Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
COATING COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING ALKYL KETENE DIMERS AND
ALKYL SUCCINIC ANHYDRIDES FOR USE IN PAPER MAKING
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is directed to the papermaking arts, more particularly
to
a process for the manufacture of a paper having improved grease and water
resistance
and increased tensile strength, yet facilitating recycling of the paper. Such
papers
(throughout the specification and claims "papers" includes virgin or recycled
paper,
kraft stock and similar materials) find particular application in the
container making
art wherein such improved properties are desirable. The container making art,
particularly, in the field of corrugated containers, folding cartons, and the
tray and box
industries, consumes much of the natural timber resources. Thus, it would be
beneficial to formulate new processes of forming papers of improved wet
strength
having grease and water resistance properties as well as increase tensile
strength
which papers would be repulpable and therefore recyclable.
2. Description of the Related Art
The art of "papermaking" is an ancient one, being attributable to invention by
the Chinese before the birth of Christ.
As far back as containers have been needed, the use of wood has been the
most popular, and has the longest history. Containers in the shape of barrels
and
crates have traditionally been used to carry and/or store many varied types of
materials, including wet products such as produce, fish, meat, and poultry.
This of
course is not the limit to the requirements of packing wet or refrigerated
products as
there are many more wet packed products that contain water and ice or
condensation
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
from refrigeration to retard the ripening process or to maintain product
freshness for
distribution over wide geographical areas.
In order to reduce costs, wooden crates were reused as many times as possible.
For some products this caused health issues, because bacteria often grow on
the
surface of wood or in the cracks of the wood. As a result, crossover
contamination of
bacteria or viruses, such as salmonella, was common, from one crate to
another, as
proper sanitation was often not performed.
The use of corrugated paper began to mature in the 1930's and 1940's as the
container of choice for lightweight items. As the technology increased and the
ability
to make corrugated boxes out of heavier or thicker paper (or liner), the
strength of the
corrugated box increased. The corrugation strength of paper was demonstrating-
strengths that the wood crate manufacturers did not expect. The confidence of
the
corrugated suppliers along with the innovative minds in the corrugated
industry
caused a new concept to be considered to perhaps penetrate the wet container
market
against the wooden crate. This was the introduction of the wax coated
corrugated
box. If the corrugated box coated with wax could be designed to hold products
safely
and in vertical stacking stresses that exceed 250 lbs., perhaps the wax would
keep the
paper/liner dry which would in turn keep the box rigidity and strength as high
as in
the dry environment, and thus replace the wooden crate. However, in order to
increase the strength of a conventional corrugated box, it became necessary to
use
heavier and thicker paper.
As a result of the superior properties of corrugated paper containers, wood
crates were slowly phased out. The wooden crate was pushed out of every market
in
which the corrugated paper box was suitable for use. Since the 1940's, the wax
coated box has done an excellent job of supplying boxes for storing items such
as
produce, fish, meat and poultry.
More modem developments resulted in the widely accepted Fourdrinier
process (See generally Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd
ed.,
Vol. 9, pp. 846-7, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1980, in which a "furnish"
(a "furnish" is predominantly water,
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
3
e.g., 99.5% by weight and 0.5% "stock", i.e., virgin, recycled or mixed virgin
and
recycled pulp of wood fibers, fillers, sizing and/or dyes) is deposited from a
headbox
on a "wire" (a fast-moving foraminous conveyor belt or screen) which serves as
a
table to form the paper. As the furnish moves along, gravity and suction boxes
under
the wire draw the water out. The volume and density of the material and the
speed at
which it flows onto the wire determine the paper's final weight.
Typically, after the paper leaves this "wet end" of the papermaking machine,
it
still contains a predominant amount of water. Therefore, the paper enters a
press
section, generally comprising a series of heavy rotating cylinders, which
press the
water from the paper, further compacting it and reducing its water content,
typically
to 70% by weight.
Thereafter, the paper enters a drying section. Typically, the drying section
is
the longest part of the paper machine. For example, hot air or steam heated
cylinders
may contact both sides of the paper, evaporating the water to a relatively low
level,
e.g., no greater than 10%, typically 2-8% and preferably 5% by weight of the
paper.
Following the drying section, the paper optionally passes through a sizing
liquid to make it less porous and to help printing inks remain on the surface
instead of
penetrating the paper. The paper can go through additional dryers that
evaporate any
liquid in the sizing and coating. Calenders or polished steel rolls make the
paper even
smoother and more compact. While most calenders add gloss, some calenders are
used to create a dull or matte finish.
The paper is wound onto a "parent" reel and taken off the paper making
machine.
The paper on the parent reel can be further processed, such as on a
slitter/winder, into rolls of smaller size or fed into sheeters, such as folio
or cut-size
sheeters, for printing end uses or even office application.
In order to make conventional containers, rolls formed by slitter/winder
(e.g.,
of paper and kraft grades of liner) are unwound and coated with a wax. Waxes
are
used to impart water resistance and wet strength to the liner, but prohibits
or
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
4
otherwise inhibits recycling the used containers incorporating them.
Additionally,
conventional wax coated liners must be adhered to the other components of the
container with hot melt adhesives. Most hot melt adhesives are a further
impediment
to recycling of formed containers because they employ wax containing
components.
Thus, there still exists a need for manufacturing paper possessing superior
wet and
tensile strength and water and grease resistance properties, but facilitating
repulping
and recycling thereof.
