Language selection

Search

Patent 2435909 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2435909
(54) English Title: ONLINE PAYMENT TRANSFER AND IDENTITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD
(54) French Title: SYSTEME ET PROCEDE DE TRANSFERT DE PAIEMENTS EN LIGNE ET DE GESTION D'IDENTITES
Status: Term Expired - Post Grant
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06Q 20/10 (2012.01)
  • G06Q 20/40 (2012.01)
  • G07F 19/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • FLEISHMAN, JACK (Canada)
  • FUERSTENBERG, ZACK (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • INTERAC CORP.
(71) Applicants :
  • INTERAC CORP. (Canada)
(74) Agent: WILSON LUE LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2020-08-25
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2002-01-25
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2002-08-01
Examination requested: 2007-01-08
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/CA2002/000107
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2002059847
(85) National Entry: 2003-07-24

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2,332,656 (Canada) 2001-01-26

Abstracts

English Abstract


A person-to-person (P2P) payment platform and identity management system which
facilitates online banking by allowing consumers to send and receive money in
real-time, with no special registration outside of the users' existing banking
relationship, and under the security, brand and control of their own
respective banks. A central clearing facility (CCF) coordinates and manages
payments for users through partner financial institutions. Customers initiate
payments within their online banking accounts or other bank delivery channels,
without setting up separate accounts profiles and passwords. The CCF is
invisible, and allows the customer to access the bank's delivery channel;
select a recipient from a list of past payees or enter a new recipient;
specify a payment amount, an expiry date and the account from which to draw
the funds, and optionally write a personalized message; receive immediate
confirmation of the transaction, following which an email message is sent to
the recipient advising of payment with links to various methods of collection,
and receive an email message confirmation when the recipient accepts the
payment. The recipient establishes his identity by providing responses to one
or more customer-defined challenge-response questions, the accuracy of which
must be verified before any financial transaction will be effected.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne une plate-forme de paiements personne-à-personne (P2P) et un système de gestion d'identités qui facilite les opérations bancaires en ligne en permettant aux clients d'envoyer et de recevoir de l'argent en temps réel, sans devoirs procéder à aucun enregistrement spécial en dehors de leur relation bancaire existante tout en profitant de la sécurité, de la marque de commerce et des possibilités de contrôle offertes par leurs banques respectives. Un mécanisme central de compensation (CCF) coordonne et gère les paiements à l'intention des utilisateurs à travers des institutions financières partenaires. Les clients effectuent les paiements à partir de leurs comptes bancaires en ligne ou par d'autres canaux bancaires d'expédition, sans devoir établir des profils de comptes et des mots de passe séparés. Le CCF est invisible et permet au client ce qui suit: accéder au canal d'expédition de la banque; choisir un destinataire sur une liste de bénéficiaires existante ou entrer un nouveau destinataire; indiquer le montant du paiement, la date limite et le compte sur lequel seront prélevés les fonds, et introduire en option un message personnel; recevoir la confirmation immédiate de la transaction, après quoi un message est envoyé par courrier électronique au destinateur pour l'informer du paiement, avec des liens pointant vers des procédés de recouvrement, puis recevoir un message par courrier électronique lorsque le destinataire aura accepté le paiement. Le destinataire déclare son identité en répondant aux questions définies par le client; avant de mener toute transaction financière, l'exactitude de ses réponses est vérifiée.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Claims:
1. A method, comprising:
storing, at a central system, first payment data relating to at least one
transfer of funds
to a payee, the first payment data comprising a payment amount and payee data,
the first
payment data being received from a first remote system and being associated
with a payer
account of a payer maintained by the first remote system, the first remote
system using a first
security infrastructure to control access by the payer to the first remote
system to initiate the
at least one transfer of funds, the first payment data being defined after
access by the payer to
the first remote system to initiate the at least one transfer of funds is
granted and prior to
storage of said first payment data;
generating, by the central system, a transaction identifier and associating
the
transaction identifier with the first payment data;
determining, at the central system, whether the payee data is authenticated
and stored
at the central system;
initiating a transmission of a notification of the at least one transfer of
funds to a
communication address identified by the payee data, the notification including
the transaction
identifier;
receiving, from a user communication device associated with the payee, a
communication associated with the transaction identifier;
after receiving the communication from the user communication device, in a
transmission to the user communication device, directing a browser executing
on the user
communication device to a website associated with a second remote system to
complete the
at least one transfer of funds;
receiving, at the central system, second payment data from the second remote
system,
the second remote system using a second security infrastructure to control
access by the
payee to the second remote system in relation to the at least one transfer of
funds, the second
payment data being received after access by the payee to the second remote
system is
granted, the first and second security infrastructures and access to the first
remote system and
the second remote system being controlled independently of the central system;
in a further transmission, providing information about the transfer of funds,
including
an identifier of the payer and the payment amount, to the second remote
system; and
- 28 -

transmitting verification of the at least one transfer of funds for receipt by
the second
remote system if the payee data is thus authenticated.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the payee data is determined to not be
authenticated
at the central system, the method further comprising, after said determining
and prior to said
transmitting:
receiving, at the central system, authentication data from the second remote
system;
and
verifying the authentication data at the central system; and
upon verification of said authentication data, authenticating the payee data
and storing
said payee data at the central system.
3. The method of claim 3, wherein said authentication data is comprised in
the second
payment data.
4. The method of either claim 2 or 3, wherein said authentication data is
received after
access by the payee to the second remote system is granted.
5. The method of any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein the authentication data
is defined
prior to granting of access to the payer to the first remote system.
6. The method of any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein the authentication data
comprises a
response to a challenge.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the challenge and response are defined in
the first
payment data.
8. The method of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the second remote system
is
associated with a payee account of the payee.
9. The method of claim 8, further comprising debiting funds associated with
said
transfer of funds from the payer account after storage of said first payment
data, and crediting
said funds to the payee account after said verification is transmitted.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said debited funds and said credited
funds are in
different currencies.
- 29 -

11. The method of any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the first remote
system comprises a
first online banking system and the second remote system comprises a different
online
banking system.
12. The method of any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein said first payment
data relates to a
plurality of transfers of funds, and further wherein said verification is
transmitted for each
one of said plurality of transfers of funds.
13. A system, comprising:
one or more computing devices configured to:
store in memory first payment data relating to at least one transfer of funds
to
a payee, the first payment data comprising a payment amount and payee data,
the first
payment data being received from a first remote system and being associated
with a
payer account of a payer maintained by the first remote system, the first
remote
system using a first security infrastructure to control access by the payer to
the first
remote system to initiate the at least one transfer of funds, the first
payment data being
defined after access by the payer to the first remote system to initiate the
at least one
transfer of funds is granted and prior to storage of said first payment data;
generate a transaction identifier and associate the transaction identifier
with
the first payment data;
determine whether the payee data is authenticated and stored at the central
system;
initiate a transmission of a notification of the at least one transfer of
funds to a
communication address identified by the payee data, the notification including
the
transaction identifier;
receive, from a user communication device associated with the payee, a
communication associated with the transaction identifier;
after receiving the communication from the user communication device, in a
transmission to the user communication device, directing a browser executing
on the
user communication device to a website associated with a second remote system
to
complete the at least one transfer of funds;
receive second payment data from the second remote system, the second
remote system using a second security infrastructure to control access by the
payee to
the second remote system in relation to the at least one transfer of funds,
the second
- 30 -

payment data being received after access by the pay ee to the second remote
system is
granted, the first and second security infrastructures and access to the first
remote
system and the second remote system being controlled independently of the
central
system;
in a further transmission, provide information about the transfer of funds,
including an identifier of the payer and the payment amount, to the second
remote
system; and
transmit verification of the at least one transfer of funds for receipt by the
second remote system if the payee data is thus authenticated.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the payee data is determined to not be
authenticated
at the system, the one or more computing devices being further configured to:
receive authentication data from the second remote system; and
verify the authentication data; and
authenticate, upon verification of said authentication data, the payee data.
15. The system of claim 14, wherein said authentication data is comprised
in the second
payment data.
16. The system of either claim 14 or 15, wherein said authentication data
is received after
access by the payee to the second remote system is granted.
17. The system of any one of claims 14 to 16, wherein the authentication
data is defined
prior to granting of access to the payer to the first remote system.
18. The system of any one of claims 14 to 17, wherein the authentication
data comprises
a response to a challenge.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the challenge and response are defined
in the first
payment data.
20. The system of any one of claims 13 to 19, wherein the second remote
system is
associated with a payee account of the payee.
21. The system of claim 20, wherein the one or more computing devices are
further
configured to debit funds associated with said transfer of funds from the
payer account after
- 31 -

storage of said first payment data, and to credit said funds to the payee
account after said
verification is transmitted.
22. The system of claim 21, wherein said debited funds and said credited
funds are in
different currencies.
23. The system of any one of claims 13 to 22, wherein the first remote
system comprises
a first online banking system and the second remote system comprises a
different online
banking system.
24. The system of any one of claims 13 to 23, wherein said first payment
data relates to a
plurality of transfers of funds, and further wherein said verification is
transmitted for each
one of said plurality of transfers of funds.
25. A method, comprising:
receiving, at a central system from a first financial service system,
payment data, created by an authenticated payer, relating to a transfer of
funds
to a payee from a payer account associated with the authenticated payer, the
payment
data identifying the payee by at least a communication address and including a
payment amount, the payer account being maintained by the first financial
service
system,
wherein the authenticated payer is a payer whose identity was validated by the
first financial service system to permit access to the first financial service
system for
creating the payment data;
storing, at the central system, the payment data;
generating a transaction identifier and associating the transaction identifier
with the
stored payment data;
determining, at the central system, whether the payee identified by the
payment data
is associated with a second financial service system;
initiating a transmission of a notification of the transfer of funds to the
- 32 -

