Language selection

Search

Patent 2582970 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2582970
(54) English Title: COATED TOOLS FOR USE IN OIL WELL PIPES
(54) French Title: OUTILS REVETUS UTILISES DANS DES TUYAUX DE PUITS DE PETROLE
Status: Expired and beyond the Period of Reversal
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • E21B 33/12 (2006.01)
  • B5D 5/08 (2006.01)
  • B5D 7/14 (2006.01)
  • B32B 15/082 (2006.01)
  • C23C 28/00 (2006.01)
  • C23F 15/00 (2006.01)
  • C23F 17/00 (2006.01)
  • F16L 58/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • MCKEEN, LAURENCE WAINO (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
(71) Applicants :
  • E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY (United States of America)
(74) Agent: TORYS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2014-03-11
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2005-11-23
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2006-06-01
Examination requested: 2010-10-22
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/US2005/042853
(87) International Publication Number: US2005042853
(85) National Entry: 2007-03-30

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
60/630,779 (United States of America) 2004-11-24

Abstracts

English Abstract


The present invention relates to a tool for use in an oil pipe having a
fluoropolymer coating imparting substantially reduced adhesion of asphaltenes,
paraffin wax, and inorganic scale, so as to reduce plugging of said tool, and
impermeability to salt water so as to protect the tool pipe from corrosion.
Such a tool is particularly useful in a pipe coated in a similar manner.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un outil utilisé dans un tuyau de pétrole comprenant un revêtement fluoropolymère qui permet de réduire sensiblement l'adhérence des asphaltènes, de la cire de paraffine et du tartre inorganique, ce qui empêche le bouchage de l'outil et lui confère une imperméabilité à l'eau salée le protégeant contre la corrosion. Cet outil est particulièrement utilisé dans un tuyau revêtu de manière similaire.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS
What is claimed is:
1. A tool for use in an oil pipe comprising a multi-layer coating on said
tool including a
primer layer adhered to its exterior surface and an overcoat adhered to said
primer
layer, wherein the coating comprises a barrier layer formed between the primer
layer
and the overcoat, and the barrier layer includes a plurality of particles
which form a
mechanical barrier against permeation of water, gas and solvents to the tool.
2. The tool of claim 1, wherein the coating has a corrosion resistance
defined by Log Z
impedance, where Log Z is greater than 6.
3. The tool of claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the coating reduces the
deposition of at least
one of asphaltenes, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale as compared to the
surface of
said tool without said coating being present.
4. The tool of claim 3, wherein the deposition is reduced by at least 40%,
5. The tool of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the primer layer comprises
a
perfluoropolymer and the overcoat comprises a perfluoropolymer.
6. The tool of claim 5, wherein said perfluoropolymer in said primer layer
and said
overcoat is independently copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene with
perfluoroolefin, said
perfluoroolefin containing at least 3 carbon atoms, or copolymer of
tetrafluoroethylene with at least one perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether), said alkyl
containing
from 1 to 8 carbon atoms.
7. The tool of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the particles comprise
mica.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
TITLE OF INVENTION
COATED TOOLS FOR USE IN OIL WELL PIPES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention.
This invention relates to tools used in pipes that convey oil, such as
oil well pipes and oil pipelines, and more particularly to coatings for the
exterior surface of such tools, especially when used in oil pipes coated
with such coatings.
2. Description of Related Art.
Oil pipes for conveying large volumes of oil have two primary
utilities, as down-hole pipes for conveying oil from underground deposits
to the earth surface and as pipelines for the long distance transportation of
oil across the earth surface. Such pipes are typically made from carbon
steel for economy reasons, rather than expensive specialty metal alloys
that better resist the corrosive entities in the crude oil. The corrosion is
especially severe in the hot underground environment of the oil deposit
from such materials as water, sulfur, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide,
hydrogen sulfide, present in the oil typically making it acidic. These
materials corrode the oil pipe even at relatively low temperatures of oil
transportation; the long contact times with the oil pipeline interior surface
provide the conditions for corrosion to occur.
An additional problem arises from soluble organic material present
in the oil at the high temperature of the oil deposit, such as asphaltenes
and paraffin waxes and with soluble inorganic material, commonly referred
to as scale, and generally comprising calcite and/or barite, present in the
oil or in the presence of salt water associated with the conveying of oil
from underground deposits. These materials become insoluble as the oil
cools, as occurs during the rise of the oil through the down-hole pipe to the
earth surface. The resultant insoluble materials tend to plate out on the
interior surface of the pipe, restricting the oil flow therethrough and
eventually plugging the pipe. This pluggage also occurs during long
distance conveying of the oil through pipelines. This requires the oil pipes
to be cleaned out, during which time oil production or transportation, as
the case may be, ceases.
Tools which are used in oil well pipes under such conditions are
subject to similar problems which plague the interior surfaces of pipes,
namely, corrosion, and the plating out of asphaltenes and paraffin waxes
on their surfaces. Attempts have been made to coat tools used in oil wells
I

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
to aaaress aarasion resistance and corrosion. For example, US Patent
No. 4,823,456 discioses a method for coating a sucker rod, where nylon or
polyphenylene sulfide is used. However, such materials do not possess
the non-stick properties that are necessary to prevent deposition of
asphaltenes and paraffin waxes. Therefore, at this time there does not
exist a commercially attractive option for reducing pluggage and corrosion
on tools used in pipes.
There remains a need for solving the problems of corrosion and
pluggage occurring on the surfaces of tools used in oil pipes.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention solves these problems by coating the exterior
surface of tools used in oil pipes, after suitable preparation of such
exterior
surface, with a fluoropolymer, which provides a non-stick surface on the
tools. The coating on the tool may be a single layer or a multi-layer
coating of primer and one or more overcoats.
There is of course an economical advantage to supplying thin
coatings in applications which are determined to be less severe. In certain
applications, where the tolerance of the pipe in which such tool is used is
less than 1.5 mils, and preferably less than 1 mil, a single layer of coating
may be used. However, thick coatings are preferred in highly abrasive or
in severely corrosive environments. In such environments, the coating
may be a multi-layer coating of primer and one or more overcoats.
According to the present invention, coating a tool for use in an oil
pipe with a coating comprising a fluoropolymer, can minimize or eliminate
the deposition of asphaltene, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale, so as to
minimize or eliminate deposition on the tool and therefore, pluggage in the
oil pipe and either reduce or minimize corrosion of the exterior surface of
the tool. The reduction in deposition can be characterized by being at
least 40%, preferably at least 50% of at least one of asphaltene, paraffin
wax, and inorganic scale. Reductions of at least 60%, 70%, 80% and
even at least 90% can be realized. Preferably these reductions apply to at
least two of the deposition materials, and more preferably, to all three of
them.
Therefore, according to the present invention, there is provided a
tool for use in an oil pipe comprising a multi-layer coating including a
primer layer adhered to its exterior surface and a overcoat adhered to said
primer layer.
2

