Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
SPLIT BALANCE WEIGHTS FOR ELIMINATING
DENSITY EFFECT ON FLOW
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to force balancing a Coriolis flow meter using
two or
more split Y-balance weights.
2. Statement of the Problem
Vibrating conduit sensors, such as Coriolis mass flow meters, typically
operate by detecting motion of a vibrating conduit that contains a material.
Properties associated with the material in the conduit, such as mass flow,
density
and the like, in the conduit may be determined by processing signals from
motion
transducers associated with the conduit, as the.vibration modes of the
vibrating
material-filled system generally are affected by the combined mass, stiffness
and
damping characteristics of the containing conduit and the material contained
therein.
A typical Coriolis mass flow meter includes one or more conduits that are
connected inline in a pipeline or other transport system and convey material,
e.g.,
fluids, slurries and the like, in the system. Each conduit may be viewed as
having a
set of natural vibration modes including, for example, simple bending,
torsional,
radial, and coupled modes. In a typical Coriolis mass flow measurement
application, a conduit is excited in one or more vibration modes as a material
flows
through the conduit, and motion of the conduit is measured at points spaced
along
the conduit. Excitation is typically provided by an actuator, e.g., an
electromechanical device, such as a voice coil-type driver, that perturbs the
conduit
in a periodic fashion. Mass flow rate may be determined by measuring time
delay
or phase differences between motions at the transducer locations.
The magnitude of the time delay is very small; often measured in
nanoseconds. Therefore, it is necessary to have the transducer output be very
accurate. Transducer accuracy may be compromised by nonlinearities and
asymmetries in the meter structure or from motion arising from extraneous
forces.
For example, a Coriolis mass flow meter having unbalanced components can
1
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
vibrate its case, flanges and the pipeline at the drive frequency of the
meter. This
vibration perturbs the time delay signal in an amount that depends on the
rigidity of
the mount. Additionally, a Coriolis flow meter determines the density of the
flow
material based on the frequency of the drive mode. If the drive mode includes
motion of the case, flanges, and pipeline, the performance of the density
measurement can be adversely affected. Since the rigidity of the mount is
generally unknown and can change over time and temperature, the effects of the
unbalanced components cannot be compensated and may significantly affect meter
performance. The effects of these unbalanced vibrations and mounting
variations
are reduced by using flow meter designs that are balanced and by using signal
processing techniques to compensate for unwanted components of motion.
The balanced vibration discussed above involves only a single direction of
vibration: the Z-direction. The Z-direction is the direction that the conduits
are
displaced as they vibrate. Other directions, including the X-direction along
the
pipeline and the Y-direction perpendicular to the Z and X-directions, are not
balanced. This reference coordinate system is important because Coriolis flow
meters produce a secondary sinusoidal force in the Y-direction. This force
creates
a meter vibration in the Y-direction that is not balanced, resulting in meter
error.
One source of this secondary force is the location of the mass of the meter
driver assembly. A typical driver assembly consists of a magnet fastened to
one
conduit and a coil of conductive wire fastened to another conduit. The Y-
vibration
is caused by the center of mass of the driver magnet and the center of mass of
the
driver coil not lying on the respective X-Y planes of the centerline(s) of the
flow
conduit(s). The X-Y planes are necessarily spaced apart to keep the conduits
from
interfering with one another. The centers of mass of the magnet.and/or coil
are
offset from their planes because the coil needs to be concentric with the end
of
magnet to be at the optimum position in the magnetic field.
