Language selection

Search

Patent 2464486 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2464486
(54) English Title: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AERODYNAMIC/HYDRODYNAMIC TESTING OF A MODEL
(54) French Title: PROCEDE ET APPAREIL PERMETTANT DE TESTER UN MODELE AU NIVEAU AERODYNAMIQUE/HYDRODYNAMIQUE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G01M 09/04 (2006.01)
  • G01M 09/02 (2006.01)
  • G01M 10/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • HANFF, ERNEST S. (Canada)
  • HUANG, XING ZHONG (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
(71) Applicants :
  • NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA (Canada)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-08-24
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2002-09-17
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-05-01
Examination requested: 2007-09-13
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: 2464486/
(87) International Publication Number: CA2002001417
(85) National Entry: 2004-04-21

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/330,438 (United States of America) 2001-10-22

Abstracts

English Abstract


An aerodynamic or hydrodynamic test apparatus that permits all air to be
evacuated from the test enclosure, such that no free liquid surfaces remain.
This permits more accurate testing of structures, particularly at low Reynolds
numbers. The apparatus includes a seal that allows the elimination of a liquid
free surface. The seal is disposed in a slit on an upper surface of the
enclosure and can include one or more inflatable sealing members. The upper
surface of the enclosure is preferably sloped upwardly towards the seal to
prevent the entrapment of air bubbles within the enclosure. A method of
testing using such an apparatus is also disclosed.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un appareil de test aérodynamique ou hydrodynamique qui permet que tout l'air soit évacué de l'enceinte de test, de façon qu'il ne reste aucune surface dépourvue de liquide. Ceci permet un test plus précis de structures, plus particulièrement à de faibles nombres de Reynolds. Cet appareil comprend un joint qui permet d'éliminer une surface dépourvue de liquide. Le joint est placé dans une fente sur une surface supérieure de l'enceinte et peut comprendre au moins un élément de joint gonflable. La surface supérieure de l'enceinte est de préférence inclinée en direction du joint pour empêcher l'emprisonnement de bulles d'air dans l'enceinte. L'invention concerne également un procédé de test mettant en oeuvre un tel appareil.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for aerodynamic or hydrodynamic testing of a model,
comprising:
an enclosure for filling with a liquid of known properties, the enclosure
having means for eliminating all air from the enclosure, such that the liquid
is in
full contact with the walls of the enclosure, thereby removing any free
surface; and
a mechanism to impart movement to the model.
2 The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the known liquid properties are selected
from viscosity and density.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the liquid includes glycerine.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the liquid includes a plurality of
liquids
mixed in order to obtain the known properties.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, further comprising a unit to control the mixing
ratio of the liquid components.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the means for eliminating the air
includes a slit at the upper surface of the enclosure, with a seal being
disposed in
the slit, and wherein the mechanism to impart movement to the model includes a
strut passing through the slit.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the seal includes at least one inflatable
member.
8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the seal is formed by two cooperating
inflatable seals arranged in face-to-face relation.
9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the seal further comprises a secondary
seal formed by two cooperating strips arranged in face-to-face relation.
10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the mechanism to impart movement to
the model includes a track inside the enclosure.
13

11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the means for eliminating the air
includes an upper surface of the enclosure upwardly angled to direct the
liquid
towards the seal, and to prevent the entrapment of air in the enclosure.
12. A method for aerodynamic or hydrodynamic testing of a model, comprising:
filling an enclosure with a liquid of known properties, and eliminating air
from the enclosure such that the liquid has no free surface ;
submerging the model in the liquid;
moving the model through the liquid in the enclosure to determine
aerodynamic or hydrodynamic characteristics properties of the model and to
diagnose the flow around it.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the step of eliminating air from the
enclosure includes providing a seal in a slit on an upper surface of the
enclosure.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the model is mounted on a strut extending
through the seal, and moving the model includes moving the strut.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the model is moved by means of a
carriage moving on a track contained within the enclosure.
16. A seal for an aerodynamic or hydrodynamic test apparatus, the
aerodynamic or hydrodynamic test apparatus including a slit forming a passage
for a strut to impart movement to a model submerged in an enclosure in the
apparatus, comprising:
at least one inflatable member for releasable attachment within the slit, with
at least one inflatable member being inflated to a pressure sufficient to
prevent the
existence of a free surface, while permitting the strut to move in the slit.
17. The seal of claim 16, wherein the seal has two cooperating inflatable
members arranged in face-to-face relation.
18. The seal of claim 17, seal further comprises a secondary seal formed by
two cooperating strips arranged in face-to-face relation.
14