Two methods for coating boxes or other paper products with liquid additives,
such as wax, are conventionally used. The first is identified as a curtain
coating
process. This design incorporates a medium that is impregnated with hot wax
and
then becomes a corrugated box. A completed, i.e., combined, board is passed
through
a curtain of hot wax, in a procedure commonly known in the art of paper making
as
"curtain coating." First one side and then the opposite side are coated with
hot wax.
However, due to the conditions necessary to perform the curtain coating
process, fire
becomes a significant risk.
Another conventional paper coating process is "cascading" The cascading
wax procedure is different from the curtain coating procedure in that a
regularly
corrugated box of any shape or size can be stood on end, such that the
corrugated
flutes are vertical, to allow the hot wax to permeate the entire structure,
with a wax
cascading around and through the container in a flat position that is easy to
stack for
shipping. In contrast to the curtain coating process, the cascading process
requires the
box to be fully formed prior to application of the wax or other liquid
additive. This is
considered the better performing wax box of the two described.
Alternative coating procedures are also known in the art, such as those
described in U.S. Patent No. 5,858,173; No. 5,531,863; No. 5,429,294; and No.
5,393,566, for example, surface coating to protect the outside of the liner on
both sides
to mimic a box subjected to the curtain coating procedure.
Moreover, substitutes for wax coatings have been developed. For example,
U.S. Patent No. 5,393,566 discusses the use of acrylic on the paper machine to
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
generate a moisture barrier. Even with the coated one side liner with the
medium
included in the design, the acrylic-coated boxes, described therein, equaled
the
performance of conventional wax coated boxes, coated via the cascade method.
End users of conventional wax boxes are often faced with exorbitant charges
for disposal fees, which can often exceed $80/ton of box waste. Because the
coatings
of the invention may be applied at any existing paper mill, such costs can be
reduced
to a one time sale of $70/ton, for a total cost savings is $150/ton at current
pricing
which is significant to national grocers. This industry is what is driving the
demand
for a solution to the waxed container that has given reliable service for
about 60 years.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present inventor has discovered that amounts of AKD or ASA as an
additive, either alone or in combination with other known additives, could
create the
wax free technologies of the future.
In order to overcome the problems associated with conventional paper
coatings, while still maintaining moisture resistance, the present invention
includes
the addition of at least one hydrocarbon dimer, such as alkyl ketene dimer
(AKD),
and/or alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA), for example, in the size press or
calendar
stack and most often in the wet end. Thus, a medium is created that
outperforms
waxed medium in laboratory testing for burst and tear strengths, and water
resistance.
As used herein, "AKD" may also be alkenyl ketene dimer, in addition to the
alkyl
ketene dimers discussed above.
The specific coatings of the invention have equaled or exceeded conventional
wax boxes used, for example, refrigerated or other wet strength environments,
such as
in poultry packaging. Generally, conventional waxed boxes last approximately 6-
9
days in wet environments such as heavy ice packs, because even with wax as a
water
barrier, the liner still becomes wet over time. However, applying a coating
composition comprising AKD and/or ASA in the wet end of the paper making
process
provides a useable life that meets or exceeds that of waxed boxes.
Additionally, the
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
6
boxes of the present invention can last 1-2 months for long term storage, such
as
under refrigerated conditions, e.g., 34 F and high humidity and without ice.
This success has prompted the inventors to consider the same formulation at
the paper machine for liner. This would revolutionize the efficiencies and the
economics of the entire cost structure and make wax alternative technology the
unmistakable choice for performance, cost and the environment.
No one has considered this approach before because a typical mill engineer
would test the water drop of the liner or medium and assume that with such
water
resistance, that no one could corrugate the board, when the board is combined
with
any water based corn starch, which must first have been bound to the two
liners and
the medium. The coated boards of the invention also pass such tests as dry
pins and
wet pins. Wet pins are tested after the corrugated board has been submerged in
water
at room temperature for 24 hours and not only stay together but also offer a
measurable resistance from being pulled apart. The inventor has studied the
use of
starches, such as ordinary corn starch, potato starch, wheat and tapioca, as
binding
and sizing agents. Thus in combination with one or more additives, AKD and/or
ASA
treated materials can replace conventional wax liners.
In one embodiment the invention is directed to a process for making paper
wherein a furnish is deposited on a wire and dewatered, wherein to the furnish
is
added a recyclable plastic coating composition comprising alkyl ketene dimer
(AKD)
and/or alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA), either alone or in combination with
other
additives or sizing agents, such as acrylics.
In another embodiment, the invention is directed to a process for making paper
wherein a famish is deposited on a wire and dewatered to form a paper, and the
dewatered paper is subsequently pressed a number of times to further reduce
the water
content of the paper, characterized in adding a recyclable plastic coating
composition,
the coating comprising alkyl ketene dimer and/or alkyl succinic anhydride
(ASA), to at least one side of the dewatered paper subsequent to a first
pressing step.
In a still further embodiment, the invention is directed to a process for
making
paper wherein a furnish is deposited on a wire and dewatered, the dewatered
paper is
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
7
subsequently pressed to further reduce the water content of the paper and
subsequently calendered, characterized in introducing to at least one side of
the paper
a recyclable plastic coating composition, comprising alkyl ketene dimer and/or
alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA), between the pressing and calendering steps.
A further embodiment discloses a process for making paper characterized in
the following steps:
(a) applying a furnish to a wirc,
(b) dewatering the furnish and obtaining a water containing paper,
(c) pressing the water containing paper to reduce the water content,
(d) calendering the pressed paper,
(e) recovering a finished paper, and
(f) adding a recyclable plastic coating, coating composition comprising alkyl
ketene dimer (ASA) and/or alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA) at any step during
the
paper making process.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. I is a perspective, schematic view of a typical paper-making machine.
