Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
PROCESS FOR GENERATION OF HYDROGEN
GAS FROM VARIOUS FEEDSTOCKS USING
THERMOPHILIC BACTERIA
CONTRACTUAL ORIGIN OF THE INVENTION
The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to an
employment
relationship between the inventor and the United States Department of Energy.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
_1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a method for using bacteria to produce hydrogen gas,
and more particularly this invention relates to a method for using
thermophilic
bacteria to generate hydrogen gas from a wide variety of feedstocks.
2. Background of the Invention
Hydrogen gas holds promise as the fuel of the future. The U.S. currently
consumes 3.6 trillion cubic feet (TCF) of hydrogen gas annually, with a
worldwide
consumption of about three times that amount. The U.S. demand alone is
expected to
increase by 40% to 5.0 TCF in the next five years.
Most of the hydrogen gas produced throughout the world is made from synthesis
gas generated either by reformation of natural gas or from the gasification of
coal. Not
only are these processes costly, but they are hostile to the environment.
Furthermore,
these methods use fossil fuels, which are non-renewable.
Biological processes have been used previously to generate hydrogen gas.
-1-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
Biological processes are particularly attractive because renewable feedstocks
(i.e.,
biomass, even organic waste streams) are utilized. Research in this area has
concentrated on three different approaches:
1 ) Using photosynthetic organisms to split water;
2) Using fermentative bacteria to digest hydrocarbons;
3) Using a combination of bacteria in which some of the bacteria digest the
complex hydrocarbons to make an appropriate feedstock for the
hydrogen-producing bacteria.
However, and as discussed more fully, infra, these efforts have not yet
resulted
in commercial success because of one or more problems. In some cases, the
metabolic
processes that produce hydrogen gas are end-product or by-product inhibited,
while in
other cases the growth rate of the bacteria is end-product or by-product
inhibited. Still
in other cases, the range of suitable feedstocks is narrow, or the production
of
undesirable gases is high. In some processes, the rate of hydrogen gas
production is
very low, while in all cases faster rates are highly desirable.
For example, photosynthetic processes exist (U.S. Patent No. 5,804,424 to
Kaplan et al; Patent No. 4,921,800 to Vatsala, and Patent No. 4,919,813 to
Weaver)
whereby photosynthetic organisms (such as algae or microalgae) use light to
convert
water into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas. However, the yields of hydrogen gas
are very
low in these instances because one of the end products of the reaction, oxygen
gas
(O~), irreversibly inhibits the hydrogenase enzyme responsible for hydrogen
gas
production. Even a very small amount of oxygen gas produced as a byproduct is
sufficient to shut down the entire hydrogen gas production system by
inacfiivating the
hydrogenase enzyme. Thus, the amount of hydrogen gas produced is minimal,
rarely
exceeding 10 ppm. Efforts to prevent this oxygen gas inhibition by
modification of the
hydrogenase enzyme have met with only
modest success. These altered hydrogenases can only tolerate 2% oxygen gas
concentration.
Pond scum has been utilized recently to produce hydrogen gas at a rate of 3
ml/I-hour. A. Melis, et al., "Sustained Photobiologica) Hydrogen Gas
Production Upon
Reversible Inactivation of Oxygen Evolution in the Green Alga," Proceedings
ofthe 1999
U. S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, pp. 1-19. However, this was accomplished
only
while maintaining an oxygen-free environment for the algae and only for short
time
spans up to four days.
-2-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
Another approach to producing hydrogen gas is the process of fermentation.
Processes utilizing monocultures of various mesophilic bacteria produce
hydrogen gas
as a byproduct of anaerobic fermentative degradation of simple sugars
(Roychowdhury,
4,480,035) or a combination of either formic acid or a formate plus a nitrogen
source
(Sanford, 5,834,264). Alternatively, glucose or glucose-containing
polysaccharide
feedstocks are utilized (Taguchi, 5,350,692). These processes confer
advantages over
photosynthetic processes because fermentative processes use less water,
require no
direct input of solar energy, and eliminate the need for a container with a
large
translucent surface area. Fermentative mesophilic bacteria only need an input
stream
consisting of an appropriate aqueous medium and substrate and an output stream
to
remove the generated waste products and gases. Unfortunately, monocultures of
mesophilic bacteria may be easily contaminated. This is a major drawback in an
industrial-scale fermenter where complete sterilization is difficult and where
contamination is almost unavoidable.
A variation of the fermentation approach has been to co-culture a number of
different types of bacteria, where the net effect is to produce hydrogen gas
as a by-
product of fermentation of various carbohydrates or even sludge. (Ueno,
5,464,539).
Co-culture with photosynthetic organisms has also been described. (Weaver,
4,919,813). Some of these processes produce noxious gases, such as hydrogen
sulfide
(H2S) and methane (CH4), along with other gases that would need to be
separated from
the hydrogen. Composting (i.e., partial decomposition) may be required as a
time-
consuming preliminary step to predigest the initial feedstock and form more
simple
compounds that can then be utilized to produce hydrogen.