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Tools used in the present invention will depend on the environment
in which the tools are used. Such tools may be packers, sucker rods, and
the like. Exemplary tools used with the present invention are commercially
available in the industry and are sold by Halliburton under the trademark
Hydrostatic-Set Versa-Trieve Packers and Hydraulic Set Perma-Series
Packers.
The present invention is particularly applicable to tools, especially
those used oil pipes, where both deposition and corrosion are concerns.
By oil pipes is meant down-hole, i.e., oil well pipes, or above-ground
pipeline systems, i.e., oil-conveying pipes.
he oil pipes in which such tools are used are large. Inner diameters
of 2 in (5.08 cm), 2-3/8 in (6.03 cm) and 3 in (7.6 cm) and larger and
lengths of at least 20 ft (6.1 m) are quite common. While the relative
dimensions of the oil pipe are large, the thickness of the coating on the
exterior surface of the tool is quite small. Where the coating comprises a
primer layer and an overcoat, the primer layer needs only to be thin
enough to adhere the overcoat layer to itself and thereby to the exterior
surface of the tool. Typically, the thickness of the primer layer is about .5
mils, and the thickness of the topcoat is about 1.0 mils. If the tolerance of
the pipe in which the tool is used is less than 1.5 mils, then just a primer
layer may be used. The primer layer needs only to be thin enough to
adhere the overcoat layer to itself and thereby to the exterior surface of
the tool.
In another embodiment, the overcoat includes a multiple coating of
a first-applied coating on the primer layer to form a lower layer of the
overcoat of a perfluoropolymer composition containing a small amount of
mica dispersed therein, followed by a subsequent applied coating on the
fluoropolymer/mica lower layer of fluoropolymer to form a fluoropolymer
upper layer that is free of mica. Each of these layers can be applied by
powder coating. Further details on the perfluoropolymer/mica composition
is disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,972,494, wherein it is disclosed that the mica
constitutes 2 to 15 wt% of the composition and 0.5 to 1.5 wt% of talc may
also be present. For purposes of the present invention, these percents
refer to the combined weight of the perfluoropolymer and the mica and the
talc, if present. The presence of this lower layer further improves the
impermeability performance of the coating when the corrosive conditions
3

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
in particular oil wells require enhanced protection of the tool and the oil
pipe.
The coating of the present invention comprises a fluoropolymer. In
one embodiment the coating of the present invention consists essentially
of a perfluoropolymer. In a perfluoropolymer, the carbon atoms making up
the polymer chain, if not substituted by oxygen, are substituted with
fluorine atoms'. The end groups of the perfluoropolymer may also be
entirely fluorine substituted, but other relatively stable end groups, such as
-CF2H and -CONH2, may be present, especially in the fluoropolymer
present in the primer layer. The perfluoropolymer used in the present
invention is melt flowable at the baking temperature, which will generally
be in the range of 300 C to 400 C. Polytetrafluoroethylene, which has a
melt viscosity of at least 108 Pa=s at 372 C, would not be melt flowable.
The perfluoropolymers used in the primer layer and the overcoat
are melt flowable fluoropolymers. Examples of such melt-flowable
fluoropolymers include copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and at
least one fluorinated copolymerizable monomer (comonomer) present in
the polymer in sufficient amount to reduce the melting point of the
copolymer substantially below that of TFE homopolymer,
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), e.g., to a melting temperature no greater
than 315 C. Preferred comonomers with TFE include the perfluorinated
monomers such as perfluoroolefins having 3-6 carbon atoms and
perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ethers) (PAVE) wherein the alkyl group contains 1-8
carbon atoms, especially 1-3 carbon atoms. Especially preferred
comonomers include hexafluoropropylene (HFP), perfluoro(ethyl vinyl
ether) (PEVE), perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) (PPVE) and perfluoro(methyl
vinyl ether) (PMVE). Preferred TFE copolymers include FEP (TFE/HFP
copolymer), PFA (TFE/PAVE copolymer), TFE/HFP/PAVE wherein PAVE
is PEVE and/or PPVE and MFA (TFE/PMVE/PAVE wherein the alkyl
group of PAVE has at least two carbon atoms). Typically, the melt
viscosity will range from 102 Pa=s to about 106 Pa=s, preferably 103 to
about 105 Pa=s measured at 372 C by the method of ASTM D-1 238
modified as described in U.S. Patent 4,380,618 . Typically these
copolymers will have a melt flow rate of 1 to 100 g/ 10 min as determined
by ASTM D-1 238 and ASTM tests applicable to specific copolymers
(ASTM D 2116-91 a and ASTM D 3307).
Melt flowable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), commonly referred to
as PTFE micropowder, can also be present in the primer layer or the
4

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
overcoat along with the melt-fabricable copolymers mentioned above,
such micropowder having similar melt flow rate. Similarly, minor
proportions of non-melt-fabricable PTFE can be present either in the
primer layer or the overcoat, or both. In the primer layer the PTFE aids in
stratification towards providing a pure perfluoropolymer in the primer at the
primer/overcoat interface. PTFE in the overcoat aids in coating
toughness, but should not be used in proportions that detract from the
impermeability of the overall coating to corrosive fluids and the protection
of the tool exterior surface provided by the coating. In either case, the
primer layer and the overcoat, while being polymer blends with either
PTFE or multiple melt-flowable perfluoropolymers, are still
perfluoropolymers.
In the primer/overcoat embodiment, the overcoat comprises a
fluoropolymer. The fluoropolymer could be, but need not be a
perfluoropolymer. In this embodiment, the primer layer may also, but not
necessarily, be comprise a perfluropolymer. In this case, other materials
may be used for the primer layer as long as they promote adhesion of the
overcoat to the tool.
The coating may be formed by a number of coating methods, such
as application of liquid-based coating composition, and/or the application
of powder coating. In the primer layer/overcoat embodiment, different
coating methods may be used for the primer layer and the overcoat.
Preferred coating methods include liquid-based coatings for the primer
layer and the overcoat, or liquid-based coating for the primer layer and
powder coating for the overcoat. The coating is heated to form the coating
on the surface of the tool. The heating is optionally sufficient to bake the
coating. This baking consolidates the coating from the dried liquid state or
powder state to a solid film state. In the primer layer/overcoat
embodiment, the primer layer is baked, and the thickness of the primer
layer after baking is no greater than about 25 micrometers (1 mil ). In this
regard, the term "baking" is used in its broadest sense of achieving the
aforesaid consolidation. Sometimes, the term "curing" is used to describe
the film-forming effect; "curing" is included within the meaning of the term
"baking". Typically, the baking is carried out by simply heating the coating
sufficiently above the melting temperature of the material of the coating to
cause the respective material to flow and fuse to become a film-like layer.
This allows the overcoat to adhere to the primer layer. In the primer
layer/overcoat embodiment, this consolidation will generally involve baking
5