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AERODYNAMIC/HYDRODYNAMIC
TESTING OF A MODEL
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No.
60/330,438, filed October 22, 2001.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to the field of aerodynamic and hydrodynamic
testing, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for such testing at
low
Reynolds numbers.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The traditional approach to aerodynamic testing consists of installing a
suitable model of a configuration under study in a wind tunnel and forcing air
around it. In the presence of the flow, a variety of physical quantities such
as
forces, moments, and pressures acting on the model are measured. As well,
properties of the flow around the model, such as local velocity, are observed
by
means of flow visualization and diagnostic techniques.
A frequently used~alternate aerodynamic testing approach is based on the
use of a water-tunnel. A water tunnel generally consists of an open channel
through which water flows. The model is submerged in the water tunnel,
resulting
in a situation similar to a wind tunnel except that, in addition to the
difference in
test medium, the test medium has a free surface at its top surface.
A traditional tow tank can also be used in aerodynamic and hydrodynamic
testing. Such tow tanks, known to someone skilled in the art, usually consist
of a
water channel containing a stationary liquid, in which a model is either
submerged
or floating on the surface, depending on the test being performed. A trolley
system
is set up over the channel and pulls the model through the channel, thereby im-
parting movement to the model. A less common towing tank is described in U.S.
Patent No. 4,587,841 to Giovachini et al. This towing tank can be used in
hydro-
dynamic testing. The model floats or is submerged in water contained inside an
1

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
elongated basin, and is supported by a mechanism within the tank that imparts
the
required motion. Giovanchini et al, discloses a submerged frame, equipped with
rollers and a motor, which is attached to the bottom of the tank. The model
travels
along the tracks at the desired velocity. Towing tanks, like water tunnels,
also
have a free top surface.
The free surface, present in both water tunnels and towing tanks, causes
undesirable waves, turbulence, and other disturbances in the surface of the me-
dium. These disturbances can cause changes in the pressure distribution within
the tank, thereby altering the flow and affecting other measurements. External
factors, such as vibration due to vehicular traffic, as well as the movement
of the
model itself, can also adversely affect the conditions in a tank or tunnel
with a free
surface. To minimize the aforementioned effects, conventional towing tanks
filled
with water are made sufficiently deep so as to allow positioning of the model
far
from the free surface.
In order to have a higher degree of control over the experimental conditions
and avoid the problems associated with free surface disturbances, it is
desirable
to have a closed channel with no free surface. Such an apparatus would have
the
additional benefit of requiring less test fluid, an important consideration
when
dealing with costly liquids. The testing tank described in JP 11-344415 to
Toyama
et al. is capable of being converted from an open channel to a closed channel,
by
attaching a lid to the apparatus. However, once the channel is closed, there
is no
mechanism to impart movement to the submerged model, and free surfaces may
still be present.
The disadvantages of conventional wind and water aerodynamic testing
apparatus become even more apparent when it is desired to test at low Reynolds
number flows. The Reynolds number is proportional to the ratio of the inertial
forces and the viscous forces affecting the model. Testing at low Reynolds num-
bers is particularly important to support fundamental research, as well as the
de-
velopment of vehicles operating in such a flow regime, such as Micro Air
Vehicles
(MAV), high-altitude, long-endurance (HALE) vehicles, etc.
The experimental determination of airloads at low Reynolds number flows
is extremely difficult with conventional apparatus, because the generated
loads
2