Attempts have been made to utilize mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria in
hydrogen gas production processes. (See for example, M.W.W. Adams, CHEMTECH,
November 1991, pp. 692-699.) Such bacteria as Pyrococcus furiosus ,
Pyrodictium
brockii and Thermotoga maritime were examined. However, the hydrogenase system
of the P. brockii and T. maritime showed a preference for H~ oxidation, versus
H2
evolution. Also, the thermostability of T. maritime enzyme appeared inferior
vis-a-vis P.
furiosus.
A need exists in the art for a biologics! process for generating hydrogen gas
on
an industrial scale. The process should utilize a wide variety of hydrocarbon
sources.
Furthermore, the process should maximize hydrogen gas production and minimize
hydrogen sulfide gas production. The process should have an inherent feature
for
-3-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
minimizing its contamination.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide a process for producing
hydrogen
that overcomes many of the disadvantages of the prior art.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a robust catabolic
process
for producing hydrogen wherein a single species or several species from a
single Order
are cultured. A feature of the invention is that the organism is eurytolerant.
An
advantage of the invention is that stringent environmental controls such as
air-tight
environs, stringent levels of nutrients and media, and predigestion, are not
required.
Another advantage of the process is that hydrogen is produced with minimal
production
of nitrous oxides (NOX), sulfur oxides (SOX), CO and CH4, all of which are
typically
generated when hydrogen is produced via hydrocarbon gasification.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a process for
producing
hydrogen using thermophilic bacteria. A feature of the invention is that the
process can
utilize a variety of hydrocarbons as its feedstock. Other features of the
invention are
that the pH of the bioreaction is controlled, that the concentrations of
potential sulfur-
donors in the feedstock and aqueous medium are controlled, and that measured
and
limited amounts of oxygen gas are introduced into the process which the
thermophilic
organisms can either use or tolerate as facultative anaerobes and which oxygen
gas
may reduce the tendency to form hydrogen sulfide. An advantage of this
invention is
that hydrogen production is maximized while the production of hydrogen sulfide
gas is
minimized.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of waste
treatment that is also an environmentally-friendly process for producing
hydrogen gas.
A feature of the invention is that bacteria used in this process are
omnivorous, and as
such, the feedstock may consist of items from any one of a number of classes
of
complex hydrocarbons: such as starch, any one of a number of sugars, xylans,
and/or
celluloses, any one of a number of amino acids, long chain fatty acids,
proteins, oils
(including petroleum products) and combinations thereof. An advantage of this
process
is that the organisms incorporated in the process can utilize very complex
hydrocarbons
without requiring pre-processing to produce simple sugars or their
catabolites.
Therefore, the process is well suited to convert a wide variety of waste
streams and
biomass into hydrogen gas.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a controllable
biological
process for producing hydrogen gas from a wide variety of complex
hydrocarbons; at
-4-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
higher rates per unit volume; with reduced sensitivity to the presence of 02;
with little
sensitivity to the generated Ha; with minimal interference from other
organisms; plus a
low production of CO~ and HAS. A feature of this invention is that it operates
using high
temperatures, which reduce the risk of methane production and hydrogen sulfide
production by other types of bacteria. An advantage of this process is that
environmentally-unfriendly production of methane gas and hydrogen sulfide gas
is
minimized without resorting to composting the stock materials, without
excessively
limiting the range of feedstocks, and without resorting to other procedures to
reduce or
eliminate methanogenic bacteria and sulfur-reducing bacteria or their
activities.
Because few other organisms are capable of growth or even life at these
temperatures,
maintaining clean cultures, even in industrial-scale operations, is more
feasible. Also,
the desired thermophilic organisms remain viable for months at room
temperature, but
only grow when the temperature is elevated. Therefore, control and containment
of the
organism is simplified.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a process which
uses
bacteria of the Order Thermotogales, to produce hydrogen gas in useful
quantities. A
feature of the invention is that the process utilizes physiological buffers
and titration to
maintain a pH in the reaction environment. An advantage of the process is that
hydrogen can be continuously produced at rates above about 5 ml/I-hour.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a biological
process for
producing hydrogen gas wherein the process utilizes facultative anaerobic
bacteria
which are also thermophilic. A feature of the invention is that the process
can tolerate
and may even use oxygen. An advantage of the process is its applicability to
industrial
situations. Another advantage is that the presence of oxygen may reduce the
formation
of HZS concomitantly generated.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a process for
producing
hydrogen gas that operates at subpyrolytic temperatures. A feature of the
invention is
that the process uses catabolism of hydrocarbons to produce hydrogen gas and
carbon
dioxide in a ratio of nearly 2:1. An advantage of the process is that unlike
thermal
processes, very little NOx, SOx, CO and CH4 is produced.
Briefly, a process for producing HZ is provided comprising confining bacteria
from
the Order Thermotogalesto an environment suitable for allowing the bacteria to
undergo
metabolism; maintaining the environment at an oxygen concentration below the
oxygen
concentration of water in equilibrium with air; and removing hydrogen from the
-5-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
environment during the metabolism.
The invention also provides for a method for producing H~ comprising selecting
a bacteria from the Order Thermotogales; subjecting the bacteria to an
environment
containing a feedstock and a media, wherein the media contains oxygen gas in a
concentration below the oxygen concentration of water in equilibrium with air;
and
maintaining the environment at a temperature, pressure and pH sufficient to
allow the
bacteria to metabolize the feedstock.