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
of both ot the primer layer and the overcoat, either sequentially or
simultaneously. Exemplary of the effect of the consolidation, in this
embodiment, after the primer layer is baked and consolidated, the
thickness of the primer layer after baking is no greater than about 25
micrometers (1 mil).
The overcoat is impermeable to salt water, as well as to the
corrosive materials present in the oil and presents a non-stick surface to
the oil, whereby the insoluble organic materials present in the oil do not
stick to the overcoat, and restriction of oil flow and pluggage is minimized
or avoided. Because of its non-stick property, however, the overcoat does
not adhere to the exterior surface of the tool after contaminants are
removed from the exterior surface of the pipe. The intervening primer
layer provides adhesion both to the overcoat layer and to the exterior
surface of the pipe. The primer layer by itself does not provide sufficient
non-stick character and impermeability to the corrosive materials present
in the oil to protect the exterior surface of the tool from corrosion.
In one preferred embodiment where the total coating thickness is
relatively small, the overall coating thickness (primer layer thickness plus
overcoat thickness) of the coating being no greater than 8 mils (203
micrometers), the exterior surface of the tool is provided with an adherent
coating that presents a non-stick surface to the oil and provides a high
degree of corrosion protection to the exterior surface. In another preferred
embodiment, the total coating thickness is relatively thick, the overall
coating thickness (primer layer thickness plus overcoat thickness in the
primer layer/overcoat embodiment) of the coating is at least 26 mils (660
micrometers).
To insure that a thin overcoat does not have pinholes through which
corrosive material may pass to ultimately reach the exterior surface of the
tool, the step of forming a coating is preferably carried out by applying
multiple coats or layers, one top of one another, where, in the embodiment
where the coating comprises a primer layer and an overcoat, the overall
thickness of the overcoat is still no greater than 7 mils (175 micrometers),
preferably no greater than 6 mils (150 micrometers) in the case of using
either liquid-based or powder coating overcoat. The succeeding coating
application of the liquid or powder overcoat composition will fill in any
pinholes present in the preceding overcoat.
In the primer layer/overcoat embodiment, the liquid basis of the
coating composition is preferably organic solvent, which avoids the
6

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
creation of rust on 'the cleaned and roughened exterior surface of the tool.
Rust would interfere with adhesion of the primer layer to the tool exterior
surface The heating of the primer layer composition is sufficient to dry the
composition to form the primer layer and may even be sufficient to bake
the primer layer, prior to the formation of the overcoat. The liquid basis of
the overcoat composition is preferably water, to minimize the need for
solvent recovery. In the case of the liquid-based overcoat, following its
application to the dried or baked primer layer, the overcoat is dried and
then baked at a sufficiently high temperature, depending on the particular
composition used, to melt the overcoat composition to be film forming and
the composition of the primer layer as well if not already baked, bonding
the primer layer to the overcoat. By "liquid-based" is meant that that the
coating composition is in the liquid form, typically including a dispersion of
perfluoropolymer particles in the liquid, wherein the liquid is the continuous
phase. The liquid basis, i.e., the liquid medium can be water or organic
solvent. In the case of forming the primer layer, the liquid basis is
preferably organic solvent and in the case of the overcoat, the liquid basis
is preferably water. Organic solvent may, for example, be present in the
overcoat liquid composition in a much smaller amount, e.g., no more than
25% of the total weight of liquid, to improve wetting of the overcoat layer
and thereby improve application properties.
When the primer composition is applied as a liquid medium, the
adhesion properties described above will manifest themselves upon drying
and baking of the primer layer together with baking of the next-applied
layer to form the non-stick coating on the tool. When the primer layer
composition is applied as a dry powder, the adhesion property becomes
manifest when the primer layer is baked.
In the primer layer/overcoat embodiment, the composition of the
primer layer and the overcoat can be the same or different, provided that
when baked together, they adhere to one another, and the primer layer
adheres to the tool. When the composition is the same, adequate
intercoat adhesion is obtained. In a preferred embodiment, the primer
layer and the overcoat both comprise perfluoropolymers. The
perfluoropolymers in the primer layer and the overcoat are preferably
independently selected from the group consisting of (i) copolymer of
tetrafluoroethylene with perfluoroolefin copolymer, the perfluoroolefin
containing at least 3 carbon atoms, and (ii) copolymer of
tetrafluoroethylene with at least one perfluoro(alkyl vinyl ether), the alkyl
7

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
containirig from 1 to 8 carbon atoms. Additional comonomers can be
present in the copolymers to modify properties. Adequate intercoat
adhesion is also obtained when one of the perfluoropolymers is copolymer
(i) and the other is copolymer (ii). The melting temperature of the coating
will vary according to its composition. By melting temperature is meant
the peak absorbance obtained in DSC analysis of the coating. By way of
example, tetrafluoroethylene/ perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) copolymer
(TFE/PPVE copolymer) melts at 305 C, while
tetrafluoroethylene/hexafluoropropylene melts at 2600C. (TFE/HFP
copolymer). Tetrafluoroethylene/perfluoro -(methyl vinyl
ether)/perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) copolymer (TFE/PMVE/PPVE
copolymer) has a melting temperature in between these melting
temperature. Thus, in one embodiment of the present invention, when the
primer layer comprises TFE/PMVE/PPVE copolymer and the
perfluoropolymer in the overcoat is TFE/HFP copolymer, the baking of the
overcoat may not be at a high enough temperature to bake the primer
layer, in which case the primer layer would be heated to the baked
condition prior to applying the overcoat to the primer layer. Alternatively,
the primer layer can contain the lower melting perfluoropolymer, in which
case the baking of the overcoat would also bake the primer layer.
A preferred ingredient in the primer layer, whether the primer is
liquid-based or a dry powder, is a heat resistant polymer binder, the
presence of which enables the primer layer to adhere to the tool exterior
surface. The binder component is composed of polymer which is film-
forming upon heating to fusion and is also thermally stable. This
component is well known in primer applications for non-stick finishes, for
adhering the fluoropolymer-containing primer layer to substrates and for
film-forming within and as part of a primer layer. The fluoropolymer by
itself has little to no adhesion to a smooth substrate. The binder is
generally non-fluorine containing and yet adheres to the fluoropolymer.
Examples of the non-fluorinated thermally stable polymers include
polyamideimide (PAI), polyimide (PI), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS),
polyether sulfone (PES), polyarylene-etherketone, and poly(1,4(2,6-
dimethylephenyl)oxide) commonly known as polyphenylene oxide (PPO).
These polymers are also fluorine-free and are thermoplastic. All of these
resins are thermally stable at a temperature of at least 140 C.
Polyethersulfone is an amorphous polymer having a sustained use
temperature (thermal stability) of up to 190 C and glass transition
8

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
terriperature of 220 C. Polyamideimide is thermally stable at temperatures
of at least 250 C and melts at temperatures of at least 290 C.
Polyphenylene sulfide melts at 285 C. Polyaryleneether-ketones are
thermally stable at least 250 C and melt at temperatures of at least 300 C.
Examples of suitable powder coating compositions comprising
perfluoropolymer and polymer binder, wherein these components are
associated with one another in multicomponent particles are disclosed in
U.S. Patents 6,232,372 and 6,518,349.
The polymer binder can be applied as an undercoat to the tool
exterior surface after treatment to remove contaminants and an organic
solvent solution thereof, prior to application of the primer. The resultant
dried thin film of polymer binder can further enhance the adhesion of the
primer layer to the tool exterior surface.
For simplicity, only one binder may be used to form the binder
component of the composition of the present invention. However, multiple
binders are also contemplated for use in this invention, especially when
certain end-use properties are desired, such as flexibility, hardness, or
corrosion protection. Common combinations include PAI /PES, PAI/PPS
and PES/PPS. Typically, the polymer binder content on the primer layer
will be from 10-60 wt% based on the combined weight of the
perfluoropolymer and polymer binder.
Other ingredients can be present in the primer, such as pigments,
fillers, high boiling liquids, dispersing aids, and surface tension modifiers.
The coating composition can be applied to the exterior surface of
the tool after removal of contaminants by spraying of the liquid-based
composition or dry powder from a nozzle. The dry powder primer can be
sprayed using an electrostatic sprayer; electrostatic spraying is
conventional in the dry powder coating art.
The preferred liquid which enables the coating composition to be a
liquid is one or more organic solvents, within which the perfluoropolymer,
present as particles in the preferred embodiment, is dispersed and the
polymer binder present either as dispersed particles or in solution in the
solvent. The characteristics of the organic liquid will depend upon the
identity of the polymer binder and whether a solution or dispersion thereof
is desired. Examples of such liquids include N-methylpyrrolidone,
butyrolactone, methyl isobutyl ketone, high boiling aromatic solvents,
alcohols, mixtures thereof, among others. The amount of the organic
9