communication address, the notification including the transaction identifier;
receiving, from a user communication device associated with the payee, a
communication associated with the transaction identifier;
after receiving the communication from the user communication device, in a
transmission to the user communication device, directing a browser executing
on the user
communication device to a website associated with the second financial service
system to
complete the transfer of funds;
in a further transmission, providing information about the transfer of funds,
including
an identifier of the authenticated payer and the payment amount, to the second
financial
service system;
receiving, from the second financial service system, an indication that the
transfer of
funds to the payee was completed by the second financial service system,
wherein the payee
is an authenticated payee associated with a payee account maintained by the
second financial
service system, whose identity was validated by the second financial service
system to permit
access to the payee account before the indication was received by the central
system.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein the communication address comprises an
email
address.
27. The method of either claim 25 or 26, wherein the payment data includes
a
personalized message to the payee, and the notification of the transfer of
funds further
comprises an identifier of the authenticated payer, the payment amount, and
the personalized
message.
28. A system, comprising:
a server comprising at least one processor configured to:
receive from a first financial service system
payment data, created by an authenticated payer, relating to a transfer
of funds to a payee from a payer account associated with the authenticated
payer, the payment data identifying the payee by at least a communication
- 33 -

address and including a payment amount, the payer account being maintained
by the first financial service system,
wherein the authenticated payer is a payer whose identity was
validated by the first financial service system to permit access to the first
financial service system for creating the payment data;
store the first payment data;
generate a transaction identifier and associate the transaction identifier
with
the stored payment data;
determine whether the payee identified by the payment data is associated with
a second financial service system;
initiate a transmission of a notification of the transfer of funds to the
communication address, the notification including the transaction identifier;
receive, from a user communication device associated with the payee, a
communication associated with the transaction identifier;
after receiving the communication from the user communication device, in a
transmission to the user communication device, direct a browser executing on
the user
communication device to a website associated with the second financial service
system to complete the transfer of funds;
in a further transmission, provide information about the transfer of funds,
including an identifier of the authenticated payer and the payment amount, to
the
second financial service system,
receive, from the second financial service system, an indication that the
transfer of funds to the payee was completed by the second financial service
system,
wherein the payee is an authenticated payee associated with a payee account
maintained by the second financial service system, whose identity was
validated by
the second financial service system to permit access to the payee account
before the
indication was received by the system.
- 34 -

29. The system of claim 28, wherein the communication address comprises an
email
address.
30. The system of either claim 28 or 29, wherein the payment data includes
a
personalized message to the payee, and the notification of the transfer of
funds further
comprises an identifier of the authenticated payer, the payment amount, and
the personalized
message.
31. A method, comprising:
storing transaction information for a pending transaction at a central
computer system,
the transaction information comprising a transaction identifier, a recipient
identification, and
payment information, the recipient identification comprising at least a
communication
address but not including a financial account number, the recipient
information and payment
information being received from a first remote computer system using a first
security
infrastructure to control user access to participate in transactions;
in a first transmission over a network, the central computer system sending a
notification message for the pending transaction to the communication address,
the
notification message comprising the transaction identifier;
the central computer system receiving over the network, from a user
communication
device associated with a second user, a communication associated with the
transaction
identifier; and
after receiving the communication, the central computer system:
in a second transmission over the network, providing instructions to direct a
browser executing on the user communication device to a website associated
with a
second remote computer system for completing the pending transaction, the
second
remote computer system using a second security infrastructure distinct from
the first
security infrastructure to control user access to participate in transactions;
receiving data for completing the transaction from the second remote
computer system, the data being provided by the second user to the second
remote
computer system after access was granted to the second user by the second
security
- 35 -

infrastructure: and
in a further transmission, providing verification of the transaction to the
second remote computer system.
32. The method of claim 31, wherein the recipient information and payment
information
are defined by a first user after access was granted to the first user by the
first security
infrastructure.
33. The method of either claim 31 or 32, wherein neither the first user nor
the second
user provide a financial account number for use by the central computer
system.
34. The method of any one of claims 31 to 33, wherein the data for
completing the
transaction comprises verification information confirming the second user as
the recipient
identified by the recipient identification.
35. The method of claim 34, wherein the recipient identification includes a
challenge
question and response, and the data for completing the transaction comprises
the response.
36. A system, comprising:
one or more computing devices configured to:
store, in memory, transaction information for a pending transaction, the
transaction information comprising a transaction identifier, a recipient
identification,
and payment information, the recipient identification comprising at least a
communication address but not including a financial account number, the
recipient
information and payment information being received from a first remote
computer
system using a first security infrastructure to control user access to
participate in
transactions, the first remote computer system being associated with a first
user;
send, in a first transmission over a network, a notification message for the
pending transaction to the communication address, the notification message
comprising the transaction identifier;
receive over the network, from a user communication device associated with a
second user, a communication associated with the transaction identifier; and
- 36 -

after receiving the communication:
in a second transmission over the network, provide instructions to
direct a browser executing on the user communication device to a website
associated with a second remote computer system for completing the pending
transaction, the second remote computer system using a second security
infrastructure distinct from the first security infrastructure to control user
access to participate in transactions;
receive data for completing the transaction from the second remote
computer system, the data being provided by the second user to the second
remote computer system after access was granted to the second user by the
second security infrastructure; and
in a further transmission, provide verification of the transaction to the
second remote computer system.
37. The system of claim 36, wherein the recipient information and payment
information
are defined by the first user after access was granted to the first user by
the first security
infrastructure.
38. The system of either claim 36 or 37, wherein neither the first user nor
the second user
provide a financial account number for use by the central computer system.
39. The system of any one of claims 36 to 38, wherein the data for
completing the
transaction comprises verification information confirming the second user as
the recipient
identified by the recipient identification.
40. The system of claim 39, wherein the recipient identification includes a
challenge
question and response, and the data for completing the transaction comprises
the response.
41. A method for controlling completion of a transaction between a sender
and a
recipient, the method being implemented by a central computer system, the
method
comprising:
receiving, from a user communication device over a network after notification
of the
- 37 -

transaction sent by the central computer system and received by the user
communication
device, information identifying a pending transaction, the user communication
device being
associated with the recipient;
in response to receiving the identifying information, directing completion of
the
pending transaction by:
transmitting instructions to the user communication device to direct a browser
executing on the user communication device to a website of a first remote
computer
system associated with the recipient for completing the pending transaction;
transmitting, to the first remote computer system, transaction information
stored at the central computer system, the transaction information including
an
identification of the sender and a payment amount, the transaction information
being
transmitted after authentication of the recipient by a first security
infrastructure of the
first remote computer system to grant access to the first remote computer
system; and
receiving, from the first remote computer system, confirmation that the
transaction is
to be completed; and
transmitting, to the first remote computer system and to a second remote
computer
system associated with the sender, information for completing the transaction.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein transmission of the identifying
information for
receipt by the central computer system was triggered by activation of a
hyperlink.
43. The method of claim 42, wherein the hyperlink is comprised in a
notification
message transmitted by the central computer system.
44. The method of any one of claims 41 to 43, wherein the second remote
computer
system uses a second security infrastructure to grant access to the second
remote computer
system, the second security infrastructure being distinct from the first
security infrastructure;
the transaction information stored at the central computer system having being
received by the central computer system from the second remote computer
system, the
second remote computer system having received the transaction information from
the sender
- 38 -

after the sender was authenticated by the second security infrastructure to
grant access to the
second remote computer system.
45. The method of claim 44, further comprising:
initially receiving, in addition to the transaction information, recipient
identification
comprising at least a communication address but not including a financial
account number;
and
sending a notification message addressed to the communication address of the
pending transaction, the notification message comprising the identifying
information.
46. A system for controlling completion of a transaction between a sender
and a
recipient, the system comprising:
one or more computing devices configured to:
receive, from a user communication device over a network after notification of
the
transaction sent by the system and received by the user communication device,
information
identifying a pending transaction, the user communication device being
associated with the
recipient;
in response to receiving the identifying information, direct completion of the
pending
transaction by:
transmitting instructions to the user communication device to direct a browser
executing on the user communication device to a website of a first remote
computer
system associated with the recipient for completing the pending transaction;
transmitting, to the first remote computer system, transaction information
stored at the central computer system, the transaction information including
an
identification of the sender and a payment amount, the transaction information
being
transmitted after authentication of the recipient by a first security
infrastructure of the
first remote computer system to grant access to the first remote computer
system;
receive, from the first remote computer system, confirmation that the
transaction is to
be completed; and
- 39 -

transmit, to the first remote computer system and to a second remote computer
system
associated with the sender, information for completing the transaction.
47. The system of claim 46, wherein transmission of the identifying
information for
receipt by the central computer system was triggered by activation of a
hyperlink.
48. The system of claim 47, wherein the one or more computing devices are
further
configured to transmit a notification message comprising the hyperlink.
49. The system of any one of claims 46 to 48, wherein the second remote
computer
system uses a second security infrastructure to grant access to the second
remote computer
system, the second security infrastructure being distinct from the first
security infrastructure;
the transaction information stored at the central computer system having being
received by the central computer system from the second remote computer
system, the
second remote computer system having received the transaction information from
the sender
after the sender was authenticated by the second security infrastructure to
grant access to the
second remote computer system.
50. The system of claim 49, wherein the one or more computing devices are
further
configured to:
initially receive, in addition to the transaction information, recipient
identification
comprising at least a communication address but not including a financial
account number;
and
send a notification message addressed to the communication address of the
pending
transaction, the notification message comprising the identifying information.
51. A computer-readable medium bearing code which, when executed by one or
more
processors of a computer system, causes the computer system to implement the
method of
any one of claims 1-12, 25-27, 31-35, or 41-45.
- 40 -

