Language selection

Search

Patent 2526998 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2526998
(54) English Title: METHOD OF DECREASING THE DISINTEGRATION OF SHALE-CONTAINING CUTTINGS AND DRILLING FLUID THEREFOR
(54) French Title: METHODE PERMETTANT DE DIMINUER LA DESAGREGATION MECANIQUE DES COUPES CONTENANT DU SCHISTE ARGILEUX, ET FLUIDE DE FORAGE CONNEXE
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E21B 21/06 (2006.01)
  • C09K 8/92 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DEARING, HARRY L., JR. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • NEWPARK DRILLING FLUIDS, LLC
(71) Applicants :
  • NEWPARK DRILLING FLUIDS, LLC (United States of America)
(74) Agent: KIRBY EADES GALE BAKER
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2013-12-31
(22) Filed Date: 2005-11-15
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2007-04-30
Examination requested: 2010-10-18
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
11/263,639 (United States of America) 2005-10-31

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention provides a method of enhancing the recovery of shale-containing cuttings during the drilling of a borehole in a shale-containing subterranean formation which comprises adding to the drilling fluid circulating in the borehole a finely ground, very sparingly soluble, anhydrous, alkali metal silicate glassy material to provide the drilling fluid with a concentration of soluble silica in the range from about 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight of the aqueous phase of the drilling fluid. Preferably the drilling fluid has a pH in the range from about 8.0 to about 11.0, most preferably about 8.5 to less than 11Ø. The preferred alkali metal is potassium.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne une méthode améliorant la récupération de coupes contenant du schiste lors du forage d'un trou de forage dans une formation souterraine contenant du schiste. L'invention comprend l'ajout, au fluide de forage circulant dans le trou de forage, d'une matière fine, très modérément soluble, anhydre et vitreuse de silicate de métal alcalin afin de donner au fluide de forage une concentration de silice soluble variant d'environ 0,1 % à environ 1,0 % en poids, en phase aqueuse du fluide de forage. Préférablement, le fluide de forage présente un pH variant d'environ 8,0 à environ 11,0, idéalement d'environ 8,5 à moins de 11,0. De préférence, le métal alcalin est du potassium.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
Claim 1. In a well drilling process in which a drilling fluid is circulated in
a borehole
while drilling, a method of increasing the recovery of shale-containing
cuttings which
comprises adding to the circulating drilling fluid a finely ground, very
sparingly soluble,
anhydrous alkali metal silicate glassy material at a rate to provide the
drilling fluid with a
concentration of soluble silica in the range from about 0.1% to about 1.0% by
weight of the
aqueous phase of the drilling fluid, wherein the drilling fluid has a pH in
the range from
about 8.0 to less than 11Ø
Claim 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the concentration of soluble silica in
the
aqueous phase of the drilling fluid is periodically determined as the drilling
proceeds and
adjusting the rate of addition of the finely ground, very sparingly soluble,
anhydrous alkali
metal silicate glassy material as needed to maintain said concentration range.
Claim 3. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein the alkali metal is potassium and
the
potassium silicate has a weight ratio of SiO2:K2O ratio from about 2:1 to
about 3.5:1.
Claim 4. The process of claim 3 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio of
SiO2:K2O ratio from about 2.25:1 to about 3.25:1.
Claim 5. The process of claim 3 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio of
SiO2:K2O ratio from about 2.5:1 to about 3.0:1.
Claim 6. The process of claim 3 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio of
SiO2:K2O ratio which is greater than about 2.5:1.
Claim 7. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein the concentration of soluble
silica is
determined in the filtrate of the drilling fluid taken at a flowline of the
well.
19

Claim 8. The process of claim 7 wherein the alkali metal is potassium and the
potassium silicate has a weight ratio of SiO2:K2O ratio from about 2:1 to
about 3.5:1.
Claim 9. The process of claim 8 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio of
SiO2:K2O ratio from about 2.25:1 to about 3.25:1.
Claim 10. The process of claim 8 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio
of SiO2:K2O ratio from about 2.5:1 to about 3.0:1.
Claim 11. The process of claim 8 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio of
SiO2:K2O ratio which is greater than about 2.5:1.
Claim 12. A method of increasing the recovery of shale-containing cuttings
during
the drilling of a borehole in a shale-containing subterranean formation which
comprises
circulating in the borehole a drilling fluid containing a finely ground, very
sparingly soluble,
anhydrous alkali metal silicate glassy material in an amount to provide the
drilling fluid with
a concentration of soluble silica in the range from about 0.1% to about 1.0%
by weight of
the aqueous phase of the drilling fluid.
Claim 13. The method of claim 12 wherein the concentration of soluble silica
in the
aqueous phase of the drilling fluid is periodically determined as the drilling
proceeds and
adjusting the rate of addition of the finely ground, very sparingly soluble,
anhydrous alkali
metal silicate glassy material as needed to maintain said concentration range.
Claim 14. The method of claim 12 or 13 wherein the alkali metal is potassium
and
the potassium silicate has a weight ratio of SiO2:K2O from about 2:1 to about
3.5:1.
Claim 15. The method of claim 14 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio
of SiO2:K2O from about 2.25:1 to about 3.25:1.

