Language selection

Search

Patent 2407741 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2407741
(54) English Title: ION-SENSITIVE, WATER-DISPERSIBLE POLYMERS, A METHOD OF MAKING SAME AND ITEMS USING SAME
(54) French Title: POLYMERES HYDRODISPERSIBLES, SENSIBLES AUX IONS, LEUR PROCEDE DE PRODUCTION ET ARTICLES UTILISANT CES POLYMERES
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D04H 1/732 (2012.01)
  • C11D 1/10 (2006.01)
  • C11D 17/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CHANG, YIHUA (United States of America)
  • DELLERMAN, PAIGE A. (United States of America)
  • LANG, FREDERICK J. (United States of America)
  • MUMICK, PAVNEET S. (United States of America)
  • POMPLUN, WILLIAM S. (United States of America)
  • CHEN, FRANKLIN M. C. (United States of America)
  • JACKSON, DAVID M. (United States of America)
  • JOHNSON, ERIC D. (United States of America)
  • LINDSAY, JEFFREY D. (United States of America)
  • RIVERA, LIGIA A. (United States of America)
  • SHAH, VARSHA K. (United States of America)
  • SCHICK, KIM G. (United States of America)
  • SCHULTZ, WALTER T. (United States of America)
  • WANG, KENNETH Y. (United States of America)
  • SOERENS, DAVE A. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2009-04-07
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2001-05-03
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2001-11-08
Examination requested: 2006-02-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2001/014205
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2001083666
(85) National Entry: 2002-10-28

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
09/564,268 (United States of America) 2000-05-04
09/564,531 (United States of America) 2000-05-04
09/564,780 (United States of America) 2000-05-04

Abstracts

English Abstract


The present invention is directed to ion-sensitive, water-dispersible
polymers. The present invention is also directed
to a method of making ion-sensitive, water-dispersible polymers and their
applicability as binder compositions. The present invention
is further directed to fiber-containing fabrics and webs comprising ion-
sensitive, water-dispersible binder compositions and their
applicability in water-dispersible personal care products.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des polymères hydrodispersibles, sensibles aux ions, un procédé de production desdits polymères et l'utilisation de ces derniers comme compositions de liants. Elle concerne également des étoffes et des bandes fibreuses contenant des compositions de liants hydrodispersibles, sensibles aux ions, ainsi que leur utilisation sous forme de produits d'hygiène hydrodispersibles.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-93-
CLAIMS:
1. A wet wipe comprising a fabric sheet saturated with a wetting composition
containing less than about 10 wt% of organic solvents, wherein the fabric
sheet comprises
fibrous material and an ion-sensitive binder, and wherein the wet wipe has an
in-use wet
tensile strength of at least 100 g/in and a tensile strength of less than
about 30 g/in after
being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions totalling
about 50
ppm to about 200 ppm for about one hour.
2. The wet wipe of Claim 1, wherein the wetting composition contains less than
about
4 wt% of organic solvents.
3. The wet wipe of Claim 2, wherein the wetting composition contains less than
about
1 wt% of organic solvents.
4. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 3, wherein the wetting composition
comprises an activating compound at a concentration of at least 1 weight
percent based on
the weight of the wetting composition.
5. The wet wipe of Claim 4, wherein the activating compound is a salt.
6. The wet wipe of Claim 5, wherein the salt is a monovalent salt.
7. The wet wipe of Claim 5 or 6, wherein the salt is present at a
concentration of from
about 1 weight percent to about 10 weight percent based on the weight of the
wetting
composition.
8. The wet wipe of Claim 7, wherein the salt is present at a concentration of
about 4
weight percent.
9. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 4 to 8, wherein the salt is sodium
chloride.

-94-
10. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 9, wherein the ion-sensitive binder
comprises at least one of an ion-sensitive polymer and a co-binder.
11. The wet wipe of Claim 10, wherein the ion-sensitive polymer is formed from
(a) at
least one of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid, and (b) one or more alkyl
acrylates.
12. The wet wipe of Claim 10, wherein the ion-sensitive polymer is formed from
acrylic acid; 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (AMPS); the sodium
salt of 2-
acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (NaAMPS); butyl acrylate; 2-
ethylhexyl
acrylate; or a mixture of the foregoing monomers.
13. The wet wipe of any one Claims 10 to 12, wherein the co-binder is non-
crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate), non-crosslinking poly(styrene-
butadiene), or
non-crosslinking poly(styrene-acrylic).
14. The wet wipe of Claim 13, wherein the co-binder is non-crosslinking
poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate).
15. The wet wipe of any one Claims 1 to 14 having an in-use wet tensile
strength of at
least 300 g/in, and a tensile strength of less than about 30 g/in after
soaking in tap water
having a concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions totalling about 50 ppm for about
one hour.
16. The wet wipe of any one Claims 1 to 14 having an in-use wet tensile
strength of
greater than about 300 g/in, and a tensile strength of less than about 20 g/in
after soaking
in tap water having a concentration of Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions totalling about 200
ppm for
about one hour.
17. A wet wipe according to Claim 1 comprising:
a fibrous material;
a binder composition for binding said fibrous material into an integral web,
said
binder composition comprising a sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid
terpolymer and a
non-crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate), wherein the binder composition
is insoluble

-95-
in a neutral salt solution containing at least about 1 weight percent salt,
said salt
comprising one or more monovalent ions; and wherein the binder composition is
soluble
in water containing up to about 200 ppm of one or more multivalent ions; and
a wetting composition containing at least about 1 weight percent of a salt.
18. The wet wipe of Claim 17, wherein the binder composition is soluble in
water
containing from about 15 ppm to about 200 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
19. The wet wipe of Claim 18, wherein the binder composition is soluble in
water
containing from about 15 ppm to about 100 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
20. The wet wipe of Claim 19, wherein the binder composition is soluble in
water
containing from about 15 ppm to about 50 ppm of one or more multivalent ions.
21. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 17 to 20, wherein the binder composition
is
insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing from about 1 weight percent to
about 5.0
weight percent salt.
22. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 17 to 21, wherein the multivalent ions
comprise Ca2+ ions, Mg2+ ions, Zn2+ ions, or a combination thereof.
23. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 17 to 22, wherein the monovalent ions
comprise Na+ ions, Li+ ions, K+ ions, NH4+ ions, or a combination thereof.
24. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 17 to 23, wherein the sulfonate anion
modified
acrylic acid terpolymer comprises (a) at least one of acrylic acid and
methacrylic acid, and
(b) one or more alkyl acrylates.
25. The wet wipe of Claim 24, wherein the sulfonate anion modified acrylic
acid
terpolymer is formed from acrylic acid; 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-
propanesulfonic acid
(AMPS), the sodium salt of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid
(NaAMPS), or
a combination thereof; butyl acrylate; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.

-96-
26. The wet wipe of Claims 25, wherein the sulfonate anion modified acrylic
acid
terpolymer is formed from acrylic acid; AMPS; NaAMPS; butyl acrylate; and 2-
ethylhexyl acrylate.
27. The wet wipe of Claims 26, wherein the sulfonate anion modified acrylic
acid
terpolymer is formed from about 35 to less than 80 mole percent acrylic acid;
from greater
than 0 to about 20 mole percent 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid
(AMPS),
the sodium salt of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid (NaAMPS), or a
combination thereof; from greater than 0 to about 65 mole percent butyl
acrylate; and from
greater than 0 to about 45 mole percent 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.
28. The wet wipe of Claims 27, wherein the sulfonate anion modified acrylic
acid
terpolymer comprises from about 50 to less than 67 mole percent acrylic acid;
from
greater than 0 to about 10 mole percent AMPS, NaAMPS, or a combination thereof-
, from
about 15 to about 28 mole percent butyl acrylate; and from about 7 to about 15
mole
percent 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.
29. The wet wipe of Claim 28, wherein the sulfonate anion modified acrylic
acid
terpolymer comprises from about 60 mol% acrylic acid; about 5 mol% AMPS,
NaAMPS,
or a combination thereof; about 24.5 mol% butyl acrylate; and about 10.5 mol%
2-
ethylhexyl acrylate.
30. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 17 to 29, wherein the binder composition
comprises from about 65 to about 75 weight percent of the sulfonate anion
modified
acrylic acid terpolymer and from about 35 to about 25 weight percent of the
non-
crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate).
31. The wet wipe of Claim 30, wherein the binder composition comprises about
75
weight percent of the sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer and
about 25
weight percent of the non-crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate).

-97-
32. A wet wipe according to Claim 1 comprising:
fibrous material;
a binder composition for binding said fibrous material into an integral web,
said
binder composition comprising (a) a first polymer formed from acrylic acid; 2-
acrylamido-
2-methyl-1 -propanesulfonic acid (AMPS), the sodium salt of 2-acrylamido-2-
methyl-l-
propanesulfonic acid (NaAMPS), or a combination thereof, butyl acrylate; and 2-
ethylhexyl acrylate; and (b) a second polymer comprising a non-crosslinking
poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate); and
a wetting composition containing at least about 1 weight percent of an
activating
compound.
33. The wet wipe of Claim 32, wherein the wherein the binder composition is
soluble
in water containing from about 15 ppm to about 200 ppm of one or more
multivalent ions.
34. The wet wipe of Claim 32 or 33, wherein the binder composition is soluble
in
water containing from about 15 ppm to about 50 ppm of one or more multivalent
ions.
35. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 32 to 34, wherein the binder composition
is
insoluble in a neutral salt solution containing from about 1 weight percent to
about 5.0
weight percent salt.
36. The wet wipe of Claim 32, wherein the first polymer is formed from about
35 to
less than 80 mole percent acrylic acid; from greater than 0 to about 20 mole
percent
AMPS, NaAMPS, or a combination thereof, from greater than 0 to about 65 mole
percent
butyl acrylate; and from greater than 0 to about 45 mole percent 2-ethylhexyl
acrylate.
37. The wet wipe of Claim 36, wherein the first polymer comprises from about
50 to
less than 67 mole percent acrylic acid; from greater than 0 to about 10 mole
percent
AMPS, NaAMPS, or a combination thereof, from about 15 to about 28 mole percent
butyl
acrylate; and from about 7 to about 15 mole percent 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.

-98-
38. The wet wipe of Claim 37, wherein the first polymer comprises about 60
mol%
acrylic acid; about 5 mol% AMPS, NaAMPS, or a combination thereof, about 24.5
mol%
butyl acrylate; and about 10.5 mol% 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.
39. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 32 to 38, wherein the first polymer is
present in
an amount from about 65 to about 75 weight percent, and the second polymer is
present in
an amount from about 35 to 25 weight percent.
40. The wet wipe of Claim 39, wherein the first polymer is present in an
amount of
about 75 weight percent, and the second polymer is present in an amount of
about 25
weight percent.
41. The wet wipe of Claim 32, wherein the first polymer comprises about 60
mol%
acrylic acid; about 5 mol% AMPS, NaAMPS, or a combination thereof; about 24.5
mol%
butyl acrylate; and about 10.5 mol% 2-ethylhexyl acrylate and is present in an
amount of
about 75 weight percent; the second polymer is present in an amount of about
25 weight
percent; and the wetting composition contains about 4 weight percent of the
salt.
42. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 41, wherein the fibrous material
comprises
one or more layers of a woven fabric, a nonwoven fabric, a knitted fabric, or
a
combination thereof.
43. The wet wipe of Claim 42, wherein the fibrous material comprises one or
more
layers of a nonwoven fabric.
44. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 41, wherein the fibrous material
comprises
fibers having a length of about 15 mm or less.
45. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 41, wherein the fibrous material
comprises
natural fibers, synthetic fibers, or a combination thereof.

-99-
46. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 41, wherein the fibrous material
comprises
one or more fibers containing cotton, linen, jute, hemp, wool, wood pulp,
viscose rayon,
cuprammonium rayon, cellulose acetate, polyester, polyamide, and polyacrylic.
47. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 41, wherein the fibrous material
comprises
wood pulp.
48. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 47, wherein the fabric sheet
comprises a
tissue web.
49. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 47, wherein the fabric sheet
comprises an
airlaid web.
50. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 47, wherein the fabric sheet
comprises a
hydroentangled web.
51. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 50, wherein the wetting composition
comprises:
about 86 to about 98 weight percent deionized water;
about 1 to about 6 weight percent sodium chloride;
up to about 2 weight percent of one or more preservatives;
up to about 2 weight percent of one or more surfactants;
up to about 1 weight percent of one or more silicone emulsions;
up to about 1 weight percent of one or more emollients;
up to about 0.3 weight percent of one or more fragrances;
up to about 0.5 weight percent of one or more fragrance solubilizers; and
up to about 0.5 weight percent of one or more pH adjusters.
52. The wet wipe of any one of Claims 1 to 50, wherein the wetting composition
comprises:
about 86 to about 98 weight percent of deionized water;
about 1 to about 6 weight percent of sodium chloride;

-100-
from greater than 0 to about 2 weight percent of one or more preservatives
comprising glycerin, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC), and
dimethyloldimethyl
(DIVMM) hydantoin;
from, greater than 0 to about 2 weight percent of a surfactant comprising acyl
glutamate;
from greater than 0 to about 1 weight percent of one or more silicone
emulsions
comprising dimethiconol and triethanolamine (TEA) dodecylbenezene sulfonate;
from greater than 0 to about 1 weight percent of an emollient comprising PEG-
75
Lanolin;
from greater than 0 to about 0.3 weight percent of one or more fragrances;
from greater than 0 to about 0.5 weight percent of a fragrance solubilizer
comprising polysorbate 20; and
from greater than 0 to about 0.2 weight percent of a pH adjuster comprising
malic
acid.
53. A wet wipe according to Claim 1 comprising:
a fabric comprising:
from about 78 to about 83 weight percent of wood pulp having a fiber length of
less than about 15 mm; and
about 22 to about 17 weight percent of a binder composition applied thereto
and
dried thereon, wherein the binder composition comprises from about 65 to about
75
weight percent of a sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer
comprising about 60
mole percent acrylic acid, about 5 mole percent NaAMPS, about 24.5 mole
percent butyl
acrylate, and about 10.5 mole percent 2-ethylhexyl acrylate; and from about 25
to about 35
weight percent of a non-crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate); and
a wetting composition comprising:
about 92.88 weight percent of deionized water;
about 4.00 weight percent of sodium chloride;
about 1.00 weight percent of one or more preservatives comprising glycerin,
IPBC,
and DMDM hydantoin;
about 1.00 weight percent of a surfactant comprising acyl glutamate;

-101-
about 0.50 weight percent of one or more silicone emulsions comprising
dimethiconol and TEA dodecylbenezene sulfonate;
about 0.25 weight percent of an emollient comprising PEG-75 Lanolin; about
0.05
weight percent of one or more fragrances;
about 0.25 weight percent of a fragrance solubilizer comprising polysorbate
20;
and
about 0.07 weight percent of a pH adjuster comprising malic acid.
54. A method of making a wet wipe comprising:
forming a web of fibrous material;
applying a binder composition onto said web, wherein the binder composition
comprises a sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer and a non-
crosslinking
poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate), wherein the binder composition is insoluble in a
neutral salt
solution containing at least about 1 weight percent salt, said salt comprising
one or more
monovalent ions; and wherein the binder composition is soluble in water
containing up to
about 200 ppm of one or more multivalent ions; and
applying a wetting composition containing at least about 1 weight percent of
an
activating compound onto the web.
55. A method of making a wet wipe comprising:
forming a web of fibrous material;
applying a binder composition onto the web, said binder composition comprising
(a) a first polymer formed from acrylic acid; 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-
propanesulfonic
acid (AMPS), the sodium salt of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid
(NaAMPS), or a combination thereof, butyl acrylate; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate;
and (b) a
second polymer comprising a non-crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate); and
applying a wetting composition containing at least about 1 weight percent of
an
activating compound onto the web.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
1
ION-SENSITIVE, WATER-DISPERSIBLE POLYMERS, A METHOD OF
MAKING SAME AND ITEMS USING SAME
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to ion-sensitive, water-
dispersible polymer formulations. The present invention is also directed to a
method of making ion-sensitive, water-dispersible polymer fqrmulations and
their applicability as binder compositions for disposable items. The present
invention is further directed to disposable items, such as wet-wipes
comprising ion-sensitive, water-dispersible binder compositions.
BACKGROUIVD OF THE INVENTION
For many years, the problem of disposability has plagued
industries which provide disposable items, such as, diapers, wet wipes,
incontinent garments and feminine care products. While much headway has
been made in addressing this problem, one of the weak links has been the
inability to create an economical coherent fibrous web, which will readily
dissolve or disintegrate in water, but still have sufficient in-use strength.
See,
for example, U.K. patent disclosure 2,241,373 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,233.
Without such a product, the ability of the user to dispose of the product by
flushing it down the toilet is greatly reduced, if not eliminated.
Furthermore,
the ability of the product to disintegrate in a landfill is quite limited
because a
large portion of the product components, which may well be biodegradable or
photodegradable, are encapsulated in or bound together by plastic which
degrades over a long period of time, if at all. Accordingly, if the plastic
disintegrated in the presence of water, the internal components could degrade
as a result of the rupture of the plastic encapsulation or binding.
Disposable products, such as diapers, feminine care products
and adult incontinent care products may be made to be disposed by flushing
down toilets. Usually such products comprise a body side liner which must
rapidly pass fluids, such as urine or menses, so that the fluid may be
absorbed
by an absorbent core of the product. Typically, the body side liner may be a

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-2-
coherent fibrous web, which desirably possesses a number of characteristics,
such as softness and flexibility. The fibrous web of the body side liner
material may be typically formed by wet or dry (air) laying a generally
random plurality of fibers and joining them together to form a coherent web
with a binder compositions. Past binder compositions have preformed this
function well. However, fibrous webs comprising these compositions tended
to be non-dispersible and present problems in typical household sanitation
systems.
Recent binder compositions have been developed which can be
more dispersible and are more environmentally responsible than past binder
compositions. One class of binder compositions includes polymeric materiais
having inverse solubility in water. These binder compositions are insoluble in
wanm water, but are soluble in cold water, such as found in a toilet. It is
well
known that a number of polymers exhibit cloud points or inverse solubility
properties in aqueous media. These polymers have been cited in several
publications for various applications, including (1) as evaporation retarders
(JP 6207162); (2) as temperature sensitive compositions, which are useful as
temperature indicators due to a sharp color change associated with a
corresponding temperature change (JP 6I92527); (3) as heat sensitive
materials that are opaque at a specific temperature and become transparent
when cooled to below the specific temperature (JP 51003248 and JP
81035703); (4) as wound dressings with good absorbing characteristics and
easy removal (JP 6233809); and (5) as materials in flushable personal care
products (U.S. Pat. No. 5,509,913, issued to Richard S. Yeo on April 23, 1996
and assigned to Kimberly-Clark Corporation).
Other recent binders of interest include a class of binders,
which are ion-sensitive. Several U.S. and European patents assigned to Lion
Corporation of Tokyo, Japan, disclose ion-sensitive polymers comprising
acrylic acid and alkyl or aryl acrylates. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,312,883,
5,317,063 and 5,384,189, as well as, European Pat. No. 608460A1. In U.S. Pat.
No.
5,312,883, terpolymers axe disclosed as suitable binders for flushable
nonwoven webs. The disclosed acrylic acid-based terpolymers, which
comprise partially neutralized acrylic acid, butyl acrylate and 2-ethylhexvl
acrylate, are suitable binders for use in flushable nonwoven webs in some
parts of the world. However, because of the presence of a small amount of

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-3-
sodium acrylate in the partially neutralized terpolymer, these binders fail to
disperse in water containing more than about 15 ppm Caz+ and/or Mgz+. When
placed in water containing more than about 15 ppm Ca'-+ and/or MgZ+ ions,
nomti-oven webs using the above-described binders maintain a tensile strength
greater than 30 g/in, which negatively affects the "dispersibility" of the
web.
The proposed mechanism for the failure is that each calcium ion binds with
two carboxylate groups either intramolecularly or intermolecularly.
Intramolecular association causes the polymer chain to coil up, which
eventually leads to polymer precipitation. lntermolecular association yields
crosslinking. Whether intramolecular or intermolecular associations are
taking place, the terpolymer is not soluble in water containing more than
about
ppm Ca" and/or Mg2+. Due to the strong interaction between calcium ions
and the carboxylate groups of the terpolymer, dissociation of the complex is
highly unlikely because this association is irreversible. T7nerefore, the
above-
15 described polymer that has been exposed to a high Ca2+ and/or MgZ'
concentration solution will not disperse in water even if the. calcium
concentration decreases. This limits the application of the polymer as a
flushable binder material because most areas across the U.S. have hard water,
which contains more than 15 p,pr,n Ca?+ anii/or Mg2+.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,804 assigned to Kimberly Clark,
there is disclosed a modification of the arcrylic acid terpolymers of the
above-
referenced patents to Lion Corporation. Specifically, U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,804
discloses a sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymers which has
improved dispersibility in relatively hard water; e.g., up to 200 ppm Caz+
and/or Mg2+, compared to the unmodified Lion polymers. However, the Lion
Corporation ion-sensitive polymers of the above-referenced_patents and the
sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymers of the _ co-pending
application, when used as binders for personal care products, such as wet
wipes, typically have reduced sheet wettability, increased sheet stiffness,
increased sheet stickiness, reduced binder sprayability and relatively high
product cost.
Another approach to dispersible personal care products is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,281,306 to Kao Corporation of Tokyo, Japan.
This patent discloses a water-disintegratable cleansing sheet; i.e., wet wipe,

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-4-
comprising water-dispersible fibers treated with a water-soluble binder having
a carboxyl group. The cleansing sheet is treated with a cleansing agent
containing 5%-95% of a water-compatible organic solvent and 95%-5% water.
A preferred organic solvent is propylene glycol. The cleansing sheet retains
wet strength and does not disperse in the organic solvent-based cleansing
agent, but disperses in water.
Although many patents disclose various ion and temperature
sensitive compositions for water-dispersible or flushable materials, there
exists a need for dispersible products possessing softness, flexibility, three
lo dimensionality, and resiliency; wicking and structural integrity in the
presence
of body fluids (including feces) at body temperature; and true fiber
dispersion
after toilet flushing so that fibers do not become entangled with tree roots
or at
bends in sewer pipes. In addition, the known ion-sensitive polymers, such as
those of Lion Corporation and the U.S. patent of Kimberly Clark,
have relatively high viscosities at high shear rates that make application by
spraying impossible or impractical. Moreover, there is a need in the art for
flushable products having water-dispersibility in all areas of the world,
including sofft and hard water areas. Furthennore, there is a need for water-
dispersible binders that do not reduce wettability of product with which they
are used and are sprayable for easy and uniform application to and penetration
into products. Finally, there is a need for water-dispersible, flushable wet
wipes that are sfable during storage and retain a desired level of wet
strength
during use and are wetted with awetting composition that is relatively free,
or
is substantially free, of organic solvents. Such a product is needed at a
reasonable cost without compromising product safety and environmental
concerns, something that past products have failed to do.
SUMMARY OF THE ITIVENTION
The present invention is directed to ion-sensitive polymer
formulations, which have been developed to address the above-described
problems associated with currently available, ion-sensitive polymers and other
polymers described in literature. The ion-sensitive polymer formulations of
the present invention have a"trigger property," such that the polymers are
insoluble in a wetting composition comprising ions of a particular type and
concentration, sueh as monovalent salt solutions at a eoncentration from about
0.3% to 10%, but can be soluble when diluted with water, including divalent

