Language selection

Search

Patent 2666677 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent Application: (11) CA 2666677
(54) English Title: STEEL AND PROCESSING METHOD FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF HIGH STRENGTH, FRACTURE-SPLITTABLE MACHINERY COMPONENTS
Status: Deemed Abandoned and Beyond the Period of Reinstatement - Pending Response to Notice of Disregarded Communication
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • C22C 38/04 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/02 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/12 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/48 (2006.01)
  • C22C 38/50 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • DIEDERICHS, ROMAN (Germany)
  • STUEBER, AXEL (Germany)
  • LANGE, ROBERT (Germany)
(73) Owners :
  • GEORGSMARIENHUETTE GMBH
(71) Applicants :
  • GEORGSMARIENHUETTE GMBH (Germany)
(74) Agent: SMART & BIGGAR LP
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued:
(86) PCT Filing Date: 2007-07-27
(87) Open to Public Inspection: 2008-03-13
Examination requested: 2009-07-29
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Yes
(86) PCT Filing Number: PCT/DE2007/001337
(87) International Publication Number: DE2007001337
(85) National Entry: 2009-02-17

(30) Application Priority Data:
Application No. Country/Territory Date
10 2006 041 146.3 (Germany) 2006-09-01

Abstracts

English Abstract

The invention relates to a steel and a processing method for higher-strength fracture-splittable machine components that are composed of at least two fracture-splittable parts. Said steel and method are characterized in that the chemical composition of the steel (expressed in percent by weight) is as follows: 0.40% <= C <= 0.60%; 0.20% <= Si <= 1.00%; 0.50% <= Mn <= 1.50%; 0% <= Cr <= 1.00%; 0% <= Ni <= 0.50%; 0% <= Mo <= 0.20%; 0% <= Nb <= 0.050%; 0% <= V <= 0.30%; 0% <= Al <= 0.05%; 0.005% <= N <= 0.020%, the rest being composed of iron and smelting-related impurities and residual matter.


French Abstract

L'invention concerne un acier et un procédé de transformation pour produire des pièces mécaniques pouvant être séparées par rupture présentant une résistance accrue, ces pièces étant constituées d'au moins deux parties pouvant être séparées par rupture. L'invention se caractérise en ce que la composition chimique de l'acier est la suivante (en pourcentage en poids) : 0,40% <= C <= 0,60%; 0,20% <= Si <= 1,00%; 0,50% <= Mn <= 1,50%; 0% <= Cr <= 1,00%; 0% <= Ni <= 0,50%; 0% <= Mo <= 0,20%; 0% <= Nb <= 0,050%; 0% <= V <= 0,30%; 0% <= AI <= 0,05%; 0,005% <= N <= 0,020%, le reste étant constitué de fer et des impuretés et résidus issus de la production de l'acier.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


4
claims
1. A steel and the processing method for the manufacture of high strength,
fracture-splittable machinery components, characterised in that they
consist of at least two fracture-splittable parts, characterised in that their
chemical composition has the following components in percentages by
weight:
0.40% .ltoreq. C .ltoreq. 0.60%
0.20% .ltoreq. Si .ltoreq. 1.00%
0.50% .ltoreq. Mn .ltoreq. 1.50%
0% .ltoreq. Cr.ltoreq. 1.00%
0% .ltoreq. Ni .ltoreq. 0.50%
0% .ltoreq. Mo .ltoreq. 0.20%
0% .ltoreq. Nb .ltoreq. 0.050%
0% .ltoreq. V .ltoreq. 0.30%
0% .ltoreq. Al .ltoreq. 0.05%
0.005% .ltoreq. N .ltoreq. 0.020%
whereby the remainder consists of iron and impurities from the melting
process and residues.
2. A steel in accordance with claim 1, characterised in that its chemical
composition is the same except that:
0.10% .ltoreq. V .ltoreq. 0.20%
3. A steel in accordance with claim 1 or 2, characterised in that its chemical
composition is the same except that:
0.020% .ltoreq. Nb .ltoreq. 0.030%

4. A steel in accordance one of claims 1 to 3, characterised in that its
chemical composition is the same except that:
0.010% .ltoreq. N .ltoreq. 0.020%
5. A steel in accordance one of claims 1 to 4, characterised in that its
chemical composition is the same except that:
0.45% .ltoreq. C .ltoreq. 0.55%
0.50% .ltoreq. Si .ltoreq. 0.70%
0.90% .ltoreq. Mn .ltoreq. 1.10%
0.10% .ltoreq. Cr .ltoreq. 0.40%
0.10% .ltoreq. Ni .ltoreq. 0.30%
0.10% .ltoreq. V .ltoreq. 0.20%
0.010% .ltoreq. Al .ltoreq. 0.020%
0.020% .ltoreq. Nb .ltoreq. 0.030%
0.010% .ltoreq. N .ltoreq. 0.020%
6. A steel in accordance one of claims 1 to 4, characterised in that its
chemical composition is the same except that:
0.45% .ltoreq. C .ltoreq. 0.55%
0.50% .ltoreq. Si .ltoreq. 0.70%
0.90% .ltoreq. Mn .ltoreq. 1.10%
0.10% .ltoreq. Cr .ltoreq. 0.40%
0.10% .ltoreq. Ni .ltoreq. 0.30%
0.10% .ltoreq. V .ltoreq. 0.20%
0.010% .ltoreq. Al .ltoreq. 0.020%
0.020% .ltoreq. Nb .ltoreq. 0.030%
0.010% .ltoreq. N .ltoreq. 0.020%
0.020% .ltoreq. Ti .ltoreq. 0.030%

