Language selection

Search

Patent 2592132 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2592132
(54) English Title: HIGH STRENGTH, HIGH TOUGHNESS AL-ZN ALLOY PRODUCT AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SUCH PRODUCT
(54) French Title: PRODUIT D'ALLIAGE AL-ZN DE HAUTE RESISTANCE ET HAUTE TENACITE ET PROCEDE DE PRODUCTION DUDIT PRODUIT
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 21/10 (2006.01)
  • C22F 01/053 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • BENEDICTUS, RINZE
  • KEIDEL, CHRISTIAN JOACHIM (Germany)
  • HEINZ, ALFRED LUDWIG (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • NOVELIS KOBLENZ GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • NOVELIS KOBLENZ GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2014-08-05
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2005-10-04
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2006-04-13
Examination requested: 2010-09-07
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/EP2005/010809
(87) International Publication Number: EP2005010809
(85) National Entry: 2007-03-28

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
04077721.1 (European Patent Office (EPO)) 2004-10-05

Abstracts

English Abstract


The invention relates to a Al-Zn alloy wrought product, and to a method of
manufacturing such a product, with an improved combination of high toughness
and high strength by maintaining good corrosion resistance, said alloy
including (in weight percent): Zn 6.0~-11.0, Cu 1.4-2.2, Mg 1.4-2.4, Zr 0.05-
0.15, Ti < 0.05, Hf and/or V < 0.25, and optionally Sc and/or Ce 0.05-0.25,
and Mn 0.05-0.12, other elements each less than 0.05 and less than 0.50 in
total, balance aluminium, wherein such alloy has an essentially fully
unrecrystallized microstructure at least at the position T/10 of the finished
product.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un produit d'alliage de corroyage Al-Zn, et un procédé de fabrication dudit produit, présentant une combinaison améliorée de haute ténacité et de haute résistance par maintien d'une bonne résistance à la corrosion. Ledit alliage comprend (en pourcentage en poids) de 6,0 à 11,0 de Zn, de 1,4 à 2,2 de Cu, de 1,4 à 2,4 de Mg, de 0,05 à 0,15 de Zr, Ti < 0,05, Hf et/ou V < 0,25, et éventuellement de 0,05 à 0,25 de Sc et/ou de Ce, et de 0,05 à 0,12 de Mn, d'autres éléments chacun inférieur à 0,05 et inférieurs à 0,50 au total, le reste étant constitué d'aluminium. Ledit alliage présente essentiellement une microstructure non entièrement recristallisée au moins sur la position T/10 du produit fini.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


14
WE CLAIM:
1. Method for producing an Al-Zn alloy product with strength, toughness and
corrosion resistance, comprising the steps of:
a. casting an ingot with the following composition, in weight percent:
Zn 6.0 to 11.0 %,
Cu 1.4 to 2.2%,
Mg 1.4 to 2.4 %,
Zr 0.05 to 0.15%,
Ti < 0.05 %,
Hf and/or V < 0.25%, and
inevitable impurities and balance aluminium,
b. homogenizing and/or preheating the ingot after casting,
c. hot working the ingot into a pre-worked product,
d. reheating the pre-worked product and
hot rolling and cold rolling the reheated product to the final gauge,
e. solution heat treating and quenching the reheated product in the final
gauge,
wherein the product in its final temper has a fully unrecrystallized
microstructure at least at the position T/10 of the finished product,

15
and wherein the hot rolling of the reheated product is to about 150 to 250
in final-guage% and then the cold rolling of the hot rolled product is to
the final gauge, or wherein the hot rolling of the reheated product is to
about 105 to 140 in final-gauge% and then the cold rolling of the hot
rolled product is to the final gauge.
2. Method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of stretching or
compressing of the quenched alloy product (step f.)).
3. Method according to claim 1 or 2, further comprising a step (g) of aging
the
quenched and optionally stretched or compressed product to achieve a
desired temper.
4. Method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, comprising hot rolling the
reheated product at temperatures in the range of 300°C to 420°C
to prevent
the alloy product from recrystallising.
5. Method according to any one of claims 3 to 4, wherein the ageing during
step
(g) is to temper selected from the group consisting of T79, and T76.
6. Method according to any one of claims 3 to 4, wherein the ageing during
step
(g) is carried out by means of a two step ageing treatment.
7. Method according to any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein the ageing during
step
(g) consists of a first ageing step at a temperature in a range of 105 to
135°C
for 2 to 20 hours and a second ageing step at a temperature higher than
135°C but less than 210°C for 4 to 12 hours to a temper selected
from T79
and T76 temper.
8. Method according to claim 7, wherein the ageing during step (g) consists of
a
first ageing step at a temperature 120°C for 2 to 20 hours and a second