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-5-
salt solutions such as hard water with up to 200 ppm (parts per million)
calcium and magnesium ions. Unlike some ion-sensitive polymer
formulations, which lose dispersibility in hard water because of ion cross-
linking by calcium ions, the polymer formulations of the present invention are
relatively insensitive to calcium and/or magnesium ions. Consequently,
flushable products containing the polymer formulations of the present
invention maintain dispersibility in hard water. Furthermore, the ion-
sensitive
polymer formulations of the present invention can have improved properties
of sprayability or reduced high-shear viscosity, improved product wettability
or decreased properties of product stiffness and stickiness.
The polyrner formulations of the present invention are useful as
binders and structural components for air-laid and wet-laid nonwoven fabrics
for applications such as body-side liners, fluid distribution materials, fluid
in-
take materials (surge) or cover stock in various personal care products. The
polymer formulations of the present invention are particularly useful as a
binder materiai for flushable personal care products, particulariy wet wipes
for
personal use such as cleaning or treating skin, make-up removal, nail polish
removal, medical care, and also wipes for use in hard surface cleaning,
automotive care, including wipes comprising cleaning agents, disinfectants,
and the like. The flushable products maintain integrity or wet strength during
storage and use, and break apart or disperse after disposal in the toilet when
the salt concentration falls below a critical level. Suitable substrates for
treatment include tissue, such as creped or uncreped tissue, coform products,
hydroentangled webs, airlaid mats, fluff pulp, nonwoven webs, and
composites thereof. Methods for producing uncreped tissues and molded
three-dimensional tissue wehs of,use.in the pr,esent invention can be found in
commonty owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,436,234, "Wet Resilient Webs and Disposable
Articles Made Therewith"; U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,686, issued to Chiu et al. on
July 4,
1995; U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,412, issued to S.J. Sudall and S.A. Engel on March
21, 1995;
U.S. Pat. No. 5,672,248, issued to Wendt et al. on Sept. 30, 1997; and U.S.
Pat.
No. 5,607,551, issued to Farrington et al, on March 4, 1997. The molded tissue
structures of the above patents can be especially helpful in providing
good cleaning in a wet wipe. Good cleaning can also be promoted

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-6-
by providing a degree of texture in other substrates as well by embossing,
molding, wetting and through-air drying on a textured fabric, and the like.
Airlaid material can be formed by metering an airflow
containing the fibers and other optional materials, in substantially dry
condition, onto a typically horizontally moving wire forming screen. Suitable
systems and apparatus for air-laying mixtures of fibers and thermoplastic
material are disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,724 (Persson),
issued Jun. 12, 1979, and reissued Dec. 25, 1984 as Re. U.S. Pat. No. 31,775;
U.S. Pat. No. 4,278,113 (Persson), issued Jul. 14, 1981; U.S. Pat. No.
4,264,289 (Day), issued Apr. 28, 1981; U.S. Pat. No. 4,352,649 (Jacobsen et
al.), issued Oct. 5, 1982; U.S. Pat. No. 4,353;687 (Hosler, et al.), issued
Oct.
12, 1982; U.S. Pat. No. 4,494,278 (Kroyer, et al.), issued Jan. 22, 1985; U.S.
Pat. No. 4,627,806 (Johnson), issued Dec. 9, 1986; U.S. Pat. No. 4,650,409
(Nistri, et al.), issued Mar. 17, 1987; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,724,980 (Farley),
issued Feb. 16, 1988; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,640,810 ( Laursen et al.), issued
Feb. 3, 1987.
The present invention also discloses how to make water-
dispersible nonwovens, including cover stock (liner), intake (surge) materials
and wet wipes, which are stable in fluids having a first ionic composition,
such as monovalent ions at a particular concentration substantially greater
than
is found in typical hard water, using the above-described unique polymer
formulations as binder compositions. The resultant nonwovens are flushable
and water-dispersible due to the tailored ion sensitivity, which can be
triggered regardless of the hardness of water found in toilets throughout the
United States and the world. Dispersible products in accordance with the
present invention also can have improved properties of softness and
flexibility. Such products also have reduced stickiness. In some
embodiments, the polymer formulations with which such articles are treated
can have improved properties of sprayability, which improves polymer
distribution on the product and penetration into the product, in addition to
ease
of application, which translates into cost savings.
The present invention further discloses an improved wetting
composition for wet wipes. Wet wipes employing the polymer formulations
of the present invention are stable during storage and retain a desired level
of
wet strength during use and are wetted with a wetting composition or cleaning
agent that can be relatively free, or is substantially free, of organic
solvents.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-7-
These features and advantages of the present invention will
become apparent after a review of the following detailed description of the
disclosed embodiments and the appended drawing and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a graph that depicts wet strength data for three binder
formulations as a function of ionic environment and soak time.
Fig. 2 is a chart showing how wet tensile strength (reported as
CDWT in grams per 2.54 cm over a range of soak times) can change over time
as a fabric, comprising 68 gsm softwood airlaid webs and ion-sensitive
binders, are soaked in solutions comprising calcium ions.
Fig. 3 compares two data sets with Lion SSB-3b product taken
from FIG. 2(labeled as Code 3300) with a sulfonated salt-sensitive binder
blended with Dur-O-Set RB polymer in a 75/25 ratio.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSED EMBODIMENTS
In order to be an effective ion-sensitive formulations suitable
for use in flushable or water-dispersible personal care products, the
formulations should desirably be (1) functional; i. e., maintain wet strength
under controlled conditions and dissolve or disperse rapidly in soft or hard
water such as found in toilets and sinks around the world; (2) safe (not
toxic);
and (3) relatively economical. In addition to the foregoing factors, the ioin-
sensitive formulations when used as a binder composition for a non-woven
substrate, such as a wet wipe, desirably should be (4) processable on a
commercial basis; i.e., may be applied relatively quickly on a large scale
basis,
such as by spraying, which thereby requires that the binder composition have
a relatively low viscosity at high shear; (5) provide acceptable levels of
sheet
or substrate wettability; and (6) provide improved product feel, such as
improved product flexibility and reduced stickiness. The wetting composition
with which the wet wipes of the present invention are treated can provide
some of the foregoing advantages, and, in addition, can provide one or more
of (7) improved skin care, such as reduced skin irritation or other benefits,
(8)
improved tactile properties, and (9) promote good cleaning by providing a
balance in use between friction and lubricity on the skin (skin glide). The
ion-
sensitive polymer formulations of the present invention and articles made
therewith, especially wet wipes comprising particular wetting compositions

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-8-
set forth below, can meet many or all of the above cnteria. Of course, it is
not
necessary for all of the advantages of the preferred embodiments of the
present invention to be met to fall within the scope of the present invention.
The polymer formulations of the present invention may be
formed from a single triggerable polymer, such as an ion-sensitive polymer, or
from a combination of two or more different polymers, such as a triggerable
polymer and a co-binder. Desirably, at least one polymer of the polymer
fortnulations of the present invention is an ion-sensitive polymer. Ion-
sensitive polymers are kno\vn in the art and include any polymer whose water
to solubility varies depending on the type and amount of ions present in
water.
Ion-sensitive polymers useful in the present invention include, but are not
limited to the Lion polymers discussed above, such as the Lion acrylic acid
tcrpolymer, the $ulf,onate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer of the
U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,804 assigned to Kimberly Clark Worldwide, Inc.; the
acrylic acid free polymers of the U.S. Pat. No. 6,537,663 entitled "Ion-
Sensitive
Hard Water Dispersible Polymers and Applications Therefor", also assigned to
Kimberly Clark Worldwide, Inc.; as well as, other ion- and chemical-sensitive
polymers, including the polymers of U.S. Pat. No. 6,043,317, issued Mar. 28,
2000
to Mumick et al., and also assigned to Kimberly Clark Worldwide, Inc.
Other known triggerable polymers include temperature-
sensitive and heat-sensitive polymers, as well as, polymers which become
dispersible in the presence of a dispersion aid added to the water of a toilet
bowl or other water source, as discussed in U.S. Patent No. 5,948,710, issued
Sept. 7, 1999 to Pomplun et al. and assigned to Kimberly Clark Worldwide,
Inc., who note that another means for rendering a polymer degradable in water
is through the use of temperature change. Certain polymers exhibit a cloud
point temperature. As a result, these polymers will precipitate out of a
solution at a particular temperature, which is the cloud point. These polymers
can be used to form fibers, ,vhich are insoluble in water above a certain
temperature, but which beconie soluble and thus degradable in water at a
lower temperature. As a result, it is possible to select or blend a polymer,
which will not degrade in bodv fluids, such as urine, at or near body

CA 02407741 2008-03-11
-9-
temperature (37 C) but which will degrade when placed in water at
temperatures below body temperature, for example, at room temperature (23
C). An example of such a polymer is polyvinylmethylether, which has a cloud
point of 34 C. When this polymer is exposed to body fluids such as urine at
37 C., it will not degrade as this temperature is above its cloud point (34
C).
However, if the polymer is placed in water at room temperature (23 C), the
polymer will, with time, go back into solution as it is now exposed to water
at
a temperature below its cloud point. Consequently, the polymer will begin to
degrade. Blends of polyvinylmethylether and copolymers may be considered
as well. Other cold water soluble polymers include poly(vinyl alcohol) graft
copolymers supplied by the Nippon Synthetic Chemical Company, Ltd. of
Osaka, Japan, which are coded Ecomaty*AX2000, AX10000 and AX300G.
lott-Sensitive Polymers
The ion-sensitive Lion polymers and the ion-sensitive
polymers of the above-referenced U.S. patents of Kimberly-Clark Worldwide,
Inc. are useful in the present invention. The sulfonate anion modified acrylic
acid terpolymer of U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,804, assigned to Kimberly-Clark
Worldwide, Inc., are desired because, unlike the Lion Corp. polymers and
other polymers cited in technical literature, the polymers of U.S. Pat. No.
6,423,804 are soluble in water having from less than about 10 ppm Ca2+
and/or Mg2+ up to about 200 ppm Ca2+and/or Mg2+. The polymers of U.S. Pat.
No. 6,423,804 are formulated to minimize the potentially strong interaction
between the anions of the polymers and the cations in the water. This strong
interaction can be explained via the hard-soft acid-base theory proposed by
R.G. Pearson in the Journal of the American Chemical Societv, vol. 85, pg.
3533 (1963); or N.S. Isaacs in the textbook, Physical Organic Chemistrv,
published by Longman Scientific and Technical with John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York (1987). Hard anions and hard cations interact strongly with
one another. Sofft anions and soft cations also interact strongly with one
another. However, soft anions and hard cations, and vice-versa, interact
weakly with one another. In the Lion polymers, the carboxylate anion of the
sodiumaaylate is a hard anion, wluchinaterad.s strongly with the hard cations,
Ca2+
and/or Mg2+, present in modeaatelyluni and hard water. By rqiacingthe
catboxylake
anions with a softer anion, such as a sulfonate anion, the interaction between
* trade -mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-10-
the anions of an ion-triggerable polymer and the hard cations, Ca2+ and/or
Mg2+, present in moderately hard and hard water, is reduced.
As used herein, the term "soft water" refers to water having a
divalent ion content of less than about 10 ppm. As used herein, the term
"moderately hard water" refers to water having a divalent ion content of from
about 10 to about 50 ppm. As used herein, the term "hard water" refers to
water having a divalent ion content of more than about 50 ppm up to about
200 ppm. By controlling the hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance and the
composition of the polymers as well as the combination of polymers forming
the formulation, the ion-sensitive polymer formulations having desired in-use
binding strength and water-dispersibility in water are produced. The ion-
sensitive polymer can be a copolymer, such as a terpolymer.
Ion-sensitive acrylic acid copolymers of the present invention
may comprise any combination of acrylic acid monomers and acrylic ester
(alkyl acrylate) monomers capable of free radical polymerization into a
copolymer and, specifically, a terpolymer. Suitable acrylic acid monomers
include, but are not limited to, acrylic acid and methacrylic acid. Suitable
acrylic monomers include, but are not limited to, acrylic esters and
methacrylic esters having an alkyl group of 1 to 18 carbon atoms or a
cycloalkyl group of 3 to 18 carbon atoms and it is preferred that acrylic
esters
and/or methacrylic esters having a alkyl group of 1 to 12 carbon atoms or a
cycloalkyl group of 3 to 12 carbon atoms be used singly or in combination.
Other suitable monomers include, but are not limited to, acrylamide and
methacrylamide based monomers, such as acrylamide, N,N-dimethyl
acrylamide, N-ethyl acrylamide, N-isopropyl acrylamide, and hydroxymethyl
acrylamide; N-vinylpyrrolidinone; N-vinylforamide; hydroxyalkyl acrylates
and hydroxyalkyl methacrylates, such as hydroxyethyl methacrylate and
hydroxyethyl acrylate. Other suitable acrylic acid monomers and acrylic ester
monomers are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,317,063, assigned to Lion
Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. A particularly preferred acrylic acid terpolymer is
LION SSB-3b*, available from Lion Corporation. (In alternative embodiments,
the ion-sensitive polymer is formed from monomers other than acrylic acid or
its
derivatives, or is relatively free of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and
salts thereof.)
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-11-
The relative amounts of the monomers in the acrylic acid
copolymer of the present invention may vary depending on the desired
properties in the resulting polymer. The mole percent of acrylic acid
monomer in the copolymer is up to about 70 mole percent. More specifically,
the mole percent of acrylic acid monomer in the copolymer is from about 15
to about 50 mole percent: Most specifically, the mole percent of acrylic acid
monomer in the copolymer is from about 25 to about 40 mole percent.
More specifically, examples of the acrylic acid copolymers
useful in the present invention include copolymers of 10 weight percent to 90
weight percent, desirably 20 weight percent to 70 weight percent of acrylic
acid and/or methacrylic acid and 90 weight percent to 10 weight percent,
desirably 80 weight percent to 30 weight percent of acrylic esters and/or
methacrylic esters having an alkyl group of 1 to 18 carbon atoms or a
cycloalkyl group of 3 to 18 carbon atoms in which 1 to 60 mole percent,
desirably 5 to 50 mole percent of acrylic acid and/or methacrylic acid is
neutralized to form a salt; or copolymers of 30 weight percent to 75 weight
percent, desirably 40 weight percent to 65 weight percent of acrylic acid, 5
weight percent to 30 weight percent, desirably 10 weight percent to 25 weight
percent of acrylic esters and/or methacrylic esters having an alkyl group of 8
to 12 carbon atoms and 20 weight percent to 40 weight percent; desirably 25
weight percent to 35 weight percent of acrylic esters and/or methacrylic
esters
having an alkyl group of 2 to 4 carbon atoms in which 1 to 50 mole percent,
desirably 2 to 40 mole percent of acrylic acid is neutralized to form a salt.
The acrylic acid copolymers of the present invention may have
an average molecular weight, which varies depending on the ultimate use of
the polymer. The acrylic acid copolymers of the present invention have a
weight average molecular weight ranging from about 10,000 to about
5,000,000. More specifically, the acrylic acid copolymers of the present
invention have a weight average molecular weight ranging from about 25,000
to about 2,000,000, or, more specifically still, from about 200,000 to about
1,000,000.
The acrylic acid copolymers of the present invention may be
prepared according to a variety of polymerization methods, desirably a
solution polymerization method. Suitable solvents for the polymerization
method include, but are not limited to, lower alcohols such as methanol,
ethanol and propanol; a mixed solvent of water and one or more lower

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-12-
alcohols mentioned above; and a mixed solvent of water and one or more
lower ketones such as acetone or methyl ethyl ketone.
In the polymerization methods of the present invention, any
polymerization initiator may be used. Selection of a particular initiator may
depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the
polymerization temperature, the solvent, and the monomers used. Suitable
polymerization initiators for use in the present invention include, but are
not
limited to, 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile, 2,2'-azobis(2-methylbutyronitrile),
2,2'-
azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile), 2,2'-azobis(2-
amidinopropane)dihydrochloride, 2,2'-azobis(N,N'-
dimethyleneisobutylamidine), potassium persulfate, ammonium persulfate,
and aqueous hydrogen peroxide. The amount of polymerization initiator may
desirably range from about 0.01 to 5 weight percent based on the total weight
of monomer present.
The polymerization temperature may vary depending on the
polymerization solvent, monomers, and initiator used, but in general, ranges
from about 20 C to about 90 C. Polymerization time generally ranges from
about 2 to about 8 hours.
The sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid copolymers in
accordance with the present invention include hydrophilic monomers, such as
acrylic acid or methacrylic acid, incorporated into the acrylic acid
copolymers
of the present invention along with one or more sulfonate-containing
monomers. The sulfonate anions of these monomers are softer than
carboxylate anions since the negative charge of the sulfonate anion is
delocalized over three oxygen atoms and a larger sulfur atom, as opposed to
only two oxygen atoms and a smaller carbon atom in the carboxylate anion.
These monomers, containing the softer sulfonate anion, are less interactive
with multivalent ions present in hard water, particularly Caz+ and MgZ+ ions.
Suitable sulfonate-containing monomers include, but are not limited to, 2-
acrylamido-2-methyl-l-propanesulfonic acid (AMPS) and organic or
inorganic salts of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-l-propanesulfonic acid, such as
alkali earth metal and organic amine salts of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-l-
propanesulfonic acid, particularly the sodium salt of 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-l-
propanesulfonic acid (NaAMPS). Additional suitable sulfonate-containing
monomers include, but are not limited to, 2-methyl-2-propene sulfonic acid,

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-13-
vinyl sulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, 2-sulfopropyl methacrylate and 3-
sulfopropyl acrylate, and organic or inorganic salts thereof, such as alkali
earth metals and organic amine salts, such as alkyl ammonium hydroxide
wherein the alkyl groups are C,-C,g. To maintain the hydrophobic/hydrophilic
balance of the ion-sensitive polymer, one or more hydrophobic monomers are
added to the polymer.
The ion-sensitive sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid
copolymers of the present invention may be produced from monomers
including the following monomers: acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, or a
combination thereof; 2-acrylamido-2-methyl-l-propanesulfonic acid (AMPS)
and organic or inorganic salts thereof, such as the sodium salt thereof
(NaAMPS); butyl acrylate; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate. Desirably, the ion-
sensitive sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid copolymers of the present
invention are produced from: acrylic acid; AMPS, NaAMPS or a combination
thereof; butyl acrylate; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate. Desirably, the monomers
are present in the sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid copolymer at the
following mole percents: acrylic acid, about 35 to less than 80 mole percent;
AMPS or NaAMPS, greater than 0 to about 20 mole percent; butyl acrylate,
from greater than 0 to about 65 mole percent; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, from
greater than 0 to about 45 mole percent. More specifically, the monomers are
present in the sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid copolymer at the
following mole percents: acrylic acid, about 50 to about 67 mole percent;
AMPS or NaAMPS, from greater than 0 to about 10 mole percent; butyl
acrylate, from about 15 to about 28 mole percent; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate,
from about 7 to about 15 mole percent. Most specifically, the monomers are
present in the sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid copolymer at the .
following mole percents: acrylic acid, about 57 to about 66 mole percent;
AMPS or NaAMPS, from about 1 to about 6 mole percent; butyl acrylate,
from about 15 to about 28 mole percent; and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, from about
7 to about 13 mole percent; especially, about 60 mole percent acrylic acid,
about 5 mole percent AlVIPS or NaAMPS, about 24.5 mole percent butyl
acrylate and about 10.5 mole percent 2-ethylhexyl acrylate.
If AMPS is used as one of the monomers, it is desired to
neutralize at least a portion of the acid component. Any inorganic base or
organic base may be used as a neutralizing agent to neutralize the acid
component. Examples of neutralizing agents include, but are not limited to,

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-14-
inorganic bases, such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, lithium
hydroxide and sodium carbonate, and amines, such as monoethanolamine,
diethanolamine, diethylaminoethanol, ammonia, trimethylamine,
triethylamine, tripropylamine, morpholine. Preferred neutralizing agents
include sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, or a combination thereof.
A sulfonate modified copolymer having salt-sensitivity may
also be produced by sulfonation of an existing polymer, such as a copolymer
or acrylic acid-derived terpolymer. Methods of sulfonating polymers are well
knowm in the art. Methods for the production of sulfonated or sulfated
polymers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,624,069, issued Nov. 1971 to
Schwelger; U.S. Pat. No. 4,419,403, issued Dec. 6, 1983 to Varona; U.S. Pat.
No. 5,522,967, issued Jun. 4, 1996 to Shet; U.S. Pat. No. 4,220,739, issued
Sep. 2, 1980 to Walles, U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,200, issued Jul. 21, 1998 to
Motley et al., as well as the following patents: U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,400,720;
2,937,066; 2,786,780; 2,832,696; 3,613,957, and 3,740,258.
Principles for sulfation and sulfonation (e.g.,
via sulfamic acid treatment , reaction with thionyl chloride or chlorosulfonic
acid, or exposure to sulfur trioxide) are among the pathways disclosed by
Samuel Shore and D.R. Berger in "Alcohol and Ether Alcohol Sulfates," in
Anionic Surfactants, Part 1, ed. Warner M. Linfield, New York: Marcel
Dekker, Inc., 1976, pp. 135-149; and by Ben E. Edwards, "The Mechanisms
of Sulfonation and Sulfation," in Anionic Surfactants, Part 1, ed. Warner M.
Linfield, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1976, pp. 111-134.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, the above-
described ion-sensitive polymer formulations are used as binder materials for
flushable and/or non-flushable products. In order to be effective as a binder
material in flushable products throughout the United States; the ion-sensitive
polymer formulations of the present invention remain stable -and maintain
their integrity while dry or in relatively low concentrations of monovalent
ions, but become soluble in water containing up to about 200 ppm divalent
ions, especially calcium and magnesium ions. Desirably, the ion-sensitive
polymer formulations of the present invention including acrylic acid
copolymers are insoluble in a salt solution containing at least about 0.3
weight
percent of one or more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent
ions. More desirably, the ion-sensitive polymer formulations of the present

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-15-
invention including acrylic acid copolymers are insoluble in a salt solution
containing from about 0.3 weight percent to about 5.0 weight percent of one
or more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent ions. Even
more desirably, the ion-sensitive polymer formulations of the present
invention including acrylic acid copolyrners are insoluble in salt solutions
containing from about 1 weight percent to about 3.0 weight percent of one or
more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent ions. Suitable
monovalent ions include, but are not limited to, Na+ ions, K+ ions, Li+ ions,
NH4+ ions, low molecular weight quaternary ammonium compounds (e.g.,
those having fewer than 5 carbons on any side group), and a combination
thereof.
In an alternate embodiment, the ion-sensitive polymer
formulations of the present invention including sulfonate anion modified
acrylic acid copolymers are insoluble in a salt solution containing at least
about 1 weight percent of one or more inorganic and/or organic salts
containing monovalent ions. More desirably, the ion-sensitive polymer
formulations of the present invention including sulfonate anion modified
acrylic acid terpolymers are insoluble in a salt solution containing from
about
1 weight percent to about 5.0 weight percent of one or more inorganic, and/or
organic salts containing monovalent ions. Even more desirably, the ion-
sensitive polymer formulations of the present invention including sulfonate
anion modified acrylic acid terpolymers are insoluble in salt solutions
containing from about 1 weight percent to about 3.0 weight percent of one or
more inorganic and/or organic salts containing monovalent ions. Suitable
monovalent ions include, but are not limited to, Na+ ions, K+ ions, Li+ ions,
NH4+ ions, low molecular weight quaternary ammonium compounds (e.g.,
those having fewer than 5 carbons on any side group), and a combination
thereof.
Based on a recent study conducted by the American Chemical
Society, water hardness across the United States varies greatly, with CaC03
concentration ranging from near zero for soft water to about 500 ppm CaC03
(about 200 ppm CaZ+ ion) for very hard water. To ensure polymer formulation
dispersibility across the country (and throughout the whole world), the ion-
sensitive polymer formulations of the present invention are desirably soluble
in water containing up to about 50 ppm Ca2+ and/or MgZ+ ions. More
desirably, the ion-sensitive polymer formulations of the present invention are

