Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
1
SYNTHETIC PAPER LABEL
The present invention relates to a synthetic paper label having an external
printable
surface.
The tern "synthetic paper" is used herein and throughout the specification to
mean
plastics film and sheet products having a feel and printability similar to
cellulose paper.
10- It has been recognised that plastics sheet material of this type can
provide an improved
alternative to paper where durability and toughness are required. Synthetic
papers
produced from polyolefins have several advantages over other plastics since
they offer
UV resistance, good tear strength and the ability to be recycled in many post-
consumer
waste applications. Labels are amongst the established uses of such products.
In certain labelling applications, it is desirable that the label construction
should be such
as to reveal any attempt at tampering after it has been applied, i.e. it
should be "tamper
evident". This is particularly important if the label is to be applied to high
value
products such as cosmetics, perfumes, fine wines and spirits, or medicines,
for example
to prevent the label being reused on counterfeit goods.
In order to be fully tamper-evident, the label should exhibit internal
cohesive failure if an
attempt is made to peel the label off the surface to which it has been
applied. Preferably,
it should shear through its full thickness, because delamination without
accompanying
shearing through the full thickness of the product could leave the printed
surface of the
label intact and therefore available for fraudulent purposes. However, a label
which
delarinates but does not shear as just described would nevertheless represent
worthwhile progress in the art.
It is an object of the invention to provide a synthetic paper tamper-evident
labelling
material that meets the first, and preferably also the second, of the above-
stated
requirements.
CONFIRMATION COPY
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
2
Accordingly, the present invention provides, in a first aspect, tamper-evident
labelling
material including a base layer of synthetic paper that is printable on its
upper surface,
and an adhesive layer on the lower surface of the base layer, characterised in
that the
base layer includes a layer of biaxially-oriented and voided high density
polyethylene
(HDPE) that has a density of not more than about 0.6g crn3. Preferably, the
HDPE
material has a density of not more than about 0.5 g cm 3 .
In a second aspect, the invention resides in the use in labelling material,
which includes a
base layer of synthetic paper that is printable on its upper surface and an
adhesive layer
on its lower surface, for the purpose of imparting tamper-evident properties,
of a layer of
biaxially-oriented and voided high density polyethylene (HDPE), characterized
in that
the layer of biaxially-oriented and voided HDPE has a density not more than
about 0.6g
cin 3. Preferably, the layer of biaxially-oriented and voided HDPE has a
density not
more than about 0.5g cin 3.
We have discovered that there is a strong relationship between the density of
the voided
HDPE material and its cohesive strength. This is believed to be due to the
fact that the
density of the HDPE material depends on the number of voids created during the
stretching process, a less dense material having a larger number of voids and
reduced
cohesive strength. We have found that if the density is not more than 0.6g cm
3, the
labelling material has useful tamper-evident properties, with improved tamper-
evident
properties being provided if the density is not more than 0.5g cm 3.
The mean cohesive strength of the labelling material, as measured by the tape
pull test
described below, is preferably not more than about 4N (Newtons) if shearing
through the
full thickness of the material is to occur when an attempt is made to peel off
the label.
The mean cohesive strength is more preferably not more than about 3N and even
more
preferably not more than about 2.5N.
The tape pull test involves measuring the force required to peel off an
adhesive tape
adhered to the labelling material. The effect of the removal of the tape on
the integrity of
the labelling material is also observed. The test may conveniently be carried
out using
25rmn wide transparent tape of the kind supplied for domestic and office use,
for
example that sold as "Sellotape* Original" (here and elsewhere in this
specification, an
CA 02489060 2010-05-28
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
3
asterisk indicates a proprietary trade mark.). The tape is pressed into
contact with the
surface of the labelling material by hand (normally in the machine direction,
if this is
known) and the resulting bond is reinforced by running a l kg roller over the
tape. The
tape is then peeled away from the labelling material using a so-called
"universal tester"
(for example as supplied by Instron Limited, United Kingdom) at a defined
speed
(typically 250 or 500mm mini 1) and defined contained angle (180 ). The
average force
required for this over the duration of the peeling operation is recorded, and
provides a
measure of the cohesive strength of the material under test. As already
mentioned,
average values for this peeling force should be less than 4N. There should be
clear
delamination and breakaway of the label material: in other words the label
should break
in two through the thickness of the film after an initial delamination step.