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
ONLINE PAYMENT TRANSFER AND IDENTITY MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM AND METHOD
Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a system and method for online monetary
transfers. In
particular, the invention relates to an online payment and identity management
system and
method for delivering payments from a financial institution over a global
computer network.
Background of the Invention
In the recent past a number of non-financial institution technology firms have
bypassed banks by launching independent, Internet-based person-to-person (P2P)
payment
mechanisms. Most such services require consumers to register and debit a
credit card or banlc
account before sending a payment. Recipients of payments receive email
notifications with a
specially coded link to register and authenticate before receiving several
payment options,
such as depositing into a bank or credit card account.
I~ue to consumer demand and the "viral" nature of these mechanisms (by
compelling
recipients to register in order to collect payments), uptake has been
significant. Consumers
want a convenient Internet mechanism to pay for online purchases and to
replace "one-off "
checks and cash payments, both domestically and internationally. For example,
consider the
millions of consumers who regularly wire money to family members that live
abroad. For
traditional financial institutions, the advent of P2P payments represents both
a threat and an
opportunity. Banks risk losing customer relationships to third-parties that
will quicl~ly try to
expand their offerings into other traditional banking functions, competing
with online
checking accounts, business accounts and merchant payment services.
With non-bank start-ups acquiring P2P market share, banlcs risk never
recouping their
massive investments in online infrastructure. Once a non-bank has entered the
P2P payment
transfer market, there is an opportunity to go beyond free P2P payments and
offer consumers
a full range of financial services, such as interest bearing sweep accounts,
low-fee mutual
funds and business accounts equipped to accept merchant payment.
Unlike other pure-play Internet banks, which have spent millions of dollaxs on
advertising to promote their brands, non-bank P2P payment transfer firms have
employed
P2P payments to drive the initial adoption of their service and, in the
process, have
-1-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
significantly reduced the average customer acquisition cost. Once a non-bank
P2P provider
makes inroads into a bank's customer relationships, it becomes easier to gain
further ground.
As a result, financial institutions face the danger of disintermediation by
aggressive non-bank
up-starts. Demand for such services has been so high that some banks are
offering P2P
payments to position themselves against third-parties and to acquire online
customers. They
include portals designed to aggressively capture new clients.
Competition with on-line banking services is arising from other payment
providers in
other forms as well, such as auction payments, online gift certificates,
event, micropayments
and stored-value, payment processing, global payments and specialty consumer
payments.
Most of these P2P payment services are positioned to operate outside of the
traditional
financial system. As such, consumers are forced to use third-party P2P
services requiring
personal financial information. This raises a number of privacy and security
concerns.
Moreover, poor performance by a non-bank third party (which is typically not
regulated to
the extent that banks and other financial institutions are) can undermine
consumers'
perception of the reliability of on-line financial service transactions
generally.
Furthermore, consumers axe suffering from password fatigue, and many are
looking to
simplify the manner in which day to day transactions and activities are
conducted. Consmners
look to their banks, which have already established the requisite credibility
in financial
dealings, to offer additional services from their core banking relationship.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides a person-to-person (P2P) payment platform and
identity management system which facilitates online banking by allowing bank
customers to
send and receive money in real-time, with no special registration requirement
outside of the
customers' existing banking relationship, and under the security, brand and
control of their
own respective banks.
The invention provides an invisible application service provider in the form
of a
central clearing facility (CCF) which coordinates and manages payments for
customers,
nationally and internationally, through partner financial institutions.
According to the
invention, customers send payments from witlun their online banking accounts,
under their
bank's existing authentication and security. Thus, customers can transfer
money directly from
an existing online banking offering without setting up separate accounts
profiles and
-2-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
passwords. Customers trust banks to move money more securely than non-bank
third-parties,
and as such will more readily respond to a payment solution offered under
their bank's
security provisions.
The CCF is invisible, and effectively operates under the bank's brand so the
bank
retains the entire customer goodwill and developed brand recognition. In
addition, each
payment, in particular those delivered by e-mail, prompts recipients who don't
banlc online to
sign up for their bank's Internet-based services to deposit payments directly
into their
accounts, thus increasing the bank's goodwill and facilitating the cross-
selling of financial
services. The e-mail payment option is a high-demand functionality that
provides
recognizable customer value and replaces customer inconvenience with real-time
transactions
and convenience to create more positive customer experiences. In addition to
being amble to
initiate and receive payments using online banking services accessible via the
web,
customers can also utilize automated teller machines (ATMs), wireless
networks, telephone,
and any other access means provided by the financial institution to its
customers.
In the preferred embodiment, to make a P2P payment the customer:
1. Accesses the online banking service;
2. Selects a recipient from a list of past payees or enters new recipient
information to create a
new payee;
3. Specifies a payment amount, the account from which to draw the funds, and
optionally an
expiry date and a personalized message to the recipient; and
4. Confirms the transaction to authorize the bank to draw the funds, following
which
notification is sent to the recipient advising of payment with referrals to
various methods of
collection; and
5. Receives a confirmation message when the recipient accepts the payment.
The recipient may:
1. "Web enable" an existing account or open online banking services;
2. Deposit the payment into any banlc account;
-3-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
3. Deposit the funds into a credit card account;
4. Request delivery of a paper check; or
5. Receive funds directly if the online banking service is an ATM.
The invention thus renders P2P payments under the control of the bank and
eliminates
the need for the bank's customers to use a third-party service. The bank
controls all front-end
consumer touchpoints including end-user communications. The banlc also has the
ability to
control how P2P payment capability drives new revenue sources, cuts costs and
increases
marlcet share, to create new revenue streams, reduce acquisition costs of new
customers,
increase marketing and cross-sell opportunities and reduce dependence on less
efficient
delivery channels.
The invention supports different frequencies of payment and multiple
currencies, and
can be deployed on all bank delivery channels, including wireless services.
All of these
services can generate new revenue opportunities for online business,
complemented with
tools that enable the bank to track and control usage.
The CCF's infrastructure is secure and scalable, able to employ the latest
encryption
technologies and security measures to deliver sound and secure transactions.
The invention
allows the bank to determine and configure a wide array of security
parameters, such as
maximum transaction limits, to suit each particular institution's rislc
tolerances. If payments
are undeliverable or unretrieved, the sender can have the funds re-credited to
their bank
account or re-send the payment. A simple, yet robust data interface enables
the bank's
Internet service to connect quickly and securely to the CCF central facility
with minimal
diversion of its technical resources.
The invention thus builds on the bank's relationship with its client, by
adding new
functionality to block out third-party online financial service providers and
strengthen the
existing relationship. Moreover, the invention forecloses the need for
account, ID, password
and other inconvenient administrative requirements that third-party financial
services
providers must ask of consumers. The bank has the opportunity to leverage
existing security
and Internet payment infrastructures, replace consumer inconvenience with
convenience and
provide a facility for real-time email payments between customers of the same
or different
financial institutions.
-4-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
The CCF can coordinate payment transactions between customers banking at both
partner and non-partner financial institutions. It handles and stores all of
the payment
relationships among customers and manages the authentication and approval of
fund
disbursements to payment recipients.
Brief Description of the Drawings
In drawings which illustrate by way of example only a preferred embodiment of
the
invention,
Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating a real-time.cleaxing network for P2P
payments
according to the invention,
Figure 2 is a bloclc diagram illustrating the payor-payee relationship in the
network of
Figure 1,
Figure 3 is a block diagram illustrating user and data interfaces according to
the
invention,
Figures 4a and 4b are block diagrams illustrating an online P2P payment
transaction
where both payer and payee bank at a partner financial institution,
Figure Sa and Sb are block diagrams illustrating an offline P2P payment
transaction
where the payee does not bank at a partner financial institution,
Figure 6 is a graph illustrating account netting at a partner financial
institution,
Figure 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the navigation path for an ovine P2P
payment
transaction where both payer and payee bank at a partner financial
institution,
Figure 8 is a block diagram illustrating an identity management system
according to
the invention,
Figures 9a and 9b are diagrammatic illustrations of a sequence of user
interfaces for a
payer sending a payment,
Figure 10 is a diagrammatic illustration of a sample of a message to a payee,
Figure 11 is a diagrammatic illustration of user interfaces for payee identity
authentication,
-5-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
Figure 12 is a diagrammatic illustration of a user interface for a payee
retrieving a
payment,
Figure 13 is a table illustrating user notifications generated according to
the invention,
Figure 14 is a table illustrating a request/response message set in the
interaction
between the CCF and a partner financial institution,
Figure 15 is a table illustrating a sample message sets,
Figure 16 is a bloclc diagram illustrating a preferred security system for the
CCF, and
Figure 17 is a block diagram illustrating the relationship between logical
service items
in the system of the invention.
Figure 18 is a block diagram illustrating an online P2P payment where the
payee
receives payment at an ATM.
Figure 19 is a block diagram illustrating an online P2P payment between
businesses.
Figure 20 is a block diagram illustrating an online P2P payment between a
customer
and a retailer.
Figure 21 is a block diagram illustrating a network for P2P payments between a
payor
and a payee in different jurisdictions according to the invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
The system and method of the invention enables customers of a financial
institution
having access to banking services over a global computer network such as the
Internet to
initiate electronic payments conveniently and securely from their financial
institution's self
service delivery channels (Online banking service, ATM, Wireless, Telephone
Banking) or
the financial institution's branch. The invention provides financial
institutions with an easy-
to-integrate mechausm to facilitate and manage person-to-person (P2P)
payments, leveraging
existing fund transfer mechanisms that reside in the middleware of a financial
institution's
banking service - the component that allows customers to move money between
their own
accounts - thereby avoiding significant back-end development. The invention
extends an
institution's existing infrastructure to facilitate funds transfers in and out
of consolidation
trust accounts established at partner financial institutions in each supported
currency.
-6-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
To process P2P payments, the invention helps partner institutions feed
transaction
interfaces with the appropriate account numbers, parameters and
authorizations. "Netting"
processes balance the positions of consolidation trust accounts across all
partner financial
institutions. As a result, a private, real-time clearing network is created
among partner
institutions to settle electronic payments initiated and caught by their
customers. This allows
financial institutions to maintain control over their user interface by
communicating with a
central clearing facility (CCF) through industry-standard messaging adaptors.
The CCF
manages the status and accounting mechanisms to ensure that users at each end
of a payment
transfer are validated and notified throughout each step of the transaction.
The GCF featuxes a
secure, open front-end to allow users that do not currently bank at partner
institutions to
"catch" payments using offline mechanisms that can reach and credit most
accounts. If
payees do not wish to receive payment electronically, they can request a check
mailed to their
address or, if receiving payment at an automated teller machine (ATM), they
can obtain the
funds directly.
The CCF is based on an application service provider model that uses industry-
standard interfaces to integrate with partner financial institutions' existing
systems. The
invention acts as a common platform among banks, interacting with each to
support the
efficient exchange of P2P payments. The net result is one of ease and
efficiency: each
financial institution establishes a one-to-one relationslup with the CCF,
eliminating the
prospect of integrating disparate systems.
Figure 1 illustrates an Application Service Provider Model which allows
financial
institutions to rapidly deploy P2P payments on their appropriate delivery
channel (Online
Banking, ATM, Wireless, etc.) To maximize security and to minimize the risk of
fraud,
payments are always initiated from within the authenticated layer of a partner
financial
institution's delivery channel. As a result, each payment that enters the
system for delivery
originates from a trusted source. As shown in Figure 2, payees can receive
their funds
through the originating institution (Payee #1) or at another affiliated
partner (Payee #2).
Alternatively, customers banking at unaffiliated financial institutions (Payee
#3) can request
payment through offline disbursement mechanisms offered at a secure Web site
powered by
the CCF. Partner financial institutions thus become a secure, real-time
clearing network for
P2P payments.
_7