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-16-
soluble in water containing up to about 100 ppm Ca" andlor Mgz+ ions. Even
more desirably, the ion-sensitive polymer formulations of the present
invention are soluble in water containing up to about 150 ppm Caz+ and/or
Mg2+ ions. Even more desirably, the ion-sensitive polymer formulations of
the present invention are soluble in water containing up to about 200 ppm Ca2+
and/or Mg` ions.
A wide variety of polymer/surfactant systems may be used to
provide the same functionality as the ion-sensitive Lion polymers and the ion-
sensitive, sulforaate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymers of
U.S. Pat. No. 6,423,804, without the need to be limited to sulfonic or
carboxylic moieties. Such other systems are described below.
Phosphorylated polymers containing phosphonic groups,
thiophsulphonic groups, or other organophosphorous groups as the "sofft"
anion capable of establishing a mismatch with Ca++ may be used as the ion-
sensitive polymer in the present invention. This can include modified
cellulose or cellulose derivatives and related gums, made insoluble by the
presence of monovalent salts or other electrolytes. In one embodiment,
soluble cellulose derivatives, such as CMC, are phosphorylated and rendered
insoluble and can be effective as ion-sensitive polymer formulations when in a
solution of high ionic strength or of appropriate pH, but are dispersible in
tap
water. In another embodiment, aminophosphinic groups which can be anionic
or amphoteric, are added to a polymer. Aminophosphinic groups can be added
via condensation of a hypophosphite salt with a primary aniitie. Reaction of
chloromethylphosphinic acid with amines can also yield useful anionic
groups, as described by Guenther W. Wasow in "Phosphorous-Containing
Anionic Surfactants," Anionic Surfactants: Organic Chemistry, ed. Helmut W.
Stache, New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996, pp. 589-590. The entire chapter by
Wasow, comprising pages 551-629 of the aforementionud book, offers
additional teachings relevant to creating polymers with useful phosphorous
groups.
Other methods of prepanng phosphorylated cellulose fibers are
well known. These methods may be adapted to CMC, which may then serve
as a binder agent. Exemplary niethods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
3,739,782, issued June 19, 1973 to Bernardin. Cellulose and synthetic or

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-17-
natural polymers modified to have other "soft" anionic groups can be useful as
the ion-sensitive polymer of the present invention.
Natural polymers that are already provided with useful anionic
groups also can be useful in the present invention. Such polymers include
agar and car-ageenan, which have multiple ester sulfate groups. These may be
further modified, if necessary, to have additional anionic groups (e.g.,
sulfonation, phosphorylation, and the like).
Polymers having two or more differing soft anionic groups,
such as both sulfonic and phosphonic groups, wherein the relative amounts of
lo the differing anions can be adjusted to optimize the strength, the ionic
sensitivity, and the dispersibility of the polymer, are also useful in the
present
invention. This also includes zwitterionic and amphoteric compounds.
Polyampholytes in particular can be readily soluble above or below the
isoelectric point, but insoluble at the isoelectric point, offering the
potential
for a triggering mechanism based on electrolyte concentration and pH.
Examples of polyampholytes include, but are not limited to, copolymers of
methacrylic acid and allylamine, copolymers of inethacrylic acid and 2-
vinylpyridine, polysiloxane ionomers with pendant amphoteric groups, and
polymers formed directly from zwitterionic monomeric salts, such as the ion-
pair of co-monomers (IPC) of Salamone et al., all as disclosed by Irja Piirma
in Polymeric Surfactants, New York: Marcel Dekker, Ine., 1992, at pp. 251-
254.
Proteins capable of being salted out, optionally modified to
have additional soft ionic groups, can be useful as the ion-sensitive polymer
of
the present invention.
Systems such as those comprising algin derivatives or natural
sulfonated polymers in which calcium ion in high concentrations (much
higher than the levels of 250 ppm or less that may be encountered in hard
water) insolubilize the binder, but allow even hard water to sufficiently
dilute
the calcium ion to render the binder dispersible are useful in the present
invention. Thus, while it is desired that the ion-sensitive binders of the
present invention be insoluble in solutions comprising a monovalent metal ion
above a critical concentration, in some embodiments useful ion-sensitive
binders are insoluble in solutions comprising a divalent metal ion above a
critical concentration, but become soluble when the divalent metal ion
concentration falls to about 200 ppm or more specifically to about 100 ppm,

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-18-
such that a fibrous substrate with the ion-sensitive polymer as a binder
maintains good wet strength in a solution comprising an elevated
concentration of the divalent metal ion, yet becomes water dispersible in hard
water or medium hard water. Thus, the triggerring mechanism, which results
in a pre-moistened wipe losing wet strength and becoming flushable even in
hard water, ca.n be due to the dilution of a monovalent or divalent metal ion,
and particularly an alkali metal ion, with monovalent ions, such as sodium
being preferred. Natural polymers and gums, which may be adapted for use as
ion-sensitive binders, are described by R.L. Whistler a.nd J.N. BeMiller in
Iriduscrial Gums, New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1973.
Natural polymers, which become firm or form a gel in the
presence of calcium ions, are described below.
Algin (which may need to be in the form of sodium alginate
and calcium alginate for good dispersibility, based on reported behavior in
use
a binder for medicinal tablets - see p. 62 of Whistler and BeMiller), which is
insoluble as alginic acid, calcium alginate, or in general as a salt of most
polyvalent metals, but soluble as sodium alginate or as a salt with low-
molecular-weight amines or quaternary ammonium compounds (p. 67) may be
useful in the present invention. This material may be used, especially when
zinc is an insolubilizing metal ion.
Other useful polymers include Carageenan and Iridophycan,
both seaweed derivatives comprising ester sulfates.
Both natural polymers, including cellulose, and s_ynthetic
polymers can be provided with anionic groups, such as sulfonic groups,
phosphonic groups, and carboxyl groups, capable of forming bridges to other
molecules in the presence of ions of a suitable type and concentration. When
the ionic concentration is substantially ehanged, such as by placing a
cleansing article of the present invention in a toilet bowl,.lhe article may
become weak and disintegrate. _
Ion-sensitive polymers iriclude those which are dispersible in
aqueous environment under prescribed conditions, yet are not dispersible in
all
aqueous environments. Examples include matenals that are aikaline
dispersible or saline insoluble. The Eastman AQ*copolyesters (Eastman
Chemical Company, Kingsport, TN), for example, can be dispersible in
deionized Nvater yet insoluble in saline solutions. They have been proposed
for use in articles such as diapers intended to absorb body fluids. Further
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-19-
information on those polymers is provided in European Patent Application
773,315-A1, "Nonwoven Web Comprising Water Soluble Polyamides and
Articles Constructed Therefrom," published May 14, 1997 by S.U. Ahmed.
Useful polyainpholytes include polyacrylamide-based
copolymers which are highly sensitive to sodium chloride concentration.
U.S. Patent No. 3,939,836 describes an alkali salt of a sulfated
cellulose ester resin which gives good dry tensile strength to fabrics, which
strength
is retained in significant part when such fabrics are contacted with a salt
solution typical
of body fluids such as blood, menstrual fluid or urine and yet are readily
dispersible in
water. The resins have a degree of sulfate substitution of from 0.10 to 0.45.
In U.S.
Patent No. 4,419,403 colloidal sulfate esters of cellulose are used for
effective water-
dispersible binders, wherein the binders have a much higher degree of sulfate
substitution than the '836 patent. The binders of the '403 patent form gels in
the
presence of potassium ions. Other patents related to dispersible polymers and
wet wipes
include U.S. Patents Nos. 4,117,187; 5,417,977; 4,309,469; 5,317,063;
5,312,883;
5,384,189, 5,543,488; 5,571,876; 5,709,940; 5,718,790.
Co-binder Polymers
As stated above, the polymer formulations of the present
invention are fon-ned from a single ion-sensitive polymer or a combination of
two or more different polymers, wherein at least one polymer is an ion-
sensitive polymer. The second polymer may be a co-binder polymer. A co-
binder polymer is of a type and in an amount such that when combined with
the ion-sensitive polymer, the co-binder polymer desirably
is.largely.dispersed
in the ion-sensitive polymer; i.e., the ion-sensitive polymer is desirably the
continuous phase and the co-binder polyrner is desirably the discontinuous
phase. Desirably, the co-binder polymer can also meet several additional
criteria. For example, the co-binder polymer can have a glass transition
temperature; i.e., TB, that is lower than the glass transition temperature of
the
ion-sensitive polymer. Furthermore or alternatively, the co-birnder polymer
can be insoluble in water, or can reduce the shear viscosity of the ion-
sensitive
polymer. The co-binder can be present at a level relative to the solids mass
of

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-20-
the triggerable polymer of about 45% or less, specifically about 30% or less,
more specifically about 20% or less, more specifically still about 15% or
less,
and most specifically about 10% or less, with exemplary ranges of from about
1% to about 45% or from about 25% to about 35%, as well as from about 1%
to about 20% or from about 5% to about 25%. The amount of co-binder
present should be low enough, for co-binders with the potential to form water
insoluble bonds or films, that the co-binder remains a discontinuous phase
unable to create enough crosslinked, or insoluble bonds, to jeopardize the
dispersibility of the treated substrate. In one embodiment, the ion-sensitive
polymer formulation of the present invention can comprise about 75 weight
percent acrylic acid terpolymer and about 25 weight percent poly(ethylene-
vinyl acetate) co-binder.
Desirably, but not necessarily, the co-binder polymer when
combined with the ion-sensitive polymer will reduce the shear viscosity of the
ion-sensitive polymer to such an extent that the combination of the ion-
sensitive polymer and the co-binder polymer is sprayable. By sprayable is
mean that the polymer can be applied to a nonwoven fibrous substrate by
spraying and the distribution of the polymer across the substrate and the
penetration of the polymer into the substrate are such that the polymer
formulation is uniformly applied to the substrate.
The co-binder polymer can be in the form of an emulsion latex.
The surfactant system used in such a latex emulsion should be such that it
does not substantially interfere with the dispersibility of the ion-sensitive
polymer.
In some embodiments, the combination of the ion-sensitive
polymer and the co-binder polymer reduces the stiffness of the article to
which
it is applied compared to the article with just the ion-sensitive polymer. It
has
been found that when the ion-sensitive polymer, such as a sulfonate anion
modified acrylic acid terpolymer, is applied to a nonwoven substrate, such as
an air laid layer of wood pulp, for the purpose of forming a wet wipe, the
nonwoven sheet can have an undesirable amount of stiffness \ that is
detrimental to the dry product feel or to the handling of the dry web during
processing, when the brittleness of the dry substrate can harm runnability. By
combining the ion-sensitive polymer and the co-binder polymer, the stiffness
of such articles can be reduced.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-21-
The co-binder polymer of the present invention can have an
average molecular weight, which varies depending on the ultimate use of the
polymer. Desirably, the co-binder polymer has a weight average molecular
weight ranging from about 500,000 to about 200,000,000. More desirably, the
co-binder polymer has a weight average molecular weight ranging from about
500,000 to about 100,000,000.
Co-binder polymers that can meet many or all of the foregoing
criteria include, but are not limited to, poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate),
poly(styrene-butadiene), poly(styrene-acrylic), a vinyl acrylic terpolymer,
neoprene, a polyester latex, an acrylic emulsion latex, poly vinyl chloride,
ethylene-vinyl chloride copolymer, a carboxylated vinyl acetate latex, and the
like, all of which can be non-crosslinking (e.g., devoid of N-methylol
acrylamide or other crosslinkers), crosslinking, or potentially crosslinking
(i.e., prepared with a crosslinker present) but not substantially crosslinked
in
the final product.
A particularly preferred non-crosslinking poly(ethylene-vinyl
acetate) is Dur-O-Set RB available from National Starch and Chemical Co.,
Bridgewater, NJ. A particularly preferred non-crosslinking poly(styrene-
butadiene) is Rovene 4817 available from Mallard Creek Polymers,
Charlotte, NC. A particularly preferred non-crosslinking poly(styrene-acrylic)
is Rhoplex NM 1715K available from Rohm and Haas, Philadelphia, PA.
When a latex co-binder, or any potentially crosslinkable co-
binder is used, the latex should be prevented from forming substantial water-
insoluble bonds that bind the fibrous substrate together and interfere with
the
dispersibility of the article. Thus, the latex can be free of crosslinking
agents,
such as NMA, or free of catalyst for the crosslinker, or both. Alternatively,
an
inhibitor can be added .that interferes with the crosslinker or with the
catalyst
such that crosslinking is impaired even when the article is heated to normal
crosslinking temperatures. Such inhibitors can include free radical
scavengers, methyl hydroquinone, t-butylcatechol, pH control agents such as
potassium hydroxide, and the like. For some latex crosslinkers, such as N-
methylol-acrylamide (NMA), for example, elevated pH such as a pH of 8 or
higher can interfere with crosslinking at normal crosslinking temperatures
(e.g., about 130 C or higher). Also alternatively, an article comprising a
latex
co-binder can be maintained at temperatures below the temperature range at
which crosslinking takes place, such that the presence of a crosslinker does.

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
' -22-
not lead to crosslinking, or such that the degree of crosslinking remains
sufficiently low that the dispersibility of the article is not jeopardized.
Also
alternatively, the amount of crosslinkable latex can be kept below a threshold
level such that even with crosslinking, the article remains dispersible. For
example, a small quantity of crosslinkable latex dispersed as discrete
particles
in an ion-sensitive binder can permit dispersibility even when fully
crosslinked. For the later embodiment, the amount of latex can be below
about 20 weight percent, and, more specifically, below about 15 weight
percent relative to the ion-sensitive binder.
Latex compounds, whether crosslinkable or not, need not be
the co-binder. SEM micrography of successful ion-sensitive binder films with
useful non-crosslinking latex emulsions dispersed therein has shown that the
latex co-binder particles can remain as discrete entities in the ion-sensitive
binder, possibly serving in part as filler material. It is believed that other
materials could serve a similar role, including a dispersed mineral or
particulate filler in the ion-sensitive binder, optionally comprising added
surfactants/dispersants For example, in one envisioned embodiment,
freeflowing Ganzpearl*PS-8F particles from Presperse, Inc. (Piscataway, NJ),
a styrene/divinylbenzene copolymer with about 0.4 micron particles, can be
dispersed in an ion-sensitive binder at a level of about 2 to 10 weight
percent
to modify the mechanical, tactile, and optical properties of the ion-sensitive
binder. Other filler-like approaches could include microparticles,
microspheres, or microbeads of inetal, glass, carbon, mineral, quartz, and/or
plastic, such as acrylic or phenolic, and hollow particles having inert
gaseous
atmospheres sealed within their interiors. Examples include EXPANCEI!
phenolic microspheres from Expancel of Sweden, which expand substantially
when heated, or the acrylic microspheres known as PM 6545*available from
PQ Corporation of Pennsylvania. Foaming agents, including COz dissolved in
the ion-sensitive binder, could also provide helpful discontinuities as gas
bubbles in the niatrix of an ion-sensitive binder, allowing the dispersed gas
p}hase in the ion-sensitive binder to serve as the co-binder. In general, any
compatible material that is not miscible with the binder, especially one with
adhesive or binding properties of its own, can be used as the co-binder, if it
is
not provided in a state that imparts substantial covalent bonds joining fibers
in
away that interferes Nvith the water-dispersibility of the product. However,
those rnatenals that also provide additional benefits, such as reduced spray
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-23-
viscosity, can be especially preferred. Adhesive co-binders, such as latex
that
do not contain crosslinkers or contain reduced amounts of crosslinkers, have
been found to be especially helpful in providing good results over a wide
range of processing conditions, including drying at elevated temperatures.
As stated above, the Tg of the co-binder polymer can be lower
than the Tg of the ion-sensitive polymer, which is believed to improve the
flexibility of the treated substrate, especially in the dry state. In Table 1
shown below is a comparison of the glass transition temperature of some of
the preferred polymers useful in the present invention.
Table 1. Glass Transition Temperatures For Select Polymers
o ymer ass ransition emperature - g
u onate anion mo i ie acry ic
acid terpolymer (dry) 55 C.
u onate anion mo i ie acryic
acid terpolymer (wet) -22' C.
op ex ry- C.
ovene 4817 ry- C.
ite 33 (dry)
ite 22 ry- C.
In an alternate embodiment, the ion-sensitive polymer
formulation of the present invention comprises about 55 to about 95 weight
percent sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer and about 5 to about
45 weight percent poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate). More desirably, the ion-
sensitive polymer formulation of the present invention comprises about 75
weight percent sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer and about 25
weight percent poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate).
As stated above, useful co-binder polymers can include a
variety of commercial latex emulsions, including those selected from the
Rovene series (styrene butadiene latices available from Mallard Creek
Polymers of Charlotte, N.C.), the Rhoplex latices of Rohm and Haas
Company, and the Elite latices of National Starch. Polymer emulsions or
dispersions generally comprise small polymer particles, such as crosslinkable
ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers, typically in spherical form, dispersed in
water and stabilized with aurface active ingredients such as low molecular

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-24-
weight emulsifiers or high molecular weight protective colloids. These liquid
binders can be applied to airlaid webs or other substrates by methods known
in the art of binder treatment for nonwoven webs, including spray or foam
application, flooded nip impregnation, curtain coating, etc., followed by
drying. In general, a wide variety of latex compounds and other resins or
emulsions can be considered, including vinyl acetate copolymer latices, such
as 76 RES 7800 from Union Oil Chemicals Divisions and Resyn 25-1103,
Resyn 25-1109, Resyn 25-1119, and Resyn 25-1189 from National Starch
and Chemical Corporation, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer emulsions, such
as Airflex ethylene-vinylacetate from Air Products and Chemicals Inc.,
acrylic-vinyl acetate copolymer emulsions, such as Rhoplex AR-74 from
Rohm and Haas Company, Synthemul 97-726 from Reichhold Chemicals
Inc., Resyn 25-1140, 25-1141, 25-1142, and Resyn-6820 from National
Starch and Chemical Corporation, vinyl acrylic terpolymer latices, such as 76
RES 3103 from Union Oil Chemical Division, and Resyn 251110 from
National Starch and Chemical Corporation, acrylic emulsion latices, such as
Rhoplex B-15J, Rhoplex P-376, Rhoplex TR-407, Rhoplex E-940,
Rhoplex TR934, Rhoplex TR-520, Rhoplex HA-24, and Rhoplex
NW1825 from Rohm and Haas Company, and Hycar 2600 X 322, Hycar
2671, Hycar 2679, Hycar 26120, and Hycar 2600 X347 from B. F.
Goodrich Chemical Group, styrene-butadiene latices, such as 76 RES 4100
and 76 RES 8100 available from Union Oil Chemicals Division, Tylac resin
emulsion 68-412, Tylac resin emulsion 68-067, 68-319, 68-413, 68-500, 68-
501, available from Reichhold Chemical Inc., and DL6672A, DL6663A,
DL6638A, DL6626A, DL6620A, DL615A, DL617A, DL620A, DL640A,
DL650A available from Dow Chemical Company; and rubber latices, such as
neoprene available from Serva Biochemicals; polyester latices, such as
Eastman AQ 29D available from Eastman Chemical Company; vinyl chloride
latices, such as Geon 352 from B. F. Goodrich Chemical Group; ethylene-
vinyl chloride copolymer emulsions, such as Airflex ethylene-vinyl chloride
from Air Products and Chemicals; polyvinyl acetate homopolymer emulsions,
such as Vinac from Air Products and Chemicals; carboxylated vinyl acetate
emulsion resins, such as Synthemul synthetic resin emulsions 40-502, 40-
503, and 97-664 from Reichhold Chemicals Inc. and Polyco 2149, 2150, and
2171 from Rohm and Haas Company. Silicone emulsions and binders can
also be considered.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-25-
The co-binder polyrner can comprise surface active compounds
that improve the wettability of the substrate affter application of the binder
mixture.
Wettability of a dry substrate that has been treated with a ion-
sensitive polymer formulation can be a problem in some embodiments,
because the hydrophobic portions of the ion-sensitive polymer formulation
can become selectively oriented toward the air phase during drying, creating a
hydrophobic surface that can be difficult to wet when the wetting composition
is later applied unless surfactants are added to the wetting composition.
Surfactants, or other surface active ingredients, in co-binder polymers can
improve the wettability of the dried substrate that has been treated with a
ion-
sensitive polymer formulation. Surfactants in the co-binder polymer should
not significantly interfere with the ion-sensitive polymer formulation. Thus,
the binder should maintain good integrity and tactile properties in the pre-
moistened wipes with the surfactant present:
In one embodiment, an effective co-binder polymer replaces a
portion of the ion-sensitive polymer formulation and permits a given strength
level to be achieved in a pre-moistened wipe with at least one of lower
stiffness, better tactile properties (e.g., lubricity or smoothness), or
reduced
cost, relative to an otherwise identical pre-moistened wipe lacking the co-
binder polymer and comprising the ion-sensitive polymer formulation at a
level sufficient to achieve the given tensile strength.
Other Co-binder polymers
The Dry Emulsion Powder (DEP) binders of Wacker Polymer
Systems (Burghausen, Germany) such as the VINNEK system of binders,
can be applied in some embodiments of the present invention. These are
redispersible, free flowing binder powders formed from liquid emulsions.
Small polymer particles from a dispersion are provided in a protective matrix
of water soluble protective colloids in the form of a powder particle. The
surface of the powder particle is protected against caking by platelets of
mineral crystals. As a result, polymer particles that once were in a liquid
dispersion are now available in a free flowing, dry powder form that can be
redispersed in water or turned into swollen, tacky particles by the addition
of
moisture. These particles can be applied in highloft nonwovens by depositing
them with the fibers during the airlaid process, and then later adding 10% to

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-26-
30% moisture to cause the particles to swell and adhere to the fibers. This
can
be called the "chewing gum effect," meaning that the dry, non-tacky fibers in
the web become sticky like chewing gum once moistened. Good adhesion to
polar surfaces and other surfaces is obtained. These binders are available as
free flowing particles formed from latex emulsions that have been dried and
treated with agents to prevent cohesion in the dry state. They can be
entrained
in air and deposited with fibers during the airlaid process, or can be applied
to
a substrate by electrostatic means, by direct contact, by gravity feed
devices,
and other means. They can be applied apart from the binder, either before or
after the binder has been dried. Contact with moisture, either as liquid or
steam, rehydrates the latex particles and causes them to swell and to adhere
to
the fibers. Drying and heating to elevated temperatures (e.g., above 160 C.)
causes the binder particles to become crosslinked and water resistant, but
drying at lower temperatures (e.g., at 110 C. or less) can result in film
formation and a degree of fiber binding without seriously impairing the water
dispersibility of the pre-moistened wipes. Thus, it is believed that the
commercial product can be used without reducing the amount of crosslinker
by controlling the curing of the co-binder polymer, such as limiting the time
and temperature of drying to provide a degree of bonding without significant
crosslinking.
As pointed out by Dr. Klaus Kohlhammer in "New Airlaid
Binders," Nonwovens Report International, Sept. 1999, issue 342, pp. 20-22,
28-31, dry emulsion binder powders have the advantage that they can easily
be incorporated into a nonwoven or airlaid web during formation of the web,
as opposed to applying the material to an existing substrate, permitting
increased control over placement of the co-binder polymer. Thus, a nonwoven
or airlaid web can be prepared already having dry emulsion binders therein,
followed by moistening when the ion-sensitive polymer formulation solution
is applied, whereupon the dry emulsion powder becomes tacky and
contributes to binding of the substrate. Alternatively, the dry emulsion
powder
can be entrapped in the substrate by a filtration mechanism after the
substrate
has been treated with ion-sensitive binder and dried, whereupon the dry
emulsion powder is rendered tacky upon application of the wetting
composition.
In another embodiment, the dry emulsion powder is dispersed
into the ion-sensitive polymer formulation solution either by application of
the