Additional objects, features and advantages are found throughout the
specification or will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon
examination of the
description that follows. Other objects may be learned by the practice of this
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Instead .of using algae, mesophilic bacteria or co-cultures of bacteria,
thermophilic bacteria of the Order Thermotogales are utilized for the
production of
hydrogen gas (HZ). The inventors have determined experimentally that bacteria
of the
Order Thermotogales, previously thought to be viable only in an anaerobic
fermentative
environment, can be used to produce hydrogen gas in a process that can
tolerate
relatively high concentrations of oxygen without apparent loss of hydrogen-
producing
ability. Some of these types of organisms can even tolerate oxygen levels very
close
to that of ambient air for short periods of time at room temperature.
In light of the forgoing, surprisingly and unexpectedly, the inventors have
found
that their invented process is not a true fermentative process, despite wide-
spread
claims in the scientific literature that incorrectly label the Order
Thermotogales as
obligate (true) anaerobes. Thus, in industrial-scale systems, small leaks in
the
fermentation apparatus will not upset or kill the culture.
The inventors speculate that any residual oxygen gas that is present combines
with carbon atoms as the hydrocarbon feedstock is metabolized, thereby
minimizing the
tendency to form sulfides from the sulfates in solution. Moreover, the
presence of
oxygen gas in this process may reduce the formation of H2S by any processes
that could
create it. The invented process illustrates that each of the members of the
Order
Thermotogales can be utilized with specific feedstocks to optimize yield, so
that while
one particular Species may produce more hydrogen when the feedstock is a
simple
sugar, others may prefer more complex carbohydrates, proteins or oils. Co-
cultures of
complimentary Species may act in concert to completely degrade hard-to-utilize
waste
materials to produce hydrogen gas. Experimental data reveals that oxygen
-6-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
concentrations in the process liquor actually increases in some situations.
Furthermore,
and as noted elsewhere in this specification, the invented protocol generates
hydrogen
gas (H2) at a 2:1 ratio with COZ, versus the expected 1:1 ratio. Not only is
the bacteria
utilizing the hydrocarbon feedstock to generate hydrogen, but the process also
may be
allowing the microbes to split water fio produce the unexpected oxygen and
hydrogen.
Thermophilic (heat-loving) bacteria become active in a temperature range that
is
much higher than for most other organisms. There is no one temperature range
that is
applicable to al! thermophilic organisms. This is particularly true for
members of the
Order Thermotogales. Below a certain temperature, these organisms change form
and
appear coccoid (spherical). At higher temperatures these rod-shaped organisms
metabolize, and at some temperature begin reproduction. After reaching a peak
in
organism growth at an optimal temperature, organism growth decreases with
further
increases in temperature. The range of temperatures over which an organism is
seen
to grow is referred to for the purposes of this document as the "permissive
range" for
that particular Species. The permissive range and the optimum temperature
differs for
each species within the Order Thermotogales.
Bacteria of the Order Thermotogales can be easily maintained as a monoculture
and readily inactivated and reactivated after short-term storage at room
temperature.
When the reaction temperature is elevated to the permissive range, the
organisms
readily grow and produce hydrogen gas. At this elevated temperature, most
other
bacteria are not capable of surviving. Thus, the maintenance of clean
monocultures
(i.e., cultures not contaminated with other bacteria) is facilitated.
Conversely, to
deactivate the bacteria, the reaction temperature is lowered to below the
permissive
range. The organisms cease growth, and hydrogen production stops. The
organisms
can be stored in a sealed bottle for several months with no harm or apparent
loss of
viability of the organisms. To kill these organisms they are sparged with air
for 1-3
hours while the temperature is elevated to the permissive range
At temperatures in the permissive range, the bacteria convert a wide array of
feedstocks into free hydrogen gas (HZ) and lesser quantities of carbon dioxide
(C02).
Only trace quantities of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are generated if the
concentrations of
elemental sulfur and sulfide salts available to the bacteria in the medium and
feedstock
are sufficiently low.
Like the permissive range for temperature, there are "permissive ranges" for
both pH and oxygen. The organisms function best at an optimal pH and oxygen
level,
-7-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
with diminishing functionality as the measured pH and oxygen levels differ
from the
optimal. The permissive range for both pH and oxygen levels also differs for
each
Species within the Order Thermotogales.
The pH at which the bacterial incubation process is conducted is extremely
important, and greatly affects hydrogen gas yields. Titration or the addition
of a
physiological buffer to the incubation solution helps to maintain the pH and
improves
hydrogen yields. The optimal incubation pH (relative to optimal hydrogen
production)
is determined experimentally for each Genus and Species of bacteria in the
Order
Thermotogales. While the optimum pH will vary from Species to Species within
the
Order, a pH of between 4 and 10 is a good starting point to determine pH
sensitivity.
Preferably, pH specificity is determined empirically for each Species
incorporated into
the protocol. It should be noted that per convention, pH is measured at 20
°C, versus
the actual running temperature.
Process Detail
A culture of bacteria of the Order Thermotogales is placed in a vessel along
with
a feedstock plus an aqueous medium. Under the incubation conditions tested,
with
over 3500 experiments conducted by the inventors, it was found that the
bacteria
produce virtually no nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide, or
methane gas.
