Language selection

Search

Patent 2605903 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2605903
(54) English Title: FOOD GRADE LUBRICANT COMPOSITIONS
(54) French Title: COMPOSITIONS DE LUBRIFIANT ALIMENTAIRE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C10M 137/10 (2006.01)
  • C10M 137/08 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • CORBETT, PATRICIA M. (United Kingdom)
  • RYAN, HELEN T. (United Kingdom)
  • SHEETS, ROGER M. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • AFTON CHEMICAL CORPORATION
(71) Applicants :
  • AFTON CHEMICAL CORPORATION (United States of America)
(74) Agent: MACRAE & CO.
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(22) Filed Date: 2007-10-04
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2008-05-29
Examination requested: 2012-03-23
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
11/564,543 (United States of America) 2006-11-29

Abstracts

English Abstract


A food grade lubricant composition and method of lubricating food processing
machinery. The food grade lubricant composition includes a major amount of
food
grade base oil and a minor amount of at least one additive composition. The
additive
composition includes one or more non-sludge promoting wear reducing agents. An
advantage of the lubricant composition is that it may exhibit lower sludge
formation
tendencies than a lubricant composition containing a conventional wear
reducing
agent.


Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


What is claimed is:
1. A food grade lubricant composition comprising:
a major amount of food grade base oil and a minor amount of at least one
additive
composition comprising one or more non-sludge promoting wear reducing agents,
wherein the lubricant composition exhibits lower sludge formation tendencies
than a
lubricant composition containing a conventional wear reducing agent.
2. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the one or more
non-
sludge promoting wear reducing agents are selected from the group consisting
of
triphenyl phosphorothionates, amine neutralized phosphoric acid esters, and
mixtures
thereof, wherein the amine is a non-branched chain amine
3. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the food grade
base oil
comprises an oil selected from the group consisting of white oil, vegetable
oils, and
mixtures thereof
4. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the additive
further
comprises at least one antioxidant selected from the group consisting of amine
antioxidants, phenolic antioxidants, and mixtures thereof.
5. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the wear reducing
agent
comprises a mixture of triphenyl phosphorothionate and an amine neutralized
phosphoric acid esters, wherein the amine is a non-branched chain amine.
6. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the additive
composition
further comprises a methacrylate antifoam agent.
7. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, further comprising a
component
selected from the group consisting of a preservative, a corrosion inhibitor,
and a rust
inhibitor
8. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the major amount
of
food grade base oil comprises from about 85 to about 99.9 weight percent based
on a
total weight of base oil and additive composition.
11

9. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the additive
composition
meets HX-1 approval criteria.
10. The food grade lubricant composition of claim 1, wherein the lubricant
composition is devoid of base oils and additives derived from animals.
11. A method of operating machinery for food processing comprising:
providing the machinery with a food grade lubricant comprising a major
amount of food grade base oil and a minor amount of at least one additive
composition comprising one or more non-sludge promoting wear reducing agents,
wherein the lubricant composition exhibits lower sludge formation tendencies
than a
lubricant composition containing a conventional wear reducing agent; and
operating the machinery.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more non-sludge promoting wear
reducing agents are selected from the group consisting of triphenyl
phosphorothionates, amine neutralized phosphoric acid esters, and mixtures
thereof,
wherein the amine is a non-branched chain amine.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the food grade base oil comprises an oil
selected from the group consisting of white oil, vegetable oils, and mixtures
thereof.
14. The method of claim 11, wherein the additive further comprises at least
one
antioxidant selected from the group consisting of amine antioxidants, phenolic
antioxidants, and mixtures thereof.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein the wear reducing agent comprises a
mixture of
triphenyl phosphorothionate and an amine neutralized phosphoric acid esters,
wherein
the amine is a non-branched chain amine.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the additive composition further comprises
a
methacrylate antifoam agent.
12

17. The method of claim 11, wherein the additive composition further comprises
a
component selected from the group consisting of a preservative, a corrosion
inhibitor,
and a rust inhibitor.
18. The method of claim 11, wherein the major amount of food grade base oil
comprises from about 85 to about 99.9 weight percent based on a total weight
of base
oil and additive composition.
13

