Language selection

Search

Patent 2413799 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2413799
(54) English Title: WATER SEPARATION FROM SOLVENT
(54) French Title: SEPARATION D'UNE EAU ET D'UN SOLVANT
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant Beyond Limit
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B01D 61/00 (2006.01)
  • B01D 17/00 (2006.01)
  • B01D 61/14 (2006.01)
  • B01D 61/18 (2006.01)
  • B01D 61/22 (2006.01)
  • B01D 69/10 (2006.01)
  • B01D 69/12 (2006.01)
  • B01D 71/32 (2006.01)
  • B01D 71/36 (2006.01)
  • G01N 1/34 (2006.01)
  • G01N 1/40 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • JOHNSON, ROBERT S. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • ROBERT S. JOHNSON
(71) Applicants :
  • ROBERT S. JOHNSON (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-08-24
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2001-06-27
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-01-10
Examination requested: 2006-06-13
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2001/020555
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2002002211
(85) National Entry: 2002-12-30

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/215,055 (United States of America) 2000-06-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


An apparatus (100) and method for separating residual water from a solvent.
The device comprises a reservoir (102) containing a solution comprising
solvent containing residual water, the reservoir having an opening to allow
the solution to drain from the reservoir. A membrane layer is provided
comprising a first layer (104) of fluoropolymer and a second layer of
fluoropolymer (105). The membrane is positioned in series with the reservoir
opening. Vacuum is generated on one side of the membrane layer wherein the
solvent containing water passes through the membrane therein removing water
from the solvent to provide a solvent with a water level of less than or equal
to 1.0 ppm.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un appareil (100) et un procédé qui permettent de séparer de l'eau résiduelle d'un solvant. Le dispositif comprend un réservoir (102) rempli d'une solution qui comprend de l'eau résiduelle contenant un solvant. Le réservoir est muni d'une ouverture servant à l'écoulement de la solution du réservoir. Une couche membranaire présente une première couche de polymère fluoré (104) et une seconde couche de polymère fluoré (105). La membrane est disposée en série avec l'ouverture du réservoir. De la vapeur est générée sur un côté de la couche membranaire et l'eau contenant un solvant passe à travers la membrane et y est séparée du solvant pour donner un solvant dont la teneur en eau est inférieure ou égale à 1,0 mg/l.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. A method for separating residual water from a solvent, comprising the steps
of:
providing a reservoir containing a solution comprising solvent containing
residual
water, the reservoir having an opening to allow the solution to drain from the
reservoir,
resisting the flow of the solution from the reservoir with a membrane layer
comprising a first layer of fluoropolymer and a second layer of fluoropolymer,
said
membrane positioned in the series with the reservoir opening,
decreasing the pressure on the second side of said supported membrane relative
to the
first side of said supported membrane to thereby increase the flow rate of the
solvent through
the membrane;
therein removing said water from said solvent to provide a solvent with a
water level
of less than or equal to 1.0 ppm.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said first layer of fluoropolymer comprises
PTFE.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said second layer of fluoropolymer comprises
ECTFE.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein said first layer comprising PTFE has a
thickness of about 1-5 mils.
5. The method of claim 3 wherein said second layer of ECTFE has a thickness of
about 5-15 mils.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said membrane is characterized with a Gurley
Number of ~ 30.0 seconds and a pore size of 0.05 - 2.0 microns.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said membrane has a pore size is about 0.05 -
2.0 micron.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of decreasing the pressure on the
second side of the membrane relative to the first side of the membrane is done
by applying a
vacuum
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the vacuum is varied.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein the vacuum ranges from about 1-15" Hg.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein the vacuum ranges from about 1-5" Hg.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein the decreasing of the pressure is delayed a
selected period of time.
13. A method for separating residual water from a solvent, comprising the
steps
of:
providing a reservoir containing a solution comprising solvent containing
residual
water, the reservoir having an opening to allow the solution to drain from the
reservoir,
resisting the flow of the solution from the reservoir with a membrane layer
comprising a first layer of polytetrafluroethylene (PTFE) and a second layer
of ethylene-
chlorotrifluroethylene (ECTFE) layer, said membrane positioned in the series
with the
reservoir opening, the membrane having said first layer in contact with the
solution, and
decreasing the pressure on the second side of said supported membrane relative
to the
first side of said supported membrane to thereby increase the flow rate of the
solvent through
the membrane.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said membrane itself is further
characterized
with a Gurley Number of ~ 25.0 seconds and a pore size of 0.05 - 2.0 microns.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein said pore size is about 0.1 micron.
16. The method of claim 13 wherein said PTFE layer has a thickness of about 1-
5
mils and said ECTFE layer has a thickness of about 5-15 mils.
17. The method of claim 13 wherein the step of decreasing the pressure on the
second side of the membrane relative to the first side of the membrane is done
by applying a
vacuum
18. The method of claim 17 wherein the vacuum is varied.
19. The method of claim 17 wherein the vacuum ranges from about 1-15" Hg.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein the vacuum ranges from about 1-5" Hg.
21. The method of claim 1 wherein the decreasing of the pressure is delayed a
selected period of time.
22. A method for separating residual water from a solvent, comprising the
steps
of:
providing a reservoir containing a solution comprising solvent containing
residual
water, the reservoir having an opening to allow the solution to drain from the
reservoir,
resisting the flow of the solution from the reservoir with a membrane layer
comprising a first layer of fluoropolymer and a second layer of fluoropolymer,
said
8