Preferably, the labelling material comprises a coextruded core layer of
biaxially-oriented
and voided HDPE between upper and lower skin layers, wherein the skin layers
have a
density of more than 0.6g cm 3, preferably more than 0.9g cm 3. The skin
layers
preferably have a thickness of not more than 2 m. Preferably, the skin layers
consist of
biaxially-oriented and substantially unvoided HDPE. The thickness of the core
layer is
preferably about 100 m.
Low-density synthetic paper as described above is easily converted into
pressure-
sensitive adhesive labels, unlike tamper-evident sheet materials produced from
PVC or
polystyrene, which tend to be brittle and difficult to handle.
The synthetic paper used in the present invention can be produced by generally
known
techniques, for example simultaneous biaxial orientation techniques as
disclosed in
British Patents Nos. 1374574 and 1442113 in combination with voiding and/or
coextrusion techniques such as disclosed in British Patents Nos. 1470 372,
1490512 or
1492771, European Patent No. 470760B or European Patent Application No.
863177A;
The proportion of voids must be such as to
produce the desired low base layer density and internal cohesive strength.
Fillers,
rubbers, antioxidants, lubricants, antistatic agents and other additives may
be included in
the sheet material, as is conventional in the synthetic paper art.
CA 02489060 2010-05-28
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
4
The term "high density polyethylene" as used herein refers to polymers and
copolymers
of ethylene with minor amounts of other a-olefin monomers as is commonly
understood
in the industry and as described in the above-mentioned patent publications.
The term is
also used to refer to mixtures of high density polyethylenes.
Plastics substrates are generally impervious to materials such as printing
inks. Thus,
they tend to be unsuitable for direct use in ink-based printing processes
because the ink
has a tendency to remain at the surface of the substrate, without being
absorbed. It is well
known to modify the surface characteristics of a plastics substrate by
applying an
absorbent coating composition to the surface of the substrate. Such a coating
composition comprises an absorbent filler, which renders the substrate more
absorbent to
ink, and a polymeric binder, which binds the filler to the surface of the
substrate. Prior
to application of the coating composition, the surface of the substrate is
subjected to
flame or corona discharge treatment such that the treated surface has a
surface energy of
about 47 dynes cm I. Alternatively, if no separate printable coating is to be
applied, and
the upper skin layer is to provide the printable surface, such a surface
treatment can be.
carried out to provide a more polar surface and the required wettability to
more readily
accept inks and coatings. The surface may also be suitably textured or
modified by the
presence of a pigment and/or a filler, and suitably has a printability
corresponding to a
wettability of at least 40 dynes cm ~.
When a printable surface coating is used, it may be formulated in a similar
manner to
aqueous coatings as commonly used in the paper industry and especially latex-
based
coatings. Of particular value in the present context, however, are the
coatings described
in British Patent Application No. 2177413A and European Patent Application No.
1055711A.
Preferably such a printable coating is provided by the application of an
aqueous system
comprising a polymeric binder, an absorbent pigment and an antistatic agent.
Typically
the binder:pigment dry weight ratio is in the range 15:100 to 50:100,
preferably 22:100
to 35:100, and the antistatic agent:pigment dry weight ratio is from 0.4:100
to 2.5:100.
The antistatic agent may be, for example, sodium polyphosphate or another of
the agents
disclosed in British Patent Application. No. 2177413A.
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
The polymeric binder may be in an aqueous or latex suspension, preferably a
latex
suspension, and should contain carboxyl groups on the polymer chain of at
least one
polymeric constituent. The binder may comprise a single polymer or a mixture
of
polymers. The binder may comprise, for example, starch or protein modified
chemically
5 or by physical addition of other polymeric species. Alternatively the binder
may
comprise a carboxylated styrene-butadiene copolymer, an acrylic polymer or
copolymer,
or a vinyl acetate polymer or copolymer. Preferably, the binder comprises a
carboxylated
styrene-butadiene copolymer.
