Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR USING TMAGE ANAhYSIS TO
MEAT AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTTCS
This application is a divisional of Canadian Patent
Application Serial Number 2,263,763, filed August 18, 1997.
BACKGROUND OF THE TNVENTION
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to image processing and statistical
analysis of digitized images of carcasses of meat animals to
determine grade and yield parameters of the carcass.
Description of the Related Art
Meat animal grading, in both live animals and carcasses,
has typically been performed by human graders, introducing
substantial subjectivity to the grading process. There are
two main aspects to meat grading, quality grade and yield
grade. Quality grade of young animals is determined by the
amount of intramuscular fat (marbling) in the meat. Yield
grade describes the proportion of lean tissue in the carcass.
In the carcass, grading is usually conducted by
observation and measurement of a cross-section of the
longissimus dorsi (described in beef as the "rib eye muscle"
and in hogs as the "loin eye muscle"). Quality grade or
marbling is typically determined by comparing the appearance
of the rib eye with reference photographs of rib eyes of
carcasses of known quality grades. The grader can assess the
quality grade by comparing the amount of marbling in the rib
eye being examined with the amount of marbling seen in the
reference photographs.
The proportion of lean tissue in the carcass (yield
grade) is typically estimated from the area of the rib eye and
the thickness of subcutaneous fat at various sites around the
rib eye. Yield grade calculations may also involve body
1
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
cavity fat measurements and hot carcass weight. As will be
discussed in greater detail herein, various definitions of a
"yield grade" are possible as they may depend on particular
carcass processing standards. A particularly useful measure
of yield grade is the "saleable yield" of the carcass which
reflects the proportion. of the live weight of the animal made
up by the sum of the weight of the saleable cuts plus the
weight of the trim. Typically, saleable yield is determined
upon butchering of the carcass into standard cuts of meat.
A number of automated meat processing systems have made
use of the different light reflecting properties of muscle
tissue versus fatty tissue. United States Patent S,324,228
(Vvgeley, issued June 28, 1994) describes a method and
apparatus far illuminating a fish fillet with a stripe of
Light as it is viewed by a pair of video cameras. Light
brightness signals from the cameras are converted by a
computer to electric digital signals representing illumination
brightness. The computer compares the digital signals to a
pre-selected threshold of grey scale levels to locate
peripheral fat areas. The computer then controls the
operation of a cutter mechanism to remove the areas of fat.
Similar systems for distinguishing light coloured edible loin
meat from dark coloured inedible waste meat in tuna slices are
described in United States Patent 3,800,363 (Lapeyre, issued
April 2, 1974) and United States Patent 4,738,004 (Lapeyre,
issued April 19, 1988).
United States Patent 3,154,625 (Kail, issued October 27,
1964) describes a method for determir_ing the marbling of a
carcass rib eye by measuring the average reflectivity of a rib
eye relative to the reflectivity of a fat coloured sample
plate, using a photometer.
United States Patent 4,413,279 (Gorl, issued November l,
2
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
1983) describes an improved method for calculating a
brightness threshold for distinguishing fat from lean tissue
to overcome problems in identifying tissues of intermediate
brightness, such as biaod-smeared fat, for use in meat gradir_g
' systems wherein the relative brightness of various tissues are
recorded with a video camera.
United States Patent 5,352,153 (Butch et al., issued
October 4, 1994) describes an apparatus for illuminating and
acquiring video images of fish sections during processing.
United States Patent 4,226,540 (Batten et al., issued
October 7, 1980) describes a method for determining features
of meat quality in which the ratio of fat to lean tissue is
determined by scanning a meat product with a moving beam of
light and discriminating fat from lean tissue based on the
differing brightness values of fat and tissue.
A number of video imaging grading systems have been
described in which a series of images are taken of live
animals. United States Patent 5,483,441 (Scofield eL al.,
issued January 9, 1996) describes a video image acquisition
and analysis system wherein a series of video images are
acquired and evaluated as a live animal moves through
successive fields of view. United States Patent 4,745,472
(Haves et al., issued May 17, 1988) describes a video image
acquisition and analysis system wherein markers are placed on
various anatomical reference points on the body of a live
animal. The animal is then positioned in a chute having top
and side walls comprising measurement grids. Video tape
recordings are made of the animal in the chute, and the video
information is analysed with a computer to determine the
distances between the markers manually attached to the .
animal's body.
Other systems have combined video imaging information
3
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
with other ir_formation acquired by, for instance, inserting a
probe into the carcass, to provide grading information.
United States Patent 4,939,574 (Petersen eC al., issued July
3, 1990) describes a light-screening chamber in whirr the
silhouette of an animal carcass is recorded with an electronic
camera and the contour of the carcass determined with a data
processing system. Carcass contour ir_forrnation is used in
conjunction with a previous carcass colour assessment and meat
and fat thickness information determined by insertion of a
probe into the carcass, to determine a carcass classification.
United States Patent 4,439,037 (Northeved et al., issued
March 27, 1984) describes an optical probe for insertion into
a carcass to assess the meat-to-lard ratio of the carcass.
Ultrasound images of live animals have been analysed for
the purpose of estimating the marbling or subcutaneous fat
thickness of the animal. United States Patent 4,785,817
(Stouffer, issued November 22, 1988) describes an apparatus
and method for using ultrasound for determining the thickness
of fat on various parts of a carcass from which grading
determinations can be made. Similarly, United States Patent
5,339,815 (Liu et al., issued August 23, 1994), addressing
ultrasonic imaging of beef cattle, teaches associating the
autocorrelation property of ultrasound speckle noise with beef
marbling score.
International Application WO 93/21597 (Henn et al.,
International Filing Date - April 13, 1993? teaches one method
for tracing the outline of a digital image of a rib eye muscle
of a carcass in which links are defined between pairs of
concavities in the rib eye outline in order to excise _mage
sections external to the rib eye.
International Application WO 92/x0523 (Newman,
International Filing Date -- June 24, 1991) describes a method
4
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
of grading carcasses after slaughter involving the steps of
checking for the presence of a carcass in the field of view of
a camera, checking that the carcass is properly oriented with
respect to the camera, acquiring images of Che carcass from a
plurality of viewpoints, determining a plurality of dimensions
of the carcass from the images and comparing the dimensions
with stored values to determine a grade for the carcass.
However, there is no description of how the dimensions of the
carcass might be determined or how they could be related to
the carcass grade.
International Application WO 91/14180 4Benn,
International Filing Date March 14, 2991) describes a method
for evaluating carcasses by object image processing involving
the steps of recording an image of a background, recording a
second image of a carcass positioned in front of the
background, analysing the first and second images to
differentiate the carcass from the background by subtracting
the first or second image from the other for each colour
component to provide a series of component difference images
which are recombined to provide an absolute difference image.
The application states that anatomical points can be
identified on the carcass by comparing the area of t:he carcass
profile with a series of reference profiles, and matching the
anatomical points of the images having the most similar area.
It is stated that quantitative dimensional measurements can be
taker_ from anatomical points to predict composition, but there
is no description of how to make the quantitative
measurements, which ones might be useful, or how to make a
prediction based on the measurements.
In concluding, the systems described above do not permit
continuous grade or yield calculations of carcasses to be made
during the slaughtering procedure. Techniques are needed to
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
reliably take accurate and reproducible measurements oL
carcass dimensions without manual identification of anatomical
features of the carcass and to develop yield predictions based
on these carcass measurements. This requires the
identification of specific definite arid reproducible carcass
measurements that are closely correlated to the grade or yield
parameter of interest. Refined rib eye tracir_g techniques are
also required to obtain accurate rib eye measurements which
may also be used in grade and yield determinations.
SUNINTARY OF THE INVENTION
The inventors have developed a rapid and accurate process
and apparatus for the on-line grading of carcasses being
processed in a slaughtering facility. Visible spectrum video
images of skinned carcass halves suspended from a dressing
rail are obtained, digitized and stored in computer memory for
image processing and analysis: The outline of the carcass
image is traced and anatomical features of the carcass, such
as the tail, are identified as indentations or protrusions in
the carcass image outline by methods disclosed herein. While
a lateral view of a carcass half is preferably used, other
carcass views, or images of intact carcasses may be useful.
Once one or more anatomical features have been identified
on the carcass outline, additional reference points can be
located on the carcass image at pre-determined positions
relative to the original anatomical features first identified.
For examgle, an additional reference point might be located a
specific percentage of the length along a line joining two
anatomical features. In this manner, by locating a small
number of anatomical features of the carcass, it is possible
to rapidly, accurately and reproducibly identify any number of
6
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
additional reference points on or within the carcass image
outline. These additional reference points may reflect
anatomical features of the carcass that are not readily
identified as clear landmarks or. the carcass image outline.
Alternatively, the additional reference points may be
arbitrarily assigned points that are useful for providing a
multitude of defined, reproducible locations from which
various one- or two-dimensional measurements can be made.
Using the various reference points identified, a
plurality of carcass image measurements are made. These may
include, among other things, linear distances between
reference points, areas bounded by reference points, angular
measurements between selected sets of three reference points,
and curvature measurements along the carcass image outline.
Using known statistical techniques such as stepwise
regression, predictive equations have been developed wherein a
selected carcass grading parameter is included as a dependent
variable, and various carcass image measurements are included
as independent variables.
In the exemplified case, relating to beef carcasses,
particularly useful independent variables have proven to be
the shortest distance from each of a plurality of reference
points along the carcass image outline to a mid-line
established parallel to the long-axis of the carcass image
outline which divides the image into roughly dorsal and
ventral portions, the width of the carcass image outline, and
the areas of regions of the carcass image which have
boundaries approximating those of standard carcass primal
cuts. Primal cuts are the gross sections into which a carcass
is first cut during the butchering process and from which the
remaining cuts made during the fabrication process depend.
The inventors have developed a method for rapidly
7
. , ., . y ...;.; :. . ....,: . . . .r.: :v
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
approximating the standard primal cuts on the carcass image
involving dividing the carcass image into sections bounded by
lines joining pre-determined reference points on and within
the carcass image outline. The area of certain primal cuts,
and the ratio of the area of these primal cuts to the total
carcass image area have proven to be particularly useful as
independent.variables in predictive equatior_s to predict such
things as the saleable yield of the carcass.
Stepwise regression techniques are used to deterr~.ine the
degree of linear association between each of the measurements
obtained from the carcass image and the selected grading
parameter of the carcass, and to determine the best model for
predicting the value of the selected grading parameter of the
carcass in which a plurality of carcass image measurements
form independent variables. Once a predictive equation has
been developed, the system can be used to take carcass image
measurements from additional carcasses, and the predictive
equation can be solved for those measurements, to provide an
output of the value of the selected grading parameter of the
carcass. Though predictive equations can be developed to
predict the value of a wide variety of carcass grading
parameters, a particularly useful application of the invention
is the prediction of saleable yield of a carcass. The
definition of "saleable yield" will vary among different
markets for butchered meat products. Generally, it reflects
the sum of the weight of initial carcass cuts at a defined fat
cover level plus the weight of trim piles at various lean
percentages. In the Examples herein, "saleable yield" was
defined as the total weight of ail cuts with i/4" (6.25mm) fat
cover, wherein all cuts are derived from the eight primal cuts
of hip, sirloin, loin, rib, chuck, flank, plate, and brisket,
plus trim piles of 50~, 75~ and 85~ lean.
8
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Broadly stated then, in one preferred embodiment, the
invention provides a process for determining a grading
parameter of a carcass, comprising the steps of:
(a) obtaining an image of a view of the carcass, the image
being composed of an array of pixels providing data
representative of information at the corresponding part
of the image;
(b) tracing the outline of the image to produce a carcass
image outline;
(c) locating a plurality of first reference points on the
carcass image outline, the first reference points
representing anatomical features of the carcass, the
anatomical features being identified as protrusions or
indentations in the carcass image outline;
(d) locating at least one second reference point on or within
the carcass image outline, the second reference points
being located at pre-determined positions relative to the
first reference points;
(e) dividing the carcass image into a plurality of sections,
the boundaries of each section being determined as a
function of the position of the first and second
reference points, and determining the area of each
section;
(f) providing a grading parameter predictive equation wherein
the grading parameter is included as a dependent
variable, and at least one area of a section determined
in step (e) is included as an independent variable; and,
(g) solving the grading parameter predictive equation to
provide a value for the grading parameter of the carcass.