16
ageing step at a temperature higher than 135°C but less than
210°C for 4 to
12 hours to a temper selected from T79 and T76 temper.
9. Method according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the ageing during step (g)
consists
of a first ageing step at a temperature 120°C for 2 to 20 hours and a
second
ageing step at temperature of 155°C for 4 to 12 hours to a temper
selected
from T79 and T79 temper.
10.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, the composition used in step
(a.) further comprising Sc and/or Ce in a range of 0.03 to 0.25wt.%.
11.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, the composition used in step
(a.) further comprising Mn in a range of 0.05 to 0.12 wt.%.
12.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein the amount of Zn is
in a range of 7.4 to 9.6 weight-%.
13.Method according to claim 12, wherein the amount of Zn is in a range of 8.0
to 9.6 weight-%.
14.Method according to claim 12, wherein the amount of Zn is in a range of 8.4
to 8.9 weight-%.
15.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the amount of Cu is
in a range of 1.7 to 2.2 weight-%.
16.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein the amount of Cu in
a range of 1.8 to 2.1 weight-%.
17.Method according to claim 15, wherein the amount of Mg is in a range of 1.7
to 2.2 weight-%.

17
18. Method according to claim 15, wherein the amount of Mg is in a range of
1.7
to 2.1 weight-%.
19.Method according to any one of claims 10 to 18, wherein the amount of Sc is
in a range of [Zr] + 1.5 [Sc] <0.15 weight-%.
20.Method according to any one of claims 10 to 19, wherein the amount of Sc is
in a range of 0.03 to 0.06%, and wherein the amount of Ce is in a range of
0.03 to 0.06%.
21.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 20, wherein the amount of
inevitable impurities are <0.05 weight-% each, and total <0.5 weight-%.
22.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 21, wherein of the finished
rolled
product more than 80% of the gauge has an unrecrystallized microstructure.
23.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 21, wherein of the finished
rolled
product more than 90% of the gauge has an unrecrystallized microstructure.
24.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 23, wherein the Al-Zn product is
a thin plate having a gauge in the range of 20-60 mm.
25.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 23, wherein the Al-Zn product is
a thin plate having a gauge in the range of 30 to 50 mm.
26.Method according to any one of claims 1 to 25, wherein the Al-Zn product is
a product selected from the group consisting of thin aircraft member, an
upper wing member, a thin skin member of an upper wing, and a stringer of
an aircraft.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
High strength, high toughness Al-Zn alloy product and method for producing
such
product
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a high-strength high-toughness Al-Zn alloy
wrought
product with elevated amounts of Zn for maintaining good corrosion resistance,
and to a
method for producing such a high-strength high-toughness Al-Zn alloy product
and to a
plate product of such alloy. More specifically, the present invention relates
to a high
strength, high toughness Al-Zn alloy designated by the AA7000-series of the
international
nomenclature of the Aluminum Association for structural aeronautical
applications. Even
more specifically, the present invention relates to a new chemistry window for
an Al-Zn
alloy having improved combinations of strength and toughness by maintaining
good
corrosion resistance, which does not need specific ageing or temper
treatments.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is known in the art to use heat treatable aluminium alloys in a number of
applications involving relatively high strength, high toughness and corrosion
resistance
such as aircraft fuselages, vehicular members and other applications.
Aluminium alloys
AA7050 and AA7150 exhibit high strength in T6-type tempers. Also precipitation-
hardened
AA7x75, AA7x55 alloy products exhibit high strength values in the T6 temper.
The T6
temper is known to enhance the strength of the alloy, wherein the
aforementioned
AA7x50, AA7x75 and AA7x55 alloy products which contain high amounts of zinc,
copper
and magnesium are known for their high strength-to-weight ratios and,
therefore, find
application in particular in the aerospace industry. However, these
applications result in
exposure to a wide variety of climatic conditions necessitating careful
control of working
and ageing conditions to provide adequate strength and resistance to
corrosion, including
both stress corrosion and exfoliation.
In order to enhance resistance against stress corrosion and exfoliation as
well as
fracture toughness it is known to artificially over-age these AA7000-series
alloys. When
artificially aged to a T79, T76, T74 or T73-type temper their resistance to
stress corrosion,
exfoliation corrosion and fracture toughness improve in the order stated (T73
being best
and T79 being close to T6) but at the cost of strength compared to the T6
temper
condition. A more acceptable temper condition is the T74-type temper which is
a limited
over-aged condition, between T73 and T76, in order to obtain an acceptable
level of
tensile strength, stress corrosion resistance, exfoliation corrosion
resistance and fracture
CONFIRMATION COPY

