Language selection

Search

Patent 2482436 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2482436
(54) English Title: POLYURETHANE ELASTOMERS FROM HDI PREPOLYMERS WITH REDUCED CONTENT OF FREE HDI MONOMERS
(54) French Title: ELASTOMERES DE POLYURETHANNE OBTENUS A PARTIR DE PREPOLYMERES HDI AVEC UN CONTENU REDUIT DE MONOMERES HDI LIBRES
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C08G 18/73 (2006.01)
  • A63B 37/00 (2006.01)
  • A63B 37/12 (2006.01)
  • C08G 18/10 (2006.01)
  • C08G 18/42 (2006.01)
  • C08G 18/44 (2006.01)
  • C08G 18/48 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • ROSENBERG, RONALD O. (United States of America)
  • ZHU, ZHENYA (United States of America)
  • PROCTOR, GLEN C. (United States of America)
  • LITKE, BRIAN D. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • CROMPTON CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • CROMPTON CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2010-08-10
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2003-04-08
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2003-11-06
Examination requested: 2008-02-25
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2003/010741
(87) International Publication Number: US2003010741
(85) National Entry: 2004-10-13

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
10/133,265 (United States of America) 2002-04-26

Abstracts

English Abstract


Polyurethane prepolymers with reduced amount of unreacted monomeric
hexamethylene 1,6-diisocyanate (HDI) are provided. Also provided are
polyurethane elastomers obtained by mixing the polyurethane prepolymers having
reduced amount of unreacted monomeric HDI with amine and/or hydroxy chain
extenders and durable, resilient, colorfast golf ball covers obtained
therefrom. Rolls, wheels and tires obtained from the polyurethane elastomers
are also provided.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne des prépolymères de polyuréthanne avec une quantité réduite d'hexaméthylène 1,6-diisocyanate (HDI) monomérique qui n'a pas réagi. L'invention concerne également des élastomères de polyuréthanne obtenus par mélange des prépolymères de polyuréthanne possédant une quantité réduite de HDI monomérique qui n'a pas réagi avec des extendeurs de chaîne amine et/ou hydroxy, ainsi que des revêtements pour balles de golf durables, élastiques et à couleur solide, obtenus à partir de ces élastomères. L'invention concerne également des rouleaux, roues et pneus obtenus à partir de ces élastomères de polyuréthanne.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


WHAT IS CLAIMED:
1. A process for preparing polyurethane prepolymers with below 2% by
weight of residual 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate monomer (HDI) comprising
a) reacting a stoichiometric excess of HDI with one or more polyols; and
b) distilling the reaction product in one or more agitated film evaporators in
series under vacuum.
2. The process of Claim 1 wherein the level of unreacted HDI is reduced to
below about 0.5% by weight.
3. The process of Claim 1 wherein the polyol is selected from the group
consisting of polyesters, polycaprolactones, polyethers, polycarbonates,
hydrocarbon polyols
and mixtures thereof.
4. The process of Claim 1 wherein the polyol is selected from the group
consisting of a polyester of adipic acid, a polyether of ethylene oxide,
propylene oxide or
tetrahydrofuran, a polycaprolactone, a polycarbonate, a hydrocarbon polyol and
mixtures
thereof, the polyol having a molecular weight from 100 to 12,000 and having a
functionality
of about 1.9 to about 2.3.
5. The process of Claim 1 wherein the distillation step comprises at least
three
agitated film vacuum evaporator distillation stages in series.
6. A polyurethane prepolymer comprising less than about 2% by weight of
unreacted HDI monomer, the prepolymer comprising the reaction product of one
or more
polyols and a stoichiomentric excess of HDI diisocyanate monomer at an NCO:OH
ratio in
the range of from about 2:1 to about 30:1 wherein the unreacted HDI
diisocyanate monomer
is removed by a process comprising distilling the reaction product in one or
more agitated
film evaporators in series under vacuum.
-23-

7. The polyurethane prepolymer of Claim 6 containing less than about 0.5%
by weight of unreacted HDI monomer.
8. The polyurethane prepolymer of Claim 6 containing less than about 2% by
weight of unreacted HDI monomer and containing an NCO content greater than
about 70% of
the theoretical NCO content for pure ABA structure.
9. The polyurethane prepolymer of Claim 6 containing less than about 0.1%
by weight of unreacted HDI monomer and containing an NCO content greater than
about
80% of the theoretical NCO content for pure ABA structure.
10. The polyurethane prepolymer of Claim 6 wherein the polyol component is
a polyol having a functionality of about 1.9 to about 2.3.
11. The polyurethane prepolymer of Claim 6 wherein the polyol is selected
from the group consisting of polyesters, polycaprolactones, polyethers,
polycarbonates,
hydrocarbon polyols and mixtures thereof.
12. The polyurethane prepolymer of Claim 6 wherein the polyol is selected
from the group consisting of a polyester of adipic acid, a polyether of
ethylene oxide,
propylene oxide or tetrahydrofuran, a polycaprolactone, a polycarbonate, a
hydrocarbon
polyol and mixtures thereof, the polyol having a molecular weight from 100 to
12,000 and
having a functionality of about 1.9 to about 2.3.
13. A polyurethane prepolymer terminated with HDI, the prepolymer
comprising no more than about 2% by weight free HDI and having at least about
70% of the
theoretical NCO content for pure ABA structure.
14. A polyurethane elastomer comprising the reaction product of (a) a
prepolymer terminated with HDI, said prepolymer comprising no more than about
2 wt.%
free HDI and having at least 70% of theoretical NCO content for pure ABA
structure with (b)
-24-

one or more hydroxy or amine-functional chain extenders, wherein the
equivalent ratio of
chain extender to prepolymer is in the range of from about 0.7:1 to about
1.2:1.
15. The polyurethane elastomer of Claim 14 wherein the HDI-terminated
prepolymer comprises less than about 0.5% by weight of unreacted HDI monomer.
16. The polyurethane elastomer of Claim 14 wherein the polyol is selected
from the group consisting of polyesters, polycaprolactones, polyethers,
polycarbonates,
hydrocarbon polyols and mixtures thereof.
17. The polyurethane elastomer of Claim 14 wherein the polyol is selected
from the group consisting of a polyester of adipic acid, a polyether of
ethylene oxide,
propylene oxide or tetrahydrofuran, a polycaprolactone, a polycarbonate, a
hydrocarbon
polyol and mixtures thereof, the polyol having a molecular weight from 100 to
12,000 and
having a functionality of about 1.9 to about 2.3.
18. The polyurethane elastomer of Claim 14 wherein the chain extender is
selected from the group consisting of 1,4-butanediol, 1,3-propanediol,
ethylene glycol, 1,6-
hexanediol, hydroquinone-bis-hydroxyethyl ether, resorcinol di (beta-
hydroxyethyl) ether,
resorcinol di (beta-hydroxypropyl) ether, 1,4-cyclohexane dimethanol, an
aliphatic triols, an
aliphatic tetrols, 4,4'-methylene-bis(3-chloroaniline), 4,4'-methylene-bis(3-
chloro-2,6-
diethylaniline), 4,4'-methylene-bis(2,6-diethylaniline), diethyl toluene
diamine, tertiary butyl
toluene diamine, dimethylthio-toluene diamine, trimethylene glycol di-p-amino-
benzoate,
methylenedianiline, methylenedianiline-sodium chloride complex and mixtures
thereof.
19. A golf ball comprising a core and a cover, the cover comprising a
polyurethane elastomer, the polyurethane elastomer comprising the reaction
product of (a) a
HDI-terminated prepolymer comprising the reaction product of one or more
polyols with a
stoichiometric excess of HDI diisocyanate monomer wherein unreacted HDI
diisocyanate
monomer is removed to less than about 2 wt. % and (b) at least one hydroxy or
amine
functional chain extender.
-25-