Claim 16. The method of claim 14 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio
of SiO2:K2O from about 2.5:1 to about 3.0:1.
Claim 17. The method of claim 14 wherein the potassium silicate has a weight
ratio
of SiO2:K2O which is greater than about 2.5:1.
21

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02526998 2005-11-15
NDF-6
METHOD OF DECREASING THE DISINTEGRATION OF
SHALE-CONTAINING CUTTINGS AND DRILLING FLUID THEREFOR
Field of the Invention
The invention relates to aqueous oil and gas well drilling and servicing
fluids
containing an additive to enhance the recovery of shale-containing drill
cuttings.
Background of the Invention
During well-drilling operations, formations are often encountered which lose
physical and dimensional integrity when exposed to aqueous drilling fluids
(muds). In most
cases, such formations comprise reactive shales. Prior to the advent of oil-
based, emulsion
and invert emulsion muds, great difficulty was encountered in drilling these
types of shales.
On the other hand, while hydrocarbon-containing muds make drilling through
reactive
shales possible, they pose safety and environmental hazards and can interfere
with well-
logging operations.
A variety of water-based drilling additives has been developed over the years
in an
attempt to deal with shale drilling problems effectively while avoiding the
problems
encountered when oil-based muds were used.
Sawdon, in U.K. Patent Application 2,089,397A, disclosed an aqueous wellbore
fluid for use in drilling, well completion, packing, perforating or workover
fluid containing at
least 20% by weight of potassium carbonate; optionally a water-soluble
polymeric
viscosifier, such as carboxymethylcellulose, was added to the wellbore fluid.
Gray et al., in
"Composition and Properties of Oil Well Drilling Fluid", 4th Edition (Gulf
Publishing
Company 1980), reported the use of potassium salts in drilling fluids to
suppress the swelling

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
of bentonite, potassium chloride being preferred. Another standard industry
reference that
describes the shale stabilizing effect of the potassium ion in polymer muds
may be found in
SPE 10100 "Fundamentals and Use of Potassium/Polymer Drilling Fluids to
Minimize
Drilling and Completion Problems Associated with Hydratable Clays," by R. P.
Steiger,
presented at the 56th Annual Fall Technical Conference, Dallas, Tex., Oct. 5-
7, 1981. U.S.
Pat. No. 4,447,341, to Block relates to a drilling fluid containing Al 0(OH)
and a crosslinked
polyvinyl alcohol together with a potassium salt, such as potassium chloride,
as a clay-
stabilizing composition. Coffey et al., in the Oil & Gas Journal, Jan. 27,
1987, described
shale inhibition using an aqueous system, maintained at a pH of 9.0 or less,
which contains
an unidentified nonionic polymer combined with potassium phosphate complex of
undefined
composition. Peterson in U.S. Pat. No. 4,780,220 discloses the use of
glycerin, polyglycerin,
and mixtures thereof in a drilling mud to inhibit the swelling of clays.
The technology of choice for aqueous-based shale-stabilizing muds involves the
use
of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA) combined with potassium
chloride.
Scheuerman disclosed such a combination in U.S. Pat. No. 3,738,437 as part of
a regimen for
dealing with shale-drilling problems. Systems involving PHPA in combination
with various
electrolytes, including potassium chloride, at pH of 8.5 to 10.0, were also
reviewed by Clark
et al. in SPE/IADC 10681, presented at the Mar. 15-18, 1987 SPE/IADC Drilling
Conference
in New Orleans, La.
Cannon U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,109,858 and 2,191,312 generally disclose the addition
of
various polyhydroxy compounds, which includes certain carbohydrates such as
sucrose, and
an alkaline material, such as caustic soda, in aqueous drilling fluids for
purposes of inhibiting
shale swelling.
2

