Language selection

Search

Patent 2494051 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2494051
(54) English Title: LIGHTWEIGHT PROPPANT AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME
(54) French Title: AGENT DE SOUTENEMENT LEGER ET METHODE DE FABRICATION CONNEXE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
Abstracts

English Abstract


A method of forming lightweight, high-strength proppants is disclosed,
comprising
the steps of: homogeneously blending at least one ceramic precursor and at
least one pore former; pelletizing the blend to form microspheres; heating the
microspheres to less than sintering temperatures, to evaporate volatile
components and pyrolyze fugitive components; further heating the microspheres
to temperatures sufficient to sinter the continuous phase of the ceramic
precursor, to form sintered particles; and then forming the sintered particles
into
generally spheroid proppants. The generally spheroid proppants, which have
preferably been sintered to near theoretical density, may then be coated.
Heating of the microspheres may comprise a series of heating stages.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS
CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method of forming lightweight, high-strength proppants comprising the
steps of:
(a) blending at least one ceramic precursor and at least one pore
former to form a blend;
(b) pelletizing the blend to form a plurality of microspheres;
(c) heating the plurality of microspheres to less than sintering
temperatures, to evaporate volatile components and pyrolyze fugitive
components;
(d) heating the plurality of microspheres to temperatures sufficient to
sinter the continuous phase of the at least one ceramic precursor, to form
sintered particles; and
(e) forming the sintered particles into generally spheroid proppants.
2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one ceramic precursor is a
ceramic oxide selected from the group consisting of alumina, aluminum
hydroxide, boehmite, pseudo boehmite, kaolin clay, kaolinite, silica, clay,
talc,
magnesia, cordierite, and mullite.
3. The method of Claim 1 further comprising the step of selecting the at least
one pore former on the basis of particle size, particle size distribution,
morphology, specific gravity, and reactivity at elevated temperatures.
4. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one pore former is an inert
pore former.
5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one pore former is a fugitive
pore former.
16

6. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one pore former is selected
from the group consisting of finely divided natural materials, finely divided
man-
made materials, walnut shells, alginates, saccharides, polymers, and carbon
modifications.
7. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one ceramic precursor is
homogeneously blended with the at least one pore former to form a
homogeneous blend.
8. The method of Claim 1 wherein at least one additional component is
blended with the at least one ceramic precursor and the at least one pore
former
to form the blend.
9. The method of Claim 8 wherein the at least one additional component is
selected from the group consisting of inorganic and organic additives.
10. The method of Claim 8 wherein the at least one additional component is
selected from the group consisting of fillers, fibres, binders, fugitive
binders,
surfactants, plasticizers, and thickeners.
11. The method of Claim 1 wherein each of the plurality of microspheres is a
generally spherical body less than 5 mm in diameter.
12. The method of Claim 1 wherein the heating of the plurality of
microspheres to sinter the continuous phase of the at least one ceramic
precursor causes the at least one ceramic precursor to reach near theoretical
density.
13. The method of Claim 1 wherein the blending of the at least one ceramic
precursor with the at least one pore former to form a blend is achieved by
milling
the at least one ceramic precursor and the at least one pore former in dry
form.
14. The method of Claim 1 wherein the blending of the at least one ceramic
precursor with the at least one pore former to form a blend is achieved by
dispersing the at least one ceramic precursor and the at least one pore former
17

with a liquid.
15. The method of Claim 1 wherein the pelletizing of the blend to form the
plurality of microspheres is achieved by a process selected from the group
consisting of agglomeration, spray granulation, wet granulation, spheronizing,
extruding and pelletizing, vibration-induced dripping, spray nozzle formed
droplets, and selective agglomeration.
16. The method of Claim 1 comprising the further step after step (e) of
coating
the generally spheroid proppants.
17. The method of Claim 16 wherein the coating of the generally spheroid
proppants employs a material selected from the group consisting of organic
coating, epoxy, furan, phenolic resins and combinations thereof.
18. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one pore former is less than 5
microns in size.
19. The method of Claim 18 wherein the at least one pore former is less than
1 micron in size.
20. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one pore former is produced
by a process selected from the group consisting of grinding, ball milling,
precipitating, dispersing, flame pyrolysis, gas condensation, spray
conversion,
crystallization, polymerization, chemical synthesis, and sol-gel techniques.
21. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one ceramic precursor is less
than 10 microns in size.
22. The method of Claim 21 wherein the at least one ceramic precursor is less
than 5 microns in size.
23. The method of Claim 1 wherein the at least one ceramic precursor is
produced by a process selected from the group consisting of grinding, ball
milling, precipitating, dispersing, flame pyrolysis, gas condensation, spray
18