A flow conduit, when driven to vibrate, does not truly translate but rather
cyclically bends about the locations at which it is fixed. This bending can be
approximated by rotation about the fixed point(s). The vibration is then seen
to be a
cyclic rotation through a small angle about its center of rotation, CR. The
angular
vibration amplitude is determined from the desired vibration amplitude in the
Z
direction and the distance, d, from the center of rotation of the conduit
center at the
2
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
driver location. The angular amplitude of vibration, A , is determined from
the
following relation:
A6 = arctan (AZ/d) (1)
The offset of the driver component (magnet or coil assembly) center of mass
from the conduit centerline causes the driver component center of mass to have
a
Y-component of its vibration. The driver component mass usually has an offset
in
the Z-direction that is at least equal to the conduit radius. The angular
offset, 0,
from the conduit centerline is thus not negligible. The driver component mass
oscillates about its offset position with the same angular amplitude as the
flow
conduit, A . Approximating the motion of the driver mass as being
perpendicular to
the line connecting the driver center of mass with the center of rotation, CR,
the
driver mass Y-direction motion, DYm, can be solved from the following:
AYm = AZ sin (4)) (2)
The Y-direction motion of the driver component mass causes the whole
meter to vibrate in the Y-direction. Conservation of momentum requires that,
for a
freely suspended meter, the Y-direction vibration of the entire meter is equal
to the
Y-direction vibration amplitude of the driver mass times the ratio of the
driver mass
divided by the meter mass. This Y-vibration of the entire meter is a direct
result of
the desired conduit vibration in Z in conjunction with the angular offset of
the drive
components' centers of mass. This coupling between the desired conduit
vibration
and the undesired Y-vibration of the entire meter means that damping of the
meter
Y-vibration damps the flow conduit vibration in Z, and that a stiff meter
mount raises
conduit frequency while a soft meter mount lowers conduit frequency. The
change
in conduit frequency with mounting stiffness has been observed experimentally
in
meters with high Y-vibration amplitude. It is a problem because conduit
frequency
is used to determine fluid density and frequency is also an indication of
conduit
stiffness. Changes in conduit stiffness due to mounting stiffness change the
calibration factor of the meter. The direct coupling between the drive
vibration and
the local environment also results in an unstable zero (a flow signal when no
flow is
present) of the meter.
3
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
Summary of the Solution
The present invention helps solve the problems associated with unbalanced
vibrational forces using a balance system that is sized and located so as to
balance
out the drive system. Advantageously, in some embodiments the invention can
maintain a substantially constant mass flow calibration factor over a wide
range of
possible flow material densities.
Some examples of a balance system include two or more Y-balance weights
and two or more attachment members that couple the two or more Y-balance
weights to a flow conduit. At least a first Y-balance weight is coupled to the
flow
conduit at a first location between the first conduit node and the drive
system and at
least a second Y-balance weight is coupled to flow conduit at a second
location
between the drive system and the second conduit node. The two or more Y-
balance weights are sized and located such that the combined center of mass of
the driver plus the two or more Y-balance weights lies substantially on the X-
Y
plane of the conduit centerline.
In some examples, two or more balance devices, called active-y-balances,
can be configured on the flow conduit(s). An active-y-balance comprises a mass
connected to one end of an attachment member, with the other end of the
attachment member being attached to the flow conduit between the driver and a
bending axis W. Active-y-balances can be used on one or both conduits
depending
on the locations of the mass centers of the magnet and coil and the type of
flow
meter configuration (i.e., single or dual conduits).
An active-y-balance works by using the Z-direction conduit motion to move
the active-y-balance mass in the Y-direction. The Y-direction momentum of the
active-y-balance can be designed to balance the Y-direction momentum of the
drive components and to thereby prevent unwanted case and environment motion.
By the principle of equivalence, this also makes the meter immune to
environmental
vibrations and damping.
ASPECTS
An aspect of the invention is a Coriolis flow meter comprising:
at least one flow conduit, with the at least one flow conduit including a
first
conduit node and a second conduit node and including a bending axis W that
intersects the flow conduit at the first conduit node and at the second
conduit node,
wherein the at least one flow conduit vibrates around the bending axis W;
4
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
a drive system coupled to the at least one flow conduit; and
a balance system coupled to the at least one flow conduit, with the balance
system comprising two or more Y-balance weights and two or more attachment
members that couple the two or more Y-balance weights to the at least one flow
conduit, wherein at least a first Y-balance weight is coupled to the at least
one flow
conduit at a first location between the first conduit node and the drive
system and at
least a second Y-balance weight is coupled to the at least one flow conduit at
a
second location between the drive system and the second conduit node.
Preferably the drive system is located a vertical distance Yd above the
bending axis W, the first Y-balance weight is located a vertical distance Ywl
above
the bending axis W, and the second Y-balance weight is located a vertical
distance
YwZ above the bending axis W.