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02605903 2007-10-04
FOOD GRADE LUBRICANT COMPOSITIONS
TECHNICAL FIELD
[001] The embodiments described herein relate to food grade lubricant
compositions
and in particular to lubricant compositions that exhibit improved sludge
control
properties compared to conventional food grade lubricants.
BACKGROUND
[002] The equipment used in the food processing industry varies by segment
with
the three leading segments comprising meat and poultry, beverages, and dairy.
While
the equipment varies from segment to segment, the moving parts such as
bearings,
gears, and slide mechanisms are similar and often require lubrication. The
lubricants
most often used include hydraulic, refrigeration, and gear oils as well as all-
purpose
greases. However, food industry oils must meet more stringent standards than
other
industry lubricants.
[003] Lubricant contamination has been a problem in the food and beverage
processing industry, where a major accident could require a company to make a
massive product recall, which could be devastating to its reputation.
[004] Minor lubricant leaks in machinery are common, sometimes unavoidable,
and
not always obvious. Just the normal wear and tear on seals can cause a gearbox
or
hydraulic system to leak, releasing minute levels of oil that can come into
contact
with food. Contamination can also come from drips from chains or a release of
compressed air that contains an oily mist.
[005] If a plant uses a nonfood-grade lubricant, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) allows zero amounts of lubricant to come into contact
with the
food. If the lubricant accidentally comes into contact with food, the batch
must be
discarded. If the plant uses food-grade lubricants, which are nontoxic,
odorless,
colorless and tasteless, the FDA limits lubrication contamination to 10 parts
per
million.
[006] The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is custodian of the
official list
of authorized compounds for use in federally inspected plants. The official
list states
that lubricants and other substances which are susceptible to incidental food
contact
are considered indirect food additives under USDA regulations. Therefore,
these
lubricants, classified as either H-1 or H-2, are required to be approved by
the USDA
before being used in food processing plants. The most stringent
classification, H-1, is
t

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
for lubricants approved for incidental food contact. Lubricants meeting the H-
1
classification are used where food may potentially be exposed to the
lubricated part of
the machine. The H-2 classification is for uses where there is no possibility
of food
contact and assures that no known poisons or carcinogens are used in the
lubricant.
For the purpose of this disclosure, the terms "food grade" and "lubricant"
will be used
interchangeably herein.
[007] In addition to meeting the requirements for safety set by federal
regulatory
agencies, the lubricant must be effective for the particular application and
may also be
required to meet Kosher and Halal requirements. Lubricating oils for food
processing
plants should lubricate machine parts, resist viscosity change, resist
oxidation, protect
against rusting and corrosion, provide wear protection, prevent foaming, and
resist the
formation of sludge in service. The product should also perform effectively at
various
lubrication regimes ranging from hydrodynamic thick film regimes to boundary
thin
film regimes. Lubricants which can meet or exceed DIN 51524 part II
specification
may meet the foregoing performance criteria. Conventional food grade
lubricants
contain antiwear agents. Of the antiwear agents used in food grade
applications,
certain amine salts of acid phosphates may result in increased sludge/varnish
formation. It is, therefore, desirable to provide an improved food grade
lubricating oil
which overcomes the sludge and varnish tendencies of conventional food grade
lubricants.
SUMMARY OF THE EMBODIMENTS
10081 In one embodiment herein is presented a food grade lubricant composition
including a major amount of food grade base oil and a minor amount of at least
one
additive composition. The additive composition includes one or more non-sludge
promoting wear reducing agents. An advantage of the lubricant composition is
that it
may exhibit lower sludge formation tendencies than a lubricant composition
containing a conventional wear reducing agent.
[009] In another embodiment, there is provided a method of operating machinery
for
food processing. The method includes providing the machinery with a food grade
lubricant containing a major amount of food grade base oil and a minor amount
of an
additive composition and operating the machinery. The additive composition
includes
one or more non-sludge promoting wear reducing agents. During operating of the
machinery on the lubricant, the lubricant composition may exhibit lower sludge
2

