Language selection

Search

Patent 2673319 Summary

Third-party information liability

Some of the information on this Web page has been provided by external sources. The Government of Canada is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability or currency of the information supplied by external sources. Users wishing to rely upon this information should consult directly with the source of the information. Content provided by external sources is not subject to official languages, privacy and accessibility requirements.

Claims and Abstract availability

Any discrepancies in the text and image of the Claims and Abstract are due to differing posting times. Text of the Claims and Abstract are posted:

  • At the time the application is open to public inspection;
  • At the time of issue of the patent (grant).
(12) Patent: (11) CA 2673319
(54) English Title: SUMP REACTOR HUB FOR AQUARIUM FILTRATION
(54) French Title: NOYAU DE REACTEUR A PUISARD POUR FILTRATION D'AQUARIUM
Status: Granted and Issued
Bibliographic Data
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC):
  • A01K 63/04 (2006.01)
  • B01D 35/02 (2006.01)
  • B01D 36/02 (2006.01)
  • C02F 1/00 (2006.01)
(72) Inventors :
  • JOHN, SHELDON C. E. (Canada)
(73) Owners :
  • SHELDON C. E. JOHN
(71) Applicants :
  • SHELDON C. E. JOHN (Canada)
(74) Agent:
(74) Associate agent:
(45) Issued: 2018-10-16
(22) Filed Date: 2009-07-20
(41) Open to Public Inspection: 2011-01-20
Examination requested: 2014-01-13
Availability of licence: N/A
Dedicated to the Public: N/A
(25) Language of filing: English

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): No

(30) Application Priority Data: None

Abstracts

English Abstract


A sump reactor hub utilizes a zoned plenum system to organize supply, drain,
and/or
recirculation through one or multiple reactor vessels, purposed for filtration
and/or
augmentation of aquarium water. Each zone comprises sub-plenum partitions
which
direct the passage of water through all stages of a reactor system. Flow
between each
reactor and its sub-plenum zone is achieved through access points; gaskets;
and
connectors. Undesirable flow is contained by plug and/or valve assemblies.
Each
reactor may be completed by a dedicated outlet or drainage assembly connected
through the same plenum system if not intrinsic to the reactor. The present
invention
allows for modular manipulation of any given aquarium filtration strategy. To
this end a
variety of reactor types are described to complete this modular filtration
system. Such
reactors are purposed to address all forms of chemical, biological, and
mechanical
filtration/augmentation of aquarium water.


French Abstract

Un moyeu de réacteur de bassin, qui utilise un système de plénum à zones afin dorganiser lalimentation, lévacuation ou la recirculation à travers une ou des cuves de réacteur multiples, prévu pour la filtration ou laugmentation deau daquarium. Chaque zone comporte des séparations de sous-plénum qui dirigent le passage de leau à travers tous les étages dun système de réacteur donné. Lécoulement entre chaque réacteur et sa zone de sous-plénum est assuré par des points daccès, des joints détanchéité et des raccords. Il est possible dempêcher un écoulement indésirable au moyen densembles bouchon ou de vanne. Chaque réacteur peut être achevé par un ensemble dévacuation ou de sortie consacré relié par lintermédiaire du même système de plénum sil nest pas intrinsèque au réacteur. La présente invention permet une manipulation modulaire de toute stratégie de filtration daquarium donnée. À cette fin, une variété de types de réacteurs sont décrits pour achever ce système de filtration modulaire. Ces réacteurs ont pour but de traiter toutes les formes de filtration/augmentation chimique, biologique et mécanique dune eau daquarium.

Claims

Note: Claims are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


CLAIMS:
What is claimed is:
1. A reactor hub comprising:
a sump complete with a zoned plenum system wherein said zoned plenum system
is divided by full and partial barriers to facilitate and direct sub-plenum
hydrological flow;
wherein said zoned plenum facilitates hydrological supply; drain; and
recirculation
to; from; and within one or more convertible and interchangeable reactors;
wherein said zoned plenum is connected to in-sump circulation and/or
recirculation facilities to accommodate hydrological flow into; out of; or
within each said
convertible and interchangeable reactor;
wherein transitions between said zoned plenum and each said convertible and
interchangeable reactor is completed with self-sealing gaskets; o-rings; and
the like to
prevent undesirable leakage between said plenum; shared sump; and each such
reactor.
2. The reactor hub of claim 1 comprising any single or combination of
convertible and interchangeable reactors specifically designed to couple with
said
zoned plenum system.
3. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein said reactors are frictionally
engaged
to said zoned plenum system.
4. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured to
facilitate unobstructed foam circulation; and completed with an appropriate
foam
collection-head in order to achieve foam fractionation based protein removal
when
coupled with said zoned plenum system.
5. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured to
contain foam and/or fibrous material; and completed with an appropriate
closure-head
in order to achieve mechanical filtration when coupled with said zoned plenum
system.
6. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured to
accommodate prescribed media and flow-rate; and completed with an appropriate
closure-head in order to achieve the various forms of biological filtration
when coupled
with said zoned plenum system.
7. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured to
accommodate prescribed media; and completed with an appropriate closure-head
in
order to achieve chemical filtration when coupled with said zoned plenum
system.
8. The reactor hub of claim 6 wherein one or more reactors is configured to
achieve anaerobic biological filtration.
9. The reactor hub of claim 6 wherein one or more reactors is configured to
achieve anoxic biological filtration.
10. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured
to
accommodate prescribed media and flow-rate; and completed with an appropriate
closure-head in order to achieve nitrate reduction when coupled with said
zoned
plenum system.
12

11. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured
to
accommodate prescribed media and flow-rate; and completed with an appropriate
closure-head in order to achieve phosphate reduction when coupled with said
zoned
plenum system.
12. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured
to
accommodate prescribed media and flow-rate; and completed with an appropriate
carbon dioxide facilitation and/or closure-head in order to achieve carbon
dioxide
saturation when coupled with said zoned plenum system.
13. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured
to
accommodate prescribed media and flow-rate; and completed with an appropriate
facilitation and/or closure-head in order to achieve trace ion supplementation
when
coupled with said zoned plenum system.
14. The reactor hub of claim 2 wherein one or more reactors is configured
to
accommodate prescribed substrate, stock and flow-rate; and completed with an
appropriate closure-head in order to provide a refuge environment for macro
algae
and/or micro-fauna production when coupled with said zoned plenum system.
15. A device comprising:
a common sump incorporating a zoned plenum system wherein said zoned
plenum system directs hydrological flow through a multitude of convertible and
interchangeable reactors;
wherein said common sump is further connected to in-sump circulation and/or
recirculation facilities via same zoned plenum system; and
wherein each said connection is completed by a self-sealing gasket.
16. The device of claim 15 wherein said one or more convertible and
interchangeable reactors provide foam fractionation, mechanical filtration,
biological
filtration, chemical filtration, nitrate reduction, phosphate reduction,
carbon dioxide
saturation, trace ion supplementation, algae based filtration, and/or micro-
fauna
production.
17. The device of claim 15 wherein any of said one or more convertible and
interchangeable reactors contain mechanical, biological, and/or chemical
filtration
media.
18. The device of claim 15 wherein each convertible and interchangeable
reactor is connected to said zoned plenum system independently.
19. The device of claim 15 wherein two or more convertible and
interchangeable reactors are connected via zoned plenum system in series.
20. A method of filtering aquarium water comprising the steps of:
Providing a reactor hub as defined in claim 2, wherein one or more reactors
are
arranged independently or in series, wherein each reactor receives
hydrological supply;
drain; and/or recirculation through said zoned plenum system.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein said one or more reactors
accommodate filter media.
13

22. The method of
claim 20 wherein the one or more reactors provide foam
fractionation, mechanical filtration, biological filtration, chemical
filtration, nitrate
reduction, phosphate reduction, carbon dioxide saturation, trace ion
supplementation,
algae based filtration, and/or micro-fauna production when coupled with said
zoned
plenum system.
14

Description

Note: Descriptions are shown in the official language in which they were submitted.


Sump Reactor Hub for Aquarium Filtration
SPECIFICATION:
Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to an aquarium filtration system, and
more
particularly to an aquarium sump specifically designed to accommodate a
multitude of
specialty purposed; readily removable and replaceable reactor vessels,
hereafter
referred to as 'reactors' of varied design and function to facilitate
disparate forms of
water filtration within a single unit or multiple thereof. The present
invention forms an
aggregative solution which provides an evolution based, interchangeable
alternative to
aquarium filtration strategies.
Background of Invention
Filters are required for fresh and saltwater aquariums to facilitate
mechanical removal of
unwanted particulates; biological transformation of toxic residuals; and
chemical
neutralization of organic compounds; all of which are produced by aquarium
inhabitants. Further specialized aquarium habitats such as those heavily
stocked with
plants; or those which require oligotrophic conditions with the provision of
specific trace
elements such as in coral reefs, require purpose focused reactors of various
function to
facilitate additional tasks within the entire water processing or filtration
system.
Aquarium sumps, and sump based filters are employed when an increased capacity
for
water purification and/or augmentation is required. The early sump filters
were designed
to accommodate large volumes of elevated media upon which aquarium water is
percolated in a manner to expedite the conversion of harmful nitrogenous
compounds
via the process of aerobic biological filtration. Water percolated through
such media
would then collect within a larger sump container prior to its recycling
through the
aquarium environment. Early sump filters provided numerous advantages
including but
not limited to: increased bio-filtration capacity; increased access to filter
media;
increased oxygen saturation levels; as well as an increased opportunity for
purpose
driven filtration refinement.
The increase of scientific and practical knowledge within the realm of
aquarium
husbandry has lead to a demand for many individually purposed types of
equipment,
hereafter referred to as 'reactors'. The various reactors have been designed
to function
either inside and/or outside of the aquarium sump container and serve to
augment
aquarium water conditions in a manner toward the natural environments from
which the
subject inhabitants originate. A few examples of such reactors are foam
fractionators;
calcium reactors; carbon dioxide reactors; phosphate reactors; kalkwasser
reactors;
denitrification reactors; sulphur reactors; etc. In-sump reactors often serve
as the
favourable option for several reasons relating to spatial constraints;
minimized leak risks;
or even for purposes of consolidating hydrological access and flow-through.
It has also been found that several types of reactors are optional based on
the adopted
strategy and particular style of husbandry chosen by any given aquarist.
Although
equipment such as foam fractionators (more commonly known as protein skimmers)
are
considered a fundamental necessity for the creation of a healthy marine
environment,
this particular piece of equipment is not typically employed in any such
freshwater
system. As well, a piece of equipment used for dissolving carbon dioxide (CO2)
into
1
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

