Language selection

Search

Patent 2397524 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2397524
(54) English Title: POROUS AGGLOMERATES CONTAINING IRON AND AT LEAST ONE FURTHER ELEMENT FROM GROUPS 5 OR 6 OF THE PERIODIC TABLE FOR USE AS AN ALLOYING AGENT
(54) French Title: AGGLOMERATS POREUX CONTENANT DU FER ET AU MOINS UN AUTRE ELEMENT DES GROUPES 5 OU 6 DE LA CLASSIFICATION PERIODIQUE DES ELEMENTS, A UTILISER COMME ELEMENT D'ALLIAGE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C21C 7/00 (2006.01)
  • B22F 9/20 (2006.01)
  • C21C 5/52 (2006.01)
  • C22B 1/24 (2006.01)
  • C22C 33/02 (2006.01)
  • C22C 35/00 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/04 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/12 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/22 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/24 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/44 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LEITNER, JURGEN (Austria)
(73) Owners :
  • TREIBACHER INDUSTRIE AG
(71) Applicants :
  • TREIBACHER INDUSTRIE AG (Austria)
(74) Agent: MARKS & CLERK
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2000-07-17
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-08-09
Examination requested: 2003-02-07
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/AT2000/000197
(87) International Publication Number: AT2000000197
(85) National Entry: 2002-07-16

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
A 179/2000 (Austria) 2000-02-04

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to agglomerates containing iron and at least one other
element from groups 5 or 6 of the periodic table, in particular, molybdenum or
tungsten. The invention is characterised in that said agglomerates have a
porosity in the range from 20 to 65 vol %, in particular, from 30 to 45 vol %.
A rapid dissolution in a metal melt is thus achieved. According to the
invention, the agglomerates, in particular, contain molybdenum as the further
element, preferably in an amount in the range of 60 to 80 wt. %. The particle
density of said agglomerates is preferably 4.2 to 6.3 g/cm3. Said agglomerates
are produced by reduction of a mixture of iron oxide and molybdenum, whereby
the reduced metal is formed into briquettes without the addition of any
binders and the Fe-Mo product in briquette form is then sintered.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des agglomérats contenant du fer et au moins un autre élément des groupes 5 ou 6 de la classification périodique des éléments, en particulier du molybdène ou du tungstène. Ces agglomérats se caractérisent en ce qu'ils présentent une porosité comprise dans la plage 20 à 65 % en volume, en particulier 30 à 45 % en volume. Grâce à cette porosité, les agglomérats se dissolvent rapidement dans du métal en fusion. Les agglomérats selon l'invention contiennent, comme autre élément, en particulier du molybdène en une proportion qui est de préférence de 60 à 80 % en poids. La masse volumique de ces agglomérats est de préférence de 4,2 à 6,3 g/cm?3¿. Ces agglomérats sont produits par réduction d'un mélange constitué d'oxyde de fer et de molybdène, les métaux étant, après la réduction, briquetés sans addition de liants, et les produits de Fe Mo briquetés étant frittés.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


