Language selection

Search

Patent 2443448 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2443448
(54) English Title: OPTIMIZED BOARD EDGER AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF
(54) French Title: COUPE-BORDURE DE TABLEAU AMELIORE ET METHODE DE FONCTIONNEMENT CONNEXE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • B27L 1/10 (2006.01)
  • B23D 59/00 (2006.01)
  • B26D 3/00 (2006.01)
  • B27B 1/00 (2006.01)
  • B27B 5/04 (2006.01)
  • B27B 5/34 (2006.01)
  • B27B 31/06 (2006.01)
  • B27C 1/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • WOODFORD, JAMES D. (Canada)
  • WEIRATHMUELLER, JOE (Canada)
  • WEIRATHMUELLER, FRIEDRICH (Canada)
  • ASAL, KHALIL G. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • VALLEY MACHINE WORKS LTD.
(71) Applicants :
  • VALLEY MACHINE WORKS LTD. (Canada)
(74) Agent: MARIO D., P. ENG. THERIAULTTHERIAULT, MARIO D., P. ENG.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2002-07-19
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-01-24
Examination requested: 2003-10-17
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
2,353,704 (Canada) 2001-07-24

Abstracts

English Abstract


In a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a new method for
edging a wood board. This method comprises the steps of constructing
from the scanned images of a wood board, a virtual entity of the wood
board; determining from the scanned images an optimized cut line along
the virtual entity; displacing the forward edge of the virtual entity ahead of
the leading edge of the wood board; displacing the rear edge of the virtual
entity behind the trailing edge of the wood board and sawing the wood
board along the optimized cut line on the virtual entity. In another feature,
the saw blades inside the board edger are mounted in saw collars and are
shifted along the arbor by an electric setworks mounted on the top of the
saw box and a shifting arm extending vertically between the setworks and
a respective saw collar.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
We claim:
1. A board edger for edging wood cants comprising;
a saw box mounted therein; said saw box comprising;
an arbour mounted therein;
at least one saw collar assembly adjustably mounted on said arbor
and a saw blade mounted in said saw collar assembly,
a networks mounted thereon and having a displacement parallel to
said arbor, and
a saw shifting arm extending at right angle from said arbor between
said saw collar assembly and said networks for moving said
saw blade along said arbor in response to a movement of said
setworks.
2. The board edger as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a
horizontal longitudinal axis, wherein said arbor is mounted
horizontally across said longitudinal axis and saw box has means for
angular adjustment about a vertical axis.
3. The board edger as claimed in claim 1, wherein said arbor has
splined thereon and said saw collar comprises a hub having grooves
therein movably engaged with said splines.
4. The board edger as claimed in claim 3, wherein said hub further
comprises a brass ring contiguous with said grooves, at each end
thereof and said brass ring has a sliding fit dimension over a crest
portion of said splines.

5. The board edger as claimed in claim 1, wherein said setworks
comprises a DC servo motor, a ball screw and ball nut actuator and
a yoke plate affixed to said shifting arm.
6. The board edger as claimed in claim 1, wherein said shifting arm
has a conduit therein and a nozzle connected to said conduit.
7. The board edger as claimed in claim 3, further comprising a bearing
mounted inside an opening in said shifting arm, and outside a
circumference of said hub.
8. The board edger as claimed in claim 7, wherein said collar assembly
comprises a flange on said hub and a lock ring with bolt holes
therein for clamping said saw blade to said flange.
9. The board edger as claimed in claim 8, wherein said hub further
comprises an inner bearing seat and a lock nut threaded thereon for
clamping a bearing inner race to said bearing seat.
10. The board edger as claimed in claim 9, wherein said shifting arm
has an outer bearing seat in said opening.
11. The board edger as claimed in claim 10, wherein said collar
assembly comprises an outer lock ring having means for clamping
a bearing outer race to said outer bearing seat.
12. The board edger as claimed in claim 3, wherein said saw box is
angularly adjustable about said vertical axis over an angle of 15°.
16

