Language selection

Search

Patent 2462074 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2462074
(54) English Title: ALUMINIUM ALLOY FOR MAKING FIN STOCK MATERIAL
(54) French Title: ALLIAGE D'ALUMINIUM PERMETTANT DE FABRIQUER UNE MATIERE DE TOLE A AILETTES
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 21/00 (2006.01)
  • C22C 21/10 (2006.01)
  • F28F 21/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HALLER, SCOTT W. (United States of America)
  • VAN DER HOEVEN, JOB ANTHONIUS
  • WITTEBROOD, ADRIANUS JACOBUS
  • BUERGER, ACHIM (Germany)
  • VIEREGGE, KLAUS (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • CORUS ALUMINIUM WALZPRODUKTE GMBH
  • CORUS L.P.
(71) Applicants :
  • CORUS ALUMINIUM WALZPRODUKTE GMBH (Germany)
  • CORUS L.P. (Canada)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2002-10-02
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-04-17
Examination requested: 2004-03-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2002/011191
(87) International Publication Number: EP2002011191
(85) National Entry: 2004-03-29

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
01203759.4 (European Patent Office (EPO)) 2001-10-05

Abstracts

English Abstract


An aluminium alloy for making fin stock material, having the composition in
weight percent: Si <= 1.2 Mn <= 0.05 Mg <= 0.05 Fe <= 2.0 0.5 <= Ni <= 1.5
0.05 <=: Cu <=: 1.0 0.5 <= Zn <= 4.0 and/or 0.1 <= Sn <= 2.0 and/or 0.01 <=:
In <= 0.5 V <= 0.40 and/or Ti <0.01 and/or Cr <0.01 and/or Zr <0.01 other
elements up to 0.05 each, up to 0.15 in total Al balance.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un alliage d'aluminium permettant de fabriquer une matière de tôle à ailettes dont la composition en poids exprimée en pour-cent est la suivante: Si <= 1,2 Mn <= 0,05 Mg <= 0,05 Fe <= 2,0 0,5 <= Ni <= 1,5 0,05 <=: Cu <=: 1,0 0,5 <= Zn <= 4,0 et/ou 0,1 <= Sn <= 2,0 et/ou 0,01 <=: In <= 0,5 V <= 0,40 et/ou Ti <0,01 et/ou Cr <0,01 et/ou Zr <0,01 d'autres éléments jusqu'à 0,05 chacun, atteignant au total 0,15 et l'Al constituant le reste.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-6-
CLAIMS
1. An aluminium alloy for making fin stock material, having the composition in
weight percent:
Si .ltoreq. 1.2
Mn .ltoreq. 0.05
Mg .ltoreq. 0.05
Fe .ltoreq. 2.0
0.5 .ltoreq. Ni .ltoreq. 1.5
0.05 .ltoreq. Cu .ltoreq. 1.0
1.0 .ltoreq. Zn .ltoreq. 3.0 and/or 0.1 .ltoreq. Sn .ltoreq. 1.0 and/or 0.01
.ltoreq. In .ltoreq. 0.05
V .ltoreq. 0.40 and/or Ti < 0.01 and/or Cr < 0.01 and/or Zr < 0.01
other elements up to 0.05 each, up to 0.15 in total
Al balance.
2. An aluminium alloy according to claim 1, wherein Si is in the range of 0.4
% to 0.8 %.
3. An aluminium alloy according to claim 1 or 2, wherein Mn .ltoreq. 0.03 %.
4. An aluminium alloy according to claim 3, wherein Mn .ltoreq. 0.01 %.
5. An aluminium alloy according to any of the claims 1 to 4, wherein Mg
.ltoreq. 0.03 %.
6. An aluminium alloy according to claim 5, wherein Mg .ltoreq. 0.01 %.
7. An aluminium alloy according to any of the preceding claims, wherein Fe is
in the range of 0.3 % to
1.6 %, and preferably in the range of 0.7 % to 1.3 %.
8. An aluminium alloy according to any of the preceding claims, wherein Ni is
in the range of 0.8 % to
1.2 %.
9. An aluminium alloy according to any of the preceding claims, wherein Cu is
in the range of 0.1 % to

