Language selection

Search

Patent 2566520 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2566520
(54) English Title: FORMING SIEVE FOR THE WET END SECTION OF A PAPER MACHINE
(54) French Title: PROCEDE PERMETTANT DE FORMER UN TAMIS POUR LA PARTIE HUMIDE D'UNE MACHINE A PAPIER
Status: Granted
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • D21F 1/10 (2006.01)
  • D06C 9/00 (2006.01)
  • D06C 15/00 (2006.01)
  • D06C 27/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • PITZLER, JOACHIM (Germany)
  • BAUMANN, OLIVER (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • HUYCK, WANGNER GERMANY GMBH (Germany)
(71) Applicants :
  • WANGNER GMBH & CO. KG (Germany)
(74) Agent: MILLER THOMSON LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2012-08-14
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2005-05-03
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2005-11-24
Examination requested: 2009-06-22
Availability of licence: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2005/004787
(87) International Publication Number: WO2005/111302
(85) National Entry: 2006-11-14

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
20 2004 008 078.8 Germany 2004-05-19
20 2004 009 300.6 Germany 2004-06-11

Abstracts

English Abstract




A sieve for the wet-end section of a paper machine is described, in which the
sieve has been
compressed by at least one of increased temperature, pressure and/or moisture.
In an
embodiment, one or more of the thread inflection shape, the width of the
thread floats and
knuckles, the height of the thread floats and knuckles, the degree of
ellipticity of the threads, the
total contact area of the sieve and the void size lying between the threads is
varied cross each
point of the sieve's width. Such a treatment leads to a sieve which has at
least one side
wherein the thread floats and knuckles are reshaped and the sieve presents at
least one
substantially flatter surface for the production of paper. Advantageously,
this process does not
cause any physical damage to the surface of the sieve, as prior techniques of
abrasively
polishing the surface do.


French Abstract

La présente invention concerne un tamis destiné à la partie humide d'une machine à papier, dans laquelle le tamis est comprimé par au moins une augmentation de température, de pression et/ou d'humidité. Un tel traitement permet d'obtenir un tamis présentant au moins un côté dont le filet flotte et les joints d'articulation sont reformés; le tamis présente au moins une surface essentiellement plus plate pour la production de papier. Le procédé décrit dans cette invention ne provoque aucun dommage sur la surface du tamis, comme c'est le cas pour les techniques actuelles qui consistent à polir la surface par abrasion. Ce mode de réalisation permet également d'obtenir des étoffes présentant des propriétés améliorées et des durées de vie plus longues.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.




Claims

1. Single or multilayered forming sieve for the wet end-section of a paper
machine with
upper machine-direction, MD, and cross-machine-direction, CMD, threads facing
the
paper side, and lower MD and CMD threads facing the machine, characterized in
that: at
least the paper-side thread floats and knuckles (10) are reshaped by means of
one or a
combination of temperature, pressure and/or moisture; wherein one, or a
combination of
more than one, of: the thread inflection shape, the width of the thread floats
and
knuckles (10), the height of the thread floats and knuckles (10), the degree
of ellipticity of
the threads (13), the total contact area of the sieve and the void size lying
between the
threads (13) varies across each point of the sieve's width.

2. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the threads (12, 13) are made of, or
contain, one or
more than one of a polymer, a polyamide or a polyolefin.

3. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the temperature lies between 100
degree C and
190 degree C.

4. Sieve according to claim 3, wherein, the temperature lies between 150
degree C and
170 degree C.

5. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the pressure lies between 10 kPa and
40 kPa.

6. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the threads on the paper side have a
diameter of
between 0.09 mm and 0.20 mm, and the machine-side threads have a diameter of
between 0.15 mm and 0.30 mm.

7. Sieve according to claim 6, wherein, the threads on the paper side have a
diameter of
0.13 mm, and the machine-side threads have a diameter of 0.18 mm.

8. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the width of the thread floats and
knuckles (10) is
greater than the diameter of the remainder of the thread (13), by between 5%
and 15%.
9. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the height of the thread floats and
knuckles (10) is
between 10% and 30% less than the diameter of the remainder of the thread
(13).





10. Sieve according to claim 9, wherein, the height of the thread floats and
knuckles (10) is
20% less than the diameter of the remainder of the thread (13).

11. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the thread floats and knuckles
comprise flat "thread
ellipses" (11) extending approximately parallel with the plane of the sieve.

12. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, the total contact area of the sieve
is about 40 to
45% of the total surface area of the sieve.

13. Sieve according to claim 1, wherein, as a result of the thread inflection
regions being
reshaped, the void size lying between the threads (13) is reduced by between
1% and
15% from the original void size prior to inflection region reshaping.

14. A method of forming a sieve for the wet end-section of a paper machine,
comprising:
calendering a sieve fabric with a plurality of rollers at one, or a
combination of more than
one, of: temperature, pressure and/or moisture, so as to permanently reshape
the thread
inflection regions at least on the paper-side of the sieve; wherein at least
one of the
plurality of rollers is formed from a plurality of segments which can be
individually
adjusted to change the pressure exerted on the fabric, so that the resulting
sieve has a
tailored cross sectional profile across its width.

15. The method according to claim 14, wherein, the pressure lies between 10
kPa and 40
kPa.

16. The method according to claim 14, wherein, the temperature lies between
100 degree C
and 190 degree C.

17. The method according to claim 14, wherein, the temperature lies between
150 degree C
and 170 degree C.


11



18. A method of forming a sieve for the wet end-section of a paper machine,
comprising:
calendering a sieve fabric with a plurality of rollers at one, or a
combination of more than
one, of. temperature, pressure and/or moisture, so as to permanently reshape
the thread
inflection regions at least on the paper-side of the sieve; wherein at least
one of the
plurality of rollers can be heated to apply a specific heat to the sieve
during processing,
and the temperature can be changed along the length of the roller to apply a
specific
profile to the sieve.


12

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.



CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787

Forming Sieve for the Wet End Section of a Paaer Machine

The present invention relates to a single- or multiple-layered forming sieve
for the wet end
section of a paper machine, according to the pre-characterizing section of
Claim 1.

Background to the Invention

In the conventional Fourdrinier paper-manufacturing method, an aqueous pulp or
suspension of cellulose fibres (known as "paper stock") is placed onto the
upper surface
of a so-called endless web made of wire and/or a synthetic material. This wire
web acts,as
a filter, which causes the cellulose fibres to be separated from the aqueous
medium and
form a so-called wet-paper sheet. During formation of this wet-paper sheet,
the forming
sieve acts as a filter which separates the aqueous medium from the cellulose
fibres, as
the aqueous medium passes through the openings in the sieve.

To accelerate the removal of the water, the filtering process is very often
carried out with
the additional action of a vacuum applied to the underside of the sieve, i.e.
on the
machine side. Once the paper sheet has left the forming end section it is
transferred to a
press section of the paper machine, at this point it is guided through the gap
between a
pair, or several pairs, of pressure rollers, over which is stretched another
fabric: a so-
called "press felt". The pressure of the rollers acting on the paper sheet
removes
additional moisture, and is frequently enhanced by the presence of a "mat"
layer within the
press felt. After passing through the pressing section, the paper is sent to a
drying section
of the machine for further removal of moisture. After drying, the paper is
ready for any
secondary processing which may be undertaken and finally packing.