Preferably a first ratio Yd/YW, is substantially one and one-half.
Preferably a first ratio Yd/Y,,, is substantially equal to a second ratio
Yd/YW2.
Preferably a first ratio Yd/YW, and a second ratio Yd/Yw2 are configured so
that a drive frequency versus twist frequency ratio wpRivE/w-rvvisT is
substantially
constant over changes in fluid density of a flow medium in the at least one
flow
conduit.
Preferably the two or more Y-balance weights and the two or more
attachment members are permanently coupled to the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably the two or more Y-balance weights and the two or more
attachment members are removably coupled to the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably the two or more attachment members are at least partially
deformable in response to motion of the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably a deformation of the two or more attachment members and the
two or more Y-ba'lance weights cause the natural frequency of the balance
system
to be less than the drive frequency of the flow meter.
Preferably the balance system vibrates substantially out of phase with the at
least one flow conduit.
Preferably the balance system is sized and located such that the combined
center of mass of the drive system and the balance system lies substantially
proximate a plane of the centerline of the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably the balance system is located on the substantially opposite side
of the at least one flow conduit from the drive system.
5
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
Preferably the balance system is located on the substantially opposite side
of the at least one flow conduit from the drive system and at an orientation
substantially forty-five degrees to a horizontal plane of the flow conduit.
Preferably the balance system is sized and located such that the momentum
of the balance system is substantially equal and substantially opposite to the
momentum of the drive system in a direction substantially perpendicular to a
drive
motion.
Preferably a mass MSpi;t of an individual Y-balance weight comprises
substantially one-half of a mass of a single, driver-located weight Ms;ngie
multiplied
by the cube of a vertical distance Yd of the drive system above the bending
axis W
divided by a vertical distance YW of the individual Y-balance weight above the
bending axis W.
An additional aspect of the invention is a method for force balancing a
Coriolis flow meter, the method comprising:
providing at least one flow conduit, with the at least one flow conduit
including a first conduit node and a second conduit node and further including
a
bending axis W that intersects the flow conduit at the first conduit node and
at the
second conduit node, wherein the at least one flow conduit vibrates around the
bending axis W;
providing a drive system coupled to the at least one flow conduit; and
providing a balance system coupled to the at least one flow conduit, with the
balance system comprising two or more Y-balance weights and two or more
attachment members that couple the two or more Y-balance weights to the at
least
one flow conduit, wherein at least a first Y-balance weight is coupled to the
at least
one flow conduit at a first location between the first conduit node and the
drive
system and at least a second Y-balance weight is coupled to the at least one
flow
conduit at a second location between the drive system and the second conduit
node.
Preferably the drive system is located a vertical distance Yd above the
bending axis W, the first Y-balance weight is located a vertical distance YWl
above
the bending axis W, and the second Y-balance weight is located a vertical
distance
Yw2 above the bending axis W.
Preferably a first ratio Yd/YWl is substantially one and one-half.
Preferably a first ratio Yd/YWl is substantially equal to a second ratio
Yd/YW2.
6
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
Preferably a first ratio Yd/YW, and a second ratio Yd/Yw2 are configured so
that a drive frequency versus twist frequency ratio wpRivE/w-,-W,sT is
substantially
constant over changes in fluid density of a flow medium in the at least one
flow
conduit.
Preferably the two or more Y-balance weights and the two or more
attachment members are permanently coupled to the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably the two or more Y-balance weights and the two or more
attachment members are removably coupled to the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably the two or more attachment members are at least partially
deformable in response to motion of the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably a deformation of the two or more attachment members and the
two or more Y-balance weights cause the natural frequency of the balance
system
to be less than the drive frequency of the flow meter.
Preferably the balance system vibrates substantially out of phase with the at
least one flow conduit.
Preferably the balance system is sized and located such that the combined
center of mass of the drive system and the balance system lies substantially
proximate a plane of the centerline of the at least one flow conduit.
Preferably the balance system is located on the substantially opposite side
of the at least one flow conduit from the drive system.