0.8 %, and preferably in the range of 0.1 % to 0.6 %.
10. An aluminium alloy according to any of the preceding claims, wherein no In
and no Sn is present.
11. An aluminium alloy according to any of the preceding claims, wherein V <
0.01 %.
12. Fin stock material made from the aluminium alloy according to any of the
preceding claims, wherein
the fin stock material has a post-braze conductivity of at least 26 MS/m (46 %
IACS), and preferably
at least 29 MS/m (50 % IACS).
13. Fin stock material according to claim 12, wherein the fin stock material
has a corrosion potential
between -750 mV and -950 mV versus SCE (ASTM G69), preferably between -750 mV
and -850
mV versus SCE (ASTM G69).
14. Fin stock material according to claim 12 or 13, wherein the fin stock
material has a post braze
Ultimate Tensile Strength between 135 and 155 MPa.
15. Fin stock material according to claim 12, 13 or 14, wherein the fin stock
material has a 0.2%-offset
proof stress > 50 MPa.
16. Fin stock material according to one of claims 12 - 15, wherein the fin
stock material has been clad
on at least one side with a clad layer having a lower melting point than the
fin stock material.
17. A brazed heat exchanger having fins made of an aluminium alloy according
to any one of claims 1 -
11.
18. A brazed heat exchanger having fins made of fin stock material according
to any one of claims 12 -
16

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
ALUMINIUM ALLOY FOR MAKING FIN STOCK MATERIAL
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an aluminium alloy for making fin stock material. Fin
stock material is used in heat exchanger devices. The fin stock material is
used for
making for instance corrugated fins, by which the heat from the heat exchanger
must
be removed. Furthermore, the invention relates to fin stock material made from
the
aluminium alloy according to the invention, and to a brazed heat exchanger
having
to fins made of this alloy. Moreover, the invention relates to a method of
producing the
fin stock alloy and the brazed heat exchanger.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART
In the prior art, aluminium alloys are used for fins in heat exchanger
applications
because of their desirable combination of strength, weight, thermal
conductivity,
brazeability, corrosion resistance and formability.
Heat exchangers from aluminium can be fabricated by stacking aluminium alloy
sheets, which have been formed to a desired configuration, to form fluid
passageways or tubes, and by securing aluminium alloy fins between the fluid
2o passageways by brazing. The aluminium alloy sheets used to make the fluid
passageways and/or the aluminium alloy used for the fins are provided with a
low
melting clad layer. The bonding between the alloy clad sheets and the fins is
achieved by melting the cladding or filler material of the sheets and/or fin
material.
As a brazing method, typically vacuum brazing or controlled atmosphere brazing
is
used. To improve the corrosion resistance of the fluid passageways, fin
materials are
used which are electrochemically anodic (less noble) relative to the fluid
passageways material, so that this fin material has a sacrificial anode
effect.
An example of an aluminium alloy for making fin material is given in
International patent application no. WO OI/36697. This alloy has the following
3o composition, in weight percent:
Si 0.7 - I.2
Mn 0.7 - 1.2
Mg up to 0.35

CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
-2-
Fe up to 0.8
Zn up to 3.0
Ni up to 1.5
Cu up to 0.5
Ti up to 0.20
In up to 0.20
Zr up to 0.25
V up to 0.25
Cr up to 0.25
others up to 0.05 each, and up to 0.15 in total.
Al balance.
This disclosed alloy is said to have an improved post-braze 0.2%-yield
strength (also
referred to as 0.2%-offset proof stress or 0.2% PS) over conventional alloys
for the
same application.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an aluminium alloy for
making
fin stock material which can be used for heat exchangers, and which has an
improved
thermal conductivity.
2o It is another object of the invention to provide such an aluminium alloy,
which
has a strength which is at least as good as the strength of conventional
aluminium
alloys for making fin stock material.
It is still another object of the invention to provide such an aluminium
alloy,
which has a corrosion potential which is at least as negative as the corrosion
potential
of conventional aluminium alloys for making fin stock material.
In one aspect of the invention one or more of these objects are reached with
an
aluminium alloy for malting fin stock material, having the composition in
weight
percent:
Si <_ 1.2
Mn <_ 0.05
Mg <_ 0.05
Fe _< 2.0

CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
-3-
0.5 _< Ni <_ 1.5
0.05 <_ Cu 51.0
0.5 <_ Zn <_ 4.0 and/or 0.1 <_ Sn _< 2.0 and/or 0.01 <_ In <_ 0.5
V <_ 0.40 and/or Ti <0.01 and/or Cr <0.01 andlor Zr <0.01
other elements up to 0.05 each, up to 0.15 in total
Al balance.
This aluminium alloy has a very good thermal conductivity, thereby improving
the heat exchange properties of the fins made from this aluminium alloy .
Moreover,
this aluminium alloy has satisfactory mechanical properties in the post-brazed
l0 condition, such as tensile strength and corrosion potential.
Although this aluminium alloy is primarily intended as fin stock material for
heat exchangers, it may be used for other parts of heat exchange units, such
as tube
plate, or other uses.
The heat exchanger market, particularly in the automotive industry, requires a
balance of properties for fin stock alloys, which includes strength,
conductivity,
formability, brazeability and corrosion potential. If one of these properties
should be
improved where the other properties must remain as good as they are, often
many of
the alloying elements in the composition must be changed in relation to each
other.
In the present case, it is the merit of the invention that has been seen that
the
conductivity of the alloy could be improved by decreasing the solid solution
in the
alloy through carefully selecting the content of certain alloying elements.
This has
resulted in the following limitations of the alloying elements in the
aluminium alloy
according to the present invention. All percentages are by weight.
Si is an important alloying element in the alloy according to the invention;
it is
expected that Si improves the strength of the alloy by solid solution
hardening and
precipitation hardening. Because the solid solution in the alloy should be as
low as
possible for the required conductivity, the amount of Si should not be higher
than 1.2
%. When the amount of Si is higher, too much Si will remain in solid solution,
resulting in a lower conductivity. A more preferred range for Si is 0.4 to 0.8
%.
3o Within this range the required combination of strength and conductivity is
reached
best.

CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
-4-
Mn is an important alloying element in conventional alloys for making fin
stock
material. Mn is normally added for strength. In the alloy according to this
invention,
the Mn content is kept very low so as to reduce the amount of solid solution
in the
alloy. Preferably Mn <_ 0.03 %, and more preferably Mn 5 0.01 %, thereby
improving
the conductivity as much as possible. Mn may also be absent.
Mg increases the strength of the alloy significantly, but has a detrimental
effect
on controlled atmosphere brazeability because it tends to interact with the
flux
material. For this reason the Mg content has a maximum of 0.05 %, and
preferably
Mg <_ 0.03 %, and more preferably Mg S 0.01 %, to keep the Mg content as low
as
possible. Mg may also be absent.
Fe is an alloying element that is present in all known aluminium alloys. Fe is
added for post-braze strength. It is supposed to form precipitates with Al, Ni
and Si.
The solid solubility of Fe in A1 is extremely low; therefore, Fe can be used
to
improve the strength without compromising the conductivity. Preferably Fe is
in the
range of 0.3 % to 1.6 %, and more preferably in the range of 0.7 % to 1.3 %,
so as to
reach a preferred strength without compromising the formability.
Ni is also present to improve the post-braze strength of the alloy. Like Fe,
the
solid solubility of Ni in A1 is extremely low; therefore, Ni can be used to
improve the
strength without compromising the conductivity. However, when the Ni content
is >
2 %, the formability becomes too low. Ni is preferably present in the range of
of 0.~
to 1.2 % because in this range the best combination of strength and
formability is
found.
Cu is present in the alloy according to the invention to improve the post-
braze
strength of the alloy. The amount of Cu is preferably restricted to the range
of 0.1 %
to 0. ~ %, and more preferably to the range of 0.1 % to 0.6 %, so as to reach
the
required strength. However, Cu is believed to increase the corrosion potential
of the
alloy, whereas the corrosion potential should be low to allow the fin material
to act
as a sacrificial anode. For this reason, at least one of the elements Zn, Sn
or In should
be present.
Zn, Sn or In, or a combination of these three elements, are present to
counteract
the effect of Cu on the corrosion potential of the alloy. The amount of these
elements
must therefore be higher than zero, taking into account the stronger effect of
Sn and

CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
-5-
especially In as compared to Zn. The amounts of Zn, Sn and In should not be
higher
than necessary and therefore preferably Zn is in the range of 1.0 % to 3.0 %
and/or
Sn is in the range of 0.1 % to 1.0 % and/or In is in the range of 0.01 % to
0.05 %.
Preferably, only Zn is present, but Zn can be (partly) replaced by Sn and/or
In.
Ti, V, Cr and Zr are to be avoided as much as possible, because they have a
negative effect on the conductivity of the alloy. Preferably, these elements
are below
0.01 % each.
It is expected that all elements present in the aluminium are detrimental to
the
conductivity of the alloy. Both impurities and intentionally added elements
should
therefore be as low as possible, the intentionally added elements being added
in so
far as they are needed to reach the desired properties.
In a second aspect of the invention there is provided fin stock material made
from the aluminium alloy as specified above, wherein the fin stock material
has a
post-braze conductivity of at least 26 MSIm (45 % IACS), and preferably at
least 29
MSIm (50 % IACS). A conductivity of more than 45 % IACS is good and a
conductivity of more than 50 % IACS is very good in comparison to conventional
fin
stock material for heat exchangers.
Preferably, the fin stock material has a corrosion potential between -750 mV
and
-950 mV versus SCE (ASTM G69), more preferably between -750 mV and -850 mV
2o according to SCE (ASTM G69). The indication SCE means that the voltage in
mV
has been measured in relation to a saturated calomel electrode. These values
for the
corrosion potential give a good sacrificial anode effect when this fin stock
material is
used in heat exchangers.
According to a preferred embodiment the fin stock material has a post braze
UTS (Ultimate Tensile Strength) between 135 and 155 MPa, andlor a 0.2% PS > 50
MPa. This strength is sufficiently high for normal use of fin stock material.
According to a third aspect of the invention, there is provided a brazed heat
exchanger having fins made of an aluminium alloy according the first aspect of
the
invention, or having fins made of fin stock material according to the second
aspect of
the invention.

CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
-6-
EXAMPLES
The aluminium alloy and fin stock material in accordance with the invention
will
now be illustrated by non-limitative and comparative examples.
On a laboratory scale nine alloys have been cast with solidification rates in
a
range comparable to solidification rates in industrial scale DC-casting. These
alloys
are manufactured on a laboratory scale, but the aluminium alloy in accordance
with
this invention can be manufactured on an industrial scale using various
standard
industrial scale DC-casting and continuous aluminium casting methods, followed
by
i0 hot andlor cold rolling.
The chemical compositions of the nine alloy examples are given in table l,
some
relevant properties after brazing simulation are given in table 2.
Table 1. Chemical composition, in wt%, of the aluminium alloys tested, the
balance
is aluminium and impurities.
alloySi Mn Mg Fe Ni Cu Zn Ti Zr V
1 0.70 <0.010.01 1.05 0.94 0.15 1.52 <0.01<0.01 <0.01
2 0.70 <0.01<0.01 0.87 0.99 0.30 1.99 <0.01<0.01 <0.01
3 0.48 <0.01<0.01 0.92 1.05 0.50 2.50 <0.01<0.01 <0.01
4 0.49 0.16 0.01 0.90 1.02 0.31 1.99 <0.01<0.01 <0.01
5 0.78 0.26 <0.01 0.76 0.66 0.51 0.51 0.03 <0.01 <0.01
6 0.78 0.96 <0.01 0.76 0.73 0.25 1.01 0.03 0.106 <0.01
7 0.76 0.97 0.11 0.29 0.71 0.25 0.20 0.13 <0.01 <0.01
8 0.79 0.99 <0.01 0.31 0.71 0.25 1.49 0.03 <0.01 0.15
9 1.07 ~ 0.21 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0.01~
0.92 0.31 0.49 0.25 0.20 0.02 <0.01