The binder content of the aqueous coating composition may be chosen to suit
individual
requirements, for example, the stiffness of the coated product. Preferably,
the binder
content of the composition is in the range 15 to 30% by weight based on the
binder plus
aqueous phase, and more preferably in the range 20 to 25%.
The absorbent filler may be any dispersible solid but is preferably an
inorganic filler or
pigment such as calcium carbonate, china clay, or titanium dioxide.
The composition may also contain an insolubilizing agent, preferably a
polyanionic
zirconium compound, most preferably ammonium zirconium carbonate. If desired,
security inclusions such as fluorescent pigments and/or coloured fibres can
also be
present.
The labelling material is coated with adhesive on its lower surface and is
easily
converted into labels in conventional manner. Any suitable adhesive may be
used,
including pressure sensitive adhesives, for example Revecryl* 491, solvent
based
solutions including rubber based solutions (e.g. DURO-TAK* 6179) or acrylic
solutions
(e.g. DURO-TAK* 1057) and hot melt adhesives (e.g. DURO-TAK* 4044). Water
based
emulsions based on acrylic copolymers and/or ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers
and
terpolymers, or silicone adhesives, can also be used. These are suggestions
and are not
limiting. Generally, the final bond to the substrate should be strong and high
tack
adhesives work well.
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
6
The invention will now be illustrated by the following examples, in which all
parts and
percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified, and all references to
melt flow
index (MFI) values are as measured by ASTM Method No. 1238.
Example 1
A synthetic paper comprising an extruded core layer and two upper and lower
coextruded skin layers was first produced.
The core layer was derived from a compound (Mix A) consisting of a mixture of
HDPE
having an MFI of 0.33; particulate filler (CaCO3, Ti02); voiding agent (a
pentaerythritol
- maleic anhydride derivative of abietic acid) and processing aids, as
follows:
Mix A
Component Wt %
Ampacet* 111096 60% CaCO3 in HDPE 15.9
ExxonMobil HDPE Paxon* AL55-003 55.9
Ainpacet* 111096 60% Ti02 in HDPE 8.00
Nova Chemicals Polystyrene High Heat 1300 3.95
Oinya Omyalene* G.200 88% CaCO3 in LDPE 8.00
DRT Dertoline* DP 001 voiding agent 8.00
Ciba Geigy Irganox* B215 anti-oxidant 0.22
The two coextruded outer layers were each derived from a dry blend mixture of
HDPE
having an MFI of 0.33 and linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) having an
MFI of
2.0, as follows:
Mix B
Component Wt %
ExxonMobil HDPE Paxon* AL55-003 75
ExxonMobil LLDPE LL-1002 25
Mix A was compounded at 210 C by a conventional extrusion, dicing and cooling
process. This compound was introduced into the primary extruder of an in-line
twin
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
7
extruder - distributor - sheeting die coextrusion arrangement. Mix B was
introduced into
a coextruder feeding the distributor. The sheeting die and distributor were of
a
conventional type enabling a three layer coextrudate to be produced
continually,
comprising a homogeneous layer of Mix B on each side of a layer of Mix A. The
throughput of the in line primary/secondary extruders was arranged to be 650kg
per hour
0
from screw speeds of 22 and 33rpm respectively, with an exit temperature of
191 C. The
throughput of the coextruder was 28kg per hour from a screw speed of 12 rpm
with an
exit temperature of 185'C. The output of the extruders was fed to the
distribution block
held at 210 C. The die lips were adjusted to 5irnn and the sheeting die gave
an extrudate
of about 420imn wide. This composite sheet was then fed directly onto and
around a set
of cooling and conditioning rollers having the following temperatures:
ROLL 1 C 54.0
ROLL 2 C 76.0
ROLL 3 C 77.0
ROLL 4 C 90.0
COND ROLL 5 C 118.0
COND. ROLL 6 C 116.0
COND ROLL 7 C 118.0
COND. ROLL 8 C 121.0
COND. ROLL 9 C 121.0
COND. ROLL 10 C 121.0
The final conditioned composite sheet, which had an overall thickness of about
1000 m
with a core thickness of 960 m and outer skin thicknesses of 20 m, was then
fed into a
simultaneous biaxial stretching apparatus of the type described and
illustrated in British
Patent No.1442113. The apparatus was arranged to produce a 4:1 stretch in each
of the
longitudinal or machine direction (MD) and transverse direction (TD). The
stretching
apparatus was provided with a 6-zoned oven: zones 1 and 2 provided preheat,
zones 3
and 4 the stretching section and zones 5 and 6 the annealing section. The
temperatures
are given in the following table:
ZONE 1 C 135.0 2
ZONE 2 C 125.0 2
ZONE 3 C 117.0 2
ZONE 4 C 117.0 2
ZONE 5 C 130.0
ZONE 6 C 130.0
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
8
The composite plastics film thus produced was cooled, edge trimmed and passed
through
a corona discharge treatment unit such that the product had a surface energy
of about 47
dynes cm -1. Finally it was wound into reels approximately 1500 min wide.