Preferably the balance system is located on the substantially opposite side
of the at least one flow conduit from the drive system and at an orientation
substantially forty-five degrees to a horizontal plane of the flow conduit.
Preferably the balance system is sized and located such that the momentum
of the balance system is substantially equal and substantially opposite to the
momentum of the drive system in a direction substantially perpendicular to a
drive
motion.
Preferably a mass MSpi;t of an individual Y-balance weight comprises
substantially one-half of a mass of a single, driver-located weight Ms;ngie
multiplied
by the cube of a vertical distance Yd of the drive system above the bending
axis W
divided by a vertical distance YW of the individual Y-balance weight above the
bending axis W.
7
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 illustrates a Coriolis flow meter comprising a flow meter assembly and
meter electronics;
FIG. 2 illustrates a drive system in one embodiment of a Coriolis flow meter;
FIG. 3 illustrates an X-axis section view of a flow conduit of a Coriolis
meter;
FIG. 4 illustrates a balance system in a first example of the invention;
FIG. 5 illustrates a balance system in another example of the invention; and
FIG. 6 illustrates a balance system in yet another example of the invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
FIGS. 1-5 and the following description depict specific examples to teach
those skilled in the art how to make and use the best mode of the invention.
For
the purpose of teaching inventive principles, some conventional aspects have
been
simplified or omitted. Those skilled in the art will appreciate variations
from these
examples that fall within the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art
will
appreciate that the features described below can be combined in various ways
to
form multiple variations of the invention. As a result, the invention is not
limited to
the specific examples described below, but only by the claims and their
equivalents.
FIG. 1 illustrates a Coriolis flow meter 5 comprising a flow meter assembly
10 and meter electronics 20. Meter electronics 20 is connected to meter
assembly
10 via leads 100 to provide density, mass flow rate, volume flow rate,
totalized
mass flow, temperature, and other information over path 26. It should be
apparent
to those skilled in the art that the present invention can be used by any type
of
Coriolis flow meter regardless of the number of drivers, pick-off sensors,
flow
conduits or the operating mode of vibration.
Flow meter assembly 10 includes a pair of flanges 101 and 101'; manifolds
102 and 102'; driver 104; pick-off sensors 105-105'; and flow conduits 103A
and
103B. Driver 104 and pick-off sensors 105 and 105' are connected to flow
conduits
103A and 103B. The flow meter assembly 10 can also include a temperature
sensor (not shown).
Flanges 101 and 101' are affixed to manifolds 102 and 102'. Manifolds 102
and 102' are affixed to opposite ends of spacer 106. Spacer 106 maintains the
spacing between manifolds 102 and 102' to prevent undesired vibrations in flow
conduits 103A and 103B. When flow meter assembly 10 is inserted into a
pipeline
system (not shown) which carries the material being measured, material enters
flow
8
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
meter assembly 10 through flange 101, passes through inlet manifold 102 where
the total amount of material is directed to enter flow conduits 103A and 103B,
flows
through flow conduits 103A and 103B and back into outlet manifold 102' where
it
exits meter assembly 10 through flange 101'.
Flow conduits 103A and 103B are selected and appropriately mounted to
inlet manifold 102 and outlet manifold 102' so as to have substantially the
same
mass distribution, moments of inertia, and elastic modules about bending axes
W--W and W'--W' respectively. The flow conduits extend outwardly from the
manifolds in an essentially parallel fashion.
Flow conduits 103A-B are driven by driver 104 in opposite directions about
their respective bending axes W and W' and at what is termed the first out-of-
phase
bending mode of the flow meter. Driver 104 may comprise one of many well known
arrangements, such as a magnet mounted to flow conduit 103A and an opposing
coil mounted to._flow conduit 103B. An alternating current is passed through
the
opposing coil to cause both conduits to oscillate. A suitable drive signal is
applied
by meter. electronics 20, via lead 110 to driver 104. The description of FIG.
I is
provided merely as an example of the operation of a Coriolis flow meter and is
not
intended to limit the teaching of the present invention.