membrane positioned in the series with the reservoir opening, said membrane
supported on a
screen layer,
decreasing the pressure on the second side of said supported membrane relative
to the
first side of said supported membrane to thereby increase the flow rate of the
solvent through
the membrane;
therein removing said water from said solvent to provide a solvent with a
water level
of less than or equal to 1.0 ppm.
23. The method of claim 22 wherein said screen layer comprises a fluoropolymer
polymer.
24. The method of claim 23 wherein said fluoropolymer comprises ETFE.
25. An apparatus for separating residual water from a solvent, comprising:
a reservoir containing a solution comprising solvent containing residual
water, the
reservoir having an opening to allow the solution to drain from the reservoir,
a membrane layer comprising a first layer of fluoropolymer and a second layer
of
fluoropolymer, said membrane positioned in the series with the reservoir
opening,
a device for generating vacuum on said second layer of fluoropolymer, wherein
said
solvent containing water passes through said membrane layer therein removing
water from
said solvent to provide a solvent with a water level of less than or equal to
1.0 ppm.
9

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02413799 2002-12-30
WO 02/02211 PCT/USO1/20555
1 WATER SEPARATION FROM SOLVENT
2 CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
3 This application claims the benefit of copending U.S. provisional patent
application
4 serial No. 60/215,055 filed June 29, 2000, the teachings of which are
incorporated herein by
reference.
6 FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention generally relates to the field of chemical laboratory equipment
for
8 sample preparation and particularly to the use of a hydrophobic membrane to
separate water
9 from an organic solvent, and more particularly to an apparatus and method
for increasing the
l0 flow rate of the solvent through the membrane without adversely affecting
the performance
11 of the membrane.
12 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
13 When samples are to be analyzed for organic and/or inorganic trace
compounds, the
14 samples are typically extracted with an organic solvent. The solvent
extracts the compounds
from the sample, due to selective chemistry.
16 Before the extract can be analyzed, all residual water should preferably be
removed
17 from the extracting solvent. This is due to the adverse effect residual
water can have on
18 subsequent sample preparation steps which are required to prepare and
analyze the samples.
19 Current practice embodies the use of a drying agent called sodium sulfate
and has
2o been the standard technique to remove the residual water from solvent
extracts. Sodium
21 sulfate is a granular material that has a high binding capacity for
residual water. The sodium
22 sulfate is first heated to. drive off any water that has been adsorbed into
the material. This
23 typically requires heating overnight at 400C. The sodium sulfate is then
placed into a glass
24 funnel containing filter paper, or a chromatography column. The funnel or
column is then
washed with extracting solvent to wash off any impurities, The extracting
solvent is then
26 discarded. Once the sodium sulfate is clean, the solvent extract is poured
on top of the
27 sodium sulfate. As the solvent drains slowly through, the residual water
becomes bound to
28 the surface of the sodium sulfate. The collected solvent passing through is
now dry and ready
29 for analysis.
3o The use of sodium sulfate, even though easy to use, requires many physical
31 manipulations. Sodium sulfate requires the use of glassware that must be
subsequently
32 washed so as not to introduce contaminants into the samples and requires
the purchase of, and
1