FIG. 2 is a schematic, side view of an alternative coating method.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A paper making machine in accordance with the invention is illustrated
generally at 10 in FIG. 1. Typically, the paper making machine 10 comprises a
"wet
end" 11 including a headbox 12, a wire 13 and a press section 15, a drying
section 16,
a size press 18, calender section 20 and parent reel 22. Optionally, a dandy
roll 14 is
positioned about two thirds of the way down the wire to level the fibers and
make the
sheet more uniform. Gravity and suction boxes (not shown) are positioned
underneath the wire to remove water from the furnish.
The stock fed to the headbox 12 can be virgin, recycled or a mixture of virgin
and recycled pulp. In the headbox 12, the stock is mixed with water to form a
furnish
for deposit onto the wire 13.
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
8
I. The RPC
In the invention, a recyclable plastic coating composition (RPC), comprising
alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) and/or alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA) is incorporated
during the papermaking process. It should be understood that in this invention
and
throughout the specification and claims, "coating" means "coating" or
"impregnation"
unless otherwise indicated.
A. Acrylic Acid Containing Material
For example, a typical RPC composition is an aqueous acrylic acid containing
material, such as homopolymers or copolymers of acrylic acid (for example,
methacrylic acid, ethylacrylic acid, polyacrylic acid, crotonic acid,
isocrotonic acid,
pentenic acid, C (1-4) alkyl substituted acrylic acid, and other acrylic
acids, such as
butyl, amyl, octyl and hexadecyl, methylacrylate vinyl acetate, vinyl
chloride,
vinylidene chloride, isobutylene, vinyl ethers, acrylonitrile, maleic acid and
esters,
TM
crotonic acid and esters, itaconic acid, and BASOPLAST 400 DS, BASOPLAST 250
D, BASOPLAST 335 D, and BASOPLAST 265 D available from BASF Corporation
of Mount Olive, New Jersey) resin based composition, comprising an acrylic
homopolymer or copolymer, such as ethylene acrylic acid copolymer, in
combination
with alkyl ketene dimer (AKD) and/or alkyl succinic anhydride (ASA).
Additionally,
aqueous dispersions of acrylic ester copolymers are considered as suitable
acrylic
TM
containing components, such as ACRONAL NX 4787, ACRONAL S 504 and
ACRONAL S 728, available from BASF Corporation. As used throughout the
specification and claims, references to "acrylic acid" and "acrylic acid
containing"
refer to materials and compositions, such as polymers, oligomers, or monomers,
comprising at least one acrylic or acrylic acid moiety. Other typical acrylic
acid
TM
containing solutions include JONCRYL 52, JONCRYL 56, JONCRYL 58,
JONCRYL 61, JONCRYL 61 LV, JONCRYL 62, JONCRYL 67, JONCRYL 74,
JONCRYL 77, JONCRYL 80, JONCRYL 85, JONCRYL 87, JONCRYL 89,
JONCRYL 91, JONCRYL 95, JONCRYL 503 and JONCRYL M-74, each of which
is available from Johnson Wax Specialty Chemicals of Racine, Wisconsin.
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
9
With respect to the acrylic acid containing material used in the invention,
any
conventionally known acrylic acid containing monomer, dimer or oligomer may be
used, either alone or in combination with any number of other acrylic acid
containing
or non-acrylic acid containing monomer, dimer or oligomer.
B. Ketene Dimers
Ketene dimers used as cellulose reactive sizing agents are dimers having the
formula: R(CH=C=O)2, where R is a hydrocarbon radical, such as alkyl having at
least 8 carbon atoms, cycloalkyl having at least 6 carbon atoms, aryl, aralkyl
and
alkaryl, and decyl ketene dimer. Examples of suitable ketene dimers include
octyl,
decyl, dodecyl, tetradecyl, hexadecyl, octadecyl, eicosyl, docosyl,
tetracosyl, phenyl,
benzyl, beta-naphthyl and cyclohexyl ketene dimers, as well as the ketene
dimers
prepared from montanic acid, naphthenic acid, 09' 10-decylenic acid, A9,10 -
dodecylenic acid, palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, ricinoleic acid, linolenic
acid, and
eleostearic acid, as well as ketene dimers prepared from naturally occurring
mixtures
of fatty acids, such as those mixtures found in coconut oil, babassu oil, palm
kernel
oil, palm oil, olive oil, peanut oil, rape oil, beef tallow, lard (leaf) and
tall oil.
Mixtures of any of the above-named fatty acids with each other may also be
used.
Such ketene dimers are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,407,994. An additional
sufficient ketene dimer is sold under the tradename AQUAPELT", by Hercules,
Inc., of
Wilmington, Delaware. Further ketene dimers include alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, and
alkaryl
ketene dimers. Optionally, the ketene dimers are provided with a cationic
starch to assist
in binding to the cellulosic constituents.
However, any ketene dimer is adequate. For example, the dimer may be a
simple 13,-cyclobutadione or a unsaturated (3 - lactone, examples of which are
provided in Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (3rd ed., Vol. 9,
pp.
882-7, John Wiley & Sons, New York 1980).
C. Alkenyl Succinic Anhydride
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
Alkenyl succinic anhydride is typically produced from the reaction of
an olefin with maleic anhydride. The maleic anhydride molecule supplies the
reactive
anhydride functionality to the ASA, while the long chain alkyl portion
provides the
hydrophobic properties associated with this size. The resulting succinic
anhydride
group is extremely reactive, and will complex with hydroxyl groups on
cellulose,
starch and water. It is the ASA molecule's high reactivity that provides some
of its
major advantages.