Typical properties measured for samples of synthetic paper film produced as
described
above are given in the following table:
Property MD TD
Tensile (N/min) 39 30
Elongation (%) 100 79
Tear (N/mm) 50 76
Stiffiiess(Gurley) 64 60
Opacity 96
Core Thickness ([tin) 100
Core density (g cm) 0.50
A printability coating was later applied to both surfaces of the film using an
air=knife
coater, and then dried. The approximate formulation of the coating was as
follows:
Parts by weight
Water 100
Acrylate dispersant 5
Ground calcium carbonate of which 90% of the
particles are below 2 m particle size 100
Anionic wetting agent 2
Mixture of acrylonitrile acrylate styrene copolymer
(50% solids content) and styrene/n-butanol copolymer
(50% solids content) in the ratio 1:4 63
Ammonium zirconium carbonate 4
As already mentioned, the cohesive strength of the synthetic paper film (which
provides
a valuable predictor of tamper-evident character) is particularly important in
this
application.
Typical measured peeling force (cohesive strength) values for samples of 50g m
2
synthetic paper film produced as described above and having 4g in 2
printability coatings
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
9
on each surface (i.e. total 58g in-2) are given in the following table. The
measurement
method was as described earlier in this specification, with peel speeds of 250
and
5001nm inin 1. The maximum measured peeling force (cohesive strength) during
the
peeling operation was also noted.
Peel Speed Maximum Cohesive Average Cohesive
mm/min Strength (N) Strength (N)
250 3.15 0.15 2.2 0.15
500 3.5 0.2 2.05 0.1
It was observed that each sample broke away through the thickness of the
substrate
during the peeling operation. As explained earlier in this specification,
achievement of
this property is very significant in terns of a fully satisfactory tamper-
evident effect.
When samples of synthetic paper film produced as described above were coated
with a
pressure sensitive adhesive laminated with release paper and die cut, the
resulting labels
could be easily adhered to glass containers but attempts at removal always
left part of the
label on the bottle, making fraudulent label transfer impossible.
Example 2
The following mixture was compounded as in Mix A, Example 1.
Component Wt %
Ampacet 111096 60% CaCO3 + Ti02 in HDPE 19.06
ExxonMobil HDPE Paxon AL55-003 64.9
Nova Chemicals Polystyrene High Heat 1300 3.17
Oinya Oinyalene G.200 88% CaCO3 in LDPE 6.34
DRT Dertoline DP 001(a pentaerythritol - maleic 6.34
anhydride derivative of abietic acid)
Ciba Geigy Irganox B215 (anti oxidant) 0.19
As in Example 1, this compound was introduced into the primary extruder of a
twin
extruder - distributor - sheeting die coextrusion arrangement and a dry blend
mixture of
Exxon Mobil HDPE Paxon AL55-003 (MFI (ASTM 1238) = 0.33)(75%) and Exxon
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
Mobil LLDPE LL-1002 (MFI (ASTM 1238) = 2.0) (25%) (mix B) was introduced into
a
coextruder feeding the distributor. The throughput of the in line
primary/secondary
extruders was arranged to be 650kg per hour and the throughput of the
coextruder was
28kg per hour. The output of the extruders was fed to the distribution block
held at
5 210 C. The die lips were adjusted to 5min and the sheeting die gave an
extrudate of
about 420mm wide. This composite sheet was formed into a biaxially-oriented
sheet
using the roller arrangement and stretcher conditions of Example 1.
