Language selection

Search

Patent 2402514 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2402514
(54) English Title: REFINER FORCE SENSOR
(54) French Title: CAPTEUR DE FORCE POUR RAFFINEUR
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01L 05/00 (2006.01)
  • D21D 01/00 (2006.01)
  • D21D 01/30 (2006.01)
  • G01L 01/16 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BANKES, ALAN HENRY (Canada)
  • WILD, PETER MARTIN (Canada)
  • OUELLET, DANIEL (Canada)
  • SHIARI, BEHROUZ (Canada)
  • OLMSTEAD, MATTHEW ALLAN (Canada)
  • SENGER, JOHN JAA (Canada)
  • SIADAT, SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON
  • JOHN JAA SENGER
  • SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI SIADAT
  • FPINNOVATIONS
(71) Applicants :
  • QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON (Canada)
  • JOHN JAA SENGER (Canada)
  • SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI SIADAT (Canada)
  • FPINNOVATIONS (Canada)
(74) Agent: NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLP/S.E.N.C.R.L., S.R.L.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2007-10-23
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2001-03-15
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-09-20
Examination requested: 2002-09-12
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: 2402514/
(87) International Publication Number: CA2001000336
(85) National Entry: 2002-09-12

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2,300,737 (Canada) 2000-03-15
60/189,601 (United States of America) 2000-03-15

Abstracts

English Abstract


This invention relates to a refiner force sensor for refiners used in the pulp
and paper industry, to a refining apparatus,
and to a method of measuring force acting on a refiner bar in a refiner.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un capteur de force destiné à des raffineurs utilisés dans l'industrie des pâtes et papiers, un appareil de raffinage et un procédé de mesurage de la force agissant sur une barre de raffinage dans un raffineur.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-29-
CLAIMS:
1. A force sensor for measuring force acting on a first refiner bar of a
refiner
plate of a refiner for producing or processing wood pulp, said force sensor
comprising:
a sensor body having a sensor head; and
at least one sensor element in force transmission contact with the sensor
body;
wherein the force sensor has a first resonant frequency that is at least about
1.5 times a bar-passing frequency of the refiner;
wherein the at least one sensor element produces a signal indicative of the
magnitude of force acting on the first refiner bar.
2. The force sensor of claim 1, wherein the refiner plate comprises a refining
surface having refiner bars, and a non-refining surface opposed to the
refining
surface.
3. The force sensor of claim 1 or 2, wherein the sensor head is adapted to
replace a portion of the refiner bar.
4. The force sensor of claim 1 or 2, wherein the sensor head is adapted to
replace all of the refiner bar.
5. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the sensor body is of
the same material as the refiner bar.
6. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the sensor head has a
profile matching that of the refiner bar.
7. The force sensor of claim 2, wherein the sensor body is attached to the
refining surface of the refiner plate.
8. The force sensor of claim 2, wherein the sensor body is adapted to fit into
a
recess in the refining surface of the refiner plate.

-30-
9. The force sensor of claim 2, wherein the sensor body is attached to the non-
refining surface of the refining plate.
10. The force sensor of claim 2, wherein the sensor body is adapted to fit
into a
recess in the non-refining surface of the refining plate.
11. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein two or more sensor
elements are provided, and the sensor body floats on the sensor elements.
12. The force sensor of claim 11, wherein only link between the sensor body
and the refiner plate is through the sensor elements.
13. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 10, further comprising a
holder,
wherein two or more sensor elements are provided, and wherein the sensor body
floats on the sensor elements such that the only link between the sensor body
and
at least one of the refiner plate and the holder is through the sensor
elements.
14. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the at least one
sensor element is piezo-electric.
15. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the at least one
sensor element is piezo-ceramic.
16. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the measured force
is at least one force selected from shear force and normal force.
17. The force sensor of any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein the at least one
sensor element is adapted for connection to signal processing equipment.
18. A method of measuring force acting on a first refiner bar of a refiner
plate
in a refiner for producing or processing wood pulp, the method comprising:
providing a force sensor comprising a sensor body having a sensor head,
the sensor head adapted to replace all or a portion of the first refiner bar,
and at

-31-
least one sensor element in force transmission contact with the sensor body,
the
force sensor having a first resonant frequency that is at least about 1.5
times a bar-
passing frequency of the refiner;
refining wood particles or wood pulp in said refiner to produce wood pulp
or refined wood pulp, such that force is applied to the sensor head and a
signal
indicative of the force is developed at the at least one sensor element; and
evaluating the signal as a measure of the force applied to the first refiner
bar.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the refiner plate comprises a refining
surface having refiner bars, and a non-refining surface opposed to the
refining
surface.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the sensor body is attached to the
refining
surface of the refiner plate.
21. The method of claim 19, wherein the sensor body is attached to the non-
refining surface of the refiner plate.
22. The method of any one of claims 18 to 21, wherein two or more sensor
elements are provided, and the sensor body floats on the sensor elements.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the only link between the sensor body and
the refiner plate is through the sensor elements.
24. The method of any one of claims 18 to 21, further comprising providing a
holder for the sensor body and sensor elements, wherein two or more sensor
elements are provided, and wherein the sensor body floats on the sensor
elements
such that the only link between the sensor body and at least one of the
refiner plate
and the holder is through the sensor elements.
25. The method of any one of claims 18 to 24, wherein the at least one sensor
element is piezo-electric.

-32-
26. The method of any one of claims 18 to 24, wherein the at least one sensor
element is piezo-ceramic.
27. The method of any one of claims 18 to 26, wherein the measured force is at
least one force selected from shear force and normal force.
28. The method of claim 27, further comprising regulating the operation of a
refiner by manipulating one or more variables selected from material feed
rate,
pulp consistency, refiner motor load, inlet pressure, outlet pressure, plate
gap, and
rotational speed in accordance with the measured force.
29. The method of claim 28, further comprising measuring normal force and
shear force, and manipulating the one or more variables such that a ratio of
the
measured normal force and shear force is maintained constant or within a
predetermined range.
30. The method of any one of claims 18 to 29, wherein the measured force is
used to detect contact between opposing discs in a refiner.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein contact between opposing discs is
corrected by retracting an axially moveable plate of said refiner.
32. The method of any one of claims 28 to 31, wherein an array of force
sensors is employed.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-1-
REFINER FORCE SENSOR
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present inventipn relates to a refiner force sensor for refiners
used in the pulp and paper industry, to a refining apparatus, and to a method
of measuring forces acting on a refiner bar in a refiner.
BACKGROUND ART
Refiners are used to produce pulp froml wood chips or to modify the
mechanical properties of wood fibres by repeatedly applying forces to the
material processed by means of bars mounted on two opposing surfaces that
move relative to one another.
Refiners are commonly used in the pulp and paper industry to
repeatedly subject wood fibres or wood chips to stresses and strains. In the
case where wood chips are processed, the purpose is usually to separate
wood fibres from one another to produce pulp that can later be used to
manufacture paper or composite wood products such as hardboard. This
process is generally conducted at high temperature and pressure in a steam
environment, because a large amount of steam is produced in the refiner
from the heat dissipated while processing the material. Coarse pulps
produced in such a way can also be fur-ther processed in a similar way to
improve some of the properties of fibres. Examples of this are the
commonly used practice of subjecting pulp to a second stage of refining, or
to screening followed by reject refining. Low-consistency or flow-through
refiners are also used to process pulp slurries at consistencies up to
approximately 5%. In this case, the aim is generally to stress and strain
wood fibres in,order to improve some of their properties.
A vast array of operating conditions are used in industrial refining
systems, but a number of design features are common to all refiners.
Refiner discs are fitted with plates having alternating patterns of bars and