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
The architecture of the invention, illustrated in Figure 3, consists of data
and user
interfaces that facilitate the movement of money between customers. Behind the
scenes, a
secure CCF Web site allows partner institutions to manage security, marketing
and customer
support centrally through sophisticated administrative and reporting tools.
To enable the flow of funds between parties, according to the invention,
consolidation
trust accounts are established by each partner financial institution, as shown
in Figures 4a and
4b. Accounts are held for each currency supported by the system. As a result,
no exchange of
funds between partner institutions is necessary to settle individual payments
between
customers. Instead, payments are executed by transferring funds from a
customer's account to
the consolidation trust account at the originating institution. If the payee
is a customer at a
partner institution, receipt of funds is accomplished by transferring movies
in real-time from
the consolidation trust account at the payee's institution to the customer's
account. Funds are
available to the payee for collection immediately after payment notification
is sent.
Collection may be effected by a withdrawal from an ATM.
A front-end Web service allows a payee banking at a non-affiliated institution
to
specify an offline mechanism for payment retrieval. The payee can select the
transfer of
funds to their accounts at CPA and NACHA member institutions (through an EFT
and ACH
processor, respectively) or crediting to most common credit cards through a
remittance
processor or payment gateway, as shown in Figures Sa and Sb. The invention
also offers the
option of a payee requesting delivery of a paper check by traditional mail for
a nominal
processing fee deducted directly from the amount they are receiving. Batch
file payments are
securely transferred to processing agencies on a nightly basis. EFT, ACH and
credit card
disbursements typically talce between one to four business days while check
delivery takes
from five to seven business days for North American delivery.
All communication with "offline" consumers include prompts to drive adoption
of a
partner institution's online banking service. Through a variety of
precautionary measures,
described below, the invention ensures the security and validity of all
payment requests and
disbursements and provides detailed reporting and transaction tracing to its
partner banlcs.
To move money between customers, the invention leverages the existing internal
funds transfer module utilized by institutions to facilitate customer
transfers. With a few
modifications, this piece of middleware (usually located on an application
server) is enabled
_g_

