Language selection

Search

Patent 2511237 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2511237
(54) English Title: IDENTIFICATION, MONITORING AND TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND CHARACTERIZATION OF INFLAMMATORY CONDITIONS RELATED TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE USING GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES
(54) French Title: IDENTIFICATION, SUIVI ET TRAITEMENT DE MALADIE INFECTIEUSE ET CARACTERISATION DE CONDITIONS INFLAMMATOIRES ASSOCIEES A LA MALADIE INFECTIEUSE UTILISANT DES PROFILS D'EXPRESSION GENETIQUE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C12Q 1/70 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BEVILACQUA, MICHAEL C. (United States of America)
  • TRYON, VICTOR (United States of America)
  • BANKAITIS-DAVIS, DANUTE M. (United States of America)
  • CHERONIS, JOHN C. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: GOWLING WLG (CANADA) LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2003-12-19
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-07-08
Examination requested: 2008-12-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2003/040551
(87) International Publication Number: US2003040551
(85) National Entry: 2005-06-20

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/435,257 (United States of America) 2002-12-19

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method is provided in various embodiments for determining a profile data set
for a subject with infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to
infectious disease based on a sample from the subject, wherein the sample
provides a source of RNAs. The method includes using amplification for
measuring the amount of RNA corresponding to at least 2 constituents from
Table 1. The profile data set comprises the measure of each constituent, and
amplification is performed under measurement conditions that are substantially
repeatable.


French Abstract

La présente invention a trait à un procédé dans divers modes de réalisation permettant la détermination d'un ensemble de données de profil d'un sujet atteint d'une maladie infectieuse ou de conditions inflammatoires associées à une maladie infectieuse basées sur un échantillon en provenance du sujet, dans lequel l'échantillon fournit une source d'ARNs. Le procédé comprend l'utilisation d'une amplification pour mesurer la quantité d'ARN correspondant à au moins deux constituants de la Table 1. L'ensemble de données de profil comprend la mesure de chaque constituant, et une amplification est réalisée dans des conditions de mesure qui sont sensiblement reproductibles.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A method for determining a profile data set for a subject with infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease based on a sample from
the subject,
the sample providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
using amplification for measuring the amount of RNA corresponding to at least
2
constituents from Table 1 and
arriving at a measure of each constituent,
wherein the profile data set comprises the measure of each constituent and
wherein amplification is performed under measurement conditions that are
substantially
repeatable.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the subject has presumptive signs of
a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the inflammatory conditions related
to
infectious disease are inflammatory conditions arising from at least one of:
blunt or
penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia,
or dental or
gynecological examinations or treatments.
4. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 1, wherein
the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than five percent.
5. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 1, wherein
the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than three percent.
6. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 1, wherein
efficiencies of amplification for all constituents are substantially similar.
-84-

7. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 6, wherein
the
efficiency of amplification for all constituents is within two percent.
8. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 6, wherein
the
efficiency of amplification for all constituents is less than one percent.
9. A method according to any of claims 1-8 wherein the sample is selected from
the
group consisting of blood, a blood fraction, body fluid, a population of cells
and tissue
from the subject.
10. A method of characterizing infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related
to infectious disease in a subject, based on a sample from the subject, the
sample
providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
assessing a profile data set of a plurality of members, each member being a
quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of
constituents selected so that measurement of the constituents enables
characterization of
the presumptive signs of a systemic infection, wherein such measure for each
constituent
is obtained under measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable.
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the subject has presumptive signs
of a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
12. A method according to claim 10, wherein the subject has presumptive signs
of a
systemic infection that are related to inflammatory conditions arising from at
least one of:
blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis, urinary tract infection,
pneumonia, or
dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
13. A method for characterizing infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related
to infectious disease in a subject according to claim 10, wherein assessing
further
comprises:
-85-

comparing the profile data set to a baseline profile data set for the panel,
wherein
the baseline profile data set is related to the infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions
related to infectious disease to be characterized.
14. A method for characterizing infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related
to infectious disease in a subject according to claim 10, wherein efficiencies
of
amplification for all constituents are substantially similar.
15. A method according claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a microbial infection.
16. A method according to claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a bacterial infection.
17. A method according to claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a eukaryotic parasitic
infection.
18. A method according claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a viral infection.
19. A method according claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a fungal infection.
21. A method according claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from systemic inflammatory
response
syndrome (SIRS).
21. A method according to claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from bacteremia, viremia, or
fungemia.
22. A method according to claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from septicemia due to any class
of microbe.
-86-

23. A method according to claim 10, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are with respect to a localized
tissue of the subject
and the sample is derived from a tissue of fluid of a type distinct from that
of the
localized tissue.
26. A method according to any of claims 1-9, further comprising:
storing the profile data set in a digital storage medium.
27. A method according to claim 26, wherein storing the profile data set
includes
storing it as a record in a database.
28. A method for evaluating infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease in a subject based on a first sample from the subject, the
sample
providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
deriving from the first sample a first profile data set, the profile data set
including
a plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount
of a
distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that
measurement of the
constituents enables evaluation of the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions
related to infectious disease wherein such measure for each constituent is
obtained under
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable; and
producing a calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein each member of
the
calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the
first profile data
set and a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel,
and wherein
the baseline profile data set is related to the infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions
related to infectious disease to be evaluated,
the calibrated profile data set being a comparison between the first profile
data set
and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing evaluation of the
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the subject.
29. A method according to claim 28, wherein the subject has presumptive signs
of a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
-87-

30. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are related to inflammatory
conditions arising
from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
31. A method according to claim 28, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject taken under circumstances
different from those of the first sample.
32. A method according to claim 31, wherein the circumstances are selected
from the
group consisting of (i) the time at which the first sample is taken, (ii) the
site from which
the first sample is taken, (iii) the biological condition of the subject when
the first sample
is taken.
33. A method according to claim 31, wherein the one or more other samples are
taken
over an interval of time that is at least one month between the first sample
and the one or
more other samples.
34. A method according to claim 31, wherein the one or more other samples are
taken
over an interval of time that is at least twelve months between the first
sample and the
one or more samples.
35. A method according to claim 31, wherein the one or more other samples are
taken
pre-therapy intervention.
36. A method according to claim 31, wherein the one or more other samples are
taken
post-therapy intervention.
37. A method according to claim 28, wherein the first sample is derived from
blood
and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject other
than blood.
38. A method according to claim 28, wherein the first sample is derived from
tissue or
body fluid of the subject and the baseline profile data set is derived from
blood.
-88-

39. A method according to claim 31, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject, taken when the subject
is in a
biological condition different from that in which the subject was at the time
the first
sample was taken, with respect to at least one of age, nutritional history,
medical
condition, clinical indicator, medication, physical activity, body mass, and
environmental
exposure.
40. A method according to claim 28, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from one or more different subjects.
41. A method according to claim 40, wherein the one or more different subjects
have
in common with the subject at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
42. A method according to claim 41, wherein a clinical indicator has been used
to
assess infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of the
one or more different subjects, further comprising: interpreting the
calibrated profile data
set in the context of at least one other clinical indicator.
43. A method according to claim 42, wherein the at least one other clinical
indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other
radiological or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and
physical
findings.
44. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a microbial infection.
45. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a bacterial infection.
46. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a eukaryotic parasitic
infection.
-89-

47. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a viral infection.
48. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a fungal infection.
49. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from systemic inflammatory
response
syndrome (SIRS).
50. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from bacteremia, viremia, or
fungemia.
51. A method according to claim 28, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from septicemia due to any class
of microbe.
52. A method according to claim 28, wherein the function is a mathematical
function
and is other than a simple difference.
53. A method according to claim 52, wherein the function is a second function
of the
ratio of the corresponding member of first profile data set to the
corresponding member
of the baseline profile data set.
54. A method according to claim 53, wherein the function is a logarithmic
function.
55. A method according to claim 53, wherein each member of the calibrated
profile
data set has biological significance if it has a value differing by more than
an amount D,
where D= F(1.1) - F(.9), and F is the second function.
56. A method according to claim 28, wherein obtaining the first sample and
quantifying the first profile data set are performed at a first location, and
producing the
calibrated profile data set includes using a network to access a database
stored on a digital
-90-

storage medium in a second location.
57. A method according to claim 56, further comprising updating the database
to
reflect the first profile data set quantified from the sample.
58. A method according to claim 56, wherein using a network includes accessing
a
global computer network.
59. A method according to claim 28, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
60. A method according to claim 28 wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 1
percent.
61. A method of providing an index that is indicative of infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of a subject based on a
first sample
from the subject, the first sample providing a source of RNAs, the method
comprising:
deriving from the first sample a profile data set, the profile data set
including a
plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount
of a
distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that
measurement of the
constituents is indicative of the presumptive signs of a systemic infection,
the panel
including at least two of the constituents of the Gene Expression Panel of
Table 1; and
in deriving the profile data set,
achieving such measure for each constituent under measurement conditions that
are substantially repeatable; and
applying at least one measure from the profile data set to an index function
that provides
a mapping from at least one measure of the profile data set into one measure
of the
presumptive signs of a systemic infection, so as to produce an index pertinent
to the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
the subject.
62. A method according to claim 61, wherein the subject has presumptive signs
of a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
-91-

temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
63. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are related to inflammatory
conditions arising
from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
64. A method of providing an index according to claim 61, wherein the index
function
has 2 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
65. A method of providing an index according to claim 61, wherein the index
function
has 3 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
66. A method of providing an index according to claim 61, wherein the index
function
has 4 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
67. A method of providing an index according to claim 61, wherein the index
function
has 5 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
68. A method of providing an index according to any one of claims 61-67,
wherein
the index function is constructed as a linear sum of terms having the form:
I = .SIGMA.C i M~(i),
wherein I is the index, M i is the value of the member i of the profile data
set, C i is a
constant, and P(i) is a power to which M i is raised, the sum being formed for
all integral
values of i up to the number of members in the data set.
69. A method of providing an index according to claim 68, wherein the values C
i and
P(i) are determined using statistical techniques, such as latent class
modeling, to correlate
data, including clinical, experimentally derived, and any other data pertinent
to the
presumptive signs of a systemic infection.
-92-

70. A method according to claim 68, further comprising providing with the
index a
normative value of the index function, determined with respect to a relevant
set of
subjects, so that the index may be interpreted in relation to the normative
value.
71. A method according to claim 70, wherein providing the normative value
includes
constructing the index function so that the normative value is approximately
1.
70. A method according to claim 71, wherein providing the normative value
includes
constructing the index function so that the normative value is approximately 0
and
deviations in the index function from 0 are expressed in standard deviation
units.
72. A method according to claim 71, wherein the relevant set of subjects has
in
common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
73. A method according to claim 72, wherein the relevant set of subjects has
in
common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
74. A method according to claim 68, wherein a clinical indicator has been used
to
assess the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of
the relevant set of subjects, further comprising: interpreting the calibrated
profile data set
in the context of at least one other clinical indicator
75. A method according to claim 74, wherein the at least one other clinical
indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other
radiological or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and
physical
findings.
76. A method according to claim 61, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
-93-

77. A method of providing an index according to claim 61 wherein the
quantitative
measure is determined by amplification, and the measurement conditions are
such that
efficiencies of amplification for all constituents differ by less than
approximately 1
percent.
78. A method for of providing an index according to claim 61, wherein the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than five percent.
79. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 61, wherein
the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than three percent.
80. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated are with respect to a
localized
tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or fluid of
a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue.
81. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a microbial infection.
82. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a bacterial infection.
83. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a eukaryotic parasitic
infection.
84. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a viral infection.
85. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a fungal infection.
-94-

86. A method according to claim 61, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from systemic inflammatory
response
syndrome (SIRS).
87. A method of providing an index according to claim 61, further comprising:
deriving from at least one other sample at least one other profile data set,
the at
least one other profile data set including a plurality of members, each being
a quantitative
measure of the amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents
selected so
that measurement of the constituents is indicative of the presumptive signs of
a systemic
infection,
wherein the at least one other sample is from the same subject, taken under
circumstances different from those of the first sample with respect to at
least one of time,
nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator, medication,
physical activity,
body mass, and environmental exposure; and
applying at least one measure from the at least one other profile data set to
an
index function that provides a mapping from the at least one measure of the at
least one
other profile data set into one measure of the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease under different circumstances, so as
to produce at
least one other index pertinent to the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions
related to infectious disease of the subject under circumstances different
from those of the
first sample.
88. A method according to claim 87, wherein the relevant set of subjects has
in
common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
89. A method according to claim 88, wherein the relevant set of subjects has
in
common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
90. A method of providing an index according to claim 87, wherein the index
function
has 2 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
-95-

91. A method of providing an index according to claim 87, wherein the index
function
has 3 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
92. A method of providing an index according to claim 87, wherein the index
function
has 4 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
93. A method of providing an index according to claim 87, wherein the index
function
has 5 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease
course.
94. A method of providing an index according to any one of claims 87-93,
wherein
the index function is constructed as a linear sum of terms having the form:
I = .SIGMA.C i M~(i),
wherein I is the index, M i is the value of the member i of the profile data
set, C i is a
constant, and P(i) is a power to which M i is raised, the sum being formed for
all integral
values of i up to the number of members in the data set.
95. A method of providing an index according to claim 94, wherein the values C
i and
P(i) are determined using statistical techniques, such as latent class
modeling, to correlate
data, including clinical, experimentally derived, and any other data pertinent
to the
presumptive signs of a systemic infection.
96. A method according to claim 87, further comprising providing with the at
least
one other index a normative value of the index function, determined with
respect to a
relevant set of subjects, so that the at least one other index may be
interpreted in relation
to the normative value.
97. A method according to claim 96, wherein providing the normative value
includes
constructing the index function so that the normative value is approximately
1.
98. A method according to claim 97, wherein providing the normative value
includes
constructing the index function so that the normative value is approximately 0
and
deviations in the index function from 0 are expressed in standard deviation
units.
-96-

99. A method according to claim 94, wherein a clinical indicator has been used
to
assess infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of the
relevant set of subjects, further comprising: interpreting the calibrated
profile data set in
the context of at least one other clinical indicator.
100. A method according to claim 139, wherein the at least one other clinical
indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other
radiological or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and
physical
findings.
101. A method according to claim 87, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
102. A method of providing an index according to claim 87 wherein the
quantitative
measure is determined by amplification, and the measurement conditions are
such that
efficiencies of amplification for all constituents differ by less than
approximately 1
percent.
103. A method for of providing an index according to claim 87, wherein the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than five percent.
104. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 87,
wherein the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than three percent.
105. A method according to claim 87, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated are with respect to a
localized
tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or fluid of
a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue.
-97-

106. A method according to claim 87, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a microbial infection and
the panel of
constituents includes at least two constituents of Table 1.
107. A method according to claim 87, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are from a bacterial infection and
the panel of
constituents includes at least two constituents of Table 1.
108. A method according to claim 87, wherein the is a eukaryotic parasitic
infection
and the panel of constituents includes at least two constituents of Table 1.
109. A method according to claim 87, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a viral infection and the panel of
constituents
includes at least two constituents of Table 1.
110. A method according to claim 87, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a fungal infection and the panel
of constituents
includes at least two constituents of Table X.
111. A method according to claim 87, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is systemic inflammatory response
syndrome
(SIRS) and the panel of constituents includes at least two constituents of
Table X.
presumptive signs of a systemic infection.
112. A method for evaluating infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease of a subject based on a first sample from the subject, the
first sample
providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
deriving from the first sample a first profile data set, the first profile
data set
including a plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of
the
amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so
that
measurement of the constituents enables evaluation of the infectious disease
or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease wherein such measure for
each
constituent is obtained under measurement conditions that are substantially
repeatable;
and
-98-

producing a calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein each member of
the
calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the
first profile data
set and a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel,
wherein each
member of the baseline profile data set is a normative measure determined with
respect to
a relevant set of subjects of the amount of one of the constituents in the
panel and the
baseline profile data set is related to the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions
related to infectious disease to be evaluated,
the calibrated profile data set being a comparison between the first profile
data set
and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing evaluation of the
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the subject.
113. A method according to claim 112, wherein the subject has presumptive
signs of a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
114. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are related to inflammatory
conditions arising
from at least one of blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
113. A method according to claim 112, wherein the relevant set of subjects is
a set of
healthy subjects.
114. A method according to claim 112, wherein the relevant set of subjects has
in
common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
115. A method according to claim 114, wherein a clinical indicator has been
used to
assess infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of the
relevant set of subjects, further comprising: interpreting the calibrated
profile data set in
the context of at least one other clinical indicator.
-99-

116. A method according to claim 115, wherein the at least one other clinical
indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other
radiological or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and
physical
findings.
117. A method according to claim 112, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
118. A method according to claim 112, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 1
percent.
119. A method according to claim 112, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
five percent.
120. A method according to claim 112, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
three percent.
121. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated is with respect to a
localized
tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or fluid of
a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue.
122. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a microbial infection.
123. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a bacterial infection.
124. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a eukaryotic parasitic infection.
-100-

125. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a viral infection.
126 A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a fungal infection.
127. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is systemic inflammatory response
syndrome
(SIRS).
128. A method according to any one of claims 112, wherein the infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease is bacteremia, viremia,
or fungemia.
129. A method according to claim 112, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is septicemia due to any class of
microbe.
130. A method according to claim 112, further comprising:
storing the profile data set in a digital storage medium.
131. A method according to claim 130, wherein storing the profile data set
includes
storing it as a record in a database.
132. A method according to claim 112, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject taken under circumstances
different from those of the first sample.
133. A method according to claim 132, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken pre-therapy intervention.
134. A method according to claim 132, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken post-therapy intervention.
-101-

135. A method according to claim 132, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken over an interval of time that is at least one month between an initial
sample and the
sample.
136. A method according to claim 132, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken over an interval of time that is at least twelve months between an
initial sample and
the sample.
137. A method according to claim 112, wherein the first sample is derived from
blood
and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject other
than blood.
138. A method according to claim 112, wherein the first sample is derived from
tissue
or body fluid of the subject and the baseline profile data set is derived from
blood.
139. A method for evaluating infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease of a subject based on a first sample from the subject and a
second
sample from a defined population of indicator cells, the samples providing a
source of
RNAs, the method comprising:
applying the first sample or a portion thereof to the defined population of
indicator cells;
deriving from the second sample a first profile data set, the first profile
data set
including a plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of
the
amount of a distinct RNA or protein constituent in a panel of constituents
selected so that
measurement of the constituents enables measurement of the presumptive signs
of a
systemic infection, wherein such measure for each constituent is obtained
under
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable; and
producing a calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein each member of
the
calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the
first profile data
set and a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel,
wherein each
member of the baseline data set is a normative measure determined with respect
to a
relevant set of subjects of the amount of one of the constituents in the panel
and wherein
the baseline profile data set is related to the infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions
related to infectious disease to be evaluated,
-102-

the calibrated profile data set being a comparison between the first profile
data set
and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing evaluation of the
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the subject.
140. A method according to claim 139, wherein the subject has presumptive
signs of a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
141. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are related to inflammatory
conditions arising
from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
142. A method according to claim 139, wherein the relevant set of subjects is
a set of
healthy subjects.
143. A method according to claim 139, wherein the relevant set of subjects has
in
common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic
location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication,
physical activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
144. A method according to claim 143, wherein a clinical indicator has been
used to
assess infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of the
relevant set of subjects, further comprising: interpreting the calibrated
profile data set in
the context of at least one other clinical indicator.
145. A method according to claim 144, wherein the at least one other clinical
indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other
radiological or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and
physical
findings.
146. A method according to claim 139, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
-103-

amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
147. A method according to claim 139, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 1
percent.
148. A method according to claim 139, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
five percent.
149. A method according to claim 139, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
three percent.
150. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated is with respect to a
localized
tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or fluid of
a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue.
151. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a microbial infection.
152. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a bacterial infection.
153. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a eukaryotic parasitic infection.
154. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a viral infection.
155. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a fungal infection.
-104-

156. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is systemic inflammatory response
syndrome
(SIRS).
157. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is bacteremia, viremia, or fungemia.
158. A method according to claim 139, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is septicemia due to any class of
microbe.
159. A method according to claim 139, further comprising:
storing the profile data set in a digital storage medium.
160. A method according to claim 139, wherein storing the profile data set
includes
storing it as a record in a database.
161. A method according to claim 139, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject taken under circumstances
different from those of the first sample.
162. A method according to claim 161, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken pre-therapy intervention.
163. A method according to claim 161, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken post-therapy intervention.
164. A method according to claim 161, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken over an interval of time that is at least one month between an initial
sample and the
sample.
165. A method according to claim 161, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken over an interval of time that is at least twelve months between an
initial sample and
the sample.
-105-

166. A method according to claim 139, wherein the first sample is derived from
blood
and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject other
than blood.
167. A method according to claim 139, wherein the first sample is derived from
tissue
or body fluid of the subject and the baseline profile data set is derived from
blood.
168. A method for evaluating infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease of a target population of cells affected by a first agent,
based on a
sample from the target population of cells to which the first agent has been
administered,
the sample providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
deriving from the sample a first profile data set, the first profile data set
including
a plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount
of a
distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that
measurement of the
constituents enables evaluation of the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions
related to infectious disease affected by the first agent, wherein such
measure for each
constituent is obtained under measurement conditions that are substantially
repeatable;
and
producing a calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein each member of
the
calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the
first profile data
set and a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel,
wherein each
member of the baseline data set is a normative measure determined with respect
to a
relevant set of target populations of cells of the amount of one of the
constituents in the
panel, and wherein the baseline profile data set is related to the infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease to be evaluated
the calibrated profile data set being a comparison between the first profile
data set
and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing an evaluation of the
infectious disease
or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the target
population of cells
affected by the first agent.
169. A method according to claim 168, wherein the target population of cells
has
presumptive signs of a systemic infection including at least one of: elevated
white blood
cell count, elevated temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced
blood
pressure, relative to medical standards.
-106-

170. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease are related to inflammatory
conditions arising
from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
171. A method according to claim 168, wherein the relevant set of target
populations of
cells is a set of healthy target populations of cells.
172. A method according to claim 168, wherein the relevant set of target
populations of
cells has in common a property that is at least one of age group, gender,
ethnicity,
geographic location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical
indicator,
medication, physical activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
173. A method according to claim 172, wherein a clinical indicator has been
used to
assess infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of the
relevant set of target populations of cells, further comprising: interpreting
the calibrated
profile data set in the context of at least one other clinical indicator.
174. A method according to claim 173, wherein the at least one other clinical
indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other
radiological or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and
physical
findings.
175. A method according to claim 168, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
176. A method according to claim 168, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 1
percent.
177. A method according to claim 168, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
five percent.
-107-

178. A method according to claim 168, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
three percent.
179. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated is with respect to a
localized
tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or fluid of
a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue.
180. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a microbial infection.
181. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a bacterial infection.
182. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a eukaryotic parasitic infection.
183. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a viral infection.
184. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a fungal infection.
185. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is systemic inflammatory response
syndrome
(SIRS).
186. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is bacteremia, viremia, or
fungemia...
187. A method according to claim 168, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is septicemia due to any class of
microbe.
-108-

188. A method according to claim 168, further comprising:
storing the profile data set in a digital storage medium.
189. A method according to claim 188, wherein storing the profile data set
includes
storing it as a record in a database.
190. A method according to claim 168, wherein the first sample is derived from
blood
and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject other
than blood.
191. A method according to claim 168, wherein the first sample is derived from
tissue
or body fluid of the subject and the baseline profile data set is derived from
blood.
192. A method according to claim 168, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject taken under circumstances
different from those of the first sample.
193. A method according to claim 192, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken pre-therapy intervention.
194. A method according to claim 192, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken post-therapy intervention.
195. A method according to claim 192, wherein the one or more other samples
are
taken over an interval of time that is at least one month between an initial
sample and the
sample.
196. A method for evaluating infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease of a target population of cells affected by a first agent
in relation to the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
the target
population of cells affected by a second agent, based on a first sample from
the target
population cells to which the first agent has been administered and a second
sample from
the target population of cells to which the second agent has been
administered, the
samples providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
deriving from the first sample a first profile data set and from the second
sample a
-109-

second profile data set, the first and second profile data sets each including
a plurality of
members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct
RNA
constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that measurement of the
constituents
enables evaluation of the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease affected by the first agent in relation to the second
agent, wherein such
measure for each constituent is obtained under measurement conditions that are
substantially repeatable; and
producing a first calibrated profile data set and a second calibrated profile
data set
for the panel, wherein (i) each member of the first calibrated profile data
set is a function
of a corresponding member of the first profile data set and a corresponding
member of a
baseline profile data set for the panel, and (ii) each member of the second
calibrated
profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the second profile
data set and
a corresponding member of the baseline profile data set, wherein each member
of the
baseline data set is a normative measure, determined with respect to a
relevant set of
subjects, of the amount of one of the constituents in the panel, and wherein
the baseline
profile data set is related to the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions related to
infectious disease to be evaluated,
the first and second calibrated profile data sets being a comparison between
the
first profile data set and the baseline profile set and a comparison between
the second
profile data set and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing an
evaluation of the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
the target
population of cells affected by the first agent in relation to the infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the target population
of cells
affected by the second agent.
197. A method according to claim 196, wherein the target population of cells
has
presumptive signs of a systemic infection including at least one of: elevated
white blood
cell count, elevated temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced
blood
pressure, relative to medical standards.
198. A method according to claim 196, wherein the target population of cells
has
presumptive signs of a systemic infection that are related to inflammatory
conditions
arising from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery,
endocarditis, urinary
tract infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or
treatments.
-110-