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
liquid wifl''depend on the flow characteristics desired for the particular
coating operation.
The solvent should have a boiling point of 50 to 2000C, so as not to
be too volatile at room temperature, but to be vaporized at reasonable
elevated temperatures, less than the baking temperature of the
perfluoropolymer. In the primer layer/overcoat embodiment, the thickness
of the primer layer is established by experience with the particular primer
composition selected and polymer binder concentrations and the relative
amount of solvent that is present. Preferably the primer contains 40 to 75
wt% solvent based on the combined weight of solvent, polymer and
polymer binder.
In another embodiment, the coating comprises a barrier layer which
includes a plurality of particles which form a mechanical barrier against
permeation of water, solvents and/or gases to the tool. The barrier layer
has a typical thickness of about 1 to about 10 mils (25 - 254 micrometers).
The barrier layer system may be used on tools which can tolerate a
clearance of 5 mils (which would reduce the total clearance of the
diameter of the pipe by 10 mils). If the tools can tolerate no more than 1
or 1.5 mils in clearance, then the single component layer should be used.
With clearances in between, the primer layer/overcoat system may be
used.
Preferably the barrier layer comprises a fluoropolymer and a
platelet shaped filler particle that are relatively inert to chemical attack.
The particles form a mechanical barrier against permeation of water,
solvent and oxygen to the substrate and are present in the amount of
about 2 to about 10% by weight based on the total dry weight of the barrier
layer. In spray application, the particles tend to align parallel to the
exterior
surface of the tool. Since oxygen, solvent and water cannot pass through
the particles themselves, the presence of aligned particle particles further
reduces the rate permeation through the coating which is formed. In the
primer layer/overcoat embodiment, the barrier layer is formed between the
primer layer and the overcoat. It is also within the scope of this invention
that the coating may contain platelet shaped filler particles with or without
the presence of an intermediate barrier layer.
Examples of typical platelet shaped filler particles include mica,
glass flake and stainless steel flake. The platelet shaped particles of filler
component of the barrier layer are preferably mica particles, including
mica particles coated with an oxide layer like iron or titanium oxide. These

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
particles nave an average particle size of about 10 to 200microns,
preferably 20-100 microns, with no more than 50% of the particles of flake
having average particle size of more than about 300 microns. The mica
particles coated with oxide layer are those described in U. S. Patent
Nos. 3,087,827 (Klenke and Stratton); 3,087,828 (Linton); and 3,087,829
(Linton).
The micas described in these patents are coated with oxides or
hydrous oxides of titanium, zirconium, aluminum, zinc, antimony, tin, iron,
copper, nickel, cobalt, chromium, or vanadium. Mixtures of coated micas
can also be used.
In the primer layer/overcoat embodiment, when a barrier layer is
used, the barrier layer of the coating may include a multiple coating of a
first-applied coating on the primer layer to form a lower layer of the
overcoat of a fluoropolymer, preferably perFluoropolymer, composition
containing a small amount of mica dispersed therein, followed by a
subsequent applied coating on the fluoropolymer/mica lower layer of
fluoropolymer, and again preferably perfluoropolymer, to form a
fluoropolymer upper layer that is free of mica. Each of these layers can be
applied by powder coating or by liquid coating. Further details on the
perfluoropolymer/mica composition is disclosed in U.S. Patent 5,972,494,
wherein it is disclosed that the mica constitutes 2 to 15 wt% of the
composition and 0.5 to 1.5 wt% of talc may also be present. For purposes
of the present invention, these percents refer to the combined weight of
the perfluoropolymer and the mica and the talc, if present. The presence
of this lower layer further improves the impermeability performance of the
coating when the corrosive conditions in particular oil wells require
enhanced protection of the tool.
A tool is lined according to the present invention as follows.
Preferably the exterior surface of the tool is subjected to cleaning and/or
grit-blasting to improve adhesion of the fluoropolymer coating to the
exterior surface. The exterior surface of the tool, as manufactured is
generally smooth but with peaks and valleys and is generally coated with
preservative to minimize any rusting. Before applying the fluoropolymer
coating on the tool exterior surface, such surface is typically cleaned to
remove the preservative. Conventional soaps and cleansers can be used.
The tool can be further cleaned by baking at high temperatures in air,
temperatures of 800 F (427 'C) or greater. The cleaned interior surface is
then preferably grit blasted, with abrasive particles, such as sand or
11

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
afuminum oxide, to torm a roughened surface to improve the adhesion of
the primer layer. The grit blasting is sufficient to remove any rust that may
be present. The roughening that is desired for primer layer adhesion can
be characterized as a roughness average of 70 - 250 microinches (1.8 -
6.4 micrometers).
In a preferred embodiment, where a primer layer and overcoat is
used, the primer is applied to the cleaned, grit-blasted interior surface of
the pipe by spraying a liquid-based composition from a nozzle. The primer
is preferably applied to a heated tool in order to prevent running, dripping
and sagging. Typically the tool is preheated to 110 - 125 F (43 - 52 C)
but higher temperatures may be used providing that they are about 20 F
below the boiling point of the solvent of the composition.
The coating is applied to the exterior surface of a tool according to
a preferred embodiment of the present invention, where a primer layer and
overcoat are applied, as follows. The primer can be applied to the exterior
surface of the tool after removal of contaminants by spraying of the liquid-
based composition or dry powder from a nozzle. The dry powder primer
can be sprayed using an electrostatic sprayer; electrostatic spraying is
conventional in the dry powder coating art.
After the heating step, the overcoat is spray-applied as a liquid-
based composition or as a dry powder onto the primer layer, using a tube
supported by sled elements and nozzle similar to that used to apply the
primer. It has been found that mere drying of the liquid-based primer to
form the primer layer may give the layer adequate integrity. To accomplish
multiple applications of the overcoat to the primer layer, the overcoat
applied in one spray application is baked so that the subsequent spay
application can be carried out without the sled elements scaring or
otherwise removing overcoat from the preceding application. In the case
of the overcoat being a dry powder, the resultant powder coating should
be baked before the next spray application of dry powder if greater coating
thickness is desired.
When the primer composition is applied as a liquid medium, the
adhesion properties described above will manifest themselves upon drying
and baking of the primer layer together with baking of the next-applied
layer to form the non-stick coating of the substrate. When the primer is
applied as a dry powder, the adhesion property becomes manifest when
the primer layer is baked.
12

