Language selection

Search

Patent 2392643 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2392643
(54) English Title: EXCAVATOR TEETH, APPARATUS AND METHOD
(54) French Title: DENTS D'EXCAVATRICE, ET DISPOSITIF ET METHODE APPLICABLES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E02F 09/28 (2006.01)
  • E02F 03/24 (2006.01)
  • E02F 03/32 (2006.01)
  • E02F 05/08 (2006.01)
  • E02F 05/32 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WAGNER, WAYNE A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • PENNSYLVANIA CRUSHER CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • PENNSYLVANIA CRUSHER CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2002-07-05
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-01-05
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


Fabricated excavator teeth comprising projections cut from hard, highly
abrasion steel plate or bar stock, for example having a Brinell Hardness
exceeding 225, and as high as 400 or higher, welded to cores through
which the teeth may be connected with excavator apparatus, including any
kind of digging implement, such as buckets and ripping arms, and any kind
of excavating machine, such as power shovels, backhoes and dredges.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


1. An excavator tooth useful for fracturing rock strata, comprising:
A. a metallic core having front and rear ends and at least one
longitudinal surface extending between said ends;
B. at least one projection formed from metallic stock and having a
tip; said projection being secured to the core at least in part by
welding with the tip and at least a portion of the length of the
projection(s) extending beyond the front end of the core; and
C. in or on the core, at least one tooth connector portion, including
at least one concave or convex connector surface, of circular or
other configuration, positioned and adapted to engage with and
non-destructively disengage from at least one mating surface of
an excavator apparatus.
2. An excavator tooth according to claim 1wherein the core is of circular
cross-section and has a single longitudinal surface in the form of a
cylinder.
3. An excavator tooth according to claim 1wherein the core is of non-
circular cross-section and has plural longitudinal surfaces.
4. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein the at least one
projection preferably includes at least one cut edge.
5. An excavator tooth according to claim 1wherein the projection metallic
stock thickness is about 1/2 to about 3, or about 3/4 to about 2 and
1/4 or about 1 to about 1 and 1/2, inches.
6. An excavator tooth according to claim 1wherein the tooth includes at
least one projection which has on opposite sides thereof, as viewed in
transverse cross-section, at least two approximately planar surfaces
which are approximately parallel to one another.
Page 30

7. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 having at least two of said
projections thereon.
8. An excavator tooth according to claim 4 wherein two projections are
secured to substantially opposite sides of the core.
9. An excavator tooth according to claim 4 wherein at least two of said
projections have inner major surfaces, portions of which surfaces
generally face one another and extend forwardly from the core, said
portions, as they progress toward their tips, having an angle of
divergence between them of about 0 to about 30 degrees, preferably
about 2 to about 30 degrees, more preferably about 12 to about 24
degrees, still more preferably about 16 to about 20 degrees and most
preferably about 18 degrees.
10. An excavator tooth according to claim 1wherein the metallic stock is
of abrasion resistant steel having a surface BHN (Brinell Hardness
Number) of at least about 225, preferably at least about 300, more
preferably at least about 350, more preferably at least about 375 and
still more preferably at least about 400.
11. An excavator tooth according to claim 7 which comprises iron,
carbon, manganese and silicon, and optionally, but preferably at least
one additional alloying element selected from the group consisting of
chromium, nickel, boron, molybdenum, vanadium, titanium, copper,
aluminum, niobium and nitrogen.
12. An excavator tooth according to claim 8 wherein the sulfur and
phosphorous contents of the plate are respectively less than about
0.05, preferably less than about 0.04 and still more preferably less
than about 0.030 percent by weight of the entire plate stock.
Page 31

13. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein there is a narrowing
of at least one projection, between its generally longitudinal edges, in
the direction of the tip.
14. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein first and second
longitudinal edges of at least one projection, or more preferably first
and second edges of a plurality of projections, converge with one
another, along at least a portion of their respective lengths, in the
direction of their tip or tips.
15. An excavator tooth according to claim 14 wherein such narrowing, or
such convergence, exists at least closely adjacent to the tip or tips.
16. An excavator tooth according to claim 14 wherein the projection
edges converge, as the edges approach the tips, preferably at an
angle of about 14 to about 35 degrees, more preferably about 15 to
about 30 degrees, still more preferably about 17 to about 25 degrees
and even more preferably about 21~2 degrees.
17. An excavator tooth according to claim 14 comprising convergence of
at least portions of projection longitudinal edges along substantially
straight lines, preferably closely adjacent to their tip or tips.
18. An excavator tooth according to claim 14 wherein convergence
occurs over at least about 25% and more preferably up to at least
about 100% of the length of the projection longitudinal edges
19. An excavator tooth according to claim 14 wherein the angles of
convergence between edges as the edges approach the tips is
generally about 10 to about 35 degrees, preferably about 15 to about
30 degrees, more preferably about 17 to about 25 degrees and still
more preferably about 21~2 degrees.
20. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 or 19 including a projection
with two convergent edges that are cut edges.
Page 32

21. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein at least one
projection is secured to the core through at least one longitudinal
surface of the core.
22. An excavator tooth according to claim 1, 7 or 21 wherein the
projection or projections is/are secured to the core entirely by welds.
23. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 comprising a plurality of said
projections that respectively extend along at least a portion of a given
longitudinal surface and are secured to the core at least in part by
welds between the given surface and adjacent portions of the
projections.
24. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein the tooth connector
portion is located at the rear end of the core.
25. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein the tooth connector
portion is located in or on a rearmost surface of the core.
26. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 wherein the tooth connector
portion is securely connected with a mating surface of an excavator
apparatus.
27. An excavator tooth according to claim 26 wherein the tooth connector
portion is a female member extending into the rear end of the core
and the mating surface is a male member on an excavator apparatus.
28. An excavator tooth according to claim 26 wherein the tooth connector
portion is a male member extending rearwardly from the rear end of
the core and the mating surface is a female member on an excavator
apparatus.
29. An excavator tooth according to claim 26 wherein a locking member
engaging the tooth and a portion of the excavator apparatus provides
security for the connection between the tooth connector portion and
the mating surface.
Page 33

30. An excavator tooth according to claim 29 wherein the locking member
is a resilient insert or metallic pin.
31. An excavator tooth according to claim 26 wherein the excavator
apparatus is an excavating machine adapted to carry, in working
position, one or more teeth constructed according to the invention.
32. An excavator tooth according to claim 26 wherein the excavator
apparatus is an excavating machine selected from the group
consisting of power shovels, backhoes, draglines, dredges, graders
and bulldozers.
33. An excavator tooth according to claim 26 wherein the excavator
apparatus is a digging attachment or combination of attachments
adapted to be mounted on an excavating machine and to carry, in
working position, one or more of said teeth.
34. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 connected with a bucket
having a mounting pin for connecting the bucket to an excavating
machine, the tooth having a projection with a major surface which is
head in approximately perpendicular relationship with the longitudinal
axis of the mounting pin.
35. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 connected with a rock ripping
tool having a mounting pin for connecting the tool to an excavating
machine, the tooth having a projection with a major surface which is
held in approximately perpendicular relationship with the longitudinal
axis of the mounting pin.
36. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 connected with a bucket or
blade at a substantially rectilinear cutting edge of the bucket or blade,
said edge defining a digging axis, a major surface of the tooth being
held in approximately perpendicular relationship with that axis.
Page 34

37. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 connected with a bucket or
blade having an at least partly non-rectilinear cutting edge having
ends at sides of the bucket or blade, said bucket or blade having a
digging axis defined by an imaginary line connecting said ends, a
major surface of the tooth being held in approximately perpendicular
relationship with that axis.
38. An excavator tooth according to claim 1 connected with a digging end
of a pivotable ripping arm for an excavating machine, said arm having
a pivoting axis about which the arm swings in operation, a major
surface of the tooth being held in approximately perpendicular
relationship with the axis.
39. A method of excavation with an excavating machine having an arm
with a pivot affording angular movement of an end of the arm about a
central axis of the pivot, said arm supporting and delivering digging
force and motion to a digging implement having projections, said
method comprising applying such force through projections that are
formed of cut plate stock and have major surfaces that are
approximately perpendicular to said axis.
40. A method of fracturing rock or frozen earth with an excavating
machine having an arm with a pivot affording angular movement of
an end of the arm about a central axis of the pivot, said arm
supporting and delivering digging force and motion to a digging
implement able to apply sufficient force through the tips of projections
on said implement to break up the strata, said method comprising
applying such force though projections that are formed of cut plate
stock and have major surfaces that are approximately perpendicular
to said axis.
41. A method according to claim 39 or 40 comprising applying such force
through one or more teeth having edges that converge at angles of
convergence between edges as the edges approach the tips of
generally about 10 to about 35 degrees, preferably about 15 to about
Page 35