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-27-
powder as the ion-sensitive polymer formulation solution is being sprayed
onto the web or by adding and dispersing the dry emulsion powder particles
into the ion-sensitive polymer formulation solution, after which the mixture
is
applied to a web by spraying, by foam application methods, or by other
techniques known in the art.
Binder Formulations and Fabrics Containing the Same
The polymer formulations of the present invention may be used
as binders. The binder formulations of the present invention may be applied
to any fibrous substrate. The binders are particularly suitable for use in
water-
dispersible products. Suitable fibrous substrates include, but are not limited
to, nonwoven and woven fabrics. In many embodiments, particularly personal
care products, preferred substrates are nonwoven fabrics. As used herein, the
term "nonwoven fabric" refers to a fabric that has a structure of individual
fibers or filaments randomly arranged in a mat-like fashion (including
papers).
Nonwoven fabrics can be made from a variety of processes including, but not
limited to, air-laid processes, wet-laid processes, hydroentangling processes,
staple fiber carding and bonding, and solution spinning.
The binder composition may be applied to the fibrous substrate
by any known process of application. Suitable processes for applying the
binder material include, but are not limited to, printing, spraying,
electrostatic
spraying, coating, flooded nips, metered press rolls, impregnating or by any
other technique. The amount of binder composition may be metered and
distributed uniformly within the fibrous substrate or may be non-uniformly
distributed within the fibrous substrate. The binder composition may be
distributed throughout the entire fibrous substrate or it may be distributed
within a multiplicity of small closely spaced areas. In most embodiments,
uniform distribution of binder composition is desired.
For ease of application to the fibrous substrate, the binder may
be dissolved in water, or in a non-aqueous solvent such as methanol, ethanol,
acetone, or the like, with water being the preferred solvent. The amount of
binder dissolved in the solvent may vary depending on the polymer used and
the fabric application. Desirably, the binder solution contains up to about 25
percent by weight of binder composition solids. More desirably, the binder
solution contains from about 10 to 20 percent by weight of binder composition
solids, especially about 12 percent by weight binder composition solids.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-28-
Plasticizers, perfumes, coloring agents, antifoams, bactericides,
preservative,
surface active agents, thickening agents, fillers, opacifiers, tackifiers,
detackifiers, and similar additives can be incorporated into the solution of
binder components, if so desired.
Once the binder composition is applied to the substrate, the
substrate is dried by any conventional means. Once dry, the coherent fibrous
substrate exhibits improved tensile strength when compared to the tensile
strength of the untreated wet-laid or dry-laid substrates, and yet has the
ability
to rapidly "fall apart", or disintegrate when placed in soft or hard water
having
a relatively high multivalent ionic concentration and agitated. For example,
the dry tensile strength of the fibrous substrate may be increased by at least
25
percent as compared to the dry tensile strength of the untreated substrate not
containing the binder. More particularly, the dry tensile strength of the
fibrous substrate may be increase by at least 100 percent as compared to the
dry tensile strength of the untreated substrate not containing the binder.
Even
more particularly, the dry tensile strength of the fibrous substrate may be
increased by at least 500 percent as compared to the dry tensile strength of
the
untreated substrate not containing the binder.
A desirable feature of the present invention is that the
improvement in tensile strength is effected where the amount of binder
composition present, "add-on", in the resultant fibrous substrate represents
only a small portion by weight of the entire substrate. The amount of "add-
on" can vary for a particular application; however, the optimum amount of
"add-on" results in a fibrous substrate which has integrity while in use and
also quickly disperses when agitated in water. For example, the binder
components typically are from about 5 to about 65 percent, by weight, of the
total weight of the substrate. More particularly, the binder components may
be from about 10 to about 35 percent, by weight, of the total weight of the
substrate. Even more particularly, the binder components may be from about
17 to about 22 percent by weight of the total weight of the substrate.
The nonwoven fabrics of the present invention have good in-
use tensile strength, as well as, ion triggerability. Desirably, the nonwoven
fabrics of the present invention are abrasion resistant and retain significant
tensile strength in aqueous solutions containing greater than about 0.3 weight
percent NaCI, or a mixture of monovalent ions, for those formulations using
the acrylic acid terpolymer, and greater than about 1 weight percent NaCI, or
a

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-29-
mixture of monovalent ions, for those formulations using the sulfonate anion
modified acrylic acid terpolymer. Yet, the nonwoven fabrics are dispersible in
very soft to moderately hard to hard water. Because of this latter property,
nonwoven fabrics of the present invention are well suited for disposable
products, such as sanitary napkins, diapers, adult incontinence products, and
dry and premoistened wipes (wet wipes), which can be thrown in a flush toilet
after use in any part of the world.
The fibers forming the fabrics above can be made from a
variety of materials including natural fibers, synthetic fibers, and
combinations thereof. The choice of =fibers depends upon, for example, the
intended end use of the finished fabric and fiber cost. For instance, suitable
fibrous substrates may include, but are not limited to, natural fibers such as
cotton, linen, jute, hemp, wool, wood pulp, etc. Similarly, regenerated
cellulosic fibers, such as viscose rayon and cuprammonium rayon, modified
cellulosic fibers, such as cellulose acetate, or synthetic fibers, such as
those
derived from polypropylenes, polyethylenes, polyolefins, polyesters,
polyamides, polyacrylics, etc., alone or in combination with one another, may
likewise be used. Blends of one or more of the above fibers may also be used,
if so desired. Among wood pulp fibers, any known papermaking fibers may be
used, including softwood and hardwood fibers. Fibers, for example, may be
chemically pulped or mechanically pulped, bleached or unbleached, virgin or
recycled, high yield or low yield, and the like. Mercerized, chemically
stiffened or crosslinked fibers may also be used.
Synthetic cellulose fiber types include rayon in all its varieties
and other fibers derived from viscose or chemically modified cellulose,
including regenerated cellulose and solvent-spun cellulose, such as Lyocell.
Chemically treated natural cellulosic fibers can be used, such as mercerized
pulps, chemically stiffened or crosslinked fibers, or sulfonated fibers.
Recycled fibers, as well as virgin fibers, can be used. Cellulose produced by
microbes and other cellulosic derivatives can be used. As used herein, the
term "cellulosic" is meant to include any material having cellulose as a major
constituent, and, specifically, comprising at least 50 percent by weight
cellulose or a cellulose derivative. Thus, the term includes cotton, typical
wood pulps, non-woody cellulosic fibers, cellulose acetate, cellulose
triacetate, rayon, thermomechanical wood pulp, chemical wood pulp,
debonded chemical wood pulp, milkweed, or bacterial cellulose. The fiber

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-30-
length is important in producing the fabrics of the present invention. In some
embodiments, such as flushable products, fiber length is of more importance.
The minimum length of the fibers depends on the method selected for forming
the fibrous substrate. For example, where the fibrous substrate is formed by
carding, the length of the fiber should usually be at least about 42 mm in
order
to insure uniformity. Where the fibrous substrate is formed by air-laid or
wet-laid processes, the fiber length may desirably be about 0.2 to 6 mm.
Although fibers having a length of greater than 50 mm are within the scope of
the present invention, it has been determined that when a substantial quantity
of fibers having a length greater than about 15 mm is placed in a flushable
fabric, though the fibers will disperse and separate in water, their length
tends
to form "ropes" of fibers, which are undesirable when flushing in home
toilets.
Therefore, for these products, it is desired that the fiber length be about 15
mm
or less so that the fibers will not have a tendency to "rope" when they are
flushed through a toilet. Although fibers of various lengths are applicable in
the present invention, desirably fibers are of a length less than about 15 mm
so
that the fibers disperse easily from one another when in contact with water.
The fibers, particularly synthetic fibers, can also be crimped
The fabrics of the present invention may be formed from a
single layer or multiple layers. In the case of multiple layers, the layers
are
generally positioned in a juxtaposed or surface-to-surface relationship and
all
or a portion of the layers may be bound to adjacent layers. Nonwoven webs of
the present invention may also be formed from a plurality of separate
nonwoven webs wherein the separate nonwoven webs may be formed from
single or multiple layers. In those instances where the nonwoven web
includes multiple layers, the entire thickness of the nonwoven web may be
subjected to a binder application or each individual layer may be separately
subjected to a binder application and then combined with other layers in a
juxtaposed relationship to form the finished nonwoven web.
In one embodiment, the fabric substrates of the present
invention may be incorporated into cleansing and body fluid absorbent
products, such as sanitary napkins, diapers, adult incontinence products,
surgical dressings, tissues, wet wipes, and the like. These products may
include an absorbent core, comprising one or more layers of an absorbent
fibrous material. The core may also comprise one or more layers of a fluid-
pervious element, such as fibrous tissue, gauze, plastic netting, etc. These
are

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-31-
generally useful as wrapping materials to hold the components of the core
together. Additionally, the core may comprise a fluid-impervious element or
barrier means to preclude the passage of fluid through the core and on the
outer surfaces of the product. Desirably, the barrier means also is water-
dispersible. A film of a polymer having substantially the same composition as
the aforesaid water-dispersible binder is particularly well-suited for this
purpose. In accordance with the present invention, the polymer compositions
are useful for forming each of the above-mentioned product components
including the layers of absorbent core, the fluid-pervious element, the
wrapping materials, and the fluid-impervious element or barrier means.
The binder formulations of the present invention are
particularly useful for binding fibers of air-laid nonwoven fabrics. These air-
laid materials are useful for body-side liners, fluid distribution materials,
fluid
in-take materials, such as a surge material, absorbent wrap sheet and cover
stock for various water-dispersible personal care products. Air-laid materials
are particularly useful for use as a pre-moistened wipe (wet wipe). The basis
weights for air-laid non-woven fabrics may range from about 20 to about 200
grams per square meter ("gsm") with staple fibers having a denier of about
0.5-10 and a length of about 6-15 millimeters. Surge, or in-take, materials
need better resiliency and higher loft so staple fibers having about 6 denier
or
greater are used to make these products. A desirable final density for the
surge, or in-take, materials is between about 0.025 grams per cubic centimeter
("g/cc") to about 0.10 g/cc. Fluid distribution materials may have a higher
density, in the desired range of about 0.10 to about 0.20 g/cc using fibers of
lower denier, most desirable fibers have a denier of less than about 1.5.
Wipes
generally can have a fiber density of about 0.025 g/cc to about 0.2 g/cc and a
basis weight of about 20 gsm to about 150 gsm; specifically from about 30 to
about 90 gsm, and most specifically from about 60 gsm to about 65 gsm.
The nonwoven fabrics of the present invention may also be
incorporated into such body fluid absorbing products as sanitary napkins,
diapers, surgical dressings, tissues and the like. In one embodiment, the
binder is such that it will not dissolve when contacted by body fluids since
the
concentration of monovalent ions in the body fluids is above the level needed
for dissolution; i.e., greater that 0.3 % by weight and/or greater than 1% by
weight. The nonwoven fabric retains its structure, softness and exhibits a
toughness satisfactory for practical use. However, when brought into contact

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-32-
with water having a concentration of multivalent ions, such as Caz+ and Mg2+
ions, of up to about 200 ppm, the binder, such as one comprising a sulfonate
anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer, disperses. Similarly, when brought
into contact with water having a concentration of multivalent ions, such as
Ca2+ and Mgz+ ions, of less than about 10 ppm, the binder comprising the
acrylic acid terpolymer disperses. The nonwoven fabric structure is then
easily broken and dispersed in the water.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the in-use tensile
strength of a nonwoven fabric is enhanced by forming the nonwoven fabric
lo with a binder material comprising an ion-sensitive polymer formulation of
the
present invention and subsequently applying one or more monovalent and/or
multivalent salts to the nonwoven fabric. The salt may be applied to the
nonwoven fabric by any method known to those of ordinary skill in the art
including, but not limited to, applying a solid powder onto the fabric and
spraying a salt solution onto the fabric. The amount of salt may vary
depending on a particular application. However, the amount of salt applied to
the fabric is typically from about 0.1 weight percent to about 10 weight
percent salt solids based on the total weight of the fabric. The salt-
containing
fabrics of the present invention may be used in a variety of fabric
applications
including, but not limited to, feminine pads, surgical dressings, and diapers.
Those skilled in the art will readily understand that the binder
formulations and fibrous substrates of the present invention may be
advantageously employed in the preparation of a wide variety of products,
including but not limited to, absorbent personal care products designed to be
contacted with body fluids. Such products may only comprise a single layer
of the fibrous substrate, or may comprise a combination of elements, as
described above. Although the binder formulations and fibrous substrates of
the present invention are particularly suited for personal care products, the
binder formulations and fibrous substrates may be advantageously employed
in a wide variety of consumer products.
The combination of the acrylic acid terpolymer or the sulfonate
anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer and the non-crosslinking
poly(ethylene-vinyl acetate) of the present invention produces improved
results over the use of the terpolymer alone. For example, when the ion-
sensitive polymer formulation of the present invention is used for a binder
composition for wet wipes, the wet wipes have improved wettability on first

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-33-
insult without losing dispersibility which allows the wipe basesheet to wet
out
easily with the wet wipe solution at commercial speeds. The ion-sensitive
polymer formulation of the present invention also can reduce the stiffness of
the dry basesheet, improve the runnability of the dry and otherwise brittle
sheet during further conversion of the product, reduce the stickiness of the
wipes and/or improve the sprayability of the ion-sensitive binder, thereby
improving binder distribution and penetration in the basesheet.
Unlike other binder systems known in the art, the ion-sensitive
polymer formulations of the present invention can be activated as binders
without the need for elevated temperature. While drying or water removal is
useful in achieving a good distribution of the binder in a fibrous web,
elevated
temperature, per se, is not essential because the binder does not require
crosslinking or other chemical reactions with high activation energy to serve
as a binder. Rather, the interaction with a soluble activating compound,
typically a salt, is sufficient to cause the binder to become active
(insoluble) or
"salted out." Thus, a drying step can be avoided, if desired, or replaced with
low-temperature water removal operations such as room-temperature drying
or freeze drying. Elevated temperature is generally helpful for drying, but
the
drying can be done at temperatures below what is normally needed to drive
crosslinking reactions. Thus, the peak temperature to which the substrate is
exposed or to which the substrate is brought can be below any of the
following: 180 C., 160 C., 140 C., 120 C., 110 C., 105 C., 100 C., 90
C., 75 C., and 60 C., with an exemplary range for peak web temperature of
from about 50 C. to about 110 C., or from about 70 C. to about 140 C. Of
course, higher temperatures can be used, but are not necessary in most
embodiments. While co-binder polymer systems, such as coniunercial latex
emulsions, may also comprise crosslinkers suited for reaction at temperatures
of 160 C. or higher, maintaining a lower peak temperature can be beneficial
in preventing development of excessive strength in the co-binder polymer that
might otherwise hinder the water dispersibility of the pre-moistened wipe.
Wet Wipe Wetting Composition and Wet Wipes Containing the Same
One particularly interesting embodiment of the present
invention is the production of pre-moistened wipes, or wet wipes, from the
above-described ion-sensitive binder compositions and fibrous materials. For
wipes, the fibrous material may be in the form of a woven or nonwoven

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-34-
fabric; however, nonwoven fabrics are more desirable. The nonwoven fabric
is, desirably, formed from relatively short fibers, such as wood pulp fibers.
The minimum length of the fibers depends on the method selected for forming
the nonwoven fabric. Where the nonwoven fabric is formed by a wet or dry
method, the fiber length is desirably from about 0.1 millimeters to 15
millimeters. Desirably, the nonwoven fabric of the present invention has a
relatively low wet cohesive strength when it is not bonded together by an
adhesive or binder material. When such nonwoven fabrics are bonded
together by a binder composition, which loses its bonding strength in tap
water and in sewer water, the fabric will break up readily by the agitation
provided by flushing and moving through the sewer pipes.
The finished wipes may be individually packaged, desirably in
a folded condition, in a moisture proof envelope or packaged in containers
holding any desired number of sheets in a water-tight package with a wetting
composition applied to the wipe. The finished wipes may also be packaged as
a roll of separable sheets in a moisture-proof container holding any desired
number of sheets on the roll with a wetting composition applied to the wipes.
The roll can be coreless and either hollow or solid. Coreless rolls, including
rolls with a hollow center or without a solid center, can be produced with
known coreless roll winders, including those of SRP Industry, Inc. (San Jose,
CA); Shimizu Manufacturing (Japan), and the devices disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 4,667,890, issued May 26, 1987 to Gietman. Solid-wound coreless rolls
can offer more product for a given volume and can be adapted for a wide
variety of dispensers.
Relative to the weight of the dry fabric, the wipe may desirably
contain from about 10 percent to about 400 percent of the wetting
composition, more desirably from about 100 percent to about 300 percent of
the wetting composition, and even more desirably from about 180 percent to
about 240 percent of the wetting composition. The wipe maintains its desired
characteristics over the time periods involved in warehousing, transportation,
retail display and storage by the consumer. Accordingly, shelf life may range
from two months to two years.
Various forms of impermeable envelopes and storage means
for containing wet-packaged materials such as wipes and towelettes and the
like are well known in the art. Any of these may be employed in packaging
the pre-moistened wipes of the present invention.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-35-
Desirably, the pre-moistened wipes of the present invention are
wetted with an aqueous wetting composition, which has one or more of the
following properties:
(1) is compatible with the above-described ion-sensitive
binder compositions of the present invention;
(2) enables the pre-moistened wipe to maintain its wet
strength during converting, storage and usage (including dispensing), as well
as, dispersibility in a toilet bowl;
(3) does not cause skin irritation;
(4) reduces tackiness of the wipe, and provides unique
tactile properties, such as skin glide and a"lotion-like feel"; and
(5) acts as a vehicle to deliver "moist cleansing" and other
skin health benefits.
The wetting composition should not act as a solvent for the
binder and generally does not contain solvents other than water, and
particularly does not contain organic solvents, though a small quantity (<1 %)
of a fragrance solubilizer such as polysorbate 20 may be present, depending
on the fragrance and the salt concentration of the wetting composition.
Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about 10 weight percent
of organic solvents, such as propylene glycol or other glycols, polyhydroxy
alcohols, and the like, based on the total weight of the wetting composition.
More desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about 4 weight
percent of organic solvents. Even more desirably, the wetting composition
contains less than about 1 weight percent of organic solvents. The wetting
composition can be substantially free of organic solvents.
One aspect of the present invention is a wetting composition,
which contains an activating compound that maintains the strength of a
water-dispersible binder until the activating compound is diluted with water,
whereupon the strength of the water-dispersible binder begins to decay. The
water-dispersible binder may be any of the ion-sensitive binder compositions
of the present invention or any other ion-sensitive binder composition. The
activating compound in the wetting composition can be a salt, such as sodium
chloride, or any other compound, which provides in-use and storage strength
to the water-dispersible binder composition, and can be diluted in water to
permit dispersion of the substrate as the binder polymer triggers to a weaker
state. Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about 10 weight

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-36-
percent of an activating compound based on the total weight of the wetting
composition. Specifically, the wetting composition may contain from about
0.3 weight percent to about 5 weight percent of an activating compound.
Even more specifically, the wetting composition may contain from about 2
weight percent to about 4 weight percent of an activating compound.
The wetting composition of the present invention may further
comprise a variety of additives compatible with the activating compound and
the water-dispersible binder, such that the strength and dispersibility
functions
of the wipe are not jeopardized. Suitable additives in the wetting composition
include, but are not limited to, the following additives: skin-care additives;
odor control agents; detackifying agents to reduce the tackiness of the
binder;
particulates; antimicrobial agents; preservatives; wetting agents and cleaning
agents such as detergents, surfactants, and some silicones; emollients;
surface
feel modifiers for improved tactile sensation (e.g., lubricity) on the skin;
fragrance; fragrance solubilizers; opacifiers; fluorescent whitening agents;
UV
absorbers; pharmaceuticals; and pH control agents, such as malic acid or
potassium hydroxide.
Skin-Care Additives
As used herein, the term "skin-care additives" represents
additives, which provide one or more benefits to the user, such as a reduction
in the probability of having diaper rash and/or other skin damage caused by
fecal enzymes. These enzymes, particularly trypsin, chymotrypsin and
elastase, are proteolytic enzymes produced in the gastrointestinal tract to
digest food. In infants, for example, the feces tend to be watery and contain,
among other materials, bacteria, and some amounts of undegraded digestive
enzymes. These enzymes, if they remain in contact with the skin for any
appreciable period of time, have been found to cause an irritation that is
uncomfortable in itself and can predispose the skin to infection by
microorganisms. As a countermeasure, skin-care additives include, but are
not limited to, the enzyme inhibitors and sequestrants set forth hereafter.
The
wetting composition may contain less than about 5 weight percent of skin-care
additives based on the total weight of the wetting composition. More
specifically, the wetting composition may contain from about 0.01 weight
percent to about 2 weight percent of skin-care additives. Even more

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-37-
specifically, the wetting composition may contain from about 0.01 weight
percent to about 0.05 weight percent of skin-care additives.
A variety of skin-care additives may be added to the wetting
composition and the pre-moistened wipes of the present invention or included
therein. In one embodiment of the present invention, skin-care additives in
the form of particles are added to serve as fecal enzyme inhibitors, offering
potential benefits in the reduction of diaper rash and skin damage caused by
fecal enzymes. U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,749, issued April 18, 2000 to Schulz et
al.,
discloses organophilic clays in a woven or nonwoven web, said to be useful for
inhibiting fecal enzymes. Such materials may be used in the present invention,
including reaction products of a long chain organic quaternary ammonium
compound
with one or more of the following clays: montmorillonite, bentonite,
beidellite,
hectorite, saponite, and stevensite.
Other known enzyme inhibitors and sequestrants may be used
as skin-care additives in the wetting composition of the present invention,
including those that inhibit trypsin and other digestive or fecal enzymes,'
and
inhibitors for urease. For example, enzyme inhibitors and anti-microbial
agents may be used to prevent the fonnation of odors in body fluids. For
example, urease inhibitors, which are also said to play a role in odor
absorption, are disclosed by T. Trinh in World Patent Application No.
98/26808, "Absorbent Articles with Odor Control System," published June
25, 1998. Such inhibitors may be incorporated into the wetting composition and
the pre-
moistened wipes of the present invention and include transition metal ions and
their soluble salts, such as silver, copper, zinc, ferric, and aluminum salts.
The
anion may also provide urease inhibition, such as borate, phytate, etc.
Compounds of potential value include, but are not limited to, silver chlorate,
silver nitrate, mercury acetate, mercury chloride, mercury nit_rate, copper
metaborate, copper bromate, copper bromide, copper chloride, copper
dichromate, copper nitrate, copper salicylate, copper sulfate, zinc acetate,
zinc
borate, zinc phytate, zinc bromate, zinc bromide, zinc chlorate, zinc
chloride,
zinc sulfate, cadmium acetate, cadmium borate, cadmium bromide, cadmium
chlorate, cadmium chloride, cadmium formate, cadniium iodate, cadmium
iodide, cadmium permanganate, cadmium nitrate, cadmium sulfate, and gold
chloride.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-38-
Other salts that have been disclosed as having urease inhibition
properties include ferric and aluminum salts, especially the nitrates, and
bismuth salts. Other urease inhibitors are disclosed by Trinh, including
hydroxamic acid and its derivatives; thiourea; hydroxylamine; salts of phytic
acid; extracts of plants of various species, including various tannins, e.g.
carob
tannin, and their derivatives such as chlorogenic acid derivatives; naturally
occurring acids such as ascorbic acid, citric acid, and their salts; phenyl
phosphoro diamidate/diamino phosphoric acid phenyl ester; metal aryl
phosphoramidate complexes, including substituted phosphorodiamidate
compounds; phosphoramidates without substitution on the nitrogen; boric acid
and/or its salts, including especially, borax, and/or organic boron acid
compounds; the compounds disclosed in European Patent Application
408,199; sodium, copper, manganese, and/or zinc dithiocarbamate; quinones;
phenols; thiurams; substituted rhodanine acetic acids; alkylated
benzoquinones; formarnidine disulphide; 1:3-diketones maleic anhydride;
succinamide; phthalic anhydride; pehenic acid; /N,N-dihalo-2-
imidazolidinones; N-halo2-oxazolidinones; thio- and/or acyl-
phosphoryltnamide, and/or substituted derivatives thereof-, thiopyridine-N-
oxides, thiopyridines, and thiopyrimidines; oxidized sulfur derivatives of
diarninophosphinyl compounds; cyclotriphosphazatriene derivatives; ortho-
diaminophosphinyl derivatives of oximes; bromo-nitro compounds; S-aryl
and/or alkyl diamidophosphorothiolates; diaminophosphinyl derivatives;
mono- and/or polyphosphorodiamide; 5-substituted-benzoxathiol-2-ones;
N(diaminophosphinyl)arylcarboxamides; alkoxy-l,2-benzothaizin
compounds; etc.
Many other skin-care additives may be incorporated into the
wetting composition and pre-moistened wipes of the present invention,
including, but not limited to, sun blocking agents and UV absorbers, acne
treatments, pharmaceuticals, baking soda (including encapsulated forms
thereof), vitamins and their derivatives such as Vitamins A or E, botanicals
such as witch hazel extract and aloe vera, allantoin, emollients,
disinfectants,
hydroxy acids for wrinkle control or anti-aging effects, sunscreens, tanning
promoters, skin lighteners, deodorants and anti-perspirants, ceramides for
skin
benefits and other uses, astringents, moisturizers, nail polish removers,
insect
repellants, antioxidants, antiseptics, anti-inflammatory agents and the like,
provided that the additives are compatible with an ion-sensitive binder