12
Claims
1. Agglomerates containing iron and at least one further element of groups 5
or 6 of the
periodic system, characterized in that they have a porosity in the range of 20
to 65% by
volume, in particular of 30 to 45% by volume.
2. Agglomerates according to claim 1, characterized in that they contain as
further
element molybdenum in an amount of 45 to 85% by weight, preferably of 60 to
80% by
weight.
3. Agglomerates according to claim 2, characterized in that their lump density
is 4.2 to
6.3 g/cm3, preferably 4.5 to 5.7 g/cm3.
4. Agglomerates according to claim 1, characterized in that they contain as
further
element tungsten in an amount of 60 to 90% by weight, preferably of 70 to 85%
by weight.
5. Agglomerates according to claim 4, characterized in that their lump density
is 4.7 to
8.4 g/cm3, preferably 5.8 to 7.4 g/cm3.
6. Use of agglomerates according to one of claims 1 to 5 as alloying agents
for
producing alloyed metal melts, in particular molybdenum-alloyed and/or
tungsten-alloyed
metal melts.
7. A process for producing agglomerates according to one of claims 1 to 5,
wherein iron
oxide and an oxide of at least one further element of groups 5 or b of the
periodic system are
reduced to the respective metals, characterized in that the reduced metals are
compacted,
especially briquetted, without adding any binding agents and in that the
thereby formed
compacted products are sintered.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02397524 2002-07-16
Ag;~lomerates containing iron and at least one further element of groups 5 or
6 of the
periodic s, s
The present invention relates to agglomerates containing iron and at least one
further
element of groups 5 or 6 of the periodic system, their use, and a method for
producing them.
As further element, one may in particular consider molybdenum and tungsten.
From DE-A - 196 22 097 agglomerates are known which are formed of an
iron/molybdenum
alloy having 60 to 80% by weight of molybdenum and are used as alloying agents
for metal
melts containing iron and molybdenum.
Molybdenum is used f.i. as an alloying element for producing high-strength
structural steels
containing molybdenum, alloyed cast iron types as well as molybdenum-
containing, rust-
resisting, acid-resisting and heat-resisting steels and nickel base alloys.
When producing molybdenum-containing alloys, steels and cast iron types, for
economic
reasons the greater part of the necessary molybdenum alloying contribution is
added to the
melt either in the form of revert scrap containing molybdenum or in the form
of briquetted
molybdenum trioxide (Mo03).
Adding molybdenum in an oxidic form is possible because in liquid steel the
iron acts as a
reducing agent and thus, the Mo03 is transformed into metallic molybdenum.
However, this
way of adding molybdenum is difficult in terms of manipulation. Attention has
to be paid to
a deep penetration of the Mo03 into the melt, given that at the temperatures
of the liquid
steel Mo03 vaporizes very easily and/or is set in the slag, whereby
insufficient immersion of
the Mo03 may cause great losses in yield.
In the course of a so-called secondary metallurgical aftertreatment, finishing
the smelting of
the above steels, for reducing the detrimental gas contents (oxygen,
nitrogen), for the exact
setting of the desired casting temperature and the final analysis of the
steel, the fine setting
of the molybdenum content is therefore effected with lumpy so-called
ferromolybdenum.
Ferromolybdenum is an iron/molybdenum alloy usually having 60-80% by weight of
molybdenum and produced by way of a metallothermal process. The metallothermal
production according to the thermite burning process is complex, given that
the metals iron
and molybdenum have to be melted on and together. The use of expensive
reducing agents
such as aluminium or ferrosilicon is required. The process may be automated
only to a

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
2
limited extent. This results in a higher market price of the ferromolybdenum
as compared to
the molybdenum trioxide (Mo03).
A disadvantage of ferromolybdenum produced according to the thermite process
is the
relatively high lump density (f.i. about 8.8 g/cm3 in standard FeMo70),
resulting in that when
alloying f.i. steel melts (density about 7.5 g/cm3), the material sinks to the
bottom of the
melting vessel where it forms depositions difficult to dissolve which only
come off in the
subsequent melts. Dissolving such ferromolybdenum lumps in the liquid steel
bath is
additionally made more difficult by the high melting point of the material,
which in the case
of a usual commercial FeMo70 quality is about 1950°C. The temperatures
in the steel bath
are significantly below this level so that now the dissolution of the FeMo
parts can only be
effected by way of diffusion processes which, accordingly, require long
periods of time.
The dissolution of ferromolybdenum produced according to the thermite process
is basically
carned out according to the following mechanism:
The alloy lumps immerging into the liquid melt sink to the bottom of the
treater. This is
caused by the high density of the parts, which is higher than that of the
liquid steel. An outer
layer of solidified steel forms on the lumps, which layer results from the
quench effect of the
immerged cold FeMo lump. Due to the heat transition from the melt to the alloy
lump, the
outer layer subsequently gets dissolved again. However, given that the melting
point of the
alloy lumps is above the temperature of the liquid steel bath, the alloy lumps
can only
dissolve by diffusion of iron from the steel bath into the boundary layer of
the melt and the
alloy lump and by the reduction of the melting point associated therewith.
According to the above DE-A-196 22 097, agglomerates are produced from an
iron/molybdenum blend by briquetting, wherein the iron/molybdenum blend is
obtained by
reducing a fine-grained molybdenum-trioxide/iron-oxide blend with hydrogen-
containing
gas. Briquetting is carried out by adding a binding agent such as water glass
in order to
improve the grain binding. Agglomerates having a lump density higher than 3.5
g/cm3 are
formed therein.
Disadvantages of this process are on the one hand the use of binding agents
which introduce
detrimental tramp elements such as silicon, sulfur, and hydrogen into the
steel, and on the
other hand the poor lump densities and resistances of the material which are
available with
this method and which lead to great losses of molybdenum to the slag.