CA 02413799 2002-12-30
WO 02/02211 PCT/USO1/20555
1 the disposal of, the used sodium sulfate. The labor time and the materials
costs, add
2 significantly to the total cost of performing sample extractions.
3 U.S. Patent 5,268,150 assigned to Corning Incorporated, discloses the use of
a
4 hydrophobic membrane in an extraction device which allows a solvent to pass
therethrough,
yet will not allow a significant amount of water from the sample liquid to
pass therethrough.
6 The patent discloses that hydrophobic membranes incorporating
polytetrafluoroethylene
7 (PTFE) have been found to be very effective in achieving the desired results
of letting solvent
8 pass, while retaining the sample usually consisting of a relatively large
portion of water or an
9 aqueous solution. The patent goes on to state that the typical dimensions of
the membrane
1o range from 10 to 50 millimeters in diameter with a thickness ranging from
0.1 to 5.0 microns
11 with a pore size ranging from 0.2 to 5.0 microns, depending upon the sample
being
12 processed.
13 Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to improve on the above
referenced
14 designs and provide a more efficient technique for separation water from a
given solvent.
More specifically, it is an object of the present invention to provide a
method and apparatus
16 and improved membrane design to improve the purification flow rate of a
solvent/water
17 mixture or emulsion through said membrane, to remove water, without
adversely effecting
18 membrane performance.
19 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
2o A method/apparatus for separating residual water from a solvent, comprising
the steps
21 of providing a reservoir containing a solution comprising solvent
containing residual water,
22 the reservoir having an opening to allow the solution to drain from the
reservoir, and passing
23 the solution in the reservoir through a fluoropolymer membrane supported on
a
24 fluoropolymer screen. The supported membrane is positioned in series with
the reservoir
opening, the membrane having a first side in contact with the solution and an
opposing
26 second side. Pressure is decreased on the second side of the supported
membrane relative to
27 the first side of said supported membrane to thereby increase the flow rate
of the solvent
28 through the membrane, wherein the fluoropolymer membrane operates to remove
water from
29 the solvent.
3o BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
31 Figure 1 is a sectional view of a first separator apparatus in accordance
with the
32 present invention, and
2