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
2
toughness. Such 174 temper is performed by over-ageing the aluminium alloy
product at
temperatures of 121 C for 6 to 24 hours and followed by 171 C for about 14
hours.
Depending on the design criteria for a particular aircraft component even
small
improvements in strength, toughness or corrosion resistance result in weight
savings,
which translate amongst others to fuel economy over the life time of the
aircraft. To meet
these demands several other 7000-series alloys have been developed.
For example each of EP-0377779, US-5,221,377 and US-5,496,426 disclose alloy
products and an improved process for producing an 7055 alloy for sheet or thin
plate
applications in the field of aerospace such as upper-wing members with high
toughness
and good corrosion properties which comprises the steps of working a body
having a
composition consisting of, about in wt.%: Zn 7.6 to 8.4, Cu 2.2 to 2.6, Mg 1.8
to 2.1 or 2.2,
and one or more elements selected from Zr, Mn V and Hf, the total of the
elements not
exceeding 0.6 wt.%, the balance aluminium plus incidental impurities, solution
heat
treating and quenching the product and artificially ageing the product by
either heating the
product three times in a row to one or more temperatures from 79 C to 163 C or
heating
such product first to one or more temperatures from 79 C to 141 C for two
hours or more
and heating the product to one or more temperatures from 148 C to 174 C. These
products are reported to have an improved exfoliation corrosion resistance of
"EB" or
better with about 15% greater yield strength than similar sized 7x50 counter-
parts in the
176-temper condition. They still have at least about 5% higher strength than
their similar-
sized 7x50-T77 counterpart (7150-T77 will be used herein below as a reference
alloy).
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide an improved Al-Zn alloy
preferably
for plate products with high (compressive) strength and high toughness.
Corrosion
resistance should not deteriorate.
More specifically, it is an object of the present invention to provide an
alloy product
which can be used for upper wing applications in aerospace with an improved
compression yield strength and a high unit propagation energy with properties
which are
better than the properties of a conventional AA7055-alloy in the T77 temper.
It is another object of the invention to obtain an AA7000-series aluminium
alloy
which exhibits strength in the range of T6-type tempers and toughness and
corrosion
resistance properties in the range of T73-type tempers.
It is another object of the invention to provide a method of manufacturing the
aluminium alloy product according to this invention.