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Salathiel U.S. Pat. No. 2,785,125 discloses a water base drilling fluid
containing 1-
15 ppb starch and 0.5-10 ppb of a water soluble heat degradation product of a
saccharide
containing 1 to 4 sugar units. The starch and degradation product combine to
reduce the fluid
loss of the drilling fluid. Salathiel U.S. Pat. No. 2,786,027 discloses a
water base drilling
fluid containing 1-15 ppb starch and 0.5-5 ppb of an additive having an
average molecular
weight of about 90 to 3000 and a ratio of carbon to oxygen of 1.5 to 2.7. The
starch and
additive combine to reduce the fluid loss of the drilling fluid. Walker U.S.
Pat. No. 3,849,317
discloses a water base drilling fluid having a liquid phase saturated with
calcium hydroxide
containing as an additive for reducing gel strength and yield point, from 1/8
to 8 ppb of
hydrolyzed cereal solids which is comprised of from about 15% to about 25% di-
saccharides,
tri-saccharides, tetrasaccharides, and penta-saccharides, and from 75% to 85%
hexa-
saccharides and above. Perricone et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,941,981 discloses a
drilling fluid for
shale inhibition comprising a liquid phase containing: (a) a water phase
comprising fresh
water, sea water, brine, simulated brine, or mixtures thereof; and (b) a water-
soluble
component selected from the class consisting of polyhydric alcohols, glycol,
glycol ethers,
polypropylene glycols, polyethylene glycols, ethylene oxide-propylene oxide
copolymers
("EO-P0"), alcohol-initiated EO-PO copolymers and/or mixtures thereof, the
concentration
of said water-soluble component in the total liquid phase being from about 5%
to about 50%
by volume.
Sheu et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,110,484 discloses aqueous drilling fluids
containing the
browning reaction product of a carbohydrate, such as pentose, hexose such as
fructose and
glucose, as well as di- and poly saccharides, such as sucrose, lactose,
mannose, cellulose,
starch, dextrin, dextran, carboxymethylcellulose, rice and derivatives of such
carbohydrates.
3

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Drilling fluids containing alkali metal silicates have also been proposed for
drilling shale-
containing formations. Thus Vail et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 2,133,759, disclose
muds containing
alkali metal silicates. In U.S. Pat. No. 2,146,693, Vietti et al. disclosed a
drilling fluid
containing one of several sodium salts, including sodium silicate, the sodium
salt content of
the mud being in excess of 20% by weight. The following U.S. patents also
disclose sodium
silicate-containing drilling fluids: Vietti et al. 2,165,824; Garrison
2,239,647; and Garrison et
al. 2,353,230.
Wingrave et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,988,450 discloses drilling fluids containing a
shale
stabilizing additive comprising one or more water-soluble polymers which are
capable of
forming nucleophilic sites when treated with a base, such as partially
hydrolyzed polyvinyl
acetate, and one or more alkaline potassium salts in a weight ratio generally
in the range
between 1:20 to about 3:1, preferably from about 1:2 to about 1.5:1. Usually
the additive is
added to the drilling fluid at a level between 0.01 weight percent and 10.0
weight percent of
the aqueous phase, typically between about 0.1 and about 4.0 weight percent,
and preferably
between about 0.3 and about 2.0 weight percent. The potassium salts are
relatively strong
Bronated-Lowry bases, such as potassium silicate, potassium carbonate, and
tribasic
potassium phosphate.
Mullen et al. U.S. Patent No. 6,248,698 discloses silicate drilling fluids
containing
hematite weighting agents and manganese oxide bridging agents.
Daley U.S. Patent No. 3,640,343 discusses the stabilization of hard shaly
formations
with an aqueous solution containing from about 1% to about 20% by weight of
dissolved
alkali metal silicate (preferably containing from about 2% to about 6% by wt.
of dissolved
silica), and a pH from 11-12, preferably 11.1 ¨ 11.4
4

