Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 1 PCT/N02006/000493
IOD AND A SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING MAINTENANCE ON A MEMBRANE USED FO
PRESSURE RETARDED OSMOSIS
The present invention relates to a method and a system for performing
maintenance
on a membrane having semi-permeable properties for use based on pressure
retarded
osmosis PRO, the membrane having a high pressure first side and second side of
lower pressure, as indicated in the preamble of attached claims 1 and 13.
Such a membrane, as well as a method and a device for providing electric power
through the use of pressure retarded osmosis is disclosed in Norwegian Patent
314575. The disclosed membrane has a thin layer of a non-porous material, the
so-
called diffusion skin, and a porous layer. The reference to said patent
implies
inclusion of its disclosure in this specification.
During the normal PRO operation of that prior art technique, i.e. when such a
device
is to provide power, the first side of the membrane is configured to receive a
high
pressure supply of sea water, and correspondingly the second side of the
membrane is
configured to receive a low pressure supply fresh water.
A pressure retarded osmosis power plant is comparable to a reverse osmosis
desalination plant running backwards. However, a PRO plant will be able to
generate
power from freshwater in stead of consuming power. Filtered fresh water enters
the
membrane from the low pressure side thereof and a high percentage of the fresh
water, e.g. 70 - 90%, is transferred by osmosis across the membrane into the
pressurized sea water on the high pressure side of the membrane, which
preferably
may have the diffusion skin oriented toward the high pressure side. The
osmotic
process increases the volumetric flow of high pressure water and is the key
energy
transfer in such a power plant. This requires a membrane that has a high water
flux
and a high salt retention. Typical membrane performance should be at least 4 W
per
square meter of membrane face area, although higher performance may be
conceivable. Salt water is pumped from the sea or another source of saline
water and
filtered before pressurisation and feeding to the membrane. A potential
consideration
could be in special cases to replace salt by a solute containing different
substance(s).
In a module containing the membrane, the sea water is diluted by freshwater
coming
through the membrane, and volumetric feed of sea water is typically
approximately
twice that of the fresh water.
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 2 PCT/N02006/000493
As disclosed in said Norwegian Patent, the resulting brackish water from the
membrane module is split in two flows, approximately 1/3 of the brackish water
going
to the turbine to generate power and approximately 2/3 returning via a
pressure
exchanger to an outlet, thereby by means of the pressure exchanger
contributing to the
pressurisation of the feed of sea water. Suitably, the sea water pressure is
in the range
of 11-15 bars, equivalent to a water head 100 - 150 meters in a hydropower
plant,
which implies the power generation in the range of 1 MW per cubic meter per
second
of supplied fresh water.
Some pre-treatment of supplied sea water and fresh water must be performed
through
use mechanical filtering. However, although mechanical filtering may be
effective in
most cases, there are nevertheless particles and microbes that are not
filtered away
and which pass into the membrane from the low pressure side. Over time the
performance of the membrane will be reduced and accordingly the performance of
the
power plant, unless some maintenance is performed to clean the membrane.
One way to perform maintenance would be to remove membranes for cleaning and
reinstall thereafter the membranes for further operation, or install
replacement
membranes when the other membranes are cleaned. However, a power plant should
to the extent possible provide power on an continuous basis, with a minimum of
down
time or reduced capacity, and above all with a minimum of maintenance staff to
carry
out removal, cleaning and reinstalling. It will also be appreciated that
physical
removal of a large number of membranes for cleaning would also be very time
consuming and would require numerous of membrane module inlet and outlet shut-
off
valves. However, if a small number of modules at a time is subjected to
maintenance/ cleaning through such physical removal and reinstalling, it could
imply
that 0.25% -1 % of the modules are removed and reinstalled on a daily basis,
yielding that the plant will have a reduced capacity by 0,25 -1 % if
maintenance
takes a full day. More frequent measures, such as cleaning, has to be made in-
situ,
and should not take more than a few seconds or minutes, dependent on the
frequency
of such measures per module. The present invention is typically directed at
providing
for such more frequent measures to be made possible in an efficient, simple
manner.