Due to the reactivity of ASA, the coating compositions incorporating ASA
will readily cure on the paper machine without excessive drying or the use of
promoters. As a result, most of the cure is achieved before the size press,
allowing
the machine to be run at similar moisture contents than those experienced
under acid
conditions, thus giving greater control of starch pick-up can be realized at
the size
press, resulting in full sizing at the reel and improved productivity.
The tendency of the ASA molecule to react with water presents additional
advantages. The ASA forms a di-acid, which is hydrophilic at one end of the
molecule and hydrophobic at the other end. The di-acid has the ability to
react with
metal ions such as calcium or magnesium that are often found in water systems.
The
products of these reactions are sticky precipitates, and have the potential to
deposit on
the fabrics and frame of the paper machine, although it has been shown that a
calcium
salt can contribute to sizing. An aluminum salt is much less tacky however,
and the
presence of an aluminum source in the system is consequentially of great
benefit.
This ability to react with metal ions has been exploited in some mills,
notably in
Japan, where a potassium salt of a low molecular weight ASA is made and then
precipitated onto the fiber using alum at acid pH in much the same way as
rosin is
used.
Any ASA may be used in the invention. Commercial sizing agents based on
ASA compounds are typically prepared from maleic anhydride and one or more
appropriate olefins, generally C(14) to C (22) olefins. ASA compounds prepared
from
maleic anhydride and C(16)internal olefins, C(18 )internal olefins, and
mixtures of C
(16 )and C (18)intemal olefins, are among the more widely used ASA compounds,
as
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
11
described in U.S. Patent No. 6,348,132.
D. Crosslinking Agent
When an acrylic acid containing material is included in the RPC, an optional
crosslinking agent is typiealUy provided in an amount sufficient to crosslink
the acrylic
acid containing material. Although any substance capable of at least partially
crosslinking the acrylic acid containing material is sufficient, often organic
or
inorganic substances including zinc, titanium or magnesium are used. Preferred
however, are zinc oxide, aluminum oxide, ammonium oxide, calcium oxide,
magnesium stearate, magnesium oxide, isostearate (e.g., 4-isostearate),
stannous
oxide, tungsten oxide, titanium oxide, and various mixtures, emulsions and
compositions including one or more of the oxides. In one embodiment, the
crosslinking agent includes a salt (as described herein) plus a butyric acid
and 5-
carbon acids, such as isovaleric, 2-methylbutyric and n-valeric acids. Other
typical
FDA approved cross linking agents include zinc octoate, zinc salts of fatty
acids,
zirconium oxide, calcium isosterate, calcium stearate, aluminum stearate,
sodium
tungstate, sodium tungstate dihydrate, calcium salts of fatty acids, magnesium
salts of
fatty acids, and aluminum salts of fatty acids. Generally, the fatty acids are
fatty acids
of animal and/or vegetable fats and oils, and would be exempt from being
kosher
compliant, since the potential use of animal oils and the original of the
animal in
question may be unspecified. In such cases, the inorganic substances would be
preferred. It is considered within the scope of this invention to incorporate
more than
one substance to form the crosslinking agent. However, as used throughout the
description and claims the term cross linking agent includes the above
described
compositions, as well as heat, radiation or any other method for initiating a
crosslinking reaction in the acrylic containing resin. Other suitable
crosslinking
agents include Zinc Oxide Solution #1, available from Johnson Wax Specialty
Chemicals of Racine, Wisconsin. For example, a typical (RPC) composition is an
aqueous acrylic resin based composition. A preferred three-component
composition
contains the composition disclosed by U.S. Patent No. 5,393,566 (hereinafter
"the
`566 patent"), modified by the addition of ASA and/or AKD. For example,
compatible compositions contain anywhere from 0-100% ASA or AKD, with the
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
12
remainder consisting of the acrylic acid resin containing composition of the
`566
patent. Typical compositions can include the following, by weight percent,
anywhere
from 0-100%, typically 25-75% and more typically, 25-30% ASA; from 0-100%,
typically 25-75 and more typically 25-30% AKD; with the remainder being the
acrylic acid containing composition of the `566 patent, typically 1-99%, more
typically, 1-10% or 10-40%.
E. MEA
NH4OH may also be added to the RPC as a pH regulator for
blend i ng/d 1 ssolving/d i spersing of the resins and emulsions and
dispersions of acrylics.
However, often, in order to remove undesired characteristics of the RPC,
produced by
the ammonium hydroxide, monoethanolamine (MEA) can be substituted for both
toll
coaters and mill environments. The heat of the paper mill has exasperated the
volatility of ammonium hydroxide causing more discomfort in producing wax
alternative medium and liners. When substituting NH4OH with MEA in a one to
one
replacement (by weight) the odor is reduced if not removed and the performance
is
equal if not slightly better. However, it is also considered within the scope
of this
invention to substitute MEA for NH4OH anywhere from 0.5-2.0 to I by weight,
preferably, 1.5:1, i.e.,50% more MEA for every gram of NH4OH. Generally, NH4OH
is delivered in a 28% aqueous solution, i.e., the highest concentration
commercially
available. Although any alkanolamine may be used, MEA is preferred.