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
'The pipe is then baked to melt the overcoat, again by placing the
pipe in an oven heated to the desired temperature. Typically, the baking
temperature applied to the overcoat through the thickness of the wall of
the pipe and the primer layer, will be at least 20 C above the melting point
of the overcoat, with the temperature and time of exposure being sufficient
to bake the overcoat. The same is true with respect to the baking of the
primer layer.
The heating of the primer coating is sufficient to dry the coating to
form the primer layer and may even be sufficient to bake the primer layer,
prior to application of the preformed film. By "baking" is meant that the
fluoropolymer layer is heated sufficiently at a temperature above its
melting temperature to cause the fluoropolymer to flow and form a
continuous film-like layer. By melting temperature is meant the peak
absorbance obtained in DSC analysis of the fluoropolymer. The barrier
layer if used is applied in the same way as the primer layer and may be
heated with the primer layer or applied to a dry primer layer and then
heated to drying or baking prior to application of the coating.
By "fusion bonding" is meant that the tool is heated sufficiently to
melt bond the overcoat or preformed film to the primer layer or intervening
barrier layer. That is to say, that the primer/overcoat or film interface, or
the interfaces of the primer layer/barrier layer/overcoat or preformed film
as the case may be, are melted together sufficiently to adhere the
overcoat firmly to the layer(s). Fusion bonding temperatures are
dependent on the particular fluoropolymer present in the or overcoat or
preformed film. For PFA or FEP, the tool is heat (baked) by conventional
means to a temperature between 600 to 700 F (315 to 371 C). For
ETFE, the tool is heated by conventional means to a temperature between
550 to 630 F (228 to 332 C). Time for fusion bonding will be dependent
on the baking temperature used but is typically from 5 minutes to 60
minutes. Baking time and temperature must be sufficient to achieve a firm
melt bond between the overcoat or preformed film and the primer or
barrier layer. As the tool cools, there is a tendency for the preformed fiim
to shrink. Unexpectedly, the intercoat bonding between the primer layer
(and barrier layer, if present) and the overcoat or preformed film is
sufficient to prevent the film from pulling away from the primer layer or
barrier layer.
The melting temperature of the coating will vary according to its
composition. By melting temperature is meant the peak absorbance
13

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
obtafned in DSC analysis of the coating. By way of example,
tetrafluoroethylene/ perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) copolymer (TFE/PPVE
copo(ymer) melts at 305 C, while tetrafluoroethylene/hexafluoropropylene
melts at 260 C. (TFE/HFP copolymer). Tetrafluoroethylene/perfluoro -
(methyl vinyl ether)/perfluoro(propyl vinyl ether) copolymer
(TFE/PMVE/PPVE copolymer) has a melting temperature in between
these melting temperature. Thus, in one embodiment of the present
invention, when the primer layer comprises a perfluoropolymer which is
TFE/PMVE/PPVE copolymer and the overcoat comprises a
perfluoropolymer which is TFE/HFP copolymer, the baking of the overcoat
may not be at a high enough temperature to bake the primer layer, in
which case the primer layer would be heated to the baked condition prior
to applying the overcoat to the primer layer. Alternatively, the primer can
contain the lower melting perfluoropolymer, in which case the baking of
the overcoat would also bake the primer layer.
The tools of the present invention are able to withstand conditions
as high as 350 F (177 C) and 20,000 psi (138 MPa) present in some high
temperature/high pressure reserves. The invention is also applicable to
tools used in the Chemical Processing Industry (CPI), especially in those
applications where temperatures such as those described above are
encountered. In the CPI temperatures of at least about 350 F (177 C) and
even as high as 400 F (204 C) are used. The tools show superior
permeation resistance to corrosive chemicals due to both to their
construction, i.e., especially when a primer layer and overcoat or primer
layer and preformed film liner are used, and especially with an optional
intervening barrier layer, and their strong adherence to the interior surface
of the tool with the aid of a primer. The coated tools of the present
invention are able to withstand the above described conditions for
continuous service, e.g., for at least 30 days, preferably at least 60 days,
and more preferably at least 12 months.
Because of all the above-noted advantages, the present invention
is capable of reducing the deposition of at least one of asphaltenes,
paraffin wax and inorganic scale by at least 40%, preferably at least 50%,
as compared to the interior surface of said tool without said coating being
present. These reductions are also made in comparison to tool lined with
only an epoxy resin on the interior surface of the tool.
In fact, reductions of at least 60%, 70%, 80% and even at least
90% have been realized. Preferably these reductions apply to at least two
14

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
of the deposition materials, and more preferably, to all three of them.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, there is also provided a
method for reducing the deposition in a tool of at least one of asphaltenes,
paraffin wax, and inorganic scale by at least 40% as compared to the
exterior surface of the tool without the coating being present.
The resultant tool then has a continuous adherent fluoropolymer
coating on its exterior surface, with the exposed surface of the
fluoropolymer providing a non-stick surface for oil to eventually flow
through the pipe and for its constituents. The coating follows the peaks
and valleys of the exterior surface of the tool and to some extent fills them
in with the primer and overcoat layers.
The fluoropolymer coating on the tool of the present invention both
acts as a non-stick surface for the oil and its constituents, but also to
isolate the steel structure of the tool, as well as the pipe from corrosion.
In
oil wells, temperatures at the bottom of the well can reach 500 F (260 C),
but will more typically be in the range of 350-450 F (177-232 C). The
fluoropolymers present in the coating are selected to have a melting
temperature greater than the temperature present at the bottom of the
well. The fluoropolymer forms a physical barrier to the corrosive
environment of the hot oil. The fluoropolymer is also resistant to
permeation of this corrosive environment through the thickness of the
coating. The overcoat provides the effective permeation resistance. This
same corrosion protection is provided to pipe used in a surface pipeline,
where temperatures will be lower, but contact with the oil occurs for a long
period of time.
The coating on the tool of the present invention can minimize or
eliminate the deposition of asphaltene, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale,
so as to minimize of eliminate deposition on the tool and therefore,
pluggage in the oil pipe and either reduce or minimize corrosion of the
exterior surface of the tool. The reduction in deposition can be
characterized by being at least 40%, preferably at least 50% of at least
one of asphaltene, paraffin wax, and inorganic scale. Reductions of at
least 60%, 70%, 80% and even at least 90% can be realized. Preferably
these reductions apply to at least two of the deposition materials, and
more preferably, to all three of them.
These reductions are determined by the Asphaltene Deposition
Test, the Paraffin Deposition Test, and the Inorganic Scale Deposition
Test, respectively, disclosed in the Examples. Even better results than