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
to execute transfers between a customer's account and a consolidation trust
account for
disbursements. The invention operates in reverse at the recipient's end. If a
payee catches a
payment at a partner institution, funds are immediately transferred from a
consolidation trust
account into the payee's own account.
To minimize liability, funds awaiting delivery are stored in accounts at
partner
institutions in each supported currency. The CCF controls the acceptance and
disbursement
of funds in these accounts, but does not take direct ownership of the money.
Instead, the trust
accounts are actually internal or suspense accounts maintained by the partner
institutions,
who earn the float on the funds awaiting disbursement. The CCF provides a
detailed
accounting of all the money flowing in and out of these accounts. The CCF acts
as a control
point, approving financiah transactions undertaken by partner institutions to
move funds
between customer and trust accounts in real-time.
The CCF network, acts as a netting center. Instead of settling each individual
transaction, the CCF becomes a virtual clearinghouse, adding and subtracting
inter-partner
payables and receivables and then providing the partner institutions with
settlement
instructions to balance the trust accounts, as shown in Figure 6.
This netting activity is captured by a robust, double-entry accounting system.
A
continuous transaction journal at the CCF mirrors each of the trust accounts
maintained at
partner institutions to facilitate auditing and reporting. The system is
designed for resilience
and will catch accounting imbalances caused by the failure of one or more mid-
operation
system processes. The CCF utilizes these accounting and reporting mechanisms
to facilitate
the following activities:
a) Daily reconciliation between the CCF and its partner institutions: The CCF
matches
transactions in its journah against those tracked by each partner institution
and then reports
any exceptions. Exception reports are investigated and addressed to ensure
that accounts are
balanced.
b) Daily settlement reporting for partner institutions. The CCF calculates
monetary
obligations of each partner institution to all other partner institutions in
the network based on
the origin and destination of completed payments. Each partner institution is
provided with a
detail list of all corresponding payments as well as a summary of movies owed
to the other
-9-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
partners. Partner institutions settle with each other outside of the CCF by
using existing large
value fund transfer mechanisms available in their jurisdiction.
c) Feed the CCF's finance and accounting systems: The transaction journal
generates a
number of accounting and control system reports.
d) Provide audit reports: Where an audit is required, the CCF uses the
transaction journal to
generate accounting reports for all funds that have yet to be disbursed. The
CCF also retains
historical records to facilitate account investigations.
e) Exception reporting: Partner institutions can send their client fund
transaction log
(covering activity in their consolidation trust accounts) to the CCF to match
these against the
transaction journal for inconsistencies. If the two reports do not balance, an
exception report
is generated so that the situation can be investigated immediately and
corrected if necessary.
Where the payer and payee are located in different jurisdictions, requiring a
currency
exchange, the settlement procedure incorporates a foreign exchange facility
which maintains
trust accounts in each jurisdiction in the local currency.
Figure 7 illustrates the payer and payee navigation paths where both payer and
payee
are existing clients with Web banking privileges at partner financial
institutions.
As shown in Figure 8, the invention provides an identity management system
that
leverages secure payment relationships between remote consumers. Each customer
(payer or
payee) is granted a unique identity that is assigned when he or she first
registers with the
service. A payer can establish a list of recurring personal payees as
required. While payee
records are immediately added to the CCF database, they are not authenticated
until they
correctly answer one or more challenge-response questions defined by the payer
and after
successfully logging onto his or her institution's online banking service or
other delivery
channel. This process establishes both the payee and the specific "channel"
where the payee
has opted to deposit funds. If a customer wishes to credit an account at
another institution on
a subsequent transaction, the customer must re-authenticate with the original
challenge-
response questions before that new "channel" is secured. The challenge-
response questions
may include the input of a secret code provided by the payer to the payee. In
another
embodiment, identity management is handled entirely by the authentication
procedures of the
partner institutions, thus allowing the institutions to manage the risk of
fraud entirely by
-10-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
implementing their own security standards without the use of a payer-defined
challenge-
response question.
The identity management aspect of the invention provides the following
advantages:
a) Increased system security: Customer account information from partner
institutions is never
stored at the CCF facility. The CCF completes all processing against its own
internal IDs,
which are established when each customer auto-enrolls to send payments. Each
CCF internal
ID is referenced against an institution's customer user ID for message
synchronization.
b) Transaction tracing: The CCF holds a unique identifier for each customer it
encounters.
The CCF layers contact information for each customer identity in its database
to facilitate
notifications and authorizations. Each identity is cross-referenced back to
the partner
institutions' customer IDs to facilitate transactions, reporting, support and
traclcing without
compromising personal information.
c) Enhanced consmner experience: The identity management model of the
invention enables
customers to retain "trusted" payment relationships to simplify future
payments. These payee
relationships are delivered on demand to a partner's system to encourage quick
re-use of the
"trusted" payee for subsequent transactions, thereby enhancing the user
experience. These
payee relationships can be deployed to other bank channels, such as WAP-
enabled phones,
through the message interface, to launch subsequent payments first established
through a
partner's Web banking service.
d) The consumer is validated on each channel before moving funds: Since the
payment
system offers customers a variety of mechanisms for "catching" payments, one
may choose
an account at a different partner institution into which funds are deposited
on a subsequent
visit. In this case, the payment system again asks the same challenge-response
questions
before validating the new payment channel, at which point the new account is
deemed
"trusted" and added to the consumer's identity.
Through the identity management function, other fraud protection and security
measures are employed by the payment system in addition to the authentication
of payment
relationships.
-11-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
a) Institution-controlled security parameters: Each institution can define
security parameters
that govern transactions originating from their banking service. These default
parameters
include transaction limits, daily transaction limits per customer and the
maximum number of
days before an unretrieved payment is sent back to the payer for recrediting.
b) Initiation of payments: All payments originate from within an authenticated
banking
environment (for example, web, telephone, wireless network, ATM, or another
access point
to banking services) at a partner financial institution. One cal initiate an
email payment only
when logged on, ensuring that such transactions are validated baclc to
customer bank accounts
at partner institutions.
c) Receiving payments: The recipient must authenticate and correctly answer
one or more
challenge-response questions before the retrieval of funds is allowed. The
partner institution
controls the number and type of challenge-response questions the payee must
answer before
the relationship is authenticated.
d) Audit trail: A detailed audit trail records all pending and historical
payments.
e) Transaction integrity: The CCF's transaction management service guarantees
that database
transactions are completed accurately. If any one operation fails, the entire
set of operations is
rolled baclc. A global transaction identifier is created when a client
application initiates a
transaction. The transaction service monitors participants for failures and
inactivity. Records
accessed during a transaction are locked until its completion. A rollback
procedure is
executed when a transaction must be stopped due to unexpected client
termination,
server/networlc failure or other events that may interrupt end-to-end
completion of the
transaction. This procedure checks recently active transactions and then
determines whether it
should be rolled back or committed.
A number of measures ensure the security of customer data. The CCF does not
store a
partner institution's customer account numbers. Data related to customers
banking at
unaffiliated institutions are stored in a secure database, which is located
behind a firewall and
encryption processes. Administrative user IDs and passwords are stored behind
a firewall in
am encrypted format. Administrative users can define multiple security groups
and access
restrictions in accordance to job function. Challenge-response questions
provide an extra
mechanism for authenticating the payee in addition to existing logon processes
at the payee's
own Web banking service. The network connecting partner institutions,
administrative users
-12-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
and unaffiliated consumers is divided into several isolation and security
zones with restricted
access among zones. Industry-standard measures are used throughout the network
to ensure
security. Intrusion detection devices, traffic encryption, packet inspection
and application
proxies minimize risk to the network. All communications between the CCF and
its partner
institutions take place over a dedicated line or VPN and are encrypted.
A number of exception processes and error handling mechanisms further ensure
the
CCF's integrity:
a) Undeliverable payments: If the payer specifies an invalid email address and
the resulting
notification bounces baclc to the server, the payer is automatically contacted
and presented the
d
option to re-credit his or her account or correct the recipient's email
address to resend the
payment notification.
b) Unretrieved (or expired) payments: With the CCF's back-office
administration tool,
affiliate institutions can each define a maximum period of time before a
payment expires if
uncollected by a payee. ~n a daily basis, the system will run a task to detect
all expired
payments. Notifications are sent to the payer and payee indicating expiration.
The payer is
then presented with the option to send it again or transfer the funds back
into a specified
account.
c) Cancelled payments: At any time before retrieval, the payer can cancel a
payment. After
logging on to the originating Web banking facility or other delivery channel,
the payer simply
cancels the payment transaction by indicating the account to be credited and
sending an
optional memo indicating why the payment was cancelled. The institution's
banking service
then sends a message to the CCF containing the payment reference number. The
CCF will
verify that the payee has not retrieved the funds and the system will change
the payment
status to 'Cancelled' while sending notification to the payee.
d) Rejected payments: The payee can reject a payment transaction from within
the
authenticated Web banking environment of an affiliate institution or upon
authentication at
the CCF Web site. If the payment is rejected, an email is sent to the payer
with instructions to
log on to his or her Web banking facility or other delivery channel to select
an account to re-
credit the funds.
-13-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
e) Invalid account information: If payees select an offline electronic method
to catch a
payment, there exists the potential that incorrect account information might
have been
entered despite the processes performed at the interface layer. Transactions
that cannot be
completed through the ACH/EFT/RPS processing facilities are returned to the
CCF. The
payee is then notified of the problem and given an opportunity to re-enter the
account
information or specify an alternate means of retrieval. If the subsequent
attempts fail to
deposit the funds into the payee's designated account, the funds are returned
to the payer and
both parties are appropriately notified.
f) Reconciliation process: On a daily basis, each partner institution sends a
file containing all
10,. transfers to and from the partner's consolidation trust accounts. Payment
reference numbers
are reconciled against information stored at the CCF.
With reference to Figure 18, a P2P payment may take place as follows:
To initiate a P2P payment, the customer logs onto the partner institution's
online
banking service via the web, telephone, wireless network, ATM (as shown in
Figure 18), or
other means. The customer selects the payment feature from the financial
institution's menu
of services and chooses from their list of prior payees. To enter a new
recipient, the customer
is prompted to enter the payee's name and e-mail address, if notification of
the payment is to
be delivered by e-mail to the payee. The customer specifies payment amount,
the account
from which to draw the funds are specified, and optionally an expiry date and
a personalized
message to the recipient. To add an additional security measure to validate
the recipient
before funds axe disbursed, the customer can create one or more challenge-
response questions
and provide the requisite answers. If the customer logs on using an ATM, these
payment
details axe communicated from the ATM to the ATM switch. As well, the customer
is
authenticated using the institution's security standards; where the customer
logs onto an
ATM, authentication of the customer is handled by the ATM switch in
communication with
the host system of the banl~ing service. The payment details axe cormnunicated
by the ATM
switch to the CCF, wluch assigns a unique payment reference number and
communicates this
number to the ATM switch. The ATM switch then communicates with the host
system, and
the customer's account is debited for the payment and the financial
institution's trust
suspense account is correspondingly credited. The ATM switch communicates with
the
ATM to cause the ATM to provide a receipt to the customer, which includes the
payment
-14-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
reference number, then communicates the successful completion of this portion
of the
transaction to the CCF. Notification is delivered to the recipient announcing
the payment.
The recipient's personalized notification indicates the amount being paid,
from whom,
the name of the originating institution, as well as options for collection. In
one embodiment,
the notification takes the form of a personalized e-mail to the recipient, as
shown in Figure
10. The payment's originating institution may promote its services through
banner
advertisements in the body of the message. The invention provides multiple
options for
retrieving funds, as shown in Figure 11.
If the recipient already banks online with a partner institution and has
previously
received an electronic payment via this system, the recipient may select from
a list of
payment options to log onto their online bank account straight from a liu~
provided in the e-
mail notification of payment, optionally identifies the payment by reference
number and
answer the challenge-response question if it is the first payment from that
particular sender.
This validates the relationship between both parties. The recipient may choose
to log onto
their online bank account using another communications protocol, such as via a
wireless
network , telephone, or ATM.
If the recipient banks online with a partner institution, but is receiving a
P2P payment
for the very first time, a link in the e-mail notification sends the customer
to a directory of
CCF partner institutions. Recipients can use their online banking service to
instantly credit
any of their accounts. The registration process is fully automated.
Recipients, who are not currently banlung online, are prompted to either "Web
enable" their existing accounts at a CCF partner institution (such as the
sender's bank) or
apply for an account with online access at another partner, as shown in Figure
12. To
facilitate this process, the CCF Web site provides aII appropriate Iinlcs and
information.
Currently, the enrollment process for acquiring online banking services at a
financial
institution can take anywhere from a few minutes to a few weeks, especially if
passwords
must be issued by mail. In the case of a delay, the CCF will hold the payment
for the
appropriate number of days; customers must wait for their account to be
activated at a partner
institution. An e-mail reminder is sent to the customer to activate the
service and retrieve
their funds.
-15-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
The recipient then selects the account into which to deposit the funds. The
institution
validates the recipient's identity, and communicates the payment details to
the CCF, which
verifies the payment and issues permission to disburse the money. The
financial institution
then debits a suspense account, and credits the recipient's account for the
payment. If the
recipient chooses to receive the funds directly, a cash account is credited
instead and the
funds are disbursed. Once the funds credit or disbursement is completed, the
CCF is
informed of the successful completion. The funds may be advanced immediately
by the
recipient's institution, because the funds have been guaranteed by the
originating institution's
verification of the identity of the sender.
The complete payment transaction is decentralized; the first component, the
initiation
of payment, is controlled by the sender's financial institution, and the
second component of
the transaction, the receipt of the payment, is controlled by the recipient's
institution. It can
also be seen that due to the authentication of each party to the transaction
independently, by
each party's own financial institution, the payer's identity does not need to
be known by the
payee in order to effect payment. The payer may use an alias or e-mail address
only, if
desired, in communication with the payee.
The funds may alternatively be deposited to a credit card or other bank
account. To
provide maximum payment reach, the CCF processes payments to non-partner
accounts on a
fee-for-service basis. Recipients may opt to deposit the payment into a credit
card or other
bank account not sponsored by a partner institution. Recipients are directed
to the CCF Web
site, where they can register for the service. When registered, recipients
specify a credit card
or bank account into which to deposit the funds. Such requests are hatched and
sent each day
to payment processing services to be credited via ACSS, ACH and RPS services.
Payment recipients who require a checlc or are uncomfortable malting
transactions
online, can request the CCF to issue a paper check for mail delivery. At every
turn, payment
recipients are prompted to use a partner institution to receive their fiuzds.
If they choose to
receive a payment using a non-partner mechanism, the CCF will facilitate the
transaction
through its Web site.
In a further embodiment, payments may be made to a recipient who does not have
a
banlc account via an ATM and is not registered with the CCF. The ATM, rather
than
requiring a banlc card to initiate any transaction, provides direct access to
the menu option to
-16-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
receive a P2P payment. To verify the identity of the recipient, since there is
no bank card
authentication, preferably the recipient must at least respond to the
challenge-response
question and/or provide the payment reference number. The ATM will communicate
these
payment details to the CCF, which will verify the payment and issue permission
to disburse
the money.
The CCF's notification server provides information to both parties regarding
the
status of a payment transaction. Each of the messages is based on a standard
template, so that
the payee receives the same message irrespective of the originating partner
institution.
Notifications have multilingual capabilities. Figure 13 shows options for end-
user
notifications generated by the system of the invention.
Payments between businesses and businesses, or between businesses and
customers,
follow the same format as the payments described above. However, if a large
number of
payments are transacted, it becomes impracticable for a business to log on and
collect each
payment as they arrive. Instead, business customers of participating
institutions may enroll in
a commercial registry which provides a funds consolidation function.
Business customers who choose to participate in the commercial registry are
first
qualified for participation and enrolled by their institution. The institution
in turn provides
this certified business customer information to a CCF commercial registry,
which is used to
validate and certify the identity and contact information of the business
company as a
legitimate operating concern with a bona fide banking relationship when
payment
transactions are initiated. Preferably, this information will include the
official name, address,
and contact information of the business, trade name, and a verified e-mail
address.
A subset of this financial institution-certified information is available to
any
individual or business that receives a payment request or wishes to originate
a merchant
payment to this business customer, which provides assurance that the funds are
being directed
to the appropriate recipient.
A business customer may generate a payment request for one of its own
customers by
delivering an invoice and directing the customer to access his or her own
financial institution
services to effect payment to the business as shown in Figure 19. The business
customer logs
onto its partner institution's ovine banking service and enters invoice data
either manually or
by importing a payment file from a third party accounting tool. The partner
institution
-17-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
transfers the payment details to the CCF, which assigns a tracking number and
optionally a
universal resource locator (URL). The payment details are stored by the CCF,
which then
notifies the customer (payer) of the invoice. Preferably, the invoice is
delivered by e-mail
and directs the customer to its partner institution's online banking service.
The customer may
choose to approve payment immediately, or may choose to view additional
information
regarding the invoice if such information is available (for example, through
the URL or
another hyperlinlc). When the payment is approved, the CCF completes the
payment in the
manner described above and issues a receipt to both parties. The business
customer can then
log onto its institution's online banking service to collect the funds and
optionally export
transaction statements to a third party accounting tool.
In another embodiment, shown in Figure 20, no invoice is issued to the
customer, but
the customer initiates the payment as part of a retail transaction in an
online environment.
For example, in a web-based auction, the customer clicks on a "pay me" link
appearing in a
vendor's auction listing. Clicking on this link passes payment details to the
CCF, together
with a token identifying the vendor and an optional return URL. In the
meantime, the
customer is referred to a partner institution, approves the transaction, and
the payment is
completed as generally described above.
When the payment is made, the business customer can choose to receive
notification
of each payment, and choose a deposit account and collect the funds.
Alternatively, because
it is impractical for the business customer to respond in this mamier to a
large number of
payments, the payment system can be configured to consolidate funds by
accumulating
cleared payments, and then sweeping the accumulated funds into a default
commercial
account at the end of the period. The funds may be swept into the commercial
account on a
periodic basis, such as a daily basis, or once the accumulated funds reach a
certain threshold
value or the number of payments reaches a threshold number.
Business-to-business payments, for example, payment by a business customer to
a
supplier, may also be effected using this system. If the recipient business is
also enrolled in
the commercial registry, the CCF will handle the payment using the funds
consolidation
method.To enable transactions between two or more payment systems, for example
two
domestic payment systems in a cross-border transaction, the financial
institutions in each
country are affiliated with a regional CCF in that country. Customers in each
country use
their partner institution's authentication process to Iog into their selected
delivery channel
-18-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
(Internet, telephone, ATM, wireless, etc.). Each regional CCF is responsible
for storing,
sending and receiving all payments which originate and terminate at that site.
Only a limited
amount of data is replicated between the regional sites when it is required to
perform a
function. Preferably, any replication is carried out based on an asynchronous
remote XML
request, which carries the data to be replicated. There is therefore no
requirement for real
time data synchronization between regional CCF sites.
An international CCF site is primarily responsible for coordinating the
exchange of
data between the regional CCF sites. The international CCF also maintains a
global directory
of affiliated institutions. A foreign exchange (FX) facility maintains a
database of exchange
rates and manages currency exchange transactions, and maintains trust accounts
in each
jurisdiction in the local currency.
For an international payment, the CCF switch at the point of origin of the
payment
queries the global directory to determine which institution and CCF regional
switch has been
designated by the recipient. If a currency exchange is required, the CCF
switch at the point
of origin also communicates with an FX facility to determine the exchange rate
and book the
currency exchange. The payment details are replicated by the regional CCF to
the regional
CCF of the recipient using an asynchronous messaging mechanism.
At the point of destination, the regional CCF delivers a payment notification
to the
intended recipient. The notification includes an encrypted payment reference
number, which
contains a payment identification code to identify the payment's point of
origin. The
notification directs the recipient to an affiliate institution to claim the
payment. The recipient
logs onto the selected banking service and receives the funds. Funds transfer
occurs by
means of transfers between suspense accounts and customer accounts, as
described above.
Settlement between financial institutions takes place on a periodic basis, for
example
at the end of each business day. Based on agreed cut-off times, the CCF
provides each
member institution with reconciliation and settlement information. This data
is used to
reconcile transactions between the CCF and each institution, as well as to
determine the
institution's monetary obligations to other members in the network to effect
settlement.
Where the institutions are located in different jurisdictions, settlement
takes place
between the originating and destination institutions using the exchange
settlement facility's
accounts in the jurisdiction of each institution, based on settlement advice
provided by the
-19-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
CCF. With reference to Figure 21, the international CCF site is networked to a
number of
regional CCF sites. The participating financial institutions in each region
are connected to its
corresponding regional switch. Each of these institutions maintains a suspense
account. The
FX facility has an international site networked with local sites, which are in
communication
with each of the institutions in the same region. Each local FX site maintains
a local currency
settlement trust account on behalf of the international CCF, through which all
foreign
exchange settlement will take place.
The networked CCFs provide settlement advice to the financial institutions so
that the
institutions may make aggregate transfers. These transfers are made to the
local currency
settlement trust accounts in the local currency, and not to the other
institutions. Each transfer
may be carried out by means of wire payment to provide finality of transfer.
Access to functions beneath the user interface layer is provided utilizing a
request/response XML-based message set. All communications are encrypted and
signed.
Figure 14 illustrates high-level interaction between a partner institution's
middleware and the
CCF facility to reconcile a payment to a new payee. Figure 15 shows a number
of possible
message sets and explains how they are used to facilitate P2P payments. Each
message set
consists of a request initiated by a partner institution's middleware and a
response returned by
the CCF. These messages involve additional system processes at the CCF.
According to the invention, the use of specific delivery channels is left to
the
discretion of the partner institution. While the primary channel is online
bai~lcing, the service
can be extended to telephone banl~ing and host-based ATMs.
Currently, consumers access Web banking services almost exclusively on a
browser
residing on a personal computer. As Internet-enabled appliances gain mass
acceptance and
continue to improve in terms of cost, connectivity, display, memory and
processing
capabilities, financial institutions will offer banking services through these
devices. A single
interface is required between the institution and the CCF to support multiple
Web-enabled
devices. Java-based adapters allow institutions to communicate internally with
other
application servers that support specific devices.
Once financial institutions have implemented P2P payment capabilities on their
Web
banking service, they can utilize the message-based interface of the invention
to support a
synchronized, multi-channel delivery strategy to offer users of non-PC devices
access to the
-20-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
same list of personal payees from their Web channel. Due to current data-entry
interface
limitations in mobile devices (such as WAP-enabled cell phones, ATMs and
telephone
banking VRUs), it may be more practical to display a customer's pre-existing
list of personal
payees through these channels. The identity management system of the invention
has the
capability to store lists of customers' established payment linkages from
prior payment
requests.
For example, a consumer wants to re-credit an acquaintance for picking up the
dinner
tab at a restaurant. This payee could log onto their institution's wireless
banking service,
select the payment recipient from his or her list of past personal payees and
enter a monetary
amount and a specific account from which to draw the funds. Upon receipt of
the payment
request, the CCF immediately launches a payment notification and the recipient
can
authenticate to deposit the funds the next time he or she accesses email.
Mobile P2P
payments will help institutions extend their wireless banking platforms,
increase adoption and
leverage their investments in that channel.
Most banks currently offer some form of telephone banking service through an
automated voice response unit (VRU). Typically, customers that authenticate
with a PIN
number can select and pay merchants from a previously determined personal
list. A list of
pre-existing personal payees stored by the CCF is akin to the merchant list
concept in the
previous example and can be presented on the VRU platform through the CCF's
XML
messaging interface.
Similarly to Web and telephone banking delivery, the institution can display a
customer's existing list of personal payees on ATMs for convenient re-use by
leveraging the
messaging interface and identity management system of the invention.
A Web-based publishing tool is supplied with the administration suite enabling
marketing managers at institutions to control the email banners that appear on
these
notifications. The CCF can send notifications to employees within partner
institutions.
Notification functionality is determined by the institution through the CCF's
Web-based
administration and reporting tools.
The invention provides a secure Web-based interface for staff at partner
institutions to
manage customer service, business planning, marketing and key system and
security
-21 -