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
3
US-A - 5,954,857 describes the production of briquets consisting of molybdenum
oxide with
NaOH as binding agent. When introducing these briquets into liquid steel
melts, the
molybdenum oxide is reduced to the metallic molybdenum by the liquid iron,
wherein iron
oxide is formed. Disadvantages of this process are the danger of losing
molybdenum oxide
by absorption in the slag which is on the surface of the liquid steel, and the
losses of iron
occurring in the reduction of the molybdenum oxide.
From US-A - 4,400,207 a method for producing metal alloys is known according
to which
molybdenum oxide, f.i., is mixed with a fine ferrosilicon powder in the
stoichiometric ratio.
As a binding agent, up to 5% bentonite are admixed, and the mixture then is
briquetted.
When introducing these briquets into steel melts, the contained ferrosilicon
acts as a
reducing agent for the molybdenum oxide which passes over to the steel melt in
a metallic
form.
A disadvantage thereof is the formation of silicon oxide as a reaction product
which has to
be set in the slag, which in the steel-making processes used today is only
possible when
taking additional measures.
The invention has as its object to provide agglomerates containing iron and at
least one
further element of groups S or 6 of the periodic system and having an improved
dissolubility
in metal melts, in order to keep the costs of treating the melt low. In
particular, the
agglomerates should not sink to the bottom of a metal melt and should have,
furthermore, a
sufficient resistance in view of storage and transport. Moreover, the quality
of the metal melt
should not be prejudiced by tramp elements being in the agglomerate and acting
as binding
agents, f.i., and a loss of molybdenum and iron should be avoided.
According to the invention, this object is achieved insofar as the
agglomerates have a
porosity in the range of 20 to 65% by volume, particularly of 30 to 45% by
volume.
The agglomerates according to the invention have a porosity and, by that, a
lump density
which on the one hand allows the penetration of a slag cover on a metal melt
and allows the
agglomerates to penetrate into the metal melt. On the other hand, the
inventive porosity of
the agglomerates results in that capillary action fills the pores of the
agglomerates with metal
melt and in that the thereby occurring enlargement of the boundary surface
between the
metal melt and the agglomerate rapidly dissolves the regions filled with metal
melt. Here,
dissolving means the melting of the agglomerates and the homogeneous
distribution of the
components of the agglomerates in the metal melt.

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
4
The dissolution process of the inventive agglomerates in a metal melt can be
described as
follows:
After penetration of the agglomerates through the slag cover on the melting
bath and
immersion into the melt, a boundary layer of solidified steel forms on the
surface of the
agglomerates, which steel results from the quench effect of the cold
agglomerates. This
boundary layer is much thinner than the layer that forms when using ferro-
alloys produced
with the thermite process, given that the thermal capacity of the agglomerates
is lower due to
high porosity.
Even though the density of the agglomerates is lower than that of the liquid
steel, they
immerge deep into the melt because of the kinetic energy of the parts which
have to cover a
corresponding height of fall before impinging on the steel bath.
After dissolution of the outer zone, the liquid steel penetrates into the
pores of the
agglomerates. The thereby produced large boundary surface between the
agglomerate and
the melt leads to a rapid warming and diffusion of iron in this boundary
layer, which
eventually causes the dissolution of the agglomerates. In addition, the gas
included in the
pores of the agglomerates expands because of the rapid warming and enters into
the metal
melt. The thereby generated turbulent flow on the surface of the agglomerates
causes the
rapid reduction of the existing concentration gradients on alloying agents
between the
boundary surface and the melt, which leads to an increase in the diffusion
rate that depends,
according to Fick's law, on the concentration gradients.
A high dissolution rate means the saving of time and costs in the production
of alloyed metal
melts.
According to a preferred embodiment, the inventive agglomerates contain as
further element
molybdenum in an amount of 45 to 85% by weight, preferably of 60 to 80% by
weight. The
lump density of these agglomerates is preferably 4.2 to 6.3 g/cm3,
particularly preferred 4.5
to S .7 g/cm3.
According to another preferred embodiment, the agglomerates contain as further
element
tungsten in an amount of 60 to 90% by weight, preferably of 70 to 85% by
weight. Their
lump density is preferably 4.7 to 8.4 g/cm3, particularly preferred 5.8 to 7.4
g/cm3.

