Language selection

Search

Patent 2641474 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2641474
(54) English Title: GAIT ANALYSIS
(54) French Title: ANALYSE DE DEMARCHE
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A61B 5/11 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • YANG, GUANG-ZHONG (United Kingdom)
  • LO, BENNY (United Kingdom)
(73) Owners :
  • IMPERIAL INNOVATIONS LIMITED
(71) Applicants :
  • IMPERIAL INNOVATIONS LIMITED (United Kingdom)
(74) Agent: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2007-02-02
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2007-08-09
Examination requested: 2012-01-10
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/GB2007/000358
(87) International Publication Number: WO 2007088374
(85) National Entry: 2008-08-05

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
0602127.3 (United Kingdom) 2006-02-02

Abstracts

English Abstract


A method and system for analysing gait patterns of a subject by measuring head
acceleration in vertical direction. The system comprises an accelerometer
mounted on the head of the subject. The analysis includes calculating a
signature from the acceleration data, using a Fourier transform, including
energy of the first harmonics and comparing the signature with the baseline
signature. Baseline signature is a representative of previously stored
signatures. The comparison is done in order to monitor changes in the gait
signatures over time. The entropy of the signatures may be used to perform the
comparison. A self organised map is used to classify the measured gait signals
.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé et un système pour analyser des profils de démarche d'un sujet en mesurant l'accélération de la tête dans une direction verticale. Le système comprend un accéléromètre monté sur la tête du sujet. L'analyse comprend le calcul d'une signature à partir des données d'accélération, à l'aide d'une transformée de Fourier, comprenant l'énergie des premières harmoniques et la comparaison de la signature avec la signature de base. La signature de base est une représentante des signatures stockées précédemment. La comparaison est faite pour surveiller des changements dans les signatures de démarche dans le temps. L'entropie des signatures peut être utilisée pour réaliser la comparaison. Une carte auto-organisée est utilisée pour classer les signaux de démarche mesurés.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


9
CLAIMS
1. A method of analysing gait including measuring a signal representative
of acceleration of the head of a subject whose gait is to be analysed, and
applying a transform to the measured signal to compute a gait signature
representative of the gait of the subject.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 which further includes comparing the
gait signature to a baseline signature to detect differences therebetween.
3. A method as claimed in claim 2 in which one or more signatures are
stored over time and the baseline signature is representative of one or more
stored signatures in order to monitor changes in the gait signature over time.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, claim 2 or claim 3 in which the
measured signature is representative of an acceleration in a substantially
vertical direction when the subject is in an upright position.
5. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the
transform is a Fourier transform.
6. A method as claimed in claim 5 in which the signature includes the
values of the energy of the first n harmonics.
7. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4 in which the transform
is a wavelet analysis.

8. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims in which the
signature is used as an input to a self organised map or a spatio-temporal
self-
organised map.
9. A method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims including
calculating the entropy of the signature, and using the calculated entropy to
compare signatures.
10. A gait analysis system including an acceleration sensor mounted in a
sensor housing which is adapted to be secured to the head of a human: and
an analyser operatively coupled to a sensor and operable to receive an
output representative of head acceleration therefrom, and to apply a transform
thereto for computing a gait signature representative of a gait pattern.
11. A system as claimed in claim 10 which further includes a comparator
operable to compare the signature to a baseline signature in order to detect
the
differences therebetween.
12. A system as claimed in claim 11 which further includes a memory for
storing one or more signatures of which the baseline is representative of one
or
more of the stored signatures such that the comparator can be used to monitor
changes in the signature over time.
13. A system as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 12 in which the housing
is adapted to be mounted such that the output is representative of head
acceleration in a substantially vertical direction when the subject is in an
upright position.