13. The board edger as claimed in claim 11, wherein said collar
assembly and said shifting arm are made of aluminum.
17

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02443448 2003-10-17
TITLE: OPTIMISED BOARD EDGER AND
METHOD.OF OPERATION THEREOF
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention pertains to sawanill edgers and more particularly, it
relates to a board edger having a movable saw box controlled by a scanner
and a computer to maximize the recovery of lumber from wood cants.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
As the processing speed increases in sawmill machinery, wood
pieces tend to bounce back from bumpers and alignment gates and are not
always presented to the sawmill equipment in an ideal position. This
inherent disadvantage with the handling of wood pieces is particularly
apparent in wood cants or Hitches. Wood cants have irregular and non-
parallel sides which make them difficult to align along the longitudinal axis
of an infeed conveyor for example. Consequently, increasing the processing
speed of machinery often results in less recovery.
In the present description, the words; wood piece, cant, Hitch and
board are used interchangeably to designate a lengthwise strip of wood cut
from a tree trunk.
In view of increasing both the processing speed and recovery, lineal
scanners and computers have been developed to precisely measure the
dimensions and the position of a wood board on a conveyor. These
scanners and computers generate three-dimensional images of the cant; and
calculate a sawing solution that represents the highest value combination
of products which can be produced from the cant.
1

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
Similarly, sawmill edgers have been developed to operate with lineal
scanners and computers. These edgers have a saw box that is adjustable
about a vertical axis, and saw blades that are movable sideways along the
arbor. The positions of the saw blades are continuously adjusted to track
the realtime position and alignment of a wood board being fed there
through and to follow the optimized cutting profile defined by the
computer.
Examples of optimized edgcrs available in the prior art are disclosed
in the following documents;
US Patent 4,239,072 issued December 16, 1980 to I-i. Merilainen;
US Patent 5,722,474 issued March 3, 1998 to C. l2aybon et al.;
US Patent 5,816,302 issued October 6, 1998 to W. I~. Newness
US Patent 5,884,682 issued March 23, 1999 to J.13. Kennedy et al.;
US Patent 5,946,995 issued September 7, 1999 to S. W. Michell et al.;
US Patent 6,17,858 issued January 30, 2001 to M.P. Knew et al.;
US Patent 6,202,526 issued March 20, 2001 to M. Dockter et al.
It will be appreciated that in a continuous wood edging process, the
cants to be trimmed must be located precisely such that the saw blades can
track the optimized cut lines in one cant and reposition quickly to track the
optimized cut lines in a next cant. It has been found, ho'Never, that when
the leading edge of a saw blade is made to focus on the leading edge of a
cant approaching at high speed, there is a certain amount of wandering of
the saw blade before it is set to track the optimized cut line. The saw blade
enters the leading edge of the cant in a milling mode rather than a sawing
mode, thereby increasing the kerf width at the leading edge of the cant.
2

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
Similarly, when the optimized cut line stops at the trailing edge of the cant,
the saw blade stops tracking the optimized cut line before it has completely
exited the cant, causing an aftercut and also increasing tl~e kerf width at
the
trailing edge of the cant.
In the machines of the prior art, several methods are used to locate
the leading and trailing edges of a cant to control the tracking of optimized
cut lines. For example, the machine described in L1S Patent 4,239,072 uses
several measuring gates on the infeed side of the cutter heads to determine
the position of the cant relative to the cutter head s and to adjust the
cutter
heads prior to entering into the cant. The position of the cant is measured
relative to a feeding line. The cutter heads are correspondingly positioned
on both sides of the feeding line, and the tracking of the optimized cut lines
starts as the cant passes through the edger. The cutler heads are inclined in
relation to each other in such a manner that the cutter heads are closer to
each other at their cutting side than at the exit side to prevent aftercut.
The machine disclosed in US Patent 5,722,474 uses photodetectors
to detect the location of a cant relative to a refi~rence point. Then the
movement of the saw blades is correlated by computer with the longitudinal
movement of the cant past the reference point.
The machine described in US Patent 5,884,682 uses another
approach. The machine uses mechanical positioning devices to position the
cant and to present it tangentially to the saw blades.
As it was explained, there are drawbacks in adjusting the saw blades
to follow optimized cut lines which start at the leading edge of the wood
board and end at the trailing edge of the board. As such, it may be
appreciated that there continues to be a need for a new and improved
3