F. Alumina-Silica
Moreover, clay powders, comprising, for example, Ale Si2 (Alumina-Silica)
may be used as an additive to the wax free formulae of this invention. The
addition of
minerals to the formula has proven to be multifaceted in its benefits. First
of all, it
has lowered Moisture Vapor Transmission Rate (MVTR, a measure of the passage
of
water vapor through a barrier) numbers into the range that will permit the
substitution
of our product as a replacement of wax or polyethylene for long-term storage
of copy
paper which is sensitive to temperature and moisture changes. More often
moisture,
but with the moisture capacity of the atmosphere directly affected by
temperature both
must be identified for the total severe environment that ream wrap and bulk
boxes
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
13
must address to protect copy paper from becoming distorted from moisture thus
rendering the paper unfit for use in a copy machine and resulting in a credit
from the
paper producer. Alumina Silica, Calcium Carbonate, Titanium Dioxide are all
satisfactory for use in this type of performance. Without a mineral additive
the
MVTR rating is approximately 30 gm/m'', for 24 hours. With an addition of 8%
mineral, most preferably Alumina/Silica, the MVTR drops to numbers under 15
gm/m2 which is the accepted target for ream wrap and bulk boxes for copy paper
and
other papers in larger dimensions that are made under the same conditions and
requiring the same sort of performance. Alumina/Silica is preferred because it
works
as well any mineral and suspends in the formulae of this invention
satisfactorily and is
the least costly of the several minerals available on the market .
Additionally the heat
resistance and the potential concerns of re-softening while bonding on the
corrugator
has reduced emensely. So with the hardening of the coated surface above the
levels
generated in the cross linking actions has also caused a greater receptiveness
to the
product by the corrugator operators. This benefit has occurred without
detriment to
the surface for receiving water based inks and bonding performance of cold set
adhesives or hot melt adhesives.
II. Method of Applying the RPC
The inventor has discovered that a product having superior water-proof
properties results when the RPC of the invention is added to Kraft, linerboard
or
medium, whether incorporated as a coating, at the wet-end, in the furnish,
calender, or
press. When Kraft, linerboard or medium is used, in one embodiment, a starch
containing component is often incorporated to achieve the elevated water-proof
properties. Such starch containing components may include ordinary corn
starch,
potato starch, wheat or tapioca starches. Using the RPC of the invention with
a starch
containing component does not affect the bonding performance of the starch
when
making products, such as corrugated board, could lead to concentrations high
enough
that the use of acrylic acid containing material at the size press or the wet
end could
be eliminated completely.
Within the laboratory environment, liner board was repulped to conform with
the consistency of pulped fiber processed in an average paper mill machine. At
this
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
14
point, the fiber was separated into four separate beakers each with 100 grams
of fiber.
To beaker number 1, 5.0 grams of RPC-1 (described below) was added. In beaker
number 2, 10.0 grams of RPC-1 was added. In beaker number 3, 20.0 grams of RPC-
1 was added. In beaker number 4, 30.0 grams of RPC-1 was added.
After stirring the fiber mixed with RPC at various levels, the fiber from each
beaker was applied to a wire mesh which would simulate the wire mesh of a
paper
machine which allows the fiber to drain by gravity or assisted through a
particle
vacuum action that starts the removal of fluids on the paper machine. Through
gravity and compression in the laboratory environment, excess fluids were
driven out
of the fiber of each test sample, one through four. To simulate paper machine
drying
the fiber, still on the wire mesh, was dried by infra-red heat. After all four
test
samples were dried, the surfaces were tested for grease resistance and water
resistance. A fifth sample was repulped, screened and dried without any RPC to
be
the control. Samples one through four showed improved grease and water
resistance
when compared to the control. The final phase was to repulp samples one
through
four, rescreen and dry. The final step in the process to determine success is
examining the dry reformed paper under a microscope to determine the presence
of
undissolved foreign matter that would indicate a failure to repulp. The
examination
revealed that no undissolved material was present, indicating success in
creating a
barrier and having the barrier, RPC, dissolve and allow no foreign matter to
be present
in any beaker marked one through four. The foregoing experiment is indicative
of
addition of RPC to the stock or furnish prior to deposit on the wire of a
paper making
machine.
The next step in taking the invention from the laboratory to a commercially
viable process was to introduce the RPC at different locations in conventional
paper
making machines.
H. Testing Runs
A position on the paper machine downstream of the headbox 12 was selected
for a manual "pour on" of liquid RPC on an edge of the paper approximately 24
inches (58.8 cm) of the width of the paper machine, in the amount of 5 gallons
(18.92
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
1S
L). This section of treated paper was tracked through the paper machine and
retrieved
at the dry end of the machine. This retrieval section was tested for grease
and water
resistance and wet-strength and additionally showed improvement in each area.
RPC was next applied with a spraybar, the application rate applied from a
minimum value, but sufficient to create perceptible enhancements to liner or
medium,
to approximately 40% by weight of paper, pH varied from 5.5 to 8Ø
The RPC was applied at the wet end via spray application to the top side of
the
sheet during a run of 26# medium. The trial spray head was positioned at:
(1) the wet/dry line on the wire, and
(2) after the second press, before the dryer.
