Language selection

Search

Patent 2408434 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2408434
(54) English Title: METHOD FOR GRINDING METALLIC WORKPIECES CONTAINING, IN PARTICULAR, NICKEL
(54) French Title: PROCEDE POUR MEULER DES PIECES METALLIQUES CONTENANT NOTAMMENT DU NICKEL
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B24B 53/053 (2006.01)
  • B24B 7/02 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • SCHLECHTER, ROBERT (Austria)
  • PASKUDA, ANDREAS (Germany)
  • KULMITZER, HARALD (Austria)
(73) Owners :
  • TYROLIT-SCHLEIFMITTELWERKE SWAROVSKI K.G.
(71) Applicants :
  • TYROLIT-SCHLEIFMITTELWERKE SWAROVSKI K.G. (Austria)
(74) Agent: BLAKE, CASSELS & GRAYDON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2001-04-21
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-11-07
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2001/004529
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2001089766
(85) National Entry: 2002-11-07

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
100 25 173.0 (Germany) 2000-05-24

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a method for grinding metallic workpieces containing,
in particular, nickel, whereby a rotationally driven grinding wheel (2) is
continuously dressed by a rotationally driven dressing wheel (3) during the
grinding of the workpiece (1) by the continual advance (vfrd) of the dressing
wheel. In order to increase the grinding capacity, the invention provides that
with a dressing advance velocity of 1 to 2 µm per rotation of the grinding
wheel and with a circumferential velocity of the grinding wheel (vs) of at
least 45 m/s, the advance (table velocity vt) is set such that the rate of
metal removal is at least 90 mm3/mms.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé permettant de meuler des pièces métalliques contenant notamment du nickel, selon lequel une meule (2) entraînée en rotation, d'une roue de dressage (3) entraînée en rotation est dressée en continu pendant le meulage d'une pièce (1), par approche continue (cfrd) de la roue de dressage. Afin d'augmenter la capacité de meulage, il est prévu d'ajuster l'avance, pour une vitesse d'approche de dressage allant de 1 à 2 µm par rotation de la meule et pour une vitesse périphérique de la meule (vs) d'au moins 45 m/s, de sorte que le taux d'enlèvement de copeaux soit d'au moins 90 mm?3¿/mms.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-6-
Claims
1. A method for grinding in particular nickel-
containing metallic workpieces, in which a grinding
wheel (2), which is driven in rotation, is continuously
dressed by a dressing wheel (3), which is driven in
rotation, during the grinding of the workpiece (1) by
means of a continuous infeed (vfrd) of the dressing
wheel, characterized in that, at a dressing infeed rate
of 1 to 2 µm per revolution of the grinding wheel and a
circumferential speed of the grinding wheel (vs) of at
least 45 m/s, the advance (table speed vt) is set in
such a way that the material-removal rate is at least
90 mm3/mms.
2. The method according to one or more of the
preceding claims or in particular according thereto,
characterized by a highly porous grinding wheel, in
particular comprising 50% by volume of air.
3. The method according to one or more of the
preceding claims or in particular according thereto,
characterized by a grinding-wheel speed of revolution
of more than 50 m/s, preferably more than 60 m/s, and
an advance which corresponds to a material-removal rate
of more than 100 mm3/mms or more than 150 mm3/mms.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


' . CA 02408434 2002-11-07
~ WO 01/89766 PCT/EPO1/04529
Method for grinding in parti~uhar nick~1-containing
metallic v~rorkpieces
The invention relates to a method for grinding in
particular nickel-containing metallic workpieces, in
which a grinding wheel, which is driven in rotation, is
continuously dressed by a dressing wheel, which is
driven in rotation, during the grinding of the
workpiece by means of a continuous infeed of the
dressing wheel.
Methods of this type are known. in the prior art as CD
grinding. The continuous dressing of t.ne grinding wheel
means that the grinding wheel always retains its exact
shape. However, it has the drawback of a high
consumption of the grinding wheel. T~:e grinding
capacity, i.e. the material-removal rate:, is determined
by the table speed. In the prior art, this is set in
such a way that the material-removal rate is below
30 mm3/mms. In the prior art, the infeed rate of the
dressing wheel is less than 1 Ecm/revolution, based on
the grinding wheel. The grinding-wheel speed of
revolution, i.e. the cutting speed, is at most 30 m/s.
The rotation of the dressing wheel is approximately 80$
of the grinding-wheel rotational speed, running in the
same direction as the grinding wheel.
The invention is based on the object of increasing the
grinding capacity.
The object is achieved by the invention specified in
the claims.
In Claim 1 it is provided that the dressing infeed rate
is increased drastically to a level which is between 1
and 2 ~m/revolution. The grinding-wheel speed of
revolution is set to at least 45 m/s. With these
parameters, the advance (table speed) can be set in

CA 02408434 2002-11-07
WO 01/89766 PCT/EPO1/04529
- 2 -
such a way that the material-removal rate is at least
90 mm3/mms. Surprisingly, it has emerged that a
considerable increase in the dressing. infeed rate and
only a relatively moderate increase in the grinding-
s wheel speed of revolution leads to a dispxopo,rtionate
increase in the material-removal rate. Surprisingly, it
has emerged that when the material-removal rate is
increased by increasing the table speed, the normal
forces acting on the table remain virtually constant
and do not rise in the same way. If the grinding wheel
is made from a highly porous material which forms an
air volume of, for example, 50~, it is possible to
improve the results still further. The cutting speed
can be increased to 60 m/s. It is then possible to
achieve material-removal rates of more than l00 mm3/mms,
even for nickel alloys, which form long chips. At a
grinding-wheel speed of revolution of 80 m/s and a
dressing infeed rate of 2 Eun/revolution, it is possible
to achieve material-removal rates of 300 mm3/mms. The
increase in the material-removal rate which is achieved
by increasing the dressing i~n~eed rate is explained by
the fact that the increase in the dressing infeed leads
to an increase in the sharpness of the tool. This is
also deemed responsible for the almost imperceptible
increase in the normal force. Although the method using
the sets of parameters according to the invention leads
to faster wear to the grinding wheel, the consumption
of the grinding wheel is surprisingly compensated for
by the increased material-removal rate, so that overall
the grinding capacity is increased. The penetration
depth of the grinding wheel, which works using its
circumferential surface, is ,pref.erably 3 mm. The table
speed can reach levels of over 1.8 m/_min. The abrasion
to the grinding wheel caused by~.the dressing,, is; greater
than the abrasion during grinding.