6
7. A steel in accordance one of claims 1 to 4, characterised in that its
chemical composition is the same except that:
0.45% .ltoreq. C .ltoreq. 0.55%
0.50% .ltoreq. Si .ltoreq. 0.70%
0.90% .ltoreq. Mn .ltoreq. 1.10%
0.30% .ltoreq. Cr .ltoreq. 0.40%
0% .ltoreq. Ni .ltoreq. 0.20%
0.10% .ltoreq. V .ltoreq. 0.20%
0.010% .ltoreq. Al .ltoreq. 0.020%
0.020% .ltoreq. Nb .ltoreq. 0.030%
0.015% .ltoreq. N .ltoreq. 0.020%
8. The use of a steel in accordance one of claims 1 to 7 to manufacture
fracture-splittable components used in the construction of vehicles,
whereby they have a predominantly pearlitic structure from the
precipitation of special carbides after forging and controlled cooling.
9. A component in accordance with claim 8, characterised in that the
apparent limit of elasticity is over 750 N/mm2 after cooling down from the
forming temperature.
10. A component in accordance with claim 9, characterised in that the tensile
strength falls between 950 N/mm2 and 1200 N/mm2 after cooling down
from the forming temperature.
11. A component in accordance with claim 10, characterised in that the
elongation to fracture exceeds 10% after cooling down from the forming
temperature.
12. A component in accordance with claim 11, characterised in that the
reduction in area at fracture exceeds 25% after cooling down from the
forming temperature.

7
13. A component in accordance with claim 12, characterised in that it is
fracture splittable.
14. A component in accordance with claim 13, characterised in that it is
suitable for induction hardening.
15. A component in accordance with claim 14, characterised in that the
mechanical properties can be adjusted both in the material prior to forging
as well as in the component through the use of thermomechanical
treatment.

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CA 02666677 2009-02-17
Georgsmarienhutte GmbH
Neue Huttenstr. 1
D-49124 Georgsmarienhutte
Steel and processinq method for the manufacture of high
strenqthi, fracture-splittable machirterY components.
The invention concerns a steel and the processing method for the manufacture
of high strength, fracture-splittable machinery components. This material was
developed, for example, for the manufacture of crack connecting rods.
The steel must be suitabie for forging or for other heat forming processes,
The
heat used in the forging is dissipated by controlled cooling to produce a
largely
pearlitic structure that has an apparent limit of elasticity in excess of 750
N/mm2,
a tensile strength between 1000 and 1200 N/mmz, elongation to fracture of over
10% and reduction in area at fracture of over 25%. Its fracture-splittability
is a
particularly important feature.
The desired properties can be obtained by intentionally creating a pearlitic
structure with the precipitation of special carbides (niobium and vanadium
carbide) and of manganese sulphides by an appropriately formulated chemical
composition, controlled temperature management during the heat forming when
producing the preliminary material as well as when forging the finished
components (thermomechanical treatment), and a suitable heat treatment after
completion of the forging or heat forming, as the case may be.
Up to now, examples of the steels used for this purpose are either mostly
eutectoid compositions with approximately 0.7% C, 0.5 to 0.9% Mn, 0.06 to
0,07% S and possibly 0.1 to 0.2% V (C70S6, 70MnVS4), or an average carbon
content of approximately 0.4%, about 1% Mn, 0,06 to 0.07% S and about 0.3%
V (36MnVS4) according to customers' technical specifications.