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
shown 'by these model Tests are expected because of the rapid flow of oil
through the oil pipe in field use of the tool. The corrosion protection
imparted by the coating to the exterior surface of the tool can be
characterized by substantial impermeability to a strong salt solution at a
high temperature for a long period of time in accordance with the Salt
Water Permeation Test described in the Examples.
It is within the scope of the invention that an oil pipe in which the
tool is used may be lined with coatings as described above with respect to
the tool. The combination of such coatings on both pipes and tools can
further enhance the benefits of deposition reduction and corrosion
resistance exhibited by the coated tool as described above.
TEST METHODS
PARAFFIN DEPOSITION TEST
A cold finger apparatus, available at Westport Technology Center
International (Houston, Texas) is used to test the baked coatings as
prepared in the Examples for the degree of release (non-stick) they
exhibit. The apparatus includes a circulating beaker (double-walled) filled
with mineral oil and connected to a first temperature bath which is placed
on a magnetic mixing plate. A stainless steel cup with a magnetic stirring
bar is submerged in the mineral oil and the temperature set to 140 F
(60 C). A cold finger (tubular projection) is connected to a second water
circulating temperature bath, and the temperature set to 60 F.
Stainless steel sleeves (6" long, 0.5" inside ID, 0.625" OD) closed
flat at the bottom which are coated as described in the Examples are
washed with solvent (toluene, then methanol) and placed in a hot oven to
ensure a clean surface for wax to deposit on. The sleeve is then weighed,
secured over the finger with a set screw at the top to create a tight fit, and
allowed to cool for thirty minutes. After thirty minutes, the sleeve is
attached over the cold finger in a tight fit and submerged in the crude oil
for twenty-four hours.
Crude oil known to have a large wax content with a wax
appearance temperature of approximately 105 F is used for this test. The
crude is initially heated to 150 F (66 C) and centrifuged twice to remove
any water and sediments. The source sample of crude was maintained at
150 F (66 C) during the duration of the testing to ensure the wax
remained in solution.
16

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
At thecompletion of the twenty-four hour test time, the sleeve is
removed from the crude and allowed to sit for one hour at 60 F (16 C) in a
nitrogen environment. A final weight is measured. Weight data collected
before and after submersion are used to calculate the wax deposition on
the sleeve. From the material balance a mass per unit area was calculated
for comparison purposes. The baseline for comparison is the paraffin
adhesion test performed on commercially available epoxy-resin coated oil
pipe, wherein the deposition of paraffin on the epoxy resin coating
amounted to 0.0652 g/cm2.
ADHESION TESTS
Test panels of cold rolled steel 4.0" x 12.0" (10.1 cm x 30.5 cm)
panels are cleaned with an acetone rinse. The panel has a grit blast
surface. The panels are coated according to the description in each of the
examples. The panels are subjected to the following two adhesion tests.
(1) POST BOILING WATER FINGERNAIL ADHESION (PWA)
Coated test panels are submerged in boiling water for 20 minutes.
The water is allowed to come to a full boil after inserting the coated panel,
before timing is begun. After the boiling water treatment, the panel is
cooled to room temperature and dried thoroughly. The fingernail scratch
test involves the use of the fingernail, to chip or peel away the coating
from the edge of a deliberate knife scratch in the film, to test the degree of
adhesion of the film. If the coating can be pulled away from the substrate
for 1 cm or more, the coating is considered to fail the PWA test. If the
coating cannot be pulled loose for a distance of 1 cm, the coating is
considered to pass the PWA test.
(2) CROSS-HATCH ADHESION
Coated substrates are subjected to a cross-
hatch (x-hatch) test for adhesion. The coated sample is scribed with a
razor blade, aided by a stainless steel template, to make 11 parallel cuts
about 3/32 inch (2.4 mm) apart through the film to the metal surface. This
procedure is repeated at right angles to the first cuts to produce a grid of
100 squares. The coated and scribed sample is immersed in boiling water
for 20 minutes, and then is removed from the water and cooled to room
temperature without quenching the sample. Then a strip of transparent
tape (3M Brand No. 898), 0.75 by 2.16 inch (1.9 by 5.5 cm), is pressed
firmly over the scribed area with the tape oriented in a parallel direction to
17

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
the scribed Iines. The tape is then pulled off at a 90 angle rapidly but
without jerking. This step is repeated at a 900 angle to the first step with a
fresh piece of tape, and then repeated two times more again at 90 angles
to the previous step, each time with a fresh piece of tape. Passing the test
requires that no squares be removed from the 100-square grid.
EXAMPLES
The following Examples illustrate the effects of the present
invention on coupons which are coated with coatings according to the
present invention.
In the following Examples, substrates for coating are cleaned by
baking 30 min @ 800 F (427 C) and grit blasted with 40 grit aluminum
oxide) to a roughness of approximately 70-125 microinches Ra. Liquid
coatings are applied by using a spray gun, Model Number MSA-510
available from DeVilbiss located in Glendale Heights, IL. Powder
coatings are applied by using Nordson manual electrostatic powder spray
guns, Model Versa- Spray I located in Amhearst, OH.
For determining the degree of release of the coatings, the
substrate being coated is a stainless steel sleeve suitable for use in the
apparatus described above in the Paraffin Deposition Test.
For determining the adhesion quality, the substrate being coated is a
carbon steel panel suitable for use in the PWA Test and the Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test described above.
The primer layers formed in the Examples have the following
pre-bake compositions:
Table 1 - Liquid Primers
Ingredient Primer
1 2 3
Wt% wt% wt lo
Fluoropolymer
FEP 12.5 10.9
ETFE 20.7
Polymer binder
Polyamideimide 1.1 3.7 11.9
Polyethersulfone 7.6
Polyphenylene Sulfide 3.4
18

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
SOIVd,YIts
NMP* 47.8 1.9 40.7
Other Organics** 20.1 4.7 32.0
Water 60.2
Pigments 9.9 4.2 1.7
Dispersing Agent 1.0 1.2 2.8
Total 100 100 100
*NMP is N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
** Other organics may include solvents such as MIBK (methyl isobutyl
ketone), hydrocarbons such as heavy naphtha, xylene etc., furfuryl
alcohol, triethanol amine or mixtures thereof.
FEP : TFE/HFP fluoropolymer containing 11 - 12.5 wt % HFP, an
average particle size of 8 micrometers and a melt flow rate of 6.8 - 7.8
g/10 min measured at 372 C by the method of ASTM D-1 238.
ETFE: E/TFE/PFBE fluoropolymer containing 19-21 wt % ethylene and 3-
4.5 wt % PFBE having average particle size of 8 micrometers and a melt
flow rate of 6- 8 g/10 min measured at 298 C by the method of ASTM D-
1238.
The overcoat layers formed in the Examples have the following pre-
bake compositions:
19

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Table 2 - Powder Overcoats
In eeL dient Overcoat
A B 1 2
wt% wt% Wt% wt%
Epoxy 100
ETFE 100
Perfluoropolymers
PFA
FEP
PFA Fluorinated 100
PFA Modified PEVE 100
Stabilizer (Zn)
Total 100 100 100 100
FEP: TFE/HFP fluoropolymer resin containing 11 - 12.5 wt % HFP having
a melt flow rate of 6.8 -7.8 g/10 min and an average particle size of 35
micrometers.
PFA: TFE/PPVE fluoropolymer resin containing 3.8 - 4.8 wt % PPVE
having a melt flow rate of 10 -17 g/10 min and an average particle size of
35 micrometers.
PFA modified with PEVE: TFE/PPVE/PEVE fluoropolymer resin
containing 6.8 - 7.8 wt % PEVE prepared according to the teachings of
US patent 5,932,673 (Aten et al./DuPont) having a melt flow rate of 13 -18
g/10 min and an average particle size of 8 micrometers.
PFA Fluorinated: TFE/PPVE fluoropolymer resin containing 3.8 -4.8 wt %
PPVE prepared according to the teachings of US patent 4,743,658
(Imbalzano et al./DuPont) having a melt flow rate of 12 -20 g/ 10 min and
an average particle size range of 25 micrometers.
PFA: TFE/PPVE fluoropolymer resin containing 3.8 - 4.8 wt % PPVE
having a melt flow rate of 10 -17 g/10 min and an average particle size of
35 micrometers.