CA 02413799 2002-12-30
WO 02/02211 PCT/USO1/20555
1 Figure 2 is a sectional view of a second separator apparatus in accordance
with the
2 present invention.
3 Figure 3 is an exploded view of a preferred separator apparatus in
accordance with the
4 presentinvention.
The above and other objects, feature, and advantages of the present invention
will be
6 apparent in the following detailed description thereof when read in
conjunction with the
'7 appended drawings wherein the same reference numerals denote the same or
similar parts
8 throughout the several views.
9 DETAILED DESRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
1o Referring to the drawings, there is illustrated generally a first
concentrator/extractor
11 apparatus 100. The concentrator/extractor apparatus 100 comprises a column
102 and
12 fluoropolymer material layers 104 and 105. Preferably, fluoropolymer layer
104 is laminated
13 to fluoropolymer layer 105 to provide a membrane type construction. A
preferred
14 fluoropolymer for layer 104 is PTFE and a preferred fluoropolymer for layer
105 is ethylene-
chlorotrifluroethylene (ECTFE).
16 A screen support layer is shown at 106, in addition to a base assembly 108,
and a
17 collection vessel 110. The column 102 forms a reservoir to hold a solvent.
The column 102,
18 which may be pressed down on top of the membrane (fluoropolymer layer 104
laminated to
19 fluoropolymer layer 105) may be used to hold the membrane in place. The
column 102 may
2o seal the membrane and prevent any solvent from passing around the edge of
the membrane.
21 The column 102 and the collection vessel 110 are preferably made of glass.
The screen
22 support member 106 is preferably an ECTFE or ETFE fluoropolymer fabric
screen with 0.5- .
23 1.0 mm openings, 0.5 -1.0 mm thick, and a 0.25-0.50 mm thread.
24 The membrane comprises layers 104 and 105 are preferably characterized as
follows:
Pore Size: 0.05 to 0.2 micron;
26 Bubble Point: Individual between 24.0 psi and 34.0 psi (47 mm membrane;
27 isopropanol at 21°C)
28 WEP: 50.0 psi minimum individual
29 Gurley Number: Mean < 30.0 seconds (100 cc air through 1 in2 orifice, 4.88"
water
pressure drop)
3

CA 02413799 2002-12-30
WO 02/02211 PCT/USO1/20555
1 Thickness: Preferably 1.0 mils to 20 mils.
2 The following definitions apply to the above:
3 Gurley number: A measure of the air permeability of the fluoropolymer. The
Gurley
4 number is the time in second required for 100cc of air to pass through a one
square inch area
of membrane, when a constant pressure of 4.88 inches of water is applied.
6 Bubble point: The minimum pressure in KG/CMZ required to force air through
the
7 fluoropolymer that has been prewetted with water, isopropanol, or methanol.
8 Water entry pressure: The pressure at which water permeates through the
membrane.
9 This is a visual test.
In a preferred embodiment, the PTFE layer 104 has usable diameters in the
range of
11 40-100 mm. The fluoropolymer layer 104 and fabric support member 105 are
positioned in
12 series between the column 102 and the collection vessel 110. In a most
preferred
13 embodiment, a 3 mil thick PTFE layer 104 with a 0.1 micron pore size is
supported on a 10
14 mil thick non-woven layer 105, comprised of ECTFE polymer, which ECTFE
polymer is
preferably obtained from Ausimont and sold under the tradename "HALAR".
16 It is worth noting that in a preferred embodiment, a 3.0 mil PTFE layer is
laminated to
17 a 10 mil ECTFE layer, and. a resulting thickness of 3-7 mils is produced
for the laminate as a
18 result of the heat setting laminating process.
19 In accordance with the present invention, the screen layer 106 is
preferably ethylene-
trifluroethylene copolymer (ETFE). The screen layer serves to gap or space
laminated layers
21 104 and 105 on the funnel surface such that it is possible to distribute
the pressure differential
22 across the entire cross-sectional area of the funnel surface to achieve
more efficient
23 performance. However, while it can be appreciated that screen layer 106 is
a separate
24 components, it can be appreciated that screen layer 106 may actually be
incorporated directly
into the surface of the funnel upon which the laminated layers 104 and 106
rest. This would
26 provide the equivalent effect of spacing laminated layers 104 and 106 to
evenly distribute the
27 pressure differential created~by vacuum.
28 Furthermore, in the context of the present invention it should be
appreciated that the
29 removal of water from a given solvent containing, e.g., some analyte to be
evaluated by
4