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-2-
grooves. The bars of opposing plates are separated by a small gap that can
be adjusted, and at least one of the discs rotates. Pulp travels through a
refiner in the form of fibre agglomerates that are repeatedly compressed and
sheared between the bars of opposing plates as these travel past each other.
Hence, all refiners expend energy on fibres through a repeated application
of compression and shear forces acting on fibre agglomerates.
To quantify the effects that these forces have on the individual pulp
fibres, some measure of the degree of refining must be talcen. Traditionally,
this measure has simply been the specific energy, which is the total energy
put into the pulp per oven dry mass of fibre. However, it is widely known
that this parameter is not sufficient to fully characterize the refining
action,
since vastly different pulp properties can be obtained at the same level of
specific energy under different refining conditions. Several methods have
been proposed to use an additional parameter to characterize the action of
refiners. The additional parameter usually aims to quantify the severity of
bar impacts. This is achieved in different ways with each method, but the
severity of bar impacts is generally expressed as a specific energy per
impact. However, energy-based characterizations have shortcomings when
it comes to identifying the mechanisms by which refining occurs. Energy
can be expended on pulp fibres in numerous ways and the method of energy
application - the forces - can have a substantial influence on the final pulp
properties. Giertz, H.W. ("A new way to look at the beating process",
Norske Skogindustri 18(7):239-248, 1964) suggested that different refining
effects could be explained by the relative magnitude of the forces applied.
Similarly, Page, D.H. ("The beating of chemical pulps - The action and the
effects", In Fundamentals of Papermaking: Transactions of the
Fundamental Research Symposium held at Cambridge, F. Bolam editor,
Fundamental Research Committee, British Paper and Board Makers'
Association, Volume 1, pp. 1-38, 1989), has suggested that a complete

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-3-
understanding of the refining process would require knowledge of the
average stress-strain history of individual fibres.
Early work on forces focused on measuring the pressure on refiner
bar surfaces. Two of these studies were in. low-consistency applications
(Goncharov, V.N., "Force factors in a disk refiner and their effect on the
beating process", English translation, Bum. Promst. 12(5):12-14, 1971; and
Nordman, L., Levlin, J.-E., Makkonen, T., and Jokisalo, H., "Conditions in
an LC-refiner as observed by physical measurements', Paperi ja Puu 63(4):
169-180, 1981), while one was at high consistency (Atack, D., "Towards a
theory of refiner mechanical pulping", Appita Jourraal 34(3):223-227,
1980). The harsh conditions that exist within the refining zone of
commercial refiners have proven too severe for standard pressure sensors.
These generally fail within a few minutes of operation in these conditions.
Despite the shortcomings of standard pressure sensors, a method has
been proposed by Karlstrom (International Patent Publication No. WO
97/38792) to use them, in conjunction with temperature sensors, to regulate
the operation of high-consistency chip refiners. In the control scheme
proposed, the mass flow rate of chips and the dilution water flow rate to the
refiner, as well as the pressure applied to regulate the gap between refining
discs, are adjusted in response to meas-ared values of pressure and
temperature in the refining zone. The aim of the method is to control the
temperature and the pressure profile across the refining zone in order to
maintain desired values of these parameters. WO 97/38792 also claims a
method to control specific pulp properties by raising or lowering the
temperature in the refining zone. In International Patent Publication No.
WO 98/48936, Karlstrom proposes an arrangement of such temperature and
pressure sensors for installation in a refiner. WO 97/38792 and WO
98/48936 relate only to the chip refining process.

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-4-
The pressure measured in the way prescribed by the above method is
not due directly to mechanical forces imposed on pulp in the refining zone.
It is rather due to the presence of steam produced as a result of the large
amount of mechanical energy expended in the refiner that is dissipated as
heat. While the steam pressure depends on the amount of energy dissipated
locally in the refining zone, it is also strongly dependent on the ease with
which steam can escape the refiner along the radial direction.
U.S. Patent No. 5,747,707 of Johansson and Kjellqvist proposed the
use of one or more sensor bars in a refiner. The sensor bars are equipped
with strain gauges to measure the load at a number of points along their
length. By mounting several strain gauges at each point, the authors
suggest that the stresses on a bar can be divided into load components
acting in different directions. The apparatus can also include temperature
gauges that can be used to compensate the measured stresses for thermal
expansion of the bar. In another embodiment, the apparatus includes means
for controlling refining in response to the load determined by the sensors.
A sensor bar with a design similar to the one described in the above
U.S. patent was used by Gradin et al. (Gradin, P.A., Johansson, 0., Berg, J.-
E., and Nystrom, S., "Measurement of the power distribution in a single-
disc refiner", J. Pulp Paper Sci., 25(11):384-387, 1999) to measure the
distribution of the expended power in the refining zone of a single-disc
refiner. The authors found that the power expended per unit area was
approximately constant over the radius of the refining zone. This
confirmed an earlier finding of Atack, D., and May, W.D. ("Mechanical
reduction of chips by double-disc refining", Pulp Paper Mag. Can. 64
(Conv. issue): T75-T83, T115, 1963). In order to improve the sensitivity of
the sensor bar, the latter was manufactured out of aluminum. This choice of
material is inadequate for long-term operation in an industrial refiner, since