20. A wheel or roll comprising a core and a polyurethane cover wherein the
cover comprises the reaction product of:
(a) a HDI-terminated prepolymer comprising the reaction product of one or
more polyols with a stoichiometric excess of HDI diisocyanate monomer wherein
unreacted
HDI diisocyanate monomer is removed to less than about 2% by weight; and
(b) at least one hydroxy or amine functional chain extender.
-26-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
POLYURETHANE ELASTOMERS FROM HDI PREPOLYMERS
WITH REDUCED CONTENT OF FREE HDI MONOMERS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention generally relates to preparing castable polyurethane
prepoiymers containing reduced levels of unreacted hexamethylene 1,6-
diisocyanate (HDI)
monomer. More particularly, this invention is directed to producing high
performance HDI-
based cast polyurethane elastomer chains extended with diols and/or diamines.
These
systems provide improved industrial hygiene, easier casting, and improved
mechanical
properties. Golf ball covers produced from such systems exhibit a surprising
combination of
resilience, durability (groove shear resistance) and colorfastness. Rolls,
tires and wheels with
low hysteresis can also be produced from such systems.
2. Description of Related Art
Castable polyurethane elastomers are well known and can be formed from a
polyurethane prepolymer based on a reaction of a molar excess of diisocyanate
monomer(s),
e.g., aromatic diisocyanates such as diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI),
toluene
diisocyanate (TDI), or para-phenylene diisocyanate (PPDI) or aliphatic
diisocyanates such as
dicyciohexyhnethane diisocyanate (Hi,MDI), isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI) or
traps-1,4-
cyclohexanediisocyanate (CHDI), with an organic polyol, e.g.,
polytetramethylene ether
glycol (PTMEG), polyester or polycaprolactone glycol (PE), homopolymers and
copolymers
of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide (E/PO) and a chain extender, e.g., an
aliphatic diol
such as 1,4 butanediol (BD) or an aromatic diamine such as diethyltoluene
diamine
(DETDA). Catalysts such as triethylene diamine (TEDA) can be used to increase
the
reactivity Of the Con1p011e11tS. Additional ColTlpOnelltS SIICh aS, fox
example, UV stabilizers,
antioxidants, dyes and antistatic agents, can also be added.
The use of a molar excess of the diisocyanate monomers in forming
polyurethane prepolymers leaves residual unreacted monomer, resulting in
potential industrial
hygiene issues. Accordingly, efforts have been made to convert the
diisocyanate monomers
to polyurethane prepolymers with a reduced content of free diisocyanate
monomer. See, e.g.,

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
British Patent No. 1,101,410 and U.S. Patent Nos 4,182,825; 4,288,577;
4,892,920;
5,202,001 and 5,703,193. It is advantageous to have polyurethane prepolymers
with a
reduced Colltellt of flee dllSOCyaIlate 1210110111eT 111 preparing cast
elastomers in that better
hygiene, processing ease, and elastomer mechanical performance are achieved.
Prepolymers
from those diisocyanate monomers with the highest vapor pressures, hence the
greatest
hygiene concerns, e.g., TDI, PPDI, and IPDI, have been offered
c0111111eTClally in low-free-
monomer form from such sources as Crompton Corp., Baxenden and Air Products.
It is well known that both skin contact and i1W alation of diisocyanate
monomers must be carefully avoided. Much attention has been given to removal
of lmreacted
TDI from prepolymers. Various methods to reduce the unreacted TDI levels in
prepolymers
are lalown and disclosed in, for example, U.S. Patent Nos. 3,248,372;
3,384,624 and
4,061,662. Commercial TDI prepolylners with below 0.1 % residual monomer are
available.
Among the various processes that have been developed in attempts to reduce
the quantity of unreacted monomeric diisocyanate levels in prepolymers are
processes or
methods that use falling film evaporators, wiped film evaporators,
distillation tecluuques,
solvent extraction, and molecular sieves. For example, U.S. Patent No.
4,182,825 discloses a
process to reduce the amount of diisocyanate (TDI) by distilling a prepolymer
reaction
product under vacuum conditions. U.S. Patent No. 4,385,171 discloses a method
for the
removal of ulueacted diisocyanate monomer (TDI) from prepolymers by
codistilling the
prepolylner reaction product with a compound that boils at a temperature
greater than the
boiling point of the diisocyanate. U.S. Patent No. 5,703,193 discloses a
process for reducing
the amolmt of residual organ lc diisocyanate monomer (PPDI) in prepolylners by
codistilling
the reaction product in the presence of a Co111b111at1011 Of tW0 lllert
solvents, with the first inert
solvent having boiling point below the boiling point of the diisocyanate
monomer and the
second inel-t solvent having temperature boiling point above the boiling point
of the
diisocyanate monomer. U.S. Patent No. 4,061,662 discloses a process for the
removal of
ulueacted toluene diisocyanate from prepolylners by passing the prepolymer
reaction product
tluough a column containing molecular sieves. U.S. Patent No. 4,288,577
discloses the
removal of urlreacted methylene bis(4-phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) via solvent
extraction with
3 0 hexane.
_2_

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
Of these processes, distillation is much simpler and more economical than
solvent extraction or molecular sieve adsorption. There is no need to
subsequently separate
tile 1110110111er fr0111 either (fIa111111ab1e) heXalle SOIVeIIt Or
1110IeCLllar SIeVeS. However, m the
distillation of diisocyallate monomers fiom polyurethane prepolymers, h lgh
temperatures
must be avoided to prevent decomposition reactions in the prepolymer.
Distillation without
use of solvents is simpler still.
Another aliphatic diisocyanate is the lnollon per l,G-hexalllethyjene
diisocyanate (HDI). Only the aromatic monomers TDI and MDI are used more
widely.
However, while HDI finds widespread commercial use in polyluetllane coatings,
it is rarely
used in cast elastomers as tile health hazards of ullreacted IIDI monomer are
well known.
Because HDI has a low boiling point and high vapor pressure similar to TDI,
PPDI, and IPDI,
it is generally converted to a higher molecular weight adduct before sale.
These adducts
typically have a high functionality, e.g., about 3. They are not polyurethane
adducts, as they
contain no urethane lilllcages. Rather, they contain isocyanurate linkages or
biuret lilllcages.
The volatile HDI monomer is typically removed front the much Less volatile
adduct by
agitated film vacuum distillation. See, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 4,888,442 which
discloses such
adducts, with fiuletionality greater than about 2.5.
Despite the longstanding wide industrial use of HDI for polyurethanes and the
fact that such low-monomer polyLlrethalle prepolymer technology has Iong been
disclosed and
practiced commercially, the preparation of low free HDI polyurethane
prepolymers from
substantially difLmctional polyols has not been disclosed and cast elastomers
from HDI based
polyurethane prepOly111erS COIltaIIlIIlg reduced levels of ullreacted HDI
monomers are
L111IC110W11.
PrepOIy111erS Of both ar0111atIC alld allj7hatlC diisocyanates are heat-
sensitive.
However, prepolymers based on aromatic diisocyanates are much more thermally
Lmstable
than prepolymers based on aliphatic diisocyallates. Polyurethane prepolymers
made from
aliphatic diisocyanates are more resistant to thermal degradation than those
made from
aromatic diisocyallates, malting removal of aliphatic monomeric diisocyallate
by distillation
less difficult. However, polyurethanes based on aliphatic diisocyanates are
generally
accompanied by a decrease in the mechanical properties. The presence of an
aromatic
diisocyanate in the hard segment typically produces a stiffer polymer chain
with a higher
_,_