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
parameters. Different job categories allow bank staffvarying levels of access
to information
and functions of the invention.
The financial institution's system security administrator possesses root-level
access
that grants privileges to other staff. This administrator can define and
update certain system-
s wide security parameters that govern transactions originating from the
institution's Web
banl~ing service. These parameters include maximum transaction limits, daily
transaction
limits per consumer and the maximum number of days before an unretrieved
payment is sent
baclc to the payer for re-crediting.
An institution's Web service channel manager can publish and update marketing
messages that appear on CCF-triggered email payment notifications. As well,
the channel
manager can view all multilingual email templates delivered to customers to
facilitate
payments and direct customers to URLs that open online banking services or
logon to
existing accounts. This person can also view all system-generated business
metric reports that
yield rich statistics, such as payment volumes, customer activation levels,
methods conswners
use to catch payments, average payment amounts and the average time between
payment
initiation and final settlement.
Customer service representatives (CSRs) can make inquiries using transaction
confirmation codes that facilitate payment tracing. The invention provides a
complete audit
trail for any activity related to a particular customer or payment transaction
within a certain
time period. CSRs can provide support by viewing payment-processing
information. Detailed
lists of system-generated messages (and explanations) as well as daily
schedules for
processing are some of the items that CSRs can access in responding to
customer inquiries.
The system also features CCF bulletin boards to publish messages that could
impact upon
customers' immediate use of the service.
The architecture of the invention, illustrated in Figure 16, provides
performance,
security, availability and scalability. The invention delivers protection from
unauthorized
external or internal access by implementing several industry standard
mechanisms including:
multi-layer firewall structure; secure access lockdown of Web servers and mail
servers;
extensive intrusion detection; documentation security and escalation
procedures. The
invention supports a cluster server architecture designed to provide maximum
fault tolerance,
performance and scalability.
-22-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
The invention uses XML based request/response messaging to exchange
information
with financial institutions. Each XML message consists of a standard header
and variable
body sections. The system is designed to support versioning and to be
baclcwards compatible
as new features are added or new means of access to online banking are
provided to
customers. For example, where an institution requests a payment transaction on
behalf of its
client the financial institution's own Internet banking application presents
the appropriate
form to the customer, gathers and validates the data entered by the customer
and formats the
XML request such as:
<?xml version = "1.0" encoding="utf 8"?>
<!DOCTYPE REQPMTBGRQ SYSTEM "file://reqpmtbgrq.dtd">
<CCFREQUEST>
<MES SAGEHDR>
<MESSAGETYPE>8<IMESSAGEGETTYPE>
<MES SAGETYPEV ER> 1.1 </MES SAGETYPEVER>
<FIID>10</FIID>
<TRANTOKEN>X3 SJCBE</TRANTOKEN>
</MES SAGEHDR>
<MESSAGEBODY>
<FIUSERID>56450983045034</FIUSERID>
<CUSTOMERID>B7856434U4</CUSTOMERID>
<CURRENCY>CAD</CURRENCY>
<PMTAMOUNT>65.00</PMTAMOUNT>
<EXPIRYDATE>2000-09-16-23:59:00.000000</EXPIRYDATE>
<MEMO>Here is the money I owe you for dinner. Thanks</MEMO>
- 23 -

