Language selection

Search

Patent 2518749 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2518749
(54) English Title: PROTECTIVE DEVICE FOR ARMORED VEHICLES, PARTICULARLY FOR PROTECTING AGAINST HOLLOW-CHARGE PROJECTILES
(54) French Title: DISPOSITIF DE PROTECTION POUR VEHICULES BLINDES, EN PARTICULIER CONTRE LES PROJECTILES A CHARGE CREUSE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • F41H 5/013 (2006.01)
  • F41H 7/04 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PFENNIG, MICHAEL (Germany)
  • KELLNER, GERD (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • KRAUSS-MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO. KG
(71) Applicants :
  • KRAUSS-MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO. KG (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2004-02-28
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2004-09-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/DE2004/000373
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2004081486
(85) National Entry: 2005-09-09

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
103 10 952.8 (Germany) 2003-03-11

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a protective device for armored vehicles,
particularly against hollow-charge projectiles, comprising at least one
protective module (4.1-4.2) that is mounted in front of the exterior of a wall
(2) to be protected. The protective module (4.1-4.2) is moved out of an
inoperative position, in which it is situated in a predetermined position, and
into an active position, in which at least partial areas of the protective
module have a, compared to the inoperative position, increased distance from
the wall (2) to be protected. The protective module can be constructed from a
number of components (4.1, 4.2), which can be displaced relative to one
another and which, as a result of a displacing motion and/or pivotal motion,
can be displaced out of the inoperative position and into the active position,
in which they are interlocked.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif de protection pour véhicules blindés, en particulier contre les projectiles à charge creuse. Ce dispositif comprend au moins un module de protection (4.1-4.2) disposé à l'avant du côté extérieur d'une paroi à protéger (2). Ledit module de protection (4.1-4.2) peut être déplacé d'un état de repos, dans lequel il se trouve dans une position prédéterminée, à un état actif, dans lequel au moins des parties dudit module se trouvent à une distance supérieure de la paroi à protéger (2) comparativement à l'état de repos. Ce module de protection peut comprendre plusieurs éléments constitutifs (4.1, 4.2) mobiles les uns par rapport aux autres, ces éléments pouvant être déplacés, par un mouvement de coulissement et/ou de pivotement, de l'état de repos à l'état actif, dans lequel ils sont interverrouillés.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
1. Protective device for armored vehicles, particularly against
hollow-charge projectiles, with at least one protective module mounted
in front of a wall to be protected, characterized in that the protective
module (4.1-4.2, 14) is moveable from an inoperative position, in which
it is disposed in a fixed, predetermined position, into an active positive,
in which at least partial areas of the protective module have a greater
distance from the wall to be protected than when in the inoperative
position.
2. Protective device of claim 1, characterized in that the protective
module (12) comprises a fixedly assembled component and is
moveable from the inoperative position into the active position in a
linear direction running essentially orthogonally to the wall (12) to be
protected.
3. Protective device of claim 1, characterized in that the protective
module comprises multiple components (4.1, 4.2) that are moveable
relative to one another, which are moveable, respectively, in a
displacing and/or pivoting motion from the inoperative position into the
active position, in which they are interlocked in one another.
10

4. Protective device of claim 3, characterized in that the protective
module comprises two plate elements (4.1, 4.2) that are pivotable
relative to one another about pivot axes (5.1, 5.2) arranged parallel to
one another and parallel to the wall to be protected, which are
designed and arranged such that in the inoperative position, the plate
elements are layered on top of one another and disposed parallel to
one another and to the wall to be protected, and with the movement
into the active position, each plate element (4.1, 4.2) is vertically
pivotable about a predetermined angle, whereby the pivoting
movements run in opposite directions, such that in the active position,
the edges (4.12, 4.22) of the plate elements (4.1, 42) facing away from
the pivot axes (5.1, 5.2) are adjacent one another and upon
achievement of this position, engage into one another.
5. Protective device of claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the
components (4.1', 4.2') of the protective module are moveable from a
first active position, in which they engage in one another, into a second
active position in a linear direction running essentially orthogonally to
the wall (2') to be protected, wherein in the second active position, at
least partial areas of the protective module have a greater distance
from the wall (2) to be protected than in the first active position.

6. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 5, characterized in
that the protective module (4.1-4.2, 14) is moveable back from the
active position into the inoperative position.
7. Protective device of one of claims through 6, characterized in
that the movement of the protective module (4.1', 4.2', 14) from the
inoperative position into the first and, if necessary, second active
position and, if necessary, back into the inoperative position, takes
place by means of a drive device.
8. Protective module of claim 7, characterized by a mechanical
drive device.
9. Protective module of claim 7, characterized by an electrical or
mechanical drive device.
10. Protective device of claim 7, characterized by a hydraulic drive
device (7, 17).
11. Protective device of claim 7, characterized in by a pneumatic
drive device.
12. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 6, characterized in
that the movements of the protective module from the inoperative
12

position into the first and, if necessary, second active position, takes
place by means of pyrotechnical means.
13. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 12, characterized in
that the protective module or the components or plate elements (4.1,
4.2) that are moveable relative to one another are formed to be
sandwich-like from multiple layers of plates.
14. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 12, characterized in
that the protective module is formed as a buckling sheet louver with a
plurality of layers (19) arranged inclined to the wall (12) to be protected.
15. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 14, characterized in
that a second protective module (6, 6', 16) is fixedly disposed between
the first protective module (4.1-4.2, 4.1'-4.2', 14) that is moveable from
a inoperative position into at least one first position and the wall (2, 2',
12) to be protected.
16. Protective device of claim 15, characterized in that the first
protective module (4.1-4.2, 4.1'-4.2', 14) is formed as protection
against hollow-charge projectiles (HL) and the second protective
module (6, 6', 16) is formed as protection against impact projectiles
(KE).
13

17. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 16, characterized in
that at least one of the protective modules is formed as passive plating.
18. Protective device of one of claims 1 through 17, characterized in
that at least one of the protective modules is formed as reactive plating.
14

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02518749 2005-09-09
PROTECTIVE DEVICE FOR ARMORED VEHICLES, PARTICULARLY
FOR PROTECTING AGAINST HOLLOW-CHARGE PROJECTILES
The invention relates to a protective device for armored vehicles, in
particular against hollow-charge projectiles, with at least one protective
module that is arranged in front of an exterior side of a wall to be
protected.
Such protective modules are known. They can be formed as passive
or as reactive plating and can be effective as protection against hollow
charge (HL) projectiles or impact (KE) projectiles depending on the
design. Several of the types of designs of these protective modules
are explained, for exa~"~e, ~ EP 0 922 924 B1 and EP 0 379 080 A2,
as well as in DE 41 14 809 C2 and DE 195 09 899 C2.
In particular with protective modules for protection against HL-
projectiles, it is known that the protective effect is greater the greater
the distance between the protective module and the wall to be
protected, since the deflection path of the disrupted penetrator is of
greater significance for efficiency based on the continuing lateral
movement after contact against the protective module. If, however, the
protective modules are disposed at the greatest possible distance from
the wall to be protected, the contour of the vehicle to be protected
1 of 14
Lit Trnsl of PCTlDE2004/000373 Bled Feb. 28, 2005 / Michael Pfennig et al l
Krauss-Maffei
Wegmann GmbH & Co.

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
increases overall, so that the prescribed loading masses no longer can
be adhered to.
The invention is based on the object of constructing a protective device
of the type described above and in the preamble to claim 1 in such a
manner that for defense of the threat, the greatest possible distance of
the protective module from the wall to be protected is achievable; on
the other hand, however, the contour of the vehicle and in particular the
prescribed loading masses are not increased.
The solution of this object takes place according to the present
invention with the features of the characterizing parts of claim 1.
Advantageous embodiments of the invention are described in the
dependent claims. The wording of the patent claims is made by
IS reference to the content of the following description.
The basic idea of the invention is to form the protective module to be
moveable in such a manner that it can be moved from an inoperative
position, in which it is positioned as closely as possible to the wall to be
protected, into an active position, in which it has a substantially greater
distance at least partially from the wall to be protected than in the
inoperative position.
2