30 degrees, more preferably about 17 to about 25 degrees and still
more preferably about 21~2 degrees.
42. A method according to claim 39 or 40 comprising applying such force
through one or more teeth respectively having at least two of said
projections with tips and inner major surfaces, portions of which
surfaces generally face one another and extend forwardly from the
core, said portions, as they progress toward their tips, having an
angle of divergence between them of about 0 to about 30 degrees,
about 2 to about 30 degrees, or about 12 to about 24 degrees, or
about 16 to about 20 degrees or about 18 degrees.
43. A method according to claim 39 or 40 comprising applying such force
through teeth wherein the plate stock is abrasion resistant steel plate
having a surface BHN (Brinell Hardness Number) of at least about
225, more preferably at least about 300, more preferably at least
about 350, more preferably at least about 375 and more preferably at
least about 400.
44. A method according to claim 39 or 40 comprising applying such force
through teeth which comprise iron, carbon, manganese and silicon,
and optionally but preferably at least one additional alloying element
selected from the group consisting of chromium, nickel, boron,
molybdenum, vanadium, titanium, copper, aluminum, niobium and
nitrogen.
Page 36

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02392643 2002-07-05
EXCAVATOR TEETH, APPARATUS AND METHODS
2 TECHNICAL PIED
3 The invention relates to teeth useful in connection with excavating
4 machines, and to digging implements and excavating machines comprising
such teeth.
6 BACKGROUND
'7 The teeth commonly employed on digging implements for excavation
8 machines, such as for bucket leading-edges, ripping arms and dredge-
9 heads, have a limited service life, depending in part upon the severity of
the
abrasion to which they ace subjected, Severe applications include rock
11 fracturing and removal, and excavation of frozen earth. in a rock trenching
1'2 operation in Ohio, U.S.A: sandston~ with a very powerful excavating
13 machine having a digging.implement equipped with cast high abrasion
14 ' resistance alloy teeth, service lives as low as less than an hour were
experienced. This invention seeks to fulfill a need for improved excavator
16 teeth and excavation methods.
1'?' SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
18 in one aspect, the invention relates to an excavator tooth useful for
19 fracturing rock strata. It comprises a metallic core having front and rear
ends and at least one longitudinal surface extending between said ends.
21 There is also at lea$t one projection formed from metallic stock, which may
22 for example be bar stock of round, square or rectangular cross-section, or
23 more preferably may be plate stock. A projection according to the invention
24 has a tip, which is an end of the projection, of whatever shape, that is
intended to act on the rack or other material on which the tooth may be
26 used. Such projection is secured to the core, at least in part by welding,
27 ~ with the tip and at least portions'of the length of the projection{s~
extending
28 beyond the front end of the core. in or on the core there is at least one
29 tooth connector portion, including at least one concave or convex connector
surface, of circular or other configuration, positioned and adapted to
Page 1

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 engage with and non-destructively disengage from at feast one mating
2 surface of an excavator apparatus.
3 The invention has a variety of additional aspects, among which are
4 preferred and highly preferred embodiments. 1=or example, the core may
be of circular or non-circular cross-section, and may have a single
6 longitudinal surface in the form of.a cylinder or plural longitudinal
surfaces.
7 The at feast one projection preferably includes at least one cut edge, an
8 edge formed at least in part in cutting the projection from the metallic
stock,
9 and this edge may for example be an end of the projection when it is cut to
length from bar stock. More preferably, the cut edge is a longitudinal edge,
11 for example an edge resulting from cutting the projection from a plate.
12 1t is preferred that the projection metallic stock thickness be about 112
to
13 about 3, or about 314 to about 2 and 114 or about 1 to about 1 and 112,
14 inches. This dimension will correspond, for example, to the diameter of
round bar stock or the thickness of plate stock.
18 In a particularly preferred embodiment, the tooth includes at feast one
17 , projection which has vn opposite sides thereof, as viewed in transverse
18 cross-section, at feast two approximately planar surfaces 'which are
19 approximately parallel to one another. Preferably, these surfaces of the
projections are approximately parallel to'the digging direction of the.tooth.
21 More preferably, when viewed in transverse cross-section and when
22 positioned vertically in the view, these surfaces are at least about as III
as
23 the distance between them.
24 Prefer~bfy, there are at least two projections on the excavator tooth. More
preferably, these are secured to substantially opposite sides of the core.
26 In a particularly preferred embodiment, there are ~at least two projections
27 that have inner surfaces, portions of which surfaces generally face one
28 another and extend forwardly from the core. These portions, as they
29 progress toward their tips, have an angle of divergence between them of
34 about 4 (i.e., no divergence or a small convergence) to about 30 degrees,
Page 2

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 prefierably about 2 to about 30 degrees more preferably about.l2 to about
2 24 degrees, still more preferably about 16 to about 20 degrees and most
3 preferably about 18 degrees,
4 in another aspect, the projection metallic stock is preferably of abrasion
resistant steel having a surface BMN ~Brineli Hardness Number) of at least
8 about 225, more preferably at least about 300, mare preferably at least
7 about 350, more preferably at least about 375 and more preferably at least
8 about 400, at least prior to its fiabrication into teeth according to the
9 invention, and more preferably afiter such .fabrication. ,
Preferred embodiments of the projection metallic stock comprise iron,
11 carbon, manganese and silicon, and optionally but preferably at least ong
12 additional alloying element selected from the group consisting of chromium,
13 nickel, boron, molybdenum, vanadium, titanium, copper, aluminum, niobium
14 and nitrogen. More preferably,the sulfur and phosphorous contents of the
metallic stock are respectively less than about .Q.05,~ preferably less fhan
1fi about 0.04 and still more preferably less than about 0.030 percent by
17 weight of the entire stock.
18 in a preferred embodiment, there is a narrowing of at least one projection,
'19 between its generally longitudinal edges, in the direction of the tip,
which
may for exarrfple occur along a single edge,
21 However, in still more preferred errtbodiments, first and seco~nd~
longitudinal
22 edges of at least one projection, or more preferably first and second edges
23 ofi a plurality of projeckions, converge with one another, along at least a
24 portion of their respective' lengths, in th~ direction of their tip or
tips,
in a particularly preferred embodiment, such narrowing, or such
Z6 convergence, exists at least closely adjacent to the tip or tips.
27 Most preferably, .the projection edges converge, as th~ edges approach the
28 tips, preferably at an angle of about 10 to about 35 degrees, more
29 preferably about 15 to about 30 degrees, still more preferably about 9 7 to
about 25 degrees and even more preferably about 2112 degrees.
Page 3

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 A particularly preferred form of the invention comprises convergence of at
2 least portions of projection longitudinal edges along substantially straight
3 lines, preferably closely adjacent to their tip or tips,
4 Preferably, convergence occurs over at least about 25% and more
preferably up to at least about 100% of th~ length of the projection
5 longitudinal edges
? Preferably, the projection or projections respectively include two
convergent
8 edges that. are cut edges.
9 It is preferred that at least one projection be secured to the core through
at
I~a~t one longitudinal surface of the core. Advantageously, the projection
11 or projections islare secured to the core preferably entirely, by welds.
Iri a
12 partict~tarly preferred embodiment, said at~least~one longitudinal surface
13 has a plurality of projections secured thereto at least in part by welds
14 between the at least one surface and adjacent portions of the projections.
. The tooth connector portion may be located at the r~ar end of the core,
1 G preferably in or on a rearmost surface of the core.
17 Wherever located on~ the core, the tooth conn~ctor portion may be securely
18 connected with a mating~surface of an excavator apparatus. Inca preferred
19 embodiment,~the tooth connector portion is a female member ext~nding
into the rear end of the core and the mating surface is a male member on
29 an excavator apparatus, or vice versa.
22 A locking member may be present, e.g., a resilient insert or metallic pin,
to
23 engage the tooth and a portion of the excavator apparatus, thus providing
24 security for the connection between the tooth connector portion and the
mating surface.
26 According to the invention, the excavator apparatus may be any excavating
27 machine adapted to carry, in working position, one or more teeth
28 constructed according to the invention. Such excavator apparatus may for
29 ~xample be an excavating~machine selected from the group consisting of
gage 4