aquarium water is referred to as a CO2 reactor and is of fundamental necessity
to
achieve success in a freshwater planted aquarium, but is no longer used with
any
dominance within salt water aquarium environments.
Additionally, in saltwater aquariums, the difference between 'fish-only' and
reef
environments is also fundamentally reflected in the types of equipment
employed to filter
and augment the quality of water. The invertebrates found in reef environments
for
example, require such a high level of water purity that phosphate reactors are
used to
maintain the lowest possible phosphate levels; trickle type biological filters
are often
foregone to limit nitrate production; and denitrification reactors provide an
option to
further eliminate any residual nitrates produced by the metabolic activities
of the
contained livestock. Such strategies are seldom employed for fish-only
marine
aquariums.
Still of consideration is the availability of a variety of reactor types to
achieve a similar
purpose. Maintaining optimum levels of calcium for example can be obtained
without
the use of a reactor by dosing any one of many available liquid or dry-form
additives.
However there are currently two primary types of commercially available
reactors to
achieve the same purpose via a more economical strategy. Calcium reactors
utilize
CO2 to dissolve calcium ions from a chosen calcareous media. The subsequent
calcium
rich solution then flows into the aquarium to maintain optimum calcium levels
tuned
between 400 ¨ 500 mg/L (ppm). As a consequence of the same process, carbonate
hardness is also maintained at optimal levels between 9 ¨ 12 dKH.
Alternatively, the use
of a limewater or 'kalkwasser reactor directs aquarium top-off water through a
saturated solution of calcium hydroxide (kalkwasser), located within a vessel
equipped
with an automated agitation mechanism, prior to its destination within the
aquarium
environment. The positive consequence introduced by the use of kalkwasser is
the
precipitation of phosphate. Aquarists have the option of using any one or
combination
of the aforementioned strategies for calcium ion supplementation.
It is also recognized that dedicated aquarists are committed to maintaining
the best
possible equipment available so long as budget allows. This can be a markedly
difficult
task as much of the core reactors are subject to regular design and
improvement
iterations which include the latest improvements to their operational
effectiveness. Such
a reality can be unfortunately costly and intimidating to many dedicated
hobbyists who
do not have the benefit of an inexhaustible income nor the type of hobby
budget that
would allow them to replace entire functional reactors, complete with
dedicated
circulation and/or recirculation equipment to match the availability of new
upgrades or
improvements provided by an ever-evolving industry. It is further recognized
that many
aquarist evolve their philosophical approach to aquarium husbandry several
times
through their accumulations of industry-wide knowledge and empirical
experience.
As can be seen there are disparate needs for the various reactors available to
the
aquarium industry. It can also be reckoned that there exists a need for a
system which
provides a significant measure of flexibility, and affords the best possible
efficiency to
aquarist still evolving their approach to aquarium husbandry.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a system in which
aquarium
reactors are readily replaceable and interchangeable with minimal effort and
expense
in a manner to afford all aquarists an economical option of equipment exchange
as
they evolve personal philosophies toward aquarium husbandry.
2
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

It is a further object of this invention to standardize a hydrological
delivery system while
providing a mechanism of simplified interchange ability and reuse of those
resources
fundamental to the various types of reactors independently of each upgrade.
It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a practical
solution of flexibility
to afford aquarists the ability to share sump real estate between multiple
reactors, based
on calculated strategy or prescribed necessity. A bio-tower, for instance, can
be
replaced by a denitrification reactor or an additional skimmer simply and
practically
synchronized with the evolution of one's philosophical methodology.
It is a further object of the present invention to mitigate the total cost of
process evolution
by means of standardizing provisions of hydrological supply such that
equipment
upgrades can be isolated to individual components such as the actual reactor,
or
pump(s) as opposed to the reactor and pump(s).
Description of Prior Arts
The concepts and approaches to aquarium filtration have been in a constant
state of
evolution over the past several decades. Canadian Patent No. 2,249,553
entitled
"Aquarium Undergravel Filter" describes one of the earliest methods of
facilitating the
phenomenon of aerobic biological filtration. Through this design, a perforated
plate
supports the aquarium's gravel bed in a position slightly elevated above the
actual
aquarium bottom. A modest but consistent flow of water is then induced through
provided lift tubes which are in turn connected to the underside of the
aforementioned
perforated plate. The result is a constant flow of water navigated through the
aquarium's gravel bed, at which point biological waste created by the aquarium
inhabitants are consumed by a population of nitrifying bacteria established
throughout
the gravel bed. The Undergravel filter has served as one of the simplest life
support
systems the aquarium trade has ever benefited from.
Canadian Patent No. 1,086,580 entitled "Aquarium Filtration Apparatus"
describes one of
several iterations of the hang-on type power filter. A hang-on filter employs
a
magnetically driven impeller to siphon water over the rim of a subject
aquarium into its
external rim-mounted filtration housing. Within such an external housing,
waste laden
water is navigated through a variety of filter media prior to overflowing back
into the
subject aquarium. The hang-on type power filter provided several benefits with
its
simplistic design. Its external mount simplified access to clean and exchange
clogged or
spent media. It also increased the ease at which mechanical and chemical forms
of
filtration can be used to enhance and augment aquarium water quality.
A further development to the external power filter can be seen in the canister
type filter
which can be located away from the aquarium's area of focus. The canister
filter adds
benefits of increased size and filtration capacity to the prior successes of
the hang-on
type power filter. Canadian Patent No. 2,145,151 entitled "Filter for
Aquariums" presents
an advanced iteration of the canister type filter. This design adds a
mechanism of
aerobic enhancement to the canister concept by allowing its filtration volume
to
alternate between a variable supply of air and aquarium water. The net result
of such an
implementation is a greater capacity for biological filtration, neatly
contained within the
confines of a media filled canister.
Canadian Patent No. 2,579,565 entitled "Modular Aquarium Filter" presents a
solution of
flexibility within a neatly contained filtration apparatus. This particular
patent utilizes a
3
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