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
The present invention also relates to the use of the agglomerates for
producing alloyed metal
melts, especially molybdenum-alloyed and/or tungsten-alloyed metal melts.
The invention further relates to a process for producing the agglomerates,
wherein iron oxide
and oxides of at least one further element of groups 5 or 6 of the periodic
system are reduced
to the respective metals.
US-A - 3,865,573 relates to a process for producing molybdenum powder and/or
ferromolybdenum, wherein molybdenum oxide and/or a blend of molybdenum oxide
and
iron oxide are reduced in a two-stage fluidized-bed process.
US-A - 4,045,216 describes a process for producing directly reduced molybdenum-
oxide
pellets, based on the two-stage reduction of molybdenum-oxide pellets in an
hydrogen-
containing atmosphere. As reduction aggregate, a shaft furnace is used which
is traversed in
counterflow by the product and the reducing gas. In this process, pellets
having a very low
density and abrasion resistance are produced.
The process according to the invention is characterized in that the reduced
metals are
compacted, especially briquetted, without adding any binding agents and in
that the thereby
formed compacted products are sintered.
Sintering is effected preferably at temperatures from 1000 to 1400°C,
in air or preferably in
an inert-gas atmosphere, for 15 to 60 minutes. At the inventive sintering
temperatures,
mainly the iron contained in the agglomerates acts as sinter-active phase and
as a binder for
the particles contained in the agglomerates. Thereby the agglomerates are
prevented from
becoming too dense during the sintering process, which would have a negative
effect on
their dissolution in metal melts.
In the following, the invention will be explained in more detail by means of
three exemplary
embodiments and Figs. 1-6.
Example 1
A powder mixture consisting of 74% molybdenum, 21% iron and 5% oxidic
contaminations
such as silica, aluminium oxide and calcium oxide and produced by reducing a
mixture of
oxides of technical purity of both metals in an hydrogen atmosphere was
compacted to
agglomerates having a diameter of 60 mm and a height of 40 mm in a compacting
press.

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
6
These pressed parts were sintered for different periods of time in a
laboratory sintering
furnace in a nitrogen atmosphere at 1170°C. After having cooled the
parts and withdrawn
them from the sintering furnace, samples were taken from the parts, and the
porosity was
measured.
Table 1 below shows the porosities of FeMo agglomerates as a function of the
sintering
period and the resulting lump density. Here, the porosity was measured with an
Hg
porosimeter. By comparison, the density and porosity of a conventional FeMo
agglomerate
is indicated (Comparative Example).
Table 1
Sintering periodDensity [g/cm3] Porosity
at
1170C
Sam 1e 1 15 4,15 42,4
Sam 1e 2 25 4,3 39,7
Sam 1e 3 45 5,48 23,1
Sam 1e 4 60 6,0 -
Com arative Exam 8,0 0
1e
Fig. 1 shows the pore size distribution of FeMo agglomerates produced with the
process
according to the invention. The particle size of the agglomerates was in a
range of 2 to 4
mm. The measurements were taken by means of an Hg porosimeter at an Hg column
pressure of 200 mm.
The curve numbered 1 represents the pore size distribution of the FeMo
agglomerates
referred to as sample 1 in the above table after sintering at 1170°C.
The molybdenum
content of these agglomerates was 74%. The curve numbered 2 represents the
pore size
distribution of the FeMo agglomerates according to sample 2. Finally, the
curve numbered 3
represents the pore size distribution of the agglomerates according to sample
3. It can be
seen from this that the mere choice of different sintering parameters
(temperature and period
of time) makes it possible to vary the number of the pores and the
distribution of the pore
size within a wide range.