CA 02408434 2002-11-07
WO 01/89766 PCT/EPO1/04529
- 3 -
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained
with reference to the appended figures, in which:
Fig. 1 diagrammatically depicts the device for
carrying out the method according to the
invention, and
Fig. 2 shows sets of parameters with which optimum
grinding results can be achieved.-
The device for grinding the workpiece 1 comprises a
grinding wheel 2 which is continuously driven in
rotation and is operated at a rotational speed which is
such that it acts on the workpiece 1 with a grinding-
contact speed vs. The direction of rotation is
indicated by the arrow 2'.
The grinding wheel 2 is continuously :dressed by a
dressing wheel 3 which runs in the same. direction 3'
and can be displaced in the direction of the arrow 3" .
The dressing wheel rotates at approximately 80% of the
rotational speed of the grinding wheel. For grinding
purposes, the circumferential surface of the grinding
wheel 2 penetrates a depth ae into the workpiece 1,
which is resting on a moveable table 4 which can be
displaced in the direction indicated by arrow 4' at the
table speed vt.
The grinding wheel consists of a porous material. 25%
of the volume is formed by abrasive grain, 15% by a
binder, while 50% of the volume of the grinding wheel
is air. This is a porous grinding wheel. It is
particularly suitable for nickel alloys.
To enable the considerable horizontal forces which
occur at relatively high material-removal rates to be
absorbed, the grinding wheel may have a specially
reinforced hub (not shown). A grinding' wheel in
accordance with Austrian patent application A 314/2000,

CA 02408434 2002-11-07
WO 01/89766 PCT/EPOl/04529
- 4 -
to which reference is made in its entirety at this
point, is particularly suitable for this purpose.
The parameters illustrated in Fig. 2 are operating
parameters at which the device illustrated in Fig. 1
gives good grinding results. The first set of
parameters corresponds to the prior art. The second set
of parameters shows how a slight increase in the
grinding-contact speed and a drastic 'increase in the
dressing infeed rate vfrd leads to an initially
approximately proportional increase in the material-
removal rate.
A further increase in the contact speed vs to 45 m/s,
while only involving approximately doubling the
grinding-contact speed, leads to a material-removal
rate which is more than four times greater than that
achieved with the set of parameters used in the prior
art.
At a contact speed of 50 m/s, with a dressing infeed
rate of 1.5 ~m/revolution it is even possible to
achieve a material-removal rate of 150 mm3/mms. If the
contact speed is increased to 80 m/s, with a dressing
infeed rate of 2 Etm/revolution it is even possible to
achieve a material-removal rate of 300 mm3/mms.
The sets of parameters illustrated in Fig. 2 were
determined by carrying out grinding experiments in
which the cutting speed vs and the infeed rate vfrd of
the dressing wheel were kept constant and the advance
(table speed) vt was increased in steps. The value
shown in Fig. 2 for the material-removal rate
corresponds to the experiment with the highest advance
in which a sufficiently good grinding result was still
achieved.

CA 02408434 2002-11-07
WO 01/89766 PCT/EPO1/04529
_ 5 _
All features of the invention disclosed are
(inherently) pertinent to the invention. The disclosure
content of the associated/appended priority documents
(copy of the prior application) and of A 314/2000 is
hereby incorporated in its entirety in the disclosure
of the present application, partly with a view to
incorporating features of these documents in claims of
the present application.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2007-04-23
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2007-04-23
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2006-04-21
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2006-04-21
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-04-13
Inactive: Office letter 2005-04-13
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-04-13
Inactive: Office letter 2005-04-11
Revocation of Agent Request 2005-03-17
Appointment of Agent Request 2005-03-17
Inactive: Agents merged 2003-02-10
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-02-10
Letter Sent 2003-02-06
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2003-02-06
Application Received - PCT 2002-12-04
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-11-07
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-11-07

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2006-04-21

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-03-17

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2002-11-07
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2003-04-22 2002-11-07
Registration of a document 2002-11-07
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2004-04-21 2004-02-09
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2005-04-21 2005-03-17
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
TYROLIT-SCHLEIFMITTELWERKE SWAROVSKI K.G.
Past Owners on Record
ANDREAS PASKUDA
HARALD KULMITZER
ROBERT SCHLECHTER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Representative drawing 2002-11-06 1 17
Description 2002-11-06 5 204
Abstract 2002-11-06 2 88
Drawings 2002-11-06 2 23
Claims 2002-11-06 1 33
Notice of National Entry 2003-02-05 1 189
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2003-02-05 1 107
Reminder - Request for Examination 2005-12-21 1 116
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2006-07-03 1 166
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2006-06-18 1 175
PCT 2002-11-06 10 395
PCT 2002-11-07 5 195
PCT 2002-11-07 5 196
Fees 2004-02-08 1 27
Correspondence 2005-03-16 2 41
Correspondence 2005-04-12 1 10
Correspondence 2005-04-12 1 10
Fees 2005-03-16 1 36