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-5-
the sensor bar would wear much faster than the other refiner bars made of
hardened material.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with a broad aspect of the present invention there is
provided a force sensor for measuring force acting on a refiner bar of a
refiner for producing , or processing wood pulp, said force sensor
comprising: a sensor body having a sensor head; and at least one sensor
element in force transmission contact with the sensor body, wherein said at
least one sensor element produces a signal indicative of the magnitude of
force acting on a refiner bar of a refiner for producing or processing wood
pulp.
In some embodiments, the refiner bar is on a refiner plate. The
refiner plate comprises a refining surface having refiner bars, and a non-
refining surface opposed to the refining surface. However, the invention is
also applicable to refiners wherein refiner bars are not on a refiner plate.
In some embodiments, the sensor head replaces a portion of the
refiner bar. In other embodiments, the sensor head replaces. all of the
refiner bar. In such embodiments, the sensor body is of the same material
as the refiner bar, and the sensor head has a profile matching that of the
refiner bar.
According to the invention, the sensor body may be attached to the
refining surface of the refiner plate. In some embodiments the sensor body
is adapted to fit into a recess in the refining surface of the refiner plate.
In
other embodiments, the sensor body may be attached to the non-refining
surface of the refining.plate. In yet other embodiments, the sensor body
may be adapted to fit into a recess in the non-refining surface of the
refining
plate.
In a preferred embodiment, two or more sensor elements are
provided, and the sensor body floats on the sensor elements. In some

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-6-
embodiments two or more sensor elements are provided, and the sensor
body floats on the sensor elements such that the only link between the
sensor body and the refiner plate is through the sensor elements. In yet
other embodiments, the force sensor further comprises a holder, and two or
more sensor elements are provided, and the sensor body floats on the sensor
elements such that the only link between the sensor body and at least one of
the refiner plate and the holder is through the sensor elements.
In some embodiments the at least one sensor element is piezo
electric, or piezo-ceramic.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention there is provided
a method of measuring forces acting on a refiner bar of a refiner for
producing or processing wood pulp, the method comprising: providing a
sensor body having a sensor head such that the sensor head replaces all or a
portion of the refiner bar; disposing at least one sensor element in force
transmission contact with the sensor body; refining wood particles or wood
pulp in said refiner to produce wood pulp or refined wood pulp, such that
force is applied to the sensor head and a signal indicative of the force is
developed at said at least one sensor element; and evaluating the signal as a
measure of the force applied to the sensor body.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the
refiner bar is on a refiner plate, the refiner plate comprising a refining
surface having refiner bars, and a non-refining surface opposed to the
refining surface. In such embodiments the sensor body may be attached to
the refining surface of the refiner plate, while in other embodiments, the
sensor body may be attached to the non-refining surface of the refiner plate.
In some embodiments, two or more sensor elements are provided,
and the sensor body floats on the sensor elements. In other embodiments,
two or more sensor elements are provided, and the sensor body floats on the

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-7-
sensor elements such that the only link between the sensor body and the
refiner plate is through the sensor elements.
In yet further embodiments, the method further comprises providing
a holder for the sensor body and sensor elements, wherein two or more
sensor elements are provided, and wherein the sensor body floats on the
sensor elements such that the only link between the sensor body and at least
one of the refiner plate and the holder is through the sensor elements.
In some embodiments the at least one sensor element is piezo
electric, or piezo-ceramic. Preferably, said measured force is at least one
force selected from shear force and normal force.
In a further embodiment of the method of the invention, shear force
and normal force are measured, said measured forces being used to regulate
the operation of a refiner by manipulating one or more variables selected
from material feed rate, pulp consistency, refiner motor load, inlet pressure,
outlet pressure, plate gap, and rotational speed, such that the ratio of the
measured normal and shear forces are maintained constant or within a
predetermined range.
In yet another embodiment, said measured force is used to detect
contact between opposing discs in a refiner. Contact between opposing
discs is corrected by retracting an axially moveable plate of said refiner.
In the above embodiments, a single force sensor or an array of force
sensors can be employed.
In another particular embodiment, there is provided in a refining
apparatus for wood pulp having a sensing means to determine a parameter,
the improvement wherein the sensing means comprises a force sensor
comprising at least one piezo-electric sensor element, suitably the at least
one piezo-electric sensor element is a piezo ceramic sensor element.
In yet another particular embodiment, there is provided a refining
apparatus comprising at least one refining disc, refining bars on said

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-8-
refining disc and at least one sensor member in at least one of said refining
bars, the at least one sensor member being in force transmission contact
with at least one piezo-electric sensor element; in a specific embodiment the
sensor member is of the same material as the refining bar in which it is
mounted, and the at least one sensor element is a piezo ceramic sensor
element. Suitably the sensor member has a sensor body and a sensor head,
and the sensor head may have a profile matching the profile of the at least
one refining bar, such at least one refining bar having an elongate length
interrupted by the sensor head. In specific embodiments the refining bars
project from a first refining face of the refining disc, and the refining disc
has a second, non-refining face opposed to the refining face, the refining
disc having a cavity extending inwardly of the second face, and the sensor
body being mounted within the cavity.
In yet another particular or specific embodiment, a method of
measuring forces on the surface of refiner bars in a refiner for producing or
processing wood pulp comprises: providing at least one sensor member in
at least one refining bar of the refiner, the at least one sensor member being
in force transmission contact with at least one piezo-electric sensor element,
refining wood particles or wood pulp in the refiner to produce wood pulp or
refined wood pulp, such that forces are applied to the at least one sensor
member and a reaction force is developed at the at least one piezo-electric
sensor element which develops an electric charge proportional to the
reaction force, and evaluating the electric charge as a measure of said forces
applied to the at least one sensor member; suitably the at least one sensor
element is a piezo ceramic sensor element, and the sensor member has a
sensor body and a sensor head, the sensor head may have, a profile matching
the profile of the at least one refining bar, and the at least one refining
bar
has an elongate length interrupted by the sensor head.

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-9-
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the invention will be described, by way of example,
with reference to the drawings, wherein:
Fig. 1 shows a cross section of a refiner force sensor according to an
embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 2 shows the embodiment of Fig. 1 in greater detail;
Figs. 3A and 3B are exploded views of the embodiment shown in
Fig. 2;
Figs. 4, 5, and 6 show cross sections of alternative embodiments of a
refiner force sensor according the invention;
Fig. 7 shows a sensor body and piezo electric elements according to
another embodiment of the invention;
Figs. 8 to 15 show cross sections of alternative embodiments of a
refiner force sensor according the invention;
Fig. 16 is an exploded view of the embodiment shown in Fig. 15;
Figs. 17A, 17B, 18A, and 18B are graphs showing normal and shear
forces measured in a refiner using a force sensor according to the
embodiment of Fig. 2;
Fig. 19 is a block diagram of a system used to measure forces within
'
a single disc refiner; and
Fig. 20 is a block diagram of a system used to measure forces within
a double disc refiner.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION AND DESCRIPTION
OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS WITH REFERENCE TO THE
DRAWINGS
The present invention relates to a force sensor for measuring forces
acting on a refiner bar in an operating refiner. A refiner force sensor
according to the present inventiori can be used in any type of mechanical
refiner used to apply force to wood pulp or wood chips. Examples of such

