will generally be mixed with a glyphosate
composition shortly before use. The composition will normally be mixed in the
spray tank however it is preferred that at least a portion of the adjuvant to
be used
is added to the spray tank prior to the glyphosate. Preferably all of the
adjuvant
component to be used will be added to the spray tank prior to addition of the
glyphosate composition.
The present invention will now be more fully described with reference to the
following examples. It should be understood, however, that the description
following is illustrative only and should not be taken in any way as a
restriction on
the generality of the invention described above. Where the concentration of
glyphosate is expressed in grams per litre (g/L) it is understood that this
refers to
grams of glyphosate as the acid form per litre of composition.

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
8
Example 1
A glyphosate composition in accordance with the invention was prepared by
combining the following components in the relative quantities specified:
RAW MATERIAE.~ ~ ~ ~ G~uant~ty~
K~l. 3 ;~..
*Glyphosate Acid (Wetcake) 0.6287
2-Propanamine 100% w/w 0.1864
Ammonia (28% w/w) 0.0213
GERONOL CF/AR 0.0266
LUCONYL Green FK872 0.001
Process Water 0.3710
Specific Gravity 1.2350
*The glyphosate acid wetcake contained approximately 86% w/w glyphosate
based on glyphosate acid (11 % w/w water). The purity of the glyphosate was
96.5% on a dry basis.
The composition, which contains 540g/L glyphosate could readily be delivered
using standard pumps used by farmers and was stable in solution at
temperatures of 5°C for extended periods.
GERONOL CF/AR surfactant sold by Rhodia is the 2-propanamine salt of
ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester.
Example 2
An adjuvant formulation for use with a glyphosate composition was prepared by
combining the following components in the relative quantities specified:

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
9
RAW MATER~'A~~~~ ~ ~ ;t~U~,WT1'T~
h ' ~' ~~
K~CI
~a <; ~~~.~r, ~ ~,3~,~....~,
~ w. ,
~ ~~~ ~~
Ammonium Sulphate 0.2550
RHODOFAC ARB-70 0.1786
Ammonia (28%w/w) 0.0510
Li-700 0.0455
Process Water 0.6320
Specific Gravity 1.162
RHODOFAC ARB-70 sold by Rhodia is an ethoxylated alcohol phosphate ester
and forms the ammonium salt in solution.
Li-700 from Loveland Industries Inc, U.S.A. is a mixture of soyal
phospholipids and
propionic acid.
The combination of components in the adjuvant composition generally allows for
better physical compatibility and improved efficacy even in hard water.
Example 3
The performance of the composition according to the present invention
comprising the glyphosate composition of Example 1 and the adjuvant
formulation of Example 2, was compared with a leading commercial glyphosate
formulation containing 490g/L glyphosate (based on glyphosate acid) in the
form
of the isopropylamine salt (Comparative example).
The results are shown in the attached drawings.
Referring to the drawings:
Figure 1 is a graph comparing the viscosity of the glyphosate formulation of
the invention with a leading 490g/L glyphosate formulation.
Figure 2 is a bar chart comparing the low use rate efficiency of a 1:1
mixture (by volume) of the composition/adjuvant formulation of Example