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
melting point. For example, U.S. Patent No. 6,046,297 discloses the
inferiority of
prepolymers based on H,~MDI to those from TDI Or 1111XtL11eS Of TDI and
H,~MDI.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide polyurethane prepolymers based
on an aliphatic diisocyanate which is suitable for producing cast polyurethane
elastomers
having excellent mechanical properties. Applications directed to golf ball
covers would be
particularly desirable, as existing cast polyurethane covers tiom aromatic
diisocyanates
exhibit an unwelcome tendency to yellow over time.
TDI-based solid polyluethane elastomers are most commonly made by
reacting the liquid prepolymers with aromatic diamines, e.g., 4,4'-methylene-
bis(3-
chloroaniline) (MBCA) to give satisfactory properties. Diol curatives give
generally inferior
properties with TDI prepolymers. MBCA is a suspect carcinogen that requires
careful
attention to industrial hygiene during casting
For industrial safety, it would be particularly desirable to have prepolymers
that are both (a) lOW 111 1110110111e11C diisocyanate level and (b) capable of
being used with diol
chain extenders or aromatic dialnine chain extenders that are not cancer
suspect. Methylene
dianiline derivatives that are fully allcylated at the four positions ortho to
the amine groups are
reported as a class to be Ames negative and of reduced suspicion as potential
carcinogens.
Examples of such aromatic diamines include 4,4'-methylene-bis(3-chloro-2,6-
diethylaniline)
and 4,4'-methylene-bis(2,6-diethylaniline), available from Lonza, Inc. (Basel,
Switzerland) as
Lonzacure MCDEA and Lonzacure MDEA respectively. (See, e.g., Voellcer et al,
"Journal
of Elastomers and Plastics", 20, 1988 and ibid, 30t'' Almual
Polyurethane/Teclmical
Marketing Conference, 1986.)
For many applications, aromatic alpine chain extenders are preferred to diol
(glycol) chain extenders - ''Glycol extended polyu rethanes are more flexible
and less strong
than the amine-extended analogs" as disclosed in Lamba et al., page 17, in
"Polyurethanes in
Biomedical Applications", CRC Press LLC, page 17, (1998), and give generally
higher
hysteresis. Consequently, amine-extended polyu rethanes are generally used in
applications
such as, for example, tires and rolls, which are subject to failure from
overheating by
hysteresis. Thus, it would be desirable to provide an aliphatic diisocyanate-
based prepolymer
that is capable of being chain-extended by a diamine curative to yield cast
elastomers with
low hysteresis.
-4-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object Of thlS 111Velltl011 to provide new, substantially
difimctional polyurethane prepolymers of HDI having a reduced content of
Luueacted HDI
whereby the polyurethane prepolymers are rendered capable of being chain-
extended by a
diamine curative, e.g., trimethylene glycol di-p-alninobenzoate, or a diol
curative.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a new distillation
method for removing HDI 11101101nerS from a prepolymer reaction product
mixture prepared
by the reaction of an HDI monomer with a polyol.
Another object of the present invention is to provide castable polyurethane
elastomer systems that are hygienically safe, that cast without difficulty,
and provide
elastomers with excellenfi mechanical properties.
A further object is to provide golf ball covers with excellent mechanical
properties, e.g., resilience and shear resistance, and with colorfastness on
aging, thereby
pehlnitting elimination of a paint coating on the covers obtained from such
prepolymers and
their elastomers.
Yet a fiuther object of the present invention is to provide wheels, e.g.,
those
used on forklifts, tires and rollers with excellent mechanical performance
obtained from such
prepolymers and their elastomers.
The present invention relates to the preparation of low free HDI polyurethane
prepolymers from difLmctional polyols and their ready conversion to cast
elastomers from
hydroxy or alpine curatives, e.g., aliphatic diols or aromatic diamines. The
resulting
elastomers possess surprisingly good dynamic mechanical properties in golf
ball covers, e.g.,
resisting mechanical damage fiom the shearing action of grooves in golf clubs,
while
providing high resilience for long flight.
The present invention also relates to reducing the content of urlreacted HDI
monomer in a difiulctional prepolymer reaction product by distilling the
reaction product
Lender vaculun in an agitated film evaporator. The molar ratio of the HDI
diisocyanate
monomer to the one or more polyols (i.e., the ratio of NCO groups to OH
groups) can range
from about 2:1 to about X0:1, with about 8:1 to about 20:1 being preferred.
The OH
functionality of the polyol or polyol blend is about 1.9 to about 2.3,
preferably about 1.98 to
about 2.1 and most preferably about 2Ø
-5-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
In a preferred e111bOdllllellt, two or more distillation stages are employed
in
series witll successively more powerful vacuLUn to successively reduce the
content of
IllOllOlller 111 the prepolyn ler to below about 2% by weight and lllost
preferably below about
0.1 % by weight.
The present invention furtller relates to polyurethane elastomers obtained by
Cha111 eXtendlllg the IOW 1110110111er1C HDI COIlta111111g pTepOIy111erS
COIltalIllllg IOW
CO11Ce11tratI0IlS Of I210I101ner1C HDI. The chain extenders can be llydroxy Or
alllllle functional
such as aliphatic diols or aromatic diamines. The extender/p repolyn ler
stoichiometry (i.e., the
molar ratio of hydroxyl or alpine groups to isocyanate groups) can range from
about 70% to
about 120% and most preferably from about 90% to about 105%.
Accordingly, the present invention is directed to a process for reducing the
anlolmt of residual 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) monomer in a
polyurethane
prepolymer reaction product comprising the step of distilling the reaction
product in one or
more agitated film evaporators in series under vacuum to reduce the level of a
llreacted HDI
monomer to below about 2 wt.%.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a polyurethane prepolymer is
provided which comprises the reaction product of one or more polyols and a
stoiclliometric
excess of HDI diisocyanate monomer at an NCO:OH ratio in the lalllge of from
about 2:1 to
about 30:1, wherein the unreacted HDI diisocyanate n lononler is removed by a
process
COlnpT1SI11g dIStIlIIIlg tile reaCtlOIl product 111 Olle Or lnOre agltated
flllll eVapOratOTS 111 SerleS
Llllder VaCLlLIln.
Yet allOtheT e111bOdIIIlellt Of tile preSellt lnVel1t1011, there is provided a
polyurethane pTepOly111eT C0111pr1SIIlg tile reaction product of one or more
polyols and a
stoichiometric excess of HDI diisocyanate monomer at an NCO:OH ratio ill the
range of from
about 2:1 to about 30:1, wherein the unreacted HDI diisocyanate monomer is
removed by a
process comprising distilling the reaction product in one or more agitated
film evaporators in
series under vacuum.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a polyurethane elastomer
comprising tile reaction product of (a) a prepolymer terminated with HDI, said
prepolymer
comprising no snore than about 2 wt.% free HDI and at least 70% of theoretical
NCO content
for pure ABA structure with (b) a hydroxy or amine-fiulctional chain extender,
wherein the
-6-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
equivalent ratio of chain extender to prepolymer is in the range of from about
0.7:1 to about
1.2:1.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a polyurethane elastomer
comprising the reaction product of (a) a HDI-terminated prepolymer comprising
the reaction
S product of one or more polyols having an overall functionality of about 1.9
to about 2.3 with
a stoichiometric excess of HDI diisocyanate monomer at an NCO:OI-I ratio in
the range of
from about 2:1 to about 30:1; wherein luueacted HDI diisocyanate monomer is
removed from
the reaction product by a prOCeSS COI11pr1S111g dlStllllllg the reaction
product in one or more
agitated film evaporators in series under vacuum; with (b) a chain extender
selected fioln the
group consisting of aliphatic diols, aromatic diamines or combinations
thereof; wherein the
equivalent ratio of prepolymer to chain extender is in the range of from about
0.7:1 to about
1.2:1.
Another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a golf ball eover
comprising a core and a cover, the cover comprising a polyurethane elastomer,
the
1 S polyurethane elastomer comprising the reaction product of (a) a HDI-
terminated prepolymer
COInprISIIlg the reaCtI021 product of one or more polyols with a
stoichiometric excess of HDI
diisocyanate monomer wherein luueacted HDI diisocyanate monomer is removed to
less than
about 2 wt. % and (b) at Least one hydroxy or alpine filnetional chain
extender.
Yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention is a wheel or roll
comprising a core and a polyurethane cover wherein the cover comprises a
polyurethane
elastomer comprising the reaction product of (a) a HDI-terminated prepolymer
comprising the
reaction product of one or more polyols with a stoichiometric excess of HDI
diisocyanate
monomer wherein urlreacted HDI diisocyanate monomer is removed to less than
about 2 wt.
and (b) at least one hydroxy or amine functional chain extender.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to the removal of the monomeric
diisocyanate HDI from prepolymer reaction products. The expression
"prepolylner reaction
product" as used herein shall be Understood to mean the .product from the
reaction of one or
more polyols and one or more diisocyanates. The polyurethane prepolymers
herein can be
obtained by reacting one or more polyols with a diisocyanate monomer by
procedures l~nown
_7_