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Table 2 cont'd- Powder Overcoats
Ingredient Overcoat
4 5 6
wt% wt% wt%
Epoxy
ETFE
Perfluoropolymers
PFA 99.2 100
FEP 100
PFA Fluorinated
PFA Modified PEVE
Stabilizer (Zn) 0.8
Total 100 100 100
Table 3 - Liquid Overcoat
Ingredient Overcoat
3
wt%
Perfluoropolymer PFA 45.0
Other Organics 0.6
Water 43.8
Thickener 10.1
Dispersing Agents 0.5
Total 100
21

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Table 4 - Liquid Midcoat
Ingredient Midcoat
I
wt%
Perfluoropolymer PFA 41.2
Glycerine 8.3
Water 42.8
Red Mica 3.9
Thickener 1.1
Dispersing Agents 0.4
Other Organics 1.1
Tin Metal 1.2
Total 100.0
The baking conditions are set forth in the Examples. Good
adhesion of the primer layer to the substrate and of the primer layer to the
overcoat layer is indicated by their performance in the PWA Test and the
Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test.
The non-stick characteristic of the baked coatings in the Examples
are confirmed by subjecting the coatings to the paraffin deposition test as
described above. The baseline for comparison is the paraffin deposition
test performed on commercially available epoxy-resin coated oil pipe,
wherein the deposition of paraffin on the epoxy resin coating amounted to
0.0652 g/cm2. The examples of this invention all have coatings with a wax
deposition below that of standard epoxy resin coating.
Comparative Example A - Epoxy Standard
A layer of coating A (epoxy powder) is applied to a prepared
stainless steel sleeve, followed by baking at 316 C for 20 minutes. The dry
film thickness (DFT) of the paint layer is 100-125 micrometers. When the
coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition Test, a deposition of
0.0652 g/cm2 is obtained.
22

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Comparative" Example B - ETFE Primer/ETFE Overcoat
A layer of primer 2 (aqueous ETFE) is applied to a prepared
stainless steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by
baking at 150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer
layer is 12-19 micrometers (p). A layer of overcoat B (powder ETFE) is
applied over the dried primer layer. It is baked at 316 C for 20 minutes.
The total DFT is 100-125 micrometers and the total thickness of the
overcoat is 81 - 113 micrometers. When the coated sleeve is subjected to
the Paraffin Deposition Test, a deposition of 0.0327 g/cm2 is obtained.
When the coated carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and
Cross-Hatch Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Aqueous primers are not preferred for use in this invention because
of the potential for reduced corrosion resistance over a prolonged period
of time. ETFE overcoats are inferior to the perfluoropolymer overcoats of
this invention.
Comparative Example C - Uncoated Substrate
An uncoated prepared stainless steel sleeve is subjected to the
Paraffin Deposition Test, a deposition of 0.0296 g/cm2 is obtained.
Example 1- FEP primer/Modified PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 1(PFA modified with PEVE
powder) is applied over the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20
minutes. The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat
is applied. It is baked at 371 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 100-125
micrometers and the total thickness of the overcoat is 81 - 113
micrometers. When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin
Deposition Test, a deposition of only 0.0168 g/cm2 is obtained. When the
coated carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 2 - FEP Primer/Fluorinated PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
23

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
1*2-'f 9"'micronieters. A .layer of overcoat 2 (fluorinated PFA powder) is
applied over the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes.
The total DFT is 60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 2 is
applied. It is baked at 371 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 100-125
micrometers and the total thickness of the overcoat is 81 - 113
micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0145 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated.
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 3 - FEP Primer/PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 3 (PFA liquid) is applied over the
dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is
60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 3 is applied. It is baked at
371 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 100-125 micrometers and the total
thickness of the overcoat is 81 - 113 micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0124 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 4- FEP Primer/PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 4 (PFA powder) is applied over
the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is
60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 4 is applied. It is baked at
371 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 100-125 micrometers and the total
thickness of the overcoat is 81 - 113 micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0124 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
24

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Example 5- FEP Primer/PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 5 (PFA powder) is applied over
the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT
is 60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 5 is applied.. It is baked
at 371 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 100-125 micrometers and the
total thickness of the overcoat is 81 - 113 micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0116 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 6 - FEP Primer/FEP Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 6 (FEP powder) is applied over
the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is
60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 6 is applied. It is baked at
371 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 100-125 micrometers and the total
thickness of the overcoat is 81 - 113 micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0110 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 7- FEP Primer/PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 5 (PFA powder) is applied over
the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT
is 60-75 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 5 is applied. It is baked
at 371 C for 20 minutes. Additional layers of overcoat 1 are applied and

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
baked at 343 C for 20 minutes until the total DFT is 950-1050 micrometers
and the total thickness of the overcoat is 931 - 1038 micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0098 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 8 - FEP/PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 1(liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
12-19 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 2 is applied over the dried primer
layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT is 60-75
micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 2 (fluorinated PFA) is applied. It
is baked at 371 C for 20 minutes. Additional layers of overcoat 4 are
applied and baked at 343 C for 20 minutes until the total DFT is 950-1050
micrometers and the total thickness of the overcoat is 931 - 1038
micrometers.
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0042 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
Example 9 - FEP Primer/PFA Overcoat
A layer of primer 3 (liquid FEP) is applied to a prepared stainless
steel sleeve and a prepared carbon steel panel, followed by baking at
150 C for 10 minutes. The dry film thickness (DFT) of the primer layer is
8-12 micrometers. A layer of overcoat 2 (fluorinated PFA) is applied over
the dried primer layer. It is baked at 399 C for 20 minutes. The total DFT
is 60-70 micrometers. A second layer of overcoat 2 (fluorinated PFA) is
applied. The total DFT is 80-110 micrometers and the total thickness of
the overcoat is 68 - 102 micrometers. It is baked at 371 C for 20 minutes .
When the coated sleeve is subjected to the Paraffin Deposition
Test, a deposition of only 0.0042 g/cm2 is obtained. When the coated
carbon steel panel is subjected to the PWA test and Cross-Hatch
Adhesion Test, the panel passes both tests.
26