199. A method according to claim 196, wherein the first agent is a first drug
and the
second agent is a second drug.
200. A method according to claim 196, wherein the first agent is a drug and
the second
agent is a complex mixture.
201. A method according to claim 196, wherein the first agent is a drug and
the second
agent is a nutriceutical.
202. A method according to claim 196, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
203. A method according to claim 196, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 1
percent.
204. A method according to claim 196, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
five percent.
205. A method according to claim 196, wherein the measurement conditions that
are
substantially repeatable are within a degree of repeatability of better than
three percent.
206. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated is with respect to a
localized
tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or fluid of
a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue.
207. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a microbial infection.
208. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a bacterial infection.
-111-

209. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a eukaryotic parasitic infection.
210. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a viral infection.
211. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is a fungal infection.
212. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is systemic inflammatory response
syndrome
(SIRS).
213. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is bacteremia, viremia, or fungemia.
214. A method according to claim 196, wherein the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease is septicemia due to any class of
microbe.
215. A method according to claim 196, further comprising:
storing the first and second profile data sets in a digital storage medium.
216. A method according to claim 196, wherein storing the first and second
profile data
sets includes storing each data set as a record in a database.
217. A method according to claim 196, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject taken under circumstances
different from those of the first sample.
218. A method according to claim 196, wherein the baseline profile data set is
derived
from one or more other samples from the same subject taken under circumstances
different from those of the second sample.
-112-

219. A method according to claim 196, wherein the first sample is derived from
blood
and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject other
than blood.
220. A method according to claim 196, wherein the first sample is derived from
tissue
or body fluid of the subject and the baseline profile data set is derived from
blood.
221. A method of providing an index that is indicative of an inflammatory
condition of
a subject with presumptive signs of a systemic infection, based on a first
sample from the
subject, the first sample providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising:
deriving from the first sample a profile data set, the profile data set
including a
plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount
of a
distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that
measurement of the
constituents is indicative of the inflammatory condition, the panel including
at least two
of the constituents of the Gene Expression Panel of Table 1; and
in deriving the profile data set,
achieving such measure for each constituent under measurement conditions that
are substantially repeatable;
applying at least one measure from the profile data set to an index function
that
provides a mapping from at least one measure of the profile data set into at
least one
measure of the inflammatory condition, so as to produce an index pertinent to
the
inflammatory condition of the sample;
wherein the index function uses data from a baseline profile data set for the
panel,
each member of the baseline data set being a normative measure, determined
with respect
to a relevant set of subjects, of the amount of one of the constituents in the
panel, wherein
the baseline data set is related to the inflammatory condition to be
evaluated.
222. A method according to claim 221, wherein the subject has presumptive
signs of a
systemic infection including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count,
elevated
temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure,
relative to
medical standards.
223. A method according to claim 221, wherein the presumptive signs of a
systemic
infection are related to inflammatory conditions arising from at least one of:
blunt or
-113-

penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia,
or dental or
gynecological examinations or treatments.
224. A method of providing an index according to claim 221, wherein the index
function has 2 components including disease status, disease severity, or
disease course.
225. A method of providing an index according to claim 221, wherein the index
function has 3 components including disease status, disease severity, or
disease course.
226. A method of providing an index according to claim 221, wherein the index
function has 4 components including disease status, disease severity, or
disease course.
227. A method of providing an index according to claim 221, wherein the index
function has 5 components including disease status, disease severity, or
disease course.
228. A method of providing an index according to any one of claims 221-227,
wherein
the index function is constructed as a linear sum of terms having the form:
<IMG>
wherein I is the index, M; is the value of the member i of the profile data
set, C i is a
constant, and P(i) is a power to which M i is raised, the sum being formed for
all integral
values of i up to the number of members in the data set.
229. A method of providing an index according to claim 228, wherein the values
C i
and P(i) are determined using statistical techniques, such as latent class
modeling, to
correlate data, including clinical, experimentally derived, and any other data
pertinent to
the presumptive signs of a systemic infection.
230. A method according to claim 221, further comprising providing with the
index a
normative value of the index function, determined with respect to a relevant
set of
subjects, so that the index may be interpreted in relation to the normative
value.
231. A method according to claim 221, wherein the quantitative measure is
determined
by amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all constituents differ by less than approximately 2
percent.
-114-

232. A method of providing an index according to claim 221 wherein the
quantitative
measure is determined by amplification, and the measurement conditions are
such that
efficiencies of amplification for all constituents differ by less than
approximately 1
percent.
234. A method for of providing an index according to claim 221, wherein the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than five percent.
235. A method for determining a profile data set according to claim 221,
wherein the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of
repeatability of better than three percent.
236. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition being
evaluated is with respect to a localized tissue of the subject and the first
sample is derived
from tissue or fluid of a type distinct from that of the localized tissue.
237. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition is a
microbial infection.
238. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition is a
bacterial infection.
239. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition is a
eukaryotic parasitic infection.
240. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition is a
viral
infection.
241. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition is a
fungal
infection.
-115-

242. A method according to claim 221, wherein the inflammatory condition is
systemic
inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).
243. A method of providing an index according to claim 221, further
comprising:
deriving from at least one other sample at least one other profile data set,
the at
least one other profile data set including a plurality of members, each being
a quantitative
measure of the amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents
selected so
that measurement of the constituents is indicative of the inflammatory
condition,
wherein the at least one other sample is from the same subject, taken under
circumstances different from those of the first sample with respect to at
least one of time,
nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator, medication,
physical activity,
body mass, and environmental exposure; and
applying at least one measure from the at least one other profile data set to
an
index function that provides a mapping from the at least one measure of the at
least one
other profile data set into at least one measure of the inflammatory condition
under
different circumstances, so as to produce at least one other index pertinent
to the
inflammatory condition of the subject under circumstances different from those
of the
first sample.
244. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention in a subject
with
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease,
the method
comprising:
providing an index according to any of claims 61, 87, 221 or 243;
comparing the index to a normative value of the index, determined with respect
to
a relevant set of subjects to obtain a difference;
using the difference between the index and the normative value for the index
to
direct therapy intervention.
245. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention according to
claim 244,
wherein the therapy intervention is microbe-specific therapy.
246. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention according to
claim 244,
wherein the therapy intervention is bacteria-specific therapy.
-116-

247. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention according to
claim 244,
wherein the therapy intervention is fungus-specific therapy.
248. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention according to
claim 244,
wherein the therapy intervention is virus-specific therapy.
249. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention according to
claim 244,
wherein the therapy intervention is eukaryotic parasite-specific therapy.
250. A method of using an index to direct therapy intervention according to
claim 244,
wherein the therapeutic intervention is toward the host immune system.
251. A method for differentiating a type of pathogen within a class of
pathogens of
interest in a subject with infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease, based on at least one sample from the subject, the sample
providing a
source of RNA, the method comprising:
determining at least one profile data set according to claim 1 for the
subject;
comparing the profile data set to at least one baseline profile data set,
determined
with respect to at least one relevant set of samples within the class of
pathogens of
interest to obtain a difference;
using the difference to differentiate the type of pathogen in the at least one
profile
data set for the subject from the class of pathogen in the at least one
baseline profile data
set.
252. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within a class of
pathogens
according to claim 251 wherein the class of pathogens is microbial.
253. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within a class of
pathogens
according to claim 252 wherein the class of pathogens is bacterial.
254. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within the class of
bacteria
pathogens according to claim 253 wherein the difference is used to
differentiate a
Gram(+) bacterial pathogen from a Gram(-) bacterial pathogen.
-117-

255. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within a class of
pathogens
according to claim 252 wherein the class of pathogens is fungal.
256. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within the class of
fungal
pathogens according to claim 255 wherein the difference is used to
differentiate an acute
Candida pathogen from a chronic Candida pathogen.
257. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within a class of
pathogens
according to claim 252 wherein the class of pathogens is viral.
258. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within the class of
viral
pathogens according to claim 257 wherein the difference is used to
differentiate a DNA
viral pathogen from an RNA viral pathogen.
259. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within the class of
viral
pathogens according to claim 257 wherein the difference is used to
differentiate a
rhinovirus pathogen from an influenza pathogen.
260. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within a class of
pathogens
according to claim 252 wherein the class of pathogens is eukaryotic parasites.
261. A method for differentiating the type of pathogen within the class of
eukaryotic
parasite pathogens according to claim 260 wherein the difference is used to
differentiate a
plasmodium. parasite pathogen from a trypanosomal pathogen.
262. A method of using an index for differentiating a type of pathogen within
a class of
pathogens of interest in a subject with infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions
related to infectious disease, based on at least one sample from the subject,
the method
comprising:
providing at least one index according to any of claims 61, 87, 221 or 243 for
the
subject;
comparing the at least one index to at least one normative value of the index,
determined with respect to at least one relevant set of subjects to obtain at
least one
difference;
-118-

using the at least one difference between the at least one index and the at
least one
normative value for the index to differentiate the type of pathogen from the
class of
pathogen.
-119-

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Attorney Docket: 2.331/126W0
Identification, Monitoring and Treatment of Infectious Disease
And Characterization of Inflammatory Conditions Related to Infectious Disease
Using Gene Expression Profiles
Technical Field and Background Art
The present invention relates to use of gene expression data, and in
particular to use of
gene expression data in identification, monitoring and treatment of infectious
disease and in
characterization and evaluation of inflammatory conditions of a subject
induced or related to
infectious disease.
The prior art has utilized gene expression data to determine the presence or
absence of
particular markers as diagnostic of a particular condition, and in some
circumstances have
described the cumulative addition of scores for over expression of particular
disease markers to
achieve increased accuracy or sensitivity of diagnosis. Information on any
condition of a
particular patient and a patient's response to types and dosages of
therapeutic or nutritional
agents has become an important issue in clinical medicine today not only from
the aspect of
efficiency of medical practice for the health care industry but for improved
outcomes and
benefits for the patients.
Summary of the Invention
In a first embodiment there is provided a method for determining a profile
data set for a subject
with infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease based on a
sample from the subject, the sample providing a source of RNAs, the method
comprising using
amplification for measuring the amount of RNA corresponding to at least 2
constituents from
Table 1 and arriving at a measure of each constituent, wherein the profile
data set comprises the
measure of each constituent and wherein amplification is performed under
measurement
conditions that are substantially repeatable.
In addition, the subject may have presumptive signs of a systemic infection
including at
least one of elevated white blood cell count, elevated temperature, elevated
heart rate, and

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards or the
inflammatory conditions
related to infectious disease may be inflammatory conditions arising from at
least one of blunt or
penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia,
or dental or
gynecological examinations or treatments.
In other embodiments, the measurement conditions that are substantially
repeatable may
be within a degree of repeatability of better than five percent, or better
than three percent and the
efficiencies of amplification for all constituents may be substantially
similar wherein the
efficiency of amplification for all constituents is within two percent, or
alternatively, is less than
one percent. In such embodiments, the sample may be selected from the group
consisting of
blood, a blood fraction, body fluid, a population of cells and tissue from the
subject.
In another embodiment there is provided a method of characterizing infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease in a subject, based on a
sample from the
subject, the sample providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising
assessing a profile data
set of a plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of the
amount of a
distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that
measurement of the
constituents enables characterization of the presumptive signs of a systemic
infection, wherein
such measure for each constituent is obtained under measurement conditions
that axe
substantially repeatable.
In addition, the subject may have presumptive signs of a systemic infection
including at
least one of elevated white blood cell count, elevated temperature, elevated
heart rate, and
elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards, or
alternatively, the subject
may have presumptive signs of a systemic infection that are related to
inflammatory conditions
arising from at least one of blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery,
endocaxditis, urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
In such
embodiments, assessing may further comprises comparing the profile data set to
a baseline
profile data set for the panel, wherein the baseline profile data set is
related to the infectious
disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease to be
characterized.
In other embodiments, the efficiencies of amplification for all constituents
are
substantially similar and the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to infectious
disease are from a microbial infection, more particularly a bacterial
infection, or a eukaryotic
parasitic infection, or a viral infection, or a fungal infection or are
related to systemic
2

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). More particularly, the infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions that are related to infectious disease may be from
bacteremia, viremia,
or fungemia, or from septicemia due to any class of microbe. In addition, the
infectious disease
or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease may be with respect
to a localized tissue
of the subject and the sample may be derived from a tissue or fluid of a type
distinct from that of
the localized tissue.
Other embodiments include storing the profile data set in a digital storage
medium,
wherein storing the profile data set may include storing it as a record in a
database..
Yet another embodiment provides a method for evaluating infectious disease ar
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease in a subject based on a first sample
from the subject, the
sample providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising deriving from the
first sample a first
profile data set, the profile data set including a plurality of members, each
member being a
quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of
constituents
selected so that measurement of the constituents enables evaluation of the
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease wherein such measure for
each constituent
is obtained under measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable.
The method also
includes producing a calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein each
member of the
calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the
first profile data set and'
a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel, and
wherein the baseline
profile data set is related to the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions related to
infectious disease to be evaluated, with the calibrated profile data set being
a comparison
between the first profile data set and the baseline profile data set, thereby
providing evaluation of
the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease of the subject.
In related embodiments, the subject has presumptive signs of a systemic
infection
including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count, elevated
temperature, elevated heart
rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards,
or alternatively, the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions may be related to inflammatory
conditions arising
from at least one of blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract infection,
pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
3

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
In addition, the baseline profile data set may be derived from one or more
other samples
from the same subject taken under circumstances different from those of the
first sample, and the
circumstances may be selected from the group consisting of (i) the time at
which the first sample
is taken, (ii) the site from which the first sample is taken, (iii) the
biological condition of the
subject when the first sample is taken.
Also, the one or more other samples may be taken over an interval of time that
is at least
one month between the first sample and the one or more other samples, or taken
over an interval
of time that is at least twelve months between the first sample and the one or
more samples, or
they may be taken pre-therapy intervention or post-therapy intervention. In
such embodiments,
the first sample may be derived from blood and the baseline profile data set
may be derived from
tissue or body fluid of the subject other than blood. Alternatively, the first
sample is derived from
tissue or body fluid of the subject and the baseline profile data set is
derived from blood.
In other embodiments, the baseline profile data set may be derived from one or
more
other samples from the same subject, taken when the subject is in a biological
condition different
from that in which the subject was at the time the first sample was taken,
with respect to at least
one of age, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator,
medication, physical
activity, body mass, and environmental exposure, and the baseline profile data
set may be
derived from one or more other samples from one or more different subjects.
In addition, the one or more different subjects may have in common with the
subject at
least one of age group, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, nutritional
history, medical
condition, clinical indicator, medication, physical activity, body mass, and
environmental
exposure. In other embodiments, a clinical indicator may be used to assess
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the one or more
different subjects, and
may also include interpreting the calibrated profile data set in the context
of at least one other
clinical indicator, wherein the at least one other clinical indicator is
selected from the group
consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or other radiological or
metabolic imaging
technique, other chemical assays, and physical findings.
In such embodiments, the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related
to
infectious disease may be from a microbial infection, a bacterial infection, a
eukaryotic parasitic
infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection, or alternatively, the
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease may be from systemic
inflammatory
4

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
response syndrome (SIRS), from bacteremia, viremia, fungemia, or septicemia
due to any class
of microbe.
In yet other embodiments, the function is a mathematical function and is other
than a
simple difference, including a second function of the ratio of the
corresponding member of first
profile data set to the corresponding member of the baseline profile data set,
or a logarithmic
function. In related embodiments, each member of the calibrated profile data
set has biological
significance if it has a value differing by more than an amount D, where D=
F(1.1).- F(.9), and F
is the second function. In such embodiments, the first sample is obtained and
the first profile data
set quantified at a first location, and the calibrated profile data set is
produced using a network to
access a database stored on a digital storage medium in a second location,
wherein the database
may be updated to reflect the first profile data set quantified from the
sample. Additionally, using
a network may include accessing a global computer network.
In related embodiments, the quantitative measure is determined by
amplification, and the
measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of amplification for all
constituents differ by
less than approximately 2 percent, or alternatively by less than approximately
1 percent.
Still another embodiment is a method of providing an index that is indicative
of
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
a subject based on a
first sample from the subject, the first sample providing a source of RNAs,
the method
comprising deriving from the first sample a profile data set, the profile data
set including a
plurality of members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount
of a distinct
RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that measurement of the
constituents is
indicative of the presumptive signs of a systemic infection, the panel
including at least two of the
constituents of the Gene Expression Panel of Table 1. In deriving the profile
data set, such
measure for each constituent is achieved under measurement conditions that are
substantially
repeatable, at least one measure from the profile data set is applied to an
index function that
provides a mapping from at least one measure of the profile data set into one
measure of the
presumptive signs of a systemic infection, so as to produce an index pertinent
to the infectious
disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the
subject.
In addition, the subject may have presumptive signs of a systemic infection
including at
least one of: elevated white blood cell count, elevated temperature, elevated
heart rate, and
elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards, or
alternatively, the infectious

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
disease or inflammatory conditions may be related to inflammatory conditions
arising from at
least one of blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis, urinary tract
infection,
pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
In related embodiments, the index function is constructed as a linear sum of
terms having
the form: I = ~CIMIP~'~, wherein I is the index, M; is the value of the member
i of the profile
data set, C~ is a constant, and P(i) is a power to which M; is raised, the sum
being formed for all
integral values of i up to the number of members in the data set. In addition,
the values C; and
P(i) are determined using statistical techniques, such as latent class
modeling, to correlate data,
including clinical, experimentally derived, and any other data pertinent to
the presumptive signs
of a systemic infection. In alternative embodiments, there is provided a
normative value of the
index function, determined with respect to a relevant set of subjects, so that
the index may be
interpreted in relation to the normative value, wherein the normative value
may include
constructing the index function so that the normative value is approximately
1, alternatively so
that the normative value is approximately 0 and deviations in the index
function from 0 are
expressed in standard deviation units. In still other embodiments, the
relevant set of subjects has
in common a property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity,
geographic location,
nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator, medication,
physical activity, body
mass, and environmental exposure, or alternatively has in common a property
that is at least one
of age group, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, nutritional history,
medical condition,
clinical indicator, medication, physical activity, body mass, and
environmental exposure.
In other embodiments, a clinical indicator may be used to assess the
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the relevant set of
subjects by
interpreting the calibrated profile data set in the context of at least one
other clinical indicator,
wherein the at least one other clinical indicator is selected from the group
consisting of blood
chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or other radiological or metabolic imaging
technique, other chemical
assays, and physical findings. In addition, the quantitative measure may be
determined by
amplification, the measurement conditions being such that efficiencies of
amplification for all
constituents differ by less than approximately 2 percent, or they differ by
less than approximately
1 percent, and the measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable
are within a degree of
repeatability of better than five percent, or within a degree of repeatability
of better than three
percent.
6

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
In such embodiments, the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related
to
infectious disease being evaluated are with respect to a localized tissue of
the subject and the first
sample is derived from tissue or fluid of a type distinct from that of the
localized tissue, wherein
the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious
disease are from a
microbial infection, more particularly a bacterial infection, still more
particularly a eukaryotic
parasitic infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection or from a systemic
inflammatory response
syndrome (SIRS).
87. A method of providing an index according to claim 61, further comprising:
deriving from at least one other sample at least one other profile data set,
the at least one
other profile data set including a plurality of members, each being a
quantitative measure of the
amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so
that measurement of
the constituents is indicative of the presumptive signs of a systemic
infection,
wherein the at least one other sample is from the same subject, taken under
circumstances different from those of the first sample with respect to at
least one of time,
nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator, medication,
physical activity, body
mass, and environmental exposure; and
applying at least one measure from the at least one other profile data set to
an index
function that provides a mapping from the at least one measure of the at least
one other profile
data set into one measure of the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to
infectious disease under different circumstances, so as to produce at least
one other index
pertinent to the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to
infectious disease of the
subject under circumstances different from those of the first sample.
Related embodiments include providing an index wherein the index function has
2, 3, 4,
or 5 components including disease status, disease severity, or disease course.
In addition, the
index function may be constructed as a linear sum of terms having the form: 1=
~C~M~Pt'~,
wherein I is the index, M; is the value of the member i. of the profile data
set, C~ is a constant, and
P(i) is a power to which M~ is raised, the sum being formed for all integral
values of i up to the
number of members in the data set, wherein the values CI and P(i) are
determined using
statistical techniques, such as latent class modeling, to correlate data,
including clinical,
7

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
experimentally derived, and any other data pertinent to the presumptive signs
of a systemic
infection.
Alternatively, a normative value of the index function is provided, determined
with
respect to a relevant set of subjects, so that the at least one other index
may be interpreted in
relation to the normative value, wherein providing the normative value
includes constructing the
index function so that the normative value is approximately 1, or so that the
normative value is
approximately 0 and deviations in the index function from 0 are expressed in
standard deviation
units. Such embodiments may also include using a clinical indicator to assess
infectious disease
or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the relevant set
of subjects by
interpreting the calibrated profile data set in the context of at least one
other clinical indicator .
selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other radiological or
metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and physical findings.
As in other embodiments, the quantitative measure is determined by
amplification, and
the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of amplification for all
constituents differ
by less than approximately 2 percent, or differ by less than approximately 1
percent, and the
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable are within a degree
of repeatability of
better than five percent or within a degree of repeatability of better than
three percent.
In addition, the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to
infectious disease
are with respect to a localized tissue of the subject and the first sample is
derived from tissue or
fluid of a type distinct from that of the localized tissue.
Still other embodiments include a method fox providing an index wherein the
infectious
disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease are from a
microbial infection, a
bacterial infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection, a eukaryotic
parasite infection, or from
systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the panel of constituents
includes at least
two constituents of Table 1.
Another embodiment provides a method for evaluating infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of a subject based on a
first sample from
the subject, the first sample providing a source of RNAs, the method
comprising deriving from
the first sample a first profile data set, the first profile data set
including a plurality of members,
each member being a quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct RNA
constituent in a panel
of constituents selected so that measurement of the constituents enables
evaluation of the

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease
wherein such measure
for each constituent is obtained under measurement conditions that are
substantially repeatable.
The method also includes producing a calibrated profile data set for the
panel, wherein each
member of the calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding
member of the first
profile data set and a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for
the panel, wherein
each member of the baseline profile data set is a normative measure determined
with respect to a
relevant set of subjects of the amount of one of the constituents in the panel
and the baseline
profile data set is related to the infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions related to
infectious disease to be evaluated, and the calibrated profile data set is a
comparison between the
first profile data set and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing
evaluation of the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
the subject.
In such an embodiment, the subject may have presumptive signs of a systemic
infection
including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count, elevated
temperature, elevated heart
rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards,
or the infectious
disease or inflammatory conditions may be related to inflammatory conditions
arising from at
least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis, urinary
tract infection,
pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
Additionally, the relevant set of subjects is a set of healthy subjects having
in common a
property that is at least one of age group, gender, ethnicity, geographic
location, nutritional
history, medical condition, clinical indicator, medication, physical activity,
body mass, and
environmental exposure. As with other embodiments, the quantitative measure is
determined by
amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all
constituents differ by less than approximately 2 percent, or they differ by
less than approximately
1 percent, and the measurement conditions are substantially repeatable within
a degree of
repeatability of better than five percent or within a degree of repeatability
of better than three
percent.
In such embodiments, the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related
to
infectious disease being evaluated is with respect to a localized tissue of
the subject and the first
sample is derived from tissue or fluid of a type distinct from that of the
localized tissue and
the profile data set may be stored in a digital storage medium, including
storing it as a record in
a database. In addition, the baseline profile data set is derived from one or
more other samples
9