Reduced production of C02 and HaS is also obtained when elemental sulfur and
sulfide
salts are not available in the incubation medium.
Specifically, a culture of these bacteria is placed in a vessel along with an
aqueous
medium plus a feedstock. The aqueous medium contains a mixture of water,
salts,
vitamins, physiological buffers and biological cofactors. The feedstock is a
material or
waste that consists of or contains any combination of sugars (monosaccharides
or
polysaccharides) or complex hydrocarbons. At temperatures above 45°C
and at
lowered dissolved oxygen levels (reduced oxygen gas in the headspace gases
relative
to ambient air), the bacteria can convert a wide array of feedstocks into free
hydrogen
gas (H2) and lesser quantities of carbon dioxide (C02). Only trace quantities
of
hydrogen sulfide (HZS) are generated if the sulfur (elemental or sulfide
salts) content of
the feedstock is sufficiently low. Hydrogen gas production does not appear to
be end-
product (H2) inhibited. To maintain continuous production, pH must be
controlled by
titration or with a physiological buffer. (A physiological buffer is one that
acts to maintain
a constant pH and is not toxic to living tissue.) This process does not
require completely
anaerobic conditions within the reactor, as in true fermentative processes
Prior to incubation and concomitant hydrogen production, nitrogen, or an inert
_g_
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
gas (which is not likely to be used by the organisms), is sparged into the
aqueous
medium to reduce the dissolved oxygen concentration in the aqueous medium to a
level
below that of water in equilibrium with ambient air. While the amount of
oxygen in the
aqueous medium is less than that normally found in water that is in
equilibrium with
ambient air, some oxygen remains. During the sparging process, oxygen is also
displaced from the headspace, thereby reducing the opportunity for
reintroduction of
oxygen into the aqueous medium. By capping or sealing the container
immediately,
oxygen is prevented from re-entering the bottle.
As an option, an indicator dye that changes color in the presence of elevated
concentrations of oxygen gas may be added to the aqueous medium. Examples of
such
indicator dyes include Resazurin or Methyl Green. However, once the
appropriate
amount of time has been empirically determined, the indicator dyes can be
replaced by
simply sparging for the amount of time empirically determined as adequate to
reduce
the oxygen content sufficiently.
The role of oxygen gas (O~) in the process of hydrogen gas generation has not
yet been determined. However, it is reasonable to consider dissolved oxygen
concentrations in terms ofi a "permissive range", which may differ with each
Species.
Generally, however, oxygen levels of between 0 and 15 volumetric percent of
the gas
in the head space of the reaction vessel is suitable.
In a batch culture, the maximum hydrogen gas concentration generated by most
hydrocarbon sources occurs between 3-7 days from the start of incubation. The
chief
gases produced are hydrogen (as much as 25-35% volumetric percent of the head
space gas), and carbon dioxide (approximately %2 the amount of hydrogen
produced),
and small quantities (ppm) of hydrogen sulfide.
In a continuously growing culture, it is theoretically possible that hydrogen
product might reach as high as 60% with most of the balance being carbon
dioxide.
Initially nitrogen is needed to displace the oxygen from both the aqueous
medium and
fihe headspace; however, once sufficient hydrogen and carbon dioxide have
evolved,
the nitrogen sparge may no longer be needed. Hydrogen and carbon dioxide gases
would comprise almost the entire gas stream produced in a continuous
production
scheme.
In a continuously operating bio-reactor, the constituents of the aqueous
medium
and the headspace can be continuously or intermittently replenished, withdrawn
or
adjusted, as can the pH, percent dissolved oxygen, and temperature.
As noted supra, process temperatures of above 45 °C are suitable.
With the
_g_
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
Species tested to date, the inventors have determined a preferable temperature
range
of approximately 55 °C and 90 °C.
Thermotoaales
Order Detail
Either the literature or test results indicate that hydrogen production occurs
with
all nineteen readily available (and thus, testable) members (shown below) of
the Order
Thermotogales. This suggests that hydrogen production may be a defining
characteristic of members of this entire Order. All members of the Order
Thermotogales
are considered suitable for use in the invented hydrogen producing process.
Several resources provide general protocols for establishing and maintaining
viable cultures of bacteria of the Order Thermotogales for innoculation,
including R.
Huber et al. "The order Thermatogales" In The Prokaryotes, Eds. A Balows, et
al
(Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, NY, 1992); incorporated herein by reference.