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
method to operate a board edger to prevent these surface defects. There is
also a need for a better board edger in which the saw blades are shifted with
greater speed and precision.
SUMMARY.' OF THE INVElrTTIOlN
In the present invention, however, there is provided an optimized
board edger in which the structure of the saw blade moving mechanism has
a low inertia, for rapid positioning of the saw blades. The saw box in the
optimized board edger follows optimized cut lines on a virtual entity of the
wood board to be trimmed. This virtual entity is made longer than the wood
board such that the tracking of the optimized cut lines starts before the saw
blades enter the leading edge of the wood board and ends after the saw
blades have completely exited the woad board.
In the present disclosure, the expression "virtual entity" is used to
describe a set of data inside a computer memory corresponding to the
dimensions, position and speed of a wood board in motion relative to one
or more space and time references that are assignable to a board edger.
Broadly, in accordance with a first feature c~f the present invention,
there is provided a new method for edging a waod board. This method
comprises the following steps:
a) providing a board edger having a movable saw box and a saw blade
mounted in that saw box;
b) scanning a wood board and obtaining images of this wood board;
c) constructing from the images, a virtual entity of the wood board;
d) determining from the images, a position, alignment and travelling
speed of the wood board;
4

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
e) determining from the images an optimized cut line along the virtual
entity;
fj superimposing the virtual entity in space and time over the wood
board;
g) displacing the forward edge of the virtual entity ahead of the leading
edge of the wood board;
h) displacing the rear edge of the virtual entity behind the trailing edge
of the wood board;
i) extending the optimized cut line to the forward arid rear edges of the
virtual entity;
j) simultaneously moving the virtual entity and the wood board
through the board edger, and
k) sawing the wood board along the optimized cut line on the virtual
entity.
The method according present invention for edging a wood board
reduces the defects and disadvantages of the prior art by incorporating
buffer zones ahead and after the wood board, in which the saw blade
adjustments are effected. The Lengths of these buffer zones are determined
by the response time of the board edger for repositioning the saw blades,
the desired speed ofthe transport conveyor and the desired spacing between
the boards.
In accordance with another feature of the present invention, there is
provided a board edger for edging wood cants, comprising a saw box
having an arbour mounted therein. At least one saw collar assembly is
adjustably mounted on the arbor and a saw blade is mounted in the saw
collar assembly. The saw box also has a setworks mounted thereon above
the arbor: The setworks has a displacement parallel to the arbor. A saw
shifting arm extends at right angle from the arbor, between the saw collar
5

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
assembly and the setworks for moving the saw blade along the arbor in
response to a movement of the networks. This saw shifting arrangement is
advantageous over other board edgers of the prior art in that it is compact,
light, frictionless and precise.
Other advantages and novel features of tlae present invention will
become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred
embodiment.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TIIE DRAWINGS
One embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in the
accompanying drawings, in which like numerals denote like parts
throughout the several views, and in which:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a board edging installation comprising the
optimized board edger according to the preferred embodiment ofthe
present invention;
FIG. 2 is an enlarged plan view of the optimized board edger and partial
views ofthe upstream transport conveyor and downstream discharge
conveyor;
FIG. 3 is a partial plan view of a board or a cant ea~tering the saws of an
edger in a prior art installation;
FIG. 4 is a plan view of a cant and of a virtual entity of this cant as
generated by the computer system comprised in the preferred
installation of the optimized board edger;
6

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
FIG. 5 is a plan view of the saw box in the optimised board edger
according to the preferred embodiment;
FIG. 6 is a cross-section view of the saw box, as seen along line 6-6 in
FIG. 5;
FIG. 7 is a side view of the saw box in the optimized board edger;
FIG. 8 is a perspective exploded view of a saw blade, a saw collar
assembly and a saw shifting arm comprised in the saw box in the
optimized board edger;
FIG. 9 is a cross-section view of the saw blade, the saw collar assembly
and the shifting arm illustrated in FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 is an enlarged view of the saw collar assembly, and in particular
of the portion of the hub as seen in detail circle 14 in FIG. 9.
DESCRIPTION OF TI3E PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
While this invention is susceptible of embodiments in many
different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will be described in
details herein one specific embodiment of the board edger according to the
present invention, with the understanding that the present disclosure is to
be considered as an example of the principles of the invention and is not
intended to limit the invention to the embodiment illustrated and described.
Similarly, the preferred installation of the optimized board edger and its
method of operation are provided as examples to explain a general concept.
These descriptions should not be used to limit the scope of the invention.
7

