Language selection

Search

Patent 2625157 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2625157
(54) English Title: CAB SIGNAL RECEIVER DEMODULATOR EMPLOYING REDUNDANT, DIVERSE FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAYS
(54) French Title: DEMODULATEUR DE RECEPTEUR DE SIGNAL DE CABINE UTILISANT DIVERSES MATRICES PREDIFFUSEES REDONDANTES PROGRAMMABLES PAR L'UTILISATEUR
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • G06F 15/78 (2006.01)
  • B61L 3/12 (2006.01)
  • B61L 3/22 (2006.01)
  • B61L 3/24 (2006.01)
  • G05B 19/05 (2006.01)
  • H03K 19/177 (2020.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • LEMONOVICH, JOHN E. (United States of America)
  • SHARP, WILLIAM A. (United States of America)
  • WERNER, JAMES C. (United States of America)
  • DING, ZHU (United States of America)
  • BERECEK, SEAN P. (United States of America)
(73) Owners :
  • ANSALDO STS USA, INC.
(71) Applicants :
  • ANSALDO STS USA, INC. (United States of America)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2017-05-16
(22) Filed Date: 2008-03-11
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2009-09-11
Examination requested: 2013-03-11
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract

A processor includes a first field programmable gate array (FPGA) having a first central processing unit (CPU) core programmed to perform a first function, and first programmable hardware logics (PHLs) programmed to perform a second function. A second FPGA includes a second CPU core programmed to perform a third function, and second PHLs programmed to perform a fourth function. A communication interface is between the first and second CPU cores. The first and second FPGAs are diverse. A portion of the first function communicates first information from the first CPU core to the second CPU core through the interface. A portion of the third function communicates second information from the second CPU core to the first CPU core through the interface, and, otherwise, the first function is substantially the same as the third function. The second function is substantially the same as the fourth function.


French Abstract

Un processeur comprend une première matrice prédiffusée programmable par lutilisateur (FPGA) comprenant une première unité centrale de traitement (UC) programmée en mémoire centrale pour exécuter une première fonction et une première logique matérielle programmable (PHL) programmée pour exécuter une deuxième fonction. Une deuxième FPGA comprend une deuxième UC programmée en mémoire centrale pour exécuter une troisième fonction et des deuxièmes PHL programmées pour exécuter une quatrième fonction. Une interface de communication est située entre la première et la deuxième UC principales. La première et la deuxième FPGA sont diversifiées. Une partie de la première fonction communique une première information de la première UC principale à la deuxième UC principale au moyen de linterface. Une partie de la troisième fonction communique une deuxième information de la deuxième UC principale à la première UC principale au moyen de linterface et, autrement, la première fonction est substantiellement la même que la troisième fonction. La deuxième fonction est substantiellement la même que la quatrième fonction.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


-43-
CLAIMS:
1. A processor comprising:
a first field programmable gate array comprising:
a first central processing unit core programmed to perform a first
function, and
first programmable hardware logics programmed to perform a second
function; and
a second field programmable gate array comprising:
a second central processing unit core programmed to perform a third
function, and
second programmable hardware logics programmed to perform a fourth
function; and
a communication interface between the first and second central processing unit
cores,
wherein the second field programmable gate array is diverse with respect to
the
first field programmable gate array,
wherein the first field programmable gate array is provided by a first vendor
and
the second field programmable gate array is provided by a second vendor,
wherein the first vendor is different than the second vendor,
wherein a portion of the first function is structured to communicate first
information from the first central processing unit core to the second central
processing unit core
through the communication interface,
wherein a portion of the third function is structured to communicate second
information from the second central processing unit core to the first central
processing unit core
through the communication interface, and, otherwise, the first function is
substantially the same
as the third function, and
wherein the second function is substantially the same as the fourth function.

-44-
2. The processor of Claim 1 wherein said second central processing unit
core is
diverse with respect to said first central processing unit core.
3. The processor of Claim 1 wherein said first central processing unit core
is a first
soft IP core central processing unit; and wherein said second central
processing unit core is a
second soft IP core central processing unit.
4. The processor of Claim 3 wherein said second soft IP core central
processing unit
is diverse with respect to said first soft IP core central processing unit.
5. The processor of Claim 1 wherein said first field programmable gate
array further
comprises a first IP core cooperating with said first programmable hardware
logics to perform the
second function; and wherein said second field programmable gate array further
comprises a
second IP core cooperating with said second programmable hardware logics to
perform the fourth
function.
6. The processor of Claim 5 wherein said second IP core is diverse with
respect to
said first IP core.
7. A cab signal apparatus for a railroad vehicle, said cab signal apparatus
comprising:
a first sub-system comprising:
a first field programmable gate array cooperating with a first receiver,
the first field programmable gate array comprising:
a first central processing unit core,
first programmable hardware logics programmed to perform a first
function, and
a first communication interface cooperating with the first central
processing unit core to communicate a first number of track signal aspects to
a first device
external to the cab signal apparatus;
a second sub-system comprising:
a second field programmable gate array cooperating with a second
receiver, the second field programmable gate array comprising:

-45-
a second central processing unit core,
second programmable hardware logics programmed to perform a
second function, and
a second communication interface cooperating with the second central
processing unit core to communicate a second number of track signal aspects to
a second device
external to the cab signal apparatus; and
a third communication interface between the first and second central
processing
unit cores,
wherein the second field programmable gate array is diverse with respect to
the
first field programmable gate array,
wherein the first field programmable gate array is provided by a first vendor
and
the second field programmable gate array is provided by a second vendor,
wherein the first vendor is different than the second vendor,
wherein the first central processing unit core is further programmed to
communicate the first number of track signal aspects from the first central
processing unit core to
the second central processing unit core through the third communication
interface,
wherein the second central processing unit core is further programmed to
communicate the second number of track signal aspects from the second central
processing unit
core to the first central processing unit core through the third communication
interface, and
wherein the first function is substantially the same as the second function.
8. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said second central
processing unit
core is diverse with respect to said first central processing unit core.
9. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said first central
processing unit
core is a first soft IP core central processing unit; and wherein said second
central processing unit
core is a second soft IP core central processing unit.
10. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 9 wherein said second soft IP core
central
processing unit is diverse with respect to said first soft IP core central
processing unit.

-46-
11. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said first field
programmable gate array further comprises a first IP core cooperating with
said first
programmable hardware logics to perform the first function; and wherein said
second
field programmable gate array further comprises a second IP core cooperating
with
said second programmable hardware logics to perform the second function.
12. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 11 wherein said second IP
core is diverse with respect to said first IP core.
13. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said first
communication interface comprises a first dual port memory having a first port
and a
second port, and a second dual port memory having a first port and a second
port, the
first port of said first dual port memory being readable by said first central
processing
unit core, the first port of said second dual port memory being writable by
said first
central processing unit core; wherein the portion of the first function is
further
structured to control said first and second dual port memories; wherein said
second
communication interface comprises a third dual port memory having a first port
and a
second port, and a fourth dual port memory having a first port and a second
port, the
first port of said third dual port memory being readable by said second
central
processing unit, the first port of said fourth dual port memory being writable
by said
second central processing unit core; wherein the portion of the second
function is
further structured to control said third and fourth dual port memories, to
read said
second number of track signal aspects from the second port of said fourth dual
port
memory and communicate said second number of track signal aspects to said
third
communication interface, and to communicate said first number of track signal
aspects from said third communication interface and write said first number of
track
signal aspects to the second port of said third dual port memory; and wherein
the
portion of the first function is further structured to read said first number
of track
signal aspects from the second port of said second dual port memory and
communicate said first number of track signal aspects to said third
communication
interface, and to communicate said second number of track signal aspects from
said
third communication interface and write said second number of track signal
aspects to
the second port of said first dual port memory.

-47-
14. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 13 wherein said first number
of track signal aspects includes a plurality of bytes of information; wherein
the
portion of the first function is further structured to determine that said
third
communication interface is requesting to communicate said first number of
track
signal aspects, to determine that said first central processing unit core is
not
attempting to write to the first port of said second dual port memory, to
confirm to
said third communication interface that communication of said first number of
track
signal aspects will begin, to sequentially read each of said plurality of
bytes of
information from the second port of said second dual port memory and
sequentially
communicate said each of said plurality of bytes of information to said third
communication interface, and to confirm to said third communication interface
that
communication of said first number of track signal aspects has completed.
15. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 13 wherein said second
number of track signal aspects includes a plurality of bytes of information;
wherein
the portion of the first function is further structured to determine that said
first central
processing unit core is requesting to read said second number of track signal
aspects
from the first port of said first dual port memory, to determine that said
first central
processing unit core is not currently attempting to read from the first port
of said first
dual port memory, to determine that no write is currently in progress to the
second
port of said first dual port memory, to confirm to said first central
processing unit core
that writes to the second port of said first dual port memory will begin, to
indicate to
said third communication interface that communication of said second number of
track signal aspects will begin, to sequentially communicate said each of said
plurality
of bytes of information from said third communication interface and
sequentially
write each of said plurality of bytes of information to the second port of
said first dual
port memory, to confirm to said first central processing unit core that writes
to the
second port of said first dual port memory have completed, and to indicate to
said
third communication interface that communication of said second number of
track
signal aspects has completed.
16. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 13 wherein said third
communication interface is structured to electrically isolate said first sub-
system from
said second sub-system.

-48-
17. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said first
communication interface comprises a dual port memory having a first port and a
second port; wherein the first port of said dual port memory is accessible by
said first
central processing unit core; wherein the portion of the first function is
further
structured to control said dual port memory, to read said first number of
track signal
aspects from the second port of said dual port memory, and to serially
communicate
said first number of track signal aspects to said first device external to
said cab signal
apparatus.
18. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 17 wherein the portion of the
first function is further structured to provide a serial peripheral slave
interface when
serially communicating said first number of track signal aspects to said first
device
external to said cab signal apparatus; and wherein said first device external
to said cab
signal apparatus is a serial peripheral master interface.
19. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 17 wherein the portion of the
first function is further structured to indicate to said first central
processing unit core
that an access to the second port of said dual port memory is in progress; and
wherein
said first central processing unit core is further programmed to inhibit
accesses to the
first port of said dual port memory when said access to the second port of
said dual
port memory is in progress.
20. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 17 wherein serial
communications of said first number of track signal aspects to said first
device
external to said cab signal apparatus include a serial message having a header
and a
plurality of data bytes; wherein one access to the first port of said dual
port memory
by said first central processing unit core occurs during a first time; wherein
serial
communication of said header occurs during a second time which is longer than
said
first time; wherein an access to the second port of said dual port memory can
begin
during said first time; and wherein after said first time, the portion of the
first function
is further structured to prohibit a subsequent access to the first port of
said dual port
memory by said first central processing unit before said access to the second
port of
said dual port memory is completed.
21. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said first central
processing unit core is further programmed to compare said first number of
track

-49-
signal aspects from said first central processing unit core to said second
number of track
signal aspects from said second central processing unit core, and to select
the more
restrictive of said first number of track signal aspects and said second
number of track
signal aspects; and wherein said first communication interface is structured
to
communicate said more restrictive of said first number of track signal aspects
and said
second number of track signal aspects to said first device external to said
cab signal
apparatus.
22. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 21 wherein said second central
processing unit core is further programmed to compare said first number of
track signal
aspects from said first central processing unit core to said second number of
track signal
aspects from said second central processing unit core, and to select the more
restrictive of
said first number of track signal aspects and said second number of track
signal aspects;
and wherein said second communication interface is structured to communicate
from said
second central processing unit core the last said more restrictive of said
first number of
track signal aspects and said second number of track signal aspects to said
second device
external to said cab signal apparatus.
23. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 22 wherein said first central
processing
unit core is further programmed to identify a first mismatch when said first
number of
track signal aspects from said first central processing unit core does not
match said
second number of track signal aspects from said second central processing unit
core;
wherein said first communication interface is further structured to
communicate said first
mismatch to said first device external to said cab signal apparatus; wherein
said second
central processing unit core is further programmed to identify a second
mismatch when
said first number of track signal aspects from said first central processing
unit core does
not match said second number of track signal aspects from said second central
processing
unit core; and wherein said second communication interface is further
structured to
communicate said second mismatch to said second device external to said cab
signal
apparatus.