CA 02413799 2002-12-30
WO 02/02211 PCT/USO1/20555
1 techniques such as gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), is such
that the
2 removal of water is highly efficient and allows for the generation of a
GC/MS analysis that is
3 not compromised by the presence of water. In that regard, it has been found
that the present
4 invention allows for removal of water down to a level at or below 1.0 ppm.
Expanding upon the above, it will be appreciated that with respect to the
removal of
6 water herein, it has been found that by reference to the generation of a
GC/MS analysis that is
7 not compromised by the presence of water, it should also be understood that
this is reference
8 to the fact that the water removal herein is sufficient to reduce the water
levels to that level
9 wherein the possibility of contamination of the GC column by a water soluble
inorganic acid
1o is removed or attenuated. In addition, the possibility of any degradation
of the GC column
11 due to the presence of water soluble inorganic salts is also equally
attenuated or removed, and
12 GC/MS can proceed without such problems.
13 Additionally, it is worth noting that the invention herein is preferably
applied to a
14 water/solvent mixture wherein the solvent is denser than water. However, in
broad context
the invention herein is not so limited.
16 As shown in Figure 2, there is illustrated generally a second
concentrator/extractor
17 apparatus 200. The concentrator/extractor apparatus 200 comprises a column
202, a
18 fluoropolymer layer 204 (PTFE) and a fluoropolymer layer 205 (ECTFE) that,
as noted
19 above, are preferably laminated to one another. In addition, a support
screen member 206 is
shown, a base assembly 20~, and a collection vessel 210. The apparatus 200 can
be coupled
21 to an external low-level vacuum 216. A low level vacuum is one that
preferably creates a
22 pressure drop of less than 6" Hg. Alternatively, the assembly 200 could
include a vacuum
23 generator device that uses a compressed gas source to create a pressure
differential. This
24 assembly 200 could be manufactured as a unit and could sit in a hood,
directly underneath a
separatory funnel. Once the gas source is set, the operator may select one of
a plurality of
26 vacuum levels on a vacuum level selector panel 214. The vacuum selector
panel 214 controls
27 the pressure drop across the membrane. These levels may include: off, low,
medium, and
28 high. Alternatively, the vacuum level may be continuously variable. Being
able to select
29 from a variety of different vacuum levels has shown to be useful, as
samples which create a
significant emulsion can be quite easily broken if no vacuum is used. Once the
emulsion has
31 broken, then the vacuum setting can be increased to significantly reduce
the sample process
5

CA 02413799 2002-12-30
WO 02/02211 PCT/USO1/20555
1 time. For example, lOml of methylene chloride may take about 4 minutes to
flow through
2 with a 5"Hg vacuum, but the same sample through the same membrane may only
take 15-20
3 second at 6"Hg. This is a significant time savings.
4 A controller 212 coupled to the vacuum 216 can be added that will vary the
pressure
drop across the membrane as a function of time. For example, the controller
212 can be
6 programmed to have an initial predetermined period of time during which no
vacuum or a
7 very low first predetermined vacuum level is applied and a second
predetermined period of
8 time during which an increased second predetermined vacuum level is applied.
The
9 controller 212 can also be programmed to turn off the vacuum after a third
predetermined
to period of time to prevent the apparatus from pulling residual water through
the membrane.
11 Given sufficient time, approximately 6 - 12 hours, any residual water on
the surface of the
12 membrane may "wet" the membrane and flow through with the organic solvent.
Therefore,
13 there is a limited time window for allowing water to reside on the
membrane, but this time is
14 not a problem for the application that this device will be used for.
In addition, testing has shown that draining the emulsion directly into the
membrane
16 , reservoir aids with the breaking of emulsions. Once the emulsion has
broken, if the analyst
17 desires, after each drying step, the retained water and emulsion can be
poured back into the
18 separatory funnel for additional extractions. This could possibly
significantly increase
19 recovery values.
As noted, Figure 3 is an exploded view of a preferred separator apparatus in
21 accordance with the present invention. More specifically, as shown therein
there can be seen
22 locking ring 310, wave spring 312, thrust ring 314, reservoir 316, base 318
for membrane and
23 screen (not shown), stopcock 322, shut-off connectors 324 and 326 (through
which vacuum
24 may be applied), bracket 328 and support rod 330.
It should be understood that, while the present invention has been described
in detail
26 herein, the invention can be embodied otherwise without departing from the
principles
27 thereof, and such other embodiments are meant to come within the scope of
the present
28 invention as def ned in the following claims.
29
6