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787
The sieves used in paper-machines are made available as endless webs, and are
manufactured by one of two methods. According to the first method, the free
ends of
individual flat woven webs are connected together by a procedure known as
"splicing",
and in so doing the endless web is formed. In flat-woven paper-machine sieves
formed in
this way, the warp threads run in the machine direction, and the filling or
weft threads run
in the cross direction. According to the second production technique, the
paper-machine
sieves are directly fashioned in the form of a continuous strip, by the so-
called endless-
web method. In this method, the warp threads run in the cross direction of the
machine,
with the weft threads in the machine direction. Within the relevant
literature, abbreviations
for these terms are commonly used, with MD standing for "machine direction"
and CMD
for "cross machine direction".

Within the wet end section of a paper machine, it is extremely important to
maintain the
cellulose fibres in the suspension on the paper side of the sieve, and to
avoid markings
within the forming sheet. These markings can occur when individual cellulose
fibres are
oriented within the paper sheet, such that their ends coincide with
interstices between the
individual threads of the sieve. In general, an attempt is made to solve this
problem by
providing a permeable sieve structure which is possessed of a coplanar
surface, and
which further allows the paper fibres to form a bridge over adjacent threads
in the fabric
and not penetrate into the interstices between them. As used herein,
"coplanar" means
that the uppermost parts of the threads, those which define the paper-forming
surface of
the sieve and are termed floats or knuckles respectively, lie at substantially
the same
height, so as to present a surface which is substantially "planar". Fine
paper, such as that
used for high-quality printing, carbonization, cigarettes, electrical
capacitors, and other
papers of similar quality, has previously been produced on very finely woven
sieves, as
these present the flattest surfaces.

In order to make the surface of the cloth as close to planar as possible,
particularly in the
case of forming sieves, the surfaces are very often ground down with fine-
grain emery
paper. Such grinding is intended to improve the topography of the paper, and
lead to a
better final surface. Unfortunately, by grinding the surface in this way, the
thread floats
and knuckles of a sieve become damaged; this can be seen in Figs. 3 and 4 when
compared with Figs. 1 and 2. Fig. 1 shows a section of a forming sieve which
has not
been processed, that is the floats or knuckles have not been ground with emery
paper.
Fig. 2 shows a section of the sieve according to Fig. 1, but under greater
magnification.
Figs. 3 and 4 correspond to the photographs shown in Figs. 1 and 2, with the
exception
2


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787
that in the sieve according to Figs. 3 and 4, the topography of the paper has
been evened
out by grinding down the floats or knuckles. Whilst this particular levelling
procedure does
not reduce the interior volume of the sieve, the thickness is slightly
reduced. This has
further disadvantageous side effects, in that the stability of the sieve is
adversely affected
as a result: primarily, the loss of material entails a lower sieve stiffness.
Furthermore, it
has been found that as a result of this mechanical intervention, the sieve
suffers from
increased abrasion and hence a shorter operating life. In the case of threads
with small
diameters, e.g. 0.11 mm to 0.13 mm, the grinding process reduces the cross
section of
the threads by 30-40%. Such severe mechanical alteration of the threads, and
hence of
the sieve, can be seen as the root cause of the reduction in sieve stiffness.
This is a
further problem, as current trends in the paper industry are moving
increasingly towards
even thinner sieves with. correspondingly thinner thread diameters. With this
progression,
limits are being placed on the mechanical alterations possible in order to
produce
coplanar sieve surfaces.

To further elucidate the state of the art as shown in Figs. 1 to 4, reference
is also made to
Figs. 5 and 6 as well as 7 and B. Fig. 5 shows the contact surface of a sieve
according to
Figs. 1 and 2, the untreated sieve, wherein about 30% of the total surface
comprises the
contact surface of the sieve. Fig. 6 shows the "standard" shape of floats and
knuckles
present in an untreated sieve, according to Figs. I and 2. Figs. 7 and 8
detail the structure
of a ground-down sieve, wherein removal of 0.02 mm from the protruding floats
and
knuckles, increases the contact surface of the sieve to about 34%. The float
or knuckle
shape after grinding is shown in Fig. 8.

