TALL GRAVITY TO ELECTRICITY INVENTION VERSION II

CONVERTISSEUR DE GRAVITE EN FORCE ELECTROMOTRICE - VERSION II

English Abstract

We will possibly use ball bearings/rollers on top of the top wheel (which will
be almost
entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel
and/or
platinum and/or carbon steel, eg. chisel material, and/or tungsten carbide...)
rods and
also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano
particles, tubes,
wires and/or nano fibers). The ball bearings/rollers maybe encased in -Option
1.- shell
(--Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon... ) were to glide directly over the ball
bearings/rollers some
of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon
to become
misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is
sandwiched
between the ball bearings/rollers and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) would
spin over.
We may place guards/rims (rollers can be positioned below the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers..) and on both sides - rollers are probably more smooth than ball
bearings, where
the path of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers) is straight, and the rollers on the
side are least
friction alternative to guide the chain (teflon/nano fibers) and to on the
side to prevent the
chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of
light weight
material whose grooves/spokes/teeth are caught and spun by the chain
(Teflon... strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of
the entire
structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia
clumsiness -
although the downside to different sized wheels is the extra cost to
customized sizes.
Re: DRAWING 4 and 5
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings/rollers next to the surface,
the difference is
that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers...) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense
concentration
of weight is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more
surface contact
between the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/rollers or larger
ones and
more horizontal spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the
movement - goes against and takes away from the movement of the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers... )) of the top wheel and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking
away from the
unbalanced force since an umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers...) to move more across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics
and our
Cumulative Effects Theory says that the unbalanced forces that drive this
invention is its
vertically stacked up high; imbalance of tanks/reservoirs each couplet being
heavier on
one side, lighter on the other.
We plan to use strong/very thin/lightest weight of material for the skin of
the tanks/reservoirs
such as the material used to make air bags or thin Teflon...
We could also make the (many wheels and very high up - tall as a sky scrapper)
shifting
weights move by rollers/ball bearings on a guide that is at a horizontal angle
from side to side
on each side of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with the weights made of
carbon steel or
iron.
We will possibly use ball bearings on top of the top wheel (which will be
almost entirely
be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or
platinum)
rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with
nano particles,
tubes, or spun nano wires and/or nano fibers) or other very strong/probably
lightweight/material - that can be cast or moulded. The ball bearings maybe
encased in
--Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon .) were to glide directly
over the ball
bearings some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and
cause the

Teflon to become misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings
on each side
is sandwiched between the ball bearings and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)
would spin
over. We may place guards/rims on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano
fibers... )
from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose
grooves/spokes are caught and spun by the chain
(Teflon...strong/lightweight/low
friction/flexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of
the entire
structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia
clumsiness.
Regarding DRAWING April 6th, 2007 - 2.:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings next to the surface, the
difference is that it
umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano
fibers... )
with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration
of weight
is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact
between
the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/or larger ones and more
horizontal
spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes
against
and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)) of the
top wheel
and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force
since an
umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move
more
across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative
Effects Theory
says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertical
imbalance.
We could also dig a very deep vertical tunnel (100 to 1,000 floors deep) and
lengthen the
solid centre cylinders (core) of the wheels (some or probably not the wheels)
(the outside
of the wheel can be ball bearings (encased on each side?). The solid centre
cylinder
(core) can be reinforced with very strong forwards and backwards and sideways
rods,
and stuck into the sides of the tunnel walls with a big strong stopper plugged
deep into
the wall using concrete and very strong (eg. rebar) cage, and especially
encased in a
large chunk of concrete at the end of the centre cylinder anchored by the big
strong
stopper. We are not quite sure of the implications of gravity on the machine
underground, since the walls have sideways gravity mass. Or we could combine a
vertical tunnel down until the water table and rising hundreds of stories
above ground.
Whereby the tunnel could support the wheels' solid centre cylinder (core)s,
while the
above ground could be supported by
Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.
In this invention the chain will be made of spun/woven nano fibres. These
chain is much
lighter so the top wheel (fairly large with rollers/ball bearings and
guard/rails that must carry
the weight of the entire system can be smaller; thus the wheels in-between are
also smaller,
leading to an allowable height relative to width of the system.
Since nano fibres are stronger than steel, we could hang more
weights/reservoirs/tanks
vertically (optimizing size of weights/reservoirs/tanks relative to level
lengths relative to
number high - Cumulative Effects Theory).
Nano fibres are flexible enough to wrap around the rollers on the top wheel,
yet strong
enough to hold up a lot of weights/reservoirs/tanks. The Cumulative Effect
Theory isolates
the forces as primarily the height and number of weights/reservoirs/tanks on
one side is
offset by (a levered - weight on the outside end of lever - magnified) a
heavier
cumulative/sum the total of each weight on one side heavier than the other
side.

The reason this model works where similar wheels have failed; is because
firstly our width is
small while our height is huge - this allows our invention to generate more
movement forces
in one direction that overcome's the weight's friction and inertia when they
are at the top and
bottom of the system - consider that on a wheel, the number of weights on the
sides and on
the top and bottom. The movement force's success is dependent on the huge
number of
weights/reservoirs/tanks stacked high up versus the few that are situated on
the top and
bottom (interfering with movement).
Additionally, Chain design updates are being applied for patents for all
Gravity Chain
Machines, and PCT/CA2005/000145, and Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention.
We will have a large wheel at the top (too carry all the weights below), it
will have a pathway
of rollers/ball bearings that are in size aligned to place the teeth of the
chain in perfect
unionson like a chainsaw, the reason for the teeth on the chain is to turn the
wheels (which
have counter teeth) below. In the alternative we could make the chain taut or
weave/spin the
nano fibers into sequences of knots that catch the wheels below's teeth. We
could also
make the chain have tiny wavy hills and valleys shape (intervals of nodules
rather than
teeth), avoiding the most friction with the top wheel (and its rollers and/or
ball bearings) while
catching the teeth of the wheels we need to spin below to generate the
electricity.
A more complex design is to put longer teeth on the chain, and a micro hinge
in-between.
The top wheel will have a protruding mechanism that folds the hinge (eg. by
pokes into it,
causing an unhooking) just before the chain's teeth reaches/approaches the top
wheels
rollers/ball bearings, thus avoiding friction. Then as the chain's teeth
leaves the rollers/ball
bearings, the Top Wheel mechanism such as a protruding poking mechanism
unfolds/rearms
the chain's teeth for catching and spinning the electricity generating wheels
below.
Or we could have guards/rails all the way from top to bottom to keep the
chain's teeth facing
inside - the down side with this design is that the teeth of the chain the a
not properly aligned
my scrape against the guards/rail, unless we made it wide enough.
We could also have guards/rails that funnel in the chain just before each
wheel to align the
teeth of the chain to point inwards.
Another design is to design the chain widely and divide its width into center
segment or
segment on both sides surrounding the centre. Either the centre will have
teeth in which
case both surrounding sides will have no teeth or both sides will have teeth,
in which case
the centre will have no teeth (in this case the top wheel could be surrounded
by larger roller
with inner rollers adding to overcome friction inside the large roller; with
rims/guards/rails or
standing up rollers to keep the movement of the chain smooth and straight) -
the inner rollers
surround the non moving neck of the Top Wheel; it must strong enough to carry
the total
weight of the entire system. The Top Wheel will have rollers to match the area
of the chain
that has the no teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides while the lower wheels
will have teeth
aligned to match area of chain that has teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding
sides of width of
chain.
ADDITION: New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention;
Micro Gravity
Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs
We are looking covering the entire Gravity Chain Machine of whatever versions
with solar
panels.

We are looking at developing Building windmills.
1. Our first design is to put the rotary blades (hereinafter referred to as
blades) on the roof
(with the blades horizontal) (see Drawing 1.).
2. Our second design is to put the blades on the side of the building
(vertically) possible on
all four sides (see Drawing 2.).
We prefer the first design because it allows clearance between buildings and
the wind
needed to may be blocked by other buildings in the second choice (in the case
of vertical
blades connected to the side of the building). There is usually more wind on
the top of the
buildings.
Even if there currently was clearance, in the future a developer may build a
new building the
blocks the wind needed for the blades.
We could also put windmill blades on our Gravity Chain Machine.
If the building is tall enough we could even line up the vertical blades one
above the other
(see Drawing 3.).
Additionally we could do a combination 1) roof, 2) on side, 3) on all four
sides, 4) multiple
vertical blades up along each side of the building (see Drawing 4.).
We could also add rings (at multiple levels) to allow the blades to catch the
wind, the way
normal windmills spin to catch the wind (see Drawing 5.) (Ch 2%).
As well we could put elongated neck with blades near the top, like a regular
windmill, except
under the circular disc base of the windmill(s) is a building.
1. We also have a design to vertical walls that funnel wind either inwards (in
which
case blades could be positioned on both sides of the funnel walls and wind
would
be channeled into the funnel. We could also stack the blades vertically.
2. The other design is to have the same funnel but position the blades on the
narrow
end of the funnel on the outside.
3. There is a base at the bottom that is circular or disc shaped that spins to
channel
the wind in the case of 1.) the wind goes inside the entrance of the funnel
and in
the case of 2.) the wind is divided by a sharp narrow divider (possibly
vertical
triangular shape - other end of the funnel.
We could place these designs on top of buildings.
We could also build windmills with multiples blades stacked vertically, and
one horizontally
on top and blades on each side of the stand.
We could also build a mixed use Energy focusing on the most
productive/efficient use of the
land - our buildings have zero effluent unlike oil/gas/nuclear never mind
coal:
1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the
support walls
of the Gravity Chain Machine.