-50-
24. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 23 wherein said first device external
to
said cab signal apparatus is a first serial peripheral interface master of a
vital automatic
train protection system; and wherein said second device external to said cab
signal
apparatus is a second serial peripheral interface master of said vital
automatic train
protection system.
25. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 22 wherein said first device external
to
said cab signal apparatus is a first serial peripheral interface master of a
vital automatic
train protection system; and wherein said second device external to said cab
signal
apparatus is a second serial peripheral interface master of said vital
automatic train
protection system.
26. The cab signal apparatus of Claim 7 wherein said first central
processing
unit core and said second central processing unit core both include a digital
signal
processor.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 1 -
CAB SIGNAL RECEIVER DEMODULATOR EMPLOYING
REDUNDANT, DIVERSE FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAYS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
This invention pertains generally to cab signal apparatus and, more
particularly, to railroad vehicle cab signal apparatus. The invention also
pertains to
processors including redundant field programmable gate arrays.
Background Information
In railroad transportation systems, it is often desirable to transmit
information to a railroad vehicle by the use of cab signaling. The information
desired
to be transmitted is encoded into a track signal current, which is transmitted
to the
railroad vehicle through the rails. When the track signal current reaches the
vehicle,
the signal information may be detected and the information utilized on-board
the
vehicle.
Some of the cab signal information transmitted may be of a nature that
is desirable to be known by those on-board the railroad vehicle and/or may be
information which is redundant with wayside signaling information. However, in
some instances, it may be desirable that the cab signal information transmits
track
signal aspects, such as speed commands, to the vehicle, which are vital to the
operation of the vehicle, along with track conditions that affect the
operation of the
vehicle. For example, four track signal aspects may be transmitted by the cab
signal
and each track signal aspect may have an associated maximum speed at which a
train
may travel into the next block. For example, the four track signal aspects may
be
"clear", "approach-medium", "approach" and "restricting".
This information can be received by the railroad vehicle through an
antenna usually positioned in front of the lead axle, which is inductively
coupled to
the cab signal current that is in the rail in front of the lead axle. The lead
axle tends to
act as a shunt between the rails and, therefore, the positioning of the cab
signal
antenna or inductive coupling is usually done in close proximity to, but in
front of the
lead axle. Other cab signal pick-up systems may also be utilized.
Some cab signal carrier frequencies of the rail current can be at
frequencies of 60 Hz and 100 Hz, although a wide range of other suitable
frequencies

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 2 -
may be employed. Changes from existing cab signal carrier frequencies on
projects
require the hardware design of a new filter printed circuit board (PCB) for
each new
carrier. This can be a laborious process, which includes designing,
prototyping,
testing, verifying and releasing a new filter PCB for each new project that
requires a
new carrier frequency.
In addition to a filter, a conventional cab signal apparatus also includes
a demodulator connected to the filter for receiving an output signal and
retrieving a
code signal from a cab signal component thereof. The code signal includes cab
signal
aspects for assisting with the operation of the railroad vehicle. Also, a
decoder is
connected to the demodulator to generate a track aspect signal corresponding
to the
code signal received from the demodulator.
All new projects that have new aspect definitions (e.g., carrier
modulation rates) require application software changes to a decoder PCB.
Furthermore, such software requires testing, verification and validation
before being
released to program and install one or more programmable memory components on
the decoder PCB.
Historically, the use of programmable logic devices (e.g., Complex
Programmable Logic Devices (CPLD) and Field Programmable Gate Arrays
(FPGAs)) has not been present in safety-critical designs due to low confidence
in the
performance of the devices as a result of the lack of a method to formally
verify that
the devices are working as designed and implemented. Hence, FPGAs are believed
to
be relatively new to safety critical systems.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,504 discloses in its Background Information that
instrumentation and control systems utilize diverse redundant primary and
backup
control mechanisms, in which the processors and/or the software utilized
therein are
different, in order to preclude common mode failures. In the case of control
mechanisms incorporating digital processors, different types of processors
(e.g., from
different manufacturers) are used to run different routines (e.g., implemented
in
different software languages) implementing common algorithms.
Pat. 5,984,504 also discloses a protection subsystem employing diverse
processors to protect a critical process, such as a nuclear reactor pressure
vessel. The
critical process has one or more characteristics, such as conditions of the
pressure

CA 02625157 2016-06-07
71548-297
- 3 -
vessel and a plurality of parameters, such as temperature and level, each of
which is
representative of a characteristic. A first processor and a corresponding
first parameter are
substantially different from a second processor and a corresponding second
parameter. The
diverse processors employ different respective parameters and substantially
different
mechanisms to provide similar respective protection outputs, which are
redundant relative to
the characteristic. In this manner, a variety of common mode failures between
the redundant
processors are obviated. Voting mechanisms combine the processor outputs to
effect a safety
or protection function, such as integrated protection logic for a nuclear
reactor trip.
Although diverse redundant control mechanisms are known, further
improvements are possible.
There is room for improvement in railroad vehicle cab signal apparatus.
There is also room for improvement in processors including field
programmable gate arrays.
SUMMARY
According to one aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a
processor comprising: a first field programmable gate array comprising: a
first central
processing unit core programmed to perform a first function, and first
programmable
hardware logics programmed to perform a second function; and a second field
programmable gate array comprising: a second central processing unit core
programmed
to perform a third function, and second programmable hardware logics
programmed to
perform a fourth function; and a communication interface between the first and
second
central processing unit cores, wherein the second field programmable gate
array is
diverse with respect to the first field programmable gate array, wherein the
first field
programmable gate array is provided by a first vendor and the second field
programmable
gate array is provided by a second vendor, wherein the first vendor is
different than the
second vendor, wherein a portion of the first function is structured to
communicate first
information from the first central processing unit core to the second central
processing

CA 02625157 2016-06-07
71548-297
- 3a -
unit core through the communication interface, wherein a portion of the third
function is
structured to communicate second information from the second central
processing unit
core to the first central processing unit core through the communication
interface, and,
otherwise, the first function is substantially the same as the third function,
and wherein
the second function is substantially the same as the fourth function.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a
cab signal apparatus for a railroad vehicle, said cab signal apparatus
comprising: a first
sub-system comprising: a first field programmable gate array cooperating with
a first
receiver, the first field programmable gate array comprising: a first central
processing
unit core, first programmable hardware logics programmed to perform a first
function,
and a first communication interface cooperating with the first central
processing unit core
to communicate a first number of track signal aspects to a first device
external to the cab
signal apparatus; a second sub-system comprising: a second field programmable
gate
array cooperating with a second receiver, the second field programmable gate
array
comprising: a second central processing unit core, second programmable
hardware logics
programmed to perform a second function, and a second communication interface
cooperating with the second central processing unit core to communicate a
second
number of track signal aspects to a second device external to the cab signal
apparatus;
and a third communication interface between the first and second central
processing unit
cores, wherein the second field programmable gate array is diverse with
respect to the
first field programmable gate array, wherein the first field programmable gate
array is
provided by a first vendor and the second field programmable gate array is
provided by a
second vendor, wherein the first vendor is different than the second vendor,
wherein the
first central processing unit core is further programmed to communicate the
first number
of track signal aspects from the first central processing unit core to the
second central
processing unit core through the third communication interface, wherein the
second
central processing unit core is further programmed to communicate the second
number of
track signal aspects from the second central processing unit core to the first
central
processing unit core through the third communication interface, and wherein
the first
function is substantially the same as the second function.

CA 02625157 2015-05-28
71548-297
- 3b -
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A full understanding of the invention can be gained from the following
description of the preferred embodiments when read in conjunction with the
accompanying
drawings in which:
Figure 1 is a block diagram in schematic form of a diverse Field Programmable
Gate Array (FPGA) sub-system in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Figure 2 is a block diagram in schematic form of two diverse composite items
of Figure 1 and the communications therebetween.
Figure 3 is a block diagram in schematic form of an external communication
interface of one of the diverse composite items of Figure 1.
Figure 4 is a block diagram in schematic form of a cab signal receiver
demodulator in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Figures 5A-5B form a block diagram in schematic form of one of the
composite items of Figure 4.
Figures 6-8 are block diagrams in schematic form of the cab signal receiver
demodulator of Figure 4.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 4 -
Figure 9 is a block diagram in schematic form of comparison logic of
the cab signal receiver demodulator of Figure 4 in which each CPU compares
current
decoded data with current decoded data as received from the other CPU of the
other
composite item.
Figure 10 is a timing diagram showing semaphore handling of a shared
dual-ported memory between the local CPU and the external SPI master of Figure
4.
Figure 11 is a block diagram in schematic form of the SPI slave
memory share logic of Figure 5B.
Figure 12 is a block diagram in schematic form of the inter-composite
item memory share logic of Figure 5B.
Figure 13 is a flowchart of the write controller of Figure 12.
Figure 14 is a flowchart of the read controller of Figure 12.
Figure 15 is a timing diagram of the write controller of Figure 12.
Figure 16 is a timing diagram of the read controller of Figure 12.
Figure 17 is a block diagram in schematic form of the isolation circuit
for the cab signal receiver demodulator of Figure 4.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
As employed herein, the term "number" shall mean one or an integer
greater than one (i.e., a plurality).
As employed herein, the term "processor" means a programmable
analog and/or digital device that can store, retrieve, and process data; a
computer; a
workstation; a personal computer; a microprocessor; a microcontroller; a
microcomputer; a central processing unit (CPU); a mainframe computer; a mini-
computer; a server; a networked processor; an on-board computer; or any
suitable
processing device or apparatus.
As employed herein, the term "vital" or "vitally" means that the
acceptable probability of a hazardous event resulting from an abnormal outcome
associated with a corresponding activity or thing is less than about 10-
9/hour.
Alternatively, the mean time between hazardous events is greater than 109
hours.
Static data used by vital routines (algorithms), including, for example,
routines
dealing with track signal aspects, have been validated by a suitably rigorous
process
under the supervision of suitably responsible parties.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 5 -
As employed herein, the terms "railroad" or "railroad service" mean
freight trains or freight rail service, passenger trains or passenger rail
service, transit
rail service, and commuter railroad traffic, commuter trains or commuter rail
service.
As employed herein, the term "railroad vehicle" means freight trains,
passenger trains, transit trains and commuter trains, or a number of cars of
such trains
or of a railroad consist.
As employed herein, the terms "carborne" and "carborne equipment"
refer to things or equipment on-board a railroad vehicle.
As employed herein, the term "IP core" means a semiconductor
intellectual property (IP) core, IP block or other reusable unit of logic,
cell or chip
layout design. IP cores can be used as building blocks within application-
specific
integrated circuit (ASIC) or FPGA logic designs. IP cores can include digital
logic,
analog and/or analog/digital logic applications. Soft IP cores permit customer
modifications, while hard IP cores do not permit their application function to
be
meaningfully modified.
As employed herein, the term "field programmable gate array" or
"FPGA" means a semiconductor device containing programmable logic components,
such as logic blocks, and programmable interconnects therebetween. Logic
blocks
can be programmed to perform the function of basic logic gates (e.g., without
limitation, AND; OR; XOR; NOT) or relatively more complex combinational
functions (e.g., without limitation, decoders; relatively simple mathematical
functions;
IP cores; central processing units). The FPGA logic blocks may also include
volatile
and/or non-volatile memory elements. A hierarchy of programmable interconnects
allows logic blocks to be interconnected and programmed after the FPGA is
manufactured to implement any logical function.
As employed herein, the term "diverse" means composed of distinct or
unlike elements or qualities. For example, an FPGA made by one vendor (e.g.,
without limitation, Altera Corporation) is diverse from a different FPGA made
by a
different vendor (e.g., without limitation, Xilinx, Inc.). However, a
processor made
by one vendor (e.g., an 8086 made by Intel ) is not diverse from a plug-
compatible,
second source processor made by a different vendor (e.g., an 8086 made by
AMDe).

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 6 -
The invention is described in association with an automatic train
protection system for a railroad vehicle, although the invention is applicable
to a wide
range of systems, such as external cab systems or SPI masters, which use cab
signal
information or track signal aspects. The disclosed cab signal receiver
demodulator
(CSRD) provides a combination of vital cab signal aspect data and non-vital
cab
signal properties such as period, amplitude and duty cycle. This data can be
accessed
by any equipment that can provide an SPI master interface. This CSRD data is
employed by an automatic train protection system, although it can be used,
either
vitally or non-vitally, by any equipment in which this data is desired.
Referring to Figure 1, a diverse Field Programmable Gate Array
(FPGA) two-out-of-two architecture 2 employs two diverse FPGAs 4,6 in a vital
application with maximum flexibility and safety. In order to compensate for
uncertainty when using this FPGA technology, a two-out-of-two voting
architecture
makes use of the diverse FPGAs 4,6 in, for example, a Cab Signal Receiver
Demodulator (CSRD) 8 (Figure 4). The CSRD 8 includes two isolated composite
items 10,12, each of which includes a different diverse FPGA 4,6 and a
different
corresponding soft-core processor 14,16, respectively, to implement the
functions of
the CSRD 8. These two parallel paths individually process received cab signal
information, compare the results, and then provide the aspect information to
an
automatic train protection (ATP) system 18.
This architecture 2 provides a maximum Safety Integrity Level (i.e.,
SIL-4, in which, for example, a probability of failure on demand is about 1 e
to 104)
in a quantitative failure analysis for a safety critical design. The
components in a
programmable hardware system can be classified into three categories: (1)
programmable hardware logics 20,22 written in Very-High-Speed Integrated
Circuits
(VHSIC) hardware description language (VHDL) (e.g., a commonly used design-
entry language for FPGAs and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs)
in
electronic design automation of digital circuits); (2) IP cores 24,26 provided
by
diverse FPGA vendors; and (3) diverse soft-core processors, such as 14,16. By
developing programmable logic using CENELEC (the European Committee for
Electrotechnical Standardization) SIL-4 techniques combined with a diverse and
redundant architecture, the CSRD 8 is sufficiently protected from both
systematic and