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Wyant et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,499,491 discloses the treatment of an aqueous
drilling
fluid with a cementitious mixture comprising hydraulic cement and powdered
sodium silicate
glass to form a mud concrete for cementing oil well casing.
The following articles discuss the use of soluble silicates in drilling
fluids: (1) John
C. Urquhart "Back to the Future in Silicate Drilling Fluids, WORLD OIL,
October 1998; (2)
Michael R. Stewart et al., "Use of Silicate Mud to Control Borehole Stability
and
Overpressured Gas Formations in Northeastern British Columbia" SPE 59751,
2000; (3)
Tare et al., "Stabilizing Boreholes While Drilling Reactive Shale Formations
with Silicate-
Base Drilling Fluids", DRILLING CONTRACTOR, May/June 2000, pp. 42-44; (4) Dave
Rawlyk et al., "Potassium Silicate Based Drilling Fluids: An Environmentally
Friendly
Drilling Fluid Providing Higher Rates of Penetration," CADE/CAODC Drilling
Conference,
Paper No. 2001-016, Oct. 23 & 24, 2001; and Walton et al., "Drilling Fluid and
Cementing
Improvements Reduced Per-ft Drilling Costs by 10%, World Oil, April 2003, 39-
43, 47.
Although drilling fluids containing sodium and potassium silicates have been
used
for decades to combat shale problems, these fluids have had limited success
for the following
reasons: free soluble silicate in the drilling fluid reacts with accumulated
drilled solids to
create problems in control of the drilling fluid properties; free soluble
silicate in the drilling
fluid filtrate polymerizes or precipitates after invading a potentially
productive formation to
cause severe reduction in permeability; free soluble silicate in the drilling
fluid precludes the
use of lubricants commonly used for torque reduction, and the high pH of such
fluids make
them hazardous to handle.
Summary of the Invention
5

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
The invention provides well drilling and servicing fluids which utilize a
finely
ground, very sparingly soluble, anhydrous alkali metal silicate glassy
material to decrease
the swelling and water sorption of shale-containing cuttings contacted by the
well drilling
and servicing fluid, and hence the disintegration, wherein the concentration
of the finely
ground, very sparingly soluble anhydrous alkali metal silicate glassy material
is such as to
provide the fluids with a concentration of soluble silica in the range from
about 0.1% to
about 1.0% by weight of the aqueous phase of the fluid, and wherein the fluids
have a pH in
the range from about 8.0 to about 11.0, preferably from about 8.5 to about
10.5.
The invention further provides a method of increasing the recovery of shale-
containing cuttings during the drilling of a borehole in a shale-containing
subterranean
formation in which a drilling fluid is circulated in the borehole during
drilling, which
comprises adding to the circulating drilling fluid a finely ground, very
sparingly soluble,
anhydrous alkali metal silicate glassy material at a rate to provide the
drilling fluid with a
concentration of soluble silica measured at the flowline in the range from
about 0.1% to
about 1.0% by weight of the aqueous phase of the drilling fluid.
The finely ground, very sparingly soluble, anhydrous alkali metal silicate
glassy
material (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "FGVSSAAMSGM") is obtained from
the
fusion or melt of an alkali metal oxide or precursor thereof (i.e., hydroxide
or carbonate) and
silica which is then super-cooled and finely ground.
The main technical benefit of incorporating the FGVSSAAMSGM instead of liquid
silicate solutions and hydrous powder forms of alkali metal silicates into the
fluids is that the
slower rate of dissolution of the FGVSSAAMSGM will reduce the undesirable
reactions of
6

CA 02526998 2013-01-23
_
the silicate with components in the fluids and will expose the cuttings and
wellbore
contacted by the fluids to the reactive silicate solids.
Other purposes, distinction over the art, advantages and features of this
invention
will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon reading this specification and
the appended
claims.
While the invention is susceptible of various modifications and alternative
forms,
specific embodiments thereof will hereinafter be described in detail and shown
by way of
example. It should be understood, however, that the claims should not be
limited by the
specific embodiments set forth but should be given the broadest interpretation
consistent
with the description as a whole.
The compositions can comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of the
stated
materials. The method can comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of the
stated steps with
the stated materials.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
The FGVSSAAMSGM is preferably formed by finely grinding an anhydrous sodium
silicate glass or an anhydrous potassium silicate glass.
The silicon dioxide to sodium oxide weight ratio in the sodium silicate glass
is in the
range from about 1.5:1 to about 3.3:1, preferably from about 1.75:1 to about
2.7:1, most
preferably in the range from about 2.0:1 to about 2.5:1.
The silicon dioxide to potassium oxide weight ratio in the potassium silicate
glass is
in the range from about 2:1 to about 3.5:1, preferably from about 2.25:1 to
about 3.25:1,
most preferably from about 2.5:1 to about 3.0:1.
7

