Language selection

Search

Patent 2461886 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2461886
(54) English Title: ELECTRICALLY TUNABLE BANDPASS FILTERS
(54) French Title: FILTRES PASSE-BANDE SYNTONISABLES PAR VOIE ELECTRIQUE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • H01P 1/203 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • TONCICH, STANLEY S. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
(71) Applicants :
  • QUALCOMM INCORPORATED (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2002-09-27
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-04-03
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2002/031118
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2003028146
(85) National Entry: 2004-03-26

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/325,701 (United States of America) 2001-09-27
60/413,009 (United States of America) 2002-09-23

Abstracts

English Abstract


A tunable bandpass filter includes at least one resonator having a reactance
with a resonant frequency, a ferroelectric film having a dielectric constant
with a value that changes with an applied electric field, and an electric
field generating device for generating relatively constant electric fields of
different strengths. The ferroelectric film is electrically coupled to the
resonator so that the reactance of the resonator and therefore the resonant
frequency of the resonator and the passband of the filter depends on the
dielectric constant of the ferroelectric film. The electric field generating
device is constructed and arranged to generate relatively constant electric
fields within the ferroelectric film, thereby making the resonant frequency of
the resonator and the passband of the filter a function of the strength of the
relatively constant electric field.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un filtre passe-bande syntonisable qui comprend: au moins un résonateur présentant une réactance et une fréquence de résonance, un film ferroélectrique présentant une constance diélectrique qui possède une valeur variant lors de l'application d'un champ électrique, et un dispositif de production de champ électrique permettant de produire des champs électriques relativement constants de forces différentes. Ledit film ferroélectrique est couplé par voie électrique au résonateur de sorte que la réactance du résonateur et ainsi la fréquence de résonance de celui-ci, ainsi que la bande passante du filtre dépendent de la constance diélectrique du film ferroélectrique. Le dispositif de production de champ électrique est conçu et disposé de manière à produire des champs électriques relativement constants dans le film ferroélectrique, la fréquence de résonance du résonateur et la bande passante du filtre devenant ainsi des fonctions de la force du champ électrique relativement constant.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


13
CLAIMS
1. A tunable bandpass filter with a passband, comprising:
at least one resonator having a reactance with a characteristic
resonant frequency;
a ferroelectric film having a dielectric constant with a value that
changes with an applied electric field, the ferroelectric film being
electrically coupled to the resonator so that the reactance of the resonator
and therefore the resonant frequency of the resonator and the passband of
the filter depend on the dielectric constant of the ferroelectric film; and
an electric field generating device for generating relatively constant
electric fields of different strengths, the electric field generating device
being constructed and arranged to generate relatively constant electric
fields within the ferroelectric film, thereby making the resonant frequency
of the resonator and the passband of the filter functions of the strength of
the relatively constant electric field.
2. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators each having a resonator transfer function, and wherein the
resonators are electrically coupled such that the filter transfer function is
a
function of the resonator transfer functions.
3. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the electric
field generating device comprises a do voltage source connected to two
conducting elements in close spaced separation.

14
4. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the at least
one resonator comprises a dielectric loaded coaxial resonator having a
central conductor and an outer conductor.
5. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 4 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted between the central conductor and the outer
conductor of the resonator.
6. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 4 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted outside the outer conductor of the resonator
and is overlaid by a conducting medium so as to form at least one overlay
capacitor.
7. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the at least
one resonator comprises a dielectric loaded waveguide resonator.
8. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 7 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted on an outer surface of the resonator.
9. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the at least
one resonator comprises a stripline resonator having a central conductor, a
dielectric substrate and two outer conductors.
10. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 9 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted between the central conductor and the
dielectric substrate of the at least one resonator.