An objective of the current invention, is the preparation of sieves that
present a highly
coplanar surface, at least on the paper side, but preferably on both the paper
and
machine sides. This is to be achieved, even for sieves that are considerably
thinner than
those disclosed in the art, and have correspondingly reduced thread diameters.
In light of
the various problems presented above, this objective is to be achieved in
particular for so-
called forming sieves, i.e. sieves intended for use in the wet end section of
a paper
machine.

Summary of the Invention

The above objective is achieved by the characterizing features given in Claim
1, with
advantageous further developments and embodiments being described in the
subordinate
claims.

3


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787

A single- or multilayered forming sieve for the wet end-section of a paper
machine with
upper machine-direction, MD, and cross-machine-direction, CMD, threads facing
the
paper side, and lower MD and CMD threads facing the machine is disclosed. The
forming
sieve having, at least the paper-side thread inflection regions reshaped by
means of one
or a combination of temperature, pressure and/or moisture. A method for
achieving such
reshaping is given in claim 15, wherein rollers are used for the application
of the pressure
and/or temperature.

Detailed Description of One Way of Implementing the Invention.

The production of sieves for paper machines in the current invention, is based
around a
system of compacting or "hot calendering" the fabric making up the sieve, in a
press
arrangement. This action is undertaken at least at one of, or a combination
of: an elevated
pressure, an elevated temperature and/or at an elevated moisture level, for a
specific
time; this time being a result of the chosen threads, and the desired
properties of the
finished product.

When fabrics which are possessed of an endless structure are employed, that is
there are
no ends making up a joining seam, they are usually configured with two warp
thread
systems. The calendering, or compacting, of this fabric is accomplished
between at least
two rollers, as can be seen in the examples shown in Fig. 9. Whilst three
possible
structures are shown in this figure detailing apparatus for compacting the
fabric, these are
not to be considered as limiting the invention in any way, and are shown as
examples
only.

Fig. 9b shows the simplest structure, in that only two rollers are provided,
between which
the fabric is compacted. In order to increase the usable area of the heated
roller, which in
turn means that the fabric will be in contact with the heat for a greater
length of time, a
third roller c can be provided as shown in figs. 9 a and Fig. 9 c.
Furthermore, these
additional rollers can be heatable if further heat application to the fabric
is required in the
process. The specific number and relative positions of the fabric, can be
chosen
depending upon the precise requirements of the fabric and the final desired
structure at
the surface thereof.

To compact or calender the fabric of the sieve, requires the provision of two
rollers which
can be brought together and a desired pressure applied between them. These are
shown
4


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787

by reference numerals A and B in Fig. 9. Here, the sieve fabric passes between
the gap
provided between the two rollers, and the required pressure is applied; this
pressure,
commonly lies between 10 and 40 kPa. The roller A, called a press roller, is
formed of a
plurality of segments which run along the width of the sieve fabric and can be
tuned to
provide different pressures across the sieve. This plurality of press rollers,
allows the final
sieve to be formed with a specific and selectable cross sectional profile.

As shown in the examples of Fig. 9, at least one of the rollers can be heated,
with the
temperature lying somewhere between 100-190 C, although it has been found that
most
processes are undertaken in the range 140-170 C. The specific temperature
chosen will
depend upon the thread within the fabric, and the final desired structure to
the surface of
the sieve. It is possible to heat one or both sides of the fabric as it is
being compacted,
and it is further possible to adjust the temperature profile along the width
and length of the
fabric during such processing. This will result in a fabric for which, at each
point along its
length and width, the specific temperature and pressure can be individually
tailored to suit
the desired final requirements of the sieve in a targeted manner.