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
Referring firstly to FIGS. 1-4, a preferred method for operating an
optimized board edgcr will be described. The preferred board edging
installation comprises an in-lint arrangement of an infeed conveyor 20, a
lineal scanner 22, a transport conveyor 24, an optimized board edger 26,
and a discharge conveyor 28. The preferred infeed conveyor 20 has a
board pre-locating device 30 which function is to position each board as
straight as possible along the transport conveyor 24. The infeed conveyor
20 can be fed manually or from a sorting table as it is customary in
sawmills. Numerous components ofthe machines mentioned above and of
the preferred optimized board edger are not illustrated herein because these
components belong to known technology and do not constitute the focus of
the present invention.
In the preferred board edging installation, a computer system is
provided between the lineal scanner 22 and the optimized board edger 26.
1~ This computer system comprises a personal computer (PC) 32 containing
an optimizing software, a programmable logic controller (PLC) 34
communicating with the PC 32 and with one or more servo modules 36 and
one or more servo drive translators 38 to control the tracking functions of
the optimized board edger 26. A two-way ethernet 100MB/sec. connection
40 is provided between the PC 32 and the PLC 34..
The lineal scanner 22 is preferably a 3-I:3 True-Shape Scanner
manufactured by Perceptron Inc., a company having its headquarters at
Plymouth, Michigan, ~JSA. The PC 32 preferably has a high speed
processor and optimizing software to receive a 3-I7~ image from the lineal
scanner 22 and to compute a breakdown solution in 250 millisecond or less
for softwood applications and in 400 millisecond or less for hardwood
applications.
8

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
The Length of the transport conveyor 24 is determined according to
the desired travel speed of this transport conveyor and the processing time
for each sawing solution. A travel speed of 800-1200 feet/minute is
believed achievable with the installation described herein.
The optimized board edger 26 according to the preferred
embodiment has an active saw box 42 which is movable about a vertical
axis and in which the saw blades are movable along the arbor. In order to
reduce the inertia of the saw box 42, the arbor is driven by an electric motor
44 through sheaves and belts under the guard 46 and a flexible drive shaft
under the guard 48.
In use, an untrimmed wood board 50 is scanned while in motion
through the scanner 22, The Iongitudiraal axis 52 of the board relative to the
longitudinal axis 54 of the optimized board edger, as well as the optimized
cut lines 56 are determined while the wood board is moving toward the
5 optimized board edger 26.
The saws are set apart a same distance A as the spacing between the
optimized cut lines 56. The saw box 42 is rotated to align the saw blades
60 parallel to the longitudinal axis 52 of the wood board, and the saw
blades are set in motion along the arbor 62 to follow the optimized cut lines
56 as the wood board 50 travels through the optimized board edger 26.
Referring now t~ FAG. 3, the problems with high speed positioning
of a saw box will be described. When the longitudinal axis 52 of a wood
board 50 to be trimmed is skewed a few degrees from the feeding direction
54, it will be appreciated that an initial adjustment to a proper spacing and
alignment of the saw blades 60 must be made before the saw blades enter
9

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
the wood piece. As the saw blades 60 enter the wood piece 50, the saw
blades 60 must move in unison along the arbor 62 to follow the optimized
cut lines 56.
In the machines of the prior art, the leading edge 70 and the rear
edge 72 of the wood board 50 are detected and used to designate the
beginning and the ending of the optimized cut lines 56. The leading and
trailing edges are used as targets with which the saw blades must aim.
However, it will be appreciated that the saw box has a certain inertia and
its actuators have acceleration, deceleration, elasticit~,~ and dampening
factors, incorporated in each of their movements. These motion factors
cause a certain delay in positioning the saw blades 60 aft the entrance and
exit of a board. As a result, the positioning of the saw blades 60 is not
instantaneous. The saw blades might still oscillate around their
programmed position as they enter the leading edge 70 of the wood board.
The tracking of the saw blades in unison to follow the optimized cut lines
56 may only start an instant after the saw blades have actually entered the
board. Similarly, the movement ofthe saw blades in tracking the optimized
cut lines throughout to the trailing edge 72 stops prematurely before the
saw blades have completely exited the wood board.
This dragging in the positioning of the saw blades to follow the
optimized cut lines causes the kerf width near the leading and trailing edges
of a wood board to be generally larger than normal, causing defects in the
recovered lumber and side stresses on the saw blades.
In the preferred method of operating the opitimized board eager 26,
the PC 32 is configured to construct a virtual entity ~0 of each wood board
50. This virtual entity ~0 has all the dimensions of the physical wood board