15
11. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 9 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted outside the outer conductor of the at least one
resonator and is overlaid by a conducting medium so as to form at least one
overlay capacitor.
12. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the at
least one resonator is at least one microstrip resonator having a microstrip
filament layer, a dielectric substrate and a ground plane.
13. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 12 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted between the microstrip filament layer and the
ground plane.
14. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 12 wherein the
ferroelectric film is mounted outside the ground plane of the resonator and
is overlaid by a conducting medium so as to form at least one overlay
capacitor.
15. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators, each resonator comprising a stripline resonator with a resonator
transfer function, and wherein the stripline resonators are
electromagnetically coupled within an interdigitated topology such that the
filter transfer function is a function of the resonator transfer functions.
16. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators, each resonator comprising a stripline resonator with a resonator

16
transfer function, and wherein the stripline resonators are
electromagnetically coupled within a combline topology such that the filter
transfer function is a function of the resonator transfer functions.
17. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators, each resonator comprising a microstrip resonator with a
resonator transfer function, and wherein the microstrip resonators are
electromagnetically coupled within an interdigitated topology such that the
filter transfer function is a function of the resonator transfer functions.
18. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 1 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators, each resonator comprising a microstrip resonator with a
resonator transfer function, and wherein the microstrip resonators are
electromagnetically coupled within a combline topology such that the filter
transfer function is a function of the resonator transfer functions.
19. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 10 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators each having a resonator transfer function, and wherein the
resonators are electromagnetically coupled such that the filter transfer
function is a function of the resonator transfer functions.
20. A tunable bandpass filter according to claim 11 wherein the
bandpass filter has a filter transfer function, and wherein there are multiple
resonators each having a resonator transfer function, and wherein the

17
resonators are electromagnetically coupled such that the filter transfer
function is a function of the resonator transfer functions.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
ELECTRICALLY TUNABLE BANDPASS FILTERS
BACKGROUND
Related Applications
This application claims the benefit of provisional U.S. Application
Serial No. 60/325,701, entitled "ELECTRICALLY TUNABLE
BANDPASS FILTERS," filed September 27, 2001, and provisional U.S.
Application Serial No. 60/XXX,XXX, entitled ELECTRONICALLY
TUNABLE FILTERS/PASSIVES PROPOSAL, filed September 23, 2002,
both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all
purposes.
Field
This invention relates generally to electronic filters. More
specifically, this invention is directed to electrically tunable bandpass
filters.
Due to increasingly crowded frequency allocations, modern wireless
communication devices require increasingly stringent filtering
specifications. This is particularly true for devices that operate in multiple
modes and/or over multiple frequency bands. Devices now popularly in
use employ fixed tuned bandpass filters (BPF) which have design
tradeoffs. The design goals of low passband insertion loss (IL) and high
close-in rejection conflict. Portions of the filter transfer function
representing the edges of the passband have a finite slope (the passband

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
2
cutoff is gradual rather than an ideal perfectly abrupt transition from 'pass'
to 'no-pass' ). The more sharp the cut off required, the higher the order of
the filter must be. Higher order filters are more bulky and have a greater
IL than lower order filters and may require extensive turning to meet
specifications. To meet the out-of band rejection specifications, typical
filter designs require a transmission zero, requiring a filter vendor to tune
each filter during its manufacture. Multiple filters are typically required
for mufti-band, mufti-mode operation. In spite of this, often filter
specifications are not met, resulting in accepting non-compliant parts with
increased IL or inadequate rejection, or using split band designs, which
require extra switches and have greater IL.
Unlike a fixed tuned BPF, a tunable filter can be dynamically tuned
to different frequency ranges within a specific band, and if sufficiently
tunable, different frequency ranges within multiple bands. Tunable filters
have several advantages over non-tunable filters. For example, tunable
filters need not have a broad passband if the passband is dynamically
adjustable. A narrow transfer function with high close-in rejection can be
implemented with a lower order filter than can a wide transfer function
with similar close-in rejection. Therefore, unlike a fixed tuned BPF, a
tunable filter can be of a lower order and still meet desired rejection
specifications. Lower order tunable filters are smaller in size, have a lower
profile, lower IL, and can be built using lower precision components using
a simpler fabrication processes, which in turn lowers cost. In addition, one
filter topology can be optimized to cover multiple bands if the tuning range
is wide enough. Thus multiple filter designs are no longer needed. Also,
split-band designs along with the associated switches become unnecessary.
Fig. 1 shows a typical implementation of a top coupled BPF 100.
One or more resonators 106 are coupled to an input 102 and an output 104