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
in the art. According to the present invention, a prepoly~ner is formed by the
reaction of one
or more polyols, e.g., polyethers andlor polyesters, with a large excess of
diisocyanate
monomer, such as HDI.
U.S. Patent No. 4,888,442 disclosed the removal of low boiling, aliphatic
monomers 4,4'-mathylene bis (cyclolzexyldiisocyanate) and 1,6-
diisocyanatohexane fr0111
polyisocyanate adduct mixtures and solvents of lower boiling point by
distillation. According
to the process, the polyisocyanate adduct was prepared without solvent.
Unxeacted
diisocyanate level was first reduced by distilling the reaction product
without solvent once,
and further reduced by distilling the treated reaction product in the presence
of 2 to 30% of an
inert solvent. This process required separating the inert solvent from the
diisocyanates if the
solvent and/or the diisocyanates were to be reused, resulting in additional
Lumecessary cost.
The adducts of HDI were isocyanLUate and biuret types, but not polyurethane
prepolymer
type; they contained no Luethane bonds and did not derive froze polyols.
According to the present invention, it is practical to prepare polyurethane
prepolymers with HDI content reduced to below about 2% by weight, preferably
below about
0.5 wt.% and most preferably below about 0.1% by weight without the use of
solvents.
Preferably, the prepolymer is passed through two or more agitated film vacuum
distillation
stages in series with progressively deeper vacuum to reduce the HDI content to
below 0.1%
by weight.
The polyurethane prepolymers of the present invention can be prepared by
reacting a stoichiometric excess of the HDI diisocyanate monomers with one or
more polyols.
If desired, other diisocyanate monomers can be employed herein in minor
amotmts, e.g.,
amounts up to about 15 weight percent, preferably up to about 5 weight percent
and most
preferably about 0 weight percent. Examples of other diisocyanates include
aromatic
diisocyanates such as TDI and MDI. MDI is commercially available as the pure
isomer 4,4'-
diphenyl methane diisocyanate from such sources as Mondlu MP and Bayer and as
mixtures
of isomexs from such sources as Mondur ML, Bayer, Lupranate MI and BASF. Other
aromatic diisocyanate monomers include PPDI, tolidene diisocyanate (TODD,
naphthalene-1,
5-diisocyanate (NDI), diphenyl-4, 4'-diisocyanate, stilbene-4,4'-diisocyanate,
benzophenone-
4,4'-diisocyanate, and mixtures thereof. Aliphatic diisocyanate monomers
include dibenzyl-
4,4'-diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), 1,3 and 1,4-xylene
diisocyanates, 1,3-
_g_