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 power shovels, backhoes, draglines, dredges, graders and bulldozers, or
2 may be a digging attachment or combination of attachments adapted to be
3 ~ mounted on an excavating machine and to carry, in working position, one
4 or more of said teeth.
In one particular embodiment, they excavator tooth is connected with a
6 bucket having a mounting pin for connecting the bucket to an excavating
7 machine. T'he tooth has a projection with a major surface which is held in
8 approximately perpendicular relationship with the longitudinal axis of the
9 mounting pin. . ,
1~0 Another embodiment includes an excavator tooth connected with a rack
11 ripping tool having a mounting pin for connecting the tool to an excavating
12 machine. Here, the tooth has a projection with' a major surface which is
13 held in approximately perpendicular relationship with the longitudinal axis
of
14 the mounting pin. ~ ~ '
Still another embodiment comprises an excavator tooth connected with a
1 fi bucket or blade at a substantially rectilinear cutting edge of the bucket
~or
17 blade. That edge is or has a digging axis, and a major surface of the tooth
18 is held in approximately perpendicular relationship with that axis. 'On the
19 other hand, the bucket or~blade may have an at least partly non-rectilinear
2g cutting edge having ends at sides of the bucket or blade. In which case, an
21 imaginary line connecting those ends defines the axis.
22 In yet another embodiment, an excavator tooth is connected with digging
23 end of a pivotable ripping arm for an excavating ~machin~. This arm has a
24 pivoting axis about which ~e arm swings in operation. A major surface of
28 the tooth is held in approximately perpendicular relationship with the
axis.'
26 Other aspects of the invention includes methods of~axcavation. Among
2T these are a method of excavation with an excavating machine having an
~8 arm with a pivot affording angular movement of an end of the arm about a
29 central axis of the pivot, said arm supporting and delivering digging force
3D and motion to a digging implement having projections. This method
31 comprises applying such force through projections that are formed of cut
Page 5

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 ~ plate stock and have major surfaces that are approximately perpendicular
2 to said axis.
3 The invention also includes a method of fracturing rock or frozen earth with
4 an excavating machine Having an arm with a pivot affording angular
movement of an end of the arni about a central axis of the pivot, said arm
fi supporting and delivering digging force and motion to a digging implement
7 able to apply sufficient force through the tips of projections on said
8~ implement to break up the. strata. This method comprises applying such
9 force through projections that are formed of cut plate stock and have major
t0 surfaces that are approximately perpendicular to said axis.
11 optional but preferred embodiments of each of the foregoing methods
12~ include applying such force .through teeth having edges that converge at
13 angles as above described, andlor applying such force through teeth
14 respectively having two projections with inner major surfaces~generally
facing one another and having an angle of divergence between them as
16 above described. Still other optional but preferred embodiments of each~of
17 the foregoing methods comprise applying such force through teeth wherein
18 the plate stock is abrasion resistant steel plate having a surface 8HN as
19 above described andlor having a compo$itian as above described., ,
Cther embodiments of the invention are described below, and additional
21 embodiments of the present invention, not disclosed herein, can be
22 constructed by persons skilled in the art without departing from the spirit
of
23 the invention.
24 ADVANTAGES
This invention makes available improvements in excavator teeth. Most
28 embodiments of the invention will include one or mare of the following
27 advantages. Certain preferred embodiments will include all of these
28 advantages. As compared to common, cast, replaceable steel teeth used
29 in the past, it is possible for persons skilled in the art of steel
fabrication to
fabricate excavator teeth according to the invention which exhibit excellent
3't cutting praperkies, long life in rock excavation and other applications,
Page 6

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 reduced cost for teeth per hour of operation and ease of fabrication, Cne
2 can fabricate~embodiments that afford a strategic balance between service
3 life and ease of penetration of rocky strata. Moreover, the invention offers
4 . the possibility of providing a range of satisfactory products which offer
a
degree of flexibility with respect to this balance. Where the projections
6 , have approximately parallel sides, then, for 'a given cutting edge width,
the
7 invention provides improved bending resistance in the projections, as
8 compared with teeth having projections formed from round bar stock. The
9 methods of the invention offer the operational advantages set forth above.
Cther advantages of these excavator teeth and methods will become
11 apparent to those skilled in the art upon using the invention.
12 BRfEF DESCRIP~'IQN Oi= THE DRAWINGS
13 Figure 1 is a side view of an excavator tooth according to the invention.
14 Figure 2 is a top view of the excavator~tooth of figure 1.
Figure 3 is a view, in perspective, of'another embodiment af'the invention
16 having a core which is the remnant of a cast excavator tooth from which the
1? original teeth have been worn away.
18 Figure 4 is a side view, partially in section, of yet another embodim~nt of
19 the invention having two projections, a portion of a prajectlon in the
foreground being broken out to reveal a projection in the background and
21 parts between them.
22 Figure 5 is a perspective view df ~stili another embodiment of the
invention.
23 Figure 6 is a side view, partially in section, of the embodiment of figure
5,
24 but with the addition, in phantom outline, of a portion of an excavator
apparatus.
28. higure 7 is~a perspective view of a digging~impl~ment, i.e., a ripping
arm,
aving mounted on its end an excavator tooth as a shown m figures 1 and
28 2.
P$ge 7

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 Figure 8 is a perspective view of a digging ii~nplement having thereon a
2 ripping arm and excavator tooth as shown in figure 7.
3 Figure 9 is a perspective view of a digging implement having thereon two
4 ripping arms, respectively.having excavator teeth as shown in ltgure 7..
S Figure 10 is an end view, with portions broken out, -of a dredge cutter-
head.
6 Figure 11 is a perspective vi~w of 2~ digging implement, i:e., a bucket,
7 . having a rectilinear front edge provided with a row of excavator teeth
8 according to the invention.
9 Figure 12 is a perspective view of a digging implement, i.e., a bucket,
having a non-rectilinear front edge provided with adapters and with
11 excavator teeth according to the invention; two of five teeth being left
Off of
12 their adapters to simplify the view. . . .
13 Figure 13 is a side view of a backhoe unit including a~ripping arm equipped
14 with one or more excavator teeth according to the invention.
. Figure 14 is a side view of a power shovel including a ripping arm equipped
9 6 with at .least one excavator tooth according to the invention.
1 ~ Figure 15 is a side view of a dragline unit including a bucket having
18 excavator teeth according to the invention.
'l9 Figure 16 is an enlarged portion of fgure 15 providing greeter detail with
respect to the bucket. w
21 VARIOUS AND PREFERRED EMgODtMENTS
22 Gores may be formed of any suitable metal. Preferably, the metal of the
23 . core should be readily weldable, economir~i and of adequate durability,
for
2~~ example, crack resistant, ductile, reasonably hard, strong and tough, in
genera(, such metal will be chosen from among one ~or more alloys
26 including one or more alloying elements to promote one or more of the
27 properties of wear resistance and fracture resistance, more preferably
Page ~