CA 02402514 2006-11-30
-10-
refiners are chip refiners and low-consistency pulp refiners. These can be,
for
example, single disc, double disc, or conical disc refiners. A single force
sensor,
or an array of force sensors, can be used for various applications, examples
of
which are described herein, to control or monitor different aspects of the
refining
process.
The invention will be described primarily with respect to single and double
disc refiners, the general structure of such refiners being well known. For
example, a typical refiner is described in U. S. Patent No. 5,747,707 to
Johansson
et al, which consists of a pair of relatively rotatable refining discs having
radial
refiner bars extending along at least part of the refining gap between the
discs.
The design of the present invention includes several improvements over the
prior devices and methods. For example, the use of a piezo electric sensor
element, (e.g., a piezo-ceramic sensor element), results in a force sensor
with high
output voltage, less sensitivity to electrical noise, and greater dynamic
range,
is relative to previous designs such as that of Johansson et al in U. S.
Patent No.
5,747,707, in which strain gauges were employed as sensor elements. Further,
the
design proposed in U. S. Patent No. 5,747,707 is impractical for several
reasons.
For instance, there must be sufficient deformation of the refiner bar
associated
with the sensor element to obtain a reliable signal from the sensor element.
At the
same time, the refiner bar associated with the sensor element must have very
similar mechanical properties to other refiner bars on the refiner plate. Such
deformation is achieved through use of appropriate material and design of the
refiner bar. If the refiner bar is too rigid, the deformations involved are
too small
to be measured reliably when strain gauges are used as sensor elements. An
analysis conducted by certain of the present

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-11-
inventors has shown that a sensor design based on strain gauges and using
steel as refiner bar material is indeed impractical from this standpoint.
To overcome problems of the design proposed in U.S. Patent No.
5,747,707, the refiner bar can be made more compliant by using a material
with a lower elastic modulus, as was done by Gradin et al. (above), or by
modifying the shape or dimensions of some components of the refiner bar.
However, deformation at the tip of the refiner bar must remain small
relative to the distance between the bars on the opposing refiner plate,
otherwise the forces measured at the sensor bar will not be representative of
the true forces between refiner bars. Also, the use of different material for
the refiner bar introduces errors because such different material has
different physical properties (e.g., hardness, wear resistance, thermal
expansion coefficient) relative to the material used for other refiner bars on
the refiner plates. Further, increasing the compliance of the refiner bar
might have a negative side effect of reducing the first, resonant frequency of
the force sensor. As discussed below, this resonant frequency must be
much higher than the bar passing frequency in the refiner, otherwise
vibrations of the refiner bar will affect the measured forces. The inventors
has also shown that it is in practice impossible to reconcile all these
requirements with a design based on strain gauges as sensing elements.
Sensor description
In accordance with a broad aspect of the present invention there is
provided a force sensor for measuring forces on a refiner bar of a refiner,
such as a refiner used for producing and/or processing wood pulp. A force
sensor according to the invention comprises a sensor body having a sensor
head, and one or more sensor elements in force transmission contact with
the sensor body. As described in detail below, the sensor body and one or
more sensor elements are attached to a refiner plate, such that the sensor

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-12-
head replaces all or a portion of a refiner bar on the refining surface of a
refiner plate.
As used herein, the term "force transmission contact" is intended to
mean contact between the sensor body and sensor elements that facilitates
transmission of any force received by the sensor body to the sensor
elements. Preferably, force transmission contact provides transmission of
forces to the sensor elements without any attenuation or distortion of the
properties of the forces (e.g., amplitude, frequency, and phase). However,
in most cases some attenuation or distortion is unavoidable.
16 As used herein, the term "sensor element" is intended to mean any,
transducer that can produce a signal (e.g., an electrical charge or an
electrical signal such as voltage or current) in response to loading (e.g.,
compression). An example of a sensor element is a piezo electric element,
such as a piezo-ceramic element. While the invention is described below
primarily with respect to piezo electric elements, it is to be understood that
the invention is not limited thereto. Suitable piezo electric elements are
available from BM Hi-Tech/Sensor Technology Ltd., Collingwood,
Ontario. Piezo electric elements selected for relatively high Curie
temperature (360 C), made of lead zirconate titanate (ceramic, e.g.,
BM500), and measuring about 1 mm x 1 mm x 7 mm, are preferable. The
poling direction is normal to the long axis and one of the short axes. The
electrodes are located on opposed surfaces normal to the poling direction.
Generally, a thin 'wire is attached (e.g., soldered) to each of the two
electrodes of the piezo electric elements, and these wires are connected to a
charge amplifier, as discussed below. An alternative source of piezo
electric elements is Piezo Kinetics Incorporated, Bellefonte, PA. Piezo
electric elements made of PKI#502 which has a Curie temperature of
350 C, are suitable. Use of at least two sensor elements will permit both
shear and normal forces to be resolved. However, under certain

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
- 13-
circumstances, both forces can be resolved with only a single sensor
element.
The sensor elements are installed in the refiner force sensor such that
forces to be measured are applied across two opposed surfaces of the
elements. In cases where the electrodes of the piezo electric elements are
also on the same opposed surfaces, an insulating layer (i.e., a dielectric
material such as mica, cellophane tape, Mylar (trade-mark for a polyester
film), paper) should be disposed between the opposed surfaces and the
sensor components that contact the opposed surfaces. Alternatively, the
sensor body and holder and/or refiner plate surfaces can be coated with a
thin insulating layer such as vapour-deposited alumina. Piezo electric
elements are preferably installed in the force sensor such that forces are
applied normal to the poling direction of the sensor elements. The poling
direction of piezo electric elements in the embodiments described herein is
normal to the two opposed surfaces that contact the force sensor
components. However, use alternative orientation of poling direction and
electrodes with respect to surfaces that contact the sensor body and holder
and/or refiner plate are contemplated.
Forces imparted to the refiner bars of the refiner plate are received
by the sensor body via the sensor head, and transmitted to the sensor
element(s). As mentioned above, the sensor body is attached to a refiner
plate such that the sensor head replaces all or a portion of a refiner bar.
Accordingly, the sensor head has a shape or profile that corresponds
substantially to that of a refiner bar. Further, the sensor head and/or body
is
made of the same or similar material as that of a refiner bar, to ensure
consistency of inechanical properties (e.g., hardness, wear resistance,
thermal expansion coefficient, etc.) across the refiner bars and sensor head.
In some embodiments the sensor assembly comprises the sensor
body and one or more sensor elements. In such embodiments the sensor