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
cyclohexyl diisocyanate, I,4-cyclohexyl diisocyanate (CHDI), the tluee
geometric isomers of
1,1'-methylene-bis(4-isocyanatocyclohexane) (H1~MDI), and mixtures thereof.
Suitable polyols for use herein are typically high molecular weight polyols
111Cltldlng, but not limited to, polyethers, polyesters such as, for example,
polycaprolactones,
polycarbonates, or hydrocarbon polyols having a molecular weight ranging from
about 100 to
about 12,000 to prepare p repolymers for cast elastomers. It is to be
Lmderstood herein that
molecular weights and equivalent weights are number average. If desired, low
molecular
weight glycols or triols, those glycols or triols having a molecular weight
from 62 to 400, can
be included. I larepolymer with a polyol or combination of polyols having an
overall
functionality of from about I .9 to about 2.3, preferably from about 1.95 to
about 2.2, and
most preferably from about 1.98 to about 2.1.
Suitable high molecular weight polyols having a number average molecular
weight of at least about 250, are used to prepare the prepolymer of the
instant invention.
Preferably the polyols have a molecular weight of about 400 to about 6000 and
most
1 S preferably a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 4000. However,
the molecular
weight of the high molecular weight polyols n Zay be as high as 12,000 or as
low as 100.
The preferred polyether polyols are polyallcyleneether polyols represented by
the general formula HO(RO)"H, wherein R is an allcylene radical and n is an
integer large
enough that the polyether Iaolyol has a number average molecular weight of at
least 250.
These polyallcyleneether polyols axe well-Imown components of polyurethane
products and
can be prepared by the polymerization of cyclic ethers, e.g., allcylene
oxides, and glycols,
dihydroxyethers, and the like by methods lalOwn Ill the art. Examples include
those polyether
laolyols available as Terathane PTMEG polyols from Dupont and Poly G polyols
of propylene
oxide and ethylene oxide from Arch Chemical.
The polyester polyols are prepared by reaction of dibasic acids, e.g., adipic
acid, glutaric, sebacic, or phthalic acid, with diols such as, for example,
ethylene glycol, 1,2-
propylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol and the like, where linear
polymer segments
are required. Minor amounts of wits of higher functionality, Sllch a5 glycerol
or
trilnethylolpropane, may be employed . Polyester polyols are available as
Folnrez polyester
polyols from Crompton and as Rucoflex polyester polyols from Bayer.
-9-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
Some polyester polyols employ caprolactone or dimerized unsatwated fatty
acids in their manufacture. Polycaprolactone polyols are available as TONE
polyols fiom
Dow. Polycarbonate polyols are available as Desmophen 2020E from Bayer. Other
suppliers
include Daicel (Japan) and Ube (Japan), Suitable hydrocarbon polyols include
those
produced from butadiene available as Poly-Bd from Sartomer and Krasol from
I~auculc
(Czech Republic).
Preferred polyols of the current invention include polytetramethylene ether
glycols (PTMEG), ), polycaprolactones, polycarbonates, and polyesters from
adipic acid.
The total polyol blend portion of the instant invention can be a combination
of
high molecular weight polyol, as previously described, and low molecular
weight polyol. An
aliphatic glycol is the preferred low molecular weight polyol. Suitable
aliphatic polyols are
ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol,
propylene glycol,
dipropylene glycol, tripropylene glycol, neopentyl glycol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,4-
butanediol, and
thelilce. In general, the weight of the low molecular weight polyol should be
no more than
20% of the combination of high molecular weight polyol and low molecular
weight polyol.
The preferred range is 0 to 15% of the combination; more preferred is 0-8%.
When forming the polyurethane prepolymer reaction product, a mole ratio
ordinarily ranging from about 2:1 to about 30:1 HDI/polyol and preferably
about 8:1 to about
20:1 HDI/polyol is recommended. The reaction is typically carried OLtt at a
reaction
temperature ranging from about 50°C to about 120°C. Preferably,
the reaction is carried out
by maintaining the reaction temperature at about 70 to about 110°C with
agitation.
When the preferred mole ratios of HDI to polyol are used, the reaction product
can be of low viscosity and primarily comprises the urethane-linced adduct of
HDI-polyol-
HDI structure (termed herein as an "ABA" structure, where A denotes HDI and B
denotes a
2~ polyol). Higher molecular weight adducts containing two or more polyol
moieties (termed
herein as "oligomers" of urethane-linked structure "ABABA", ''ABABABA", etc.)
are
typically less desirable. An HDI:polyol mole ratio of at least about 8:1 or
greater favors
formation of a final prepolymer (after removal of flee HDI monomer) with NCO
content of at
least 70% of the theoretical NCO content for a pwe ABA structure and
preferably at least
~0% of the theoretical NCO'content for a pure ABA structure.
-10-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
If polyol B has a fiu lctionality of 2, then each ABA and ABABA adduct has
two ullreacted NCO groups, one on each of the terminal A moieties. The
internal A moiety in
the ABABA adduct has no remaining ullreacted NGO group. Therefore, tile ABABA
adduct
has a lower NCO content than the ABA adduct. Accordingly, in a prepolymer
reaction
product mixture substantially flee of unreacted A, the relative content of ABA
to higher
molecular weight addLlCiS Call be determined by tile NCO C011te11t Of the
mixture. By
employing a large molar excess of HDI over polyol, oligomer formation is
minimized.
As an illustration, consider a difiu lctional polyol having a nlunber average
molecular weight ("mw") of 1000 and HDI having a mw of 168. The mw of the ABA
adduct
is 168+1000+168=1336. It would also have two NCO end groups, each being 42
daltons.
Thus, the NCO content is 2(42)/1336=6.3% for the ABA structlue. Similarly, all
ABABA
structure possesses a mw of 2504 and an NCO content of 2(42)/2504=3.35%.
Polyol number average equivalent weight ("ew") can be obtained by titration
of hydroxyl (OH) groups as described in ASTM methods E222, E326, and D4274.
This
quantity gives the number of grams (or other mass unit) required for one
Avogadro's number
of OH groups. The number average molecular weight is taken by multiplying the
Ew by the
functionality of the polyol. Thus, for a polyol having a functionality of 2
(i.e., 2 OH groups
per polyol molecule), the number average molecular weight ( mw) is twice tile
ew.
NCO content of p repolymers can be obtained by titration methods as described
in ASTM method D2572.
The crude reaction product prepared in accordance with the present invention
contains a large amount of ullreacted HDI which is removed by distillation.
Ally distillation
equipment that can be efficiently operated at deep vaculun, moderate
temperature, alld short
residence time can be used in this step. For example, one can use an agitated
film distillation
system commercialized by such sources as Pope Scientific, Inc.; Al-tisall
Industries, Ine.; GEA
Canzler GmbH & Co.; Pfaudler-U.S., Inc.; I11C011 Tec1111ologies, L.L.C.; Luwa
Corp.; UIC
I11C.; Or Buss-SMS GmbH for thls purpose. CO11t111L1011S L1111tS Wlth
lllterllal condensers are
preferred because they can reach lower operating VaCLlL1111S Of fr0111 about
0.001 to about 1
torn.
It is practical to strip excess HDI at a pressure of about 0.04 Torr and at a
temperatlue ranging from about 100°C to about 175°G, and
preferably at a pressure of about
-11-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
0.02 torr or below and at a temperature of about 150°C or below. The
importance of
minimizing high temperatLUe degradation of polyurethane prepolymers is
described in British
Patent No. 1,101,410, WhlCh 1eC0111111e11dS that dlStlllatloll be conducted
tlllder VMCLlLllll Wlth
an evaporative temperature preferably under 175°C. U.S. Patent No.
4,182,825 describes the
use of evaporative jacket temperatures of 150-160°C for TDI p
repolymers. U.S. Patent No.
5,703,193 reconnnended jacket temperature of 120°C.
As a rule of thumb, it is desirable that, in operation of agitated film
distillation
equipment, the condenser temperature for the distillate be at least about
100°C below the
evaporative temperature. The C011de11SeT 111L1St also be cold e110Llgh to
efficiently COllde115e
substantially all IIDI vapor. A condenser temperature of about 20°C or
below is preferred.
If the recommended stripping conditions are observed, the residue
(prepolymer) can contain less than about 2% by weight fiee IIDI, preferably
less than about
0.5% free HDI and most preferably less than about 0.1% by weight free HDI, and
the
distillate can come out clean and remain transparent at room temperature. The
distillate can
then be reused to produce more prepolymer. Generally, the resulting
prepolymers can have
low viscosity, low monomeric I-IDI level and high NCO content preferably 80%
or more of
the theoretical NCO content for ABA structure). The prepolymer can be easily
chain-
extended by various chain extenders at moderate processing temperatures. The
chain
extenders can be, for example, water, aliphatic diols, aromatic diamines, or
their mixtures.
Representative of the preferred chain extenders are aliphatic diols and
aromatic dialnines. Suitable aliphatic diols for use herein include, but are
not limited to, 1,4-
butanediol (BDO), di (beta-hydroxyethyl) ether (HER), di (beta-hydroxypropyl)
ether (HPR),
hydroquinone-bis-hydroxyethyl ether (HQEE), 1,3-propanediol, ethylene glycol,
1,6-
hexanediol, 1,4-cyclohexane dimethanol (CHDM) and the like and
COlllb111at10115 thereof
Suitable aromatic diamines for use herein include, bLlt are not limited to,
4,4'-methylene-
bis(3-chloroaniline) (MBCA), 4,4'-methylene-bis(3-chloro-2,6-diethylalliline)
(MCDEA),
4,4'-methylene-bis(2,6-diethylaniline) (MDEA), diethyl toluene dianline
(DETDA,
EthacLire~ 100 from Albemarle Corporation), tertiary butyl toluene diamine
(TBTDA),
dimethylthio-toluene diamine (Ethacure''M 300 fiom Albemarle Corporation),
trimethylene
glycol di-p-amino-benzoate (Vibracure0 A157 from Uniroyal Chemical Company,
Inc. or
Versalilllc 740M from Air Products and Chemicals), methylenedialliline (MDA)
and
-12-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
methylenedianiline-sodilun chloride complex (Caytur0 21 and 31 from Uniroyal
Chemical
Company, Inc.). If desired, aliphatic triols and tetrols, e.g., trimethylol
propane, and adducts
of propylene oxide, and/or ethylene oxide having molecular weight 190 to 500,
such as
various grades of Voranol (Dow Chemical), Pluracol (BASF Corp.) and Quadrol
(BASF
Corp.) can also be used.
The most preferred chain extenders are BDO, I-IQEE, MBCA, MDEA,
trimethylene glycol di-p-amino-benzoate, MCDEA, and DETDA..
The polyLUethane elastomers of the present invention can be made by chain-
extending the foregoing prepolymers of low monomeric HDI content with the
foregoing chain
extenders by methods lalown in the art. Typically, the amine or diol chain
extender and the
prepolymer are mixed together to polymerize. The chain extension temperature
for the
polymerization will ordinarily range from about 20°C to about
150°C. The specimens so
obtained are preferably aged for about 4 weeks at room temperature before
Luldergoing their
intended use or standard testing for mechanical properties.
For industrial casting operations, a working life (pour life) of at least
sixty
seconds is typically required to mix prepolymer alld chain extender and to
pour the mixture
lllt0 lllOldS WlthOLlt bLlbbleS. hl lllally cases, a worlcing life of abOLlt 5
t0 abOLlt 10 111111uteS 15
preferred. For the purpose of this invention, a working life (or pour life)
shall be Lmderstood
herein to mean the time for the mixture of prepolymer and chain extender to
reach a
Broolcfield viscometer viscosity of about 200 poise when each component is
"preheated" to a
temperature at which viscosity is about 15 poise or lower and preferably about
10 poise or
lower.
The following 11011-lllllltlllg examples are illustrative of the present
invention.
-13-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
EXAMPLES
The following materials were used in the examples:
PTMEG 1000: mw=951, ew=476, Polytetramethylene ether glycol (Functionality
2.0)
Fomrez 66-112: 111W=998, ew=499, , Crompton Corp., Polyester of hexanediol and
adipic
acid (Functionality 2.0) ("PIIAG 1000")
Desmophen 2020E: mw=2OO4, ew 1002, Bayer Corp., POlyhexatllethylelle
Carb011ate diol
(Functionality 2.0) ("PC 2000")
Luxate Aliphatic Isocyanate HM, Lyondell Chemical Company, 1,6-Hexamethylene
diisocyanate ("HDI")
Desmodur W, Bayer Corp., Dicyclohexyl methane diisocyanate ("H~~MDI")
Adiprene0 LF 90: Crompton Corp., Prepolymer consisting essentially of PTMEG
and TDI
with below 0.1% monomeric TDI, approx. 3.8% NCO.
Adiprene0 LF 95: Crompton Corp., Prepolymer consisting essentially of PTMEG
and TDI
with below 0.1 % monomeric TDI, approx. 6.1 % NCO.
Adiprene0 LW 570: Crompton Corp., Prepolymer consisting essentially of PTMEG
and
H12MDI without a monomer removal step for unreacted H,ZMDI monomer ( 10 % by
weight).
Lonzacure0 MCDEA: Lonza, 4,4'-methylene-bis(3-chloro-2,6-diethylaniline)
Lonzacu re0 MDEA: Lonza, 4,4'-methylene-bis(2,6-diethylaniline)