Meter electronics 20 receives sensor signals on leads 111 and 111',
respectively. Meter electronics 20 produces a drive signal on lead 110 which
causes driver 104 to oscillate flow conduits 103A and 103B. Meter electronics
20
processes left and right velocity signals from pick-off sensors 105, 105' in
order to
compute a mass flow rate. Path 26 provides an input and an output means that
allows meter electronics 20 to interface with an operator.
FIG. 2 illustrates a drive system 104 in one embodiment of a Coriolis flow
meter 5. In a preferred exemplary embodiment, driver 104 is a coil and magnet
assembly. One skilled in the art will note that other types of drive systems
may be
used.
Driver 104 has a magnet assembly 210 and a coil assembly 220. Brackets
211 extend outward in opposing directions from magnet assembly 210 and coil
assembly 220. Brackets 211 are wings which extend outward from the flat base
and
have a substantially curved edge 290 on a bottom side that is formed to
receive a
flow conduit 103A or 103B. The curved edge 290 of brackets 211 are then welded
9
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
or in some other manner affixed to flow conduits 103A and 103B to attach
driver
104 to Coriolis flow meter 5.
Magnet assembly 210 has a magnet keeper 202 as a base. Brackets 211
extend from a first side of magnet keeper 202. Walls 213 and 214 extend
outward
from outer edges of a second side of magnet keeper 202. Walls 213 and 214
control the direction of the magnetic field of magnet 203 perpendicular to the
windings of coil 204.
Magnet 203 is a substantially cylindrical magnet having a first and a second
end. Magnet 203 is fitted into a magnet sleeve (not shown). The magnet sleeve
and
magnet 203 are affixed to a second surface of magnet keeper 202 to secure
magnet 203 in magnet assembly 210. Magnet 203 typically has a pole (not shown)
affixed to its second side. The magnet pole (not shown) is a cap that is
fitted to the
second end of magnet 203 to direct the magnetic fields into coil 204.
Coil assembly 220 includes coil 204, and coil bobbin 205. Coil bobbin 205 is
affixed to a bracket 211. Coil bobbin 205 has a spool protruding from a first
surface
around which coil 204 is wound. Coil 204 is mounted on coil bobbin 205
opposing
magnet 203. Coil 204 is connected to lead 110 which applies alternating
currents to
coil 204. The alternating currents cause coil 204 and magnet 203 to attract
and
repel one another which in turn causes flow conduits 103A and 103B to
oscillate in
opposition to one another.
FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified X-axis section view of flow conduit 103. Flow
conduit 103 has mounted to it driver 104. Driver 104 is offset from flow
conduit 103
by ch. Flow conduit 103 moves in the Z-direction with an amplitude AZ. As flow
conduit 103 translates in the Z-direction its fixed location causes it to
rotate about
its center of rotation, CR, resulting in angular amplitude, AO. Driver 104 and
its
associated center of mass, CM, rotates with the same angular amplitude, AO, as
flow conduit 103. However, because of the offset angle, 0, drive component
center
of mass CM oscillates up and down line L. This gives drive component center of
mass CM vertical motion AYm.
FIG. 4 illustrates a balance system 400 in a first example of the invention.
Balance system 400 includes Y-balance weights 401 & 402 coupled to flow
conduits 103A & B. Coupling of Y-balance weights 401& 402 can be
accomplished using various methods including mechanical attachment, welding,
brazing, or gluing. Y-balance weight 401 has a center of mass CMbl. Y-balance
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
weight 401 is sized and located such that its center of mass CMbl combined
with
the coil assembly center of mass CM. results in a combined center of mass CCM,
that is located on the X-Y plane of conduit 103A. Also, Y-balance weight 402
has a
center of mass CMb2. Y-balance weight 402 is sized and located such that its
center of mass CMb2 combined with the magnet assembly center of mass CMm
results in a combined center of mass CCM2 that is located on the X-Y plane of
conduit 103B. The particular attributes of the Y-balance weights are such that
the
mass times velocity of the Y-balance weight is equal and opposite to the mass
times velocity of the driver assembly, in the Y-direction, for each flow
conduit as
shown by:
(M * vY)Bw + (M * VY)DA -0 (3)
In other words the momentum of the Y-balance weight counters the momentum of
the driver assembly attached to'a particular conduit as given by:
(MBw)Y + (MDA)Y = 0 (4)
FIG. 5 illustrates balance system 500 in another example of the invention.