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
3
The present invention meets one or more of these objects by the characterizing
features of the independent claims. Further preferred embodiments are
described and
specified within the dependent claims.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As will be appreciated hereinbelow, except otherwise indicated, alloy
designations
and temper designations refer to the Aluminum Association designations in
Aluminum
Standards and Data and the Registration Records, all published by the US
Aluminum
Association.
One or more of the above mentioned objects of the invention are achieved by
using
an Al-Zn alloy product with an improved combination of high toughness and high
strength
by maintaining good corrosion resistance, said alloy comprising, and
preferably consisting
of, (in weight percent):
Zn 6.0 to 11.0
Cu 1.4 to 2.2
Mg 1.4 to 2.4
Zr 0.05 to 0.15
Ti <0.05,
Hf and/or V < 0.25,
optionally Sc and/or Ce 0.05 to 0.25, and
optionally Mn 0.05 to 0.12,
and inevitable impurities and balance aluminium, preferably other elements
each less than
0.05 and less than 0.50 in total, and wherein the alloy product has a
substantially fully
unrecrystallized microstructure at the position T/10 of the finished product.
Such chemistry window for an AA7000-series alloy exhibits excellent properties
when produced to relatively thin plate products, and which is preferably
useable in
aerospace upper-wing applications having gauges in the range of 20 mm to 60
mm.
The above defined chemistry has properties which are comparable or better than
existing alloys of the AA7x50 or AA7x55 series in the T77-temper, without
using the above
described cumbersome and complicated T77 three-step ageing cycles. The
chemistry
leads to an aluminium product which is more cost effective and is also simpler
to produce
since less processing steps are necessary. Additionally, the chemistry allows
new
manufacturing techniques like age forming or age creep forming which is not
feasible
when a T77-temper alloy is applied. Even better, the chemistry as defined
above can also
be aged to the T77-temper whereby the corrosion resistance further improves.

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
4
According to the invention it has been found that a selected range of
elements, using
a higher amount of Zn and a specific combination of a particular range of Mg
and Cu,
exhibit substantially better combinations of strength and toughness and
maintaining a
good corrosion performance such as exfoliation corrosion resistance and stress
corrosion
cracking resistance.
The present invention uses the chemistry also in combination with a method to
produce a rolled product from such chemistry, as explained herein below, to
obtain a
substantially fully unrecrystallized microstructure at least at the position
T/10 of the
finished product. More preferably the product is unrecystallized across the
whole
thickness. With unrecystallized we mean that more than 80%, preferably more
than 90%
of the gauge of the finished rolled product is sunstantially unrecrystallized.
Hence, the
present invention is disclosing an alloy product which is in particular
suitable for upper
wing skin applications for aircrafts and having a thickness in the range of 20
to 60 mm,
preferably 30 to 50 mm.
It has been found that is not necessary to slowly quench the rolled product or
to
increase the gauge of the rolled product to obtain superior compression yield
strength and
toughness properties.
Copper and magnesium are important elements for adding strength to the alloy.
Too
low amounts of magnesium and copper result in a decrease of strength while too
high
amounts of magnesium and copper result in a lower corrosion performance and
problems
with the weldability of the alloy product. Prior art techniques used special
ageing
procedures to ameliorate the strength while low amounts of magnesium and
copper are
used in order to achieve a good corrosion performance. In order to achieve a
compromise
in strength, toughness and corrosion performance copper and magnesium amounts
(in
wt.%) of between 1.7 and 2.2%, preferably between 1.7 and 2.1% for Mg and 1.8
and
2.1% for Cu have been found to give a good balance for thin plate products.
Throughout
the claimed chemistry of the present invention it is now possible to achieve
strength levels
in the region of a T6-temper alloy while maintaining corrosion performance
characteristics
similar to those of T74-temper alloys.
Apart from the amounts of magnesium and copper the invention discloses a
balance
of magnesium and copper amounts to zinc, especially the balance of magnesium
to zinc,
which gives the alloy these performance characteristics. The improved
corrosion
resistance of the alloy according to the invention has exfoliation properties
("EXCO") of EB
or better, preferably EA or better.