conversion, crystallization, chemical synthesis, and sol-gel techniques.
24. The method of Claim 14 wherein the liquid has a boiling point of less than
150.degrees.C.
25. The method of Claim 14 wherein the liquid is water.
26. The method of Claim 14 wherein concentration of the liquid is 2 to 75 wt.
percent.
27. The method of Claim 10 wherein the fillers are selected from the group
consisting of fly ash, sludges, stags, volcanic aggregates, expanded perlite,
pumice, obsidian, diatomaceous earth mica, borosilicates, clays, oxides,
fluorides, sea shells, silica, inorganic pore formers, mineral fibres, and
chopped
fibreglass.
28. The method of Claim 27 wherein the inorganic pore formers are selected
from the group consisting of carbonates, acetates, nitrates, silica and
alumina
hollow spheres.
29. The method of Claim 10 wherein the binders are selected from the group
consisting of acrylic polymers, alginates, saccharides, silicates, and monomer-
catalyst combinations.
30. The method of Claim 1 wherein the step of heating the plurality of
microspheres to less than sintering temperatures comprises a series of heating
stages.
31. The method of Claim 1 wherein the temperatures sufficient to sinter the
continuous phase of the at least one ceramic precursor are above
800.degrees.C.
19

32. The method of Claim 1 wherein the heating of the plurality of
microspheres to sinter the continuous phase of the at least one ceramic
precursor causes the at least one ceramic precursor to achieve less than
theoretical density.
20

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
LIGHTWEIGHT PROPPANT AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME
FIELD OF INVENTION
Lightweight particles, commonly referred to as proppants, are provided for use
in
oil and gas wells. The particles are useful to prop open subterranean
formation
fractures.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Hydraulic fracturing is a process of injecting fluids into an oil or gas
bearing
formation at sufficiently high rates and pressures such that the formation
fails in
tension and fractures to accept the fluid. In order to hold the fracture open
once
the fracturing pressure is released, a propping agent (proppant) is mixed with
the
fluid and injected into the formation. Hydraulic fracturing increases the flow
of oil
or gas from a reservoir to the well bore in at least three ways: (1 ) the
overall
reservoir area connected to the well bore is increased, (2) the proppant in
the
fracture has significantly higher permeability than the formation itself, and
(3)
highly conductive (propped) channels create a large pressure gradient in the
reservoir past the tip of the fracture.
Proppants are preferably spherical particulates that resist high temperatures,
pressures, and the corrosive environment present in the formation. If
proppants
fail to withstand the closure stresses of the formation, they disintegrate,
producing fines or fragments, which reduce the permeability of the propped
fracture. Early proppants were based on silica sand, glass beads, sand, walnut
shells, or aluminum microspheres. For its sensible balance of cost and
compressive strength, silica sand (frac-sand) is still the most widely used
proppant in the fracturing business. Its use, however, is limited to depth
with
closure stresses of 41 MPa. Beyond this depth resin-coated and ceramic
proppants are used. Resin-coated and ceramic proppants are limited to closure