3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the
total length
ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that
rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of
the
shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further
out
sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This
sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level
until the
trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine
reservoir/tanks
are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy
for
heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry
windmills'
whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath
it.
6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the
pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses'
rotating
trays component is really not that high.
7. As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms,
or
germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle
board, bag,
spin/weave.. .
Smaller Scale Gravity Chain Machine Version 3
The main difference in this invention is that the chain, instead of being made
from Teflon, we
use spun, woven nano fibres that can be stronger than steel with possibility
mixture of nano
particles in plastic, and give the chain teeth (for spinning the wheels that
generate electricity
like a windmill).
Since the chain material is so light we don't need as high a structure (for
cumulative effects
theory to work).
The cumulative effects theory says that the higher the structure the more
total net differing
weight (accumulating into force more down on one side than the other), this
differing force
must overcome, friction and inertia.
If we use nano material for the chain, the chain is far lighter, and therefore
less friction and
inertia (probably more flexible - then Teflon and stronger - than steel, so
even less material
is needed) to hold back the entire system from working.
This could allow for micro GCM (Smaller Scale).
We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano
particles or spray
on fibres, mixed with plastic We could also make the reservoir/tank structural
cage out of a
mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic or other mixable
substances that
make strong/durable yet light cage. (GP).
The skin of the reservoir/tank could be made of nano textiles (eg. that are
water proof,
fabrics, or diver's suit except thinner and lighter).
We could also make the skin out of mylar or air bag material.

In addition to reflective mirror surrounding a solar panelled boiler and
boiling salt water that
spins a propeller under pressure and creates fresh water at the other end:
1. We could put magnifying glasses in between the sun the reflective mirrors
and the
solar panel boiler.
2. In fact all solar panels could have moving magnifying or moving solar
panels to
capture maximum sun exposure throughout the day.
We could build comprehensive energy farms...
1. solar cells roof
2. direction of flow of rainwater
3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below
4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro
Gravity Chain
Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain
Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to
outer
surrounding level of crops
5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light
from reflective
(mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we
could have
- rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the
sun's
energy)
6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine
8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect
sunlight to
the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each
level/floor
below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture
the
most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy).
We are planning to use possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps,
cordura nylon,
ballistic nylon, leather for the wheel surface (and chain)(possibly steel
threads - especially
on the wheels), as well as stamp a crisscross pattern on the exposed surfaces
meet.
We are also looking at chinks of titanium possibly linked together by tightly
and greased spun
Kevlar chords to make up the chain, where the wheels have spokes that poke
into the open
spaces where the chain, end of the hole catches and spins the wheel.
We are also looking at keeping chain taut (eg. possibly a layer of Kevlar
straps, Teflon
straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather). The tight surfaces between
the chain and the
wheel contact points, uses friction to drag the wheel in the vector direction
of the chain. We
could also use knots.
We might even make the wheel out of rubber (An).
Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will
make the
intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as
maximizing (peak
efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as
maximizing (peak
efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of
cumulative effects
theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such
as closer
stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack
each level of

tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg. carbon
graphite), and
tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom
of the system.
We have developed a modular Gravity Chain Machine blocks (that expand to fit a
plot of land
while maximize the amount of energy produced in that plot's size of space),
windmills are
situated on top of walls surrounding the Gravity Chain Machines and at the
solid sides of the
collective.
Bascially each unit (block) of Gravity Chain Machine is surrounded by
windmills, by placing
the unit/blocks together (on any of all sides) to squeeze the most out of the
usage of the land
and the modular design makes it flexible to fit odd land shapes.
Pertaining to DRAWING 3.5 - Compressed version so you can get more net forces
(more
yield) for the same height (you won't have to stack it up as high to get the
same yield) - and
furthermore once you reach the maximum buildable height you could increase
yield
compressing (plus it may save building costs) that according to the cumulative
effects theory,
the more additional amount of extra by way of weight (water) switching to
extremity of each
side of the lever(s) means a net force of one side being heavier than the
other side. The
system of chains and the levers (weights) connected to the chains must be
flexible enough at
the top and bottom to allow spinning around the top end of the Top and Bottom
wheel.
Furthermore we are experimenting with shrinking the wheel making a shorter
(some may say
it creates a steeper change in drag but there should be an equal and opposite
pull on the
other side of the wheel - nullifying each other out - even some) and less
space to cover
(given that the top wheel is strong enough (reinforced) which would not make
sense to try to
spin, therefore we would use rollers/ball bearings) my hypothesis is to
maximize the size of
the reservoirs/tanks (sticking/jutting out and width) and optimize usage of
vertical space;
while minimizing the resistance to the flow/spin of the system from handling
the top and
bottom part of the system

Claims

8
CLAIMS
1. DISCLOSURE: This Invention generates electricity by harnessing what I call
the
Cumulative Effects Theory.
2. The Invention Comprises of:
2.i) PRIMARY NOVELTY: Our invention increases height over width by shrinking
the
proportionate size (eg. diameter) of the wheels, we do this by stacking the
wheels high
up. The outcome is that the height is where the (increases in totalling net
forces) of the
cumulative effects theory is derived this net force is increased with a
higher/taller design
and results in the wheels being proportionatedly - relatively smaller. We note
that most of
the inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight
pushing
down on one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top and bottom
wheels.
2.ii) We will dissect this invention from the inside out, like peeling an
onion from the inside
out.
2.iii) The Invention is compromised of a top wheel which is solid - with ball
bearings or
rollers for the chain (teflon/nanofibers... ) and water tanks (eg the wheel
can be made of
tungsten carbide reinforced by cage shaped to and embedded into the wheel,
which may
also have casing and guards or we may use other very strong mate(al since the
top
wheel will have hold up the weight of all the tanks all together).
2.iv) There will be hundreds light weight wheels (eg. spokes) at the stacked
up the
vertical centre of the invention. The closest invention to ours, explicitly
says their
invention is comprised of 2 wheels (see below).

9
2.v) Next outer layer is the chain it has grooves/spokes/teeth interact with
and spins
wheels, the chain might be made of Teflon ... strong/lightweight/low
friction/flexible
material.
2.vi) Next layer out are the tanks/reservoirs levers that are slanted at an
angle.
3. HOW THEY INTERACT:
3.i) In order to for the invention to make the Cumulative Effects Theory work,
the
invention will need 100's if not 1000's of unbalanced weights. There are
several ways to
hold the invention erect (possibly as tall as a building) is to stick a solid
pole, almost as
thick in diameter as the top wheel's diameter allowing clearance for the inner
tanks/reservoirs to pass above. Or use an anchor (see Drawings top wheel
4,5,8,9,10,
11, 12) - very thick (tungsten carbide) top wheel.
In de 19919022 A1 they explicitly state that their invention consists 2 wheels
furthermore
both their figures show 14 weights on each figure.
This is very different from Our invention, where the Cumulative Effects Theory
tells us to
increase the number of net weights (cumulative overbalanced levels up) on each
side,
this invention needs 100's to 1000's weights/levers high (to accumulate the
total of
net/overbalanced; forces of levered mass on each side downwards).
We will possibly use ball bearings/rollers on top of the top wheel (which will
be almost
entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel
and/or
platinum and/or carbon steel, eg. chisel material and/or tungsten carbide...)
rods and
also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano
particles, tubes,
wires and/or nano fibers). By using rollers - ball bearings we avoid using
needing to turn
the large and heavy top wheel (and the inertia and friction of spinning such a
wheel).
The ball bearings/rollers maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- the
chain
(Teflon...) may glide directly over the ball bearings/rollers some of the ball
bearings may
not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned).
In -Option
1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the
ball
bearings/rollers and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) would spin over.
We may place guards/rims (rollers can be positioned below the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers..) and on both sides - rollers are probably more smooth than ball
bearings, where
the path of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers) is straight, and the rollers on the
side are least
friction alternative to guide the chain (teflon/nano fibers) and to on the
side to prevent the
chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of
light weight
material whose grooves/spokes/teeth are caught and spun by the chain
(Teflon... strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of
the entire
structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia
clumsiness -
although the downside to different sized wheels is the extra cost to
customized sizes.
Regarding DRAWING 2:

10
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings/rollers next to the surface,
the difference is
that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers...) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense
concentration
of weight is not focused on a small location.
The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface -
more
ball bearings/rollers or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the
- adds
dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from
the
movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... )) of the top wheel and the chain
(Teflon/nano fibers... ) taking away from the unbalanced force since an
umbrella shape
top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) to move more across a
horizontal
path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that
the
unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertically stacked up high;
imbalance of
tanks/reservoirs each couplet (each horizontal pair on each side of the
chain/fulcrum)
being heavier on one side, lighter on the other.
We plan to use strong/very thin/lightest weight of material for the skin of
the tanks/reservoirs
such as the material used to make air bags or thin Teflon...
We could also make the (many wheels and very high up - tall as a building)
shifting weights
move by rollers/ball bearings on a guide that is at a horizontal angle from
side to side on
each side of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) with the weights made of carbon
steel or iron.
3.ii) The 100's to 1000's of light weight wheels vertically stacked up the
middle of the
invention. Each wheels whose sides' grooves/spokes/teeth are spun by the
movement of the
chain (Teflon/nanofibers...). The purpose of the inbetween wheels are two
fold. One. Each
or some of the wheels have a rod in its centre that protrudes out and as it
spins it generates
electricity. Two. The many wheels are needed to keep the shape of the chain
and
tanks/reservoirs from twisting (since the invention will be the height of a
building).
3.iii) The chain (Teflon/nanofiber...) must be made of strong/lightweight/low
friction/flexible
material. It will have holes or grooves that catch the teeth or the other way
around to spin
the wheels which generate electricity. We are looking at reinforcing the chain
with duct tape
like material - such as the mesh spread equally, possibly sandwiched by Teflon
- or some
flexible material to cover the mesh to smoothen out the surface - reduce
friction.
3.iv) There is a tank/reservoir (or shifting weights see DRAWING 6,7 and 8).
On each end of a lever (eg. see saw). The longer the lever the more magnified
the shift in
weight position of one side's force downwards to the other side. Consider a
see saw or a old
doctor's weight scale, the further outwards towards the extreme length of the
lever the weight
is shifted the more force downwards the scale (see saw) will be tipped.
The second function of the lever is to be thick and hollow enough to let water
drain from inner
tank/reservoir to outer tank/reservoir.
The lever must be shaped and positioned to easily drain the higher
tank/reservoir until
empty, and therefore its hole must be connected to the bottom of the higher
tank/reservoir.
The lever is positioned at an angle (we are experimenting with various angles)
where the
outside tank/reservoir is lower than the inner tank/reservoir on one (say the
left) side of the

11
chain then as the chain spins this particular lever/outer and inner tank under
discussion spins
underneath and to the other side.
The angle of the lever naturally becomes upside down. - Firstly, The outer
tank/reservoir is
(or square solid tightly vertically stacked weights with rods or rails -
levers; as guides and
rollers - ball bearings to allow passage) situated lower than its matching
inner tank/reservoir
so naturally the lever drains the water from the higher upper inner
tank/reservoir to the lower
outer tank/reservoir.
- Secondly, look at the chain as a responsive fulcrum, meaning it will move
around the
wheels as more down force is added on one side of the chain relative to the
other.
The water weight in the outer tank/reservoir, being further out (ie. the
shifting of weight on the
doctor's scale or see saw that becomes magnified as the weight is shifted
further and further
out to the far end of the fulcrum) and thus will have more downwards force -
Thirdly, relative
to its counterpart on the other side of the chain, where the outer
tank/reservoir becomes (the
opposite in terms of relative positioning to the other side of the chain)
higher (switches in
relative height - just enough to drain all the water) than the inner
tank/reservoir. Thus the
water drains from the outer tank/reservoir to the inner tank/reservoir on the
right side.
Based on the LAWS OF LEVERAGE - force downwards is lighter when the weight
shifts
closer to the fulcrum (chain) and is magnified on the other side where the
weight is on the far
end of the lever; further away from the fulcrum (chain) (see Drawing 1.).
3.v) Each set of weights (eg. take the example of the see saw again, the
person's weight on
each side of the fulcrum, where they are equal in mass, but the weight of one
person over
the other is magnifed by the fact the person; say the left side is seated
further away from the
fulcrum while the person on the right side is seated closer (or even right
next to the fulcrum)
this imbalance in leverage causes the left side to sink and the right side to
sink.
4.) The weakness in the system is the transition in the top and the bottom,
where the weights
wreak havoc on the invention. Here is where weights shift/transition from side
to side, and
are exert inertia, drag, can cause friction and bounciness. The weights
interfere with the free
flow of the chain that is critical to the success of the system. Fortunately
we have the
Cumulative Effects Theory, which was discovered by Gerard Voon.
4.i) The cumulative effects theory says that for each set of weights
horizontally (think of a see
saw) there is a net gain downwards. By adding up all the net gains the total
becomes larger
and larger the more sets of weights you stack each set on top of the other.
4.ii) By making the machine very tall (technically the taller you make it the
more total net
gains increase) and making the wheels very small (or at least using smooth
ball
bearings/rollers) the total net gains will become greater and greater than the
inertia, drag,
friction and bounciness.
5.) Not knowing or understanding The Cumulative Effects Theory is where de
19919022 A1
goes wrong, they have only two wheels and 14 weights/levers - even if they
build their
invention as high as a building, both their figures in their drawings are in
the same number of
relative parts proportions which we are convinced is inoperable. We believe
that their 14
weights are all so small they can't overcome the inertia (the propensity for
the wheels which
are so large to slow down and rest... stop), not to mention friction and drag
of such large
wheels relative to so few and small weights.

12
Furthermore for de 19919022, without wheels in the middle the chains may
twist, losing its
shape and getting caught and even breaking, especially at the height of a
building.
We have enclosed a Drawing of de 19919022 model, you must realize the huge
size of the
wheels relative to the weights in width if their model were built to the
height of building.
Our invention increases height over width by shrinking the relative size of
the wheels, we do
this by stacking the wheels high up. The outcome is that the height is where
the (increases
in totalling net forces) of the cumulative effects theory is derived is
increased with a the
higher/taller the versus the slimmer (smaller wheels) the structure. We note
that most of the
inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight
pushing down on
one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top and bottom wheels.
I believe with the top wheel (see 3i) ) that we have designed is the only
solution to holding
the invention erect, the invention is weighted down by 100's to 1000's of
weighted water
tanks the invention is as high as a building.
Furthermore:
Firstly, 19919022 A1 have round weights and their weights are not closely
stacked (they use
round weights we use squareish shaped weights) for maximum use of space -
density.
Secondly, 19919022 A1's weights are not large enough for the space/amount of
chain they
occupy, their dispersal, along the chain - density
Thirdly, 19919022 A1 don't have long enough lever length for the amount of
chain space
(dispersal) allocated each lever - density.
Fourthly, 19919022 fail to come up with a solution to hold (errect) up the
invention especially
if it is as tall as a building.
Fifth, 19919022 A1's 14 weights (such small weights and levers) scaled to a
building tall to
two proportional - to their drawings -(adds up to two) very large (and huge
inertia) wheels
we don't think would accumulate enough total net gain down wards force.
The wheels are too large and the 14 weights and levers are neither heavy
enough nor long
enough to overcome the huge wheels' friction and inertia.
I believe de 19919022 A1 is inoperable while Our Invention provides the novel
solution that
will work. Note the internet website: LIST TITLE: PATENTS FOR UNWORKABLE
DEVICES
that de 19919022 cannot work. Further evidence that it does not work is that 6
years have
past and they have not produced anything. However for Our Invention most of
our people
believe that the crucial novelties in our design makes working sense.
We will possibly use ball bearings on top of the top wheel (which will be
almost entirely be
solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or
platinum) rods and
also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano
particles, tubes, or
spun nano wires and/or nano fibers) or other very strong/probably
lightweight/material - that
can be cast or moulded. The ball bearings maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-
Option 2.- if
the chain (Teflon...) were to glide directly over the ball bearings some of
the ball bearings

13
may not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become
misaligned). In -Option
1.- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the
ball bearings and
the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) would spin over. We may place guards/rims
on the side to
prevent the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) from slipping off. We also many
wheels made of
light weight material whose grooves/spokes are caught and spun by the chain
(Teflon...strong/lightweight/low friction/flexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of
the entire
structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia
clumsiness.
Regarding DRAWING April 6th, 2007 - 2.:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings next to the surface, the
difference is that it
umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano
fibers... )
with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration
of weight
is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact
between
the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/or larger ones and more
horizontal
spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes
against
and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... )) of the
top wheel
and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force
since an
umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move
more
across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative
Effects Theory
says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertical
imbalance.
We could also dig a very deep vertical tunnel (100 to 1,000 floors deep) and
lengthen the
solid centre cylinders (core) of the wheels (some or probably not the wheels)
(the outside
of the wheel can be ball bearings (encased on each side?). The solid centre
cylinder
(core) can be reinforced with very strong forwards and backwards and sideways
rods,
and stuck into the sides of the tunnel walls with a big strong stopper plugged
deep into
the wall using concrete and very strong (eg, rebar) cage, and especially
encased in a
large chunk of concrete at the end of the centre cylinder anchored by the big
strong
stopper. We are not quite sure of the implications of gravity on the machine
underground, since the walls have sideways gravity mass. Or we could combine a
vertical tunnel down until the water table and rising hundreds of stories
above ground.
Whereby the tunnel could support the wheels' solid centre cylinder (core)s,
while the
above ground could be supported by
Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.
In this invention the chain will be made of spun/woven nano fibres. These
chain is much
lighter so the top wheel (fairly large with rollers/ball bearings and
guard/rails that must carry
the weight of the entire system can be smaller; thus the wheels in-between are
also smaller,
leading to an allowable height relative to width of the system.
Since nano fibres are stronger than steel, we could hang more
weights/reservoirs/tanks
vertically (optimizing size of weights/reservoirs/tanks relative to level
lengths relative to
number high - Cumulative Effects Theory).
Nano fibres are flexible enough to wrap around the rollers on the top wheel,
yet strong
enough to hold up a lot of weights/reservoirs/tanks. The Cumulative Effect
Theory isolates
the forces as primarily the height and number of weights/reservoirs/tanks on
one side is
offset by (a levered - weight on the outside end of lever - magnified) a
heavier
cumulative/sum the total of each weight on one side heavier than the other
side.