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-14-
assembly is clamped to a refiner plate with any suitable fastener such as
screws. In particular, the sensor elements are clamped between the sensor
body and the refiner plate. Such clamping can be achieved, for example,
with a screw that directly penetrates the sensor body.
In other embodiments the sensor assembly comprises the sensor
body, one or more sensor elements, and a holder. The sensor assembly is
attached to a refiner plate via the holder using any suitable fastener.
Clamping of the sensor body in force transmission contact with the sensor
elements is achieved, for example, by screwing the sensor body to the
holder such that the sensor elements are clamped between the sensor body
and the holder. However, it is preferable that the sensor body is clamped to
the holder without directly screwing the sensor body to the holder. For
example, the holder can comprise two or more portions between which the
sensor body and sensor elements are clamped, the holder portions being
clamped together with fasteners such as screws. In such embodiments, the
only physical/mechanical link between the sensor body and the refiner plate
and/or the holder is through the sensor elements, such that the sensor body
"floats" on the sensor elements (see, for example, the embodiments shown
in Figs. 2, 4, 11, 14, 15, and 16, below).
Clamping of the sensor elements between the sensor body and
refiner plate and/or holder compresses the sensor elements, advantageously
providing a preload to the sensor elements. The preload helps to ensure a
stable signal (e.g., reduces noise) from the sensor elements during operation
of the force sensor. Further, clamping gives the sensor assembly structural
integrity and ensures that a change (e.g., an increase or decrease) in loading
does not result in loss of contact between the sensor body and sensor
element(s).
For optimal operation in a refiner, the force sensor assembly (i.e., the
assembly comprising the sensor body, sensor elements, holder, if present,

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-15-
and hardware such as screws) should have a vibrational behaviour
(frequency response) such that it has a first resonant frequency which is
much higher than the bar-passing. frequency of the bars in the refiner (that
is, the frequency with which bars on one of the refiner plates pass by the
bars on the other plate). As used herein, the term "optimal operation" is
intended to mean operation that produces force data which can be used to
resolve the forces produced at a refiner bar during each bar passing.
Depending upon factors such as the design of the refiner, the design of the
refining plates, and the position of the plates, the bar passing frequency in
a
typical commercial refiner varies between about 20 kHz and about 50 kHz.
Whereas in theory the first resonant fiequency of the force sensor assembly
should be as high as possible, relative to the bar passing frequency, physical
constraints limit how high the first resonant frequency can be. A first
resonant frequency that is about ten times (lOX) the bar-passing frequency
is expected to be the upper limit for most force sensor designs, and such
first resonant frequency is expected to perform fully satisfactorily. On the
other hand, a first resonant frequency that is about 1.5 times (1.5X) the bar-
passing frequency will produce usable data, but will also produce some
noise due to vibration of the sensor body. In general, there are four design
principles which can be followed to increase the first resonant frequency:
1. Reduction of the mass of the sensor body;
2. Reduction of the distance from the sensor elements to the center of
mass of the sensor body;
3. Selection of a material from which the sensor body is manufactured
which has a higher ratio of elastic modulus (stiffness) to density (for
example, carbon fiber/epoxy coinposite has a much higher ratio of
elastic modulus to density than steel);

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-16-
4. Reduction of the compliance of the sensor elements (e.g., piezo
electric) by reducing their thickness to the minimum allowed by
manufacturing and assembly constraints.
Theoretical procedures such as finite element analysis can be used to
determine the resonant frequency of force sensor assemblies. The
theoretical values can be measured and confinned experimentally.
Various embodiments of a force sensor according to the present
invention are described below. Throughout Figs. 1 to 16, common
reference numerals refer to the same or similar components of the
embodiments described.
With reference to the embodiment of Figs. 1 and 2, there is shown in
cross section a refiner plate 10 comprising a force sensor assembly 14.
Refiner plate 10 has a refining face 16, a non-refining face 18 opposed to
face 16 and a cavity or recess 20 extending inwardly of face 18. Refiner
face 16 has a plurality of refiner bars 22.
Sensor assembly 14 comprises a sensor body 30 and four piezo
electric sensor elements 26 disposed in a sensor holder 28. Sensor
assembly 14 is disposed in recess 20.
Sensor body 30 has a sensor head 32; sensor head 32 has a profile
which matches the profile of the portion of the refiner bar into which it is
inserted. That is, the top and side faces of sensor head 32 are substantially
flush with the adjacent top and side faces of the refiner bar into which it is
inserted. The sensor head 32 thus replaces a short length (e.g., 5 mm) of the
refiner bar in which it is inserted and is preferably made of the same
material, so that it has the same mechanical properties.
An adhesive filler 52 (e.g., a silicone adhesive) occupies the gap
between sensor body 30, refiner plate 10, and sensor holder 28, to prevent
contamination of the sensor elements 26 by water, steam, and/or pulp.

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-17-
The piezo electric sensor elements 26 are disposed between sensor
body 30 and sensor holder 28. To facilitate assembly the piezo electric
sensors can be bonded to the sensor body, using an adhesive such as, for
example, epoxy, however; bonding of the sensors to the sensor body is
otherwise unnecessary as clamping the sensor assembly together holds the
sensor elements in place. Four piezoelectric elements 26 are used in the
embodiment shown in Fig. 1, but designs incorporating any number of
sensor elements 26 are understood to be part of the present invention.
As shown in greater detail in Fig. 2, the sensor holder 28 is made of
two parts 28a,28b held together by fasteners 65. By tightening the fasteners,
a preload is applied to the piezo electric sensor elements 26 to ensure that,
during operation, the piezo electric elements 26 are always in compression.
In addition, this ensures that the sensor elements 26 are . in force
transmission contact in the holder 28. The sensor holder 28 is fastened
within the recess 20 in the non-refining surface 18 of the refining plate 10,
with screws 60.
Using finite element analysis, the first natural frequency of the
embodiment shown in Fig. 2 was found to be 30kHz.
Figs. 3A and 3B are exploded views of a force sensor assembly such
as the embodiment shown in Figure 2. As shown, thin layers of insulating
material 72 such as, for example, mica, are disposed between each of the
two opposed surfaces of the piezo electric elements 26, and the surfaces of
the holder 28a,28b with which they are in contact. If necessary, the
insulating layers can be bonded to the piezo electric elements 26 and/or the
surfaces of the sensor body 30 and/or holder 28a,28b using a suitable
adhesive. The insulating layers 72 prevent electrical contact between
electrodes on the surfaces of the piezo electric elements 26 and the sensor
body 30 and holder 28. The sensor body 30 and piezo electric elements 26
are clamped between the two parts 28a, 28b of the holder 28 with screws