The invention extends to analysis of the rib eye of the
carcass. During the slaughtering process, the carcass is cut
transversely between the ribs, generally between the 12th and
9
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
13th ribs. The cut does not extend clear through the carcass
so that the carcass is left intact, in one piece, hanging from
the dressing rail. The weight of the carcass opens the cut,
allowing observation of a cross-section of the Iongissimus
dorsz muscle, which, ir~ beef cattle, is typically called the
"rib eye", and in hogs is called the "loin eye". As used
herein and in the claims, the term "rib eye" includes the
Iongissimus dorsi muscle of cattle and hogs, as typically
viewed in cross-section during carcass grading. The rib eye
represents the most valuable cut in red meat animals such as
hogs, lambs and cattle. Grading systems throughout the world
have evolved around measurements derived from the rib eye. As
described previously with reference to the whole carcass, a
visible spectrum video image of the rib eye of the carcass is
obtained, digitized and stored in computer memory for image
processing and analysis. Pixels representing muscle tissue
are distinguished from pixels representing fat on the basis of
a pixel colour characteristic threshold such as brightness
level. Pixels representing cartilage may be identified by
their low colour saturation level. The outline of the rib eye
is traced, and the value for such variables as the percentage
of intramuscular fat, the rib eye area, and the thickness of
subcutaneous fat at various points or. the rib eye outline are
determined. These variables may be included as independent
variables in the predictive equations for predicting carcass
grading parameters based on carcass image measurements
described previously.
Alternatively, the rib eye information can be used
independently of measurements taken from the carcass images to
develop predictive equatior_s for predicting carcass grading
parameters based only on rib eye image measurements.
Accurate grading predictions based on rib eye image
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
measurements require accurate tracing of the rib eye outline.
Muscle tissue that abuts the longissimus dorsi (rib eye) but
that is not part of the longissimus dorsi must be
discriminated to permit accurate rib eye measurements to be
' taken from the traced image. The present invention extends to
novel rib eye tracing techniques whexein external image
sections representing muscle tissue abutting the rib eye but
not part of the rib eye are accurately identified and excised
to provide superior rib eye tracing results.
As discussed above, the information derived from the
traced rib eye outline may be used independently of the
information derived from the carcass image to predict a
carcass grading parameter such as saleable yield or quality
grade (marbling?. In one preferred embodiment, relating to
the prediction of marbling, the invention includes acquiring
images from standard quality grade reference photographs of
rib eyes which are commonly used as a guide in slaughtering
facilities for human graders in determining quality grade.
The photographs depict rib eyes having a degree of marbling at
the cut-off level for a particular grade. Traditionally, the
human grader compares the rib eye under examination with the
reference photographs and assigns a grade on the basis of the
cut-oft marbling levels between which the rib eye under
examination appears to fall. In one embodiment of the present
invention, the actual percentage of intrarnuscular fat in the
sample rib eyes depicted in the reference photographs is
determined by rib eye image tracing analysis. Following rib
eye tracing analysis, yield grades can then be assigned to
carcasses as a function of the percentage marbling calculated
for the rib eye image.
11
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In drawings illustrating embodiments of the invention:
Figure 1 is a side elevation of the carcass imaging
system positioned in front of the backdrop. A carcass
suspended from an overhead conveyor is positioned between the
backdrop and the carcass imaging system;
Figure 2 is a side elevation of the rib eye camera
connected to the CPU;
Figure 3 is a bottom plan view of the rib eye camera,
showing the positioning jig;
Figure 4 illustrates an image of a latticed white board
used for camera calibration;
Figures 5-7 illustrate different image searching masks
useful in the present invention;
Figure 8 illustrates division of the carcass image into a
plurality of separate regions for analysis;
Figure 9 illustrates an additional searching mask useful
in the present invention;
Figures 10-14 illustrate successive carcass image
analysis steps of the invention;
Figures 15-18 illustrate the identification of anatomical
reference points, the estimation of primal cuts, the
definition of linear measurements, and the definition of
angular measurements, respectively;
Figure 19 shows the general appearance of a rib eye in an
unprocessed digital image;
Figures 20-30 illustrate successive rib eye image
analysis steps of the invention;
Figure 31 shows further details of a rib eye image; and
Figures 32-35 illustrate steps in making grading
measurements from the traced rib eye outline.
12
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
DE'TAILtED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EM30DZMENT
The invention is best understood in reference to the
attached figures.
I. System Overview
A. Apparatus
Images are obtained first of intact beef carcass halves
hanging from a dressing rail. Intact carcass images may be
taken within a few hours after slaughter, when the carcass is
still near body temperature, or after the carcass has been
chilled prior to further processing. The timing of making the
intact carcass image is not essential. As shown in Figure I, a
backdrop 10 made up of four collapsible background panels 12
mounted on a stainless steel frame 14 and supported on
casters, can be positioned about two feet (60 cm) behind the
carcass 16 carried on an overhead conveyor and ten feet (3 m)
in front of a CCD camera. One of the panels 12 may be
reversible, having a grid design on one side and a black
surface on the other. The grid is useful for calibrating a
camera. Five squares in the centre column of the grid, one
coloured each of black, white, red, green and blue are
provided for colour calibration. The background panels 12
provide a non-reflective blue (or other colour having a hue
that is distinct from the hue of any significant portion of
the carcass - blue or green therefore being preferred)
background behind the carcasses 16 to facilitate tracing of
the outline of the carcass 16. One or more glide bars I8
attached to the frame I4 and oriented parallel to the
direction of carcass 16 travel, maintain the carcass 16 at a
desired distance from the panels 12, in a plane perpendicular
to the camera. When a carcass 16 moves to the centre of the
backdrop 10, the system triggers a camera to capture its
image.
13
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
The carcass imaging system 20 includes a CCD camera 22,
two flood light assemblies 24 (only one is visible in Figure
1) and CPU 26 are mounted on a mobile base 28. The hot
carcass imaging system 20 is positioned at a desired distance
in front of the carcass 16 travelling along the overhead
conveyor and the backdrop 10 is positioned behind the carcass
16 in line with the hot carcass imaging system 20.
The flood light assemblies 24 are directed toward the
backdrop 10. Each Mood light assembly 24 includes two 110V
250W halogen lamps 30, mounted in waterproof stainless steel
housings. Preferably, the lamps 30 are positioned about five
feet (1.5 m) in front of the backdrop 10. While flood light
assemblies 24 are shown mounted on mobile base 28, they may
alternatively be either mounted on the ceiling or free
standing. The entire hat carcass imaging system 20 is
preferably collapsible for easy moving and storage.
CCD camera 22 may be a PanasonicTM 3-CCD industrial colour
camera (model GP-US502) mounted in a stainless steel housing
and powered by a 12V DC supply. The RGB video signal
generated by the camera 22 is fed to a MatroxTM image digitizing
board (Matrox Electronic Systems Ltd., Dorval, Quebec, Canada)
(not shown) in the CPU 26. The CPU is contained in a
stainless steel box (not shown) to conform with slaughter
facility sanitary regulations. The CPU 26 may be a PentiumTM
150 MHz computer running software under Microsoft Windows 95
operating systems. The digitizing board grabs an image of a
carcass 16 when the carcass 16 moves into position in front of
the backdrop 10. The outline of the carcass 16 is traced,
certain anatomical points are determined, a. series of linear,
2-dimensional and angular measurements are made, and the
results and image are saved.
Images of the rib eye area of the carcass 16 are
14
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
generally taken after the carcass 16 has been chilled for 24
hours. While rib eye images could be taken from hot
carcasses, it would be more difficult to distinguish
intramuscular fat from lean muscle tissue. As shown in
Figures 2 and 3, the rib eye image system 32 includes a hand
held rib eye camera 34 and a CPU 36. Rib eye images are taken
of a partial cross section of the carcass 16 between the 12th
and 13th ribs. This is the rib eye muscle site normally
graded by government inspectors. Therefore, the camera 34
should be portable so that it can be placed into the V-shaped
notch cut between the 12th and 13th ribs of the carcass. The
hand held camera 34 may be a PanasonicTM 3-CCD camera, similar
to CCD camera 24, mounted inside a stainless steel housing 38.
Two EXN 12 V, 50 W low voltage display lamps 40 are mounted on
each side of the camera 34. A toggle switch 42 on the camera
handle 44 is connected to an input/output board on the CPU 36,
which in turn informs the CPU 36 to grab an image.
The hand-held camera 34 is mounted on a jig 46 having a
positioning tab 48 which correctly positions the camera 34
relative to the rib eye muscle area of the carcass 16.
Alternatively, a light weight remote camera head having a
small camera and lens unit connected to a remote control unit
(not shown), may be used. The camera head could be mounted
directly on a small light weight jig similar to jig 46 for
easy manipulation.
CPU 36 may be a PentiumTM 150 MHZ computer mounted in a
stainless steel housing 38. The CPU 16 runs software under
Microsoft Windows 95 operating systems. The software grabs an
image of a rib eye. It traces the outline of the rib eye
muscle, calculates the rib eye muscle area and the length and
width of the rib eye, measures the thickness of subcutaneous
fat, the colour of the muscle and the percentage of
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
intramuscular fat. The software then saves the results and
image.
The following additional computer hardware and software
may be utilized with the hot carcass imaging system 20 and rib
eye muscle imaging system 32 described above:
- A MatroxTM MGA Millenium video display adapter (Matrox
Electronic Systems, Ltd.) far the display of live (30fps in 32
bit colour) video on-screen;
- A Matrox~ Meteor image digitizing board (Matrox Electronic
Systems, Ltd.) to capture images;
- A PC-TIO-lOTM Input/output board (National Instruments
Corporation, Austin, Texas) used to accept an external trigger
to signal the software to acquire an image from the video
digitizer;
- A FASTCOM~/IG232 communication port (Industrial Computer
Source, San Diego, California) used for serial communication
with packing plant communications systems;
- A Minoltas Spectrophotometer for initial program
calibration and testing;
- A JVC 3-chip RGB camera (model GP-U5502) used as a video
input source;
- A Microsoft Windows 95 operating system (Microsoft,
Redmond, WA) under which development occurred;
- Microsoft Visual C++ V4.0 used as the main development
environment including C++ language, debugger, interface
builder, and Microsoft Foundation Classes;
- A MatroxTM Imaging Library (MIL) Lite (Matrox Electronic
Systems, Ltd.) basic frame grabber interface for acquiring RGB
images from a video source;
- An NI-DAQ Function library I/0 board interface (National
Instruments Corporation), allowing software to be triggered by
an external button attached to a hardware interface on a
16
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
computer; and,
- JPEG library version 6 (independent JPEG Group) program
code for reading and writing JPEG formatted images to
secondary storage devices.
B. Image Processing
The system comprises two subsystems, a carcass image
processing subsystem and a rib eye image processing subsystem.
The carcass measurements may be taken from the hot carcass
immediately during the slaughtering procedure or after some
period of chilling. Rib eye measurements are typically taken
after 24 hours of chilling.
I. Carcass Image Processing
The carcass imaging system 20 is used to acquire a
visible spectrum image of an entire half beef carcass moving
along a dressing rail during the slaughtering procedure. The
carcass has been bisected into two symmetrical halves along
its dorsal axis.
Two carcass orientations (carcass side viewed) are
possible for each of the left and right halves of the carcass,
resulting in four possible views: (a) bone-side left; (b)
bone-side right; (c) skin-side left; and, (d) skin-side right.
The left skin-side of the carcass is used in the Canadian beef
grading system. The other views are not used in the Canadian
system.
As the carcass halves come down the line, either the
bone-side or the skin-side may face the camera. An operator
standing upstream from the carcass imaging system 20 manually
flips the carcass halves into the skin-side orientation. The
carcass imaging system 20 differentiates between the left and
right carcass halves, and retains images of the selected
carcass half for analysis.
Various linear, two-dimensional and curvature
17
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
measurements of the carcass are made, as will be discussed in
detail herein. A total of approximately 400 measurements are
made. Prediction equations can be developed from these
measurements to (i) predict carcass conformation, (ii? sort
carcasses into size groups and (iii) provide precise
coordinates for automated fabrication of primal cuts by
robotic machinery.