Balance system 500 includes Y-balance weights 501 & 502 coupled to flow
conduits 103A & B using leaf springs 504 & 505. Leaf spring 504 in this
embodiment is oriented at approximately 45 degrees to the X-Y plane and is
connected to the opposite side of the flow conduit as coil assembly 220. The
stiffness of leaf spring 504 and mass of Y-balance weight 501 are chosen so
that
the natural frequency of the active-y-balance in its first vibration mode (the
diving
board mode) is below the drive frequency of the meter. With the natural
frequency
below the excitation (drive) frequency, weight 501 tends to move out of phase
with
conduit 103A. Thus, as conduit 103A moves to the left (-Z direction), active-
Y-balance weight 501 moves to the right (+Z) relative to the conduit. But,
because
of the angle of leaf spring 504 to the X-Y plane, weight 501 is constrained by
leaf
spring 504 to move to the right and down (+Z and -Y). This is advantageous
because when conduit 103A moves to the left, the offset coil assembly 220
moves
left and up (+Z and +Y). By designing mass and spring rate such that the
Y-direction momentum (mass times velocity) of the active-y-balance are equal
and
11
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
opposite to the Y-direction momentum of the offset driver components, the
external
Y-direction vibration of the entire meter can be nearly eliminated. The same
design
principles apply to tube 103B.
This second example has an additional advantage. Because weight 501 and
502 are suspended from conduits 103A & B by leaf spring 504 & 505, they
vibrate
out of phase with flow conduits 103A & B, resulting in very little of its mass
being
coupled to flow conduits 103A & B.
It should be understood that the angle and orientation of the leaf springs 504
and weights 501 in the figure are given for example. The angle and orientation
of
the leaf springs 504 and weights 501 can be varied and still achieve the goals
of
the invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates a balance system 600 in yet another example of the
invention. In this embodiment, the balance system 600 includes the flow
conduit
103 having a first conduit node 603a and a second conduit node 603b, the drive
system 104, pickoffs 105 and 105', at least first and second Y-balance weights
601 a and 601 b, and at least first and second attachment members 602a and
602b.
The pickoffs 105 and 105' are located between the drive system 104 and the
first
conduit node 603a and the second conduit node 603b. It should be understood
that the shape of the flow conduit 103 in the figure is given for example, and
the
flow conduit 103 can comprise other geometries. It should also be understood
that
the locations of the Y-balance weights 601 a and 601 b are also examples, and
the
locations can vary according to the flow tube material, the flow tube
geometry, the
flow material, temperature, driver vibration, driver mass, pick-off mass,
construction
tolerances, etc.
The flow conduit 103 can comprise a single conduit flow meter or can
comprise a component of a two conduit flow meter (see FIG. 5). The flow
conduit
103 vibrates around a bending axis W (see also the center of rotation CR in
FIG. 3).
The bending axis W intersects the flow conduit at the first conduit node 603a
and at
the second conduit node 603b.
The Y-balance weights 601 and attachment members 602 are coupled to the
flow conduit 103. A first Y-balance weight 601a and a first attachment member
602a can be coupled to the flow conduit 103 between the first conduit node
603a
and the drive system 104. Likewise, a second Y-balance weight 601 b and a
second attachment member 602b can be coupled to the flow conduit 103 between
. 12
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
the drive system 104 and the second conduit node 603b. The first Y-balance
weight 601 a and the second Y-balance weight 601 b can be permanently or
removably coupled to the flow conduit 103 by the corresponding first
attachment
member 602a and second attachment member 602b. In addition, a removably
coupled attachment member 602 can comprise a slidably coupled attachment
member 602 that can be slidably positioned on the flow conduit 103.