It will be appreciated at major maintenance or washing / cleaning of a module
should
not need to be made more frequent than, say, every 6 to 24 months.
It has therefore been an object of the present invention to avoid a time
consuming,
technically complicated and expensive maintenance, and in stead provide a very
efficient method and system for performing such maintenance, and which will
require
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 3 PCT/N02006/000493
a minimum of staff, a minimum of time and no membrane removal/ reinstalling.
The
invention has also as an object to provide for remote control of the
maintenance.
In the context of the present invention, the use of a skin on e.g. the high
pressure side
of the membrane is suitably best defined by the general term "a semi-permeable
material".
In view of the fact that most power plants normally provide more power output
than
required at a specific point of time, it will be appreciated that a temporary
power loss
of say 5 - 10% will not be critical, which implies that the plurality of
membranes (or
membrane modules) required in such a plant can be subjected to maintenance,
i.e.
cleaning, by performing cleaning operation on the membranes successively, or
the
membranes as groups.
According to the present invention the method comprises introducing a plug of
a
second type of water on the first side of the membrane to alter concentration
of
dissolved substance(s) in water of a first type thereat, said second type of
water
having a concentration of dissolved substance(s) lower than that of the first
type of
water, and creating a PRO pressure backwash function with the water of the
second
type from the first to the second side of the membrane by applying the high
pressure
of the water of the first type on said first side onto the plug of water of
the second
type.
Further embodiments of the method will appear from the attached sub-claims 2 -
12
as well the detailed disclosure with reference to the attached drawing
figures.
According to the present invention, the system comprises: a time controllable
first
valve or pump connected between an input to the low pressure side of the
membrane
and an input to the high pressure side of the membrane, said first valve or
pump
operable to selectively deliver a plug of a second type of water to the first
side of the
membrane to alter concentration of dissolved substance(s) in water of a first
type
thereat, thereby creating a PRO pressure backwash function with the water of
the
second type from the first to the second side of the membrane pressurized on
said
first side by the high pressure of water of the first type applied onto the
plug of water
of the second type, said second type of water having a concentration of
dissolved
substance(s) lower than that of the first type of water. This implies that the
PRO
pressure backwash function is provided by use of the water of the second type
from
the first to the second side of the membrane pressurized on the first side by
the high
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 4 PCT/N02006/000493
pressure of the first type of water that already exists because of the PRO
process and
can be supplied from either upstream or downstream of the membrane module in
the
hydraulic flow line for the first type of water. In other words, there is used
an already
existing pressure available on the first side of the membrane. Thus, no
hydraulic
pressure is created particularly for the backwashing operation.
Further embodiments of the system will appear from the attached sub-claims 14 -
26
as well the detailed disclosure with reference to the attached drawing
figures.
The present invention is now to be further described with reference the
enclosed
drawing figures which indicate alternative, though not limitative embodiments
of the
present invention.
Fig. 1 a illustrates the prior art PRO power plant structure of Norwegian
Patent
314575.
Fig. lb illustrates another prior art structure in the form of a sub-surface
or sub-sea
PRO power plant.
Fig. 2a illustrates some basic considerations related to membrane backwash in
a
PRO based power plant, and Figs. 2b - 2d are rather schematic illustrations of
water
fluxes and salt concentration profiles for PRO, backwash and
enhanced.backwash,
respectively.
Fig. 3 illustrates a PRO pressure backwash embodiment applied on a surface PRO
power plant installation.
Fig.4 illustrates an osmosis enhanced PRO pressure backwash embodiment.
Fig. 5 illustrates a PRO pressure backwash with pressure-less freshwater
injection.
Figs. 6a and 7 illustrate backwash embodiments utilizing exchanged PRO, the
fig. 6a
embodiment using pump assistance, and the fig. 7 embodiment using valve
operation.