Subsequently, the RPC-1 was applied via calendar stock treatment to a 69#
special liner. The purpose of this trial was to ascertain the viability of
this application
technique utilizing two water boxes on one side. The results of this latter
trial is
shown in Table I:
TABLEI
69# Special Liner
Reg. 69# Liner Treated One Side Treated Two Sides
Basis W t (lbs) MSF 69 69.1 69.8
Caliper 19.0 20.0 19.5
STFI MD 128 118 120
CD 46-69 52 65
Cobb 1-min TB grns - 0.37/0.17 0.20/0.06
ScottTMolyblend - 95 1 00
Porosity (sec) 8 700+ 1200+
Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 2, coating on both sides of a moving paper
web 24 can be effected by passing web 24 between the nip of rollers 26, 28 in
which a
bank 30 of RPC is found thereby applying the RPC to one side of web 24. After
passing over idler roll 32, the other side of the web 24 can be coated by bank
40 and
rollers 36, 38. Additional layers of coating may be applied one or more times
to
either or both sides of web 24 by additional rollers 46, 48, 56, 58 and banks
50 and
60. Additional idler rolls 42,
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
16
52 may be provided to convey and tension web 24. The device of FIG. 2 can be
used
prior to, subsequent to, or in place of size press 18 of FIG. 1. It should be
understood
that additional rollers (not shown), banks (not shown) and even idler rolls
(not shown)
may be employed to apply as many additional layers of RPC as desired.
Additionally,
sizing agents may be incorporated into one or more of the banks of RPC.
All of the foregoing tests produced a paper that was repulpable. Thus,
corrugated boxes and components thereof can be recycled even when such boxes
have
been made water and grease resistant, i.e., combined with the RPC of the
invention.
In addition, the addition of RPC appears to dramatically increase fiber
strengths.
Using 100% recycled fiber treated with RPC increased fiber strengths, giving
strengths of 90% of virgin fiber, whereas normal recycled fiber are
approximately
60% of virgin fiber. However, in commercial embodiments, the RPC may be used
in
amounts such as approximately 0.5-10 dry lbs. per ton of paper, typically
approximately 1-5 dry lbs. per ton, and preferably approximately 3 dry lbs.
per ton.
For example, approximately 3.5 dry lbs. may be incorporated into the wet end
of the
paper machine for medium, and approximately 7.0 dry lbs. per ton can be used
for
commercial production runs of liner. Thus, the inventor has discovered that
higher
amounts of AKD and/or ASA can be used, such that the use of an acrylic acid
containing composition at the wet end can be eliminated completely.
The process of paper making can be modified to include RPC addition at the
headbox (or even upstream of the headbox when the stock is mixed with fillers,
sizing
or dyes), in the press section at any point subsequent to the first press, and
subsequent
to the drying section, either at or in place of the size press but before the
calenders.
The papers coated by the process find special use in the following industries,
the label industry, especially the 60 lb./3000 ft2 label industry, folding
carton, tray and
box (all board weights) and liquid packs, such as water, soda, and milk, ice
cream,
yogurt and delicatessen carry-out containers.
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
17
The fine paper industry for barrier containers and interleaves for between
sensitive paper or metallized papers or photographic plates can also benefit
from the
invention.
By using the invention to apply a coating formulation into a paper making
machine, the following benefits are achieved:
(1) the overall cost of the finished coated/impregnated liner or paper is
reduced, and
(2) incorporating the technology into the paper making machine (process)
would allow the technology to reach its maximum potential.
The coated materials of the invention also pass the Edge Wick Test. A strip of
medium or liner to be tested is cut into a 1 inch by 6 inch square and stood
in 1/8
inches of water. Conventional medium will pull water into the structure, but
the
incorporation of ASA and/or AKD, and optionally an acrylic acid containing
substance, eliminates or significantly reduces such "edge wicking". Since dry
fibers
are known to be stronger than wet fibers, by not absorbing water, the medium
of the
invention has shown it can maintain its strength even in wet environments.
Additionally, the coated materials of the invention have stacking strengths at
least as great as conventional wax coated materials. Stacking strength is
measured via
the Edge Crush Test, wherein the materials are placed in a high humidity and
low
TM
temperature environment and crushed with test equipment as described by TAPPI
Test Method T811 "Edgewise compressive strength of corrugated fiberboard
(short
column test)". This test resulted in the data provided as Table III, showing
Edge Crush
of corrugated board and the resulting retention percentage of vertical
strength after
being subjected to the humidity.
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
18
TABLE III
Edge Crush (lbs/In)
50 % RH, 73 OF 80% RH, 90 OF
Avg. a Avg. G Retention %
Wax Dip 98.2 4.50 71.9 2.90 73.2
Curtain Coated 55.60 3.10 41.80 1.80 75.2
Sample 1 56.5 1.9 42.8 1.90 75.7
Sample 2 61.4 1.80 46.00 2.10 74.9
Sample 3 67.3 2.50 51.30 2.40 76.2
In this test, and in all tests described herein, "Wax Dip" refers to
conventional fully
wax impregnated cabbage boxes; "Curtain Coated" refers to bell pepper boxes,
curtain coated on both sides with conventional wax containing coatings; while
Samples 1-3 are three separate runs of paper products according to the
invention.
Paper products according to the invention also show similar pin adhesion
properties, when measured according to Test Method T 821 om-96: "Pin Adhesion
of
Corrugated Board by Selective Separation", as shown by the data in Table IV.
TABLE IV
Pin Adhesion (lbs/24 Ln in)
Combined C Standard Conditions , Wet (24 hour soak)
Weight Single Face Double-Face Single-Face Double-Face
(lbs/MSF) Avg. E Avg. a Avg. a Avg. a
Wax Dip 220.8 189.6 5.6 144.7 5.6 50.4 2.2 17.7 1.1
Curtain 177.6 123.6 7.0 117.7 3.2 5.1 0.7 9.3 0.9
Coated
Sample 164.4 124.6 5.4 88.9 14.9 5.8 0.2 6.4 1.2
1
Sample 188.2 158.9 6.2 120.0 2.0 15.2 1.2 15.2 1.5
2
Sample 200.7 137.6 3.7 133.7 3.4 10.6 1.9 16.9 1.5
3
As used in Tables III and IV, Sample I is 26# medium with 69# liner on both
sides.