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Silicate glasses of such ratios are very sparingly soluble thus having high
dissolution
times. As used herein, the phrase "very sparingly soluble" is intended to mean
that the
solubility of the anhydrous alkali metal silicate after one hour at 40 C (104
F) at a
concentration of one lb/bbl (0.2857 w/v %) in deionized water is such that
greater than
about 20% of the anhydrous sodium silicate and greater than about 45% of the
anhydrous
potassium silicate remain undissolved.
The particle size of the FGVSSAAMSGM should be smaller than the openings of
any screens which are utilized during circulation of the well drilling and
servicing fluids to
remove the drill cuttings from the fluids. Thus the FGVSSAAMSGM will remain in
the well
drilling and servicing fluids while continuing the well drilling and servicing
operations.
Preferably 90% by weight of the particles of the FGVSSAAMSGM will pass
through a 200 mesh screen, U.S. Sieve Series (i.e., 74 microns).
The fluids of this invention will contain a continuous aqueous phase with
additives
added thereto to provide the fluids with the desired properties and
characteristics. These
additives may be viscosifiers, suspending agents, fluid loss control agents,
weighting
materials, lubricity agents, other shale inhibitors, soluble salts, an
emulsified oleaginous
phase, and other additives all as is known in the well drilling and servicing
fluid art.
The well drilling and servicing fluids of this invention containing the
FGVSSAAMSGM have a pH in the range from about 8.0 less than 11.0, preferably
from
about 8.5 to about 10.5.
The well drilling and servicing fluids of this invention containing the
FGVSSAAMSGM may have incorporated therein one or more water soluble salts to
further
decrease the swelling and water sorption of shales and shale-containing
cuttings contacted
8

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
by the well drilling and servicing fluids. The water soluble salts should have
a monovalent
cation to prevent the precipitation of the solublized silicate anion and
reaction with the solid
FGVSSAAMSGM. Preferred are potassium salts such as potassium carbonate,
potassium
chloride, potassium formate; potassium acetate and other water soluble
potassium salts.
In order to more completely describe the invention, the following non-limiting
examples are given. In these examples and the specification, the following
abbreviations
may be used, all as are well known in the art: lb = pound; API = American
Petroleum
Institute; gal = gallon; I = liter; hr = hour; HR = hot roll; AM = alkali
metal; F = degrees
Fahrenheit; g = grams; mg = milligrams; ml = milliliters; min = minutes; cP =
centipoises;
1() rpm = revolutions per minute; in = inches; ft = foot.
In the examples, New Gel NTTm, New EdgeTM, and NEW PAC LVTM, products of
Newpark Drilling Fluids, Inc., Houston, Texas are respectively: an untreated
bentonite clay;
an oxidized sub-bituminous coal; and a low viscosity polyanionic cellulose.
Examples of the fluids of this invention and the effect of either a finely
ground (-200
mesh (U.S. Standard Sieve Series) or -74 microns) anhydrous sodium silicate
glass having a
Si02/Na20 wt. ratio of 2.0 or a finely ground anhydrous potassium silicate
glass having a
Si02/K20 wt. ratio of 2.5 on the properties of the fluids is set forth
hereinafter. The properties
were measured by the procedure set forth in API Recommended Practice RP13B.
The
SHALE RECOVERY testing procedure is as follows:
After mixing, the mud properties for each sample are tested. Wedges cut from a
preserved downhole shale core were placed in each of the muds, which had been
hot rolled,
and the muds were rolled an additional 16 hr at 150 F. The initial moisture of
the shale was
determined. Each shale wedge was tested as to initial weight (approximately 30
to 40 g) and
9

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
both wet and dry weight after exposure to a mud. These tests permitted
calculation of the
percent by weight recovery of the simulated shale cuttings and the moisture
content of the
shale exposed to each of the muds. The shale used for this testing was a
preserved
downhole shale cored at a depth of about 12,900ft in the Mississippi Canyon
Block751 area
of the Gulf of Mexico.

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Table 1
Effectiveness of FGVSSAAMSGM in Inhibiting the Hydration and Dispersion
Of Simulated Shale Cuttings, AM = Sodium
Composition Number 1-1 1-2 1-3 Base
Mud
_
Base Mud, ml 350 350 350 350
Freshwater, ml 341 341 341 341
NewGel NT, g 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Caustic Soda, g 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
New Edge, g 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
NewPac LV, g 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
SS C200 (Na Silicate) g(*) 0.25 (0.07) 0.50 (0.146) 1.0
(0.292) 0
API Rheology 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F
600 rpm 27 18 27 18 28 22
300 rpm 16 11 16 11 17 14
200 rpm 13 8 12 9 13 11
100 rpm 8 6 8 7 8 7
6 rpm 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 rpm 2 2 2 2 2 2
Plastic Viscosity, cP 11 7 11 7 11 7
Yield Point, lb/100ft2 5 4 5 4 5 7
Initial Gel, lb/100ft2 3 3 3 3 3 3
min Gel, lb/100ft2 7 6 6 7 7 8
Measure Density, lb/gal 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60
pH 10.71 10.77 10.91 10.68
After hot rolling 16 hr @ 150 F
API Rheology 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F
600 rpm 57 37 64 44 65 43 44 32
300 rpm 34 22 38 27 37 25 26 20
200 rpm 25 17 28 20 27 19 20 14
100 rpm 16 11 18 l 17 12 12 10
11