MBCA:4,4'-methylene-bis(3-chloroaniline)
1,4-Butanediol: BASF Corporation
Vibracvtre0 A250: CT0111pt011 Corp., Blend of 1,4-butanediol and trace mixing
aid;
HQEE: hydroquinone-bis-hydroxyethyl ether (Arch Chemical)
EthacureTM 100, Albemarle Corporation, Diethyl toluene diamine ("DETDA")
EthacureTM 300, Albemarle Corporation, Dimethylthio-toluene diamine ,
Vibracure0 A157, Crompton Corp., Trimethylene glycol di-p-amino-benzoate
("TMGDAB")
Trimethylolpropane: (Celanese Chemical Corporation)
-14-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES A - E
Preparation of Elastomers fro111 MCDEA Curative and Prepolymers
Comparative Examples A through E are taken from Examples O, P, R, S and 9
fT0111 U.S. Patent No. 6,046,297, tile teaC11111gS Of Whlch are 111cOrpOTated
heTelll by reference.
These examples were directed to the preparation of industrial rolls such as
paper mill rolls,
industrial wheels, and industrial tires with low hysteresis.
Cured elastomers were prepared fiom Lonzacure MCDEA curative and the
following prepolymers:
Comparative Example A: Adiprene0 LF 90: Prepolymer consisting essentially
of PTMEG and TDI with below 0.1% monomeric TDI due to removal of flee TDI by
vacuum
distillation; approx. 3.8% NCO.
Comparative Example B: Adiprene0 LF 95: Prepolymer consisting essentially
of PTMEG and TDI with below O.I% monomeric TDI due to removal of free TDI by
vaculun
distillation; approx. 6.1 % NCO.
Comparative Example C: Adiprene0 LW 570: Prepolylner consisting essentially
of PTMEG and H1~MDI without a monomer removal step for ulueacted H,~MDI
monomer (10
%); approx. 7.4% NCO.
Comparative Example D: Low free H»MDI prepolymer. Reaction product of 10
moles H~~MDI with one mole of PTMEG, 650 mw, then freed of ulueacted H1~MDI
monomer
by vaculun distillation on a wiped film evaporator. 6.7% NCO content.
Comparative Example E: Physical blend of 86 parts by weight Adiprene LF 90
(the LFTDIprepolymer of Comp. A) with 14 parts by weight ulueacted H,ZMDI
monomer. 7.8%
NCO content.
The dynamic mechanical properties of these elastomers were measlued as set
forth
in U.S. Patent No. 6,0465,297 with the results being set forth in Table I
below.
The low monomeric I-IDI content prepolymers of the present invention were
prepared according to the following general prepolymer synthesis procedure.
-15-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
EXAMPLE 1
PREPARATION OF HDI PREPOLYMER WITH PTMEG 1000
A prepolymer was prepared by charging first 1680 parts HDI, then 952 parts
PTMEG 1000 (952 mw) to a batch reaction flaslc equipped with nitrogen sweep,
an agitator,
a thermometer, a heating mantle, and a vacuum source. The molar ratio of HDI
to PTMEG
(hence the equivalent ratio of NCO groups to OH groups) was 10:1. The reaction
mixture
was cooked for G hours at a temperature of 80°C Wlth vaClll1111 of 1-10
torr the last hour to
remove entrained gases. The NCO content of this crude reaction mixture reached
28.4% at 3
hours and remained there at 6 hours.
1O The CPllde reaCtloll 1111Xtllre Wa5 then prOCeSSed through a wiped film
evaporator to remove unreacted HDI monomer. Vacuum was 0.04 torr or less.
Jacket
temperature was 140°C and the condenser temperature was 5°G.
The stripped prepolymer contained less than 0.1% free HDI. It had 6.12%
NCO content, 94% of the theoretical value of 6.53% for prepolymer of pure ABA
structure
(1288 mw when B is 952 mw). The distillate had 50% NCO content, as expected
for
substantially pure HDI monomer.
EXAMPLE 2
PREPARATION OF HDI PREPOLYMER WITH PHAG 1000
A prepolymer was prepared by the procedures of Example l, using 1000 mw
polyhexamethylene adipate glycol as the polyol in place of PTMEG 1000. This
polyester
polyol is commercally available as Fomrez 66-112 (Crompton Corp.). The
specific lot had
499 ew, hence 998 mw as fimctionality is 2Ø Phosphoric acid was added at 15
ppm.
The resulting prepolymer had 5.80% NCO content, 92% of the theoretical
value of 6.30% for prepolymer of pure ABA structure (1166 mw when B is 998
mw). Also,
the resulting prepolymer contained a free HDI content of 0.14%.
EXAMPLE 3
PREPARATION OF HDI PREPOLYMER WITH POLYCARBONATE 2000
A prepolymer was prepared by the procedures of Example l, using 2000 mw
polyhexalnethylene carbonate glycol as the polyol. This polycarbonate polyol
is available as
-16-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
Desmophen 2020E (Bayer Corp.). The specific lot had 1002 ew, hence 2004 mw as
fimctionality is 2Ø Phosphoric acid was added at 15 ppnl. The resulting
prepolyn ler had
3.84% NGO content and contained 0.08% free HDI content.
The pOlylllethalle elaSt0111erS f01'111ed ff0111 the lOW 111o11O111eT1C HDI
C011te11t
prepolyn leis of the present invention were prepared according to the
following general
synthesis procedure.
EXAMPLE 4
AN ELASTOMER FROM I-iDI/PTMEG PREPOLYMER AND MCDEA
An elastolner was prepared by mixing the HDI prepolymer of Example 1 with
Lonzacure MCDEA by the procedures used in Comparative Examples A-E. Thus, 100
parts
by weight prepolymer was mixed with 27 parts by weight MCDEA (98% of the MCDEA
needed to provide one amine group per isocyanate group in the prepolymer).
The dynamic mechanical propel-lies of this elastomer were then measured.
The results of the measurements are set forth below in Table I.
TABLEI
Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Elastomers from PTMEG-Based Prepolymers and
MCDEA Curative
Comp. Example/Exam~eComp. Comp. Comu. Comp. C0111p.4
A B C D E
Example of U.S. PatentO P R S 9 (New)
No. 6,046,297
Prepolymer %NCO 3.8 6.1 9.4 6.7 7.8 6.1
Isocyanate Types TDI TDI H,ZMDI H,~MDI T D HDI
I -
H, ~MDI
G', STORAGE MODULUS
(dynes/cm2 x 10~~
30C 4.5 12 41 31 19 5.0
200C 2.2 5.1 0.93 Sample 7.3 3.3
softened
% Retention, 50% 43% 2% 0 38% 66%
200C/ 30C
TANGENT DELTA
30C 0.036 0.066 0.089 0.12 0.051 0.037
150C 0.017 0.027 0.19 0.028 0.049 0.017
200C 0.032 0.034 0.14 Sample 0.076 0.027
softened
-17-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
Dynamic mechanical properties were determined on a Rheometrics dynamic
mechanical spectrometer under conditions of 1 % strain and 10 Hz frequency.
Properties
meastued included Storage 1110dt1111S, 1055 1110dL11tlS, and tangent delta.
Froln these properties, a
comparative power loss also may be calculated.
Storage Modules, G' in Table I, is g1Ve11 111 t1111tS Of dylleS/C1112. In
practical
applications, such as paper mill rolls and other dynamic applications, it is
desirable that G'
remain constant over the range of 30°C. to 230°C, and especially
from 30°C to 150°C. If G'
decreases too much over this range, articles in dynamic service may fail from
heat buildup.
Tangent Delta is a dimensionless number indicating hysteresis. Lower values
are typically desired throughout the temperature range from 30°C to
200°C, and especially
from 30°C to 150°C.
As the data show, the dynamic mechanical propel-ties of the elastomer within
the scope of this invention (Example 4) are superior to those of prior art
Comparative
Examples A tlllough E, even those based on aromatic TDI. For example, the
storage modules
(G') resisted dropping tluoughout the temperature range of 30-200°C,
thus retaining 66% of
its 30°C value at 200°C. Also, the tangent delta remained low
tluoughout this range. This is
highly desirable and unentirely unexpected.
EXAMPLE 5
AN ELASTOMER FROM I IDI/PHAG PREPOLYMER AND MCDEA
A polyurethane elastomer was prepared by mixing the HDI prepolymer of
Example 2 with Lonzacure MCDEA by the procedtues useel in Comparative Examples
A-E.
Thus, 100 parts by weight prepolymer was mixed with 26 parts by weight MCDEA
(98% of
the MCDEA needed to provide one amine group per isocyanate group in the
prepolymer).
EXAMPLE G
AN ELASTOMER FROM IIDI/POLYCARBONATE PREPOLYMER AND MCDEA
A polyurethane elastolner was prepared by mixing the HDI prepolymer of
Example 3 with LonzacureO MCDEA by the procedures used in Comparative Examples
A-E.
Thus, 100 parts by weight prepolymer was mixed with 17 pal-ts by weight MCDEA
(98% of
the MCDEA needed to provide one amine group per isocyanate group in the
prepolymer).
-18-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
The physical properties for the resulting elastomers of Examples 4-6 are
summarized below in Table II.
TABLE II
Polyurethane Elastomers from IIDI Prepolymers and MCDEA Cluative
Examule _4 _~ _6
Polyol Type, lnw PTMEG 1000 PIIAG 1000PC 2000
Prepolymer %NCO 6.1 5.8 3.8
Hardness, Shore A 97 98 93
100% MOChlltl5, psi 2210 2320 1300
Elongation at Brealc, 480 290 350
%
Tensile Strength, psi 4210 4760 5130
Compression Set,
22 hour @ 70C 45 33 --
22 holu er, 100C 62 59 --
G', Storage MOdLIILIS
(dynes/cm'- x 10~~
30C 5.0 6.9 3.0
200C 3.3 4.0 2.3
Retention, 66% 58% 77%
200C/ 30C
TANGENT DELTA
3OC O.O37 O.OB O.O7
150C 0.017 0.02 0.014
200G 0.027 0.02 0.017
EXAMPLES 7-12
ELASTOMERS FROM IIDI/PTMEG PREPOLYMER AND VARIOUS CURATIVES
Elastomers were prepared by 1111x111g the I-IDI prepolymer of Example 1 with
various dialnine and diol cluatives. The dialnines were used at 98% of the
weight needed to
provide one alpine group per isocyanate group in the prepolymer. The diols
were used at
95% of the weight needed to provide one hydroxyl group per isocyanate group in
the
prepolymer. In all cased the elastomers were allowed to cure 24 hours at
127°C.
-19-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
TABLE III
PolyL~retliane Elastomers
from IIDI/PTMEG Prepolymer
and Various CL~ratives
Example 7 8 9 10 11 12
Curative Type TMGDAB DETDA MDEA EthacureTM Vibracure0HQEE
300 A
250
Curative ew 157 89 155 107 45 99
Curative, g/100g 22.4 12.7 22.1 15.3 6.2 , 13.7
prepolymer
Hardness, Shore A 90 95 97 81 96 96
100% Modulus, psi 900 1240 1860 660 1400 1500
Elongation at Brealc,520 950 340 820 780 320
%
Tensile Strength, 4130 5890 3440 3690 4280 2130
psi
TESTING OF POLYURETHANE ELASTOMERS AS GOLF BALL COVERS
As disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,334,673, holyurethanes are advantageous in
tile production of golf ball covers because they have the feel and click of
balata covered balls
with much greater cut resistance. In addition, the polyu rethanes are
generally more resilient
than balata, allowing balls to be made with both good feel and good distance.
Resilience can
be measured as percent rebound of a steel ball bouncing on a flat elastomer
sample from a
height of one meter, where the sample is at least 0.5 inches thiclc and is
firmly moLmted so as
to prevent movement. Ionomer covers such as SURLYN lz have good resilience,
but are
harder and do not give the click and feel of the polyurethane and balata
covers.
Another advantageous feature of polyurethane formulations is shear resistance,
as disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,908,358, Shear resistance measLUes the
damage to a cover
from the impact of club with sharp grooves, which can tear away bits of the
cover. In contrast,
cut resistance measures the resistance to damage of the cover from a miss hit
shot, where the
leading edge of the iron cuts directly into the cover. Shear resistance of
polyurethane
formulations can vary. One such method that can be used to improve the shear
resistance of a
polyurethane formulation is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,908,358.
U.S. Patent No. 6,309,313 discloses convenient methods for assessing the
resilience and groove shear resistance of polyurethane formulations as golf
ball covers, the
contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
-20-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
EXAMPLE 13
PREPARATION OF I-IDI PREPOLYMER WITH RECYCLED HDI DISTILLATE
A prepolymer was prepared by the procedures of Example l, substituting the
I-iDI distillate from Example 1 for the fresh HDI. I11 addltton, a different
batch of PTMEG
1000 was used. This batch had 988 mw.
The stripped prepolymer had 5.70% NCO content, 90% of the theoretical
value of 6.35% for prepolymer of pure ABA structure (1324 mw when B is 988
mw).
EXAMPLE 14
A GOLF BALL FROM AN ELASTOMER
OF HDI PREPOLYMER AND 1,4- BUTANEDIOL
The HDI prepolymer of Example 13 was mixed with 1,4-butanediol in a
weight ratio 100/6.0, providing 98/100 ratio of hydroxyl groups to isocyanate
groups. A
commercially available white pigment paste was also included in the mixture at
2 parts per
100 parts prepolymer. The resultant mixture was de-aerated and cast into a
mold cavity
containing a golf ball core to form a standard sized golf ball. The golf ball
was cured at 70°C
for 16 hours.
EXAMPLE 15
A GOLF BALL FROM AN ELASTOMER OF IIDI PREPOLYMER
AND 1,4-BUTAN>JDIOL WITH TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE
A golf ball was prepared by the procedures of Example 14, substituting an
80/20 blend by weight of 1,4-butanediol and trimethylolproparle for the pure
1,4-butanediol
and mixing the blend with the HDI prepolymer of Example 13. (Each of the two
components
t is particularly advantageous when forming the cast polyurethane elastomers,
to form the
of the blend had ew 45). The prepolymerlcurative weight ratio was 100/6.0,
providing
98/100 ratl0 Of hydTOXyI grOllpS to isocyanate groups. The resultant mixture
was de-aerated
and cast into a mold cavity containing a golf ball core to form a standard
sized golf ball. The
golf ball was cured at 70°C for 16 hours.
The golf balls of Examples 14 and 15 were tested side by side with tluee
commercially available golf balls: (1) the Nilce Tour Accuracy, which has a
thermoplastic
polyurethane cover; (2) the Strata Professional Balata, which has a balata
cover; and (3) the
-21-