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
are so low as to be virtually immeasurable with an acceptable accuracy.
Further-
more, the small size of the models required to carry out the tests, and corre-
spondingly small associated flow features, seriously limits the accuracy and
reso-
lution with which the flow surrounding the test vehicle can be investigated.
In ad-
s dition, the rapid rate of growth of boundary layers at low Reynolds number
condi-
tions precludes the use of a test facility where the fluid moves with respect
to the
surrounding walls, as in the case of a wind or water tunnel, because the wall
boundary layers prevent the development of a suitable velocity profile in the
test
section. It, therefore, becomes necessary to use an approach where the fluid
is
stationary with respect to the surrounding walls and the model is moved
through it.
It is, therefore, desirable to provide a test apparatus or facility that over-
comes the problems associated with the use of conventional apparatuses, par-
ticularly for testing at low Reynolds numbers.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the
disadvantages of previously known methods and apparatuses for aerodynamic
and hydrodynamic testing. It is a particular object to provide a method and
apparatus that permits improved aerodynamic and hydrodynamic testing at low
Reynolds numbers. In a first aspect, there is provided an apparatus for
aerodynamic or hydrodynamic testing of a model. The apparatus comprises an
enclosure for filling with a liquid, such as glycerine, of known properties,
such as
viscosity and density. The liquid can be a mixture of two or more liquids,
such as
water and glycerine. If liquid mixtures are used, a mixing unit can be
provided that
also controls the mixing ratio. The enclosure is covered such that the liquid
is in
full contact with all walls of the enclosure, thereby preventing the existence
of a
free surface. A mechanism is provided to impart movement to the model.
In a presently preferred embodiment of the apparatus of the present
invention, the carriage that imparts the model motion is located above the
enclosure. The enclosure's upper surface roof features a slit to allow passage
of
the model support strut. A seal installed along the full length of the slit
ensures
that the slit is normally closed yet it allows the motion of the strut by
tightly
3

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
surrounding it. This arrangement prevents the existence of a free surface m
the
vicinity of the strut as the model is pushed through the test medium. While it
is
contemplated that the seal can comprise a single inflatable member, it is
presently
preferred that the seal be formed by two cooperating inflatable seals arranged
in .
face-to-face relation. To facilitate the displacement of air from within the
enclosure
by the liquid, the upper surface of the enclosure can be upwardly angled, to
direct
the liquid towards the seal, which for the purpose of filling the tank is
opened, thus
preventing the entrapment of air within the enclosure. In a further
embodiment, the
apparatus can include a track inside the enclosure to move the model, thereby
obviating the need for a seal.
In a further aspect, there is provided a method for aerodynamic or
hydrodynamic testing of a model in an enclosure filled with a liquid of known
properties. The method comprises submerging the model in the test fluid which
completely fills the enclosure such that the liquid has no free surface; and
moving
the model through the liquid in the enclosure to determine aerodynamic or
hydrodynamic characteristics of the model and to investigate the flow around
it.
Preferably, the model is mounted on a strut extending through the seal. In
this
embodiment, moving the model includes moving the strut. Alternatively, the
model
can be moved model along on a track contained within the enclosure.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a seal for an
aerodynamic or hydrodynamic test apparatus. The aerodynamic or hydrodynamic
test apparatus includes a slit that provides a passage for a strut to impart
movement to a model submerged in the test fluid within the enclosure. The seal
comprises at least one inflatable member that can be inflated to a pressure
sufficient to prevent the existence of an opening that leads to a free
surface, while
permitting the strut to move in the slot. In a presently preferred embodiment
the
seal has two cooperating inflatable members arranged in face-to-face relation.
Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent
to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following
description of
specific embodiments of the invention, in conjunction with the accompanying
figures.
4

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference
to the attached drawings, in which:
FIG. 1A is an elevated view of the first embodiment of the testing apparatus
having one roof panel and the pivoting , panel in the service module
removed to shov~i~the interior features of the enclosure;
FIG. 1 B is an elevated view of the first embodiment of the testing apparatus
showing the volume occupied by the enclosure;
FIG. 2 is a side view of the first embodiment of the testing apparatus having
one roof panel removed to show a side view of the seal;
FIG. 3A is a front view of the first embodiment of the testing apparatus;
FIG. 3B is a front view of a variation of the first embodiment of the testing
apparatus, where some of the elements of the structure are cantilevered to
allow the mounting of observation equipment on the model carriage
FIG. 4 is an elevated view of the seal and associated model 'support strut,
as used in the first embodiment;
FIG. 5 is a section view of the seal without the strut in place;
FIG. 6 is a section view of the seal with the strut in place;
FIG. 7 is an elevated view of the seal, as an independent unit, and
associated model support strut;
FIG. 8 is a curve of the test medium kinematic viscosity as a function of
glycerine concentration (in water);
FIG. 9 is a graph that shows the model velocity needed to obtain a given
Reynolds number for a given model size and test medium composition
5