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
The amount (in weight%) of zinc is preferably in a range of 7.4 to 9.6%, more
preferably in a range of 8.0 to 9.6%, most preferably in a range of 8.4 to
8.9%. Testing has
found an optimum zinc level of about 8.6%. Further details are given in the
examples as
described in more details hereinbelow.
5 It has furthermore been shown that, according to a preferred embodiment
of the
present invention, a So-containing alloy is an excellent candidate for
obtaining high
strength versus high notch toughness levels. By adding Sc to an alloy
comprising copper,
magnesium, zinc, zirconium and titanium it has been found that the
microstructure
remains unrecrystallized, thereby showing superior properties with regard to
strength and
toughness. Hence, preferred amounts of Sc (in weight%) are in a range of [Zr]
+ 1.5 [Sc]
<0.15%. Preferred amounts (in weight%) of Sc or Ce are in a range of 0.03 to
0.06%
when the amount of Zn is about 8.70% and Mg and Cu are about 2.10%. The levels
of the
unit propagation energy are considerably good for an alloy with additional Sc,
Ce or Mn
alloying elements.
A preferred method for producing a high strength, high toughness Al-Zn alloy
product with good corrosion resistance according to the present invention
comprises the
steps of
a. casting an ingot with the following composition (in weight percent):
Zn 6.0 to 11.0
Cu 1.4 to 2.2
Mg 1.4 to 2.4
Zr 0.05 to 0.15
Ti <0.05,
Hf and/or V < 0.25,
optionally Sc and/or Ce 0.05 to 0.25, and
optionally Mn 0.05 to 0.12,
and inevitable impurities and balance aluminium, preferably other elements
each
less than 0.05 and less than 0.50 in total,
b. homogenising and/or pre-heating the ingot after casting,
c. hot working the ingot into a pre-worked product,
d. reheating the pre-worked product, and either
dl. hot rolling the reheated product to the final gauge, or
d2 hot rolling and cold rolling the reheated product to the final gauge,
e. solution heat treating and quenching the solution heat treated product,

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
6
f. optionally stretching or compressing of the quenched alloy product or
otherwise cold
worked to relieve stresses, and
g. optionally ageing the quenched and optionally stretched or compressed
product to
achieve a desired temper, and wherein the alloy product has a substanlially
fully
unrecrystallized microstructure at the position T/10 of the finished product.
It has been found that the microstructure of the alloy product remains
substantially
fully unrecrystallized underneath its surface when the inventive method step
of pre-
working the product and hot rolling and/or or cold rolling the pre-worked
product are
applied.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention the method includes
a
first hot rolling of the ingot which has been homogenised into a pre-worked
product, hot
rolling the re-heated product to about 150 to 250 (in final-gauge%) and then
cold rolling
the hot rolled product to the final gauge or hot rolling the re-heated product
to about 105 to
140 (in final-gauge%) and then cold rolling the hot rolled product to the
final gauge. "Final-
gauge%" means a percentage in thickness compared to the thickness of the final
product.
200 final-gauge% means a thickness which is twice as much as the thickness of
the finally
worked product. That means that it has been found that it is advantageous to
first hot roll
the pre-heated product to a thickness which is about twice as high as the
thickness of the
final product and then cold rolling the hot rolled product to the final
thickness or to hot roll
the pre-heated product to a thickness which is about 20% higher than the
thickness of the
final product and then cold rolling the product, thereby obtaining another
about 20%
reduction of the gauge of the hot rolled product.
According to another embodiment of the present invention it is advantageous to
hot
roll the re-heated product at low temperatures in the range of 300 C to 420 C
so that the
alloy does not recrystallise. Optionally, it is possible to artificially
ageing the worked and
heat-treated product with a two-step 179 or T76 temper or to use a T77-three
step temper
if SCC performance shall be improved.
The present invention is useful for hot-working the ingot after casting and
optionally
cold-working into a worked product with a gauge in the range of 20 to 60 mm.
The present invention also concerns a plate product of high strength, high
toughness
Al-Zn alloy of the aforementioned composition which plate product is
preferably a thin
aircraft member, even more preferably an elongate structural shape member such
as an
upper-wing member, a thin skin member of an upper-wing or of a stringer of an
aircraft.