Two or more Y-balance weights 601 are used in order to accurately and
effectively perform Y-balancing of the flow meter 5, but without affecting a
flow
calibration characteristic of the flow meter 5. A problem that is encountered
with a
single Y-balance weight, attached at a single point on the flow conduit 103,
is that
the flow calibration factor can shift when the flow meter 5 is used for fluids
of
different densities. In order for the flow meter 5 to have a flow calibration
factor that
is independent of fluid density, the distribution of mass added to the flow
conduit
103 has to be such that a drive frequency to twist frequency ratio (i.e.,
WDRIVE/WTWIST) remains constant over any and all changes in fluid density.
In a typical U-tube flow meter, the flow conduit 103 is vibrated at a drive
frequency. The drive frequency is chosen to substantially match a resonant
frequency of the flow conduit 103. The resulting drive mode vibration (i.e., a
first
out-of-phase bending mode) includes stationary nodes at the ends of the flow
conduit 103, while the point of maximum vibrational amplitude occurs at the
center
of the flow conduit 103, i.e., at the drive system 104. For example, these end
nodes can comprise the nodes 603a and 603b shown in FIG. 6.
The twist mode of vibration is excited by the Coriolis force resulting from
fluid
flow. It is the tube vibration in the twist mode that creates the time delay
that is
measured by the electronics. In a twist mode of vibration (i.e., a second out-
of-
phase bending mode), the flow conduit 103 has stationary nodes at the ends of
the
flow conduit and additionally includes a stationary node at the center (i.e.,
at the
drive system 104). Consequently, in the twist mode the maximum amplitude of
the
flow conduit 103 occurs at two points located between the drive system 104 and
the end nodes.
The twist mode has a twist resonant frequency that is generally higher than
the drive frequency. However, the Coriolis force is of greatest amplitude at
the
drive frequency, rather than the higher twist frequency, and is preferably
measured
at the drive frequency. The resonant frequency of the twist mode of vibration
is
13
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
generally higher than the resonant frequency of the drive mode of vibration.
Therefore, the resulting amplitude of vibration is a function of the frequency
difference between the drive frequency and the twist resonant frequency. If
the two
frequencies are close, the twist amplitude is large. If they are distant, the
twist
amplitude is small. It can thus be seen that a frequency ratio between the
drive
frequency and the twist resonant frequency must be kept constant in order to
keep
the flow calibration factor of the flow meter at a constant level.
The drive and twist frequencies both change when the fluid density changes.
The location of mass on the flow tube determines whether the frequency ratio
remains constant between the two. Because the drive mode in a typical U-tube
flow meter includes nodes at the ends of the flow conduit 103 and because the
point of maximum amplitude occurs in the center, locating extra mass at the
drive
system 104 has the effect of lowering the drive frequency and reducing the
effect of
fluid density change on the drive frequency. In the twist mode, where there
are
nodes at both ends of each flow tube as well as one in the center, locating
extra
mass at the drive system 104 does not affect the twist mode because of the
central
node. However, locating mass at the points of maximum deflection in the twist
mode (between the drive system 104 and the end nodes) reduces the twist mode
sensitivity to changes in fluid density.
The solution to this drawback is to form a balance system 600 including at
least two spaced apart Y-balance weights 601 on either side of the drive
system
104. The at least two Y-balance weights 601 are located upstream and
downstream from the drive system 104, as shown in the figure. The mass for the
Y-balance weights can thus be located at a distance from the drive system 104
so
that the drive and twist frequencies both change the proper amount with
changes in
fluid density. This distance from the drive system 104 can be determined, such
as
through finite element analysis, for example, and has been determined to be
the
distance at which the ratio of frequencies (wDRivE/WTwisT) stays constant with
changes in fluid density. Simultaneously, these weights can be sized so that
they
are correct for Y-balancing the meter.
The drive system 104 is located a vertical distance Yd above the bending
axis W. The first Y-balance weight 601a is located a vertical distance YWi
above
the bending axis W. The second Y-balance weight 601b is located a vertical
distance YW2 above the bending axis W. The two or more Y-balance weights 601a
14
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
and 601 b are therefore located according to a Y distance ratio Yd/Ywj and
Yd/Yw2,
for example. In one embodiment, one or both of the ratios can be substantially
one
and one-half (i.e., Yd/Yw = 1'/2). In another embodiment having a different
flow tube
geometry (and other factors), the ratios can be substantially two. However,
other
values can be used as desired. In one embodiment, the first ratio Yd/Yw, is
substantially equal to the second ratio Yd/Yw2 (i.e., Yd/Ywi = Yd/Yw2).