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
FIG. 10 shows the ratio between aerodynamic loads in a glycerine solution
and in air acting on the model at a given Reynolds number.
FIG. 11 shows the boundary layer growth as a function of distance and flow
velocity in pure glycerine;
FIG. 12 is a side view of the second embodiment of the testing apparatus;
and
FIG. 13 is a front view of the third embodiment of the testing apparatus,
which is constructed from an existing tow tank that has been reused to
create a tank, but without the structure of the first and second
embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Generally, the present invention provides an apparatus, designed to
conduct aerodynamic and hydrodynamic tests at very low Reynolds numbers, that
addresses the problems encountered in conventional facilities when used under
these conditions. The apparatus provides an enclosure for a test medium, which
substantially eliminates any free surface between the medium and its
surroundings, while permitting a model to move through the medium. The fluid
contained in the tank is fully surrounded by and in contact with the walls,
floor and
roof, thereby substantially eliminating the possibility of a free surface. A
method of
using such an apparatus is also provided.
Preferably, the test medium is a mixture of two or more liquids where some
have high viscosity and others have low viscosity, such that the viscosity of
the
test medium can be adjusted by changing the ratio between the components.
A first embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2,
3A and 3B. Referring to FIGS. 1A and 1B, an elevated view of the apparatus,
the
device comprises three modules abutted and secured in sequence to form an
enclosure 5 running through them. The first is. an access module 3, for the
insertion and removal of a model 112 into the enclosure 5. The second is one
or
more intermediate modules) 2, which can vary in number in order to obtain
6

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
testing facilities of different lengths for different requirements. The third
is an end
module 1. In a single device, these modules have the same width, but can vary
in
length. The current unit is shown having three modules (only one intermediate
module). It is understood that more such modules can be added as needed.
The access module 3 has four posts 30, which extend over the enclosure 5
to permit the installation of pulleys and/or a motorized hoist, leaving enough
room
to insert or remove the model 112 in or out of the enclosure 5. The other
modules
have posts 10, arranged in pairs and joined by upper bars 12 that support a
track
150 such that there is sufficient clearance for a carriage assembly 26 to move
freely over the enclosure 5 and under the track 150. All the modules are built
in
the same fashion with lower bars 11 supporting the bottom part of the
enclosure,
and the upper bars 12 over the enclosure. The posts 30 of the access module 3
have also supplemental bars 31 over their upper bars 12 to support the model
lifting equipment.
On each side of the modules there are upper 21 and lower 22 rectangular
structural tube assemblies joining consecutive posts on the same side of the
enclosure 5. Reinforcement bars 13 may be added, based on the weight of the
enclosure and of the fluid filling it. The posts (10 or 30) can be directly
fastened or
attached to a fixed or mobile structure, and/or joined by a horizontal bar 14
to the
corresponding post on the other side of the device. Leveling pads 15 are
included
under the structure to provide accurate height adjustment.
Referring to FIG. 2, the side view of the facility, the enclosure 5 is defined
by a series of panels comprising: paired panels on opposite sides of the
enclosure
(17, 23, 32), end panels (16, 33), floor panels (13, 22, 40) and roof panel
pairs
(19, 24 on FIG. 1A), access module roof 35, and seal assembly 100. The panels
seal the apertures formed by two posts and two bars, or by four bars.
The panels 32, 33 and 40 in the access module 3 can be made of a non-
transparent material such as aluminum, or a transparent material such as
glass,
PlexiglassTM, etc. Should the back panels be made of a non-transparent
material,
they can have an observation window to visualize the loading and unloading
operations of the model 112, and the movement of the model 112 in a test. The
7