CA 02482436 2004-10-13
WO 03/091306 PCT/US03/10741
Nilce Precision Distance, which has an ionomer cover. All balls were hit by a
golf
professional with a pitching wedge having sharp grooves and the contact points
were marked.
Damage to the balls was rated on a 1 to 10 scale, where 10 indicated no marlcs
at the point of
contact and the ball is indistinguishable from a new ball. A 5 indicated a
ball with substantial
damage to the cover at the point of contact, but no loss of material. A 1
indicated a ball with
cover material loss at the point of contact. Three different observers rated
the balls and the
ratings were averaged as follows:
Example 14: 7.3
Example 15: 6.7
Nilce Tour Accuracy 5.0
Strata Professional Balata 4.9
Nilce Precision Distance 1.0
The golf balls of Examples 14 and 15 containing the polyurethane elastomers
of this invention were also tested for their colorfastness by exposing the
golf balls in a
Weather-o-Meter Lender a UV. exposure of 5500 watts for 36 hours. The results
of this test
indicated no change in color or fading to the polyurethane elastomer covers of
the golf balls.
The golf balls of Examples 14 and 15 containing the polyurethane elastomers
of this invention were also tested for resilience by dropping a steel ball on
the elastomer and
measuring the height of rebound. In this test, recovery of at least 50% of the
drop height is
considered good. The two elastomers each exhibited 70% resilience.
In view of tile many changes and modifications that can be made without
departing from principles Lmderlying the invention, reference should be made
to the appended
claims for an understanding of the scope of the protection to be afforded the
invention.
-22-