Sample 2 is 35# medium with 74# liner on both sides. Sample 3 is 25# medium
with
90# liner on both sides. Each of the liners are coated or treated as described
above,
having received 2.0-2.2 dry lbs./1000 ft2 of RPC-1. The mediums for Table VII
received 0.5-1.0 dry lbs/1000 ft2 of RPC-l.
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
19
A Ring Crush Test (RCT) of paperboard (as described by TAPPI Test Method
822, 26# 100% recycled medium, formed in accordance with the invention showed
superior properties over untreated medium, as shown in Table V for fibers
oriented
in the machine direction (MD) and Table VI for fibers oriented in the cross
direction
(CD). For each test, a'/2" by 6" sample was placed in special ring shaped
holders and
crushed by the testing equipment.
TABLE V
Untreated 26# medium
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 Avera e
RCT (lbf) 33.4 33.7 35.4 35.7 39.5 35.54
Treated 26# medium
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 Average
RCT (lbf) 38.4 40.2 42.1 43.9 47.1 42.34
Difference 5.00 6.50 6.70 8.20 7.60 6.80
% Increase 15.0 19.3 18.9 23.0 19.2 19.1
TABLE VI
Untreated 26# medium
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 1 Average
RCT (lbf) 49.1 49.8 53.2 54.4 58.8 53.06
Treated 26# medium
Sample 1 2 3 4 5 Average
RCT (lb 66.4 69.0 69.5 72.6 75.4 70.58
Difference 17.30 19.20 16.30 18.20 16.60 17.52
% Increase 32.5 38.6 30.6 33.5 28.2 33.0
Thus, significant improvements are made in both MD and CD Ring Crush Tests
when
RPC-1 is added to 26# 100% recycled medium. Specifically, when the RPC is
utilized an increase of 30% can be observed over industry norms without any
treatment. Table V additionally demonstrates a significant and unexpected
increase
in tensile strength of 19.1%.
In order to achieve the treated medium according to the invention, a two-part
process is preferred. Specifically, at the wet end, the AKD is added,
preferably in an
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
2!1
amount of between 1 and 10, typically 3.5, dry pounds per ton of stock.
Typical AKD
iM
is commonly available in the market as KEYDIME C 125, an allyl ketene dimmer
stabilized with cationic starch, specially formulated for use with micro and
nanoparticle systems and available from EKA Chemicals of Bohus, Sweden. This
particular AKD also exhibits self retentive characteristics and high
efficiency and
withstands elevated wet end temperatures.
Later during the process, for example, at the size press or calender stack, a
second treatment may be performed. In a preferred embodiment, this second
treatment includes the application of a blend of acrylate (0.5 -2 lbs./1000
ft2, typically
1 lbs./1000 ft2 of paper produced) with a synthetic polyethylene (1-20%,
typically
10% wt.), a cross-linking agent, such as zinc oxide (0.1-10%, typically 3%
wt.). The
remainder of the additive used in the second treatment is typically a solvent,
preferably water. Typical acrylates include methylmethacylate, sold as Gellner
K-2 1,
available from Gellner & Co. of Gillette, New Jersey. Typical repulpable
synthetic
TM
polyethylenes are sold under the tradenames JONWAX 22, JONWAX 26, JONWAX
28 and JONWAX 120, each of which is available from Johnson Wax Specialty
Chemicals of Racine, Wisconsin.
However, it is additionally considered within the scope of the invention to
eliminate the size press or calender stack application, in favor of a modified
wet end
application (WEGP). In one embodiment, the acrylic containing resin (e.g., 10-
40 dry
lbs./ton) and the AKD (1-20 dry lbs./ton) are added at the wet end. A
preferred
TM
WEGP comprises Gellner K-21 (20 or 35 dry lbs/ton) as the acrylic resin and
Keydime 125C (7 dry Ibs./ton) as the AKD component. Other typical WEGP
compositions include from approximately 15-40 dry Ibs./ton of the Gellner K-21
containing resin and from approximately 2-10 dry lbs/ton of the AKD, e.g.,
Keydime
125C, for example 35 or 20 dry tbs./ton acrylic containing resin with 7 dry
lbs./ton
AKD.
Experiments have shown that medium treated with this process has shown
moisture resistance at least as great as conventional cascade-coated wax
medium.
Additionally, the "wet-end only" treated medium (WEGP) performs equal with
respect to moisture resistance when compared to the "wet-end plus calender
stack"
CA 02502102 2011-05-17
21
treated medium described above. For example, surface water absorption over 30
seconds, expressed in g/m2, measured by Cobb Test (see TAPPI T 441,
ring crush test and Concora tests (see TAPPI T 809) show such properties.
Moreover, by eliminating the calender stack treatment, the paper machine is
permitted
to run at a higher rate, because if the RPC is added into the wet end and not
at the
calender or size press, the machine speeds can double. Table VII, below,
compares
the WEGP chemical medium, wherein each test is run according to the standards
as
described by the respective TAPPI test method.