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
7
Agglomerates produced according to the inventive method and corresponding to
the material
referred to as sample 1 in table 1 were dissolved in a steel melt in a
laboratory electric-arc
furnace (see Example 2).
Fig. 2 shows, in an exemplary manner, the dissolution rate of an inventive
FeMo
agglomerate as compared to standard FeMo (produced by way of a silicothermal
process).
The curves were recorded when smelting a high-speed-steel quality (S-6-5-2,
1.3343) with a
molybdenum content of 5%. The composition of the steel produced in the
experiment is
indicated in table 2 below.
Table 2
S-6-5-2, % b wei ht
1.3343
C 0,9
Cr 4,1
Mo 5
V 1,8
W 6,4
Fe ~ rest
Data specification of the experimental electric-arc furnace:
Electrical data: 3-phase; power max. 200 kw
voltages: 52 / 63,5 / 75 / 86,5 / 90 / 110 / 120 / 150 v
Electrodes: graphite Q~ 100 mm, automatic control
Furnace crucibles: infeed with magnesite, with a casting nose
effective volume about 1001
The size of the experimental melt was 300 kg. The melt was used in a three-
phase electric-
arc furnace as a set-up charge, that is, the steel composition was set to a
pure-iron melt by
adding ferro-alloys in a corresponding amount. As a first step, all of the
alloying elements
except Mo were added and set according to the target analysis. For protection
against
reoxidation, the steel bath was covered with a calcium aluminate slag.
In a first experimental melt, the molybdenum content was set by adding
ferromolybdenum
having a grain size of 5-50 mm and produced according to the thermite process.
After having
added the FeMo, samples were taken from the melt at short intervals. A second
melt was

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
g
produced in the same way except that here, the inventive agglomerates were
used to set the
molybdenum content. It could be seen that the inventive agglomerates
(represented in Fig. 2
by the broken line) dissolved much faster than standard FeMo (represented in
Fig. 2 by the
unbroken line).
The significant advantage of the agglomerates according to the invention is
that they
dissolve faster in steel melts than standard FeMo, which results in the saving
of time and, by
that, costs for the user.
Example 2
In a large-scale application experiment, the dissolution behaviour of the
inventive
agglomerates was compared with that of usual commercial ferromolybdenum
produced
according to the thermite process.
Agglomerates produced with the inventive method and corresponding to the
material
referred to as sample 1 in table 1 were dissolved in a steel melt in a steel
ladle having a
charge weight of about 190 t, and the dissolution rate was compared to that of
ferromolybdenum produced according to the thermite process. Table 4 indicates
the
composition of the produced steel.
Table 4
Element % b wei t
C <0,2
Si 0,1
Mn 1,2
Cr 0,25
V 0,02
Mo - _ ~0'S
During the experiments, the steel bath was protected against reoxidation by a
calcium
aluminate slag, and for better homogenization, the melt was washed with Ar by
means of a
fireproof lance introduced from above into the melt.

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
9
A total of six experiments was carned out, two charges of them with usual
commercial
ferromolybdenum having a grain size of 5-50 mm and four charges of them with
the
agglomerates according to the invention. The alloying agent was added via a
slide from a
bunker system. The samples were taken by means of an automated sublance system
at
intervals of about 20 s.
The experimental parameters are summed up in table 5.
Table 5
Charge Number 39999 40000 40300 40301 40324 40348
FeMo FeMo A 1. A I. A 1. A 1.
St. St. 1 2 3 4
LD converter
LD tapping time 11:24 12:16 12:46 13:35 11:16 09:34
Mo content % 0,064 0,074 0,012 0,066 0,075 0,087
in LD
Calc. weightt 190,8 184,2 192,8 182,7 192,8 189,9
LD
TN
Temp. arrivalC 1616 1627 1628 1604 1640 1627
FeMo additionkg 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
Mo content kg 681,7 681,7 724 703 743 743
Gas stirringmin 17 14 14 14 15 15
time
Gas flow Nl/min 925 922 763 765 900 922
de-S
Continuous
casting
plant
Start cont.time 13:28 14:31 15:07 16:09 14:00 15:48
casting
Charge weightt 191,1 I 81,7 191,7 183,1 190,1 192,3
Mo content % 0,493 0,622 0,481 0,497 0,629 0,49
1
Moyield % 98,6 94,1 96,1 99,9 95,8 95,6
1
Mo content % 0,488 0,637 0,482 0,501 0,625 0,492
2
Mo field % 97,4 96,7 96,3 100,8 95,1 96,1
2
As to Fig. 3, it can be seen that the inventive agglomerates dissolve much
faster, yielding
more molybdenum. From the curves relating to standard FeMo it can be seen that
even after
periods of treating the melt of about 10 min, less than 80% of the added
molybdenum has
dissolved in the melt. In practice, this means that such a melt has to be
heated up once again
in a pan furnace in order to obtain a commercial molybdenum yield, which,
however,
requires higher treatment costs.
Example 3