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
3
via capacitors 108. Other realizations are also possible. The resonators are
constructed and arranged so as to have a reactance that has at least one
resonant frequency. At frequencies below 200 - 300 MHz. the resonators
can be constructed from discrete components (i.e. separate capacitors and
inductors). Tuning involves changing the resonant frequency of the
reactance by changing the values of the discrete components. At higher
frequencies a more distributed layout is required because the inherent
reactances of all circuit components become more significant at higher
frequencies. At higher frequencies, resonators utilizing a monoblock
design are commonly used.
A high frequency resonator is essentially a transmission medium
with impedance discontinuities at both of its ends. Reflections at these
discontinuities causes energy to build up within the resonator, a fraction of
which is released during each cycle. A quality factor, Q, is defined as the
ratio of the energy stored within the resonator to that dissipated during one
cycle. Due to boundary conditions that must be obeyed by the electric and
magnetic fields, only signals with wavelengths that divide the length of the
resonator by certain discrete multiples will be maximally reflected and
constructively interfere. These correspond to the resonant frequencies.
Typically, the resonator is made sufficiently short such that only one
resonant frequency exists within the frequency range to be filtered. Signals
at other frequencies are increasingly transmitted to ground as their
frequency difference from the resonance frequency increases, resulting in
significant signal attenuation outside the passband.
The wavelength at a particular frequency within a particular
transmission medium is a function of the reactance of that medium. The
resonant frequency is changed by changing the length of the resonator as
measured with respect to the wavelength of the signal such that the

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
4
constructive interference underlying resonance occurs at the new resonance
frequency. Electrical tuning can be accomplished either by changing the
functional dependence of the local wavelength on the frequency or by
changing the electrical length of the resonator.
The wavelength dependence on frequency within a transmission
medium is a function of the reactance of the medium. This functional
dependence of the wavelength is varied in YIG (Yttrium-Iron Garnet)
resonators with the application of a variable magnetic field. But such
resonators are expensive, require bulky magnetic field generating coils, and
are unsuited for the low power, low profile, low cost requirements of
mobile communication systems.
Another approach utilizes a bulk, single crystal ferroelectric (f e)
waveguide as a resonator, where an applied voltage across the body of the
crystal is used to generate an electric field within .the waveguide, thereby
changing the dielectric constant of the crystal and hence its resonant
frequency (see US Patent No. 5,617,104). However, the loss tangent of
known f-a materials are poor compared to typical microwave ceramics.
This means that the reactance of the material contains a non-negligible
resistive component (i.e. an imaginary component to the dielectric
constant), resulting in significant power loss via resistive heating of the
material. As a result usage of bulk ferroelectric materials for resonators at
GHz and sub-GHz frequencies are currently impractical for many
applications. This does not preclude the use of ferroelectric films, but
heretofore no prior art has disclosed or suggested the adaptation of such
films to provide electrical tuning of electronic filters.
Further, bulk f a resonators may require the application of rather
high control voltages considering the relatively large geometries involved.
As previously mentioned, electrical tuning can also be accomplished by

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
changing the electrical length of the resonator. This is accomplished in the
prior art via the use of varicaps in which one or more varactor diode is
coupled to one end of the resonator. This arrangement electrically extends
that end of the resonator because the capacitance of the varactor prevents
that end from being either totally closed or totally open. Varactors provide
a variable capacitance as a function of an applied do voltage, and therefore
changes the length of the resonator in response to changes in the voltage.
But they are noisy, temperature dependent and have low Q's at UHF and
above. They are also limited as to how they can be employed in a filter.
They are too lossy to be put in parallel with a resonator and difficult to
implement within a distributed design. In addition their capacitive values
are relatively low and not very consistent from lot-to-lot.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is a tunable bandpass filter comprising: at least one
resonator having a reactance with a resonant frequency, a ferroelectric f-a
film having a dielectric constant with a value that changes with an applied
electric field, and an electric field generating device for generating
relatively constant electric fields of different strengths. The ferroelectric
film is electrically coupled to the resonator so that the reactance of the
resonator and therefore the resonant frequency of the resonator and the
passband of the filter depends on the dielectric constant of the ferroelectric
film. The electric field generating device is constructed and arranged to
generate relatively constant electric fields within the ferroelectric film,
thereby making the resonant frequency of the resonator and the passband