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Table 1 (cont'd)
Effectiveness of FGVSSAAMSGM in Inhibiting the Hydration and Dispersion
Of Simulated Shale Cuttings, AM = Sodium
Composition Number 1-1 1-2 1-3 Base Mud
6 rpm 5 4 6 5 5 4 5 4
3 rpm 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3
Plastic Viscosity, cP 23 15 26 17 28 18 18 12
Yield Point, lb/100ft2 11 7 12 10 9 7 8 8
Initial Gel, lb/100ft2 5 4 6 5 5 4 4 4
min Gel, lb/100ft2 12 8 13 9 10 7 11 10
pH 9.54 9.71 9.96 9.48
API Filtrate, m1/30 min 8.9 9.7 12.0 7.8
API Filter Cake, 1/32'' in 2 2 3 2
API Mud Alkalinity, ml 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.5
API Filtrate Alkalinites, Pf/Mf, ml 0.90/1.90 1.10/2.10
1.40/2.30 0.80/1.80
Calcium, mg/1 40 40 40 40
Chlorides, mg/1 700 700 800 800
Filtrate Sodium, mg/1 4,230 3,246 3,365 3,545
Filtrate Potassium, mg/1 37 42 32 37
Activity 0.990 0.992 0.995 0.993
SHALE RECOVERY
Initial shale weight, g 31.66 34.04 38.43 29.50
After HR exposure, weight, g 4.14 6.84 21.02 3.02
After HR exposure, dried weight, g 2.44 4.18 14.97
1.72
Cuttings recovery after hot rolling, wt% 9 14 44 7
Moisture content after hot rolling, wt% 41 39 29 43
Shale Activity 0.957 0.955 0.949 0.977
(*) wt.% AM Silicate based on the aqueous phase
12

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Table 2
Effectiveness of FGVSSAAMSGM in Inhibiting the Hydration and Dispersion
Of Simulated Shale Cuttings, AM = Potassium
Composition Number 2-1 2-2 2-3 Base
Mud
Base Mud, ml 350 350 350 350
Freshwater, ml 341 341 341 341
NewGel NT, g 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5
Caustic Soda, g 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
New Edge, g 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
NewPac LV, g 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Kasil SS (K Silicate) g(*) 0.25 (0.07) 0.50 (0.146) 1.0
(0.292) 0
API Rheology 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F
600 rpm 30 19 29 20 30 22
300 rpm 19 13 17 14 18 15
200 rpm 13 9 12 11 14 11
100 rpm 9 7 8 7 9 7
6 rpm 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 rpm 2 2 2 2 2 2
Plastic Viscosity, cP 11 6 12 6 12 7
Yield Point, lb/l 00ft2 8 7 5 8 6 8
Initial Gel, lb/100ft2 3 3 3 3 3 3
min Gel, lb/100ft2 7 6 6 8 6 7
Measure Density, lb/gal 8.60 8.60 8.60 8.60
pH 10.70 10.75 10.84 10.68
After hot rolling 16 hr @ 150 F
API Rheology 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F 80 F 120 F
600 rpm 54 34 66 39 84 50 44 32
300 rpm 32 20 40 24 51 30 26 20
200 rpm 23 14 29 17 38 24 20 14
100 rpm 14 10 18 11 24 15 12 10
13