14
The reason this model works where similar wheels have failed; is because
firstly our width is
small while our height is huge - this allows our invention to generate more
movement forces
in one direction that overcome's the weight's friction and inertia when they
are at the top and
bottom of the system - consider that on a wheel, the number of weights on the
sides and on
the top and bottom. The movement force's success is dependent on the huge
number of
weights/reservoirs/tanks stacked high up versus the few that are situated on
the top and
bottom (interfering with movement).
Additionally, Chain design updates are being applied for patents for all
Gravity Chain
Machines, and PCT/CA2005/000145, and Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention.
We will have a large wheel at the top (too carry all the weights below), it
will have a pathway
of rollers/ball bearings that are in size aligned to place the teeth of the
chain in perfect
unionson like a chainsaw, the reason for the teeth on the chain is to turn the
wheels (which
have counter teeth) below. In the alternative we could make the chain taut or
weave/spin the
nano fibers into sequences of knots that catch the wheels below's teeth. We
could also
make the chain have tiny wavy hills and valleys shape (intervals of nodules
rather than
teeth), avoiding the most friction with the top wheel (and its rollers and/or
ball bearings) while
catching the teeth of the wheels we need to spin below to generate the
electricity.
A more complex design is to put longer teeth on the chain, and a micro hinge
in-between.
The top wheel will have a protruding mechanism that folds the hinge (eg. by
pokes into it,
causing an unhooking) just before the chain's teeth reaches/approaches the top
wheels
rollers/ball bearings, thus avoiding friction. Then as the chain's teeth
leaves the rollers/ball
bearings, the Top Wheel mechanism such as a protruding poking mechanism
unfolds/rearms
the chain's teeth for catching and spinning the electricity generating wheels
below.
Or we could have guards/rails all the way from top to bottom to keep the
chain's teeth facing
inside - the down side with this design is that the teeth of the chain the a
not properly aligned
my scrape against the guards/rail, unless we made it wide enough.
We could also have guards/rails that funnel in the chain just before each
wheel to align the
teeth of the chain to point inwards.
Another design is to design the chain widely and divide its width into center
segment or
segment on both sides surrounding the centre. Either the centre will have
teeth in which
case both surrounding sides will have no teeth or both sides will have teeth,
in which case
the centre will have no teeth (in this case the top wheel could be surrounded
by larger roller
with inner rollers adding to overcome friction inside the large roller; with
rims/guards/rails or
standing up rollers to keep the movement of the chain smooth and straight) -
the inner rollers
surround the non moving neck of the Top Wheel; it must strong enough to carry
the total
weight of the entire system. The Top Wheel will have rollers to match the area
of the chain
that has the no teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides while the lower wheels
will have teeth
aligned to match area of chain that has teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding
sides of width of
chain.
ADDITION: New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention;
Micro Gravity
Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs
We are looking covering the entire Gravity Chain Machine of whatever versions
with solar
panels.

15
We are looking at developing Building windmills.
1. Our first design is to put the rotary blades (hereinafter referred to as
blades) on the roof
(with the blades horizontal) (see Drawing 1.).
2. Our second design is to put the blades on the side of the building
(vertically) possible on
all four sides (see Drawing 2.).
We prefer the first design because it allows clearance between buildings and
the wind
needed to may be blocked by other buildings in the second choice (in the case
of vertical
blades connected to the side of the building). There is usually more wind on
the top of the
buildings.
Even if there currently was clearance, in the future a developer may build a
new building the
blocks the wind needed for the blades.
We could also put windmill blades on our Gravity Chain Machine.
If the building is tall enough we could even line up the vertical blades one
above the other
(see Drawing 3.).
Additionally we could do a combination 1) roof, 2) on side, 3) on all four
sides, 4) multiple
vertical blades up along each side of the building (see Drawing 4.).
We could also add rings (at multiple levels) to allow the blades to catch the
wind, the way
normal windmills spin to catch the wind (see Drawing 5.) (Ch 2%).
As well we could put elongated neck with blades near the top, like a regular
windmill, except
under the circular disc base of the windmill(s) is a building.
1. We also have a design to vertical walls that funnel wind either inwards (in
which case
blades could be positioned on both sides of the funnel walls and wind would be
channeled into the funnel. We could also stack the blades vertically.
2. The other design is to have the same funnel but position the blades on the
narrow
end of the funnel on the outside.
3. There is a base at the bottom that is circular or disc shaped that spins to
channel the
wind in the case of 1.) the wind goes inside the entrance of the funnel and in
the case
of 2.) the wind is divided by a sharp narrow divider (possibly vertical
triangular shape
- other end of the funnel.
We could place these designs on top of buildings.
We could also build windmills with multiples blades stacked vertically, and
one horizontally
on top and blades on each side of the stand.
We could also build a mixed use Energy focusing on the most
productive/efficient use of the
land - our buildings have zero effluent unlike oil/gas/nuclear never mind
coal:
1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the
support walls
of the Gravity Chain Machine.

16
3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the
total length
ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that
rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of
the
shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further
out
sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This
sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level
until the
trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine
reservoir/tanks
are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy
for
heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry
windmills'
whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath
it.
6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the
pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses'
rotating
trays component is really not that high.
7. As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms,
or
germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle
board, bag,
spin/weave...
Smaller Scale Gravity Chain Machine Version 3
The main difference in this invention is that the chain, instead of being made
from Teflon, we
use spun, woven nano fibres that can be stronger than steel with possibility
mixture of nano
particles in plastic, and give the chain teeth (for spinning the wheels that
generate electricity
like a windmill).
Since the chain material is so light we don't need as high a structure (for
cumulative effects
theory to work).
The cumulative effects theory says that the higher the structure the more
total net differing
weight (accumulating into force more down on one side than the other), this
differing force
must overcome, friction and inertia.
If we use nano material for the chain, the chain is far lighter, and therefore
less friction and
inertia (probably more flexible - then Teflon and stronger - than steel, so
even less material
is needed) to hold back the entire system from working.
This could allow for micro GCM (Smaller Scale).
We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of nano
particles or spray
on fibres, mixed with plastic We could also make the reservoir/tank structural
cage out of a
mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic or other mixable
substances that
make strong/durable yet light cage. (GP).
The skin of the reservoir/tank could be made of nano textiles (eg. that are
water proof,
fabrics, or diver's suit except thinner and lighter).
We could also make the skin out of mylar or air bag material.
In addition to reflective mirror surrounding a solar panelled boiler and
boiling salt water that
spins a propeller under pressure and creates fresh water at the other end:

17
1. We could put magnifying glasses in between the sun the reflective mirrors
and the
solar panel boiler.
2. In fact all solar panels could (15%, they plagiarize, while they
handicapped me and I
can't plagiarize off their ideas) have moving magnifying or moving solar
panels to
capture maximum sun exposure throughout the day.
We could build comprehensive energy farms...
1. solar cells roof
2. direction of flow of rainwater
3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below
4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro
Gravity Chain
Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain
Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to
outer
surrounding level of crops
5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light
from reflective
(mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we
could have
- rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the
sun's
energy)
6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine
8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect
sunlight to
the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each
level/floor
below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture
the
most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy)
We are planning to use possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps,
cordura nylon,
ballistic nylon, leather for the wheel surface (and chain)(possibly steel
threads - especially
on the wheels), as well as stamp a crisscross pattern on the exposed surfaces
meet.
We are also looking at chinks of titanium possibly linked together by tightly
and greased spun
Kevlar chords to make up the chain, where the wheels have spokes that poke
into the open
spaces where the chain, end of the hole catches and spins the wheel.
We are also looking at keeping chain taut (eg. possibly a layer of Kevlar
straps, Teflon
straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather). The tight surfaces between
the chain and the
wheel contact points, uses friction to drag the wheel in the vector direction
of the chain. We
could also use knots.
We might even make the wheel out of rubber (An).
Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will
make the
intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as
maximizing (peak
efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as
maximizing (peak
efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of
cumulative effects
theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such
as closer
stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack
each level of
tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg. carbon
graphite), and
tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom
of the system.