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
6
of the filter a function of the strength of the relatively constant electric
field.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 shows a typical implementation of a bandpass filter utilizing
multiple coupled resonators.
Fig. 2 is a diagram of a microstrip resonator utilizing the f a film.
Fig. 3 is a diagram of a first example of a stripline resonator utilizing
the f a film.
Fig. 4 is a diagram of a dielectric loaded waveguide resonator
utilizing the f a film.
Fig. 5 is a diagram of a second example of a stripline resonator
utilizing the f a film.
Fig. 6 is a diagram of an overlay capacitor coupled resonator
utilizing the f a film.
Fig. 7 is a diagram of an interdigitated filter topology.
Fig. 8 is a diagram of an interdigitated filter topology utilizing
overlay capacitors.
Fig. 9 is a diagram of a combline filter topology utilizing overlay
capacitors.
Fig. 10 is a table generally illustrating some of the design options,
benefits and issues associated with a variety of f-a device designs.

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
7
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The relative permittivity, ~r, which determines the dielectric constant
of a dielectric may be varied in f a materials under the application of a
slowly varying ("near DC") electric field (E-field). And although the loss
tangent of bulk f a dielectrics is significant, that of applicable f-a thin or
thick films fabricated on a wide range of microwave ceramics may be
much better, approximating that of some commonly used microwave
ceramics. Therefore, rather than use a varactor or bulk f-a dielectrics for
electrical tuning, thin f a films may be used to modify the local capacitance
of the transmission medium and thereby provide an adjustable reactance
that changes the resonant frequency of the resonator. When properly
designed and fabricated, these f-a capacitors may provide a higher
capacitance and Q than varactors at frequencies above 1 GHz. They are
available as thin or thick films and are ideal for tuning distributed or
lumped element resonators. Their electrical properties from lot-to-lot are
also more consistent than that of varactors.
Thin/thick f a films are widely used in high temperature
superconductivity work, and there are several hundred of such known
materials. Film thicknesses on the order of 0.1 hum to 1 mm are typical.
Barium strontium titanate, BaXSr~l_X~Ti03 (BSTO) is the most popular for
room temperature operation where x is preferably between 0.3 and 0.7.
Their tuning speed is about 0.3 - 1.0 bus for an applied constant E-field, so
they are not modulated by a rf signals. An applied do voltage Vd~ is
generally used to create the E-field. It is not uncommon to have films with
O~r/OVd~ > 3.

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
8
Fig. 2 is an example of a microstrip resonator 200 comprised of a
microstrip filament layer 202, a ground plane 204, and a dielectric
substrate 206. A f-a film layer 208 is positioned between the microstrip
filament layer and the dielectric substrate. The wavelength of a propagated
signal is a function of the dielectric constant of the transmission medium of
the resonator and is therefore a function of the relative permittivity of the
f
a film 208. A voltage applied by a do voltage source 210 positively biases
the microstrip filament 202 with respect to the ground plane 204, and
creates an electric field (E-field) 212 across the f a film that changes ~ of
the film and therefore the resonant frequency of the resonator. The voltage
is controlled by external control signal 214.
Fig. 3 is a first example of a coplanar waveguide 300 comprised of a
central conductor 302, two grounded outer conductors 304, a ground plane
322, and a dielectric substrate 306. An f-a film layer 308 is positioned
between the stripline conductors 302 and 304, and the dielectric substrate.
A voltage applied by the do voltage source 310 positively biases the central
conductor with respect to the two outer conductors and creates an electric
field (E-field) 312 across the f a film, but in this case the choice of bias
arrangement is better than that of Fig. 2 because the E-field 312 is more
concentrated within the f-a film and is therefore greater for the same
voltage and substrate thickness. The voltage is controlled by external
control signal 314.
Fig. 4 is an example of a dielectric loaded waveguide (DLWG)
resonator filter 400. An input signal introduced via input port 416
resonates at the resonant frequency within a first half of the waveguide 424
and is coupled via 2°d order aperture 420 to a second half of the
waveguide
426, which having the same resonant frequency, combine to form a second
order filter. An output signal is taken via output port 418. The body of the