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
Table 2 (cont'd)
Effectiveness of FGVSSAAMSGM in Inhibiting the Hydration and Dispersion
Of Simulated Shale Cuttings, AM = Potassium
Composition Number 2-1 2-2 2-3 Base
Mud
6 rpm 4 3 5 4 7 5 4 4
3 rpm 3 3 4 3 5 4 4 3
Plastic Viscosity, cP 22 14 26 15 33 20 18 12
Yield Point, lb/100ft2 10 6 14 9 18 10 8 8
Initial Gel, lb/100ft2 4 3 5 4 7 5 4 4
min Gel, lb/100ft2 8 7 9 8 10 11 11 10
pH 10.52 10.56 10.72 9.48
API Filtrate, m1/30 min 8.8 9.8 11.0 7.8
API Filter Cake, 1/32nd in 2 2 3 2
API Mud Alkalinity, ml 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.50
Filtrate Alkalinites, Pf/Mf, ml 0.70/1.60 0.80/1.70
1.20/2.10 0.80/1.80
Calcium, mg/1 40 40 40 40
Chlorides, mg/1 700 700 800 500
Filtrate Sodium, mg/1 2,852 2,598 3,233 3,545
Filtrate Potassium, mg/1 95 164 245 37
Activity 0.997 0.996 0.995 0.993
SHALE RECOVERY
Initial shale weight, g 25.29 32.05 36.85 29.50
After HR exposure weight, g 2.91 7.94 16.04 3.02
After HR exposure dried, weight, g 1.63 4.91 12.48 1.72
Cuttings recovery after hot rolling, wt% 7 17 38 7
Moisture content after hot rolling, wt% 44 38 22 43
Shale Activity 0.948 0.946 0.941 0.977
(*) wt.% AM Silicate based on the aqueous phase
14

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
The process of this invention of increasing the recovery of shale-containing
cuttings
while circulating a drilling fluid in a borehole while drilling is exemplified
by utilizing the
drilling fluids of examples 1-2, 1-3, 2-2 and 2-3 in which the concentration
of the
FGVSSAAMSGM is greater than about 0.1% by weight of the aqueous phase of the
drilling
fluid.
The concentration of soluble silica in the aqueous phase of the drilling fluid
is
determined by measuring the concentration of silica in the filtrate obtained
from the drilling
fluid at the flowline of the well. The filtrate can be obtained by any
filtration procedure
which separates the liquid and solid phases of the drilling fluid, such as the
filtration
procedures set forth in API Recommended Practice RP 13B.
A suitable titration method for measuring the concentration of silica in the
filtrate is
to determine the alkali concentration by titrating the filtrate with 0.2
normal HC1 followed
by titrating another sample of the filtrate with 2.0 normal HCI as follows:
Field Test Method for Alkali Content in an Alkali Metal Silicate Drilling
Fluid
1. Principle:
A sample of potassium silicate drilling fluid filtrate is weighed into a flask
and
mixed with water and a small amount of indicator (methyl orange). The mixed
solution is
then titrated with 0.2N HCI acid. All materials that react with acid are
titrated and are
calculated as a percent potassium oxide (K20).
2. Equipment and Chemicals:
1. Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) - 0.2 Normal
2. Prepared Methyl Orange Indicator* (actually green in color)
3. Beaker-400m1

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
4. Calibrated Burette/Pipette - 25m1
5. Graduated Cylinder ¨ 100m1
*Methyl orange xylene can be purchased at most major suppliers of laboratory
chemicals (i.e., Fisher Scientific)
3. Safety:
Follow safe laboratory procedures such as wearing eye protection and gloves
while
handling chemicals.
4. Procedure:
a. Measure 5 ml (to the nearest 0.1 ml) of an alkali metal silicate drilling
fluid
filtrate into a beaker.
b. Add 100m1 of distilled water and swirl beaker until completely mixed.
c. Add 4 drops of prepared methyl orange indicator and swirl beaker, solution
will
turn green.
d. Titrate sample with 0.2 Normal HC1 acid till a grey/light purple color
develops
e. Record volume of HCl acid used.
5. Calculation:
For Potassium Silicate For Sodium Silicate
V x 0.94 = % K20 V x 0.62 = % Na20
V = volume in ml of HC1 used during titration
W = weight in grams of silicate drilling fluid sample
6. Precision and Accuracy:
Samples should be done in duplicate. Accuracy of this procedure can be
effected by
16

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
other mud ingredients (ex. caustic, sodium silicate, sodium carbonate etc.)
acid/or possible
contamination from the drill hole.
Field Test Method for Silica Content in an Alkali Metal Silicate Drilling
Fluid
1. Principle:
A sample of silicate drilling fluid filtrate is weighed into a flask and mixed
with
water and a small amount of indicator (methyl red). The mixed solution is then
titrated with
2.0N HCI acid until the solution turns and stays reddish-orange.
2. Equipment and Chemicals:
1. Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) - 2.0 Normal
2. Sodium Fluoride
3. Prepared Methyl Red* (actually orange in color)
4. Beaker - 400m1
5. Calibrated Burette/Pipette - 25m1
6. Graduated Cylinder ¨ 100m1
*1 gram methyl red indicator dissolved in 600m1 methanol. Add 400m1 distilled
water to bring final volume to 1 liter.
3. Safety:
Follow safe laboratory procedures such as wearing eye protection and gloves
when
handling chemicals. It is recommended that a dust mask be worn when handling
NaF
powder.
4. Procedure:
a. Measure 5m1 (to the nearest 0.1m1) of an alkali metal silicate
drilling fluid filtrate
into a beaker.
17