The
following members of the Order Thermotogales are suitable for use in the
invented
hydrogen producing process:
Thermotoga sp. (DSMZ 4138)*
Thermotoga elfeii (ATCC 51869, DSMZ 9442)
Thermotoga hypogea (DSMZ 11164)
Thermotoga maritima (DSMZ 3109)
Thermotoga neapolitana (from Naples) (ATCC 49049, DSMZ
4359) Thermotoga neapolitana (from Africa) (DSMZ 5068)
Thermotoga subterranea (DSMZ 9912)
Thermotoga thermarum (DSMZ 5069)
Petrotoga miotherma (ATCC 51224, DSMZ 10691 )
Petrofoga mobilis (DSMZ 10674)
Thermosipho sp. (DSMZ 6568)
Thermosipho africanus (DSMZ 5309)
Thermosipho melanesiensis (DSMZ 6976)
Fervidobacterium islandicum (DSMZ 5733)
Fervidobacterium nodosum (DSMZ 5306)
Fervidobacterium pennavorans (DSMZ 9078)
Fervidobacterium gondwanense (DSMZ 13020)
Geotoga petraea
Geotoga subterranea
-10-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
*DSMZ = Deutsche Sammulung von Mikroorganismne and Zellkulturen GmbH
(German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Culture)
Nutrient and
Media Detail
An aqueous medium comprising water, salts, vitamins, physiological buffers,
and
biological cofactors are utilized. The aqueous medium is supplemented with a
hydrocarbon source as the "feedstock".
Bacteria of the Order Thermotogales can utilize very complex hydrocarbons
without requiring preprocessing to produce simple sugars or their catabolites.
Therefore, feedstocks suitable for the invented process include materials,
such as
biomass or organic wastes, that consist of or contain any combination of: (1 )
sugars
(monosaccharides and polysaccharides); (2) complex hydrocarbons, such as crude
oil;
(3) carbohydrates, such as starch; (4) xylans and celluloses; (5) amino acids;
(6)
proteins; and (7) long chain fatty acids.
Specific media formulations that have been demonstrated as suitable for
specific
members of the Order Thermotogales can be utilized in this process if the
formulation
is modified so that no elemental sulfur or sulfide salt is present. The
elemental sulfur
or sulfide salt is replaced with a compound such as cysteine, to provide any
sulfur that
might be needed by the bacteria. This modification will help minimize the
production of
hydrogen sulfide.
Any media chosen is likely to be modified by enriching the hydrocarbon source,
and/or omitting any indicator dyes (such as Resazurin or Methyl Green).
All of the common fermentative catabolites (such as acetate salts) are also
omitted from the media formulations.
The following are exemplary media which can be employed in the process:
ATCC Medium 1658: MMS Medium for Thermotoga neap.
ATCC Medium 1977: Thermotoga elfeii Medium NH4CI
ATCC Medium 1881: Petrotoga Medium Trypticase
DSMZ Medium 88: Sulfolobus Medium
DSMZ Medium 141: Methanogenium Medium
DSMZ Medium 144: Thermoanaerobium Medium
DSMZ Medium 343: Thermotoga Medium
DSMZ Medium 483: Thermosipho africanus Medium
DSMZ Medium 498: Thermotoga II Medium
-11-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
DSMZ Medium 501: Fervidobacterium islandicum
Medium
DSMZ Medium 613: TF Medium
DSMZ Medium 644: Thermotoga elfeii Medium
DSMZ Medium 688: Thermotoga subterranea Medium
DSMZ Medium 718: Petrotoga Medium
DSMZ Medium 740: TF(A) Medium
DSMZ Medium 794: Thermotoga hypoge~ Medium
The following materials (see Demonstration Experiment) are likely to be found
in a suitable medium for this process. Some of the constituents are consumed
by the
organisms and others are needed for the organism to prevent hyper- or hypo-
tonicity
and to maintain homeostasis. While exact concentrations of each constituent
are not
as important as its mere presence, the pH of the medium seems to require
control to
maintain high production rates.
Demonstration Experiment
The current known best practice protocol for preparation ofthe aqueous medium
and for conducting a demonstration experiment is outlined below.
1. An exemplary aqueous medium is prepared using the following constituents
and
protocol. It should be noted that different concentrations of salts should be
used for
some bacteria of the Order Thermotogales that typically are found in an
environment
that contains either more or less salt fihan in the illustrated examples
contained herein.
Aqueous Medium
(Use a different concentration of salts for
some species; see examples)
HBO 1.0 L
NH4 CI 1.0 gm
K2 HP04 0.3 gm
KH2P04 0.3 gm
MgCl2 x 6 H20 0.2 gm
CaCl2 x 2 H20 0.1 gm
NaCI 10.0 gm
KCI 0.1 gm
Cysteine HCI 1.0 gm
Trizma Base (optional) 1.21 gm
Sodium Acetate (optional) 0.5 gm
-12-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
Yeast Extract 2.0 gm
Trypticase (BBL 11921 ) 2.0 gm
Resazurin (optional) 0.5 mg
Vitamin Solution (described below) 10.0 ml
Trace Element Solution (described below)10.0 ml
Vitamin Solution
(This solution can be omitted for some e examples)
species; se
HZO 1.0 L
Biotin 2.0 mg
Folic Acid 2.0 mg
Pyridoxine HCI 10.0 mg
Thiamine HCI 5.0 mg
Riboflavin 5.0 mg
Nicotinic Acid 5.0 mg
Calcium D-(+)-Pantothenate 5.0 mg
Cyanocobalamine 0.1 ,ug
p-Aminobenzoic Acid 5.0 mg
Thioctic Acid 5.0 mg
Trace Element Solution
(This solution can be omitted for some e examples)
species; se
Nitrolotriacetic acid 1.500
g
MgS04 x 7 H20 3.000
g
MnS04 x 2 H20 0.500
g
NaCI 1.000
g
FeS04 x 7 H20 0.100
g
CoS04 x 7 H20 0.180
g
CaCl2 x 2 H20 0.100
g
ZnS04 x 7 H20 0.180
g
CuSO4 x 5H20 0.010
g
KAI(S04)2 x 12 HBO 0.020
g
H3B03 0.010
g
Na2Mo04 x 2H20 0.010
g
NiCl2 x 6 H20 0.025
g
-13-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
Na~Se03 x 5 H20 0.300 mg
Distilled water 1000.000 ml
2. The initial pH of the aqueous medium is adjusted with acid or base (e.g.
NCI or
NaOH) as appropriate for the selected species of bacteria.