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
formation tendencies than a lubricant composition containing a conventional
wear
reducing agent.
[0010] As set forth briefly above, embodiments of the disclosure may provide
an
improved food grade lubricant composition that exhibits reduced sludge and/or
varnish formation, and meets the wear criteria for food grade lubricants.
Other
features and advantages of the compositions and methods described herein may
be
evident by reference to the following detailed description which is intended
to
exemplify aspects of the embodiments without intending to limit the
embodiments
described herein.
[0011] It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and
the
following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are
intended to
provide further explanation of the embodiments disclosed and claimed.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
[0012] According to exemplary embodiments described herein, there is provided
an
improved food grade lubricant composition that may be particularly effective
for
reducing sludge and varnish formation, and may meet the H-1 and/or H-2
requirements for use in food processing industries. The exemplary food grade
lubricants are also suitable for providing good wear protection, suitable
protection
against rust and corrosion, and good foam and air release properties. As set
forth
above, the lubricant composition includes a food grade base oil.
[0013] The base oil for use in the food grade lubricating oils described
herein may be
selected from food grade hydrocarbon oils such as food grade mineral oil, food
grade
polybutene, food grade hydrogenated polybutene, food grade polyolesters, food
grade
diesters, food grade hydrogenated poly(alpha olefin) with an alpha olefin
monomer of
not less than 6 carbon atoms, and a wide variety of vegetable oils. The base
oil
should be substantially odorless, colorless, and tasteless and comply with the
USDA
H-1 and/or H-2 specifications and requirements for use in food processing
plants and
other applications.
[0014] In one exemplary embodiment, the base oil may be a mineral oil such as
a
technical grade white oil made from select lubricant base stocks. The food
grade
mineral oil may also be a white mineral oil which meets the more stringent
requirements of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) or a light mineral oil
which
meets the more stringent requirements of the National Formulary (NF). These
food
3

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
grade mineral oils are often directly derived from crude oil through the
processing
steps of distillation, extraction, dewaxing, and severe hydrotreating.
Suitable base
oils, derived from other means are food grade polybutene, food grade
hydrotreated
polybutene, food grade polyolesters, food grade diesters, and food grade
hydrogenated poly(alpha olefin) with an alpha olefin monomer of not less than
6
carbon atoms.
[0015] Vegetable oils may also be used as the base oil component, either alone
or in
combination with the foregoing oils. Suitable vegetable oils may include, but
are not
limited to, rapeseed oil, jojoba oil, tung oil, castor oil, tall oil, linseed
oil, olive oil,
peanut oil, rope oil, coconut oil, soybean oil and mixtures thereof. Oils
derived from
meat products, such as lard oil, tallow oil, mink oil, and the like are
avoided for
lubricant applications meeting Kosher and/or Halal requirements.
[0016] The base oil comprises from about 85.0% to 99.9% by weight of the
lubricant
composition containing additives to provide a product having a viscosity
ranging from
cSt at 40 C. to 1000 cSt at 40 C. The additives used may suitably meet the
HX-1
criteria for providing H-1 food grade lubricant compositions and may meet the
HX-2
criteria for providing H-2 food grade lubricant compositions.
ANTI-WEAR ADDITIVES
[0017] Anti-wear additives which may be used in the compositions described
herein
include food grade oil-soluble sulfur and/or phosphorus containing compounds
and
neutralized alkyl phosphate esters, and mixtures of the foregoing.
[0018] One sulfur and/or phosphorus compound that may be used is triphenyl
phosphorothioate. Other sulfur and/or phosphorus containing materials which
are not
currently approved for food grade use include: zinc dialkyl dithiophosphate,
zinc
dithiocarbamate, amine dithiocarbamate, and methylene bis dithiocarbamate. Any
of
the above compounds, with HX-1 approval, would be a suitable anti-wear
additive.
[0019] A suitable neutralized alkyl phosphate ester component may include a
component containing a mixture of mono- and di-C4-Cg-alkyl phosphate esters
and/or
polyphosphate esters that have been neutralized with a non-branched chain
amine.
The non-branched chain amines may be selected from tetramethylnonylamines, C>>-
C14 alkylamines, and the like.
[0020] The food grade lubricant may contain from about 0.1 to about 0.5 of the
anti-
wear additive based on a total weight of the lubricant composition. For a food
a ade
lubricant containing the triphenyl phosphorothioate component and the
neutralized
4