TABLE VII
T441 -Cobb Test T460-Porosity T410 T411
120 seconds (avg. Gurley (avg s/100 Caliper
g/m2) air) (avg In 1/
Top Side Wire Top Side Wire Grammage Basis Wt. 1000 inch)
Side Side (avg. m2) (#/1000 ft)
WEGP 31.33 28.93 23.56 23.12 152.96 31.36 0.01
AKD
WEGP 27.85 29.54 26.76 27.57 160.09 32.82 0.01
AKD
size
press
The following RPC (RPC-2) was used in the "WEGP AKD size press"
example of Table VII: JONCRYL 82 (60% wt.); JONCRYL 61 LV (20%); zinc oxide
(3%), ammonium hydroxide (3%); JONWAX 28 (5%), with the remainder being
water to dilute the RPC to the desired viscosity. JONCRYL 82 is a heat-
resistant
polymer available from Johnson Wax Specialty Chemicals. JONCRYL 61LV is an
acrylic acid containing resin composition available from Johnson Wax Specialty
Chemicals, and includes JONCRYL 678, available from Johnson Wax Specialty
Chemicals, (35.0 wt %), ammonia 28% (7.5 wt %), ethylene glycol (.15% wt %)
isopropyl alcohol (5.0 wt %) water (51.0 wt %), and optionally blended with
one or
more acrylic acid containing resins.
The following RPC (RPC-3) was used in the "WEGP AKD" example of Table
VII: Gellner K-21 (35 dry lbs./ton) and Keydime C125 (7 dry lbs./ton).
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
22
As used in Table VII, WEGP AKD is used in the wet-end of the paper making
process because it is cationic. In contrast, the size press composition
utilizes a non-
ionic polymer, to be used in the size press. Thus, it can be seen the WEGP
size press
medium exhibits less water absorption in the Cobb test, less porosity in the
Gurley
test and is slightly higher in the Grammage and Basis Weight results when
compared
to the WEGP AKD medium.
Typical liners produced in accordance with the invention are subjected to a
rod
coating first process and a top coating second process. In the first process,
a blend of
1 lbs./1000 ft2 and 50% styrene-butadiene rubber latex (50% wt.) is added
along with
the following composition:
Component Amount
JONCRYL 82 40-70%, preferably 60% wt.
Acrylic 5-30%, preferably 20%
Crosslinking agent 0.5-10%, preferably 3%
Ammonium hydroxide 0.5-10%, preferably 3%
Polyethylene 0.5-10%, preferably 5%
Water Remainder
Thereafter, the top coating process is performed with an RPC similar to the
RPC used in the first process. Specifically, the RPC of the second process is
lacking
the latex.
A typical acrylic is JONCRYL 61LV from Johnson Wax Specialty Chemicals,
a 33% ammonia solution of an acrylic resin. The crosslinking agent as
discussed
above, is typically zinc oxide, while the polyethylene is preferably JONWAX
28, a
repulpable fine particle polyethylene emulsion, added merely for slip benefit
for when
the product is being processed in the machines. Although many synthetic
polyethylenes are classified as "waxes", the low level of polyethylene added
according to the present invention is not sufficient to perform as a
conventional wax.
In contrast, conventional wax coatings employ much higher levels of natural
wax,
such as paraffin wax, often in amounts greater than 6 dry lbs/ton.
The following is a typical RPC, utilized in the first process (hereinafter RPC-
1): methylmethacrylate (35 dry lbs/ton) zinc oxide (3% wt.), and Keydime 125C
(3.5
dry lbs./ton). Preferably, use of RPC-1 is followed by an application of 10%
wt. of
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
23
the Jonwax 22 synthetic repulpable wax. Optionally, a starch such as corn
starch is
included up to 4% wt.
As detailed above, it is advantageous to include cationic particles in the
coating composition according to the present invention. Such cationic
particles may
be inorganic (such as salts) or organic (such as monomers or polymers).
Additionally,
non-ionic and anionic polymers with artificial charges of a cationic nature
may be
employed. In other words, when a non-cationic material is introduced into the
wet
end, a retention aid is typically premixed with the non-cationic material to
cause it to
bond more successfully with the naturally anionic fiber may be used to suspend
the
cationic particle and activate bonding to the anionically charged fiber. Such
charged
particle systems may be used in combination as, with or in lieu of, the
acrylic
containing resin and/or ASA/AKD additives detailed above, and can be applied
at any
stage of the paper making process, e.g., in the wet end, at the calender stack
or as a
coating following production of the paper product. Thus, the use of a cationic
polymer, i.e., without a retention aid, results in a product that is more
effective than
such typical products requiring such a retention aid. Typical particles have a
molecular weight number average between about 10,000 and 100,000, typically
about
30,000-50,000. However, the preferred cationic material is Gellner OTTOPOL K21
from Gellner & Co., an acrylic copolymer, and Poly Emulsion 392C30, a cationic
emulsion of high density polyethylene from GenCor or Chester, New York.
For example, the cationic material may include the acrylic containing resin.
Suitable cationic acrylic resins include STH-55, manufactured by Mitsubishi
Yuka
Fine, Japan; and BASOPLAST 265 D, available from BASF Corporation of Mount
Olive, New Jersey.
Additionally, the cationic material may be a cationic wax to enhance the wet
resistances generated in the wet end. Such formulations are substantially
similar to
RPC-1, wherein approximately 1- approximately 20% of the formulations is the
cationic wax, such as a synthetic polyethylene wax. Preferably, the cationic
wax
makes up approximately 2- approximately 18, and more preferably, approximately
4.0- approximately 16-.0% of the RPC.
CA 02502102 2005-04-12
WO 2004/037930 PCT/US2003/033743
24
Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific
embodiments, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various
modifications
may be made according to those embodiments without departing from the scope of
the applied claims and their equivalents. Accordingly, the present invention
should
not be construed to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed herein.