Fig. 6b illustrates a PRO pressure backwash embodiment applied on a sub-
surface
PRO power plant installation as shown on fig. lb and also indicated on fig.
11, and
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 5 PCT/N02006/000493
represents an alternative to the surface PRO power plant installation
embodiment of
fig. 6a.
Figs 8 and 9 illustrate osmosis enhanced PRO pressure backwash embodiments,
the
fig. 8 embodiment having pump assistance, and the fig. 9 embodiment using
valve
operation.
Fig. 10 is a simplified block diagram to illustrate remote control of
operation of
pumps and valves depicted in the respective drawings of figs. 3- 9.
Fig. 11 illustrates a practical embodiment of the continuous subsurface PRO
power
plant schematically shown on fig. lb.
In the description below of the present invention and with reference to the
attached
drawings, the following abbreviations will be used for the various water
flows:
SW = a first type of water, e.g. sea water
FW = a second type of water
FB = bleed of a second type of water, e.g. fresh water bleed
BW = brackish water
PRO = Pressure Retarded Osmosis
DA = Disinfecting agent
SW side = first side
FW side = second side
Fig. 1 a illustrates in general terms the prior art PRO power plant disclosed
in
Norwegian Patent 314575 having a pressurised SW inlet 11 and a FW inlet 12.
Typically the prior art SW pressure is in the vicinity of 12 bar at the inlet
to the
membrane module and the FW pressure is less than 0,5 bar, which implies in
this
example that the BW pressure will be less than 0,5 bar lower than the SW
pressure at
the entry to the membrane module. These pressure figures are however just
typical
examples, and should not in any way be considered to be limitative to the
scope of the
present invention which to be further described. One or more membranes 13' are
present in a membrane module or membrane rig 13. In a practical embodiment of
a
PRO power plant it will be understood that a plurality of such modules or rigs
will be
used. Due to the PRO process, the outlet 14 on the high pressure side of the
module
will deliver BW at a pressure somewhat lower 12 bar, e.g. less than 0.5 bar
lower,
and in the typical example also mentioned in the introduction, approximately
2/3 of
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 6 PCT/N02006/000493
the BW will pass to a BW outlet 15 via a pressure exchanger 16 which provides
for
pressure application to the SW inlet 11. The remaining 1/3 of the BW will pass
through a turbine 17 to BW outlet 18. The FB from the membrane module through
the
low pressure outlet 19 will typically have in the present example a pressure
less than
0.5 bar and somewhat below the FW pressure.
Fig. lb illustrates a variant of the embodiment of figs. la. Fig. lb shows a
sub-
surface or sub-sea PRO power plant, as further shown and described in
connection
with fig. 11. It is noted at the pressure exchanger 16 as shown on fig. 1 a is
no longer
present, as the submerging of the power plant makes installation of a pressure
exchanger 16 unnecessary. In a sub-surface or submerged power plant, FW having
high pressure is directed via the turbine 17', which is located on the FW side
of the
membrane rig 13 upstream thereof and then directly to the FW side of the
membrane
rig 13.
In the following drawing figures, the turbine 17 has for simplicity reason not
been
shown, as it does not form part of the backwash operation. It should however
be
considered present. Although just one membrane module is shown, it will be
appreciated that two or more modules or rigs may be present. A single pressure
exchanger may operate on one module, although preferably there will be several
modules connected to each pressure exchanger. This means that preferably
several
modules will be subjected to PRO pressure backwash simultaneously.
Fig. 2a illustrates the basic concept of the present invention. A plug 21 of
FW has
been injected into the SW flow and for the time that FW moves through the
membrane to the low pressure side of the membrane (i.e. low pressure side of
the
membrane module, the osmotic process will stop. Accordingly, the FW will be
pressed by the high pressure SW, which has a pressure higher than'the pressure
on the
low pressure side of the membrane, through the membrane like backwash in
common
membrane filtration. It will be appreciated that if salt water or SW had been
present
on the normally low pressure side of the membrane as indicated by arrow 22,
reverse
flux could be increased, but the SW would need to diffuse or penetrate into
the
membrane structure first.