2. Rib Eye Image Processing
After 24 hours of chilling, a cut is made between the
12th and 13th ribs of the carcass to expose the Zongissimus
dorsi muscle, also called the rib eye. Manual observation of
a cross section of the rib eye is a conventional carcass
grading technique. The weight of the carcass opens the cut so
that the hand held camera 34 may be inserted in the resulting
notch and an image taken. There are two principal reasor_s
that the rib eye is examined for meat grading purposes.
First, rib eye grading measurements are known to correlate
closely with the grade of the rest of the carcass. Secondly,
the rib eye is the most expensive cut of meat in the carcass
and is therefore of the greatest importance for grading
purposes.
Generally, the rib eye area analysis involves the
following steps:
a. The bottom edge of the rib eye area is detected.
The bottom edge of the rib eye muscle area is defined by
a fat/air boundary. It represents the outer edge of a
cross-section of the carcass. This step is taken to
determine if there is anything in the image that would
interfere with the image thresholding step. This step is
optional.
b. Determine threshold brightness levels over the whole
carcass image area to distinguish lean tissue from fat.
18
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
The background is presumed to be all areas of the image
below the bottom edge of the rib eye area determined in
step a. All pixels below this edge are set to black.
c. Trace the boundary of the rib eye muscle.
d. Determine the area and the percentage marbling
inside the rib eye muscle boundary.
e. Determine the longest axis of the rib eye muscle
area.
f. Determine the greatest width of the rib eye muscle
area, perpendicular to the longest axis.
g. Determine the approximate location of the
subcutaneous fat layer. The subcutaneous fat is found in
the area between the external carcass boundary and the
edge of the rib eye muscle.
h. Measure the thickness of the subcutaneous fat by
dividing the long axis of the rib eye muscle area into
four equal quadrants and measuring the thickness of the
fat at the boundary between each of the quadrants.
TI. Colour Analysis of Meat Tissuas
Carcass analysis in the present invention involves three
principal types of tissue, meat (muscle), fat and gristle
(cartilage). Each of these tissue types has distinguishing
colour characteristics.
The colour of light is a function of its electromagnetic
wavelength. Seven distinctly named colours or hues are
distinguishable in the visible light spectrum, each
representing a different wavelength: red, orange, yellow,
green, blue, indigo and violet. Light colours, as
' distinguished from pigment colours, work on an additive basis.
The absence of light of any colour produces black. A
combination of the three primary light colours, red, green and
blue, add to produce white light.
19
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
There are three dimensions or attributes of colour: hue;
value, or brightness; and chrome, or saturation. "Hue" is the
specific name of a colour. Hue depends on the dominant
visible wavelength of a colour. The wavelength associated
with the particular hue indicates that hue's position within
the spectral range. The seven hues described above are
considered pure hues, and cannot be separated into simpler
colours. Other visible hues are combinations of several
different light wavelengths (see, for instance, Wallschlaeger
C., and C Busic-Snyder, Basic Visual Concepts and Principles
for Artists, Architects, and Designers, 1992, Wm. C. Brown
Publishers). "Value", or "brightness", is the relative
lightness or darkness of a colour as it would agpear in a
black and white photograph. The value of a colour depends on
how much light the colour reflects. Colour values are
referred to as "tints" or "shades". Tints are lighter in
value. Shades are darker in value. "Chrome", or
"saturation", refers to the amount of hue in a particular
colour or the relative purity of a colour on a scale from a
hue to grey. A colour that has a high chrome is said to be
saturated with a monochromatic (one colour) hue. Hue, value
and chrome (hue, brightness, saturation) are interrelated.
For instance,, at extremely high or low values, it is difficult
to determine the hue or chrome of a colour as all colours will
appear, respectively, very light (white) or very dark (black).
Further, to the human eye, different hues may reach their
maximum chrome at different values. For instance, yellow
reaches its maximum chrome at a higher value (brightness) than
does purple-blue. An excellent discussion of colour analysis,
representation and reproduction is provided in Benson, K.
Blair ed., Television Engineer~.ng Handbook Rev. Ed., McGraw-
Hill Inc., New York, 1992.
2Q
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
When these colour principles are applied to the tissues
of an animal carcass, the differing colour characteristics of
muscle tissue, fat, and cartilage car. be distinguished in a
digitized image of the rib eye area. Muscle tissue, having a
medium value (brightness) and chroma (saturation) can be seen
to have a reddish hue. Cartilage, having a low to medium
value and low chroma appears an achromatic grey because the
saturation or intensity of the hue (reddish) is low. Fat,
having a high value, appears bright white because it is
difficult to discern the hue (reddish) at very high values.
Thus, cartilage can be distinguished from muscle tissue or fat
on the basis of the low chroma of cartilage, and fat can be
distinguished from muscle tissue or cartilage due to the high
value of fat.
A number of systems may be used to define colour for
computer/video applications. In the RGB system, the amount of
each of red, green and blue in the colour of a pixel is
defined. An RGB value may be represented in hexadecimal forn~
(ie. bright red FF0000, bright green OOFF00, bright blue
0000FF, black 000000, white FFFFFF). All necessary colour
information can be determined from the RGB colour value. The
tint or hue is determined by the relative proportions between
the red, green and blue values. Thus, CC33FF will have a
different hue than CC3300, the latter having a bluer hue. The
brightness and saturation of the colour is also determined by
the relationship between the red, green and blue values. For
instance 66FF99 will have the same hue as 33CC66 (medium-
green) but will be brighter.
RGB values can be converted directly into other colour
systems such as H5L (hue, saturation, lightness). The HSL
system is intuitively suitable for carcass image analysis
purposes in that it makes direct reference to~the
2Z
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
distinguishing characteristics of hue; chrome (saturation) and
value (lightness) described previously.
It has been determined that muscle tissue, fat and
cartilage have the HSL colour characteristics shown in Table
1.
Table I.
hue saturation lightness
muscle reddish medium medium
tissue
fat reddish hard to high
(hard to measure
measure )
cartilage reddish low low-medium
(hard to
measure)
The colour of an object is dependent on illumination. To
assess meat colour objectively, the image colour is corrected
to known standard lighting conditions. The brightness of the
image is first equalized to account for differences in the
illumination level across the carcass surface or rib eye
muscle. The image is then adjusted to standard lighting
conditions.
To adjust the image for brightness, an image of a uniform
18~ grey card with a known RGB colour value is recorded. The
standard colour value of each pixel in the grey card image is
used to adjust the colour value of each corresponding pixel in
a carcass or rib eye muscle image. The RGB value of each
pixel in the carcass or rib eye muscle image is adjusted to
the known lighting condition as:
22
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
TrueCrey(c)~~
Pixel(c);j=Pixel(c);Jx C,QmeraGrey(c)~~
where pixel(c)'i~ is the adjusted pixel value and pixel(c)ij is
the pixel to be adjusted located at row i and column j and c
is an R, G, or B colour component. The true grey (c)i3 is the
known. grey value at standard lighting conditions and the
camera grey (c)i~ is the camera perceived value. The (RGB?i~ at
pixeli~ becomes (RGB) ij' after brightness adjustment.
The brightness corrected image is subjected to colour
adjustment by a calibration matrix A as:
~u ~m ~n
(rgb)Jl.. _ (rgb)t/. g2i a?z a~
ail a32 X33
The calibration matrix is derived by comparing five
colours (black, white, red, green and blue? to be calibrated
to the same five colours under known standard lighting
according to the following relationship:
XA = B
where X is a S x 3 matrix representing r,g and b values of the
five colour samples, A is a 3 x 3 calibration matrix to be
solved for, and B is a S x 3 matrix of known constants,
representing the r, g, and b values of five colour samples
under standard lighting. A least squares solution for the
calibration matrix A is obtained as:
A - (X'X) 1X~B
23
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
where X' is the transpose of matrix X find (X'Xy -i is the inverse
of matrix (X'Xy .
III. Hot Carcass Image Analysis
A. Camera Calibration
A latticed white board having a grid of black lines
spaced at lOcm intervals is used as a backdrop to scale the
carcass image. Prior to commencing a carcass analysis
session, the latticed backdrop is imaged to determine the
number of pixels in the image frame (scale). A threshold
value is established to distinguish the white background from
the grid lines. As the board is bright white and the grid
Lines are dark black, that is, they are at the extremes of the
brightness range, the threshold value may be arbitrarily set
as the median brightness level (on an HSL colour measurement
system).
As shown in Figure 4, the digital image shows the
latticed white board 100 against a background 102 of empty
space. To find the area (number of pixelsy in each grid
square 104, the boundaries of each square 104 must be
detected. Because the squares are regular geometric shapes,
the boundaries of each square are defined by the regular
intersections 105 of the grid lines 106. Finding the grid
line intersections 205 involves searching in a regular pattern
along each row and column of pixels in the image using a mask
to locate a desired shape determined by the mask used. once
the grid line intersections along the grid lines defining the
right edge and the bottom edge of the grid have been located,
the entire grid may be extrapolated as the grid is defined by
a regular geometric pattern of Lines intersecting at right
angles.
The intersections 105 of the grid lines l00' in the
latticed background describe a number of different right angle
24
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
L shapes. These could also be described as the shapes
defining the four corners of a square. Masks may be defined
to identify each of the possible intersection shapes. For
example, if the screen shown in Figure 4 is analysed by
searching pixel by pixel, vertically upwards from right to
left, along lines 108, the first intersection shape to be
detected along the grid line defining the bottom edge of the
grid will be a lower right corner shape. A Lower right corner
can be identified by a 5x5 pixel mask 110 as shown in Figure
5, wherein the H's represent pixels of high intensity and the
L's represent pixels of low intensity. The mask 110 is
defined such that the sum of the brightness values in the L
pixel positions is subtracted from the sum of the brightness
values in the H pixel positions. The resulting difference is
indicative of the fit of the mask.
Because a thresholding process is used, brightness levels
will arbitrarily be reduced to two numerical designations.
For instance, on a 0-255 range of brightness levels, all
intermediate brightness levels may be reduced to either a
value of 10 (low brightness - black line area) or 200 (high
brightness -.white area) depending on whether the brightness
value of the pixel falls above or below a pre-determined
threshold value. Thus, a lower right corner shape is detected
when (sum H) - (sum L) - greatest difference for the mask 110
shown at Figure 6. In this example, the maximum difference
for the mask 210 would be (9x200) - (16x10)=1640. This
difference will be achieved when the mask is located such that
each H pixel is located over a bright (white background) pixel
of the digital image and each L pixel in the mask is located
over a dark (black grid line 106) pixel of the digital image.
A better fit of the mask is indicated by a greater difference
between (sum H) - (sum L) .
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Conversely, as shown in Figure 7, when the mask 110 is
not aligned over the lower right corner shape, the difference
of (sum H) - (sum L) will be lower. For the poorly fitting
mask 110 shown in Figure 7, the difference would be ((3x200) +
(6x20)) - ((10x200) + (5x20)) - -1400. It will therefore be
apparen~ that the mask :.10 is not centred over a lower right
corner shape.
The first lower right corner shape is located by
searching across the image from bottom to top, one column of
pixels at a time, working from right to lef t. Once the first
Lower right corner shape has been located (lower-right corner
of grid), the mask 110 may be moved from right to left in the
same row of pixels in the image to locate lower right corner
shapes located in the same row (bottom-most horizontal grid
line}. By moving right to left along the X axis to determine
the positions of first and second lower right corner shapes,
it is possible to determine the number of pixels between the
positions of the lower right corner shapes.
Other grid line 106 intersection 105 shapes such as upper
right corner shapes may be detected using appropriately
designed masks 110. By repeating this process along the Y
axis to detect lower right corner shapes, the grid
intersections on the right-most vertical grid line can be
detected. By determining the number of pixels between lower
right corner shapes on the right- most vertical grid line, it
is possible to calculate the number of pixels in each lOcm x
lOcm square.
By calculating the number of pixels in the digital image
of each lOcrn x lOcm grid square cn the latticed background,
the system can be calibrated to determine the actual distance
represented by each pixel. This calibration becomes useful
when the digital images are used for making actual
26
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
measurements of carcass features.
B. Carcass Image Analysis
After the hot carcass imaging system 20 has been
calibrated, the latticed background panel 12 is replaced with
a backdrop panel 12 having high contrast with the carcass.
Preferred panel colours are blue and green. Preferably, the
panels 12 are substantially non-reflective.
The first carcass half is moved into position in front of
the backdrop 10 and a digital image is recorded.