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
</MESSAGEBODY>
</CCFREQUEST>
The invention executes the appropriate transaction and return a response to
the Financial
Institution using a similar format.
The preferred production system runs on a hardware platform under the Unix
Operating System and uses commercially available and reliable Application and
Database
Management Software. The system is housed in data center facility. The
preferred
embodiment of the invention employs Java 2 Enterprise Edition technology
coupled with an
enterprise relational database system using a clustered, fault-tolerant
configuration which is
both scalable a,nd extensible, providing the ability to easily manage and
update with
additional features and services as required.
Applying mufti-tier distributed design patterns, the invention is composed of
four
logical service items (presentation, messaging, business and data), shown in
Figure 17, that
are physically distributed through several redundant, fault-tolerant and
balanced
implementation systems. Presentation logic is the linlc between the client
interface and the
business logic. Using JavaBean and Servlet specifications, the presentation
logic components
communicate with the business logic components (EJBs). The presentation logic
is based on
the concept of heterogeneous client interfaces, allowing both browser and non-
browser
interfaces to cormnunicate with the CCF. The messaging layer is the link
between the partner
institution and the business logic. This layer consists of a number of Java
servlets responsible
for parsing and validating XML messages and the invocation of appropriate
business
components. Business logic is processed by a distributed middleware server
with enabled
clustering and object caching based on the Enterprise JavaBean standard. Both
business logic
and functional rules are maintained in a eries of session beans and entity
beans that are
located on networked systems. Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs) communicate with the
associated
data media and apply any relevant business rules. Data media and its
associated transactions
are maintained in an enterprise database system supporting both the encryption
of resident
data and the features that promote redundancy and reliability.
The following technologies may be employed in the implementation of the system
and method of the invention:
-24-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
Java 2 Standard Edition
JavaTM 2Standard Edition (J2SETM) is a Web platform that enables rapid
development and
deployment of software applications across multiple operating systems and
platforms with
fewer defects than similar technologies. With significant performance gains
and improved
Web deployment mechanisms for enterprise, client-side Java applets and
applications, J2SE
Version 1.3 includes a new client Java virtual machine (JVMTM), tuned
libraries throughout
the platform and enhancements to the Java Plug-in software for improved Web
browser
delivery.
Java Beans
Developed in collaboration with industry leaders, JavaBeans are a portable,
platform-
independent component model written in Java. JavaBeans enable developers to
write reusable
components once and run them anywhere independent of platform.
Java 2 Enterprise Edition
The JavaTM 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE), defines the standard for
developing multi-
tier enterprise applications. J2EE simplifies enterprise applications by
basing them on
standardized, modular components, providing a complete set of services to
those components
and handling many application behavior details without complex programming.
J2EE takes
advantage of many Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition, such as "Write Once, Run
AnywhereTM" portability, JDBCTM API for database access, CORBA technology for
interaction with existing enterprise resources and a security model that
protects data even in
Internet applications. Building on this base, Java 2, Enterprise Edition, adds
full support for
Enterprise JavaBeansTM components, Java Servlets API, JavaServer PagesTM and
XML
technology.
Java Server Pages
The 3avaServer PagesTM technology provides a quick and simple way to create
dynamic Web
content while enabling rapid development of Web-based applications that are
server- and
platform-independent. The JavaTM Servlet API provides Web application
developers with a
simple and consistent mechanism for extending Web server functionality.
Enterprise Java Beans
The Enterprise JavaBeans specification defines an API that helps developers
create, deploy
- 25 -