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 7 -
random common-mode faults. This takes full advantage of the capabilities that
programmable devices, such as FPGAs, have to offer in safety critical
applications,
such as the CSRD 8.
For the programmable hardware logics, such as 20,22, written in
VHDL, it is not possible to quantify a systematic fault by quantitative
analysis.
Therefore, the CSRD 8 preferably complies with the standard EN50128 (Railway
applications. Communications, signaling and processing systems. Software for
railway control and protection systems) to ensure a qualitative approach.
Also, the
diverse IP cores 24,26 are provided by different vendors, although these
implement
the same or similar functions. In this manner, a systematic fault can be
prevented.
The implementation of the diverse soft-core processors 14,16 helps to reduce
the risks
associated with die changes and obsolescence. Similar to the diverse IP cores
24,26,
two diverse function-identical processors 14,16 add redundancy to the CSRD 8
to
prevent a systematic fault. In both instances, diversity protects against
systematic
faults and, also, random common-mode faults. The results generated by the two
soft-
core processors 14,16 are cross-checked and matched results are declared as
being
valid.
In the example CSRD 8, to compensate for uncertainty when using
FPGAs, a two-out-of-two voting architecture (Figure 9) is provided with the
diverse
FPGAs 4,6. The CSRD 8 (Figure 4) employs two isolated composite circuits
10,12,
each of which includes a different diverse FPGA 4,6 (Figure 1) and a diverse
corresponding soft-core processor 14,16 to implement the functions of the CSRD
8.
As will be discussed, these two parallel paths individually process received
cab signal
information, compare the results, and then provide the aspect information to
the ATP
system 18 (Figure 4). The CSRD 8 preferably employs light-weight, inter-
composite
communication, in order that results can be exchanged and compared quickly and
easily between the two isolated composite circuits 10,12. The final result to
the ATP
18 is preferably transmitted using a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI) Bus
communication link (or SPI link) 28,30. Also, an FPGA-based SPI memory share
interface 32 (Figures 5B and 12) is preferably implemented between the diverse
FPGAs 4,6 to simplify SPI data transmission.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
=
283359-00458
- 8 -
Figure 2 shows light-weight inter-composite communication between
the soft-core processors 14,16. Each soft-core processor 14,16 interfaces with
two
tightly coupled internal memories 34,36, one memory 34 is processor read-only
and
other memory 36 is processor write-only. The processor write-only memory 36
allows the local processor 14,16 to write data. The local processor read-only
memory
34 is synchronized with the other composite item write-only memory 36. In this
manner, a data read from the local processor read-only memory 34 is the data
written
by the other composite item processor 14,16. All the data synchronization is
done by
FPGA control logic (Figure 12). Using this approach, the software interface
between
the composite items 10,12 (Figure 4) is as simple as reads from and writes to
memory
34,36.
The advantages of the disclosed light-weight inter-composite
communication include: (1) relatively small hardware logics are employed with,
for
example, less than about 1% additional FPGA logic utilization (e.g., without
limitation, the FPGA control logic 32 employs 85 logic slices while the entire
FPGA
device (e.g., without limitation, Virtex4LX25) contains 10,752 total logic
slices); (2)
software 64 (Figure 5) of the CPUs 14,16 employs generic memory read and write
functions to access the local processor read-only and write-only memories
34,36, and
data synchronization between the soft-core processors 14,16 employs minimum
software processing; and (3) a typical data transmission speed is about 136
Mb/S with
about 2500 VRms isolation. This provides a reliable and high-speed
communication
interface that allows for the comparison of redundant results without the
introduction
of excessive processing latency.
Referring to Figure 3, the CSRD 8 (Figure 4) includes an interface 38
implemented in the FPGA 4,6 that enables it to be treated by an SPI master,
such as
the ATP 18 (or other external cab equipment) (Figure 4), as being an SPI
slave. The
software 64 (Figure 5) employs general memory read and write operations to
perform
communication with the ATP 18, instead of handling an SPI communication
protocol,
which can be processor intensive. Also, by functioning as an SPI slave, the
CSRD 8
can be used with any cab equipment that includes a configurable SPI master.
The
benefits of the FPGA-implemented SPI interface 38 include: (1) providing a
standard
SPI slave protocol; and (2) the software 64 of the CPUs 14,16 uses generic
memory

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 9 -
read and write operations to complete SPI communication without handling an
SPI
protocol.
Referring to Figure 4, the CSRD 8 is shown including two composite
items 10,12. Composite fail-safety is realized to address random faults and to
ensure
system safety in the event of any type of single random fault, which is
recognized as
possible.
The CSRD 8 preferably generates all detected types of cab signals for
use in safety self-checking and system verification testing. Each composite
item
10,12 configures the characteristics of a test signal 40 (e.g., modulation
type;
frequencies; level; message) for the other composite item 12,10 through an
inter-
channel communication link 42. The fault detection time is the interval of
test (e.g.,
once every 24 hours in the example embodiment). The test signal 40 is injected
by
taking the composite item 10,12 "off-line" and switching out the antenna(s)
44. The
ATP 18 runs this test (Figure 7) only when cab signal detection is not
required (e.g.,
when the train is stopped and off-line running system-wide diagnostic tests;
when the
train controls and propulsion systems are turned off).
The CSRD 8 preferably creates test AF-90X FSK track signals with
selectable digital data, signal level, and mark and space frequencies. These
parameters are selectable both within the criteria of an acceptable AF-90X
signal, and
outside the criteria with bad data, low signal level or frequencies out of
tolerance
range.
The CSRD 8 preferably creates a test MC cab signal with selectable
level, frequency, period and duty-cycle. Dual carrier signals are selectable,
though
simultaneous generation of both carriers is not employed. The level,
frequency,
period and duty-cycle are all selectable within and outside of the criteria
parameters
for the aspects that are configured for detection.
The CSRD 8 preferably creates test steady carrier signals with
selectable level and duration. The level and duration are selectable within
and outside
of the criteria for the declaration of steady carrier.
The CSRD 8 preferably creates test impulse response system (IRS)
signals with selectable level and period. The level and period are selectable
within
and outside of the criteria parameters for the aspects that are configured for
detection.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 10 -
The CSRD 8 provides various example interfaces. When referencing
an interface as being "internal" or "external", this refers to the interface
as being
internal or external to the CSRD 8. When referencing a "hardware-to-software
interface", this refers to an interface from the software 64 (Figure 5) of the
CPU 14,16
to the hardware and/or to the programmable hardware.
The test signal interface 46 (Figure 8) is an internal hardware-to-
software interface that configures all facets of the diagnostic test signal
40.
The level detection interface (not shown) is an internal hardware-to-
software interface that provides in-band level (amplitude) information from
the four
decoding channels.
The DSP - filter interface (not shown) is an internal hardware-to-
software interface that configures all facets of the digital filters (e.g.,
filter corner
frequencies; filter phase response; magnitude response).
The DSP - demodulator interface (not shown) is an internal hardware-
to-software interface that configures all facets of the demodulation process
(e.g.,
detection parameters; logic thresholds). This interface also provides the
software with
the decoded digital data transitions and associated timestamps.
The DSP ¨ analog-to-digital interface (not shown) is an internal
hardware-to-software interface that configures analog and analog-to-digital
hardware
for receiving and digitizing track signals.
The inter-channel communications interface 32 (Figure 5B) is an
internal composite item-to-composite item interface that provides for software
and
hardware inter-channel communications between the two composite items.
The LEDs interface 48 (Figure 5B) is a user interface that provides
software and hardware controlled LEDs (not shown).
The external debugging interface 50 (Figure 5B) is an external
interface for CPU debugging and debugging/control of programmable hardware.
The external communications interface 52 (Figure 5B) is an external
interface for off-board communications to the ATP 18 (Figure 4). This may
include
one or more interface types (e.g., SPI; RS-485).
As shown in Figures 5A-5B, the CSRD 8 is a highly configurable
microprocessor-based signaling subsystem. The CSRD 8 is a stand-alone and
multi-

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 11 -
purpose receiver that can be configured to receive and demodulate, for
example, AF-
90X FSK track circuit signals, modulated carrier (MC) cab signals (e.g.,
single and
dual carrier), steady carrier track signals (or constant carrier (CC) cab
signals), and
impulse track signals (or impulse response system (IRS) cab signals). The CSRD
8
simultaneously decodes up to four carrier frequencies, which allows it to be
configured for multiple combinations of signal types. The CSRD 8 also provides
communication to external cab equipment by providing RS-485 54,56 and other
high-
speed SPI links 58,60.
The decoded cab signal information is available via serial
communication to other cab equipment for use in ATP or control. The CSRD 8 can
be used in many signal processing applications employing filtering,
demodulation and
decoding of cab signals, or in other signaling applications employing signal
processing and decoding. The CSRD 8 uses DSP hardware technology 62 coupled
with configurable software 64 to effectively provide cab signal filter and
decoder
CPU/FSK functions. The CSRD 8 is designated at Safety Integrity Level 4 (SIL-
4)
and, therefore, communicates fail-safe vital decoded signaling information to
the ATP
18 (Figure 4). The fail-safe architecture is one of composite fail-safety,
implying that
each safety related function is performed by more than one item (redundancy).
In the
case of the CSRD 8, two composite items 10,12 (Figure 4) together form a vital
sub-
system. This ensures system safety in the event of any type of single random
fault,
which is recognized as possible. Since it is not feasible to quantify
systematic faults
by quantitative analysis, all software 64 of the CPUs 14,16 and/or
programmable
hardware of the FPGAs 4,6 preferably adhere to EN 50128 to ensure a
qualitative
approach according to the respective software or programmable hardware level
(SIL-
4). For example, composite fail-safety is realized to address random faults
and to
ensure system safety in the event of any type of single random fault, which is
recognized as possible.
The CSRD 8 can simultaneously detect and decode up to four carrier
frequencies allowing it to be configured for multiple combinations of track
signal
types. This configuration is available via communication with external cab
signal
equipment at start-up. Table 1 shows the capabilities of simultaneous decoding
channel configurations.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 12 -
Decoding Decoding Decoding Decoding
Channel 1 Channel 2 Channel 3 Channel 4
FSK Mark 0 FSK Space 0 FSK Mark 1 FSK Space 1
MC/CC/Impulse MC/CC/Impulse MC/CC/Impulse MC/CC/Impulse
Dual MC ¨ f0 Dual MC ¨ fl Dual MC ¨ f2 Dual MC ¨ f3
Dual MC ¨ f0 Dual MC ¨ fl MC/CC/Impulse MC/CC/Impulse
Dual Carrier Dual Carrier Modulate/Steady/ Modulate/Steady/
Impulse Impulse
Table 1
When referring to the four "decoding channels", even though each
composite item 10,12 contains the same four functional decoding channels, this
does
not mean that there are eight simultaneous channels. The first composite item
10
contains four decoding channels, and likewise the second composite item 12
contains
four decoding channels that together provide four channels of vital
information.
Therefore, when referencing one of the four decoding channels of one composite
item
10,12, it can be considered simply redundant in the other composite item
12,10.
When configured to decode an AF-90X FSK track signal, the CSRD 8
uses two of its four available decoding channels for each FSK carrier (mark or
space).
Since AF-90X track signaling employs simultaneous decoding of the "current"
and
"next" carrier frequencies, the CSRD 8 uses four of the four available
decoding
channels. The CSRD 8 monitors for FSK signal, recovers the digital data
contained
within the signal, and decodes any valid AF-90X data message from the raw
data. In
addition to FSK data, the signal amplitude level is also detected, providing
for bond-
crossing detection. The data message and signal level are made available via
the
communication links 28,30 to the ATP system 18 (Figure 4).
When configured to decode a modulated carrier type cab signal, the
CSRD 8 uses one of its four available decoding channels per carrier frequency.
The
CSRD 8 is therefore capable of receiving and decoding four modulated carriers
simultaneously. The CSRD 8 monitors for MC signal and determines the level,
period
and duty cycle. When configured for a dual carrier MC signal, the phase
relationship
between the two carrier modulation rates is also determined.
The CSRD 8 declares a cab aspect based on the detection of an MC
signal that meets all defined criteria. This criteria includes, but is not
limited to,