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
50. This virtual entity 80 is superimposed in space and time over the
physical wood board 50.
Depending upon the operating speed and the length c~f the transport
conveyor 24, the virtual entity 80 is assigned excess length L ahead of the
leading edge 70 of the wood board 50, and excess length T following the
trailing edge 72 of the wood board 50. The optimized cut lines 56 are
projected along both excess lengths L, T.
In the preferred method of operation, the angle of the saws 60
relative to the longitudinal axis 52 of the wood board 50 and the spacing A
of the saw blades 60 are adjusted, and the displacement of the saw blades
in unison along the arbour 32 is set in motion by the PC 32 according to the
position, alignment and travelling speed ofthe virtual entity 80. The target
set points between which precise tracking of the saw blades 60 is
maintained are set at the forward edge 70' and tJhe rear edge 72' of the
virtual entity 80. By aiming the saw blades 60 at the forward edge 70' of
the virtual entity 80, the inherent oscillation of the saw blades 60 during
positioning occurs along the excess length L, such that uniform side edges
are obtained from the leading edge 70 of the actual wood board 50.
Similarly, the tracking of the optimized cut lines back to the rear edge 72'
of the virtual entity 80 ensures that the saw blades are out of the wood
board 50 when tracking stops. In the preferred edging installation, having
the response and computing time as mentioned hereinbefore, the lengths L
and T are set at 24 inch each.
Referring now to FIGS. 5-7, the saw box 42 in the preferred
optimized edger 26 will be described in some details. The saw box consists
of a frame 90, an arbor 92 mounted in bearings 94, 96, a pair of saw blades
11

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
60 mounted on the arbor 92. The saw box has a setworks 98 mounted on
top of the frame 90. There is provided three circular ball bearings 100 on
the bottom of the frame 90. The bearings 100 are set on a circular rail 102,
represented by a dashed line in FIG. 5. This circular rail is mounted on the
base of the edger 26. The preferred angular adjustment B of the saw box
42 is 7-1/2° to the left and to the right of the longitudinal axis 54
of the
optimized board edger 26, for a total angular displacement of 15°.
The rotation of the saw box 42 to the -right or the left of the
longitudinal axis 54 is effected by a DC servo drive actuator controlled by
the PC 32. This DC servo drive actuator and its mounting have not been
illustrated herein for being known to those skilled in the art.
The setworks 98 also comprises two DC servo drive motors 104
respectively linked to a linear slide 106, and also being controlled by the
PC 32. Each linear slide 106 encloses a ball screw and a ball nut connected
to a yoke plate 108. Each DC servo drive motor 104 drives the yoke plate
108 along the linear slide 106 with precision. A shifting arm 110 is affixed
to the yoke plate 108 and extends to a respective saw collar assembly 112
for moving one of the saw blades 60 along the arbor 92. Both saw blades
60 are movable independently of each other along the arbor 92 for board
width adjustment, and in unison with each other during the edging of a
wood board.
The arbor 92 has splines thereon as it is customary with board
edgers. Each saw blade 60 is supported in a collar assembly 112, which is
adapted to engage with, and to slide along these splines. This collar
assembly 112 is better illustrated in FIGS. 8-10. The saw collar assembly
112 comprises a hub 114 which has grooves 116 therein to engage with the
12