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
The movement of the protective module can take place in different
ways depending on its structure and arrangement. As explained
subsequently with reference to the embodiments, here linear
movements, in particular linear motions that take place orthogonally to
the wall to be protected, can be used as well as pivoting motions. The
motions can be produced by means of simple mechanical drive
devices, that is, manual as well as electrical, electromechanical,
hydraulic, or pneumatic drive devices. It is also possible to produce the
motion of the protective module from the inoperative position into the
active position with pyrotechnical means.
The protective modules can be constructed in a known manner in a
sandwich-like manner from multiple, layered plates. However, they
also can be constructed as a buckling sheet louver with a plurality of
inclined layers, for example.
In order to achieve effective protection against HL-projectiles as well as
against KE-projectiles, it was noted to be advantageous when a
second protective module is fixedly disposed between the moveable
first protective module and the wall to be protected, whereby the
structure can be such that the first protective module serves in a first
line for protection against HL-projectiles and the second protective
module serves in a first line for protection against KE-projectiles. It is
3

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
further possible to construct the protective module as a passive plating
as well as an active plating.
Next, embodiments of the protective devices according to the present
invention will be described in greater detail with reference to the
accompanying figures.
In the drawings:
Fig. 1 shows a partial section through an armored vehicle with a first
embodiment of a protective device with a protective module disposed
in the inoperative position;
Fig. 2 shows the protective device according to Fig. 1 with the
moveable protective module in the active position;
Fig. 3 shows a variation of the protective device of Figs. 1 and 2 in an
illustration analogous to Fig. 2, in which the protective module is moved
into a second active position;
Fig. 4 shows a further embodiment of a protective device with a
protective module disposed in the inoperative position in an illustration
analogous to Fig. 1; and
4

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
Fig. 5 shows the protective device of Fig. 4 with the moveable
protective module in the active position.
In Figs. 1 and 2, a first embodiment of a protective device for an
armored vehicle is shown, whereby only the parts that are essential for
illustrating the protective device are shown, namely a part of the
vehicle shell or vehicle body with a roof plate 1 and the side wall 2 to
be protected. On the outer surface of the side wall 2, first a KE-
protective module 6 is fixedly disposed, which can be structured in a
known manner and is not explained in detail below. An Hl_-protective
module is arranged outside of this KE-protective module. This HL_-
protective module is constructed of two plate elements 4.1 and 4.2,
which in a known manner, for example, can comprise two plates that
are separated from one another by air space. The plate element 4.1 is
outwardly pivotable around a pivot axis 5.1 arranged parallel to the side
wall 2 in the area of the roof plate 1. The edge 4.11 of the plate
element 4.1 facing the pivot axis 5.1 is attached to a corresponding
pivot lever 5.11. The plate element 4.2 is outwardly pivotable around a
pivot axis 5.2 running parallel to the side wall 2 and parallel to the pivot
axis 5.1. The pivot axis 5.2 is disposed beneath the pivot axis 5.1 on
the side wall 2. The edge 4.21 faxing this pivot axis 5.2 is attached to a
corresponding pivot lever 5.21.
5

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
In the position shown in Fig. 1, both plate elements 4.1 and 4.2 are
disposed in the inoperative position parallel to one another and parallel
to the side wall 2. In this inoperative position, in which they lie directly
on top of one another in the shown embodiment, they have the least
possible distance to the side wall 2 and lie within a spatially defined
contour 3 of the vehicle.
The plate elements 4.1 and 4.2 are pivotable outwardly into an active
position from the inoperative position shown in Fig. 1 in opposite pivot
motions; the active position is shown in Fig. 2. In this active position,
the edges 4.12 or 4.22 of the plate elements facing away from the pivot
axes 5.1 and 5.2 directly adjoin one another. These edges are
constructed such that they interlock in one another upon reaching the
active position in the manner shown in Fig. 2, and therewith have a
roof-shaped form facing outwardly, comprised of the two plate
elements 4.1 and 4.2. In this position, the protective module projects
outwardly over the contour 3, and as a result of the inclined position of
both plate elements 4.1 and 4.2, an optimal protection against
incoming HL-projectiles is achieved.
With this structure of the protective device, it is therefore possible to
load the vehicle into a transport aircraft, for example, in the inoperative
position of the protective module, in which the prescribed loading mass
is maintained. In use of the vehicle or also first in case of a threat, the
6