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
. =
283359-00458
- 13 -
minimum level, allowable period and duty cycle, number of valid periods before
declaration, and hold-time of aspect if the signal is no longer detected. In
the case of
dual carrier MC signals, the allowable phase relationship between the two-
carrier
modulation rate is also defined. The aspect criteria is definable by external
cab
equipment via the communication links 28,30 (Figure 4). The declared aspect
and all
determined MC signal characteristics are made available by the CSRD 8 to the
ATP
18 via the communication links 28,30.
When configured to decode constant carrier track signals, the CSRD 8
uses one of its four available decoding channels per carrier frequency. The
CSRD 8
monitors for steady carrier signal and determines the level and duration of
the signal.
The CSRD 8 declares detection of the constant carrier signal when all defined
criteria
are met. This criteria includes, but is not limited to, minimum level, minimum
duration and the hold-time of the declaration after a signal is no longer
detected. The
declaration criteria is definable by the ATP 18 via the communication links
28,30.
The detection declaration and all determined steady carrier signal
characteristics are
made available by the CSRD 8 to the ATP 18 via the communication links 28,30.
When configured to decode an impulse cab signal, the CSRD 8 uses
one of its four available decoding channels. The CSRD 8 monitors for impulse
detection and determines the pulse level, pulse width, and the period between
pulses.
The CSRD 8 declares a cab aspect based on the detection of an impulse signal
that
meets all defined criteria. This criteria includes, but is not limited to,
minimum level,
allowable period between pulses, number of valid periods before declaration,
and
hold-time of aspect if the signal is no longer detected. The aspect criteria
is definable
by the ATP 18 via the communication links 28,30. The declared aspect and all
determined impulse signal characteristics are made available by the CSRD 8 to
the
ATP equipment 18 via the communication links 28,30.
Communication to the ATP 18 is provided by the CSRD 8 via an RS-
485 serial link 54,56 (Figure 5) or other suitable high-speed SPI link 58,60
(Figure 5).
In both cases, the CSRD 8 acts as a slave on the link and responds only if
requested.
All data on the communication links 28,30 (Figure 4) is vital and is protected
and
checked with, for example, a suitable CRC.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 14 -
Figures 5A-5B show one of the two CSRD composite items 10,12, it
being understood that the other diverse CSRD composite item 12,10 (redundant
item)
is identical, although it incorporates a diverse FPGA 6,4. For the composite
items
implemented by identical VHDL code, the VHDL programming preferably strictly
adheres to EN50128 to ensure a qualitative approach according to the
respective
programmable hardware component SIL level. The systematic fault of those
components is eliminated by using diverse synthesis and place and route
development
tools. Using different development tools, the same VHDL code may lead to
different
netlists and definitely different gate level implementations on the diverse
FPGAs 4,6.
For example, place and route is done by an Altera QuartusII
development tool (synthesis tools plus place and route tools) for an Altera
composite
item, and is done by a Xilinx ISE development tool (synthesis tools plus place
and
route tools) for a Xilinx composite item. The VHDL file is first synthesized
to
diverse netlists by the diverse synthesis tools, and the diverse netlists are
placed and
routed as different gates targeted on diverse FPGA logic cells (logic
elements).
Custom embedded peripherals are preferably done by adding register
interfaces to custom logics. The custom logics are almost identical between
the two
composite items 10,12. The register interfaces are adjusted for different CPU
(e.g.,
without limitation, MicroBlazeTM CPU; NIOS II CPU) bus signals.
The power and supervisory circuit 70 provides for protection on DC
input voltages 72 from outside sources and for
distributing/generating/monitoring DC
power. This circuit 70 generates local power for the digital and analog
circuits and
monitors this local power for degradation. For example, if power degradation
exceeds
a predetermined amount, then a RESET output (not shown) is asserted to cause
the
CSRD 8 to asynchronously clear all outputs to default states. The RESET output
can
also be asserted responsive to a front panel reset pushbutton (not shown).
The test signal switch 74,76 switches in/out the antenna track signal
78,80 / diagnostic test signal 40. The test signal switch 74,76 is controlled
by the
opposing composite item 12,10. Although the switch 74,76 is controlled by the
opposing composite item 12,10, the control is indirect. The opposing composite
item
12,10 sends the switch setting information as a message via the inter-
composite item
memory share logic 32. The local CPU 14,16 receives the message and then sets
up

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 15 -
the test signal switch 74,76 on the local composite item 10,12. This control
is
implemented in order that the CPU 14,16 for the composite item 10,12 under
test may
not be aware that it is under test by the other composite item 12,10. This
gains
independence between the "checker" and the item being "checked". The test
signal
switch 74,76 inputs a track signal 78,80 from the corresponding antenna 88,90,
respectively, and a diagnostic sinusoidal test signal 40 from the test signal
generation
analog circuit 92. The test signal switch 74,76 outputs a single analog output
94,96
containing either the track signal data 78,80 from the antenna 88,90,
respectively, or
the diagnostic test signal 40.
The RX1 and RX2 analog front end circuitry 98,100 provides for the
initial analog receiver differential input and front-end signal protection.
The
protection circuitry withstands continuous signals in excess of about 150 Vpp
and for
ESD immunity. These circuits 98,100 receive either the test signal 40 or the
"real"
antenna track signal 78,80 from the test signal switch 74,76 and reference
that signal
to a corresponding ground 102. In the example embodiment, there are two
differences between the analog receivers 84,86: (1) the second receiver 86 has
an
initial differential attenuation of -8dB (a linear gain of 0.4) for added
dynamic input
range in detecting high-energy track circuits; and (2) the first receiver 84
has a
selectable preamp of 6dB for added gain prior to the variable gain amplifier
(VGA)
(not shown). This may be used, for example, in an application, such as FSK,
for
relatively very weak signals.
The analog signal processing 84,86 provides analog signal processing
functions before analog-to-digital conversion: (1) gain control; and (2) anti-
aliasing.
Gain control is employed to achieve a minimum signal-to-noise ratio and
appropriate
signal level at the corresponding analog-to-digital converter (ADC) (not
shown) of
ADC conversion circuit 104, in order that such filtering and demodulation can
be
reliably performed at various track circuit currents, as received from various
antennas
88,90. Preferably, the CSRD 8 supports a relatively wide frequency and
amplitude
range and, if so, then a suitably wide dynamic range from the analog signal
processing
84,86 is needed. Since the FPGA 4,6 provides a sampled DSP function, good anti-
aliasing is also needed before the ADC provides the analog-to-digital
conversion.
When applied with a suitable anti-alias cutoff-to-sample rate ratio, this
ensures that

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 16 -
unwanted or "phantom" signals do not appear by signals that are under-sampled
per
the Nyquist criterion. A programmable anti-alias filter (not shown) is
preferred, such
that sample rate and receiver bandwidth are configurable functions.
Amplitude control of the incoming signal 78,80 is achieved using one
of two techniques: (1) fixed gain control (FGC); and (2) automatic gain
control
(AGC). Amplitude control using AGC is preferred to minimize the quantization
distortion and maximize the available headroom of the analog-to-digital
conversion of
the circuit 104. Using AGC allows the CSRD 8 to abstract the antenna
characteristics
and minimum track circuit currents, since the AGC control loop will constantly
servo
to lock onto any signal that may be present. AGC also lends itself to ease of
demodulation, since a fixed digital threshold may be used while maintaining a
very
accurate duty cycle detection. This makes systems engineering easier by not
considering, for example, antenna source impedance, minimum track current and
relatively complicated detector parameters. However, running AGC makes it
relatively difficult to determine the level of the in-band filtered signal,
since the
control in the continuous-time analog domain is ahead of the digital filters
by the
phase response and variable group delay. To worsen the problem, at relatively
very
low frequencies, the group delay is a relatively large percentage of the
modulation
rate.
For these reasons, a fixed-gain may be more desirable to systems
where the in-band signal level information must be quantified for comparison
to
calibration levels as a vital function. Using FGC lends itself to accurately
calculating
the level of the in-band filtered signal with the trade-off being additional
detector
parameters and systems engineering for determining, for example, the gain
setpoint
and the minimum level.
Since there are systems that can benefit from either of the two
techniques, the ability to run AGC or FGC is implemented by the CSRD 8. The
gain
control mechanism is a VGA (not shown) that is controlled by a digital-to-
analog
converter (DAC) of the digital-to-analog conversion circuit 106 that is
coupled to the
gain control FPGA logic 108. When under FGC, the CPU 14,16 can set the fixed-
gain discrete value to the DAC-controlled VGA stage, to hold a steady gain. In
AGC
mode, the FPGA gain control logic 108 adaptively servos the envelope of the

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 17 -
incoming received signal to a setpoint programmed by the CPU 14,16, using a
proportional/integral/derivative (PID) loop and the DAC-controlled VGA stage.
The anti-alias filter (not shown) is implemented as a clock frequency
programmable switched-capacitor filter. This simplifies the receiver 84,86 by
eliminating the necessity of having active filters switched in/out based on
the slice of
the frequency spectrum of interest. The switched-capacitor filter itself,
however, is a
sampled system, which suitably over-samples the signal. Also, a general
purpose
active continuous-time fourth order low pass filter with a relatively high
corner
frequency is used to attenuate switch-noise signals.
The analog receiver signal control 110,112 provides for routing of
signals in the analog domain (receiver 84 only) and the VGA amplitude control
signaling. Routing of signals is accomplished using discrete control signals
to analog
switches (e.g., a switch (not shown) in the pre-amp (not shown) for receiver
84).
Amplitude control is accomplished using a DAC-controlled VGA (not shown). The
DAC provides a bipolar DC control voltage to a VGA providing -20 dB to +35 dB
of
dynamic signal control of the input signal.
The test signal generation analog circuitry 92 generates the sinusoidal
diagnostic safety test signal 40 with CPU-controlled variable volume control.
The
output of the selftest modulator 114 is processed by a two-channel high-speed
DAC
(not shown) of the circuit 106 where the first channel can be used to
digitally
synthesize the waveform and this output can be input to the voltage reference
of the
second channel, thereby making a precision volume control (e.g., amplitude
control
via four-quadrant multiplication). The resulting precision 20 Vpp test signal
is then
low pass filtered, such that the discrete-time sampled stair-step response of
the digital
waveform synthesis is attenuated. The corner frequency of this low pass filter
is high
enough such that the response of the filter is as flat as possible in the pass-
band yet
sufficiently removes the quantization distortion. An active filter using
operational
amplifiers is desired here as opposed to active filter integrated circuits.
The circuit 106 provides the physical DAC devices (not shown) and
connectivity to the FPGA 4,6 for several functions. First, two diagnostic re-
construction DACs (not shown) provide two unipolar DAC channels to
simultaneously represent two channels (e.g., mark and space) of signal
information.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 18 -
Analog representation of any digital filter tap point can then be
reconstructed (e.g.,
mark and space band pass; mark and space low pass; mark/space absolute value
(ABS); raw input). These DACs are controlled by the DSP diagnostic logic 136.
Second, a diagnostic test signal DAC (not shown) is provided for an analog
sinusoidal
waveform synthesis using a dual channel high-speed current output DAC (not
shown).
One DAC output (not shown) is the full-scale test signal itself where the
other (not
shown) is the amplitude control. Third, a VGA control DAC (not shown) provides
the control voltage for the VGA and, therefore, controls the amplitude range
of the
input signal (whether in FGC or AGC).
The analog-to-digital conversion circuit 104 provides the physical
ADC devices (not shown) and connectivity to the FPGA 4,6 for digitizing the
signals
after the anti-alias filters within the two analog receivers 84,86. The ADC
(not
shown) for the signal information is chosen such that the conversion rate is
at least
two times the Nyquist frequency of the highest frequency of interest. A 14-bit
ADC
(not shown) provides sufficient resolution and high enough signal-to-noise
ratio to
filter, demodulate and recover data. This ADC samples and provides data in
from the
two receivers 84,86 in parallel (e.g., up to 400,000 samples per second for a
maximum input signal of about 150 kHz). These ADCs input the analog anti-
aliased
signal 117,118 from receivers 84,86 (amplitude controlled) and output the
digitized
discrete-time signals 120 for receivers 84,86 containing either the diagnostic
test
signal, or track information such as MC, FSK, impulse, or constant carrier.
The clock oscillator 122 provides the clock source to the FPGA 4,6
and its internal logic. From this clock source, three clocks (not shown) are
derived
inside the FPGA. The system clock clk_sys 224 (Figures 11 and 12) may be
divided
down internally for other variable rate clocks (not shown) (e.g., switched-
capacitor
filter frequency is derived by counting down the system clock; an NCO core
clock for
generating numerical samples for frequency synthesis; a DDR SDRAM clock which
is the same clock as the system clock with the exception of a compensated
phase
shift).
The FPGA 4,6 provides the core functionality and control for the
CSRD 8. The FPGA 4,6 includes a soft processor core 14,16 that runs
application
specific software 64 controlling filtering and demodulation, and
communications to

CA 02625157 2015-05-28
- 71548-297
- 19 -
the host CPU (e.g., ATP 18 (Figure 4)). The various FPGA core components are
discussed,
below.
The digital signal processing (DSP) core 62 implements a digital filter, a
demodulator and a detector that is capable of filtering and demodulating MC,
CC, FSK, or
impulse type track signals. The DSP core 62 is interfaced to the CPU 14,16 for
controlling
the filtering and demodulation process by setting parameters (e.g., filter
coefficients; detector
logical thresholds). The DSP core 62 also provides the CPU 14,16 with the
decoded digital
data and associated timestamp information and status information (e.g.,
carrier status; low
SNR detected). A non-limiting example of a cab signal filter and demodulator
using a DSP is
disclosed by U.S. Pat. No. 5,711,497.
The selftest modulator 114 generates a modulated test signal sinusoidal
waveform for all of the detected track signal types (e.g., MC; CC; FSK;
impulse) and
precisely adjusts the volume (amplitude control) of the test signal 40.
The ADC control logic 124 acquires data from the two analog receiver ADCs
(not shown) of the circuit 104, and interfaces to the ADC devices (not shown)
of the circuit
104 and the associated electrical timing. The digitizing rate is a variable
rate set by the CPU
14,16. The output of each acquisition is registered and signaled as ready to
downstream logic.
The gain control logic 108 runs in two modes: AGC or FGC. This includes a
DAC controller (not shown) that interfaces to the DAC devices (not shown) of
the circuit 106
and associated electrical timing and incorporates a gain control mechanism
(not shown) for
controlling the gain in the analog receivers 84,86 and a PID controller (not
shown) for running
in the AGC mode. A corresponding CPU interface (not shown) sets up the gain
control process.
The soft processor core (CPU) 14,16 runs application specific software 64 and
controls the CSRD 8. The CPU 14,16 controls inter-composite item
communications, off-board
communications and all application level tasks. The CPU 14,16 accepts a wide
range of
configuration items (e.g., hold and drop time; aspect definitions; signal
determination routines).
The SPI slave memory share logic 116 functions, for example, as a SPI
slave to the host ATP 18 (Figure 4) (or as an RS-485 slave to external cab
equipment