11
14. A system as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 13 which is included
within the housing.
15. A system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 14 in which the housing
includes an ear plug, a behind-the-ear clip, an ear ring, an ear clip, a
hearing aid
or a pair of spectacles.
16. A system as claimed in any of one claims 10 to 15 in which the housing
is secured to a headband, a hat or other head wear.
17. A system as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 16, in which the
transform is a Fourier transform.
18. A system as claimed in claim 17 in which the signature includes the
values of the energy of the first n harmonics.
19. A system as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 16 in which the
transform is a wavelet analysis.
20. A system as claimed in any of claims 10 to 19 further including a further
analyser including a self organised map or a spatio-temporal self organised
map which is operable to receive the signature as an input.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
1
GAIT ANALYSIS
The present invention relates to a method and system of analysing gait.
In analysing gait it is often desirable to monitor gait patterns pervasively,
that is
in a subject's natural environments in contrast to relying on a subject
walking
on a treadmill in front of a video camera. Known pervasive gait analysis
systems typically place sensors on the ankle, knee or waist of the subjects,
aiming to capture the gait pattern from leg movements. However, due to
variation in sensor placement, these systems often fail to provide accurate
measurements or require extensive calibration for detecting predictable gait
patterns, for example abnormal gait patterns following an injury.
The inventors have made the surprising discovery that efficient gait analysis
can be performed using an accelerometer placed on a subject's head, for
example using an ear piece. Such an ear piece can be worn pervasively and can
provide accurate measurements of the gait of the subject for gait analysis,
for
example in the study of recovery after injury or in sports investigations.
The invention is set out in independent claims 1 and 10. Further, optional
features of embodiments of the invention are set out in the remaining claims.
The analysis may include detecting certain types of gait patterns by comparing
a signature derived from the sensed head acceleration to one or more base line
signatures. It may also include monitoring the historical development of a
gait
pattern of a subject by storing signatures derived from the acceleration
signals
and coinpare future signatures against one or more of the stored signatures
(the
stored signatures thus acting as the baseline).

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
2
Preferably, the acceleration sensor senses head acceleration in a
substantially
vertical direction when the subject is in an upright position. This is
believed to
measure the shockwaves travelling through the spine to the head as the
subject's feet impact on the ground during walking or running.
The acceleration sensor may be mounted on the head in a nuinber of ways, for
example in an ear piece to be placed inside the outer ear, a hearing-aid-type
clip to be worn around and behind the ear, or an ear clip or ear ring to be
worn
on the ear lobe. Alternatively, the acceleration sensor may be secured to
another form of head gear for example, a headband or a hat, a hearing aid or
spectacles, and may in some applications be surgically implanted.
The signature can be derived from the acceleration signal using a nuinber of
techniques, for example a Fourier transform or wavelet analysis. The signature
may be analysed in a number of ways including calculating its entropy, using
it
as an input to a self-organised map (SOM) or a spatio-temporal self-organised
map (STSOM), as described in more detail below.
An exemplary embodiment of the invention is now described with reference to
the attached drawings, in which:
Figures 1A to C schematically show a number of different ways of
attaching the acceleration sensor to a subject's head;
Figures 2A to C show acceleration data obtained using an embodiment
of the invention for a subject before and after injury and when
recovered; and
Figures 3A to C show plots of the corresponding Fourier transform.

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
3
Figures 1A to C illustrate three different housings for an acceleration sensor
to
measure head acceleration (A: earplug; B: behind-the-ear clip; C: ear clip or
ring). Inside the housing an acceleration sensor is provided, coupled to a
means for transmitting the acceleration signal to a processing unit where it
is
analysed. Additionally, the housing may also house means for processing the
acceleration signal, as described in more detail below. The result of this
processing is then either transmitted to a processing unit for further
processing
or may be stored on a digital storage means such as a flash memory inside the
housing. While Figures lA-C show different ways of mounting an acceleration
sensor to a subjects' ear, alternative means of mounting the sensor to the
head
are also envisaged, for example mounting on a headband or hat or integrated
within a pair of spectacles or head phones.
The acceleration sensor may measure acceleration along one or more axes, for
example one axis aligned with the horizontal and one axis aligned with the
vertical when the subject is standing upright. Of course, a three axis
accelerometer could be used, as well.
It is understood that the housing may also house further motion sensors such
as
a gyroscope or a ball or lever switch sensor. Furthermore, gait analysis using
any type of motion sensor for detecting head motion is also envisaged.
Figures 2A to C show the output for each of two axes for such an acceleration
sensor worn as described, with the dark trace showing the horizontal
component and the lighter trace showing the vertical component. The y-axis of
the graphs in Figures 2A to C shows the measured acceleration in arbitrary
units and the x-axis denotes consecutive samples at a sampling rate of 50 Hz.
As is clear from the cyclical nature of the traces, each of the figures shows
several footstep cycles.