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-39-
composition associated therewith, and especially the ion-sensitive binder
compositions of the present invention (i.e., they do not cause a substantial
loss
of strength in the wet state of the pre-moistened wipes, prior to dilution in
water, while permitting dispersibility in water).
Useful materials for skin care and other benefits are listed in
McCutcheon's 1999, Vol. 2: Functional Materials, MC Publishing Company,
Glen Rock, NJ. Many useful botanicals for skin care are provided by Active
Organics, Lewisville, Texas.
Odor Control Additives
Suitable odor control additives for use in the wetting
composition and pre-moistened wipes of the present invention include, but are
not limited to, zinc salts; talc powder; encapsulated perfumes (including
microcapsules, macrocapsules, and perfume encapsulated in liposomes,
vessicles, or microemulsions); chelants, such as ethylenediamine tetra-acetic
acid; zeolites; activated silica, activated carbon granules or fibers;
activated
silica particulates; polycarboxylic acids, such as citric acid; cyclodextrins
and
cyclodextrin derivatives; chitosan or chitin and derivatives thereof;
oxidizing
agents; antimicrobial agents, including silver-loaded zeolites (e.g., those of
BF
Technologies, located in Beverly, Massachusetts, sold under the trademark
HEALTHSHIELDTm); triclosan; kieselguhr; and mixtures thereof. In addition
to controlling odor from the body or body wastes, odor control strategies can
also be employed to mask or control any odor of the treated substrate.
Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about 5 weight percent
of odor control additives based on the total weight of the wetting
composition.
More desirably, the wetting composition contains from about 0.01 weight
percent to about 2 weight percent of odor control additives. Even more
desirably, the wetting composition contains from about 0.03 weight percent to
about 1 weight percent of odor control additives.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the wetting
composition and/or pre-moistened wipes comprise derivatized cyclodextrins,
such as hydroxyprop.yl beta-cyclodextrin in solution, which remain on the skin
after wiping and provide an odor-absorbing layer. In other embodiments, the
odor source is removed or neutralized by application of an odor-control
additive, exemplified by the action of a chelant that binds metal groups
necessary for the function of many proteases and other enzymes that

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-40-
commonly produce an odor. Chelating the metal group interferes with the
enzyme's action and decreases the risk of malodor in the product.
Principles for the application of chitosan or chitin derivatives to
nonwoven webs and cellulosic fibers are described by S. Lee et al. in
"Antimicrobial and Blood Repellent Finishes for Cotton and Nonwoven
Fabrics Based on Chitosan and Fluoropolymers," Textile Research Journal,
69(2); 104-112, Feb. 1999.
Detackifying Agents
While elevated salt concentrations may reduce the tack of the
ion-sensitive binder, other means of tack reduction are often desirable. Thus,
detackifying agents may be used in the wetting composition to reduce the
tackiness, if any, of the ion-sensitive binder. Suitable detackifiers include
any
substance known in the art to reduce tack between two adjacent fibrous sheets
treated with an adhesive-like polymer or any substance capable of reducing
the tacky feel of an adhesive-like polymer on the skin. Detackifiers may be
applied as solid particles in dry form, as a suspension or as a slurry of
particles. Deposition may be by spray, coating, electrostatic deposition,
impingement, filtration (i.e., a pressure differential drives a particle-laden
gas
phase through the substrate, depositing particles by a filtration mechanism),
and the like, and may be applied uniformly on one or more surfaces of the
substrate or may be applied in a pattern (e.g., repeating or random patterns)
over a portion of the surface or surfaces of the substrate. The detackifier
may
be present throughout the thickness of the substrate, but may be concentrated
at one or both surfaces, and may be substantially only present on one or both
surfaces of the substrate.
Specific detackifiers include, but are not limited to, powders,
such as talc powder, calcium carbonate, mica; starches, such as corn starch;
lycopodium powder; mineral fillers, such as titanium dioxide; silica powder;
alumina; metal oxides in general; baking powder; kieselguhr; and the like.
Polymers and other additives having low surface energy may also be used,
including a wide variety of fluorinated polymers, silicone additives,
polyolefins and thermoplastics, waxes, debonding agents known in the paper
industry including compounds having alkyl side chains such as those having
16 or more carbons, and the like. Compounds used as release agents for

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-41-
molds and candle making may also be considered, as well as, dry lubricants
and fluorinated release agents.
In one embodiment, the detackifier comprises
polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE), such as PTFE telomer (KRYTOX DF)
compound, used in the PTFE release agent dry lubricant MS-122DF, marketed
by Miller-Stephenson (Danbury, CT) as a spray product. For example, PTFE
particles may be applied by spray to one side of the substrate prior to
winding
of the pre-moistened wipes. In one embodiment, a detackifying agent is
applied to only one surface of the substrate prior to winding into a roll.
The wetting composition desirably contains less than about 25
weight percent of detackifying agents based on the total weight of the wetting
composition. More desirably, the wetting composition contains from about
0.01 weight percent to about 10 weight percent of detackifying agents, more
specifically about 5% or less. Even more specifically, the wetting
composition contains from about 0.05 weight percent to about 2 weight
percent of detackifying agents.
In addition to acting as a detackifying agent, starch compounds
may also improve the strength properties of the pre-moistened wipes. For
example, it has been found that ungelled starch particles, such as hydrophilic
tapioca starch, when present at a level of about 1% or higher by weight
relative to the weight of the wetting composition, can permit the
pre-moistened wipe to maintain the same strength at a lower salt concentration
than is possible without the presence of starch. Thus, for example, a given
strength can be achieved with 2% salt in the wetting composition in the
presence of salt compared to a level of 4% salt being needed without starch.
Starch may be applied by adding the starch to a suspension of laponite to
improve the dispersion of the starch within the wetting composition.
Microparticulates
The wetting composition of the present invention may be
further modified by the addition of solid particulates or microparticulates.
Suitable particulates include, but are not limited to, mica, silica, alumina,
calcium carbonate, kaolin, talc, and zeolites. The particulates may be treated
with stearic acid or other additives to enhance the attraction or bridging of
the
particulates to the binder system, if desired. Also, two-component
microparticulate systems, commonly used as retention aids in the

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-42-
papermaking industry, may also be used. Such two-component
microparticulate systems generally comprise a colloidal particle phase, such
as
silica particles, and a water-soluble cationic polymer for bridging the
particles
to the fibers of the web to be formed. The presence of particulates in the
wetting composition can serve one or more useful functions, such as (1)
increasing the opacity of the pre-moistened wipes; (2) modifying the rheology
or reducing the tackiness of the pre-moistened wipe; (3) improving the tactile
properties of the wipe; or (4) delivering desired agents to the skin via a
particulate carrier, such as a porous carrier or a microcapsule. Desirably,
the
wetting composition contains less than about 25 weight percent of particulate
based on the total weight of the wetting composition. More specifically, the
wetting composition may contain from about 0.05 weight percent to about 10
weight percent of microparticulate. Even more specifically, the wetting
composition may contain from about 0.1 weight percent to about 5 weight
percent of microparticulate.
Microcapsules and Other Delivery Vehicles
Microcapsules and other delivery vehicles may also be used in
the wetting composition of the present invention to provide skin-care agents;
medications; comfort promoting agents, such as eucalyptus; perfumes; skin
care.agents; odor control additives; vitamins; powders; and other additives to
the skin of the user. Specifically, the wetting composition may contain up to
about 25 weight percent of microcapsules or other delivery vehicles based on
the total weight of the wetting composition. More specifically, the wetting
composition may contain from about 0.05 weight percent to about 10 weight
percent of microcapsules or other delivery vehicles. Even more specifically,
the wetting composition may contain from about 0.2 weight percent to about
5.0 weight percent of microcapsules or other delivery vehicles.
Microcapsules and other delivery vehicles are well known in
the art. For example, POLY-PORE E200 (Chemdal Corp., Arlington
Heights, IL), is a delivery agent comprising soft, hollow spheres that can
contain an additive at over 10 times the weight of the delivery vehicle.
Known additives reported to have been used with POLY-PORE E200
include, but are not limited to, benzoyl peroxide, salicylic acid, retinol,
retinyl
palmitate, octyl methoxycinnamate, tocopherol, silicone compounds (DC
435), and mineral oil. Another useful delivery vehicle is a sponge-like

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-43-
material marketed as POLY-PORE"' L200, which is reported to have been
used with silicone (DC 435) and mineral oil. Other known delivery systems
include cyclodextrins and their derivatives, liposomes, polymeric sponges, and
spray-dried starch.
Additives present in microcapsules are isolated from the
environrnent and the other agents in the wetting composition until the wipe is
applied to the skin, whereupon the microcapsules break and deliver their load
to the skin or other surfaces.
Preservatives and Anti-Microbial Agents
The wetting composition of the present invention may also
contain preservatives and/or anti-microbial agents. Several preservatives
*
and/or anti-microbial agents, such as Mackstat H 66 (available from McIntyre
Group, Chicago, IL), have been found to give excellent results in preventing
bacteria and mold growth. Other suitable preservatives and anti-microbial
agents include, but are not limited to DMDM hydantoin (e.g., Glydant PlusT"',
Lonza, Inc., Fair Lawrr, NJ), iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, Kathon*(Rohm
and 1-lass, Philadelphia, PA), methylparaben, propylparaben, 2-bromo-2-
nitropropane-1,3-diol, benZoic acid, and the like. Desirably, the wetting
composition contains less than about 2 weight percent on an active basis of
preservatives and/or anti-microbial agents based on the total weight of the
wetting composition. More desirably, the wetting composition contains from
about 0.01 weight percent to about 1 weight percent of preservatives and/or
anti-microbial agents. Even more desirably, the wetting composition contains
from about 0.01 weight percent to about 0.5 weight percent of preservatives
and/or anti-microbial agents.
Wetting Agents and Cleaning Agents
A variety of wetting agents and/or cleaning agentsJnay be used
in the wetting cornposition of the present invention. Suitable wetting agents
and/or cleaning agents include, but are not liniited to, detergents and
nonionic,
amplhoteric, arnd anionic surfactants, especially amino acid-based
surfactants.
Amino acid-based surfactant systems, such as those derived from aniino acids
L-glutaniic acid and other natural fatty acids, offer pH eompatibility to
hurnan
skin and good cleansing power, while being relatively safe and providing
improved tactile and moisturization properties compared to other anionic
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-44-
surfactants. One function of the surfactant is to improve wetting of the dry
substrate with the wetting composition. Another function of the surfactant can
be to disperse bathroom soils when the pre-moistened wipe contacts a soiled
area and to enhance their absorption into the substrate. The surfactant can
further assist in make-up removal, general personal cleansing, hard surface
cleansing, odor control, and the like.
One commercial example of a.n amino-acid based surfactant is
acylglutamate, marketed under the Amisofft name by Ajinomoto Corp., Tokyo,
Japan. Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about 3weight
percent of wetting agents and/or cleaning agents based on the total weight of
the wetting composition. More desirably, the wetting composition contains
from about 0.01 weight percent to about 2 weight percent of wetting agents
and/or cleaning agents. Even more desirably, the wetting composition
contains from about 0.1 weight percent to about 0.5 weight percent of wetting
agents and/or cleaning agents.
Although amino-acid based surfactant are particularly useful in
the wetting compositions of the present invention, a wide variety of
surfactants may be used in the present invention. Suitable non-ionic
surfactants include, but are not limited to, the condensation products of
ethylene oxide with a hydrophobic (oleophilic) polyoxyalkylene base formed
by the condensation of propylene oxide with propylene glycol. The
hydrophobic portion of these compounds desirably has a molecular weight
sufficiently high so as to render it water-insoluble. The addition of
polyoxyethylene moieties to this hydrophobic portion increases the water-
solubility of the molecule as a whole, and the liquid character of the product
is
retained up to the point where the polyoxyethylene content is about 50% of
the total weight of the condensation product. Examples of compounds of this
type include commercially-available Pluronic*surfactants (BASF Wyandotte
Corp.), especially those in which the polyoxypropylene ether has-a molecular
weight of about 1500-3000 and the polyoxyethylene content is about 35-55%
of the molecule by weight, i.e. Pluronic L-62.
Other useful nonionic surfactants include, but are not limited
to, the condensation products of Cg -Cõ alkyl alcohols with 2-50 moles of
ethylene oxide per niole of alcohol. Examples of compounds of this type
include the condensation products of Cõ -C15 secondary alkyl alcohols with 3-
50 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol, which are commercially-
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-45-
available as the Poly-Tergent SLF* series from Olin Chemicals or the
TERGITOL series from Union Carbide, i.e. TERGITOL 25-L-7, which is
formed by condensing about 7 moles of ethylene oxide with a C12 -C15
alkanol.
Other nonionic surfactants, which may be employed in the
wetting composition of the present invention, include the ethylene oxide
esters
of C6-C12 alkyl phenols such as (nonylphenoxy)polyoxyethylene ether.
Particularly useful are the esters prepared by condensing about 8-12 moles of
ethylene oxide with nonylphenol, i.e. the IGEPAL" CO series (GAF Corp.).
Further non-ionic surface active agents include, but are not
limited to, alkyl polyglycosides (APG), derived as a condensation product of
dextrose (D-glucose) and a straight or branehed chain alcohol. The glycoside
portion of the surfactant provides a hydrophile having high hydroxyl density,
which enhances water solubility. Additionally, the inherent stability of the
acetal linkage of the glycoside provides chemical stability in alkaline
systems.
Furthermore, unlike some non-ionic surface active agents, alkyl
polyglycosides have no cloud point, allowing one to formulate without a
hydrotrope, and these are very mild, as well as readity biodegradable non-
ionic surfactants. Thisclass of surfactants is available from Horizon Chemical
under the trade marks APG-300, APG-350, and APG-500.
Silicones are another class of wetting agents available in pure
form, or as microemulsions, macroemulsions, and the like. One exemplary
non-ionic surfactant group is the silicone-glycol copolymers. These
surfactants are prepared by adding poly(lower)alkylenoxy chains to the free
hydroxyl groups of dimethylpolysiloxanols and are available from the Dow
Coming Corp as Dow Coming 190* and 193* surfactants (CTFA name:
dimethicone copolyol). These surfacta.nts funetion, with or without any
volatile silicones used as solvents, to control foaming produced by. the other
surfactants, and also impart a shine to metallic, ceramic, and glass-surfaces.
Anionic surfactants may also be used in the wetting
compositions of the present invention. Anionic surfactants are useful due to
their high detergency include anionic detergent salts having alkyl
substituents
of 8 to 22 carbon atoms such as the water-soluble higher fatty acid
alkali~metal
soaps, e.g., sodium myristate and sodium paimitate. A preferred class of
anionic surfactants encompasses the water-soluble sulfated and sulfonated
anionic alkali metal and alkaline earth metal detergent salts containing a
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-46-
hydrophobic higher alkyl moiety (typically containing from about 8 to 22
carbon atoms) such as salts of higher alkyl mono or polynuclear aryl
sulfonates having from about 1 to 16 carbon atoms in the alkyl group, with
examples available as the Bio-Soflseries, i.e. Bio-Soft D-40 (Stepan Chemical
Co.).
Other useful classes of anionic surfactants include, but are not
limited to, the alkali metal salts of alkyl naphthalene sulfonic acids (methyl
naphthalene sodium sulfonate, Petro AA; Petrochemical Corporation);
sulfated higher fatty acid monoglycerides such as the sodium salt of the
sulfated monoglyceride of cocoa oil fatty acids and the potassium salt of the
sulfated monoglyceride of tallow fatty acids; alkali metal salts of sulfated
fatty
alcohols containing from about 10 to 18 carbon atoms (e.g., sodium lauryl
sulfate and sodium ste4ryl sulfate); sodium Cõ -Ci6 -alphaolefin sulfonates
such as the Bio-Terge*series (Stepan Chemical Co.); alkali metal salts of
sulfated ethyleneoxy fatty alcohols (the sodium or ammonium sulfates of the
condensation products of about 3 moles of ethylene oxide with a C,2-C15 n-
alkanol, i.e., the Neodol ethoxysulfates, Shell Chemical Co.); alkali metal
salts
of higher fatty esters of low molecular weight alkylol sulfonic acids, e.g.
fatty
acid esters of the sodium salt of isothionic acid, the fatty ethanolamide
sulfates; the fatty acid amides of amino alkyl sulfonic acids, e.g. lauric
acid
amide of taurine; as well as numerous other anionic organic surface active
agents such as sodium xylene sulfonate, sodium naphthalene sulfonate,
sodium toulene sulfonate and mixtures thereof
A further useful class of anionic surfactants includes the 8-(4-
n-alkyl-2-cyclohexenyl)-octanoic acids, wherein the cyclohexenyl ring is
substituted with an additional carboxylic acid group. These compounds or
their potassium salts, are commercially-available from Westvaco Corporation
as Diacid 1550~or H-240~ In general, these anionic surface.active agents can
be employed in the form of their alkali metal salts, ammoniurn or alkaline
earth metal salts.
Macroeniulsions and Microemulsion of Silicone Particles
The wetting composition may further comprise an aqueous
microemulsion of silicone particles. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,407,
"Process for the Preparation of Aqueous Emulsions of Silicone Oils andlor
Gums and/or Resins" issued March 14, 2000, discloses organopolysiioxanes
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-47-
in an aqueous microemulsion. Desirably, the wetting composition contains
less than about 5 weight percent of a microemulsion of silicone particles
based
on the total weight of the wetting composition. More desirably, the wetting
composition contains from about 0.02 weight percent to about 3 weight
percent of a microemulsion of silicone particles. Even more desirably, the
wetting composition contains from about 0.02 weight percent to about 0.5
weight percent of a microemulsion of silicone particles.
Silicone emulsions in general may be applied to the
pre-moistened wipe by any known coating method. For example, the
lo pre-moistened wipe may be moistened with an aqueous composition
comprising a water-dispersible or water-miscible, silicone-based component
that is compatible with the activating compound in the wetting composition.
Further, the wipe can comprise a nonwoven web of fibers having a
water-dispersible binder, wherein the web is moistened with a lotion
comprising a silicone-based sulfosuecinate. The silicone-based sulfosuccinate
provides gentle and effective cleansing without a high level of surfactant.
Additionally, t:he silicone-based sulfosuccinate provides a solubilization
function, which prevents precipitation of oil-soluble components, such as
fragrance components, vitamin extracts, plant extracts, and essential oils.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the wetting
composition comprises a silicone copolyol sulfosuccinate, such as disodium
dimethicone copolyol sulfosuccinate and diammonium dimethicone
copolyolsulfosuccinate. Desirably, the wetting composition comprises less
than about 2 percent by weight of the silicone-based sulfosuccinate, and more
desirably from about 0.05 percent to about 0.30 percent by weight of the
silicone-based sulfosuccinate.
In another exarrtple of a product comprising a silicone
emulsions, Dow Corning 9506* powder may also be present in the wetting
coniposition. Dow Coming 9506 powder is believed to comprise a
ciiniethicone/vinyldimethicone cross-polymer and is a spherical powder,
which is said to be useful in eontrolling skin oils (see "Ne-'v Chemical
Perspectives," Soap attd Cos ietics, Vol. 76, No. 3, March 2000, p. 12). Thus,
a water-dispersible wipe, which delivers a powder effective in controlling
skin
oil, is also within the scope of the present invention. Principles for
preparing
silicone emulsions are disclosed in WO 97/10100, published March 20, 1997.
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-48-
Emollients
The wetting composition of the present invention may also
contain one or more emollients. Suitable emollients include, but are not
limited to, PEG 75 lanolin, rnethyl gluceth 20 benzoate, C12-C15 alkyl
benzoate, ethoxylated cetyl steary,l alcohol, products marketed as Lambent
wax WS *- L, Lambent WD - F~ Cetiol HE*(Henkel Corp.), Glucam P20'
(Amerchol), Polyox WSR N-10*(Union Carbide), Polyox WSR N-3000*
(LJnion Carbide), Luviquat*(BASF), Finsotv SLB 101*(Finetex Corp.), mink
oil, allantoin, stearyl alcohol, Estol 1517*(Unichema), and Finsolv SLB 201 *
(Finetex Corp.).
An emollient can also be applied to a surface of the artiele prior
to or after wetting with the wetting composition. Such an emollient may be
insoluble in the wetting composition and can be immobile except when
exposed to a force. For example, a petrolatum-based emollient can be applied
to one surface in a pattern, after which the other surface is wetted to
saturate
the wipe. Such a product could provide a cleaning surface and an opposing
skin treatment surface.
The emollient composition in such products and other products
of the present invention can comprise a plastic or fluid emollient such as one
or more liquid hydrocarbons (e.g., petrolatum), mineral oil and the like,
vegetable and animal fats (e.g., lanolin, phospholipids and their derivatives)
and/or a silicone materials such as one or more alkyl substituted polysiloxane
polymers, including the polysiloxane emollients disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
5,891,126, issued Apr. 6, 1999 to Osborn, III et al. Optionally, a hydrophilic
surfactant may be combined with a plastic emotlient to improve wettabiiity of
the coated surface. In some embodiments of the present invention, it is
contemplated that liquid hydrocarbon emollients and/or alkyl substituted
polysiloxane polymers may be blended or combined with one or more fatty
acid ester emollients derived from fatty acids or fatty alcohols.
ln an embodiment of the present invention, the emollient
material is in the form of an emollient blend. Desirably, the emollient blend
comprises a combination of one or more liquid hydrocarbons (e.g.,
petrolatum), mineral oil and the like, vegetable and animal fats (e.g.,
lanolin,
phospholipids and their derivatives), with a silicone material such as one or
more alkyl substituted polysiloxane polyrners. More desirably, the emollient
blend coniprises a combination of liquid hydrocarbons (e.g., petrolatum) with
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-49-
dimethicone or with dimethicone and other alkyl substituted polysiloxane
polymers. In some embodiments of the present invention, it is contemplated
that blends of liquid hydrocarbon emollients and/or alkyl substituted
polysiloxane polymers may be blended with one or more fatty acid ester
emollients derived from fatty acids or fatty alcohols. PEG-7 glyceryl cocoate,
available as Standamul HE* (Henkel Corp., Hoboken, N.1), can also be
considered.
Water-soluble, self-emulsifying emollient oils, which are
useful in the present wetting compositions, include the polyoxyalkoxylated
lanolins and the polyoxyalkoxylated fatty alcohols, as disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 4,690,821, issued Sep. 1, 1987 to Smith et al. The polyoxyalkoxy chains
desirably will comprise mixed propylenoxy and ethyleneoxy units. The
lanolin derivatives will typically comprise about 20-70 such lower-alkoxy
units while the C12 -C20 - fatty alcohols will be derivatized with about 8-15
lower- alkyl units. One such useful lanolin derivative is Lanexol*AWS (PPG-
12-PEG-50, Croda, Inc., New York, N.Y.). A useful poly(15-20)C2_C3-
~
alkoxylate is PPG-5-Ceteth-20, known as Procetyl AWS (Croda, Inc.).
According to one embodiment of the present invention, the
emollient material reduces undesirable tactile attributes, if any, of the
wetting
composition. For example, emollient materials, including dimethicone, can
reduce the level of tackiness that may be caused by the ion-sensitive binder
or
other components in the wetting composition, thus serving as a detaclcifier.
Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than al>out 25
weight percent of emollients based on the totai weight of the wetting
composition. More specifically, the wetting composition may comprise less
than about 5 weight percent emollient, and most specifically less than about
2% emollient. More desirably, the wetting composition may contain from
about 0.01 weight percent to about 8 weight percent of emollients. Even more
desirably, the wetting composition may contain from about 0.2 we.ight percent
to about 2 weight percent of emollients.
In one embodiment, the wetting composition and/or pre-
moistened wipes of the present invention comprise an oil-in-water emulsion
comprising an oil phase containing at least one emollient oil and at least one
emollient wax stabilizer dispersed in an aqueous phase comprising at least one
polyhydric alcohol emollient and at least one organic water-soluble detergent,
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-50-
as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,559,157, issued Dec. 17, 1985 to Smith et al.
Surface Feel Modif ers
Surface feel modifiers are used to improve the tactile sensation
(e.g., lubricity) of the skin during use of the product. Suitable surface feel
modifiers include, but are not limited to, commercial debonders; and
softeners, such as the softeners used in the art of tissue making including
quaternary ammonium compounds with fatty acid side groups, silicones,
waxes, and the like. Exenlplary quaternary ammoruum compounds with
utility as softeners are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,554,862, issued to
Hervey
et al. on Jan. 12, 1971; U.S. Pat. No. 4,144,122, issued to Emanuelsson et
al.,
Mar. 13, 1979, U.S. Pat. No. 5,573,637, issued to Ampulski et al. Nov. 12,
1996; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,476,323, issued to Hellsten et al., Oct. 9, 1984.
Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about 2 weight
percent:of
surface feel modifiers based on the total weight of the wetting composition.
More desirably, the wetting composition contains from about 0.01 weight
percent to
about I weight percent of surface feel modifiers. Even more desirably, the
wetting composition contains from about 0.01 weight percent to about 0.05
weight percent of surface feel modifiers.
Fragrances
A variety of fragrances may be used in the wetting composition
of the present invention. Desirably, the wetting composition contains less
than
about 2 weight percent of fragrances based on the total weight of the wetting
composition. More desirably, the wetting composition contains from about
0.01 weight percent to about 1 weight percent of fragrancEs. Even more
desirably, the wetting composition contains from about 0.01 weight percent to
about 0.05 weight percent of fragrances.
Fragrance Solubilizers
Further, a variety of fragrance solubilizers may be used in the
wetting composition of the present invention. Suitable fragrance solubilizers
include, but are not lim-ted to, polysorbate 20, propylene glycol, ethanol,
isopropanol, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, dipropylene glycol, diethyl