18
We have developed a modular Gravity Chain Machine blocks (that expand to fit a
plot of land
while maximize the amount of energy produced in that plot's size of space),
windmills are
situated on top of walls surrounding the Gravity Chain Machines and at the
solid sides of the
collective.
Bascially each unit (block) of Gravity Chain Machine is surrounded by
windmills, by placing
the unit/blocks together (on any of all sides) to squeeze the most out of the
usage of the land
and the modular design makes it flexible to fit odd land shapes.
Pertaining to DRAWING 3.5 - Compressed version so you can get more net forces
(more
yield) for the same height (you won't have to stack it up as high to get the
same yield) - and
furthermore once you reach the maximum buildable height you could increase
yield
compressing (plus it may save building costs) that according to the cumulative
effects theory,
the more additional amount of extra by way of weight (water) switching to
extremity of each
side of the lever(s) means a net force of one side being heavier than the
other side. The
system of chains and the levers (weights) connected to the chains must be
flexible enough at
the top and bottom to allow spinning around the top end of the Top and Bottom
wheel.
Furthermore we are experimenting with shrinking the wheel making a shorter
(some may say
it creates a steeper change in drag but there should be an equal and opposite
pull on the
other side of the wheel - nullifying each other out - even some ) and less
space to cover
(given that the top wheel is strong enough (reinforced) which would not make
sense to try to
spin, therefore we would use rollers/ball bearings) my hypothesis is to
maximize the size of
the reservoirs/tanks (sticking/jutting out and width) and optimize usage of
vertical space;
while minimizing the resistance to the flow/spin of the system from handling
the top and
bottom part of the system.

Description

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
19
June, 2007
Gerard Voon
Note: not to be publicly published until International Patent Application has
Occurred.
Description
1.i) PRIMARY NOVELTY: Our Invention increases height over width by shrinking
the
proportionate size (eg. diameter) of the wheels, we do this by stacking the
wheels high
up. The outcome is that the height is where the (increases in totalling net
forces) of the
cumulative effects theory is derived this net force is increased with a
higher/tal{er design
and results in the wheels being proportionatedly - relatively smaller. We note
that most of
the inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight
pushing
down on one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top and bottom
wheels.
1.ii) We will dissect this invention from the inside out, like peeling an
onion from the inside
out.
1.iii) The Invention is compromised of a top wheel which is solid - with ball
bearings or
rollers for the chain (teflon/nanofibers...) and water tanks (eg the wheel can
be made of
tungsten carbide reinforced by cage shaped to and embedded into the wheel,
which may
also have casing and guards or we may use other very strong material since the
top
wheel will have hold up the weight of all the tanks all together).
1.iv) There will be hundreds light weight wheels (eg. spokes) at the stacked
up the
vertical centre of the invention. The closest invention to ours, explicitly
says their
invention is comprised of 2 wheels (see below).
Liste de la familie de brevets
1 family member for:
DE19919022
Derived from 1 application.
U Motor drivable by three different forces, viz. gravity, dans ma liste de
tl ytÃrostatic force or aerostatic ~srPssur~ comprises two
wheels on vertical axes and connected to link gear brevets
Informations relatives 3 la pubiication: DE19919022 Al - 2000-03-02
Les donnees sont foumies par la banque de donnees esp@cenet - Woridwide
We explicitly claim Our Invention needs possibly 100's if not 1,000's of
wheels to operate.
1.v) Next outer layer is the chain it has grooves/spokes/teeth interact with
and spins
wheels, the chain might be made of Teflon... strong/lightweight/low
friction/flexible
material.
1.vi) Next layer out are the tanks/reservoirs levers that are slanted at an
angle.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
2.i) In order to for the invention to make the Cumulative Effects Theory work,
the
invention will need 100's if not 1000's of unbalanced weights. The only
conceivable way
to hold the invention erect (possibly as tall as a building) is to stick a
solid pole, almost as
thick in diameter as the top wheel's diameter allowing clearance for the inner
tanks/reservoirs to pass above.
In de19919022 Al they explicitly state that their invention consists 2 wheels
furthermore
both their figures show 14 weights on each figure.
This is very different from Our Invention, where the Cumulative Effects Theory
tells us to
increase the number of net weights (cumulative overbalanced levels up) on each
side,
this invention needs 100's to 1000's weights/levers high (to accumulate the
total of
net/overbalanced; forces of levered mass on each side downwards).
We will possibly use ball bearings/rollers on top of the top wheel (which will
be almost
entirely be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel
and/or
platinum and/or carbon steel, eg. chisel material and/or tungsten carbide...)
rods and
also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with nano
particles, tubes,
wires and/or nano fibers).
The ball bearings/rollers maybe encased in -Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- the
chain
(Teflon... ) may glide directly over the ball bearings/rollers some of the
ball bearings may
not move in a straight direction and cause the Teflon to become misaligned).
In -Option
1- the shell over the ball bearings on each side is sandwiched between the
ball
bearings/rollers and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) would spin over.
We may place guards/rims (rollers can be positioned below the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers..) and on both sides - rollers are probably more smooth than ball
bearings, where
the path of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers) is straight, and the rollers on the
side are least
friction altemative to guide the chain (teflon/nano fibers) and to on the side
to prevent the
chain (Teflon/nano flbers... ) from slipping off. We also many wheels made of
light weight
material whose grooves/spokes/teeth are caught and spun by the chain
(Teflon... strong/lightweight/1ow frictionlflexible material.
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of
the entire
structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia
clumsiness -
although the downside to different sized wheels is the extra cost to
customized sizes.
Regarding DRAWING 4 and 5:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings/rollers next to the surface,
the difference is
that it umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain
(Teflon/nano
fibers...) with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense
concentration
of weight is not focused on a small location.
The downside is that more surface contact between the mechanisms (eg. surface -
more
ball bearings/rollers or larger ones and more horizontal spread slows down the
- adds
dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes against and takes away from
the
movement of the chain (Teflon/nano tibers...)) of the top wheel and the chain
(Teflon/nano fibers... ) taking away from the unbalanced force since an
umbrella shape