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
from the same subject taken under circumstances different from those of the
first sample,
wherein the one or more other samples are taken pre-therapy intervention or
alternatively taken
post-therapy intervention, or the one or more other samples are taken over an
interval of time
that is at least one month between an initial sample and the sample, or at
least twelve months
between an initial sample and the sample. Also, the first sample is derived
from blood and the
baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or body fluid of the subject
other than blood, or
alternatively, the first sample is derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject and the baseline
profile data set is derived from blood.
Yet another embodiment provides a method for evaluating infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of a subject based on a
first sample from
the subject and a second sample from a defined population of indicator cells,
the samples
providing a source of RNAs, the method comprising applying the first sample or
a portion
thereof to the defined population of indicator cells. The method also includes
deriving from the
second sample a first profile data set, the first profile data set including a
plurality of members,
each member being a quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct RNA or
protein
constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that measurement of the
constituents enables
measurement of the presumptive signs of a systemic infection, wherein such
measure for each
constituent is obtained under measurement conditions that are substantially
repeatable, and also
includes producing a calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein each
member of the
calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of the
first profile data set and
a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel, wherein
each member of the
baseline data set is a normative measure determined with respect to a relevant
set of subjects of
the amount of one of the constituents in the panel and wherein the baseline
profile data set is
related to the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to
infectious disease to be
evaluated, the calibrated profile data set being a comparison between the
first profile data set and
the baseline profile data set, thereby providing evaluation of the infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of the subject.
In related embodiments, the subject may have presumptive signs of a systemic
infection
including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count, elevated
temperature, elevated heart
rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards,
or alternatively, the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions may be related to inflammatory
conditions arising

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery, endocarditis,
urinary tract infection,
pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments, and the
relevant set of
subjects is a set of healthy subjects.
In addition, the relevant set of subjects has in common a property that is at
least one of
age group, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, nutritional history,
medical condition, clinical
indicator, medication, physical activity, body mass, and environmental
exposure. Additionally,
a clinical indicator may be used to assess infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions related to
infectious disease of the relevant set of subjects by interpreting the
calibrated profile data set in
the context of at least one other clinical indicator, wherein the at least one
other clinical indicator
is selected from the group consisting of blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or
other radiological
or metabolic imaging technique, other chemical assays, and physical findings.
As with other embodiments, the quantitative measure is determined by
amplification, and
the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of amplification for all
constituents differ
by less than approximately 2 percent, or they differ by less than
approximately 1 percent, and the
measurement conditions are substantially repeatable within a degree of
repeatability of better
than five percent, or within a degree of repeatability of better than three
percent. Also, the
infectious disease being evaluated is with respect to a localized tissue of
the subject and the first
sample is derived from tissue ar fluid of a type distinct from that of the
localized tissue, and the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease is
a microbial
infection.
In related embodiments, the baseline profile data set is derived from one or
more other
samples from the same subject taken under circumstances different from those
of the first
sample, wherein the one or more other samples are taken pre-therapy
intervention, or are taken
post-therapy intervention, or are taken over an interval of time that is at
least one month between
an initial sample and the sample, or are taken over an interval of time that
is at least twelve
months between an initial sample and the sample. In such embodiments, the
first sample is
derived from blood and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or
body fluid of the
subject other than blood, or the first sample is derived from tissue or body
fluid of the subject
and the baseline profile data set is derived from blood.
11

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
In another embodiment of the invention, a method for evaluating infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of a target population
of cells affected by a
first agent, based on a sample from the target population of cells to which
the first agent has been
administered, the sample providing a source of RNAs, is presented. The method
comprises
deriving from the sample a first profile data set, the first profile data set
including a plurality of
members, each member being a quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct
RNA
constituent in a panel of constituents selected so that measurement of the
constituents enables
evaluation of the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to
infectious disease
affected by the first agent, wherein such measure for each constituent is
obtained under
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable; and producing a
calibrated profile data
set for the panel, wherein each member of the calibrated profile data set is a
function of a
corresponding member of the first profile data set and a corresponding member
of a baseline
profile data set for the panel, wherein each member of the baseline data set
is a normative
measure determined with respect to a relevant set of target populations of
cells of the amount of
one of the constituents in the panel, and wherein the baseline profile data
set is related to the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease to
be evaluated, the
calibrated profile data set being a comparison between the first profile data
set and the baseline
profile data set, thereby providing an evaluation of the infectious disease or
inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease of the target population of cells
affected by the first agent.
The target population of cells may have presumptive signs of a systemic
infection including at
least one of: elevated white blood cell count, elevated temperature, elevated
heart rate, and
elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards. The
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease may be related to
inflammatory conditions
arising from at least one of: blunt or penetrating trauma, surgery,
endocarditis, urinary tract
infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological examinations or treatments.
The relevant set of
target populations of cells may be a set of healthy target populations of
cells. Alternatively, the
relevant set of target populations of cells may have in common a property that
is at least one of
age group, gender, ethnicity, geographic location, nutritional history,
medical condition, clinical
indicator, medication, physical activity, body mass, and environmental
exposure. In such a case,
a clinical indicator may be used to assess infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions related to
infectious disease of the relevant set of target populations of cells, and the
method further
12

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
comprises interpreting the calibrated profile data set in the context of at
least one other clinical
indicator; the at least one other clinical indicator may be selected from the
group consisting of
blood chemistry, urinalysis, X-ray or other radiological or metabolic imaging
technique, other
chemical assays, and physical findings. The quantitative measure may be
determined by
amplification, and the measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of
amplification for all
constituents differ by less than approximately 2 percent, or alternatively,
less than approximately
1 percent. The measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable may be
within a degree
of repeatability of better than five percent, or alternatively better than
three percent. Also, the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease
being evaluated may
be with respect to a localized tissue of the subject and the first sample is
derived from tissue or
fluid of a type distinct from that of the localized tissue. The infectious
disease or inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease may be a microbial infection, a
bacterial infection, a
eukaryotic parasitic infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection,
systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), bacteremia, viremia, fungemia,
or septicemia
due to any class of microbe. A related embodiment of the method may further
comprise storing
the profile data set in a digital storage medium. Storing the profile data set
may include storing it
as a record in a database. The embodiment may include the limitations that the
first sample is
derived from blood and the baseline profile data set is derived from tissue or
body fluid of the
subject other than blood. Alternatively, the first sample may be derived from
tissue or body fluid
of the subject and the baseline profile data set is derived from blood. As
well, the baseline
profile data set may be derived from one or more other samples from the same
subject taken
under circumstances different from those of the first sample. Such one or more
other samples
may be taken pre-therapy intervention, post-therapy intervention, or over an
interval of time that
is at least one month between an initial sample and the sample.
Other embodiments of the invention are directed toward a method for evaluating
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
a target population
of cells affected by a first agent in relation to the infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions
related to infectious disease of the target population of cells affected by a
second agent, based on
a first sample from the target population cells to which the first agent has
been administered and
a second sample from the target population of cells to which the second agent
has been
administered, the samples providing a source of RNAs. Such a method includes
the steps of
13

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
deriving from the first sample a first profile data set and from the second
sample a second profile
data set, the first and second profile data sets each including a plurality of
members, each
member being a quantitative measure of the amount of a distinct RNA
constituent in a panel of
constituents selected so that measurement of the constituents enables
evaluation of the infectious
disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease affected by
the first agent in
relation to the second agent, wherein such measure for each constituent is
obtained under
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable; and producing a
first calibrated profile
data set and a second calibrated profile data set for the panel, wherein (i)
each member of the
first calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding member of
the first profile data
set and a corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for the panel,
and (ii) each member
of the second calibrated profile data set is a function of a corresponding
member of the second
profile data set and a corresponding member of the baseline profile data set,
wherein each
member of the baseline data set is a normative measure, determined with
respect to a relevant set
of subjects, of the amount of one of the constituents in the panel, and
wherein the baseline profile
data set is related to the infectious disease or inflammatory conditions
related to infectious
disease to be evaluated, the first and second calibrated profile data sets
being a comparison
between the first profile data set and the baseline profile set and a
comparison between the
second profile data set and the baseline profile data set, thereby providing
an evaluation of the
infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease of
the target
population of cells affected by the first agent in relation to the infectious
disease or inflammatory
conditions related to infectious disease of the target population of cells
affected by the second
agent. The target population of cells may have presumptive signs of a systemic
infection
including at least one of: elevated white blood cell count, elevated
temperature, elevated heart
rate, and elevated or reduced blood pressure, relative to medical standards.
As well, the target
population of cells may have presumptive signs of a systemic infection that
are related to
inflammatory conditions arising from at least one of: blunt or penetrating
trauma, surgery,
endocarditis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological
examinations or
treatments. The first agent may be a first drug and the second agent may be a
second drug.
Alternatively, the first agent is a drug and the second agent is a complex
mixture or a
nutriceutical. The quantitative measure may be determined by amplification,
and the
measurement conditions are such that efficiencies of amplification for all
constituents differ by
14

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
less than approximately 2 percent, or alternatively by less than approximately
1 percent. The .
measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable may be within a
degree of repeatability
of better than five percent, or alternatively better than three percent. The
infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease being evaluated may be
with respect to a
localized tissue of the subject and the first sample is derived from tissue or
fluid of a type distinct
from that of the localized tissue. The infectious disease or inflammatory
conditions related to
infectious disease may be a microbial infection, bacterial infection, a
eukaryotic parasitic
infection, a viral infection, a fungal infection, systemic inflammatory
response syndrome (SIRS),
bacteremia, viremia, fungemia, or septicemia due to any class of microbe. This
method may ,
further include the step of storing the first and second profile data sets in
a digital storage
medium. The first and second profile data sets may include storing each data
set as a record in a
database. The baseline profile data set may be derived from one or more other
samples from the
same subject taken under circumstances different from those of the first
sample, or alternatively
different from those of the second sample. The first sample may be derived
from blood and the
baseline profile data set may be derived from tissue or body fluid of the
subject other than blood.
The first sample may be derived from tissue or body fluid of the subject and
the baseline profile
data set may be derived from blood. .
In yet another embodiment of the invention, a method of providing an index
that is
indicative of an inflammatory condition of a subject with presumptive signs of
a systemic
infection, based on a first sample from the subject, the first sample
providing a source of RNAs,
is presented. The method comprises deriving from the first sample a profile
data set, the profile
data set including a plurality of members, each member being a quantitative
measure of the
amount of a distinct RNA constituent in a panel of constituents selected so
that measurement of
the constituents is indicative of the inflammatory condition, the panel
including at least two of
the constituents of the Gene Expression Panel of Table l; and in deriving the
profile data set,
achieving such measure for each constituent under measurement conditions that
are substantially
repeatable; applying at least one measure from the profile data set to an
index function that
provides a mapping from at least one measure of the profile data set into at
least one measure of
the inflammatory condition, so as to produce an index pertinent to the
inflammatory condition of
the sample; wherein the index function uses data from a baseline profile data
set for the panel,
each member of the baseline data set being a normative measure, determined
with respect to a

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
relevant set of subjects, of the amount of one of the constituents in the
panel, wherein the
baseline data set is related to the inflammatory condition to be evaluated.
The subject may have
presumptive signs of a systemic infection including at least one of: elevated
white blood cell
count, elevated temperature, elevated heart rate, and elevated or reduced
blood pressure, relative
to medical standards. Alternatively, the presumptive signs of a systemic
infection are related to
inflammatory conditions arising from at least one of: blunt or penetrating
trauma, surgery,
endocarditis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, or dental or gynecological
examinations or
treatments. The at least one measure of the profile data set that is applied
to the index function
may be 2, 3, 4, or 5.
Still other embodiments provide a method of using an index to direct therapy
intervention
in a subject with infectious disease or inflammatory conditions related to
infectious disease, the
method comprising providing an index according to any of the above-discussed
embodiments,
comparing the index to a nonnative value of the index, determined with respect
to a relevant set
of subjects to obtain a difference, and using the difference between the index
and the normative
value for the index to direct therapy intervention, wherein therapy
intervention is microbe-
specific therapy, or is bacteria-specific therapy, or is fungus-specific
therapy, or is virus-specific
therapy, or is eukaryotic parasite-specific therapy.
Another embodiment provides a method for differentiating a type of pathogen
within a
class of pathogens of interest in a subject with infectious disease or
inflammatory conditions
related to infectious disease, based on at least one sample from the subject,
the sample providing
a source of RNA, the method comprising: determining at least one profile data
set for the subject,
comparing the profile data set to at least one baseline profile data set,
determined with respect to
at least one relevant set of samples within the class of pathogens of interest
to obtain a
difference, and using the difference to differentiate the type of pathogen in
the at least one profile
data set for the subject from the class of pathogen in the at least one
baseline profile data set,
wherein the class of pathogens is microbial. Alternatively, the class of
pathogens is bacterial
and the difference is used to differentiate a Gram(+) bacterial pathogen from
a Gram(-) bacterial
pathogen. Alternatively, the class of pathogens is fungal and the difference
is used to
differentiate an acute Candida pathogen from a chronic Cafzdida pathogen. More
particularly,
the class of pathogens is viral and the difference is used to differentiate a
DNA viral pathogen
from an RNA viral pathogen, or the class of pathogens is viral and the
difference is used to
16

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
differentiate a rhinovirus pathogen from an influenza pathogen. Still more
particularly, the class
of pathogens is eukaryotic parasites and the difference is used to
differentiate a plasmodiurra
parasite pathogen from a trypanosomal pathogen.
Yet another embodiment provides a method of using an index for differentiating
a type of
pathogen within a class of pathogens of interest in a subject with infectious
disease or
inflammatory conditions related to infectious disease, based on at least one
sample from the
subject, the method comprising providing at least one index according to any
of the above
disclosed embodiments for the subject, comparing the at least one index to at
least one normative
value of the index, determined with respect to at least one relevant set of
subjects to obtain at
least one difference, and using the at least one difference between the at
least one index and the
at least one normative value for the index to differentiate the type of
pathogen from the class of
pathogen.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by
reference to
the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying
drawings, in which:
Fig. lA shows the results of assaying 24 genes from the Source Inflammation
Gene Panel
(shown in Table 1) on eight separate days during the course of optic neuritis
in a single male
subject.
1B illustrates use of an inflammation index in relation to the data of Fig.
lA, in
accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a graphical illustration of the same inflammation index calculated
at 9 different,
significant clinical milestones.
Fig. 3 shows the effects of single dose treatment with 800 mg of ibuprofen in
a single
donor as characterized by the index.
Fig. 4 shows the calculated acute inflammation index displayed graphically for
five
different conditions.
Fig. 5 shows a Viral Response Index for monitoring the progress of an upper
respiratory
infection (URI).
Figs. 6 and 7 compare two different populations using Gene Expression Profiles
(with
respect to the 48 loci of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1).
17

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 8 compares a normal population with a rheumatoid arthritis population
derived from
a longitudinal study.
Fig. 9 compares two normal populations, one longitudinal and the other cross
sectional.
Fig. 10 shows the shows gene expression values for various individuals of a
normal
population.
Fig. 11 shows the expression levels for each of four genes (of the
Inflammation Gene
Expression Panel of Table 1), of a single subject, assayed monthly over a
period of eight months.
Figs. 12 and 13 similarly show in each case the expression levels for each of
48 genes (of
the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1), of distinct single
subjects (selected in each
case on the basis of feeling well and not taking drugs), assayed, in the case
of Fig. 12 weekly
over a period of four weeks, and in the case of Fig. 13 monthly over a period
of six months.
Fig. 14 shows the effect over time, on inflammatory gene expression in a
single human
subject., of the administration of an anti-inflammatory steroid, as assayed
using the Inflammation
Gene Expression Pa~iel of Table 1.
Fig. 15, in a manner analogous to Fig. 14, shows the effect over time, via
whole blood
samples obtained from a human subject, administered a single dose of
prednisone, on expression
of 5 genes (of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1).
Fig. 16 also shows the effect over time, on inflammatory gene expression in a
single
human subject suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, of the administration of a
TNF-inhibiting
compound, but here the expression is shown in comparison to the cognate locus
average
previously detexmined (in connection with Figs. 6 and 7) for the normal (i.e.,
undiagnosed,
healthy) population.
Fig. 17A further illustrates the consistency of inflammatory gene expression
in a
population.
Fig. 17B shows the normal distribution of index values obtained from an
undiagnosed
population.
Fig. 17C illustrates the use of the same index as Fig. 17B, where the
inflammation
median for a normal population has been set to zero and both normal and
diseased subjects are
plotted in standard deviation units relative to that median.
18

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 18 plots, in a fashion similar to that of Fig. 17A, Gene Expression
Profiles, for the
same 7 loci as in Fig. 17A, two different (responder v. non-responder) 6-
subject populations of
rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Fig. 19 thus illustrates use of the inflammation index for assessment of a
single subject
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, who has not responded well to traditional
therapy with
methotrexate.
Fig. 20 similarly illustrates use of the inflammation index for assessment of
three subjects
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, who have not responded well to
traditional therapy with
methotrexate.
Each of Figs. 21-23 shows the inflammation index for an international group of
subjects,
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, undergoing three separate treatment
regimens.
Fig. 24 illustrates use of the inflammation index for assessment of a single
subject
suffering from inflammatory bowel disease.
Fig. 25 shows Gene Expression Profiles with respect to 24 loci (of the
Inflammation
Gene Expression Panel of Table 1) for whole blood treated with Ibuprofen in
vitro in relation to
other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Fig. 26 illustrates how the effects of two competing anti-inflammatory
compounds can be
compared objectively, quantitatively, precisely, and reproducibly.
Figs. 27 through 41 illustrate the use of gene expression panels in early
identification and
monitoring of infectious disease.
Fig. 27 uses a novel bacterial Gene Expression Panel of 24 genes, developed to
discriminate various bacterial conditions in a host biological system.
Fig. 28 shows differential expression for a single locus,1FNG, to LTA derived
from three
distinct sources: S. pyogenes, B. subtilis, and 5. aureus.
Figs. 29 and 30 show the response after two hours of the Inflammation 48A and
48B loci
respectively (discussed above in connection with Figs. 6 and 7 respectively)
in whole blood to
administration of a Gram-positive and a Gram-negative organism.
Figs. 31 and 32 correspond to Figs. 29 and 30 respectively and are similar to
them, with
the exception that the monitoring here occurs 6 hours after administration.
Fig. 33 compares the gene expression response induced by E. coli and by an
organism-
free E. coli filtrate.
19

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 34 is similar to Fig. 33, but here the compared responses are to stimuli
from E. coli
filtrate alone and from E. coli filtrate to which has been added polymyxin B.
Fig. 35 illustrates the gene expression responses induced by S. aureus at 2,
6, and 24
hours after administration.
Figs. 36 through 4lcompare the gene expression induced by E. coli and S.
aureus under
various concentrations and times.
Fig. 42 illustrates application of a statistical T-test to identify potential
members of a
signature gene expression panel that is capable of distinguishing between
normal subjects and
subjects suffering from unstable rheumatoid arthritis.
Fig. 43 illustrates, for a panel of 17 genes, the expression levels for 8
patients presumed
to have bacteremia.
Fig. 44 illustrates application of a statistical T-test to identify potential
members of a
signature gene expression panel that is capable of distinguishing between
normal subjects and
subjects suffering from bacterexnia
Fig. 45 illustrates application of an algorithm (shown in the figure),
providing an index
pertinent to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as applied respectively to normal
subjects, RA patients,
and bacteremia patients.
Fig. 46 illustrates application of an algorithm (shown in the figure),
providing an index
pertinent to bacteremia as applied respectively to normal subjects, rheumatoid
arthritis patients,
and bacteremia patients.
Detailed Description of Suecific Embodiments
Defiuitiohs
The following terms shall have the meanings indicated unless the context
otherwise
requires:
"AlgoYitlana" is a set of rules for describing a biological condition. The
rule set may be
defined exclusively algebraically but may also include alternative or multiple
decision points
requiring domain-specific knowledge, expert interpretation or other clinical
indicators.
An "agent" is a "corrzposition" or a "stimulus", as those terms are defined
herein, or a
combination of a compositiofz and a stimulus.

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
"Ampli~catioyi" in the context of a quantitative RT-PCR assay is a function of
the number
of DNA replications that are tracked to provide a quantitative determination
of its concentration.
"Amplification" here refers to a degree of sensitivity and specificity of a
quantitative assay
technique. Accordingly, amplification provides a measurement of concentrations
of constituents
that is evaluated under conditions wherein the efficiency of amplification and
therefore the
degree of sensitivity and reproducibility for measuring all constituents is
substantially similar.
A "baseline profile data set" is a set of values associated with constituents
of a Gene
ExpYessio~2 Pa.~el resulting from evaluation of a biological sample (or
population or set of
samples) under a desired biological condition that is used for mathematically
normative
purposes. The desired biological condition may be, for example, the condition
of a subject (or
population or set of subjects) before exposure to an agent or in the presence
of an untreated
disease or in the absence of a disease. Alternatively, or in addition, the
desired biological
condition may be health of a subject or a population or set of subjects.
Alternatively, or in
addition, the desired biological condition may be that associated with a
population or set of
subjects selected on the basis of at least one of age group, gender,
ethnicity, geographic location,
nutritional history, medical condition, clinical indicator, medication,
physical activity, body
mass, and
environmental exposure.
A "set" or "population" of samples or subjects refers to a defined or selected
group of
samples or subjects wherein there is an underlying commonality or relationship
between the
members included in the set or population of samples or subjects.
A "population of cells" refers to any group of cells wherein there is an
underlying
commonality or relationship between the members in the population of cells,
including a group
of cells taken from an organism or from a culture of cells or from a biopsy,
for example,
A "biological coriditio~" of a subject is the condition of the subject in a
pertinent realm
that is under observation, and such realm may include any aspect of the
subject capable of being
monitored for change in condition, such as health, disease including cancer;
trauma; aging;
infection; tissue degeneration; developmental steps; physical fitness;
obesity, and mood. As can
be seen, a condition in this context may be chronic or acute or simply
transient. Moreover, a
targeted biological condition may be manifest throughout the organism or
population of cells or
may be restricted to a specific organ (such as skin, heart, eye or blood), but
in either case, the
21

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
condition may be monitored directly by a sample of the affected population of
cells or indirectly
by a sample derived elsewhere from the subject. The term "biological
condition" includes a
"physiological condition".
"Body fluid" of a subject includes blood, urine, spinal fluid, lymph, mucosal
secretions,
prostatic fluid, semen, haemolymph or any other body fluid known in the art
for a subject.
"Calibrated profile data set" is a function of a member of a first profile
data set and a
corresponding member of a baseline profile data set for a given constituent in
a panel.
A "clir2ical indicator" is any physiological datum used alone or in
conjunction with other
data in evaluating the physiological covdit~ioya of a collection of cells or
of an organism. This
teen includes pre-clinical indicators.
A "composition" includes a chemical compound, a nutriceutical, a
pharmaceutical, a
homeopathic formulation, an allopathic formulation, a naturopathic
formulation, a combination
of compounds, a toxin, a food, a food supplement, a mineral, and a complex
mixture of
substances, in any physical state or in a combination of physical states.
To "derive" a profile data set from a sample includes determining a set of
values
associated with constituents of a Gene Expf-ession Panel either (i) by direct
measurement of such
constituents in a biological sarraple or (ii) by measurement of such
constituents in a second
biological sample that has been exposed to the original sample or to matter
derived from the
original sample.
"Distinct RNA or protein constituent" in a panel of constituents is a distinct
expressed
product of a gene, whether RNA or protein. An "expression" product of a gene
includes the gene
product whether RNA or protein resulting from translation of the messenger
RNA.
A "Gene Expression Panel" is an experimentally verified set of constituents,
each
constituent being a distinct expressed product of a gene, whether RNA or
protein, wherein
constituents of the set are selected so that their measurement provides a
measurement of a
targeted biological condition.
A "Gene Expression Profile" is a set of values associated with constituents of
a Gene
Expression Panel resulting from evaluation of a biological sample (or
population or set of
samples).
22

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
A "Gene Expression Profile Infla»amatory Index" is the value of an index
function that
provides a mapping from an instance of a Gene Expressiofa Profile into a
single-valued measure
of inflammatory condition.
The "health" of a subject includes mental, emotional, physical, spiritual,
allopathic,
naturopathic and homeopathic condition of the subject.
"Index" is an arithmetically or mathematically derived numerical
characteristic developed
for aid in simplifying or disclosing or informing the analysis of more complex
quantitative
information. A disease or population index may be determined by the
application of a specific
algorithm to a plurality of subjects or samples with a common biological
condition.
"Inflammatioyi" is used herein in the general medical sense of the word and
may be an
acute or chronic; simple or suppurative; localized or disseminated; cellular
and tissue response,
initiated or sustained by any number of chemical, physical or biological
agents or combination of
agents.
"Inflammatory state" is used to indicate the relative biological condition-of
a subject
resulting from inflammation, or characterizing the degree of inflammation
A "large number" of data sets based on a common panel of genes is a number of
data sets
sufficiently large to permit a statistically significant conclusion to be
drawn with respect to an
instance of a data set based on the same panel.
A "normative" condition of a subject to whom a composition is to be
administered means
the condition of a subject before administration, even if the subject happens
to be suffering from
a disease.
A "panel" of genes is a set of genes including at least two constituents.
A "sample" from a subject may include a single cell or multiple cells or
fragments of
cells or an aliquot of body fluid, taken from the subject, by means including
venipuncture,
excretion, ejaculation, massage, biopsy, needle aspirate, lavage sample,
scraping, surgical
incision or intervention or other means known in the art.
A "Sigf~ature Profile" is an experimentally verified subset of a Gene
Expression Profile
selected to discriminate a biological condition, agent or physiological
mechanism of action.
A "Signature Parcel" is a subset of a Gefie Expression Panel, the constituents
of which
are selected to permit discrimination of a biological condition, agent or
physiological mechanism
of action.
23