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2482436 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2014-04-08
Letter Sent 2013-04-08
Grant by Issuance 2010-08-10
Inactive: Cover page published 2010-08-09
Inactive: Final fee received 2010-05-27
Pre-grant 2010-05-27
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2010-05-06
Letter Sent 2010-05-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2010-05-06
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2010-05-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2010-02-25
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2009-08-25
Letter Sent 2008-04-23
Request for Examination Received 2008-02-25
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2008-02-25
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-02-25
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2004-12-31
Inactive: Cover page published 2004-12-21
Letter Sent 2004-12-17
Letter Sent 2004-12-17
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2004-12-17
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2004-12-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2004-12-16
Inactive: IPC assigned 2004-12-16
Application Received - PCT 2004-11-12
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2004-10-13
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2003-11-06

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2010-03-26

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
CROMPTON CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
BRIAN D. LITKE
GLEN C. PROCTOR
RONALD O. ROSENBERG
ZHENYA ZHU
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2004-10-12 22 1,230
Abstract 2004-10-12 1 51
Claims 2004-10-12 4 156
Description 2010-02-24 22 1,197
Claims 2010-02-24 3 90
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2004-12-19 1 110
Notice of National Entry 2004-12-16 1 193
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-12-16 1 106
Notice of National Entry 2004-12-30 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2004-12-16 1 105
Reminder - Request for Examination 2007-12-10 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2008-04-22 1 190
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2010-05-05 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-05-20 1 171
PCT 2004-10-12 9 357
Fees 2008-03-24 1 41
Correspondence 2010-05-26 2 49