3. In experimental situations, the aqueous medium is placed in a container
that has
an appropriate headspace and that can be sealed. An appropriate headspace is
one
that is large enough to collect the hydrogen gas. An example of a suitable
container for
bench-top analysis is a serum bottle with 150 ml capacity. In such situations,
approximately 50 ml of medium is put in the bottle.
4. Approximately 0.25 grams of a feedstock are added to the reaction
container.
The feedstock contains one or more of the following: starch, cellulose,
bagasse,
carboxymethyl cellulose, hemicellulose, glucose, cellobiose, crude oil, amino
acids,
proteins or other hydrocarbon source.
5. Optionally, a physiological buffer (such as, Trizma Base) is added to the
solution
to help maintain a constant pH. Maintaining the pH of the cultured medium
either with
a physiological buffer or by titration facilitates optimal hydrogen gas
production.
6. An indicator dye (e.g., Resazurin or Methyl Green) may be added as an
optional
indicator to show when a high concentration of dissolved oxygen is present.
When
sufficient 02 is removed by the purging procedure discussed in step 7, the
solution turns
colorless.
7. Excess oxygen is removed from the reaction chamber by sparging with an
inert
gas for a time sufficient to reduce the oxygen content in both the liquid and
gaseous
phases in the container. Application of heat will facilitate the sparging
process. While
sparging, the reaction container is heated, (e.g., by being placed in a hot
oil bath) at
approximately 100°C for 5-10 minutes while the sparge gas is gently
bubbled through
the medium. If an indicator dye has been added, the sparging is stopped when
the
liquid medium goes colorless. Inasmuch as a standard serum bottle is utilized
as the
reaction vessel, sealing after sparging is nearly immediate. This helps
prevent re-entry
of oxygen into the reaction space.
-14-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
8. The reaction chamber with its contents is then subjected to heat for a time
sufficient to sterilize the contents. In this example, the chamber is
sterilized at 134-
138°C for %2 hour.
9. The solution is then inoculated with bacteria of the Order Thermotogales,
an
example of which is Thermotoga neapolitana (Naples).
10. The bacteria are incubated for a time sufficient to produce hydrogen gas.
Generally, suitable parameters include incubation times of between 3-9 days at
a
temperature of above 45 °C, preferably above 55 °C, and most
preferably between 55
°C and 90 °C (with or without mixing) without elevating the
pressure artificially.
11. Following incubation, gases in the headspace of the serum bottle, are
withdrawn
and analyzed using a hydrogen sensing device such as a gas chromatograph.
12. In a continuous fermentation, the hydrogen gas can be removed from the
headspace and collected for analysis using a myriad of gas collection means,
including
gas-tight bags or containers.
This best practice demonstration experiment describes a basic process that can
lead to the development of an industrial-scale production of hydrogen gas and
carbon
dioxide (2:1 v/v). The demonstration experiment starts with a liquor of 50 ml
of the
aqueous medium (as described above) and can produce at least 20 to 35 ml total
hydrogen gas evolved in addition to the C02 and H2S in 3-7 days within a
headspace
of 110 ml. This is accomplished using a biological process that degrades
complex
hydrocarbons. No other process has been found that describes the use of
members of
the Order Thermotogales in combination with the described mixture of salts,
vitamins,
physiological buffers and biological cofactors for such rapid production of
hydrogen gas.
The following examples are illustrative only. As such, the specific
concentrations
and ranges discussed therein should not be construed as limiting the scope of
the
claims, appended hereto.
Example 1
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga neapolitana (ATCC 49049, DSMZ4359 from
Naples) was placed in a sealed container along with the medium described
above, at
the strength indicated above, pH 8.5, and with soluble starch as the
hydrocarbon
-15-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
source. The container had 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml,
consisting
initially of nitrogen gas with 5-12% oxygen gas. The hydrogen gas production
in the
headspace may be described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 24.4
ml (in
110 ml of available headspace) in 85 hours of incubation; (2) a cumulative Ha
production
rate of 2.61 ml/I-hour; and a calculated H~ concentration of 221 m1/1. This
production
assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests
started
when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 2
A thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga neapolitana (ATCC 49049, DSMZ 4359 from
Naples), was placed in a sealed container along with a physiologically
buffered solution
of the medium described above, at the concentration noted, with a pH of 8.0,
and with
soluble starch as the hydrocarbon source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a
headspace
of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production can be described as follows: (1 ) a
cumulative
HZ production of at least 33.7 ml (in 110 ml of available headspace) in 74
hours; (2) a
cumulative H~ production rate of at least 4.14 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated
H~
concentration of 306 m1/1. This production assumes that the hydrocarbon source
was
not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the sterile medium was
inoculated.