As shown in Figure 8, analysis of the image begins by
inserting a rough processing rectangle 112 around the carcass
portion of the image (the image encompasses both an area in
which the carcass is found, and a surrounding blue background
area). The processing rectangle I12 is positioned so that it
is somewhat larger than the carcass area. The processing
rectangle is divided into twelve equal-sized zones lI4 for
image processing purposes. Brightness thresholding is
conducted separately in each zone I14 to account for variation
in illumination o~ the carcass surface. Alternatively and
preferably, during camera calibration, the camera 22 may be
adjusted so that the image frame is no larger than the blue
background, thereby excluding any potentially interfering
objects in the background.
1. ThxeshoZding the Edge of the Carcass Image
Five equally spaced points I16 are selected along the
bottom border of the lower middle zone for further analysis
using a mask technique. The mask 118 used is 10 pixels Lang
in the Y coordinate and I pixel wide in the X coordinate as
shown in Figure 9. The mask 118 is moved upwardly one pixel
at a time in each of the columns designated by one of the five
selected points 1I6. At each one-pixel increment, the sum of
the values of the L pixels in the mask 118 is subtracted from
27
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
the sum of the values of the H pixels. The values measured in
the mask 118 are brightness values on an arbitrary brightness
scale such as 0 -255, brighter values designated as a greater
number. The background/carcass border is detected when (sum
h) - (sum L) - greatest value. At that point, each of the H
pixels in the mask is centred over a carcass image pixel and
each of the L pixels in the mask is centred over a background
image pixel. The average of the low (L) pixels in the mask is
determined. This represents the average brightness of the
image background.
Of the five samples taken, that having the highest
average background brightness is used as the reference
standard. The brightness level of the background is used to
set a brightness threshold to distinguish the image background
(blue panels 12) from the carcass image (bright - fat
covered). A small constant is added to the background
(average of L pixels in mask) brightness Level to provide a
margin of error. Any image pixel having a brightness level
higher than the threshold is presumed to be a carcass pixel.
Alternatively and preferably, the edge of the carcass
image is determined on the basis of hue, rather than
brightness. That is, the carcass having a reddishlyellowish
hue can be readily distinguished from the backdrop which has a
blue hue. To accomplish hue thresholding, the average hue of
the image background (blue panels 12) is determined,
greferably from ar_ image taken of the background without a
carcass present. As the background is of a substantially
consistent colour, the hue can be approximated from a very
small portion of the background. Turning to the carcass
image, if the hue of a given image pixel d=ffers from the
average hue of the blue background by a pre-determined
significant amount (for example - more than 40 degrees on the
28
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
HSL colour wheel), then the pixel is presumed to represent a
portion of the image containing the carcass.
2. Tracing the Edge of the Carcass Image
Once a position on the carcass border (background/carcass
boundary) has been detected, the outline of the carcass is
traced. As the image background blue panels 12) is dark and
the carcass outer surface is bright (fatty tissue), the
tracing procedure traces the boundary between the dark and
bright pixels. Working from the first carcass pixel (first
pixel above threshold established in the previous step)
detected at the lower right edge of the carcass border,
carcass outline tracing proceeds using a basic edge chain
s
linking algorithm to trace the inner boundary of carcass
pixels in the image in a clockwise direction. Edge chain
linking algorithms are well known and the basic theory and
practice of such algorithms are described in Gozalez, Rafael
C. et al., Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley, USA,
1993. Working upwardly in each column from the lower right
edge of the image frame, the first carcass pixel (bright -
fat) identified using the mask 118 shown in Figure 9 is
detected. Starting with the first carcass pixel; tracing
commences by moving vne pixel below the first carcass pixel
and tracing clockwise through the nine pixels immediately
surrounding the first carcass pixel to find the next carcass
pixel (next pixel having a brightness value greater than the
threshold). The tracing process is then repeated until the
entire carcass border has been traced. In this manner, each
edge pixel in the carcass image is detected, thereby tracing
the outline of the carcass image.
29
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
3. Distinguishing the Outside Laft Carcass Image
a. Finding the Tail
Once the carcass outline has been traced, the left and
right carcass half images are distinguished. As discussed
previously, in the Canadian grading system, the left side of
the carcass is analysed. For use in Canada, the invention
discards the images taken of the right hale of the carcasses.
The left and right half carcass images will appear generally
as shown in Figures I0 and 11 respectively. Certain distinct
anatomical. features may be detected in each carcass image. To
distinguish the right and left carcass halves, the position of
w the tail 220 is first detected.
To detect the position of the tail 120 in the image, the
half way point in the list of X coordinates in the carcass
outline (beginning from the point furthest to the lower right)
is selected. The remainder of the list of X coordinates in
the carcass outline is searched until the same X coordinate is
found. Connecting these two X coordinates will define a line
122 bisecting the carcass into left and right halves.
Because it is known that the tail 120 will not be found
in the left half of the image, the left half of the image can
be disregarded and only the right half of the image need be
further analysed. As shown in Figure 12, for each X
coordinate, there will be at Least two Y coordinates, one
defining the upper edge 124 of the carcass, and the other
defining the lower edge 126 of the carcass. The change in Y
values along the line defining the carcass edge will be
greatest on the edge of the carcass where the tail 120 is
found .
~a
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
b. Distinguishing the Eone-Side From the
Skin-Side of the Carcass
Once the position of the tail 120 has been determined,
the image is analysed to determine whether the image shows the
bone-side ar the skin-side of the carcass. As shown in
Figures 10 and 11, the skin-side surface of the carcass is
covered in a relatively homogeneous layer of fat (bright) 128.
The bone-side surface of the carcass is characterized by the
alternating dark and light bands 130, representing,
respectively, lean tissue between the ribs and the rib bones.
The ribs are not visible from the outside view of the carcass.
To identify the ribs, a horizontal (X axis) line 132 is
defined a selected distance inside the carcass boundary on the
tail side. The brightness value of each pixel along the
horizontal line 132 is determined. Rapid significant
variation in the brightness level along the horizontal Line
132 indicates that the image depicts the inside surface of the
carcass where the ribs are exposed. The brightness level
along the outside surface of the carcass will not vary greatly
as the outside surface of the carcass is covered with a
relatively continuous layer of fat.
Using the information regarding the position of the tail
and whether or not the ribs are ir. view, it is possible to
determine the carcass half and orientation being viewed. The
skin-side left half image is used for Canadian grading, and
the skin-side right half image is used for U5 grading. The
skin-side left image is characterized by the ribs not showing,
and the tail 120 appearing at the top of the image.
4. Carcass Measurements
As will be discussed in greater detail herein, a variety
of measurements are made on the carcass image outline. These
measurements are useful as independent variables in predictive
31
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
equations for predicting various carcass grading parameters.
Not all of the possible types of measurements will be used in
each predictive equation. For instance, as discussed in the
Examples herein, a highly accurate equation far predicting
saleable yield in beef cattle was developed without using any
of the oblique angle or curvature measurements discussed
herein as independent variables.
The carcass measurement techniques described herein are
particularly useful as they do not require any manual
measurement or analysis of the carcass. Rather, certain
distinctive anatomical features of the carcass may be
identified by image analysis techniques. The remaining
measurements may all be made as a function of the position of
the anatomical features originally identified.
a. LocatiaQ Anatomical Reference Points
A number of anatomical carcass features can be
distinguished on each carcass image outline. As shown in
rr~igure 13, the tail 220, lower hip 134, dorsal hind Leg 136,
lower armpit 138, and upper armpit I40 are characterized by
readily discernible protrusions or indentations along the
carcass outline and can therefore be located by image analysis
techniques. To locate one of the anatomical features
referenced above, analysis of the carcass image outline is
restricted to a short segment of the carcass image outline
within which the subject anatomical feature is known to be
located.
Within each selected short segment of the image outline,
the anatomical feature of interest typically appears as a
protrusion or indentation in the carcass image outline. As
shown in rFigure 14, to representation of the lower armpit 138?
the protrusion or indentation can be estimated to be an apex
142 defined by two intersecting Lines 144, 146. Although the
32
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
apex 142 shown in Figure 14 defines the position of the lower
armpit I38 along the line segment bounded by 148, 15Q
relatively accurately, the actual position of the apex I42 and
the direction of lines (vectors) 144, 146 are not critical.
A Line 152 is projected perpendicular to a line I54
bisecting the angle formed by the apex I42. The furthest
point along the segment of the carcass image outline under
analysis from perpendicular line 152, as defined by line 156,
represents the lower armpit 138. This method can be used to
locate any anatomical reference point on the carcass outline
that can be defined as a protrusion or indentation of the
carcass image outline.
The projection of virtual lines 144,146 and the bisection
of the angle formed between lines 144,146 is not critical.
This is merely a graphical representation of one method by
which to position line 152 approximately perpendicular to apex
142, so that apex 142 will be the most distant point along the
Line segment bounded by 148,150 from line I52.
b. Locating Other Anatomical Points
Other anatomical points, described herein as the loin,
the rib, the chuck, the neck, the ventral hind leg, the flank,
the 12th rib, and the brisket, can be located as proportions
of the distance between certain of the previously determined
anatomical reference points.
As shown in Figure 15, the distance ir_ the X coordinate
between the tail 120, located at carcass outline point bl, and
the upper armpit 140, located at carcass outline point b9, is
defined as d~. The distance in the X coordinate between the
dorsal hind leg I36, located at carcass outline point b3, and
the lower armpit 138, located at carcass outline point b8, is
33
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
defined as d~. Anatomical points can be located as shown in
Figure 15 and Table 2.
Table 2.
Anatomical proportion of proportion of d,
Point d;
loin (b13) 0.19
rib (b12) 0.60
chuck (bll) 0.74
neck (b30) 1.00
ventral hind 0.00
leg (b4)
flank (b5) 0.19
12th rib (b6) 0.52
brisket (b?) 0.73
c. Definiag Pximal Cuts
Once the anatomical points have been determined, primal
cuts may be calculated. Primal cuts are the principal cuts of
meat produced during the butchering process, and which include
the hip, sirloin, loin, rib, chuck, flank, plate, and brisket.
Primal cuts are shown in Figure 16. Primal cut lines are
identified by their anatomical endpoints. Point pl is located
42~ of the distance along line b12-b6.
Point p2 is located at the intersection of a line plotted
upwardly from pl, parallel to line b12-b13 and a line plotted
rightward from b13, parallel to the Y axis (note that the axes
in Figure 16 are reversed from their usual positions).
Point p3 is located at the intersection of line p2-b5
with a line Blotted rightward from bl, parallel to the Y axis.
Point p4 is located 45~ of the distance along line b12-
b6.
34
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Point p5 is located at the intersection of line bll-b7
and a line plotted downward from p4, parallel to line b6-b7.
Front primal cuts are separated from hind quarter primal
cuts by line b6-b12.
The hip primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge outline
and lines bl-p3 and p3-b5.
The sirloin primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge
out?ine and Lines b1-p3, p3-p2, and p2-b13.
The Loin primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge
outline and lines b13-p2, p2-pl, and pl-b12.
The rib primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge outline
and lines b12-pal, p4-p5, and p5-b11.
The flank primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge
outline and lines bS-p2, p2-pl, and pl-b6.
The plate primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge
outline and lines b6-p4, p4-pS, and p5-b7.
The brisket primal cut is bounded by the carcass edge
outline and Lines b7-p5, and p5-b9.
The length of the carcass is recorded tlength in pixels
of line b3-b9) and the area of each of the eight primal cuts
is determined. The sum of the areas of the eight primal cuts
provides the total carcass area.
d. Linear Measurements
Linear measurements are made to divide the carcass into
six linear regions, the hind leg, Lower hip, upper hip, lower
back, mid back and shoulder.
As shown in Figure ~.~, line b3-b9 defines the carcass
length. Carcass length line b3-b9 also divides the carcass
dorsally/ventrally.
Prior to making the following measurements, the image is
rotated so that line b3-b9 is parallel to the X axis (as
above, axes in Figure I7 are reversed).
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Lines separate arid define the linear regions. Line b2-
cl, separating the hind leg region from the Lower hip region,
projects from b2 perpendicular to carcass length line b3-b9,
to intersect the opposite side of the carcass outline at c1.
Line b1-c2, separating the lower hip from the upper hip,
projects from the tail (b1? perpendicular to the carcass
length line b3-b9, to intersect the opposite side of the
carcass outline at c2.