CA 02526998 2005-11-15
b. Add 100m1 of distilled water and swirl beaker until completely mixed.
c. Add 4 drops of prepared methyl red indicator and swirl beaker, solution
will turn
yellow.
d. Titrate sample with 2.0 Normal Ha acid to a red color, while stirring
constantly.
e. Add 4g of previously weighed sodium fluoride and mix thoroughly. The color
will turn back to yellow.
f. Continue titration after the addition of sodium fluoride. Titrate
until the yellow
color disappears and a reddish-orange color develops and stays.
5. Calculation:
For Potassium Silicate For Sodium Silicate
%K20 x W = alkali correction (AC) %Na20 x W = alkali correction (AC)
9.42 6.2
(V-AC) x 3.0 = % Si02 (V-AC)_x 3.0 = % Si02
%K20, %Na20 = previously calculated from alkali titration
V = volume in ml of HCl used during titration
W = weight in grams of silicate drilling fluid filtrate sample
6. Precision and Accuracy:
Samples should be done in duplicate. Accuracy of this procedure can be
effected by
other mud ingredients and/or possible contamination from the drill hole.
18

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2526998 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Maintenance Fee Payment Determined Compliant 2024-10-21
Maintenance Request Received 2024-10-21
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-01-09
Letter Sent 2015-11-23
Inactive: Correspondence - MF 2015-11-10
Inactive: Office letter 2015-10-28
Letter Sent 2015-06-03
Inactive: Correspondence - MF 2015-04-30
Inactive: Correspondence - MF 2015-01-14
Inactive: Office letter 2014-10-29
Grant by Issuance 2013-12-31
Inactive: Cover page published 2013-12-30
Pre-grant 2013-10-21
Inactive: Final fee received 2013-10-21
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-04-22
Letter Sent 2013-04-22
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-04-22
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2013-04-15
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-01-23
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2012-07-24
Letter Sent 2010-11-03
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-10-18
Request for Examination Received 2010-10-18
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2010-10-18
Letter Sent 2009-01-29
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons 2009-01-08
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2008-11-17
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2007-04-30
Inactive: Cover page published 2007-04-29
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2007-01-17
Inactive: Correspondence - Transfer 2006-12-01
Inactive: Acknowledgment of s.8 Act correction 2006-11-07
Inactive: Applicant deleted 2006-10-31
Letter Sent 2006-10-31
Letter Sent 2006-10-31
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities 2006-10-23
Inactive: S.8 Act correction requested 2006-10-18
Inactive: Single transfer 2006-10-18
Inactive: IPC assigned 2006-03-05
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2006-02-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 2006-02-10
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2006-01-03
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2006-01-03
Application Received - Regular National 2006-01-03
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2005-01-10

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2008-11-17

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2013-10-16

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NEWPARK DRILLING FLUIDS, LLC
Past Owners on Record
HARRY L., JR. DEARING
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2005-11-15 18 558
Abstract 2005-11-15 1 15
Claims 2005-11-15 3 77
Cover Page 2007-04-25 1 32
Description 2013-01-23 18 559
Claims 2013-01-23 3 80
Cover Page 2013-11-28 1 32
Confirmation of electronic submission 2024-10-21 1 61
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-10-31 1 105
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2006-10-31 1 105
Filing Certificate (English) 2007-01-17 1 167
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2007-07-17 1 112
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2009-01-12 1 173
Notice of Reinstatement 2009-01-29 1 164
Reminder - Request for Examination 2010-07-19 1 120
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2010-11-03 1 189
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2013-04-22 1 164
Maintenance fee payment 2023-11-07 1 26
Correspondence 2006-01-04 1 27
Correspondence 2006-10-18 2 52
Correspondence 2006-10-23 1 32
Fees 2009-01-08 1 42
Correspondence 2013-10-21 1 37
Correspondence 2014-10-29 1 27
Correspondence 2015-01-14 1 36
Correspondence 2015-04-30 1 36
Correspondence 2015-06-03 1 23
Courtesy - Office Letter 2015-10-28 1 29
Maintenance fee correspondence 2015-11-10 5 200
Courtesy - Acknowledgment of Refund 2015-11-23 1 20