For fabrics that are possessed of two ends, which are joined together via a
seam to form
the endless structure, the compacting process is a little different.
Initially, it is necessary to
specifically control the pressures which are applied to the starting and end
points of the
fabric. This is achieved by providing a ramp control to the applied pressure,
wherein the
machine is aware of the start and end points to the fabric, and thus a process
is achieved
which suffers from no transitions. All other processing of the "fabric follows
the method
detailed above for the preformed endless fabric.
The specific tension applied to the fabric during the calendering process,
whether
preformed or one with a seam, is dependent upon the individual fabric design.
During the
compacting process the fabric will change its length by up to 1.5%, a fact
which requires
taking into account at the fabric forming stage and prior to the calendering
process.
Furthermore, changes to the width of the fabric, which lie in the range 0-3%
are generally
monitored, and compensated for with simultaneous thermal treatment of the
fabric.

As shown in Fig. 9c, an additional drying unit can be provided which applies
heat to the
fabric after the compacting process. This is shown in the figure as being
provided by a
heat box with a tenter for drying the fabric over. Clearly, other options
exist for this drying
stage, and are not limited to that disclosed in the drawings.

5


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787
The threads which form the fabric of the sieves can comprise or contain a
polymer such
as one, or a combination of: a polyester, a polyamide and/or a polyolefin.
Furthermore, the
calendering process as disclosed can readily be implemented on sieves which
have warp
threads present on the paper side with a diameter of between 0.09 and 0.20 mm,
and
machine-side warp threads having a diameter of between 0.15 and 0.30 mm. In
particular
the paper side threads are chosen with a diameter of 0.13mm and the machine-
side
threads with a diameter of about 0.18 mm. Additionally, the compressive
process can be
used on fabrics which are possessed of one or multiple layers.

As is shown in Figs. 10 and 11, the fabrics processed according to the current
invention,
have a substantially different structure to those processed with the
conventional grinding
techniques. The knuckles or floats of the interwoven threads, can be seen to
have a
compacted or flattened shape on the side facing the paper and/or the
papermaking
machine. The key difference here, however, is that the floats or knuckles are
not
mechanically damaged as they are when ground down; compare Fig. 11 with Fig.
4. In
addition to this, there is the further advantage that the calendered fabric
has no loss of
material, as Fig. 12 shows when compared with Fig. 8, which removes the
problems
associated with the sieves having a reduced stiffness.

The protruding knuckles or floats (10), can be seen in Figs. 10 and 11 to be
somewhat
flattened as a result of the compacting. This produces a relatively broad
"thread ellipse"
(11), which will run quietly within the paper machine as the fabric moves. As
a result of
this "thread ellipse", the width of the permanently flattened floats and
knuckles is greater
than the diameter of the remainder of the thread, which is best observed in
Fig. 11.
Indeed, it is preferable that the width of the flattened floats and knuckles
be about 5-15%
greater than the diameter of the remainder of the thread. Furthermore, the
height of the
flattened floats and knuckles is reduced by about 10-30%, and preferably is
approximately
20% less than the diameter of the remainder of the thread. That is, compacting
has
reduced the diameter by about 30-50%.
By compacting the threads in the fabric of the sieve at the float or knuckle
points, the
contact area of the sieve with the paper is increased by around 25-30%, when
compared
with an untreated sieve. This increase, leads to a sieve which is possessed of
a contact
area that is around 40-45% of the total area of the sieve. Such a measurement
can be
seen in Fig. 4, wherein a treated fabric is shown to have a contact area of 41
% of its total
surface area. Comparing Fig. 13 with both of Figs. 5 and 7, it is clear that
the current
invention shows greatly improved surface characteristics to the fabric over
the prior art
6


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787
techniques.