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-51-
phthalate, triethyl citrate, Ameroxol OE-2*(Arnerchol Corp.), Brij 78* artd
Brij
98*(ICI Surfactants), Arlasolve 200*(ICI Surfactants), Calfax 16L-35*(Pilot
Chemical Co.), Capmul POE-S *(Abitec Corp.), Finsolv SUBSTANTIAL~
(Finetex), and the like. Desirably, the wetting composition contains less
thaii
about 2 weight percent of fragrance solubilizers based on the total weight of
the wetting coniposition. More desirably, the wetting composition contains
from about 0.01 weight percent to about 1 weight percent of fragrance
solubilizers. Even more desirably, the wetting composition contains from
about 0.01 weight percent to about 0.05 weight percent of fragrance
solubilizers.
Opacifiers
Suitable opacifiers include, but are not limited to, titanium
dioxide or other minerals or pigments, and synthetie opacifiers such as
REACTOPAQUE particles (available from Sequa Chemicals, Inc., Chester,
South Carolina). Desirably, the wetting composition contains less than about
2 weight percent of opacifiers based on the totat weight of the wetting
composition. More desirably, the wetting composition contains from about
0.01 weight percent to about 1 weight percent of opacifiers. Even more
desirably, the wetting composition contains from about 0.01 weight percent to
about 0.05 weight percent of opacifiers.
pN Control Agents
Suitable pH control agents for use in the wetting composition
of the present invention include, but are not limited to, malic acid, citric
acid,
hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, and
the like. An appropriate pH range minimizes the amount of skin irritation
resulting from the wetting composition on the skin. DesirabLy, the pH range
of the wetting composition is from about 3.5 to about 6.5. More desirably, the
pl-1 range of the wetting composition is frotn about 4 to about 6. Desirably,
the wetting composition contains less than about 2weight percent of a pH
adjuster based orl the total weight of the wetting composition. More
desirably,
the wetting composition contains from about 0.01 weight percent to about 1
v,,eight percent of a pH adjuster. Even more desirably, the wetting
coniposition corntains from about 0.01 weight percent to about 0.05 weight
percent of a pH adjuster.
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-52-
Although a variety of wetting compositions, fonned from one
or more of the above-described components, may be used with the wet wipes
of the present invention, in one embodiment, the wetting composition contains
the following coniponents, given in weight percent of the wetting
composition, as shown in Table 2 below:
Table 2. Wetting Composition Components
Kettuig omposition omponent: etg t ercent:
etontze ater a out 86 to a out 98
ctivattng compoun a out to a out
reservattve p to a out
ur actant p to a out
t tcone mu sion p to a out
mo tent p to a out
ragrance p to a out 0.3
ragrance so u t tzer p to a out 0.5
p a juster p to a out 0.2
In another embodiment of the present invention, the wetting
composition comprises the following components, given in weight percent of
the wetting composition, as shown in Table 3 below:
Table 3. Wetting Composition Components
ass o ettcng peci ic ettrng
Composition Composition Component
Component: Component: Name: -Weight Percent:
Vehicle Deionized Water about-86 to about 98
Activating Sodium Chloride about 1 to about 6
compound (Ivlillport Ent.,
Milwaukee, WI)
Preservative Glycerin, IPBC and Mackstat 14-66 * Up to about 2
DMDM Hydantoin (McIntyre
Group, Chicago,
IL)
Sur actant Acyl Glutamate CS22 * Up to about 2
(Ajinomoto,
Tokyo,)apan)
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-53-
ass o 'ettrng pect ic ettmg
Composition Composition Component
Component: Component: Name: Weight Percent:
Silicone Emulsion Dimethiconol and TEA DC1785 * Up to about 1
(Detackifier/Skin Dodecylbenezene (Dow Corning,
Feel agent) Sulfonate Midland, MI)
Emollient PEG-75 Lanolin Solulan L- 575 ~ Up to about 1
(Amerchol,
Middlesex, N.l)
Fragrance Fragrance Dragoco * Up to about 0.3
0/708768
(Dragoco,
Roseville, MN)
Fragrance Polysorbate 20 Glennsurf L20 * Up to about 0.5
solubilizer (Glenn Corp., St.
Paul, MN)
pH adjuster Malic Acid to pH 5 Up to about 0.2
(Haarman & Reimer,
Tetrboro, NJ)
In another embodiment of the present invention, the wetting
composition comprises the following components, given in weight percent of
the wetting composition, as shown in Table 4 below:
Table 4. An Exemplary Wetting Composition
-Cla-s-s o etting peci ic ettuig
coniposition composition Contponent
Component: Component: Name: Weight Percent:
e ic e eiontze ater about93
cttvating o ium on e a out
compound
reservative ycerin, IPB an Tac stat a out
DMDM I-lydantoin H-66
ur actant cy utamate _ a out
22P
1 icone imet icono an ---- ~7~- a out 0.5
Emulsion TEA DC1785
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
.
-54-
ass o etting peciTic ettrng
compositiorn composition Component
Component: Coniponent: Name: Weight Percent:
o ecy enezene
Sulfonate
mo ient PEG-75 ano in o u an - a out 0.25
ragrance ragrance ragoco a out 0.05
Fragrance
0/708768
ragrance o ysor ate ennsur a out 0.25
solubilizer
p a ~uster aic ci to p a out .
It should be noted that the above-described wetting
compositions of the, present invention may be used with any one of the above-
described ion-sensitive binder compositions of the present invention. Further,
the above-described wetting compositions of the present invention may be
used with any other binder composition, including conventional binder
compositions, or with any known fibrous or absorbent substrate, whether
dispersible or not.
Strength Properties
Unless otherwise specified, tensiie testing is performed
according to the following protocol. Testing of dry product should be
conducted under Tappi conditions (50% relative humidity, 73 F) with a
procedure similar to ASTM-1117-80, section 7. Tensile tests are performed
with a constant crosshead speed tensile tester such as the Thw{ng Albert 1256
*
100 tensile tester with an RSA-2 10-kg load cell. Specimens are cut to 3-inch
Nvidths and 6 inch lengtlis, and mounted betveen jaws with a 4-inch gauge
length. The cross}head sheed is 12 inches per minute. Peak load (for tensile
strength) and elongation at peak load (for stretch) are measured. For cross
direction (CD) tensile tests, the sample is cut in the cross direction. For
machine direction (MD) tensile tests, the sample is cut in the cross
direction.
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-55-
Tensile tests in the dry state a.re reported for webs taken prior to
application of the wetting composition. The machine direction dry tensile
strength is abbreviated as "MDDT," and the cross direction dry tensile
strength as "CDDT." The results can be reported as kg/3-in or converted to
units of g/in or g/2.54 cm.
Based on the dry weight of the specimen cut to the appropriate
size, an excess amount of wetting solution (4% saline solution with no other
additives, unless otherwise specified) is applied to reach a solution add-on
of
250-400%. The wetted specimens are then immediately passed through an
Atlas Lab Wringer"(Atlas Electric Devices Company, Chicago, Ill. No. 10404
LW-1, no load) to uniformly distribute the solution in the sample and gently
remove the excess solution to achieve a final solution add-on of 200%.
Several iterations or passes may be needed to reach the add-on target
depending on the sample. The completed, pre-moistened samples are then
bagged in plastic to prevent dry-out before testing.
Cross direction wet tensile tests (CDWT) or machine direction
wet tensile strength (MDWT) are performed as described above using the pre-
moistened sample as is, after the sample has equilibrated by sitting overnight
in a sealed plastic bag.
For tests related to strength loss in a premoistened web
occurring after exposure to a new solution, a container having dimensions of
200 mm by 120 mm and deep enough to hold 1000 ml is filled with 700 ml of
the selected soak solution. No more than 108 square inches of sample are
soaked in the 700 ml of soaking solution, depending on specimen size. The
premoistened specimens, that have equilibrated overnight, are immersed in the
soak solution and then allowed to soak undisturbed for a specified time period
(typically I hour). At the completion of the soak period, samples are
carefully
retrieved from the soak solution, allowed to drain, and then teSled
immediately
as described above (i.e., the sample is immediately niounted iu the tensile
tester and tested, without being passed through the wringer). In cases with
highly dispersible materials, the samples often catinot be retrieved fTom the
soaking solution without falling apart. The soaked tensile values for such
samples are recorded as zero for the corresponding solution.
For the deionized soaked cross-direction wet tensile test, S-
CDWT, the saniple is imniersed in deionized water for I liour and then tested.
For the hard-water soaked cross-direction wet ternsile test, S-CDWT-M (M
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-56-
indicating divalent metal ions), the sample is immersed in water containing
200 ppm of Ca++/Mg++ in a 2:1 ratio prepared from calcium chloride and
magnesium chloride, soaked for one hour and then tested. For the medium
hard water soaked cross-direction wet tensile test, MS-CDWT-M, the sample
is immersed in water containing 50 ppm of Ca++/Mg++ in a 2:1 ratio, soaked
for one hour and then tested. Testing done with other time increments or
soaking solutions should be so indicated to prevent confusion with the S-
CDWT or S-CDWT-M tests.
In one embodiment of the present invention, wet wipes are
produced using the above-described wetting composition in Table 3 and an
air-laid fibrous material comprising about 80 weight percent of bleached kraft
fibers and 20 weight percent of any one of the above-described ion-sensitive
binder compositions of the present invention, wherein the weight percentages
are based on the total weight of the dry nonwoven fabric. In a further
embodiment of the present invention, wet wipes are produced using the above-
described wetting composition in Table 3 and an air-laid fibrous material
comprising 90 weight percent of softwood fibers and 10 weight percent of an
ion-sensitive binder compositions comprising acrylic acid terpolymers or a
copolymer substantially free of acrylic acid monomers, wherein the weight
percentages are based on the total weight of the dry nonwoven fabric. The
amount of wetting composition added to the nonwoven fabric, relative to the
weight of the dry nonwoven fabric in these embodiments, is desirably about
180 percent to about 240 weight percent.
Desirably, the wet wipes of the present invention possess an in-
use wet tensile strength (CDWT) of at least 100 g/in, and a tensile strength
of
less than about 30 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of
Caz+ and/or Mgz+ ions of about 50 ppm for about one hour (MS-CDWT-M).
More desirably, the wet wipes possess an in-use wet tensile strength of at
least
300 g/in (CDWT), and a tensile strength of less than about 30 g/in after being
soaked in water having a concentration of CaZ+ and/or Mg2+ ions of about 50
ppm for about one hour (MS-CDWT-M). In a further embodiment, the wet
wipes desirably possess an in-use wet tensile strength of at least 200 g/in
(CDWT), and a tensile strength of less than about 20 g/in after being soaked
in
water having a concentration of Caz+ and/or Mg2+ ions of about 200 ppm for
about one hour (S-CDWT-M). Even more desirably, the wet wipes possess an
in-use wet tensile strength of at least 300 g/in, and a tensile strength of
less

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-57-
than about 20 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca2+
and/or Mg2+ ions of about 200 ppm for about one hour (S-CDWT-M).
Desirably, the wet wipes treated with the binder material of the
present invention including the acrylic acid terpolymer possess an in-use wet
tensile strength of at least 100 g/in for a 1 inch width sample in the cross
machine direction when soaked with 10% to 400% by weight wet wilies
solution containing more than 0.3% by weight monovalent ion (NaCI)
concentration and a tensile strength of less than about 30 g/in after being
soaked in deionized water for about one hour. More desirably, the wet wipes
treated with the binder material of the present invention including the
acrylic
acid terpolymer possess an in-use tensile strength of at least 200 g/in for a
1
inch width sample in the cross machine direction when soaked with 10% to
400% by weight wet wipes solution containing more than 0.3 % by weight
monovalent ion (NaCI) concentration and a tensile strength of less than about
30 g/in after being soaked in deionized water for about one hour.
In a further embodiment, the wet wipes treated with the binder
material of the present invention including the sulfonate anion modified
acrylic acid terpolymer desirably possess an in-use tensile strength of at
least
200 g/in for a 1 inch width sample in the cross machine direction when soaked
with 10% to 400% by weight wet wipes solution containing more than 1% by
weight monovalent ion (NaCI) concentration and a tensile strength of less than
about 30 g/in after being soaked in water having a concentration of Ca2+
and/or MgZ+ ions of about 50 ppm for about one hour. Even more desirably,
the wet wipes treated with the binder material of the present invention
including the sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid terpolymer possess an in-
use tensile strength of at least 200 g/in for a 1 inch width sample in the
cross
machine direction when soaked with 10% to 400% by weight wet wipes
solution containing more than 1% by weight monovalent ion (NaCI)
concentration and a tensile strength of less than about 30 g/in after being
soaked in water having a concentration of CaZ+ and/or Mg2+ ions of about 200
ppm for about one hour.
Products with high basis weights or wet strengths than
flushable wet wipes may have relatively higher wet tensile strength. For
example, products such as pre-moistened towels or hard-surface cleaning
wipes may have basis weights above 70 gsm, such as from 80 gsm to 150
gsm. Such products can have CDWT values of 500 g/in or greater, with S-

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-58-
CDWT values of about 150 g/in or less, more specifically about 100 g/in or
less, and most specifically about 50 g/in or less, with similar ranges
possible
for S-CDWT-M.
Dispersibility
Prior efforts to measure dispersibility of webs, whether dry or
premoistened, have commonly relied on systems in which the web was
exposed to shear while in water, such as measuring the time for a web to break
up while being agitated by a mechanical mixer. The constant exposure to
shear offers an unrealistic and overly optimistic test for products designed
to
be flushed in a toilet, where the level of shear is weak and extremely brief.
Once the product has passed through the neck of the toilet and entered a
septic
tank, shear rates may be negligible. Further, the product may not be fully
wetted with water from the toilet bowl when it is flushed, or rather, there
may
not have been adequate time for the wetting composition of the product to
have been replaced with the water of the toilet bowl when the momentary
shear of flushing is applied. Thus, previous measurements of dispersibility
could suggest that a product is dispersible when, in fact, it may be poorly
suited for septic system.
For a realistic appraisal of dispersibility, it is believed that a
relatively static measure is needed to better simulate the low shear that real
products will experience once they have become fully wetted with water from
the toilet. Thus, a test method for dispersibility has been developed which
does not rely on shear and which provides an improved means of assessing
suitability of a product for a septic system. In this method, the tensile
strength
of a product is measured in its original, wetted form (the CDWT measurement
described above) and after the product has been soaked in a second solution
for one hour (either the S-CDWT or S-CDWT-M test). The second solution
can be either deionized water for determination of the "Deionized
Dispersibility" value or hard water (according to the S-CDWT-M test) for
determination of the "Hard Water Dispersibility" value. In either case, the
Dispersibility is defined as (1 minus the ratio of the cross-direction wet
tensile
strength in the second solution divided by the original cross-direction wet
tensile strength) * 100%. Thus, if a pre-moistened wipe loses 75% of its CD
wet tensile strength after soaking in hard water for one hour, the Hard Water
Dispersibility is (1-0.25)*100% =75%. The articles of the present invention

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-59-
can have a Deionized Dispersibility of 80% or greater, more specifically 90%
or greater, specifically still 95% or greater, and can have a Deionized
Dispersibility of about 100%. The articles of the present invention can have a
Hard Water Dispersibility of 70% or greater, more specifically 80% or greater,
specifically still about 90% or greater, and can have a Deionized
Dispersibility
of about 100%.
Method of Making Wet Wipes
The pre-moistened wipes of the present invention can be made
in several ways. In one embodiment, the ion-sensitive polymer composition is
applied to a fibrous substrate as part of an aqueous solution or suspension,
wherein subsequent drying is needed to remove the water and promote
binding of the fibers. In particular, during drying, the binder migrates to
the
crossover points of the fibers and becomes activated as a binder in those
regions, thus providing acceptable strength to the substrate. For example, the
following steps can be applied:
1. Providing an absorbent substrate that is not highly bonded
(e.g., an unbonded airlaid, a tissue web, a carded web, fluff pulp, etc.).
2. Applying an ion-sensitive polymer composition to the
substrate, typically in the form of a liquid, suspension, or foam.
3. Applying a co-binder polymer to the substrate.
4. Drying the substrate to promote bonding of the substrate.
The substrate may be dried such that the peak substrate temperature does not
exceed 160 C, or 140 C, or 120 C, 110 C, or 100 C. In one embodiment,
the substrate temperature does not exceed 80 C or 60 C.
5. Applying a wetting composition to the substrate.
6. Placing the wetted substrate in roll form or in a stack and
packaging the product.
Application of the co-binder polymer can be done
simultaneously with application of the binder composition by previously
mixing the two, or the co-binder polymer can be added before or after the
binder is applied. The other steps are desirably conducted in the order shown
above.
Application of the ion-sensitive polymer composition to the
substrate can be by means of spray; by foam application; by immersion in a
bath; by curtain coating; by coating and metering with a wire-wound rod; by

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-60-
passage of the substrate through a flooded nip; by contact with a pre-metered
wetted roll coated with the binder solution; by pressing the substrate against
a
deformable carrier containing the ion-sensitive polymer composition such as a
sponge or felt to effect transfer into the substTate; by printing such as
gravure,
inkjet, or flexographic printing; and any other means known in the art.
In the use of foams to apply a binder or co-binder polymer, the
mixture is frothed, typically with a foaming agent, and spread uniformly on
the substrate, after which vacuum is applied to pull the froth through the
substrate. Any known foam application method can be used, including that of
U.S. Pat. No, 4,018,647, "Process for the Impregnation of a Wet Fiber Web
with a Heat Sensitized Foamed Latex Binder," issued Apr. 19, 1977 to
Wietsma. Wietsma discloses a method wherein a foamed latex is heat-sensitized
by the addition of a heat-sensitizer such as functional siloxane compounds
including
siloxane oxyalkylene block copolymers and organopolysiloxanes. Specific
examples
of applicable heat-sensitizers and their use thereof for the heat
sensitization of latices
are described in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,255,140; 3,255,141; 3,483,240 and
3,484,394.
The use of a heat-sensitizer is said to result in a product having a very soft
and
texile-like hand compared to prior methods of applying foamed latex binders.
The amount of heat-sensitizer to be added is dependent on,
inter alia, the type of latex used, the desired coagulation temperature, the
machine speed and the temperatures in the drying section of the machine, and
will generally be in the range of about 0.05 to about 3% by weight, calculated
as dry matter on the dry weight of the latex; but also larger or smaller
amounts
may be used. The heat sensitizer can be added in such an amount that the
latex will coagulate far below the boiling point of water, for instance at a
temperature in the range of 35 C to 95 C, or from about 35 .,C to 65 C.
Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that a
drying step after application of the binder solution and before application of
the wetting composition enhances bonding of a fibrous substrate by driving
the binder to fiber crossover points as moisture is driven off, thus promoting
efficient use of the binder. However, in an alternative method, the drying
step
listed above is skipped, and the ion-sensitive polymer composition is applied
to the substrate followed by application of the wetting composition without
significant intermediate drying. In one version of this method, the ion-

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
,
-61-
sensitive polymer composition selectively adheres to the fibers, permitting
excess water to be removed in an optional pressing step without a significant
loss of the binder from the substrate. In another version, no significant
water
removal occurs prior to application of the wetting composition. In yet another
alternative method, the ion-sensitive polymer composition and the wetting
composition are applied simultaneously, optionally with subsequent addition
of salt or other activating compounds to activate or further activate the
binder.
The present invention is further illustrated by the following
examples, which are not to be construed in any way as imposing limitations
upon the scope thereof. On the contrary, it is to be clearly understood that
resort may be had to various other embodiments, modifications, and
equivalents thereof which, after reading the description herein, may suggest
themselves to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of
the
present invention and/or the scope of the appended claims.
As used herein, the "thickness" of a web is measured with a 3-
in acrylic plastic disk connected to the spindle of a Mitutoyo Digimatic*
Indicator (Mitutoyo Corporation, 31-19, Shiba 5-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo
108, Japan) and which delivers a net load of 0.05 psi to the sample being
measured. The Mitutoyo Digimatic Indicator is zeroed when the disk rests on
a flat surface. When a sample having a size at least as great as the acrylic
disk
is placed under the disk, a thickness reading can be obtained from the digital
readout of the indicator. Water-dispersible substrates of the present
invention
can have any suitable thickness, such as from about 0.1 nim to 5 mm. For wet
wipes, thicknesses can be in the range of 0.2 mm to about 1 mm, more
specifically from about 0.3 mm to about 0.7 mm. Thickness can be
controlled, for example, by the application of compaction rolls during or
after
web formation, by pressing after binder or wetting composition has been
applied, or by controlling the tension of winding when forming a ro11 good.
The use of the platen method to measure thickness gives an
average thickness at the macroscopic level. Local thickness may vary,
especially if the product has been embossed or has otherwise been given a
three-dimensional texture.
EXAMPLE 1
Preparafion of Sulfonale Anion Modified Acrylic Acid Terpolymer
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-62-
Acrylic acid (43.3 g, 0.60 mol), AMPS (10.7 g, 0.052 mol),
butyl acrylate (35.2 g, 0.27 mol), and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (20 g, 0.11 mol)
were dissolved in 55 g of acetone/water (70/30) mixture. An initiator, 2,2-
azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) (0.51 g, 3.1x10-3 mol), was dissolved in 20 ml
of acetone. The monomer solution was deoxygenated by bubbling N2 through
the solution for 20 minutes. To a 1000 ml three-neck round bottom flask,
equipped with a condenser, two addition funnels and a magnetic stirrer, was
added 120 g of an acetone/water (70/30) mixture. The solvent was heated to
gentle reflux under nitrogen. Monomers and initiator were added
simultaneously from the addition funnels over a period of two hours.
Polymerization was allowed to proceed for an additional two hours, at the end
of which, the addition funnels and condenser were replaced with a distillation
head and a mechanical stir rod to remove acetone. A steady stream of N2 was
kept during distillation while the temperature was increased gradually from
about 65o C. to about 90 C. When the distillation was completed, 400 g of
deionized water was added to reduce the viscosity of the polymer solution. A
hazy, but uniform solution was obtained.
A total of nine polymers (Samples 1-9) were synthesized using
the above-described procedure. NaOH (2.1 g, 0.052 mol) in 20 ml of water
was added at room temperature to neutralize the AMPS component in the
samples. The compositions of Samples 1-9 are summarized in Table 5 below.
All percentages are given in mole percent.
Table 5. Sulfonate Anion Modified Acrylic Acid Terpolymers
amp e %AMPS %NaAMPS o 0 %EHA
1 3.0 64. 22.5 10.5
2 3.5 63. 10.5
3 3.9 9.4
4 4.0 12.5
5 0.0 4.2 64.7 19.7 11.4
6 5.0 58.0 10.5
9 5.0 60. 24.5 10.5