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
7
The properties of the claimed alloy may further be enhanced by an artificial
ageing
step comprising a first heat treatment at a temperature in a range of 105 C to
135 C,
preferably around 120 C for 2 to 20 hours, preferably around 8 hours and a
second heat
treatment at a higher temperature then 135 C but below 210 C, preferably
around 155 C
for 4 to 12 hours, preferably 8 to 10 hours.
The foregoing and other features and advantages of the alloys according to the
present invention will become readily apparent from the following detailed
description of
preferred embodiments.
Example 1
On a laboratory scale 14 different aluminium alloys have been cast into
ingots,
homogenised, pre-heated for more than 6 hours at about 410 C and hot rolled to
4 mm
plates. Solution heat treatment was done at 475 C and thereafter water
quenched.
Thereafter, the quenched product was aged by a two-step T76 ageing procedure.
The
chemical compositions are set out in Table 1.
Table 1. Chemical compositions of alloys in thin plate form, in
weight%, balance
aluminium and inevitable impurities, Fe 0.06, Si 0.05, Ti 0.04 and Zr 0.12.
Alloy Cu Mg Zn Others
1 2.0 2.1 8.0 0.08 Mn
2 2.1 2.1 8.1 -
3 1.7 1.75 8.7 -
4 2.1 1.7 8.6 . -
5 2.4 1.7 8.6 -
6 1.7 2.2 8.7 -
7 2.1 2.1 8.6 -
8 2.4 2.1 8.7 -
9 1.7 2.5 8.7 -
10 2.1 2.4 8.6 -
11 2.5 2.5 8.7 -
12 2.1 2.1 9.2 -
13 2.1 2.1 8.7 0.03 Ce
14 2.1 2.1 8.7 0.06 Sc

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
8
The alloys of Table 1 were processed using three processing variants (see step
5):
1. Homogenisation was performed by heating at a temperature rate of 40 C/h
to a
temperature of 460 C, then soaking for 12 hours at 460 C and another increase
with
25 C/h to a temperature of 475 C with another soaking for 24 hours at 475 C,
and
air cooling to room temperature.
2. Pre-heating was done at 420 C for 6 hours with a heating rate of 40 C/h.
3. The lab scale ingots were hot rolled from 80 to 25 mm, thereby reducing
the gauge
by about 6 to 8 mm per pass.
4. The 25 mm thick products were reheated to 420 C for about 30 min.
5. Variant 1: The reheated product was hot rolled to 4.0 mm.
Variant 2: The reheated product was hot rolled to 8.0 mm and thereafter cold
rolled
to 4.0 mm.
Variant 3: The reheated product was hot rolled to 5.0 mm and then cold rolled
to 4.0
mm.
6. Solution heat treatment was done for 1 hour at 475 C, thereafter water
quenched.
7. Stretching was done by 1.5 to 2.0% within about 1 hour after quenching.
8. Thereafter, the stretched products were aged in accordance with a T76
ageing
procedure, thereby raising the temperature to 120 C at a rate of 30 C/h and
maintaining the temperature at 120 C for 5 hours, raising the temperature at a
rate
of 15 C/h to a temperature of 160 C and soaking for 6 hours, and air cooling
the
aged product to room temperature.
Strength was measured using small Euronorm and toughness were measured in
accordance with ASTM B-871(1996). The results of the three above-mentioned
variants
are shown in Table 2a to 2c.

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
9
Table 2a. Strength and toughness properties of the alloys as shown in Table
1 in
MPa and notch toughness (TYR) in accordance with Variant 1.
Alloy Rp UPE 'TYR
1 582 211 1.31
2 564 215 1.48
3 534 243 1.49
4 550 214 1.48 ,
579 208 1.44
6 592 84 1.34
7 595 120 1.32
8 605 98 1.32
9 612 30 1.31
613 54 1.12
11 603 33 1.11
12 - - -
13 597 163 1.27
14 587 121 1.35
Table 2b. Strength and toughness properties of the alloys as shown in Table
1 in
5 MPa and notch toughness (TYR) in accordance with Variant 2.
Alloy Rp UPE TYR
1 599 125 1.30
2 567 268 1.45
3 533 143 1.53
4 587 205 1.38
5 563 178 1.45
6 569 134 1.35
7- - -
8 616 72 1.10
9 - - -
10 601 22 1.00
11 612 5 1.05
12 - - -
13 595 88 1.16
14 626 71 1.26