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2021-06-28
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-06-10
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-06-11
Inactive: Late MF processed 2016-07-18
Letter Sent 2016-06-27
Inactive: Late MF processed 2014-06-30
Letter Sent 2014-06-27
Inactive: Late MF processed 2012-07-02
Letter Sent 2012-06-27
Grant by Issuance 2010-08-24
Inactive: Cover page published 2010-08-23
Pre-grant 2010-04-19
Inactive: Final fee received 2010-04-19
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2009-11-04
Letter Sent 2009-11-04
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2009-11-04
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2009-11-02
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2009-07-06
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-03-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2008-08-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2008-02-28
Letter Sent 2006-07-06
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2006-06-13
Request for Examination Received 2006-06-13
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2006-06-13
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Letter Sent 2005-05-02
Letter Sent 2005-05-02
Inactive: Single transfer 2005-03-29
Extension of Time for Taking Action Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-04-21
Letter Sent 2004-04-21
Inactive: Extension of time for transfer 2004-03-31
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2003-03-11
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-03-06
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2003-03-04
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2003-03-04
Correct Applicant Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-03-04
Application Received - PCT 2003-01-28
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2002-12-30
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-01-10

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2010-06-03

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 2002-12-30
Basic national fee - standard 2002-12-30
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2003-06-27 2003-06-03
Extension of time 2004-03-31
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2004-06-28 2004-06-15
Registration of a document 2005-03-29
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2005-06-27 2005-06-27
Request for examination - standard 2006-06-13
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2006-06-27 2006-06-20
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2007-06-27 2007-06-07
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2008-06-27 2008-06-03
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2009-06-29 2009-06-05
Final fee - standard 2010-04-19
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2010-06-28 2010-06-03
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - standard 2011-06-27 2011-06-24
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - standard 2012-06-27 2012-07-02
Reversal of deemed expiry 2016-06-27 2012-07-02
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - standard 2013-06-27 2013-06-27
Reversal of deemed expiry 2016-06-27 2014-06-30
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - standard 2014-06-27 2014-06-30
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - standard 2015-06-29 2015-06-29
Reversal of deemed expiry 2016-06-27 2016-07-18
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - standard 2016-06-27 2016-07-18
MF (patent, 16th anniv.) - standard 2017-06-27 2017-06-26
MF (patent, 17th anniv.) - standard 2018-06-27 2018-06-18
MF (patent, 18th anniv.) - standard 2019-06-27 2019-06-18
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - standard 2020-06-29 2020-06-15
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ROBERT S. JOHNSON
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2002-12-30 6 362
Abstract 2002-12-30 2 59
Claims 2002-12-30 3 133
Representative drawing 2002-12-30 1 6
Drawings 2002-12-30 3 40
Cover Page 2003-03-06 1 34
Description 2008-08-28 6 330
Claims 2008-08-28 3 93
Claims 2009-07-06 3 106
Representative drawing 2010-07-28 1 4
Cover Page 2010-07-28 2 42
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2003-03-04 1 107
Notice of National Entry 2003-03-04 1 200
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2003-12-31 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-05-02 1 104
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-05-02 1 104
Reminder - Request for Examination 2006-02-28 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2006-07-06 1 176
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2009-11-04 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2012-07-03 1 171
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2012-07-02 1 164
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2012-07-02 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2014-06-30 1 170
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2014-06-30 1 163
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2014-06-30 1 163
Maintenance Fee Notice 2016-07-18 1 182
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2016-07-18 1 167
Late Payment Acknowledgement 2016-07-18 1 167
PCT 2002-12-30 1 59
Correspondence 2003-03-04 1 24
PCT 2002-12-31 4 185
Correspondence 2004-03-31 1 37
Correspondence 2004-04-21 1 15
Fees 2005-06-27 1 36
Correspondence 2010-04-19 2 49