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-63-
EXAMPLE 2
Preparation of an Acrylic Acid Terpolymer
An acrylic acid terpolymer was produced using the
polymerization procedure outlined in Example 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,312,883.
The following monomers were used: acrylic acid (50 g, 0.69 mol), butyl
acrylate (25 g, 0.20 mol), and 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (25 g, 0.14 mol). The
polymer was neutralized with 0.1 mole sodium hydroxide.
EXAMPLE 3
Preparation of Ion-sensitive Polymer Formulation
The polymers prepared in Table 5, Sample 9 and Example 2
above were combined with Dur-O-Set RB to form the ion-sensitive polyrner
formulations of the present invention. The polymer formulations were
prepared as shown in Table 6 below.
Table 6. Ion-Sensitive Polymer Formulations
amp e o erpo ymer o o i ie erpo ymer o EVA
(Example 2) (Table 5, Sample 9)
1 85.0 0.0
2 0.0 85.0
3 65.0 0.0
4 0.0 65.0
5 95.0 0.0
6 0.0 95.0
8 0.0 55.0 45.0
9 75.0 0.0
EXAMPLE 4
Solubility of lon-sensitive Polymer Formulation
The sensitivity of the polymer formulations of Example 3 to
divalent cations present in hard water were measured. Samples 1-10 of

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-64-
Example 3 are placed in a number of CaClz solutions with a Caz+
concentration varying from <10 to 200 ppm. Following soaking for an hour,
the solubility of each polymer is noted. The solubility results are given
below
in Table 7.
Table 7. Solubility Results
amp e o u i ity in Ca-
<10 pPm 50 ppm 100 ppm 200 ppn-
amp e
amp e
amp e 3 100 60 36 2
amp e
Sampl-e- 5-- 100 97 88 19
amp e
amp e 7 89 42
amp e
amp e 9 100 73 78 7
amp e
In every case the film cast from the blend containing NaAMPS
is more soluble than the film containing the acrylie acid terpolyrner,
especially
as the calcium ion concentration inereases.
EXAMPLE 5
Testing the Binding Strength of Polymer Formulations With and Without
Crosslinking
For the pilot scale trials we used pulp based (CF 405 or NB 416
pulp form Weyerhaeuser) airlaid base-sheets bound together with 2-5% bico
*
fibers. The bico fibers were either Type-255 (from KoSa Fibers of Salisbury,
NC) with an activated polyethylene sheath and a polyester core or Danaklon*
fibers (from FiberVisions of Varde, Denmark) with a polyethylene sheath and
a polypropylene core. Both kinds of bico fibers were 2-3 denier and cut to
6mm length. The binder formulations were applied by spraying 12-15 weight
percent solutions on to both sides of the above base-sheet. The strengths of
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-65-
the base-sheets under various conditions are reported after subtracting the
base
strength of the web due to the bico fibers. Table 8 reports the strengths of
the
base-sheets with different formulations in 0.4 weight percent NaCI (CDWT) as
well as after a one hour soak in deionized water (S-CDWT):
Table 8. Tensile Strength
Sample % % EVA BW Binder Oven CDWT S-
Ter- EVA Cross- (gsm) Add-On Temp (g/in) CDWT
polymer linkable o ( C.) (g/in)
~ ( /o)
1 85 15 Yes 70 22 400 413 112
2 65 35 Yes 70 22 400 467 375
3 85 15 Yes 71 23 400 444 116
4 85 15 Yes 76 28 400 518 143
5 85 15 No 70 22 400 430 21
6 85 15 Yes 73 25 350 336 60
7 65 35 Yes 67 18 350 332 237
8 65 35 Yes 69 21 350 268 165
9 85 15 Yes 68 20 350 219 35
65 35 Yes 67 19 350 199 74
11 85 15 No 69 21 350 226 20
12 65 35 No 67 19 350 196 29
BW: Basis Weight
10 CDWT: Cross machine Direction Wet Tensile strength.
S-CDWT: CDWT after soaking for one hour in deionized water.
All the above codes would wet out better on first insult relative
to a binder formulation containing 100% acrylic acid terpolymer. Also, the
binder formulations which contain the EVA, spray much better than 100%
acrylic acid terpolymer, leading to much improved binder distribution and

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-66-
penetration on the substrate. Significantly, those formulations that were not
crosslinkable; i.e., Samples 5, 11 and 12, had S-CDWTs of less than 30 g/in.
EXAMPLE 6
Binder formulations are prepared having the compositions
shown in Table 9 below. The binder formulations at 12 weight percent solids
are sprayed on both sides of an airlaid web. The airlaid web is based on pulp
~
(CF 405 from Weyerhaeuser). Table 9 shows the strength of the base-sheet in
0.9% NaCI solution (CDWT) and after a one hour soak in deionized water (S-
CDWT). The effect on strength after aging the samples in salt solution over a
period of up to 16 weeks is also shown. A preservative, such as Mackstat
H66, is added to the samples to prevent mold growth on the basesheets as they
age in the salt solution.
Table 9. Tensile Strength of Base-Sheet
Sample % % BW Binder Add- Oven Temp Aging Time CDWT S-CDWT
Terpolymer EVA (gsm) On (%) ('C) (Weeks) (g/in) (g/in)
1 85 15 73 25 440 0 488 14
2 85 15 73 25 440 16 393 11
3 65 35 64 25 440 0 358 16
4 65 35 64 25 440 12 369 21
5 55 45 64 25 440 0 364 28
6 55 45 64 25 440 12 354 32
The results in Table 9 indicate that the web does not lose initial
properties even after extensive aging in the in-use salt solution when Dur-O-
*
Set RB is used as the EVA. lf a crosslinkable agent is present in the EVA,
lower dispersibility results after aging the samples for a few weeks.
EXAMPLE 7
In Figure 1 is shown the strength properties of the NaAMPS
modified terpolymer, which is also dispersible in hard water (up to 200 ppm
Ca'+/Mg" solution). A base-slheet based on 75 weiglit percent NaAMPS
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-67-
modified acrylic acid terpolymer (SSB) and 25 weight percent EVA (Dur-O-
Set RB) exhibits very good strength during use (in 1.5% or 4.0% NaCI
solution) and disperses in very hard water. SSB-4 dispersed in hard water in
minutes. SSB-5 dispersed in hard water in 3 hours. NaAMPS-SSB is
5 more viscous relative to Lion-SSB.
Tensile results for Examples 5 through 7 were obtained with an
MTS tensile test device, the MTS 500/S unit (MTS Systems, Research Park,
North Carolina) using the TestworksT"' 3.10 for Windows software. Instead of
the normal 3-inch strip for testing, a 1-inch wide strip was used, cut to 6
10 inches in length. The gauge length between the rubber-coated jaws of the
test
device was 3 inches. Testing was operated at the specified crosshead speed of
12 in/min. The MTS device with the modified test procedure generally gives
comparable results to the tensile test protocol previously described using 3-
inch wide samples and the Thwing-Albert tester.
EXAMPLE 8
The addition of the co-binder polymer to the ion-sensitive
polymer reduces the shear viscosity of the polymer blend compared to the
shear viscosity of the ion-sensitive polymer alone. Table 10 illustrates the
effect of the addition of various co-binder polymers to an acrylic acid
terpolymer (SSB-2) in accordance with the present invention.
Table 10. Effect of the Addition of Various Co-Binder Polymers to SSB-2
Polymer Blend Viscosity @ 100 sec'
18 weight percent SSB-2 solids oo ig to measure:
> 100,000 cps
15 weight percent sodium polyacrylate solids
(MW = 250,000, 50% neutralization) 10,0.00 cps .
12 weight percent neat SSB-2 80 cps -
12 weight percent blend of 80 parts by wt. 25 cps
SSB-2 and 20 parts by wt. Rhoplex NW
1715K
12 weight percent blend of 80 parts by wt. 28 cps
SSB-2 and 20 parts by wt. Rovene
12 weight percent blend of 80 parts by wt. 20 cps
SSB-2 and 20 parts by wt. Dur-O-Set RI3
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2008-03-11
-68-
Table ] 0 shows that the addition of Rhoplex NW 1715K,
Rovene 4817 and Dur-O-Set RB significantly reduce the shear viscosity of
the SSB-2 acrylic acid terpoiymer alone. The reduction in viscosity is not due
to a mere dilution of the SSB-2, because the addition of sodium polyacrylate
resulted in a significant increase in the shear viscosity of the SSB-2.
EXAMPLE 9
Dried solid bars were prepared from Rhoplex NW 1715K,
lo Rovene 4817 and Dur-O-Set" RB. The bars were prepared by pouring a
quantity of the polymer into a rectangular silicone mold an open rectangular
silicone mold 1 cm wide, 4 cm long, and 3 mm deep. The polymer in the mold
was then heated at 60 C overnight. The dried polymer in the mold was then
placed in a container with 30 ml of deionized water at about 23 C and allowed
to sit for one hour. None of the bars were dispersed in the deionized water.
Bar samples were then prepared from the sulfonate anion
modifted acrylic acid terpolymer (NaAMPS+SSB) blended separately with
Rhoplex NW 1715K, Rovene' 4817 and Dur-O-Set RB. The polymer
blends were made from 75% by weight sulfonate anion modified acrylic acid
terpolymer and 25% by weight of the co-binder polymers. The bar samples
were prepared in the same manner as described above. The bar samples were
then added to deionized water. Each of the bar samples rnade from the
following polymer blends; i.e., NaAMPS+SSBt`Rhoplex NW 1715K,
NaAIvIPS+SSB/Rovene 4817 and Na.AIvLPS+SSB/Dur-O-Set RB, dispersed in
the deionized water within one hour.
EXAMPLE 10
A substrate in the form of an airlaid web was prepared on a
commercial airlaid machine having a width of 66.5 inches. A DaflWeb airlaid
former with two forming heads was used to produce substrates having basis
weights of about 60 gsm. Weyerhaeuser CF405 bleached softwood kraft fiber
in pulp sheet form was used and fiberized in a hammermill, then formed into
an airlaid web on a moving wire at a speed of 200 to 300 feet per minute. The
newly formed web was densified by heated compaction rolls and transferred
to a second wire, where the web was humidified with an atomizeti spray of
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-69-
water applying an estimated 5% moisture add on level immediately prior to a
second heated compaction roll to further densify the web. The web was then
transferred to an oven wire and sprayed on the top side with ion-sensitive
polyrner formulation mixture on the exposed surface of the web, applying
10% ion-sensitive polymer formulation solids relative to the dry fiber mass of
the web.
The ion-sensitive polymer formulation mixture comprised
water as the carrier with 12% binder solids, wherein the binder comprised
75% SSB-4 as the ion-sensitive polymer formulation and 25% Rhoplex NW-
1715K latex emulsion (Rohm and Haas Corp.) as the co-binder polymer.
Spray was applied with a series of Quick Veejet nozzles,
Nozzle No. 730077, manufactured by Spraying Systems Co. (Wheaton,
Illinois), operating at 95 psi. A spray boom over the web provided 13 such
nozzles on 5.5-inch centers with a tip-to-wire distance of 8 inches. This
arrangement yields 100% overlap of spray cones for the ion-sensitive polymer
formulation solution of this trial.
After the web was sprayed, it was carried into an oven with
through-flow of air at about 225 C. to dry the binder solution. The web then
was transferred onto the underside of another oven wire, upon which it passed
over another spray boom where more ion-sensitive polymer formulation
solution was applied to the bottom side of the web to add another 10 weight
percent solids relative to the dry fiber mass of the web. The web then passed
through two successive dryer units where through-air drying with air at about
225 C. completed drying of the web. The pressure differential across the web
was approximately 10 inches of water. The length of the three dryer sections,
from first to third, respectively, was about 9, 10, and 6 feet.
The thickness of the web after drying was 1.14 mm (this
number, like other physical properties reported here, can vary depending on
the fibers, basis weight, and so forth). The machine direction dry tensile
(MDDT) strength of the web was measured at 4.59 kg/3 in. The cross
direction dry tensile (CDDT) strength of the web was measured at 3.82 kg/3 in
with a CD stretch of 8.98%.
The dried and treated web was then trimmed to 60 inches
width, reeled and later slit into 4-inch wide rolls, which were then treated
with
wetting composition and formed into coreless rolls suitable for use as a pre-
moistened bath wipe. The wetting composition was sprayed uniformly on one

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-70-
side of the 4-inch wide web prior to reeling the web into rolls suitably sized
for use. The wetting composition was 4 weight percent NaCI in deionized
water.
The cross direction wet tensile (CDWT) at 4 weight percent
saline was measured at 0.76 kg/3 in. The Soaked CDWT strength was
effectively 0, as was the Soaked CD Stretch, meaning the sheet was fully
dispersible.
EXAMPLE 11
The sheet formed was identical to that of Example 10 except that the fibers in
the airlaid web were 75% softwood kraft and 25% PET fibers. The thickness
of the web after drying was 1.35 mm. The machine direction dry tensile
(MDDT) strength of the web was measured at 3.87 kg/3 in. The cross
direction dry tensile (CDDT) strength of the web was measured at 2.84 kg/3 in
with a CD stretch of 11.31%. The cross direction wet tensile (CDWT) at 4%
saline was measured at 0.82 kg/3 in. The Soaked CDWT strength was
effectively 0, as was the Soaked CD Stretch.
EXAMPLE 12
Additional examples were conducted according to Example 10,
with the exception that Rovene latex emulsion was used as the co-binder
polymer and the basis weight and fiber composition varied as shown in Table
11. The Soaked CDWT results were all 0, indicating a complete loss of
tensile strength. Other results are shown in Table 11, where Pulp/PET
designates the ratio of softwood to synthetic fibers in the substrate, BW is
the
basis weight in gsm, TH is the thickness in mm, and S-CDWT-M is the one-
hour soak CD wet tensile test for a sample soaked in water containing 200
ppm of Ca++/Mg++- in a 2:1 ratio.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-71-
Table 11. Measurements for Examples 3A-3F.
Run Pulp/PET BW TH MDDT CDDT CDWT S-CDWT-M
3A 100/0 60.3 1.18 5.44 4.12 0.69 0
3B 85/15 62.9 1.25 4.68 4.23 0.66 0
3C 75/25 55.6 1.04 5.48 4.06 0.66 0
3D 75/25 59.3 1.19 4.87 3.96 0.81 0.17
3E 75/25 60.7 1.48 4.41 3.51 0.79 0.12
3F 85/15 62.7 1.46 4.6 3.82 0.76 0
The non-zero S-CDWT-M values (soaked wet tensile in hard
water) are non-zero for two trials with 25% PET fibers, suggesting that higher
amounts of synthetic fibers can begin to compromise water dispersibility.
EXAMPLE 13
A pre-moistened wipe was made similar to that of Example 10,
except that the co-binder polymer was a modified Elite latex emulsion
substantially free of crosslinking agents provided by National Starch. The
basis weight of the web was 61.35, the thickness 1.21 mm, the MDDT 5.09
kg/3-in, the MD stretch 7.89%, the CDDT 3.90 kg/3-in, the CD stretch 9.50%,
the CDWT in 4% saline 0.78 kg/3-in, the CDWT stretch 32.96%, and the
residual strengths after one hour in both deionized water (S-CDWT) and hard
water (S-CDWT-M) were 0 kg/3-in.
EXAMPLE 14
Particulate Addition
Pre-moistened wipes comprising the basesheet of Example 10
were prepared with a wetting composition comprising a slurry of particles.
The particles were selected from the following products marketed by
Presperse, Inc. (Piscataway, New Jersey):

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-72-
Table 12. Particles from Presperse, Inc. selected for use in pre-moistened
wipes
Name Composition Characteristics
MCP-45 * Mica and polymethyl Fine powder, platelets coated with
methacrylate microspheres, 13-17 microns
Sericite SL-012 * 98 io mica, 2% methicone Fine white powder, hydrophobie
surface, 2-10 microns
Rose talc * Tale White powder, 10-12 microns
Permethyl 104A ~ Iso-octahexacontane
(polyisobutene)
Cashmir K-II * Mica (97%), sihca beads Fine white powder, platelets
(3%), 0.3 microns coated with microspheres, 10-14
microns
Synthecite FNK-100* Synthetic fluorphogopite Fine powder, 10-15 microns
Ganzpearl GMX- Methyl methacrylate Spherical powder, 4.5-8.5 microns
0610 * crosspolymer
Ganzpearl GS-0605* Styrene/divinylbenzene White powder, 4.5-8.5 microns
copolymer
Ganzpearl PS-8F * Styrene/divinylbenzene 0.4 microns
copolymer
Spheron N-2000 * Amorphous silica White powder, 2-15 microns, low
oil absorption
Spheron L-1500~ Amorphous silica White powder, 3-15 microns, high
--loil absorption
For each particle type in Table 12, five 1000-gram batches of
wetting composition were prepared with particle concentrations of 0.5%, 1%,
2%, 5%, and 10% by weight. Each batch was prepared by adding the
appropriate amount of deionized, filtered water to a 1.15-liter beaker (for
the 5
batches, the water amounts were, respectively, 926.3 g, 921.3 g, 911 g, 881 g,
and 831 g). A 2.5-inch magnetic stirring rod stirred the contents of the jar
while residing on a Thermolyne Cimarec 2*stirrer, with stirring speed set to
maximum to provide a strong central vortex in each of 5 jars. Each batch
comprised 4 weight percent sodium chloride, added to the water as 40 g of
salt; 1 weight percent (10 g) Amisoft ECS22-P* acylglutamaie surfactant
(Ajinomoto, Tokyo, Japan); 0.5 weight percent (5 g) DC silicone emulsion
(Dow Corning) added to the salt water and surfactant; 1 weight percent (10 g)
Mackstat H 66 preservative (Mclntyre Group, Chicago, Illinois); and 0.05
weight percent (0.5 g) of fragrance first mixed into 0.25 weight percent (2.5
g)
of polysorbate 20, then mixed into the solution comprising the previous
ingredients; and the respective aniount of powder (from 0.5 to 10, weight
percent or from 5 g to 100 g). The Po\vder was added to the solution as it was
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-73-
being stirred and allowed to wet and become suspended over a period of about
30 minutes after addition of the powder. Some additional stirring by hand was
needed for some of the powders to promote mixing. Once the powder was
dispersed in the liquid, the pH was adjusted to 5.0 by adding malic acid,
prepared at a strength of 50 weight percent in water. The pH was measured
with a Cole Parmer*Model 59002-00 pH/mV/ C. meter, with a Model 59002-
72 KK8 electrode.
Each of the particle suspensions was then added to dried airlaid
basesheets that had been treated with NaAMPS binder and a co-binder
polymer according to Example 13. The add level was 200%, with application
by spray on one side of the web. The moistened web was then sealed in
plastic to sit overnight. Examination of the pre-moistened wipes treated with
particulate suspensions as the wetting composition revealed that the particles
generally remained in the wet wipe without the need for additional thickeners
or polymeric retention aids. Squeezing the pre-moistened wipes, for example,
yielded a mostly clear fluid apparently substantially devoid of particulates,
in
contrast to the milky suspensions used to wet the wipes. Generally, no visible
residue appeared to be left of the hands after using the wipes. The
particulates
also generally improved opacity and appeared to slightly provide tactile
property improvements (reduced tack, better rheological feel).
EXAMPLE 15
The role of ungelled starch particles in the wetting composition
of the present invention was investigated as a means of reducing tackiness and
improving surface feel for a pre-moistened wipe. Five wetting compositions
containing tapioca starch were prepared according to the formulations in Table
13. Softwood airlaid webs according to Example 10 were wetted with the
wetting composition with a 300% add-on level. (QS means."quantity
sufficient" to achieve the desired pH).
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-74-
Table 13. Formulations for five wetting compositions containing starch
ater ase
ater ap
apontte *
osp o ipi *
a ic ci o
Solution) to pH 4
apioca - *
*
ragoco ragrance *
0/708768
ac state ~
o ium Chionde .
ac am *
a ic ci o
Solution) to pH 4
The pre-moistened wipes comprising starch displayed reduced
tackiness when handled with the human hand than did similar pre-moistened
wipes without the starch. The wipes containing starch also felt smoother.
EXAMPLE 16
Additional pre-moistened wipes were prepared using the
wetting compositions displayed in Table 14, one of which comprised starch as
an additive and the other which comprised botanicals. The wetting
composition was added to an airlaid fibrous substrate comprising an ion-
sensitive binder. The wetting composition was added at add-on levels of 300
and 200 weight percent, respectively.
Table 14. Formulations for two wetting composi'tions
o e tarc i otanica
ormu a
aw aten a s
ater ase
ater ap
aponite *
osp o ipi ~
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-75-
a ic ci o
Solution) to pH 4
apioca 28-18 10 25
ragoco ragTance
0/708768
ac state
o ium Chlonde 1.5 1.5
ac am
a ic ci o o ution
to pH 4
mu gin *
itc aze
p - ina
o ution a-on o 0
EXAMPLE 17
Binder Specifications
A variety of ion-sensitive binders were prepared comprising
acrylic acid (AA), butacrylic acid (BA), 2-ethylhexyl-acrylic acid, and AMPS,
with the mole percents and molecular weights shown in Table 15:
Table 15. Ion-sensitive binders comprising AMPS
io
o e percent o monomers:
SSB X - _
Code
0.604
1 0.71 10.5 5
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-76-
These binders were prepared according to the methods of
Example l, but scaled up as a batch process capable of producing several
hundred gallons per batch.
EXAMPLE 18
Typical Wetting Solution
A wetting composition was prepared by combining the
following ingredients according to the specific weight percent: 92.88 weight
percent deionized water, 4 weight percent NaCI, 1 weight percent Mackstat H-
66 preservative (McIntyre Group, Chicago, Illinois), 1 weight percent CS22
acyl glutamate anionic surfactant (Amisoft Corp., Tokyo, Japan), 0.5 weight
percent DC 1785 silicone emulsion (Dow Corning), 0.25 weight percent
Solulan L-575 (PEG-75 lanolin, available from Amerchol, a division of Union
Carbide), 0.05 weight percent Dragoco fragrance 0/708768 (Dragoco SA,
Cuautitlan Izcalli, D.F. Mexico, Mexico), 0.25 weight percent polysorbate 20,
and about 0.07 weight percent of 50 percent by weight malic acid solution to
bring the pH to 5Ø

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-77-
EXAMPLE 19
A Treated Substrate
An airlaid substrate was made with the equipment described for
Example 10. Basis weight was 65 gsm and the fibers were 100%
Weyerhaeuser CF405 bleached soflwood kraft pulp. The binder solution had
12.8 weight percent binder solids, 75 weight percent of which was SSB Code
H of Table 15 and 25 weight percent Dur-O-Set RB latex co-binder (National
Starch). The binder solution was sprayed onto the web as described in
Example 1, with the dryer air temperature at 215 C. for all three oven
sections.
EXAMPLE 20
A Treated Substrate
An airlaid substrate was made according to Example 10, except
that the basis weight was 63 gsm and the oven temperature was 227 C. Reel
speed was 197 fpm. Thickness of the dried web was 1.30 mm.
MDDT was 5.55 kg/3-in, CCDT was 4.83 kg/3-in, CDWT (in
4% NaCI solution) was 1.07 kg/3-in, and S-CDWT as well as S-CDWT-M (1
hour aoak tests) gave 0 kg/3-in.
Some of the dried web was slit to a 4.25-inch width and treated
with wetting composition at 225% add-on, comprising 4% NaCI in deionized
water without surfactant. The moistened web was perforated with a perf-knife
operating with a depth of 0.070 inches to perforate every 4.5 inches. The
perforated web was rolled into a coreless roll with 100 perforated sheets per
roll (approximately 37.5 feet per roll) and placed in a white plastic
cartridge
for subsequent use in a dispenser for pre-moistened wipes.
EXAMPLE 21
A portion of the dried, treated web of Example 20 was wetted
with the wetting composition of Example 18 and converted into perforate roll
form for use as pre-moistened wipes to be dispensed from a bathroom
dispenser.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 22
A conventional, adhesively bonded airlaid substrate with a
basis weight of 60.1 gsm was created using the methods described in Example