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-18-
65. Wires (not shown) from each of the piezo electric elements 26 pass
through an orifice 76 in the holder 28a.
The force sensor assembly is secured in a recess 20 in the non-
refining surface 18 of the refiner plate 10 using screws 60. The recess 20 in
the refiner plate 10, if prepared after heat treatment of the refiner plate,
can
be prepared using any suitable process, such as electro-discharge machining
(EDM). Non-heat treated inserts 78 can be pressed into holes prepared by
EDM and these inserts can then be tapped to receive the screws 60.
As shown in Fig. 3B, an opening 80 in a refiner bar 22a receives the
sensor head 32 such that the sensor head 32 replaces a portion of refiner bar
22a, and the exposed faces of sensor head 32 are flush with the adjacent
faces of the refiner bar 22a.
The following altenlative embodiments of the refiner force sensor
take advantage of the first and second of the above design principles,
resulting in higher first resonant frequencies than the einbodiment of Fig. 2.
Further increases in the first resonant frequency of any of these
embodiments can be achieved applying the third and fourth design
principles discussed above.
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 4, the sensor body 30 is T-shaped,
as in the embodiments of Figs. 1 to, 3B. Unlike those embodiments,
however, the sensor holder 28 no longer encompasses a portion of the
sensor body 30, and instead has been reduced to a simple plate. As
discussed above, only two piezo electric elements are required to resolve
the shear and normal forces applied to the sensor head 32. Thus, in this and
the previous embodiments, two of the four sensor elements can option.ally
be replaced with inactive elements (i.e., elements of the same or different
material as the sensor elements, having an effective compliance about the
same as that of the sensor elements). For example, in the present
embodiment, the two elements 46 are such inactive elements. A preload is

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-19-
applied to the piezo electric elements 26 by screws 64 which also secure the
sensor holder 28 in the recess 20 of the refiner plate 10. The inactive
elements 46 have sufficient compliance that, when the sensor head 32 is
subjected to normal and shear forces, these forces are borne principally by
the piezo elements 26. The simplification of the sensor holder 28 facilitates
reduced length and mass of the sensor body 30, and thus the distance from
the piezo elements 26 to the center of mass of the sensor body 30. These
modifications all contribute to a reduction in the first resonant frequency of
the force sensor assembly.
The embodiment shown in Fig. 5 is similar to that of Fig. 4 except
that the inactive components 46 are eliminated, and the sensor body 30 is
captured by a screw 62, through which a preload is applied to the piezo
sensor elements 26. The screw is located on the longitudinal axis of the
sensor body 30 (i.e., aligned with the long axis of the refiner bars 22).
Screws 60 attach the force sensor assembly in the recess 20 of the refiner
plate 10, but do not apply any preload to the sensor elements 26. Some of
the shear and normal forces that are received by the sensor head 32 will be
transmitted to the sensor holder 28 via the screw 62 rather than via the
piezo electric elements 26. It is, therefore, essential that the screw 62 be
substantially more compliant (i.e., less stiff) than the piezo elements 26 so
that sufficient load is transmitted through the piezo electric elements 26 to
ensure that measurable signals are generated.
The emb-odiment shown in Fig. 6 is similar to that shown in Fig. 5
except that the shoulder 34 of the sensor body 30 is flush with the surface
of the refiner plate at the base 24 of the grooves between refiner bars 22.
This further reduces the length and mass of the sensor body 30 which, in
turn, reduces the distance from the piezo elements 26 to the center of mass
of the sensor body 30, resulting in a higher first resonant frequency.
However, this embodiment has the disadvantage that failure of the screw 62

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-20-
will cause the sensor body 30 to fall into the refining zone between refiner
plates, with substantial damage to the refiner. In the previous
embodiments, the sensor body 30 is captured in the refiner plate 10 to
prevent movement of the sensor body 30 into the refining zone in the event
of failure.
With reference to Fig. 6, this embodiment can be modified by
eliminating the holder 28 and the recess 20 in the non-refining surface 18 of
the refiner plate 10. Instead, a small recess is provided in the refining
surface 16 to accept the sensor body 30 and piezo elements 26. An orifice
through refiner plate 10 is provided to accept a screw 62 for securing refiner
body 30 in the recess in the refining surface 16. In such modified
embodiment, the sensor body 30 is held in position in the refining surface
16 of the refiner plate 10, without the need for a holder 28. However, such
embodiment has the same disadvantage as that mentioned above in respect
of the embodiment of Fig. 6.
Fig. 7 shows an embodiment of sensor body 30, with piezo elements
26, suitable for use in a force sensor similar to that shown any of the
previous embodiments. As can be seen in Fig. 7, the sensor body 30 has
been modified to accommodate the sensor elements 26 at an angle relative
to the surface of refiner plate 10. Corresponding modification of the holder
28 and/or refiner plate 10 of the previous embodiments would therefore be
required to accommodate the present sensor body.
As noted above, piezo electric elements are more sensitive to loading
which occurs normal to their poling direction. As the poling direction of
the piezo electric elements 27 is normal to the two opposed surfaces that
contact the sensor components, the angled orientation of the piezo electric
elements 27 of this embodiment provides superior resolution of a shear
force applied to the sensor head 32.

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-21-
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 8, the mass of the sensor body 30
has been reduced, relative to that of the previous embodiments. The sensor
body 30 is mounted on two piezo electric elements 26 which are positioned
at an angle with respect to the surface of the refiner plate 10. As in the
previous embodiment, this orientation of the piezo electric elements 26
ensures superior resolution of a shear force applied to the sensor head 32.
The sensor body 30 is captured, and preload is applied to the piezo elements
26, with a screw 62 located centrally in the sensor body 30 and holder 28.
The sensor body 30 also incorporates tabs 40 which extend under the
refining surface of the refiner plate 10. The tabs 40 prevent the sensor body
30 from falling into the refining zone in the event of failure of the screw
62.
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 9, the mass of the sensor body 30
has been further reduced, with respect to the previous embodiment, by
providing a holder 28 that replaces a portion of a refiner bar. The sensor
body 30 is mounted on two piezo electric elements 26 which, unlike
previous embodiments, are located above the base of the grooves between
refiner bars 22 in the refiner. plate 10. The sensor body 30 is captured, and
preload is applied to the piezo electric elements 26, by a screw 62 located
centrally in sensor body 30. The sensor body 30 also incorporates tabs 40
which extend under the upper surface of the refiner plate 10. The tabs 40
prevent the sensor body 30 from falling into the refining zone in the event
of failure of the screw 62.
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 10, the sensor body 30 is supported
laterally on four piezo electric elements 26 and supported vertically on one
piezo electric element 29. The holder 28 comprises a vertical extension 54
and a retaining plate 56. The sensor body 30 and piezo electric elements 26
are clamped between the vertical extension 54 and retaining plate 56 with
one or more screws 65; which also applies a preload to the sensor elements.