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
9
filter, formed on substrate 406, is comprised of a high Er dielectric 402. An
f-a film 408, shown mounted on the surfaces parallel to the x-y plane at the
aperture, is overlaid by conducting planes 422. A voltage applied between
the two conducting planes 422 generates an E-field within the f-a film 408
that changes its reactance, resulting in a change of the resonant frequency
within the waveguide. The voltage applied by do voltage source 410 is
controlled by control signal 414. The f-a film 408 and conducting planes
422 could also be mounted on the surfaces parallel to the x-y plane. With
no external load, a DLWG resonator can provide a Q of about 1000 within
the PCS band (i.e. around 2 GHz) with an LL. of about 1.6 dB at a 3dB
bandwidth of 10 MHz.
Fig. 5 shows a second example of a stripline resonator 600
comprised of a central conductor 602, two grounded outer conductors 604,
and a dielectric substrate 606. The f-a film 608 is mounted between the
central conductor 602 and the dielectric substrate 606. A do voltage source
610 controlled by control signal 614 is applied between the central
conductor 602 and the two outer conductors 604 so as to generate an E-
field within the f-a film and thereby dynamically adjust the resonant
frequency of the resonator 600. With no external load, a stripline resonator
can provide a Q of about 750 within the PCS band with an LL. of about 2.2
dB at a 3dB bandwidth of 6 MHz.
Filter tuning with f-a films can also be implemented according to a
similar scheme as that described for tuning with varactors where tuning is
accomplished by adjusting the effective electrical length of one end of the
resonator. Instead of mounting the f-a film within the coax, stripline, or
microstrip resonators as shown in Figs. 2, 3 and 5, the film is coupled to
the transmission medium by mounting it as an overlay capacitor as
illustrated for the overlay capacitor coupled resonator 700 shown in Fig. 6.

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
The basic resonator 701, which can be coaxial, stripline or microstrip, is
mounted atop a ceramic substrate 706 with an underlying rf ground plane
704. An f a film layer 708 of thickness d is positioned towards one end of
the resonator and sandwiched between the resonator's grounded outer layer
and an overlaid metal layer 722, thereby forming the overlay capacitor.
Coupling to such a resonator can be achieved by either electromagnetic
coupling, capacitive coupling, or by a direct tap into and out of the
resonator (or filter) structure. F-a thin film layers of about 1 micro-meter
seem to provide high do R fields for a given (small) do voltage. For an
inductively coupled input signal, both ends of the resonators inner
conductor 702 can be grounded as shown. A do voltage source 710
controlled by control signal 714 generates the E-field used to adjust the
capacitance of the overlay capacitor.
Direct f 2 thin film deposition can be done on some substrates, or
with buffer layers on others. The packaging of an f 3 device may eliminate
the need for a substrate.
As shown in Fig. 1, multiple resonators can be electrically coupled
to obtain a higher order filter with a filter transfer function that, while
centered about the same resonant frequency as that of the resonator, has a
more abrupt cutoff and a flatter peak than each individual resonator's
transfer function. A number of different filter topologies utilizing different
resonator types are possible. Popular topologies utilizing stripline and
microstrip resonators include interdigitated filters, combline filters, and
edge coupled and hairpin filters. Fig. 7 is the top view of an example of an
interdigitated filter topology utilizing f a film electrical tuning in which
the
wavelength-frequency relationship within the resonator is varied. The
input signal via transmission line 802 is electromagnetically coupled to
each resonator in turn as it travels across the resonators (vertically in the