Line c8-c3, separating the upper hip region from the
lower back region, is made perpendicular to the carcass length
line b3-b9 33~ of the distance along line b3-b9.
Line c7-c4, separating the lower back region from the. mid
back region, is made perpendicular to the carcass length Line
b3-b9 53~ of the distance along line b3-b9.
Line c6-c5, separating the mid back region from the
shoulder region, is made perpendicular to the carcass length
line b3-b9 80~ of the distance along line b3-b9.
Line b3-b9, defining the carcass length, forms the basis
for a series of measurements which may be useful as
independent variables in equations fox predicting carcass
grading parameters. Each of the six linear regions (the hind
leg, lower hip, upper hip, lower back mid back and shoulder)
is divided into a plurality of fine divisions, for instance 10
divisions, perpendicular to line b3-b9. The distance from
line b3-b9 to the ventral or dorsal edge of the carcass image
outline at each fine division may be used as an independent
variable. Arithmetically dividing each of the linear regions
into many small equal divisions is a convenient method for
providing a large number of reproducible carcass image
measurements, any of which may be useful as independent
variables in predictive equations for carcass grading
parameters.
36
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
e. Oblique .Angle Measurements
As shown in Figure 18, the distance from b9 to each of
cl, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, bl and b2 is measured.
Numbering and lettering in Figure Z8 corresponds to that in
Figure 17.
Angles Lc6-b9-c5, Lc7-b9-c4, Lc8-b9-c3, Lbl-b9-c2, and
Lb2-b9-cI are measured.
f. Curvature Measurements
Cubic spline functions are estimated for carcass outline
segments b2-b3 and bl-b13 by known methods as described in
Gozalez, eC al., supra.
Iv. Rib Eye Muscle haage An.a.lysis
A. Camera Ca3ibration
1. BriQhtaass.
Using the rib eye imaging system 32, a digital image of
an 18~ grey card is acquired to calibrate the camera for
brightness level. The image is pre-processed with a low-pass
filter which allows only minor variations in brightness to
pass. This eliminates variations in the brightness level
across the image.
The average brightness of the uniform grey image is
determined using a spectrophotometer and each image pixel is
corrected for brightness as described previously. This data
is utilized during carcass image analysis to compensate for
lack of uniformity in the light source, and to improve the
accuracy of colour measurements.
2. Coloux Balance and Image Scale.
Colour balance and image scale information is determined
from an image acquired of a standard colour calibration sheet
available from Kodak and used far colour correction as
described previously. A standard colour calibration sheet.has
black, white, red, green and blue colour calibration squares,
37
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
and a large white image area calibration square, each side
being eight mm in length. The RGB values of the colour
calibration squares are recorded for use in colour correction.
The image scale is determined by calculating the area of
the image area calibration. square on the colour calibration
sheet. A row of pixels approximately half way down the image
is searched from left to right. As the background of the
colour calibration sheet is dark, and the image area
calibration sa_uare is bright, it is assumed that any pixel
along the horizontal row searched that has a brightness value
below the median value on the brightness scale is a background
pixel, and pixels above the median brightness value fall
within the calibration square. The number of bright pixels
per row is summed. This process is repeated for each row
above and below the centre row of pixels in the image until
the first row in both directions (up and down) is encountered
which does not contain any bright pixels. When the boundary
of the entire calibration square has been determined, the area
of the calibration square is calculated (in number of pixels)
for use in verifying the accuracy of the following image area
calculation based upon a matrix solution.
During image scale determination, the top-Left (TL),
bottom-left tBL), and bottom-right (BR) corners of the
calibration square are recorded. The length in pixels of
vectors BL-TL and BL-BR is calculated and correlated to their
actual lengths (8 cm). A simple matrix is solved to find kX
(the X scale) and kY (the Y scale) and the results are
compared to those determined in the previous step. If the
results differ beyond an acceptable limit (ie. 50 square
pixels), the image calibration step is repeated. The camera
is rotated slightly in each direction between each step to
ensure rotation-invariant image size calibration.
38
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
B. Rib Eye Muscle Image Acquisition
After 24 hours of chilling, a cut is made between the
12th and 13th ribs of the carcass. The weight of the carcass
opens the cut so that the rib eye camera 34 may be inserted in
the resulting notch and an image taker..
The rib eye imaging system 32 is used to take a digital
image of the rib eye area. As discussed previously, the rib
eye is the common name for the longissimus dorsi muscle.
There are two principal reasons that the rib eye muscle is
examined for meat grading purposes. First, rib eye muscle
grading measurements are known to correlate closely with the
grade of the rest of the carcass. Secondly, the rib eye is
the most expensive cut of meat in the carcass and i.s therefore
of the greatest importance for grading purposes.
The digital image of the rib eye muscle area is corrected
for any deviation in brightness by adding each pixel
brightness deviation as calculated previously for each pixel
in the uniform grey brightness calibration image to the
brightness value of each pixel in the rib eye muscle area
image.
C. Pxe-processing of Rib Eye Muscle Image
1. Tracing of Outer Fat Edge
The rib eye muscle image appears generally as shown in
Figure 19. The rib eye (longissimus dorsi muscle) 200 appears
as a generally elliptical dark region in the centre of the
image. Subcutaneous fat 202 appears as a bright band below
the rib eye muscle 200. The background 204 is the open space
surrounding the hanging carcass and appears dark. Muscle
tissue 206 which abuts but is not part of the rib eye 200 may
be present.
As shown in Figure 20, the image is searched from bottom
to top along a plurality of narrowly spaced columns of pixels
39
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
208, spaced about 5 mm apart (actual distance on rib eye
muscle) to locate distinct rises in pixel brightness. In this
step, the image is analysed in 5-pixel increments in order to
rapidly approximate the outer fat edge 210 of the image. Each
distinct rise in pixel brightness in a column of pixels 208
identifies a point 212 located approximately along the outer
fat edge.
Points 212 are joined along a minimal er_ergy path. A
minimal energy path has little internal energy. That is, it
is as straight a Line as possible. A straight line has no
internal energy whereas a zip-zap line has high internal
energy. This path defines the approximated outer fat edge
210. If the approximated outer fat edge 210 does not span the
entire image horizontally, it is extended horizontally as a
straight line left-right to the image borders.
The outer fat edge 210 of the carcass may be damaged by
small cuts or nicks. These will appear as irregularities or
indentations in the approximated outer fat edge. A smoothing
process is therefore used to even-out the approximated outer
fat edge and disregard small irregularities. As showiz in
Figure 21, damage to the outer fat edge 210 will likely appear
as a small indentation 214 in the approximated outer fat edge.
Most indentations can be represented as three "turns" in
approximated lane 216. Normally, the approximated line forms
a 180° angle around a point 212. At an indentation 214, line
2I6 makes at least three turns 218, 220, 222. A turn is
recognized to occur when the angle of the approximated line
210 around a point 212 differs substantially from I80°. The
first and last turns over a small area indicate the beginning
and end of a deviation. ih the approximated outer fat edge line
210. The points 212 at the first turn 218 and last turn 222
are joined to eliminate the indentation 214. Points within
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
the indentation are transposed onto the new smoothed line.
All pixels below the smoothed approximated outer fat edge
line 210 are set to a minimum brightness level (black) in
order to avoid extraneous interference with image processing
by any objects appearing ir. the background of the image.
2. Differentiating Left and Right Carcass Side
Image S
Any right-side rib eye muscle images will be flipped
horizontally and processed like left side images. All
algorithms may be designed to process the left-side rib eye
muscle images, if the system is designed for Canadian grading
standards.
As shown in Figure 20, the bottom edge of the rib eye
muscle tapers upwardly on one side. On the right half of the
carcass, the rib-eye will taper upwardly on the left. On the
left half of the carcass, the rib-eye will taper upwardly on
the right.
The Y coordinate value of two points 224, 226 along the
approximated outer fat edge line 210, spaced approximately 20~
inside the left and right image borders is measured. If the
left-most point 224 is closer to the top of the image frame
than is the right-most point 226, the image represents the
right side of the carcass. If the right-most point 226 is
closer to the top of the image frame than is the left-most
point 224, the image represents the left side of the carcass.
3. Thresho2ding of the Iatage
The entire image is thresholded for brightness to
distinguish pixels representing muscle tissue (medium
brightness or value) from pixels representing fat (high
brightness or value) and thresholded for saturation to
distinguish pixels representing muscle tissue (medium
saturation) from pixels representing cartilage (low
4I
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
saturation).
a. Increasing Image Contrast
Each pixel in the rib eye muscle image is re-mapped onto
a high contrast image ("IMap"). The brightness level of each
pixel in the IMap is calculated by the formula:
IMap(i) - 255(1.0 - (Y(i)/255)~2/3
where Y(i) is the brightness component (0:255) of the pixel
value at position "i" of the image. This function enhances or
exaggerates this brightness difference between muscle tissue
pixels and fat pixels, thereby increasing the image contrast.
This function also results in colour reversal so muscle tissue
pixels, which ordinarily appear dark and would have a low
brightness number (0:255), appear bright and have a high
brightness number (0:255) on the IMap, and fat pixels, which
ordinarily appear bright and have a high brightness number
50:255), appear dark and have a low brightness number (0:255)
on the IMap.
b. Meat Colour Brightness Thresholdiag
The rib eye muscle IMap image is divided into six equally
sized zones prior to thresholding analysis. Colour
thresholding analysis is performed separately in each zone.
.Any portion of the image below the outer fat edge is
disregarded. This increases accuracy as the average muscle
tissue colour may vary in different parts of the image.
In each section, all rib eye muscle pixels are
thresholded for brightness. An arbitrary value of 55 on a
scale of 0:255 is established as the cutoff value between
muscle tissue and fat pixel brightness. Any pixel having a
brightness value below 55 is presumed to be fat (brightness is
reversed on IMap). The remaining pixels are presumed to
represent either muscle tissue or cartilage.
42
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
c. Meat Colour Saturation Thresholding
In each section, the average muscle tissue pixel (pixels
not determined to be fat as determined in the previous step)
colour saturation is determined. A threshold saturation level
is established by subtracting a constant value from the
average muscle tissue colour saturation level, thereby
providing a margin of error. A pixel having a saturation
Level below the threshold value is presumed to represent
cartilage. A pi.x~l having a saturation level over the
threshold value is presumed to represent muscle tissue. For
the purposes of the remaining steps, cartilage is treated as
being equivalent to fat. Thus, pixels representing muscle
tissue are distinguished from pixels representing any other
tissue, whether fat or cartilage.
4. Reduced Scale IMap
A reduced scale IMap, denoted the "QIMap" is created in
order to reduce the amount of data to be analysed in some of
the following steps. The IMap is preferably scaled down at a
ratio of 8:1, though other ratios may be used, to form the
QIMap. Where, for instance, the scaling down. ratio is 8:1,
the colour information from 6g pixels in the IMap is averaged
(eight in the x dimension and eight in the y dimension), and
becomes the mean colour information for one pixel in the
QIMap.
5. Locating the Rib Eye Muscle Within the Image by
Blob A.aalysis
Blob analysis is used to distinguish the rib eye from
extraneous muscle tissue that appears to contact the rib eye
muscle, but that is not anatomically part of the rib eye
muscle. In blob analysis, the muscle tissue pixels in the
QIMap are grouped into four-connected objects. In four-
connected object grouping, an image pixel is considered to be
43
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
in the same group or blob as a pixel immediately adjacent to
the left, right, top or bottom. Adjacent corner pixels are
not considered to be part of the same blob. This may be
contrasted with eight-connected object grouping, in which a
pixel is considered to be part of the sane object as a pixel
occupying any of the eight surrounding pixel positions.
Four-connected and eight-connected object analysis are known
techniques which are described in Gozalez et al., supra.
In blob analysis of the gIMap, only those pixels having
QIMap exceeding a muscle tissue brightness threshold value are
considered part of a blob. The brightness threshold is
established by subtracting an arbitrary constant from the
average non-fat pixel IMap value for the entire image.