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
splines 118 on the arbor 92, with a loose sliding fit. The hub 114 has a
flange 120 on its circumference, to which is clamped the saw blade 60, by
means of a blade lock ring 122 with bolt holes 124 and machine screws 126
through these holes. Next to the flange 120, there is an inner bearing seat
128 on the outside surface of the hub, and an adyoining threaded portion
130. A bearing I32 is held to the inner bearing seat 128 of the hub by a
lock nut 134 engaged over the threaded portion 130. This bearing 132
affords a frictioniess rotation of the hub 114 relative to the shifting arm
110.
The outer race of the bearing 132 is clamped into an outer bearing
seat 136 inside an opening 138 in the lower end of the shifting arm 110.
The outer race of the bearing 132 is held to the outer bearing seat 136 by
means of an outer lock ring 140 having bolt holes 1.42 and machine screws
144 through these holes. Where possible, the components ofthe saw collar
assembly 112 are made of aluminum to ensure a minimum weight and
inertia.
The preferred shifting arm I10 has a conduit 146 therein to which
is connected a nozzle 148. This conduit 146 and nozzle 148 are
advantageous for periodically pumping lubricant to the surface of the arbor
92 for lubricating the hub 114 and the arbor 92.
Referring particularly to F'IG. 10, the grooves 116 inside the hub
I14 do not extend the full length of the hub. A brass ring 150 is mounted
on each end ofthe hub 114, inside the hub, and both rings 150 complement
with the grooves, the full length of the hub. Each brass ring 150 is press
fitted into a shoulder at each end of the hub 114. The inside diameter of
each ring 150 is a loose fit over the crest of the splines I 18 on the arbor
92.
13

CA 02443448 2003-10-17
The brass rings 150 are advantageous for preventing a binding of the
grooves 116 into the splines ilk and facilitate to a considerable extent the
movement of the collar assembly 112 along the arbor ~2.
1-~s to other manner of usage and operation of the present invention,
the same should be apparent from the above description and accompanying
drawings, and accordingly further discussion relative to the manner of
usage and operation of the invention would be considered repetitious and
is not provided.
While one embodiment of the present invention has been illustrated
and described herein, it will be appreciate d by those skilled in the art that
various modifications, alternate constructions and equivalents may be
employed without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Therefore, the above description and the illustrations should not be
construed as limiting the scope of the invention which is defaned by the
1 S appended claims.
I~

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2008-07-22
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2008-07-22
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-07-21
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2007-09-13
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2007-07-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-01-22
Letter Sent 2006-03-15
Letter Sent 2006-03-15
Letter Sent 2006-03-15
Letter Sent 2006-03-15
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: Single transfer 2006-01-04
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-10-25
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-08-02
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2005-08-02
Inactive: Cover page published 2003-11-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2003-11-14
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2003-11-14
Inactive: IPC assigned 2003-11-13
Application Received - Divisional 2003-10-29
Letter sent 2003-10-29
Letter Sent 2003-10-29
Divisional Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-10-29
Inactive: Divisional - Presentation date updated 2003-10-29
Application Received - Regular National 2003-10-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2003-10-17
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2003-10-17
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2003-01-24

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2008-07-21

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2005-06-27

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2003-10-17
Request for examination - small 2003-10-17
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2004-07-19 2004-06-30
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2007-07-19 2005-06-27
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2005-07-19 2005-06-27
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2006-07-19 2005-06-27
Registration of a document 2006-01-04
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
VALLEY MACHINE WORKS LTD.
Past Owners on Record
FRIEDRICH WEIRATHMUELLER
JAMES D. WOODFORD
JOE WEIRATHMUELLER
KHALIL G. ASAL
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Abstract 2003-10-17 1 33
Description 2003-10-17 14 727
Claims 2003-10-17 3 88
Drawings 2003-10-17 5 198
Representative drawing 2003-11-27 1 18
Cover Page 2003-11-28 1 54
Description 2005-10-25 14 685
Claims 2005-10-25 3 69
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2003-10-29 1 173
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-03-22 1 109
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-03-15 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-03-15 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-03-15 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-03-15 1 105
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2007-10-15 1 167
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2008-09-15 1 172
Correspondence 2003-10-29 1 42
Fees 2004-06-30 1 37
Fees 2005-06-27 1 39
Correspondence 2007-09-13 3 93