All the alternatives that are described below utilize one or two effects to
achieve
backwash:
Injection of FW in a section of, or the complete length of the membrane module
13
and thereby locally removing the osmotic driving force. The pressure in the SW
line is
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 7 PCT/N02006/000493
maintained in the PRO power plant because the PRO process continues in other
modules/ rigs of the power plant. This pressure will force the water flux
through the
membrane in the opposite direction compared to PRO, thereby backwashing the
membrane locally, as indicated on fig. 2a. The opposite flux will drain water
from,
instead of feed water into the SW-side of the membrane. Thus the amount of
brackish
water from the backwashed modules/ rigs will temporarily drop.
If SW is injected to the FW-side of the membrane in the location as FW is
injected to
the SW-side, there will be an osmotic force to drive water from the SW-side to
the
FW-side of the membrane. The resulting (osmotic) flux will come in addition to
the
backwards flux generated by the PRO pressure in the SW pipe, thereby
increasing the
total backwash water flux. The osmotic force will need some time to act
because salt
must diffuse into the membrane. This diffusion needs in the order of one
minute,
about the same time as the flow time through the module during PRO.
The exemplary embodiments to be discussed with reference to the drawings are
in no
manner to be considered exhaustive of the inventive concept, but are merely
included
to explain how the present invention could be put to practise.
In the PRO process a normal pressure of 4- 30 bar could be present in the SW
feed-
in 11 and a pressure less than 1 bar, suitably less than 0.5 bar, in the FW
feed-in 12.
Suitably the higher pressure would be in the more restricted range 8 - 16 bar,
and in
experiments made the pressure has been 0- 20 bar, but typically 12 bar. The
pressures at the BW and FB outlets 14, 19 are suitably less than 0.5 bar below
the
respective SW and FW inlets 11, 12. These pressure levels can be maintained by
modules/ rigs that still are maintained in PRO operation. The local backwash
in the
PRO plant should be achieved with a minimum of valves, pumps and power loss,
and
from the disclosure to follow it will be appreciated that the invention offers
a very
efficient and simple backwash operation.
Whether backwashing is to take place in a whole module or only a section of
its
length at a time will have to be decided upon based on the actual structure of
the
module and/ or the structure and operation of the power plant. Similarly,
operational
conditions and the power plant structure will dictate whether backwashing is
to be
carried out simultaneously in a few modules, just in one module / rig at a
time or in a
large number of modules / rigs simultaneously.
Fig. 2b illustrates PRO, the arrow 23 indicating osmotic water flux and Cs
indicating
concentration of salt in the module 13 relative to the membrane 13', where 13"
indicates diffusion skin and 13"' indicates a porous structure. Whether the
porous
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 8 PCT/N02006/000493
structure is layered or of other configuration, dependent materials of
structure used, is
unimportant in the present context as regards the understanding of the
principles of
the present invention.
Fig. 2c illustrates backwash, reference numeral 24 indicating backwash flux
driven by
hydraulic pressure generated by PRO in the power plant.
Fig. 2d illustrates enhanced backwash, reference numeral 25 indicating
backwash flux
driven by hydraulic pressure generated by PRO in the power plant and
additionally
local osmosis.
More detailed examples are now to be explained with reference to figs. 3 - 9.
Fig. 3 is the simplest version of the invention. Reference numeral 31 denotes
a high-
pressure volumetric pump with built-in no-return valve (e.g. like piston
pumps) that
"injects" a given amount of FW in a given time interval into the SW-side of
the
membrane. Hydraulic pressure is maintained at this side by the SW feed line 11
in
PRO operation. The energy to the pump 31 is recovered in the turbine (minus
efficiency loss).