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
4
The present embodiment uses the vertical component of head acceleration
(lighter traces in Figures 2A to C) to analyse gait. It is believed that this
acceleration signal is representative of the shock wave travelling up the
spine
as the foot impacts the ground during walking or running. This shockwave has
been found to be rich in information on the gait pattern of a subject.
For example, in a healthy subject, gait patterns tend to be highly repetitive
as
can be seen in Figure 2A showing the acceleration traces for a healthy
subject.
By contrast, in Figure 2B, which shows acceleration traces of a subject
following an anlcle injury, it can be seen that following the injury the
acceleration traces become much more variable, in particular for the vertical
acceleration (lighter trace). It is believed that this is associated with
protective
behaviour while the subject walks on the injured leg, for example placing the
foot down toes first rather than heel first followed by rolling of the foot as
in
normal walking.
Figure 2C shows acceleration traces from the same subject following recovery
and it is clear that the repetitive nature of, in particular, the vertical
acceleration
trace that regularity has been restored.
Based on the above finding, the detection of a gait pattern representative of
an
injury (or, generally, the detection of a gait pattern different from a
baseline
gait pattern) may be achieved by suitable analysis of the above described
acceleration signals. In one embodiment, the vertical acceleration signal is
analysed using a Fourier transform for example, calculated using the Fast
Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithin with a sliding window of 1024 samples.
The abnorinal gait pattern can then be detected from the frequency content.

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
Figures 3A to C show the FFT for the respective acceleration measurements of
Figiires 2A to C. The y-axis is in arbitrary units and the x-axis is in units
of
(25/512) Hz, i.e. approximately 0.05 Hz. While the absolute value of the
energy of the FFT (plotted along the y-axis) will depend on factors such as
the
5 exact orientation of the acceleration sensor with respect to the shockwave
travelling through the spine and its placement on the head, as well as the
overall pace of the gait, the plots clearly contain information on the type of
gait
pattern in the relative magnitudes of the energy of the FFT at different
frequencies. . It is clear that the relative magnitudes of the FFT peaks have
changed.
As can be seen from Figure 3A, the FFT of the acceleration signal of a healthy
subject shows a plurality of, decaying harmonics. By contrast, the leg injury
data (Figure 3B) shows a much broader frequency content in lvhich the
spectrum lacks the well defined peaks of Figure 3A and the non-uniform
harmonics indicate abnormal gait. Figure 3C shows the FFT of acceleration
data for the same subject following recovery, and it can be seen that, to a
large
extent, the pre-injury pattern has been restored.
Summarising, a signature indicative of the gait pattern can be derived from
the
acceleration data and used to classify the gait pattern for example as normal
or
injured as above as demonstrated by the above data. In the above example, the
signature is a Fourier transform. It is understood that other ways of
calculating
a signature are equally envisaged. For example, a signature can be calculated
using wavelet analysis, for example by passing the data through a wavelet
transform (e.g. first order Debauchies) and then using the transformed data as
an input to a classifier, e.g. a SOM. For example, only the first high
frequency
component of the wavelet transfer could be used as an input to the classifier.
_ '`,

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
6
Once a signature is derived as described above, it can be analysed
automatically in order to detect changes in the gait pattern. On the one hand,
it
may be desirable to detect whether the gait pattern is close to a desired gait
pattern. This can be useful for example in training athletes. To this end, a
signature obtained from acceleration data of a subject, for example an
athlete,
is obtained and compared to a baseline signature obtained from baseline data
representing desired behaviour. The resulting information may then be used to,
help an athlete in his training, for example helping a long distance runner to
adjust his leg movements.
On the other hand, it may be desirable to use the above analysis to detect
changes over time within a subject. For example, this can be useful in
pervasive health monitoring where the gait pattern of a patient can be
monitored such that a doctor or healthcare professional can be notified when a
change in the gait pattern indicative of an injury is detected.
For example, one measure that can be used to detect changes in the signature
is
to calculate the entropy of the signature. In the exaniple of the FFT
described
with reference to Figures 3A to C, it is clear that the entropy value for the
injury data would be much larger than the entropy value for the normal data.
One way to compare and classify signatures is to use them as an input for a
self
organized map (SOM). For example, the energies of the FFT at the first four
harmonics can be used as an input vector to an SOM. A person skilled in the
art will be aware of the use of SOM for the analysis and clarification of data
and the implementation of an SOM to analyse the signature as described above
is well within the reach of normal skill of the person skilled in the art.
Briefly,
the SOM is presented with input vectors derived from the signatures described
above during a training period for a sufficiently long time to allow the SOM
to
-- ,~ ~