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 20 -
(not shown)) for a memory share function. The memory share logic 116 provides
semaphore control of the shared resources, de-serializes the data into a dual-
ported
random access memory (DPRAM) 128 (Figure 11) for the CPU 14,16, and clock
domain crossing (signal hardening) with the ATP 18.
The inter-composite item memory share logic 32 acts as a memory
share function between inter-composite items 10,12 (e.g., without limitation,
Altera
FPGA 4 and Xilinx FPGA 6). The memory share logic 32 provides for semaphore
control, synchronous high-speed data transfer into DPRAMs 130,132 (Figure 12)
for
the CPU 14,16, and clock domain crossing (signal hardening) between the clock
domains.
The watchdog logic 134 provides a watchdog reset function with the
CPU 14,16. The software 64 refreshes the watchdog logic 134 within a specified
window to determine health. If the watchdog logic 134 is not refreshed within
the
specified window, then the CPU 14,16 is reset.
The DSP diagnostic logic 136 provides "eyes" into the digital filter
domain. The user can select (e.g., using DIP switches (not shown); a soft CPU
register (not shown)) any two signals to monitor within the digital filter
domain. This
DSP diagnostic logic 136 synthesizes the waveform by controlling the external
DAC
devices (not shown) of the circuit 106 and associated timing.
The waveform processing logic 138 provides the CPU 14,16 with the
level of the in-band signal for each of the four filter chains. A level
detector (not
shown) is implemented as a peak detect function providing the CPU 14,16 with
the
peak since last read cycle, until the CPU 14,16 resets the peak. The waveform
processing logic 138 also provides the CPU 14,16 with the instantaneous level
value
for reading and evaluation at any time.
The clock management and reset control 140 provides the FPGA 4,6
with several clocks. A reset control function combines any source that can
reset the
CPU 14,16 (e.g.; the watchdog logic 134; a PCB level reset) and preferably
provides a
synchronized transition to a non-reset state.
The receiver control logic 142 controls the two analog receivers 84,86.
The two switched-capacitor frequencies are generated based on CPU-selection of
the

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 21 -
frequencies. This receiver control logic 142 also controls signal routing
through the
receivers 84,86 (e.g., pre-amp select in receiver 84; test signal injection
control).
The general purpose I/O (GPIO) counter logic 144 provides counter
logic for use with the general purpose inputs 146. This logic allows for the
GPIO
counter logic 144 to be used to count pulses when an input 146 is used to
monitor the
output of a tachometer (not shown).
The isolated inter-composite item communications circuit 148
facilitates cross-composite item isolated high-speed communication. This
circuit 148
includes four control signals, eight data out signals (to the other composite
item
12,10), and eight data in signals (from the other composite item 12,10)
to/from the
FPGA 4,6. These are incorporated through high-speed isolation buffers 150
(Figure
17) to communicate with the other FPGA 6,4 on a separate ground plane. The
electrical interface combined with the FPGA circuit 148, as a whole, acts as a
memory
share. The FPGA circuit 148 handles all control and data serializing/de-
serializing
to/from the other composite item 12,10. Since the interface appears to both
soft
processors 14,16 as being a DPRAM and the CPUs 14,16 are un-synchronized, the
FPGA circuit 148 handles semaphores for multiple access, clock domain
crossing,
and DPRAM interfacing.
The diagnostic debug signal reconstruction 152 is implemented as
"eyes" into the digital filter domain. Two DAC channels (not shown) are
instrumented to simultaneously represent two channels (mark and space) of
filter
chain signal information. The output waveform of the diagnostic DACs is first
low
pass filtered (LPF) to eliminate the stair-step response common in digitally
representing an analog signal. The LPF is realized through a dual second order
(fourth order) continuous time filter integrated circuit (IC) (not shown)
programmed
with a corner frequency of approximately 120 kHz. Using -24dB/octave, this is
a low
enough corner frequency to sufficiently attenuate the step function output of
the DAC
while passing all pertinent filter information in the range of frequency
interest.
Switches (not shown) select the signals to output to the DAC channels for
debugging
purposes.
The FPGA configuration circuitry 154 provides for configuring the
FPGA's SRAM cells (not shown) upon power on reset (POR). The configuration

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 22 -
process upon POR is accomplished using a suitable complex programmable logic
device (CPLD) (not shown) that accesses the flash memory devices 157 and
serially
shifts data into the FPGA 4,6. The CPLD uses a state machine to read the flash
memory 157 sequentially and write the configuration data to the FPGA 4,6. This
configuration process is protected with a 32-bit CRC. If the CRC fails, then
the
FPGA 4,6 tristates all I/O and asserts an error signal to the CPLD.
The processor debugging interface 50 provides for debugging of the
FPGA 4,6 and the CPU 14,16. This allows for gate-level signal monitoring and
background operation of the CPU 14,16 including, for example, trace, go, stop
and
break.
The Ethernet circuitry (PHY) 156 provides for high-speed
downloading of FPGA configuration data, application CPU code (s-records), or
general flash event data. A boot program (not shown) may also be used to issue
debugging commands to dump memory or write to a block of RAM (not shown).
When the CSRD 8 is completely blank from manufacturing, the boot program and
initial FPGA configuration are programmed into flash memory 157 via the
processor
debugging interface 50, in order that the FPGA 4,6 and boot program is
initiated and
automatically run upon POR. The boot program incorporates a TCP/IP stack (not
shown) and handles communication to/from a LAN controller (not shown). The
embedded LAN controller acquires an IP address using DHCP, or uses a static IP
address so a personal computer (PC) (not shown) may recognize and connect to
the
CSRD 8 via the Ethernet link 158. After the connection is established, the PC-
side
application can transmit and receive data using the opened TCP/IP data socket.
To
process data to/from the embedded LAN controller, the FPGA 4,6 is configured
with
a valid configuration with the CPU 14,16 running the boot program with TCP/IP
stack.
The flash memory 157 provides for electrical connectivity and
interfacing from off chip flash memory to the embedded FPGA's CPU 14,16. The
flash memory 157 is coupled to the FPGA's soft processor core 14,16 via a
synchronous tristate bus 159.
The double data rate (DDR) synchronous dynamic random access
memory (SDRAM) circuitry 160 provides for electrical connectivity and
interfacing

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 23 -
between the FPGA 14,16 and the DDR SDRAM thereof (not shown). To control the
DDR SDRAM 160, a controller core (not shown) is incorporated within the FPGA
4,6. The FPGA DDR SDRAM controller provides for configuring the parameters
(e.g., number of rows and columns; column address select (CAS) latency; burst
length; refresh interval; precharge period; write recovery time) employed to
interface
with the DDR SDRAM 160.
The UART transceivers 162,164 provide for RS-485 communications
for off-board short or long distance communications.
The SPI circuitry and level translators 166 provide high-speed off
board serial communications. An SPI master, such as the example ATP 18 (Figure
4),
sources four chip selects (not shown) to control four peripherals (not shown)
non-
multiplexed or 15 devices (not shown) multiplexed. The SPI master serial clock
(spis_clk 226) (Figure 11) can be run at speeds up to 20 MHz. The SPI slave is
seen
by the off-board SPI master as being an SPI slave. However, on the CSRD-side,
the
SPI slave is incorporated into VHDL logic to act as an SPI slave to the off-
board
master, and interface to the DPRAM 128 (Figure 11) internally. This allows the
CPU
14,16 in the FPGA 4,6 to access the memory share as a straight DPRAM 128 while
the SPI slave memory share logic 116 acts as an SPI slave to the off-board
master.
Level shifters translate to logic-level signals for off board signals and also
translate
the GPIO input and outputs to logic-level signals for off board signals.
Referring to Figures 6 and 7, the operations of the CSRD 8 can be
considered in two parts: (1) normal running operations; and (2) testing
operations,
respectively. In normal running operations (Figure 6), the ATP 18 is simply
comparing the aspects declared and whether the two composite items 10,12
agree.
Additionally, the ATP 18 is provided with signal determination data for
diagnostic
purposes only.
With regard to testing operations (Figure 7), the ATP 18 commands
initiation of the test to each composite item 10,12. The ATP 18 then expects
the
disagreement between aspects declared and waits some reasonable time for the
test
pass/fail status. From the perspective of the CSRD 8, after a composite item
10,12
gets the message from the ATP 18 to run a test from a command from the ATP 18,
that composite item 10,12 waits a reasonable amount of time to receive the
expected

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
. ,
283359-00458
- 24 -
test results. The expected test results are the results that correspond to the
test
communicated to the opposing composite item's test signal logic. The test
signal 40 is
injected by taking the composite item "off-line" and switching out the
antenna(s) 44
(Figure 4).
Figure 8 shows another high-level block diagram of the CSRD 8. This
will be discussed in terms of the main function blocks and, also, how the CSRD
8
generally processes the received cab signal information from a signal flow
perspective.
The CSRD 8 includes the two diverse composite items 10,12. These
composite items 10,12 perform almost identical functions and are redundant to
each
other.
A number of signal antennas 44 (Figure 4) receive analog signals that
are injected into the rails (not shown) by the wayside equipment (not shown).
For
example and without limitation, each composite item 10,12 is able to connect
with up
to two antennas to receive analog signals that are injected into the rails
(not shown) by
the wayside equipment (not shown). The CSRD 8 allows for the two receivers
84,86
in each composite item 10,12 to share an antenna or they can use separate
antennas.
This option is preferably jumper configurable (not shown) on the CSRD 8. These
signals include, but are not limited to, FSK, modulated carrier, steady
carrier and
impulse signals. The analog receiver 84,86 (Figure 5) receives either a test
signal 40
or the "real" antenna track signal 78 (Figure 5) based upon the position of an
analog
switch 74 (Figure 5) controlled by the CPU 14,16 (Figures 4 and 5). The analog
receiver 84,86 provides suitable analog signal processing to clean, protect
and scale
the front-end signal.
The analog-to-digital conversion circuit 104 (Figure 5) digitizes the
received analog signal in the analog continuous-time domain from the analog
receiver
84,86 (Figure 5) to the discrete-time domain for DSP processing.
The digital-to-analog conversion circuit 106 converts digital signals
from the FPGA 4,6 to analog signals for test signal generation. This circuit
also uses
a number of digital-to-analog converters (DACs) (not shown) for gain control
of the
received analog signal.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 25 -
The digital signal processing (DSP) core 62 (Figure 5) provides
variable rate signal digitizing, digital filtering, demodulation and decoding
of the
detected signals over all ranges of detection, frequencies, amplitudes and
modulation
types. Preferably, the DSP core 62 can be dynamically configured for filter
topology
and response, sample rate, demodulation type, magnitude response and decoding
sensitivity. The DSP core 62 also provides communications interfaces to/from
the
CPU software 64 (Figure 5B) for configuration data and demodulated decoded
track
data.
The test signal generation circuit 46 (Figure 8) generates the digitized
sinusoidal diagnostic safety test signal 40 with CPU-controlled volume
adjustment.
The generated digital signals are converted to a self-test analog signal by
the digital-
to-analog conversion circuit 106.
The CPU 14,16 executes the CSRD software 64 (Figure 5), and
provides hardware and software interfaces to support interfaces with multiple
FPGA
components.
The SPI slave memory share logic 116 (Figure 5) facilitates
communications and data transfer between external equipment, such as the ATP
18,
and the CSRD 8. This logic 116 is structured from the external side, such that
the
CSRD 8 appears to the external equipment as being an SPI Slave, while the
logic
itself appears to the CSRD soft-CPU 14,16 as being memory.
The inter-composite communication logic 32 (Figure 5) provides fast
and isolated data exchange to/from the other composite item 12,10 on the CSRD
8.
As shown in Figure 8, an unconditioned cab signal 170 is injected as
input into the CSRD 8 from the number of antennas 44. The signals, such as
170,
may range from about 50 mVpp to about 150 Vpp and have a frequency range of DC
to about 75 kHz. Analog circuitry (not shown) provides high voltage and ESD
protection, programmable gain control and programmable anti-alias filtering.
The
resulting signal is converted from analog to digital and provided to the DSP
core 62 of
the FPGA 4,6. The DSP core 62 provides a programmable multi-stage digital
filter
(not shown) to reject signals outside of the desired cab signal carrier
frequency band.
The DSP core 62 then detects the existence of a carrier frequency from the
filtered