series of media compartments which connect in series to facilitate a
utilitarian and
expandable filtration strategy. The design allows for any number of
compartments to be
assembled in a manner to facilitate all forms of mechanical, biological and
chemical
filtration, as determined by the bio-load of a subject aquarium. The design
also intends
for any single media compartment to be removed from the complete system
without risk
of leakage or disturbance to the remaining cartridges. Although this modular
filter
excludes a self contained pump conveyance system, it does successfully add the
concept of modular flexibility to the aforementioned strategies of external
filtration.
United States Patent No. 6,436,295 B2 entitled "Protein Skimmer" represents a
solution to
facilitate the phenomenon known to aquarists as foam fractionation. Foam
fractionation
utilizes processes of positive and negative ionic attractions to facilitate
aquarium waste
removal in the form of 'protein' prior to its degradation into toxic
nitrogenous compounds
within the aquarium system. A Protein Skimmer can be simplified in concept to
an
apparatus which facilitates the production of foam, and accommodates the
interaction
between such foam and waste-laden aquarium water as a means to disassociate
the
waste/protein from the aquarium water and bind the same to an abundant supply
of air
bubbles which subsequently rise to a protein collection cup as a measure to
permanently remove polluting organics from the aquarium water. The most
successful
protein skimmers provide a turbulent mix of aquarium water infused with
infinitely fine and
numerous bubbles; prolong the reaction time between waste-laden aquarium water
and
bubbles; and provide a zone for dry, dirty foam liberation from the aquarium
water prior
to the latter's return as a waste-diminished product. Protein skimmers are
considered of
fundamental necessity to the success of all marine aquarium environments, and
represent a history of constant refinement within the aquarium trade.
Yet another design which represents a combination of filtration mechanisms is
detailed in
United States Patent No. 7,094,335 52 entitled "Aquarium Filtration System".
This particular
design has formalized a filtration strategy which combines the common elements
utilized
within a marine aquarium system. In particular it utilizes a sump container
which houses a
mechanical pre-filter, which in turn serves as the precursor to individual
steps of foam
fractionation and aerobic biological filtration in the form of a trickle-type,
or wet/dry bio-
tower. The design identifies several strategies that have been used either
individually or
in numerous combinations in many saltwater aquariums around the world.
However,
what is noteworthy of such a system is the use of a common sump which
consolidates
filtration hydrology within a single container that is gravity fed from the
aquarium above,
and utilizes at least one return pump to complete the hydrological connection
between
the aquarium and its respective filtration system.
The current invention focuses on the utility of combining multiple filtration
strategies within
a shared sump. Its enhancement to the art of aquarium husbandry is found in
its modular
approach to filtration expandability and convenient modification.
Summary of the Invention
A sump reactor hub comprising of a reservoir container, complete with a zoned
plenum
divided in a manner to accommodate any combination of a single or series of
interchangeable reactors, wherein each individual reactor can be connected in
a
water-sealed manner to the sub-plenum zone in order to access hydrological
supply;
drain; or recirculation facilities.
4
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

The said reactor hub is to contain a strategic pattern of dimensionally
standard holes
which provide interchangeable reactors access to the sub-plenum level, while
appropriately installed seals disallow fluid leakage between super and sub-
plenum zones
of the said hub.
The sub-plenum level is strategically divided by a pattern of full; semi-top;
and semi-
bottom barriers to purposefully direct the passage of fluid between each
reactor; its
respective plenum zone; and the shared sump.
A foam reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner to
facilitate
receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through said plenum
system. The
foam reactor will operate as a conventional foam fractionator (also known as a
protein
skimmer) to facilitate the removal of aquarium waste products (protein) via
the
interaction of aquarium water and foam.
A mechanical reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner
to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through
said plenum
system. The mechanical reactor will utilize media such as filter floss or
engineering foam
and the like, appropriate for the physical removal of solid waste from
aquarium water.
An aerobic bio-reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner
to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through
said plenum
system. The aerobic bio-reactor will operate as a conventional biological
filter to
expedite the conversion of toxic nitrogenous compounds to less toxic nitrates.
A chemical reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through
said plenum
system. The chemical reactor will accommodate media such as activated carbon
or
other such chemically absorptive material commonly used to remove undesirable
organic compounds from aquarium water.
A denitrification bio-reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a
manner to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through
said plenum
system. The denitrification bio-reactor will accommodate inert and/or
chemically active
media within an anaerobic or anoxic micro environment purposed to
destructively
remove; neutralize; or assimilate nitrates from aquarium water.
A phosphate reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through
said plenum
system. The phosphate reactor will accommodate conventional media such as
ferrous-
oxide or aluminum hydroxide known to absorb phosphates dissolved in aquarium
water.
A carbon dioxide (CO2) reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in
a
manner to facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services
through the
said plenum system. The CO2 reactor will use appropriate media and
hydrological
recirculation to dissolve supplied CO2 into aquarium water.
A calcium reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner to
facilitate
receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through the said
plenum system.
The calcium reactor will use conventional media as well as an external carbon
dioxide
supply system to facilitate the supply of calcium ions to the aquarium system.
5
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

A kalkwasser reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner
to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through the
said plenum
system or auto top-off mechanism. The kalkwasser reactor will use appropriate
media/reagents as well as an automated agitation mechanism to facilitate the
supply of
calcium ions to the aquarium system.
A Refugium reactor designed to connect to the said reactor hub in a manner to
facilitate receipt of supply; drain; and/or recirculation services through the
said plenum
system. The refugium reactor will be used to propagate algae and/or micro-
fauna within
a controlled environment free of predation in order to provide a natural means
of algae-
feeding nutrient reduction; and live food production in service to the greater
aquarium
environment.
In method form the present invention comprises a method of connecting
separately
purposed reactors and respective circulation mechanisms to a single sump via a
zoned
plenum system whereby each zone organizes hydrological flow into categories of
reactor supply, reactor drain, and reactor recirculation, and each access
point is
appropriately sealed to prevent undesirable transmission of fluid between
plenum zones
and the shared sump container.
The present invention further comprises a method of adding individual reactors
to a
single sump to afford aquarists ease of expansion within an existing sump
filtration system.
Brief Description of the Drawings
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will
become
more apparent from the following description and claims considered in
conjunction with
the accompanying drawings, where like reference numbers indicate identical or
functionally similar elements.
FIG. 1 is a schematic isometric view of the present invention with the leading
side and
front panels removed to disclose its interior composition and three sample
reactors with
indication of suggested hydrological services;
FIG. 2 is a schematic exploded isometric view of the embodied layout
represented in
FIG. 1, indicating the primary relationships between sub-plenum zones;
hydrological
connections; and sample reactors also indicated in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 depicts a long sectional view of a sample layout, taken through the
midpoint of
the represented embodiment;
FIG. 4 depicts a cross sectional view of a sample layout, taken just beyond
the midpoint
of the represented embodiment;
FIG. 5 is a schematic section isometric taken along the midpoint of the
represented
embodiment;
FIG. 6 is an exploded section isometric indicating the internal
representations of the
exploded isometric depicted in FIG. 2.
Detailed Description of the Invention
6
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