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
1/Example 2 with the comparative glyphosate/adjuvant combination (Comparative
example) - in the recommended mixing ratio - at the rate of grams of active
ingredient per hectare.
5 Figure 3 is a bar chart comparing the weed control performance of the
composition of the Example 1 when used with the adjuvant of Example 2 in a 1:1
volume ratio with the composition of Comparative example when used with the
recommended surfactant adjuvant.
10 Figure 4 is a bar chart comparing the efficiency obtained by the crop
performance of the glyphosate/adjuvant combination of Examples 1 and 2 (1:1
volumetric ratio) with the composition of Comparative example when used
together with TRIFLUR trifluralin formulation.
Figure 5 is a bar chart comparing the performance of the
glyphosate/adjuvant combination of Examples 1 and Example 2 (1:1 volumetric
ratio) with the composition of the Comparative example, when each are used
with
NUTRAZINE brand atrazine formulation.
Referring to Figure 1 it can be seen that the viscosity of the composition of
the
invention is significantly less than the prior art formulation despite
containing
540g/L compared with the prior art containing 490g/L. The dual salt
composition
of the invention gives a viscosity which is typically 30% less than the prior
art high
loading compositions which merely contain 490g/L glyphosate acid
Referring to Figure 2 it can be seen that despite lower use rates placing more
pressure on the surfactant system the composition/adjuvant combination of the
invention performs successfully even at low rates. We found higher efficacy
thus
prior art formulations of 490g/L glyphosate at equivalent low usage rates
(gai/ha=
grams active ingredient per hectare). As shown in Figure 3 we also found good
activity on broadleaf weeds such as cape weed or clover at equivalent rates.
This
is a weakness of many prior art formulations.

CA 02387173 2002-04-11
WO 01/26469 PCT/AU00/00283
11
Glyphosate products are frequently sprayed in conjunction with other
pesticides
but incompatibility with other pesticides is sometimes an important issue
which
can arise from physical effects within the spray tank or biological effects.
Biological incompatibility (antagonism) may result from interactions between
herbicides resulting in poorer weed control than when the herbicides are
separately applied. Figures 4 and 5 show that the glyphosate composition of
the
invention exhibits a high compatibility rate when compared with a high rate
glyphosate composition. Figure 4 compares the invention with the prior art
composition when each are used with a commercial Trifluralin composition.
Figure 5 compares composition of the invention with the prior art composition
when used with commercial atrazine formulation.
It is to be understood that the invention described hereinabove is susceptible
to
variations, modifications and/or additions other than those specifically
described
and that the invention includes all such variations, modifications and/or
additions
which fall within the spirit and scope of the above description.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2387173 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2011-04-28
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2011-04-28
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2011-04-04
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2010-04-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-10-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2009-07-29
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-02-05
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2007-11-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-05-25
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-06-16
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-04-12
Inactive: Office letter 2005-04-12
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-04-12
Inactive: Office letter 2005-04-12
Letter Sent 2005-04-12
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-03-31
Appointment of Agent Request 2005-03-31
Revocation of Agent Request 2005-03-31
Request for Examination Received 2005-03-31
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2005-03-31
Letter Sent 2004-05-18
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2004-05-04
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2004-04-05
Inactive: Agents merged 2003-02-07
Letter Sent 2003-01-02
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-11-14
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-09-26
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2002-09-24
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2002-09-24
Application Received - PCT 2002-07-03
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-04-11
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2001-04-19

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2011-04-04
2004-04-05

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2010-03-01

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NUFARM LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
CLIFFORD NEALE MUIR
SHANE JOHN KOENIG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2002-04-10 11 523
Abstract 2002-04-10 1 45
Claims 2002-04-10 3 81
Drawings 2002-04-10 5 197
Description 2007-11-22 11 533
Claims 2007-11-22 3 104
Claims 2009-07-28 3 152
Notice of National Entry 2002-09-23 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-01-01 1 106
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2004-05-17 1 175
Notice of Reinstatement 2004-05-17 1 166
Reminder - Request for Examination 2004-12-06 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2005-04-11 1 178
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2010-07-20 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2011-05-29 1 172
PCT 2002-04-10 7 252
Correspondence 2002-09-23 1 25
PCT 2002-04-11 3 139
Fees 2004-05-03 1 27
Fees 2004-05-03 2 38
Correspondence 2005-03-30 2 42
Correspondence 2005-04-11 1 15
Correspondence 2005-04-11 1 15
Fees 2005-03-30 1 31
Fees 2006-03-12 1 24
Fees 2007-03-25 1 27
Fees 2008-03-10 1 25
Fees 2009-03-18 1 42