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
21
top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) to move more across a
horizontal
path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative Effects Theory says that
the
unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertically stacked up high;
imbalance of
tanks/reservoirs each couplet (each horizontal pair on each side of the
chain/fulcrum)
being heavier on one side, lighter on the other.
We plan to use strong/very thin/lightest weight of material for the skin of
the tanks/reservoirs
such as the material used to make air bags or thin Teflon...
We could also make the (many wheels and very high up - tall as a building)
shifting weights
move by rollers/ball bearings on a guide that is at a horizontal angle from
side to side on
each side of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers... ) with the weights made of
carbon steel or iron.
2.ii) The 100's to 1000's of light weight wheels vertically stacked up the
middle of the
invention. Each wheels whose sides' grooves/spokes/teeth are spun by the
movement of the
chain (Teflon/nanofibers... ). The purpose of the inbetween wheels are two
fold. One. Each
or some of the wheels have a rod in its centre that protrudes out and as it
spins it generates
electricity. Two. The many wheels are needed to keep the shape of the chain
and
tanks/reservoirs from twisting (since the invention will be the height of a
building).
2.iii) The chain (Teflon/nanofiber...) must be made of
strong/lightweight/lowfriction/flexible
material. It will have holes or grooves that catch the teeth or the other way
around to spin
the wheels which generate electricity. We are looking at reinforcing the chain
with duct tape
like material - such as the mesh spread equally, possibly sandwiched by Teflon
- or some
flexible material to cover the mesh to smoothen out the surface - reduce
friction.
2.iv) There is a tank/reservoir (or shifting weights - see DRAWING 6, 7 and 8)
or square
large weights stacked tightly with inner guides or outer rails using rollers
or ball bearings to
shift the weight from end to end of the levers (guides - rails 10% Ch).
On each end of a lever (eg. see saw). The longer the lever the more magnified
the shift in
weight position of one side's force downwards to the other side. Consider a
see saw or a old
doctor's weight scale, the further outwards towards the extreme length of the
lever the weight
is shifted the more force downwards the scale (see saw) will be tipped.
The second function of the lever is to be thick and hollow enough to let water
drain from inner
tank/reservoir to outer tank/reservoir.
The lever must be shaped and positioned to easily drain the higher
tank/reservoir until
empty, and therefore its hole must be connected to the bottom of the higher
tank/reservoir.
The lever is positioned at an angle (we are experimenting with various angles)
where the
outside tank/reservoir is lower than the inner tank/reservoir on one (say the
left) side of the
chain then as the chain spins this particular lever/outer and inner tank under
discussion spins
underneath and to the other side.
The angle of the lever naturally becomes upside down. - Firstly, The outer
tank/reservoir is
situated lower than its matching inner tank/reservoir so naturally the lever
drains the water
from the higher upper inner tank/reservoir to the lower outer tank/reservoir.
- Secondly, look at the chain as a responsive fulcrum, meaning it will move
around the
wheels as more down force is added on one side of the chain relative to the
other.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
22
The water weight in the outer tankireservoir, being further out (ie. the
shifting of weight on the
doctor's scale or see saw that becomes magnified as the weight is shifted
further and further
out to the far end of the fulcrum) and thus will have more downwards force -
Thirdly, relative
to its counterpart on the other side of the chain, where the outer
tank/reservoir becomes (the
opposite in terms of relative positioning to the other side of the chain)
higher (switches in
relative height - just enough to drain all the water) than the inner
tank/reservoir. Thus the
water drains from the outer tank/reservoir to the inner tank/reservoir on the
right side.
Based on the LAWS OF LEVERAGE - force downwards is lighter when the weight
shifts
closer to the fulcrum (chain) and is magnified on the other side where the
weight is on the far
end of the lever; further away from the fulcrum (chain) (see Drawing 1.).
2.v) Each set of weights (eg. take the example of the see saw again, the
person's weight on
each side of the fulcrum, where they are equal in mass, but the weight of one
person over
the other is magnified by the fact the person; say the left side is seated
further away from the
fulcrum while the person on the right side is seated closer (or even right
next to the fulcrum)
this imbalance in leverage causes the left side to sink and the right side to
sink.
3.) The weakness in the system is the transition in the top and the bottom,
where the weights
wreak havoc on the invention. Here is where weights shift/transition from side
to side, and
are exert inertia, drag, can cause friction and bounciness. The weights
interfere with the free
flow of the chain that is critical to the success of the system. Fortunately
we have the
Cumulative Effects Theory, which was discovered by Gerard Voon.
3.i) The cumulative effects theory says that for each set of weights
horizontally (think of a see
saw) there is a net gain downwards. By adding up all the net gains the total
becomes larger
and larger the more sets of weights you stack each set on top of the other.
3.ii) By making the machine very tall (technically the taller you make it the
more total net
gains increase) and making the wheels very small (or at least using smooth
ball
bearings/rollers) the total net gains will become greater and greater than the
inertia, drag,
friction and bounciness.
4.) The main thing that's new in this design is the huge wheel at the top that
rather than
spinning, allows the chain to pass via rollers - ball bearings.
5.) Not knowing or understanding The Cumulative Effects Theory is where de
19919022 Al
goes wrong, they have only two wheels and 14 weightsllevers - even if they
build their
invention as high as a building, both their figures in their drawings are in
the same number 'of
relative parts proportions which we are convinced is inoperable. We believe
that their 14
weights are all so small they can't overcome the inertia (the propensity for
the wheels which
are so large to slow down and rest... stop), not to mention friction and drag
of such large
wheels relative to so few and small weights.
Furthermore for de 19919022, without wheels in the middle the chains may
twist, losing its
shape and getting caught and even breaking, especially at the height of a
building.
We have enclosed a Drawing of de 19919022 model, you must realize the huge
size of the
wheels relative to the weights in width if their model were built to the
height of building.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
23
Our Invention increases height over width by shrinking the relative size of
the wheels, we do
this by stacking the wheels high up. The outcome is that the height is where
the (increases
in totalling net forces) of the cumulative effects theory is derived is
increased with a the
higher/taller the versus the slimmer (smaller wheels) the structure. We note
that most of the
inertia, drag, friction, and bounciness (also dead weight - no net weight
pushing down on
one side of the chain over the other) occurs on the top wheel.
I believe with the top wheel (see 3i) that we have designed is the only
solution to holding the
invention erect, the invention is weighted down by 100's to 1000's of weighted
water tanks
the invention is as high as a building.
Furthermore:
Firstly, 19919022 Al have round weights and their weights are not closely
stacked (they use
round weights we use squareish shaped weights) for maximum use of space -
density.
Secondly, 19919022 Al's weights are not large enough for the space/amount of
chain they
occupy, their dispersal, along the chain - density
Thirdly, 19919022 Al don't have long enough lever length for the amount of
chain space
(dispersal) allocated each lever - density.
Fourthly, 19919022 fail to come up with a solution to hold (errect) up the
invention especially
if it is as tall as a building.
Fifth, 19919022 Al's 14 weights (such small weights and levers) scaled to a
building tall to
two proportional - to their drawings - (adds up to two) very large (and huge
inertia) wheels
we don't think would accumulate enough total net gain down wards force.
The wheels are too large and the 14 weights and levers are neither heavy
enough nor long
enough to overcome the huge wheels' friction and inertia.
I believe de 19919022 Al is inoperable while Our Invention provides the novel
solution that
will work. Note the intemet website: LIST TITLE: PATENTS FOR UNWORKABLE
DEVICES
that de 19919022 cannot work. Further evidence that it does not work is that 6
years have
past and they have not produced anything. However for Our Invention most of
our people
believe that the crucial novelties in our d sign makes working sense.
We will possibly use ball bearings on top of the top wheel (which wili be
almost entirely
be solid steel and/or platinum with possible embedded circular (steel and/or
platinum) _
rods and also sideways for a cage effect - possibly further reinforced with
nano particles,
tubes, or spun nano wires and/or nano fibers) or other very strong/probably
lightweight/material - that can be cast or moulded. The ball bearings maybe
encased in -
Option 1.- shell (-Option 2.- if the chain (Teflon... ) were to glide directly
over the ball
bearings some of the ball bearings may not move in a straight direction and
cause the
Teflon to become misaligned). In -Option 1.- the shell over the ball bearings
on each side
is sandwiched between the ball bearings and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)
would spin
over. We may place guards/rims on the side to prevent the chain (Teflon/nano
fibers... )
from slipping off. We also many wheels made of light weight material whose
grooves/spokes are caught and spun by the chain (Teflon ...
strong/lightweight/low
friction/flexible material.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
24
The purpose of the top solid/reinforced cylinder is to support the weight of
the entire
structure - in fact the lower wheels might be smaller to avoid inertia
clumsiness.
Regarding DRAWING April 6th, 2007 - 2.:
The top wheel is also solid, with ball bearings next to the surface, the
difference is that it
umbrella shaped to spread the down pulling weight of the chain (Teflon/nano
fibers... )
with all its weights on each side. The spread ensures that dense concentration
of weight
is not focused on a small location. The downside is that more surface contact
between
the mechanisms (eg. surface - more ball bearings/or larger ones and more
horizontal
spread slows down the - adds dead drag to the - counters the movement - goes
against
and takes away from the movement of the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)) of the
top wheel
and the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) taking away from the unbalanced force
since an
umbrella shape top wheel would cause the chain (Teflon/nano fibers...) to move
more
across a horizontal path which in the rules of physics and our Cumulative
Effects Theory
says that the unbalanced forces that drive this invention is its vertical
imbalance.
We could also dig a very deep vertical tunnel (100 to 1,000 floors deep) and
lengthen the
solid centre cylinders (core) of the wheels (some or probably not the wheels)
(the outside
of the wheel can be ball bearings (encased on each side?). The solid centre
cylinder
(core) can be reinforced with very strong forwards and backwards and sideways
rods,
and stuck into the sides of the tunnel walls with a big strong stopper plugged
deep into
the wall using concrete and very strong (eg. rebar) cage, and especially
encased in a
large chunk of concrete at the end of the centre cylinder anchored by the big
strong
stopper. We are not quite sure of the implications of gravity on the machine
underground, since the walls have sideways gravity mass. Or we could combine a
vertical tunnel down until the water table and rising hundreds of stories
above ground.
Whereby the tunnel could support the wheels' solid centre cylinder (core)s,
while the
above ground could be supported by
Micro Gravity Chain Machine Version 4.
In this invention the chain will be made of spun/woven nano fibres. These
chain is much
lighter so the top wheel (fairly large with rollers/ball bearings and
guard/rails that must carry
the weight of the entire system can be smaller; thus the wheels in-between are
also smaller,
leading to an allowable height relative to width of the system.
Since nano fibres are stronger than steel, we could hang more
weights/reservoirs/tanks
vertically (optimizing size of weights/reservoirs/tanks relative to level
lengths relative to
number high - Cumulative Effects Theory).
Nano fibres are flexible enough to wrap around the rollers on the top wheel,
yet strong
enough to hold up a lot of weights/reservoirs/tanks. The Cumulative Effect
Theory isolates
the forces as primarily the height and number of weights/reservoirs/tanks on
one side is
offset by (a levered - weight on the outside end of lever - magnified) a
heavier
cumulative/sum the total of each weight on one side heavier than the other
side.
The reason this model works where similar wheels have failed; is because
firstly our width is
small while our height is huge - this allows our invention to generate more
movement forces
in one direction that overcome's the weight's friction and inertia when they
are at the top and
bottom of the system - consider that on a wheel, the number of weights on the
sides and on
the top and bottom. The movement force's success is dependent on the huge
number of
weights/reservoirs/tanks stacked high up versus the few that are situated on
the top and
bottom (interfering with movement).