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 alloys that contain iron as a major component (more than 50°~) by
weight.
2 The cores may have arrd preferably do have less wear r~sistance than the
3 projection(s). Wear resistence should be sufficient to maintain, in rock
4 excavating service, the structural integrity required to s~curely support
the
excavating projeCtion(s) and pertorm their connecting function over the
fi useful life of the projection(s),
1 Fracture resistance should be sufficient to resist breakage of the care
under
8 the loads imposed in rock excavating service. Rack excavating service
9 includes, far example, one or to more of the following: use, on buckets or
other digging implements attached to the amps of backhoes engaged in
11 digging rocky soil or gravel; more preferably, use on drag-fine buckets
12 engaged in the stripping of froaen earth andlor rocky overburden; and, most
13 preferabljl, service on buckets or- other digging implements attached to
the
14 arms of large and very powerful hydrauIic shovels, for example, Caterpillar
model 385, engaged in the fracturing and subsequent removal, e.p.,
1 fi digging, of rock strata. The fracture resistance requirement depends on
17 loads which are sustained in operation, which to some degree depend on
1$ force exerted by excavating rnachlne, the hardness of the rock to be.
19 penetrated by the tooth and leverage imposed on the core by the design of
the tooth, for example leverage' imposed by the lengths of the core and the
21 proj~ction(s). '
22 Temper resistance can also be a bene~cial~prapecty, such as when it
23 assists in warding off to same extent lass in hardness~arising out of
heating
24 of the care during welding of the projections to the core or during
frictional
engagement with rock when the tooth is Iri use.
26 Qne example of suitable metals for the core is carbon steel conforming to
27 ASTM~ Standard A~2~, preferably grade TO~fi. Because of their low cost
28 and ease of welding, these are considered best for applications in which
29 the core will not be subjected to heavy abrasion, such as where only softer
3~ rock is to be fractured and or the projections extend far beyond the fronts
of
31 the cores, Where greater abrasion resistance is needed, it is considered
32 best to use cast steels conforming to AISI 8630 or ASTM A148, preferably
33 grade 90-fi0, either of which type of material has been quenched and
Page 9

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 tempered to any suitable hardness lev~f, for example a BHN of about 300
2 to about 400. Other suitable core metals include, for example, the
3 remnants of worn, cast rock fracturing teeth, such as those manufactured
4 by Mensley and others.
.Approxim2~te. compositions of a number of these core metals, by weight, the
6 balance being iron, appear below:
7 Metal C 11I n P ~, Vii, ~ ~,i, Mo Cu V g!.
8 80-fi0 .32 1,5 .05 .05 .45 .4
9 $fi30 .3 .8 .03 .03 .23 .5 .55 .2
Hensiey .28 .64 .02 .01 1.2 1.7 .2 .4 .04 .02 .03
11 Other .31 1 .02 .01 1.2. 2 .05 .45 .02 ,Q1 .01
12 The specific examples of metals set forth above appear sufficient iri
.fracture
13 resistance and temper resistance arid the other properties enumerated
14 herein far purposes of making cores. However, it is believed that there is
a
wide variety of other'-suitable metals and that persons skilled in the .
16 metallurgical arts are able to adust metals composition and heat treatments
17 ~ applied to such other metals to achieve desired levels of weldability and
18 durability to produce acceptable cores. For further guidance on effecting
19 desired levels of hardness, fracture resistance, temper resitance and other
beneficial properties, see U.S. Patents 5,525,167 and 5,595,614 and other
21 patents identified therein, the disclosures of all such patents being
22 incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
23 Gores may be formed as one or more~castings (single casting preferred) or
24 . as a fabricated assert~bly of segments of plate or non-plate components
or
in any other suitable way from any suitable new (virgin or used metal not
26 previously employed as a tooth core) or used (previously used as a portion
27 of a tooth) material. Ex2~mples of used materials include the remaining
28 shanks of tooth from which the projections have been worn away. Used
Page 10

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 cores are not preferred, due to expectation of undependable supply.
2 However, used cores,, where available, can be made into teeth better than
3 the originals.
4 Preferred embodiments of cores have front ends that include front surfaces
of any workable shape, rear ends irvith any shape consistent with the
E connector function, described below and a longitudinal, axis. The
7 longitudinal surfaces) of the core may have a surface or surfaces of any
8 number or shape, including one (e.g., cylindrical) and plural (e.g., three
or
9 . more) (four preferred). As viewed in transverse cross-section, the core's
exterior surface may be of any shape, symmetric or asymmetric, for
11 example, imay be at least partly circular, oval, triangular, square,
12 rectangular, diamond, polygonal, parallelogram, trapezoidal, modifications
13 of any af'the foregoing, composite shapes (combinations of the abave)~ e.g.
1~4 generally square but with rounded comers. Such cross-section may be
uniform yr variable along its length, but is preferably flattened on two sides
1 G where two projections are wrelded to it. The longitudinal cross-section of
17 the core's exterior surface may have 'any suitable 'shape, may be uniform
or
18 variable along its length, may be tapered, at least.iti part (preferred),
may
19 hav~ divergent ~land(s)" on which to weld divergent projection(s), when
divergent projections are used and may be non-tapered.
21 Teeth fabricated according to the invention have one or more projections) -
22 ' which may for sxample be fabricated from metallic stock, such as bar
stock,
23 but preferably from plate stock. The metallic stack has a composition
24 andlor trEatment history contributing to -the presence, in the stack,' of
properties of wear resistance, fracture resistance and temper resistance
25 sufficient for satisfactory fabrication of and service in excavating teeth,
27 Preferably the metallic stock is abrasion resistant steel, having a '
28 ~ composition and treatment history being sufficient to provide in the
stock a
~29 surface BHN (Brinell Hardness Number) of at least'about 225. Still more
preferably, the metallic stack is an abrasion resistant quenched and
31 tempered steel alloy which comprises iron, carbon, manganese and silicon,
32 and optionally but preferably at least one additional alloying element
33 selected from the group consisting of chromium, nickel, boron,
Page 11

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 molybdenum, vanadium, titanium, copper, aluminum, niobium and nitrogen,
2 the amounts of the aforementioned constituents and the treatment history
3 of the stack being sufficient to provide in the stock a surface BHN of at
least
4 about 300, more preferably at feast about 350, still more preferably at
least
about 375 and most p.referabiy at least about 400. Most preferably, the
6 sulfur and .phosphorous contents of the stock are respectively less than
7 about 0.05, preferably less than about 0.04 and stiff more preferably less
8 than about 4..030 percent by weight:of the entire metallic stock.
9 Preferably, the wear resistance, fracture resistance and temper resistance
t0 of the projection metallic stock and resultant projections are sufficient
far
11 the projections to remain useful for fracturing rock, while avoiding major
12 breakage of the projections and retaining at least about 50, at least about
13 70 or at least about 85%-of their as-manufactured hardn~ss, in rock
14 excavating service, over a period ~of at least about 4, more preferably at
. least about $, and still more preferably .at least about 1 fi and most
16 preferably at least about 40, hours of operation. In some instanc~a, where
17 a particular projection of very hard metal tends to be quite brittle, a
18 workable tooth may be manufactured by using metallic stock having less
19 hardness.
Suitable metals are available, including for example USS (~Inited States
21 Steel) AR 225, AR 350; AR 400 and AR 500, tJSS T~1 and USS T-1, types
22 A, Band C, and USS Ni-~r~Mo; Lukens Hardwear (tm) 235, 400, 425 and
23 500; Bethlehem AR 235, RQC, RQAR, RCA, RQB and RQ; Astra(lay-V;
24 and Oliver !=ormable 400 and Ultra-Tuff plate: Particularly preferred are
plates identified as Hardox 4Q0 and especially Hardox 504, respectively
25 having the following reported properties:
Page 12

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 Hardox 400 Hardox 500
2 (about) (about) '
3 BHN hardness 360-440 450-580
4 yield strength 145 ksi 190 ksi .
tensile strength 180 ksi 225 ksi
6 elongation (A5) '! 0Id 8/a
7 impact properties
8 (Charpy V, longl-
9 tudinal specimen) 18 ft.~ ibs. (at 18 ft. Ibs. (at
-40F) +14F)
Materials of higher hardness levels may be used.
l 1 The above illustrative metals are believed sufficient in fracture
resistanc~,
12 temper resistance and other 'properties enumerated above to be useful in
13 making projections for use in the present invention. However, it is
believed
14 that a inride variety of other suitable metals is available and that
persons
skilled in metallurgy can a~dust metals composition and heat treatments
16 applied to such~other metals to achieve desired levels of weidability and
17 durability to produce acceptable projections. For~further guidance on
18 effecting desired levels of hardness, fracture resistance, temper resitance
19 and otherb~neficial properties in projections, see U.S. Patents 5,528,187
and 5,595,614 and other patents identified therein, the disciasures of alf
21 such patents being incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
22 Projections of any acceptable thickness can be employed, far example
23 about 1I2 to about 3 inches, frequently about 3I4 to about 2 and 114
inches,
24 and in many instances about 1 to about~1 and'/z inches, most preferably
Z5 about 1 and 1l4 inches for the applications. with which the most experience
2G has been acquired.
27 As the tips of projections are brought to bear on rock, sufficient force
must
28 ~ be applied in order to penetrate the rock: Otherwise, the tips will only
rub
29 across the surface and no fracturing or "digging" will occur. More powerful
~quipment is able to supply more force per unit of tip area; which of course,
Page 13

