Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.
Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:
(12) Patent Application: | (11) CA 2534007 |
---|---|
(54) English Title: | ENHANCED VEHICLE SAFETY BUMPER (EVSB) |
(54) French Title: | PARE-CHOCS DE SECURITE AMELIORE POUR VEHICULE |
Status: | Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication |
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC): |
|
---|---|
(72) Inventors : |
|
(73) Owners : |
|
(71) Applicants : |
|
(74) Agent: | |
(74) Associate agent: | |
(45) Issued: | |
(22) Filed Date: | 2006-01-19 |
(41) Open to Public Inspection: | 2007-07-19 |
Availability of licence: | N/A |
Dedicated to the Public: | N/A |
(25) Language of filing: | English |
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): | No |
---|
(30) Application Priority Data: | None |
---|
Most of the dangerous accidents occur during the head on collisions of
vehicles from the front
or the rear. The Bumpers are designed to take impact loading but in most of
the cases the
impact from the bumpers is transmitted to the vehicle body and to the
occupants. To reduce
the impact on the vehicle body and its occupants various designs of bumpers
have been tried
out including special materials and flexing of bumpers. Yet the extent of
damage to the
vehicles and injuries of occupants have not been drastically reduced.
The Enhanced Vehicle Safety Bumper (referred to as ESVB, in short) consists of
a double
walled Bumper design with compression springs in between. The design, rating,
size,
selection and number of compression springs is such that the entire impact
load transmitted
during a collision would be absorbed by the compression springs via the outer
bumper wall.
The outer bumper wall would be the first to face the impact load and it would
transfer the
same to the compression springs. The compression springs are designed to
absorb two
opposite forces (both the vehicles in the accident) and would compress and
deflect under load
such that there would be none or minimal load transmission of impact to the
inner bumper
wall which is attached to the vehicle frame. Thus the collision load/impact is
not transmitted
to the vehicle body and hence the occupants of the vehicle
The above design would cause minimal damage to the vehicle as well as to its
occupants
during any accident or collision saving immense cost due to vehicle damage or
injuries to the
occupants of the vehicle.
At this stage only the front and rear bumpers will be designed according to
the above scheme.
At a later date the same scheme will be utilized for the sides of the vehicle,
keeping aesthetic
aspects of the vehicle intact.
Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.
Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.
For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee and Payment History should be consulted.
Description | Date |
---|---|
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline | 2012-01-19 |
Time Limit for Reversal Expired | 2012-01-19 |
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented | 2011-10-21 |
Inactive: Abandon-RFE+Late fee unpaid-Correspondence sent | 2011-01-19 |
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice | 2011-01-19 |
Inactive: Office letter | 2010-09-23 |
Letter Sent | 2009-04-23 |
Reinstatement Requirements Deemed Compliant for All Abandonment Reasons | 2009-03-31 |
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice | 2009-01-19 |
Inactive: Correspondence - Formalities | 2007-09-17 |
Inactive: Compliance - Formalities: Resp. Rec'd | 2007-09-17 |
Inactive: Incomplete | 2007-09-06 |
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) | 2007-07-19 |
Inactive: Cover page published | 2007-07-18 |
Inactive: IPC assigned | 2006-06-30 |
Inactive: First IPC assigned | 2006-06-30 |
Application Received - Regular National | 2006-02-22 |
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant | 2006-02-22 |
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) | 2006-02-22 |
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant | 2006-01-19 |
Abandonment Date | Reason | Reinstatement Date |
---|---|---|
2011-01-19 | ||
2009-01-19 |
The last payment was received on 2009-10-27
Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.
Fee Type | Anniversary Year | Due Date | Paid Date |
---|---|---|---|
Application fee - small | 2006-01-19 | ||
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small | 02 | 2008-01-21 | 2007-01-02 |
2007-09-17 | |||
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small | 03 | 2009-01-19 | 2009-03-31 |
Reinstatement | 2009-03-31 | ||
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard | 04 | 2010-01-19 | 2009-10-27 |
Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.
Current Owners on Record |
---|
SHAMSHER S. BHACHU |
Past Owners on Record |
---|
None |