CA 02462074 2004-03-29
WO 03/031667 PCT/EP02/11191
_7_
Table2. Properties after simulated brazing cycle.
alloy conductivitycorrosion potentialUTS 0.2% PS
[%IACS] [mV SCE] [MPa] [MPa]
1 49.3 -783 137 53
2 51.4 -779 143 59
3 46.0 -786 149 57
4 43.2 -778 134 54
42.8 -732 142 56
6 42.3 -770 156 70
7 40.5 -748 166 76
8 36.6 -805 154 67
9 43.3 -747 161 69
The nine different chemistries as specified in table 1 were cast and sawn to
pieces with a thickness of 80 xnm, and thereafter preheated to a temperature
below
5 540°C, the alloys were not homogenised. Subsequently hot rolled at a
temperature
below 540°C and cold rolled to a thickness of 0.15 mm. After inter
annealing, the
pieces were cold rolled to a thickness of 0.1 mm.
In the alloys 1 to 4 of table l, no Ti, V, Cr or Zr is present. The Zn present
in the
alloys can be (partly) replaced by Sn and/or In, as is known in the art.
1o As can be seen, the alloys 4 to 9 are comparative examples that do not fit
in the
alloy ranges according to the invention. The amount of Mn is too high. In
alloys 6.7
and 8 additions of Zr, Ti and V, respectively, are also present. Despite the
fact that
the Mn level of alloys 4 and 5 is increased as compared to alloys 1, 2 and 3,
the
strength is not significantly increased. This is attributed to the decrease in
Ni. Alloys
6, 7 and 8 show that with the Ni level of alloys 4 and 5 high strength can be
reached
when Zr, Ti or V additions are present. However, due to the additions of Mn,
Zr, Ti
or V in the alloys 4 to 9, the conductivity of these alloys is comparatively
low.
The three alloys 1, 2 and 3 having a composition according to the invention
clearly have a high conductivity, a sufficiently high strength and a corrosion
potential
2o within the required range to get the sacrificial anode effect.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2462074 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2008-08-06
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2008-08-06
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2007-10-02
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2007-08-06
Letter Sent 2007-03-08
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2007-02-06
Letter Sent 2006-09-21
Letter Sent 2005-04-14
Letter Sent 2005-04-14
Inactive: Single transfer 2005-03-01
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2005-03-01
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2004-11-03
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2004-06-01
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-05-31
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2004-05-27
Letter Sent 2004-05-27
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2004-05-27
Application Received - PCT 2004-04-27
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-03-29
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-03-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2004-03-29
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2003-04-17

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2007-10-02

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2006-09-12

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CORUS ALUMINIUM WALZPRODUKTE GMBH
CORUS L.P.
Past Owners on Record
ACHIM BUERGER
ADRIANUS JACOBUS WITTEBROOD
JOB ANTHONIUS VAN DER HOEVEN
KLAUS VIEREGGE
SCOTT W. HALLER
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2004-03-28 7 332
Claims 2004-03-28 2 67
Abstract 2004-03-28 1 52
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2004-05-26 1 176
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-06-02 1 109
Notice of National Entry 2004-05-26 1 201
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2005-03-29 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-04-13 1 104
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-04-13 1 104
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2007-11-26 1 173
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2007-10-28 1 165
PCT 2004-03-28 12 408
Correspondence 2004-05-26 1 26
Fees 2004-09-15 1 29
Correspondence 2005-02-28 3 95
Fees 2005-09-12 1 28
Correspondence 2006-09-21 1 9
Fees 2006-09-11 1 29