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
alkyl phosphate ester wear reducing agents, the anti-wear additive component
of the
composition may include from about 0 wt. % to about 50 wt.% of the triphenyl
phosphorothioate component and from about 35 wt.% to about 100 wt.% of the
neutralized alkyl phosphate ester component.
[0021] A criteria for the anti-wear additive is that the additive be a non-
sludge
promoting antiwear additive. Conventional antiwear additives typically include
a
neutralized dialkyl phosphate that have been neutralized with a C12-C14 t-
alkyl
primary amine. Surprisingly, food grade lubricants containing antiwear
additives that
have not be neutralized with a branched alkyl amine exhibit reduced
sludge/varnish
formation tendencies compared to the same lubricants containing an anti-wear
additive that is neutralized with a C12-C14 t-alkyl primary amine.
ANTI-OXIDANT ADDITIVES
[0022] Antioxidation additives that may be used as a component of the food
grade
lubricant composition include phenolic and amine antioxidants and mixtures
thereof.
[0023] The phenolic antioxidants which may be include, but are not limited to,
food
grade, oil-soluble, sterically hindered phenols and thiophenols. Included
within the
definition of phenolic and thiophenolic antioxidants are sterically hindered
phenolics
such as hindered phenols and bis-phenols, hindered 4,4'-thiobisphenols,
hindered 4-
hydroxy-and 4-thiolbenzoic acid esters and dithio esters, and hindered bis(4-
hydroxy-
and 4-thiolbenzoic acid and dithio acid) alkylene esters. The phenolic moiety
may be
substituted in both positions ortho to the hydroxy or thiol groups with alkyl
groups
which sterically hinder these groups. Such alkyl substituents usually have 3
to 10
carbons, suitably 4 to 8 carbons, with one alkyl group generally being
branched rather
than straight-chain (e.g., t-butyl, t-amyl, etc.).
[0024] The first group of hindered phenolic antioxidants is the single
hindered
phenols. Examples of such compounds include 2,6-bi-tert-butylphenol, 2,6-di-
tert-
butyl-p-cresol, 2,6-di-tert-amyl-p-cresol, and 2-tert-butyl-6-tert-amyl-p-
cresol.
[0025] A second group of hindered phenolic antioxidants is the hindered
bisphenols.
Examples of these compounds include 4,4'-methylene bis(2,6-bi-tert-
butylphenol),
4,4'-dimethylene bis(2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol), 4,4'-trimethylene bis(2,2-di-
tert-amyl
phenol), and 4,4'-trimethylene bis(2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol).
[0026] Another group of hindered phenolic antioxidants is the hindered 4,4'-
thio bis-
phenols. Examples of these compounds include 4,4'-thio bis(2,6-di-sec-butyl
phenol),

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
4,4'-thio bis(2-tert-butyl-6-isopropyl phenol), and 4,4'-thio bis(2-methyl-6-t-
butyl
phenol).
[0027] A fourth group of hindered phenolic antioxidants is 4 alkoxy phenols.
Examples of these compounds include butylated hydroxy anisole, butylated
hydroxy
phenetole, and butylated hydroquinone. Any of the above compounds, with HX-1
approval, would be a suitable phenolic antioxidant.
[0028] Butylated hydroxy toluene (BHT) is cost effective, commercially
available,
and is HX-1 approved. Butylated hydroxy toluene may be present in the food
grade
lubricating oil in an amount less than about 1% by weight and most typically
is
present in an amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 0.6% by weight of the
food
grade lubricating oil composition. Likewise, the food grade lubricant
composition
may contain less than 1% by weight of the phenolic antioxidant.
[0029] Suitable food grade, oil-soluble aromatic amine antioxidants are
naphthyl
phenyl amines, alkylated phenyl naphthyl amines, and alkylated diphenyl
amines.
Examples of aromatic amine antioxidants include, but are not limited to, the
napthylamines such as N-phenyl-alpha-naphthylamine, N-p-methyl-phenyl-alpha-
naphthylamine, and the diphenylamines such as di-sec-butyldiphenylamine, di-
isobornyl-di-phenylamine, and dioctyldiphenylamine. Any of the above
compounds,
with HX-1 approval, may be a suitable aromatic amine antioxidant.
[0030] Particularly suitable aromatic amine antioxidants are the alkylated and
dialkylated diphenyl amines, for example, the reaction products of the
alkylation of n-
phenylbenzenamine and 2,4,4 trimethyl pentene. The resultant product of may be
a
mixture of ortho, meta, and para bis(octyl phenyl)amine. Bis(octyl
phenyl)amine may
also be referred to as dioctyl diphenyl amine and is a food grade amine.
Another
suitable food grade diphenyl amine is an octylated, butylated diphenyl amine.
The
aromatic amine may be present in the lubricant composition in an amount of
than
about 1% by weight of the lubricating oil composition. A suitable amount of
alkylated diphenyl amine may range from about 0.05 to about 0.5 wt.% of the
total
weight of the lubricant composition.
[0031] The lubricant composition may typically contain only one antioxidant
additive. However, combinations of the foregoing antioxidant additives may
also be
used. When a combination of antioxidant additives is used, the phenolic and
aromatic
amine antioxidant components may range in ratio by weight from 20:1 to 1:20
although a suitable ratio ranges from 4:1 to 1:1.
6