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
Table 2c.
Strength and toughness properties of the alloys as shown in Table 1 in
MPa and notch toughness (TYR) in accordance with Variant 3.
Alloy Rp UPE TYR
1 600 170 1.35
2 575 211 1.47
3 535 232 1.59
4 573 260 1.46
5 604 252 1.39
6 587 185 1.43
7 613 199 1.26
8 627 185 1.18
9
10 607 31 1.09
11 614 26 0.92
12 606 58 1.11
13 601 148 1.26
14 616 122 1.35
5 From
the results presented in Tables 2a to 2c it is clear that a minor degree (10
to
20%) of cold rolling is beneficial for an optimum toughness versus strength
balance. The
purely hot rolled material in accordance with Variant 1 (Table 2a) is close to
the optimum
but in general the Variant 3-alloys are better.
Furthermore, it can be seen that Sc-containing alloy 14 is advantageous if
high
10
strength versus high notch toughness is needed. Small amounts of manganese do
increase the strength but at the cost of some toughness.
Example 2
Additional chemistries have been processed in accordance with the above-
mentioned processing steps 1 to 8, thereby using the variant 3 of step 5 of
example 1
above and a T76 ageing.

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
11
Table 3.
Chemical compositions of thin plate alloys, in weight%, for all alloys
balance aluminium and inevitable impurities, Fe 0.06, Si 0.05.
Alloy Cu Mg Zn Zr Ti Others
1 2.0 2.1 8.0 ' 0.11 0.03 0.08 Mn
2 2.1 2.1 8.1 0.12 0.03 -
3 1.7 2.2 8.7 0.12 0.03 -
4 2.1 2.1 8.6 0.12 0.03 -
2.4 2.1 8.7 0.12 0.03 -
6 2.1 2.1 9.2 0.12 0.03 -
7 2.1 2.1 8.7 0.12 0.04 0.04 Ce
8 2.1 2.1 8.7 0.10 0.04 0.06 Sc
9 1.7 2.1 9.3 0.12 0.03 -
1.6 2.5 9.2 0.12 0.04 -
11 2.1 2.4 9.2 0.12 0.04 -
The properties of the alloys mentioned in Table 3 have been tested in the L-
direction for
5 the strength and in the L-T-direction for the toughness.
Table 4.
Strength and toughness properties of the alloys as shown in Table 3 in
MPa and notch toughness (TS/Rp) in accordance with Variant 3.
Alloy Rp Rm UPE TS/Rp
(MPa) (MPa) (kJ/m2)
1 601 637 177 1.35
2 575 603 221 1.48
3 591 610 194 1.45
4 613 647 199 1.34
5 624 645 178 1.18
6 608 638 63 1.13
7 601 639 163 1.27
8 618 652 132 1.35
9 613 632 75 1.25
10 618 650 5 1.29
11 619 654 26 1.18
10 The
toughness versus tensile yield strength (Rp) shown in Table 4 clearly shows
that the best toughness versus tensile yield strength value is obtained for
alloys having

CA 02592132 2007-03-28
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
12
around 8.6 to 8.7 weight% zinc. Alloys with lower levels of zinc will show
similar toughness
values but the tensile strength is -generally speaking- lower whereas high
levels of zinc
result in higher strength levels but lower toughness levels. Small amounts of
manganese
do increase the strength at the cost of toughness.
Example 3
Further tests were done with zinc levels of 8.6 and 8.7 thereby varying copper
and
magnesium levels. It can be shown that toughness levels can be elevated at the
same
strength levels. Some additional alloys were processed similar as to the ones
in Example
2, thereby using the processing steps 1 to 8 as described above and Variant 3
of step 5 of
Example 1.
Table 5. Chemical compositions of thin plate alloys, in weight%, for
all alloys
balance aluminium and inevitable impurities, Fe 0.06, Si 0.05.
Alloy Cu Mg Zn Zr Ti Others
3 1.7 2.2 8.7 0.12 0.03 -
4 2.1 2.1 8.6 0.12 0.03 -
5 2.4 2.1 8.7 0.12 0.03 -
12 2.5 2.5 8.7 0.11 0.03 0.08 Mn
13 2.1 2.4 8.6 0.12 0.03 -
14 1.7 2.5 8.7 0.12 0.03 -
1.7 1.7 8.7 0.12 0.03 -
16 2.4 1.7 8.6 0.12 0.03 -
17 2.1 1.7 8.6 0.12 0.04 -