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-22-
The embodiment of Fig. 11 is similar to that shown in Fig. 10 except
that the sensor body 30 is supported laterally on two, rather than four piezo
electric elements 26.
The embodiment of Fig. 12 is similar to that shown in Fig. 10 except
that the four piezo elements 26 for are positioned at an angle with respect to
the central axis of the sensor body 30, and the piezo electric element 29 at
the base of the sensor body 30 has been eliminated. The vertical extension
54 of the sensor holder 28 and the retaining plate 56 have opposed wedge-
like profiles. Screws 65 clamp the sensor body 30 between the vertical
extension 54 and the retaining plate 56, and apply preload to the sensor
elements 26. Also, when the clamping screws 65 are tightened, the wedge
profiles ensure that the sensor body 30 and piezo elements 26 are properly
located in both the vertical and horizontal directions.
The -embodiment of Fig. 13 is similar to that shown in Fig.. 12,
except that two of the piezo electric elements 26 have been eliminated and
the central span of the sensor body 30 has been reduced to a thin web.
Also, the sensor holder comprises two portions 28a, 28b. Upon clamping
the sensor body 30 and piezo electric elements 26 between the holder
portions 28a, 28b, this web transfers preload to the upper portion of the
sensor body 30, and hence to the sensor elements 26, while being
sufficiently flexible that forces applied to the sensor head 32 are
transmitted to the piezo electric elements 26.
In the embodiment of Fig. 14, which shows a refiner force sensor
assembly only, the sensor body 30 is triangular at its base. The sensor body
30 is supported on three piezo electric elements 26. The sensor body 30
and piezo electric elements 26 are captured in a triangular recess in the
holder 28, which exists between the vertical extension 54 of the holder 28
and the retaining plate 56. Preload is applied to the sensor elements 26
laterally by one or more screws 65.

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
- 23 -
In the embodiment shown in Fig. 15, the sensor body 30 has a
triangular base portion similar to that shown in Fig. 14. Sensor holder 28
has a corresponding slotted recess for accepting sensor body 28 and three
piezo elements 26. Unlike the embodiment of Fig. 14, the sensor holder 30
of this embodiment does not comprise a vertical extension 54 or retaining
plate 56. Instead, set screw 70 and plate 58 are used to clamp the sensor
body 30 into the sensor holder 28, and to apply preload to sensor elements
26. That is, tightening set screw 70 forces plate 58 towards the sensor
elements 26 and sensor body 30. Plate 58 is tabbed to prevent it from
rotating when set screw 70 is turned. The holder 28 is fastened into the
recess 20 in the refiner plate 10 with screws 64.
In the embodiments of Figs. 14 and 15, the piezo electric element 26
below the base of the sensor body 30 can be replaced with an inactive
element, as discussed above. The inactive component should have sufficient
compliance that, when the sensor head 32 is subjected to normal and shear
forces, these forces are borne principally by the remaining two piezo
electric elements 26.
As mentioned above, in some embodiments (e.g., those shown in
Figs. 2, 4, 11, 14, 15, and 16), the only physical/mechanical link between
the sensor body and the refiner plate and/or the holder is through the sensor
elements, such that the sensor body "floats" on the sensor elements. It is
noted that in the embodiments of Figs. 10 and 12, such floating of the
sensor body 30 can be achieved if the screw(s) 65 do not contact the sensor
body 30. That is, to achieve floating of the sensor body 30, the orifice in
sensor body 30 should be of sufficient diameter that screw 65 does not
contact sensor body 30.
Sensor Operation
With reference to the embodiments of Figs. 1 to 16, when normal
and shear forces are applied to the sensor head 32 , reaction forces are

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-24-
developed at each of the piezo sensor element locations. An electric
charge, proportional to the magnitude of the reaction force, is developed by
each piezo sensor element 26. The applied normal and shear forces can be
determined by measuring and processing the electric signals from each of
the piezo sensor elements 26 using appropriate signal conditioning
equipment and data analysis.
Working Example
A force sensor according to the embodiment of Fig. 2 was installed
in a laboratory refiner. The refiner had a diameter of 30 cm and operated at
atmospheric pressure. The refiner was fed with chemi-thermomechanical
pulp at a consistency of approximately 20%. Figs. 17A and B show the
normal and shear forces calculated using the signals from two of the piezo-
ceramic element sensors 26. In Fig. 17A, the refiner was running at 1260
rpm, corresponding to a period of approximately 270 s between bar
passings (a bar-passing frequency of about 3.70 ldiz). In Fig. 17B the
refiner was running at a higher speed of 2594 rpm, corresponding to a bar-
passing period of 131 s (a bar-passing frequency of about 7.63 lcHz). From
these results, it can be seen that normal and shear forces related to
individual bar crossings can be measured with a force sensor according to
the present invention
The piezo electric elements used in the initial testing above were
found to have poor dimensional control. As a result, piezo electric elements
having superior dimensional control (Piezo Kinetics Incorporated,
Bellefonte, PA; PKI#502, Curie temperature 350 C) were incorporated into
the force sensor of Fig. 2. This improved tolerances during assembly and
provided a more uniform distribution of loading to the sensor elements. In
addition, the charge amplifiers used in initial testing, above, which were
developed in-house, were replaced with industrial quality charge amplifiers

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
- 25 -
(Kistler Type 5010). These two factors improved the quality of signal
obtained from the sensor, as indicated in Figures 18A and B.
In Fig. 18A, the refiner was running at 700 rpm, corresponding to a
bar-passing frequency of about 2.06 kHz. In Fig. 18B the refiner was
running at a higher speed of 2600 rpm, corresponding to a bar-passing
frequency of about 7.64 ldiz. From these results, it can be seen that
optimization of the force sensor provides excellent resolution of normal and
shear forces related to individual bar crossings.
Measurement System
With reference to Fig. 19, a refining system 200 comprises a single
disc refiner 202, charge amplifiers 204, a data acquisition unit 206 and a
computer or controller 208.
Single disc refiner 202 has a rotary disc 210 comprising refiner
plates and a stationary disc 212 conzprising refiner plates and force sensors
214, according to the present invention, such as the embodiments shown in
Figs. 1 to 15. Each force sensor 214 comprises one or more piezo electric
sensor elements as illustrated in the above elnbodiments .
Refiner 202 has a shaft 216 for rotating disc 210 and a feed inlet 218
for wood chips or wood pulp.
Fig. 19 thus shows the various components of a system used to
measure forces within a refiner. The refiner illustrated in Fig. 19 is a
single-rotating disc refiner, commonly referred to as a single-disc refiner.
Four force sensors are illustrated in Fig. 19, but any number can be used
depending on the application. Each piezo electric element of each force
sensor is connected to a charge amplifier. The charge amplifiers are
connected to the data acquisition unit. In the embodiment shown, the latter
can be a digital oscilloscope, analogue to digital converter, or any other
means of sampling and digitizing the signals from the charge amplifiers.
However, analogue techniques can also be employed to process the force