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
stresses of 55 and 83 MPa, respectively.
According to a study for the United States Department of Energy, published in
April 1982 (Cutler and Jones, 'Lightweight Proppants for Deep Gas Well
Stimulation' DOE/BC110038-22), ideal proppants for hydraulic fracturing would
have a specific gravity less than 2.0 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, be able to withstand closure
stresses of 138 MPa, be chemically inert in brine at temperatures to
200.degrees. C., have perfect sphericity, cost the same as sand on a volume
basis, and have a narrow proppant size distribution. The report concludes that
such a proppant is not likely to be forthcoming in the foreseeable future.
United States Patent No. 4,493,875 to Beck et al. discloses the manufacture of
lightweight composite particles, the core of which is a conventional proppant
particle, such as silica sand. The core has a thin coating containing hollow
glass
microspheres. Proppant particles manufactured in accordance with the invention
have apparent densities ranging from of 1.3 to 2.5 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. Proppants
manufactured according to this invention are not much stronger than the core
particle itself and are, due to the cost of the resin and hollow glass
spheres, quite
expensive to manufacture.
United States Patent No. 5,030,603 to Rumpf and Lemieux teaches the
manufacture of lightweight ceramic proppants with apparent specific gravities
ranging from 2.65 to 3.0 g/cm<sup>3</sup> from calcined Kaolin clay having particle
sizes of less than 8 micron. The clay is mixed with an organic binder, then
pelletized and sintered at 1,400.degrees. C. Disadvantages of this invention
are
that the proppants have a relative high apparent specific gravity and are
limited
to closure stresses of 55 MPa.
United States Patent No. 5,120,455 to Lunghofer discloses the manufacture of
lightweight ceramic proppants with apparent specific gravities of
approximately
2.65 g/cm<sup>3</sup> by sintering a mixture largely containing alumina and silica
at
2

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
1,200 to 1,650.degrees. C. The proppants show significant conductivity at
closure stresses of 83 MPa. The main disadvantage of this invention is that
the
proppants still have a relative high apparent specific gravity.
United States Patent No. 6,364,018 to Brannon, Rickards, and Stephenson
discloses the manufacture of proppants with apparent specific gravities
ranging
from 1.25 to 1.35 g/cm<sup>3</sup> from resin-coated ground nut hulls. The patent
states low conductivities at closure stresses of 15 MPa. The use of the
proppants, therefore, is limited to shallow wells.
United States Patent No. 6,753,299 to Lunghofer et al. claims the use of using
quartz, shale containing quartz, bauxite, talc, and wollastonite as raw
materials.
The proppant contains as much as 65% quartz, and has yielded sufficient
strength to be used in wells to a pressure of 69 MPa. The apparent specific
gravity of the proppant is approximately 2.62 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. The invention
provides
some improvements on US patent 5,120,455, cited above, by reducing the
specific gravity of the proppants and by introducing cost savings due to an
increased use of silica.
United States Patent Application No. 10/804,868 to Urbanek, assigned to the
present applicant, teaches the manufacture of lightweight ceramic proppants
with
apparent specific gravities ranging from 1.4 to 1.9 g/cm<sup>3</sup> using sol-gel
processes. The application claims the preferred use of two exothermic chemical
compositions commonly referred to as 'Geopolymers' and 'Phosphate Cements'.
United States Patent Application No. 10/911,679 to Urbanek, assigned to the
present applicant, teaches the manufacture of lightweight ceramic proppants
with
apparent specific gravities ranging from 1.4 to 1.9 g/cm<sup>3</sup> by introducing
micro- and mesopores into ceramics. The application claims the use of sol-gel
processes to form porous proppants.
3

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
At the present time, commercially available lightweight ceramic proppants have
an apparent specific gravity of around 2.7 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. The proppants are
manufactured in accordance with United States Patent No. 5,120,455, cited
above.
The present invention seeks to address the perceived limitations in the art by
providing a novel lightweight proppant and method of manufacturing the same.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the present invention there is provided a composition and method
useful in the manufacture of lightweight and high-strength proppants.
The proppants are composed of porous ceramics. Pores in proppants according
to this invention are of sufficient physical stability at high temperatures to
permit
accurate and independent control of porosity and the sintering process. Thus,
durable porous ceramics can be manufactured with repeatable accuracy, which
are useful in the manufacture of lightweight and high-strength proppants.
Porosity is achieved by homogenously blending ceramic precursors with pore
formers and sintering of the continuous phase of the ceramic precursors,
preferably to near theoretical density.
Ceramic precursors may comprise ceramic oxides, preferably selected from the
group consisting of alumina, aluminum hydroxide, boehmite, pseudo boehmite,
kaolin clay, kaolinite, silica, clay, talc, magnesia, cordierite, and mullite.
Pore formers comprise a predetermined particle size, particle size
distribution,
morphology, specific gravity, and reactivity at elevated temperatures. Pore
formers may inherently have a low thermal reactivity and are hereafter
referred to
as 'inert pore formers', or have a high thermal reactivity and are hereafter
4