CA 02592132 2012-06-14
WO 2006/037648 PCT/EP2005/010809
13
Table 6. Strength and toughness properties of the alloys as shown in
Table 5 in
MPa and notch toughness (TS/Rp) in accordance with Variant 3.
Alloy Rp UPE TS/Rp
(MPa) (kJ/m2)
=
3 591 194 1.45
4 613 199 1.34
624 178 1.18
12 614 26 0.92
13 607 31 1.09
14 621 55 1.01
535 232 1.59
16 604 252 1.39
17 573 260 1.46
As shown in Table 6 it is advantageous to have magnesium levels of less than
2.4%
5 with an optimum of about 1.7%. When magnesium levels are at about 1.7%,
excellent
toughness properties are obtained but the strength levels decrease. With
magnesium
levels of about 2.1% the best strength levels are obtained. Hence, magnesium
is best in
between 1.7 and 2.1%.
All above mentioned alloys have been tested on exfoliation corrosion according
to
10 ASTM G-34. They all showed a performance of EB or better.
Furthermore, it has been shown that the addition of Ce or Sc enhances the
microstructure of the alloy thereby reducing recovery processes. Since the
recovery within
the alloy material is low, nearly no recrystallization takes place even though
a solution
heat treatment is used in accordance with the standard route. Sc represses
15 recrystallization so that usually more than 90% of the thickness of the
thin plate products
remains unrecrystallized.
Having now fully described the invention, it will be apparent to one of
ordinary skill in
the art that many changes and modifications can be made without departing from
the
scope of the invention as herein described.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2592132 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Maintenance Request Received 2024-09-23
Maintenance Fee Payment Determined Compliant 2024-09-23
Letter Sent 2022-05-18
Letter Sent 2022-05-18
Inactive: Multiple transfers 2022-04-20
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2018-01-12
Grant by Issuance 2014-08-05
Inactive: Cover page published 2014-08-04
Pre-grant 2014-05-06
Inactive: Final fee received 2014-05-06
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-11-29
Letter Sent 2013-11-29
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2013-11-29
Inactive: Q2 passed 2013-11-27
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2013-11-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-07-10
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2013-01-14
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-06-14
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-12-14
Letter Sent 2010-09-16
Request for Examination Received 2010-09-07
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2010-09-07
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2010-09-07
Letter Sent 2007-09-24
Inactive: Cover page published 2007-09-06
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2007-09-04
Correct Applicant Request Received 2007-08-08
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2007-07-25
Application Received - PCT 2007-07-24
Inactive: Single transfer 2007-07-20
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-03-28
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2006-04-13

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2013-09-27

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
NOVELIS KOBLENZ GMBH
Past Owners on Record
ALFRED LUDWIG HEINZ
CHRISTIAN JOACHIM KEIDEL
RINZE BENEDICTUS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2007-03-27 13 540
Abstract 2007-03-27 1 57
Claims 2007-03-27 4 113
Description 2012-06-13 13 541
Claims 2012-06-13 3 112
Claims 2013-07-09 4 113
Confirmation of electronic submission 2024-09-22 3 79
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2007-09-03 1 113
Notice of National Entry 2007-09-03 1 195
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2007-09-23 1 129
Reminder - Request for Examination 2010-06-06 1 129
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2010-09-15 1 177
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2013-11-28 1 162
Courtesy - Certificate of Recordal (Change of Name) 2022-05-17 1 396
Courtesy - Certificate of Recordal (Change of Name) 2022-05-17 1 396
Correspondence 2007-07-19 2 98
PCT 2007-04-22 2 86
PCT 2007-03-27 3 107
Correspondence 2007-08-07 2 82
Fees 2007-09-17 1 30
PCT 2007-10-24 1 43
Fees 2008-09-22 1 37
Fees 2009-09-20 1 38
Fees 2010-09-19 1 40
Correspondence 2014-05-05 1 51