The composite plastics film thus produced was cooled, edge trimmed and passed
through
10 a corona discharge treatment unit to give a treatment level of about
47dynes/cm. Finally
it was wound into reels approximately 1500 min wide.
The properties of the film are given in the following table:
Property MD TD
Tensile (N/inm) 35 32
Elongation (%) 130 100
Tear (N/mm) 62 69
Opacity 92
Thickness ( m) 90
Density (g cm 3) 0.57
The substrate was coated to provide a printable surface, according to GB-A-
2177413 and
the European patent application EP-1055711-A2.
The surface cohesive strength for a product coated to give 4gsm per side and
using the
tape peel test described before is given in the table below:
Peel Speed Maximum Surface Average Surface
mm/min Cohesive Strength (N) Cohesive Strength (N)
250 5.8 0.3 3.8 0.3
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
11
The peel action of the tape did not always rupture the product and as such
this substrate
was not as good as the material from Example 1 and it would therefore be more
exacting
in matching the adhesive of the final label to the substrate to be labeled, to
provide good
tamper-evident properties. Nevertheless, when this substrate was coated with a
pressure
sensitive adhesive laminated with release paper and die cut, the resulting
labels could be
easily adhered to glass containers but attempts at removal would always leave
part of the
label on the bottle, making complete label transfer impossible.
Comparative Example 3
The following mixture was compounded as in Mix A, Example 1.
Component Wt %
Ampacet 111096 60% CaCO3 + Ti02 in HDPE 15.88
ExxonMobil HDPE Paxon AL55-003 70.76
Nova Chemicals Polystyrene High Heat 1300 2.64
Omya Oinyalene G.200 88% CaCO3 in LDPE 5.28
DRT Dertoline DP 001(a pentaerythritol - maleic
5.28
anhydride derivative of abietic acid)
Ciba Geigy Irganox B215 (anti oxidant) 0.16
A biaxially-oriented sheet was formed as described in Examples 1 and 2 using
the above
mixture in place of Mix A and the same coextruding procedure with Mix B. After
corona
treatment the film had the following properties.
Property MD TD
Tensile (N/mm) 45 35
Elongation (%) 120 130
Tear (N/ mm) 82 106
Opacity 94
Thickness ( m) 100
Density (g cm") 0.7
CA 02489060 2004-12-08
WO 2004/007196 PCT/GB2003/002890
12
The surface cohesive strength for a product coated to give 4gsin per side and
using the
tape peel test described before is given in the table below:
Peel Speed Maximum Surface Average Surface
mm/min Cohesive Strength (N) Cohesive Strength (N)
250 7.4 0.3 7.0 0.3
The peel action of the tape did not rupture the product and as such this
substrate was not
suitable for the intended purpose.
The relationships between density, cohesive strength and tamper evident
performance at
a peel speed of 250mm/min for each of Examples 1, 2 and 3 are summarised in
the
following table:
Example Density Maximum Cohesive Average Cohesive Performance
(g cm ) Strength (N) Strength (N) Rating
1 0.50 3.15 2.2 Very good
2 0.57 5.8 3.8 Good
3 0.70 7.4 7.0 Poor
This demonstrates that there is a strong relationship between the density of
the voided
HDPE material and its cohesive strength. This is believed to be due to the
fact that the
density of the HDPE material depends on the number of voids created during the
stretching and orientation process, a less dense material having a larger
number of voids
and therefore less cohesive strength. We have found that if the density is
about 0.6g cm -3
or less the labelling material has an average cohesive strength of about 4N or
less, which
provides good tamper-evident properties, whereas if the density is about 0.5g
cm -3 or less
the cohesive strength is about 2.5N or less, which provides very good tamper-
evident
properties. On the other hand, if the density is 0.7g cm -3 or more, as
illustrated by
comparative example 3, the material has a cohesive strength of about 7N or
more, which
provides poor (i.e. unsatisfactory) tamper-evident properties.
