Language selection

Search

Patent 2427544 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2427544
(54) English Title: METHOD OF SHEAR HEATING OF HEAVY OIL TRANSMISSION PIPELINES
(54) French Title: METHODE DE CHAUFFAGE DE CISAILLEMENT POUR RESEAUX DE DISTRIBUTION DE PETROLE LOURD
Status: Withdrawn
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F17D 01/18 (2006.01)
  • F16L 01/028 (2006.01)
  • F16L 53/30 (2018.01)
  • F16L 59/15 (2006.01)
  • F17D 01/14 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PERRY, GLEN F. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • ALTEX ENERGY LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • ALTEX ENERGY LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent: BENNETT JONES LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2003-05-02
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-11-02
Examination requested: 2008-01-14
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method aid apparatus for transporting heavy oil in a pipeline using shear
heating. Shear
heating provided by external friction or internal friction acts to heat the
heavy oil to increase or
maintain the temperature of the heavy oil as it flows through the pipeline.
The pipeline may be
designed to enhance shear heating.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS:
1. A method of transportation of heavy oil in a substantially underground
pipeline by
increasing or maintaining the temperature of the heavy oil within the pipeline
using shear heating.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the shear heating is provided by external
friction within a
pump.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the shear heating is provide by internal
shear friction
within the flow of the heavy oil.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the pipeline is substantially non-insulated
or poorly
insulated.
5. The method in claim 1, wherein the heavy oil has an API gravity of less
than 26 degrees
API.
6. The method of claim 1, where shear heating acts to raise the temperature of
the heavy oil
at a rate designed to substantially match, within desired parameters, the
effect of pipeline
conditions in lowering the temperature of the oil, to produce an equilibrium
oil temperature.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the equilibrium oil temperature, defined as
substantially
the asymptote of the temperature versus time graph, averaged over
substantially the length of the
pipeline is at least about 15°F (8.3°C) above the average ground
temperature at the pipeline's
operating condition.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising the step of heating the heavy oil
to
substantially the equilibrium oil temperature before using shear heating for
increasing or
maintaining the temperature of the heavy oil.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein a portion of the pipeline comprises a
feature for
increasing shear heating.
6

10. The method of Claim 9, wherein the feature comprises a section of reduced
pipeline
diameter, a flow restriction, a mixer, internal blades or vanes, an uncoated
pipeline wall, a
roughened pipeline wall, or a combination thereof.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein the heavy oil is cooled to keep the heavy
oil substantially
at or below a selected temperature.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the selected temperature corresponds
substantially to the
design and temperature limits of the pipeline.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the design temperature limit of the
pipeline is selected
on the basis of an external coating temperature limit or an environmental
design temperature
limit.
14. The method of claim 1, where the shear heating in at least a segment of
the pipeline is
controlled by controlling the pressure drop of the heavy oil within the
pipeline, wherein a larger
pressure drop yields more shear heating of the heavy oil.
15. The method of claim 1, where the shear heating is tailored for at least a
segment of the
pipeline by tailoring flow velocity and pressure drop within the segment
(assuming no change to
other inputs such as constitution of heavy oil, starting temperature and
pressure, pipeline diameter
and environmental conditions), the flow velocity and/or discharge pressure
being tailored by
adjustment of pump horsepower and pump operating pressure range.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the pipeline has a length of at least 160
miles (266 km)
(i.e, the pipeline is a "long-haul" pipeline).
17. The method of Claim 16, wherein the pipeline has a length of at least 300
miles (500 km).
18. The method of claim 1, wherein selected portions of the pipeline are
thermally insulated
to reduce heat loss in the selected portions.
7

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the selected portions comprise river
crossings, surface
projections (expansion loops, surface valves or piping, meter stations, etc.),
or regions where the
ground has a higher thermal conductivity (e.g. wet soil).
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the heavy oil comprises a blend or mixture
of heavier oil
and a diluent.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein the diluent is a hydrocarbon having five
or fewer
carbon atoms.
22. The method of claim 20, wherein the diluent is a hydrocarbon having six or
more carbon
atoms.
23. The method of claim 20, wherein the diluent is selected from a group of
high
(>atmosphere) vapor pressure products comprising, ethane, propane, n-butane, i-
butane,
ethylene, propylene and butylene.
24. The method of claim 20, wherein the heavy oil has an API gravity of less
than about 26
degrees API.
25. A method of selecting the route of a substantially non-insulated
substantially
underground pipeline in order to facilitate a shear heating effect, comprising
the steps of:
a) assessing a plurality of possible routings, considering at least one
detracting
factor, the at least one detracting factor known to effect or at least
partially overcome the
shear heating effect in achieving or maintaining the pipeline's equilibrium
temperature;
and
b) selecting one of the plurality of possible routings based on the
minimization or
reduction in the at least one detracting factor.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the at least one detracting factor is
selected from the
group of ground thermal conductivity, river crossing required, or surface
projections (expansion
loops, surface valves or piping, meter stations, etc.).
8