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
referred to as 'fugitive pore formers'. The term 'thermal reactivity' refers
to
chemical reactions, which may occur at elevated temperatures. Relative to
heating in air, the thermal reactivity of pore formers may be reduced by
heating
the disclosed compositions in the presence of non-oxidizing atmospheres,
hereafter referred to as 'inert atmospheres', or enhanced by heating in
oxidizing
atmospheres. If pore formers are substantially inert at elevated temperatures,
they are chosen to have a lower specific gravity than the sintered ceramic.
Pore
formers are preferably comprised of finely divided natural or man-made
materials, including walnut shells, alginates, saccharides, polymers, or
carbon
modifications, such as carbon black.
Proppants are formed by methods comprising the steps of:
(a) homogenously blending ceramic precursors and pore formers, and
other components which may improve the technical or economic
performance of proppants during the stages of manufacture, storage,
and field use;
(b) pelletizing the homogenous blend to form microspheres. The term
'microspheres' refers to preferably spherical bodies of less than 5 mm
in diameter;
(c) heating the microspheres to less than sintering temperatures to
evaporate volatile components and to pyrolyze fugitive pore formers
and other fugitive components; and
(d) heating the microspheres to temperatures sufficient to sinter the
ceramic precursors, preferably to near theoretical density.
Any process providing for homogenous mixtures may be selected to blend the
components of this invention. Thus, components may be ground or ball milled
together in dry form. Components may also be blended or dispersed with a
liquid
to improve homogeneity and the process of forming and sintering the
5

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
microspheres.
Homogenous blends utilized in this invention have properties that allow them
to
be shaped and sintered to form proppant particles. These properties may be
controlled by varying the solids content, temperature, pH, particle size,
particle
size distribution, and particle morphology, and through the use of inorganic
and
organic additives, commonly known to be theology modifiers, such as fillers,
fibres, binders, fugitive binders, surfactants, plasticizers, and thickeners.
The method of forming the blends into 'green' proppants may be caused by
techniques selected from the group consisting of agglomeration, spray
granulation, wet granulation, spheronizing, extruding and pelletizing,
vibration-
induced dripping, spray nozzle formed droplets, and selective agglomeration.
The term 'green proppants' refers to microspheres of this invention, which
have
been shaped from the disclosed compositions but are not sintered.
Green proppants are then heated in stages to sintering temperatures. During
the
initial stages of heating evaporation and pyrolysis of pore formers and other
additives occurs. The present invention permits sintering of the continuous
phase
of ceramic precursors to less than or near theoretical density. Any economical
heating process may be selected to heat the blended materials.
The method may comprise the further step of coating the microspheres after
forming the proppants, the coating of the proppants then preferably comprising
use of a coating selected from the group consisting of organic coating, epoxy,
furan, phenolic resins and combinations thereof.
The invention provides a composition and method useful to economically
manufacture proppants with repeatable accuracy. The proppants have an
apparent specific gravity of 1.0 to 2.9 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and a compressive strength
of
5 to 140 MPa.
6

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The following is a detailed description of preferred embodiments of the
present
invention wherein is described a composition and method useful in the
manufacture of particulate ceramics, commonly referred to as proppants. The
proppants comprise porous ceramics.
Porous ceramics have previously been used in many applications, such as
refractories, filters, abrasives, fuel cells, bone implants, catalyst
substrates,
catalysts, drying agents, diffusion layers, heat exchange components, thermal
insulators, sound barriers, and wicks. The utility of ceramics in these
applications
depends on material properties such as bend and compressive strength, thermal
shock resistance, thermal expansion, modulus of elasticity, fracture
toughness,
thermal conductivity, hardness, density, catalytic activity, and chemical
inertness.
Although many of these material properties are available in dense ceramics,
they
are lost once pores are introduced. It has been observed, for instance, that
compressive strength decreases exponentially with increasing pore volumes (see
Ryshekewitch and Duckworth, 'Compression Strength of Porous Sintered
Alumina and Zirconia', Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 36 [2] 65,
1953
and Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 36 [2] 68, 1953).
Pore volumes can be controlled to a certain degree through initial ceramic
particle properties and sintering profiles. Extended sintering periods and
high
temperatures, however, generally decrease the amount of pores present (see
Deng, Fukasawa, Ando, Zhang and Ohji, 'Microstructure and Mechanical
Properties of Porous Alumina Ceramics Fabricated by the Decomposition of
Aluminum Hydroxide', Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 84 (11 ),
2638, 2001 ). Sintering, therefore, must be restricted at times to achieve
certain
pore volumes while other mechanical properties are neglected.
Since porosity is very sensitive to ceramic precursor properties, sintering
7