The present invention utilizes a zoned plenum system and strategically
arranged access
points to add new efficiencies to the problem of aquarium filtration and
strategic
modification by addition and/or subtraction of a wide variety of reactors
useful to the art
of aquarium husbandry. A detailed description of a suggested embodiment is
provided
below. While the invention is described in conjunction with that embodiment,
it should
be understood that the invention is not limited to any one embodiment. Rather,
the
scope of the invention is limited only by the appended claims, and the
invention
encompasses numerous alternatives, modifications and equivalents. Specific
details are
set forth in the following description for the purpose of example, in order to
provide a
thorough understanding of the invention. The invention may be practiced
according to
the claims without some or all of the presented specific details.
As shown in FIG. 1, the aquarium filtration system 25 of the present invention
comprises a
plurality of reactor vessels 4, 5, 6 connected through plenum boundary 2 to
access sub-
plenum zone 3 of sump container 1. Undesirable communication of fluid between
sub-
plenum zone 3 and general sump volume 26 is controlled by the use of self-
sealing
gaskets 9 and plug assemblies 10.
It is to be understood that any number and combination of reactor types can be
employed within the scope of the present invention, however for the purpose of
thorough conveyance of this particular embodiment, reactor vessel 4 is
depicted as a
foam fractionator hereafter referred to as a Foam Reactor; reactor vessel 5
will be
depicted as a sulphur based denitrator hereafter referred to as a Nitrate
Reactor; and
reactor vessel 6 will be depicted as a calcium reactor hereafter referred to
as a Cala
Reactor.
As can be seen in FIG. 1, all reactors 4, 5, 6; circulation and recirculation
pumps 8;
optional external supply feeds 7; and reactor drainage assemblies 11 are each
connected to the filtration system through the plenum boundary 2, into the sub-
plenum
zone 3, and completed by self-sealing gaskets 9.
Stacking of the primary components of the present invention is depicted in
FIG. 2. The
exposed sub-plenum zone 3 is comprised of a strategic arrangement of
reactor/zone
isolation barriers 12; partial lower flow partitions 13; partial upper flow
partitions 14; and
full internal partitions 15. It is further clarified that fluid routed through
each individual
reactor shall not interact undesirably at the sub-plenum level prior to its
wilful dispatch
into the greater sump volume 26 by means of controlled exit provisions as
exemplified by
reactor drainage assembly 11; or separate reactor specific outlets 27 and 28.
In order to standardize the present invention with the inherent flexibility to
accommodate
a disparate array of purpose specific reactor vessels, a predetermined pattern
of access
points 29 is designed to purposefully relate to the various sub-plenum areas
and divisions
described above. Nominally sized plug assemblies 10, are provided for
discretionary
employment to decommission any access points which become redundant to the
operation of any given reactor.
Circulation/recirculation pumps 8 also bypass plenum boundary 2, via provided
access
points 29 to connect into sub-plenum zone 3. A wide variety of available pumps
can be
fitted to mate with this invention, as determined by size and flow
requirements of each
desired reactor. In addition, it can be arranged that any such reactor be
provided with
an additional circulation/recirculation pump 8' to boost a respective
reactor's efficiency
as in the case of Foam Reactor 4.
7
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

A deliberate pattern of full partitions 15; partial lower flow partitions 13;
and partial upper
flow partitions 14, allows for all reactor circulation and feed requirements
to occur
through plenum boundary 2, and sub-plenum zone 3. Per the discretion of the
aquarist,
this can be achieved either via induction by circulation/recirculation pump 8,
or by
means of installing an optional external supply feed 7. The external supply
feed 7 may in
turn serve as the conduit of a separately dedicated circulation pump; or may
in fact be
gravity fed from the main display aquarium located above the level of the
present
filtration system. In such instances supply control valves 16 are provided to
refine the rate
of aquarium water to be fed through each respective reactor vessel.
A group of access points typically exemplified as 29a, 29b, 29c, 29d, and 29e,
normally
but not exclusively located central to each reactor's spatial allocation,
serve as
attachment facilities for a given reactor vessel. Each reactor vessel 4, 5,
and 6 is mated
with its respective group of access points in a manner of stable connection to
its portion
of the sub-plenum zone 3.
The long sectional view depicted by FIG. 3 illustrates some of the many
potential
functionalities and connections between a given reactor and the sub-plenum
hydrological system resolved by the present invention. In the current
embodiment, Foam
Reactor 4, Nitrate Reactor 5, and Calc Reactor 6 are each provided with a
stable
plenum/reactor connector 20. Such a connection is steadfastly secured to the
reactor
vessel, however employs the same frictional means of connection through plenum
boundary 2 via self sealing gasket 9 typical with all other vessel and service
connections
to the present filtration system. This stable connection 20 can be achieved by
several
means, most typical of which would be a mechanical method through the use of a
standard bulkhead; or by a chemical bonding process made possible by an
appropriately selected adhesive.
Nitrate Reactor 5, and Calc Reactor 6 are operationally similar in their
design as 'media
reactors'. Each media reactor utilizes a group of access points previously
described by
29a, 29b, 29c, 29d, and 29e (FIG. 2) to facilitate mechanics of reactor feed,
and reactor
recirculation. Though any given reactor, by manipulation of its respective
pump and
plenum connections, can be arranged to readily accommodate either upwardly or
downwardly directed hydrological flow through its volume of media, many
skilled
aquarists are aware that both calcium reactors and sulphur denitrators have
been found
to operate with greater efficiency when aquarium water is circulated upwardly
through
their respective medias. To this end, and for the purposes of clearly
conveying the intent
of this particular embodiment, the mechanics of Nitrate Reactor 5 and Calc
Reactor 6
are similarly described as follows:
Aquarium water enters the media reactor by controlled feed into the suction
side of the
recirculation pump 8, where it is mixed with water already in circulation
through the
subject reactor prior to being directed into its respective portion of sub-
plenum zone 3.
From the sub-plenum zone, the described mix of fresh and recirculated aquarium
water
enters the reactor vessel through an appropriate number of connectors 17 as
well as
stable connector 20, below a bottom diffuser plate 19. Connectors 17 and 20
may be
equipped with angled outlets as required to evenly mix and disperse aquarium
water
below the aforementioned diffuser plate 19. Each diffuser plate 19 is prepared
with a
number of appropriately sized perforations purposed to adequately temper
overly
aggressive turbulence prior to aquarium water entering the reactor's
interactive zone 30.
The tamed mix of aquarium water upwardly commutes through the selected media
or
8
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