Analysis proceeds left to right, top to bottom. However,
other orderly analysis patterns may be used, such as Ieft-
right, bottom-top. Analysis proceeds until the first muscle
tissue pixel in the image is detected. The pixels immediately
above and to the left of the first muscle tissue pixel are
examined to determine whether one or both is also a muscle
tissue pixel. If the analysis proceeds from top-bottom, Ieft-
right, the pixels above and to the left of the first muscle
tissue pixel located will not be muscle tissue pixels. The
process continues in the same pattern until the next muscle
tissue pixel is detected. Once again the pixels immediately
above and to the lef t of the current muscle tissue pixel
examined are tested to determine if one or both are also
muscle tissue pixels. If yes, then the currer~t pixel under
examination is known to be part of the same blob as the muscle
tissue pixel immediately above and/or to the left. Where a
pixel is determined to be part of a first blob, and is
subsequently determined to also be connected to a second blob,
it is concluded that what originally appeared to be two blobs
44
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
actually form a single blob.
The largest blob detected during blob analysis is
indicative of the position and size of the rib eye muscle.
6. Estimating the Position of the Rib Eye Muscle
in the Image
A small area within the rib eye image in which the rib
eye muscle itself is actually located is demarcated by
defining a processing area denoting the rib eye box around the
rib eye muscle. The accuracy of colour discrimination of
different tissues is increased as, to the greatest extent
possible, extraneous tissue around the rib eye muscle area is
excluded from analysis. To define the rib eye box, the
approximate position of each of the top, bottom, left and
right edges of the rib eye muscle are determined.
a. Locatissg the Right Edge of the Rib Eye
Muscle
Starting at the centre of the bottom edge of the øIMap
and working to the right, each column of pixels is searched
from bottom to top, stopping when the first muscle tissue
pixel is located. As shown in Figure 22, the length of the
columns of non-muscle tissue pixels 228 will become
substantially longer when the right edge 230 of the rib eye
muscle is reached. Therefore, when. the length of the column
of non-muscle tissue pixels becomes substantially longer, it
is known that the position of the right edge of the rib eye
muscle has been detected. This column is defined as the right
side of the rib eye box.
b. Locating the Bottom Edge of the Rib Eye
Muscle
Starting at the centre of the right edge of the QIMap and
working toward the bottom edge, each row of pixels is searched
from right to left, stopping when the first muscle tissue
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
pixel is located. As shown in Figure 23; the length of the
rows 232 of non-muscle tissue pixels will become substantially
longer when the bottom edge of the rib eye muscle is reached.
Therefore, when the length of the row of non-muscle tissue
pixels becomes substantially longer, it is known t~:at the
position of the bottom edge of the rib eye muscle has been
detected. This row 234 defines the bottom side of the rib eye
box.
c. Locating the Top Edge of the Rib Eye
Muscle
As shown in Figure 24, a row of pixels 236 in the QIMap
is selected approximately Scm (actual measurement on rib eye
muscle) above the bottom side of the rib eye box. The total
number of muscle tissue pixels on the row up to the column
where the right edge of the rib eye muscle has been located is
tabulated. Moving upwardly towards the tap of the image, one
row of pixels at a time, the tabulation of the total number of
muscle tissue pixels on each row continues until the sum of
the lengths of the pixels on the row is less than 2.Scm, based
on the image size calibration. The first row 238 detected
where the sum of the lengths of the pixels is less than 2.5cm
is presumed to be the top edge of the rib eye muscle and
defines the top side of the rib eye box. By summing the total
number of muscle tissue pixels in a row, rather than using
only continuous runs of muscle tissue pixels, discontinuities
in the rib eye muscle edge are disregarded for the purpose of
this approximation of the location of the top edge of the rib
eye muscle.
d. Locating the Left Edge of the Rib Eye
Muscle
As shown in Figure 25, a column o: pixels 240 on the
QIMap located approximately l3cm (actual rib eye muscle
46
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
measurement) left of the right side of the rib eye box. is
selected and the total length of the number of muscle tissue
pixels in the portion of the column bounded by the top and
bottom sides of the rib eye box is determined. This
measurement is made in each column, working to the left, until
the total length represented by the muscle tissue pixels in
the column is less than 1.5 cm. This column 242 indicates t~.e
positron of the left edge of the rib eye muscle and is defined
as the left side of the rib eye box.
?. ~ Secondary Thresholding to Improve Muscle
Tissue/Fat Discrimination
The rib eye box defined on the ~IMap is projected onto
the IMap and the pixels within the rib eye box which were not
concluded in step IV(C)(3) to be fat or cartilage are re-
thresholded in each of the six zones calculated in step
IV(C)(3). As many pixels clearly representing cartilage and
fat were already identified by saturation and brightness
thresholding in step IV(C)(3), and the area outside the rib
eye box can be disregarded, colour brightness thresholding of
the rib eye muscle can be accomplished with greater
sensitivity. This allows fat having a slightly dark or
reddish tinge to be distinguished from lean muscle tissue.
47
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
8. Rib Eye Muscle Edge Tracing
Rib eye muscle edge tracing is conducted on the IMap.
The rib eye box is divided into upper and lower halves and
three vertical columns to form six equal zones. Tracing
starts in the column of pixels at the centre of the bottom
side of the rib eye box. Working from bottom to top, the
column of pixels is examined until the first muscle tissue
pixel is located. This is presumed to be a pixel on the edge
of the rib eye muscle.
The rib eye muscle is traced using an eight-connected
edge tracing technique as discussed previously, now tracing in
a counter-clockwise direction. Approximately the last ten
edge pixel positions are cached.
Tracing around the rib eye muscle continues until the
first rib eye muscle edge pixel is again reached. If the area
defined by the rib eye muscle edge is too small, that is,
below an arbitrary cut-off value, the trace is discarded and
edge tracing is repeated from a new starting point upwards
from the original first edge pixel and above the traced area
rejected. This avoids errors resulting from commencing
tracing from a muscle tissue pixel that is not on the rib eye
muscle edge.
a. Identifying Extraneous Muscle Tissue
Attached to the Rib Eye Muscle
Extraneous muscle tissue that is not part of the rib eye
muscle may nevertheless appear to be attached to the rib eye
muscle on the basis of blob analysis. The extraneous muscle
tissue must be identified and removed during rib eye muscle
tracing. Removal of extraneous muscle tissue involves tracing
inside the extraneous muscle, thereby cutting it off from the
rib eye muscle. As used herein, "cutting" or making a "cut"
means the process of excluding extraneous tissue f tom the rib
48
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
eye muscle by estimating the actual rib eye muscle edge and
tracing inside the extraneous muscle tissue.
As shown in Figure 19, the rib eye muscle edge 205, while
generally relatively straight, typically turns sharply
outwardly where extraneous muscle tissue 206 is attached.
Such sections of muscle can therefore be identified by sharp
turns in the rib eye muscle edge.
As shown in Figure 26, during rib eye muscle tracing, a
group of 10 pixels is examined at a time, the 10 pixel group
moving incrementally along the traced edge 242. The angle
LABC is measured at each incremental step. It is known that
the traced rib eye muscle edge is turning sharply when LABC
falls below a selected acute angle such as 45°. As shown in
Figure 26, LABC will only be less than 45° when point B is
near the vertex 244 of the turn. A turn is defined as an area
along the traced rib eye muscle edge from the point along the
edge (position of B) where LABC first falls below 45° (or some
other prescribed angle) and the point along the edge where
LABC first again becomes greater than 45°.
Figure 27 is a symbolic representation of the outline of
the rib eye 200, showing a sharp turn 246. When a sharp turn
246 has been identified, a line 248 is plotted, bisecting the
angle formed by the turn 246.
A roughly elliptical or egg-shaped figure 250 is plotted,
surrounding the rib eye muscle 200. The ellipse 250 roughly
approximates the general shape of the rib eye muscle and fits
closely within the rib eye box, contacting the rib eye box on
each of its four sides. A line 252 is plotted from the centre
254 of the ellipse through the vertex of the turn to intersect
a point 256 on the ellipse. A line 258 is plotted through the
point on the ellipse tangent to the ellipse. Lines 248 and
258 are compared. If they are roughly parallel, the turn 246
49
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
is further considered as a site for cutting. The turn 246 is
given further consideration for cutting because the roughly
parallel direction of Lines 248 and 258 suggest that the
proposed cut (near line 248) would follow the predicted rib
eye muscle edge, rather than cutting in towards the centre of
the rib eye muscle along a path that would be atypical of a
rib eye muscle outline. If lines 248 and 258 are not roughly
parallel, the turn 246 is rejected as a potential cutting
site, and tracing continues because the proposed cut would
likely not follow the predicted rib eye muscle edge, but would
be directed toward the centre of the rib eye muscle.
b. Determa.ning the Path of a Cut
As shown in Figure 28, if cutting at a sharp turn 246
identified in the previous step has not been rejected, a
series of lines 260 radiating from the vertex of the turn 246
are plotted approximately 60° to either side of the line
bisecting the turn. The sum of the brightness values along
each line 264 is recorded. Recording stops when the line
reaches a significant body of fat (ie. 4 or more consecutive
pixels). This may represent fat at the edge of the rib eye
muscle 262 or intramuscular fat 264. As colours are reversed
on the IMap, high brightness values represent muscle tissue.
A line raving a high brightness sum is either a long Line
through muscle tissue, or it is interrupted by few fat pixels.
A line having a low brightness sum is likely a short line
through muscle tissue, terminating at the fat layer
surrounding the rib eye muscle or a blob of intramuscular fat.
The line representing the most likely cutting path is
therefore the line having the lowest brightness sum.
If the lowest sum line still has a relatively high
brightness sum (above a selected threshold), a cut will not be
made as the proposed cut line is long, and therefore probably
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
projects substantially into the interior of the rib eye muscle
rather than towards the edge. If the proposed cut line is
below the threshold sum brightness, a cut will be considered
further.
As shown in Figure 27, a small ellipse 266, substantially
smaller than ellipse 250, is potted inside ellipse 250. The
small ellipse 266 is sufficiently small that it will. always
fall inside the rib eye muscle outline. If the start point or
end point of a proposed cut would fall within the small
ellipse, the cut is rejected. If neither the start point or
end point of the proposed cut would fall within the small
ellipse, a cut is made.
Using this process, accurate cuts can be made to exclude
extraneous muscle tissue from the traced rib eye muscle
outline. As shown in Figure 19, the boundary between an
extraneous muscle segment 206 and the rib eye muscle 200 is
often dotted with a chain of small fat globules forming an
interstitial seam of fat 258. The cut analysis technique
described above will select a series of short cuts from one
fat globule to the next, which, in most cases, will fairly
accurately describe the rib eye muscle edge.
c. Confirming Edge Tracing
In certain cases, particularly where there is no
interstitial seam of fat between the rib eye muscle and a
piece of extraneous muscle tissue, the process described in
the previous step will fail to cut off a piece of extraneous
muscle tissue: A technique described herein as progressive
angle analysis is therefore used as a safeguard against missed
cuts.
As shown in Figure 29, a line 270 is projected from the
centre 272 of the ellipse 250 (shown in Figure 27~ to each
point along the traced rib eye muscle edge, progressing
51
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
consecutively in a counter-clockwise direction, starting from
an arbitrary point of origin 274. As the traced rib eye
muscle edge is a generally regular shape, with few scarp
turns, line 270 will appear to sweep in a counter-clockwise
direction t~;rough points 274 - 282. Angle 284 will therefore
continue to increase as the sweep of line 270 progresses.
Between points 282 and 286, the sweep of line 270 will reverse
and move in a clockwise direction. Angle 284 will therefore
become smaller. Between points 286 and 288, angle 284 will
once again increase. Point 288 is co-linear with points 272
and 282. The change in angle 284 indicates the location of
the sharp turn at 282.
As shown in Figure 30, as in step IV(C)(8)(a?, the sharp
turn at point 282 is bisected, and a series of radiating lines
290 are projected. Unlike step IV(C)(8)(a), the lines 290 do
not terminate when fat is reached, but rather when the rib eye
muscle outline 205 is reached. The shortest line 2.90, that
being the line 290 to point 292 is selected for possible
cutting.
Cutting along line 290 from point 282 to point 292 would
cut off muscle segment 294. The longest axis 296 of muscle
segment 294 is determined. If line 290 is less than
approximately half the length of line 295, the next r_riteria
far cutting is examined. If line 290 is greater than
approximately half the length of 296, a cut is not made.