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
temperatures, and hold times, it is difficult to produce consistent porous
ceramic
articles. Ideally, lightweight ceramics would be produced according to a
method
which controls pore size, pore size distribution, and total pore volume
independent of the sintering process. The method may also permit sintering of
ceramic precursors to near theoretical density and thereby improvements of
mechanical properties, including compressive strength.
In United States Patent No. 4,777,153 issued to Sonuparlak et al., entitled
'Process For The Production Of Porous Ceramics Using Fugitive Polymeric
Microspheres And The Resultant Product', colloidal suspensions of polymeric
microspheres of selected sizes and shapes are consolidated with aluminum
oxide particles to form compacts. Upon heating, the microspheres are
decomposed to leave pores. The resulting structure is then sintered to form a
porous ceramic body with a plurality of pores, substantially of the same size
and
shape. The pores are evenly distributed and noncontiguous throughout the
ceramic body. The major disadvantage of this process is that extended heating
periods are required to decompose the polymeric microspheres into stable pore
structures.
In United States Patent No. 5,563,212 issued to Dismukes et al., entitled
'Synthesis Of Microporous Ceramics', microporous ceramic compositions are
prepared by first forming an intimate mixture of oligomeric or polymeric
ceramic
precursors with additive particles to provide a composite intermediate,
followed
by pyrolysis of the composite intermediate under an inert atmosphere in
sequential stages. Although the addition of pore formers to produce porous
ceramics is paramount to this prior art, there is no suggestion that the
method
can be used to control pore volumes or compressive strength.
In United States Patent No. 6,156,091 issued to Casey, entitled 'Controlled
Porosity For Ceramic Contact Sheets And Setter Tiles', porosity of ceramics is
controlled by the volume percentage, particle size, and particle shape of a
8

CA 02494051 2005-Ol-26
fugitive material, which is added to the original refractory material slurry.
The
method is used to fabricate setter tiles and contact sheets. The fugitive
phase is
used independently to introduce porosity or in conjunction with partial
densification. Since porosity is not solely dependent upon partial sintering,
higher
porosity levels can be achieved with less impact on subsequent mechanical
properties of the sintered refractory material. This prior art uses carbon
black as
a pore former to improve mechanical properties other than compressive strength
and to control pore volumes of ceramics containing contiguous pores after
sintering. The use of inert atmospheres to control porosity is not mentioned.
Bearing in mind the status of the prior art, it is therefore one object of the
present
invention to provide a composition and method to accurately and independently
control sintering of ceramic precursors and porosity of the sintered ceramics.
The
porous ceramics are useful in the manufacture of lightweight and high-strength
proppants. Control of porosity and sintering processes is achieved by
improving
the stability of intentionally introduced pores at high temperatures. The
invention
permits sintering of the pore-encompassing ceramic precursors to less than or
near theoretical density.
Pore formers of this invention may be fugitive or inert. Fugitive pore formers
are
substantially reactive and undergo chemical reactions at elevated
temperatures.
Such reactivity may encompass thermal and redox processes. The composition
of final reaction products therefore depends on the chemical composition of
pore
formers initially present, intermediates formed during heating, and the
reactivity
of both with optional oxidizing atmospheres at elevated temperatures. Those
skilled in the art will recognize the complexity of thermally induced
reactions
possible in presence or absence of oxidizing atmospheres and the multitude of
compounds that can occupy pores of the sintered ceramics. Thermal and
oxidative processes are jointly referred to hereafter as 'pyrolyses'. Inert
pore
formers inherently have low thermal reactivity and do not experience
substantial
pyrolyses with heating. Generally, pores are occupied by materials that have a
9