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
top part of the enclosure in the access module 3 can be closed by pivoting
panel
35.
Panels 22, 23, in the intermediate module 2 can be made of glass,
PlexiglassTM or any other suitable transparent material, to permit observation
of
the model from any angle. Panels 16, 17 and 18 in the end module 1 are also
made of glass, PlexiglassTM or any other suitable transparent material. The
end
panel 16 can also be made of an opaque material and have an observation
window to visualize the movement of the model in a test.
Referring to FIGS. 1A and 1 B, the top part of the enclosure 5 in the
intermediate modules) 2 and the end module 1 is closed by two pairs of roof
panels (24 and 19 respectively) and a seal assembly 100, which prevents any
vertical motion of the fluid through the slit between the roof panels.
Preferably, the
roof panels 19 and 24 are slightly sloped up towards the seal assembly 100 to
prevent air entrapment in the tank (angle a on FIG. 3 and FIG. 5) On FIGS. 3A
and 3B the panel slope is shown by the position of the upper row of screws 51
on
the front panel 16. The seal assembly will be described in greater detail
below.
Referring to FIG. 2, the loading module 3 has a hoisting assembly 140 to
insert and remove the model in and out of the enclosure. This hoisting
assembly
140 has four vertical guides 152 to keep a hoisting track 151 in alignment
throughout the hoisting movements. The hoisting track 151 is an extension of
the
track 150, having the same cross-section. Two of the vertical guides 152 are
attached to the upper bar 12 and the supplementary bar 31 on each side of the
hoisting track 151. A pulley retainer 153 joins the four guides together at
their high
end. Pulleys (126 and 127) are attached to the pulley retainers 153, so
that,the
movement of the hoisting track 151 can be imparted from the hoist 34 by means
. of a cable 125. The pulleys and hoist system can be replaced advantageously
by
a motorized hoist at the exact position of pulley 127.
Referring to FIGS. 3A and 3B, flow diagnostic equipment (61, 62, 64) may
be installed on carriages mounted on tracks external to the tank either on
separate carriages as shown in Fig. 3A (62, 64) or on the model carriage as
shown in Fig. 3B (60, 61 )
8

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
Referring to FIG. 2, two manifolds, 43 and 47, consisting of pipes that run
along the length of the enclosure 5, with perforations along them facing the
interior
of the tank , are used to introduce and withdraw fluid into and out of the
tank.
These pipes are connected to a system which the user can use to control the
ratio
of low viscosity to high viscosity liquid, depending on the desired viscosity
of the
test medium. The manifolds can also be used to create a cross flow in the
enclosure that displaces dyes or other trace materials left after flow
diagnostics
tests, such that the central part of the enclosure remains clear for
additional
testing. Pouring the fluid in the access module 3 when the pivoting panel 35
is
opened may also fill the enclosure 5. The fluid can be forced to circulate
through
the enclosure 5 by means of a closed circuit pumping loop connected to ports
44
and 46 (FIG. 1A).
Referring to FIGS. 4 and 7, the primary seal assembly 100 prevents
leakage of the fluid through the enclosure roof, but permits the model support
strut
110 to translate along the slit. The primary seal assembly includes mounting
elements 101 that can be an integral part of the roof panels (FIG. 4) or
separate
units attached thereto (FIG. 7), and a suitably shaped inflatable seal 102.
The
mounting elements 101 are separated by a constant gap. The inflatable seals
102
can be glued to the mounting elements 101, or attached to the. latter by means
of
"L"-shaped brackets 109, or any suitable means permitting the eventual
replacement of worn-out seals. The inflatable member 102 is closed at one end
and connected to a suitable air supply through a tube 103 at the other end.
Referring to FIGS. 5 and 6, the inflatable primary seals 102 on each side of
the seal assembly are arranged in face-to-face configuration. These inflatable
seals are close together, but not necessarily in contact when no pressure is
applied. When pressure is applied, the inflatable seals are first in
tangential
contact, and by increasing the pressure, the surface of contact can be
augmented.
Higher pressure results in better sealing, while lower pressure results in
easier
movement of the strut 110. The use of a lubricant permits the operation of the
seal
at a higher pressure. For this reason, the inflatable seals are preferably
slightly
immersed in the test fluid to keep them well lubricated. Even immersed, the
seal
assembly blocks the escape of the fluid, by the contact between the inflatable
9