mix thereof contained within the reactor's interactive zone 30. In the case of
Nitrate
Reactor 5, interactive zone 30 may contain both elemental sulphur, and a
supply of
porous media which combine to accommodate the type of bacteria that reduce
nitrate
to nitrogen gas. In the case of Calc Reactor 6, interactive zone 30 will
contain a
prescribed type of calcareous media which when fed by acidified aquarium water
will
liberate calcium ions for subsequent delivery into the greater aquarium
system. Following
the activities designed to occur within each vessel's interactive zone 30, the
treated
aquarium water will continue through a second diffuser plate 19', into
exit/recirculation
zone 31. Within this zone 31, a portion of water equal to the amount entering
into the
reactor, will exit the reactor vessel via reactor outlets 27/28, to be
directed either toward
another reactor system for subsequent augmentation, or back into the greater
aquarium
system. The remaining portion of water within zone 31 will be redrafted for
circulation via
media by-pass/plenum connection 18 and its respective plenum zone 3, where it
will be
accessed by recirculation pump 8; mixed with incoming aquarium water; and
recycled
through the feed side of the same reactor apparatus.
Foam Reactor 4, bears many characteristics similar to the media type reactors
5 and 6.
A primary difference with regard to the function of reactor 4 is the desire
for a downward
water flow through interactive zone 30'. It is conventional knowledge within
the realm of
protein skimmer design, that counter-current hydrodynamics within a skimmer's
reaction
chamber serves as a more efficient means to facilitate the process of protein
to bubble
ionic attachment. To this end, aquarium water is fed into Foam Reactor 4, at
an
elevated point within interactive zone 30' via the mid-reactor supply/plenum
connector
21. Connector 21 also possesses an angled outlet to achieve favourable
dispersion
within interactive zone 30'. As a result of this particular reactor's
employment of a
drainage assembly identified as item 11 on FIG. 1, also connected to sub-
plenum zone 3
and bound by the appropriate zone partitions, exit-flow of aquarium water may
be
directed downwardly from interactive zone 30' through the lower diffuser plate
19 and
into the sub-plenum zone 3 via an appropriate connector 17. While in its
downward flow
through interactive zone 30', aquarium water is stripped of undesirable
dissolved organic
compounds and proteins by process of ionic attraction to a controlled mix of
bubbles,
produced by recirculation pumps 8 and 8' which are delivered upwardly through
the
lower diffuser plate 19 in a manner similar to that described for the
aforementioned
media reactors 5 and 6.
Another difference made evident by the illustration of Foam Reactor 4 is the
upper
portion, representative of a means of protein export commonly referred to as a
skimmer
collection cup. A well functioning collection cup provides an uninhibited
means of
exhaust to relieve the volume of air intrinsic to the production of foam; it
provides an
inner riser 32 where dirty, protein laden foam can emerge; and a protein
collection area
24 where dirty skimmate may be staged prior to its disposal by the aquarist.
It can also
be noted that dry protein laden foam is most efficiently separated from a wet
bubble
mix in the presence of a concentric cylindrical reduction. To this effect, it
is an inherent
benefit that the inner riser area 32 is diametrically smaller than interactive
zone 30'.
The cross section illustrated in FIG. 4 provides an alternate view of some
primary
relationships resolved by the present invention. A typical media reactor is
mounted onto
plenum boundary 2. Reactor/plenum connectors 17, 18, and 20 stemming from sub-
plenum zone 3 enter through sealed reactor base 23. A typical media reactor's
interactive zone 30 is bound by perforated diffuser plates 19 and 19', between
which any
selection of purpose-specific media may be employed to achieve a desired form
of
aquarium water filtration/augmentation. Of the provided reactor/plenum
connectors, a
9
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