CA 02494051 2005-O1-26
lower specific gravity than the continuous phase of sintered ceramics.
Relative to heating in air, pyrolyses of pore formers may be reduced by
heating in
non-oxidizing atmospheres or enhanced by heating in oxidizing atmospheres.
Inert atmospheres may be produced by replacing air with gases such as
nitrogen, argon, or ammonia. Oxidizing atmospheres may comprise oxygen by
itself or in presence of other gases, such as the composition of air.
Further to having a composition and reactivity, pore formers also have a
predetermined concentration, particle size, particle size distribution,
morphology,
including porous, foamed, or hollow particles, and specific gravity. These
parameters jointly permit accurate and independent command of pore sizes, pore
size distribution, total pore volumes, and pore connectivity from sintering.
Since
pores of this invention can be managed throughout the manufacturing cycle,
sintering of ceramic precursors can be independently controlled by choosing
methods and conditions. Thus, sintering of the continuous phase of ceramic
precursors to near theoretical density can be achieved, resulting in porous
ceramics of improved mechanical properties, such as compressive strength.
The at least one pore former may comprise finely divided natural or man-made,
organic or inorganic materials, including walnut shells, alginate,
saccharides,
polymers, or carbon modifications, such as carbon black. Although the carbon
black is the preferred pore former, other materials that have well-controlled
particle size distributions and are easily blended or dispersed, preferably as
fine
powders, may be utilized in the present invention. The particle size of pore
formers is preferably less than 5 microns, and most preferably less than 1
micron. Pore formers of appropriate particle size, particle size distribution,
and
particle morphology may be produced by any suitable and economical process,
such as grinding, ball milling, precipitating, dispersing, flame pyrolysis,
gas
condensation, spray conversion, crystallization, polymerization, chemical
synthesis, or sol-gel techniques.

CA 02494051 2005-O1-26
Pore formers are homogenously blended with at least one ceramic precursor,
which may comprise a finely divided ceramic oxide, preferably selected from
the
group consisting of alumina, aluminum hydroxide, boehmite, pseudo boehmite,
kaolin clay, kaolinite, silica, clay, talc, magnesia, cordierite, and mullite.
Those
skilled in the art will recognize the extensive list of ceramic oxides used in
the
manufacture of ceramics. It is apparent that ceramic oxides of lower specific
gravity require lower concentrations of pores than those of higher specific
gravity
in order to produce porous ceramics of equal specific gravity. Because of the
logarithmic relationship between compressive strength and pore concentration,
the use of ceramic oxides of lower specific gravity in the manufacture of
porous
ceramics of high compressive strength, therefore, may be preferred. The
particle
size of ceramic precursors is preferably less than 10 microns, and most
preferably less than 5 microns. Ceramic precursors of appropriate particle
size,
particle size distribution, and particle morphology may be produced by any
suitable and economical process, such as grinding, ball milling,
precipitating,
dispersing, flame pyrolysis, gas condensation, spray conversion,
crystallization,
chemical synthesis, or sol-gel techniques.
Any process providing for homogenous mixtures may be selected to blend the
components of this invention. Thus, components may be blended by grinding,
ball milling, or pulverizing together in dry form. Components may also be
blended
or dispersed with at least one liquid to improve homogeneity and the process
of
forming and sintering the microspheres. For the purpose of this invention, the
liquid preferably has a boiling point less than 150.degrees. C. More
preferably,
the liquid is water. Concentrations of liquid may range from 2 to 75 wt.
percent.
Homogenous blends utilized in this invention have properties that allow them
to
be shaped and sintered to form proppant particles. These properties may be
controlled by varying the solid content, temperature, pH, particle size,
particle
size distribution, and particle morphology, and through the use of inorganic
and
11