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 all other things remaining equal, is a function of thickness. Thus, in teeth
2 for use on more powerful equipment, thicker metallic stock may be used in
3 making the projections, and longer wear would be expected from thicker
4 projections. However, the tips of narrower projections made from thinner
metallic stock would be expected to enable a given piece of equipment to
G exert mare force-per unit area oil the~rcck strata, and thus penetrate the
7 strata more easily. Accordingly, it is beneficial to select projection
8 thickness with the goal of effecting a balance between service life and ease
9 of penetration. For applications in which ripping arms bearing one or two
1 Q teeth comprising a total of two to four projections made from plate stock
are
11 employed on a large power shovel, such as a Gaterpiilar 385, a plate
12 thickness of about 1.25 inches is presently considered optimum. It should
13 be noted that it can be necessary or desirable to adjust characteristics
14 other than projection thickness vVhen preparing teeth far more and less
powerful excavating machines.
18 Monolithic projections are preferred. A monolithic projection is composed
17 substantially of a single thickness of a given portion of metallic stock.
18 The projections have "major surfaces". Iri the case of projections formed
19 from plate stock, the major surfaces are thane portions of the projections
that, if not surface-modified after cutting from the pfate,~ were otiginaliy
part
21 of the largest surfaces of the plate stock, i.e., the top and bottom
surfaces
22~ as distinguished from the edges; and it is for this reason that they are
23 r~fer~ed to as "major" surtaces. In the projections, these major surfaces
are
24 usually and preferably, but hot necess~riiy; of larger area than any of the
other surfaces, i.e., than the peripheral edges, of the projections. In the
26 case of projections cut from bar stack that has approximately planar '
27 surfaces vn opposite sides thereof that are approximately parallel, and
28 preferably also in the ease of protections cut from plate, the major
surfaces
29 are preferably those that are approximately parallel ~to the digging
direction
of the tooth. Approximately planar, as applied to bar stock, means~at feast
31 nearly flat (i.e. essentially fat ar, if its surface is arcuate, having a
radius of
32 at least 10, preferably at least 15 and more preferably at least 20 times
its
33 width) throughout at least 80, preferably at least 90 and more preferably
at
34 least 95 percent of its width. Approximately parallel, as applied to
opposed
Page 14

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 surfaces of a bar, means nearly parallel, i.e., with an angle of up to 20,
2 more preferably less than 10, still rr~ore preferably less than 5 and most
3 preferably sera degrees between those surrtaces. Approximately parallel,
4 as applied to the relationship between a digging direction and a surface of
a
projection, means that surtace is more nearly parallel than perpendicular to
6 that direction, more preferably at an angle to one another that is up to
7 about 35 degrees, more preferably up to about 25 degrees, still more
8 preferably up to about 15 degrees and most preferably about 9 degrees nr
9 less, including zero degrees.
1 g Preferably, in the f nished tooth, the abrasion resistance of each
projection
11 intermediate its major surfaces is at least a major fraction of its
abrasion
1 Z resistance at its major surfaces; ,preferably, the hardness of the
projections
13 intermediate their major surfaces is at least about 60, about '~0, about
80,
14 or above 90, percent of its major surface hardness: w
Qne or more cut edges are present on projections cut from plate. Two or
16 mare edges may be cut from plate stock. However, one or more edges
17 may correspond to the edge of a plate and thus will not be cut from the
18 plate. Plate stock is preferably' cut by an automatically guided gas jet
19 cutter. For many of the available types of plates, their manufacturers
recommend pre-heating prior to cutting and give specific recommendations
21 as to temperature limits. These should be considered.
22 Projection edges may be of straight, curved, saw-tooth, stepped or other
23 configuration(s), and the comers of the projections may be rounded, ' '
24 chamfered, or not. Preferably, there will be at least two edges having
~5 portions that converge to a tip. Convergence may be along straight, curved
2f or other farms of axes to provide dagger shape, "hook" shape or any other
27 suitable shape. Moreover, the convergence may be symmetrical or non-
28 symmetrical, of uniform or non-uniform slope relative to the axislaxes and
29 continuous or non-continuous. Where a projection is formed from bar
stock, e.g. square bar stock, all of the convergence may be in portions of
31 the edges closely adjacent the tip. ~tanges of exemplary included angles of
32 convergence between edges, e.g., throughout their length or only as the
33 edg~s approach the tip, include about 10 to about 35 degrees, preferably
Pag~ 15

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 about 15 to about 30 degrees, more preferably about 17 to about 25
2 degrees, and stilt more preferably about 212 degrees. It is currently
3 considered optimumlbest for fracturing hard rock under heavy force to have
4 the edges converge at about 21-11411 degrees. One or both of the
convergent edges n'1ay be chamfered, but these are preferably .not
6 chamfered.
7 As to the nature of the ti.p, it may ba a sharp point if desired, but this
Is not
8 necessary. While the tip may be squared off, a rounded tip is preferred.
9 The tip may be cut as a segment of a circle with a radius of, e.g., about
0.1
14 to about 1 inch, preferably about 0.2 to about 0.7 inch, more preferably
11 about 0.2 to about 0.4 inch and most preferably about 0.3 inch.
12 For an excavating machine capable of exerting a given force, larger and
13 smaller tip'radii respectively, ail other factors remaining equal, r~suit
in the
14 application of lass and more fracturing force per unit area to~rock
strat2i.
Thus, in selecting tip radii when designing teeth according to the invention,
i 5 persons skilled in the art may wish ~ta consider short radii for Less
powerful
17 equipment and vice versa. While having a proper tip radius can be
18 ~ important when a tooth is first placed in service, it should be
understand
9 9 that such radius is likely to change or~wear to a diffErent shape as the
tooth
wears.
21 , . - '
22 The shape of ether edges and comers of~the projections may be varied
23 widely as desired, e.g., may be straight, curved andlor of other suitable
z4 shapes.
Tooth length may also vary widely as appropriate for digging and for
2fi providing enaugh'avedap of projection and core to allow fonnatiort of
welds
27 of the requisite strength between them. ~ '
28 ~ While the number of projections may be at feast one~per tooth, preferably
29 two projections per tooth are preferred. There may be more than two
projections per tooth. Where there are plural projections, it is pr~ferred
that
31 there be divergence of one or more of these projections, for example
32 divergence of the outer surface of a projection from a central axis of th~
Page 16

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 tooth or divergence of the outer surface ,of a projection from the outer
2 surface of another projection.
3 When divergence is present, for example, in at least one projection of a
4 tooth employed in trenching, moderate divergence assists the operator,
,when desired, in keeping the side of the trench vertical and in squaring off
6 an Intersection between a side and the bottom of the trench. Where
7 vertical side walls and squared-off side-wall to bottom-wall intersections
are
8 not required or may be achieved in another way, at least one, e.g., all, of
9 plural projections) in a tooth maybe mounted with one or both of itsltheir
major faces) parallel to or convergent with the tooth axis. Where there is
11 divergence, It may for example be about 1 to about 15, preferably about 6
12 to about 12, more preferably about 8 to about 10 and most preferably about
13 9, degrees from the tooth axis. Where the angle of divergence is .
14 expressed as the angle between major surfaces of two projections, the
above r~naxima and minima of the above ranges are doubled. 'there c,~n be
1~ an advantage in limitirig the amount of divergence to no more than.~is
1 ~ needed to~ facilitate "squaring off";- in some tooth designs, ~ careful
control
18 over the divergence angle will contribute to the strength of the tooth.
19 Providing divergence of orie or more projections from the core axis; when
such is provided, can be facilitated by securing a projection to ~a core side
21 which, overall, is generally divergent from the core axis at the projection
22 angle of divergence. Alternatively, one may secure a projection to a "land"
23 representing a portion of the side of a core, the land being angled frann
the
24 core central axis at the projection angle of divergence. Where a projection
is not secured in the above manner, e.g., where the core has paraliel sides,
26 one or more shims may be placed between the inner surface of the
27 projection and the adjacent surface of the core to orient the projection at
28 the desired angle during fabrlcation,.e.g., during welding.
S9 In securing projections to cores, portions of projections may be secured in
slots or grooves formed in cores or to longitudinal surfaces) of cores,
31 which is preferred, or in any other ~niay. A pair of projections is
preferably
32 secured to opposite sides of a core; However, one may also secure a first
33 projection in a central groove at the front end of core, and secure eecond
Page.17