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
7
settle. Subsequently, activations of the output units of the SOM can then be
used to classify the data. For example, it has been found that in a trained
SOM
data from the subject of Figures 2 and 3 may activate a first subset of units
before injury and a second subset of units after injury.
In the embodiment described above, a signature is calculated using a sliding
window FFT. As such, the resulting signature will be time varying such that
more than one unit of an SOM will be activated over time. If it is desired to
analyse the time varying nature of the input vector derived from the
signature,
an alternative analysis technique described in co-pending patent application
W02006/097734, herewith incorporated herein by reference, may be used.
The application describes an arrangement, referred to as Spatio-Temporal SOM
(STSOM) below, of SOMs in which, depending on the measure of the temporal
variation of the output of a first layer SOM, a second layer SOM is fed with a
transfoimed input vector which measures the temporary variation of the
features in the original input vector. As in a conventional SOM, the output of
the second, temporal layer SOM can then be used to classify the data based on
its temporal structure.
Briefly, classifying a data record using an STSOM involves:
(a) defining a selection variable indicative of the temporal variation
of sensor signals within a time window;
(b) defining a selection criterion for the selection variable;
(c) comparing a value of the selection variable to the selection
criterion to select an input representation for a self organising
map and deriving an input from the data samples within the time
window in accordance with the selected input representation; and

CA 02641474 2008-08-05
WO 2007/088374 PCT/GB2007/000358
8
(d) applying the input to a self organising map corresponding to the
selected input representation and classifying the data record based
on a winning output unit of the self organising map.
For example, the selection variable may be calculated based on the temporal
variability of the output units of a SOM.
Training an STSOM may involve:
(a) computing a derived representation representative of a temporal
variation of the features of a dynamic data record within a time
window;
(b) using the derived representation as an input for a second self -
organised map; and
(c) updating the parameters of the self-organised map according to a
training algorithm.
The training may involve the preliminary step of partitioning the training
data
into static and dynamic records based on a measure of temporal variation.
Further details of training an STSOM and using it for classification can be
found in the above-mentioned published patent application.
It is understood that the sensor signals of the above described embodiment may
also be used for human posture analysis and/or activity recognition.
Furthermore, the system described above could be an integral part of a body
sensor network of sensing devices where multiple sensing devices distributed
across the body are linked by wireless communication links.

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Inactive: IPC expired 2022-01-01
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2014-02-04
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2014-02-04
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-02-04
Inactive: Correspondence - PCT 2012-03-01
Letter Sent 2012-01-18
Request for Examination Received 2012-01-10
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2012-01-10
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2012-01-10
Letter Sent 2009-04-28
Inactive: Single transfer 2009-02-18
Inactive: Cover page published 2008-11-24
Inactive: Declaration of entitlement/transfer - PCT 2008-11-20
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2008-11-20
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2008-11-19
Application Received - PCT 2008-11-18
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2008-08-05
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2007-08-09

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-02-04

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2012-01-19

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2008-08-05
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2009-02-02 2008-11-12
Registration of a document 2009-02-18
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2010-02-02 2010-01-27
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2011-02-02 2011-01-28
Request for examination - standard 2012-01-10
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2012-02-02 2012-01-19
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
IMPERIAL INNOVATIONS LIMITED
Past Owners on Record
BENNY LO
GUANG-ZHONG YANG
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2008-08-05 8 387
Drawings 2008-08-05 3 76
Claims 2008-08-05 3 99
Abstract 2008-08-05 1 67
Representative drawing 2008-11-21 1 10
Cover Page 2008-11-24 1 42
Reminder of maintenance fee due 2008-11-20 1 112
Notice of National Entry 2008-11-20 1 194
Courtesy - Certificate of registration (related document(s)) 2009-04-28 1 103
Reminder - Request for Examination 2011-10-04 1 117
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2012-01-18 1 177
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2013-04-02 1 173
PCT 2008-08-05 5 220
Correspondence 2008-08-25 1 33
Correspondence 2008-11-20 1 24
Correspondence 2012-03-01 3 81