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
ANTI-RUST ADDITIVES
[0032] The anti-rust additive component may include a combination of food
grade
ionic and non-ionic surface active anti-rust ingredients. The total amount by
weight
of ionic and non-ionic surface active anti-rust additive necessary to impart
the desired
degree of rust resistance may be significantly less than either anti-rust
additive
independently.
[0033] Ionic anti-rust lubricating additives which may be used in the
compositions
described herein may include food grade phosphoric acid, mono and dihexyl
ester
compounds with tetramethyl nonyl amines, and CIo to C18 alkyl amines. Any rust
inhibitor compound with HX-1 approval would be a suitable anti-rust additive.
Likewise, the amine salt of the acid phosphate used as an antiwear additive
may also
be used for its rust inhibiting properties as a anti-rust additive.
100341 Non-ionic anti-rust lubricating additives which may be used in the
compositions described herein may include food grade fatty acids and their
esters
formed from the addition of sorbitan, glycerol, or other polyhydric alcohols,
or
polyalkylene glycols. Other non-ionic anti-rust lubricating additives may
include
food grade ethers from fatty alcohols alkoxylated with alkylene oxides, or
sorbitan
alkoxylated with alkylene oxides, or sorbitan esters alkoxylated with alkylene
oxides.
[0035] Examples of suitable food grade non-ionic anti-rust lubricating
additives
include: sorbitan mono-oleate, ethoxylated vegetable oil, isopropyl oleate,
ethoxylated
fatty acids, ethoxylated fatty alcohols, fatty glyceride esters,
polyoxyethylene sorbitan
mono-oleate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan, glycerol mono-oleate, glycerol di-
oleate,
glycerol mono-stearate, and glycerol di-stearate. Any of the above compounds,
with
HX-1 approval, would be a suitable anti-rust additive.
[0036] The food grade anti-rust additive may comprise less than about 1% by
weight
of the food grade lubricating oil and may comprise from about 0.01 to about
0.3% by
weight of the food grade lubricating oil.
CORROSION INHIBITOR ADDITIVE
[0037] In some embodiments, corrosion inhibitors may constitute another class
of
additives suitable for inclusion in the compositions described herein. Such
compounds include food grade thiazoles, triazoles and thiadiazoles. Examples
of
such compounds include benzotriazole, tolyltriazole, octyltriazole,
decyltriazole,
dodecyltriazole, 2-mercapto benzothiazole, 2,5-dimercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazole, 2-
mercapto-5-hydrocarbylthio-1,3,4-thiadiazoles, 2-mercapto-5- hydrocarbyldithio-
7

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
1,3,4-thiadiazoles, 2,5-bis(hydrocarbylthio)- 1,3,4-thiadiazoles, and 2,5-
bis(hydrocarbyldithio)-1,3,4-thiadiazoles. Suitable compounds include the
1,3,4-
thiadiazoles, a number of which are available as articles of commerce,
combinations
of triazoles such as tolyltriazole with a 1,3,5-thiadiazole such as a 2,5-
bis(alkyldithio)-
1,3,4-thiadiazole, and bis-alkyl-arylalkyl benzotriazole alkylamines such as
N,N-
bis(2-ethyl)ar-methyl-IH-benzotriazole-l-methanamine. The amount of corrosion
inhibitor in the food grade formulations described herein may range from about
0.01
to about 0.5 wt% based on the total weight of the lubricant composition.
ANTIFOAM ADDITIVE
[0038] In some embodiments, a foam inhibitor may form another component
suitable
for use in the food grade compositions. Foam inhibitors may be selected from
silicones, polyacrylates, methacrylates, surfactants, and the like meeting the
HX-1
approval criteria. The amount of antifoam agent in the food grade formulations
described herein may range from about 0.0025 wt% to about 0.01 wt% based on
the
total weight of the food grade lubricant composition.
PERSERVATIVE ADDITIVES
[0039] Suitable food grade preservatives include, but are not limited to
vitamin E (a-
tocopherol) and/or C2-C6 alkyl hydroxyl benzoates such propyl p-hydroxyl
benzoate.
The amount of preservative in the lubricant composition may range from about
0.001
to about 0.1 percent by weight of the total weight of the food grade lubricant
composition.
[0040] Additives used in formulating the compositions described herein may be
blended into the base oil individually or in various sub-combinations.
However, it is
suitable to blend all of the components concurrently using an additive
concentrate
(i.e., additives plus a diluent, such as the base oil). The use of an additive
concentrate
takes advantage of the mutual compatibility afforded by the combination of
ingredients when in the form of an additive concentrate. Also, the use of a
concentrate reduces blending time and lessens the possibility of blending
errors.
[0041] In the following Table 1, the formulations for conventional food grade
lubricant compositions (Samples 1-4) and for food grade lubricant compositions
according to exemplary embodiments described herein (Samples 5-8) are given.
Table 2 compares the results of testing the fluid compositions.
8