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Example 11-Inorganic Scale Deposition Test
A number of the overcoats (FEP and PFA) from the foregoing
Examples were subjected to coupon immersion testing in brine solutions in
order to determine the reduction in inorganic scale deposition of the
coated coupon, with the result being that scale deposition was reduced by
more than 50 wt% as compared to the uncoated coupons. These tests
were done by soaking coated and uncoated steel coupons in calcite and
barite brine solutions having the following compositions:
Brine A g/kq water Brine B g/kg
CaC12.21-120 36.87 same 8.6
KCI 11.43 same 4.38
MgCI2.6H20 1.8 same 0.41
NaCI 138.9 same 89.09
Na2SO4 0.32 --
-- BaC12 3.08
The coupons were suspended for two days under 100 psi (6.9 MPa)
pressure in either in Brine A heated at 140F (60 C) or in Brine B heated at
90 F (32 C) and the weight pickups (scale deposition) for the coated
coupons were compared to that for the uncoated steel coupons to reveal
the reduction in scale deposition for the coupons coated with coatings of
the present invention.
Example 12- Asphaltene Deposition Test
Asphaltene is a mixture of amorphous high molecular weight,
polynuclear aromatic compounds, containing C, H, 0, N, and S, and often
metals such as V or Ni. Asphaltene is soluble in oil, but becomes
insoluble with drop in pressure, change in pH, or solvency change such as
occurs in oil pipe utility. Asphaltene deposition can be measured by the
flow loop method as practiced by the Petroleum Research Center located
at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and technology in Socorro, NM.
Briefly, the material to be tested is formed into a loop and oil is flowed
through the loop under conditions to cause the asphaltene in the oil to
become insoluble, so that it has a chance to deposit on the interior surface
of the loop. The deposition of asphaltene is determined by weighing the
loop after the flow experiment is completed, comparing such weight with
the weight of the loop before the flow test. In greater detail, the loop being
tested is a tube that 100 ft (30.5 m) long and has an interior diameter of
0.03 in (0.75 mm) and is made of either one of the overcoat
27

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
perfl'uoropolymers disclosed in the foregoing Examples or of steel. The
tube is formed into a coil (loop), like a spring, so that it will fit into a
water
bath maintained at 60 C. A 50/50 vol% mixture of asphaltene-containing
oil and n-pentadecane solvent is metered through the loop at a rate of
0.24 mI/hr for 24 hrs. The oil tested had the following characteristics: API
gravity of 28.8 , viscosity of 30cP at 20 , and was composed of 51.1 %
saturates, 28.3% aromatics, 14.5% resins, 6.1 % asphaltenes and
contained 19 ppm Ni and 187 ppm V. For the uncoated steel loop, the
weght gain from deposited asphaltene is 0.51 g, while for FEP and the
fluorinated PFA of Example 8, there is no weight gain, indicating the
effectiveness of the perfluoropolymer to reduce asphaltene deposition.
Example 13 - Salt Water Permeation Test
This test is conducted to determine the salt water permeability of
perfluoropolymers as compared to epoxy resin by exposing 5 mil (127
micrometers) thick coatings of these materials on steel coupons to salt
water under severe conditions and subjecting the so-exposed coupons to
the well-known Log Z-Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy. Impedance of
the coating before and after the exposure is compared. A reduction in
impedance indicates the permeability of the coating. In greater detail, the
coated coupons are suspended in an autoclave having : 1) an aqueous
phase with a 5 wt% aqueous solution of NaCI, 2) an organic phase with 50
volume % kerosene and 50 volume % toluene, and 3) a gas phase with 5
volume % hydrogen sulfide (H2S), 5 volume % carbon dioxide (C02) and
90 volume % methane (CH4), which is maintained at approximately 251 F
(122 C) therein in contact with a portion of the coating. The autoclave is
maintained at 251 F (122 C) and 1026 psi (70.8 MPa) for 29 days. The
impedance of the coating is measured (before and after salt water
exposure) using an electrochemical cell consisting of the coated coupon, a
reference electrode, and an inert counter electrode. The electronic
measuring equipment consists of a potentiostat, a frequency response
analyzer and a computer with electrical impedance spectroscopy software.
Impedance of the coating is measured as a function of the frequency of
the applied AC voltage. The frequency ranges from 0.001 to 100 kHz.
The resulting data is presented in the form of a Bode plot, consisting of
Log Z plotted versus Log f, where Z is the impedance in ohms cm and f is
frequency in Hertz. The comparison in impedance results is taken a 0.1 of
the Bode plot, as follows:
28

CA 02582970 2007-03-30
WO 2006/058271 PCT/US2005/042853
Coating Log Z impedance
Before Exposure After Exposure
PFA 11.0 10.9
FEP 11.0 11.0
Epoxy 10.8 7.1
Tests of a one-coat system of FEP/PES which could only be applied to a
thickness of 2 mils, are subjected to the same Autoclave conditions, and
result in a Log Z impedance before exposure of 9.4, and after exposure, of
5.8.
The 34% decrease in impedance for the epoxy resin coating
represents a substantial permeability of this coating to the salt water, and
indeed the coating had blistered in places from the underlying steel
coupon. In contrast, the impedance of perfluoropolymer coatings with no
binder is substantially unchanged and there is no separation (no blistering)
of the coating from the steel coupon, indicating substantial impermeability
of these coatings to the salt water. This substantial impermeability can
therefore be characterized by the absence of coating separation of the
coating from the steel coupon or quantitatively by the reduction in Log Z
impedance of less than 10%, preferably less than 5%. When the coated
coupons are subjected to H2S gas and methane/toluene liquid mixture in
the same autoclave under the same conditions as the salt water testing,
no change in the coatings is noticed, indicating the greater severity of the
salt water exposure.
Example 14-Single Layer Coating
Primer 1 is used a single layer coating on the coupon and
tested as set forth in Example 11. Despite the presence of non-fluorine
containing polymer binder (polyamideimide and polyether sulfone) in the
primer composition, the deposition of inorganic scale on the coating is
much less than for the bare steel coupon and about the same as for the
FEP overcoat.
29

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2582970 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-02-03
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2022-02-03
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2015-11-23
Letter Sent 2014-11-24
Grant by Issuance 2014-03-11
Inactive: Cover page published 2014-03-10
Pre-grant 2013-12-16
Inactive: Final fee received 2013-12-16
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-06-17
Letter Sent 2013-06-17
4 2013-06-17
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-06-17
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2013-06-12
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-05-14
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2012-11-21
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-09-12
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2012-03-14
Letter Sent 2010-11-04
Request for Examination Received 2010-10-22
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2010-10-22
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-10-22
Inactive: IPC removed 2008-01-04
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2008-01-04
Inactive: IPC assigned 2008-01-04
Inactive: Office letter 2007-10-12
Appointment of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-10-11
Revocation of Agent Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-10-11
Inactive: Office letter 2007-10-04
Letter Sent 2007-08-30
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-08-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-08-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-08-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2007-08-23
Inactive: Single transfer 2007-06-18
Inactive: Courtesy letter - Evidence 2007-06-05
Inactive: Cover page published 2007-06-04
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2007-05-29
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2007-04-27
Application Received - PCT 2007-04-26
Inactive: IPRP received 2007-03-31
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-03-30
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2006-06-01

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2013-11-15

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Past Owners on Record
LAURENCE WAINO MCKEEN
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2007-03-29 29 1,632
Claims 2007-03-29 1 41
Abstract 2007-03-29 1 56
Cover Page 2007-06-03 1 29
Claims 2012-09-11 1 36
Claims 2013-05-13 1 33
Cover Page 2014-02-04 1 30
Notice of National Entry 2007-05-28 1 195
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-08-29 1 104
Reminder - Request for Examination 2010-07-25 1 120
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2010-11-03 1 189
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2013-06-16 1 164
Maintenance Fee Notice 2015-01-04 1 170
PCT 2007-03-29 36 1,482
Correspondence 2007-05-28 1 27
PCT 2007-03-30 12 439
Correspondence 2007-09-18 19 271
Correspondence 2007-10-08 1 14
Correspondence 2007-10-15 2 43
Fees 2008-11-17 1 39
Correspondence 2013-12-15 1 37