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
A "subject" is a cell, tissue, or organism, human or non-human, whether in
vivo; ex vivo
or in vitro, under observation. When we refer to evaluating the biological
condition of a subject
based on a sample from the subject, we include using blood or other tissue
sample from a human
subject to evaluate the human subject's condition; but we also include, for
example, using a
blood sample itself as the subject to evaluate, for example, the effect of
therapy or an agent upon
the sample.
A "stiyn.ulus" includes (i) a monitored physical interaction with a subject,
for example
ultraviolet A or B, or light therapy for seasonal affective disorder, or
treatment of psoriasis with
psoralen or treatment of melanoma with embedded radioactive seeds, other
radiation exposure,
and (ii) any monitored physical, mental, emotional, or spiritual activity or
inactivity of a subject.
"Therapy" includes all interventions whether biological, chemical, physical,
metaphysical, or combination of the foregoing, intended to sustain or alter
the monitored
biological condition of a subject.
The PCT patent application publication number WO 01!25473, published April 12,
2001,
entitled "Systems and Methods for Characterizing a Biological Condition or
Agent Using
Calibrated Gene Expression Profiles," filed for an invention by inventors
herein, and which is
herein incorporated by reference, discloses the use of Gene Expression Panels
for the evaluation
of (i) biological condition (including with respect to health and disease) and
(ii) the effect of one
or more agents on biological condition (including with respect to health,
toxicity, therapeutic
treatment and drug interaction).
In particular, Gene Expression Panels may be used for measurement of
therapeutic
efficacy of natural or synthetic compositions or stimuli that may be
formulated
individually or in combinations or mixtures for a range of targeted biological
conditions; prediction of toxicological effects and dose effectiveness of a
composition or
mixture of compositions for an individual or for a population or set of
individuals or for a
population of cells; determination of how two or more different agents
administered in a single
treatment might interact so as to detect any of synergistic, additive,
negative, neutral or toxic
activity; performing pre-clinical and clinical trials by providing new
criteria for pre-selecting
subjects according to informative profile data sets for revealing disease
status; and conducting
preliminary dosage studies for these patients prior to conducting phase 1 or 2
trials. These Gene
24

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Expression Panels may be employed with respect to samples derived from
subjects in order to .
evaluate their biological condition.
A Gene Expression Panel is selected in a manner so that quantitative
measurement of
RNA or protein constituents in the Panel constitutes a measurement of a
biological.condition of a
subject. In one kind of arrangement, a calibrated profile data set is
employed. Each member of
the calibrated profile data set is a function of (i) a measure of a distinct
constituent of a Gene
Expression Panel and (ii) a baseline quantity.
We have found that valuable and unexpected results may be achieved when the
quantitative measurement of constituents is performed under repeatable
conditions (within a
degree of repeatability of measurement of better than twenty percent, and
preferably five percent
or better, and more preferably three percent or better). Fox the purposes of
this description and
the following claims, we regard a degree of repeatability of measurement of
better than twenty
percent as providing measurement conditions that are "substantially
repeatable". In particular, it
is desirable that, each time a measurement is obtained corresponding to the
level of expression of
a constituent in a particular sample, substantially the same measurement
should result fox the
substantially the same level of expression. In this manner, expression levels
for a constituent in a
Gene Expression Panel may be meaningfully compared from sample to sample. Even
if the
expression level measurements for a particular constituent are inaccurate (for
example, say, 30%
too low), the criterion of repeatability means that all measurements for this
constituent, if
skewed, will nevertheless be skewed systematically, and therefore measurements
of expression
level of the constituent may be compared meaningfully. In this fashion
valuable information may
be obtained and compared concerning expression of the constituent under varied
circumstances.
In addition to the criterion of repeatability, it is desirable that a second
criterion also be
satisfied, namely that quantitative measurement of constituents is performed
under conditions
wherein efficiencies of amplification for all constituents are substantially
similar (Within one to
two percent and typically one percent or less). When both of these criteria
are satisfied, then
measurement of the expression level of one constituent may be meaningfully
compared with
measurement of the expression level of another constituent in a given sample
and from sample to
sample..
Present embodiments relate to the use of an index or algorithm resulting from
quantitative measurement of constituents, and optionally in addition, derived
from either expert

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
analysis or computational biology (a) in the analysis of complex data sets;
(b) to control or
normalize the influence of uninformative or otherwise minor variances in gene
expression values
between samples or subjects; (c) to simplify the characterization of a complex
data set for
comparison to other complex data sets, databases or indices or algorithms
derived from complex
data sets; (d) to monitor a biological condition of a subject; (e) for
measurement of therapeutic
efficacy of natural or synthetic compositions or stimuli that may be
formulated individually or in
combinations or mixtures for a range of targeted biological conditions; (f)
for predictions of
toxicological effects and dose effectiveness of a composition or mixture of
compositions for an
individual or for a population or set of individuals or for a population of
cells; (g) for
determination of how two or more different agents administered in a single
treatment might
interact so as to detect any of synergistic, additive, negative, neutral of
toxic activity (h) for
performing pre-clinical and clinical trials by providing new criteria for pre-
selecting subjects
according to informative profile data sets for revealing disease status and
conducting preliminary
dosage studies for these patients prior to conducting phase 1 or 2 trials.
Gene expression profiling and the use of index characterization for a
particular condition
or agent or both may be used to reduce the cost of phase 3 clinical trials and
may be used beyond
phase 3 trials; labeling for approved drugs; selection of suitable medication
in a class of
medications for a particular patient that is directed to their unique
physiology; diagnosing or
determining a prognosis of a medical condition or an infection which may
precede onset of
symptoms or alternatively diagnosing adverse side effects associated with
administration of a
therapeutic agent; managing the health care of a patient; and quality control
for different batches
of an agent or a mixture of agents.
The subject
The methods disclosed here may be applied to cells of humans, mammals or other
organisms without the need for undue experimentation by one of ordinary skill
in the art because
all cells transcribe RNA and it is known in the art how to extract RNA from
all types of cells.
Selectin~Lconstituents of a Gene Expression Panel
The general approach to selecting constituents of a Gene Expression Panel has
been
described in PCT application publication number WO Olf 25473. We have designed
and
experimentally verified a wide range of Gene Expression Panels, each panel
providing a
quantitative measure, of biological condition, that is derived from a sample
of blood or other
26

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
tissue. For each panel, experiments have verified that a Gene Expression
Profile using the
panel's constituents is informative of a biological condition. (We show
elsewhere that in being
informative of biological condition, the Gene Expression Profile can be used
to used, among
other things, to measure the effectiveness of therapy, as well as to provide a
target for therapeutic
intervention.) Examples of Gene Expression Panels, along with a brief
description of each panel
constituent, are provided in tables attached hereto as follows:
Table 1. Inflammation Gene Expression Panel
Table 2. Diabetes Gene Expression Panel
Table 3. Prostate Gene Expression Panel
Table 4. Skin Response Gene Expression Panel
Table 5. Liver Metabolism and Disease Gene Expression Panel
Table 6. Endothelial Gene Expression Panel
Table 7. Cell Health and Apoptosis Gene Expression Panel
Table 8. Cytokine Gene Expression Panel
Table 9. TNF/IL1 Tnhibition Gene Expression Panel
Table 10. Chemokine Gene Expression Panel
Table 11. Breast Cancer Gene Expression Panel
Table 12. Infectious Disease Gene Expression Panel
Other panels may be constructed and experimentally verified by one of ordinary
skill in
the art in accordance with the principles articulated in the present
application.
DesigLn of assays
We commonly run a sample through a panel in quadruplicate; that is, a sample
is divided
into aliquots and for each aliquot we measure concentrations of each
constituent in a Gene
Expression Panel. Over a total of 900 constituent assays, with each assay
conducted in
quadruplicate, we found an average coefficient of variation, (standard
deviation/average)* 100, of
less than 2 percent, typically less than 1 percent, among results for each
assay. This figure is a
measure of what we call "intra-assay variability". We have also conducted
assays on different
occasions using the same sample material. With 72 assays, resulting from
concentration
measurements of constituents in a panel of 24 members, and such concentration
measurements
determined on three different occasions over time, we found an average
coefficient of variation
27

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
of less than 5 percent, typically less than 2 percent. We regard this as a
measure of what we call
"inter-assay variability".
We have found it valuable in using the quadruplicate test results to identify
and eliminate
data points that are statistical "outliers"; such data points are these that
differ by a percentage
greater, for example, than 3% of the average of all four values and that do
not result from any
systematic skew that is greater, for example, than 1 %. Moreover, if more than
one data point in a
set of four is excluded by this procedure, then all data for the relevant
constituent is discarded.
Measurement of Gene Expression for a constituent in the Panel
For measuring the amount of a particular RNA in a sample, we have used methods
known to one of ordinary skill in the art to extract and quantify transcribed
RNA from a sample
with respect to a constituent of a Gene Expression Panel. (See detailed
protocols below. Also see
PCT application publication number WO 98/24935 herein incorporated by
reference for RNA
analysis protocols). Briefly, RNA is extracted from a sample such as a tissue,
body fluid, or
culture medium in which a population of cells of a subject might be growing.
For example, cells
may be lysed and RNA eluted in a suitable solution in which to conduct a DNAse
reaction. First
strand synthesis may be performed using a reverse transcriptase. Gene
amplification, more
specifically quantitative PCR assays, can then conducted and the gene of
interest size calibrated
against a marker such as 18S rRNA (Hirayama et al., Blood 92, 1998: 46-52).
Samples are
measured in multiple duplicates, for example, 4 replicates. Relative
quantitation of the mRNA is
determined by the difference in threshhold cycles between the internal control
and the gene of
interest. In an embodiment of the invention, quantitative PCR is performed
using amplification,
reporting agents and instruments such as those supplied commercially by
Applied Biosystems
(Foster City, CA). Given a defined efficiency of amplification of target
transcripts, the point
(e.g., cycle number) that signal from amplified target template is detectable
may be directly
related to the amount of specific message transcript in the measured sample.
Similarly, other
quantifiable signals such as fluorescence, enzyme activity, disintegrations
per minute,
absorbance, etc., when correlated to a known concentration of target templates
(e.g., a reference
standard curve) or normalized to a standard with limited variability can be
used to quantify the
number of target templates in an unknown sample.
Although not limited to amplification methods, quantitative gene expression
techniques
may utilize amplification of the target transcript. Alternatively or in
combination with
28

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
amplification of the target transcript, amplification of the reporter signal
may also be used.
Amplification of the taxget template may be accomplished by isothermic gene
amplification
strategies, or by gene amplification by thermal cycling such as PCR.
It is desirable to obtain a definable and reproducible correlation between the
amplified
target or reporter and the concentration of starting templates. We have
discovered that this
objective can be achieved by careful attention to, for example, consistent
primer-template ratios
and a strict adherence to a narrow permissible level of experimental
amplification efficiencies
(for example 99.0 to 100% relative efficiency, typically 99.8 to 100% relative
efficiency). For
example, in determining gene expression levels with regard to a single Gene
Expression Profile,
it is necessary that all constituents of the panels maintain a similar and
limited range of primer
template ratios (for example, within a 10-fold range) and amplification
efficiencies (within, for
example, less than 1 %) to permit accurate and precise relative measurements
for each
constituent. We regard amplification efficiencies as being "substantially
similar", for the
purposes of this description and the following claims, if they differ by na
more than
approximately 10%. Preferably they should differ by less than approximately 2%
and more
preferably by less than approximately 1 %. These constraints should be
observed over the entire
range of concentration levels to be measured associated with the relevant
biological condition.
While it is thus necessary for various embodiments herein to satisfy criteria
that measurements
are achieved under measurement conditions that are substantially repeatable
and wherein
specificity and efficiencies of amplification for all constituents are
substantially similar,
nevertheless, it is within the scope of the present invention as claimed
herein to achieve such
measurement conditions by adjusting assay results that do not satisfy these
criteria directly, in
such a manner as to compensate for errors, so that the criteria are satisfied
after suitable
adjustment of assay results.
In practice, we run tests to assure that these conditions are satisfied. For
example, we
typically design and manufacture a number of primer-probe sets, and determine
experimentally
which set gives the best performance. Even though primer-probe design and
manufacture can be
enhanced using computer techniques known in the art, and notwithstanding
common practice, we
still find that experimental validation is useful. Moreover, in the course of
experimental
validation, we associate with the selected primer-probe combination a set of
features:
29

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
The reverse primer should be complementary to the coding DNA strand. In one
embodiment, the primer should be located across an intron-exon junction, with
not more than
three bases of the three-prime end of the reverse primer complementary to the
proximal exon. (If
more than three bases are complementary, then it would tend to competitively
amplify genomic
DNA.)
In an embodiment of the invention, the primer probe should amplify cDNA of
less than
110 bases in length and should not amplify genomic DNA or transcripts or cDNA
from related
but biologically irrelevant loci.
A suitable target of the selected primer probe is first strand cDNA, which may
be
prepared, in one embodiment, is described as follows:
(a) Use of whole blood for ex vivo assessment of a biological condition
affected by an
agent.
Human blood is obtained by venipuncture and prepared for assay by separating
samples
for baseline, no stimulus, and stimulus with sufficient volume for at least
three time points.
Typical stimuli include lipopolysaccharide (LPS), phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and
heat-killed
staphylococci (HKS) or carrageean and may be used individually (typically) or
in combination.
The aliquots of heparinized, whole blood are mixed without stimulus and held
at 37°C in an
atmosphere of 5% C02 for 30 minutes. Stimulus is added at varying
concentrations, mixed and
held loosely capped at 37°C for 30 min. Additional test compounds may
be added at this point
and held for varying times depending on the expected pharmacokinetics of the
test compound. At
defined times, cells are collected by centrifugation, the plasma removed and
RNA extracted by
various standard means.
Nucleic acids, RNA and or DNA are purified from cells, tissues or fluids of
the test
population of cells or indicator cell lines. RNA is preferentially obtained
from the nucleic acid
mix using a variety of standard procedures (or RNA Isolation Strategies, pp.
55-104, in RNA
Methodologies A laborator~~uide for isolation and characterization, 2nd
edition, 1998, Robert
E. Farrell, Jr., Ed., Academic Press), in the present using a filter-based RNA
isolation system
from Ambion (RNAqueous TM, Phenol-free Total RNA Isolation Kit, Catalog #1912,
version
9908; Austin, Texas).
In accordance with one procedure, the whole blood assay for Gene Expression
Profiles
determination was carried out as follows: Human whole blood was drawn into 10
mL Vacutainer

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
tubes with Sodium Heparin. Blood samples were mixed by gently inverting tubes
4-5 times. The
blood was used within 10-15 minutes of draw. In the experiments, blood was
diluted 2-fold, i.e.
per sample per time point, 0.6 mL whole blood + 0.6 mL stimulus. The assay
medium was
prepared and the stimulus added as appropriate. ,
A quantity (0.6 mL) of whole blood was then added into each 12 x 75 mm
polypropylene
tube. 0.6 mL of 2X LPS (from E. coli serotye 0127:B8, Sigma#L3880 or serotype
055, Sigma
#I~005, lOnglml, subject to change in different lots) into LPS tubes was
added. Next, 0.6 mL
assay medium was added to the "control" tubes with duplicate tubes for each
condition. The caps
were closed tightly. The tubes were inverted 2-3 times to mix samples. Caps
were loosened to
first stop and the tubes incubated @ 37°C, 5% C02 for 6 hours. At 6
hours, samples were gently
mixed to resuspend blood cells, and 1 mL was removed from each tube (using a
micropipettor
with barrier tip), and transfered to a 2 mL "dolphin" microfuge tube (Costar
#3213).
The samples were then centrifuged for 5 min at 500 x g, ambient temperature
(IEC
centrifuge or equivalent, in microfuge tube adapters in swinging bucket), and
as much serum.
from each tube was removed as possible and discarded. Cell pellets were placed
on ice; and
RNA extracted as soon as possible using an Ambion RNAqueous kit.
(b) Amplification strategies.
Specific RNAs are amplified using message specific primers or random primers.
The
specific primers are synthesized from data obtained from public databases
(e.g., Unigene,
National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine,
Bethesda, MD),
including information from genomic and cDNA libraries obtained from humans and
other
animals. Primers are chosen to preferentially amplify from specific RNAs
obtained from the test
or indicator samples, see, for example, RT PCR, Chapter 15 in RNA
Methodologies, A
laboratory~uide for isolation and characterization, 2nd edition, 1998,Robert
E. Farrell, Jr., Ed.,
Academic Press; or Chapter 22 pp.143-151, RNA isolation and characterization
protocols,
Methods in molecular biology, Volume 86, 1998, R. Rapley and D. L. Manning
Eds., Human
Press, or 14 in Statistical refinement of primer design parameters, Chapter 5,
pp.55-72, PCR
applications: protocols for functional genomics, M.A.Innis, D.H. Gelfand and
J.J. Sninsky, Eds.,
1999, Academic Press). Amplifications are carried out in either isothermic
conditions or using a
thermal cycler (for example, a ABI 9600 or 9700 or 7700 obtained from Applied
Biosystems,
Foster City, CA; see Nucleic acid detection methods, pp. 1-24, in Molecular
methods for virus
31

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
detection, D.L.Wiedbrauk and D.H., Farkas, Eds., 1995, Academic Press).
Amplified nucleic
TM
acids are detected using fluorescent-tagged detection primers (see, for
example, Taqman PCR
Reagent I~it, Protocol, part number 402823 revision A, 1996, Applied
Biosystems, Foster City
CA.) that are identified and synthesized from publicly known databases as
described for the .
amplification primers. In the present case, amplified DNA is detected and
quantified using the
ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detection System obtained from Applied Biosystems
(Foster City,
CA). Amounts of specific RNAs contained in the test sample or obtained from
the indicator cell
lines can be related to the relative quantity of fluorescence observed (see
for example, Advances.
in quantitative PCR technology: 5' nuclease assays, Y.S. Lie and C.J.
Petropolus, Current
Opinion in Biotechnology, 1998, 9:43-48, or Rapid thermal cycling and PCR
kinetics, pp. 211-
229, chapter 14 in PCR applications: protocols for functional genomics, M.A.
Innis, D.H.
Gelfand and J.J. Sninsky, Eds., 1999, Academic Press).
As a particular implementation of the approach described here, we describe in
detail a .
procedure for synthesis of first strand cDNA for use in PCR. This procedure
can be used for both
whole blood RNA and RNA extracted from cultured cells (i.e. THP-1 cells).
Materials
1. Applied Biosystems TAQMAN Reverse Transcription Reagents Kit (P/N 808-
0234). Kit Components: lOX TaqMan RT Buffer, 25 mM Magnesium chloride,
deoxyNTPs
mixture, Random Hexamers, RNase Inhibitor, MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase
(50 U/mL) (2)
RNase / DNase free water (DEPC Treated Water from Ambion (P/N 9915G), or
equivalent)
Methods
Place RNase Inhibitor and MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase on ice
immediately.
All other reagents can be thawed at room temperature and then placed on ice.
2. Remove RNA samples from -80°C freezer and thaw at room temperature
and
then place immediately on ice.
3. Prepare the following cocktail of Reverse Transcriptase Reagents for each
100
mL RT reaction (for multiple samples, prepare extra cocktail to allow fox
pipetting error):
1 reaction 11~, e.g. 10 samples
(mL) (mL)
10~ RT Buffer10.0 110.0
25 mM MgCl2 22.0 242.0
dNTPs 20.0 220.0
32

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Random Hexamers 5.0 55.0
RNAse Inhibitor 2.0 22.0
Reverse Transcriptase 2.5 27.5
Water 18.5 203.5
Total: 80.0 880.0 (80 mL per sample)
4. Bring each RNA sample to a total volume of 20 mL in a 1.5 mL
microcentrifuge
tube (for example, for THP-1 RNA, remove 10 mL RNA and dilute to 20 mL with
RNase !
DNase free water, for whole blood RNA use 20 mL total RNA) and add 80 mL RT
reaction mix
from step 5,2,3. Mix by pipetting up and down.
5. Incubate sample at room temperature for 10 minutes.
6. Incubate sample at 37°C for 1 hour.
7. Incubate sample at 90°C for 10 minutes.
8. Quick spin samples in microcentrifuge.
9. Place sample on ice if doing PCR immediately, otherwise store sample at -
20oC
for future use.
10. PCR QC should be run on all RT samples using 18S and b-actin (see SOP 200-
020).
The use of the primer probe with the first strand cDNA as described above to
permit
measurement of constituents of a Gene Expression Panel is as follows:
Set up of a 24-gene Human Gene Expression Panel for Inflammation.
Materials
1. 20X Primer/Probe Mix for each gene of interest.
2. 20X Primer/Probe Mix for 18S endogenous control.
3. 2X Taqman Universal PCR Master Mix.
4. cDNA transcribed from RNA extracted from cells.
5. Applied Biosystems 96-Well Optical Reaction Plates.
6. Applied Biosystems Optical Caps, or optical-clear film.
7. Applied Biosystem Prism 7700 Sequence Detector.
33

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Methods
1. Make stocks of each Primer/Probe mix containing the Primer/Probe for the
gene
of interest, Primer/Probe for 18S endogenous control, and 2X PCR Master Mix as
follows. Make
sufficient excess to allow for pipetting error e.g. approximately 10% excess.
The following
example illustrates a typical set up for one gene with quadruplicate samples
testing two
conditions (2 plates).
1X(1 well) 9X (2 plates worth)
2X Master Mix 12.50 112.50
20X 18S Primer/Probe Mix 1.25 11.25
20X Gene of interest Primer/Probe Mix 1.25 11.25
Total 15.00 135.00
2. Make stocks of cDNA targets by diluting 95w1 of cDNA into 2000.1 of water.
The amount of cDNA is adjusted to give Ct values between 10 and 18, typically
between 12 and
13.
3. Pipette 15,1 of Primer/Probe mix into the appropriate wells of an Applied
Biosystems 96-Well Optical Reaction Plate.
4. Pipette 10,1 of cDNA stock solution into each well of the Applied
Biosystems 96-
Well Optical Reaction Plate.
5. Seal the plate with Applied Biosystems Optical Caps, or optical-clear film.
6. Analyze the plate on the AB Prism 7700 Sequence Detector.
Methods herein may also be applied using proteins where sensitive quantitative
techniques, such as an Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELTSA) or mass
spectroscopy,
are available and well-known in the art for measuring the amount of a protein
constituent. (see
WO 98124935 herein incorporated by reference).
Baseline profile data sets
The analyses of samples from single individuals and from large groups of
individuals
provide a library of profile data sets relating to a particular panel or
series of panels. These
profile data sets may be stored as records in a library for use as baseline
profile data sets. As the
term "baseline" suggests, the stored baseline profile data sets serve as
comparators for providing
34

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
a calibrated profile data set that is informative about a biological condition
or agent. Baseline
profile data sets may be stored in libraries and classified in a number of
cross-referential ways.
One form of classification may rely on the characteristics of the panels from
which the data sets
are derived. Another form of classification may be by particular biological
condition. The
concept of biological condition encompasses any state in which a cell or
population of cells may
be found at any one time. This state may reflect geography of samples, sex of
subjects or any
other discriminator. Some of the discriminators may overlap. The libraries may
also be accessed
for records associated with a single subject or particular clinical trial. The
classification of
baseline profile data sets may further be annotated with medical information
about a particular
subject, a medical condition, a particular agent etc.
The choice of a baseline profile data set for creating a calibrated profile
data set is related
to the biological condition to be evaluated, monitored, or predicted, as well
as, the intended use
of the calibrated panel, e.g., as to monitor drug development, quality control
ox other uses. It may
be desirable to access baseline profile data sets from the same subject for
whom a first profile
data set is obtained or from different subject at varying times, exposures to
stimuli, drugs or
complex compounds; or may be derived from like or dissimilar populations or
sets of subjects.
The profile data set may arise from the same subject for which the first data
set is
obtained, where the sample is taken at a separate or similar time, a different
or similar site or in a
different or similar biological condition. For example, Fig. 5 provides a
protocol in which the
sample is taken before stimulation or after stimulation. The profile data set
obtained from the
unstimulated sample may serve as a baseline profile data set for the sample
taken after
stimulation. The baseline data set may also be derived from a library
containing profile data sets
of a population or set of subjects having some defining characteristic or
biological condition. The
baseline profile data set may also correspond to some ex vivo or in vitro
properties associated
with an in vitro cell culture. The resultant calibrated profile data sets may
then be stored as a
record in a database or library (Fig. 6) along with or separate from the
baseline profile data base
and optionally the first profile data set although the first profile data set
would normally become
incorporated into a baseline profile data set under suitable classification
criteria. The remarkable
consistency of Gene Expression Profiles associated with a given biological
condition makes it
valuable to store profile data, Which can be used, among other things for
normative reference
purposes. The normative reference can serve to indicate the degree to which a
subject conforms