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-26-
sensor signal(s). The data acquisition unit is connected to the computer via
a digital interface, so that the measured data can be transferred for
processing to determine the magnitude of the forces on refiner bars of the
stationary disc.
Fig. 20 shows a refining system 300 comprising a refiner 302
having a pair of rotating discs 310 and 312, charge amplifiers 304, a data
acquisition unit 306 and a computer or controller 308.
Refiner disc 312 comprises refiner plates and a plurality of sensors
314 such as illustrated in the above embodiments . Refiner 302 comprises a
shaft 316 for rotating discs 310 and 312, and a feed inlet 318 for wood
chips or wood pulp.
A slip ring unit 319 provides connection between the sensors 314
and the charge amplifiers 304.
Thus Fig. 20 illustrates an arrangement for a case where the forces
on refiner bars are measured on a rotating disc, such as would be the case in
a refiner where both discs are rotating (e.g., a double-disc refiner). In this
case, wires from the force sensors are brought through the shaft of the
refiner to a slip-ring unit. This unit allows the transfer of electrical
signals
from a rotating part to a non-rotating part, or vice-versa. The rest of the
measurement system is similar to the one described in Fig. 19. In. a
variatiori of the system illustrated in Fig. 20, the charge amplifiers are
mounted on the rotating shaft of the refiner, and the amplified signals are
fed to the data acquisition unit through the slip-ring unit. In the latter
case,
the slip-ring unit can also be eliminated by transferring the amplified
signals using a non-contact transmitter-receiver system.
Applications
A number of applications have been identified for the present
invention and are briefly described hereinafter. Any of these applications
may require a single force sensor or an array of force sensors at a number of

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-27-
locations within the refining zone of a refiner. Except where otherwise
specified, these applications refer both to refining of wood chips or wood
fragments for the production of pulp using mechanical means or the use of a
refiner to modify some properties of wood fibres or pulp.
a) A single force sensor, or .an array of force sensors, can be used to
measure the magnitude of the normal force, acting perpendicular to the
plane of the refiner bar surfaces, and the shear force, acting in the plane
of the refiner bar surfaces. The relative magnitude of the normal and
shear forces affects the action of the refiner on the material processed
and can be adjusted by changing the feed rate of material to the refiner,
the solids content of the material fed, the plate gap in the refiner, or the
rotational speed of the refiner. By manipulating the refiner operating
conditions so as to maintain a constant ratio between the shear and the
normal forces in response to changes caused by process upsets, a more
uniform refining action can be maintained.
b) A single force sensor, or an array of force sensors, can be used to detect
contact between two opposing refiner plates (plate clash). Specific
features of the force signals can be monitored to detect such contact, and
corrective action can be taken to preserve the integrity of the refiner
plates and avoid premature wear, such as, for example, retracting the
axially moveable plate of the refiner.
c) The magnitude of the measured forces in a refiner depends, among other
things, on the amount of material present between the refiner bars and
the distance between the face of the intersecting bars (plate gap). When
the mass flow rate of material fed to a refiner changes, due for example
to process upsets or non-uniform quality of the feed material, the
amount of material present between refiner bars can also change. A
single force sensor, or an array of force sensors, in conjunction with a

CA 02402514 2002-09-12
WO 01/68974 PCT/CA01/00336
-28-
suitable means to measure plate gap in the refiner, can be used to detect
such changes and take corrective action.
d) In refiners having multiple co-axial refining zones, such as for example,
twin refiners, conical disc refiners, multidisc refiners, Duoflo refiners,
and the lilce, an arrangement of sensors can be used to measure the
relative magnitude of forces between different refining zones. . The
sensors can be used as part of a control system to regulate the flow of
material or the plate gap in each refining zone in order to maintain
predetermined optimal operating conditions.
Equivalents
Those skilled in the art will recognize variants of the embodiments
described herein. Such variants are within the scope of the present
invention and are covered by the appended claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2014-03-17
Letter Sent 2013-03-15
Grant by Issuance 2007-10-23
Inactive: Cover page published 2007-10-22
Pre-grant 2007-08-02
Inactive: Final fee received 2007-08-02
Letter Sent 2007-05-24
Letter Sent 2007-05-11
Inactive: Single transfer 2007-03-30
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-02-08
Letter Sent 2007-02-08
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2007-02-08
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2007-01-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2006-11-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2006-05-31
Inactive: IPC assigned 2004-11-30
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2004-11-30
Letter Sent 2004-03-10
Letter Sent 2004-03-10
Letter Sent 2004-03-10
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2004-03-08
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2004-03-08
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2004-01-08
Inactive: Single transfer 2004-01-08
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-01-13
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2003-01-09
Correct Inventor Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-01-09
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2003-01-09
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2003-01-09
Letter Sent 2003-01-09
Letter Sent 2003-01-09
Letter Sent 2003-01-09
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2003-01-09
Application Received - PCT 2002-10-21
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-09-12
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-09-12
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2002-09-12
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2001-09-20

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-01-17

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON
JOHN JAA SENGER
SEYED MOHAMMAD ALI SIADAT
FPINNOVATIONS
Past Owners on Record
ALAN HENRY BANKES
BEHROUZ SHIARI
DANIEL OUELLET
MATTHEW ALLAN OLMSTEAD
PETER MARTIN WILD
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-09-11 1 7
Description 2002-09-11 28 1,437
Claims 2002-09-11 5 169
Abstract 2002-09-11 1 57
Drawings 2002-09-11 16 414
Description 2006-11-29 28 1,430
Claims 2006-11-29 4 143
Representative drawing 2007-09-30 1 9
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-01-08 1 174
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2003-01-08 1 106
Notice of National Entry 2003-01-08 1 198
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-01-08 1 106
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-01-08 1 106
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-03-09 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-03-09 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-03-09 1 105
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2007-02-07 1 161
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-05-23 1 107
Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-04-25 1 171
PCT 2002-09-11 9 398
PCT 2002-09-11 2 78
PCT 2002-09-11 4 175
Correspondence 2004-01-07 4 125
Correspondence 2007-05-10 1 23
Correspondence 2007-08-01 2 45