Thus, in the embodiment of fig. 3, there is introduced by means of the pump 31
a
plug of FW on the first side or FW side of the membrane of module 13' to alter
concentration of dissolved substance(s) ( in effect: salinity) in SW thereat,
and PRO
pressure backwash function is thereby created with FW from the first side (SW
side)
to the second side (FW side) of the membrane by using the high pressure of SW
on
said first side to pressurize said plug of FW. This basic principle is also
valid for the
embodiments of figs. 4- 9.
Fig. 4 illustrates the principle of osmosis enhanced PRO pressure backwash.
The pump 41 has the same function as pump 31 in fig. 3. However, at the same
time
the pump 41 operates, a valve 44 operates to inject SW to the FW side of the
membrane 13' in module 13 and which enhances the backwash function by adding
an
osmotic driving force and flux to the PRO pressure backwash, as illustrated in
fig. 2d.
Fig. 5 illustrates PRO pressure backwash with pressure-less freshwater
injection.
In this embodiment a valve 54 and a valve 55 shut off SW and BW, respectively.
Subsequent opening of a valve 56 releases the pressure on the SW side of the
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 9 PCT/N02006/000493
membrane 13' in module 13 and allows FW to flow to this side (SW side) of the
membrane 13' through an opened valve 51. When valves 51 and 56 are
subsequently
closed and valves 54 and 55 are opened, a backwash function will be created.
As
shown by dotted lines, optionally SW can be led to the FW-side of the membrane
by
means of a further valve 57 from the SW feed-in pipe to the FW inlet to add
osmotic
flux. However, this latter option will add to the number of valves required,
the plant
complexity and cost.
Fig. 6a illustrates backwash by exchanged PRO pressure, using a pump 61 to
provide
the plug of FW to the SW side of the membrane 13'.
The pump 61 is a suitably low-pressure pump that has sufficient pumping power
to
overcome the pressure in SW feed line 11 upstream of the pressure exchanger 16
and
therefore replace SW with a plug of FW in the liquid feed to the exchanger 16,
thereby injecting FW to the SW side of the membrane 13'. The operation is
quite
similar to the embodiment of fig. 3, except that only a low-pressure type pump
61 is
needed and the power loss in the power plant is smaller.
Fig. 7 illustrates backwash by exchanged PRO pressure, using assistance from a
pair
of valves 71 and 74 instead of the pump 61 in fig. 6a.
The valve 74 shuts off the SW feed-in to the pressure exchanger 16 and FW is
led to
the pressure exchanger 16 by opening the valve 71. Otherwise the principle is
similar
to that of fig. 6. Subsequently, after the plug of FW has been introduced to
the SW
side, the valve 71 will close and valve 74 will open.
Fig. 6b, being a sub-surface variant of the embodiment of fig. 6a, has similar
operation to the embodiment of fig. 6a as regards backwash function. However,
it is
noted, as discussed in relation to figs. lb and 11, that the turbine 17' is
located on the
FW side of the membrane 13' upstream thereof.
Fig. 6b also provides backwash by existing PRO pressure, using a pump 61 to
provide the plug of FW to the SW side of the membrane 13. The pump 61 is a
suitably low-pressure pump that has sufficient pumping power to overcome the
pressure in SW feed line 11 upstream of the membrane and therefore replace SW
with
a plug of FW in the liquid feed to the high pressure side of the membrane 13',
thereby injecting FW to the SW side of the membrane 13'. The operation is thus
quite similar to the embodiment of fig. 6a, however with the difference that
there is a
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 10 PCT/N02006/000493
sub-surface installation which in effect makes the pressure exchanger 16
superfluous,
and also similar to the embodiment of fig. 3, except that only a low-pressure
type
pump 61 is needed and the power loss in the power plant is smaller.
The embodiments of figs. 8 and 9 are both related to osmosis-enhanced PRO
pressure
backwash.
In fig. 8 the embodiment is pump operated as regards the injection of a plug
of FW to
the SW side of the membrane 13'. Thus, injection of FW to the SW-side of the
membrane is achieved by a low-pressure pump 811ike the type of pump 61
depicted
in fig. 6. When the pump 81 operates, a valve 84 will operate to lead SW to
the FW
side of the membrane 13', which enhances the backwash by adding an osmotic
driving force and flux to the PRO pressure backwash, as disclosed in fig. 2d..