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
Agglomerates produced with the inventive method and corresponding to the
material
referred to as sample 1 in table 1 were dissolved in a steel melt in a steel
ladle having a
charge weight of about 90 t, and the dissolution rate was compared to that of
ferromolybdenum produced according to the thermite process.
Table 6 indicates the chemical composition of the produced steel.
Table 6
Elements % b wei t
C 0,02
Si 0,5
Mn 1,5
P <p,04
S <0,0055
Cr 17
Ni 11
Mo 2,0
Al <0,007
<0,03
Four charges of the steel, each having a melting weight of about 90 t, were
produced. In the
ladle washing station, FeMo produced according to the thermite process was
added to two
charges and the inventive agglomerates were added to two charges. The added
quantities can
be seen in table 7. After the addition, samples were taken from the melt at
regular intervals
so as to be able to examine the increase in molybdenum content.
Table 7
Experiment FeMo additionForm of FeMo
k
E 1 347 standard
E2 414 standard
E3 250 a lomerates
E4 350 a lomerates

CA 02397524 2002-07-16
11
Additionally, slag samples and samples from the cold rolled strip produced
from the steel
were taken during the experiments so as to be able to study a possible effect
on the degree of
purity of the produced steel, caused by the use of the inventive agglomerates.
Fig. 4 shows a comparison of the dissolution rates of the ferromolybdenum
produced
according to the thermite process vs. those of the inventive agglomerates. It
can be seen that
also in Example 3, the inventive agglomerates dissolve faster in steel than
the standard
FeMo.
The examinations of the degree of purity of the product produced did not show
any
significant changes caused by the use of the inventive agglomerates for
producing
molybdenum-alloyed steels.
Referring to exemplary applications in steel melts, Figs. 5 and 6 show further
examples of
the dissolution rates of inventive FeMo agglomerates as compared to standard
FeMo.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2397524 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2006-07-17
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2006-07-17
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-07-18
Letter Sent 2003-03-06
Letter Sent 2003-02-28
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2003-02-07
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2003-02-07
Request for Examination Received 2003-02-07
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-02-07
Inactive: Single transfer 2003-01-02
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2002-12-10
Inactive: Cover page published 2002-12-05
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2002-12-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2002-12-03
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2002-12-03
Application Received - PCT 2002-09-19
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-07-16
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2001-08-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2005-07-18

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2004-06-29

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2002-07-17 2002-07-16
Basic national fee - standard 2002-07-16
Registration of a document 2002-07-16
Request for examination - standard 2003-02-07
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2003-07-17 2003-05-27
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2004-07-19 2004-06-29
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TREIBACHER INDUSTRIE AG
Past Owners on Record
JURGEN LEITNER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2002-12-04 1 39
Description 2003-02-06 12 543
Claims 2003-02-06 1 36
Description 2002-07-15 11 527
Drawings 2002-07-15 6 140
Abstract 2002-07-15 1 13
Claims 2002-07-15 1 36
Notice of National Entry 2002-12-02 1 189
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-03-05 1 185
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-02-27 1 130
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2005-09-11 1 173
PCT 2002-07-15 11 472
Correspondence 2002-12-02 1 26
Fees 2003-05-26 1 49
PCT 2002-07-16 4 174
Fees 2004-06-28 1 48