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
Additionally, Chain design updates are being applied for patents for all
Gravity Chain
Machines, and PCT/CA2005/000145, and Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention.
We will have a large wheel at the top (too carry all the weights below), it
will have a pathway
of rollers/ball bearings that are in size aligned to place the teeth of the
chain in perfect
unionson like a chainsaw, the reason for the teeth on the chain is to turn the
wheels (which
have counter teeth) below. In the alternative we could make the chain taut or
weave/spin the
nano fibers into sequences of knots that catch the wheels below's teeth. We
could also
make the chain have tiny wavy hills and valleys shape (intervals of nodules
rather than
teeth), avoiding the most friction with the top wheel (and its rollers and/or
ball bearings) while
catching the teeth of the wheels we need to spin below to generate the
electricity.
A more complex design is to put longer teeth on the chain, and a micro hinge
in-between.
The top wheel will have a protruding mechanism that folds the hinge (eg. by
pokes into it,
causing an unhooking) just before the chain's teeth reaches/approaches the top
wheels
rollers/ball bearings, thus avoiding friction. Then as the chain's teeth
leaves the rollers/ball
bearings, the Top Wheel mechanism such as a protruding poking mechanism
unfolds/rearms
the chain's teeth for catching and spinning the electricity generating wheels
below.
Or we could have guards/rails all the way from top to bottom to keep the
chain's teeth facing
inside - the down side with this design is that the teeth of the chain the a
not properly aligned
my scrape against the guards/rail, unless we made it wide enough.
We could also have guards/rails that funnel in the chain just before each
wheel to align the
teeth of the chain to point inwards.
Another design is to design the chain widely and divide its width into center
segment or
segment on both sides surrounding the centre. Either the centre will have
teeth in which
case both surrounding sides will have no teeth or both sides will have teeth,
in which case
the centre will have no teeth (in this case the top wheel could be surrounded
by larger roller
with inner rollers adding to overcome friction inside the large roller; with
rims/guards/rails or
standing up rollers to keep the movement of the chain smooth and straight) -
the inner rollers
surround the non moving neck of the Top Wheel; it must strong enough to carry
the total
weight of the entire system. The Top Wheel will have rollers to match the area
of the chain
that has the no teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding sides while the lower wheels
will have teeth
aligned to match area of chain that has teeth 1) inside or 2) surrounding
sides of width of
chain.
ADDITION: New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention;
Micro Gravity
Chain Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs
We are looking covering the entire Gravity Chain Machine of whatever versions
with solar
panels.
We are looking at developing Building windmills.
1. Our first design is to put the rotary blades (hereinafter referred to as
blades) on the roof
(with the blades horizontal) (see Drawing 1.).
2. Our second design is to put the blades on the side of the building
(verticaily) possible on
all four sides (see Drawing 2.).

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
26
We prefer the first design because it allows clearance between buildings and
the wind
needed to may be blocked by other buildings in the second choice (in the case
of vertical
blades connected to the side of the building). There is usually more wind on
the top of the
buildings.
Even if there currently was clearance, in the future a developer may build a
new building the
blocks the wind needed for the blades.
We could also put windmill blades on our Gravity Chain Machine.
If the building is tall enough we could even line up the vertical blades one
above the other
(see Drawing 3.).
Additionally we could do a combination 1) roof, 2) on side, 3) on all four
sides, 4) multiple
vertical blades up along each side of the building (see Drawing 4.).
We could also add rings (at multiple levels) to allow the blades to catch the
wind, the way
normal windmills spin to catch the wind (see Drawing 5.) (Ch 2%).
As weil we could put elongated neck with blades near the top, like a regular
windmill, except
under the circular disc base of the windmill(s) is a building.
1. We also have a design to vertical walls that funnel wind either inwards (in
which
case blades could be positioned on both sides of the funnel walls and wind
would
be channeled into the funnel. We could also stack the blades vertically.
2. The other design is to have the same funnel but position the blades on the
narrow
end of the funnel on the outside.
3. There is a base at the bottom that is circular or disc shaped that spins to
channel
the wind in the case of 1.) the wind goes inside the entrance of the funnel
and in
the case of 2.) the wind is divided by a sharp narrow divider (possibly
vertical
triangular shape - other end of the funnel.
We could place these designs on top of buildings.
We could also build windmills with multiples blades stacked vertically, and
one horizontally
on top and blades on each side of the stand.
We could also build a mixed use Energy focusing on the most
productive/efficient use of the
land - our buildings have zero effluent unlike oil/gas/nuclear never mind
coal:
1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the
support walls
of the Gravity Chain Machine.
3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the
total length
ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that
rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of
the
shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further
out
sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This
sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level
until the