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
to a given biological condition (healthy or diseased) and, alternatively or in
addition, to provide a
target for clinical intervention.
Selected baseline profile data sets may be also be used as a standard by which
to judge
manufacturing lots in terms of efficacy, toxicity, etc. Where the effect of a
therapeutic agent is
being measured, the baseline data set may correspond to Gene Expression
Profiles taken before
administration of the agent. Where quality control for a newly manufactured
product is being
determined, the baseline data set may correspond with a gold standard for that
product. However,
any suitable normalization techniques may be employed. For example, an average
baseline
profile data set is obtained from authentic matexial of a naturally grown
herbal nutriceutical and
compared over time and over different lots in order to demonstrate
consistency, or lack of
consistency, in lots of compounds prepared for release.
Calibrated data .
Given the repeatability we have achieved in measurement of gene expression,
described
above in connection with "Gene Expression Panels" and "gene amplification", we
conclude that
where differences occur in measurement under such conditions, the differences
are attributable to
differences in biological condition. Thus we have found that calibrated
profile data sets are
highly reproducible in samples taken from the same individual under the same
conditions. We
have similarly found that calibrated profile data sets are reproducible in
samples that are
repeatedly tested. We have also found repeated instances wherein calibrated
profile data sets
obtained when samples from a subject are exposed ex vivo to a compound are
comparable to
calibrated profile data from a sample that has been exposed to a sample iv
vivo. We have also
found, importantly, that an indicator cell line treated with an agent can in
many cases provide
calibrated profile data sets comparable to those obtained from in vivo or ex
vivo populations of
cells. Moreover, we have found that administering a sample from a subject onto
indicator cells
can provide informative calibrated profile data sets with respect to the
biological condition of the
subject including the health, disease states, therapeutic interventions, aging
or exposure to
environmental stimuli or toxins of the subject.
Calculation of calibrated profile data sets and computational aids
The calibrated profile data set may be expressed in a spreadsheet or
represented
graphically for example, in a bar chart or tabular form but may also be
expressed in a three
dimensional representation. The function relating the baseline and profile
data may be a ratio
36

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
expressed as a logarithm. The constituent may be itemized on the x-axis and
the logarithmic
scale may be on the y-axis. Members of a calibrated data set may be expressed
as a positive
value representing a relative enhancement of gene expression or as a negative
value representing
a relative reduction in gene expression with respect to the baseline.
Each member of the calibrated profile data set should be reproducible within a
range with
respect to similar samples taken from the subject under similar conditions.
For example, the
calibrated profile data sets may be reproducible within one order of magnitude
with respect to
similar samples taken from the subject under similar conditions. More
particularly, the members
may be reproducible within 50%, more particularly reproducible within 20%, and
typically
within 10%. In accordance with embodiments of the invention, a pattern of
increasing,
decreasing and no change in relative gene expression from each of a plurality
of gene loci
examined in the Gene Expression Panel may be used to prepare a calibrated
profile set that is
informative with regards to a biological condition, biological efficacy of an
agent treatment
conditions or for comparison to populations or sets of subjects or samples, or
for comparison to
populations of cells. Patterns of this nature may be used to identify likely
candidates for a drug
trial, used alone or in combination with other clinical indicators to be
diagnostic or prognostic
with respect to a biological condition or may be used to guide the development
of a
pharmaceutical or nutriceutical through manufacture, testing and marketing.
The numerical data obtained from quantitative gene expression and numerical
data from
calibrated gene expression relative to a baseline profile data set may be
stored in databases or
digital storage mediums and may retrieved for purposes including managing
patient health care
or for conducting clinical trials or for characterizing a drug. The data may
be transferred in
physical or wireless networks via the World Wide Web, email, or Internet
access site for
example or by hard copy so as to be collected and pooled from distant
geographic sites (Fig. 8).
In an embodiment of the present invention, a descriptive record is stored in a
single
database or multiple databases where the stored data includes the raw gene
expression data (first
profile data set) prior to transformation by use of a baseline profile data
set, as well as a record of
the baseline profile data set used to generate the calibrated profile data set
including for example,
annotations regarding whether the baseline profile data set is derived from a
particular Signature
Panel and any other annotation that facilitates interpretation and use of the
data.
37

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Because the data is in a universal format, data handling may readily be done
with a
computer. The data is organized so as to provide an output optionally
corresponding to a
graphical representation of a calibrated data set.
For example, a distinct sample derived from a subject being at least one of
RNA or
protein may be denoted as PI. The first profile data set derived from sample
PI is denoted M~,
where M~ is a quantitative measure of a distinct RNA or protein constituent of
PI. The record Ri
is a ratio of M and P and may be annotated with additional data on the subject
relating to, for
example, age, diet, ethnicity, gender, geographic location, medical disorder,
mental disorder,
medication, physical activity, body mass and environmental exposure. Moreover,
data handling
may further include accessing data from a second condition database which may
contain
additional medical data not presently held with the calibrated profile data
sets. In this context,
data access may be via a computer network.
The above described data storage on a computer may provide the information in
a form
that can be accessed by a user. Accordingly, the user may load the information
onto a second
access site including downloading the information. However, access may be
restricted to users
having a password or other security device so as to protect the medical
records contained within.
A feature of this embodiment of the invention is the ability of a user to add
new or annotated
records to the data set so the records become part of the biological
information.
The graphical representation of calibrated profile data sets pertaining to a
product such as
a drug provides an opportunity for standardizing a product by means of the
calibrated profile,
more particularly a signature profile. The profile may be used as a feature
with which to
demonstrate relative efficacy, differences in mechanisms of actions, etc.
compared to other drugs
approved for similar or different uses.
The various embodiments of the invention may be also implemented as a computer
program product for use with a computer system. The product may include
program code for
deriving a first profile data set and for producing calibrated profiles. Such
implementation may
include a series of computer instructions fixed either on a tangible medium,
such as a computer
readable medium (for example, a diskette, CD-ROM, ROM, or fixed disk), or
transmittable to a
computer system via a modem or other interface device, such as a
communications adapter
coupled to a network. The network coupling may be for example, over optical or
wired
communications lines or via wireless techniques (for example, microwave,
infrared or other
38

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
transmission techniques) or some combination of these. The series of computer
instuuctions
preferably embodies all or part of the functionality previously described
herein with respect to
the system. Those skilled in the art should appreciate that such computer
instructions can be
written in a number of programming languages for use with many computer
architectures or
operating systems. Furthermore, such instructions may be stored in any memory
device, such as
semiconductor, magnetic, optical or other memory devices, and may be
transmitted using any
communications technology, such as optical, infrared, microwave, or other
transmission
technologies. It is expected that such a computer program product may be
distributed as a
removable medium with accompanying printed or electronic documentation (for
example, shrink
wrapped software), preloaded with a computer system (for example, on system
ROM or fixed
disk), or distributed from a server or electronic bulletin board over a
network (for example, the
Internet or World Wide Web). In addition, a computer system is further
provided including
derivative modules for deriving a first data set and a calibration profile
data set.
The calibration profile data sets in graphical or tabular form, the associated
databases,
and the calculated index or derived algorithm, together with information
extracted from the
panels, the databases, the data sets or the indices or algorithms are
commodities that can be sold
together or separately for a variety of purposes as described in WO 01/25473.
Index construction
In combination, (i) the remarkable consistency of Gene Expression Profiles
with respect
to a biological condition across a population or set of subject or samples, or
across a population
of cells and (ii) the use of procedures that provide substantially
reproducible measurement of
constituents in a Gene Expression Panel giving rise to a Gene Expression
Profile, under
measurement conditions wherein specificity and efficiencies of amplification
for all constituents
of the panel are substantially similar, make possible the use of an index that
characterizes a Gene
Expression Profile, and which therefore provides a measurement of a biological
condition.
An index may be constructed using an index function that maps values in a Gene
Expression Profile into a single value that is pertinent to the biological
condition at hand. The
values in a Gene Expression Profile are the amounts of each constituent of the
Gene Expression
Panel that corresponds to the Gene Expression Profile. These constituent
amounts form a profile
data set, and the index function generates a single value-the index- from the
members of the
profile data set.
39

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
The index function may conveniently be constructed as a linear sum of terms,
each term
being what we call a "contribution function" of a member of the profile data
set. For example,
the contribution function may be a constant times a power of a member of the
profile data set. So
the index function would have the form
I = ~' C~MtP~'~ ,
where I is the index, M; is the value of the member i of the profile data set,
Ct is a constant, and
P(i) is a power to which M; is raised, the sum being formed for all integral
values of i up to the
number of members in the data set. We thus have a linear polynomial
expression.
The values C~ and P(i) may be determined in a number of ways, so that the
index I is
informative of the pertinent biological condition. One way is to apply
statistical techniques, such
as latent class modeling, to the profile data sets to correlate clinical data
or experimentally
derived data, or other data pertinent to the biological condition. In this
connection, for example,
may be employed the software from Statistical Innovations, Belmont,
Massachusetts, called
Latent Gold" . See the web pages at www statisticalinnovations.comh~/, which
are hereby
incorporated herein by reference.
Alternatively, other simpler modeling techniques may be employed in a manner
known in
the art. The index function for inflammation may be constructed, for example,
in a manner that a
greater degree of inflammation (as determined by the a profile data set for
the Inflammation
Gene Expression Profile) correlates with a large value of the index function.
In a simple
embodiment, therefore, each P(i) may be +1 or -1, depending on whether the
constituent
increases or decreases with increasing inflammation. As discussed in further
detail below, we
have constructed a meaningful inflammation index that is proportional to the
expression
1/4{IL1A} + 1/4{IL1B} + 1/4{TNF} + 1/4{INFG} -1/{IL10},
where the braces around a constituent designate measurement of such
constituent and the
constituents are a subset of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table
1.
Just as a baseline profile data set, discussed above, can be used to provide
an appropriate
normative reference, and can even be used to create a Calibrated profile data
set, as discussed
above, based on the normative reference, an index that characterizes a Gene
Expression Profile
can also be provided with a normative value of the index function used to
create the index. This
normative value can be determined with respect to a relevant population or set
of subjects or

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
samples or to a relevant population of cells, so that the index may be
interpreted in relation to the
normative value. The relevant population or set of subjects or samples, or
relevant population of
cells may have in common a property that is at least one of age range, gender,
ethnicity,
geographic location, nutritional history, medical condition, clinical
indicator, medication,
physical activity, body mass, and environmental exposure.
As an example, the index can be constructed, in relation to a normative Gene
Expression
Profile for a population or set of healthy subjects, in such a way that a
reading of approximately
1 characterizes normative Gene Expression Profiles of healthy subjects. Let us
further assume
that the biological condition that is the subject of the index is
inflammation; a reading of 1 in this
example thus corresponds to a Gene Expression Profile that matches the norm
for healthy .
subjects. A substantially higher reading then may identify a subject
experiencing an
inflammatory condition. The use of 1 as identifying a normative value,
however, is only one
possible choice; another logical choice is to use 0 as identifying the
normative value. With this
choice, deviations in the index from zero can be indicated in standard
deviation units (so that
values lying between -1 and +1 encompass 90% of a normally distributed
reference population or
set of subjects. Since we have found that Gene Expression Profile values (and
accordingly
constructed indices based on them) tend to be normally distributed, the 0-
centered index
constructed in this manner is highly informative. It therefore facilitates use
of the index in
diagnosis of disease and setting objectives for treatment. The choice of 0 for
the normative value,
and the use of standard deviation units, for example, are illustrated in Fig.
17B, discussed below.
EXAMPLES
Example 1: Acute Inflammatory Index to Assist in Analysis of Large, Complex
Data
Sets. In one embodiment of the invention the index value or algorithm can be
used to reduce a
complex data set to a single index value that is informative with respect to
the inflammatory state
of a subject. This is illustrated in Figs. lA and 1B.
Fig. lA is entitled Source Precision Inflammation Profile Tracking of A
Subject Results
in a Large, Complex Data Set. The figure shows the results of assaying 24
genes from the
Inflammation Gene Expression Panel (shown in Table 1) on eight separate days
during the
course of optic neuritis in a single male subject.
41

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 1B shows use of an Acute Inflammation Index. The data displayed in Fig.
lA above
is shown in this figure after calculation using an index function proportional
to the following
mathematical expression: (1/4{ILlA} + 1/4{IL1B} + 1/4{TNF} + 1/4{INFG} -
1/{IL10}).
Example 2: Use of acute inflammation index or algorithm to monitor a
biological
condition of a sample or a subject. The inflammatory state of a subject
reveals information about
the past progress of the biological condition, future progress, response to
treatment, etc. The
Acute Inflammation Index may be used to reveal such information about the
biological condition
of a subject. This is illustrated in Fig. 2.
The results of the assay fox inflammatory gene expression for each day (shown
for 24
genes in each row of Fig. lA) is displayed as an individual histogram after
calculation. The index
reveals clear trends in inflammatory status that may correlated with
therapeutic intervention (Fig.
2).
Fig. 2 is a graphical illustration of the acute inflammation index calculated
at 9 different,
significant clinical milestones from blood obtained from a single patient
treated medically with
for optic neuritis. Changes in the index values for the Acute Inflammation
Index correlate
strongly with the expected effects of therapeutic intervention. Four clinical
milestones have been
identified on top of the Acute Inflammation Index in this figure including (1)
prior to treatment
with steroids, (2) treatment with IV solumedrol at 1 gram per day, (3) post-
treatment with oral
prednisone at 60 mg per day tapered to 10 mg per day and (4) post treatment.
The data set is the
same as for Fig. 1. The index is proportional to 1/4{IL1A} + 1/4{IL1B} +
1/4{TNF} +
1/4{INFG} - 1/{TL10}. As expected, the acute inflammation index falls rapidly
with treatment
with IV steroid, goes up during less efficacious treatment with oral
prednisone and returns to the
pre-treatment level after the steroids have been discontinued and metabolized
completely.
Example 3: Use of the acute inflammatory index to set dose, including
concentrations and
timing, for compounds in development or for compounds to be tested in human
and non-human
subjects as shown in Fig. 3. The acute inflammation index may be used as a
common reference
value for therapeutic compounds or interventions without common mechanisms of
action. The
compound that induces a gene response to a compound as indicated by the index,
but fails to
ameliorate a known biological conditions may be compared to a different
compounds with
varying effectiveness in treating the biological condition.
42

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 3 shows the effects of single dose treatment with 800 mg of ibuprofen in
a single
donor as characterized by the Acute Inflammation Index. 800 mg of over-the-
counter ibuprofen
were taken by a single subject at Time=0 and Time=48 hr. Gene expression
values for the
indicated five inflammation-related gene loci were determined as described
below at times=2, 4,
6, 48, 50, 56 and 96 hours. As expected the acute inflammation index falls
immediately after
taking the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ibuprofen and returns to baseline
after 48 hours. A
second dose at T=48 follows the same kinetics at the first dose and returns to
baseline at the end
of the experiment at T=96.
Example 4: Use of the acute inflammation index to characterize efficacy,
safety, and
mode of physiolo~ical action for an went, which may be in development and/or
may be complex
in nature. This is illustrated in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4 shows that the calculated acute inflammation index displayed
graphically for five
different conditions including (A) untreated whole blood; (B) whole blood
treated in vitro with
DMSO, an non-active carrier compound; (C) otherwise unstimulated whole blood
treated in vitro
with dexamethasone (0.08 uglml); (D) whole blood stimulated in vitro with
lipopolysaccharide, a
known pro-inflammatory compound, (LPS, 1 ng/ml) and (E) whole blood treated in
vitro with
LPS (1 ng/ml) and dexamethasone (0.08 ug/ml). Dexamethasone is used as a
prescription
compound that is commonly used medically as an anti-inflammatory steroid
compound. The
acute inflammation index is calculated from the experimentally determined gene
expression
levels of inflammation-related genes expressed in human whole blood obtained
from a single
patient. Results of mRNA expression are expressed as Ct's in this example, but
may be
expressed as, e.g., relative fluorescence units, copy number or any other
quantifiable, precise and
calibrated form, for the genes ILlA, IL1B, TNF, IFNG and IL10. From the gene
expression
values, the acute inflammation values were determined algebraically according
in proportion to
the expression 1/4{IL1A} + 1/4{IL1B} + 1/4{TNF} + 1/4{INFG} - 1/{IL10}.
Example 5 ~ Development and use of population normative values for Gene
Expression
Profiles. Figs. 6 and 7 show the arithmetic mean values for gene expression
profiles (using the 48
loci of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1) obtained from whole
blood of two
distinct patient populations (patient sets). These patient sets are both
normal or undiagnosed. The
first patient set, which is identified as Bonfils (the plot points for which
are represented by
diamonds), is composed of 17 subjects accepted as blood donors at the Bonfils
Blood Center in
43

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Denver, Colorado. The second patient set is 9 donors, for which Gene
Expression Profiles were
obtained from assays conducted four times over a four-week period. Subjects in
this second
patient set (plot points for which are represented by squares) were recruited
from employees of
Source Precision Medicine, Inc., the assignee herein. Gene expression averages
for each
population were calculated for each of 48 gene loci of the Gene Expression
Inflammation Panel.
The results for loci 1-24 (sometimes referred to below as the Inflammation 48A
loci) are shown
in Fig. 6 and for loci 25-48 (sometimes referred to below as the Inflammation
48B loci) are
shown in Fig. 7.
The consistency between gene expression levels of the two distinct patient
sets is
dramatic. Both patient sets show gene expressions for each of the 48 loci that
are not
significantly different from each other. This observation suggests that there
is a "normal"
expression pattern for human inflammatory genes, that a Gene Expression
Profile, using the
Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1 (or a subset thereof)
characterizes that
expression pattern, and that a population-normal expression pattern can be
used, for example, to
guide medical intervention for any biological condition that results in a
change from the normal
expression pattern.
In a similar vein, Fig. 8 shows arithmetic mean values for gene expression
profiles (again
using the 48 loci of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1) also
obtained from
whole blood of two distinct patient populations (patient sets). One patient
set, expression values
for which are represented by triangular data points, is 24 normal, undiagnosed
subjects (who
therefore have no known inflammatory disease). The other patient set, the
expression values for
which are represented by diamond-shaped data points, is four patients with
rheumatoid arthritis
and who have failed therapy (who therefore have unstable rheumatoid
arthritis).
As remarkable as the consistency of data from the two distinct normal patient
sets shown
in Figs. 6 and 7 is the systematic divergence of data from the normal and
diseased patient sets
shown in Fig. 8. In 45 of the shown 48 inflammatory gene loci, subjects with
unstable
rheumatoid arthritis showed, on average, increased inflammatory gene
expression (lower cycle
threshold values; Ct), than subjects without disease. The data thus further
demonstrate that is
possible to identify groups with specific biological conditions using gene
expression if the
precision and calibration of the underlying assay are carefully designed and
controlled according
to the teachings herein.
44

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 9, in a manner analogous to Fig. 8, shows the shows arithmetic mean
values for gene
expression profiles using 24 loci of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of
Table 1) also
obtained from whole blood of two distinct patient sets. One patient set,
expression values for
which are represented by diamond-shaped data points, is 17 normal, undiagnosed
subjects (who
therefore have no known inflammatory disease) who are blood donors. The other
patient set, the
expression values for which are represented by square-shaped data points, is
16 subjects, also
normal and undiagnosed, who have been monitored over six months, and the
averages of these
expression values are represented by the square-shaped data points. Thus the
cross-sectional
gene expression-value averages of a first healthy population match closely the
longitudinal gene
expression-value averages of a second healthy population, with approximately
7% or less
variation in measured expression value on a gene-to-gene basis.
Fig. 10 shows the shows gene expression values (using 14 loci of the
Inflammation Gene
Expression Panel of Table 1) obtained from whole blood of 44 normal
undiagnosed blood donors
(data for 10 subjects of which is shown). Again, the gene expression values
for each member of
the population (set) are closely matched to those for the entire set,
represented visually by the
consistent peak heights for each of the gene loci. Other subjects of the set
and other gene loci
than those depicted here display results that are consistent with those shown
here.
In consequence of these principles, and in various embodiments of the present
invention,
population normative values for a Gene Expression Profile can be used in
comparative
assessment of individual subjects as to biological condition, including both
for purposes of health
andlor disease. In one embodiment the normative values for a Gene Expression
Profile may be
used as a baseline in computing a "calibrated profile data set" (as defined at
the beginning of this
section) for a subject that reveals the deviation of such subject's gene
expression from population
normative values. Population normative values for a Gene Expression Profile
can also be used as
baseline values in constructing index functions in accordance with embodiments
of the present
invention. As a result, for example, an index function can be constructed to
reveal not only the
extent of an individual's.inflammation expression generally but also in
relation to normative
values.
Example 6- Consistency of expression values of constituents in Gene Expression
Panels,
over time as reliable indicators of biolo~~ical condition. Fig. 11 shows the
expression levels for
each of four genes (of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1), of
a single subject,

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
assayed monthly over a period of eight months. It can be seen that the
expression levels are
remarkably consistent over time.
Figs. 12 and 13 similarly show in each case the expression levels for each of
48 genes (of
the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1), of distinct single
subjects (selected in each
case on the basis of feeling well and not taking drugs), assayed, in the case
of Fig. 12 weekly
over a period of four weeks, and in the case of Fig. 13 monthly over a period
of six months. In
each case, again the expression levels are remarkably consistent over time,
and also similar
across individuals.
Fig. 14 also shows the effect over time, on inflammatory gene expression in a
single
human subject, of the administration of an anti-inflammatory steroid, as
assayed using the
Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1. In this case, 24 of 48 loci are
displayed. The
subject had a baseline blood sample drawn in a PAX RNA isolation tube and then
took a single
60 mg dose of prednisone, an anti-inflammatory, prescription steroid.
Additional blood samples
were drawn at 2 hr and 24 hr post the single oral dose. Results for gene
expression are displayed
for all three time points, wherein values for the baseline sample are shown as
unity on the x-axis.
As expected, oral treatment with prednisone resulted in the decreased
expression of most of
inflammation-related gene loci, as shown by the 2-hour post-administration bar
graphs.
However, the 24-hour post-administration bar graphs show that, for most of the
gene loci having
reduced gene expression at 2 hours, there were elevated gene expression levels
at 24 hr.
Although the baseline in Fig. 14 is based on the gene expression values before
drug
intervention associated with the single individual tested, we know from the
previous example,
that healthy individuals tend toward population normative values in a Gene
Expression Profile
using the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1 (or a subset of it).
We conclude from
Fig. 14 that in an attempt to return the inflammatory gene expression levels
to those
demonstrated in Figs. 6 and 7 (normal or set levels), interference with the
normal expression
induced a compensatory gene expression response that over-compensated for the
drug-induced
response, perhaps because the prednisone had been significantly metabolized to
inactive forms or
eliminated from the subject.
Fig. 15, in a manner analogous to Fig. 14, shows the effect over time, via
whole blood
samples obtained from a human subject, administered a single dose of
prednisone, on expression
of 5 genes (of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1). The samples
were taken at
46

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
the time of administration (t = 0) of the prednisone, then at two and 24 hours
after such
administration. Each whole blood sample was challenged by the addition of 0.1
ng/ml of
lipopolysaccharide (a Gram-negative endotoxin) and a gene expression profile
of the sample,
post-challenge, was determined. It can seen that the two-hour sample shows
dramatically
reduced gene expression of the 5 loci of the Inflammation Gene Expression
Panel, in relation to
the expression levels at the time of administration (t = 0). At 24 hours post
administration, the
inhibitory effect of the prednisone is no longer apparent, and at 3 of the 5
loci, gene expression is
in fact higher than at t = 0, illustrating quantitatively at the molecular
level the well-known
rebound effect.
Fig. 16 also shows the effect over time, on inflammatory gene expression in a
single
human subject suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, of the administration of a
TNF-inhibiting
compound, but here the expression is shown in comparison to the cognate locus
average
previously determined (in connection with Figs. 6 and 7) for the normal (i.e.,
undiagnosed,
healthy) patient set. As part of a larger international study involving
patients with rheumatoid
arthritis, the subject was followed over a twelve-week period. The subject was
enrolled in the
study because of a failure to respond to conservative drug therapy for
rheumatoid arthritis and a
plan to change therapy and begin immediate treatment with a TNF-inhibiting
compound. Blood
was drawn from the subject prior to initiation of new therapy (visit 1). After
initiation of new
therapy, blood was drawn at 4 weeks post change in therapy (visit 2), 8 weeks
(visit 3), and 12
weeks (visit 4) following the start of new therapy. Blood was collected in PAS
RNA isolation
tubes, held at room temperature for two hours and then frozen at -30°C.
Frozen samples were shipped to the central laboratory at Source Precision
Medicine, the
assignee herein, in Boulder, Colorado for determination of expression levels
of genes in the 48-
gene Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of Table 1. The blood samples were
thawed and RNA
extracted according to the manufacturer's recommended procedure. RNA was
converted to
cDNA and the level of expression of the 48 inflammatory genes was determined.
Expression
results are shown for 11 of the 48 loci in Fig. 16. When the expression
results for the 11 loci are
compared from visit one to a population average of normal blood donors from
the United States,
the subject shows considerable difference. Similarly, gene expression levels
at each of the
subsequent physician visits for each locus are compared to the same normal
average value. Data
from visits 2, 3 and 4 document the effect of the change in therapy. In each
visit following the
47