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 and third projections to opposite sides of core. When at least one
2 projection is secured to at (east one longitudinal surface ~of~the core,
which
3 is preferred, such projections) may and preferably do extend along at least
4 a portion of the at least one longitudinal surface and 'a portion of said at
least one projection extends past the front end of the core with the tip and
G at least a portion of the~converging edges projecting 'beyond the front end
7 of the core. . '
8 Although other securing methods may be employed, welding is preferred.
9 One may $mploy any suitable welding techniques, which may include
cleaning, e.g., by wire wheel or other means, and preheating the core
i 1 andlor projection for any suitable time and temperature by any suitable
12 heating method under any suitable atmosphere, e.g., to 150-200 degrees
13 F. in air with a gas torch. One r~nay employ any suitable welding process,
14 flux, atmosphere, wirelrod type, temperature during'~welding, and any other
details that might be considered useful. SMAW and GM~W are examples
16 of suitable welding methods. In gerierai, far welding excavator tooth
17 prosections to.cores, it is considered good practice to farm welds between
18 the parts everywhere possible. Among the post~welding operationslsteps
19 to be considered are cool-down processing (time, temperature,
atmosph~re), quenching, wrapping the hot welded part in a welding blanket
21 to inhibit cracking of welds. Plate manufacturers' recommendations should
22 be considered.
23 A preferred welding procedure which has provided good results includes
24 cleaning the surfaces to be welded by wire wheel, locating th~
projection(s)
properly located on the core arid tack welding them in place. The location
2'fi of the plates is then checked. Now, 3132" diameter TT5 flux-core wire is
27 applied to the joint where projection meets core. A preferred covey gas of
28 100% COz is used with the T-7~5 wire, it is best to apply multiple passes
in
29 filling the joint. In addition, the temperature of the work-piece is held
at 600
degrees lr. or less. After the welding operation, the finished part is
31 immediately wrapped in an insulating blanket for several hours to allow for
32 slow cooling to ambient temperature, thus avoiding formation of cracks in
33 the weld areas and heat affected zone of the weld.
Page 18

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 Teeth according to the invention comprise part of a connector, called the
2 tooth connector portion, which is adapted to cooperate with another part of
3 a connector, called the excavator connector portion, located on an
4 excavator apparatus, as further described below, in this way, the tooth and
.5 excavator apparatus may be connected to one another in working
fi relationship. The tooth connector portion is located in or art the. core,
7 preferably at (in, on or near) the rear end of the core and more preferably
in
8 or on the rearmost surface of the core. , However, the tooth connector
9 portion may be located in or 0n other surtaces of the core, e.g., its top
l0 surface, where such exists, its bottom surface, where such exists, a
lateral
11 surface(s~, where such exists, or the front surface, where such exists.
l 2 The tooth connector portion, includ~s at I~ast one concave or convex
9 3 connector surface, which .may have circular configuration, may have any
14 other suttat~le configuration and may be tapered or not tapered, but
tapered
15 surfaces are preferred far most applications. ~ Viewed in transverse cross-
16 section, the connector'surface~ may for example appear at least partly
1 T circular, oval, triangular, square, rectanguiar,~ diairond-shaped,
polygonal,
18 of parallelogram shape, trapezoidal, a.modifcation of any of the foregoing
~19 or a composite shape (combinations of any of the above, e.g. generally
2~ square but with rounded corners).' The transverse cross-section iir~ay
21 appear uniform or var~iabie along most if not all of its length.
22 in longitudinal cross-section, the connector surface may be of any suitable
23 shape, whether uniform or variable along its length, including not tapered
or
24 tapered, the latter being preferred.
26 The connector surface of the tooth oohnactor portion is positioned and
27 adapted to engage with and nondestructively disengage from at least one
28 mating surface of an excavator apparatus,
29 Locking members may be provided to seGUre teeth to excavator apparatus.
~0 For examples of different locking members, both metaAic, partly metallic
31 and non-metallic, see U.S. Patents C,Q47,487; 5,937,550; 5,638,621;
32 5,617,655; 5,579,594; 4,891,893; 5,853,048; 5,526,593; fi,079,132 and
33 6,247,255, which are incorporated herein by reference. it is not necessary
Page 19

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 however that teeth according to the invention be held in fixed relation to
2 their adapters; for reciprocation of projections or teeth by air or
hydraulic
3 drives, see tJ.S. Patent 5,485, fi85.
4 For purposes of the present invention,' an excavator apparatus is any
excavating machine adapted to carry, in working position, one or more
6 teeth constructed according to the invention, .such as a mechanical or
7 hydraulic power shovel, backhoe,.trackhoe, .dragline or shaft drill. In
8 addition to such machines, excavator apparatus includes any digging
g attachment or combination of attachments adapted to be mounted on an
excavating machine and to carry, in working position, one or more teeth
11 constructed according to the invention, such as a blade, bucket, ripper
arm,
12 cutting chain, dredge cutterhead, quick-toolrconnectldisconnect attachment
13 ~ or any suitable form of tooth adapter used with ariy of the foregoing.
14 Excavator apparatus usually comprises, as included; or attached elements,
one or more excavator connector portions that have one or more concave
16 or convex surfaces adapted to mate,with and~form, in cooperation with one
T'i' or more tooth connector portions of the core; at least a portion of a
robust
18 connector for securing a tooth or teeth to the excavator apparatus with
19 sufficient strength to resist the loads imposed thereon in rock excavating
~ service. The mating surfaces) on the excavator connector portions and on
21 the tooth connector portions with which they .cooperate preferably
represent
22 a nearly exact match, so that one fits snugly within the other in order to
23 minimize relative movement of the surfaces after itlthey lslare securely
24 seated against or within, one another. However, these surfaces need not in
all circumstances be an exact matt for one another or be in interfacial
2fi contact over their entire confronting areas. They need only abut one
27 another over sufficient area to provide the required strength and load
28 resistance. ~. . ~ .
29 in preferred applications of the invention, a major surface of at least one
projection is maintained approximately perpendicular to an axis of an
31 excavator apparatus. Approximately perpendicular means more nearly
32 perpendicular to than parallel to an axis, which may for example be the
axis
33 of a pin or pivot, or an axis around which an ident~ied part such as a
ripper
Page 20

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 arm pivots, or may be an edge of a part such as a bucket or blade. if one
2 or more projections have~their major surfaces angled vertically andlor
3 horizontally (a.g., tilted andlor splayed) with respect to a plane that is
4 perpendicular to such an axis, such angles) will be selected to limit
resultant tearing forces oh welds andlor other connections between the
fi projections and their mountings (e.g., cores) as necessary to provide
7 commercially acceptable resistance to breakage of those connections and
8 of the projections themselves during operation, and morn preferably to
9 essentially prevent such breakage. Preferably, such angles) will be in the
range of up to about 35 degrees, yet more preferably up to about 25
11 degrees, and most preferably up to about 15 d~grees, including zero
12 degrees. About 9 degrees is considered best. If the major surtaces are not
13 planar, e.g., are of curved, corrugated or other cross-section, the angle
of
14 those surfaces relative to the axis may be judged on the basis of 'a sound
approximation, for example, in the case of corrugation, the angle could
1 G possibly be measured in reference to a plane irvhich includes the peaks,
of
17 the corrugations; or in the case of a curved,cross-sectlon, the ar~gie
could
18 possibly be measured in reference to a plane which includes the edges of
19 the curved cross-section,
Benefits can be realized from preferted embodiments of the invention
21 involving particular orientation of teeth relative to digging direction in
22 excavator apparatus. In these embodiments, the teeth comprise one or
23 more projections having a major surfacelsurfaces having a selected
24 orientation relative one or more planes that islets transverse to the
excavator digging axis (e.g., the axis of rotation of sin excav$tor~2~rm
28 relative to the excavator boom). Preferably, one or mare projections
isla~re
27 respectiv~ly in planes that are approximately perpendicular to the arm-
28 boom axis. Still more preferably, each tooth comprises at least two
29 projections that~are in planes which diverge from one another.at
progressively greater distances in the direction of their tips. Preferably
31 tooth connector portion and mating portion of the excavator apparatus are
32 sufficiently symmetrical to permit rotation of the tooth and projections
180
33 degrees, so that direction of digging by~~the projections can be reversed
and
34 ~ the wear on the projections can ~be equalized. ~ '
Page 21