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 26 -
signal, determines the level of any detected carrier, and detects and stores a
clock-
based timestamp for every transition of the carrier state.
The carrier state (on or off), the carrier level, and carrier state
transitions data (on-to-off and off-to-on timestamps) are passed to the soft-
core CPU
14,16 of the FPGA 4,6. The CPU 14,16 calculates from this information signal
characteristics (e.g., modulation state times and period; modulation duty
cycle;
number of modulation cycles detected and associated signal level). The CPU
14,16
compares these signal characteristics to programmable criteria for declaring
vital
CSRD determinations (e.g., cab-signal aspects; steady carrier declarations).
As one
non-limiting example, the CPU 14,16 declares a specific vital output state
(aspect)
when the signal detected has a modulation period between "x" and "y", a duty
cycle
between "a" and "b", a signal level greater than "z", and at least "n" periods
of this
signal have been detected with these characteristics. As another non-limiting
example, an aspect ID of 3 may correspond to an ATP speed limit of 25 MPH. In
order to declare this aspect, the CPU 14,16 may need to detect a signal period
between 100 milliseconds and 104 milliseconds with a duty cycle between 48%
and
52% and a signal level greater than 2500 A/D units. At least four periods of
this
qualified signal must be detected before declaring the example aspect ID of 3.
The CSRD 8 provides four independently programmable DSP channels
for detection of up to four different carrier frequencies. The signal data
provided by
the DSP core 62 to the CPU 14,16 for each of these signals can be used
independently
or as relational data. As such, the CPU 14,16 can declare up to four channels
of
independent vital declarations, or it can relate the data from one channel to
another
channel to make declarations based on the existence of multiple carrier
frequencies.
In addition to declaring vital output states based on criteria, the DSP
core 62 can decode digital data from the input signal. Using the carrier state
transitions from the DSP core 62 and applying a programmable baud rate clock,
the
CPU 14,16 can decode the modulation data into digital data, which can be
provided as
another vital system output of the CSRD 8. This vital system output is also
compared
by the two FPGAs 4,6.
Figure 9 shows CSRD comparison logic 172 that compares current
decoded data of one composite item 10 (e.g., without limitation, using a
MicroBlazeTM

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 27 -
CPU 14 marketed by Xilinx, Inc.) with the current decoded data as received
from the
other composite CSRD item 12 (e.g., without limitation, using a Nios II CPU
16
marketed by Altera Corporation) for the current cycle. Any discrepancy between
the
vital data causes a failure counter (not shown) to be incremented. Any cycle
of
failure-free comparisons decrements that non-zero counter. If the failure
counter
exceeds a predetermined maximum limit, then the CSRD CPU software 64 (Figure
5B) declares a critical failure error. If the CSRD software 64 detects any
failure for
longer than a predetermined maximum amount of time (e.g., without limitation,
20
seconds which equals 2000 software cycles at 10 ms per software cycle), then
it
declares a critical failure error. A critical failure error is only reset by
cycling power
on the CSRD 8. The failure counter increment (e.g., > + 1), decrement (e.g., <-
1),
predetermined maximum limit and predetermined maximum amount of time are
preferably configurable values.
The CPU vital output data detection logic 174,176 compares the signal
characteristic determined from the FPGA hardware with programmable criteria
for
declaring vital output data, such as aspect, steady carrier declarations and
demodulated digital data. The output data selectively can include modulation
and
steady declarations for each of the four independent filter channels,
relational
modulation declarations of filter channel #1 with filter channel #2, and
filter channel
#3 with filter channel #4, and decoded digital data from any combination of up
to all
four channels.
The inter-composite communication logic 148 provides inter-channel
communication of data between the two isolated composite items 10,12.
The CPU compare logic 178,180 compares the output data 182,184
detected by the local composite data detection logic 174,176 with the output
data
184,182 detected by the other composite item data detection logic 176,174.
This
compare logic 178,180 then outputs 186,188 the more restrictive output 190,192
of
the two for each element of output data 182,184, and also outputs 194,196 a
mismatch
flag 198,200 to indicate when the local output data 182 does not match the
other
composite item output data 184.
As a non-limiting example, all cab aspects within the CSRD 8 are
equated to a number identifier in which the lower the number, the more
restrictive the

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 28 -
aspect. The aspect identifier 0 is reserved for the most restrictive state of
no cab
signal detected. If the local composite item data detection logic determines
an output
aspect value of 3, and the other composite item detects an output aspect value
of 2,
then the CPU compare logic 178,180 will output the more restrictive output
value of 2
and will set the corresponding mismatch flag 198,200 to indicate that the two
CPUs
14,16 do not agree. In doing so, both composite items 10,12 will provide the
same
output value, which is the more restrictive value of 2.
The CPU mismatch logic 202,204 monitors the mismatch flag 198,200.
This mismatch logic 202,204 utilizes a failure counter (not shown), which is
incremented when there is a mismatch, decremented when it is not equal to zero
and
there is no mismatch, and monitored for the total time that the counter is not
zero.
When either or both of the two maximum thresholds (predetermined maximum limit
and predetermined maximum amount of time) are exceeded in the counter and the
time measurement, then the mismatch logic 202,204 clears the vital output data
206,208, thereby providing a safe "no result" from the CSRD 8.
The SPI slave memory share logic 116 makes the vital output data
206,208 available to the external client (e.g., external SPI master 18 (Figure
4)). The
data is available as an SPI accessed memory slave, and is also available from
both
composite items 10,12 of the CSRD 8. This ensures safety because both vital
output
data 206,208 must be vitally compared by the external client.
Referring to Figures 10 and 11, a timing diagram 210 for the CSRD
CPU 14,16 and the SPI master 18 (Figure 4) memory access and the SPI slave
memory share logic 116 are shown. The SPI slave memory share logic 116
facilitates
communications and data transfer between the SPI master 18 (e.g., ATP 18;
other
external cab equipment; other external client) and the CSRD CPU 14,16. The SPI
slave memory share logic 116 functions such that the CSRD 8 appears to the
external
SPI master 18 as being an SPI Slave. The external SPI master 18 treats the
CSRD 8
as a memory mapped peripheral with the ability to read/write a specified
memory
space in DPRAM 128 for application specific information (e.g.; configuration
data;
demodulated data; the vital output data 206,208 of Figure 9). The SPI slave
memory
share logic 116 serializes/de-serializes SPI data, and controls the DPRAM 128,
such
that the CSRD CPU 14,16 accesses the DPRAM 128 for both communication and

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 29 -
data transfer with the external SPI master 18. The SPI slave memory share
logic 116
provides the DPRAM 128 with SPI control on one side, and parallel bus control
on
the other side. To prevent read/write hazards of a shared resource, a
semaphore
system is implemented with the setup bytes 268, as will be discussed.
Two potential access hazards exist with shared access to the DPRAM
128 and each of these is handled by the CSRD 8 with the same handling
mechanism.
The first access hazard is a CSRD access attempt while the external SIP master
access
is in progress, and the second access hazard is the external SIP master 18
(Figure 4)
attempts access while the CSRD access in progress. For this purpose, read
operations
from DPRAM 128 and write operations to DPRAM 128 are not treated separately;
both of these are considered as being an "access" to DPRAM 128. Since the CSRD
CPU 14,16 can access the local DPRAM 128 much faster than the external SPI
master
18, and has a much faster application cycle time, a simple status bit is used
from the
SPI slave memory share logic 116 to the CPU software 64 indicating that an
external
access is already in progress. This status bit is the SPI slave select line
(spis_cs_n)
212 from the external SPI master 18. The CSRD CPU 14,16 does not access the
shared DPRAM 128 if the external SPI master 18 is already in progress with an
access.
Figure 10 shows an example of the semaphore handling of the shared
DPRAM 128 (Figure 11) between the CSRD 8 (Figure 4) and the external SPI
master
18 (Figure 4). The first access hazard of the CSRD access attempt while the
external
SIP master access is in progress is avoided by the CSRD CPU software 64
(Figure
5B) disallowing access while the external SPI slave select line signal 212 is
active.
Since the external SPI master 18 preamble time 214 is greater than the CSRD
CPU
access time 216, it is allowable for the external SPI master 18 to access the
shared
DPRAM 128 while the CSRD CPU 14,16 access is already in progress because the
CSRD CPU 14,16 access will finish before the external SPI master preamble 218
is
fully decoded. In other words, the CSRD CPU 14,16 will finish with its access
before
the external SPI master preamble 218 is decoded. This will avoid the second
access
hazard of the external SIP master 18 attempting access while the CSRD access
in
progress.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 30 -
Figure 11 shows the SPI slave memory share logic 116, which includes
the SPI serializer/de-serializer 220, the operation decoder 222 and the DPRAM
128.
The signal clk_sys 224, which is input by the circuits 220,222,128, is
the system PLL/DCM clock from the clock management and reset control logic 140
(Figure 5B).
At the SPI serializer/de-serializer 220, the signal spis_clk 226 is the
SPI clock from the SPI master 18. This is the SPI slave local clock and is
synchronized to the clock clk_sys 224 domain by the circuit 220. The signal
spis_mosi 228 is the SPI master out/slave in serial data signal line. The
signal
spis_cs_n 212 is the SPI active low slave select signal from the SPI master
18. The
signal spis_miso 230 is the SPI master in/slave out serial data line.
At the DPRAM 128, the bus cpu_address 232 includes the CPU
address bus signals for a DPRAM CPU-side access, and the bus cpu_data_out 234
includes the CPU data bus signals for a DPRAM CPU-side data write. The signal
cpu_write_n 236 is the CPU write enable signal for the DPRAM CPU-side. The bus
cpu_data_in 238 includes the data bus signals from the DPRAM 128 to the CPU
14,16 for a CPU-side data read.
The following signals are from the SPI serializer/de-serializer 220 to
the operation decoder 222. The signal data_strobe_syncd 240 is a data strobe
indicating a byte of data synchronized with the system clock clk_sys 224 is
ready.
The bus data_to_dpram 242 includes a data byte (8 bits) synchronized with the
system
clock clk_sys 224. The signal spi_cs_n 244 is the slave select signal (from
the input
signal spis_cs_n 212) indicating that an external SPI master access is in
progress. The
following signals are from the operation decoder 222 to the SPI serializer/de-
serializer
220. The signal data_strobe_out 246 is a data strobe indicating a byte of data
from
the DPRAM 128 is ready to be shifted out serially, and the signal
data_from_dpram_a
248 is DPRAM data to be serialized and shifted out on the spis_miso signal
230.
The following signals are from the operation decoder 222 to the
DPRAM 128. The bus dpram_addr_a 250 includes the current address for data
to/from the DPRAM SPI-side, and the bus data_to_dpram_a 252 includes the data
to
the DPRAM SPI-side. The signal dpram_wren_a 254 is the write enable for the
SPI-
side access to the DPRAM 128 for an external SPI master write operation.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 31 -
One bus is from the DPRAM 128 to the operation decoder 222. This
bus data_from_dpram_a 256 includes the data signals from the DPRAM SIP-side.
The SPI serializer/de-serializer 220 serially shifts data in and out
responsive to the clock signal spis_clk 226 when the slave select signal
spis_cs_n 212
is active. This circuit 220 enables the CSRD 8 to be treated by the SIP master
18 as
an SPI slave, since it serializes/de-serializes data based on the SPI serial
clock signal
spis_clk 226 and chip select signal spis_cs_n 212, which follows the SPI slave
standard. The SPI serializer/de-serializer 220 synchronizes, or hardens, the
clock
signal spis_clk 226 to the system clock clk_sys 224 domain. After each byte (8
bits)
is clocked in from the SPI master 18, the SPI serializer/de-serializer 220
provides the
byte-wide data on bus data_to_dpram 242 and a single clock data strobe on
signal
data_strobe_syncd 240 to the operation decoder 222. Conversely, when the SPI
serializer/de-serializer 220 receives the signal data_strobe_out 246 from the
operation
decoder 222 and the associated byte-wide data on bus data_from_dpram_a 248 as
read from the DPRAM 128, this circuit 220 serializes the data and shifts it
out on the
signal spis_miso 230.
The operation decoder 222 provides the interface between the SPI
serializer/de-serializer 220 and the DPRAM 128 (SPI-side). The operation
decoder
222 decodes data from the SPI serializer/de-serializer 220, interprets the
number of
command bytes 260 of the SPI serial message 262 (Figure 10) as being a read
operation or a write operation, and decodes the address bytes 264 to set the
starting
address for the read operation from or the write operation to DPRAM 128. All
such
operations start on the falling edge (select) of the signal spis_cs_n 212, and
end on the
rising edge (de-select) of such signal 212. This allows the external SPI
master 18 to
clock as much data as desired into or out of the DPRAM 128. The SPI slave
determines the byte count. For example, if the SPI master requests to read (or
write) 5
bytes from (or to) the CSRD 8, then the SPI master will send out 5*8 = 40 SPI
serial
clock pulses, on spis_clk 226, to the CSRD 8, which is defined by the SPI
communication standard. The CSRD 8 will keep sending (or receiving) data from
(or
to) DPRAM 128 sequentially as long as the SPI serial clock pulse exists.
The DPRAM 128 is a dual-ported shared memory between the external
SPI master 18 and the CSRD CPU 14,16. The example DPRAM 128 is a byte-