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
change in the therapy, the level of inflammatory gene expression for 10 of the
11 loci is closer to
the cognate locus average previously determined for the normal (i.e.,
undiagnosed, healthy)
patient set.
Fig. 17A further illustrates the consistency of inflammatory gene expression,
illustrated
here with respect to 7 loci of (of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of
Table 1), in a set of
44 normal, undiagnosed blood donors. For each individual locus is shown the
range of values
lying within ~ 2 standard deviations of the mean expression value, which
corresponds to 95% of
a normally distributed population. Notwithstanding the great width of the
confidence interval
(95%), the measured gene expression value (ACT)-remarkably-still lies within
10% of the
mean, regardless of the expression level involved. As described in further
detail below, for a
given biological condition an index can be constructed to provide a
measurement of the
condition. This is possible as a result of the conjunction of two
circumstances: (i) there is a
remarkable consistency of Gene Expression Profiles with respect to a
biological condition across
a population and (ii) there can be employed procedures that provide
substantially reproducible
measurement of constituents in a Gene Expression Panel giving rise to a Gene
Expression
Profile, under measurement conditions wherein specificity and efficiencies of
amplification for
all constituents of the panel are substantially similar and which therefore
provides a
measurement of a biological condition. Accordingly, a function of the
expression values of
representative constituent loci of Fig. 17A is here used to generate an
inflammation index value,
which is normalized so that a reading of 1 corresponds to constituent
expression values of
healthy subjects, as shown in the right-hand portion of Fig. 17A.
In Fig. 17B, an inflammation index value was determined for each member of a
set of 42
normal undiagnosed blood donors, and the resulting distribution of index
values, shown in the
figure, can be seen to approximate closely a normal distribution,
notwithstanding the relatively
small subject set size. The values of the index are shown relative to a 0-
based median, with
deviations from the median calibrated in standard deviation units. Thus 90% of
the subject set
lies within +1 and -1 of a 0 value. We have constructed various indices, which
exhibit similar
behavior.
Fig. 17C illustrates the use of the same index as Fig. 17B, where the
inflammation
median for a normal population of subjects has been set to zero and both
normal and diseased
subjects are plotted in standard deviation units relative to that median. An
inflammation index
48

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
value was determined for each member of a normal, undiagnosed population of 70
individuals
(black bars). The resulting distribution of index values, shown in Fig. 17C,
can be seen to
approximate closely a normal distribution. Similarly, index values were
calculated for
individuals from two diseased population groups, (1) rheumatoid arthritis
patients treated with
methotrexate (MTX) who are about to change therapy to more efficacious drugs
(e.g., TNF
inhibitors)(hatched bars), and (2) rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with
disease modifying
anti-rheumatoid drugs (DMARDS) other than MTX, who are about to change therapy
to more
efficacious drugs (e.g., MTX). Both populations of subjects present index
values that are skewed
upward (demonstrating increased inflammation) in comparison to the normal
distribution. This
figure thus illustrates the utility of an index to derived from Gene
Expression Profile data to
evaluate disease status and to provide an objective and quantifiable treatment
objective. When
these two populations of subjects were treated appropriately, index values
from both populations
returned to a more normal distribution (data not shown. here).
Fig. 18 plots, in a fashion similar to that of Fig. 17A, Gene Expression
Profiles, for the
same 7 loci as in Fig. 17A, two different 6-subject populations of rheumatoid
arthritis patients.
One population (called "stable" in the figure) is of patients who have
responded well to treatment
and the other population (called "unstable" in the figure) is of patients who
have not responded
well to treatment and whose therapy is scheduled fox change. It can be seen
that the expression
values for the stable patient population, lie within the range of the
95°Io confidence interval,
whereas the expression values for the unstable patient population for 5 of the
7 loci are outside
and above this range. The right-hand portion of the figure shows an average
inflammation index
of 9.3 for the unstable population and an average inflammation index of 1.8
for the stable
population, compared to 1 for a normal undiagnosed population of patients. The
index thus
provides a measure of the extent of the underlying inflammatory condition, in
this case,
rheumatoid arthritis. Hence the index, besides providing a measure of
biological condition, can
be used to measure the effectiveness of therapy as well as to provide a target
for therapeutic
intervention.
Fig. 19 thus illustrates use of the inflammation index for assessment of a
single subject
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, who has not responded well to traditional
therapy with
methotrexate. The inflammation index for this subject is shown on the far
right at start of a new
therapy (a TNF inhibitor), and then, moving leftward, successively, 2 weeks, 6
weeks, and 12
49

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
weeks thereafter. The index can be seen moving towards normal, consistent with
physician
observation of the patient as responding to the new treatment.
Fig. 20 similarly illustrates use of the inflammation index for assessment of
three subjects
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, who have not responded well to
traditional therapy with
methotrexate, at the beginning of new treatment (also with a TNF inhibitor),
and 2 weeks and 6
weeks thereafter. The index in each case can again be seen moving generally
towards normal,
consistent with physician observation of the patients as responding to the new
treatment.
Each of Figs. 21-23 shows the inflammation index for an international group of
subjects,
suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, each of whom has been characterized as
stable (that is, not
anticipated to be subjected to a change in therapy) by the subject's treating
physician. Fig. 21
shows the index for each of 10 patients in the group being treated with
methotrexate, which
known to alleviate symptoms without addressing the underlying disease. Fig. 22
shows the index
for each of 10 patients in the group being treated with Enbrel (an TNF
inhibitor), and Fig. 23
shows the index f~r each 10 patients being treated with Remicade (another TNF
inhibitor). It can
be seen that the inflammation index for each of the patients in Fig. 21 is
elevated compared to
normal, whereas in Fig. 22, the patients being treated with Enbrel as a class
have an
inflammation index that comes much closer to normal (80% in the normal range).
In Fig. 23, it
can be seen that, while all but one of the patients being treated with
Remicade have an
inflammation index at or below normal, two of the patients have an abnormally
low
inflammation index, suggesting an immunosuppressive response to this drug.
(Indeed, studies
have shown that Remicade has been associated with serious infections in some
subjects, and here
the immunosuppressive effect is quantified.) Also in Fig. 23, one subject has
an inflammation
index that is significantly above the normal range. This subject in fact was
also on a regimen of
an anti-inflammation steroid (prednisone) that was being tapered; within
approximately one
week after the inflammation index was sampled, the subject experienced a
significant flare of
clinical symptoms.
Remarkably, these examples show a measurement, derived from the assay of blood
taken
from a subject, pertinent to the subject's arthritic condition. Given that the
measurement pertains
to the extent of inflammation, it can be expected that other inflammation-
based conditions,
including, for example, cardiovascular disease, may be monitored in a similar
fashion.

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 24 illustrates use of the inflammation index for assessment of a single
subject
suffering from inflammatory bowel disease, for whom treatment with Remicade
was initiated in
three doses. The graphs show the inflammation index just prior to first
treatment, and then 24
hours after the first treatment; the index has returned to the normal range.
The index was
elevated just prior to the second dose, but in the normal range prior to the
third dose. Again, the
index, besides providing a measure of biological condition, is here used to
measure the
effectiveness of therapy (Remicade), as well as to provide a target for
therapeutic intervention in
terms of both dose and schedule.
Fig. 25 shows Gene Expression Profiles with respect to 24 loci (of the
Inflammation
Gene Expression Panel of Table 1) for whole blood treated with Ibuprofen in
vitro in relation to
other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The profile for
Ibuprofen is in front. It
can be seen that all of the NSAms, including Ibuprofen share a substantially
similar profile, in
that the patterns of gene expression across the loci are similar.
Notwithstanding these
similarities, each individual drug has its own distinctive signature.
Fig. 26 illustrates how the effects of two competing anti-inflammatory
compounds can be
compared objectively, quantitatively, precisely, and reproducibly. In this
example, expression of
each of a panel of two genes (of the Inflammation Gene Expression Panel of
Table 1) is
measured for vaxying doses (0.08 - 250 ~g/ml) of each drug in vitro in whole
blood. The market
leader drug shows a complex relationship between dose and inflammatory gene
response.
Paradoxically, as the dose is increased, gene expression for both loci
initially drops and then
increases in the case the case of the market leader. For the other compound, a
more consistent
response results, so that as the dose is increased, the gene expression for
both loci decreases
more consistently.
Figs. 27 through 41 illustrate the use of gene expression panels in early
identification and.
monitoring of infectious disease. These figures plot the response, in
expression products of the
genes indicated, in whole blood, to the administration of various infectious
agents or products
associated with infectious agents. In each figure, the gene expression levels
are "calibrated", as
that term is defined herein, in relation to baseline expression levels
determined with respect to
the whole blood prior to administration of the relevant infectious agent. In
this respect the figures
are similar in nature to various figures of our below-referenced patent
application WO 01/25473
(for example, Fig. 15 therein). The concentration change is shown
ratiometrically, and the
51

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
baseline level of 1 for a particular gene locus corresponds to an expression
level for such locus
that is the same, monitored at the relevant time after addition of the
infectious agent or other
stimulus, as the expression level before addition of the stimulus. Ratiometric
changes in
concentration are plotted on a logarithmic scale. Bars below the unity line
represent decreases in
concentration and bars above the unity line represent increases in
concentration, the magnitude
of each bar indicating the magnitude of the ratio of the change. We have shown
in WO 01/25473
and other experiments that, under appropriate conditions, Gene Expression
Profiles derived in
vitro by exposing whole blood to a stimulus can be representative of Gene
Expression Profiles
derived in vivo with exposure to a corresponding stimulus.
Fig. 27 uses a novel bacterial Gene Expression Panel of 24 genes, developed to
discriminate various bacterial conditions in a host biological system. Two
different stimuli are
employed: lipotechoic acid (LTA), a gram positive cell wall constituent, and
lipopolysaccharide
(LPS), a gram negative cell wall constituent. The final concentration
immediately after
administration of the stimulus was 100 nglmL, and the ratiometric changes in
expression, in
relation to pre-administration levels, were monitored for each stimulus 2 and
6 hours after
administration. It can be seen that differential expression can be observed as
early as two hours
after administration, for exaanple, in the IFNA2 locus, as well as others,
permitting
discrimination in response between gram positive and gram negative bacteria.
Fig. 28 shows differential expression for a single locus, IFNG, to LTA derived
from three
distinct sources: S. pyogenes, B. subtilis, and S. aureus. Each stimulus was
administered to
achieve a concentration of 100 nghnL, and the response was monitored at 1, 2,
4, 6, and 24 hours
after administration. The results suggest that Gene Expression Profiles can be
used to distinguish
among different infectious agents, here different species of gram positive
bacteria.
Figs. 29 and 30 show the response of the Inflammation 48A and 48B loci
respectively
(discussed above in connection with Figs. 6 and 7 respectively) in whole blood
to administration
of a stimulus of S. aureus and of a stimulus of E. coli (in the indicated
concentrations, just after
administration, of 107 and 106 CFU/mL respectively), monitored 2 hours after
administration in
relation to the pre-administration baseline. The figures show that many of the
loci respond to the
presence of the bacterial infection within two hours after infection.
Figs. 31 and 32 correspond to Figs. 29 and 30 respectively and are similar to
them, with
the exception that the monitoring here occurs 6 hours after administration.
More of the loci are .
52

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
responsive to the presence of infection. Various loci, such as IL2, show
expression levels that
discriminate between the two infectious agents.
Fig. 33 shows the response of the Inflammation 48A loci to the administration
of a
stimulus of E. coli (again in the concentration just after administration of
106 CFU/mL) and to
the administration of a stimulus of an E. coli filtrate containing E. coli
bacteria by products but
lacking E. coli bacteria. The responses were monitored at 2, 6, and 24 hours
after administration.
It can be seen, for example, that the responses over time of loci IL1B, IL18
and CSF3 to E.coli
and to E.~coli filtrate are different.
Fig. 34 is similar to Fig. 33, but here the compared responses are to stimuli
from E. coli
filtrate alone and from E. coli filtrate to which has been added polymyxin B,
an antibiotic known
to bind to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). An examination of the response of IL1B,
for example,
shows that presence of polymyxin B did not affect the response of the locus to
E. coli filtrate,
thereby indicating that LPS does not appear to be a factor in the response of
IL1B to E. coli
filtrate.
Fig. 35 illustrates the responses of the Inflammation 48A loci over time of
whole blood to
a stimulus of S. aureus (with a concentration just after administration of 107
CFU/mL) monitored
at 2, 6, and 24 hours after administration. It can be seen that response over
time can involve both
direction and magnitude of change in expression. (See for example, IL5 and
IL18.)
Figs. 36 and 37 show the responses, of the Inflammation 48A and 48B loci
respectively,
monitored at 6 hours to stimuli from E. coli (at concentrations of 106 and 102
CFU/mL
immediately after administration) and from S. aureus (at concentrations of 107
and 102 CFU/mL
immediately after administration). It can be seen, among other things, that in
various loci, such
as B7 (Fig. 36), TACI, PLA2G7, and C1QA (Fig. 37), E. coli produces a much
more pronounced
response than S. aureus. The data suggest strongly that Gene Expression
Profiles can be used to
identify with high sensitivity the presence of gram negative bacteria and to
discriminate against
gram positive bacteria.
Figs. 38 and 39 show the responses, of the Inflammation 48B and 48A loci
respectively,
monitored 2, 6, and 24 hours after administration, to stimuli of high
concentrations of S. aureus
and E. coli respectively (at respective concentrations of 107 and 106 CFU/mL
immediately after
administration). The responses over time at many loci involve changes in
magnitude and
direction. Fig. 40 is similar to Fig. 39, but shows the responses of the
Inflammation 48B loci.
53

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Fig. 41 similarly shows the responses of the Inflammation 48A loci monitored
at 24
hours after administration to stimuli high concentrations of S. aureus and E.
coli respectively (at
respective concentrations of 107 and 106 CFUImL immediately after
administration). As in the
case of Figs. 20 and 21, responses at some loci, such as GROl and GR02,
discriminate between
type of infection.
Fig. 42 illustrates application of a statistical T-test to identify potential
members of a
signature gene expression panel that is capable of distinguishing between
normal subjects and
subjects suffering from unstable rheumatoid arthritis. The grayed boxes show
genes that are
individually highly effective (t test P values noted in the box to the right
in each case) in
distinguishing between the two sets of subjects, and thus indicative of
potential members of a
signature gene expression panel for rheumatoid arthritis.
Fig. 43 illustrates, for a panel of 17 genes, the expression levels for 8
patients presumed
to have bacteremia. The data are suggestive of the prospect that patients with
bacteremia have a
characteristic pattern of gene expression.
Fig. 44 illustrates application of a statistical T-test to identify potential
members of a
signature gene expression panel that is capable of distinguishing between
normal subjects and
subjects suffering from bacteremia. The grayed boxes show genes that are
individually highly
effective (t test P values noted in the box to the right in each case) in
distinguishing between the
two sets of subjects, and thus indicative of potential members of a signature
gene expression
panel for bacteremia.
Fig. 45 illustrates application of an algorithm (shown in the figure),
providing an index
pertinent to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as applied respectively to normal
subjects, RA patients,
and bacteremia patients. The index easily distinguishes RA subjects from both
normal subjects
and bacteremia subjects.
Fig. 46 illustrates application of an algorithm (shown in the figure),
providing an index
pertinent to bacteremia as applied respectively to normal subjects, rheumatoid
arthritis patients,
and bacteremia patients. The index easily distinguishes bacteremia subjects
from both normal
subjects and rheumatoid arthritis subjects.
54

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
These data support our conclusion that Gene Expression Profiles with
sufficient precision
and calibration as described herein (1) can determine subsets of individuals
with a known
biological condition; (2) may be used to monitor the response of patients to
therapy; (3) may be
used to assess the efficacy and safety of therapy; and (4) may used to guide
the medical
management of a patient by adjusting therapy to bring one or more relevant
Gene Expression
Profiles closer to a target set of values, which may be normative values or
other desired or
achievable values. We have shown that Gene Expression Profiles may provide
meaningful
information even when derived from ex vivo treatment of blood or other tissue.
We have also
shown that Gene Expression Profiles derived from peripheral whole blood are
informative of a
wide range of conditions neither directly nor typically associated with blood.
Furthermore, in embodiments of the present invention, Gene Expression Profiles
can also
be used for characterization and early identification (including pre-
symptomatic states) of
infectious disease, such as sepsis. This characterization includes
discriminating between infected
and uninfected individuals, bacterial and viral infections, specific subtypes
of pathogenic agents,
stages of the natural history of infection (e.g., early or late), and
prognosis. Use of the
algorithmic and statistical approaches discussed above to achieve such
identification and to
discriminate in such fashion is within the scope of various embodiments
herein.

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Table
1. Master
Infectious
Disease
or Inflammatory
Conditions
Related
to Infectious
Disease
Gene
Expression
Panel
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
AKA MRPl, ABC29: Multispecific
organic
ATP-binding anion membrane transporter;
over expression:
ABCC1 cassette, sub-familymembrane confers tissue protection against
a wide variety
C, member 1 transporter of xenobiotics due to their
removal from the
cell.
V-abl Abelson Cytoplasmic and nuclear protein
tyrosine kinase
murine leukemia implicated in cell differentiation,,
division,
ABLl viral oncogene oncogene a~esion and stress response.
Alterations of .
homolog 1 ABLl lead to malignant transformations.
A~ PAP: Major phosphatase of
the prostate;
ACpp Acid phosphatase,phosphatase synthesized under androgen regulation;
secreted
prostate by the a ithelial cells of the
rostrate
Actins are highly conserved
proteins that are
involved in cell motility, structure
and integrity.
ACTB Actin, beta Cell StructureACTB is one of two non-muscle
cytoskeletal
actins. Site of action for cytochalasin
B effects
on cell motility.
Disintegrin-like
and
metalloprotease AKA METH1; Inhibits endothelial
cell
(reprolysin proliferation; may inhibit angiogenesis;
type)
ADAMTS1 Protease ment
be associated with develo
a
i
with p
on m
y
express
thrombospondin of cancer cachexia.
type 1 motif,
1
Metabolism Increases expression of xenobiotic
metabolizing
~R Aryl hydrocarbonReceptor/Transcrienzymes (ie P450) in response
to binding of
receptor ption Factor planar aromatic hydrocarbons
Liver Health Carrier protein found in blood
serum,
ALB Albumin synthesized in the liver, downregulation
linked
~dicator to decreased liver function/health
Cytochrome c binds to APAFl,
triggering
'~'~l Apoptotic Proteaseprotease activatingactivation of CASP3, leading
to apoptosis. May
Activating Factorpeptide also facilitate procaspase 9
1 auto activation.
ARG2 Arginase II Enzyme/redox Catalyzes the hydrolysis of
arginine to ornithine
and urea; may play a role in
down regulation of
nitric oxide synthesis
B7 B7 protein cell signalingRegulatory protein that may
and be associated with
activation lupus
Heterodimerizes with BCLX and
counters its
BAD BCL2 Agonist membrane proteindeath repressor activity. This
of displaces BAX
Cell Death
and restores its apoptosis-inducing
activity.
56

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
In the presence of an appropriate
stimulus BAK
BCL2- 1 accelerates programmed cell
death by binding
BAKl antagonist/killermembrane proteinto, and antagonizing the repressor
1 BCL2 or its .
adenovirus homolog elb 19k protein.
apoptosis Accelerates programmed cell death
by binding
B~ BCL2 associatedinduction-germto and antagonizing the apoptosis
X repressor
protein cell developmentBCL2; may induce caspase activation
B-cell CLL apoptosis Blocks apoptosis by interfering
/ Inhibitor with the
BCL2 lymphoma 2 - cell cycle activation of caspases
control
- onco enesis
Dominant regulator of apoptotic
cell death. The
long form displays cell death
repressor activity,
BCL2L1 BCL2-like 1 membrane proteinwhereas the short isoform promotes
(long apoptosis.
form) BCL2L1 promotes cell survival
by regulating
the electrical and osmotic homeostasis
of
mitochondria.
Induces ice-like proteases and
apoptosis.
BH3-Interacting Counters the protective effect
of bcl-2 (by
BID Death Domain similarity). Encodes a novel
death agonist that
Agonist heterodimerizes with either agonists
(BAX) or
onto onists (BCL2).
Accelerates apoptosis. Binding
to the apoptosis
BCL2-Interacting repressors BCL2L1, bhrfl, BCL2
or its
BIK Killer adenovirus homolog elb 19k protein
suppresses
this death-promotin activity.
May inhibit apoptosis by regulating
signals
BIRC2 Baculoviral apoptosis required for activation of ICE-like
LAP proteases.
Repeat-Containingsuppressor Interacts with TRAF1 and TRAF2.
2 Cytoplasmic
Bacufoviral apoptosis Apoptotic suppressor. Interacts
TAP with TRAF1
B1RC3 Repeat-Containingsuppressor and TRAF2.Cytoplasmic
3
AKA Survivin; API4: May counteract
a default
Bacufoviral induction of apoptosis in G2/M
BIRCS L4P apoptosis phase of cell
Inhibitor
repeat-containing cycle; associates with microtubules
5 of the
mitotic spindle during a o tosis
signal Member of Ig superfamily; tumor
cell-derived
transduction-
BSG Basignin collagenase stimulatory factor;
stimulates
peripheral matrix metalloproteinase synthesis
plasma in fibroblasts
membrane rotein
57

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
BPI Bactericidal/permeaMembrane-boundLPS binding protein; cytotoxic
for many gram
bility-increasingprotease negative organisms; found in
myeloid cells
protein
Cl A Complement Proteinase Serum complement system; forms
l Cl complex
component l, Proteinase with the proenzymes clr and cls
q
subcomponent, Inhibitor
alpha polypeptide
Calcitonin/calcitoniCell-signalingAKA CALC1; Promotes rapid incorporation
and of
CALCA n-related activation calcium into bone
polypeptide,
alpha
CASP1 Caspase 1 proteinase Activates IL1B; stimulates apoptosis
Proteinase Involved in activation cascade
/ of caspases
CASP3 Caspase 3 Proteinase responsible for apoptosis - cleaves
CASP6,
Inhibitor CASP7, CASP9
Binds with APAF1 to become activated;
cleaves
CASP Caspase 9 proteinase and activates CASP3
9
Cytokines- AKA: MIPl-alpha; monkine that
binds to
CCL3 Chemokine (C-Cchemokines- CCR1, CCR4 and CCRS; major HIV-
motif) ligand growth factorssuppressive factor produced by
3 CD8 cells.
Drives cell cycle at G1/S and
G2/M phase;
CCNA2 Cyclin A2 cyclin interacts with cdk2 and cdc2
58

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription .
CCNB 1 Cyclin B 1 cyclin Drives cell cycle at G2/M phase;
complexes
with cdc2 to form mitosis promoting
factor
Controls cell cycle at G1/S (start)
phase;
CCND1 Cyclin Dl cyclin interacts with cdk4 and cdk6;
has oncogene
function
Drives cell cycle at Gl/S phase;
expression
CCND3 Cyclin D3 cyclin rises later in G1 and remains
elevated in S
phase; interacts with cdk4 and
cdk6
Drives cell cycle at GlIS transition;
major
CCNE1 Cyclin E1 cyclin downstream target of CCND1; cdk2-CCNEl
activity required for centrosome
duplication
during S hase; interacts with
RB
A member of the beta chemokine
receptor
family (seven transmembrane proteins).
Binds
CCRl chemokine (C-CChemokine SCYA3/MIP-la, SCYAS/RANTES, MCP-3,
motif) receptorreceptor HCC-l, 2, and 4, and MPIF-1.
1 Plays role in
dendritic cell migration to inflammation
sites
and recruitment of monocytes.
C-C type chemokine receptor (Eotaxin
receptor)
binds to Eotaxin, Eotaxin-3,
MCP-3, MCP-4,
SCYAS/RANTES and mip-1 delta
thereby
CCR3 chemokine (C-CChemokine mediating intracellular calcium
flux.
motif) receptorreceptor Alternative co-receptor with
3 CD4 for HIV-1
infection. Involved in recruitment
of
eosinophils. Primarily a Th2,
cell chemokine
rece tor.
Member of the beta chemokine
receptor family
(seven transmembrane proteins).
Binds to
SCYA3/MIP-la and SCYAS/RANTES.
chemokine (C-CChemokine Expressed by T cells and macrophages,
and is
CCRS motif) receptorreceptor an important co-receptor for
5 macrophage-tropic
virus, including HIV, to enter
host cells. Plays a
role in Thl cell migration. Defective
alleles of
this gene have been associated
with the HIV
infection resistance.
CD14 CD14 antigen Cell Marker LPS receptor used as marker for
monocytes
CD 19 CD 19 antigen Cell Marker AKA Leu 12; B cell growth factor
AKA: hematopoietic progenitor
cell antigen.
CD34 CD34 antigen Cell Marker Cell surface antigen selectively
expressed on
human hematopoietic progenitor
cells.
Endothelial marker.
59