CA 02666677 2009-02-17
2
These steels have a predominantly pearlitic structure with vanadium carbides
and manganese sufphides and conform to requirements regarding mechanical
properties. The drawbacks in the various known material alternatives are that
the
versions used to this point need considerable resources in terms of expensive
and scarce alloying materials. Vanadium in particular is currently used
increasingly in the field of precipitation hardening ferritic-pearlitic steels
(AFP
steels), making vanadium an increasingly scarce commodity.
The aim of this invention is to avoid the cited disadvantages by proposing a
new
steel which has the required mechanical properties regarding strength (and
fatigue strength) and, additionally, good toughness characteristics in tensile
tests, combined at the same time with good splittability. The steel must also
be
easy to continuously cast and forge. Furthermore, the new steel must use fewer
resources when being produced than the known steels by partially substituting
the vanadium content with niobium using an appropriately adapted forming and
cooling strategy_
The high value for the apparent limit of elasticity is achieved, other than
with the
basic composition, by the precipitation of extremely finely dispersed carbides
of
special carbide formers niobium and vanadium, This requires a solution of the
present carbides before the final hot forming process as well as controlled
temperature management during the hot forming, followed by a final cooling off
stage. Finely dispersed precipitation can be achieved, in particular, by
having a
low final forming temperature, ending with slightly accelerated cooling. This
raises the apparent limit of elasticity in particular, thus improving the
elastic limit
ratio considerably.
The tensile strength value of the basic composition comprising 0.5% C, 0.6%
Si,
1.0% Mn, 0.23% Cr, 0.2% Ni and 0_14% V can be adjusted to the desired level
by slightly accelerated cooling after hot forming.
The toughness characteristic values are controlled, in particular, by
selective
alloying with 0.06 to 0.07% sulphur_ The carbon content and relatively high
nitrogen content also act positively in this regard.

CA 02666677 2009-02-17
3
A crystalline fracture or macroscopic deformation is essential for the
material to
split properly. This is achieved by designing the alloy with high contents of
carbon, nitrogen and sulphur, and comparatively low contents of chromium,
nickel and molybdenum.
According to the solution proposed, the invention concerns a steel for the
manufacture of fracture-spiittable components for the vehicle industry with
the
following chemical composition in percentages by weight:
0.4%<_C50.6%;0.2%5Si<_1.0%;0.5%<_Mn51.5%;0%SCr<_1.0%;
0%5NiS0.5%;0%5Mo50.2%;0%5Nb<0.05%;0%5V:5 0.3%;
0% S Al 5 0.05%; 0.005% 5 N 5 0.020%
whereby the remainder consists of iron and impurities from the melting
process.

Representative Drawing

Sorry, the representative drawing for patent document number 2666677 was not found.

Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Application Not Reinstated by Deadline 2014-07-29
Time Limit for Reversal Expired 2014-07-29
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2013-08-05
Deemed Abandoned - Failure to Respond to Maintenance Fee Notice 2013-07-29
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2013-02-05
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2012-08-08
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2012-02-08
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2011-09-14
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2011-05-16
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2011-05-16
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2011-03-22
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry correction 2010-10-20
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry - RFE 2010-10-12
Inactive: Correspondence - PCT 2010-03-17
Letter Sent 2009-09-02
Inactive: Acknowledgment of national entry correction 2009-08-20
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-07-29
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2009-07-29
Request for Examination Received 2009-07-29
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-07-03
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-07-03
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2009-07-03
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-07-03
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-07-03
Inactive: Cover page published 2009-07-02
Inactive: Notice - National entry - No RFE 2009-06-29
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2009-06-15
Application Received - PCT 2009-06-15
National Entry Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-02-17
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2008-03-13

Abandonment History

Abandonment Date Reason Reinstatement Date
2013-07-29

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2012-06-01

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Patent fees are adjusted on the 1st of January every year. The amounts above are the current amounts if received by December 31 of the current year.
Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Basic national fee - standard 2009-02-17
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - standard 02 2009-07-27 2009-05-14
Request for examination - standard 2009-07-29
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - standard 03 2010-07-27 2010-05-28
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - standard 04 2011-07-27 2011-05-18
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - standard 05 2012-07-27 2012-06-01
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
GEORGSMARIENHUETTE GMBH
Past Owners on Record
AXEL STUEBER
ROBERT LANGE
ROMAN DIEDERICHS
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column (Temporarily unavailable). To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.

({010=All Documents, 020=As Filed, 030=As Open to Public Inspection, 040=At Issuance, 050=Examination, 060=Incoming Correspondence, 070=Miscellaneous, 080=Outgoing Correspondence, 090=Payment})


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Description 2009-02-16 3 106
Abstract 2009-02-16 1 14
Claims 2009-02-16 4 79
Description 2011-09-13 4 137
Claims 2011-09-13 5 89
Claims 2012-08-07 4 73
Notice of National Entry 2009-06-28 1 192
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2009-09-01 1 175
Notice of National Entry 2010-10-11 1 203
Notice of National Entry 2011-05-15 1 205
Notice of National Entry 2011-05-15 1 205
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (Maintenance Fee) 2013-09-22 1 172
Courtesy - Abandonment Letter (R30(2)) 2013-09-29 1 164
PCT 2009-02-16 4 167
Correspondence 2009-08-19 2 136
Correspondence 2010-03-16 1 51
Correspondence 2010-10-19 3 161
Fees 2009-05-13 1 37