27. The method of claim 26, wherein underground moisture affects the ground
thermal
conductivity.
28. A pipeline for transporting heavy oil, the pipeline adapted to benefit
from shear heating,
the pipeline having a maximum operating pressure (MOP) greater than about 800
psia, an
operational average pressure drop greater than about 10 psi/mile, and a
equilibrium oil
temperature, defined as substantially the asymptote of the temperature versus
time graph,
averaged over substantially the length of the pipeline, of at least about
15°F (8.3°C) above the
average ground temperature, at the pipeline's operating condition.
9

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02427544 2003-05-02
Inventor: PEItRY, GLEN F.
Title: l~~IETHOD OF SHEAR HEATING OF HEAVY OIL T1~ANS1VIISSION
PIPELINES
Field of the Invention
The Invention relates to the field of oil and gas. In particular, the
l:nvention, in one
embodiment, is a method of using shear heating effect for the long distance
pipeline
transportation of heavy oil.
Background of the Invention
The state of the prior art can be summarized by the following quotation, taken
from a
paper presented in the October 26, 1998, issue of the Oil and Gas Journal. The
paper is
called "Drive to produce heavy cnzde prompts variety of transportation
methods", by 1~.
Gustavo, H. J. Rivas Nunez and D. D. Joseph. The statement is as follows:
"It is important to note that the external heating of the oil can be partially
frustrated
by heat losses from the pipe walls when the flow velocity is low... Heat
losses will
always occur and the heating method can work only (emphasis added) when the
oil
is reheated in the pumping stations. Direct fired heaters are generally used
to raise
the oil temperature; they can be natural gas or fuel fared."
Summary of the Invention
It is an object of the Invention to overcome limitations in the prior art.
It has been found that it is possible to design a long distance, non-
insulated, heavy
oil transmission pipeline that can be heated using a principle referred to
here as shear
heating. This principle refers to the fact that, using appropriate design
factors, the
temperature in the pipeline will naturally (without the injection of heat)
increase above
ground temperature, and will remain at this elevated state, even when the line
is not
insulated. The increased temperature shows a benefit in reducing the viscosity
of the
heavy oil, and thus allowing for greater throughput at a lower power
requirement. The
temperature can be controlled by varying the design choices of line diameter,
station
spacing, operating pressure range and the viscosity specification of the
transported oil at
ambient temperature.
These and other objects and advantages of the Invention are apparent in the
following description of embodiments of the Invention, which is not intended
to limit in
any way the scope or the claims of the Invention.
1

CA 02427544 2003-05-02
l3escription of the Invention
The following described embodiments of the Invention display preferred methods
but are not intended to limit the scope of the Invention. It will be obviou;9
to those skilled
in the art that variations and modifications may be made without departing
from the scope
and essential elements of the Invention.
For heavy oil and bitumen oil involved in long distance pipeline
transportation, the
designed viscosity specification of oil pipelines is usually met by blending
the heavy oil
with a lighter hydrocarbon compound. l~latural gasoline, pentanes plus or
naphtha is
traditionally used because of their low vapor pressure. Traditional oil
pipelines operate
with a low vapor pressure restriction, close to ambient pressure, in order to
maximize their
capacity. This restricts the choice of blending compounds to CS+ or heaviier.
For example,
an older pipeline with a maximum operating pressure ("MOP") of 80C) psia,
operating
down to 25 Asia, has 775 psi.a of useful pressure drop betwf;en pump stations
to define the
throughput. Raising the minimum pressure to 150 psia would reduce throughput
significantly. Increasing the maximum pressure to 925 psia would reestablish
the lost
capacity, however this is not possible with an existing line already operating
at MOP.
When designing a new line, the minimum and maximum operating pressure can be
designed so that the shear heating effect, which permits this Invention's
benefits, can be
predicted and controlled and the range of available blending compounds used to
vary the
base heavy oil or bitumen oil viscosity for transport is broadened. The new
line could, for
example, range between 1400 psia and 150 Asia, allowing for both a greater oil
velocity
between stations and a higher vapor pressure limit.
With a minimum vapor pressure limit of 150 Asia, a new pipeline can use
hydrocarbon compounds lighter than natural gasoline for blending, such as
ethane,
propane or butane. This has an advantage in areas such as Alberta, Canada,
where the
available supply of CS+ is limited, and thus carries an economic penalty as a
diluent, while
the available supplies of C2, C3 and C4 are plentiful, and can be purchased
for a discount
relative to the value of the commodities at the destination of the pipeline.
The resulting system has a pressure drop of 1250 psia between stations,
sufficient
to generate the shear heating effect.
The shear heating effect is initiated by two factors. The first is the small
temperature increase that occurs in the pump through friction, as the o:il is
increased in
pressure. This is dependent on the pressure rise and tends to increase the oil
temperature
2