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
and manage cross-platform, component-based enterprise applications that work
with systems
currently in use.
Java Naming and Directory Interface
This provides uniform, industry-standard and seamless connectivity between the
Java
platform and one's business information assets, allowing developers to deliver
Java
applications with unified access to multiple naming and directory services
across the
enterprise.
Java Database Connectivity
This provides programmers with a uniform interface to a wide range of
relational databases,
as well as a common base upon which higher-level tools and interfaces can be
built.
Java Messaging Services
This specification provides developers with a standard Java API for enterprise
messaging
services, such as reliable queuing, publishing and subscription cormnunication
and vaxious
aspects of push/pull technologies.
Remote Method Iuvocatioh over IIOP
RMI-IIOP provides developers an implementation of the Java RMI API over the
Object
Management Group's industry-standard Internet Inter-Orb Protocol (IIOP). It
allows
developers to write remote interfaces between clients and servers and
implement them using
Java technology and the Java RMI APIs.
XML
XML (eXtensible Markup Language) is a simplified subset of the Standard
Generalized
Markup Language (SGML, ISO 8879) that provides a file format for representing
data, a
schema for describing data structure and a mechanism for extending and
annotating HTML
with semantic information.
Secure Socket Layer API
Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) is the Internet security protocol for point-to-
point connections. It
provides protection against eavesdropping, tampering and forgery. Clients and
servers
establish a secure linlc, or "pipe," across the Internet to protect
information that is sent and
received to ensure confidential, authentic and original information exchange.
-26-

CA 02435909 2003-07-24
WO 02/059847 PCT/CA02/00107
Various embodiments of the present invention having been thus described in
detail by
way of example, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that
variations and
modifications may be made without departing from the invention. The invention
includes all
such variations and modifications as fall within the scope of the appended
claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Expired (new Act pat) 2022-01-25
Common Representative Appointed 2020-11-07
Grant by Issuance 2020-08-25
Inactive: Cover page published 2020-08-24
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-07-02
Inactive: Final fee received 2020-06-10
Pre-grant 2020-06-10
Inactive: COVID 19 - Deadline extended 2020-06-10
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2020-02-17
Letter Sent 2020-02-17
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2020-02-17
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2020-01-31
Inactive: Q2 passed 2020-01-31
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2019-08-21
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2019-02-21
Inactive: Report - No QC 2019-01-30
Inactive: Protest acknowledged 2018-08-14
Letter Sent 2018-08-14
Inactive: Protest/prior art received 2018-08-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-07-09
Letter Sent 2018-03-22
Inactive: Single transfer 2018-03-12
Inactive: Agents merged 2018-02-19
Inactive: Office letter 2018-02-19
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2018-01-08
Revocation of Agent Request 2017-12-29
Appointment of Agent Request 2017-12-29
Inactive: Report - No QC 2017-12-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2017-06-28
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2017-01-09
Inactive: Office letter 2017-01-09
Inactive: Office letter 2017-01-09
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2017-01-09
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2016-12-28
Inactive: Report - QC passed 2016-12-22
Revocation of Agent Request 2016-12-09
Appointment of Agent Request 2016-12-09
Inactive: Office letter 2016-11-28
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2016-11-28
Appointment of Agent Request 2016-11-03
Revocation of Agent Request 2016-11-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2016-04-27
Letter sent 2016-01-27
Inactive: Office letter 2016-01-27
Letter Sent 2016-01-27
Extension of Time for Taking Action Requirements Determined Compliant 2016-01-27
Extension of Time for Taking Action Request Received 2016-01-20
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-11-04
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-10-28
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2015-09-29
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-08-05
Inactive: Report - QC failed - Minor 2015-08-03
Inactive: Office letter 2015-07-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-07-28
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-07-26
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2015-06-25
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-03-25
Inactive: Report - QC failed - Minor 2015-03-24
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-12-16
Inactive: Report - QC passed 2014-09-16
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2014-09-16
Inactive: Report - No QC 2014-07-28
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2014-06-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-06-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-06-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-05-28
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2014-05-28
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2014-02-28
Inactive: Report - No QC 2014-02-27
Letter sent 2014-02-14
Advanced Examination Determined Compliant - paragraph 84(1)(a) of the Patent Rules 2014-02-14
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) 2014-01-27
Inactive: Advanced examination (SO) fee processed 2014-01-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2014-01-27
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2013-07-25
Inactive: IPC deactivated 2012-01-07
Inactive: IPC from PCS 2012-01-01
Inactive: IPC from PCS 2012-01-01
Inactive: First IPC from PCS 2012-01-01
Inactive: IPC expired 2012-01-01
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2011-10-18
Letter Sent 2011-02-10
Inactive: Single transfer 2011-02-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2010-06-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2010-05-21
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-11-24
Letter Sent 2007-01-22
Request for Examination Received 2007-01-08
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-01-08
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2007-01-08
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Letter Sent 2004-08-12
Inactive: Single transfer 2004-07-23
Inactive: IPRP received 2003-10-20
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-09-29
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2003-09-26
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2003-09-26
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2003-09-23
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2003-09-19
Application Received - PCT 2003-09-02
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-07-24
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2002-08-01

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2019-11-11

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2003-07-24
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2004-01-26 2004-01-21
Registration of a document 2004-07-23
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2005-01-25 2005-01-25
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2006-01-25 2006-01-25
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2007-01-25 2007-01-08
Request for examination - standard 2007-01-08
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2008-01-25 2008-01-08
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2009-01-26 2008-12-02
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2010-01-25 2010-01-06
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - standard 09 2011-01-25 2010-12-17
Registration of a document 2011-02-08
MF (application, 10th anniv.) - standard 10 2012-01-25 2012-01-24
MF (application, 11th anniv.) - standard 11 2013-01-25 2013-01-24
MF (application, 12th anniv.) - standard 12 2014-01-27 2014-01-24
Advanced Examination 2014-01-27
MF (application, 13th anniv.) - standard 13 2015-01-26 2014-12-17
MF (application, 14th anniv.) - standard 14 2016-01-25 2016-01-20
Extension of time 2016-01-20
MF (application, 15th anniv.) - standard 15 2017-01-25 2017-01-20
MF (application, 16th anniv.) - standard 16 2018-01-25 2018-01-19
Registration of a document 2018-03-12
MF (application, 17th anniv.) - standard 17 2019-01-25 2019-01-11
MF (application, 18th anniv.) - standard 18 2020-01-27 2019-11-11
Final fee - standard 2020-06-17 2020-06-10
MF (patent, 19th anniv.) - standard 2021-01-25 2021-01-21
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
INTERAC CORP.
Past Owners on Record
JACK FLEISHMAN
ZACK FUERSTENBERG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2014-05-28 29 1,297
Drawings 2003-07-24 23 393
Description 2003-07-24 27 1,562
Claims 2003-07-24 5 152
Abstract 2003-07-24 2 80
Representative drawing 2003-09-29 1 12
Cover Page 2003-09-29 2 58
Claims 2003-07-25 5 193
Claims 2010-05-21 13 688
Claims 2014-01-27 15 683
Claims 2014-06-09 29 1,252
Claims 2014-12-16 23 924
Claims 2015-06-25 18 742
Claims 2015-09-29 19 768
Claims 2016-04-27 13 502
Claims 2017-06-28 13 497
Claims 2019-08-21 13 507
Representative drawing 2020-07-28 1 9
Cover Page 2020-07-28 2 57
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2003-09-29 1 106
Notice of National Entry 2003-09-19 1 188
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2004-07-27 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-08-12 1 105
Reminder - Request for Examination 2006-09-26 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2007-01-22 1 189
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2011-02-10 1 103
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2018-03-22 1 106
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2020-02-17 1 503
Fees 2012-01-24 1 156
Fees 2013-01-24 1 156
Protest-Prior art 2018-08-09 2 32
Acknowledgement of Receipt of Protest 2018-08-14 1 47
Acknowledgement of Receipt of Prior Art 2018-08-14 1 53
PCT 2003-07-24 16 521
Correspondence 2003-09-19 1 25
PCT 2003-07-25 9 364
Fees 2004-01-21 1 33
Fees 2005-01-25 1 31
Fees 2006-01-25 1 33
Fees 2007-01-08 1 32
Fees 2014-01-24 1 24
Correspondence 2014-05-28 5 228
Correspondence 2014-06-09 3 66
Fees 2014-12-17 1 25
Amendment / response to report 2015-06-25 28 1,250
Examiner Requisition 2015-07-28 10 680
Courtesy - Office Letter 2015-07-30 1 22
Examiner Requisition 2015-08-05 11 711
Amendment / response to report 2015-09-29 28 1,272
Examiner Requisition 2015-11-04 11 729
Fees 2016-01-20 1 25
Extension of time for examination 2016-01-20 1 47
Correspondence 2016-01-27 1 23
Amendment / response to report 2016-04-27 16 612
Correspondence 2016-11-03 3 144
Correspondence 2016-12-09 5 253
Examiner Requisition 2016-12-28 9 584
Courtesy - Office Letter 2017-01-09 4 220
Courtesy - Office Letter 2017-01-09 4 219
Fees 2017-01-20 1 25
Courtesy - Office Letter 2016-11-28 138 5,840
Amendment / response to report 2017-06-28 18 732
Examiner Requisition 2018-01-08 9 632
Maintenance fee payment 2018-01-19 1 25
Courtesy - Office Letter 2018-02-19 1 34
Amendment / response to report 2018-07-09 7 321
Maintenance fee payment 2019-01-11 1 25
Examiner Requisition 2019-02-21 15 920
Amendment / response to report 2019-08-21 22 1,003
Maintenance fee payment 2019-11-11 1 26
Final fee 2020-06-10 3 86
Maintenance fee payment 2021-01-21 1 26