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
CD3Z CD3 antigen, Cell Marker T-cell surface glycoprotein
zeta
polypeptide
CD4 CD4 antigen Cell Marker Helper T-cell marker
(p55)
Cell surface receptor for hyaluronate.
Probably
CD44 CD44 antigen Cell Marker involved in matrix adhesion,
lymphocyte
activation and lymph node homing.
CD86 CD 86 Antigen Cell signalingAKA B7-2; membrane protein found
(cD and in B
28 antigen activation lymphocytes and monocytes; co-stimulatory
ligand)
signal necessary for T lymphocyte
proliferation
through IL2 production.
CD8A CD8 antigen, Cell Marker Suppressor T cell marker
alpha
polypeptide
Cadherin 1, cell-cell ''~ ECAD, LTVO: Calcium ion-dependent
type l, adhesion cell
CDH1 adhesion molecule that mediates
E-cadherin / interactioncell to cell
interactions in epithelial cells
AKA NCAD, CDHN: Calcium-dependent
CDH2 Cadherin 2, cell-cell glycoprotein that mediates cell-cell
type 1, adhesion interactions;
N-cadherin / interactionmay be involved in neuronal recognition
mechanism
Associated with cyclins A, D
and E; activity
maximal during S phase and G2;
CDK2
Cyclin-dependent activation, through caspase-mediated
cdk2 ~nase cleavage
~nase 2 of CDK inhibitors, may be instrumental
in the
execution of apoptosis following
caspase
activation

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
cdk4 and cyclin-D type complexes
are
cdk4 Cyclin-dependentkinase responsible for cell proliferation
during G1;
~nase 4 inhibited by CDKN2A (pl6)
May bind to and inhibit cyclin-dependent
kinase
Cyclin-Dependent activity, preventing phosphorylation
of critical
CDKN1A Kinase Inhibitortumor suppressorcyclin-dependent kinase substrates
lA and blocking
(p21) cell cycle progression; activated
by p53; tumor
su ressor function
Cyclin-dependentcell cycle '~'~ p16, MTSl, INK4: Tumor suppressor
control -
CDKN2A gene involved in a variety of
malignancies;
~nase inhibitortumor suppressorarrests normal diploid cells
2A in late G1
Cyclin-Dependent W teracts strongly with cdk4
and cdk6; role in
CDKN2B Kinase Inhibitortumor suppressorgrowth regulation but limited
2B role as tumor
(p15) suppressor
Involved in cell cycle arrest
when DNA damage
Checkpoint, has occurred, or unligated DNA
is present;
CHEKl S. ombe prevents activation of the cdc2-cyclin
P b
com lex
AKA DFNB29; Component of tight
junction
CLDN14 Claudin 14 strands
A~ Procollagen; extracellular
matrix protein;
COL1A1 Collagen, typeTissue implicated in fibrotic processes
1, of damaged
alpha 1 Remodeling liver
collagen-
Type VII collagen,differentiation-alpha 1 subunit of type VII collagen;
may link
COL7A1 alpha 1 extracellularcollagen fibrils to the basement
membrane
matrix
retinoid binding-
Cellular Retinoicsignal Low molecular weight protein
highly expressed
CRABP2 Acid Binding transduction-in skin; thought to be important
in RA-mediated
Protein transcriptionregulation of skin growth & differentiation
regulation
CRP C-reactive Acute phase Acute phase protein
protein
protein
61

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
CSF2 Granulocyte- cytokines- AKA GM-CSF; Hematopoietic growth
factor;
monocyte colonychemokines- stimulates growth and differentiation
of
stimulating growth factorshematopoietic precursor cells
factor from various
lineages, including granulocytes,
macrophages,
eosinophils, and erythrocytes
CSF3 Colony stimulatingcytokines- AKA GCSF controls production
ifferentiation
factor 3 chemokines- and function of granulocytes.
(granulocyte) growth factors
insulin-like Member of family of peptides
including serum-
growth factor-
Connective induced immediate early gene
Tissue products
CTGF Growth Factor differentiation-expressed after induction by
growth factors;
wounding over expressed in fibrotic disorders
response
Binds cadherins and links them
with the actin
CTNNAl Catenin, alphacell adhesiont
1 k
l
e
on
cytos
e
CX3CR1 is an HIV coreceptor as
well as a
chemokine (C-X3-Chemokine leukocyte chemotactic/adhesion
receptor for
CX3CR1 fractalkine. Natural killer cells
predominantly
C) receptor receptor express CX3CR1 and respond to
1 fractalkine in
both mi ation and adhesion.
Receptor for the CXC chemokine
SDFI. Acts
chemokine (C-X-CChemokine as a co-receptor with CDA~ for
lymphocyte-
CXCR4 motif), receptorreceptor tropic HIV-1 viruses. Plays role
4 in B cell, Th2
(fusin) cell and naive T cell mi ation.
Cytochrome Metabolism Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
P450 metabolism;
CYP1A1 1A1 Enzyme rnonooxygenase
Cytochrome Metabolism Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
P450 metabolism;
CYPIA2 1A2 Enzyme monooxygenase
CYP2C29 Cytochrome Metabolism Xenobiotic metabolism; monooxygenase
P450
2C 19 Enzyme
62

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
CYP2D6 CYtochrome Metabolism Xenobiotic metabolism; monooxygenase
P450
2D6 Enzyme
Xenobiotic metabolism; monooxygenase;
CYP2E CYtochrome Metabolism catalyzes formation of reactive
P450 intermediates
2E1 Enzyme from smah organic molecules (i.e.
ethanol,
acetamino hen, carbon tetrachloride)
Cytochrome Metabolism Xenobiotic metabolism; broad
P450 catalytic
CYP3A4 3A4 Enzyme specificity, most abundantly
expressed liver
P450
Cytokines- A~'~ Gamma IP10; interferon inducible
Chemokine (C-X-C cytokine IP10; SCYBIO; Ligand
CXCL 10 chemokines- for CXCR3;
moif) ligand growth factorsbinding causes stimulation of
10 monocytes; NK
cells; induces T cell mi anon
DAD1 Defender Againstmembrane proteinLoss of DADI protein triggers
apoptosis '
Cell Death
DC13 DC13 protein unknown function
DNA Fragmentation Induces DNA fragmentation and
chromatin
DFFB Factor, 40-KD,nuclease condensation during apoptosis;
can be activated
Beta Subunit by CASP3
Calcium-binding transmembrane
glycoprotein
DSGl Desmoglein membrane proteininvolved in the interaction of
1 plaque proteins
and intermediate filaments mediating
cell-cell
adhesion. Interact with cadherins.
Diphtheria Thought to be involved in macrophage-
toxin
receptor (heparin- mediated cellular proliferation.
Cell signaling,DTR is a potent
DTR binding epidermal ~togen and chemotactic factor
for fibroblasts
growth factor-like~togen ~d smooth muscle cells, but not
endothelial
owth factor) cells.
Induced in human skin fibroblasts
by
Dual Specificityoxidative oxidative/heat stress & growth
stress factors; de-
DUSPl phosphatase response-tyrosinephosphorylates MAP kinase erk2;
may play a
phosphatase role in negative regulation of
cellular
roliferation
Endothelia
ECE1 converting MetalloproteaseCleaves big endothelia 1 to endothelia
enzyme 1
1
EDN1 Endothelia Peptide hormone
1 AKA ET1; Endothelium-derived
peptides;
potent vasoconstrictor
The specific function in human
cells has not yet
EDR2 Early Development been determined. May be part
of a complex
Regulator 2 that may regulate transcription
during
embryonic development.
Early growth TranscriptionA~ NGFlA; Regulates the transcription
of
EGRI response I factor genes involved in mitogenesis
and
differentiation
63

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
ELA2 Elastase 2, protease Modifies the functions of NK
cells, monocytes
neutro hil and anulocytes
Epoxide hydrolaseMetabolism Catalyzes hydrolysis of reactive
epoxides to
EPHXl 1, microsomal Enzyme water soluble dihydrodiols
(xenobiotic)
Oncogene. Over expression of
ERBB2 confers
v-erb-b2 Taxol resistance in breast cancers.
Belongs to
erythroblastic the EGF tyrosine kinase receptor
family. Binds
ERBB2 leukemia viralOncogene gp130 subunit of the IL6 receptor
in an IL6
oncogene homolog dependent manner. An essential
component of
2 IL,-6 signaling through the MAP
kinase
athway.
v-erb-b2
Oncogene. Over expressed in mammary
Erythroblastic ~mors. Belongs to the EGF tyrosine
kinase
ERBB3 Leukemia ViralOncogene receptor family. Activated through
neuregulin
Oncogene Homolog and ntak binding.
3
Receptor / ESR1 is a ligand-activated transcription
factor
ESR1 Estrogen ReceptorTranscriptioncomposed of several domains important
1 for
Factor hormone binding, DNA binding,
and activation
of transcription.
F3 F3 Enzyme ! RedoxAKA thromboplastin, Coagulation
Factor 3; cell
surface glycoprotein responsible
for coagulation
catalysis
Apoptotic adaptor molecule that
recruits
Fas (TNFRSF6)- caspase-8 or caspase-10 to the
activated fas
FADD associated co-receptor (cd95) or tnfr-1 receptors; this
via death death-inducing
domain signaling complex performs CASP8
proteolytic
activation
FAP Fibroblast Liver Health Expressed in cancer stroma and
activation wound healing
protein, ~ Indicator
Fc fragment Membrane receptor of CD64; found
of lgG, in
FCGRlA high affinity Membxane protein
monocytes, macrophages and neutrophils
receptor IA
Involved in a variety of biological
processes,
Fibroblast including embryonic development,
FGF18 Growth Growth Factorcell growth,
Factor 18 morphogenesis, tissue repair,
tumor growth, and
invasion.
growth factor-
differentiation-
Fibroblast ~a KGF; Potent mitogen for epithelial
growth cells;
FGF7 factor 7 wounding induced after skin injury
response-signal
transduction
64

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name Classification Description
Fms-related
tyrosine
kinase 1 (vascular
A~ VEGFR1; FRT; Receptor fox VEGF;
FLTl endothelial involved in vascular development and
growth
factor/vascularregulation of vascular permeability
permeability
factor
rece tor)
cell adhesion- Major cell surface glycoprotein
of many
FN1 Fibronectin motility-signal fibroblast cells; thought
to have a role in cell
transduction adhesion, morphology, wound healing
& cell
motility
FTL Ferritin, lightIron Chelator Intracellular, iron storage
protein
polypeptide
AKA PSMA, GCP2: Expressed in normal and
FOLHl Folate Hydrolasehydrolase neoplastic prostate cells; membrane
bound
glycoprotein; hydrolyzes folate and is an
N-
acetylated a-linked acidic dipeptidase
transcription
v-fos FBJ murinefactor- Proto-oncoprotein acting with JUN,
stimulates
FOS osteosarcoma inflammatory transcription of genes with AP-1
virus regulatory
oncogene homologresponse-cell sites; in some cases FOS expression
is
growth & associated with apoptotic cell death
maintenance
Catalyzes the final step in the gluconeogenic
glucose-6- Glucose-6- and glycogenolytic pathways. Stimulated
by
G6PC phosphatase, phosphatase/Glyc glucocorticoids and strongly
inhibited by
catalytic ogen metabolism insulin. Over expression (in
conjunction with
PCKl over expression) leads to increased
he atic lucose roduction.
Transcriptionally induced following stressful
Growth Arrest growth arrest conditions & treatment with
and DNA
cell cycle-DNA
'
GADD45A DNA-damage- damaging agents; binds to PCNA affecting it
s
repair-apoptosis
inducible alphainteraction with some cell division protein
kinase
Pancreatic hormone which counteracts the
glucose-lowering action of insulin by
pancreatic/peptide stimulating glycogenolysis
and
GCG glucagon hormone gluconeogenesis. Under expression
of glucagon
is preferred. Glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1)
proposed for type 2 diabetes treatment inhibits
luca
Expression of GCGR is strongly unregulated
by
GCGR glucagon receptorglucagon receptor glucose. Deficiency or imbalance
could play a
role in NIDDM. Has been looked as a potential
for Qene them y.

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
The rate limiting enzyme for
glucose entry into
the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway
(HBP).
glutamine-fructose-Glutamine Over expression of GFA in muscle
and adipose
GFPTl 6-phosphate a~dotransferasetissue increases products of
the HBP which are
transaminase thought to cause insulin resistance
1 (possibly
through defects to glucose
AKA CX43; Protein component of
gap
junctions; major component of
gap junctions in
GJA1 gap Junction the heart; may be important in
protein, synchronizing
alpha 1, 43kD heart contractions and in embryonic
development
CXC chemokine receptor binds
to SCYB 10/IP-
10, SCYB9/MIG, and SCYB11/I-TAC.
Binding of chemokines to GPR9
results in
GPR9 G protein-coupledChemokine integrin activation, cytoskeletal
changes and
receptor 9 receptor chemotactic migration. Prominently
expressed
in in vitro cultured effector/memory
T cells and
plays a role in Thl cell migration.
GR01 GROl oncogene cytokines- AKA SCYBl; chemotactic for neutrophils
(melanoma growthchemokines-
stimulating growth factors
activity,
alpha)
GR02 GR02 oncogene cytokines- AKA MIP2, SCYB2; Macrophage
chemokines- inflammatory protein produced
by monocytes
growth factorsand neutrophils
Glutathione p'~ GR; GRASE; Maintains high
levels of
GSR reductase 1 Oxidoreductasereduced glutathione in the cytosol
Catalyzes glutathione conjugation
to metabolic
Glutathione Metabolism substrates to form more water-soluble,
S-
GST transferase Enzyme excretable compounds; primer-probe
set
pons ecific for all members of
GST family
Catalyzes glutathione conjugation
to metabolic
GSTA1 and Glutathione Metabolism tes to form more water-soluble
S- b
t
A2 transferase Enzyme ,
lAl/2 su
s
ra
excretable compounds
66

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Glutathione Metabolism Catalyzes glutathione conjugation
S- to metabolic
GSTM1 transferase Enzyme substrates to form more water-soluble,
M1
excretable compounds
Catalyzes the conjugation of
reduced
GSTTl Glutathione-S-metabolism glutathione to a wide number
of exogenous and
Transferase, endogenous hydrophobic electrophiles;
theta 1 has an
im ortant role in human carcino
enesis
A key enzyme in the regulation
of glycogen
synthesis in the skeletal muscles
of humans.
GYS1 glycogen synthaseTransferase/GlyeoTypically stimulated by insulin,
2 but in N)DDM
(muscle) gen metabolismindividuals GS is shown to be
completely
resistant to insulin stimulation
(decreased
activity and activation in muscle)
AIWA CTLAl; Necessary for target
cell lysis in
cell-mediated immune responses.
Crucial for
Proteinase/Proteinthe rapid induction of target
cell apoptosis by
GZMB Granzyme B aye InhibitorcYtotoxic T cells. Tnhibition
of the GZMB-
IGF2R (receptor for GZMB) interaction
prevented GZMB cell surface binding,
uptake,
and the induction of apoptosis.
Hypoxia-inducible AIWA MOP 1; ARNT interacting
Transcriptionprotein;
HIF1A factor l, alpha mediates the transcription of
factor oxygen regulated
subunit genes; induced by by oxia
Phosphorylates glucose into glucose-6-
HI~2 hexokinase hexokinase phosphate. NIDDM patients have
2 lower HK2
activity which may contribute
to insulin
resistance. Similar action to
GCI~.
HLA-DRB Major HistocompatibilityBinds antigen for presentation
1 to CD4+ cells
histocompatibility
complex, class
II,
DR beta 1
High mobility DNA binding Potential oncogene with MYC binding
group - site at
HMGIY protein, isoformstranscriptionalpromoter region; involved in
I the transcription
and Y regulation regulation of genes containing,
- or in close
oncogene proximity to a+t-rich regions
67

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
HMOX1 Heme oxygenaseEnzyme / RedoxEndotoxin inducible
(decycling)
1
HSPAlA Heat shock Cell Signalingheat shock protein 70 kDa; Molecular
protein and
70 activation chaperone, stabilizes AU rich
mRNA
ICAMI Intercellular Cell AdhesionEndothelial cell surface molecule;
l regulates cell
adhesion moleculeMatrix Proteinadhesion and trafficking, unregulated
during
1 cytokine stimulation
gamma interferoncell signaling
and
IFI16 inducible proteinactivation Transcriptional repressor
16
IFNA2 Interferon, cytokines- interferon produced by macrophages
alpha 2 with
chemokines-growthantiviral effects
factors
Cytokines Pro- and anti-inflarrunatory
/ activity; TH1
IFNG Interferon, Chemokines cytokine; nonspecific inflammatory
Gamma l mediator;
Growth Factorsproduced by activated T-cells.
Insulin-like cytokines Mediates insulin stimulated DNA
growth - synthesis;
IGF1R factor 1 receptorchemokines mediates IGFl stimulated cell
- proliferation and
rowth factorsdifferentiation
Insulin-like AKA IBP3; Expressed by vascular
growth endothelial
IGFBP3 factor binding cells; may influence insulin-like
growth factor
protein 3 activity
1L10 Interleukin cytokines- Anti-inflammatory; TH2; suppresses
10 production
chemokines-growthof proinflammatory cytokines
factors
IL12B Interleukin cytokines- Proinflammatory; mediator of
12 p40 innate immunity,
chemokines-growthTH1 cytokine, requires co-stimulation
with IL-
factors 18 to induce IFN-g
68

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Cytokines /
1L13 Interleukin Chemokines Inhibits inflammatory cytokine
13 / production
Growth Factors
Cytokines / Proinflarrunatory; mediates T-cell
activation,
ILlS Interleukin Chemokines inhibits apoptosis, synergizes
15 / with IL-2 to
Growth Factorsinduce IFN-g and TNF-a
IL18 Interleukin cytokines- Proinflannmatory, THl, innate
18 and acquired
chemokines-growthimmunity, promotes apoptosis,
requires co-
factors stimulation with IL-1 or IL-2
to induce TH1
cytokines in T- and NIA-cells
cytokines-
IL-18 Binding Implicated in inhibition of early
TH1 cytokine
1L18BP Protein chemokines-growthresponses
factors
Receptor for interleukin 18;
binding the agonist
1L18RI Interleukin Membrane proteinleads to activation of NFKB-B;
19 belongs to IL1
receptor 1 family but does not bind 1L1A
or IL1B.
Proinflammatory; constitutively
and inducibly
cytokines- expressed in variety of cells.
Generally
IL1A Interleukin chemokines-growthcytosolic and released only during
1, alpha severe
factors inflammatory disease
cytokines- proinflammatory;constitutively
and inducibly
IL1B Interleukin chemokines-growthexpressed by many cell types,
1, beta secreted
factors
AW CD12 or IL1R1RA; Binds all
three forms
1L1R1 interleukin Cell signalingof interleukin-1 (IL1A, IL1B
1 and and IL1RA).
receptor, activation Binding of agonist leads to NFI~B
type I activation
B-1 receptor antagonist; Anti-inflammatory;
Interleukin Cytokines ! inhibits binding of 1L-1 to IL-1
1 receptor by
IL1RN Receptor Chemokines binding to receptor without stimulating
/ IL,-1-
Antagonist Growth Factorslike activity
Cytokines l T-cell growth factor, expressed
by activated T-
IL2 Interleukin Chemokines cells, regulates lymphocyte activation
2 / and
Growth Factorsdifferentiation; inhibits apoptosis,
TH1 cytokine
~ti-inflammatory; TH2; suppresses
Cytokines l proinflammatory cytokines, increases
IL4 Interleukin Chemokines IL,-1RN, regulates lymphocyte
- 4 / expression of
G rowth Factors activation
Cytokines / Eosinophil stimulatory factor;
stimulates late B
II,5 Interleukin Chemokines g
5 / cell differentiation to secretion
I of
G rowth Factors
69

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
IL6 Interleukin cytokines- Pro- and anti-inflammatory activity,
6 TH2
( interferon, chemokines-growthcytokine, regulates hematopoietic
beta 2) system and
factors activation of innate response
IL8 Interleukin cytokines- Proinflammatory, major secondary
8
chemokines-growthinflammatory mediator, cell adhesion,
signal
factors transduction, cell-cell signaling,
angiogenesis,
synthesized by a wide variety
of cell types
Decreases blood glucose concentration
and
INS insulin Insulin receptoraccelerates glycogen synthesis
in the liver. Not
ligand as critical in NIDDM as in IDDM.
Regulates transcription of interferon
genes
through DNA sequence-specific
binding.
Interferon TranscriptionDiverse roles include virus-mediated
activation
regulatory Factor of interferon, and modulation
factor 5 of cell growth,
differentiation, apoptosis, and
immune system
activity.
Positive regulation of insulin
action. This
signal protein is activated when insulin
binds to
IRS 1 insulin receptortransductionltransminsulin receptor - binds 85-kDa
subunit of PI 3-
substrate 1 embrane receptorK. decreased in skeletal muscle
of obese
protein
humans.
A~~ Complement receptor, type
3, alpha
Integrity, subunit; neutrophil adherence
alpha M; receptor; role in
ITGAM complement Integrity adherence of neutrophils and
monocytes to
receptor activate endothelium
Component of the keratinocyte
cross linked
structural envelope; first appears in the
protein- cytosol becoming
IVL Involucrin peripheral cross linked to membrane proteins
plasma by
membrane proteintrans lutaminase
v-jun avian transcriptionProto-oncoprotein; component
factor- of transcription
JUN sarcoma virus factor AP-1 that interacts directly
17 with target
oncogene homologDNA binding DNA sequences to regulate gene
expression
A~ SAR2, CD82, ST6: suppressor
of
I~AIl Kangai 1 tumor suppressormetastatic ability of rostate
cancer cells
K-ALPHA- Alpha Tubulin,microtubule Major constituent of microtubules;
binds 2
1 ubiquitous peptide molecules of GTP

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
AKA Stem cell factor (SCF); mast
cell growth
KITLG KIT ligand Growth Factorfactor, implicated in fibrosis/cirrhosis
due to
chronic liver inflammation
Kallikrein protease - AKA hGK-1: Glandular kallikrein;
2, expression
KLK2 prostatic kallikrein restricted mainly to the prostate.
A~ PSA: Kallikrein-like protease
which
KLK3 Kallikrein protease - functions normally in liquefaction
3 of seminal
kallikrein fluid. Elevated in rostate cancer.
TYpe I keratin; associates with
keratin 5;
structural component of intermediate filaments;
protein- several
KRTl4 Keratin 14 differentiation-cellautosomal dominant blistering
skin disorders
shape caused by gene defects
TYpe I keratin; component of
intermediate
structural filaments; induced in skin conditions
protein- favoring
KRT16 Keratin 16 differentiation-cellenhanced proliferation or abnormal
shape differentiation
structural AKA K19: Type I epidermal keratin;
protein - may form
KRT19 Keratin 19 differentiationintermediate filaments
AKA EBS2: 58 kD Type II keratin
co-
expressed with keratin 14, a
50 kD Type I
structural keratin, in stratified epithelium.
protein - KRTS
KRTS Keratin 5 expression is a hallmark of mitotically
differentiationactive
keratinocytes and is the primary
structural
component of the 10 nm intermediate
filaments
of the mitotic a idermal basal
cells.
A~ K8, CKB: Type II keratin;
coexpressed
KRTB Keratin 8 structural with Keratin 18; involved in
protein - intermediate
differentiationfilament formation
LGALS3 Lectin, galactoside-Liver Health A~ galectin 3; Cell growth
regulation
binding, soluble,Indicator
3
A~ PCTA-1: binds to beta galactoside;
Lectin, cell adhesioninvolved in biological processes
- such as cell
LGALS8 Galactoside- growth and adhesion, cell growth regulation,
inflammation,
binding, solubledifferentiationimmunomodulation, a o tosis and
8 metastasis
LBP LipopolysaccharideMembrane proteinAcute phase protein; membrane
protein that
binding protein binds to Lipid a moity of bacterial
LPS
Associates with TNFR1 through
a death
domain-death domain interaction;
Over
MAP-kinase expression of MADD activates
the MAP kinase
MADD activating co-receptor ERK2, and expression of the MADD
death death
domain domain stimulates both the ERK2
and JNK1
MAP kinases and induces the phosphorylation
of cytosolic phospholipase A2
Mitogen-activated
MAP3K14 protein kinasekinase Activator of NFKB 1
kinase kinase
14
~tgen-activated A~ ERK2; May promote entry into
the cell
MAPKl protein kinaseTransferase cycle, growth factor responsive
1
71