CA 02494051 2005-O1-26
organic additives, commonly known to be rheology modifiers, such as fillers,
fibres, binders, fugitive binders, surfactants, plasticizers, and thickeners.
Fillers
may be added to achieve desired economic targets, specific mechanical and
chemical properties during mixing of the chemical components, forming and
sintering of green proppants, and the field performance of the final product.
Compatible fillers include waste materials, such as fly ash, sludges, stags,
volcanic aggregates, expanded perlite, pumice, obsidian, diatomaceous earth
mica, borosilicates, clays, oxides, fluorides, sea shells, silica, inorganic
pore
formers, mineral fibres, or chopped fibreglass. Inorganic pore formers may be
added to increase porosity and are preferably selected from the group
consisting
of carbonates, acetates, nitrates, silica and alumina hollow spheres. The
addition
of binders may improve the process of dispersing, shaping, or sintering of the
composition. Binders may include natural or man-made materials such as acrylic
polymers, alginates, saccharides, silicates, and monomer-catalyst combinations
used in processes commonly known as 'reactive bonding'.
Homogenously blended materials are heated in several stages to sintering
temperatures. At temperatures below 500° C., liquids are volatilized.
At
higher temperatures, pyrolysis of polymers occurs and low-molecular-weight
organics are volatilized. Pyrolysis is also performed at temperatures below
500° C. The remaining organic compounds are typically burned off above
temperatures of about 800° C. Sintering and densification may also
occur
above these temperatures. Any economical heating process may be selected to
heat the blended materials. While partial densification produces even higher
levels of porosity, full densification of ceramic precursors is preferred. The
resulting porous ceramics are lightweight, have high compressive strength, and
can be produced with repeatable accuracy.
The disclosed lightweight proppants may be coated with organic coatings, such
as epoxy, furan, and phenolic resins (United States Patent No. 5,639,806), and
combinations of these coatings to improve their performance characteristics
and
utility. Specifically, coatings may be used to seal open pores connecting to
the
12

CA 02494051 2005-O1-26
surface of sintered proppants. Applications may be carried out in accordance
with known methods for coating proppants or ceramics.
Thus, through careful selection of raw materials and manufacturing conditions,
essential properties of porous ceramics, such as compressive strength and
specific gravity can be accurately and independently controlled. The selection
of
raw materials and manufacturing conditions would be clearly evident to those
skilled in the art. It is therefore another object of this invention to
provide durable
porous ceramics, which can be manufactured with repeatable accuracy, and are
useful in the manufacture of proppants for oil and gas wells. The proppants
are
l0 strong in compression, have a low apparent specific gravity, and can be
made
more economically than presently available materials.
In preferred embodiments of the present invention, a composition and method to
accurately and independently control sintering of ceramics precursors and
porosity of the sintered ceramic is disclosed. The resulting porous ceramics
are
lightweight and high in compressive strength. The ceramics are suitable for
the
manufacture of proppants and have an apparent specific gravity of 1.0 to 2.9
g/cm<sup>3</sup> and a compressive strength of 14 to 104 MPa.
The method of the present invention may comprise the step of homogenously
blending or dispersing the at least one finely divided ceramic precursor and
pore
former, and other additives using conventional blending or dispersing
techniques.
The properties of the disclosed blends permit use of sphere-forming techniques
such as agglomeration, spray granulation, wet granulation, spheronizing,
extruding and palletizing, vibration-induced dripping (United States Patent
No.
5,500,162), spray nozzle formed droplets (United States Patent No. 4,392,987),
selective agglomeration (United States Patent No. 4,902,666), the use of which
is
incorporated herein by reference. The techniques allow manufacture of green
proppants from the disclosed compositions. Green proppants are heated in
stages to sintering temperatures. The continuous phase of ceramic precursors
may be sintered to less than or near theoretical density using conventional
13

CA 02494051 2005-O1-26
heating techniques. Prvppants manufactured according to the present invention
have an apparent specific gravity of 1.0 to 2.9 g/cm<sup>3</sup> and a compressive
strength of 5 to 140 MPa. The disclosed lightweight proppants may be coated
with organic coatings, such as epoxy, furan, and phenolic resins, and
combinations of these coatings to improve their performance characteristics
and
utility. The coating may be carried out in accordance with known methods of
coating proppants or ceramics.
When compared on volume bases to presently manufactured lightweight
proppants, high pore volumes and lower heat capacities of the porous ceramics
both permit reduction in manufacturing costs. The properties of the disclosed
blends permit production of highly spherical and near monodisperse particles.
Proppants manufactured according to the present invention can meet a wide
range of economic and mechanical requirements. As porosity of the ceramics is
increased, proppants show less compressive strength, but also material and
energy costs to manufacture the same volume of proppants are significantly
reduced. Highly porous proppants, therefore, can be manufactured according to
this invention to compete with frac-sand, and denser proppants can be tailored
to
be competitive with current ceramic proppants. This range is not readily
adapted
by other techniques.
A lightweight, high-strength proppant is disclosed, comprising the formation
of
porous ceramics by sintering ceramic precursors in the presence of pore
formers.
A method of manufacturing such a proppant is also disclosed, comprising the
steps of preferably blending ceramic precursors, pore formers, and additives
homogenously. These blends have properties, which permit the shaping of
spheres using conventional palletizing techniques. Staged heating of the
microspheres to sintering temperatures produces porous ceramics with
repeatable accuracy. The palletized porous ceramics are useful as lightweight
and high-strength proppants.
14