The edge of muscle segment 294 (along the traced rib eye
muscle outline between points 282 and 292) is approximated as
a series of short straight lines, each about 20 pixels in
length, to define a many-sided polygon. The polygon is broken
into triangles, and a triangle area formula is used to
determine the area of each triangle in the polygon. The sum
of the areas of the triangles making up the polygon equals the
52
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
area of the polygon and is used as an estimate of the area of
muscle segment 294. The proportion of the area of muscle
segment 294 that falls inside projected ellipse 250 is
determined. The proposed cut will be rejected if any of the
following criteria are met:
- the area of muscle segment 294 that falls outside
projected ellipse 250 is greater than l5cm' ion 1:1 scale
with actual rib eye);
- the area of the rib eye outline that would remain after
excision of muscle segment 294 would be less than 50cm2
(on 1:1 scale with actual rib eye); or
- less than one half of the total area of muscle segment
294 falls outside projected ellipse 251.
If none of these criteria are met, a cut is made.
9. Determin3ang the Axes cf the Traced Rib Eye
Muscle
After tracing of the rib eye muscle outline has been
completed, the number of pixels on each row within the traced
rib eye muscle outline on the IMap is tabulated. This data is
readily correlated with the image size information derived
during camera calibration. Each pixel within the rib eye
muscle outline is determined to be either a fat pixel or a
muscle tissue pixel on the basis of brightness thresholding.
The full colour information of pixels in the original
acquired image corresponding to muscle tissue pixels
identified in the IMap axe recorded and used to calculate an
accurate average colour of the rib eye muscle tissue. The
average rib eye muscle tissue colour is corrected with the
colour information obtained during camera calibration.
Average rib eye muscle tissue colour information may be used
for meat grading purposes.
As the number of fat pixels within the rib eye muscle
53
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
outline is known, the proportion of intramuscular fat, or
marbling, can be readily determined by dividing the number of
fat pixels within the rib eye muscle outline by the total
number of pixels within the rib eye muscle outline.
All intramuscular fat pixels are subjected to blob
analysis, as described previously. Blobs of fat larger than a
selected threshold size are eliminated from the calculation of
the percentage marbling.
10. Determining the Thickness of the ,Subcutaneous
Fat Layer
As shown in Figure 31, it may be difficult to distinguish
the layer of subcutaneous fat 202 used for grading purposes
from other fat 298. The subcutaneous fat layer 202 is bounded
by the rib eye muscle outline 205, and the fat edge 210 traced
in step IV(C)(1). Generally, a fine dark line 300 may be
detected separating the subcutaneous fat layer 202 from the
other fat 298.
As shown in Figure 32, starting from the right-most pixel
column 302 on the rib eye muscle outline 205, the length of
the line 304 between the fat edge 210 and the rib eye muscle
outline 205 is determined. The length of line 304 defines the
thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer 202 in the right-most
pixel column 302 on the rib eye muscle outline 205,
Using the same method, the thickness of the subcutaneous
fat layer 202 is measured at approximately 3mm (measurement on
rib eye muscle) intervals, working leftward. Typically, the
other fat 298 is present primarily on the le:Et side of the rib
eye muscle image (left side of carcass rib eve muscle) and is
not found on the right side of the rib eye muscle. The
thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer 202 is therefore most
easily determined on the right side of the rib eye image.
Using a mask LLHHHHH, an attempt is made to locate fine
54
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
dark line 300 by searching upward along columns at five column
intervals, working leftward. If a fine dark line 300 is
found, it is used to define the inside edge of the
subcutaneous fat layer 202 by connecting the points found
along the fine dark line 300. This defined inside edge is
rejected if it would result in the thickness of the
subcutaneous fat layer at the left side ov the image being
substantially different than the average thickness of the
subcutaneous fat layer at the right side oø the image.
IL no fine dark line 300 can be detected, or is too faint
to be reliably detected, the position of the inner edge of the
subcutaneous fat layer 202 where it meets other fat 298 (which
would be in the same position as fine dark line 300) is
estimated to be the same as the average thickness of the
subcutaneous fat layer at the right side of the image, where
there is little likelihood of encountering other fat 298. A
line is therefore plotted a distance upward of the fat edge
210 that represents the average thickness of the subcutaneous
fat layer at the right side of the image.
The inner fat edge is then smoothed out using the process
described in step IV(C)(1?.
li. Determining the Length of the Rib Eye Muscle
As shown in Figures 33A to 33C, the left-most 306 and right-
most 308 points on the rib eye muscle outline are selected. A
series of lines are projected from point 306 to a range of
points 310 along the rib eye muscle outline near point 308.
The length of each line from point 306 to point 3I0 is
compared with the length of the line from point 306 to point
308 to determine which line is longest.
Similarly, a series of lines are projected from point 308
to a range of points 312 along the rib eye muscle outline near
paint 306. The length of each line from point 308 to point
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
312 is compared with the length of the line having endpoints
308 and 306 to determine which line is longest.
The longest line detected above defines the rib eye
muscle length.
12. Determining the Width of the Rib Eye Muscle
As shown in Figure 34, line 314 defining the length of
the rib eye muscle is divided into nurn,erous (approximately
200) equal divisions 316. The distance from each point 3I8 on
the traced rib eye muscle outline 205 above line 314 in the
column of pixels at each division 316 is added to the distance
from each point 320 on the traced rib eye muscle outline 205
below line 314 in the column of pixels at each division 316.
The column having the greatest total length from point 318 to
line 314 plus line 314 to point 320 defines the rib eye muscle
width.
As a safeguard, the width measurement is rejected if it
falls on a.column outside of the centre 50~ of the length of
the rib eye muscle.
13. Measuring the Thickness of the Subcutaneous Fat
Layer for Grading Purposes
Once the length of the rib eye muscle has been
determined, this information, in conjunction with the data
collected in step IV(C)tl0y about the thickness of the
subcutaneous fat layer, can be used for grading analysis.
Grading analysis will vary according to beef grading
practices in various jurisdictions. In Canada, for instance,
as shown in Figure 35, the line describing the length of the
rib eye muscle 3I4 is divided into four equal sections,
thereby defining points 322, 324 and 326. At each of points
322, 324 and 326, a line 328 is plotted downward,
perpendicular to line 314, to intersect the inner edge of the
subcutaneous fat layer 202 (that being the rib eye outline
56
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
205). The thickness of the subcutaneous fat layer 202 is
determined along each line 328 through points 322, 324 and
326, by calculating the distance between the inner edge of the
subcutaneous fat layer 202 (that being the rib eye outline
205) and the outer edge 210 of the subcutaneous fat Layer 202,
perpendicular to the outer edge 210. The minimum thickness of
the subcutaneous fat layer in the right quadrant, representing
the standard "grade fat" measurement, is also determined.
This information is used in determining the yield grade of the
carcass.
v. Analysis of Data Collected by the Hot carcass Imaging
System aad the Rib Eye Muscle Imaging System
The measurements obtained from the carcass imaging system
and the rib eye imaging system are useful as independent
variables in predictive equations to predict various carcass
parameters. Predictive equations may include independent
variables consisting of measurements taken only from the whole
carcass (one side only), only from the rib eye, or may include
measurements taken from both the whole carcass and the rib eye
image.
Carcass parameters of particular interest include those
which are indicative of the commercial value of the carcass.
As described in the Examples herein, predictive equations have
been developed to predict the saleable yield of beef
carcasses. Other carcass parameters of interest include,
without limitation, lean body mass ar_d carcass yield. mean
body mass may be defined as the total mass of skeletal muscle
in an animal ar as the proportion of the entire live weight of
the animal represented by skeletal muscle. Carcass yield may
be defined as the combined mass of skeletal muscle, bane and
associated fat as a proportion of live animal weight. This
value is commonly expressed as a percentage (e_g. 60~ carcass
57
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
yield) or as a weight relationship (e. g. 600g/kg live weight).
In developing a predictive equation, carcass image and
rib eye image analysis as described hereinabove is performed
on a sample population of carcasses and the value of the
carcass parameter of interest is measured for each carcass.
The sample population contains a sufficient number of
carcasses that a statistically significa~t relationship or
correlation between one or more of the selected independent
variables and the carcass parameter (dependent variable) of
interest can be determined. The sample population may contain
as few as three carcasses, and more preferably greater than
ten carcasses, and still more preferably, greater than 100
carcasses.
The relationship between the independent variables and
the dependent variables can be determined by any of a number
of known statistical methods such as multiple linear
regression, Artificial Neural Net learning, cluster analysis
and discriminant analysis. In a preferred embodiment, the
multiple regression procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc.,
Cary, North Carolina) is used. jnlhere there are multiple
independent variables, a solution utilising matrix algebra may
be used. Far instance, where nine independent variables are
being analysed, and the dependent variable i:5 saleable yield,
the multiple regression model may be:
~'J - a + bixy + brTZ~ + b~r3l + b~x~~ + b~s~ + bfiX6~ + brr-r, + bsxsJ + b~9j
~' a
9
= a + ~ b x,.f + e~
t=s
where:
yJ = the saleable yield of the j-th animal, j=x.,2...9,
a = the overall mean,
58
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
bi = the i-th regression coefficient, i.=1, 2..,9,
xj = the j-th predictor variable, j=1,2,...9,
e~ = random error associated with the j-th observation.
The following matrix and vectors are defined:
I xi~ x~~ . d xgi y~ e~ bi
I .r~., x,,,, . . x9, y~ e, bz
x = . . . . . . ~ Y = . , a = . . and b =
X~n .rte . . x9n yn en bn
The complete set of equations is
y=Xb + a with E(y), E(e)=O and war(e)=a2 I, where E denotes the
expectation operator and a2 is a constant.
The regression coefficient b is estimated as,
b = (X'X)-i X'y
The prediction is
9
y=a+~ b~x~l
~_,
Information taken from the rib eye analysis alone may
also be used to derive a predictive equation for a carcass
parameter such as saleable yield as described above.
Alternatively, the rib eye analysis information may be used to
determine a quality grade for the carcass. As discussed
previously, North American quality grading of carcasses into
59
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
grades such as A, AA, and AAA generally depends on the
percentage of intramuscular fat (marbling> of the carcass, as
estimated from the rib eye. As the accurate.tracing and
muscle tissue/fat discrimination techniques of the present
invention permit accurate assessment of the percentage of
intramuscular fat in the rib eye, the rib eye analysis
techniques of the invention are useful for determining quality
grades of carcasses.
The inver_tion is further illustrated by the following
non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLE
An apparatus and process of the invention was tested to
evaluate the accuracy of the rib eye imaging system in
determining rib eye parameters. For convenience, the
embodiment of the invention tested in the following examples
is referred to herein by the inventors' designation "Lacombe
CVS".
Rib eye images were obtained and analysed with the
Lacombe CVS from 40 beef cattle carcasses. The rib eyes were
then manually traced by human graders and measured using a
grading grid. As shown in Table 3, the Lacombe CVS tracing of
the rib eye area correlated closely with the manual tracing.
Squaring the correlation provides the R~ value.
Table 3
Correlatian of CVS traced rib eye area and graders est~.ma.tes
Graders' grid area Graders' traced area
Computer traced area 0.89 0.87
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
EXAMPLE 2
A total of 65 carcasses, representing ?9, 19 and 22
carcasses of A, AA and AAA grade, respectively were sampled
and railed to the back cf the grading stand for further
measurement (Table 5). A certified grader assessed the
quality grade and marbling in AMSA (American Meat Science
Association) units directly from the carcass and again from
the captured image displayed on the computer screen.
Images of United States Department of Agriculture
marbling standard photographs were analysed with the Lacombe
CVS in order to calibrate the CVS to make quality grade
determinations. The estimated percentage of infra-muscular
fat as determined by the CVS for Canadian and US quality
grades is set forth in Table 4_
Table 4
Lacombe CVS estimates of USDA marbling standard
Canada quality US quality grade Lacombe CVS estimated ~
grade infra-muscular fat
AA Slight 0.9 ~
AAA Small 2.0 ~
Canada Prime Slightly Abundant 9.'7 ~
The rule for assigning quality grade is shown in Table 5.
61
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Table 5
Lacombe CVS rules for assigzriag Canadian quality grade
Grade Rules
H1 0~ CVS marbling
A 0~ < CVS marbling ~ < 0.9~
AA 0.9~ s CVS marbling o < 2.0~
AAA 2.0~ s CVS marbling ~ < 9.7~
Canada Prime 9.7~ <_ CVS marbling o
Table 6 shows the CVS ~ marbling determinations, the AMSA
scores determined by the certified grader directly from the
carcass and as determined from the CVS computer screen.