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Mitogen kinase-stress aka JNKl; mitogen activated
protein kinase
MAPK8 Activated response- signalregulates c-Jun in response
Protein to cell stress; UV.
Kinase 8 transduction irradiation of skin activates
MAPK8
Mdm2,, Inhibits p53- and p73-mediated
cell cycle arrest
transformed Oncogene / and apoptosis by binding its
3T3 . transcriptional
MDM2 cell double Transcription activation domain, resulting
minute in tumorigenesis.
2, p53 bindingFactor Permits the nuclear export of
p53 and targets it
rotein for roteasome-mediated roteolysis.
Macrophage AKA; GIF; lymphokine, regulators
Cell signalingmacrophage
and
MIF migration ~nctions through suppression
~wth factor of anti-
inhibitory inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids
factor
aka Collagenase; cleaves collagens
types I-III;
Matrix proteinase plays a key role in remodeling
/ occurring in both
MMP1 Metalloproteinaseproteinase normal & diseased conditions;
Inhibitor transcriptionally
1 regulated by growth factors,
hormones,
cytokines & cellular transformation
Matrix aka Gelatinase; cleaves collagens
types IV, V,
MMPZ MetalloproteinaseProteinase VII and gelatin type I; produced
/ by normal skin
Proteinase fibroblasts; may play a role
Inhibitor in regulation of
vascularization & the inflammatory
res once
MMP3 Matrix Proteinase AKA stromelysin; degrades fibronectin,
/ laminin
metalloproteinaseProteinase and gelatin
Inhibitor
3
Matrix Proteinase A~ gelatinase B; degrades extracellular
/
MMP9 metalloproteinaseproteinase matrix molecules, secreted by
Inhibitor 1L-8-stimulated
9 neutrophils
Proteinase Member of the pitrilysin family.
/ A
MP1 Metalloproteaseproteinase metalloendoprotease. Could play
1 Inhibitor a broad role
in eneral cellular re lation.
Meiotic
recombination Exonuclease involved in DNA
MRElIA (S. nuclease double-strand
cerevisiae) breaks repair
11
homolo A
V-myc avian Transcription factor that promotes
cell
MYC myelocytomatosistranscription proliferation and transformation
factor by activating
viral oncogene- oncogene growth-promoting genes; may
also repress gene
homolog ex ression
Putative prostate Integral membrane protein. Associated
with
N33 cancer tumor Tumor Suppressorhomozygous deletion in metastatic
prostate
suppressor cancer.
72

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Nuclear factor p105 is the precursor of the
of p50 subunit of the
kappa light nuclear factor NFKB, which binds
to the kappa-
NFI~B 1 polypeptide Transcriptionb consensus sequence located
gene in the enhancer
enhancer in Factor region of genes involved in immune
B- response
cells 1 (p105) and acute phase reactions; the
precursor does
not bind DNA itself
Nuclear factor
of Inhibits/regulates NFKB complex
activity by
kappa Light trapping NFKB in the cytoplasm.
polypeptide TranscriptionPhosphorylated serine residues
gene mark the
enhancer in Regulator NFKBIB protein for destruction
B- thereby
cells inhibitor, allowing activation of the NFKB
complex.
beta
Synthesizes nitric oxide from
L-arginine and
Mitric oxide molecular oxygen, regulates skeletal
muscle
NOS1 synthase 1 Enzyme/redox vasoconstriction, body fluid
homeostasis,
(neuronal) neuroendocrine physiology, smooth
muscle
motility, and sexual function
NOS2A Nitric oxide Enzyme / RedoxA~ iNOS; produces NO which is
synthase 2A bacteriocidal/tumoricidal
Nitric oxide Enzyme found in endothelial cells
mediating
NOS3 synthase 3 Enzymelredox smooth muscle relation; promotes
clotting
through the activation of platelets.
transcription~a pAR2; Member of nuclear hormone
activation
Nuclear receptorfactor- receptor family of ligand-activated
transcription
NR1I2 subfamily signal transduction-factors; activates transcription
1 of cytochrome P-
xenobiotic 450 genes
metabolism
Nuclear receptorMetabolism A~ Constitutive androstane receptor
beta
NR1I3 subfamily Receptor/Transcrip(CAR); heterodimer with retinoid
l, X receptor
group I, familytion Factor forms nuclear transcription factor;
3 mediates
P450 induction by Phenobarbital-like
inducers.
AKA NRP, VEGF165R: A novel VEGF
receptor that modulates VEGF
binding to KDR
(VEGF receptor) and subsequent
bioactivity
NRP1 Neuropilin cell adhesionand therefore may regulate VEGF-induced
1
angiogenesis; calcium-independent
cell
adhesion molecule that function
during the
formation of certain neuronal
circuits
ORMl Orosomucoid Liver Health AKA alpha 1 acid glycoprotein
1 (AGP), acute
Indicator hase inflammation rotein
OXCT catalyzes the reversible
transfer of
OXCT 3-oxoacid Transferase coenzyme A from succinyl-CoA
CoA to acetoacetate
transferase as the first step of ketolysis
(ketone body
utilization) in extrahe atic
tissues.
73

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Prostate
PART) androgen- Exhibits increased expression
in LNCaP cells
regulated upon exposure to androgens
transcri t
1
PCA3 Prostate cancer AKA DD3: prostate specific; highly
expressed
antigen 3 in rostate tumors
Prostate cancer
AKA IPCA7: unknown function;
co-expressed
PCANAP7 associated
protein
with known prostate cancer genes
Rate limiting enzyme for gluconeogenesis
-
phosphoenolpyruvrate-limitingplays a key role in the regulation
of hepatic
PCKl ate carboxykinasegluconeogenicglucose output by insulin and
glucagon. Over
1 enz expression in the liver results
m in increased
y hepatic glucose production and
e hepatic insulin
resistance to Tyco en synthe
DNA binding-DNARequired for both DNA replication
8z repair;
Proliferatingreplication-DNA
PCNA Cell processivity factor for DNA polymerases
delta
Nuclear Antigenrepair-cell
and epsilon
roliferation
Belongs to the SERlTHR family
of protein
PCTKl PCTA1RE protein kinases; CDC2/CDKX subfamily.
May play a
kinase I role in signal transduction cascades
in
terminally differentiated cells.
Programmed The principal mitochondria) factor
Cell causing
PDCD8 Death 8 enzyme, reductasenuclear apoptosis. Independent
(apoptosis- of caspase
inducin factor) apoptosis.
Prostate Acts as an androgen-independent
transcriptional
epithelium activator of the PSA promoter;
directly interacts
PDEF specific Ets transcriptionwith the DNA binding domain of
factor androgen
transcription receptor and enhances androgen-mediated
factor activation of the PSA romoter
PF4 is released during platelet
aggregation and
is chemotactic for neutrophils
and monocytes.
Platelet Factor PF4's major physiologic role
4 appears to be
PF4 ( SCYB4) Chemokine neutralization of heparin-like
molecules on the
endothelial surface of blood
vessels, thereby
inhibiting local antithrombin
III activity and
promotin coa lation.
Proteinase proteinase aka SKALP; Proteinase inhibitor
found in
inhibitor-proteinepidermis of several inflammatory
PI3 inhibitor skin
3 skin
binding- diseases; it's expression can
d erived be used as a marker
extracellularof skin irritancy
matrix
74

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
phosphoinositide-
Positive regulation of insulin
action. Docks in
3-kinase, IRS proteins and Gabl - activity
is required for
PIK3Rl regulatory regulatory insulin stimulated translocation
enzyme of glucose
subunit,
transporters to the plasma membrane
and
polypeptide activation of glucose uptake.
1
( 85 al ha)
PLA2G7 PhospholipaseEnzyme I RedoxPlatelet activating factor
A2,,
group VII
(platelet
activating
factor
acetylhydrolase,
plasma)
Plasminogen A~ TPA; Converts plasminogin
to plasmin;
PLAT activator, protease involved in fibrinolysis and
tissue cell migration
PLAU Plasminogen Proteinase AKA uPA; cleaves plasminogen
/ to plasmin (a
activator, Proteinase protease responsible for nonspecific
Inhibitor
urokinase extracellular matrix degradation)
Catalyzes the 5-prime phosphorylation
of
Polynucleotide nucleic acids and can have associated
3-prime
PNKP kinase 3'- phosphatase phosphatase activity, predictive
of an important
phosphatase function in DNA repair following
ionizing
radiation or oxidative damage
Prostate cancer
RNA expressed selectively in
prostate tumor
POV 1 overexpressed samples
gene 1
Peroxisome
Binds peroxisomal proliferators
(ie fatty acids,
PPARA proliferator Metabolism hypolipidemic drugs) & controls
pathway for
activated Receptor beta-oxidation of fatty acids
receptor
peroxisome transcription The primary pharmacological
target for the
proliferator-factor/Ligand-treatment of insulin resistance
in NIDDM.
PPARG activated dependent nuclearInvolved in glucose and lipid
receptor, metabolism in
gamma receptor skeletal muscle.

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Negative regulation of insulin
action. Activated
by hyperglycemia - increases
phosphorylation
protein kinaseprotein kinaseof IRS-1 and reduces insulin
C, receptor kinase
PRKCB 1 C/protein
beta 1 activity. Increased PKC activation
may lead to
phosphorylationoxidative stress causing over
expression of
TGF-beta and fibronectin
Prostate-specific cell surface
antigen expressed
PSCA Prostate stemantigen strongly by both androgen-dependent
cell and -
antigen rode endent tumors
Phosphatase Tumor suppressor that modulates
and G1 cell cycle
tensin homolog progression through negatively
regulating the
PTEN (mutated in tumor suppressorPI3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway;
one critical
multiple advanced target of this signaling process
is the cyclin-
cancers 1) de endent kinase inhibitor 27
(CDKN1B).
AKA PGIS; PTGI; CYPB; CYP8A1;
Converts
Prostaglandin prostaglandin h2 to prostacyclin
I2 (vasodilator);
PTGIS (prostacyclin)Isomerase cytochrome P450 family; imbalance
of
synthase prostacyclin may contribute to
myocardial
infarction, stroke, atherosclerosis
PTGS2 Prostaglandin-Enzyme l RedoxAKA COX2; Proinflammatory, member
of
endoperoxide arachidonic acid to prostanoid
conversion
synthase 2 pathway; induced by proinflammatory
cytokines
PTPRC protein tyrosineCell Marker AKA CD45; mediates T-cell activation
phosphatase,
receptor type,
C
pentaxin-related AKA TSG-14; Pentaxin 3; Similar
to the
gene, rapidly pentaxin subclass of inflammatory
acute-phase
PTX3 induced by proteins; novel marker of inflammatory
IL-1
beta reactions
RAD52 (S. DNA binding Involved in DNA double-stranded
break repair
RAD52 cerevisiae) proteinsor and meiotic l mitotic recombination
hornolog
76

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Regulator of cell growth; interacts
with EZF-
Retinoblastoma like transcription factor; a
1 nuclear
RB 1 (including tumor suppressorphosphoprotein with DNA binding
activity;
osteosarcoma) interacts with histone deacetylase
to repress
transcri tion
Member of S 100 family of calcium
binding
calcium binding-proteins; localized in the cytoplasm
&/or
S 100A7 S 100 calcium-epidermal nucleus of a wide range of cells;
involved in the
binding proteindifferentiationregulation of cell cycle progression
7 &
differentiation; markedly overexpressed
in skin
lesions of psoriatic atients
Small inducibleCytokine/ChemokiA~ Monocyte chemotactic protein
1 (MCP1);
SCYAZ Cytokine A2 ne recruits monocytes to areas of
injury and
infection, unre fated in liver
inflammation
A "monokine" involved in the
acute
small inducible inflammatory state through the
recruitment and
SCYA3 cytokine A3 Chemokine activation of polymorphonuclear
leukocytes. A
(MIPla) major HIV-suppressive factor
produced by
CD8- ositive T cells.
Binds to CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5
and is a
small inducible Chemoattractant for blood monocytes,
memory
SCYA5 cytokine A5 Chemokine t helper cells and eosinophils.
A major H1V-
(RANTES) suppressive factor produced by
CD8-positive T
cells.
A CXC subfamily chemokine. Binding
of
small inducible SCYB 10 to receptor CXCR3/GPR9
results in
cytokine stimulation of monocytes, natural
killer and T-
SCYB 10 subfamily Chemokine cell migration, and modulation
B (Cys- of adhesion
X-Cys), member molecule expression. SCYB 10
is Induced by
10 IFNg and may be a key mediator
in IFNg
response.
Belongs to the CXC subfamily
of the intercrine
family, which activates leukocytes.
SDFl is the
stromal cell- primary ligand for CXCR4, a coreceptor
SDFl Chemokine with
derived factor CD4 for human irninunodeficiency
1 virus type 1
(HIV-1). SDF1 is a highly efficacious
1 m hocyte Chemoattractant.
selectin E AKA SLAM; Expressed by cytokine-stimulated
(endothelial
SELE Cell Adhesionendothelial cells; mediates adhesion
adhesion molecule of
1) neutrophils to the vascular lining
Serine proteinaseProteinase Protease Inhibitor; Tumor suppressor,
/
SERPINBS inhibitor, Proteinase especially for metastasis. Inhibits
Glade B, Inhibitor tumor
member 5 / Tumor Suppressorinvasion by inhibiting cell motility.
77

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
SERP1NE1 Serine (or Proteinase Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1
/ / PAI-1
cysteine) Proteinase
protease Inhibitor
inhibitor,
Glade B
(ovalbumin),
member 1
Surfactant,
SFTPD pulmonary ExtracellularAKA; PSPD; mannose-binding protein
associated Lipoprotein associated with pulmonary surfactant
protein
D
solute carrier
family 2 Glucose transporters expressed
uniquely in b-
(facilitated cells and liver. Transport glucose
SLC2A2 glucose transporterinto the b-
glucose cell. Typically under expressed
in pancreatic
transporter), islet cells of individuals with
NIDDM.
member 2
solute carrier Glucose transporter protein that
is final
family 2 mediator in insulin-stimulated
glucose uptake
SLC2A4 (facilitated glucose transporter(rate limiting for glucose uptake).
Under
glucose expression not important, but
over expression in
transporter), muscle and adipose tissue consistently
shown to
member 4 increase lucose trans ort.
Second
SMAC ~tochondria- mitochondrialPromotes caspase activation in
cytochrome c
derived activatorpeptide APAF-1 l caspase 9 pathway of
apoptosis
of Gas ase
superoxide
Enzyme that scavenges and destroys
free
SOD2 dismutase Oxidoreductaseradicals within mitochondria
2,
mitochondrial
78

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Responsible for signal-recognition-particle
SRP19 Signal recognition assembly. SRP mediates the targeting
of
article l9kD proteins to the endoplasmic
p reticulum.
' Binds to the IFN-Stimulated
Response Element
(ISRE) and to the GAS element;
specifically
Signal transducer required for interferon signaling.
STAT1 can
STAT1 and activatorDNA-Binding be activated by IFN-alpha, IFN-gamma,
of EGF,
transcriptionProtein pDGF and 1L6. BRCA1-regulated
1, genes
9lkD overexpressed in breast tumorigenesis
included
STAT1 and JAK1.
Signal AKA APRF: Transcription factor
for acute
transduction phase response genes; rapidly
and activated in
STAT3 activator transcription response to certain cytokines
of factor and growth
transcri tion factors; binds to IL6 response
3 elements
Tumor necrosiscytokines-
factor receptor T cell activating factor and
calcium cyclophilin
TACI superfamily, chemokines-growthmodulator
member 13b factors
AKA TIE2, VMCM; Receptor for
angiopoietin-
1; may regulate endothelial
cell proliferation
TEK tyrosine kinase,Transferase and differentiation; involved
in vascular
endothelial Receptor morphogenesis; TEK defects are
associated
with venous malformations
Ribonucleoprotein which in vitro
recognizes a
Telomerase single-stranded G-rich telomere
primer and
TERT reverse transcriptase adds multiple telomeric repeats
to its 3-prime
transcriptase end by using an RNA tem late
Proinflammatory cytokine that
is the primary
mediator of immune response
and regulation,
Transforming Transferase Associated with THl responses,
/ mediates host
TGFA Growth Factor,Signal response to bacterial stimuli,
regulates cell
Alpha Transduction growth & differentiation; Negative
regulation of
insulin action
TGFB 1 Transforming cytokines- Pro- and anti-inflannmatory
activity, anti-
growth factor,chemokines-growthapoptotic; cell-cell signaling,
can either inhibit
beta 1 factors or stimulate cell growth
Transmits signals through transmembrane
Transforming serinelthreonine kinases. Increased
expression
TGFB3 growth factor,Cell Signalingof TGFB3 may contribute to the
growth of
beta 3 tumors.
Transforming AKA: TGFR2; membrane protein
involved in
TGFBR2 growth factor,Membrane proteincell signaling and activation,
ser/thr protease;
beta receptor binds to DAXX.
II
79

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription -
tissue inhibitorproteinase Irreversibly binds and inhibits
of /
TIMPl metalloproteinaseproteinase metalloproteinases, such as
Inhibitor collagenase
1
TLR2 toll-like cell signalingmediator of petidoglycan and
receptor and lipotechoic acid
2
activation induced signaling
TLR4 toll-like cell signalingmediator of LPS induced signaling
receptor and
4
activation
Transcription Member of the homeodomain family
T-cell leukemia, of DNA
TLX3 binding proteins. May be activated
homeobox 3 Factor in T-ALL
leukomogenesis.
cytokine/tumorNegative regulation of insulin
action. Produced
tumor necrosisnecrosis factorin excess by adipose tissue
of obese individuals
factor receptor ligand- increases IRS-1 phosphorylation
and
decreases insulin receptor kinase
activity.
Tumor NecrosisCytokines / Pro-inflammatory; THt cytokine;
Mediates host
TNFA Factor, AlphaChemokines response to bacterial stimulus;
/ Regulates cell
Growth factoxsgrowth & differentiation
Tumor necrosis
factor receptor Activates NFI~B 1; Important
regulator of
TNFRSF11A superfamily, receptor
interactions between T cells
and dendritic cells
member lla,
activator
of NFKB
Tumor necrosis
factor receptor
superfamily,
Induces apoptosis and activates
NF-kappaB;
TNFRSF12 member 12 receptor contains a cytoplasmic death
domain and
(translocating
chain-association transmembrane domains
membrane
protein)
TNFSF13B Tumor necrosiscytokines- B cell activating factor, TNF
family
factor (ligand)chemokines-growth
superfamily, factors
member 13b

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
TNFSFS Tumor necrosiscytokines- Ligand for CD40; expressed on
the surface of T
factor (ligand)chemokines-growthcells. It regulates B cell function
by engaging
superfamily, factors CD40 on the B cell surface.
member 5
TNFSF6 Tumor necrosiscytokines- AKA Fast; Ligand for FAS antigen;
transducer
factor (ligand)chemokines-growthapoptotic signals into cells
superfamily, factors
member 6
Potent inhibitor of Fas induced
apoptosis;
expression of TOSO, like that
of FAS and
FASL, increases after T-cell
activation,
followed by a decline and susceptibility
to
apoptosis; hematopoietic cells
expressing
TOSO Regulator receptor TOSO resist anti-FAS-, FADD-,
of Fas- and TNF-
induced apoptosis induced apoptosis without increasing
expression
of the inhibitors of apoptosis
BCL2 and
BCLXL; cells expressing TOSO
and activated
by FAS have reduced CASP8 and
increased
CFLAR expression, which inhibits
CASP8
rocessin
DNA binding A~ PS3: Activates expression
of genes that
TP53 Tumor proteinprotein - inhibit tumor growth and/or invasion;
53 cell cycle involved
in cell cycle regulation (required
- tumor suppressorfor growth
.rest at G1); inhibits cell owth
throu h
81

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
activation of cell-cycle arrest
and apoptosis
TNFRSFlA- Over expression of TRADD leads
to 2 major
TRADD associated co-receptor TNF-induced responses, apoptosis
via and
death domain activation of NF-kappa-B
TRAF1 T~ receptor-co-receptor Interact with cytoplasmic domain
of TNFR2
associated
factor 1
TNF receptor-co-receptor Interact with cytoplasmic domain
of TNFR2
associated
factor 2
82

CA 02511237 2005-06-20
WO 2004/057034 PCT/US2003/040551
Symbol Name ClassificationDescription
Triggering cell signalingMember of the lg superfamily;
and receptor
TREM1 receptor activation exclusively expressed on myeloid
expressed cells.
on myeloid TREM1 mediates activation of
cells 1 neutrophils and
monocytes and may have a predominant
role in
inflammatory res onses.
UCP2 Uncoupling Liver Health Decouples oxidative phosphorylation
from ATP
rotein 2 Indicator synthesis, linked to diabetes,
obesity
~P Metabolism Catalyzes glucuronide conjugation
to metabolic
UGT GlucuronosyltransEnzyme substrates, primer-probe set
nonspecific for all
ferase members of UGTl family
AKA L1CAM; CD106; INCAM-100;
Cell
vascular surface adhesion molecule specific
cell for blood
VCAM1 adhesion Cell Adhesionleukocytes and some tumor cells;
molecule / mediates
1 Matrix Proteinsignal transduction; may be
linked to the
development of atherosclerosis,
and rheumatoid
arthritis
Functions as a voltage-gated
pore of the outer
Voltage- mitochondrial membrane; proapoptotic
proteins
VDAC1 dependent membrane proteinB~ and BAK accelerate the opening
anion of
channel 1 VDAC allowing cytochrome c
to enter, whereas
the antiapoptotic protein BCL2L1
closes VDAC
by binding directl to it
vascular cytokines- VPF: Induces vascular permeability,
endothelial
VEGF endothelial chemokines-growthcell proliferation, and angiogenesis.
Produced
growth factorfactors by monocytes
Multimeric plasma glycoprotein
active in the
V~ Von WillebrandCoagulation blood coagulation system as
Factor an antihemophilic
factor factor (VIIIC) carrier and
platelet-vessel wall
mediator. Secreted by endothelial
cells.
X-ray repair
complementing Functions together with the
DNA ligase IV-
XRCCS defective helicase XRCC4 complex in the repair
repair in of DNA double-
Chinese hamster strand breaks
cells 5
-83-

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2018-01-01
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2012-09-24
Inactive: Dead - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2012-09-24
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2011-12-19
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2011-09-22
Letter Sent 2011-07-12
Letter Sent 2011-07-12
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2011-06-17
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-03-22
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2011-03-08
Inactive: Office letter 2011-03-08
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-03-01
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2011-02-21
Letter Sent 2009-01-22
Request for Examination Received 2008-12-11
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2008-12-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-12-11
Letter Sent 2007-01-16
Inactive: Single transfer 2006-11-10
Inactive: Transfer information requested 2006-10-10
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2006-09-06
Inactive: Transfer information requested 2006-08-07
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2006-07-18
Inactive: Single transfer 2006-06-22
Inactive: IPC from MCD 2006-03-12
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2005-09-20
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-09-19
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2005-09-15
Application Received - PCT 2005-08-15
Correct Applicant Request Received 2005-08-09
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2005-07-06
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-06-20
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2004-07-08

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2011-12-19

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2010-12-06

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
DANUTE M. BANKAITIS-DAVIS
JOHN C. CHERONIS
MICHAEL C. BEVILACQUA
VICTOR TRYON
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Drawings 2005-06-19 49 2,484
Description 2005-06-19 83 5,004
Claims 2005-06-19 36 1,606
Abstract 2005-06-19 1 230
Representative drawing 2005-06-19 1 421
Cover Page 2005-09-18 1 263
Description 2005-07-05 83 5,060
Claims 2005-07-05 14 661
Claims 2011-02-20 8 375
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2005-09-14 1 110
Notice of National Entry 2005-09-14 1 193
Request for evidence or missing transfer 2006-06-20 1 101
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-01-15 1 127
Reminder - Request for Examination 2008-08-19 1 118
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2009-01-21 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2011-12-14 1 166
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2012-02-12 1 176
PCT 2005-06-19 10 586
Correspondence 2005-08-08 3 118
Correspondence 2005-09-14 1 29
Fees 2005-12-18 1 20
Correspondence 2006-08-06 2 26
Correspondence 2011-03-07 1 16