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
protective module is moved from the inoperative position into the active
position and can be moved back again into the inoperative position
after termination of the threat or for loading.
Fig. 3 shows a variation of the protective device according to Figs. 1
and 2, in which a still greater distance of the protective module from the
side wall of the vehicle to be protective is achievable. In Fig. 3,
components which correspond to the embodiment of Figs. 1 and 2 are
provided with the same reference numerals and an apostrophe.
In the inoperative position (not shown) of the protective module, both
plate elements 4.1' and 4.2' lie on top of one another and parallel to the
side wall 2' in front of the outer side of the KE-protective module 6'
within the vehicle contour 3', analogously to the situation of Fig. 1.
Also, the plate elements 4.1' and 4.2' are pivotable about pivot axes
5.1' or 5.2' that run parallel to one another and to the side wall 2', and
the outward pivoting motion takes place by means of a drive device
(not shown). In this manner, analogously to the embodiment of Fig. 1,
both plate elements 4.1' and 4.2' first are pivotable from the inoperative
position into a first active position (likewise not shown), in which they
again adopt a roof-shaped position relative to one another, in which
both outer edges are interlocked in one another. In this first active
position, already a greater distance from the side wall 2' is achieved.
According to Fig. 3, the protective module now can be moved into a
7

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
second active position. In this connection, the pivot axis 5.1' is
disposed on the outer end of the piston rod 7.1 of a piston cylinder
drive 7, and the pivot axis 5.2' is disposed on a guided holding rod 8.
By means of the piston cylinder drive 7, which is disposed above the
roof plate 1', the protective module comprised of the plate elements
4.1' and 4.2' can be displaced outwardly in a displacing motion, which
runs essentially orthogonally to the side wall 2', and therewith the
distance of the protective module to the side wall 2' is increased,
providing a still better protection against incoming HL-projectiles.
Figs. 4 and 5 show another embodiment of a protective device for an
armored vehicle, of which only the roof plate 11 and the side wall 12 to
be protected are shown, analogously to Fig. 1. Again, a KE-protective
module 16 is fixedly mounted in front of the side wall 12, and outside
of the KE-protective module, the moveable HL-protective module 14 is
disposed, which in this case is constructed as an individual, fixedly
assembled component in the form of a buckling sheet louver with a
plurality of sheets 19 running at an angle to the side wall 12. The
sheets 19 are arranged with an intermediate air space. In the
inoperative position shown in Fig. 4, the protective module 14 is
disposed substantially within the vehicle contour 13. The protective
module 14 is moveable from this inoperative position, in a direction that
runs essentially orthogonally to the side wall 12, into an active position,
which is shown in Fig. 5. In this active position, it lies with an
8

CA 02518749 2005-09-09
essentially greater distance to the side wall 12 outside of the vehicle
contour 13. To achieve the motion, the protective module 14 is
connected on the upper side shown in Fig. 4 via a swivel joint 15.1 with
the piston rod 17.1 of a piston cylinder drive 17, which is disposed
above the roof plate 11. On the lower side shown in Fig. 4, the
protective module 14 is guided via a roller 15.2 on a linear guide 18. In
this manner, upon deployment of the piston rod 17.1, the protective
module 14 moves from the inoperative position of Fig. 4 into the active
position of Fig. 5 and if necessary, back into the inoperative position.
In the active position of Fig. 5, a substantially improved protection
against incoming HL-projectiles is achieved as a result of the greater
distance from the side wall 12. In the inoperative position, in contrast,
the vehicle can be loaded into a transport aircraft, for example, as a
result of the reduced vehicle contour.
9

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2009-03-02
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2009-03-02
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-02-28
Letter Sent 2006-03-23
Inactive: Single transfer 2006-02-16
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2005-11-15
Inactive: Cover page published 2005-11-10
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2005-11-08
Application Received - PCT 2005-10-20
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2005-09-09
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2004-09-23

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2008-02-28

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2007-01-12

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2005-09-09
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2006-02-28 2005-10-12
Registration of a document 2006-02-16
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2007-02-28 2007-01-12
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
KRAUSS-MAFFEI WEGMANN GMBH & CO. KG
Past Owners on Record
GERD KELLNER
MICHAEL PFENNIG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2005-09-09 5 110
Abstract 2005-09-09 1 16
Description 2005-09-09 9 255
Representative drawing 2005-09-09 1 32
Drawings 2005-09-09 5 132
Cover Page 2005-11-10 1 53
Notice of National Entry 2005-11-08 1 192
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-03-23 1 128
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2008-04-24 1 178
Reminder - Request for Examination 2008-12-01 1 117
PCT 2005-09-09 5 196
Correspondence 2005-11-08 1 28
Fees 2005-10-12 1 35