CA 02427544 2003-05-02
by about 1-2 degrees Fahrenheit. The second is the heat generated by internal
shear
friction within the oil as it flows through the pipeline. This shear friction
translates into
heat. When the sum of these two heat inputs exceeds the ability of the non-
insulated pipe
to radiate heat to the surrounding ground, the temperature of the oil will
continuously
increase until an equilibrium temperature is reached, where the heat
generation is equal to
the heat loss. As the temperature of the oil rises, the viscosity and internal
shear friction
reduces and therefore the shear friction heat generation reduces. Also, as the
temperature
rises, the heat loss to the environment increases with the difference in
temperature
between the oil and the environment.
For some of the designs, the net temperature increase can add upwards of 1
degree
Fahrenheit for every 10-20 miles of distance, with an equilibrium temperature
of 150
degrees Fahrenheit.
Rather than wait for this effect to slowly heat the oil as it travels down the
pipelir3e,
and be limited in pipeline capacity by the operating conditions over the
initial distance
traversed, one design using or embodying the invention would include a heater
at the front
end of the pipeline, so that this target equilibrium temperature was induced
in the oil being
injected into the pipeline at the outset. In this fashion, the equilibrium
temperature (and
other operating factors) would be maintained throughout the pipeline systf;m.
In the event that the equilibrium temperature exceeds a maximum design
temperature limit, dictated by other factors such as environmental impact,
external
coating, or steel expansion, the oil can be cooled by the use of low cost
aerial radiators or
similar coolers at selectively spaced pump stations. This is possible because
the heating
effect is quite gradual, usually taking several pump stations to rise by 10
degrees
Fahrenheit.
The key contributing factors to the shear heating effect are summarized below:
1. The higher the oil viscosity, the greater the internal shear friction and
the
more heat is generated. This shear heating effect is not seen with normal
light and
medium gravity oil as the viscosity within the transport system is too low.
The
upper limit on viscosity on long distance pipelines specifically designed for
heavy
oil will usually be dictated by the pipeline's shut down condition. The oil
must be
able to move after an extended shut down, when it has cooled to the ambient
temperature. This would, for example, prevent pure bitumen with a viscosity of
250,000 ep at 50 degrees Fahrenheit from being used, and would dictate the
need
3

CA 02427544 2003-05-02
for some blending. In the following examples, a 75%/25% bitumen-to-condensate
blend is assumed. This blend has an assumed viscosity of 310 cp at 50 degrees
Fahrenheit and 108 cp at 80 degrees Fahrenheit. If the shutdown condition is
not a
key design feature, because the cool down time is so long that pipeline
startup can
be guaranteed within the time window, then even higher viscosity oils can be
assumed and the shear heating effect is increased.
2. The higher the velocity and pressure drop per unit distance, the greater
the
heat generation. For practical applications, this means that the pipeline must
be in
turbulent flow or partially turbulent flow. The high velocity is achic;ved
byutilizing
a large pressure drop between pump stations, and in using relatively tight
station
spacing. The following example assumes a pump station outlet of 1400 psia, a
pump station inlet of 150 psia, and station spacing between 60 and 120 miles.
The
resulting velocity is 4-10 feet per second.
3. The greater the pipe diameter, the greater the ratio between oil volume
(radius squared) and heat radiating surface area (radius). The following
example
assumes three pipe sizes of 24", 30" and 36" diameter. The ~fect is seen to be
greater with the larger diameters.
4. The equilibrium temperature is very sensitive to the ground thermal
conductivity. Typical North American soil conditions range from 0.6 to 0.9
BTU/ft-degree F-hour in the summer and 0.8 to 1.1 in the winter. The following
example is based on 0.9 for summer conditions, which would represent a wet,
clay-
like soil, with about the highest heat conductivity of all soils expected to
be
encountered. The equilibrium temperature would be higher with more typically
dryer or insulating soils.
The impact of higher oil temperature on pipeline capacity is to reduce the
viscosity
of the oil. With all else being equal (minimum and maximum pressure, line
size, station
spacing, elevation), at similar throughput, this viscosity reduction reduces
the pressure
drop between stations. Alternatively, at a similar pressure drop between
stations, this
viscosity reduction allows for an increase in throughput. The increase in
throughput for the
60-mile station spacing bettueen using the referenced oil blend at 50 degrees
Fahrenheit
and 310 cp and in using the referenced oil blend at 130 degrees Fahrenheit and
28 cp is
approximately 40%. This requires a 40% increase in pump horsepower, however
all the
other aspects of the system remain the same. As the pump station horsepower
represents
4