In addition to the increase in contact area for the calendered fabrics, these
sieves have
much smoother surfaces, when compared with untreated or ground fabrics, which
leads to
a much improved final paper topography. Moreover, a sieve which has
appropriately
compacted floats on the paper-machine side in addition to the paper side,
shows no
different weft knuckle heights when the fabric is loaded, as would be caused
by different
materials: this again improves the final paper surface as the knuckle heights
are reduced
on the paper machine side, other problems associated with new sieves running
on the
machine are dramatically. reduced. Of such problems, the most significant are
those
associated with the load which needs to be supported by the paper machine, and
the
starting up of the machine with a new sieve that has not been properly run-in.
In particular,
as a result of the broad, already formed, "thread ellipse", a sieve which is
adapted to the
machine is more rapidly obtained. In a papermaking machine a sieve which is
constructed
in accordance with the present invention, can start up more rapidly, it
requires less
subsequent adjustment and begins quiet running sooner, this is when compared
with
currently employed sieves.

Sieves with the float or knuckle shape in accordance with the invention,
exhibit no, or at
least greatly reduced, differences at the transition point between the seam
region and the
solid fabric. This leads to the sieves producing no marking on topographically
sensitive
kinds of paper. As a result of the slightly broader and flatter float shapes,
the sieve
exhibits higher stability and stiffness, because the interwoven threads are
displaced less
with respect to one another.
Clearly, the process of calendering a fabric leads to a permanent reduction in
the fabric
thickness as a result of the applied pressure. Depending upon the specific
treatment
applied, the thickness of the fabric can be reduced by between 1 and 20% of
the original.
In order to achieve this, the inflection heights and shapes of the individual
threads running
through the fabric are permanently altered. As there is no loss of material in
this
technique, merely a compressing, the weight per unit area of the fabric
remains constant.
In addition to the geometry of the threads within the sieve being altered
after calendering,
the internal volumes within the body of the fabric are permanently reduced.
Obviously,
when the fabrics are compressed and the thread geometry adjusted, it is
necessary for
the threads to move somewhere, and in this case there is a reduction in the
void size lying
between them as they are brought closer together. This reduction in cavity
size between
7


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787

the fibres has advantageous effects for the sieves as they run on the paper
making
machines. When the sieve is being used to hold the paper stock as the aqueous
medium
is being removed, it is possible for the cavities within the fabric to induce
turbulence as
they move. Such turbulence often produces the unwanted side effect of dragging
water
along with the cavities, as the sieve moves through the machine. Clearly, if
the water
remains within the sieve, the drying of the paper stock is adversely affected.
With the
reduction in cavity size associated with fabrics treated by the current
process, however,
the problems associated with turbulence and water logging are lessened. Once
again,
depending upon the specific fabric and treatment thereto, the cavities can be
reduced in
size by between 1 and 15%.

Further advantages result from the change in inflection points between the
threads in the
fabric, and from their altered geometry. With the increase in contact surface
area to the
fabric, there is a related increase to the level of friction between the
sieves and the paper
forming machine. This leads to a reduced delay in the movement of the fabric
when the
machinery is initially started, and further reductions in the transverse
motion whilst the
machine is running. Such improvements increases the efficiency of the paper
drying
process, whilst additionally requiring less adjustment to the belts with
prolonged usage.
Moreover, in the seam regions where present, the thread-thread friction is
increased with
this change in the inflection between the warp and weft threads, the result
being an
increase in the seam stability and strength.

Standard, that is un-calendered, sieves which are formed with a seam, will
tend to suffer
from inconsistencies in the thickness of the fabric between the regions of the
seam and
the main body of the fabric. This difference in surface properties can have
adverse effects
on the paper production, leading to marking of the page, and will also lead to
an increased
level of wear in this region. The compressing techniques of the current
invention,
however, alleviate these problems by giving a fabric which has a uniform
thickness along
its entire length. Furthermore, internal stresses and tensions on the fabric
threads which
result from these inconsistencies in the un-treated sieves, are substantially
equalised in
the fabric calendered in accordance with the present invention.

A final property of the fabric that is altered with the compressive treatment,
is that of the
permeability. It is assumed that it is the compaction of the fabric, giving
the reduction in
fabric thickness with corresponding changes to the void size and density,
which leads to
this difference. Dependent upon the initial fabric, and the treatment done
thereto, the
permeability can be reduced from between 0 and 30%, and this is usually taken
into
8


CA 02566520 2006-11-14
WO 2005/111302 PCT/EP2005/004787
consideration when the specific processing and fabric are being chosen.