Examale 3
A thermophilic bacteria, Petrotoga mobilis (DSMZ 10674), was placed in a
sealed
container along with the medium described above at double strength with a pH
of 6.0
and cellobiose as the hydrocarbon source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a
headspace
of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production can be described as follows: (1 ) a
cumulative
Hz production of 15.5 ml (in 110 ml of available headspace) in 248 hours; (2)
a
cumulative HZ production rate of .567 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated Hz
concentration
of 140 m1/1. This production assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-
limiting
and that the tests started when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 4
A thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga elfeii (ATCC 51869, DSMZ 9442), was placed
in
a sealed container along with a buffered solution of the medium described
above at the
concentration noted, with a pH of 8.0, and with soluble starch as the
hydrocarbon
source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas
production can be described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of
31.6 ml (in
110 ml of available headspace) in 124 hours; (2) a cumulative HZ production
rate of at
least 2.32 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated HZ concentration of 287 m1/1. This
production
-16-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests
started
when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 5
A thermophilic bacteria, Petrotoga miotherma (ATCC 51224, DSMZ 10691 ), was
placed in a sealed container along with the unbuffered medium described above
at a
pH of 8.0 and with potato starch as the hydrocarbon source. There was 50 ml of
liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production can be
described
as follows: (1 ) a cumulative HZ production of 12.9 ml (in 110 ml of available
headspace) in 176 hours; (2) a cumulative H~ production rate of 0.668 ml/I-
hour; and
(3) a calculated H2 concentration of 118 m1/1. This production assumes that
the
hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the
sterile
medium was inoculated.
Examale 6
A thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga sp.(DSMZ 4138), was placed in a sealed
container
along with the medium described above at a pH of 8.0, and with dextrose as the
hydrocarbon source. There was 50 mf of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The
hydrogen gas production can be described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H~
production
of at least .56 ml (in 110 ml of available headspace) in 55 hours; (2) a
cumulative H2
production rate of at least 0.093 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated H2
concentration of 50.9
, m1/1. This production assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-
limiting and
that the tests started when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 7
A combination of thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga elfeii (ATCC 51869, DSMZ
9442),
Thermotoga neapolitana (ATCC 49049, DSMZ 4359) and Thermofoga sp. (DSMZ
4138), were placed in a sealed container along with a double strength medium
compared to that described above, at a pH of 6.5 and with cellulose as the
hydrocarbon
source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas
production can be described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative HZ production of
18.0 ml (in
110 ml of available headspace) in 146 hours; (2) a cumulative HZ production
rate of at
least 1.12 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated H~ concentration of 163 m1/1. This
production
assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests
started
when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 8
-17-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga hypogea (DSMZ 11164) was placed in a
sealed
container along with a single strength medium compared as described above, at
a pH
of 9.0 and with dextrose as the hydrocarbon source. There was 50 ml of liquor
with a
headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production can be described as follows:
(1 )
a cumulative H2 production of 20.08 ml (in 110 ml of available headspace) in
179
hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at least 1.02m1/I-hour; and (3)
a calculated
H2 concentration of 182.5 m1/1. This production assumes that the hydrocarbon
source
was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the sterile medium was
inoculated.
Example 9
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermosipho africanus (DSMZ 5309) was placed in a
sealed
container along with a double strength medium compared with the media
described
above, at a pH of 8.0 and with dextrose as the hydrocarbon source. There was
50 ml
of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production can be
described
as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 21.99 ml (in 110 ml of
available
headspace) in 111 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at least 1.80
ml/I-hour;
and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 199.9 m1/1. This production assumes
that the
hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the
sterile
medium was inoculated.
Examale 10
The thermophilic bacteria, Fervidobacterium pennavorans (DSMZ 9078) was placed
in
a sealed container along with a one-tenth strength medium compared with the
medium
described above, at a pH of 8.0 and with cellobiose as the hydrocarbon source.
There
was 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production
can be
described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 17.68 ml (in 110 ml
of available
headspace) in 80 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at least 2.01
ml/I-hour;
and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 160.7 m1/1. This production assumes
that the
hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the
sterile
medium was inoculated.
Example 11
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga subterranea (DSMZ 9912) was placed in a
sealed container along with DSMZ medium 344, a medium similar to that
described in
detail above, at a pH of 7.0 and with dextrose as the hydrocarbon source.
There was
50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production can be
described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 19.49 ml (in 110 ml
of available
-18-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
headspace) in 128 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at least 1.38
ml/I-hour;
and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 177.2 m1/1. This production assumes
that the
hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the
sterile
medium was inoculated .
Example 12
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga maritima (DSMZ 3109) was placed in a
sealed
container along with a single strength DSMZ medium 688, a medium similar to
that
described above, at a pH of 7.0 and with dextrose as the hydrocarbon source.
There
was 50 mi of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas production
can be
described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 6.31 ml (in 110 ml of
available
headspace) in 128 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at least 0.448
ml/I-hour;
and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 57.4 m1/1. This production assumes
that the
hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the
sterile
medium was inoculated.