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
DETAILED DESCRIPT1GN QF DRAWINGS
2 Figures 1-2
3 Figures 1 and 2 illustrate a particularly preferred embodiment'of an
4 excavator tooth according to the present invention, having a metallic core
S with first and second projections~3.and 4. Were this core of circular
6 transverse cross-section, which is an optional embodiment of the invention,
7 the core could have a single, cylindrical, longitudinal surface. Mowever, in
8 the present figures, the core has four tangitudinal surfaces, including top
5,
9 bottom 6, first side 7 and opposite side 8. Its ends include front end 9 and
rear end 10.
11 A connector portion 13~ is located at rear end 10 of the core and more
12 preferably in the rearmost surface of the core. Connector portion 13
13 includes a concave connector surface 14, which may be of circular or other
14 configuration, positioned and adapted to engage with and non-destructively
disengage from at least one mating surface (not shown} of an excavator
18 apparatus (not shown}.
17 In the present disclosure and claims, wherever reference is t'nade to a
18 concave or convex connector 'surface, whether in or on a core, or in or on
19 an excavator apparatus, the singular farm of the word "surface" includes
the plural of this term. For example, connector surface 14, corresponding
21 in shape with a truncated pyramid, comprises tsve surfaces, inciuding those
22 of.four convergent inner walls 1 S and of end wall 1 ~,
23 Core rear end 10 also includes rearwardly projecting ears 17 with apertures
24 18 in them to receive a locking pin (not shown}. These assist in
fixing..the
excavator tooth to any form of excavator apparatus, such as an adaptor
26 (not shown).
27 First projection 3 includes inner and outer major surfaces 20 and 21 while
28 . second projection 4 includes inner and outer major surtaces 22 and 23. In
29 this preferred embodiment, inner major surfaces 20 and 22 have an angle
of divergence 24 between them.
Page 22

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 Convergent cut ~dges 25 and 26 of each of these major surfaces, which
2 terminate in tip 27, define between them an angle of convergence 28. The
3 projection back edges 29 blend into edges 25 and 26 through short arcs 30.
4 Welds 31 join the back edges 29 and portions 33 of the projections to
portions 32 of the core. Portions 34 of the projections, not welded to the
G core, face one another and extend forward away from the core.
7 exemplary dimensions for the embodiment just described, which has been
8 found suitable for rock excavating service on power shovels, include an
9 overall length, from the backs of theears l7.ta the,tips 27 of projections 3
14 and 4 measuring 16 inches, a total projection length from back .edges 29 to
11 tips 27 of 9 inches, a convergence of projection cut edges 25 and 26 of
12 21.25 degrees, a radius for tips'27 of 0.3 inches, a radius of 0.5 inches
for
13 arcs 30, a maximum vertical spread of the projection cut edges 25 and 26,
14 near their back edges 29 of 3.fi7 inches, a separation of the projection
outer major surfaces 21 and 23 from one another, at their tips 27, of 10.75
~16 inches, an angle of divergence of 18 degrees between the inner major
17 surfaces 20 and 22 of the,projections and a projection thickness of 1.25
18 inches where the projections have been cut from commercially available
19 Hardox 500 plate stock.
Figure 3
21 This figure illustrates an excavator to 38 having a me'tafiic core 39 of
used
22 material, in this case a used cast tooth from which the remnants of the wom
,
23 digging points have been ground away. There are also first and second
24 projections 40 and 41, similar to those of the preceding embodiment.
Core 39 comprises four longitudinal surfaces, including a top surface 42, a
26 bottom surface {not shown), a first side 43 and an opposite side (not
27 shown). This core also has front end 44 and rear end 45. Rear end 45
28 comprises tooth connector portion 48 including a concave connector
29 surtace at 46, similar to that of the preceding embodiment, as well as ears
5a and locking pin apertures 51.
. . Page 23

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
Figure 4
2 In this embodiment, excavator tooth 55 has a first projection 56, in the
3 foreground of the view, and a second projection 57 in the background.
4 While the inner major surface of first projection 5G is not shown, its outer
major surface 58 is~ in the foreground of the view. A portion of the inner
6 major surface 59 of the second projection may be seen where a portion of
7 the first projection has been broken out in the view. The outer rna~jor
8 surface of the second projection is at the back of the part and thus it is
not
9 shown in this view.
The inner major surfaces of the projections may be parallel, convergent or
11 pref~rably divergent, as viewed from above. Each projection has a lower
12 convergent edge fi0, upper convergent edge 61, tap 62 and back edge 63.
13 Unlike. the previous embodiments, the core and tooth connector portions of
14 the present embodiment are fabricated rather than cast. They include an
upper inclined plate 67 and lower inclined piate 68 which are welded to and
16 extend laterally. between the inner major surfaces of projections 55 and
57.
17 Plates G7 and 68 are removed by a substantial distance' 6~9~frorn
prbjection
18 tips 62. These two plates comprise convergent inner surfaces 70 and 71,
18 representing a concave or female connector surtace, e.g., pocket 72.
Apertures 73, po$itioned in plates 67 and 68 intermediate the projection
21 inner surfaces, are provided far insertion of a locking pin, as discussed
22 below. ~ ...
23 In this figure, an excavator apparatus is represented by a portion Qf an
24 adaptor 74, It may for exarriple be located on a digging Implement ar on
any earth=working portion of an excavating machine. mere adaptor 74
26 includes a body 75 comprising a convex mating surface compatible with
27 pocket 72. Body 75 also includes a bore 77 which is in registry with
28 apertures 73 when the tooth is installed on excavator apparatus 74 and
29 held in place with the aid of locking pin 78.
Page 24

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
Figures 5-6
2 While.former embodiments disclose fixing projections to outer surfaces of
3 cores, one can construct useful excavator teeth in which one or more
4 projections are mounted within one or more portions of a care. Figures 5
and 6 illustrate this.
B This ~mbodiment includes forked core 82 comprising main body 83 with
T forwardly projecting first and second arms ~84 and 85, defining between
8 them a cavity 86. Here, a single projection 87 having cut edges 88, tip 89
9 and back edge 90, the latter being defined by two angled portions 91 and
92, is secured in cavity 86. Such securing is accomplished by welds 93
11 between the back 94 of the .cavity and the angled portions 91 'and 92 of
12 projection back edge.
13 Here, the~tooth connector port. ion is, for example, a male~member 99,
14 prei'erably of truncated pyramidal shape. It extends rearwardly from the
end 100 of core main body $3. The mating surface is a female member, for
16 , exampte~ a cavity 101 in an excavator apparatus 102, shown in phantom
17 outline in figure 6.
18 A locking member, for example bolt 103, passes through matching hales
19 104 and 105 in tooth connector portion 99 and excavator apparatus 102.
By engaging the tooth and a portion of the excavator apparatus; this bolt
21 provides security for the connection between the tooth connector portion
22 and its mating surface in the excavator apparatus:
23 Figures 7-9
24 F,.xcavator teeth according to the invention can be used in virtually any
kind
of digging implement, for example above ripping arms Illustrated in figures
2fi ~ 7-9. In figure 7, an excavator tooth 107 having projections 108 is
affixed to
27 a ripping arm 106 with the aid of locking, pin 109.
28 As shown in figure 8, a ripping arm, such as arm 106 of figure 7, may be
29 secured to a base plate 110, Webs 111 projecting from the rear of base
Page 25