While various features and embodiments of the invention are described above,
they can
readily be combined with each other resulting in further embodiments of the
invention.

9

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Administrative Status , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Administrative Status

Title Date
Forecasted Issue Date 2012-08-14
(86) PCT Filing Date 2005-05-03
(87) PCT Publication Date 2005-11-24
(85) National Entry 2006-11-14
Examination Requested 2009-06-22
(45) Issued 2012-08-14

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Payment History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Amount Paid Paid Date
Application Fee $400.00 2006-11-14
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-03-12
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 2 2007-05-03 $100.00 2007-04-16
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-04-30
Registration of a document - section 124 $100.00 2007-08-20
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 3 2008-05-05 $100.00 2008-03-25
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 4 2009-05-04 $100.00 2009-03-13
Request for Examination $800.00 2009-06-22
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 5 2010-05-03 $200.00 2010-03-24
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 6 2011-05-03 $200.00 2011-05-03
Maintenance Fee - Application - New Act 7 2012-05-03 $200.00 2012-04-25
Final Fee $300.00 2012-05-16
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 8 2013-05-03 $200.00 2013-04-03
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 9 2014-05-05 $200.00 2014-04-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 10 2015-05-04 $250.00 2015-04-27
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 11 2016-05-03 $250.00 2016-05-02
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 12 2017-05-03 $250.00 2017-05-01
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 13 2018-05-03 $250.00 2018-04-30
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 14 2019-05-03 $250.00 2019-04-26
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 15 2020-05-04 $450.00 2020-04-24
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 16 2021-05-03 $459.00 2021-04-23
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 17 2022-05-03 $458.08 2022-04-29
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 18 2023-05-03 $473.65 2023-04-28
Maintenance Fee - Patent - New Act 19 2024-05-03 $624.00 2024-04-26
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
HUYCK, WANGNER GERMANY GMBH
Past Owners on Record
BAUMANN, OLIVER
PITZLER, JOACHIM
WANGNER GMBH
WANGNER GMBH & CO. KG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Cover Page 2007-01-22 1 33
Abstract 2006-11-14 1 55
Claims 2006-11-14 3 96
Drawings 2006-11-14 7 670
Description 2006-11-14 9 497
Representative Drawing 2011-10-06 1 7
Abstract 2011-10-04 1 19
Claims 2011-10-04 3 87
Representative Drawing 2012-07-23 1 7
Cover Page 2012-07-23 2 49
Correspondence 2011-04-12 1 16
Assignment 2007-03-12 10 335
Correspondence 2007-01-18 1 28
PCT 2006-11-14 2 81
Assignment 2006-11-14 3 94
Correspondence 2007-04-20 1 23
Assignment 2007-04-30 4 121
Fees 2007-04-16 1 33
Correspondence 2007-07-05 1 28
Correspondence 2007-07-05 1 28
Assignment 2007-08-20 7 227
Correspondence 2011-04-20 2 66
Fees 2008-03-25 1 27
Fees 2010-03-24 1 200
Prosecution-Amendment 2009-06-22 1 30
Fees 2009-03-13 1 36
Correspondence 2010-11-15 3 67
Correspondence 2010-11-23 1 16
Correspondence 2010-11-23 1 22
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-04-04 3 103
Correspondence 2011-03-24 1 40
Correspondence 2011-05-02 1 17
Fees 2011-05-03 1 36
Prosecution-Amendment 2011-10-04 8 273
Fees 2012-04-25 1 163
Correspondence 2012-05-16 2 64
Fees 2013-05-03 2 67
Correspondence 2013-05-14 1 16
Correspondence 2013-05-31 3 84
Correspondence 2013-06-25 1 14