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-78-
10. Dur-O-Set E-646 (National Starch) was used with wood pulp (CF405)
The substrate was wetted with a 4% NaCI solution and tested using the
methods described. The binder was entirely the self-crosslinking Dur-O-Set
E-646 compound; no salt-sensitive binder was applied. The binder solids mass
was 17% of the substrate mass. Dry thickness of the web was 1.4 mm, and the
CDWT value was 1.3 kg/3-in, while S-CDWT was 1.2 kg and S_CDWT-M
was 1.15 kg, indicating that the web maintained nearly all of its strength
after
soaking, and suggesting that the crosslinked latex provided the majority of
the
tensile strength of the web and that the latex bonds did not weaken
substantially in water.
EXAMPLE 23
A variety of binder/co-binder combinations were prepared, as
described below, using the salt-sensitive binders of Table 15 and co-binders
as
shown in Table 16 which are not self-crosslinkable.
Table 16. Latex co-binders that are not self-crosslinkable.
o- m er o- m er anu acturer
ur- - et ationa tarc
op ex - o an aas
ovene 4817 a ar ree
Using the methods described in Example 10, airlaid substrates
were made from bleached kraft fibers. The substrate was wetted with a 4%
NaCI solution and tested using the methods described. All substrates were
comprised of wood pulp (CF405) and binder. Results are shown in Table 17,
where the binder mixture consistently comprised 75% of a salt-sensitive
binder selected from Table 15 and 25% of a co-binder selected from Table 16.
The binder/co-binder column refers to the binder and co-binders listed in
Table 15 and 16, respectively. For example, "A/1" refers to a mixture of SSB
Code A in Table 15 and co-binder 1 of Table 16.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-79-
Table 17. Tensile data for various binder systems.
m er ic - - -
/ CDWT CDWT- IVI3
M
% Cob. MWx10- (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3") 3
Binder 6 hrs(kg/3
As seen in Table 17, nearly all of the substrates have lost more
that 80% of their tensile strength after soaking in deionized water for 1 hour
(S-CDWT). The substrates have lost more that 60% of their strength (S-
CDWT-M) after soaking for 1 hour in a solution of 200 ppm of divalent
cations (Ca++/1Vig++ 2:1). In particular, for the runs shown in Table 17, the
samples completely lost their strength in 1 hour in the 200 ppm solution when
the molecular weight of the salt sensitive binder was less than 1,200,000.
After 3 hours of soak time in the 200 ppm divalent cation solution, the SSBs
with high molecular weight have generally lost more of their strength, but may
still have non-zero tensile strength.
By comparison, the comparative Example 22 lost less than
15% of its strength after soaking for 1 hour in either deionized water or 200
ppm divalent ion solution. All of the substrates in Table 17 lost more tensile
strength on soaking than the comparative Example 22.
EXAMPLE 24
Different co-binders from Table 16 were blended with the salt-
sensitive binder Code F from Table 15. The binder blend was then applied
using the methods described in Example 10 to create the airlaid substrates
listed in Table 18. In each case, 20% binder solids were applied to the
substrate in a blend of 75% SSB/25% co-binder

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-80-
Table 18. Tensile data for various co-binder systems.
Binder/ Co-binder BW Thick, CDWT S-CDWT S-CDWT-M
Co-binder Used (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3")
F/I ur- - et
RB
op ex
ovene 160.281 1.18 1 0.687 1 0 1 0
Under similar. run conditions, all three co-binders perform
comparably. All of the substrates have lost their tensile strength (S-CDWT-
M) in the 200 ppm divalent cation solution independent of co-binder type.
EXAlVIPLE 25
Measurements were made of the peel force required to unroll
the product from the outer layers of a coreless roll of pre-moistened wipes
suitable for use as a moist toilet paper product. The product was made
according to Example 10 with an add-on level of 200% wetting composition.
The dried web was slit to a 4.25-inch width and treated with wetting
composition at 200% add-on, comprising 4% NaCI in deionized water with
surfactants, silicone, and lanolin as listed in Table 19 for wetting
composition
Q, R, and S. The moistened web was perforated with a perf-knife operating to
perforate every 4.5 inches. The perforated web was rolled into a coreless roll
with 100 perforated sheets per roll (approximately 37.5 feet per roll) and
sealed in a plastic cartridge for subsequent use in a dispenser for pre-
moistened wipes.
Table 19. Other additives in three wetting compositions.
o ution i icone ano m cy g utamate
emulsion surfactant
o . o
o . o
0 0
The roll rested freely in a plastic tub with a rounded, ribbed
bottom that held the roll in place with a minimum of friction when the roll

CA 02407741 2008-03-11
-81-
was unwound by pulling vertically upwards on the tail end of the roll.
Adjacent plies adhered to each other such that some force was required to
separate the layers. The peel force needed was less than the weight of the
roll
and appeared to be substantially greater than the frictional resistance
offered
by the tub as the roll turned, evidenced in part by angle between the web and
the roll at the point of separation. With no peel force, the angle between the
web being pulled up and a line normal to the roll at the point of separation
would be 90 degrees, but in unwinding the moist roll with the salt-sensitive
binder, the angle was substantially less than 90 degrees, thus imparting peel
force to separate the web.
~
The peel force was measured with an MTS Sintech 1/G test
machine with TestWorks 3.10 software. All testing as done in a conditioned
laboratory under Tappi Standard conditions. A 4.5-inch wide clamp with
rubber surfaces gripped the tail of a roll, with the roll position directly
underneath the clamp such the tail would remain vertical as it was unwound
from the roll if there were no peel force causing the web to wrap a portion of
the roll and deflect from the vertical. The clamp was attached to the
crosshead,
which pulled the tissue web upward at a speed of 100 cm/minute. Peel force
was measured by a 50 N load cell. The average load to pull 18 sheets away
from the roll was recorded by averaging two runs in which 4 sheets each were
separated and two runs in which 5 sheets each were separated. Only the first
18 sheets from the roll were used in the measurement. The average peel force
for two rolls per condition (for an overall average taken over a total of 36
sheets) is reported in Table 20 below.
Table 20. Peel force in grams to remove a web from a wound moist roll.
, gsm ic ess m er o utwn , ee ._ orce, _
, mm add-on g/in g
1.1 o -
0
0
60 0.76 0
0
0
0
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-82-
Peel forces for a roll having a width between 7 and 15 cm (the
width of the rolls tested in Table 20 are 10.8 cm) are desirably are less than
500 g, more specifically less than 300 g, more specifically less than about
200
g, more specifically still less than about 160 g, most specifically less than
about 120 g, with an exemplary range of from about 50 g to about 350 g, or
from about 80 g to about 200 g. More generally, the peel force per 4-inch
width of a moist roll can be any of the aforementioned values of ranges.
EXAMPLE 26
Additional samples were prepared according to Example 24
above, except that 15 weight % of the fiber blend consisted of 6-mm, crimped
PET fibers (KoSa). Different co-binders from Table 16 were blended with the
salt-sensitive binder Code F from Table 15. The binder blend was then
applied using the methods described in Example 10 to create the airlaid
substrates whose properties are listed in Table 21. In each case, 20% binder
solids were applied to the substrate in a blend of 75% SSB/25% co-binder.
The properties of these substrates were measured a8er wetting with a 4%
NaCI solution. All three co-binders perform comparably. All of the substrates
have lost their tensile strength in 200 ppm divalent cation solution
independent of co-binder type. Compared to the parallel results in Example
24, incorporation of the synthetic fibers impart a slight to modest strength
improvement (CDWT) and a modest increase in dry bulk.
Table 21. Data for substrates with PET fibers and various co-binders.
m er o- m er ic , - - -
M
Co- Used (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3")
binder
F/I ur- - et
RB
op ex
ovene 62.
EXAMPLE 27
Additional examples were conducted according to Example 26
with increasing amounts of synthetic fiber being added to the fiber blend.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-83-
Either a 6 mm crimped PET fiber (KoSa) or a 6 mm, crimped 2.4 dtex,
Lyocell fiber was used as noted in Table 22 below. The binder blend was a
constant blend of 75% SSB and 25% co-binder.
Table 22. Data for substrates with PET fibers and various co-binders.
u p ynt . m er m er ic . - - -
CDWT M
Synth. Type % Co- (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3")
binder
one 20%
0
6mm
0
6mm
o . .
6mm
PET¨ 0
6mm
yoce - 19%
6mm
yoce - o
6mm
The non-zero soaked CDWT tensiles in 200 ppm of divalent
cation are non-zero for those trial combinations with 25% synthetic fiber (PET
or Lyocell), suggesting that higher amounts can begin to compromise water
dispersibility.
EXAMPLE 28
The substrates shown in Table 23 were all made according to
the methods of Example 10 and prepared according to the methods described
in Example 23. All of the substrates in Table 23 were formed from airlaid pulp
(CF405). All binder blends were 75% SSB and 25% co-binder. The dry
thickness of the sheet was controlled by adjusting the level of web compaction
by the two compaction rolls prior to the first spray application of binder.
SSB
Codes 0 and Q from Table 15 were used.

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-84-
Table 23. Data for substrates with PET fibers and various co-binders.
o m er ic . CDW - - -
Binder / T CDWT M
in sheet Cob. (gsm) (mm) (kg/3" (kg/3") (kg/3")
)
20 -1 . 696
5 It appears that compaction of the dry web prior to binder
application can significantly increase final sheet wet strength without
sacrificing dispersibility. This unexpected level of strength increase can
allow
equivalent wet tensiles to be achieved in a variety of combinations including
basis weight reduction and/or percent binder in sheet reductions.
EXAMPLE 29
All substrates were prepared according to the methods
described in Example 27. All substrates were comprised of the fiber blend
noted in Table 24 with 20% binder in the sheet and Dur-O-Set RB serving as
the co-binder. Synthetic fibers were crimped and either 6 mm PET (KoSa) or
6 or 8 mm Lyocell with 1.7 or 2.4 dtex (Accordis).

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-85-
Table 24. Data for substrates with various fibers and binders.
o yn. m er ic . - - -
Syn. / CDWT M
Code Fiber Fiber Cob. MW (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3(kg/3
none
~ . . .
~ . . .
$ . 1.47 0.842 0
none
8. . . . .
none
-3016 5 . . 0.79 . 0.170 -
8
The examples of Table 24 suggest that that synthetic fiber
length, SSB molecular weight and web compaction in combination can affect
the dispersibility of the product as indicated by its S-CDWT-M value. All
substrates comprised of the 6 or 8 mm synthetic fibers were dispersible with
the lower molecular weight SSB. As the molecular weight was increased, the
8 mm Lyocell substrate began to retain some of its strength after soaking for
1
hour in the divalent cation solution; this substrate, however, was dispersible
in
DI water. Densifying the dry web prior to binder application can also impact
the dispersibility of a synthetic fiber containing substrate (Codes 3015 and
3016). Both Code 3015 and Code 3016 were fully dispersible in the DI water.
Sheet dispersibility can be managed by choosing lower molecular weight
SSBs in combination with synthetic fibers and dry web densification.
EXAMPLE 30
The substrates listed in Table 25 were prepared, wetted with
4% NaCI solution, and tested according to the methods described in Example
29. Each substrate was comprised of the fiber blend noted and 20% binder
with the SSB / co-binder blend noted in Table 25. Dur-O-Set RB was the co-
binder used in all of the samples listed in Table 25. All codes used 100%

CA 02407741 2008-03-11
-86-
softwood fiber except the last one, Code 2813, which comprised 15% PET
fiber (the 6 nun, crimped fiber obtained from KoSa). Basis weight was
generally held constant to about 60 gsm. The thickness of the airlaid web was
controlled by adjusting the level of web compaction by the two compaction
rolls prior to the first spray application of binder. The dry CD stiffness of
selected substrates in Table 25 were measured using a Handle-o-meter*and
reported as stiffness.
Table 25. Data for substrates with various binder blends.
m er in . ic - - ti es
/ CDWT CDWT- s
M
Code Cob. Type (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3") g force
As the percentage of the salt sensitive binder in the blend is
decreased from 100% to 5 5 % there is only to modest decrease in the CDWT at
constant dry bulk. At compositions of 65% salt-sensitive binder in the binder
blend, the substrate begins to retain a greater portion of its wet strength
after
soaking for 1 hour in 200 ppm of the divalent cation solution. As the web is
densified prior to the first binder application and the percentage of salt
sensitive binder in the blend is reduced to 65% or lower, a greater amount of
strength is retained after soaking in DI water or the 200 ppm divalent cation
solution for 1 hour compared to the same compositions at a higher dry bulk.
These examples suggest that increasing the co-binder content with or without
additional densification of the web can begin to compromise substrate
dispersibility.
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-87-
The results in Table 25 also show significant CDWT increases
as the thickness of the dry web is compressed prior to the application of the
binder. Codes 3007 to 3010 show that the CDWT is increasing as a function
of decreasing dry bulk with no loss of substrate dispersibility at constant
binder conditions.
Based on the Handle-O-Meter results (stiffness), it appears that
as the percentage of salt sensitive binder in the blend is decreased, the CD
stiffness of the substrate decreases.
EXAMPLE 31
The substrates listed in Table 26 were prepared according to
the method described in Examples 10 and 23. Each substrate comprised pulp
(CF405) and 20% binder. The binder had the SSB / co-binder blend given in
Table 26. Dur-O-Set RB was the co-binder. The substrate was converted into
roll form and wetted with solution Q of Table 19 (solution D). Measurements
were made of the peel force required to unroll the product from the outer
layers of the coreless roll of pre-moistened wipes according to the method
described in Example 25. The results of these tests are recorded in Table 26
below.
Table 26. Peel force results for coreless rolls.
o mer mer ic. ee
Binder
Code In sheet Blend Cob. (gsm) (mm) (g)
In this case, decreasing the percentage of the salt-sensitive
binder in the blend decreased the peel force.
EXAMPLE 32
Samples were made as in Example 10 using 75/25 blends of
SSB binder (see Table 15) and Dur-O-Set RB co-binder (co-binder 1 of Table

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-88-
16), according to the information in Table 27 below. Tensile results in Table
27 show good dispersibility over a range of product conditions.
Table 27. Tensile results for a range of binders and basesheet properties.
o in er ic . - - -
/ CDWT M
Binder Cob. MW (gsm) (nun) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3")
RJI
, .
0
The samples reported in Table 27 demonstrate some of the ranges of binder
content, basis weight, and web thickness over which dispersible substrates can
be made.
EXAMPLE 33
Samples were made generally as in Example 10 using 75/25
blends of SSB binder (see Table 15) and co-binder (see Table 16) as noted in
Table 28. All substrates contain 6 mm crimped, 2.4 dtex Lyocell*(Accordis)
as 15% of the fiber blend with 85% softwood pulp (CF405). All substrates are
comprised of 19 io binder and 81% of the binder blend.
Table 28. Tensile results for a range of binders and basesheet properties.
m e r i c. UDWT - - -
CDWT M
Cob. M W. (gsm) (mm) (kg/3") (kg/3") (kg/3 ")
, -
, -TI-7--0.960
0.990
,
In Table 28, all samples lost at least 75% of their wet strength
after soaking in the 200 ppm divalent cation solution for 1 hour (S-CDWT-
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-89-
M). The main differences in these samples is in the SSB composition, as
depicted in Table 15. Salt-sensitive binders L and E have the same
composition, but different molecular weights, than the salt sensitive binders
W
and AB (see Table 15). Salt sensitive binders W and AB have the same
composition but different molecular weights. The W/1- and AB/2-treated
substrates appear to be less dispersible than the L/1- and E/2-treated
substrates
independently of co-binder. Reducing the salt sensitive binder's molecular
weight can be used to make the substrate more dispersible as is shown by
substrate AB/1. Or, changing the salt sensitive binder's composition can be
used to make the substrate more dispersible as demonstrated by L/1 and E/2.
Thus, by modifying the salt sensitive binder's molecular composition or its
molecular weight, fully dispersible blends can be made. Alternatively, by
selecting a different co-binder chemistry to be more compatible with the salt
sensitive binder, fully dispersible binder blends can be made as demonstrated
by substrates AB/2 and AB/l.
EXAMPLE 34
A latex emulsion comprising about 6 /a NMA crosslinker,
AirFlex 105*(Air Products, Allentown, PA), was combined with SSB Code H
of Table 15 at a ratio of 75 parts SSB to 25 parts latex solids and cast into
8
bars with dimensions 1 cm x 4 cm x 3 mm as described in Example 9. Four
bars were prepared by drying in air at 60 C. overnight, while the other four
bars were dried at 167 C for 3 hours. Two bars from each set were then each
placed in 30 ml of 4% NaCI solution and allowed to sit for one hour, after
which solubility was determined gravimetrically. Bars from both sets (the two
drying conditions) were essentially completely insoluble in the saline
solution.
The remaining bars from each set were each placed in 30 ml of hard water
containing 200 ppm calcium and magiiesium ions at a 2:1 ratio at about 23 C.
and allowed to sit for one hour. The two bars dried at 167 C. and placed in
hard water were essentially completely insoluble (0% soluble). The two bars
dried at 60 C. and placed in hard water were 54% and 53% soluble,
respectively, which was unexpectedly low given that the latex should be
substantially uncrosslinked for drying at this temperature. However, some
coagulation occurred when the latex was mixed with the SSB, suggesting a
possible compatibility problem between the two mixtures, and thus solubility
may be impaired, or some coagulated particles may not have passed through
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-90-
the filter paper. It is also possible that some of the NMA crosslinker in the
Airflex latex may have promoted crosslinking or gelling of the blend. While
it is believed that a more compatible latex emulsion would have yielded
higher solubility, it is also believed that co-binders that are relatively low
in
crosslinking agents (e.g., less than 6%, specifically less than 2%, more
specifically less than 1%, and most specifically less than 0.3% crosslinker on
a solids mass basis) can be helpful in maintaining high solubility of the
dried
polymer blend.
Figure 1 shows the wet tensile results for treated airlaid
basesheets, wherein the tests have been carried out in different saline
solutions
or hard water. The airlaid basesheets were prepared according to Example 10
and provided with 20% add-on of salt-sensitive binder compositions labeled
as Code X, Code Y, and Code Z. Code X is a binder polymer comprising 60%
acrylic acid, 10.5% 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, 24.5% butyl acrylate, and 5%
NaAMPS, polymerized according to Example 1 with a molecular weight of
1.3 million, corresponding to Code B in Table 15. Code Y is similar but with
a molecular weight of about 550,000, corresponding to Code D in Table 15.
Code Z is similar but has 62% acrylic acid and 8.5% 2-ethylhexyl acrylate as
monomers, with a molecular weight of about 1.2 million, corresponding to
Code G in Table 15. All binders were blended with Dur-O-Set RB co-binder
in a 75:25 ratio. The treated webs were dried, as in Example 10, and then
wetted with either a 4% or 1.5% NaCI solution. Wet tensile testing was
conducted according to the CDWT protocol with the exceptions described in
Example 5(e.g., a 1-inch wide strip and a MTS tensile tester were used).
Soaked CD tensile tests were conducted on samples prepared
with the 4% solution. The four columns shown for each code (some of which
are not visible due to zero values) correspond to the results from the four
different tests. The first two columns are the CDWT values "as is" for the
web in either the 4% or 1.5% NaCI solution. The third and fourth columns are
the S-CDWT-M (hard water soak) results at 1 hour and 3 hours for each web
that had been wetted with the 4% solution.
The results show good wet strength at both 1.5% NaCI and 4%
NaCI, with excellent strength loss for webs treated with Code Y(Hard Water
Dispersibility of 100%), good strength loss for Code Z, and residual strength
still present for Code X. Comparison of Code X to Code Y suggests that a

CA 02407741 2007-01-16
-91-
reduction in molecular weight can promote dispersibility of the salt-sensitive
binder.
Fig. 2 is a chart showing how wet tensile strength (reported as
CDWT in grams per 2.54 cm over a range of soak times) can change over time
as 68 gsm softwood airlaid webs comprising ion-sensitive binders are soaked
in solutions comprising calcium ions. The moistened webs were prepared
with 20% binder by weight comprising 85% Lion (Tokyo, Japan) SSB-3b
acrylic-acid based terpolymer and 15% Dur-O-Set RB (National Starch) co-
binder. After being dried, the webs were wetted with a solution containing
0.9% NaCI, 0.5% phospholipid CDM (Mona), and 0.5% Mackstat H-66 and
displayed a wet strength of about 400 g/in (or g/2.54 cm). Solution add-on
was 250% based on the dry weight of the web. The treated webs were then
soaked in NaCI-free water containing calcium ions at levels of 0, 13, 29, and
109 ppm, yielding the four curves shown in FIG. 2 for wet tensile strength
versus time. At 109 ppm calcium ions there is essentially no loss in strength.
Strengths over 100 g/in are maintained in 29 ppm calcium ions. It appears
that even a small amount of calcium ions in the water will interfere with a
dispersibility of a web treated with the Lion SSB-3b product.
Fig. 3 compares two data sets with Lion SSB-3b product taken from FIG. 2
(labeled as Code 3300) with a sulfonated salt-sensitive binder blended with
Dur-O-Set RB polymer in a 75/25 ratio. The data set labeled as Code 2102
refers to a 65-gsm web containing the sulfonated salt-sensitive binder, which
corresponds to SSB Code H in Table 15. This web was wetted with the
solution described in Table 4, Soltjtion add-on was 225% hased on the dry
weight of the web. This binder formulation displayed a rapid drop in tensile
strength - hence good triggerability - when immersed in hard water, even at a
calcium ion concentration of 257 ppm. Thus, the sulfonated salt-sensitive
binders of the present invention show a dramatic improvement in their ability
to be dispersible in hard water relative to prior acrylic-acid based
terpolymers.
Tensile results for data in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 were obtained with
*
an MTS tensile test devices, the MTS 500/S unit (MTS Systenis, Research
Park, North Carolina) using the TestworksT"' 3.10 for Windows software.
Instead of the normal 3-inch strip for testing, a 1-inch wide strip was used,
cut
to 6 inches in lengtll. The gauge length between the rubber-coated jaws of the
test device was 3 inches. Testing was operated at the specified crosshead
speed of 12 in/min.
* trade-mark

CA 02407741 2002-10-28
WO 01/83666 PCT/USO1/14205
-92-
It should be understood, of course, that the foregoing relates
only to certain disclosed embodiments of the present invention and that
numerous modifications or alterations may be made therein without departing
from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended
claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2019-05-03
Letter Sent 2018-05-03
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2013-11-12
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2013-03-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2013-03-16
Inactive: IPC expired 2012-01-01
Grant by Issuance 2009-04-07
Inactive: Cover page published 2009-04-06
Pre-grant 2009-01-19
Inactive: Final fee received 2009-01-19
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2008-08-19
Letter Sent 2008-08-19
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2008-08-19
Inactive: IPC removed 2008-08-18
Inactive: IPC removed 2008-08-18
Inactive: IPC removed 2008-08-18
Inactive: IPC removed 2008-08-18
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2008-06-16
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2008-03-11
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-09-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2007-01-16
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Letter Sent 2006-03-10
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2006-02-14
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2006-02-14
Request for Examination Received 2006-02-14
Inactive: IPRP received 2004-01-16
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Letter Sent 2003-03-03
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-02-05
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2003-02-03
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2003-02-03
Application Received - PCT 2002-11-28
Inactive: Single transfer 2002-10-28
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-10-28
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2001-11-08

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2008-04-24

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC.
Past Owners on Record
DAVE A. SOERENS
DAVID M. JACKSON
ERIC D. JOHNSON
FRANKLIN M. C. CHEN
FREDERICK J. LANG
JEFFREY D. LINDSAY
KENNETH Y. WANG
KIM G. SCHICK
LIGIA A. RIVERA
PAIGE A. DELLERMAN
PAVNEET S. MUMICK
VARSHA K. SHAH
WALTER T. SCHULTZ
WILLIAM S. POMPLUN
YIHUA CHANG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2003-02-05 2 39
Description 2002-10-28 92 4,646
Abstract 2002-10-28 1 66
Claims 2002-10-28 22 836
Drawings 2002-10-28 3 63
Description 2007-01-16 92 4,545
Claims 2007-01-16 9 355
Description 2008-03-11 92 4,550
Claims 2008-03-11 9 354
Representative drawing 2008-09-29 1 14
Cover Page 2009-03-18 2 56
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2003-02-03 1 106
Notice of National Entry 2003-02-03 1 189
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-03-03 1 130
Reminder - Request for Examination 2006-01-04 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2006-03-10 1 177
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2008-08-19 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2018-06-14 1 178
PCT 2002-10-28 2 71
PCT 2002-10-29 5 272
Correspondence 2009-01-19 1 37