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
Table 1
Component Sample I Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4
Base Oil 90 90 90 90
Antifoam agent 0.0 0.0 0.02 0.02
Conventional Antiwear 0.20 0.15 0.0 0.0
Agent
Non-sludge forming 0.0 0.0 0.15 0.15
Antiwear Agent
triphenyl phosphorothioate 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
vitamin-E 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
preservative 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Antioxidant 1 0.20 0.20
Antioxidant 2 0.50 0.50
Corrosion Inhibitor 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
Rust Inhibitor 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Table 2
Test Results Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4
CCMA Test
sludge wt. (mg/100 ml) 39.11 39.72 9.4 11..68
FZG Scuffing Test --- --- 11 pass 12 pass
4 Ball wear --- --- 0.28 0.27
20 kg/1475 rpm/lhr/ambient
4 Ball wear --- --- 0.47 0.46
20 kg/1475 m/lhr/ambient
[0042] As shown in table 2, the fluid compositions according to the disclosure
(Samples 3-4) provided relatively low sludge results of less than 15 mg/100
mls in the
CCMA test versus a limit of 25 mg/100 mis.
[0043] By comparison, the use of a conventional antiwear agent (Samples 1-2)
exhibited sludge results that were much higher than Samples 3-4 and were over
25
mg/100 mis. Beakers containing Samples 1-2 had much more varnish on them than
the beakers of Samples 3-4. FZG scuffing and wear data for Samples 3-4
indicated
that, even with low sludge, suitable wear protection may be obtained by the
formulations of Samples 3-4 containing the non-sludge forming antiwear agent.
[0044] The foregoing embodiments are susceptible to considerable variation in
its
practice. Accordingly, the embodiments are not intended to be limited to the
specific
exemplifications set forth hereinabove. Rather, the foregoing embodiments are
within
the spirit and scope of the appended claims, including the equivalents thereof
available as a matter of law.
9

CA 02605903 2007-10-04
[0045] The patentees do not intend to dedicate any disclosed embodiments to
the
public, and to the extent any disclosed modifications or alterations may not
literally
fall within the scope of the claims, they are considered to be part hereof
under the
doctrine of equivalents.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2605903 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2013-10-04
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2013-10-04
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2012-10-04
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-04-30
Letter Sent 2012-04-03
Request for Examination Received 2012-03-23
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2012-03-23
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-03-23
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2008-05-29
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-05-28
Inactive: IPC assigned 2008-01-23
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2008-01-23
Inactive: IPC assigned 2008-01-23
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2007-11-20
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2007-11-20
Application Received - Regular National 2007-11-16

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2012-10-04

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2011-09-20

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - standard 2007-10-04
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2009-10-05 2009-09-25
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2010-10-04 2010-09-23
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2011-10-04 2011-09-20
Request for examination - standard 2012-03-23
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
AFTON CHEMICAL CORPORATION
Past Owners on Record
HELEN T. RYAN
PATRICIA M. CORBETT
ROGER M. SHEETS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2007-10-04 10 467
Abstract 2007-10-04 1 12
Claims 2007-10-04 3 83
Cover Page 2008-05-16 1 27
Filing Certificate (English) 2007-11-20 1 157
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2009-06-08 1 110
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2012-04-03 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2012-11-29 1 173