In the fig. 9 embodiment the pump 81 of fig. 8 is replaced by two valves 91
and 94.
The injection of FW to the SW side of the membrane 13' is thus achieved as in
the
embodiment of fig. 7. The valve 94 closes and the valve 91 opens in order to
introduce a plug of FW to the inlet of the pressure exchanger and subsequently
to the
SW side of the membrane 13'. At the same time a valve 95 leads SW to the FW
side
of the membrane 13', adding an osmotic driving force and flux to the PRO
pressure
backwash, as in the embodiment of fig. 8. Subsequently, after the plug of FW
has
been introduced to the SW side, the valves 91 and 95 will close and the valve
94 will
open.
Thus, it will be appreciated that the plug of FW injected on the SW side of
the
membrane will require that SW high pressure is subsequently there to forcibly
push
the FW plug from the SW side to FW side of the membrane.
In figures 3 through 9 there has been indicated a valve 32, 42, 52, 62, 72, 82
and 92,
respectively, the operation of which is to inject a disinfecting agent DA into
the plug
of FW when the latter is injected to the SW side of the membrane.
In figures 3 through 9 there has also been indicated a valve 33, 43, 53, 63,
73, 83
and 93, respectively, the operation of which is to inject a disinfecting agent
DA into
the FW so as to let the DA enter the membrane 13' from the low pressure side,
i.e. the
FW side, thereof a predetermined time prior to injecting said plug of FW to
the SW
side of the membrane 13'. The advantage of this disinfecting operation is that
the DA
CA 02634298 2008-06-19
WO 2007/073207 11 PCT/N02006/000493
will move into the membrane 13' and be stopped by the diffusion skin 13", and
when
the backwashing commences with FW moving from the SW side to FW side of the
membrane 13', bacteria and other undesirable micro-organisms located in the
membrane 13' will be flushed out together with the DA.
DA provided to the SW side of the membrane 13', i.e. to the SW side of the
diffusion
skin will merely take care of bacteria and other undesirable micro-organisms
on the
surface there of. Thus , DA can be applied to either side of the membrane 13'
or
just one, as deemed necessary. Suitably, said DA is a chlorine solution,
although
other agents may be used.
Fig. 10 illustrates a control and processing unit 101 which may operate
automatically
according to a maintenance program or have overriding means 102 to enable
manual control by an operator (not shown). A display 103 is suitably provided
to
enable an operator to monitor how a backwash operation progresses in the power
plant. The unit 101 has outputs to control operation of the pumps and valves
as
required, i.e. to control start and stop of the pumps and opening and closing
of the
valves as required. The unit 101 can suitable have a microprocessor or PC
structure,
governed by suitable software and/ or firmware.
Fig. 11 illustrates a continuously operating sub-surface PRO power plant. FW
feed
111 is provided to a turbine 112 (similar to the turbine 17' on figs. lb and
6b) from a
FW supply 113, e.g. a river. A module rig 114 (similar to membrane rig 13) is
on
the FW side connected to the outlet from the turbine 112, and the FW bleed FB
115
from the module rig 114 is directed to a SW reservoir 116, e.g. the sea. SW
feed
117 enters the high pressure side of the membrane rig 114 and exits the
membrane rig
114 as BW which is fed via line 118 back to the reservoir 116.
Although just one module rig 114 is shown on fig. 11, and also on other
drawing
figures, it will be understood that a plurality or even a substantial
plurality of
membrane modules 13; 114 would nonnally be involved in the operation of a PRO
power plant.
Further, it will be appreciated that the principles of backwash operation as
disclosed
in connection with figs. 5, 6a, 7, 8 and 9 will apply equally well in case the
turbine
instead is located on the FW upstream side of the membrane rig, thus implying
that
backwash operation is to be made on a sub-surface installation, rather than on
a
surface installation.