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 plate 110 may be squipped with mounting pins 112 to engage with a quick
2 connect-disconnect appliance, by means of which this digging implement
3 may be installed on an excavating machine, such as a power shovel or
4 backhoe.
trigure 9 includes a base plate 110, webs 111 and mounting pins 112,
G similar to those of figure 8. However, here, two ripping arms 1136 are
7 ' secured to the base plate.
8 In figures 8 and 9, mounting pins 112 have axes 113. Major surfaces 114
9 of the projections 108 are approximately perpendicular to these axes.
f=igure 10
11 This figure illustrates another type of digging implement an which
excavator
12 teeth of the present inventiori'rriay be used. Here, the digging implement
is
13 a dredge cutter-head 117. It comprises central rotary shaft 118 having an
14 axes of rotation 119 which ~is perpendicular to the plane in which this
view is
drawn. Spiral vanes 120, extending from shaft 118 have inner ends 121
1 B and outer ends 122, support ring 123 being secured ~to the latter. A
plurality
17 of adapters 124 may be installed on ring 123 far mounting excavator teeth
18 . 125 with projections 12fi whose major surfaces 127 are approximately
19 perpendicular to axis 119.
Figures 11-12
21 Yet another type of digging implement in which the present invention is
22 useful is excavator buckets. As will be shown, such buckets may have
'23 rectilinear or non-rectilinear cutting edges.
24 Bucket 131 of figure 11 includes sides 132, a back 133 and a bottom 134,
having a substantially rectilinear cutting .edge' 135. Bdge 135 defines a
26 digging axis 136. Along this edge is distributed a series of adapters 137
on
27 which excavator teeth 138 according to the invention is mounted. Major
28 surtaces 139 of protrusions 140 in these teeth have their major surfaces
2g positioned approximately perpendicular to digging axis 13fi.
Page 2B

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 The bucket 143 in ftgure 12 compnses~ sides 144, a back 145 and a bottom
2 148, having across its front an at least parkly non-rectilinear cutting edge
3 147. Reference line 149, drawn through points at which the ends 148 of
4 edge 147 intersect with sides 144, represents the digging axis of the
bucket. Adapters 150, distributed across cutting edge 147, are provided for
6 mounting a series of excavator teeth 951 on the bucket. To reduce clutter
7 in the drawing, the teeth have been omitted from fiwo of the five adapters.
8 Each excavator tooth includes projections 152 having major surfaces 153
9 that are approximately perpendicular to digging axis 149.
Figure 13
11 Teeth fabricated according to the present invention can be utilised in a
wide
12 variety of excavating machines, one example of which is the rubber tired
13 backhoe machine illustrated schematically in figure 13. it includes body
14 157, and, at the front of the machine, a bucket 158, bucket arms 1 ~59 and
bucket pivot 160. Rotational axis 161 of this bucket is perpendicular to the
16 plane in which the figure is drawn and therefore is represented by a dot at
17 the center of the pivot. A series of excavator teeth 162, only one being
18 shown in this view, is distributed across the front edge of the bucket, for
19 example in a manner similar to that showin in figure 11 or 12, These teeth
have projections 183 with major surfaces 1fi4 approximately perpendicular
21 to axis 1 G1.
22 Towards the rear of the machine is a boom 1 g8 having a base pivot 169
23 upon which the boom may'~be raised,and lowered. Upper. pivot 170, having
24 . pivot axis 177, is a pivot point for excavator arm 171, which is.mounted
at
the upper end of the boom. At the lower end of the arm is an end pivot 172
26 on which a digging implement, for example pivoting rock ripping implement
27 173, is mounted. Hydraulic boom lift cylinder 174, arm pivoting cylinder
28 .175 and implement pivoting cylinder 176 are provided to raise and lower
29 the boom, and move the arm and ripping implement back and forth.
Excavator teeth according to the invention can also be used with backhoe
31 units equipped with means to allow the boom to swivel from side to sidd
32 around a vertical axis, but that feature has been omitted from the present
33 drawings to simplify them.
Page 27

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 At the center of end pivot 172 is a pivoting axis 181 about which ripping
2 implement 173 pivots when digging through rocky strata. Excavator teeth
3 178, made according to the present invention, have projections 179. Their
4 major surfaces 180 are approximately perpendicular to axes 177 and 181.
Figure 14
fi Excavator teeth according to the invention have demonstrated their
7 durability in service on the buckets of large power shovels, such as that
8 shown schematically in figure 14. Typical machines of this type move on
9 crawler tracks 185 and include a body 186, boom 187, boom base pivot
188, boom lift cylinder 189, arm 190, boom-arm pivot 191, arm pivoting
11 cylinder 192, implement 193, in this case a rock ripping arm, implement
12 pivot 194 and implement pivoting cylinder 195. Pivots 188, 191 and 194
13 include, respectively, pivoting axis 200 about which the boom swings up
14 and down, pivating~ axis 201 about inrhich the arm swings in and out and
pivoting axis 202 about which th~ implement swings back and forth.
16 Implement 193 is equipped with excavator teeth 203 according to the
17 invention. They include projections 204, the major surfaces 205 of which
18 are approximately perpendicular to axes 200, 201 and 202.
19 Figur~s' 15-16
Another example of many types of excavating machines on which the
21 excavator teeth of the present invention 'may be .used is draglines, an '~.
'
22 example of which is shown schematically in figures 15-1 t3. As is usual in
23 such equipment, this embodiment includes main boom 210 having base
24 pivot 211, overhead cable system 212 to suppork ~- and winch cable system
213 to draw - bucket 214, ail as shown in figure 15.
26 Base pivot 211 has a pivoting axis 215. As shown in greater detail in
figure
27 1 G, bucket 214 has excavator teeth according to the present invention with
28 projections 217, These projections have major surfaces at least some and
preferably all of which that era approximately perpendicular to axis 215:
Page 28

CA 02392643 2002-07-05
1 The present disclosure has discussed and illustrated a number, but
2 certainly not ail, of the different ways in which the present invention may
be
3 practiced: Accordingly, the following claims are intended to cover ail the
4 embodiments falling within their literal scope, whether specifically
disclose
herein or nat, and all equivalents thereof,
fi D~FiNITI4NS
T Excavate, excavating, excavation, excavator, digging, ripping and related
8 terms employed herein are intended to be construed broadly to include all
9 forms of earth moving whether they result in formation of a cavity in the
earth or not. For example, these tefms include not only trenching, dredging
11 and formation of other types of open cavities in the earth or in the
earthen;
12 including rocky, sub-soil of a body of water, but also~ripping, scraping,
13 stripping, grading, leveling and other forms of earth moving that disturb
14 earth, as distinguished from rnerely carrying It from one place to another.
In this context, earth.includes not only soil, but also frozen soil, grave!
and
1 fi layers at or below the earth's surface comprising mostly mineral matter
and
17 which may be essentially all .rock, and rt~ay include solid rock strata,
which .
18. represents a particularly useful application of the invention.
'! 9 What is claimed is:
Page 29

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2006-07-05
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2006-07-05
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-07-05
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2004-01-05
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-01-04
Inactive: Office letter 2003-08-26
Letter Sent 2003-08-12
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2003-07-21
Inactive: Single transfer 2003-07-03
Inactive: Filing certificate correction 2003-06-02
Request for Priority Received 2003-06-02
Inactive: IPC assigned 2002-10-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2002-10-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2002-10-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2002-10-07
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2002-10-07
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2002-08-27
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2002-08-22
Application Received - Regular National 2002-08-22

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-07-05

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-05-11

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 2002-07-05
Registration of a document 2003-07-03
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2004-07-05 2004-05-11
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
PENNSYLVANIA CRUSHER CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
WAYNE A. WAGNER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-12-11 1 7
Description 2002-07-04 29 1,751
Abstract 2002-07-04 1 16
Claims 2002-07-04 7 353
Drawings 2002-07-04 7 194
Filing Certificate (English) 2002-08-21 1 162
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2003-07-07 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-08-11 1 106
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-03-07 1 109
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2005-08-29 1 173
Correspondence 2002-08-21 1 34
Correspondence 2003-06-01 2 68
Correspondence 2003-08-19 1 14