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
seals. Also, the inflatable seals, by virtue of their elasticity, conform to
the contour
of the strut 110 as it moves along the roof slit. Very small local gaps may be
present at the leading and trailing edges of the strut 110, but the high
viscosity of
the fluid renders any flow through them essentially negligible. A secondary
seal
108, located above the primary seal 102, consists of two overlapping flexible
strips
mounted on brackets 109.This secondary seal 108 permits the translation of the
model support strut through the roof slit, and is used to keep dust away from
the
small amount of fluid above the primary seat needed for lubrication as
discussed
above. The presence of the secondary seal 108 also produces a small-elongated
chamber 113 defined by this seal at the top, the fluid level at the bottom and
brackets 109 on the sides. If a hygroscopic test fluid such as glycerine is
used,
this chamber can be kept slightly pressurized with dry air to minimize the
absorption of water by the fluid.
Referring to FIG. 4, any suitable source 106 of air can be used to operate
the inflatable seal 102. From this source, a control unit 104 can,
automatically or
manually, maintain the desired operating pressure. A single tube 105 may be
connected from the source 106 to the control unit 104, and their respective
tube
103 feeds each inflatable seal 102 of the seal assembly 100 from the control
unit
104.
Given the definition of the Reynolds number (Re = VI /v, where V =
velocity, I = reference length, and v = kinematic viscosity of the fluid), in
order to
obtain a given value of Re the higher the fluid kinematic viscosity, the
larger the
model can be for a given velocity, and the higher the velocity can be for a
given
model size. Thus super-scale models can be used by virtue of a high kinematic
viscosity test medium which permits magnification of the flow features for
more
detailed study. Various high viscosity fluids can be used, so long as they
satisfy
the necessary Newtonian characteristics. By changing the concentration of a
solution of a high viscosity fluid in a low viscosity one, it is possible to
vary the
kinematic viscosity continuously. Referring to FIG. 8, as an example,
glycerine
can be used as the high viscosity liquid, and water as the low viscosity.
component. Such a solution allows a continuous change in kinematic viscosity
over three orders of magnitude, from that of pure water (~1.OE-6 m2/s) to that
of

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
pure glycerine (~1.OE-3 m2/s). The use of this type of fluid allows the
experimenter to adjust the viscosity of the test medium over a significant
range on
either side of the kinematic viscosity of air (approximately corresponding to
that of
a 2/3 solution of glycerine) (FIG. 9), providing the ability to test over a
vast range
of Reynolds number. The use of a high viscosity fluid also allows the speed of
the
model to be increased, which together with the high fluid density, compared to
air,
leads to a large gain in dynamic pressure, and therefore increases the
generated
loads for a given Reynolds number. Thus, the use of a fluid of high kinematic
viscosity and density addresses the experimental problems associated with
measuring extremely small loads at low Reynolds numbers.
Low Reynolds number flows are characterized by a very rapid boundary
layer growth. Fig. 11 depicts the laminar boundary layer thickness as a
function of
rdistance for various free stream velocities for pure glycerine. (FIG. 11)
Given the
fast boundary layer growth and its dependence on Reynolds number, it renders
boundary layer suction impractical and thus largely precludes the use of an
apparatus where the fluid moves with respect to the walls, such as in a wind
tunnel. Therefore, for very low Reynolds numbers, it is preferable for the
fluid to
be stationary with respect to the walls of the tank.
In operation the enclosure is rumU n ~ dU~Q~ ~~~ Ju~~ ~ ~~ ~U~ .....
completely fills it up to, and including the seal 100. As shown in FIG. 6, the
slope
of the enclosure roof panels prevents the trapping of any air bubbles within
the
enclosure 5. Sufficient liquid is introduced into the enclosure to reach a
level just
above the inflatable members 102. This ensures that the enclosure is
completely
free of air, and provides lubrication to the strut-seal interface. The model
112 is
rigidly attached to the bottom end of strut 110, which is attached at its
upper end
to carriage 26. The carriage 26 is moved by a motor 115, which can be remotely
controlled to produce an arbitrary velocity profile. A system of rack and
pinion or a
friction wheel on a high friction band are suitable to transform the rotary
motion of
the motor into a linear motion of the carriage, and for speed reduction. A
second
motor or a transmission system using the carriage motor 115 can be used
through
a shaft inside the strut 110 to impart movement, such as wing flapping, to the
model 112.
11