media by-pass 18 is used as desired to accomplish the required flow direction
necessary
for the operation of each reactor type. Within the bounds of sub-plenum zone
3, each
connector (17, 18, and 20) is detailed for hydrological access 22, to readily
accommodate the passage of aquarium wafer in and out of each respective
reactor.
The optional external supply feed 7 when employed is designed to access any
subject
reactor via its respective sub-plenum zone 3 according to the typical means of
connection to plenum boundary 2. In such instances where an external feed 7 is
desired
for certain but not all reactors in a given filtration system, a supply
control valve 16 may
be employed to isolate any given reactor from this particular supply
mechanism. It is also
clear that plug assemblies 10 can also be used to decommission access points
considered obsolete or redundant to the operation of any given reactor.
Access points 29 adjacent to each reactor are allocated to accommodate any of
the
required functions of reactor supply, drain, and/or recirculation. In
instances where a
dedicated or external feed 7 is not employed, aquarium water may be induced
into a
given reactor by feed/recirculation pump 8. The egression of aquarium water
may be
accomplished through reactor outlets (27/28) or drainage assemblies (11).
Furthermore,
where there can be benefits from increased circulation within a given reactor,
such as in
the case of Foam Reactor 4, a second recirculation pump 8' can be readily
added
within the standard pattern of access points 29 provided within the scope of
the present
invention.
FIG. 5 illustrates a sectional isometric depiction of the embodied filtration
system. The
primary relationships between each reactor; its modes of circulation; and most
importantly, its particular plenum zone are representative of the fundamental
resolution
of the present invention. In addition, it has been a specific goal of the
present invention
to practically afford the widest breadth of flexibility within any given
strategy of aquarium
filtration. To this end, the following process flow can be considered for the
sample
assembly of reactors already described for this particular embodiment of the
present
invention:
In an application to sustain a sample saltwater reef environment, the present
invention
will combine Foam Reactor 4, Nitrate Reactor 5, and Calc Reactor 6 as a
primary
strategy for aquarium water filtration/augmentation. Aquarium water will be
induced
into sulphur based Nitrate Reactor 5 via a feed/recirculation pump 8 through a
valve-
controlled inlet. Within this particular reactor, aquarium water will flow
upwardly through
two distinctly stacked media types: an inert, high porosity media will rest
directly on top
of diffuser plate 19; and a relatively thin layer of elemental sulphur will
rest directly on top
of the aforementioned media. The porous media is intended to provide an
abundance
of real estate for denitrifying bacteria, while the sulphur is provided as a
food source for
the same bacteria. Within this particular reactor system, the hydrology will
be subject to
dominant recirculation, with a relatively small flow-rate of water exiting
through reactor
outlet 27.
It is known that the effluent of any denitrification system has an extremely
acidic
characteristic. For this reason the outlet from Nitrate Reactor 5 leads
directly to the feed
inlet of Calc Reactor 6. Calcium reactors in general use a carbon dioxide
(002) supply
system to dissolve calcium and calcium carbonate from a selected type of
calcareous
media. Because such media has a tendency to compact and channel as a
consequence of its degradation, an upward flow of circulation is also opted
for within
Calc Reactor 6. In a similar manner to that of Nitrate reactor 5, aquarium
water is
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

induced into this reactor through the sub-plenum zone 3 where it is
predominantly
recirculated, with a relatively small flow rate of calcium rich effluent
exiting through
reactor outlet 28. In addition to the acidic effluent received from reactor 5,
Cale
Reactor 6 will also receive CO2 from a separate supply system.
Yet again, the effluent of Cale Reactor 6 will be routed directly into Foam
Reactor 4.
Although reactor 4 will also be supplied with aquarium water drafted directly
from the
surrounding sump area, the extreme process of aeration intrinsic to the
operation of any
properly functioning protein skimmer provides a valuable degassing service
which will
relieve aquarium water from unwanted compounds present in the effluents of
both
reactors 5 and 6. Latent hydrogen sulphide; nitrogen gas; and carbon dioxide
may all
be present in the effluents of reactors 5 and 6, and will be substantially
reduced, and
even eliminated following adequate aeration within Foam Reactor 4.
FIG. 6 uses an exploded section isometric to further illustrate the
connections of each
reactor (4,5, and 6) to the plenum boundary 2, and overall sump container 1.
It is again
made clear that the core functionality of the present invention is derived
from its
strategic use of a zoned plenum system 3 and self-sealing gaskets 9 to execute
sound
hydrodynamics in a manner to completely organize the services of each employed
reactor type. All possible circulation and recirculation facilities (7
and/or 8) are
separately attached to any portion of the plenum zone 3 so that required
manipulations
to any given reactor can be executed separately from its particular
hydrological
provisions based on the needs and desired strategies employed by the aquarist.
While the invention has been described in complete detail and graphically
illustrated in
the accompanying drawings, it is not to be limited to such details, since many
changes
and modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the
spirit and
the scope thereof. While the above detailed description has shown, described,
and
pointed out fundamental novel features of the invention as applied to the
presented
embodiment, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and
changes
in the form and details of the system illustrated may be made by those skilled
in the art,
without departing from the intent of the invention. The present invention is
intended to
employ a strategy of 'plug n play', in a manner to accommodate a comprehensive
variety of reactor types hereafter described in the following claims.
11
CA 2673319 2018-07-19

Representative Drawing
A single figure which represents the drawing illustrating the invention.
Administrative Status

2024-08-01:As part of the Next Generation Patents (NGP) transition, the Canadian Patents Database (CPD) now contains a more detailed Event History, which replicates the Event Log of our new back-office solution.

Please note that "Inactive:" events refers to events no longer in use in our new back-office solution.

For a clearer understanding of the status of the application/patent presented on this page, the site Disclaimer , as well as the definitions for Patent , Event History , Maintenance Fee  and Payment History  should be consulted.