CA 02494051 2005-O1-26
EXAMPLE
The following example illustrates the use of porous ceramics in the
manufacture
of lightweight proppants.
160 litres of an aqueous solution of 8% by weight ALsub.2 (SO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub> and
3% by weight MgSO<sub>4</sub> are intensively blended with 0.06% carbon and 120
litres of 8% NaOH. The precipitate is filtered under vacuum and carefully
washed with water. The cake is partially dried. Conventional sphere forming
and
sintering at 1,400.degrees. C. in an atmosphere of Argon results in
lightweight
proppants made of MgAl<sub>2</sub> O<sub>4</sub> spinet, having an apparent specific
gravity of 1.8 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. and a compressive strength of 39 MPa.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been described in
the foregoing, it is to be understood that other embodiments are possible
within
the scope of the invention and are intended to be included herein. It will be
clear
to any person skilled in the art that modifications of and adjustments to this
invention, not shown, are possible without departing from the spirit of the
invention as demonstrated through the exemplary embodiments. For
example, while porous ceramics may solely be used to manufacture proppants,
the use of fillers may improve the economical and physical properties of the
proppants, so the embodiments described above are therefore meant to be
merely illustrative. The invention is therefore to be considered limited
solely by
the scope of the appended claims.
15

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2494051 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2013-11-19
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2013-11-19
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-01-28
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2012-11-19
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2012-05-18
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-02-29
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-08-31
Letter Sent 2010-02-08
Request for Examination Received 2010-01-22
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-01-22
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2010-01-22
Letter Sent 2009-04-28
Inactive: Office letter 2007-01-23
Inactive: Entity size changed 2007-01-23
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-01-22
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-01-22
Inactive: Office letter 2007-01-22
Inactive: Corrective payment - s.78.6 Act 2007-01-11
Revocation of Agent Request 2007-01-11
Appointment of Agent Request 2007-01-11
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2006-07-26
Inactive: Cover page published 2006-07-25
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2005-04-14
Inactive: Filing certificate correction 2005-03-24
Inactive: Filing certificate correction 2005-03-24
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2005-03-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2005-03-22
Inactive: IPC assigned 2005-03-17
Application Received - Regular National 2005-02-23
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-02-23
Letter Sent 2005-02-23
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2005-02-23

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-01-28

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2012-01-26

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Registration of a document 2005-01-25
Application fee - small 2005-01-25
2007-01-11
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2007-01-26 2007-01-15
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2008-01-28 2008-01-25
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2009-01-26 2009-01-13
Registration of a document 2009-03-05
Request for examination - standard 2010-01-22
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2010-01-26 2010-01-25
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - standard 06 2011-01-26 2011-01-21
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - standard 07 2012-01-26 2012-01-26
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
1389414 ALBERTA LTD.
Past Owners on Record
THOMAS W. URBANEK
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2012-02-29 4 149
Description 2005-01-26 15 755
Abstract 2005-01-26 1 21
Claims 2005-01-26 5 158
Cover Page 2006-07-18 1 31
Description 2012-02-29 15 718
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2005-02-23 1 105
Filing Certificate (English) 2005-02-23 1 158
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2006-09-27 1 110
Reminder - Request for Examination 2009-09-29 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2010-02-08 1 176
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2013-02-11 1 164
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2013-03-25 1 173
Correspondence 2005-03-24 2 97
Correspondence 2007-01-11 2 74
Correspondence 2007-01-22 1 14
Correspondence 2007-01-23 1 14
Fees 2007-01-15 1 39
Fees 2008-01-25 1 39
Fees 2009-01-13 1 42
Fees 2010-01-25 1 39
Fees 2011-01-21 1 40