CA 02464486 2004-04-21
WO 03/036253 PCT/CA02/01417
In a second embodiment, shown on FIG. 12, the enclosure 200 is fully
closed by a bottom panel 209, a roof panel 213, side panels 211 and end panels
212. At least one track (201, 202, 203) is submerged in the enclosure 200. The
track can be attached to the bottom 209, to the roof 204 (track 203), or the
side
211 (track 202) of the tank. A carriage 213 imparts the necessary motion to
the
model via a suitable support strut. This enables the user to move the model
221
through the test medium without any external moving parts. In such a case, the
panel of the roof 204 of the tank, can be identical to the other panels of the
facility.
A service panel 216 provides access to the model 221 and to the serviceable
parts of the tracks and carriage. When the service panel 216 is closed, the
facility
creates a completely enclosed channel, with no free surfaces. The simple
structure used in this second embodiment, with no additional structural
support
extending past the bottom panels of the tank, is also applicable to the first
embodiment, as is the additional structure of the first embodiment applicable
to
this embodiment.
In a third embodiment (FIG. 13), a large channel 301, such as a
conventional towing tank, can be adapted to use an overhead crane or gantry
305
to impart some or all movements to the model. In this case one or two of the
enclosure surfaces can be provided by the wall and bottom of the tow tank.
Similarly, some other substitution to the proposed stand-alone version can be
sought without departing from the scope of the invention.
It is understood that the present invention is not limited to the sole
embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within
the scope of the following claims.
12

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2012-09-17
Letter Sent 2011-09-19
Grant by Issuance 2010-08-24
Inactive: Cover page published 2010-08-23
Inactive: Final fee received 2010-06-03
Pre-grant 2010-06-03
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2009-12-23
Letter Sent 2009-12-23
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2009-12-23
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2009-12-17
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2009-11-09
Inactive: Office letter 2009-06-12
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-05-08
Correct Applicant Request Received 2007-11-14
Letter Sent 2007-10-09
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-09-13
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2007-09-13
Request for Examination Received 2007-09-13
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-06-17
Inactive: Inventor deleted 2004-06-15
Letter Sent 2004-06-15
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2004-06-15
Application Received - PCT 2004-05-20
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-04-21
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2003-05-01

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2010-07-09

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2004-04-21
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2004-09-17 2004-08-10
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2005-09-19 2005-06-29
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2006-09-18 2006-08-28
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2007-09-17 2007-05-11
Request for examination - standard 2007-09-13
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2008-09-17 2008-08-27
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2009-09-17 2009-06-03
Final fee - standard 2010-06-03
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - standard 08 2010-09-17 2010-07-09
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA
Past Owners on Record
ERNEST S. HANFF
XING ZHONG HUANG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 2004-04-20 10 244
Description 2004-04-20 12 654
Claims 2004-04-20 2 81
Abstract 2004-04-20 1 65
Representative drawing 2004-04-20 1 27
Description 2009-11-08 12 606
Claims 2009-11-08 3 84
Representative drawing 2010-07-27 1 19
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-06-14 1 109
Notice of National Entry 2004-06-14 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-06-14 1 106
Reminder - Request for Examination 2007-05-21 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2007-10-08 1 189
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2009-12-22 1 162
Maintenance Fee Notice 2011-10-30 1 171
Maintenance Fee Notice 2011-10-30 1 171
PCT 2004-04-20 5 163
Correspondence 2007-11-13 1 41
Correspondence 2009-06-11 1 13
Correspondence 2009-12-22 1 54
Correspondence 2010-06-02 1 31