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
11
figure), and is output via transmission line 806. Each resonator has one
capacitively loaded and one shorted end. The relative placement of which
is alternated for adjacent filter. The resonance frequency of the resonator is
electrically adjusted as described above for f a film electrical tuning
utilizing the wavelength-frequency relationship adjustment.
Fig. 8 shows the same topology as that of Fig. 7 but with tuning
achieved via the use of overlay capacitors 908 coupled to what would
otherwise have been the open end of the resonators 904.
Fig.. 9 is the top view of an example of a second order
electromagnetically coupled planar combline filter topology utilizing
overlay capacitors 1008. The signal input via transmission line 1002 is
electromagnetically coupled to each resonator in turn as it travels across
the resonators 1004 (horizontally in the figure), and is outputted via
transmission line 1006. Such a filter may have a 10 mhz bandwidth in the
PCS band. With a 20 mil thick Mg0 substrate, no buffer layer may be
needed.
The structure of the resonators is not limited to that shown in Figs.
2-6. Any resonator structure where an f-a film is coupled to the
transmission medium is contemplated by the invention. For instance,
instead of being mounted within the resonator as shown in Fig. 5, the f a
film could be mounted on one or more outside surface of the coaxial or
stripline resonator similarly to the arrangement shown in Fig. 4 for the
DLWG resonator. Likewise, the f a layers need not be limited to coupling
apertures of the DLWG shown in Fig. 4. Instead, f a film can be deposited
on the I/O (Input/output) surfaces on the waveguide as well as on one or
more surfaces on the outside. Additionally, instead of using just one
overlay capacitor as shown in Fig. 6, two or more overlay capacitors can be
used at either or both ends of the resonator. Fig. 10 is a table generally

CA 02461886 2004-03-26
WO 03/028146 PCT/US02/31118
12
illustrating some of the design options, benefits and issues associated with
a variety of f-a device designs. Designs 3, 4, and 5 generally range from
minimum insertion loss, maximum size to minimum size maximum
insertion loss.
It can thus be appreciated that the objectives of the present invention
have been fully and effectively accomplished. The foregoing specific
embodiments have been provided to illustrate the structural and functional
principles of the present invention and is not intended to be limiting. To the
contrary, the present invention is intended to encompass all modifications,
alterations, and substitutions within the spirit and scope of the appended
claims.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2008-09-29
Inactive: Dead - RFE never made 2008-09-29
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-09-29
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent 2007-09-27
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2005-09-15
Letter Sent 2005-08-29
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to Office letter 2005-06-30
Inactive: Single transfer 2005-06-28
Inactive: IPRP received 2005-02-11
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-06-03
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2004-06-02
Correct Applicant Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-06-02
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2004-06-01
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2004-05-31
Application Received - PCT 2004-04-26
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-03-26
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2003-04-03

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2008-09-29

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-06-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2004-03-26
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2004-09-27 2004-06-17
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2005-09-27 2005-06-15
Registration of a document 2005-06-28
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2006-09-27 2006-06-14
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2007-09-27 2007-06-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Past Owners on Record
STANLEY S. TONCICH
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2004-03-26 12 521
Drawings 2004-03-26 10 116
Representative drawing 2004-03-26 1 11
Claims 2004-03-26 5 155
Abstract 2004-03-26 1 61
Cover Page 2004-06-03 1 46
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-05-31 1 109
Notice of National Entry 2004-05-31 1 192
Notice of National Entry 2004-06-02 1 192
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2005-03-30 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-08-29 1 104
Reminder - Request for Examination 2007-05-29 1 118
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Request for Examination) 2007-12-06 1 167
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2008-11-24 1 174
PCT 2004-03-26 6 264
Correspondence 2004-06-02 1 26
PCT 2004-03-27 6 281