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 32 -
aligned, synchronous DPRAM with two read ports and two write ports (SIP-side
and
CPU-side). The DPRAM 128 uses a single clock, the system clock signal clk_sys
224
for both of these sides.
The CPU software 64 (Figure 5B) writes to and reads from the
DPRAM 128 as a general memory access (e.g., analogous to *(address) =
data_write;
data_read = *(address)). The CSRD 8 is a passive device to the external SPI
master
18. All communication between the CSRD 8 and the external SPI master 18 is
initiated by the external SPI master 18.
A suitable SPI message format of the SPI serial message 262 (Figure
10) is employed for SPI data transfers. The read/write operation (command byte
260), address information (address bytes 264) are embedded in the message 262.
Before the SPI master 18 reads from or writes to the CSRD 8, the SPI master 18
sends
out the complete message 262, the SPI slave memory share logic 116 receives
and
decodes the first two portions (command and address bytes 260,264) of the
message
262. From this, it knows the nature (read or write; address) of the memory
request
from the SPI master 18. If the SPI master 18 requests a read operation from
the
CSRD 8 (DPRAM 128), then the SPI slave memory share logic 116 reads data from
the DPRAM 128, and sends serialized data, which is synchronized with the SPI
clock
signal spis_clk 226. If the external SPI master 18 requests a write operation
to the
CSRD 8 (DPRAM 128), then the SPI slave memory share logic 116 receives the
serial data from the external SPI master 18, de-serializes the data, and saves
the data
to the DPRAM 128.
Following voting (Figure 9), the SPI slave memory share logic 116
provides the aspect information to the SPI master (e.g., ATP 18) in a serial
message
format (Figure 10), which as part of the data bytes 266 includes aspect, CRC
and
sequence number. The implementation of the SPI slave memory share logic 116 is
independent of the precise message format and treats messages, such as 262, as
binary
data in the DPRAM 128.
As a non-limiting example, aspect data can be reported through four
messages, one for each demodulation channel. Each message includes the message
protocol in addition to aspect data for all possible configurations such that
the external
system may monitor aspect information as needed. An example of the message
data

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 33 -
for a single demodulation channel would be sequence number (which is
incremented
each subsequent cycle), vital aspect ID detected of the channel, non-vital
signal
detection diagnostic data for the demodulation channel, and a 32-bit cyclic
redundancy code calculated on all the data previously described in this
example.
The CPU software 64 (Figure 5B) uses general memory read and
memory write operations to access the DPRAM 128. The CPU 14,16 reads an
incoming message 262 (from the SPI master 18) from the DPRAM 128 and stores
the
outgoing message (not shown) (to the SPI master 18) in the DPRAM 128. The SPI
slave memory share logic 116 reads the data of the outgoing message from the
DPRAM 128, serializes the data, and transfers the serial data following the
SPI
standard.
Two dummy setup bytes 268 are used for DPRAM arbitration as was
discussed, above. These dummy setup bytes 268 are used to guarantee that the
SPI
preamble time 214 is greater than the CSRD CPU access time 216.
Referring to Figure 12, the inter-composite item memory share logic
32 provides data synchronization across the inter-composite items 10,12
(Figure 4)
and a memory share function between those items 10,12. The local memory share
logic 32 (e.g., of composite item 10) is able to be read from and written to
by the local
CPU (e.g., CPU 14). The data in the local memory share logic 32 is
synchronized
with the other memory share logic 32 in the other composite item (e.g.,
composite
item 12) via inter-composite item communications
The inter-composite item memory share logic 32 includes a write
controller (phw_write_ctrl 270), a CPU read-only DPRAM 130, a read controller
(phw_read_ctrl 272) and a CPU write-only DPRAM 132. All of these four circuits
270,130,272,132 receive from the clock management and reset control logic 140
(Figure 5B) the signal reset _n 274, which is the asynchronous master reset
signal, and
the system clock signal clk_sys 224, which is the system PLL/DCM clock.
On the other composite item side (e.g., the side to composite item 12),
the write controller 270 outputs the signal phw_req_out 276, which is a data
synchronization request output, and inputs the signal phw_ds_in 278, which is
the
input data strobe indicating new input data. On the local CPU side, the write
controller 270 inputs the signal cpu_req_flag 280, which when active indicates
that

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 34 -
the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14) requests data synchronization, inputs the signal
cpu_rd_flag 282, which indicates that the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14) is
performing a
read operation from the DPRAM 130, and outputs the signal phw_wr_flag 284,
which
indicates that the other composite item (e.g., composite item 12) is
performing a write
operation to the DPRAM 130.
The read controller 272, at the other composite item side (e.g., the side
from composite item 12), inputs the signal phw_req_in 286, which is a data
synchronization request input, and outputs the signal phw_ds_out 288, which is
the
output data strobe indicating new output data. At the local CPU side, the read
controller 272 inputs the signal cpu_wr_flag 290, which indicates that the
local CPU
(e.g., CPU 14) is performing a write operation to the DPRAM 132, and outputs
the
signal phw_rd_flag 292, which indicates that the other composite item (e.g.,
composite item 12) is performing a read operation from the DPRAM 132.
On the other composite item side (e.g., the side from composite item
12), the DPRAM 130 receives the bus phw_din 294, which includes the input data
signals from the other composite item, the bus phw_addr_w 296, which includes
the
input address signals to access the DPRAM 130, and the signal phw_wea_w 298,
which is the write enable signal to access the DPRAM 130. The DPRAM 130, on
the
local CPU side, outputs the bus inter_cpu_data_in 300, which includes the
output data
signals to the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14), inputs the signal inter_cpu_write
302, which
is the write enable signal from the local CPU, and inputs the bus
inter_cpu_address
304, which includes the input address signals from the local CPU.
The DPRAM 132, on the other composite item side (e.g., the side to
composite item 12), outputs the bus phw_dout 306, which includes the output
data
signals to the composite item side, and inputs the bus phw_addr_r 308, which
includes the input address signals to access the DPRAM 132, and the signal
phw_wea_r 310, which is the read enable signal to access the DPRAM 132. On the
local CPU side, the DPRAM 132 inputs the bus inter_cpu_data_out 312, which
includes the input data signals from the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14) to the DPRAM
132,
the bus inter_cpu_address 304, which includes the address signals from the
local CPU
to access the DPRAM 132, and the signal inter_cpu_write 302, which is the
local
CPU write enable signal to access the DPRAM 132. The signal inter_cpu_write
302

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 35 -
(not shown) is a CPU bus signal indicating a CPU write operation, which signal
is
connected to a 'we' (not shown) port (not numbered) on the DPRAM 130. When the
CPU 14,16 performs a read operation, the signal inter_cpu_write 302 equals
logic '0'
and the DPRAM 130 acts as being read on the CPU side.
Referring to Figure 13, the write controller 270 (Figure 12), as will be
described, upon receiving the data synchronization request signal
cpu_rect_flag 280
from the local CPU, at 320, sends the request signal phw_req_out 276 to the
other
composite item side, at 324, which then writes the other composite item data
into the
DPRAM 130 and then releases the request signal phw_req_out 276, at 330, after
all of
the other composite item data are synchronized. First, at 320, after detecting
the
signal cpu_req_flag 280 being active, the local write controller 270 checks
both the
signal cpu_rd_flag 282 and the signal phw_wr_flag 284 to confirm that the
DPRAM
130 is not in use. If so, then, at 324, the write controller 270 sets the
signal
phw_wr_flag 284 to signal the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14) that the other
composite item
write is in progress. This action guarantees that the local CPU is blocked
from
reading the DPRAM 130 while the other composite item (e.g., composite item 12)
is
writing. From now on, the write controller 270 is ready for receiving data
from the
opposing composite item at any time. Step 324 also sets the request signal
phw_req_out 276. Upon receiving each data strobe signal phw_ds_in 306, at 326,
the
input data is written into the DPRAM 130, in sequence, until the last
specified
memory address of the DPRAM 130 is accessed, at 328. After all data are
received,
the signals phw_wr_flag 284 and phw_req_out 276 are cleared, at 330.
Referring to Figure 14, the read controller (phw_read_ctrl 272), as will
be discussed, upon receiving an active signal phw_req_in 286, at 332, from the
opposing composite item (e.g., composite item 12) to request data
synchronization,
the read controller 272 checks the signal cpu_wr_flag 290, at 334, to check
whether
the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14) is actively writing the DPRAM 132. If the signal
cpu_wr_flag 290 is not active, at 334, which indicates the local CPU is not
actively
writing data into the DPRAM 132, then the read controller 272 starts the read
operation. Otherwise, the read controller 272 waits, at 334, until the local
CPU
finishes writing data to the DPRAM 132.-+

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 36 -
Before reading data, at 336, from the DPRAM 132, the read controller
272 sets the signal phw_rd_flag 292 (Figure 12) to block the local CPU (e.g.,
CPU
14) from writing to the DPRAM 132. Then, at 338, the read controller 272
begins
reading and sending data from the DPRAM 132 to the other composite item (e.g.,
composite item 12) sequentially, starting at the base address of the DPRAM
132. The
data strobe signal phw_ds_out 288 is generated, at 338, for each valid data.
After all
data in the DPRAM 132 are sent to the other opposing item, as determined at
340, the
read controller 272 clears the signal phw_rd_flag 292, at 342, to the local
CPU, which
permits it to again access the DPRAM 132.
The DPRAMs 130 and 132 are included in the FPGA 4,6. Each
DPRAM 130,132 has two ports, and each of these ports supports reading and
writing
operations. The two ports function at the same system clock frequency of the
clock
signal clk_sys 224 (Figure 12). The DPRAM 130 is assigned to be read by the
local
CPU (e.g., CPU 14) and written by the write controller 270 (for the other
composite
item (e.g., composite item 12)). The DPRAM 132 is assigned to be written by
the
local CPU and read by the read controller 272 (for the other composite item).
In order
to protect data integrity, only one operation (either read or write) can be
performed on
each of the DPRAMs 130 and 132. For the DPRAM 130, the local CPU read
operation and the write controller write operation are mutually exclusive. For
the
DPRAM 132, the local CPU write operation and read controller read operation
are
mutually exclusive.
The write controller (phw_write_ctrl 270) (Figure 12) generates the
request signal phw_req_out 224 to initiate memory synchronization for the
DPRAM
130, and controls memory write operations performed by the inter-composite
item
memory share logic 32 (Figure 12) to the DPRAM 130. The write controller 270
receives the request signal cpu_req_flag 280 from the local CPU and generates
the
pulse signal phw_req_out 276 to the other composite item. At the same time,
the
write controller 270 sets a semaphore to prevent the local CPU from reading
the local
CPU read-only DPRAM 130 during the memory synchronization. Afterwards, the
write controller 270 waits for the data strobe signal phw ds_in 278 and the
data
signals of the bus phw_din 294 from the other composite item. The data are
stored
into the CPU read-only DPRAM 130 in sequence.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 37 -
For example, in order to compensate for propagation delays on the
inter-composite communication channels 42 (Figure 4), the data from the other
composite item is active for about five times the period T_clk_sys 225 of the
clock
signal clk_sys 224 (Figure 15). The maximum difference between the
communication
channels is less than about two clock cycles; hence, after two clock cycles of
the
rising edge of each data strobe signal phw_ds_in 278, the data signals of the
bus
phw_din 294 are guaranteed to be valid. Therefore, such data signals are
latched two
clock cycles after the rising-edge of each such data strobe.
The reset operation is to initialize the value of signals during and right
after reset
signal is active.
In the write controller 270, when the signal reset_n 274 is active low,
the signals phw_req_out 276, phw_wea_w 298 and phw_wr_flag 284 are set
inactive
asynchronously, and the signals of the bus phw_addr_w 296 are set to zero
asynchronously. The outputs of the write controller 270 are kept at the reset
states if
the signal cpu_rd_flag 282 is set, at 322, and the write controller 270 waits
for another
cpu_req_flag 280, at 320.
Referring to Figure 15, the write controller 270 receives the request
signal cpu_req_flag 280 from the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14). If the signal
cpu_rd_flag
282 is active, then the write controller 270 waits until the signal
cpu_rd_flag 282 is
inactive. Otherwise, the write controller 270 generates the pulse signal
phw_req_out
276 to the other composite item (e.g., composite item 12). At the same time,
the
signal phw_wr_flag 284 is set active. If the signal cpu_req_flag 280 is
detected as
being active, then the write controller 270 begins to check the status of the
signal
cpu_rd_flag 282.
If the signal cpu_req_flag 280 is detected as being active, at 320, and
the signal cpu_rd_flag 282 is inactive, at 322, then the write controller 270
sets the
pulse signal phw_req_out 276 active for at least about the width of one clock
cycle
(i.e., period 225) of the clock signal clk_sys 224. Otherwise, the signal
phw_req_out
276 is set inactive.
The write operation starts when the first rising edge of the data strobe
signal phw_ds_in 278 arrives. After two clock cycles from the rising edge of
each
data strobe signal phw_ds_in 278, the signal phw_wea_w 298 is active high for
one