However, it
should be understood that the distances can vary according to flow conduit
size
and characteristics, construction tolerances, etc., and the distances
therefore can
form any size of ratio. Moreover, the two ratios Yd/Yw, and Yd/Y,iir2 can
differ, and
are not necessarily equal.
The actual locations of the Y-balance weights 601, and therefore the
distances Ywi and Yw2, can be determined experimentally or can be iteratively
determined using a Finite Element Analysis (FEA) technique, for example. The
desired FEA result maintains a substantially constant wpRIVE/w-rwIST ratio
over
changes in fluid density of a flow medium in the flow conduit 103. The desired
FEA
therefore constrains the Y-motion to an acceptable level. In one embodiment,
an
approximate starting point for the FEA computation initially locates the Y-
balance
weights 601 half-way vertically to the pickoffs 105 and 105' (i.e., the
distance ratios
Yd/Ywl and Yd/Yw2 are approximately = 2 and creates an angle from the
horizontal
that is approximately 45 degrees).
In addition, the mass of each Y-balance weight 601 will have to be
calculated when the location has been determined. The mass MSput of each
individual split Y-balance weight 601 will need to be greater than the mass
Ms;ngle of
a single Y-balance weight located at the drive system 104 in order to achieve
the
same mass balancing effect. The mass Msplit of an individual Y-balance weight
601 a or 601 b can be approximately determined through use of the formula:
Msplit = ~/2(Msingle)(YdNw)3 (5)
Consequently, as the vertical distance Yw decreases, the above formula will
cause
the mass Mspl;t to increase.
As in the previously discussed Y-balance weight 501 and leaf spring 504 of
FIG. 5, the attachment members 602a and 602b can be at least partially
deformable. For example, an attachment member 602 can comprise a spring or
leaf spring. Consequently, the attachment members 602a and 602b can deform in
CA 02574857 2006-12-14
WO 2006/014153 PCT/US2004/021318
response to motion of the flow conduit 103. The deformation of the two or more
attachment members 602 and the two or more Y-balance weights 601 cause the
natural frequency of the balance system 600 to be less than the drive
frequency of
the flow meter 5. As a result, the balance system 600 can vibrate out of phase
with
the flow conduit 103.
The balance system 600 in one embodiment is sized and located such that
the combined center of mass of the drive system 104 and the balance system 600
lies substantially proximate a plane of the centerline of the flow conduit
103. In one
embodiment, the balance system 600 is located on the substantially opposite
side
of the flow conduit 103 from the drive system 104 (see FIG. 5). In one
embodiment, the balance system 600 is located on the substantially opposite
side
of the flow conduit 103 from the drive system 104 and at an orientation
substantially
forty-five degrees to a horizontal plane of the flow conduit 103. The balance
system 600 in one embodiment is sized and located such that the momentum of
the
balance system 600 is substantially equal and opposite to the momentum of the
drive system 104 in a direction substantially perpendicular to a drive motion.
It should be understood that more than two Y-balance weights 601 can be
used in order to accomplish the objectives of the invention. In addition,
various
numbers and configurations of attachment members 602 can be employed. The
attachment members 602 can include cross-links between Y-balance weights 601,
can include multiple attachment members 602 per Y-balance weight 601, can
include variously shaped or sized attachment members 602, can include
attachment members 602 formed of different materials, can include attachment
members 602 having different deformation characteristics, etc.
The above examples are not limited to compensating for the driver mass
offset. For instance, deformation of the manifold castings by conduit forces
can
cause the meter flanges to vibrate in the Y-direction. If this flange
vibration is
in-phase with that caused by the drive mass offset, then the balance mass can
be
increased to compensate for the additional vibration due to the manifold
deformation. Likewise, if the flange vibration due to manifold deformation is
out-of-phase with that caused by the drive mass offset, the balance mass can
be
made smaller.
16