Event History

Description Date
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Common Representative Appointed 2019-10-30
Grant by Issuance 2018-10-16
Inactive: Cover page published 2018-10-15
Inactive: Final fee received 2018-08-31
Pre-grant 2018-08-31
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2018-08-21
Letter Sent 2018-08-21
Notice of Allowance is Issued 2018-08-21
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2018-08-14
Inactive: Q2 passed 2018-08-14
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-07-19
Examiner's Interview 2018-07-18
Withdraw from Allowance 2018-07-09
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2018-07-01
Inactive: Q2 passed 2018-06-29
Inactive: Approved for allowance (AFA) 2018-06-29
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2018-03-06
Inactive: Report - No QC 2018-01-26
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2018-01-26
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2017-11-30
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2017-05-31
Inactive: Report - No QC 2017-05-31
Maintenance Request Received 2017-05-03
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2017-01-05
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2016-07-05
Inactive: Report - No QC 2016-06-30
Amendment Received - Voluntary Amendment 2016-01-25
Inactive: Report - No QC 2015-07-24
Inactive: S.30(2) Rules - Examiner requisition 2015-07-24
Inactive: Office letter 2015-07-23
Inactive: Adhoc Request Documented 2015-07-23
Inactive: Delete abandonment 2015-07-23
Maintenance Request Received 2015-07-17
Inactive: Correspondence - Prosecution 2015-07-16
Inactive: Abandoned - No reply to s.30(2) Rules requisition 2015-05-21
Inactive: Report - No QC 2014-11-21
Letter Sent 2014-01-20
Maintenance Request Received 2014-01-20
All Requirements for Examination Determined Compliant 2014-01-13
Request for Examination Requirements Determined Compliant 2014-01-13
Request for Examination Received 2014-01-13
Inactive: Payment - Insufficient fee 2011-11-17
Request for Examination Received 2011-11-03
Application Published (Open to Public Inspection) 2011-01-20
Inactive: Cover page published 2011-01-19
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-09-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2010-09-07
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-10-09
Inactive: First IPC assigned 2009-10-09
Inactive: IPC assigned 2009-10-07
Filing Requirements Determined Compliant 2009-09-03
Inactive: Filing certificate - No RFE (English) 2009-09-03
Application Received - Regular National 2009-08-18
Small Entity Declaration Determined Compliant 2009-07-20

Abandonment History

There is no abandonment history.

Maintenance Fee

The last payment was received on 2018-06-25

Note : If the full payment has not been received on or before the date indicated, a further fee may be required which may be one of the following

  • the reinstatement fee;
  • the late payment fee; or
  • additional fee to reverse deemed expiry.

Please refer to the CIPO Patent Fees web page to see all current fee amounts.

Fee History

Fee Type Anniversary Year Due Date Paid Date
Application fee - small 2009-07-20
MF (application, 4th anniv.) - small 04 2013-07-22 2011-07-19
MF (application, 2nd anniv.) - small 02 2011-07-20 2011-07-19
MF (application, 3rd anniv.) - small 03 2012-07-20 2011-07-19
Request for examination - small 2011-11-03
MF (application, 5th anniv.) - small 05 2014-07-21 2014-01-20
MF (application, 6th anniv.) - small 06 2015-07-20 2015-07-17
MF (application, 7th anniv.) - small 07 2016-07-20 2016-05-25
MF (application, 8th anniv.) - small 08 2017-07-20 2017-05-03
MF (application, 9th anniv.) - small 09 2018-07-20 2018-06-25
Final fee - small 2018-08-31
MF (patent, 10th anniv.) - small 2019-07-22 2019-07-12
MF (patent, 12th anniv.) - small 2021-07-20 2020-07-14
MF (patent, 11th anniv.) - small 2020-07-20 2020-07-14
MF (patent, 14th anniv.) - small 2023-07-20 2022-07-18
MF (patent, 13th anniv.) - small 2022-07-20 2022-07-18
MF (patent, 15th anniv.) - small 2024-07-22 2022-07-18
Owners on Record

Note: Records showing the ownership history in alphabetical order.

Current Owners on Record
SHELDON C. E. JOHN
Past Owners on Record
None
Past Owners that do not appear in the "Owners on Record" listing will appear in other documentation within the application.
Documents

To view selected files, please enter reCAPTCHA code :



To view images, click a link in the Document Description column. To download the documents, select one or more checkboxes in the first column and then click the "Download Selected in PDF format (Zip Archive)" or the "Download Selected as Single PDF" button.

List of published and non-published patent-specific documents on the CPD .

If you have any difficulty accessing content, you can call the Client Service Centre at 1-866-997-1936 or send them an e-mail at CIPO Client Service Centre.


Document
Description 
Date
(yyyy-mm-dd) 
Number of pages   Size of Image (KB) 
Claims 2017-01-05 3 115
Description 2009-07-20 11 787
Abstract 2009-07-20 1 28
Claims 2009-07-20 2 79
Drawings 2009-07-20 7 207
Representative drawing 2011-01-07 1 11
Cover Page 2011-01-07 2 52
Claims 2016-01-25 3 116
Claims 2017-11-30 3 107
Claims 2018-03-06 3 112
Description 2018-07-19 11 743
Claims 2018-07-19 3 114
Abstract 2018-07-19 1 20
Cover Page 2018-09-13 1 39
Representative drawing 2018-09-13 1 7
Filing Certificate (English) 2009-09-03 1 156
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2011-04-21 1 122
Notice of Insufficient fee payment (English) 2011-11-17 1 91
Acknowledgement of Request for Examination 2014-01-20 1 175
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2015-04-21 1 119
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2016-04-21 1 129
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2017-04-24 1 120
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2018-04-23 1 119
Commissioner's Notice - Application Found Allowable 2018-08-21 1 162
Notice: Maintenance Fee Reminder 2019-04-24 1 120
Amendment / response to report 2018-07-19 19 956
Interview Record 2018-07-18 1 21
Final fee 2018-08-31 2 59
Correspondence 2009-09-03 1 35
Correspondence 2011-04-21 1 55
Fees 2011-07-19 2 67
Correspondence 2011-11-17 1 20
Fees 2014-01-20 1 30
Maintenance fee payment 2015-07-17 1 31
Prosecution correspondence 2015-07-16 1 29
Correspondence 2015-07-23 1 20
Examiner Requisition 2015-07-24 6 359
Amendment / response to report 2016-01-25 16 784
Fees 2016-05-25 1 23
Examiner Requisition 2016-07-05 4 207
Amendment / response to report 2017-01-05 10 427
Maintenance fee payment 2017-05-03 1 32
Examiner Requisition 2017-05-31 3 172
Amendment / response to report 2017-11-30 5 163
Examiner Requisition 2018-01-26 3 175
Amendment / response to report 2018-03-06 6 208
Maintenance fee payment 2018-06-25 1 23
Maintenance fee payment 2019-07-12 1 23
Maintenance fee payment 2020-07-14 1 24
Maintenance fee payment 2022-07-18 1 24