CA 02427544 2003-05-02
about 25% of the total system capital and operating cost, one achieves 140% of
the
throughput at 110% of the cost. The unit cost of transportation reduces by
about 21
(30/140). This is one measure ofthe economic value of the invention.
All aspects of the Invention may be comprised of any suitable material or
methods,
including but not limited to: pipeline greater than 300 miles in length; oil
which has an
API gravity of less than 26 degrees API; oil temperature more than 15 degrees
Fahrenheit
hotter than the ground temperature; temperature maintained without the use of
external
heating except at the initiation station; use of aerial coolers to keep the
oil below the
maximum operating temperature.
Figure One (1) displays the results from a hydraulic simulation of am
embodiment of
the Invention.
In the foregoing descriptions, the Invention has been described in known
embodiments. However, it will be evident that various modifications and
changes may be
made without departing from the broader scope and spirit of the Invention.
Accordingly,
the present specifications and embodiments are to be regarded as illustrative
rather than
restrictive.
The descriptions here are meant to be exemplary and not limiting. It is to be
understood that a reader skilled in the art will derive from this descriptive
material the
concepts of the Invention, and that there are a variety of other possible
implementations;
substitution of different specific components for those mentioned here will
not be
sufficient to differ from the Invention described where the substituted
components are
functionally equivalent.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2427544 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2019-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2018-08-03
Inactive: IPC expired 2018-01-01
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-11-24
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-11-24
Inactive: Office letter 2009-11-24
Inactive: Office letter 2009-11-24
Inactive: Office letter 2009-11-10
Inactive: Withdraw application 2009-11-05
Inactive: Withdraw application 2009-11-05
Appointment of Agent Request 2009-11-04
Revocation of Agent Request 2009-11-04
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2009-10-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-10-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-10-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-10-30
Letter Sent 2008-03-17
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2008-01-14
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-01-14
Request for Examination Received 2008-01-14
Letter Sent 2007-05-28
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2007-05-28
Inactive: Entity size changed 2007-03-06
Inactive: Office letter 2007-03-06
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2007-01-30
Inactive: Corrective payment - s.78.6 Act 2007-01-30
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2006-05-02
Letter Sent 2006-02-15
Inactive: Office letter 2006-01-19
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2006-01-12
Letter Sent 2006-01-12
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2005-10-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-10-28
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2005-10-28
Inactive: Compliance - Formalities: Resp. Rec'd 2005-10-28
Letter Sent 2005-10-17
Inactive: Single transfer 2005-09-22
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2005-05-02
Inactive: Office letter 2005-02-04
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2004-11-02
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-11-01
Inactive: Withdraw application 2004-06-10
Inactive: Withdraw application 2004-06-10
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2003-11-12
Inactive: IPC assigned 2003-07-22
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2003-07-22
Inactive: IPC assigned 2003-07-22
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2003-06-05
Application Received - Regular National 2003-06-03

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2006-05-02
2005-05-02

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2009-03-10

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2003-05-02
Registration of a document 2005-09-22
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2005-05-02 2005-10-28
Reinstatement 2005-10-28
2005-10-28
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2006-05-02 2006-04-26
2007-01-30
Reinstatement 2007-01-30
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2007-05-02 2007-02-14
Request for examination - standard 2008-01-14
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2008-05-02 2008-02-08
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2009-05-04 2009-03-10
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ALTEX ENERGY LTD.
Past Owners on Record
GLEN F. PERRY
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2003-05-01 5 311
Abstract 2005-10-27 1 9
Claims 2005-10-27 4 110
Drawings 2003-11-11 1 29
Drawings 2005-10-27 1 29
Filing Certificate (English) 2003-06-04 1 158
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2005-01-04 1 109
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-10-16 1 106
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2006-01-10 1 174
Notice of Reinstatement 2006-01-11 1 165
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2007-05-27 1 176
Notice of Reinstatement 2007-05-27 1 166
Reminder - Request for Examination 2008-01-02 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2008-03-16 1 177
Correspondence 2003-06-03 1 14
Correspondence 2003-11-11 3 95
Correspondence 2004-05-20 1 20
Correspondence 2004-06-09 2 56
Correspondence 2005-02-03 1 14
Fees 2005-10-27 3 87
Correspondence 2005-10-27 13 434
Correspondence 2006-01-18 1 12
Correspondence 2006-02-14 1 22
Correspondence 2006-01-16 17 536
Correspondence 2006-02-26 1 31
Fees 2006-01-16 2 80
Fees 2007-01-29 1 46
Correspondence 2007-03-05 1 14
Correspondence 2009-11-04 2 61
Correspondence 2009-11-03 2 61
Correspondence 2009-11-23 1 16
Correspondence 2009-11-23 1 18