Table 6
Percent marbliag by quality grade
A AA AAA
Number of 19 19 22
carcasses
Computer ~S 2.73~2.20 4.90~1.12 6.33~1.70
marbling
AMSA 289.47~36.13 487.89-=29.92 542.27~63.39
Screen AMSA 427.50~53.23 521.25-33.64 563.33~71.39
The correlation of CVS estimated marbling ~ with grader's
AMSA in real time was 0.81 (Table 7). The correlation
improved to 0.92 when the grader graded the carcasses again
from the computer screen.
62
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Table 7
Correlations between CVS % marb3.ing estimate anc3 grader's AMSA
score
AMSA .81
Screen AMSA .92
Based on n=65
Ey_A.M~LE 3
The Lacombe CVS was tested to determine whether
consistent grading determinations could be made on the same
carcass rib eye under different lighting conditions.
44 beef steaks having varying levels of marbling were
purchased from super markets. Each steak was analysed S times
at the Lacombe Meat Research Centre in Lacombe, Alberta,
Canada in the cutting room, in a meat cooler, and in a display
case. These areas represent lighting conditions of bright
fluorescent light, dimmed fluorescent light and incandescent
light, respectively.
As shown in Table 8, the repeatability estimates for rib
eye area and ~ marbling ranged from 0.86 to 0.96, indicating
that the rib eye imaging system can provide consistent results
under different lighting conditions. The repeatability
estimates for grade fat were lower because the steaks were
kept at room temperature and were therefore very soft and
changed shape when they were moved from one location to
another.
63
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Table 8
Repeatability of Lacombe CVS measurements in various
lighting conditions
CVS measuxements Location
Cutting roam Meat Cooler Display case
Grade fat 0.66 0.84 0.44
Rib eye area 0.96 0.96 0.86
Marbling % 0.96 0.96 0.96
EXAMPLE 4
A second study was conducted to assess the repeatability
of measurements taken by the Lacombe CVS. On the first day of
the study, a human grader made standard measurements of grade
fat, rib eye area and marbling on the rib eyes of 14 carcasses
using a measuring grid. The carcasses were then measured
twice within a minute by the CvS. '~he carcasses were manually
pushed one at a time to be measured by the rib eye camera. On
the second day of the study, essentially the same procedures
were carried out on 21 aciditior_a~ carcasses.
Table 9 shows the correlation between the two successive
measurements taken by the Lacombe CVS on each carcass.
Overall, the average correlation can be seen to be very high,
close to 97~.
64
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Table 9
Correlation of two repeated CVS measurements
Correlation betweex~ Study 1(n=14) Study 2(n=2I)
CVS first and second 0.98 0.97
grade fat measurements
CVS first and second 0.98 0.98
rib eye area measurements
CVS first and second 0.97 0.94
marbling measurements
EXAMPLE 5
A further repeatability study was conducted in which
grade fat, rib eye area and ~ marbling were measured for rib
eyes of 166 beef carcasses with the Lacombe CVS. Measurements
were repeated between 2 and I1 times, with a mean of 4
repeated measurements. The carcasses were also graded by
human graders. A total of 166 head of beef cattle,
representing carcasses from 2 sexes by 3 weight groups by 3
fatness leve2s, were sa.~rcpled. Data collection was completed
in a 3-day cycle. In the first day of the data cycle, images
were obtained of intact carcasses, prior to chilling. Poor
quality images were noted so those carcasses were not selected
for cutout the next day. In the second day, carcasses were
selected according to a pre-planned sampling scheme. Rib eye
images from chilled carcasses were obtained and human graders'
grades were recorded. In the third day, the selected
carcasses were cut out (dissected) by a crew of 7 cutters who
dissected 20 left half carcasses to 1/" trim saleable yield in
3 hours. Technicians supervised the cutout and recorded
weights of various cuts.
ss
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
The carcass cutout data were assembled and edited.
Saleable meat yield was defined as the sum of the cut weights
plus the weights of the trim (S0, 75 and 8S~ lean) expressed
as a percentage of the side weight. The data from image
analysis were merged.
As shown in Table 10, the repeatability for grade fat,
rib eye area and ~ marbling were all g~eate~ than 0.95.
Table 10
Repeatability of CYS measurements
CVS measurements Repeatability
Grade fat 0.99
Rib eye area 0.95
Marbling ~ 0.95
EXAMPLE 6
Correlations between~Lacombe CVS and human grader
measurements for grade fat thickness and rib eye area were
determined for the data collected in Examples 2 and 3. As
shown in Table 11, correlations between the Lacombe CVS and
grader measurements ranged from 0.89 to 0.99 in 3 separate
studies.
Table II
Correlation between CvS and grader measurements
Between CVS and grades Study 1 Study Study 3
;2
measurement for (n=I4) (n=21) (n=166)
Grade fat 0.89 0.96 0.95
Rib eye area 0.9I 0_99 0.95
66
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
EXAMPLE 7
The degree of correlation between human grader marbling
(quality grade) determinations and those of the Lacombe CVS
was determined. The CVS marbling percent estimation was
ca1'_brated with the regional grading supervisor, Food
Protection & Inspection Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food
Canada. The threshold for deciding whether a pixel is muscle
or fat was adjusted by trial and error in an effort to mimic
the marbling levels seen by the grader. After the adjustment
was complete, a test was conducted to determine the
correspondence between the marbling grade assigned by the CVS
and by the grading supervisor. Out of a total of 62 carcasses
tested, mostly AA and AAA grades, only 4 were in disagreement_
This suggests that the Lacombe CVS can be calibrated to match
an experienced grader to a reasonable level of accuracy.
EXAMPLE 8
Saleable yield predictive equations were determined using
the data acquired in Example 5. Hip, sirloin, loin, rib,
chuck, flank, plate and brisket primal cuts were determined on
carcass images as described in step III(B)(4)(c) in the
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment. As
described in step III(B)(4)(d) of the Detailed Description of
the Preferred Embodiment and shown in Figure 17, the carcass
images were divided into six linear regions described as the
hind leg, lower hip, upper hip, lower back, mid back and
shoulder linear regions. Each linear regiok: was divided into
equal divisions, demarcated by lines plotted transversely
67
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
to the long axis of the carcass image. T_n each linear region,
the transverse lines were assigned reference numbers 1-9,
starting at the posterior end or the carcass image. The
distance from the points where each transverse line
intersected the ventral and dorsal regions of the carcass
image outline to the mid-line cline b3-b9 in Figure i7) were
determined.
Angular measurements and curvature measurements as
described in steps IIZ(B)(4)(e) and (f) were also determined.
Ir~ total, in excess of 400 carcass and rib eye measurements
were made and tested for correlation with carcass saleable
yield.
Stepwise regression was applied to the data to arrive at
the best models to predict saleable yield from intact carcass
measurements, rib eye measurements and the combination of
these two sets of measurements. The Ra (multiple correlation
squared), which indicates how well the data fit the model, and
residual standard deviation (square root of the residual mean
square), which indicates the error of predicting the cutout
value from CVS measurements, are sus~marized in Table 12. The
accuracy of the Lacombe CVS (RSD=1.03? to predict saleable
yield was higher than the Australian system evaluated by Jones
et al. (1993, RSD=1.27} and Richmond et al. (1395,
RSD=1.65}. The most accurate results were obtained when
measurements both from the intact carcass image and from the
rib eye image were included as independent variables in the
predictive equation. The use of 20 measurements from the
carcass image alone proved to be the next most accurate
approach, followed by 5 CVS measurements only from the rib
eye. Notably, all saleable yield equations determined using
CVS measurements proved to be of greater accuracy than
equations based upon measurements made by a human grader.
68
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
Table Z2
Accuracy of using computer vision measurements to predict
saleable yield
Measurements included in the model RZ~ RSD (%)~~
Based on grader's measurements
at grading site 0.57 1.55
Based on 20 carcass
measurements alone 0.67 1.46
Based on 5 rib eye
measurements at grading site 0.61 1.49
Based on a combination of 20 carcass
and 5 rib eye measurements 0.84 1.03
' multiple correlation squared
" RSD-residual standard deviation
The saleable yield prediction equation based upon rib eye
measurements only was determined to be:
% saleable yield = 76.23$706 + 0.0i0I97 TARS- 0.349$52 T'PFar
- 0.427767 AF~~. + 0.25422 tYIFAr-- 0.193396 GF,~r
where:
T~ - total area of the rib eye;
TpFAT = total percentage of intramuscular fat in the
rib eye;
AFAT - average of rib eye subcutaneous fat thickness
measurements at top, mid, and bottom points as
shown in Figure 35, reference numbers 322, 324,
and 326;
MFaT - subcutaneous fat thickness at mid point as
shown in Figure 35 at reference number 324; and
GFaT - subcutaneous fat thickness at the standard
69
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
grade fat measurement point, being the minimum
subcutaneous fat thickness i.n the right-most
quadrant as shown ir_ Figure 35.
The saleable yield predictive equation based upon carcass
measurements ar~ly was determined to be:
~la Saleable yield = 106.085803 - 176.062150 PR~$ +262.044441 PyotN -
340.168645 PP~rF
- 270.060083 A4 + 295.1439 Ab + 32.222714 HINDS + 24.016820 HIND22
+ 7.035919 L~~pj,~ - 51.034738 LHjpjs ~ 14.944928 MBpGxj - 27.824773 M-BACKl2
- 89.700540 SHLD2 + 73.786202 SHLDcS - i 5.522698 SHLD23 + 35.014305 C~Y~
where:
PRIa - ratio of the area of the rib primal cut to
total carcass image area;
P~zN - ratio of the area of the loin primal cut to
total carcass image area;
pPLAT~ - ratio of the area of the plate primal cut to
the total carcass image area;
A4 - area of loin primal cut;
A6 - area of plate primal cut;
HINDS - ventral distance to mid-line for interval 1 in
the hind Ieg linear region;
HIND22 - dorsal distance to mid-line for interval 6 in
the hind leg linear region;
LH=p8 - carcass width for interval 2 ~_n the lower hip
linear region;
Z'HIP34 - dorsal distance for interval 9 in the lower hip
linear region;
1'HIP35 - ventral distance for interval 9 in the lower
hip linear region;
Ma~cxa - ventral distance for interval i in the mid-back
linear region;
Msncx~z - carcass width for interval 3 in the mid-back
'7 0
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
linear region;
SHLD2 - dorsal distance for interval 1 in the shoulder
linear region;
SHLD23 - dorsal distance for interval 6 ir_~ the shoulder
linear region; and
CWLB - average carcass width in the lower bac'.~c linear
regi or. .
The saleable yield predictive equation using measurements
from both the whole carcass and the rib eye as independent
variables was determined to be:
% Saleable yield = 79.448902 + 0.018258 T,~R~ - 0.191083 TPF,~r - 0.362784
AF,~r * 0.267664 MF,~r
- 0.185617 GF~r - 20.087953 PRJB + 214.ZI3295 PLOW - 243.441006 PpurE
- 224.112984 A4 + 171.424092 A6 + 13.781479 HlND3 + 14.12217 HIND22
* 2.862327 LXrps - 20.933690 LNJpj,~ - 25.216945 LHtP3s ~ 2.567813 MSACxt
- 1.173930 MBACxrz ' 59.559750 SHLD2 + 45.429554 SHLD6 - 11.739671 SHLD23
+ 41.817415 CWT
wherein the independent variables are as set forth above.
It will be noted in the above predictive equations for
saleable yield that none of the oblique angle measurements or
curvature measurements proved to be closely associated with
saleable yield of beef carcasses in this instance. Further,
it is somewhat surprising that the area of the plate primal
cut and the ratio of the area of the plate primal cut to the
total carcass outline area proved to be important variables,
in that the plate primal cut is of lesser economic importance
than other primal cuts from the beef carcass. It will further
be noted that the saleable yield predictive equations include
at least two distances from each of the ventral and dorsal
regions of the carcass image outline to the mid-line, at least
two carcass widths, and primal cut areas and the ratios of
primal cut areas to the total carcass image area.
All publications mentioned in this specification are
71
CA 02466289 2004-05-28
indicative of the level of skill of those skilled in the art
to which this invention pertains.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in
some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of
clarity of understanding, it will be obvious that certain
changes and modifications may be practised. within the scope of
the appended claims.
72