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
27
trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine
reservoir/tanks
are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy
for
heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry
windmills'
whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath
it.
6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the
pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses'
rotating
trays component is really not that high.
7. As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms,
or
germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle
board, bag,
spin/weave...
Smaller Scale Gravity Chain Machine Version 3
The main difference in this invention is that the chain, instead of being made
from Teflon, we
use spun, woven nano fibres that can be stronger than steel with possibility
mixture of nano
particles in plastic, and give the chain teeth (for spinning the wheels that
generate electricity
like a windmill).
Since the chain material is so light we don't need as high a structure (for
cumulative effects
theory to work).
The cumulative effects theory says that the higher the structure the more
total net differing
weight (accumulating into force more down on one side than the other), this
differing force
must overcome, friction and inertia.
If we use nano material for the chain, the chain is far lighter, and therefore
less friction and
inertia (probably more flexible - then Teflon and stronger - than steel, so
even less material
is needed) to hold back the entire system from working.
This could allow for micro GCM (Smaller Scale).
We could also make the reservoir/tank structural cage out of a mix of riano
particles or spray
on fibres, mixed with plastic We could also make the reservoir/tank structural
cage out of a
mix of nano particles or spray on fibres, mixed with plastic or other mixable
substances that
make strong/durable yet light cage. (GP).
The skin of the reservoir/tank could be made of nano textiles (eg. that are
water proof,
fabrics, or diver's suit except thinner and lighter).
We could also make the skin out of mylar or air bag material.
In addition to reflective mirror surrounding a solar panelled boiler and
boiling salt water that
spins a propeller under pressure and creates fresh water at the other end:
1. We could put magnifying glasses in between the sun the reflective mirrors
and the
solar panel boiler.
2. In fact all solar panels could (15%, they plagiarize, while they
handicapped me
and I can't plagiarize off their ideas) have moving magnifying or moving solar
panels to capture maximum sun exposure throughout the day.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
28
We could build comprehensive energy farms...
1. solar cells roof
2. direction of flow of rainwater
3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below
4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro
Gravity Chain
Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain
Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to
outer
surrounding level of crops
5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light
from reflective
(mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we
could have
- rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the
sun's
energy)
6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine
8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect
sunlight to
the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each
level/floor
below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture
the
most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy).
We are planning to use possibly a layer of Kevlar straps, Teflon straps,
cordura nylon,
ballistic nylon, leather for the wheel surface (and chain)(possibly steel
threads - especially
on the wheels), as well as stamp a crisscross pattern on the exposed surfaces
meet.
We are also looking at chinks of titanium possibly linked together by tightly
and greased spun
Keviar chords to make up the chain, where the wheels have spokes that poke
into the open
spaces where the chain, end of the hole catches and spins the wheel.
We are also looking at keeping chain taut (eg. possibly a layer of Kevlar
straps, Teflon
straps, cordura nylon, ballistic nylon, leather). The tight surfaces between
the chain and the
wheel contact points, uses friction to drag the wheel in the vector direction
of the chain. We
could also use knots.
We might even make the wheel out of rubber (An).
Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel) design will
make the
intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well as
maximizing (peak
efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out as well as
maximizing (peak
efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the most (peak) of
cumulative effects
theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of unbalanced weight such
as closer
stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we could also stack
each level of
tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg. carbon
graphite), and
tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and bottom
of the system.
We have developed a modular Gravity Chain Machine blocks (that expand to fit a
plot of land
while maximize the amount of energy produced in that plot's size of space),
windmills are
situated on top of walls surrounding the Gravity Chain Machines and at the
solid sides of the
collective.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
DRAWING 1.
1. Fulcrum
2. Inner weight
3. Direction of the lever.
DRAWING 2. Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel)
design will
make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well
as
maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out
as well as
maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the
most (peak) of
cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of
unbalanced weight
such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we
could also stack
each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg.
carbon graphite),
and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and
bottom of the
system
1. Wheels who protrudes and spins generating energy
2. Direction of the water from higher (inner) to lower (outer)
tanks/reservoirs via
levers/necks (rectangular) - on the left side
3. Direction of the spin of the system
4. Direction of the water from the higher (outer) to higher (inner)
tanks/reservoirs via
levers/necks (rectangular) - on the right side
5. The chain (reacting/moving/spinning) fulcrum
6. Maximum efficiency sideways size and shape
7. Maximum efficiency front size and shape
8. Least vertical gap between reservoir/tanks
DRAWING 3. Additionally, with regards to DRAWINGS 4 and 5, our new (novel)
design will
make the intervals between tanks (vertical gap between stacks thinner) as well
as
maximizing (peak efficiency) size of reservoir/tanks sideways and sticking out
as well as
maximizing (peak efficiency) of neck (tube/lever). The idea is to cram in the
most (peak) of
cumulative effects theory on a smaller footprint (especially the amount of
unbalanced weight
such as closer stacking distance between vertical tanks). In this respect we
could also stack
each level of tanks/reservoirs right next to each other, but with chain (eg.
carbon graphite),
and tanks/reservoirs able to separate and handle the curve at the top and
bottom of the
system
1. Wheels who protrudes and spins generating energy
2. Direction of the water from higher (inner) to lower (outer)
tanks/reservoirs via
levers/necks (rounded) - on the left side
3. Direction of the spin of the system
4. Direction of the water from the higher (outer) to higher (inner)
tanks/reservoirs via
levers/necks (rounded) - on the right side
5. The chain (reacting/moving/spinning) fulcrum
6. Funnel between the tanks/reservoirs where connected to levers/necks
7. Maximum efficiency sideways size and shape
8. Maximum efficiency front size and shape
9. Least vertical gap between reservoir/tanks
DRAWING 3.5.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
1. Reservoir/tanks spinning over top.
2. Space/gap between vertical reservoir/tanks.
3. Outer reservoir/tank.
4. Lever/tube.
5. Inner reservoir/tanks.
6. Wheel that spun to generate electricity.
7. Direction of spin.
DRAWING 4. - Top Wheel
1. Ball bearings
2. Neck of wheel
3. Neck attached to much larger anchor on each side - less likely to break
4. Rods the reinforce the neck and extra sideways length wise between neck and
the larger anchors on each side, and rods circular intervals in diameter (not
shown in DRAWING to keep DRAWING form getting to complex).
5. Chain (Teflon/nanofibers/duct tape particularly the mesh...) that hang off
the neck
of the Top Wheel.
DRAWING 5 - Top Wheel
1. Rollers
2. Neck of wheel
3. Neck attached to much larger anchor on each side - less likely to break
4. Rods the reinforce the neck and extra sideways length wise between neck and
the larger anchors on each side, and rods circular intervals in diameter (not
shown in DRAWING to keep DRAWING form getting to complex).
5. Rod guards the side to make the chain movement looser and smoother and
aligned straight.
6. Chain (Teflon/nanofibers/duct tape particularly the mesh...) that hang off
the neck
of the Top Wheel.
DRAWING 6.
1. Stopper
2. hole that travels through the entire weight centred with surrounding steel
or ball
bearings (rollers) in ring.
3. weight
4. bar to guide weight from side to side (could also be square bar)
DRAWING 7.
1. Stopper
2. 2 holes for the bars shafts to pass through/that travels through the entire
weight
centred with surrounding steel or ball bearings (rollers) in ring.
3. weight
4. bar to guide weight from side to side (could also be square bar)
DRAWING 8.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
^ Rails on each side of the weight, travelling along by ball bearings or
rollers. (C)
DRAWING 9. (Top Wheel)
1. rollers - ball bearings
2. hooks to side support
3. chain
4. thick center to carry weight the entire chain and weights system.
DRAWING 10. (Top Wheel)
1. rollers - ball bearings
2. hooks to side support
3. chain
4. thick and broader spread of center to carry weight the entire chain and
weights
system.
DRAWING 11. (Top Wheel)
1. rollers - ball bearings
2. protrusions that stick into supporting side walls at intervals like
multiple hooks.
3. chain
4. thick center
DRWAING 12. (Top Wheel)
1. rollers - ball bearings
2. very thick side protrusion
3. vertical embedded supporting rods
4. chain
5. center very thick to carry weight to entire weights of the system.
6. horizontal rods that strengthen the ability of the center to carry entire
weights of
the system
DRAWING 13. April 6t', 2007 - 1.
1. The wheel that is like one big solid cylinder (possibly reinforced/embedded
with
very strong circular and attached sideways as well.
2. Ball bearings
3. Tanks/Reservoirs (shifting weights)
4. Wheels that spin to generate electricity
5. Chain (Teflon/nano fibers...)
6. Casing on each side that fit in between the ball bearings and the chain
(teflon/nano fibers...) and guarded by rims
DRAWING 14. April 6th, 2007 - 2. - Top wheel is larger for the purpose of
strength for
holding more weight.
1. The wheel that is like one big solid cylinder (possibly reinforced/embedded
with
very strong circular and attached sideways as well.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
2. Ball Bearings
3. Tanks/Reservoirs (shifting weights)
4. Chain (Teflon/nano fibers... )
5. Wheels that spin to generate electricity
6. Casing on each side that fit in between the ball bearings and the chain
(teflon/nano fibers... ) and guarded by rims
DRAWING 15. April 6th, 2007 - 3. Vertical Tunnel
1. Tanks/Reservoirs (shifting weights)
2. Stoppers encased in a large chunk of concrete
3. The solid centre (of wheel) cylinder that protrudes into the wall each
level
therefore acting as support for the weight of the machine
4. The vertical tunnel walls, which could also to be sprayed with concrete and
reinforced with cage (strong material eg. rebar)
DRAWING 16.
1. Blades horizontal on roof of building.
2. Building.
DRAWING 17.
1. Blades situated vertically.
2. Building.
DRAWING 18.
1. Multiple blades above each other vertically.
2. Building.
DRAWING 19 - Combination(s).
1. Top blades on roof.
2. Building.
3. Muitiple blades lined up vertically up the buildings wall.
DRAWING 20.
1. Top blades on Roof.
2. Rotating Ring that allows the possible multi number of blades to spin to
catch the
wind direction.
3. Lower Ring.
4. Building.
DRAWING 21.
1. Regular windmill's neck.
2. Blades near top of neck.
3. Building.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
DRAWING 22.
1. Out stretched wind funnel.
2. Windmill Blades that placed on two sides (on both sides of the vertical
funnel) if in
close proximity, we could get more yield out the same amount of space or the
blades
could be placed on the outside of the funnel walls also on the narrow end on
the
funnel walls.
3. The lower funnel walls are attached to a circular base. The base spins to
catch the
maximum amount of wind into the oppening of the funnel. Below the base stands
the
building.
DRAWING 23.
1. At the centre are Gravity Chain Machines.
2. Windmills stacked vertically or on each side or on horizontally top of the
support walls
of the Gravity Chain Machine.
3. On the side walls are possibly multiply stacked on each far end of the
total length
ends of the Gravity Chain Machine side by side condensed blue print design.
4. Pyramid/greenhouse, where each level has perhaps 10 trays (of corn) that
rotate.
Each level further away from the Gravity Chain Machine centre extend out of
the
shade of the levels of trays above it and therefore each level extends further
out
sideways to capture maximum sunlight for the rotating trays of that level.
This
sideways pyramid structure keeps extending out and down until level by level
until the
trays reach ground level. The trays and the Gravity Chain Machine
reservoir/tanks
are enclosed in the same structure, where heating sharing (best use of energy
for
heating) in winter may be needed.
5. Probably extending in between the green houses are the stands that carry
windmills'
whose blades may tower above the level/step of the pyramid/greenhouse beneath
it.
6. Structurally strong yet transparent or translucent material to hold up the
pyramid/greenhouses (if even necessary), since each pyramid/greenhouses'
rotating
trays component is really not that high.
As well we could use the space under each level's tray to grow mushrooms, or
germinate the next crop of corn, or shred and pelletize, or logs or particle
board, bag,
spin/weave...
DRAWING 24.
1. solar cells roof
2. direction of flow of rainwater
3. drain for slanted roof to pour and collect rainwater to reservoir below
4. New Gravity Chain Machine; Tall Gravity To Electricity Invention; Micro
Gravity Chain
Machine Version 4.; New Chain and Wheel Designs; Overbalanced Endless Chain
Motor - the walls are covered with reflective material to reflect light to
outer
surrounding level of crops
5. slanted panels (shine light on to crops from centre out) that catch light
from reflective
(mirrors) below on the surrounding ground floor (at some point or both we
could have
- rotating panels to best capture the most sunlight and also magnifying the
sun's
energy)
6. One level/floor of surrounding crops.

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
7. windmills on to of each Overbalanced Endless Chain Machine
8. Ground level, or some higher up (eg. crisscross cheap towers) to reflect
sunlight to
the slanted panels that then re-reflect light back down to the crops at each
level/floor
below (at some point or both we could have - rotating panels to best capture
the
most sunlight and also magnifying the sun's energy).
DRAWING 25.
9. solar panels
10. windmill blades outside walls
11. windmill blades in the cross diagonal position between Gravity Chain
Machines
12. top wheel of Gravity Chain Machine
13. reservoir/tank
14. windmill facing the sides (aligned) to the moving tanks

CA 02603153 2007-09-28
29
Bascially each unit (block) of Gravity Chain Machine is surrounded by
windmills, by placing
the unit/blocks together (on any of all sides) to squeeze the most out of the
usage of the land
and the modular design makes it flexible to fit odd land shapes.
Pertaining to DRAWING 3.5 - Compressed version so you can get more net forces
(more
yield) for the same height (you won't have to stack it up as high to get the
same yield) - and
furthermore once you reach the maximum buildable height you could increase
yield
compressing (plus it may save building costs) that according to the cumulative
effects theory,
the more additional amount of extra by way of weight (water) switching to
extremity of each
side of the lever(s) means a net force of one side being heavier than the
other side. The
system of chains and the levers (weights) connected to the chains must be
flexible enough at
the top and bottom to allow spinning around the top end of the Top and Bottom
wheel.
Furthermore we are experimenting with shrinking the wheel making a shorter
(some may say
it creates a steeper change in drag but there should be an equal and opposite
pull on the
other side of the wheel - nullifying each other out - even some ) and less
space to cover
(given that the top wheel is strong enough (reinforced) which would not make
sense to try to
spin, therefore we would use rollers/ball bearings) my hypothesis is to
maximize the size of
the reservoirs/tanks (sticking/jutting out and width) and optimize usage of
vertical space;
while minimizing the resistance to the flow/spin of the system from handling
the top and
bottom part of the system.

Representative Drawing