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 38 -
clock cycle to write valid data into the DPRAM 130. Then, after one more clock
cycle, the signals of the bus phw_addr_w 296 are increased to the next address
for the
next memory write. After the last byte of data is written into the DPRAM 130,
the
write controller 270 clears the signal phw_wr_flag 284 (Figure 12) to the
local CPU.
The write controller 270 generates sequential memory address signals
of the bus phw_addr_w 296 and memory write signals phw_wea_w 298 to write data
signals of the data bus phw_din 294 from the other composite item into the
dual port
memory DPRAM 130 in sequence. Data is stored to this memory two clock cycles
after the rising edge of each data strobe signal phw_ds_in 278 is detected.
Referring again to Figure 12, the read controller (phw_read_ctr1) 272
provides read control for the DPRAM 132. Upon receiving an active request
signal
phw_req_in 286 from the other composite item (e.g., composite item 12), the
read
controller 272 checks if the local CPU (e.g., CPU 14) is accessing the CPU-
write-only
dual port memory DPRAM 132. If so, then the read controller 272 waits until
this
memory access terminates. Otherwise, the read controller 272 sets up a
semaphore to
block the local CPU from writing to the DPRAM 132, outputs the address signals
of
the bus phw_addr_r 308, and outputs the memory read signal phw_wea_r 310 to
enable valid data output from the DPRAM 132. During the period of each valid
data,
the data strobe signal phw_ds_out 288 is asserted. All data in the CPU-write-
only
memory DPRAM 132 are read and output to the other composite item during one
complete read operation.
In order to compensate for the various propagation delays on the inter-
composite communication channels 42 (Figure 4), the width of the data strobe
signal
phw_ds_out 288 is set to about three clock cycles, which is about two times as
wide
as the maximum difference of the delay. In this manner, valid data signals of
the bus
phw_dout 306 are guaranteed to appear at two clock cycles after the rising
edge of
each such data strobe even after they are transmitted to the other composite
item.
In the read controller 272, a reset operation initializes the value of
various signals during and right after the reset signal reset_n 274 is active.
This
includes the signal phw_ds_out 288 and phw_rd_flag 292 being set inactive
asynchronously, and the address signals of the bus phw_addr_r 308 being set to
zero
asynchronously.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 39 -
A read operation by the read controller 272 from the DPRAM 132
starts when the signal cpu_wr_flag 290 is inactive (logic zero) and after the
active
edge of the signal phw_req_in 276 is detected. Then, the read controller 272
sets the
signal phw_rd_flag 292. Next, the memory address signals of the bus phw_addr_r
308 and the memory read signal phw_wea_r 310 are generated to sequentially
read
data from the dual port memory DPRAM 132. The data strobe signal phw_ds_out
288 is active high indicating valid output data from the DPRAM 132. After the
last
byte of data in the dual memory DPRAM 132 is read, the read controller 272
clears
the signal phw_rd_flag 292.
Referring to Figure 16, if the rising edge of the signal phw_req_in 286
is detected, then the read controller 272 begins to check the status of the
signal
cpu_wr_flag 290. The output of the read controller 272 is kept at the reset
states until
the signal cpu_wr_flag 290 is cleared. If the rising edge of the signal
phw_req_in 286
is detected and the signal cpu_wr_flag 290 is inactive (logic zero), then the
read
controller 272 sets the signal phw_rd_flag 292 (Figure 12) active. Otherwise,
that
signal is set inactive.
After the signal phw_rd_flag 292 (Figure 12) is set active, the read
controller 272 generates sequential memory address signals of the bus
phw_addr_r
308 to read all data signals of the data bus phw_dout 306 from the dual port
memory
DPRAM 132 in sequence. The memory read signal phw_wea_r 310 is always kept
low (i.e., read) to enable the DPRAM 132 to be read-only on the phw (read
controller
272) side. During the period of each valid data, the data strobe signal
phw_ds_out
288 is asserted for three clock cycles and de-asserted for two clock cycles.
After the
last byte in the dual port memory DPRAM 132 is read by the read controller
272, it
clears the signal phw_rd_flag 292.
The CPU software 64 (Figure 5B) writes to the DPRAM 132 as a
general memory access (e.g., analogous to *(address) = data_write), and reads
from
the DPRAM 132 as a general memory access (e.g., analogous to data_read =
*(address)).
For example and without limitation, in the example embodiment, for
every five cycles of the system clock clk sys 224, the inter-composite logic
32
(Figure 12) transfers one byte of data. The example five clock cycles
compensate for

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 40 -
the propagation delays introduced, for example, by the isolation circuit 400
(Figure
17). For example, based upon an example 85 MHz system clock frequency, the
data
speed is 85 MHz per clock cycle / 5 clock cycles per byte * 8 bits per byte =
136
Mb/S.
Referring to Figure 17, the isolation circuit 400 of the CSRD 8
preferably provides about 2500 VRms isolation between the two composite items
10,12. As a non-limiting example, a quad channel digital isolator 402, such as
ADUM1400CRW marketed by Analog Devices, Inc. of Norwood, Massachusetts,
provides four independent isolation channels on each device. Six of these quad
channel digital isolators 402,404,406,408,410,412 are employed as follows: (1)
four
output control signals CHl_CTLOUT[3..0] are isolated by isolator 402 before
being
input by the other composite item 12 as input control CH2_CTLIN[3..0]; (2-3)
isolators 404,406 isolate output data signals CH l_DOUT[7..0] for input by the
other
composite item 12 as input data signals CH2_DIN[7..0]; (4) isolator 412
isolates
output control signals CH2_CTLOUT[3..0] from composite item 12 for input by
the
composite item 10 as input control signals CH1_CTLIN[3..0]; and (5-6)
isolators
408,410 isolate output data signals CH2_DOUT[7..0] from composite item 12 for
input by the composite item 10 as input data signals CH1_DIN[7..0].
Here, CHl_CTLIN[0] is the signal phw_ds_in 278 of composite item
10 and CH1 CTL1N[1] is the signal phw_req_in 286 of composite item 10,
CHI CTLOUT[0] is the signal phw_ds_out 288 of composite item 10, and
CH1 CTLOUT[1] is the signal phw_req_out 276 of composite item 10.
CH1 CTLIN[3..2] and CHI CTLOUT[3..2] are reserved (unused) signals.
CH1 CTLDIN[7..0] are the data signals of the bus phw_din 294 of composite item
10, and CH l_CTLDOUT[7..0] are the data signals of the bus phw_dout 306 of
composite item 10.
Similarly, CH2_CTLIN[0] is the signal phw_ds_in 278 of composite
item 12 and CH2 CTLIN[1] is the signal phw_req_in 286 of composite item 12,
CH2 CTLOUT[0] is the signal phw_ds_out 288 of composite item 12, and
CH2 CTLOUT[1] is the signal phw_req_out 276 of composite item 12.
CH2 CTLIN[3..2] and CH2 CTLOUT[3..21 are reserved (unused) signals.
CH2 CTLDIN[7..0] are the data signals of the bus phw_din 294 of composite item

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
-41 -
12, and CH2 CTLDOUT[7..0] are the data signals of the bus phw_dout 306 of
composite item 12.
The disclosed CSRD 8 and its FPGA programmable hardware
technology allow for modular application with a relatively very high number of
configurable I/0 (e.g., a DSP cab signal board; a low-cost vital I/O board; an
Automatic Train Operation (ATO) board). Diverse FPGAs 4,6 and diverse soft
processor cores 14,16 make the CSRD 8 highly scalable and provide lowered
obsolescence risk making the CSRD 8 a good choice for a systems engineer
looking
for a vital platform CPU. The vital two-out-of-two architecture (Figure 9)
provides
maximum Safety Integrity Level (SIL-4) in quantitative failure analysis for
safety
critical design. The FPGAs 4,6 provide migration paths upward and downward for
a
low-cost version, or a fully featured version.
The CSRD 8 provides maximum flexibility by preferably being readily
configured for all known carrier frequencies. Preferably, new cab signal
frequencies
are added to the available carrier frequencies without changes to hardware or
application software. For example, a table of configuration data can be stored
in
nonvolatile memory on the CSRD 8 to provide this configurability, and
configuration
data can be changed as needed using a suitable user interface. In this manner,
although changed configuration data must be validated, neither the hardware
nor the
application software 64 (Figure 5B) need to be changed or re-verified for
these
changes. Similarly, the definitions of project aspects can also be stored as
configuration data.
The CSRD 8 provides a high-performance safety architecture
(platform) using composite fail-safety, FPGA technology, and soft-processors
14,16
for maximum flexibility and scalability. This fulfills the highest safety
requirements
since the diverse FPGA/soft processor architecture satisfies SIL-4 CENELEC
requirements. This also saves PCB space and cost since the combination of a
sampled
digital signal processing (DSP) system and FPGAs 4,6 provides a very high
level of
flexibility and scalability, while drastically reducing board-space when
compared to a
discrete component solution. In comparison to a conventional cab signal
architecture,
the CSRD 8 replaces up to about ten PCBs in non-vital signaling, and five PCBs
in
vital signaling.

CA 02625157 2008-03-11
283359-00458
- 42 -
The CSRD 8 maximizes flexibility, configurability and scalability by
being configurable to receive and demodulate AF-90X FSK track signals,
modulated
carrier (MC) cab signals, steady carrier track signals and impulse response
system
track signals. A DSP architecture employs dynamic "soft" configuration of, for
example, filter corner frequencies, filter topology, filter type and response.
This also
reduces obsolescence risk, since the DSP architecture lowers obsolescence and
degradation issues associated with dozens of tuned analog filter circuits.
Implementation of a soft-core processor 14,16 as opposed to a hard device also
reduces risk associated with microprocessor die changes and associated logic
obsolescence. The soft processor timing to off-chip peripherals is completely
configurable and scalable, since FPGAs 4,6 lend themselves to in-system
configurability.
The CSRD 8 provides a product-based configuration for dynamic
project-implementation that forms a configurable and versatile solution. The
CSRD 8
allows for complete project specific configuration for implementation. By
generating
new digital filter coefficients, new decoding parameters and aspect
definitions using a
simple user interface, the CSRD 8 can be adapted to target a completely new
set of
cab signaling requirements. For example, through various configurations, the
CSRD
8 supports multi-territory cab signals. The CSRD 8 can store several
selectable
configurations such that as a railroad vehicle is moved from one territory to
another,
the CSRD 8 can change to the selected cab signal type. For example, the CSRD 8
can
be configured to receive FSK signals from an AF-90x territory. Then, if the
vehicle
moves into 100 Hz / 205 Hz territory, the CSRD 8 can dynamically change from
decoding FSK to decoding modulated aspects. In this example, the single CSRD 8
replaces an FSK receiver PCB, an FSK controller PCB, a 100 Hz filter PCB, a
250 Hz
filter PCB and a decoder PCB.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in
detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various
modifications and
alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall
teachings of the
disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be
illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is
to be given
the full breadth of the claims appended and any and all equivalents thereof

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC assigned 2020-05-19
Inactive: IPC expired 2020-01-01
Inactive: IPC removed 2019-12-31
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2017-05-16
Inactive: Cover page published 2017-05-15
Inactive: Final fee received 2017-03-22
Pre-grant 2017-03-22
Inactive: Office letter 2017-02-09
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2017-01-31
Letter Sent 2017-01-31
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2017-01-31
Inactive: Q2 passed 2017-01-27
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2017-01-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2016-06-07
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-12-07
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-11-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2015-05-28
Change of Address or Method of Correspondence Request Received 2015-01-15
Inactive: S.29 Rules - Examiner requisition 2014-12-09
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2014-12-09
Inactive: Report - No QC 2014-11-27
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2013-04-08
Letter Sent 2013-03-18
Request for Examination Received 2013-03-11
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2013-03-11
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2013-03-11
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2009-09-11
Inactive: Cover page published 2009-09-10
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-08-13
Letter Sent 2009-07-28
Letter Sent 2009-07-28
Inactive: Single transfer 2009-06-09
Inactive: Declaration of entitlement - Formalities 2008-05-20
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-04-25
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2008-04-25
Application Received - Regular National 2008-04-24

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2017-02-22

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
ANSALDO STS USA, INC.
Past Owners on Record
JAMES C. WERNER
JOHN E. LEMONOVICH
SEAN P. BERECEK
WILLIAM A. SHARP
ZHU DING
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2008-03-11 42 2,143
Abstract 2008-03-11 1 23
Claims 2008-03-11 8 340
Drawings 2008-03-11 17 347
Representative drawing 2009-08-15 1 13
Cover Page 2009-09-08 1 49
Description 2015-05-28 44 2,239
Claims 2015-05-28 8 345
Description 2016-06-07 44 2,236
Claims 2016-06-07 8 339
Representative drawing 2017-04-12 1 13
Cover Page 2017-04-12 1 49
Maintenance fee payment 2024-03-01 49 2,036
Filing Certificate (English) 2008-04-25 1 168
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2009-07-28 1 102
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2009-11-16 1 112
Reminder - Request for Examination 2012-11-14 1 116
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2013-03-18 1 177
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2017-01-31 1 162
Correspondence 2008-04-28 1 17
Correspondence 2008-05-20 2 63
Change to the Method of Correspondence 2015-01-15 2 64
Examiner Requisition 2015-12-07 4 254
Amendment / response to report 2016-06-07 13 559
Correspondence 2017-02-09 1 25
Final fee 2017-03-22 2 63