Example 13
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermosipho melanesiensis (DSMZ 12029) was placed
in a
sealed container along with single strength DSMZ medium 344, a medium similar
to that
described in detail above, at a pH of 7.0 and with dextrose as the hydrocarbon
source.
There was 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas
production
can be described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 17.97 ml (in
110 ml of
available headspace) in 128 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at
least 1.28
mlll-hour; and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 163.4 m1/1. This
production assumes
that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started
when the
sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 14
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga neapolitana (africa) (DSMZ 5068) was
placed
in a sealed container along with a single strength DSMZ medium 344, a medium
similar
to the medium described above, at a pH of 7.0 and with dextrose as the
hydrocarbon
source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas
production can be described as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of
13.63 ml (in
110 ml of available headspace) in 175 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production
rate of at
least 0.708 mill-hour; and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 123.9 m1/1.
This
-19-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
production assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that
the tests
started when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 15
The thermophilic bacteria, Fervidobacterium gondvvanense (DSMZ 13020) was
placed
in a sealed container along with a single strength DSMZ medium 740, a medium
similar
to the medium described above, at a pH of 7.0 and with dextrose as the
hydrocarbon
source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a headspace of 110 ml. The hydrogen gas
production can be described as follows: (1) a cumulative H2 production of
6.57m1 (in
110 ml of available headspace) in 14 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production
rate of at
least 5.4 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated H2 concentration of 59.72 m1/1. This
production
assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests
started
when the sterile medium was inoculated.
Example 16
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga neapolitana (DSMZ 4359 from Naples) was
placed in a sealed container along with ATCC medium 1977 and no additional
hydrocarbon source was added beyond the proteins, amino acids and hydrocarbons
characteristic of this medium. The bacteria had previously been habituated to
a medium
containing only minimal amounts of carbohydrates. There was 50 ml of liquor
with a
headspace of 110 ml in the container. The hydrogen gas production can be
described
as follows: (1 ) a cumulative H2 production of 5.12m1 (in 110 ml of available
headspace)
in 137 hours; (2) a cumulative H2 production rate of at least .339 ml/I-hour;
and (3) a
calculated H2 concentration of 46.54 m1/1. This production assumes that the
hydrocarbon source was not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the
sterile
medium was inoculated.
Exam~~le 17
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermotoga eifeii (ATCC 51869, DSMZ 9442) was
placed in
a sealed container along with ATCC medium 1977 at a pH of 8.0 and with West
Virginia
Crude Oil as the hydrocarbon source. There was 50 ml of liquor with a
headspace of
110 mi. The hydrogen gas production can be described as follows: (1 ) a
cumulative H2
production of 11.20 ml (in 110 ml of available headspace) in 183 hours; (2) a
cumulative
H~ production rate of at least .556 ml/I-hour; and (3) a calculated HZ
concentration of
101.80 m1/1. This production assumes that the hydrocarbon source was not rate-
limiting
and that the tests started when the sterile medium was inoculated.
-20-
CA 02416377 2003-O1-15
WO 02/06503 PCT/USO1/16518
Example 18
The thermophilic bacteria, Thermosipho sp. (DSMZ 6568) was placed in a sealed
container along with DSMZ medium 613, a medium similar to the example medium
above, and listed as one of the media that can be used for this invention. A
pH of 7.0
was used glucose as the hydrocarbon source. The container had 50 ml of liquor
with
a headspace of 110 ml, consisting initially of nitrogen gas with 5-12% oxygen
gas. The
hydrogen gas production in the headspace may be described as follows: (1 ) a
cumulative H2 production of 13.1 ml (in 110 ml of available headspace) in 22
hours of
incubation; (2) a cumulative HZ production rate of 5.4 ml/I-hour; and a
calculated H2
concentration of 119 m1/1. This production assumes that the hydrocarbon source
was
not rate-limiting and that the tests started when the sterile medium was
inoculated.
While the invention has been described with reference to details of the
illustrated
embodiment, these details are not intended to limit the scope of the invention
as defined
in the appended claims. For example, many species in the Order Thermotogales
have
been isolated from oil wells. Inasmuch as these organisms appear to be able to
live and
proliferate within the oil wells, then these organisms should be able to
consume the
organic matter found there, to produce the large amounts of H2S normally found
at those
depths. In fact, the inventors have found that these bacteria produce
increased
amounts of H2S when fed crude oil.
In light of the foregoing, a method for producing hydrogen is proposed wherein
organisms from the Order Thermotogales are injected into tertiary oil wells
that have
been pre-treated in a manner that sequesters sulfides and elemental sulfur.
Care is
taken to maintain suitable pH, salinity, and temperature and perhaps pressure,
of the
spent well-turned reaction vessel. The envisioned process would facilitate
consumption
of residual oil which is no longer economically feasible for extraction.
Harvesting
procedures of the resulting hydrogen gas is effected via conventional means,
i.e,
vacuum, or sweeping with inert fluids.
Inasmuch as the oil-feedstocks in these scenarios are several thousand feet
below the earth's surface, any inhibiting effect due to the oxygen
concentrations found
at the earth's surface (i.e., 20 percent) is nonexistent.
-21-
